Video summary
John Rao, founder of New Voters, highlights a critical disconnect between the sheer size of Generation Z and Alpha populations and their significant underrepresentation in American political discourse. Drawing from his own experience feeling powerless during the 2016 election at age sixteen, he established an organization that now operates across over one thousand high schools to foster civic agency through voter registration and leadership development. While panelists like Troy Stevenson House, Sonia, and Mayapus express hope for direct community engagement despite often viewing politics as confusing or filled with broken promises, researchers Oscar Pocas and Dustin Wall present data indicating that low youth participation stems not from apathy but from structural barriers within the current electoral system.
The core issue identified is a winner-take-all system that entrenches two major parties, creates safe districts that discourage competition, and allows incumbents to hold power indefinitely, which fosters complacency among older politicians while excluding young voices who lack funds or experience. To address this, experts advocate for proportional representation as a solution capable of breaking the two-party loop by enabling multi-member districts with diverse candidates and reducing reliance on voting for the "lesser of two evils." This reform would allow parties to field varied platforms reflecting local values rather than enforcing national homogeneity, thereby creating fluidity and competition that better represents constituents who increasingly disidentify with traditional party labels.
Beyond electoral mechanics, the discussion explores practical reforms such as same-day voter registration, which is deemed more effective for mobile young people than mandatory voting or ineffective term limits alone. The role of media is also scrutinized, noting how social media algorithms often reinforce ideological echo chambers while long-form content can either polarize or educate depending on usage; however, strategies like consuming opposing viewpoints through specific podcasts demonstrate potential paths to reducing polarization. Ultimately, the panel concludes that generational tensions arise not from the people themselves but from systemic structures and norms around power consolidation, suggesting that initiatives connecting cultural institutions with local communities offer a more viable path forward than focusing solely on federal politics in Washington.
Read the full video transcript
Hello everybody and welcome to our
today's panel. It is such an honor to be
here to talk about the next generation
of voters. My name is John Rao and I am
the president and founder of New Voters.
But I'm going to take you back in time 9
years to start off our [snorts] panel
today to when I was 16, the same age as
the panelists that you're going to be
hearing from. And when I was 16, I felt
helpless. I was 16 when the 2016
election happened and obviously too
young to vote. And I remember sitting on
my couch in the suburbs of Philadelphia,
Chester County, famously purple area
where they zoom in on the maps and
watching colors on the map and numbers
on the screen and knowing that I was not
a part of them. I remember going into
school the next day and seeing my
friends on both sides of the aisle
across every political spectrum identity
you can imagine in the suburbs of
Philadelphia and everyone was walking
around in a days like zombies. And I
remember going up to people who I
thought would be happy with the results
of the election and the resounding
opinion from everybody, Republican,
Democrat, anarchist, purple people
leaders was, you know, this was the most
talked about event of our entire lives.
And it felt like we had absolutely no
say.
And that felt fundamentally unfair. the
decisions being made back then in 2016
and still to this day impact my
generation Gen Z and Gen Alpha and and
you know whatever is below that I don't
know um more than anybody else
and these decisions are made without our
say. So, I started New Voters as a high
school club at my high school in Berwin,
Pennsylvania to register my senior class
to vote. And in 3 days, we registered
85% of our senior class to vote. And
that was the first time I ever felt
something happen as a result of
something that I did.
And it is that agency and that belief
that the world is not just happening to
you, but you're happening to the world
that makes young people engage in our
democratic system and in civic
engagement beyond, you know, voting,
registering their peers to vote, and
hopefully running for office.
I through New Voters Now have been
leading it for the past nine years
full-time for the last three since
graduating from college. And we're in
over a thousand high schools across the
country in over 42 states. And this
year, we piloted our first year-long
fellowship called the New Voters 250
fellowship. And through this fellowship,
I have met some of the most incredible
students I have ever met in my life who
each have already had those experiences
of doing something that they see change
the lives of the people in their
community.
And the question that's on everybody's
mind, the reason we're all here today is
why are these decisions, why are these
young people who make up one of the
largest generations in our country, in
fact, 4 million students graduate from
high school every year, and almost every
single one of them are eligible to vote.
