The Next Phase of Enterprise AI Is About Experience | AppDevANGLE
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
The enterprise landscape is undergoing a rapid transformation driven by the shift from traditional AI models to autonomous agents, marking what experts describe as a revolution rather than an evolution. While 90% of organizations plan to adopt AI agents by the end of 2025, a critical gap has emerged regarding observability; many companies are deploying these powerful tools without real-time visibility into their performance. This lack of insight creates significant operational risks, as enterprises often wait hours to become aware of production issues, only to find that users have already abandoned the service. Unlike static software where functionality is deterministic and predictable, agents operate through dynamic conversations, making it impossible to rely on legacy monitoring tools designed for button-clicks and predefined workflows. Instead, businesses must now focus on understanding the semantic patterns of user interactions to ensure agents are delivering value in real time.
To address this challenge, a new framework centered on "Agent Experience" is essential, moving beyond simple quality of service metrics like uptime or basic task completion. The core argument presented is that success depends on measuring the sentiment and efficiency of the interaction itself, such as how quickly an agent understands user intent and how many conversational turns are required to reach a goal. This approach directly impacts both user satisfaction and operational costs, particularly regarding token consumption; inefficient agents that waste time or require excessive prompting not only frustrate users but also drive up expenses. By optimizing these experience metrics, companies can reduce unnecessary token usage while simultaneously improving the overall utility of their AI systems, ensuring that the promise of making consumers' lives easier is actually fulfilled rather than broken by poor performance.
The lessons from the streaming industry serve as a powerful parallel for this new agentic era, where market leaders like Disney and HBO succeeded because they prioritized high-quality user experiences over mere availability. In the world of AI agents, the same principle applies: if an agent fails to provide a seamless, efficient, and satisfying experience, users will leave regardless of the underlying technology's sophistication. As organizations increasingly rely on multi-agent collaboration for customer support, sales, and booking tasks, the ability to diagnose issues instantly and intervene before user frustration sets in becomes a primary competitive differentiator. Companies that fail to invest in real-time experience intelligence risk losing their market position to competitors who can offer streamlined, reliable interactions that build lasting relationships with their users.
Ultimately, the future of enterprise AI belongs to those who recognize that deploying an agent is only the first step; the true value lies in continuously monitoring and refining the experience it delivers. This requires a fundamental shift in mindset from viewing AI as a static product to treating it as a dynamic service that demands constant attention and optimization. Organizations must embrace this learning curve immediately, leveraging advanced analytics to uncover behavioral signals that traditional tools miss. By committing to an "AI-first" strategy that prioritizes real-time visibility into agent behavior, businesses can navigate the complexities of the agentic marketplace effectively. Those who act now to understand and enhance their agent experiences will be the ultimate winners in this rapidly evolving landscape, turning potential pitfalls into opportunities for growth and innovation.
Read the full video transcript
32% of enterprises take hours to become
aware of production problems. And that
was before AI agents started running
millions of concurrent sessions that no
human team could ever watch in real
time. My name is Paul Nashawaty, I'm the
practicing and principal analyst, and
this is the AppDev Angle. Today, I'm
joined by Keith from Conviva. Um this is
a company that it is a business of
real-time experience intelligence long
before AI observability became a
conference buzzword. Keith, I'm glad to
have you on the show. Great to be here.
What's What Why don't you tell us a
little bit about you and about the
company?
>> Great, thanks. Great to be here. Thanks
for making that for having me. Um so
first, me, I've been in technology about
35 years. And uh
super exciting because right now I think
is one of the most exciting times in my
35 years to be in technology with AI
coming on and now we're trending, cuz I
really believe it's not an evolution,
it's a revolution. So I think the
excitement, potential, the promise is
massive. And so it's a lot of fun to be
a part of it in the marketplace. And
that's really where Conviva sees our our
where we're going to play. And I think
we we play a big strategic part in that
is that we started the company 20 years
ago really around internet business
experience. That if you're going to put
up anything out on the internet, you're
going to put anything out in the digital
world, you need to measure it. Not just
measure the systems, but you have to
measure is it performing at the end
point the way I want to. And at that
that time we picked video
before the streaming market hit. And we
were measuring video quality and showing
video publishers that you need to
understand the video experience. Not
just whether it worked, it came on, but
really the things that the human eye can
see, resolution, pixelation, you know,
buffering
issues. So we were talking about
experience when it came to video because
you have to understand what the viewer
experience looks like for you to have a
successful video business. And now it's
replicating itself as this new agentic
future is starting to unfold as
companies are looking at using agents to
interface with employees or users and
using agents interface with consumers.
