Video summary
Angelo Somers argues that striving to achieve twice what others do, often described as "trying for 20," is frequently a reactive behavior driven by a sense of lack and fear rather than genuine internal desire. This comparative competitive mindset anchors individuals' actions to the environment, reducing their freedom while potentially increasing output in areas they may not truly care about. Somers illustrates this with examples from Los Angeles's status game and trading strategies like Nassim Taleb’s approach to options, where massive success relies on betting against probability rather than consistent superiority. He suggests that self-belief is often a product of the belief itself rather than external proof, creating dynamic relationships between confidence and reality that can lead to either upward or downward spirals depending on how one interprets evidence. The conversation delves into the psychological mechanisms behind inauthenticity and identity formation, highlighting how trauma and social conditioning cause individuals to rewrite their personal histories. Angelo shares his own experience of surviving a severe car accident at age 20 that instilled lasting travel anxiety, illustrating Dr. Paul's point about how victims often retrospectively alter their memories to align with the victor drive—whether it is fear or resilience—which then defines their sense of self. This rewriting process extends to addiction and failure cycles where repeated setbacks reinforce negative narratives unless one acknowledges these flaws as part of character rather than denying them, a crucial step for genuine growth that many avoid due to shame. A significant portion of the discussion addresses "Region Beta," a state of comfortable complacency where individuals feel neither good enough nor bad enough, leading to prolonged dissatisfaction and resentment toward those who appear successful or stable. Angelo reflects on his own journey from feeling like an unacceptable human needing constant performance validation to realizing that praise often targets roles rather than true selves. He critiques the pickup artist movement for teaching men to act as actors devoid of authenticity, noting that such performances fail because they are built on a foundation of perceived deficiency. The dialogue emphasizes that while external achievements can provide temporary relief, real fulfillment comes from addressing internal emotional drivers and accepting the mundane reality of ordinary Tuesdays rather than chasing peak experiences or utopian ideals. The speakers explore how modern society strips away comforting myths and stories, leaving individuals without archetypes to navigate a complex world, which exacerbates feelings of alienation despite technological advancements like AI and driverless cars. They use the myth of Procrustes—the bandit who stretched short people or cut off long limbs to fit them into his bed—as a metaphor for how humans force messy reality into neat categories, ignoring context in favor of arbitrary frameworks found in bureaucracy or rigid theories. This tendency leads to "cherry-picking" data and retrofitting narratives after events occur, making it difficult to recognize when one is being tricked by hindsight bias. Ultimately, the podcast concludes that life's meaning isn't derived from a moral calculus of pleasure versus pain but from finding legitimacy within daily struggles and relationships with oneself, acknowledging perpetual dissatisfaction as an inherent part of the human condition rather than a failure to optimize.
Read the full video transcript
What does trying for 20 mean to you?
>> Um, as with most things, people tend to
do it as a positive and a negative side.
Um, I'm sure you're aware of that. Um,
the idea is just that, you know, when
everybody else is trying for 10, you're
going to be the guy that tries for 20.
And so, the positive side of that is you
can end up getting a lot done. You can
end up building a podcast with a billion
plays. Um but the negative side of it is
uh you're constantly anchoring your
actions and your behaviors to what you
see other people around you doing. Um so
in some sense it kind of reduces your
freedom but um can increase your actual
output or at least like what you're
managing to achieve.
>> So it's kind of like this comparative
competitive sort of testosterone maxing
thing where you're just like whatever
the other guy does I'm going to do more.
Mhm.
>> Um I think it was in the Horosi episode
or something when it came to meditation.
It was something like however much
everyone else is meditating for inner
peace, I'm going to meditate more. And
it's like you if you're a hammer,
everything is a nail. And so if that's
the type of guy you are, you're probably
going to achieve a lot of cool stuff. Um
but yeah, you might not be the happiest
while you're doing it, but you never
know, maybe you will be as well
>> because the position is always lack.
It's always you always feel behind the
eightball and you're trying to catch up.
Not only do you need to be better than
everybody else, but you have set your
sights so much higher than them double.
>> Yeah.
>> That you're always going to be setting a
chasing an unrealistic opportunity.
>> 100%. And also, you're living in a
reactive state, right? Like you're
you're not actually affirming something
that's like an internally generated idea
of what you should be doing with your
time. You're just reacting to the
environment often times out of like a
sense of lack or a fear. I mean, we have
these like adaptive personalities that
we create where we'll like something bad
will happen and then um I don't know,
maybe like you're kind of outcast in
school. That was my example. And then
you kind of create this adaptation which
is like okay to avoid that sort of pain,
>> you're going to do everything you can to
not be in that position again, which
often means just doing better than the
next guy. Um but the problem you you can
end up just getting really good at [ __ ]
you don't actually care about. um or
making a lot of progress along a
dimension that you
wouldn't have otherwise.
>> What like give me an example.
>> Um
well, I was just in LA and I feel like
this is a hub of that. Um there's a lot
of people sort of playing the status
game. It seems to be like the the center
of the status game in in many ways. Um
and often times it's to overcome a sense
of
lack. Um
but you know nature always spoke about
like creating your own values. Um and
there's kind of a lot of debate over the
extent to which you're actually capable
of doing that. Um people like Peterson
are kind of saying like you can't do it.
Young says you can't do it. Um, but I
think it's because there's it's not
because we're actually confused about
what we mean when we say values or like
the capacity
um or where they come from. It's because
we're generally quite confused about
this term you like I like what actually
is that what's the scope of it and it
can kind of expand or contract depending
on the context at play. Um, so if you
consider you to be like the body that is
Chris Williamson, like that body will
actually be creating its own values even
if they're mimicking other stuff in
other people's bodies. Like mirror
neurons are still in your head, right?
So you're kind of if that's who you are,
then you are creating your own values.
But the conscious personality, the
conscious identity, Chris doesn't have
any like top down control over the body.
If you did, I could say just pause your
heartbeat and you'd be able to pause it.
But you can't because it's, you know,
nature's quite smart and it realizes
that um certain things just shouldn't be
within the jurisdiction of
>> um the conscious personality.
>> What do you think about self-belief or
where do you think self-belief comes
from? Because it seems there that trying
for 20 is inherently uh wrapped up in a
high level of self-belief. I can do this
thing. even if you're whipping yourself
into doing it, right? Even if it's
coming from a relatively negative uh
fuel source, it seems like that has to
be tied up with self-belief. And also in
self-belief is the word self, which is
what you were just talking about.
>> So, what do you think about uh
self-belief and its relationship to
aiming high?
>> Um
I did this, you know, the the the quote
um like is the juice worth the squeeze?
M I I kind of inverted that at one point
and said like the the juice isn't a
product of the um the sorry the the
belief that the juice is worth the
squeeze is not a product of the juice or
any of the attributes of the juice.
>> Um the juice is actually a product of
the belief that it's worth the squeeze.
And I think that kind of maps on roughly
to self-belief where it's like can you
actually do something? Um there's like a
birectional sort of answer to that
question where obviously if you don't
believe that you can you're never gonna
actually try. Um and then from the
opposite direction, um
I think yeah, you have to have some
level of
like you just decide that you actually
can and that's the only way that you
ever get any evidence that will actually
come to serve as proof in the future.
Um, I think the fear-based response is
to try and
wait for the proof to emerge and then
you'll start saying it, then you'll
start believing it.
>> Um, but yeah, it's it's not like it goes
proof and then belief or it goes belief
and then proof. They're kind of like in
a dynamic relationship with each other
and that's where you get like downward
spirals and upward spirals.
>> Of course. Yeah, that's a that's that's
a good point that if the world is
delivering something to you which
confirms your negative self-beliefs, you
begin to believe them more which makes
you less likely to take action which
means that you believe them more. And
the same thing happens in reverse too.
Uh you've got this good idea which is
the line between grandeur and delusions
of grandeur is just one good day. And it
feels like that's talking about the same
thing
>> 100%. Yeah. Because like you can have a
belief forever and if unless until
reality matches it, you can be called
delusional and it'll make sense. But you
can just have one good day like say
you're a trader or an investor or
something and like um I've been reading
Taleb recently and TB's the perfect
example of this, right? Because he had
this like strategy for trading in
options where he would essentially um
take lots of small losses over a long
period of time with minimal downside and
then there would be massive upside
potential when something unexpected
happened. And so all he was betting on
was something unexpected happening. Um,
and he got super rich doing that. And so
for the same in in him executing that
strategy, there's like the majority of
the time he is not actually coming
across as a very smart guy. He's just
taking losses after loss after loss
every day. Um, and so if you just sample
select a random day from his entire
trading strategy, you might think you
might feel justified in saying this
guy's a [ __ ] [ __ ] He's just
>> Mhm.
>> But all it takes is that one good trade,
which is the entire [ __ ] purpose of
the strategy to begin with
>> to then rewrite history and all of a
sudden, oh yeah, no, obviously that guy
was going to do well. Like he he was he
was doing the thing, you know?
>> So funny how uh retrospectively we love
to make sense of any story like that.
Rob Henderson's got this great example
where uh he says the duh obviously
response that happens when a lot of
psychology articles come out is really
interesting because first off duh
obviously is I had an intuition about
this but no one is prepared to hold
science and uh modern research to the
standards of we don't need to research
this we just know it like that's that's
taking a step back right to just like
intuitive knowing
>> um and he uses this wonderful example
which I saw happen live, which was there
was a study done uh that looked at
whether highv value men or low value men
I men that were more desirable or less
desirable uh were uh more or less
misogynistic. And a first iteration of
the study or this research came out and
said that low value men were more
misogynistic. And the internet said,
"Duh, obviously these men resent women.
They feel like they're entitled because
they haven't been given this thing."
turned out that that was wrong and it's
high value men that were the ones that
were most misogynistic and the internet
said duh obviously they have got
everything laid at their feet already
they are actually entitled because of
this sort of palatial looking down from
on high pedestal that they're on and you
go so it's unfalsifiable the obviously
thing becomes unfalsifiable and I think
it goes to show that we want to try and
weave a very neat narrative together we
want this sort of perfect sphere and we
can sort of roll it along the floor and
it doesn't bounce at all and it's it's
beautiful and smooth
>> yeah the intellect likes straight lines
but they never exist in reality and
it'll often retrofit them to to adjust
whatever kind of thing happened. There
was a good quote, I think it was TB as
well, something along the lines of like
um
we are easily tricked into thinking that
we almost predicted something when it
happened
cuz you look back and then obviously it
makes sense because you can see all the
points. But like at the time you
obviously [ __ ] can't. But like yeah,
every time something big happens or
something unexpects there's a sense like
I almost like I almost saw that coming.
>> Um
>> well everybody's got this sense. It's
been stuck in my in my head for about 3
years now. This this line built for
more. And uh it's certainly something
that I felt when I was in my 20ies, not
when I was probably a teenager, but
especially as I got to the end of my
20s. I was like, God, this I just I feel
like a crab sort of growing up against
the my shell. Like I just need there's
something that's constraining me and
constricting me here and this doesn't
feel good. I think a lot of people feel
that. A lot of people feel like I'm not
where I'm meant to be actualizing my
potential. I'm built for more. There is
something more out there that I should
do. But the another line from one of
your videos like what if your dreams are
just dreams? What if there isn't any
there there? And nobody wants to hear
that. Nobody wants to hear be realistic.
Don't try harder. Don't commit yourself
to this thing. Take less risk. Nobody
wants to hear that. And rightly so
because I think on average the the sort
of people that seek out content like
mine and like yours are the sorts of
people who already have quite a bit of
self-doubt. they already have quite a
bit of introspection and rumination and
have a tendency toward like high agency
but um analysis paralysis which is this
sort of brutal middle ground right which
is like I can make
>> I happen to the world but only if I
really really push myself to do it and
I'm chronically afraid of making making
a mistake and getting it wrong. M
yeah,
we uh
there was a there was a quote you had a
while ago. I forgot what it was though.
It was something along the same lines.
>> Um
but yeah, this fear it's kind of sad to
to think like you walk around and you
get a false picture of how like younger
generations are actually doing because
the ones that are struggling aren't
actually outside. Um so you can go
around living life thinking yeah people
are roughly okay but there is like
millions of young people who are kind of
just like
dying of thirst for that sense of
adventure to like test themselves up
against something. Um and you know it's
a cocktail of bad conditions in in which
there is sufficient ways to sort of
sedate yourself and sort of avoid
um the pain that comes from like a slow
decay. Um
and yeah you can get really resentful as
as a result of that. I think you know
this is something that happened with me
to some extent. And it kind of turned
into this like slow suicide almost where
it was like
I'm not actually going to commit to it,
but like I'm just going to do everything
I possibly can to ensure my own
destruction. Like I'm going to go out
and do all the drugs. I'm going to go
out and, you know, abandon everything
that I'm working on. I'm just going to
>> um essentially stage like a misguided
attempt at rebelling against the harsh
conditions of life.
>> And it feels like rebellion. It feels
like, yeah, why would I go out and and
commit to life? Why would I get
involved? Why would I participate? Um
especially today where it feels like
it's kind of the the goal is just ever
receding into the distance with like
home ownership and like the things
people actually want.
>> Um is just kind of scooting further and
further away and seeming less and less
possible. And um
yeah, it's a chicken and egg thing. It's
like the other thing. It's not like one
then the other. It's not like you you
you dangle the reward in front of
somebody and then they go for it or they
go for it first and then the rewards
start appearing. It's like a dynamic
thing both ways. And like sometimes you
just need to like it's like the urge you
get when you see somebody in that
position. You just want to shake them
like as if like um something was out of
whack. There's this thing in like um in
metallergy where they like heat up metal
and in order to make it stronger because
the heat will make the atoms like get
unlocked from their positions and then
they'll settle back into like a firmer
position. But you need that like energy.