And in fact, if 18-year-olds alone voted
the same rate as baby boomers, they
would be the deciding voice in almost
every contested election in the country.
Why, if they make up such a huge portion
of our potential electorate, do they
remain so underrepresented in our
politics? And perhaps even more
importantly, what would it take to
change that? So today, we're going to
hear from researchers who spent years
studying the structural barriers that
shape political participation and
representation. And we'll also hear
directly, if you remember, I said those
incredible New Voters 250 students,
three of them are here today on the
call. and you will hear from them
directly about how they are organizing
in their communities every day. We
provide them with personal mentors to
run nonpartisan voter registration
drives, but also address issues in their
communities that they identify. We'll
talk about what young people want from
our political system, where they feel
heard, where they don't, and explore
ideas for how our democracy could better
reflect the people it serves. We'll also
have time for questions, so please be
thinking about what you'd like to ask as
we go. With that, I'd love to have each
of our panelists briefly introduce
themselves. and I'm going to turn it
over to them. Thank you all for being
here today and supporting our newest
voters and these students who aren't
even old enough to vote themselves and
creating so much change in their
communities.
Okay, I'll start. My name is Troy
Stevenson House and I'm a New Voters 250
fellow. I go to Columbia High School in
Maplewood, New Jersey. And so obviously
through New Voters I've run a voter
registration drive, but my civic
engagement project, which is the thing
that John was referring to that we all
do with a mentor, um is focused on
empowering teens to be more to have
better media literacy through engaging
skits and comedy that people will laugh
at and learn from.
>> Yeah, I'm happy to go next. Thank you,
Troy. Um my name is Sonia. I am a rising
senior in Carolton, Texas, which is a
suburb of Dallas. Um my project is about
encouraging or closing the gap rather in
civic literacy through early
intervention. So we facilitate these
civic education lessons run by high
school volunteers in this two-prong
strategy at daycarees and ESD programs.
So, not only do these high school
volunteers develop their leadership
skills and their passion for civics, you
also have elementary school students
find that passion as well from learning
from high school mentors.
Hi, I am Mayapus. I am the last student.
Um, I live in Birmingham, Alabama. And
my project is a podcast started by me
and my friend Olivia Self. And it's all
about addressing voter miseducation in
Alabama. So, it's me and Olivia talking
directly to candidates running for
elections in Alabama. And it started
with our local elections, but now we are
addressing elections that are covering
the US Senate and gubanatorial races in
my state.
>> Awesome. I'll introduce myself now. My
name is Oscar Pocas. I'm a senior uh
research analyst at New America where I
do research on electoral systems,
different ways of voting [clears throat]
and how what electoral systems have to
do with the representation or under
reppresentation of different groups. One
of which is young people in American
politics and together with Dustin who
can introduce himself after me. Uh we've
written on the age divide showing how
the US is particularly doing a terrible
job at getting young people to
participate and one of the things we
keep arguing about is it's not about the
lack of energy. It's not that young
people are apathetic. Um but the system
sometimes creates huge barriers for the
participation of young people. So very
excited to talk with the new voters who
are here and also talk a bit about our
research on alternative electoral
systems and what they have to do with
young people.
And I'm Dustin Wall. I'm the executive
director of Fix Our House. um where we
advocate for proportional representation
as a reform to break uh the US out of
its two-party doom loop uh and make
Congress better equipped to pass
legislation and and uh work for the
American people. Um, like Oscar said,
uh, we, you know, we at Fixer House, uh,
work on a number of different projects,
but, uh, one of, uh, one of the things
we did recently with, um, with Oscar and
the folks at New America is this age
divide report that we'll talk a little
bit more about, uh, there.
All right, so let's get started with the
conversation. And first, I think we're
all super excited to hear about the
young people who are here. uh which I
don't know if that includes me anymore
now that I'm in my late 30s. Um but
yeah, I would love to hear first uh from
May, Troy, and Sonia. Just get a sense
of how do you feel about pol like when
you hear the word politics today? What
do you what do you feel? Do you feel
despair? Do you feel hope? Um is it
frustrating? Or yeah, what comes to mind
when when you start hearing about
politics?
