Video summary
Dr. Tracy Vaillancourt challenges the popular cultural narrative of an unconditional female sisterhood, arguing instead that women often engage in intense indirect aggression and intrasexual competition to maintain group power dynamics. She posits a "game theory of shaming" where sex is treated as a resource; consequently, women who are perceived as too sexually provocative or promiscuous threaten the collective bargaining position of their peers by lowering the market value of this resource. To counteract this threat and enforce social norms regarding mate availability, groups often employ indirect aggression tactics such as gossiping, peer exclusion, non-verbal disgust (the "once over"), and ostracization. Vaillancourt's research demonstrates that these behaviors are deeply rooted in evolutionary history where female survival and offspring care were historically dependent on strong coalitions; thus, maintaining group cohesion required suppressing individual sexual expression to prevent resource dilution or the loss of potential mates. The transcript details specific studies conducted by Vaillancourt illustrating how women police each other's behavior through subtle but effective means. In one experiment involving a confederate dressed in either a sexy or conservative outfit interrupting conversations between pairs of women, those treated poorly were exclusively subjected to indirect aggression when the interloper was sexually provocative. Furthermore, observations from high-performance soccer teams reveal that adolescent girls are hyper-attuned to social slights and status threats, often holding grudges against rivals for years while men move on quickly after a game. This sensitivity is linked to FOMO (fear of missing out) and the intense need to belong; when this belonging feels threatened by jealousy or exclusion—exacerbated by social media comparisons—the result can be significant depression and anxiety. Vaillancourt notes that high-status individuals, particularly attractive girls for females and athletes for males, often wield power through bullying those who challenge their status, a dynamic found universally from schools to university sororities and workplaces. Vaillancourt also addresses the long-term psychological impact of bullying and social rejection, highlighting how "social pain" activates the same neural pathways as physical injury. She discusses genetic factors, specifically the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism in the serotonin transporter gene, which can influence an individual's resilience to childhood maltreatment; those with a specific short allele version are at higher risk for developing depression following abuse compared to those with protective long alleles. Despite these biological predispositions and the potential for lasting neurological harm from early trauma, she emphasizes human neuroplasticity and adaptability as mechanisms that allow many individuals to recover and thrive. The discussion underscores that while some victims become depressed or anxious due to perceived threats to their social standing, others reframe their experiences into sources of strength, turning victimhood into agency through cognitive behavioral strategies like reframing narratives about the past. Finally, the conversation shifts toward effective interventions for reducing bullying, noting that many current programs fail because they focus on low-status bullies rather than addressing high-power elites who abuse their status to maintain dominance. Vaillancourt argues that successful anti-bullying efforts must be universal and implemented before middle school, involving teacher education without relying solely on peer-led initiatives which can sometimes reinforce toxic hierarchies. She critiques the tendency of parents and schools to remain silent or mishandle situations due to fear of retaliation or a belief that bullying will not stop if reported; however, evidence suggests that reporting incidents immediately is crucial as it often halts the behavior instantly. Ultimately, Vaillancourt calls for an honest acknowledgment of female intolerance toward sexy peers and the complex interplay between evolutionary drives for belonging and competition, urging society to move beyond simplistic "girl power" memes to address how women actively police each other's sexuality and status within their social groups.
Read the full video transcript
do women have an intolerance of sexy
peers
absolutely um
100% uh I we say we don't we say that we
just love women and we promote women but
um we look we love certain women and we
promote certain women so uh yeah we're
we're not the angels that we purport we
are to be um I think we do a lot of
impression
management who are the women we do
support and love um it depends like
obviously we're going to have um
different qualities that we admire in a
person and so if they have those then I
think that that's who we're going to
promote we're pretty good at um
tolerating our friends and promoting our
friends um but I don't think we're
universally kind to all women and it's
interesting because I think that there's
been this like change in zge where
people where women talk about how The
Sisterhood has never been stronger and
we support each other unconditionally
and yet we really
don't why why why do you think that
that's the current pop
culture summarization of female
friendships uh and why is it not the
case well I think that it it's funny cuz
it's kind of said but it's not really
said so have you seen the Barbie movie
yet no okay you need to see it it's
really good okay but anyhow so it's
funny because there's this big speech
where she talks about like all the
pressures that women are under and
everything that we have to manage and
you know and then there's also this like
Thread about women supporting women and
yet there's like plenty of examples of
women not supporting women in that movie
right so I think that there's this like
a little bit of a disconnect where we
say it but then we don't actually um
live that ideal um now the reason I
think it happens that we don't support
each other as much as we should is
because there's like a resource scurity
that affects women I think more than men
and I or this perception of resource
scurity and in some places in the world
there's absolutely resource scurity um
with women you know they're not they
don't have as many privileges they don't
make as much money those sorts of things
um and when things don't seem fair it's
hard to be uh
generous right so what's the sexy bit of
the sexy peers why be particularly
intolerant of the sexy ones so so that
would be um the idea
that it's going to sound
sexist but it's a robust finding I did a
study on this so the idea that um
historically we've sort of
maintained uh control over what the
opposite sex wanted and so if we um you
know are giving away sex freely you mean
we as women we as women then then we
don't hold that we don't the power of
that resource is um is less it's even
non-existent so it would behoove us to
then punish those who give away sex too
freely so shame um debase women who
are a threat to that power holding
position
and so this is a study that I did that
showed that exact phenomenon it has
since been replicated around the world
and basically um women are intolerant of
certain types of women but in
particularly they're particularly
intolerant of women who are
sexy and it's a universal
phenomenon right so sexy is a very
specific word to use here this isn't
necessarily just attractive I it's like
presumably sexually provocative
exactly it's not attractive per se
although I think that if you get to the
end of that Spectrum on attractiveness
so like you're incredibly attractive I
think that that would publicly unnerve
some women because that person would be
um would be revered by men and that
would then debase their own standing in
terms of competition but generally
speaking I mean yeah
so the the impression would be that
you're sexually provocative or available
what was the study that you did or are
there any that came along after yours
and did it even better that you prefer
well I don't know if anybody's done it
better because I think I did it the best
but because I thought about it forever
and ever it took like over a decade to
for the study to come to fruition so
basically what I saw the time was that
when a woman violated Norms so the norm
of you know you could be sexy but not
too sexy um then women would mock them
they would use indirect aggression an
indirect aggression um takes the form of
gossiping peer group exclusion um but
also more non-verbal things like you
know the once over where you start at
the top you look down you look up but
you don't smile to convey disgust or you
stare at each other and then when she
leaves the room you laugh those sorts of
things so anyhow I saw that over and
over again so I um designed a study with
my post-doctoral student anel Sharma
where we had women come into the lab
they were part of this previous study
where we were looking at their use of
indirect aggression then we invited them
into the lab to talk about female
friendships how they deal with conflict
um we randomized them into one of four
conditions with their friend with a
stranger and whether or not they were
going to be interrupted in their
conversation by a very sexy dress
Confederate or a conservatively dress
Confederate and the person was the exact
it was the same person Lisa gorgeous
absolutely
gorgeous anyhow we standardized
everything right down to the number of
steps she took everything was scripted
so they came through they didn't know
that we were recording them right from
the get-go she came through and walked
right between the two women and
mentioned to anel in the back room that
I needed to talk to her about something
and then she left with anel and we
recorded what they did and everybody in
the sexy condition treated her poorly
with two exceptions um and I think they
were just not paying attention because
had had they be been they would have
done something and those that when um
Lisa interrupted them and she was just
dressed conservatively they didn't even
pay attention so the only thing that was
different between the two
conditions was her sexy
outfit wow okay so what are the
implications of this what does it what
does it tell you about female psychology
it tells us that like I mean a lot of
times people think that the suppression
of women's sexuality is done by men and
it is done by men um for sure that
exists and especially in certain