You need that volatility in order to
have it. And when you live like every
day on repeat and you're just in your
mom's basement eating whatever, doing
whatever, then yeah, you kind of lack
the volatility that acts as the spark to
that. And like there's plenty of foder
in your soul. There's plenty of timber
ready to catch fire. But often times
it's like we're actually avoiding the
sparks cuz the sparks are often times
stresses. They're often things that we
don't really want to uh to experience
cuz they're uncomfortable. Um but then
yeah, you just trade like acute pain for
chronic pain.
>> Mhm. Yeah. It's a a short amount of
discomfort or a lifetime of misery.
>> Yeah.
>> And Yeah. Well, I suppose it's this sort
of comfortable complacency thing, region
beta paradox, right? It's not good
enough to be good, but it's not bad
enough to be bad. And you have this
weird
prolonged dissatisfaction.
>> Do you think that reaches a fever pitch
at some point? Do you think it gets bad
enough?
>> It depends. So, I the region beta thing
got I had a few questions on my live
tour in Australia last year about this
and this guy, it was ballsy. He was
like, "Uh, I think I'm stuck in region
beta. Should I purposefully make my life
worse?
You know, should I self-destruct in an
attempt to hit rock bottom so I can
bounce back out?" I'm watching the
Charlie Sheen documentary on Netflix at
the moment. Have you seen that?
>> You'd love it. Very, very good.
>> And um it he has a unique constitution,
right? Yeah.
>> But still, it certainly seems like there
was periods. He he didn't learn
consequences was a big thing. Every time
that he did something insane, he seemed
to land not only on his feet, but on his
feet three steps higher than he had been
previously. So, he never felt that come
into contact with reality. Rock bottom
was it wasn't a floor, it was a
trampoline.
>> And for him, he just kept bouncing
higher and higher and higher. Uh but he
did when he was in sort of a
capable complacency which is still a
downward spiral but until he hit rock
bottom it was a and this is presumably
the life cycle of a lot of addicts as
well
>> which are like I'm clean I'm clean. I'm
clean. I'm a little dirty. I'm a little
dirty. I'm a little dirty. Oh [ __ ] And
then we go back up. I'm clean again.
Clean clean. And then I sort of spiral
back.
>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah, cuz you're not like
just one. You don't you're not just like
one person. You're many people
inhabiting the same body and they all
have their own agenda of what they want
to get done, what they want to
prioritize. And um and yeah, the the the
will to smash loads of cocaine and f
cookers is there in those people and it
will win occasionally. It will win over
time. and like the there's this really
interesting idea from nature that's kind
of like probably one of the main reasons
that I became so OCD about his questions
that he asks and like trying to
understand them or come up with answers
to them. Um, which is like that question
of the the the I what is the I what is
the U is something that is like always
taken my interest because my dad was
this non-duality speaker who speaks
about that type of stuff a lot. Um, and
also it's just a weird thing. I mean
like you can
Viki gives a an example where he like
the spit that's in your mouth is kind of
you. If you spit it into a clean cup
it's not you anymore. So the idea of
drinking it again is disgusting.
>> But nothing's changed about what it was.
It hasn't got dirtier or anything. But
just physically as soon as it exits you
that's not me anymore. But while it's
there it's kind of a part of you. And so
this like sense of self can be very
>> sort of transient. It can move around a
lot. M
>> um and
you know the idea history is written by
the victors.
>> Mhm.
>> So nature kind of took that not
literally that quote but like this is a
good way of explaining it. He took that
and applied it to the sense of self
where those drives like the the urge to
[ __ ] and do cocaine versus the urge
to start a family and all the various
different wills that you have within
you. Um they kind of will battle for
like executive authority over your
actions. And then whichever one wins
writes the history and that is what the
sense of self is. So when you say I
you're actually that's just the the
winning drive rewriting history to say
that was me all along. sequence of
victors saying this is what happened
before us. Great idea. [ __ ] it. Paul,
>> who's the trauma dude that human had on
his show? He said he was the smartest
guy in in terms of raw intellect he's
ever spoken to. Uh he was on he wrote a
great book about trauma. He's big trauma
guy. Um he taught me on the show that um
we can retrospectively rewrite things
from before a specifically traumatic
incident, but the same thing would
probably occur in smaller amounts if it
was less traumatic. I said when I was 20
years old, I got hit head-on by a snow
plow at 60 mph on the A1 from Newcastle
to Scotland. So it's a single lane
contra flow at 60 mph. Like a classic A-
road. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I did. Uh
walked away from it. um but had travel
anxiety for a little while which I came
up I I overcame after a couple of months
but if I was on a a road that had
contraflow so no central reservation and
traffic's coming in the other direction
the Tin Bridge in Newcastle is a perfect
[ __ ] example of this and uh it made
me nervous and uh what he said was with
some people if they didn't get over the
travel anxiety if they were more
susceptible to it or or it was worse or
whatever it reached critical mass Not
only would they stop driving because it
made them uncomfortable, but if someone
was to say to them, "Well, you used to
love driving. Used to we, you remember
before the crash, you used to love." No,
no, no. I've never liked driving.
>> Yeah.
>> So, they rewrite
who they were prior to the incident,
their capacity to be able to
see uh either side of the war being lost
and the victor of travel anxiety
winning, that doesn't exist anymore.
Does that make I think that's aligned
with what you're talking about.
>> Yeah. Yeah. 100%. Yeah. It's impossible
to sort of see yourself fully as
somebody else. Like we have this
capacity for empathy. We can feel
feelings other people. We can imagine
what it would be like if we were in
their position. You can't really imagine
what it would be like to actually be
them. It's just it doesn't
>> Well, you also struggle to imagine what
it was like to be you in the past. I've
always thought it would be such a great
idea if we could make a
kind of like a a photo camera but for
mental states. If I could go back and
visit what it was like to be Chris at 27
and 17,
>> how cool would that be? Oh my god, do
you remember when I used to be captured
by that? I was so distracted or I was so
focused. I was so peaceful. I was so in
chaos. And you know, you could just go
back and visit that like take a a mental
screenshot and then reinhabit it for a
little bit because it's kind of the same
question as when did you get older, when
did you get fat? You say one day at a
time. And it's the same thing with it.
When did you become peaceful or when did
you become anxious or when did you get
travel discomfort? One day at a time.
And even when it's a very acute
situation, your ability to imagine what
it was like before is is pretty
difficult.
>> Yeah. Which is why we also tend not to
think that we'll ever change into going
into the future
>> because we don't see the change
happening in front of us. Yeah. Or in
the past.
>> In the past as well. It's like I think
if you did have that machine where you
could just like zip back to like 20
years ago, you'd probably just not
believe it. I think you would you'd sit
there and you'd kind of be like,
>> "Oh, that's good."
>> H no, there's no way this was actually
me. Cuz like we
>> got it wrong. There must be something
wrong.
>> There's something wrong with the
machine. Um Jonathan height has another
cool idea um about like this sort of uh
retrofitting rationalizations for like
moral intuitions and like that's another
example of it where you can be fully
convinced he gives a great example where
but you know the can't you thing that I
explained earlier where it was like can
can you just not
>> um so that was an example from his book
where his wife came in and was like can
you just not leave like the um the dog
food on the table where the baby food is
supposed to be and he immediately
invented the story of like I was doing I
I was walking the dog, feeding the baby,
and doing the dishes all at the same
time. Like I was kind of multitasking
because I was in like a rush because of
X reason. And like he came out with it
and believed it himself. And it was only
when he was read like writing the book
later where he thought back against that
cuz it was such like a unremarkable part
of his day. It was just the type of
conversation that goes on 100,000 times
a day.
>> Um and you look back and he was like
actually that just that wasn't true.
there was a sequence like I I walked a
dog and then I did that thing and then I
did this thing. But in order to make
like a justification like the narrative
you end up coming up with is one that
like fits the the intuition that you
have which is I shouldn't be getting
told off for this.
>> Yeah. Do you think the the fundamental
sort of underlying principle there is I
am right or I am in the right somehow.
>> Yeah. And it's impossible to see past
that even if you I think even when you
believe that you are seeing past it.
It's kind of like um
it's like a sort of psychological slight
of hand thing that's you're like
simulating it. Like this is a really
autistic um metaphor, but like on a
computer you can have a virtual machine
which runs like another operating system
on top of it. It's kind of like that.
It's like not actually at the base
layer, but you can simulate what it
would be like,
>> right? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. You're
you're not fully engaging with it, but
you're imagining what it would be like
if that was true.
>> Yeah. Yeah.
>> Yeah. Yeah, that's a cool that's a cool
way to
>> and I think that happens with a lot of
like advice stuff when people hear what
like I made a video kind of like
criticizing my the the thing that I'm
doing which is making like advice videos
>> and the thing that I'm doing.
>> Yeah, both of us.
>> Um and
>> yeah, one of the main points in that was
just that like it it's very possible to
listen to people talking about something
that you want to do and or like help you
reason about like your priorities and
stuff and then it feels like you're
actually doing it. or when people give
dating advice about like um don't uh
yeah don't be too pushy or something
like that like it you listen to that and
imagine what it would be like to be them
which is this like virtual machine
simulation you're doing but like because
you think in pictures and pictures
create feelings like you get the
feelings from it too and that feeling is
often then mistaken for like a inner
change
>> when often times like inner change I
think it rarely comes from like just
words and mental pictures it has to come
from like actual
experiences.
>> Yeah. Talking about the thing and doing
the thing. Vive for the same resources.
Allocate yours appropriately.
>> Right.
>> And Dr. K, who was on the show
yesterday, uh has this wonderful
explainer about venting, which is uh
people like to vent, but one of the
problems with venting is that anger is a
really motivating emotion. Anger,
frustration, bitterness, resentment,
like me, you know, those sorts of
things, they really galvanize you to to
get going. M
>> um and if you vent, you actually blow
off some of that energy that could have
been used to put it into action,
>> right?
>> Uh so again, talking about the thing,
inventing about the thing or doing the
thing, inventing about the thing, v for
the same resources, allocate yours
appropriately. And if you're using, it's
the same as
>> people who struggle with sleep,
especially with sleep latency, falling
to sleep. Matthew Walker's advice is
just don't nap. People think I only got
four hours of sleep last night. I should
nap this this afternoon. But you build
up sleep pressure and that sleep
pressure is good because it's going to
help you actually fall asleep. Obviously
there's, you know, caveat caveat, but uh
largely this is the same thing. And I
think a venting like a pressure release
valve for some of the action that you
could take. Well, yeah, okay, maybe you
want to connect with your friend and and
and be told, it's all right. You got it.
Like you've got nothing to worry about.
on the flip side that you just kind of
got rid of a little bit of that and you
got a bit Yeah, I feel better about this
thing now. It's like maybe you didn't
need to feel better. Maybe you needed to
feel [ __ ] motivated.
>> Yeah.
>> And I wonder whether the online advice
uh I thought that essay was was
fantastic. Uh by the way, dude, I
thought it was really really good. G
give me your thesis. What what do you
think about the world of modern
self-help advice on the internet?
I think we've culturally sort of
mistaken
unpleasant experiences for harm. We've
sort of made a false equivocation that
like there
this goes deep into like the kind of the
fundamental values that you have. But
like I think largely we're in a
hedonistic culture and that's not to say
that everyone's running around doing
whatever they want. It's just to say
that pleasure and pain are paramount
considerations. And if the if pleasure
and pain are sort of the only values
that we're still holding on to, then
anything that's painful is harmful. And
we're kind of unable to distinguish
between the two. Like you see on
university campuses all the time where
like safe like I need to feel safe and
you often get it in relationships as
well where the word safe isn't quite it
shouldn't really be there. Um but we
make this false equivocation and then
what comes downstream of that is
you know it
there's something kind of a bit messy
about the incentives of the internet
when it comes to advice. um
people that have done a very good job at
coming up with retrofitting narratives
to their experiences
that optimize for pleasure um and
against pain uh tend not to have truth
as like an anchoring point.
>> Can you give an example?
Have you ever had a conversation with
somebody that just went through a
breakup and they're sort of talking
about what happened and they're like,
"Can you believe they they did this
thing and then they did the other thing
with the person and and they did the"
And you're like nodding, "Yeah, yeah,
yeah." But in your head, you're
thinking, "Well, actually
kind of maybe that was actually the
right thing for them to do." And the
reaction that you're seeming to be okay
with on your on your side isn't
>> adding up and this story you're writing
is a bit fishy. And so you're like not
convinced, but the other person is fully
convinced. They are genuinely they're
not lying to you.
>> They're lying to themselves and they're
fully convinced by their lie. Um and so
those sorts of stories that people
create, uh they're adaptive. They're
they're there to to kind of avoid
discomfort and often times to avoid like
uncomfortable implications about
ourselves. Um, and then
you can take that sort of story and
naturally people become very
enthusiastic when they find a story that
rewrites the history of a painful
experience such that it's not as painful
anymore to think back on. Obviously,
they're going to be enthusiastic about
that. And that enthusiasm often
translates to blah blah blah blah blah
and they're posting it and that that
video then gets filtered to other people
who have had similar painful experiences
because they've kind of got this like if
it's if the story if the narrative is
kind of abstract enough and zoomed out
enough then you can kind of like take
what they said about that thing about
their relationship that they're not
saying was a part of their relationship
or derived from it but they've made it
really abstract. So now you
>> It's like horoscopes in a way. It's
sufficiently vague that everybody can
insert their own story into
>> Yeah. Yeah. Like cold reading like
bluish brownish greenish eyes. Like you
kind of just take the the part that you
like and go, "Ah, yes, of course."
>> Um
>> and that is at least what you see as a
good chunk of online advice.