Um, I guess I can go ahead first. I
would say
the word that comes to mind when I hear
about politics, um, I don't know if you
guys have heard of this word or not, but
it's called rage bait. Um, and yeah, so
the idea is that I think a lot of young
people when they kind of see politics,
they just see something or they see a
system that's now designed intentionally
to create kind of outreach as the
primary motivation behind, you know,
voting in elections, right? like
irrespective of how where you stand on
the political spectrum, it feels like
politics is all kind of about you know
hating the opposing side or hating this
facet of a platform or just this kind of
like being driven not out of like
curiosity for you know the better future
um but for sort of like or you know like
positive implications of policy like oh
this policy would be really interesting
or oh like we should totally do you know
this health care system it's more about
like oh I don't like you know this thing
about you this or I don't like this
group of people. And so in consequence,
I think that's where you get a lot of
that apathy from because I feel like
some people like a lot of us aren't
inclined to really hate the certain
aspects of the other side. And it's hard
to kind of find where you stand from if
your whole politics is defined by, you
know, rage bait and hate when it's an
intentionally exhausting system that I
think people would rather just choose
not to engage with than engage with. So
yeah, I would say that's what I think of
when I think of politics. As fun as it
is for me, I know it's not for others.
>> Yeah. May and Troy, do you feel
something similar?
>> Yeah. I mean, my initial reaction
actually is pretty helpful because I
think that politics is kind of the one
thing that affects everybody's life the
most. So, it is um when I think about
politics, I kind of think about all the
change I could be making and it kind of
gets me hopeful. But as I've gotten into
politics more and as the more I've
realized it has been a very confusing
paradox for me cuz I feel often like
everybody is agreeing that like whatever
side you're on like this is a good idea
and like we want to help these people
and then the people that are
representing me just kind of go around
and do the opposite. So it's like it's
confusing and it makes me kind of want
to get into politics because I'm like
well like the solution is so clear like
we just do this but like nobody can seem
to agree on that. So, I kind of have
hope in that way, but it's also very
frustrating at the current moment, I
would say.
>> Um, yeah, I to be honest, when I heard
the question, I was like, I should have
been a little more angry. But I
definitely also had a hopeful vision.
Like when I think about politics, I
think about like sitting on old people's
porches and talking to them about
democracy because I recently did like a
canvasing event where um that was aimed
at not just getting people to vote for
somebody, but surveying people's
opinions about democracy and the future
of our country. And I had an experience
where I talked to or I was just walking
by somewhere and like this woman like
her house isn't on our list so we
weren't going to go but I was like I
really want to talk to her. And so I
talked to her and I sit down on her
porch and she's like oh she invites us
to sit on her porch and she's like I
don't speak English and I'm like pulling
up my phone translating the questions
into Creole and like trying to like
break out my French one skills and it
was just a mess. But honestly, like I
had a great time. And so, like, when I
think about politics, I think about
people because I think it's so easy,
especially for young people to get so
wrapped up in politics. I think it's so
sensationalized to us. But at the end of
the day, politics is just supposed to be
something that makes life politics and
government is supposed to be something
that makes life life easier and life
more enjoyable. And so, [snorts] I I
think about just the important
conversations that we have with one
another and the bridges that we build.
when I think about politics.
>> Yeah, that's really great to hear
because often times we hear of how like
politics, you know, it's something for
old people, you know, it's something
that's dominated by so many older
people. Um, and there are very few
avenues for younger people to get
involved with at least with traditional
electoral politics, but are you finding
that there are like other than just like
voting or like get out the vote
activities, what are like other avenues
that you find for participating in
politics or for making yourself heard?
Um, mate, maybe you can tell us a bit
about the podcast and how how that like
fits in with like asking questions or
like making your voice heard out there.