countries but it also is policed by
women and women do to suppress other
women's sexual
expression so on average would you say
more shaming comes from men or from
women I think it depends on the country
it really does there's a cultural
component to that but let's just talk
about Western cultures um I think that
uh that women are particularly
intolerant of sexy peers more so than
men does it bother you to see a sexy
woman me no but I I would campaign for
more if there was
exactly and would would you be upset if
women were more promiscuous yeah
precisely I mean this this is from Roy
bow Meister I learned this from him that
he was saying it it's very strange to
lay at the feet of men a restriction in
female sexual Freedom given the fact
that almost every man if given the
opportunity would campaign for that
precise thing like exactly I I haven't
been to a parade downtown here in Austin
but if there was one for that that would
be up there with one of the you know for
for my other male Brethren I'm going to
stand firm and I will help I you know
you will you will finally be able to get
your endway so yeah I I I it makes
complete sense to me and I learned from
Jeffrey Miller and Tucker Max as well
this insight about the game theory of
shaming
where if you think about sex as having a
price and if one woman is prepared to
lower the price from three dates to one
date or from x amount of resources to.5
x amount of resources that lowers the
market value of whatever that thing is
overall so you need that's exactly what
I showed y you you need a price
enforcement mechanism it's a cartel yeah
and that's and bow meister's theory that
so he wrote a paper with Jean twingy
where they talk about this and this is
what I used as the theoretical basis for
the study along with what I knew about
uh indirect aggression so it's
interesting because uh intr competition
is like one area that people study but
indirect aggression is very similar it's
like the behavior the manifestation of
intr seexual competition it's the
enforcement mechanism of intr seexual
competition and people hadn't really
considered that so I wrote a theory was
published in trans B of the royal Royal
Society and it did very well and um
people have used it now to springboard
other studies but basically I was
arguing just that that the form of
intersexual competition the form of in
women is indirect
aggression interesting I've got a quote
from you here sex is Coveted by men
accordingly women limit access as a way
of maintaining advantage in the
negotiation of this resource women who
make sex too readily available
compromise the power holding position of
the group which is why many women are
particularly intolerant of women who are
or seem to be promiscuous and it's the
seem to be bit I think which is
particularly interesting there exactly
it's interesting because after that
study came out I was in Florida at
Disney with my daughter who was eight
and I we brought along her two
girlfriends and there was a woman who
was dressed um in a very sexually
provocative manner she was probably in
her mid-50s uh tiny tiny skirt tiny tiny
shirt Florida baby out Florida look
gorgeous look gorgeous anyhow and uh I
turned around and I saw these three
eight-year-olds doing exactly what was
done in my Stu
so so she was getting she was getting
the once over by three mean
eight-year-olds well what I mean that's
fascinating what why would it be the
case
that animals who aren't even sexually
active who don't understand what sex is
How Deeply wired is this at the base of
the brain stem that even they have got
an idea she might be too promiscuous and
maybe she's going to take some future
husband away from me I don't know if
it's at the brain stem but it certainly
there's like a lot of socialization
around this think about um school dress
codes so we've had tons of pressure in
Canada a lot of schools have had to
revoke their school dress codes because
they're sexist where they punish girls
for dressing um in small clothes but not
boys and so they've gotten rid of them
and under that the premise that it is
sexist which it is hang but anyhow hang
on a boy do boys want to wear small
clothes well they wear tank tops I think
that's a small clothing right okay so
girls are girls are allowed to wear
things like skirts and vests so we don't
typically wear um so we don't wear
uniforms in North American schools
unless you go to a private school okay
but my point is is that these um dress
codes exist and they've long existed and
just now in 2023 are we getting rid of
them and um little girls know about them
and little boys know about them and they
know about why they know that they're
unfair or they feel that they're unfair
they are unfair um so where does that
come from so it's like really hard to
separate um The evolutionary
significance of this from the the mass
of socialization pressure that they're
under so I do think that it's rooted in
our evolutionary history I wrote that in
a in a paper that two 2013 paper I
talked about that theoretical paper um I
do think that there's an evolutionary
signific against to our Behavior but I
also think that um you know we're
Society in general across the world um
is quite intolerant of this why is it
the case if this is true and I believe
that it's true and I've been singing
this game theory of shaming song
for at least a few years now why is it
the case that we are a Sisterhood that
is all together these men need to stop
controlling our sexuality it's all girl
power stuff how is that meme remaining
so sticky if the truth doesn't seem to
actually match up to the that sort of
zeitgeist I think it's easy for us to
blame you and not look at ourselves
right and I do think that there's truth
that some sometimes it does exist like
we talked about like do you get upset by
somebody dressing sexy absolutely not
but some men do for sure and in some
cultural groups they really do right um
we know that that's the case
um but that said I just think that and
this is the book that I have coming out
next year called mean with Simon and
Schuster and it's basically just that
trying to reconcile that so you know a
good feminist doesn't say what I'm
saying so um a good feminist supports
women no matter what and yet a good
feminist actually doesn't support all
women like if you really look at the
behavior of women you see that um you
know we say that it's men oppressing
women but it's also women oppressing
women and if we can acknowledge that uh
we can manage it in direct competition
do men use that too what's the what's
the ratio of indirect competition
between the Sexes So proportionally
speaking and I'll talk about indirect
aggression because indirect um
competition I'm not too sure what that
means per se so indirect aggression um
is used by men for sure men talk about
each other they gossip they give give
each other the silent treatment that
sort of thing but not as often so men
use a mange of behavior so you guys are
like straight out in your face um you uh
are physically aggressive and you also
use indirect aggression uh indirectly
aggressive tactics whereas women
proportionately speaking only use this
form of aggression of course there are
exceptions there's some women are really
violent but they are rare and they're so
Salient when we see these women they
make the front page of every news Outlet
in the world world because we don't see
them that often so this is our exclusive
way of dealing with each other when
we're um being less than appropriate
being less than kind interesting okay so
and we're more affected by it so if I
rolled my eyes at you it it's not GNA
cause much
distress if I did that to a woman it
would cause some problems and there's
quite a bit of study showing that we
have a high physiological response to
being um ostracized rejected um all of
the things that Encompass indirect
aggression so women are more attuned to
more attuned to it and we res we respond
to it more and that has an evolutionary
significance because belonging was far
more important to women than to men not
to suggest that you didn't need to
belong you needed to get your coalitions
set right so that you could win the war
and kill the boar but um for women we
also needed um Alo parents we needed
support from other women and so it's a
really interesting um issue because on
the one hand you need the support of
women but in the other hand there's not
enough resources to go around so there's
also a zero some game in a sense
attached to that so it's trying to
reconcile that so then the way to do it
then is to be strategic is to um appear
to be on your side but not really be on
your
side why is it so important to not be
directly aggressive as a woman so um an
Campbell wrote this really great theory
about this and basically it was about
she called it staying alive and so if
women
historically um got into a physical
battle a fight and they died or were
injured and not able to take care of
their offspring
those Offspring did not survive so
historically and in some places in the
world it still exists um infant survival
is inextricably um linked to maternal
survival so we can't be fighting all
over the place I think it's not good for
our health and wellness and it's
certainly not good for our Offspring so
how do you get your jeans into the Next
Generation they got to grow up and make
babies and cells okay whereas if the man
was to die in some fist fight gone wrong
the kids are still probably going to
survive mom's still around men also a
little bit more physically robust bit
more tolerant of being hit in the head
that's why you've got the brow Ridge and
the bigger hands and blah blah blah okay
how how effective is indirect aggression
and just before we say that to get to
that um before I answer that the other
thing too is that men don't always stick
around and yet we still we still have
managed it better if they did
historically they haven't always though
and they still don't really always stick
around I just needed to put that dig in
okay see because I'm like really good at
indirect aggression from that research
it is effective it is effective it I
felt it in my soul what is that me
search research so um it's incredibly
effective it really is and again because
women are so attuned to it so it doesn't
have the same hit on men so us using it
against men doesn't have the same effect
but man are we ever good at picking it
up women we see it in a nanc I coach
adolescent girls I'm a high performance
soccer coach and I tell them I can hear
them roll their eyes like a kilometer
away I know when it's going down and we