>> Yeah. Like probably the va the vast
majority of it. Not in terms of what not
if you're measuring it by like what gets
consumed. I think people have half
decent [ __ ] detectors generally,
especially adults. That's a good That's
a really good way to put it.
>> Um, but in terms of like the actual
advice that gets posted, like God, I
live in Bali at the moment. You go to
Bali, there is thousands of coaches that
shouldn't be coaching.
>> Like,
and and you know, it's you can make the
point that okay, maybe like they're
actually like good at giving advice,
they're just not good at implementing it
themselves. And like just because a
doctor is fat doesn't mean he's not good
at being a doctor. Like you can make
that whole point and that's fair. But I
think in lots of these things, they're
so especially on like the the dating
side, it's so
intimate and raw like with your
emotional centers that it's it's hard to
separate
>> which should be treated with caution as
well. Believe
>> 100%.
>> You know, um I think it's a good point.
I think the word that keep keeps coming
up for me is cope,
>> right?
>> That this is just retrofitting cope.
Yeah.
>> And and you know, cope has got a bad
rap. Like a lot of the time you do need
to cope with problems and maybe you
shouldn't
>> engage with the full raw 4K high bit
rate
difficult thing that is in front of you
now or that happened to you yesterday.
Perhaps a little bit of anesthetic for
this while to bring you into land would
be a good way a good healthy way for you
to do this. It's okay. You can just like
cry on the couch and watch Netflix and
eat ice cream for a couple of weeks.
That's fine. Like it's okay. And then
after then you can begin to engage when
you've had a little bit of psychic
distance from this thing. Perhaps now we
can engage
>> with that challenge. But yeah, I think
you know I certainly traffic in internet
advice. One of the things that you know
you'll be episode 105 or something right
on this show.
Definitely what I've tried to do
at least
partly successfully I think is
regularly identify my own ignorance
regularly say when I change my mind or
that I get things wrong. So sort of
publicly state I used to believe this
thing and now I believe this thing and
and and and that's changed which helps
to keep you uh like
>> it's not intellectually humble because
that doesn't that that sounds like it's
something that's noble. It's like a
intellectually aware of your own like
idiocy would be maybe a more accurate
way to put it. Like you just put your
ignorance up front.
>> Uh and that helps you to not cling too
tightly to ideas which has been pretty
good. Uh, and on top of that, the an
easy way to do this, at least as far as
I've found,
as things change over time, concede that
my strategy or whatever it is that I'm
doing or whatever I agree with doesn't
need to be right forever. It's what I'm
trying right now. And sometimes it was
right for right then. They've got this
idea that um, don't model the result,
model the rise. And this is you look at
people that are successful and they talk
about X work life balance, the
importance of their family, how their
dog walks and lying in a hammock is
their performance enhancer. And you say,
"Oh, that's great." Like you know me
starting out on my journey like Warren
Buffett, I should just read books and
and the the FT all day. And you go,
"Well, what did he do when he started?"
No, he was a hustler. You know, he
didn't sleep much. He didn't have good
work life balance. He didn't look after
his body. He didn't have a say, you
know, whatever. Like
>> I think looking at what people did when
they were at your stage, not what they
do now. And this is the issue that most
of the people who have the platform to
be able to give lots of advice have only
reached that because of being
successful. But as they're more
successful, that makes them more out of
touch with most of the people who are
consuming the content. They are an
outlier by design, which means that the
things they now do are not strategies
that are accessible, applicable to
people that are watching or them when
they were in the position of the people
that were watching. You know what I
mean?
>> Yeah. Yeah. And then they look back and
they say like, "Oh, no. I was never like
that." It's the same thing we were
talking about earlier. There's like a
>> I'm not sure on that. At least
>> I think if you if you like So, what did
you do when you were my stage? They
would go
>> actually. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I did
do that. I did. You're right. You're
right. I did send the [ __ ] out of it. I
did burn the candle at three ends. Like,
okay,
>> there we go. But I do the model the
rise, not the result is just a really
lovely reminder. Like if you get the
opportunity to sit down with Warren
Buffett, like don't ask him how he
spends his day, that's of no use to you
until you're 90 and a billionaire. Like
what did you do when you were 31? Like
can you remember like what was that
like? What would you do if you were at X
stage? Cuz that's the most applicable.
And that's one of the issues that people
who are super successful
really struggle.
So leaving a trail of breadcrumbs which
is the advantage of writing regularly,
talking regularly and recording it etc.
is I can't really recall the challenges
not viscerally like you were saying I
can run the virtual computer of I was
interested in productivity when I was 32
years old whatever but
>> I actually have this little time capsule
of well look at what I was obsessed
about for 50 episodes. Nearly half of
them were about space repetition and the
ebbing house forgetting curve and
studying and whatever it might be. Oh,
and then I moved on to this and I moved
on to that. So with the internet advice
thing, I think one of the issues and a
dynamic that I know you've talked about
before is that um certainty
is a proxy for expertise that someone
who's ardent about this is the way looks
like they know what they're talking
about because most of us are chronically
uncertain. And if you see somebody who's
unequivocating in their perspective, you
assume that that's because they have
expertise and they know this [ __ ] super
deep.
Maybe they are.
Fluency is not a proxy for truthfulness
and certainty is not a proxy for
expertise.
>> But we can't help but think, well, [ __ ]
If if I was that certain and
unequivocating about something, I would
have to know it inside out by front and
back. You know, I'd have 20 year career
of understanding this stuff. That's
exactly the way I need to have my
relationship. That's exactly the way
that I should train and eat and sleep
and do whatever else.
>> Yeah. Yeah, we're not really good at um
understanding that other people can be
very different from us. And just because
you wouldn't do something, you wouldn't
act that certain if you weren't certain,
doesn't mean other people won't. And
also like this the selfdeception thing.
Sometimes they truly believe they're
certain. And that's why I think this
show has done really well is cuz you
haven't really been a fingerpointing
teacher. You've been, you know, the
whole building in public thing. You've
been learning in public and people
watching learning out loud.
>> Yeah. and people watch that and they
learn alongside you and um it kind of
did you see like there's this Michelle
Thomas way of um learning languages.
It's great. It kind of like separates
you from the language learning process
by uh their audio tapes and there'll be
somebody teaching another student and
then there'll be a third person that's
like kind of helping them along and you
just listen to this student learn. Um,
and the whole kind of prompt they give
you at the beginning is like do not try
to remember any of this. Like don't try
to learn, don't try to learn the
language. Just listen to this other
person learning it and listen to the way
they get confused and stumble when
they're trying to say a certain thing.
And like your brain maps the language so
much faster. No way. Doing it that way.
Yeah.
>> That's so cool. What's that called?
>> Michelle Thomas. They're like they were
quite famous a while back I think in the
language learning things. But like it
works way better than Duolingo and stuff
like that where you're I mean I did it
for like a few weeks and then moved on
cuz Google Translate exists. But um
>> but yeah, it's kind of a similar thing
where I think if you try if you're like
really trying to do something often you
can like sort of get in your own way,
trip up over your own feet in a lot of
ways.
>> Um but yeah, no, the show works really
well for that reason. I think
>> I hope so. It's a thinly veiled
autobiography of of [ __ ] that I've been
struggling with and uh
I think
I'm good at finding talent early and I'm
good at finding ideas early. Um you're
one of them. You know, I've got a list.
I got a list. I did it on a vlog the
other day. You Dwarash Patel, although
he's massive now, but I met him the
first day I ever moved to Austin. I flew
in on the Saturday and I met him on the
Sunday. He's now like a million subs.
Joe Folly who does unsolicited advice.
I'm a little late to the party with Joe.
Um Alex Okconor I was listening to in
2018 and we became friends since 2019.
Yeah, exactly. Um yourself Elliot Buick.
Do you know Elliot? He does uh uh um
Next Generation podcast. Dylan O
Sullivan. Dillano on Substack. [ __ ]
money. Like just this like super reader
Irish artist living in Greenwich now
just north of New York. He's part of Jim
or Shaughnessy's like weird commune of
[ __ ] super geniuses writing stuff and
editing books. So my point being that um
being able to see ideas early and go
like that's interesting, I'll
investigate it, I think is is good. But
another um separation that's interesting
is this line between intellectual
avoidance and true introspection. Mhm.
>> And I think that um
using learning as a prophylactic against
actually having to do stuff or having to
engage fully with the discomfort of
having not done stuff is
this weird it's good for you, it's
better for you than probably scrolling
Tik Tok, but then if it actually stops
you from going out and doing something,
maybe it's even worse for you. You know
what I mean? All of that. There's a um
if you like if you select a bunch of
like
again it's sort of in the mole Sophia so
they have to be kind of like political
statements or something but you give
people a bunch of statements and tell
them to write a list of pros and cons as
fast as they can and you time it um the
people who have higher IQs
um will be able to write a whole lot
more. So firstly they're right um
whether or not they agree with the
sentiment or not of the ones that they
agree. So that they'll have two lists of
arguments for each statement, for and
against. Um, and people with higher IQs,
there's a direct correlation between
your IQ and the amount of for arguments
you can make,
>> but not against if you're for it. And
there's a correlation between the amount
of against arguments you can make, but
not for ones. So basically, whatever
intuition or belief that you have about
that certain thing, your IQ just makes
you a lot better at coming up with
reasons why you believe what you already
believe, it doesn't actually make you
much better at arguing from different
perspectives. Like you really have to
take the time
>> to like set your intention to do exactly
that and try to like distance yourself
and your own sort of like um dog in the
fight in order to be able to do that.
But that's not what people do when they
think. When people think they're in the
shower, they're scrubbing their balls.
They're not, you know, actually
thinking, you know what, I'm going to do
I'm going to do 30 minutes of
considering this even
>> disagreeing with myself.
>> Yeah, I'm going to disagree with myself
this evening. Like, no one does that. It
just doesn't Why would you need to do
that?
>> Um, but yeah, it's kind of scary when
you think that like, you know, that's
the double-edged sword of intelligence
is that it can make you
it can help you with foresight. It can
make you better at modeling things. It
has all of the obvious benefits, but
when you just have more horsepower up
there, you become a lot better at
bullshitting yourself.
>> Um,
>> it becomes an impediment to seeing the
truth as opposed to
assistance to it.
>> 100%. And that's one thing I would
actually like I I do try like I want to
say to people who are like sort of
younger and are like in that basement
situation where they're not going out is
I think like we can often get this sense
that there's like a an insufficiency
within you especially around
intelligence. It's like people think I'm
just not smart enough.
>> Um but
it's almost in all cases it's character
that actually correlates cuz there's so
many like super smart people who just do
nothing. Um and so like you should
optimize for your character, not for
your intelligence and like try not to be
misguidedly pessimistic about the extent
to which your intelligence puts a
ceiling on your potential.
>> Didn't you try nihilism for a while?
>> Yeah. How'd that go?
>> Not great. Um, yeah, it's uh
that that was sort of the slow offing
myself period when I was like a
teenager.
>> Well, give me give me the story of what
happened with your school career and the
subsequent spirals.
>> Right. Yes. Um, so I never like really
enjoyed school. I didn't fit in too
well. Um, so I would always like come up
with different ways to um sort of
convince myself to go to school often by
like sandwiching school in between two
things I was excited about, which could
be like a bunch of random [ __ ] It was
video games at one point. In primary
school, it was uh unicycling at one
point. I would unicycle to my primary
school um cuz it was something different
and exciting. And uh eventually like
when I got to secondary school, it was
parkour. Um, so I was doing like a bunch
of parkour going to competitions and
stuff after a while and yeah, I landed
on my spleen on a bar of scaffolding um
at this competition
which had like a bunch of doctors then
uh sort of a couple days later coming
and trying to convince me to do like a a
CT scan um to see what was going on with
my spleen, whether or not there was a
tear in the lining um which is what they
were worried about. But um if they did
find a tear in the lining, they wouldn't
have been able to actually do anything
anyway. They were just covering their
asses legally. Um cuz if there was a
tear, you wouldn't operate in case it
bursts. You would just put somebody in a
bed and watch them. So like, can I be in
a bed at home? And they were like, well,
yeah, technically, but you know, it's
very dangerous. And they applied a lot
of pressure. I had like six different
doctors come in and try and convince me
I was going to die. Um which really
>> 12 years old?
>> Yeah, I was 12. So that really brought
mortality like right up front. It became
like a state I was currently in rather
than like a event in the future.
um which is I think how people generally
perceive it. It's like an event that
like your death is an event in the
future versus your mortality being a
state you're in like you're in the
process of dying right now. Um and that
all became like immediate way too young
of an age and sort of I freaked out a
little bit. Um but one of the side
effects of that was that whenever I felt
like I was wasting time, I couldn't
really see the the end or the purpose of
a certain action, it would like trigger
that anxiety. I felt in the hospital. Um
I felt like I was sort of like dying
again. Um so yeah, I ended up going to
see like a child psychologist and stuff
to make sure I wasn't completely insane,
but they were just like, "Yeah, leave
school." Um that was what I was pushing
for already. Um and they kind of were
like, "Yeah, it makes sense." So yeah, I
wrote this like document trying to
convince my my dad and my mom to let me
just drop out. Um and
>> I think you're glossing over. Wasn't it
like a big PowerPoint presentation?
Yeah, it was like 22 pages. Yeah, like
uh like a Yeah, I mean it worked. I
think they were more probably not
because of the content of what was in
it. It was clearly written by a
12-year-old, but the fact that I had
gone and done it off my own impetus was
like I think enough for them to kind of
be like at least take the question
seriously.
>> What was your proposal?
>> Um it was just like a constellation of
different points around like mainly
trying to outline the pros and cons and
quell their biggest fears. But
>> but what did you want? What was the
outcome that you wanted?
>> I wanted to learn stuff that I was
genuinely interested in um that I would
actually remember and that would
actually be useful in my
>> This was going to be self-directed.