And again, it's the same fundamental
promise that you can get the agent to
work and it will come on and it will
answer questions. But the reality is as
a as a business owner, as a product
owner, you really have to understand
what is the users or the consumers
experience with my agent. It's it is not
enough to just understand the quality of
service. You have to understand the
quality of experience. So we're really
excited. We built very successful
business measuring every the largest
streaming apps in the world today. Still
big customers of ours. And now we're
excited because we're at the forefront
of this agentic marketplace and really
positioning a very unique and and what
we think is a differentiated agentic
strategy.
>> Okay, there's a lot to talk about here.
I mean this this I'm excited to have you
on. This is a real a really relevant
conversation, but it's also
you know, as we've been talking about in
our briefings and conversations, there's
a lot happening. A lot changes and
organizations need to understand what
their options are and what they can
actually do. So let's set the stage
here. When we look at this because the
numbers are telling a pretty clear
story. And in the last year's research,
we saw that 90% of organizations plan to
use AI agents by the end of 2025. And
79% of organizations anticipated
worldwide world spread AI adoption
within 3 years. And that is happening.
It's happening real time. It's going
now. But that massive wave is moving
very fast. It's raising immediate
operational question. Are agents doing
the work and who's watching the agents,
right? And that's something that we have
to think about here. But when when we
think about this, here's what makes the
the the moment interesting from an
analyst perspective, right? Enterprise
teams are not building
most of this themselves. 71% of
organizations are sourcing agentic AI
capabilities through platform vendors
and 68% engage at IT or consulting
service providers, while only 32% are
building agentic AI capabilities
primarily in-house. So, do you get a
situation where the you know, majority
of enterprises are deploying
agent-powered experiences through vendor
platforms, but the observability layer
and the ability to to actually see what
those agents are doing in the experience
they're creating this for the end user,
it's still a massive open question.
Right? So, when we look at Conviva and
what we're doing and you're filling the
gap, you talked about um you know, tying
these these insights. You have a
sophisticated multi-agent pipeline in in
the in the world. It's a it's a from
what I can understand. Um you know,
you're doing things that a lot of
vendors are not doing. Um when and
you're solving problems that people are
doing, but
when you look at this, what can you
know, you you see from the experience of
producing in real time, um if you're not
seeing it real time, you're really
flying blind. And that's not just a
philosophical concern, that's a live
operational risk that's already showing
up in in high-stakes and production
environments. So, Keith, question I have
for you. When I I want to start with,
you know, the current state. Where
things are happening. Real-time
observability is no longer a future
problem. It's happening right now. We
see it at World Cup ski, right? Um
Yeah, so what are your thoughts here?
>> That's a great That is a great starting
point because I think the World Cup
we're doing the World Cup right now for
20 different broadcasters and 20
different streamers right now. We're
almost 30 million daily peak concurrents
that we're managing as we speak. So, we
understand large-scale deployments of
any technology into a business or into
the marketplace. And you touched on it.
The real-time nature is absolutely
critical. Anybody that deploys an agent
for any purpose, by the way, the goal
should be that you have a real-time
connection to how it's doing what you
think it's supposed to do. It's not a
mature technology. And reality is as you
mentioned, it's coming up fast and it's
not an if, it's a when. There's no
question now.
But it's still immature, no matter when
you pick your time that you're going to
do it. Whether you use someone else's
agentic framework, you buy an agent from
someone else, or you build your own, it
doesn't matter. The key is that that
agent is going to be talking to either
your employees, your users, or your
consumers. And if you don't know what
that is doing to those constituents, you
could be in real trouble. And and and
that's why we said in video, you need
real-time analytics. You can't find out
tomorrow that you have a video quality
problem because people will just leave
or people will stop you know using your
service. And it's the same with agentic.
No matter where or how you're deploying
an agent, you have to have a real-time,
not sample, but a real-time full census
ability to see what's happening. Is it
doing what I think it's supposed to do?
And then beyond the fact that it's
working,
are people happy with it? Because you
know, measuring an agent outcome is just
one small piece of the puzzle.