do we we notice that um there are memes
like you go on to any social media
platform and there's tons of memes of
like you know a woman like opening the
door real quickly because she heard
somebody like roll their eyes or do a
you know we come back in we hear it we
know it there's a number of interesting
studies going on at the moment to do
with female sports I think um tennis
players and basketball players on
opposite teams given that you've been
doing your ethnographic uh in place
research with your high performance
female soccer team what have you
observed about inter int team love and
distaste and all that stuff oh noticed
so much and in fact I've studied a lot
of the things that I've noticed so one
of the things I've noticed and then we
actually have a study that showed this
to be true more so for adolescent girls
than for adolescent boys but adolescent
girls make a lot of social comparisons
is she prettier than me is she better
than me if she smarter than me is she
more popular those social comparisons
elicit jealousy and the way that
jealousy is managed is either it's
turned inward they become depressed
anxious or they like I'm not as good as
so and so or they turn it outward which
is more common and they tear down their
rival so the only reason that she's
playing Left fullback and I'm a left
fullback is because her dad's the coach
or her mom's the coach that sort of
thing so we show we showed that
longitudinally that's the pathway and we
showed it to be stronger in girls than
in boys one thing I noticed all the time
is that um like when somebody's done you
wrong on the field you can't let it go
if you're a girl or a woman but men just
go out for a beer right after the game
they don't give a it's done with
let's move on right does that matter to
whether it's your own team or the
opposition we can't let it go from the
opposition so I'll get to this so what
happens is um it's very common to do a
handshake after the game in North
America and um and for you to not get
your hand shook by somebody who thinks
you did them dirty on the field whereas
man just shake hands and get on with it
and there was a study that looked at
this across I think it was 44 different
countries post affiliative Behavior
after competitions and it showed that
women around the world just can't let it
go so like if somebody's done us wrong
it's there it's there for life like if
you did me wrong in grade five and I ran
into you just now it's on okay so anyhow
so I noticed that and I don't notice
that and I've coached little boys too
and I've never noticed that and then
they talk about the girls the other team
and the women on the other team and what
a I can't believe she did this
this and that like they are personally
offended by a slide tackle gone wrong
whereas you know men don't don't really
seem to care about that and then the
other thing I've noticed that is that on
a girl's team or a young women's team
the best player on the team is not
necessarily the most popular player on
the team whereas in boys teams and men's
team teams the best player on the team
is almost invariably always the most
popular person on that team is always
the leader so we don't care if you're
the best per se unless you get to like
the high high high end of um of elite
women's sports um that's not what makes
you popular and in fact being the best
might actually make get you bullied on a
girl's team or a women's team because
how dare you think you're so good so
there's this whole theory about tripping
the prom queen I've written about it um
knocking down the tall Poppy and we're
pretty good at making sure women stay in
their place and if they're not going to
stay in their place and they're going to
think too well of themselves we'll put
them back there real quick okay so
status and competence are split apart in
female hierarchies in a way that they
are not in male hierarchies 100% And
it's interesting because I read Carly
Lloyd's autobiography and she talked
about how um Lloyd is one of the most
decorated women's uh football player in
the world she won the Balon do um for
the uh and also the best player for uh
the FIFA World Cup when it was here in
Canada in 2015 she order her in her
autobiography she talks about how when
she joined the national team that
sometimes she felt that women weren't
passing to her the ball even because she
was seen as competition and can you
imagine like you know if you're playing
a sport even if it's like a beer league
and you're not that good as a guy you
take yourself off and sit on the bench
so that you guys can win the
championship whereas I think and it's
been said by many of my colleagues in
some ways women and girls would rather
lose the game and have everybody play
than win now of course I'm not talking
about at the elite elite level because
that's going to have different
parameters and different personality
types but you've got this a preference
for egalitarianism the you have
preference for knowing your place and
staying in your
placees yeah I
uh I learned some interesting stuff to
do with the behavior of male and female
students as they walk out of exam Halles
and they talk to each other and the guys
will say oh yeah question three
absolutely smashed it I I revised that
like that was absolutely great whereas
the girls would go oh you know I was all
really high probably failed it's not so
good and the guys will also say that too
but it seems like the guys have less of
an issue proclaiming their successes uh
again also super interesting study where
um girls will tend to downplay
qualifications and accolades if they
think that their responses are going to
be seen by other people as opposed to if
they're being kept private so there is
this very below the surface you know
under sea current that's going on on
here with how women play with status uh
what they want other people to know
about their accolades and their
accomplishments they do not want to
enact the ey or the jealousy or the Envy
of any of the other girls specifically
that are in their location and I think
that final bit is they're probably at
least partially aware that many of the
accomplishments that they could be
talking about probably don't impact
their mate value all that much so it's
going to be a detriment to me to the
females that are around me and maybe not
that like is the is the guy around you
going to be that much more attracted to
you if you say that you smashed that
exam than if you didn't like is your
socioeconomic competence going to be a
big part of it he's not going to be
turned off by it that's for sure but
what's going to happen is like the
reason why women they make themselves
smaller not because of men they make
themselves smaller so that they don't
get they don't attract the negative
attention of women we can't brag we
can't say what we're good at because
then you think you're special and you'll
get torn down and then and then we
wonder why we lack confidence right like
it's it's just really interesting a lot
of times people will talk about how
women dress for other women and it
there's some truth to that right like we
really are trying to um please other
women and um and minimize the discomfort
that could come um from not pleasing
them um Amy Schumer has this really
funny skit and you should try and find
it after where it's like women basically
use we use a lot of self-deprecating
humor so we put ourselves down all the
time like oh my goodness you know if
somebody says something nice about us
like are you kidding me I just found
that in the garbage and put it on me you
know like whatever you know we go on and
on and and make sure that um we don't
think well of our ourselves or give the
impression that we think well of
ourselves so the skin goes on about
women just putting themselves down all
around and then this one woman somebody
compliments her and she just says thanks
and all of their heads explode what do
you mean thanks like we just said
something and nice about yourself you're
supposed to put yourself down those are
the rules so it it's spot on what she
did in this in this skit talk to me
about how jealousy mediates this
relationship then between uh
attractiveness comparison and indirect
aggression so it it it actually works
just like that it's it's a mediator
right so it explains the relationship so
if I am jealous then um I need to remedy
that icky feeling that's not a good
feeling and so I have a couple different
ways I could do it or more than a couple
I have a few different ways I can manage
it but the more often the more common
way it's managed is by attacking myself
or attacking the source of my comparison
the person that's making feel jealous
and women are very good at attacking um
other women whom they perceive to have
more but again they justify it so back
to remember we started off with
impression management um so they use a
variety of cognitive strategies to make
their egregious acts more palatable and
um and one way they do it is they they
make it so that the the person that's
being targeted um had it coming to them
it was justified so if she wasn't so
arrogant if she wasn't um you know
whatever it is it's going to be then I
wouldn't have treated her
poorly interesting did you see and by
the way like I can predict what the
reaction's going to be when this comes
out and when my book comes out too the
reaction is going to be that um you know
I have internalized the misogyny myself
that you know what I'm your data
apparently pardon me so is your data
apparently yeah exactly like I I
obviously don't like women and I don't
like women because I've believed what
men have said about women um and yet you
know we do these really sneaky studies
and in the right context we see it done
we it comes out like in full force so I
don't know like maybe there is a bit of
internalized misogyny I'll own I'll own
some of the variants but a lot of this
is uh it persists because it works it's
very very effective effective you don't
need to worry we've had Tanya Reynolds
and Joyce benon and you know there are
there are many female heads that have
been chopped off by the internet before
you've got here I think everyone that's
listening is fully aware of the fact
that being a woman being a female and
trying to navigate the delicate Samurai
blade that is the female status
hierarchy is really really tough and it
does not get any easier it is not made
you're no more prepared by ignoring the
sort of thermodynamics of how these
interactions work it but I mean how do
you change it if you can't acknowledge
it right so like I I'm prepared I've you
know I've dealt with it for many many