>> Um originally the idea was actually to
do the curriculum at home and get
through it as quickly as possible and
then start learning stuff I was
interested in. That didn't go too well
cuz again when I got the textbooks I'd
started to get the anxiety from the
hospital experience. So eventually we
were just like okay we have to ditch
that entirely and um
yeah so I ended up just learning about
things that I was actually interested
in. Um which has worked out better than
expected. You know TB said uh uh
everything that he learned in school and
this is a guy that did like he did the
degrees but he also spent an additional
30 hours a week reading for like 10
years. And he said everything he learned
off of his own interests he remembers
but everything he learned teologically
which is just to like achieve a
different end you forget because once
that purpose is served your brain
deletes the information and that was
happening at school all the time. So I
kind of felt like school was wasting my
time. So I wanted to leave and do it
myself. Um and yeah read the document
sent that to them and yeah ended up
leaving. Um, and then I I think it it
kind of went okay for a little bit and
then a couple years later like you you
know that experience people get when
they leave university and they're like,
"Oh [ __ ] I'm alive. This is the real
world. I have to figure out where I'm
going and what I care about and who I
am." Um, that kind of happened like a
way probably too young age. Um, so yeah,
after like a few
about a year of like questioning
everything, um,
that inevitably leads you towards
nihilism because the method generates
its own frustration. It's like if you're
trying to test whether or not water can
be carried by getting a net and putting
the net in the ocean and lifting it up
and going, "Well, no, see, every time I
bring up the net, there's no water in
it." And then you kind of like get a
false conclusion. um when you
obsessively question why you do things,
you can end up in that exact spot. Um
where you just end up thinking, okay,
everything is pointless cuz I'm only
doing this to do that and I'm doing that
to do that and I'm doing that to die or
like there's nothing per you kind of get
confused in a way, which is I think what
nihilism is. I think it is a confusion.
Um and so
>> you're what like 15 now?
>> Yeah, I was it was yeah 15 when it
started going tits up. Yeah. Um, and
then I found out about this awesome
stuff called weed. Um, which is great
and alcohol and parties and that was a
good anesthetic to the sort of
existential questions and you know as we
were saying about the upwards and
downward spirals that kickstarted a
downward one for the first time in my
life which you know then served as
further evidence that life sucks and
it's all evil and I started to develop
this sort of adversarial relationship
with reality itself where it was like
reality and the conditions I found
myself in called life are sort of out to
get me. They're like
problematic. Um,
and yeah, I think that sort of
became the fuel for me to
spin up various narratives that
justified that sort of
nihilistic hedonistic
obsession with pleasure and pain. Um,
which drugs obviously fit really well
into. Um, and yeah, it went on like that
for a couple years.
the obsession with pleasure and pain.
Was that just obsession with running
away from pain?
>> Mhm. Yeah. It's kind of one slider in a
way. Like the further down you are, the
more painful. The further up, the more
>> I think there's some there's certainly
some people, you're right, by design, if
you are in pleasure, you tend to not be
in pain. But I think there's some people
that are pleasure focused running toward
a thing. Some people who are anti-pane
focused, running away from a thing.
>> Yeah. Yeah, you can be motivated by the
negative or the positive of any value
judgment. Um, there's another one of
nature's ideas that interested me. You
can value judgment can spawn out of the
negative where you say that is bad,
therefore everything that's not like
that is good.
>> Or that is good, therefore everything
that's not like that is bad.
>> Mhm.
>> It's kind of the same thing. So you end
up in a similar position but one is much
more um kind of
uh
anti-life itself which is where you look
at the conditions you're in and you and
you say so much pain that is bad
therefore whatever gives pleasure is
good
>> and then you chase pleasure in whatever
way Charlie Sheen style and it just goes
wrong.
>> You were a young Charlie at this stage I
guess just using slightly cheaper drugs.
>> Yeah, exactly.
>> Uh okay. So what you're 16 now than
what? Yeah. 16. Um,
it kind of just like Yeah, it just
continued like and just got worse and
worse for a couple of years. Like I
>> What does worse and worse mean?
>> Just like worse drugs. Um, worse
friends.
>> How about drugs? What drugs?
>> Not like meth and heroin or anything,
but you know, uh, a fair degree of
psychedelics and cocaine at one point.
And that was sort of right at the end
where I was like reaching this fever
pitch where it was like there was a fork
in the road. And it was like okay either
either I have like some radical change
in the way that I live or I am like
committing to never experiencing the
things that I was so passionate about
experiencing when I was a kid. Um
and that was around when I was 18. So
right when it became legal to drink
alcohol. Um, I had that moment and it
was like probably partially because it
was legal at that point which made it a
lot easier again. So you can drink on
your own then and that's not good. Um,
so yeah, there was kind of like a come
to Jesus moment at that point.
>> It's a strange It must have been a
strange
uh place to find yourself in that you
hadn't fitted in at school. You find
this solution which you have to write a
20page document in order to be able to
acquire and then the outcome of that is
not liberated perfect selfdirected
learning. It's oh [ __ ] I took this risk
and this risk didn't pay off and maybe
things are even worse now.
>> What did that teach you about risk and
taking risk? Did it make you more
concerned about doing it? Um,
in some sense, yeah, I think I've become
slightly more risk averse as I've got
older, but only slightly. Like, it
sounds like your tolerance for risk was
pretty high already.
>> Yeah, I always
>> maybe brought you back down to a
acceptable range.
>> Maybe. I'm still probably not quite in
the acceptable range. I mean like um
yeah, I've always kind of wanted to jump
in the deep end uh with things and then
like figured that's the quickest way to
learn to swim and like cut burn the
boats type attitude. Um most of the time
like the first psychedelic I did was
Iaska. Um
>> [ __ ] me. How did you get a hold of Iaska
in the UK?
>> Uh there's people that do like retreats
like
>> Yeah. Yeah. I'm on the mailing list for
a couple of them still.
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah. Yeah. So, it was the whole like
ritual and all of that. And
>> but this means that you've researched it
on the internet, managed to find a
forum, that's given you the private link
that's got you on the email list, that's
given you the listing of where it's
>> sort of I actually met somebody in
London who knew somebody who hosted
>> Same thing though, right? Yeah. It's
just the real world equivalent of that
digitally.
>> Yeah. So, um that that blew my brain out
of my head and probably delayed the
process of realizing my trajectory was
offkilter
>> a little bit. um but also had incurred
massive benefits and I think the entire
arc that I went on during that period of
time is probably where I learned some of
the most important things um because I
was in direct contact with like my own
psychology because there's nothing that
will reveal to you the ways in which
you're capable of bullshitting yourself
more than addiction. Like it is the
crucible of [ __ ] M
>> um and yeah, I have it's an intuition,
but I feel like the stuff that I did
learn through that period are they've
proved to be so far and probably will
continue to be like invaluable going
forwards. And it's also got that whole
thing out of my system. I opened the
door went, "Oh, fuck." Closed it and
I've got the rest of my life.
>> What was on the other side of the door?
everything I described, you know, just
like a slow death where you're seeking
your own destruction um subconsciously
to some degree
>> and like everything that goes wrong as a
result of that feeds back into the loop
and becomes evidence that um everything
sucks and you're right to feel feel
angry about the world. Um
>> do you see why people become apathetic
and resentful?
>> 100%. I've been there, you know, 100%.
Um,
it's almost like more of a miracle that
people don't in in some cases. There's a
lot to be resentful about. Like there's
many ways that you can interpret life
that lead to the conclusion that, you
know,
>> it's pointless and unfair.
>> It's pointless. It's unfair. And you're
the foot of some kind of cosmic joke. I
think lots of people feel that way. I I
definitely felt that way.
>> Yeah. Me too. Me too. For a very long
time. Uh, and still a lot a lot of the
time now. I think at least for me the
weird thing a few a few of the strange
things that were formative around the
same time that you were going through
that was being an only child,
>> right?
>> And also being very unpopular in school.
>> Yeah.
>> Because if you've got those two things
together, there is no
safe base. There's no sort of foundation
that feels like someone's got my back.
>> I have to have my back, which means that
I keep secrets. I have shame. I have
stuff that's just for me because nobody
else would understand. And if I was to
tell them, they wouldn't even What are
they going to do? Oh, mom's just going
to make a a big song and dance. She'll
go into school and tell them about the
bullying or tell them about the this
thing or tell them about the that. So,
you're like, I'll I'll just deal with
it. Like, I'll become insular and I'll
look after it myself.
>> And yeah, the um I always had this this
line, I keep using it a lot about the
idea of a personal curse. the fact that
I don't know the psychology of other
people, which means that I believe a lot
of the mental pathologies I have are
unique challenges that only I face
>> like this personal curse. No one else on
the planet feels this thing, has this
doubt, has this shame, it manifests in
this way, thinks that thought.
>> And one of the brilliant things that I
think about exists in longer form
conversations like this is not really to
do with
the big ideas that people come up with,
but the throwaway lines that are sort of
like filler
>> that explains where somebody was at a
certain time. Mel Robbins had this line.
I was preparing to speak to somebody,
Dr. Paul Ki, [ __ ] trauma guy. I knew
it would come back to me. Maybe it was
Paul. I can't remember. And she said in
the back of her mind, her whole life,
she felt like someone was always mad at
her. M
>> she just had this sense. My whole life
>> I'd always felt like somebody was mad at
me, like I'd done something wrong
>> and someone was angry about it,
>> right?
>> And I was like, and it was a a tossway
line. It wasn't the thing. It wasn't
even the thing in between. It was like
just this random filler sentence that
she said.
>> And you know, that happened over and
over again. It happened with Peterson.
It happened with Rogan. It happened with
Naval Ravocant. It happened with Alander
Boton from the School of Life. And
that sense
at least you're less alone than you
thought you were
>> is a big source of comfort for a lot of
people.
>> I think
>> holy [ __ ] that person who seems to be at
least remotely put together in a manner
that I'm not,
>> right? Because I'm deficient, I am
flawed, I am broken,
>> right?
uh that person, even if they're some
unknown guy on a podcast or or some
random clip on TikTok, oh [ __ ] that
means it's not just me. And I think
that, you know, you can feel when you
think it's not just me. Like your whole
[ __ ] nervous system just releases a
little bit because it's not you're not
the foot of some great cosmic joke.
>> This is an an endemic part of being a
sensitive human.
>> And
>> oh well, at least there's two of us.
>> Yeah. Yeah. And as soon as you say at
least there's two of us, you immediately
infer there's probably millions.
>> Okay. It's not just me.
>> Yeah. I remember when I was like at the
bad like right at the fever pitch of it
all. I remember sitting on the couch and
there was like some news thing going on
and
I just felt this [ __ ] gulf of
distance between me and the well
presentable news anchors on the
television.
It was just like they came from a
different universe almost and they were
like
>> they were like the
nondeffective
puppets that got manufactured and
actually went into production and there
was like me this sort of defective one
that was like sort of there's a a book
notes from underground by uh doski that
captures this exact sentiment perfectly.
Um, highly recommend reading it where it
basically just delves into the
psychology of of resentment and and the
weird shapes that it can take in your
own psyche and the conclusions it can
lead you to and just the sentiments, the
kind of the smell of it.
>> Mhm.
>> And it's not fun to be on that side. And
do you think maybe like that experience
was the the negative value judgment?
That's bad. Therefore, that learning
about human nature good.
>> M
maybe. I mean, it took a long time to
percolate, dude. Uh I
I really
tried to hit all of the different
macronutrients of uh where modern
society tells a young man that he should
get success from. Before I was like,
[ __ ] maybe I'm gonna have to develop
myself. It just wasn't something I
considered. Even Even my training
program was done very much to try and
get people to admire me or like me or
something. And this wasn't even as cool
as I know it's going to be hot. It was
much more fear-based. It was like I am
so insufficient and so broken and so
unlovable and unlikable and unwanted by
the world that I need to be able to be a
bear juggling on a unicycle at the same
time in order like please please please
assuage my deep feelings of insecurity
and inferiority. If only I can be
sufficiently impressive and and smooth
and good-looking and successful and
well-known and popular andah,
maybe the world will accept me. Because
it hadn't happened before when I was
like trying to be me, whatever that was.
I'm like, okay, me is unacceptable.
>> That's an unacceptable human. I should
not try and be me. Did that in school
didn't work. Like that that I I
evidently I need to perform. I have to
perform. And after a while, you end up
uh gaining momentum for the persona, not
the person, which means that not only
have you uh built lots and lots of
layers of sort of
selfdeception and mistruth and and um
perverse incentives on top of who you
are. So digging back down to find out
who that person is. Like working out who
you truly are is actually really kind of
a hard thing to do. People say, "Oh, it
should be the most obvious thing in the
world." It's like there's all of these
layers that you've built on top of it
like performance and expectation and
social recognition and all this stuff.
Not only that, but even if you did know
where it was that you had to get to,
people expected this other thing of you.
People expected you to show up as for me
the sort of big name on campus, party
boy, club promoter person, stood in the
front door, you know, runs the big
events, knows everybody, has this
massive afro, does the thing like he's
the guy. And that means that the gulf
between the person that you truly are,
which is being increasingly hidden, and
the person that you're showing up as is
getting wider and wider, even as you
don't really actually know it.
>> And um one of the things I realized is
that
that's why
if you're playing a persona, praise
never really comes into contact with you
because people aren't applauding you,
they're applauding the role that you
played. And you know that you've
basically super secret squirrel
technique fugazied these people into
like you will like me, you will like me,
let me do the thing so you will like me.
This is why the pickup artist movement I
think was fundamentally a fail because
what it taught men was in you can get
women to sleep with you if you are so
not yourself that you're basically an
actor. And what's the subtext that that
teaches you about your level of
selfworth
>> just to be able to show up openly in the
world? Yeah,
>> you are not right. You are not enough.