>> 100%. So, me and Olivia actually started
the podcast so that we could give young
people like us the drive and the passion
that we have about learning about these
things so that these people could um get
involved. Uh, a lot of what we've
learned through the podcast is that
these people are super accessible. The
people that are representing us, like we
just send them an email and they reach
out to us and they want to talk to us.
So, it is empowering in that way that we
can look these people in the eye and ask
them about the promises that they've
that they've been giving to voters and
are they going to stand on those and
what's their plan for addressing this
issue. So, it is incredible in that way
to see young people holding um their
elected officials accountable even if
they aren't necessarily the people
representing them that we could kind of
be the liaison between the community and
these elected officials in that way
where we can ask the questions that are
on everybody's mind and we can put that
information out to voters so they can
see who they're really voting for.
Sonia, what about you with your project
uh on civic education? Um have you found
that it's is it different like when you
go to like like a
space that's not about like winning an
election or the campaign? How does that
feel like?
>> Yes, 100%. I think like you know I think
Troy and May touched on why politics can
be enjoyable and how like there's an
ideal version of politics. Um and so
that reminded me specifically of this
time I went to this daycare. It was run
by a military veteran and it was about
to be closed soon. And so a lot of the
kids there were more of like, you know,
quiet, older. It was kind of like a
smaller daycare. Um, and so me and my
friends gave her a lesson and then one
of the activities that we have is to
have the kids do a kind of like mock
bill. So they wrote their own little
legislative proposals and then they kind
of pull them out of a hat and then vote
to pass or fail them and then they come
up and like say their thoughts on it.
And so one of the proposals was um if
you litter, you get beheaded. And it
sounds like pretty crazy, right? But
surprisingly, I see that there's like a
genuine passion for these topics and
that they're able to come up with kind
of actual arguments and engage in kind
of like a policy debate. Obviously, we
had to change the bill so that you don't
get beheaded or it was like you get to
you have to pay like $10 or pay your
candy or something. But I think that
what's cool about policy specifically
and what I've seen like whenever I teach
these civic education lessons is that
kids learn how to engage with it through
the things that they're actually
interested. So you'll see kids who are
interested in like art, they'll be, you
know, drawing out their congressional
maps and they'll be like, "Oh, we should
set up a new museum here." You'll see
kids that are, you know, interested in
like technology be like, "We should
develop this like cool new AI system." I
think that that kind of passion is a way
that I've learned to engage with it. So
really through legislative advocacy is
kind of like what I've picked up from
these kids and what I do in my own time.
And I'd say that is one way that I find
a way to engage in politics beyond just
you know like voting or even like
canvasing and like get out the vote
efforts. I think that like at its truest
form, politics is about advocating for
you know what you care about or trying
to get what you care about um you know
is that to become reality and so I think
that legislative advocacy or you know
engaging with politicians on the policy
level is one way to do that.
>> Yeah. And Troy, I'm curious. Um, in your
projects, like do you get that people
your age feel that voting is important
or where they tell you like, well, but
these people don't represent me? Um,
yeah. What are some of these
conversations you have about whether
like voting makes a difference or
whether like people you're voting for
actually care about you as a young
person? Um, yeah, I'm just curious to
hear more about that.
Yeah. So, my project is more about media
literacy, but I've definitely seen this
theme of indifference among kids. And I
think that a lot of the time it can be
it's sort of hard to talk about how
media shapes people's participation in
politics when people aren't interested
in politics altogether. And I think that
was really something that I thought was
the norm until I went to um we did a we
recently had our summit in um June and
that was when like I went to work with
all the other fellows and we sort of
workshopped our projects and we got
advice on our voter registration drives.
But that's kind of what gave me the
inspiration to make um media literacy
more skits based and more fun. So what I
do is because um me and a lot of my
friends like to act is that we like put
on like performances that get people
really into how media impacts politics
and how they want to vote and how and
the neuroscience behind it as well. And
I think like breaking down those
concepts and like doing workshops with
kids has been really instrumental to my
understanding of where people are at
because I think that older people have
this idea that it's it's sometimes good,
but I think sometimes it can be a little
condescending that young people are just
these like indifferent people that are
so frustrated and we need to come save
them. Like we have this like savior
complex when it comes to young people.