years I know what's going to be said and
ironically they use indirect aggression
to make their point and I just think
like seriously you don't see the irony
and and how you're behaving because
certainly we should be tolerant of
people holding different viewpoints it's
not like I'm exposing hate speech but um
Mr Rogers of all people said that if
it's mentionable it's manageable so how
do then we change our Behavior if we
can't acknowledge it and it causes a lot
of harm like I mean we've we've kind of
been joking around here but some young
women take their lives over this some
older women take their lives over it
teenage girls take their lives over this
um you know the bullying uh that they
injure is real it's significant it's
linked to eating disorders depression
anxiety suicidality so I mean this is an
important uh worthy area of study we got
to get this right the issue that you
come up against is anything which is
seen as not being upfront very very
positive for whichever the maligned or
lower down group is is always presumed
it's always castigated very quickly as
being the thing which is at fault and
it's the child wants to eat ice cream
every night that is what the child wants
and would be enjoyable but is ultimately
not good for it in the long run so your
frontloading compassion but backloading
all of the issues that come from not
actually understanding what the problem
is in the first place exactly um I I
would love for women to be and some
women are I mean women in Academia I
find are very tough and and can handle
uh opinions being um expressed directly
and in contradiction to their own
viewpoints but I just wish just
generally speaking I think if we were a
little less um sensitive a little bit
more tolerant um a little bit more
honest then I we'd probably be in a
better position in terms of uh wielding
power holding power um progressing with
power did you see this uh hypothetical
hairdressing client study that came out
a little while ago okay so give me one
more hint I feel like I know this uh I
explored how women sabotage hypothetical
hairdressing clients through
disingenuous Beauty advice which would
detrimentally impact clients physical
attractiveness in both studies the more
attractive the client the more hair was
recommended to be cut off both laay
women and female professional
hairdressers cut most hair off women who
were of the same attractiveness level as
them with women cutting the most hair of
women they perceive to be about as
attractive as themselves they sabotaged
women whose hair was in good condition
and had requested a smaller amount cut
off to a greater extent than women with
hair in poor condition client makeup
caused lower mate value lay women to cut
off less hair suggesting the dominance
incited by women wearing makeup resulted
in reduced sabotage more inex
competitive women including hairdressers
cut off more hair confirming competitor
manipulation as intrasexual
competitiveness strategy being employed
yes it that study finds itself in the
book
amazing um it's interesting because I
had this one um girlfriend in high
school we were in that popular group and
everybody was very attractive and had a
lot of um assets and competencies that
the peer group valued but anytime she
told me that I looked really good in an
outfit I automatically had to change
it anything she said like I mean I just
like it was almost like a given that
opposite day I look like crap
and this is why she's saying it wow that
is so good and that's not my reaction to
all women right but like experience
tells you what's going on Bill Burr has
this amazing bit about the body
positivity movement he thinks basically
that the body positivity movement is
women encouraging other women to push
themselves further and further out of
the appropriate mate value dating pool
that you know as you applaud women for
being the side that they are it makes a
really good case that well yeah you get
all of the points of being you know
morally grandstanding and I am empathy
and I care for the the the downtrodden
group and so on and so forth but you are
also doing something that benefits your
own mate value right which is moving
more and more women away from wherever
you are so are we that Ma of alien I
think that
the underly
uh turbulence that happens below the
surface is so effective it doesn't
matter whether you are or whether you
aren't the net result is what works and
ultimately I think that this would you
know because that's some sneaky
that is some sneaky but I don't
think that it's I don't think pretty
much any woman is cognizant of this I
this is again it's a bit from Bill Burr
that I was listening to and as I was
listening to I was like wow this sounds
like really comprehensive intersexual
competition from women to push the women
out of the mating pool hm I wonder if
that's so this is total Bro Science here
right and you know it's interesting
because I have a reaction to it because
like here I know people are GNA women
are gonna have a reaction to everything
I said and now I'm having a reaction to
this so I'm gonna have to give this some
thought because like I want to believe
that we're not that Mack of alien and I
also want to believe that um we we I I
do know we have free will and we're
consci conscious beings and
conscientious individuals as well so I
don't know I'm not I'm not buying that
one just yet high hopes for Humanity
okay so one of the other things you
mentioned it earlier on about
um bullying the sort of the effect of
Youth
ostracization on especially young girls
uh some of the stuff that I learned from
your work one in four children report
that they have experienced clinically
elevated rates of depression 25% of
children and Adolescence reported that
they had experienced significant
depression
incidents and H hospitalization rates
for new onset Eating Disorders increased
by 60% during the pandemic and rates for
emergency department visits for
attempted suicide have increased by 22%
in the past few years what is going on
with young people's mental health so
there's been a general decline in their
mental health for the
past 15 years or so so it has it wasn't
good before the pandemic and it was
worse during the pandemic and it'll be
inter to see what happens in the next
few years so I've been studying um
mental health and violence for years and
not the violence like not the mental
health of violent people but what
happens when people are exposed to
violence and the mental health issues
that ensue um so we have this crisis
this Mental Health crisis that's
particularly pronounced for adolescent
girls and young women and there's a
bunch of reasons why this could be the
case um during the pandemic I think that
a lot of it had to do with um social
isolation there's a lot of evidence to
support that the need to belong as a
fundamental human motivator to all but
it's particularly pronounced for women
and we talked about this already so
staying alive so you know belonging
being in a group affiliating all of
those things are really important for my
survival and my Offspring survival um so
I think that challenged girls and women
particularly during the pandemic um but
also too we're we're more we're exposed
to violence more than men so we're more
likely to be um victims of intimate
partner violence um you know uh
everything except for Murder Men get
murdered more than women um and then
they're uh we're big on social
comparisons and so social media has not
been really good for um adolescent girls
and for women um I think all of those
things contribute to poor for mental
health well if you look at Greg lukanov
and Jonathan Height's work they lay an
awful lot of the changes at the feet of
social media what's your what's your
perspective on that do you think it is
the patient zero of all of this or is
there more going on there's going to be
more going on it'll never be you're
never going to find one thing that
causes everything um but I do think it
counts for a lot of the variants I
really do um we see this over and over
again um like don't do any clinical work
anymore but certainly this was something
that was when I worked in the mood
disorders clinic when I was doing my
internship it's something I saw a lot um
yeah girls and women make a lot of
comparisons they spend a lot of time on
social media um and those social
comparisons I already told you lead to
jealousy and that jealousy in turn leads
to externalized or internalized behavior
um I don't think men use social media
the same way we do I really don't um I
don't I don't know how often you take
your screen and zoom it to see um you
know every wrinkle and every hair out of
place do you ever do that I'm just
curious no like do it even like if I ask
my husband he'd be like what are you
even talking about yeah um but certainly
we do that all the time and thank
goodness that feature exists now because
I used to have to take a picture of it
and then I could zoom it um anyhow so uh
yeah it's not good it's not good for the
health of uh of females and and we need
to get a grip on this and figure it out
we did this study that's just under
review and um so one thing I notice that
happens and hasn't been looked at but it
makes sense so we're really interested
in um threats to relationships right so
like mate poaching and the like and I
know you know that literature very well
um so I was really interested in female
and friendship poaching and what it
looks like for girls or sorry for women
versus men so what we did was we looked
we developed a scale called a social
media friendship um jealousy scale and
basically said like you know how
affected are you if your friend posts
something and you're not tagged in it or
your friend's geolocator tells you that
they're out with all their friends and
you're not invited um your friend and
it's like just all these things that
happen on social media and we found that
women were more affected than men by it
across three studies very interesting
and then they became more depressed and
anxious as well as a consequence of that
jealousy wow what's the
underlying Dynamic that social media is
playing on which is
particularly uh effective
at impacting girls mental health like
what what is it the ostracization is it
being felt like feeling like they're
being left out it's that it's that Fe
it's that fomo it's that fear of missing
out it really is significant for girls
and women and it comes back again to
that need to belong I'm not suggesting
that you're all Psychopaths that men are
psychopaths and they don't need uh
positive relationships and affiliation