You're flawed, broken, insufficient. And
uh yeah, that was that was definitely a
big a big lesson that I took from that.
And you um it's all well and good
saying, well, you know, it propelled me
to learn about human nature and to be a
it's like it took [ __ ] 15 years.
>> Yeah.
>> Like in order for me to even get pull my
head out of my ass from that. So it
wasn't a it wasn't a quick trajectory.
>> No.
Sometimes like those learning arcs
people go on will be until they're 80
and they they only have the aha when
they're 80.
>> Um doesn't make the aha less valuable.
Just makes the journey longer.
>> Mhm.
>> Do you think you posted something on
Instagram the other day that [ __ ] was
great.
>> Kind of similar to what I was saying
about the you at the beginning about
true self.
>> Mhm. Mhm.
>> Um,
when something kind of affirms uh a
moral stance that we have in somebody
else, we say that's their true self.
>> Mhm.
>> And when it's different, we say they're
not themselves anymore.
>> Yep. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
>> How does that gel with what you were
just saying about like
feeling like you were going in an
inauthentic direction? Like where do you
think that sense actually comes from of
inauthenticity? Cuz like you can't
really pinpoint it with words. Words are
often times like a terrible tool for
most jobs, but like it feels like you
can you can not in the moment, but
retroactively you can tell that
something was off, but in the moment
you're convinced. And so that brings in
the question that we had earlier about
like if you are just retrofitting
narratives, then is that
>> whoever the victor was is the one that
>> whoever Yeah, exactly. So it's like, oh
that was inauthentic. But like I don't
know like you can make that case but it
does it really feels like there is some
like inner [ __ ] detector which means
there must be in a [ __ ] right.
>> Yeah that's a that's a really good
point. So the uh essay that I wrote
basically explained how
we tend to see the best in our allies
and the worst in our enemies. And that
our allies making an error is some sort
of uh loss of their self and our uh
enemies uh doing well is some sort of
aberration or some sort of like weird
deviation from who they truly are.
>> And uh that when it comes to the way
that we see ourselves too, typically
it's the fundamental attribution error,
right? Like I cut that person off in
traffic because I'm late. They cut me
off because they're a prick. Yeah. Um
it's b it's that but for everything that
we do all the way down. Um you are right
though when it comes to authenticity.
What does it mean to say that this is my
true self? Uh given that it is
constantly being rewritten and we're
immersive of the environment around us
and social conditioning and norms and
all the rest of the stuff. At least for
me it's a good point to make that
>> uh cognitively top down trying to say
this is who I am.
>> Yeah. doesn't really seem to be able to
capture the question because if you
explain why, if you ask why sufficient
times, it gets back to something like it
feels right. It feels like me. Usually,
it tends to be a bit upward aiming. And
I think that that's why when you hear
people who are drug addicts or sort of
down on their luck and they say, "It's
who I really am." it that whenever I see
that on documentaries, you know, movies
and stuff like that, that really sort of
strikes at my heart because that's, you
know, somebody who has embodied their
downward trajectory and taken it as a s
a part of their sense of self and they
believe it. Maybe only in that moment,
you know, I'm sure that maybe at some
points in your downward spiral, you
thought this is who I am, but you know,
you've also got this upward aiming, this
high sort of uh belief thing going on,
too. So these two things are coming into
conflict.
>> You know what's fascinating about that
is
maybe counterintuitively the the moment
where I said this is who I am that was
actually the inflection point where it
started getting better.
>> Um I think
it was at that point it was
undeniable that that was at least an
aspect of my character. Mhm.
>> And I think it's often the case that
until you acknowledge that, it really is
impossible to fix. Like you can't
untangle a web of [ __ ] unless you're
willing to look at it, right?
>> Mhm.
>> Um
it's weird. It's weird though. It's
weird how often
like God knows how the mind works, but
it does seem interesting how often
it's the case that when you shine a
light on something, it kind of starts
fixing itself. And it's only when it
doesn't have that spotlight of attention
>> that that it doesn't Well, I wonder how
much of that's resistance. That would be
at least something that has to play a
part of a role for this. I think I am
not I'm not this thing. I'm not this
thing. I'm not this thing. Well, in the
effort of the resistance,
>> you are
>> right.
>> You're lying to yourself about what's
going on. I am this thing.
>> Yeah. Yeah. Cuz if you try to control
what ideas you have in your head, then
the ideas end up controlling you, right?
Like if you push against a wall that
can't be moved, it's you that ends up
moving. And so like the more you try to
control things that are literally just
the case,
>> the more they end up affecting you. It's
a weird like I don't know if there's not
many cases in which um Newtonian physics
maps on to psychology but I think that's
one of them like every force does an
opposite.
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. So I think uh
>> to sort of round this out what I said at
the start about um aiming for 20
>> trying for 20. Uh there is a a challenge
to people that have self-belief and high
standards, which is when you stop
meeting them, when you fall short a
little bit, it's painful. And when you
fall short a lot, it just feels like a
total loss of your sense of self. If you
have made if you have wrapped your
identity up in being the person who has
high standards and is able to meet them
and I'm upward aiming and all the rest
of it. And I think this is why
stories that have someone who hits rock
bottom and then bounces back out. Okay,
that's like relatively neat. But it's
the story that has multiple rock bottoms
or maybe not even rock bottoms but
serious, you like 50% pullbacks. and
that I thought I was [ __ ] I thought I
was getting better.
>> I thought this thing was moving in the
right direction. And to me, there isn't
enough
talk, especially in sort of the advice
world about what happens when you've
made the commitment, you've started to
make progress, and then you reach
multiple pullbacks, self-inflicted,
purely environmental, exclusively inside
your own head. Like you totally manifest
by your own self-doubt, right? like
there's no external imposition. You
didn't break a leg. You haven't lost a
family member. You haven't gone
bankrupt. You have, you know, it's
nothing's going on other than your own
self-doubt creeping back in. My own
mental pathology curtailed the
trajectory that I had worked so hard to
get back on. And [ __ ] I'm about to eat
[ __ ] again. God, that sucks.
>> Yeah. I mean, I got a friend uh back in
Wales, one of like the friends I grew up
with, best friend, and yeah, he's sort
of in a cycle. It kind of gets better
and stops and gets better and stops and
gets better and stops and like
you know the the Homozi quote about like
proof.
>> Mhm.
There's something to be said about
each time it drops back, it can serve as
like another data point that gets used
in like a narrative of yourself that
then becomes causal. It becomes its own
creator of that type of behavior into
the future. Like if you try to quit
smoking
>> and you fail and you fail 10 times, it
actually increases the odds that you'll
fail on the 11th as well.
>> And so and you can feel that slippage
like each time you fail. You feel like
>> I haven't just gone back again. I've
actually lost like a strategic vantage
point from which I was
>> I I I had the opportunity to make the
next move and I've lost that vantage
point now because it's gone back again.
and you can feel yourself kind of it
feels like the walls are closing in a
lot of the time.
I do like the way that Alex reframes it
as saying uh how can I say that I'm a
man who can withstard hand withstand
hard things if I've never withtood hard
things
>> and that
turns uh pullback into nobility in that
way but you're right you know if if you
regularly try and then there is some
sort of a challenge the next time that
you try you're expecting challenge and
sometimes the challenge is really
uncomfortable
or or results in no progress, which is,
you know, the [ __ ] rocky line of like
it's not about how hard you can hit,
it's about, you know, getting knocked
down, getting back up, etc. There's a
little trite, but I think functionally
ends up being really important, like is
way deeper than than it actually sounds
because
if all that happens is a straight
trajectory of going up,
what problem have you got? This is why
people have an issue with the sort of
silver spoon infant whose life appears
to be smooth sailing the whole way
through. We have a sort of instinctive
revulsion, resentment, discontent with
that person because we think, well, you
didn't deserve it. You started halfway
along the race and then didn't encounter
a single hurdle for the rest of it. This
feels unfair. And then the people who
sort of bounce and then come back out,
you think, oh well, you know, there they
they sort of kissed death and then rose
to an acceptable altitude.
Congratulations on that. But there is
something about like people who are just
regularly uh struggling that just I
don't think really gets talked about,
especially if it's like a mundane
struggle. Oh well, what's the issue? The
issue is that I don't really believe in
myself that much. The issue is that I
fear things. The issue is that I
struggle to make a commitment. It's
like, dude, there's people like
starving. There's people who can't
afford their medical bills. There's
people who can't afford food. There's
people who were beaten or abused or
child addicted to drugs as kids. Like,
and you're oh, like my inability to
believe in myself is stopping me from
making progress. W I wish that I could
make more risk without feeling scared
about why like you and that shame I
think gets layered on top for a lot of
people too. And
>> this sort of generation of lost men
thing. Uh I was dinner with Rob
Henderson in New York. He had this
[ __ ] brilliant line. He was talking
about why guys struggle to approach
women. And he said uh
if you approach one woman and get
rejected, you remember for the rest of
your life. If you approach a hundred
women and get rejected, it's just
another Tuesday.
>> Yeah. And you have this thing as you
said the more insulated that you are the
bigger all of these events sort of feel
because there's fewer there's less
ballast you know what I mean in the
system there's like less sort of uh uh
stabilizers going on.
>> Yeah. Yeah. Taleb has a quote that's
something like um the the beginning of
robustification
it starts with a modicum of harm.
>> It's often true. you have to have
something bad happen like you have to
get hurt a little bit in order to like
have the compensatory response to
actually heal and get better as a as a
result. There was this theory I've uh
haven't looked into in years, but there
was this psychologist called Drosski. Um
he had this theory of positive
disintegration where everybody in his
time it was there wasn't really much
positive psychology going on as a field
of study at that time. Um but they all
were sort of painting psychological
disintegration as a horrible thing and
it's always bad. And he was the first
guy to kind of flip that and and notice
these cases in which disintegration is
actually like the metal thing. It's
stuff getting like knocked out of place
and unlocked so that resettle in a more
integrated fashion. Literally in the
case of metal, it's more integrated.
>> And your psyche can do that too. But
often times that's yeah catalyzed by
these unpleasant experiences that we go
our whole lives trying to avoid. And uh
you know it was it was the case that a
few thousand years ago you actually
couldn't avoid them. It was just life.
Like your sister's going to die of the
bubonic plague and that's going to suck.
And so you know I do wonder
human brains are expectant right? Like
they the the brain when you first are a
baby is kind of like a first draft. And
uh I think you get to a certain age and
most of the neurons have already been
created and then uh it's really young
and from that point forwards it's it's
actually just pruning. It's getting rid
of neurons as new experiences come in.
So you get like the marble and then it
like sculpts down to the actual
sculpture. Um and I wonder to what
extent
um we are expectant
our brains are expectant of more
suffering than we're actually getting in
terms of acute suffering. Right? because
we have plenty of chronic suffering.
Things are just kind of moderately [ __ ]
all the time. Um,
Britain basically in a sense.
>> Yeah. I said like a a true British
person.
>> Yeah. Um, but that kind of moderately
[ __ ] all the time doesn't actually tend
to do anything for you in terms of
growth or harm. And so I think your
friend actually had a genuinely good
question of should I make my life worse
>> in order to rebound out of it? M and
like when I was going through that tough
time, I think there were elements I kind
of knew that was going on. I was leaning
into it a little bit in my teen years
because I' i'd noticed a pattern that
everybody that seems to have like
reached somewhere that I want to be in
terms of psychological development or
like external success or whatever had a
really [ __ ] period.
>> Um
>> I'll get mine I'll frontload mine up the
way when I'm 16.
>> Exactly. Yeah. Cuz then I've got my
20's, right?
>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I think I just
want to linger on it a little bit more.
that idea that this sensation that
you're destined for something more, but
you aren't currently reaching it.
>> And the pain of that, I think so many
people feel that.
>> Mhm.
>> So many people feel it. And it's a
really unique
type of discomfort. And it sounds very
luxurious, but uh in reality just feels
like a [ __ ] [ __ ] ton of pain.
>> Yeah. Well, I think most of like the mo
like psychologically speaking, most pain
the most painful things are social
things and um that sense that you're
supposed to do more often times like
that's a very socially loaded sentiment.
>> Supposed to
>> Yeah. supposed to and also want to be
seen as um that's incredibly powerful
and it's often people throw stones at it
like oh you care what people think of
you but like no don't be a child you
know like obviously I do
>> um and
and yeah it's uh
living with a a big disconnect between
the sense of how things should have gone
for you
>> who you are and who you want to be.
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah. Yeah. I mean that's the they say
true hell is when the person that you
are meets the person you could have
been,
>> right? And that happens every day.
>> Correct. Because you will if you set an
ideal, you will constantly compare
yourself to that ideal and immediately
find yourself lacking. You're always
going to fall short of your ideals. And
this is the curse of somebody who has
high standards
>> as far as I can see that your
>> dream if you are trying for 20
>> m
>> you nail it. 19. Oh my god. You nearly
doubled what was normally acceptable for
a good performance. Yeah. But you fell
short of your unreasonably high stand.
>> How How does that work in Do you feel
that still? Cuz obviously from the
outside like couldn't be in a better
position. But
>> every day every day still there.
>> Oh yeah. Every day.
>> Is that because the goalposts move or is
it for something else?
>> In some ways uh you begin it's very
slippery. Um in some ways you
start to change the game,
>> right? not just move the goalpost.
>> So it becomes one of not only do I want
to be able to do this thing, but I want
to be able to do it with peace and I
want to be able to do it with
self-awareness and I want to be able to
do it with equinimity and I want to be
able to do it whilst being a good friend
and I want to be able to you start you
can imagine some sort of tank and all
you wanted to do was get the tank to go
forward. But now this tank's got [ __ ]
wings and a spoiler and a base and you
know it's like I want to be able to do
all of this [ __ ] You've augmented the
challenges. That being said, um
the reason to win the game is so that
you don't need to play it anymore.