It could frustrate people that get to an
outcome, which means they're never
coming back. So, it's not sufficient to
just say it worked and it got people to
an outcome. That's not good anymore. You
need to see as it's happening, what is
the sentiment of my users with my agent?
If it starts to fall, you don't wait for
them to leave. You need to intervene
immediately and understand what are the
things I can do. Whether it's a
third-party agent that you're using or
or your own, you need to be able to
diagnose and make changes as it's
happening because that's your business.
That's your users. So, regardless of
where you got the agent from, the impact
is yours. So, you should have the
real-time visibility and control to see
is it doing what I'm planning it to do
or that I anticipated it to do or is it
affecting my business in a negative way?
>> And and when we look at this, right?
This is actually a really important
point here. Why are traditional models
not working? Like if you're using
traditional setups in like, you know,
I've been doing this the way it's been
working and we're analyzing the data. I
know that you can say that automation
and the scale is going is an issue, but
it's more than that. Would you Would you
agree?
>> Yes, absolutely. And and by the way,
there's a big difference between models
and agents. All All the models are the
big you know Death They They have all
have everything. That's where everything
operates. But enterprises, product
teams, businesses should not be
operating at a model level because now
you're talking about a global update, a
global intelligence update. Anything you
share, everybody gets access to. And in
particular, the models update much, much
slower. They're great general purpose.
They're great general intelligence,
general AI capabilities, but the real
tuning and the real enterprise value
will come from Agentyc. Meaning that I
build something that automates my
workflow. I build something that talks
to my consumers. I build something that
calls my data sources separate from the
model. So, that's a big distinction here
is that anyone who's looking at using
AI, and I hear people say, "Oh, AI."
Okay, that's like a category. The key
is, do you understand how agents work?
Do you
Do you understand what you need from an
Agentyc perspective? Because the world
will not operate on models. That's
That's not where the majority of the
business will be. It will not be where
the majority of the automation comes
from. A majority of the market and the
world will be agents. And that's why
Marc Benioff Salesforce said, "The
future is about agents. There will be
more agents than people in the world in
the future." So, that's a that's where
we believe you should instill the
intelligence. It's where you should have
the real-time visibility. And that's
really where you should be betting on
the right outcomes and building the
right experiences to the right outcomes
to either your product or your or for
your business.
>> So, let's let's talk about that a little
bit more because I think if we look at
this, you talked about future, you
talked about the next generation, you
talked about the wave of things
happening. Um, you know, agents are
generating behavioral signals that
really existing tools were never
designed to capture uh these signals,
right? So, I I kind of asked that
question of in the in the lines of
we know what the heritage tools can do.
But that's that's a point in time,
right? And that's not the right
approach. These signals that are coming
out, that Let's talk a little bit about
that because what you are doing is
interesting and and it adds a lot more
value to uh to the delivery, right? It
it adds value to the insights of what's
happening. And you know, you shared with
me this this five-pillar model. I think
that is kind of an important thing to
kind of go through. I let's let's look
at that a little bit.
>> Absolutely. Now, so you touched on a
word that really really matters here,
which is patterns. You know, we we are
investing heavily in pattern creation,
not funnel steps or journeys, right?
Fundamentally, agents are not software.
So, that's something people have to
understand. Agents are not software. And
the biggest distinction between an agent
and a piece of software is software is
very deterministic. Buttons are put in
places that people do things, and when
you click that button, something
specific happens. And you build your
software in very specific pieces, and
everything is in front of you. So,
there's nothing dynamic. There's nothing
that, you know, isn't prescribed or
pre-built. In the agentic world, all
that goes away. It's now a conversation.
So, everything becomes dynamic. You can
no longer have a deterministic path. You
can't have a deterministic, you know,
event. You have to unpack a conversation
and convert that to a pattern. I have to
understand when when you're having a
dialogue with an agent, what was your
intent? What were you trying to get
done? What were you asking? What was the
topics that mattered to you? Those are
all semantics layer that you have to
unpack from the conversation, and then
you have to create a pattern. What is
the behavior pattern that I engaged an
agent? And all of those things are
completely unpredictable and very
dynamic. So, that's the first thing is
that as as we move into measuring agents
or as if you're starting to really
understand what you want the agent how
you want the agent to work, the first
thing is that you can no longer operate
from the old tool sets.