and the like you certainly do but we
need it more we absolutely do need it
more and so um you know we our value is
is not that it should be but we place a
lot of value on having friends and
belonging um and being in uded and when
we're not it hurts give me the
evolutionary explanation for why that's
the case is it just that a woman on her
own is fragile and potentially dead is
dead she's so fragile she needs the
resources of other women um you know
that's that tailor tend and befriend
hypothesis that we really do need and
there's tons of evolutionary Scholars
who've written about this that women
have historically relied on other women
to to stay alive and to keep their
children alive and it still exists in
some places in the world today so it's
like a fine line again you need to
belong um more so than men um but you
also have to compete within this um nest
of belonging and that's really
challenging which is why I think we're
so so good at indirect aggression we're
so sophisticated in how we use it like
you're all pretty crude when you use it
and we're not we're
like block Bel it's a surgeon scalpel
rather than a big hammer totally it's so
funny how often I'll say to my husband
oh my goodness did you notice what she
did and like he didn't even notice she
was in the room
like how do you get through life like
this but then it's like how do we get
through life where we're like so hyper
sensitive and attune to every perception
of slight have you got any idea this uh
attenuation to what's going on in the
room is that on a sliding scale where
certain women obviously this is on
average there is a bell curve blah
blah is there a particular personality
trait which really tunes that up is it
conscientiousness is it neuroticism is
it you know is there something that you
have found that can quite accurately
predict the level of attenuation that a
girl would have to her surroundings and
the status in her group I think it it
it's not going to be any of the big five
or if you look at the hexico it's not
going to be any of those per se we
looked at it we found like
conscientiousness was actually
negatively related to it um but it's
going to be hyper competitiveness so
there's the competitiveness where you um
just like personal development
competitiveness that you use to better
yourself Visa yourself and then there's
the I need to be better than everybody
else where like everything is a zero sum
game so women who are hyperco
competitive are the ones that are more
likely to be attuned to these things
they're more likely to perceive SL light
when things are ambiguous they're more
likely to cause harm to others who they
perceive to have harmed them um to hold
grudges to get others mad at them to so
to use indirect aggression so
hypercompetitive women are um they're
difficult in a lot of ways and they're
not happy themselves which is really
interesting their mental health profiles
are very problematic wow talk to me
about the relationship between bullying
and social status I had Tony vul on the
show a few months ago I adored his work
on bullying I spent a lot of time being
uh becoming more familiar with bullying
than I would have liked while I was in
school so I was getting to learn an
awful lot what what have you found about
this we've spoken a lot about social
status so far mostly for for girls but
also for boys what is this how do these
two things live in in relationship to
each other so Tony's a really good
friend of mine um he's fantastic and uh
so I I told you about that study the um
shaming study the sexy confederate
study so I think one of my other more
famous studies if you can say that
without getting knocked down because I'm
like bragging about myself um is um
basically I my for my dissertation my
PhD I looked at Mean Girls the
phenomenon before it even came out as a
movie so I was really interested at the
time scientists kept talking about about
popular kids being really well adjusted
good citizens in their schools and that
sort of thing and I kept thinking I'd go
to these conference and say like what
the heck are you talking about that's
not what popular kids are like but I
honestly think that there's probably an
over representation of nerds in Academia
who weren't in the popular group so they
really didn't know what it was about but
I was in that popular group and we
weren't all that nice in a lot of ways
so I for my dissertation looked at um
adolescence from grade six to 12 um and
whether or not they had assets and
competencies that the peer group valued
so if they were attractive good athletes
Rich funny tough all of those things and
how that related to bullying and um
other status indicators like popularity
and power and what we found was or what
I found for my dissertation was that um
most kids who bully others have a lot of
power um then then there's this other
group of kids who bully others who have
low power those are like the Nelsons
from The Simpsons right so um that group
kind of indiscriminately bullies
everybody but they're very marginalized
they're rejected um you know their
future is pretty bleak um but most kids
who bully others are actually the elite
of the school so the reason that they're
afforded power and they abuse their
power is because they have things that
the peer group values right so for girls
it's being attractive and for boys it's
typically being athletic in North
American culture or probably even in
Western culture so every school's going
to have a different culture um you know
you could go to a performing arts school
and the most popular kids at that school
will be maybe the best I don't know
whatever guitar players or whatever so
all this to say whatever the peer group
values that affords you power that power
then in turn typically gets um corrupted
and that's true of almost every human
being on the planet power corrupts and
it um and it and absolutely corrupts
right so um so anyhow so that's what my
dissertation was about and it's been
robustly uh uh replicated you know this
is something we see over and over again
I went to Finland early in my career to
give a talk on this and they I was H
hosted by uh Christina sov valy and
she's like I don't know if we'll find
this in in Finland and I was like oh
I've been to your malls you're going to
find it and they found it it's been
found everywhere right so and it exists
in colleges too universities so my
daughter plays D1 soccer it exists in D1
Sports it exists in sororities that
exists in university
life and then we get out of it what two
questions first off what did the bullies
get out of it what what is the benefit
to them and secondly why do we then get
out of it what is it about growing up
they get resources right so we've shown
and we've shown with Tony so Tony and
and I have published a few studies on
this they get more sex which is awesome
I guess and good stuff for for people um
they get um uh better recognition they
can influence the peer group and the
Norms of a school more uh they get more
resources people give them people
look at them people adore them all those
things are good right like they're the
silver boxs of their school um and then
Nobody messes with them which is also a
good feeling I I don't understand I
don't understand how uh standing on the
shoulders of lower status individuals
gives the bully it bestows that benefit
on them that's not who they bully that
group doesn't bully the the lowest lower
standard so they do a little bit but no
it's not that unfair fight so much so um
Bob faris's work and others have shown
that um High status bullies tend to
bully those that are just at the next
rung the ones that are
challenging their status right so those
are the ones that are in
trouble and um or anybody who threatens
their cat bird seat in a sense is that
because it's a signal of low status to
seem like you're in competition with
someone who's supposedly 10 rungs below
you well they're not on your radar
because you know the thing is the
corrupting influence of power also makes
you impervious to the plight of others
so you're not paying attention to others
unless you're paying attention to people
that are a threat to you that's all
you're really paying attention to so I
don't know if it's that um they're that
conscientious where it's like such an
unfair fight and you're a loser if you
pick on somebody who's perceived as a
loser kind of thing I don't think it's
like that I think it's about
maintaining um so achieving and
maintaining hemony I really think it's
about trying to maintain power and uh
and you maintain power by making sure
those that are trying to threaten your
power base don't get too close there's a
meme that very well may be in your book
as well that says uh everything After
High School is just High School uh where
it talks about you know the lunch table
that you sit at and the cool kids and
the games and so on and so forth you've
suggested there that once you're D1
soccer career is over you enter the real
world and these Dynamics at least begin
to dissipate what how much do they fall
away what's adult bullying look like is
there even such a thing in the same
context as childhood bullying adult
bullying looks different from childhood
bullying and that it's not as um status
oriented like I just suggested these
high status bullies it's more um I mean
certainly it it exists like in the
workplace people will pick on somebody
who they perceive as a threat to them
the reason it dissipates is because our
peer groups are more fluid um they're
not as stable so I think the stability
of high school peer groups is what
contributes to it as well because the
hierarchy gets formed through stability
and that doesn't exist in adulthood as
much right so like you have your hockey
friends and then you have you know your
gim Bros and then you have I'm just
making all of them are gim Bros they're
all gim Bros I only have one group of
friends and the old but but my point is
like you know and then you have the
workplace and you have an atypical job
so let's just say like mostly we go to
the job same job where we see the same
people over and over again all of those
things sort of happen but we have all
these different groups right so it's
less likely to take hold unless there's
more stability one place that does
happen though that you kind of re you
kind of um see High School happen over
and over again is when your kids um when
you have kids and then you become like a
soccer mom soccer moms are scary like
there that's where the high school
hierarchy comes up again it's honestly
it's high school all over again there's