>> And it's a good realization from you
that look,
>> if you say you shouldn't give a [ __ ]
about what other people think of you, I
think that you have fallen at the first
hurdle because we're social creatures.
We're inbuilt for social validation. So,
it's way easier to say, I don't need
people to care about me. If you've spent
a good bit of time with people caring
about you,
>> like if you've got the social
recognition, realized that it's not what
it was cracked up to be, then ah, okay,
I've rid myself of that of that desire,
right? The reason to win the game is so
that you no longer need to play it. And
I don't think that you can shortcut
that. I think maybe you can. Maybe
there's a particular type of level of
insight or volume of meditation,
critical mass that you can reach where
you sort of pierce straight through it.
But honestly, the quickest route to
getting past your vapid need for this
external goal is just to get it.
>> It's to get it and realize that it
wasn't it because trying to rid yourself
of it without having got it is at least
for me with my constitution would just
always leave this this big open loop.
>> Does that make sense?
>> Yeah. Yeah, it does. It's like the
reminds me of the Naval quote about uh
achieving your material desires is far
easier than announcing them.
>> Yeah.
>> Um
Yeah.
I think
do you think it ever reaches a fever
pitch where you go actually I [ __ ]
smashed it?
>> Yeah. That's a conscious
that's a conscious act.
>> Mhm.
>> That you need to practice. Um it's
certainly something that's difficult to
do on your own. And again, this is
another curse of of high standards. Uh I
had this idea about the curse of
competence, which is if you're good at
things and you regularly do well when
you're faced with the challenge, success
doesn't become a reason for reason for
celebration. It is simply the minimum
acceptable performance. M
>> uh and that makes any form of success as
merely okay and any form of acceptable
uh or even close to failure as a
catastrophe. Right. you. So this curse
of high standards thing again.
>> Um
>> it
it definitely
does reach a stage where you think if I
can't have fun now,
when the [ __ ] can I have fun? So a good
example, I started doing live shows
about two years ago and you know 35 at
this point the channel's reached a
million subs and I did a show in
Manchester and Manchester was the
toughest show of the run. It was a um
classic music auditorium like 650
people. So it was the biggest show I'd
done at the time. Uh, but high ceilings,
not a fantastic sound system, like some
of the stuff that comedians often talk
about influencing the atmosphere. And I
just wasn't feeling I wasn't feeling it.
It wasn't the performance that I wanted
to get. I'd done Dublin the night before
and [ __ ] smashed it. It was a
Thursday. Everyone was drunk. It was
amazing. Like, it was really rockous and
and and and positive and got, you know,
all this stuff. And then the uh
Manchester show, which was the Friday,
was just not the same. And halfway
through at the interval I was like just
in my own head about the show and I
wasn't happy and my mom and dad had come
to see it and loads of my ex- business
partners because this was the northern
show, right? So people from Newcastle
would come, people from Manchester I
used to work with, my mom and dad were
there and uh partway through I sort of
took myself into the bathroom and looked
in the mirror and had a word with myself
and I was like, "Dude,
650 people came to see you speak live at
your second ever live show. Your mom and
your dad are here. They're healthy. your
ex- business partner you haven't seen in
years is here. Tons of people that are
friends and family have come to support
you and all they want to do is watch you
win. Like if you can't have fun now,
>> when the [ __ ] are you going to start
having fun?
>> Yeah.
>> And I think asking
yourself the question like if this isn't
it and you can say that's fine. Like
this isn't it? It would have been
unacceptable for me
50 episodes into the podcast to say this
is it. I should be just purely driven
by, you know, my desire for enjoyment
and transcendent blah blah blah blah
blah. It's like, maybe you do need to
use some toxic fuel. Maybe you should
use your resentment and your bitterness
and your inferiority and your desire for
more and the chip on your shoulder from
school. Maybe you should do that.
>> But [ __ ] like if it's not now,
>> like when is it? And
>> just asking yourself like when when will
you start having fun? when will you
start giving yourself credit is a
wonderful question because it forces you
to come into contact with a point when
that needs to be
>> and a lot of the time we we don't have
that and the more that I've consciously
tried to practice
>> this is really fun
>> like this is a this is a Wednesday
afternoon nothing else I want to be
doing than sitting and doing this like
this is really cool or this is a a
lovely day this is a nice walk this is a
whatever but it is a permanent [ __ ]
uphill battle, right? And some people
are more disposed to this than others. I
would put myself more in the like hard
gainer category of uh of gratitude.
>> Hard gainers of gratitude.
>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. It's a I
I have to use gym analogies. That's the
only [ __ ] language I know. Um
but it's effortful. It's just it is the
hard gainer thing. All right, dude.
You're going to have to lift [ __ ]
more consistently. You're going to have
to sleep more. You're going to have to
eat more protein. You're going to have
to be more dialed in. You're going to
have to work harder in order to do that.
But okay, like [ __ ] what's the
alternative?
>> Rage against the fact that it was
cosmically unfair that you were well,
guess what? These are the cards that you
were dealt and you've got a ton of
genetic predispositions that you're
[ __ ] happy to have.
>> You're happy with your work rate. You're
happy with your vision. You're happy
with your pace of of of learning and
your curiosity or your ability to, you
know, be good in social situations or
your ability to be good in solitude or
whatever it is. like everybody's got
their unique constitution and some
people
got a larger overall uh um point score
too, right? It's not just that it's 100
points spread evenly. Some people got 80
and some people got 120 and some people
got more.
>> Um
>> but [ __ ] hell, like largely
>> finding out what your strengths are and
trying to play to them is the only way
that you can really play this game. at
least as far as I've learned and
understanding. Okay, what are the thing
for me? Gratitude does not necessarily
come that easily to me. So, it's okay.
I'm going to have to lift that load.
Obsession [ __ ] say no more, dude.
Like, got it. [ __ ] sweet.
>> So, okay. Well, I can take my foot off
the gas with regards to that and coast
with it. And then with other things, I
can I'm going to have to put a bit of
work in it.
>> Yeah. It's interesting like you kind of
create this irony where it's like you're
in grateful for the amount of gratitude
that you can easily acquire.
>> Absolutely. Absolutely.
>> Yeah. So it like eats its own tail in a
way. It's like if that's if that's like
the pair of glasses you've got on, if
that's the lens through which you're
seeing everything is like identifying
problems to be solved, then you will
find problems everywhere. even in things
like gratitude and you create those
little circular things where it's like,
damn, I wish I was more grateful.
>> Um, but yeah, I mean there's pros and
cons to either side of it and I think
there probably is an inverse
relationship between having nice things
and being able to enjoy them. Um,
>> and that's a part of the nature of not
just Chris or Angelo, but just of
humans. Like that's that's sort of what
we're there to do. And like you know
there's a great um part in I think it
was in notes from underground as well
where DSTI is talking about um a
potential utopia and he said you could
give people all the land all the houses
and allow them to busy themselves with
the eating of cake and the reproduction
of their species and they would burn it
all to the ground just so that something
unexpected would happen.
>> And um we do that in our personal lives
as well. like there's that there's a
chance that what we're not actually
after is
satiety
like and um satiation
>> and uh the fulfillment of desires
>> but desire itself
>> like nature said um ultimately it is the
desire not the desired that we truly
love and so if you're really going to
play that role well well it makes sense
to put yourself in this position where
you're
ungrateful for the amount of gratitude
that you have cuz then you've you've won
the game. You can be searching for
>> Yeah. the uh the great philosopher a
Tate once said
having things isn't fun. Getting things
is fun.
>> Yeah.
>> And yeah, I I spoke to Dan Bilzerian
about this separately before he uh came
on the show and uh
I said basically you've sort of
completed hedenism as far as I can see.
Do you ever wish that you'd sort of
played the game more slowly? Because
where do you go from here?
>> Mhm.
>> And
Jimmy Carr had the same intuition which
is trajectory is more important than
position. Trajectory is more important
than absolute position.
>> 100%. 100. I've experienced that in my
life. like the best parts of my life,
the best memories are when there was
like a a change in in trajectory, like a
moment of acceleration.
Um, it's not to do with Yeah. where you
are at all, for sure. Um, and also on
the point of Dan Bilzerian and like
completing hedenism. Um that's why I
think what people like Jordan Peterson
and John Vi are doing is so important
because they're they've identified that
issue like that even if you're damn
zerian you will get there and be like
what what now?
>> Um and yeah what people do need is that
structure
through which they can derive meaning or
at least interpret meaning in their
lives. And like when you're oriented
towards pleasure instead of meaning, you
you really are kind of
shooting yourself in the foot right at
the beginning of the race.
>> Have you heard me do my Frankle's
inverse law bit?
>> Don't think so.
>> Stinks of you. Let me give you this one.
>> So, you'll know this quote. When a man
can't find a deep sense of meaning, they
distract themselves with pleasure. Uh
Franklin is arguing that a lack of
meaning causes people to seek temporary
relief in superficial pursuits rather
than addressing the underlying
existential void. Perhaps for many,
maybe even most, this is a big issue.
But there is another group who suffer
with the opposite problem. Frankle's
inverse law. When a man can't find a
deep sense of pleasure, they distract
themselves with meaning. If ease, grace,
joy, and playfulness don't come easily
to you, one solution is to just ignore
moment to moment happiness entirely and
just always pursue hard things. You
become a world champion at winning the
marshmallow test. You convince yourself
that delayed gratification in perpetuity
is noble because you struggle to ever
feel grateful. TLDDR: You prioritize
meaning over happiness because happiness
doesn't come easily to you. That's
perfect. That's perfect. 100%. There was
a moment when I was a teenager where I
think that happened in me. There was
like a very potent switch. I mean like
when I was 13, I was so obsessed with
happiness that I like tried to write a
book about it and how to be it. Um the
child psychologist I ended up going to
uh was asking for source material and we
gave her that book I wrote and the first
thing she said when I sat down with her
was I read your book and I was like all
you know bushy tailed and puppy eye and
I was like oh yeah what you good ideas
right and she was like so I'm guessing
you're like um struggling with a sort of
depression
>> your happiness book made me depressed.
>> Yeah. Yeah. Well, I don't know if it
made her depressed, but she could see so
obviously that there was something there
with me that like I was pedestalizing
happiness to such
>> Yeah. Think about think about what the
thing is. What everybody is chasing is
almost always the thing that they're
feeling that they're lacking. Exactly.
>> You know, this person who needs lots of
wealth is because they feel like they
are unsecure in their resources. This
person who needs lots of admiration is
the one who feels inferior socially. The
person who needs lots of
beautifification on the outside somehow
feels ugly. And the The older that I've
got, the more true that has become
because
more people are motivated by running
away from something they fear than
running towards something they want.
That's not to say that nobody has this
perfectly balanced desire for just
maximizing their time on the planet,
man. You know, and I have met those
people and they're [ __ ] freaks and
aliens. Um, but I would say of the high
performers that I'm around,
nine out of 10 of them are probably the
running away from something you fear.
>> Mhm.
>> Uh, as opposed to the just pure alchemy
of something that you want.
>> And I suppose you could look at it as
alchemy, too. Like, you know, this is
something bad and you've turned it into
something good and congratulations that
that's an upward aiming trajectory.
But
if you 13-year-old writes a book about
happiness, so why where do you think
that comes from? It comes from a huge
lack of happiness.
>> Mhm. Yeah. That was kind of the basis
for the whole uh dating advice video
that I did, which is that like it's the
exact same dynamic at play. When you
feel like there's a lack there, you're
just going to become obsessive about it.
>> Mhm.
>> I don't know. I wish there was a
different way to frame human motivation
because it it's got a tinge of like um
cosmic joke in it, doesn't it? where
it's like you're just going to be on the
hamster wheel that's, you know, suited
to your deepest fear. But I don't think
that's all it because the I've noticed
at least in my life like
as I've overcome certain
fears like with respect to failure and
stuff like that like things you say
overcome, it's a sliding scale, right?
Like you it decreases. It doesn't just
>> some things just turned it down a
little. I've turned down the dial and
some things do just disappear like magic
tricks when you see how they're done
psychologically, but most things they're
sliding scale and and like of those
things that I've managed to decrease a
fair bit.
>> Um, it can leave you feeling kind of
directionless in some sense. Like I had
a big moment of that this year where I
think like for a lot of my life I was
hugely motivated by like the applause
and stuff like praise. Um, and like I
think that was all wrapped up in some
subconscious thing around like jealousy
in relationships and stuff. And that was
a big problem for me for like a really
long time. And I thought I had a big
jealousy problem. Turns out I just had a
really big problem with being jealous.
Um,
>> what's that mean? What's the difference?
>> Well, if you have a big jealousy
problem, then you actually are a
problem. And you know, your jealousy is
like a parasite that's living on top of
you and uh making you feel the wrong
things and say and do the wrong things.
But if you just got a problem with your
jealousy, jealousy is just a normal part
of the human experience, right? As are
many of the
>> So, it's the story that you told
yourself about what being jealous meant.
>> Yeah, it's partly that and also partly
just a visceral rejection of the emotion
of how it feels in your body.
>> Um,
>> this shouldn't be the way it is. You
shouldn't be feeling this. Well, guess
what? You are.
>> Yeah, exactly. So, I thought I had a
jealousy problem. Turns out it was just
a problem. I had a problem with being
jealous. And when the problem dropped
away, I realized actually I'm not
[ __ ] Satan for feeling this. I'm
actually just an ape that you were
talking before. It's a
>> resistance%.