They're all done. They're all in the
past. Those are all deterministic
software steps that are built into old
capabilities. Now, you have to move into
a world of very flexible dynamic
semantics unpacking and creating
patterns so that I can understand what
people were trying to do, not from
whether they clicked a button or not,
but because they used a specific word or
they or they ask for a very specific
question.
Those are the things that now matter in
a gentic and and and that's where we
really invest in those things called
patterns and that's the difference
between how you should look at an agent
versus looking at software. It's a
completely new design, new architecture,
and new fundamental technology
requirement that old tool companies
cannot do.
And so we're excited about this ability
to unpack these conversation patterns
and really show you how the agent is
performing.
>> Yeah, and I think it's important to
understand that across the you know, if
you look across the full agent journey,
we see that two-thirds of enterprise AI
leaders are already implementing a
multi-agent collaboration and live pilot
workflows. So, this is not theoretical
or hypothetical. This is a problem that
we we are we need to have those signals,
understand those signals, and then move.
But like when we also talked through
this,
um
it's it's about active and growing um
now with these agents and and not
waiting until, you know, you have a
fully baked, fully deployed solution.
Knowing what those signals are providing
and then acting on that. Um I think I
think that's more strategic and versus
being tactical or, you know, not being
reactive. Would you agree?
>> I absolutely. I I that's what I said. I
think really understanding first how
agents work it's a new it's a new
paradigm completely. And then
understanding, okay, now what what do I
need from my tool sets cuz now old tools
don't work anymore. And understanding
what's available and and asking yourself
entirely new questions. That That again,
if you looked at old tool sets and you
tried to jam an agent into the old tool
sets, first of all, it wouldn't work,
but second, you would be missing out on
so much intelligence.
And that's where we really define it as
agent experience because there are so
many things, for example, one of the
biggest issues hitting a gentic today in
AI is token consumption.
Everybody knows it's a problem and
everybody's seen the value and the
benefit of this rapid, you know,
deployment of AI, the automation of
processes, of workflows, and and reaping
benefits, by the way. So, even here at
Conviva, we've committed to being an
AI-first company. We have massive
benefits in our productivity and
acceleration of product development.
But, then all of a sudden I got the
bill. And you realize, "Oh my gosh, in 1
year I became a million-dollar customer
with Anthropic, a multi-million-dollar
customer with Anthropic, using Claude."
So, now everybody's deploying agents,
but the problem with that is there's
tokens on the back end. And so, now
everyone's like, "Wow, I launched this
thing and it's and I think it's working
and maybe it's not uh you know,
optimized." But, the one thing that's
definitely not optimized is your token
consumption. So, if your agent is
wasting time, if it's asking questions
multiple times, or it's frustrating
consumers, not only are you losing a
user or a consumer, you're spending
money on tokens. So, experience is
actually a way cuz again, QoS means it
just happened. It it worked. So, zero
token consumption versus token
consumption. That's QoS. See, experience
is where you can start optimizing
consumption. If I can make the
experience more efficient, and I can cut
down the time it takes an agent to
understand the intent, for example.
However many back and forth it took,
that you can cut that down, not only are
you improving the experience, which is
by the way an experience measurement,
right? Time it took to acquire intent is
an experience, not a QoS thing,
you're you're creating a better
experience, while at the same time
reducing your token consumption. So,
we're you know, we we we fundamentally
believe that once you get past the agent
work, which is where the market is today
in a very big way, we can show you that,
the immediate thing you have to
understand is I can start seeing things
like how long it took the agent to do
something specific.
And can I optimize that? And can I make
it better? Again, back in the old days,
there was no need for that cuz the
product was predetermined, it was
pre-built. So, there really is no need
to say, "Well, can I make it shorter?"
Like, it's just can I get consumers to
click buttons faster? Now,
if you can get your agent to respond to
a consumer faster or user faster and
start to move through the intent to, you
know, outcome more efficiently, you're
creating a great experience in which
people are going to want to come back
and they're going to use your agent, but
you're also reducing token consumption
at the same time.
>> Yeah, but Keith, here's here's where I
think it's, you know, we have to kind of
double-click down on agent experience is
about to become the primary competitive
surface for consumer and enterprise
brands, right? It's It's It really is
about the focus, but yet most companies
are shipping customer-facing agents with
zero visibility into experience, and
those agents are actually that they're
actually creating. So, they don't know
what's happening, right? Customer
support agents, sales agents, booking
agents, they're all live right now, but
they don't have those those that
customer uh or that agent experience
that you're talking about. And our data
shows that 51% of organizations rely on
public AI tools such as ChatGPT and and
and Copilot, while 20% report
enterprise-wide AI deployments on, you
know, they're built on governed
frameworks. So,
the agent experience, it's it's a
competitive advantage if you know what
you're looking for, right?