a queen bee mom she usually is the
manager of the soccer team she organizes
everything in favor of her daughter or
her son um she manipulates other moms uh
you get you don't get included to go to
the mall with them during tournaments
and you know it's all high school all
over again and it's really interesting
when why that happens so we kind of
relive it again through our kids right
so when these social groups aren't
sufficiently aifi and stable you don't
have enough time for everything to lock
in and for people to understand I am
this with this group and this with
another group School creates a
purpose-built en almost a purpose-built
environment to precisely create this uh
predictability of what's going to go on
we know where people have come before
some on news come in but they come in
into an existing dynamic as opposed to
just being part of this sort of swirling
mess 100% so very well summarized I
think I'm more wordy than you are but
that's probably why you're good at your
job and I'm just like trying my best
here but the other thing that happens
that I think contributes to this is that
we can get out of toxic relationships a
lot easier than kids can so if I'm in
grade 11 and all the girls are treating
me poorly because I'm like the cute one
on campus that sort of thing like how am
I going to manage that so have to change
schools and historically that wasn't
really allowed now we allow it more um
before the internet um you could kind of
Escape that now you can't escape it as
much as you as you used to be able to
but anyhow as adults like okay so the
moms are being mean to me on the soccer
team we just move teams like it's it's
easier than what it is in high school
yeah so again it's that sort of aifi
nature the fact that it's predictable
the fact that it's going to continue
going into into the future yeah so funny
that uh you get school and then you
leave and then you get dragged back into
school from your children and then the
Dynamics of school happen again even
though you're no longer in school and
yeah and and they do and they don't like
so in some ways like like I see it
replicate itself also in Academia like
Academia oh man there are a bunch of
like Bully BRS like but like we're like
you know when what's that what's that um
what's the saying you know like when the
stakes are so low you have to fight
fiercely and that's kind of what's
happening but anyhow anytime you can get
a hierarchy going that hierarchy is
going to organize in such a way and the
people at the top are typically going to
abuse their power with very few
exceptions so there are very few people
who are just pure implicit power and
implicit power is the kind of power that
you get by having assets and competency
that the peer View group values and you
um you elevate people you treat them
well most people are a mixture of nice
and mean implicit and explicit power
explicit power is the kind of power you
get by uh you know making people afraid
um soliciting compliance that sort of
thing there was this my favorite study
that's ever been done was a study on
parking and um so what's your prediction
if somebody is in the parking stall
and they know you're at Costco do you
have Costco where you live you must have
Costco yeah I do I also know I also know
the study so if to get me to predict it
you could you can yeah ruin the game so
like the thing is is that when
somebody's waiting for your parking spot
you take longer than when somebody's not
work waiting for your parking spot
that's when you got to do all your
safety checks got to reapply your lip
gloss make sure everything's good gotta
answer that really urgent text and then
it's like oh you want this you're gonna
have to wait like that is the ultimate
example of the corrupting influence of
power so people in the right context
tend to abuse their power what is the
impact of bullying on a developing brain
oh my goodness it's enormous and it
persists across the lifespan so we've
done I'd say like most of my research
has been on the neurobiology of peer
victimization so how does it get under
the skin to confer a risk for future
mental health difficulties and health
difficulties so bullying affects all
aspects of functioning not only in
childhood and Adolescence but also in
adulthood so it always hurts so um so
you're going to have the mental health
difficulties the physical health
difficulties the memory issues and the
like but um it impacts your hypothalamic
pituitary adrenal axis which is your
stress response system so at the
beginning you get overly activated um
HPA AIS because you're stressed out and
then eventually the body adapts and then
you have lower cortisol your HPA AIS
downgrades and that in turn then causes
an inflammation response and then it
affects your cortisol H sorry your
testosterone levels um it has a an
effect on your brain in terms of a um
places in your brain like areas that are
really rich in gluc cortico receptor
sites so those are the areas of your
brain like your prefrontal cortex and
your hippocampus that are really
sensitive to the effect of cortisol so
it affects your memory so people think
that kids don't do well at school
because they're bullied um and that's
just because they don't want to go to
school they're not paying attention but
it actually affects their memory I've
shown that in a study that was published
in
2011 um it um has epig genetic processes
too so um you know it you can't change
the gene code but you can certainly
change the expression of genes and uh
you see tiir erosion that you have
shorter tiir which is an indicator of um
basically if you're G to do well like in
terms of health or die kind of thing so
it's like a good I guess bioindicator of
how much shit's gone down in your life
in a sense yes so it's terrible this is
it's so bad for your health it's so bad
for your brain it's so bad for
everything in your body why would it be
the case that our bodies would respond
to Childhood bullying by by making all
of this stuff happen is this an Adaptive
response or is it just a byproduct of
some other I think it's an
Adaptive response which sounds a bit
weird because again back to this need to
belong so if we were all lone wolves and
we weren't like taking care of each
other and we didn't have this strong
need for affiliation we wouldn't be
where we are as humans right um in every
system like so when you look at the the
prevalence of psychopathy is 2%
worldwide you know we can't Toler rate
more than 2% on on that on psychopathy
it just creates Havoc so we need to get
along we need to belong um and we need
to feel pretty shitty when we don't
belong because then it motivates you to
then do everything you can to belong um
and then there'd probably be some that
would argue that it also weeds out the
week but you know the kids people who
get bullied aren't often weak like
people are bullied for a right of
reasons and a lot of times especially
for adolescent girls it's because they
have they're pretty they're pretty
good-looking and they have a lot of
assets and competencies like you'd
mentioned that you had a puty rough go
at this what do you think what would you
attribute it to um I struggled to relate
to other kids so I wasn't socially very
attuned or Adept I think I was quite
awkward uh there was definitely a
neediness around so I was an only child
going to school I spoke differently I
don't have the accent from the place
that I'm from uh I did cricket K which
was you know seen as this sort of upper
class sport in one of the most
workingclass towns in all of the UK and
yeah it was just ostracized and uh a
combination of not being socially Nimble
and doing things that made you stand out
with probably being a a a physically
unformidable child I was a like a skinny
kid yeah yeah small skinny kid um and I
mean ended up growing probably
height-wise at the same rate as
everybody else but there was lots you
these dudes in school that just hit
puberty at 10 and 10 and a half years
old before you've even got into
Secondary School these guys are massive
so yeah I think that was that would have
contributed a good bit so it's
interesting so we did a study and we
found that like late developing boys
were 22 times more likely to be bullied
than ontime their ontime peers so these
like squirty little boys especially in
places that have a doggy dog world like
the UK and Canada and United States they
don't Fair too well and then they then
they go through puberty and then life
gets a little bit better and it's
interesting though what do you think for
girls so it comes back all full circles
to shaming wow okay so early
developing girls if you have precocious
puberty and you look more like a woman
early on you're going to be seen as more
of a threat by the girls and they're
going to be picked on Wow because you're
going to get the attention of the boys
in class they're going to be looking at
the girl who's got boobs at at 12 years
old and the girl that doesn't have boobs
at 12 years old is going to be ignored
the only way that she can rebalance this
disparity is to claw down the one that's
developed you got it so you can
come to your PhD with me now I'm ready
ready to go I told you I'm I'm moving to
Canada uh but yeah I
mean the brain developing
thing just to kind of round that out is
the suggestion that
if you was a child ancestrally grew up
in an environment where there was a lot
of uh peer group
ostracization uh an awful lot of
pressure perhaps you were left out
perhaps it was by Design or perhaps it
was simply just as a byproduct of the
climate or the period that you were
living
through there is a likelihood down the
line from that that the world is still
quite an unsafe place to be therefore
you being more forthcoming you being
more needy you being more anxious and
more attached to the people that are
around you is going to be adaptive
because I am living in a period that is
not particularly safe socially or from a
kinship perspective is that kind of the
sort of the narrative story that uh uh
evolution is telling us I think it's one
pathway and that's the whole thing I
think we tend to want to tell a simple
story but in truth there's tons of het
heterogenity and we should expect it
like we I mean there's just you know
there's people start in the the same
spot and end up in different spots and
people who end up in this at the end
spots the same but their Beginnings are
so different so multifinality
equifinality that sort of thing I think
that um it's really hard when you think
about the evolutionary significance of
bullying and I know you spoke to to Dr
vul to Tony about this because um like