>> Yeah. And as that sort of um resistance
drops away,
>> um you you can often be completely
unaware of how much that was being the
toxic fuel that you talk about in the
background. Like you don't really notice
it. And like I think lots of my um sort
of desire to sort of overcompensate on
the social dimension like start a
YouTube channel last year and post as
fast as I can like three videos a week
when I started. A lot of that I think
came from this like excessive desire to
overexpand that backed into this sense
that I was inferior and like this was
the proof that I was inferior.
>> Uh have you looked at the courage to be
disliked or any adarerian stuff? Yeah.
>> Yeah. So, it feels like I'm not super
deep in it, but at least from a little
bit of the stuff that I've learned,
Adler believed that inferiority or the
fear of inferiority is one of the big
drivers
>> psychically for for humans.
>> And uh I I think that's a really lovely
framing because it it it captures
both of the things that we've talked
about today, which is who do I think I
should be and where am I compared with
that? And who are the people around me
and where am I compared with that? I'm
I'm inferior to my own standards and
inferior to the performance of the
people that are around me. There's this
weird asymmetry that I really love and I
realized in my 20ies though that
>> we get to see the inner landscape of our
own minds which includes all of our
self-doubt and foibless and failures and
uncertainty from a front row seat a
million times a second, right? As our
brain wors back and forth. But we only
get to see the psychological
landscape of other people in the actions
that they take which is one to a million
bit rate difference right you know the
resolution that we see someone else's
interior minations compared with our own
cuz I only get to see what emerges from
you even if
>> [ __ ] like we're both on psychedelics
at the same time and they're the most
transparent ever. How many words a
minute can you speak? How much how much
body language can I infer from you? It's
not that much. When you think about the
depth of your own thoughts versus the
black and white 360p of everybody else's
behavior in front of you, which always
is going to put you on the wrong side of
assuming everyone else is a wellput
together, slick, rational human who is
well-built and I am a wavering idiot
>> by comparison.
>> You know what I mean?
>> Oh, 100%. like
unraveling that perception of other
people I think is one of the most
powerful things you can actually do to
improve the quality of your life and
your relationships. It's very hard um
because it often it means you have to
acknowledge the nasty parts of other
people which
>> is sometimes easy if they're your enemy.
You want to see the nasty parts but when
they're your friends that's not that's
not easy at all. Um, and the even harder
part acknowledging those within
yourself. Like my example with the
jealousy. Like until that's like fully
integrated into your personality, it
will be like a sabotur in the background
like for your entire life. Adults don't
exist, dude. I've spent,
>> you know, the last few years around some
of the richest, most famous, most
successful people on the planet. And
it's [ __ ] idiots all the way up.
Like, it really is. No one has any idea
what they're doing. M
>> and the small number of people that
actually do probably don't talk about it
that much. Um but you know, you were
saying about is it a a weird sort of
cosmic joke that this trajectory and
habituation just uh ever ratchets up the
difficulty of what you have to do. Like
I need to achieve more to be satisfied,
but now that the bar has been set
higher, that means that the next
achievement needs to again be higher in
order for me to again be higher and
again be higher. Oh, I've completed that
game. So then I do what I was talking
about before, which is, oh, I changed
the game. It's do that with this. It's
do that in a different domain. It's do
that not just again a thousand times.
It's do it with this twist on it. Or
it's do it in, oh, it's going to be in a
more gentle state, whatever it might be.
And I can start to see, I might be being
precient here. I'm not too sure. It
might just be because I was sat up as a
Dr. K yesterday. I can start to see this
is the genesis of the spiritual arc of
people who have reached success. that
it's an entire
universe that people have tried to
complete and maybe they've managed to
tick off a lot of the different quests
and side quests that go on inside of
there and they go
maybe it's not in this realm.
>> Maybe the entire
uh avenue of nourishment needs to be
different. It has to come from a
different place. And I've been trying to
I've been trying to drink water to make
myself not hungry anymore. And you go,
I'm using the wrong pathway here. I need
to do something else. And I can at least
in some ways begin to see why
aestheticism come spiritual practice
with all of that stuff
helps you to play a little bit of a
different game. Uh but
>> it's the trajectory thing is certainly a
challenge because every time that you
have a big leap forward in progress,
hooray, isn't this great? I have a
greater vantage point. Boo, this is now
higher from which to fall at the same
time. Like, oh, I've got something to
lose.
>> And and that's terrifying.
>> It is. I think it would definitely be a
lot worse of a situation if it was the
case that it's the desired that we
really love. But that switch from nature
that it's the desire that you like
>> changes the entire thing because then
like
>> from Mr. Tate.
>> Yeah.
>> Oh yeah. He does it as well. But that
changes the game cuz then it's like oh
thank god there's always going to be a
new thing to strive for cuz if that's
like really the juice of life
>> is this like
>> pushing yourself up against the
boundaries and the hard edges of reality
and seeing what gives.
>> Like
>> it's incredibly fulfilling. And if you
ran out of things to achieve, um, you
might find yourself incredibly bored.
Um, so
yeah, I wonder I wonder how much of
human life is like a, as you say, thinly
veiled attempt at quelling boredom. I
think
>> What do you make of your generation's
struggles with masculinity and girls?
Um,
I think it backs into that thing we said
at the beginning about adventure. The
the lack of adventure in young dudes
lives is palpable and it's immediate.
And I think the whole picture of
masculinity
as some sort of um
divine solution to that where all you
need to do is become more masculine and
then all of a sudden, you know, all of
the the kind of dullness of life will be
solved. You'll be um getting all the
girls that you want to get. You'll be
starting the business and swinging it
around wherever you go. Like it's a
really attractive meme. um to young guys
who feel like they are kind of half
alive. Um
and
it has the added fuel of backing into
insecurities. Um it's very easy to sort
of make masculinity the measure of a man
and then uh promote that message and
make everybody feel like, "Oh [ __ ]
maybe that's true. Maybe you can make a
case for it in retrospect." And then
everybody hears that case and starts
measuring themselves against it and
feels like they've come up lacking. Um
and uh that makes it very easy to sell
courses and very easy to um
sort of do like a pop psychology type
offer like a a general solution to
personal problems
>> which is rarely uh rarely effective cuz
I think most of the issues that people
actually have to deal with in their
lives are hypers specific and nuanced
based on like their actual immediate
iate problem in their life. Maybe
they're addicted to weed or they've got
a bad relationship with their mom and
these are the things they actually need
to solve and they're really
uncomfortable to solve. And so instead
you have somebody come along online and
say actually you know the reason you're
dissatisfied is not because of you know
your personal issues that I know nothing
about. It's because of this like grand
cosmic narrative going on where like
they're trying to cut your balls off and
what you need to do is go and retake it.
And like all good stories, like all
popular stories, it's invested with a
with a modicum of truth. Um, in that,
you know, they're
young men are sort of growing up in a
world that is
not allowing them the wiggle room to
express those natural um, parts of
themselves. And then it layers a bit of
shame on top of it with the the sort of
woke stuff.
>> Um, Mhm. and it becomes very like the
woke stuff is
very pervasive. It's sort of everywhere.
>> Um, and it's easy to internalize that
especially when you know we didn't have
sort of religious stories or anything
growing up. Most of us we just had
Hollywood movies and that's you know the
the morals of those stories are going to
be subject to all of the personal
preferences of the people that made the
movies and wrote them which might not be
reflective of what's actually best for
you. It might be reflective of what
would be more convenient for them. Maybe
it would be more convenient if you're a
little bit less loud and if you shut up
a little bit and if you just sat down at
your desk at school and didn't bother
the teacher. Like
>> it's convenient but often times not for
the person who the rule is aimed at.
>> Mhm. Um, so it's a weird blend of of
modicums of truth mixed with like
opportunism on the part of people who
recognize the insecurity in others that
they feel in themselves and then use it
to sort of create this
>> sort of circle jerk of
>> interesting sort of first mover
advantage of here is a point of pain
that I feel in myself. I can push that
button in other people too.
>> Mhm.
>> Yeah. Which Peterson says is the
definition of evil. Um, funnily enough,
like this
>> I've just made this connection as we
speak, but um the the reason you don't
think a lion is evil when it kills a
sheep is because it's not out there to
it. One, it doesn't know what it's doing
in a metacognitive sense. It's just
doing it. It doesn't know that it is
doing it. That's a human trait.
>> Um, and that backs into self-awareness.
You need to have one, you need to know
that you exist in order to know that you
know something. And the whole idea that
Peterson gives about the um the Adam and
Eve story is that it's like a revelation
of your own vulnerability. Um how easily
you are you are harmed and how easily
you're hurt and that it's that life is
going to include a lot of suffering. And
when you realize you're in that
position, aha, everyone else is in that
position too.
>> Mhm.
>> And I can [ __ ] with them now because I
know exactly I know what's going to
really hurt me. That means I know what's
also going to really hurt you. And it's
the utilization of that knowledge that
is like exclusive to humans that I've
heard Peterson
>> the theory of mind thing.
>> The theory of mind. Yeah. He points at
that as evil. So I think there is
something
um
yeah not very great about I don't think
it's it's often times done like fully
consciously. So it's I wouldn't point a
finger at it and call it evil.
>> Or is it the most people are motivated
by believing that they're doing the
right thing?
>> Yeah. Yeah. 100%. Um, and as well, you
know, if this is a if this is a a
mechanism of
sedation or anesthesia for this person,
they go, "Hey, I fixed it." Like all of
the guys that said your problems with
girls will be sorted if you just ask
them about the [ __ ] fight that
happened outside, neg them, take them to
three different locations on one night,
you know, like all of the PUA 101 stuff.
You go, "Well, yeah. I mean, like, it
did. It did. That is true. That is true.
Lots of guys do have problems with women
and this is a strategy that reliably
will like surface level fix what you
think is the problem. But the problem
wasn't the problem. The problem wasn't I
can't get laid. It's I don't feel
comfortable around women and I don't
have fun when I'm with girls. Yeah.
>> Like you're still not having fun.
>> Yeah. You're like goal oriented and
>> Yeah. Um,
all very profitable though and all very
catchy cuz like you I've been on the
receiving end of it as well when I was a
teenager. Like what like I think as most
guys are at this point, you kind of get
exposed to every potential solution to
the problems that you're currently
experiencing. Lots of them is the red
pill stuff. And it's super attractive.
>> It really is. it like sort of um there's
something about it that tends to
it tends to like point responsibility
away from you a little bit I find as
well. It's like um
obviously because like especially on the
ideological side that stuff is coming
out of people often times as a response
to certain pains. So, it's like
perfectly adapted to the type of pain
that young guys experience in the dating
world. Um, so it spreads super super
fast cuz of the network effect. Um, but
yeah, the that an idea convinces you
should not serve as evidence that it's
true, just that it's convincing.
>> Um,
so yeah, the red pill can be very
convincing, but it doesn't necessarily
mean it's the whole truth. It often is
true within like a certain if you like
are hyper selective about your context
and your frame. Um, and a lot of that
like selection is cherrypicking and it's
smuggled in in the subtext of stuff.
It's not explicit. It's often times
implicit like that the goal is just to
get laid. Like that's something that's
implicit in the pickup stuff. Um, but
lots of guys will come there with the
problem that the real problem and then
they're kind of like experiencing this
new way of looking at things that has
that implication that the goal is just
to get laid. That feels nice because it
divorces them from all of the other [ __ ]
they might have to do. And so they don't
>> I want to feel comfortable with a woman.
>> Yeah. I want to feel I want to have fun
with it. Um but by shifting the
goalposts in the implication in the like
implicitly shifting the goalposts you
can interact with that whole way of
thinking and start to feel really good
like there's an alleviation of pain
>> because you're not engaging with it
anymore the real thing.
>> Yeah. It's like you are solving
something but it's like a different
problem to what you set out to and you
haven't noticed that the problem is
switched. There's an interesting
uh positioning that happens I think with
a lot of guys advice which is it it has
the right amount of uh autonomy baked
into the solution just enough autonomy
baked into the solution to give you the
I am masculine man doing it on my own uh
justification because I don't think that
guys would go for the pure victimhood
narrative. That would feel too icky.
Yeah,
>> but also you can't go the level of
autonomy and you should look at yourself
in the mirror kind of stops at your
routine. It doesn't go to
>> you need to do therapy, dude. Or you
need to journal a lot. You need to work
out what the drive for your desperate
requirement for social validation like
where's that coming from? Oh, it's
because you don't feel good enough. And
that that is something that needs to be
unpacked slowly and and internally.
>> And going to the gym is going to make
you feel really great, but your problems
are still going to be waiting for you
when you get home.
>> And that doesn't mean you shouldn't go
to the gym, but you cannot confuse going
to the gym for doing the work that is
getting rid of the problems. And this
also means that a world where you just
work on your problems and don't go to
the gym is worse than one where you get
to do both. But you can't confuse the
thing which is frankly easier to do
>> for the one that includes the hard
thing. This is, you know, the emotions
piece trying to um live below the neck
as I call it. Uh
>> I like that.
>> Yeah. Um is has been a bit of an
obsession, but I understand as well that
it's made at least the show over the
last 12 months like a lot more fluffy.
Uh, you know, I've got kind of Homosian
seabbum sat on each shoulder and Alex is
saying, "Stop being such a [ __ ] Just
work harder. Don't care about your
emotions." And Chris is saying, "You
should start a family. Go lie in a
hammock. Go for a walk." And these two
things are. And I've definitely been
more sebum energy than I have Alex
energy this year. And I think Alex has
actually been more Sebum energy than he
has been Alex. The most recent
conversation we had was specifically
around this. He's like taking a more
holistic look at what's going on. And uh
I understand that that makes for a
fluffier and in many ways much less
sexy, much messier, you know, this the
sort of chat that we've had today.