>> Yes, and I and I this is where the
parallels to the old the streaming
market come into play. And you go back
and you look at all of the successful
streamers built TV quality experiences
online. And the head of HBO when we
started our partnership said, "If you're
going to build a TV business online, you
better build a TV quality experience
first, because people expect TV quality
experience." It's the same with Ajanity
is
it will be a competitive differentiator
for sure. People ask me the other day,
"What is Conviva's mission?" And I said,
"Our mission is to fulfill the promise
of Ajanity to make consumers' lives
easier." I I I I would love a world in
which I can just talk to my device and
it would do things for me. I would walk
in my home and and speak to my home and
it would just do things for me. If I
needed to get something done online, I
just tell my computer and it goes and
does it for me. That's an efficient
world. But that means the experience is
good. That means that I'm not clicking
and and typing and trying to understand
and asking three times and it's coming
back with the wrong stuff and I have to
re-prompt it.
That That That's not fulfilling the
promise of Ajanity to make consumers'
lives easier. So, we We take it
seriously that experience is the
competitive differentiator for
businesses to build lasting consumer or
user relationships. And the fact that
their agents so streamlined, it's so
efficient, it's so good at getting me to
the outcome I wanted, I'm going to come
back all the time. Versus if you don't,
you're going to fail. And that's where
if you go look back at the streaming
market, it was the same thing. People
would have launching video products. And
if you didn't look at experience, you
failed because you didn't understand
consumers didn't like the product you
were pushing out. They may have clicked
play, but they left. It's the same thing
here. The successful streamers knew the
Disney's, the NBC's, the Paramount's of
the world knew experience HBO knew
experience mattered and they won. It's
the same in AgentSync. If you're not
thinking experience, you will fail
because you're going to lose to those
that have a better consumer experience
that consumers enjoy dealing with your
agent versus
frustrated.
>> Yeah, Keith,
it's incredibly important that you know,
you were you're talking about here. Your
your heritage and experience
on the streaming market is just
absolutely applying to the AgentSync AI
world. This is this is super important.
The audience needs to understand that
it's more than just deploying and what
you know, what setting up it's one and
done. It's actually about that that
experience. So So Keith, if people want
to learn more, the listeners here want
to learn more about what you do and what
can be can be as doing, where should
they go to learn more about what we're
talking about because this is new to a
lot of people.
>> Yes, no, it's coming on fast and I would
encourage everyone to lean in. Learn as
much as you possibly can cuz that's why
I call it a revolution, not an
evolution. And and and those that will
win in anything, whether it's your your
job, whether it's a company, whether
it's your business, those that commit to
leveraging AI in AgentSync faster will
be the ultimate winners. So it's a
learning curve no matter when you start,
so start now. You can come to our
website canbiva.ai. We have a LinkedIn
profile on a LinkedIn profile and then a
lot of different social media, YouTube,
we have a YouTube channel which we
publish a a of videos. Our website we
publish a lot of of blogs. But or or or
get to me on LinkedIn. I'm happy to have
any conversations around anyone who's
considering this. And one of the things
we've already seen as companies launch
these agents into the wild. And what are
the the gotchas and the things that you
need to be aware of so that you have a
successful AI or agentic launch if
because not launching is is not an
option.
>> Well, Keith, thank you for your
insights. And this has really been great
having you on the podcast today. I think
the audience will get a lot out of this
discussion. You know, it's definitely
something that's top of the ROI on their
AI invest. Well, thank you for being on.
>> Thanks for having me. This was a lot of
fun. I appreciate it.
>> Absolutely. And a big thank you to all
of you who have tuned in. We do
appreciate you being part of the Active
Angle community. But for now, that wraps
up this episode. And we'll be back next
Wednesday with another conversation
diving into the tools, trends, and
talent shaping the future of application
development. So whether you're deploying
at the edge, building with AI, or
modernizing your cloud stack, we've got
you covered. Be sure to follow us on
social if you have any thoughts,
questions, or just want to connect.
Until next time, stay curious and stay
building.