it's such a cruel experience and it's
such a damaging experience that it's
difficult to put an evolutionary lens on
it and say how could this be adaptive
like I mean I think it's adaptive for
the people who are perpetrating the
violence but not for those that are
receiving the violence I can't think of
how it makes them better people in any
way um people will say that they
wouldn't want to trade their experience
because they've achieved excellence and
it made who they are it's so interesting
how often you hear about people being
bullied and they're really prominent
individuals I just watched the Netflix
series uh becum have you watched it yet
I haven't no and both um they were both
you know kids isolated kids in a lot of
ways and um and it's interesting because
then I hear this often by people who
have achieved a lot and they said they
were bullied and they think they're
tough because of that that experience is
what made them and I always think okay
so if you're at a on a scale of 1 to 10
and you're at an eight on excellence and
Excellence is like worldclass Excellence
what if you were supposed to be a 10
like like you know we don't know what
your top was supposed to be maybe you
were supposed to cure cancer well I said
this too I said this to David gogins who
had opened up an awful lot about the way
that he was treated as a kid both at
school and by his father he had this
tyrannical father that was very abusive
and I opened up about for the first time
at the start of this year properly about
sort of bullying in school I hadn't
brought it up before because it just
seemed kind of lame to bring up the fact
that I guess I was still ashamed and
kind of guilty about the fact that I had
been mistreated as a kid and like you
know what does it mean to be someone in
the 30s still talking about this but
then it's an important part of the
origin story of view and it's been very
formative so you should bring it up but
then it's kind of seems like maybe
you're giving power back to the so
there's you know the pingpong game of
why you should or shouldn't bring
something up was kind of strong and one
of the things that I said was something
along the lines of a lot of the things
that you're most proud of in yourself at
the light side of something that you're
probably pretty embarrassed about right
and it's exact the classic narrative
that you talk about this Alchemy I have
taken something which should have been
awful and I turned it on its head I got
to I took control right I used my agency
and my sovereignty to kind of wrangle
this reality into something which is
good to me now there's I I'm falling in
love with this Frame at the moment
things which are literally true but
figuratively false and things that are
figuratively false but literally true um
I think that
I think that this is one of those things
that may be literally true but
figuratively false or or at least
functionally false which
is I may have been a much better
businessman son and podcaster had I not
been
bullied but belief in that is completely
pointless and the only way that I can
ameliorate the fact that I did get
mistreated in school is for me to say
actually most of the things that I went
through helped to not only not hold me
back but also Forge me into the
situation that I'm in because believing
about the other Universe the second
strand where you weren't and thinking
about just how much further ahead you
could have got is just a recipe for
victimhood and misery and it's uh yeah
literally true functionally false
perhaps you know what's interesting too
it kind of highlights back to that
heterogenity point that I was making so
like I do think that some individuals
are bullyed and they do okay they Faire
better and um and the reason why one
person goes left and one person goes
right is is varied like you know the
attributions that you're making are
really important and there's those are
helpful but there's also biological risk
that we never talked about so for
example and this has kind of been this
is a bit dated but it gives you it's a
really simple way of explaining it so
I'll use it but just know that the
genetics have caught up and that things
are a little bit more complicated than
this um so um caspy Moffet and all um
published a seminal paper in science in
19 or sorry 2003 and uh basically they
looked at 5htt LPR so it's the serotonin
transporter Dre Gene the polymorphism of
it so you can get you get 50% of your
genes from your mom 50% from your dad so
you can have a long Al um like a long
long Al a short short Al and a short
long Al and having
um the short Al is a risk factor for
depression because it it it's implicated
in how serotonin is used by your body so
anyhow they looked at kids who were um
maltreated in childhood and the
likelihood of them becoming depressed at
age
26 and whether or not it was moderated
by their 5hd LPR and what they found was
that if you were bullied or sorry
maltreated in childhood and you had the
short shorter Le you were 65% you had a
65% chance of being depressed in
adulthood if you had the same horrible
experience and you had the protective
long long then you were no more likely
to be depressed than if you hadn't been
abused so do you know what your 5hd LPR
polymorphism is no but I can ask someone
because I've had a full I've had a full
Gene scan done so this is my point like
you don't like okay so now we know you
could you 23 and me we can have some
idea but it really is important for
people to understand this because
sometimes too when people aren't
resilient we blame them again so they
get bullied and then they're not
resilient on their on being bullied and
we say ah you see you know look at
should have tried harder should have
done the one yeah like Chris came out of
it and he's a better he's a better
person he's done all of these things you
know um so if you could just you know be
stronger you iCal risk is I mean this is
the it's the ultimately the brutal red
pill of behavioral genetics right that
the raw materials that everybody is
starting with is not the same and when
you fold when you fold that in with
epigenetics and determinism you have a a
a pretty brutal soup for quite a
nihilistic life you know if you don't
believe that there's free will and if
you believe that the predisposition that
you had was ordained before you were
even born and then if you learned that
epigene I thought epigenetics was total
and then I had spolsky on and
he he totally blew my mind and there are
things that can have happened to your
parents' lives that aren't a part of
their genetics which can influence the
genetics that they will give to you the
behavior that your mother goes through
when you're in utero will have huge
changes epigenetic changes that are
locked in for the rest of the life and
not only that it's now your kids and
your grandkids are potenti grand kids
cuz your your grandmother made the ovam
that became you right I mean exactly so
these stressors play out into
generations to come my point in telling
this is just it's really important
because like so there's like you know
talking about genetic risk but there's
also attribution risks so for example
Studies have shown that we're really
keen on reducing bullying and uh but
Studies have shown that when you're the
only kid in the class being bullied your
mental health outcomes are worse than if
there's multiple kids being bullied in
the classroom so then how do we
reconcile that and it makes sense
because if I'm the only one being
bullied then it's something I've done
right but if everybody's getting bullied
it's because there's some in our
classroom that's just picking on
everybody so there's like there's like a
communism of bullying solution here you
know there's like misery loves company
so so here we're trying to reduce
bullying and then we're we're having
this issue the other thing that's really
interesting about the intervention
literature and I'm given actually a talk
to um the Montreal School Board tomorrow
on this is that um studies has shown so
back to Christina Salma valy I told you
I went to Finland and I told them that
you know I went to your mall I know
you're going to have popular bullies
that have a lot of assets and
competencies what they found they have
like almost every kid in the country
involved in their studies and they have
this big anti-bullying program called
the Kea um they found that the ones that
were most impervious to their
anti-bullying um efforts were the
highest status bullies why would you
give up your your power holding
position so yeah what what about so for
the people that are listening who might
be thinking okay well I went through
some bad times in school uh am I now
locked into a life of suboptimal brain
development and my hippocampus and gry
matters smaller I'm never going to be
able to remember my 16 digigit number
across the front of my card how possible
is it to reverse the harm that's being
created neurologically biologically from
bul
so we don't know but I think that it's
going to be okay for a lot of people and
the reason I say that is that we're
adaptive like so we have hundreds of
thousands of years of selection pressure
we are designed to survive we're
designed to be resilient and so um we
know that
neuroplasticity exists across the
lifespan so we you know we can I think
reverse some of this damage for sure but
in the absence of knowing that knowing
that it causes us much harm it behooves
us to be better citizens and we we
really need to be reducing this right we
can't just be hoping that well you know
in the end at the end of the day we'll
be able to fix this pick up the pieces
in your late 30s or something yeah well
and also the just the lived experience I
again like I can fly the flag from my
ethnographic research like it's just not
enjoyable like have this 4,000 weeks
that you've got on this planet and of
them however many is spent like really
just not enjoying your time feeling bad
about yourself it's funny that you said
that like I'm giving um a the keynote
for unicef's violence um conference
that's coming up Pro violence presumably
Pardon Me pro violence presumably yeah
yeah you're Pro you're Pro you're going
into violence Symposium yeah exactly
yeah anti you mean anti violence anyhow
um and so the abstruct that I wrote was
just about what you said in a sense like
that
um it's interesting how people with live
experience have told us over and over
again how harmful this was and is being
bullied being treated poorly um even
women being treated poorly by other
women and um and yet we needed to like