There's hopefully something useful and
interesting in there, but it's not as
linear as, you know, get up on time, eat
your veggies, go to the gym, one gram
per pound of body weight, protein, like,
you know, it's not as linear as that.
And
>> that doesn't mean that it's in any way
more elevated, right? It it's it's it's
there's just as many layers of
obfiscation and cope and and need for um
protection from feeling things. But at
least it kind of accepts, all right, the
game is not just out there. And the game
is not just like out there as me, but
it's really [ __ ] turning it inward
and trying to feel trying to feel
feelings and trying to work out where
they come from and taking a pretty sort
of hard look, not just in the mirror,
but like in the sort of mirror of your
soul and thinking,
okay, I I look, this is an unteachable
lesson, right? I it a thousand episodes
of this podcast, move to America, do all
of the things for me to say fame won't
fix your self worth. Money isn't going
to like improve your happiness. You
don't love that girl. She's just hot and
difficult to get. You should see your
parents more. Don't work so hard. Like
all of these things, they are only, as
far as I can see, realizations you can
arrive at by completing them.
>> Like, you need to go through the video
game, get to the end, and go, "All
right, well, congratulations. that thing
that everyone clichedly said like with
[ __ ] religious revelation, I now get
why they said it. Like it's because it's
either one of two things, right? It's
either that is the truth or people who
get to the end of a particular game and
start proilitizing about how the game
wasn't the game and nobody else should
be playing it is part of some weird
secret society that all successful
people are a part of to like con the
peeons into not playing the game just to
keep all of the success for themselves.
Like why is it that people so reliably
get to the end of these sorts of games
and say it was good in some ways but
largely unfulfilling in others and there
was an area of me I thought it was going
to satisfy and it didn't and [ __ ] it's
still there and now I'm I'm going to
have to look at something else.
>> Like why do you think so many people
keep saying that? Why is that the place
that they go to?
>> I think it's how we're built. I really
do. I think that's that is what it is to
be a human is to be perpetually
dissatisfied. Um, and that that's just
the case. And it's not a nice case. It's
not like pleasant, but it is the case.
And um, and so it'll it'll always be
there. There will always be an element
of like,
[ __ ] I thought this was going to be
like sunshine and rainbows and, you
know, it has its moments, but ultimately
like no matter where I am, there I am,
I'm still I got to be with myself. Um,
and sometimes, right, sometimes it is
because people spend their entire lives
chasing the wrong thing and they get to
the end of it and they go, "Fuck, like
that was pointless." And those are the
people you hear you hear from cuz those
are the people who are rich and famous
cuz rich and famous is what you go for
when you're chasing something that
wasn't originally your plan.
>> Um, so you hear that message a lot.
partially is just like the selection
bias of that like um but you know you
hear people who are also happily married
and have beautiful families and they're
still kind of
>> dissatisfied
>> um because at the end of the day like
the floor feels like the [ __ ] floor.
My stomach hurts. I've got a bit of a
headache and like I've got to do stuff
today that I didn't I wouldn't choose to
do if I could do whatever I wanted.
That's like the human condition. And
like I think a good part of personal
growth is actually not like optimizing
so that you're like some bastion of
gratitude your whole life and going
about in this perfect zen flow state of
like everything's super enjoyable and
I'm and I'm getting gratitude but I'm
not like sort of uh falling back on my
motivation. Like I'm grateful and
motivated as if that's like a thing you
can do.
um and to reach this like sort of it's
like a picture you have in your head of
what could be possible to live and it's
a great thing to strive for cuz it will
make you do things and it will preoccupy
you. Um, but like at the end of the day,
there has to be some concession to the
general day-to-day human experience
because that is what your life is. Like
>> narratively, your your life gets defined
as like a few really important moments,
reaching a billion plays, like doing
this, doing that.
>> That's what you connect the dots at the
end cuz that's what you put on your one
page sheet that goes at your funeral to
explain what your life was. It's just
one page. My grandma died last year and
it struck me cuz
there was a
an explanation of her life and it was
one page and I remember being like
that's a whole life. This one's been on
the planet for decades and it's reduced
down to an A4 sheet
>> to literally. And I remember being like,
huh, [ __ ] And I was thinking to myself
like, is that all life is? Just like a
few important moments and everything
else is just fluff. And I was like, no,
it's the exact [ __ ] opposite of that.
It's that those few moments don't matter
that much. They matter to the ego. They
matter to the identity because they are
the proof that you are who you said you
are and all of that stuff. But like real
life is just dayto-day. and like your
relationship with the [ __ ] walls and
with the floor and with your own body
and your own the voice that's in your
head. That is where like if you're
talking about maximizing
uh general fulfillment in life like your
relationship with those things I think
is actually the only lever that really
matters cuz whether you get the big
thing or not like it will be a high and
then a low and then you b then you
baseline that's just like structurally
functionally what you are. It's not even
like a personality trait. It's just like
definitionally the case.
>> Um, and we we argue against that because
we want to believe in the utopia of like
400 virgins and bliss for the rest of
your life, but that doesn't happen. Um,
and that's not to say you can't be
deeply fulfilled in life. You can. It's
just that that fulfillment doesn't look
like bliss and excitement in perpetuity.
There was when I was playing around
eight years ago with I knew I wanted to
start the show, but I didn't know what
to call it.
>> And I had a short list of pretty bad
names. Uh, Brains and Brawn, one of
them. Glad that I didn't go for that.
And Modern Wisdom is the only time in my
entire copywriting marketing career,
which has lasted a very long time. had
to come up with names for club nights a
lot because they fail a lot which means
you permanently need to be reinventing
them.
>> Uh the only time I ever got divine
inspiration was Modern Wisdom and I woke
up at 3 in the morning and was like
that's the name. Wrote it down in my
phone so I didn't forget it and uh so
I've never looked back. But one of the
other names that was on the cutting room
floor that I didn't go for was Crushing
a Tuesday. Crushing a Tuesday comes from
Tim Ferrris. And even though I would
probably like because I'm all elevated
now and I say cross-legged um I would
call it enjoying a Tuesday or peaceful
on a Tuesday. His argument is basically
people optimized for peak experiences
but your life is made up of ordinary
Tuesday.
>> Right. Yeah.
>> And your goal should be that your
average Tuesday is just pretty good.
>> Mhm.
>> Right. Because your life is made up of
ordinary Tuesdays. And I think that
that's that's what you're talking
>> Yeah. That's exactly the same thing.
Yeah. Modern wisdom is perfect as well.
>> Thank you.
>> It's really good. It fills the exact
[ __ ] hole that is there today that
needs to be filled, which is how do you
be wise when the [ __ ] log has been
pulled out underneath us and there's no
like source material in a
>> mismatched environment. Yeah. Yeah. It's
uh I think that's fundamentally the
question a lot of people are asking
themselves because we're at this weird
we are a generation or you know a bunch
of generations that
have the curse of awareness of
holy [ __ ] a lot of the things that we
used to rely on that were comforting
stories maybe they're not quite so true
and we've got things that are phenomenal
uh contributors to our quality of I've
got the entire world's [ __ ] corpus of
human history now in a chatbot. There
you can talk to it. You're never going
to be lonely for the rest of your life.
>> Here in a driverless car, there was no
one in the driver's seat.
>> Yeah, the Whimos. Yeah, they're crazy.
Um, yeah, all of these things. And yet
at the same time, all of the stories and
all of the levels of comfort have gone
out of the window. This is one of the
great insights Alex Okconor taught me. I
think he actually taught me this in a
vlog, not in a on a podcast episode, but
he was stood in that lobby outside and
uh he was saying
the problem with the modern atheist
movement and the sort of rationalist
movement is that it is selling people on
statistics, data, and the scientific
method and telling them to get rid of
archetype, myth, and story. The issue is
the human brain finds archetype, myth,
and stories a thousand to one more
compelling than the numbers. So you're
telling people to dispense with the
thing that feels most real to them and
believe in the thing that feels most
fake.
>> And I think that that sense of I really
don't [ __ ] know how to operate. This
is a very novel, fastmoving world. And
all for all that humans are adaptable
creatures. We're adaptable on like
genetic time scales, right? We're not
adaptable and we we we're not bad,
right? You know, modern world, Wi-Fi
signals, we seem to be surviving. There
was a pandemic not long ago. Everyone
got through that kind of okay,
>> but like psychologically
it's a challenge for a lot of people.
And then when you layer on top the shame
of what was your line? Uh the majority
of your life is spent in relative
physical comfort, but psychologically
life feels anything but comfortable. How
could this be? you live at the high
point of human history and your biggest
question is whether or not life is worth
living. Um it's it's
[ __ ] true. And this
additional layer of I don't feel good
and I don't feel good that I don't feel
good. I don't have legitimacy in this
discontent and my melancholy feels
shameful.
>> Yeah.
>> You know.
>> Yeah. Like measuring your success
against your happiness is a shorefire
way to ensure that every moment of
unhappiness doesn't go unmultiplied.
Then you're not just unhappy, you're
also failing,
>> which is twice unhappy
>> because that's the metric of success.
And like the meaning thing is exactly
where we get the sense that life is
worth living. We don't really get it
from doing like a a [ __ ] moral
calculus of pleasure and pain and then
seeing which comes out more. Like if
there was 51% pleasure and 49% pain,
would that still be worth living if that
was the entire sort of story? Well, I
don't know. Like, so meaning and stuff
is definitely where we get that from.
And you can use a a myth to explain why
we are so confused on that front. Have
you heard of pro prostes?
>> No. So, Procrsties was an inkeeper in
Greek mythology that was like on a road
from Athens to somewhere else. And as
bandits walked, as people walked across,
there was lots of bandits. Um, but he
would offer people free accommodation.
So, people would come in and say, "Ah,
yeah, this is great. This is a long
road. I'm very tired and stuff." And
then, uh, they would lie down in his bed
except for if they were too short to fit
the bed, then he would stretch them to
so they fit it perfectly. And if they
were too long, he would chop off their
excess limbs so that they fit really
nice. So he was doing them a service,
you know, making sure that they fit
perfectly. Obviously, not a service.
This is really [ __ ] up. But it's a
it's often used to the the idea of a
procrustian bed is used to explain this
compulsion of humans to map messy
reality into arbitrary but neat straight
lines. Um, and so words always do this.
Like whenever you use a word, you're
invoking a category. and categories all
put like boundaries around certain
patterns and exclude context from
content. Um but by doing that you are
literally by adding any sort of category
and excluding the context from the
content. You are then no longer dealing
capable of dealing with contextual
questions. And the meaning of life is a
contextual question. So whenever you go
about like trying to answer what am I
doing this for in a way that you could
explain to somebody else you're like
trying to lift up water with a net and
being
>> Could you give me a modern example of
the procristian bed
>> bureaucracy is one there's like a
million cases where um people like have
to just like select an arbitrary like
like box ticking. They just they need to
check the boxes. And they were like
there was a story in David Greyber's
[ __ ] jobs about a guy that wanted to
move his computer from one room to the
other. And it in total it included like
four different companies, two moving
vans, uh like 20 pieces of paperwork or
something crazy like that because they
had to check the boxes that they moved
the computer in the right way cuz it was
a military computer
>> and he could have done it himself. And
it ended up paying like six people like
uh a few thousand because as it expanded
it was just like you needed someone to
verify the verifiers of the and so like
that can be a procrasty situation. You
often see it in science where people
have like a totalizing theory for a
messy reality and then instead of
adjusting their theory to map the
reality they adjust their perception of
reality to map the theory. And so
psychologists do this a lot. The first
psychologist I went to see did this with
me where she, you know, had the degrees
on the wall, but
she mapped my experience onto her
theories, which all told her to amplify
um uh and validate her her um patients,
which made me just sink deeper into, oh
yes, these are real problems. I do have
like a disease in my brain and it is
very real and everybody else needs to
accommodate them otherwise I'm going to
like drown and and it just got worse and
like um
I think yeah we are allergic to
messiness and
whenever reality is too messy or it's
messy in a way that we find distasteful
we'll try and like force it into a
proced of our own left hemisphere sort
of.
Yeah.
>> There's a idea from Gwinder Bogle called
the golden hammer. When someone usually
an intellectual who has gained a cultish
following for popularizing a concept
becomes so drunk with power he thinks he
can apply that concept to everything.
Every mention of this concept should be
accompanied by a picture of Nasim Talb.
Nasim Talib is the perfect one because
well there's a there's there's another
reason I think Nasim Talib's ideas span
such a wide variety of things is because
like if you read his books he's talking
about literature and then art and then
economics and trading and stuff but it's
because all of the insights like
anti-fragility and stuff like really
their insights about people and not
really about the thing at hand. And so
all you then need to do is map how this
thing that people do interacts in these
different things. And it seems like
you've got a new information about all
these different industries
simultaneously, but it's people that
you're really talking about.
>> Mhm. Dude, you're great. I'm really,
really impressed with what you're doing.
What can I do? What can I do for you? If
I was to give you a favor, you don't
need to choose it now, but you've got a
favor on the table from me. So, whatever
it is that you need, I'm happy to
facilitate.
>> Um, I don't know. Have me back on again.
I enjoyed it.
>> [ __ ] yeah. Where should people go to
keep up to date with what you
>> um so I'm on YouTube at Angelos Summers.
S O M E R S. Um and
uh yeah, that's the main thing. I've got
this like uh web app software thing I'm
coming up with to like wisdom tools. Um
that's the compass.
Um oh, and I have a newsletter I just
started called Navotes. It's on
Substack. And also if you go to angels
summers.com you can put your email in
and do it on kit. Um but yeah.
>> Okay. People should go and watch your
YouTube dude. You crush. Thank you.
Congratulations. You made it to the end
of a podcast episode. Even if you did
nothing else today. Imagine how amazing
that is. Anyway, Matthew McConnA waiting
for you right here. Go on. Press it.