put 30 years worth of science to it to
in a sense acknowledge their pain was
real like how like that's like
we like why did we need to do this like
we certainly needed to show it but why
do we have to show it over and over
again like we keep showing it without
doing anything about it like we need to
do something about it and
stop documenting the harms well
definitely you know speaking as a a
member a proud member of the ex bolied
Community I guess one of the issues with
at least being two forthcoming is what I
said at the beginning it's the reason I
was reticent to bring it up in the first
place on the show that it's a signal of
those status you know you'd already had
to battle with this before in the past
is this not something that I should have
already got passed into adulthood is
this really something that plays on my
mind and even if it's something that
doesn't play on your mind and that you
have got passed and you do feel like
you've managed to get a balanced life
and you've got friends that you care
about and you think that you've repaired
the damage that might have been done to
your brain and all the rest of the
stuff even the fact that you're able to
acknowledge that it was a part of the
story in the first place is also kind of
still this signal of vulnerability you
don't want to give the people that
mistreated you any more power any more
time or any more thought than they
already got out of you when it was
happening at the time so it's just a you
know the real Litany of reasons as to
why people who have gone through
bullying wouldn't want to bring it up
even in adulthood when it's no longer
affecting them it's interesting because
um women are more uh vengeful than men
you may not think that but it's true um
so we never forget somebody who's done
us wrong remember I said so if I was you
and I had the podcast like meaning like
I was as popular as you and I had the
good lighting that you have on the back
of me and stuff like that I've been
naming
names I be like here's the list of the
people who with
me I'd out them but you're like a Kinder
person it's interesting that you still
say this though because um you're
probably very familiar with the social
pain research no what's up okay so there
so um about a maybe about 15 years ago
um you know with the the advancements
and fmis and the like what they found
was that the physical pain Network so
you stub your toe your brain lights up
it tells you you know this thing just
happened you pull your foot away that
sort of thing so there's this mechanism
and we know what parts of the brain that
are um activated when you physically
hurt yourself when you're ozed treated
poorly bullied you name it the same
areas of your brain are activated it's
called social pain the difference
between social pain and physical pain so
there's overlapping neuro structures
physical and and social pain and this
has evolutionary significance again
because um it's a neural alarm that
you're not belonging so you better be
motivated to get back in there and
belong right so it actually does hurt
and it's interesting because like when
you think about the physical pain met or
the the the physical pain metaphors are
used to Des Des cribe social pain around
the world broke my heart when I wasn't
invited to that party I felt like he
punched me in the stomach when I think
about it right so the thing about
physical pain is that it's short-lived
so I had two daughters and both times
the epidural didn't take which is
complete BS but I can tell you and I
don't have a visceral reaction I don't
but if I think about the time when my
daughter was in grade six and she wasn't
invited to that party I feel like I felt
that day and so social pain lasts a
lifetime and it's very it's it's very um
socially motivating but it's really hard
to shake so when you're 88 and you think
about when you were eight you'll feel
the same thing it's so Salient and
that's been shown to be very robust um
so you know this is why it hurts it
hurts forever um it's it serves an
evolutionary um function but it's kind
of like an evolutionary function that
took steroids and and kind of went off
have you looked at interventions for
people to grow beyond the vestage of
their bullying no but I mean I would say
that probably the better programs would
be cognitive behavioral therapy I think
that that would be the way to deal with
it because it's really about reframing
that and and being kind to yourself like
kind of the things that you've been
saying you know that makes sense to me
and it the reframing is really important
um you know there's kids who get bullied
like where the peer group says they're
being bullied and they say they're not
bullied and their mental health profile
looks good and then there's kids who say
they're um they're being bullied and the
peer group doesn't say they're being
bullied and their mental health profiles
look bad because at the end of the day
it's how you perceive the environment
that matters right yeah yeah very
interesting your perception of the event
given that you're talking about this an
awful lot it's obviously a topic that
you're passionate about what are the
interventions that look most promising
for reducing the rates of bullying so
the most programs don't work very well
they work a tiny bit if they work at all
and then there was a a paper that just
came out of metaanalysis that involved
over a 100 studies and it showed that
the effects were pretty small again um
better than they've been in the past but
the programs that work tend to be
Universal so they address all kids in
the school um they do it before they
head out of middle school because
they're not very effective in high
school um they um involve the peers but
are not
peer-led um they um include education of
teachers um they have consistency so
there's like some components here and
there but ultimately I think that the
reason the programs don't work is
because we don't have a good enough
appreciation of that that dichotomy I
talked about the low status bullies and
the high status bullies and I think
historically all of our programs have
been devoted towards um the remediation
of Nelson instead of the remediation of
you know that mean girl cleck I think
then we'd be in a better position if we
um if we address that that talk TI your
group it's such a
uh kind of like not a game of Russian
Roulette but a little bit of a catch 22
for parents and for the kid
you know by bringing it up there's a
fear that more bullying is going to
happen to you the parent goes into
school that also lowers the status of
the kid presumably because they can't
handle it on their own and then the
parent now is super Vigilant I mean
there must be something like uh even
though it's no longer a developing brain
but a second order parent to the child
that's being bullied vigilance effect
which is going on you know increased
anxiety all the rest of it so they're
now going to be asking their kid when
they come home did that girl speak to
you today has anything changed and
you're then kind of scared cuz M I don't
want to say if I tell you what's
happened then you're I'm scared you're
going to shout at me I feel like I'm at
fault and you end up as the child I
certainly did this with my parents I
ended up being like being scared of
telling my mom and dad that bad things
had happened at school but I was also
having to absorb the bad things that
were happening so you end up kind of
like I don't know this sort of neutron
star that's just absorbing whatever
whatever is around it a desperate
attempt to try and just not make the
situation any worse so I need everybody
to understand that most studies show
that when you tell somebody you're being
bullied like a caran adult in your
school that bullying stops and it tends
to stop immediately so we have this
misperception that it's not going to be
dealt with if we actually say something
out loud out so a lot of times what
happens is kids um finally tell somebody
six months after the fact when it's been
going on for far too long and now
they're like they're near death store
kind of thing so that's really important
that people understand they should be
telling somebody but oftentimes parents
advocacy is I understand why it happens
but it's maybe not the best advocacy to
your point and it's because it's mere
neuron systems right so they're
absolutely feeling what their kid is
feeling and they have an intolerance for
their kids's discomfort and they want it
addressed immediately so they come in
and they're probably not in a good
position to advocate for their kid
because they're too emotionally charged
instead of coming in and rationally
speaking about this it's hard to be
rational when your baby's hurting I get
that but if you did you'd get a little
bit further I think with the schools um
the schools most schools in the world
have to deal with this even at a legal
point so like for example in Ontario
where I live it's in our education act
that they have to address bullying so
they're motivated legally if not morally
and they are morally motivated but if
even if they weren't they would be
legally motivated to do something so
that's that's how it's done now when you
were being bullied that wasn't the case
like it was really like the Wild Wild
West in a lot of ways right and like
teachers even bullied kids and was about
like it sorted itself out and that's
just how it is you know it was darwinian
thinking on this which was problematic
so yeah it's tough kids parents need to
advocate for their kids they need to do
it rationally kids need to understand
that their parents aren't going to screw
it up if they go in calm and that the
school will deal with it it's not going
to fix everything overnight but it's
certainly will fix a lot of things all
right Tracy let's bring this one home I
want to run this back again next year
when your book comes out but for the
people that have loved what they've
heard today where should they go if they
want to keep up to date with all your
work so um I'm on this platform called
Twitter X where you go to get bullied um
so so you can keep up with it with me
there um it's really lovely I just just
love my interactions there um I think
that's probably the best place because
I'm not on any other social media site
so um gotta keep my social comparisons
low so I my mental health is good very
nice Tracy I really appreciate you thank
you it was so nice chatting with you
Chris I could do it all day long if you
enjoyed that episode then press here for
a selection of the best clips from the
podcast over the last few weeks and
don't forget to subscribe