But I really have found that that isn't
the case in doing workshops. And so and
especially being at the new voter
summit, like I think that it's I I do
think that there are constructive um
discussions that can be had about why
young people are disengaged and whatnot,
but I also think that sometimes it's
about being in the right place at the
right time.
>> Yeah. And this is just for everyone, but
so what do you think, you know, there's
so much talk about the frustration of
young people with politics and how young
people are not under represented.
Why do you think that is? Uh is it
because May you said before that people
go and do something different from what
they said they would do when they're
campaigning? Uh is it the parties that
are not representing? like do you not
see yourself like represented in a
party? Um or is it like hard to see like
policy change coming from voting? Um
yeah, I'm curious to hear what you think
is wrong with American democracy right
now
and that's a big question. So for anyone
>> I guess yeah I can jump in here. So, I
will say that I think one of the big
factors behind why we don't necessarily
see um younger people represented in
politics is sort of the it's my turn
kind of vibe that you get or like when
you're climbing up the political ladder.
Um you often times see that young people
get dismissed as, you know, not having
enough experience. And then another
thing that you see is there's a lot of
politicians that um will cling on to
their, you know, political power. And so
they'll stay in office for a really
really really really long time. And so
this is a two-pronged effect where at
first it's like young people who could
be taking on those roles just never get
the experience. Um and then on the other
hand, it's, you know, people who stay in
those positions of power increasingly
get out of touch with the younger base.
And that creates kind of a ripple effect
where you're not expressing policies
that actually affect the younger base
that's going to inherit you know the the
you know the effects of the policies.
And so that puts off younger people from
politics altogether. So I'd say it's
sort of that two-pronged effect where
you know you see that number one young
people aren't being allowed into the
spaces anyway and then the consequences
of young people not being allowed into
the spaces just drives them away
further. But I think that's the main
problem I'm seeing. But it's through,
you know, networks and solitary that
I've seen with like, you know, new
voters and, you know, even meeting
friends like, you know, Troy and May
here that I think people find that
motivation to, you know, keep going and
keep pushing irrespective of those
failures. So I feel like that's, you
know, one solution. But I'd say the main
problem is simply kind of the mindset
that politics is about, you know, it's
my turn or that like you have to climb
up this ladder.
I say I would totally agree with
everything you say and I think you
brought up a great point of just trying
to like consolidate power like the
parties you know I feel like the biggest
criticism with younger candidates is
that they don't have enough experience
yet it's not their turn like you were
saying so the parties will kind of
choose you know an older institutional
candidate and um work their way you know
down as those candidate gets older then
they get that power and what I'm kind of
seeing especially in the new voter
summit when I see all of these amazing
projects from all of these young people
is that even though young people aren't
represented in government, they're still
working in kind of a grassroots capacity
and in their communities to address
issues there, even if they're not
represented on the national level. So
that is kind of hopeful, but is very
confusing to me how a generation so in
involved could be so under reppresented.
>> Yeah, I definitely feel what May is
saying as well. Like I think being
around people, there are certain like
grassroots organizations and things that
young people can do, but I do think that
like especially as high schoolers, our
power is very limited, but I think young
people in general are more restricted
because of how much money is in politics
and campaigns and like the money that it
costs to run a campaign. And it's just
something that a lot of like young
people like coming out of college or
coming out of graduate school just like
don't have the like don't have the money
for. And I also think that like you sort
of have to have a reputation before like
and I think there's just such a big um
there's such a big like presence of like
corporate dollars in politics and I
think that a lot of older candidates are
maybe more willing to take that money
and are more like prolific in taking it
and I also think that I just think it's
it's been made like very it's been made
a very like hostile place for emerging
young politicians and then I als I also
think that there is a complacency that
comes with sort of secure districts or
just having your position for a long
time. It's I personally believe that a
public servant should have to work to
keep their job. And I think that should
just be the nature of public service.
And so I'm going to like make a
reference because I hope you guys know
the like Dallas Cowboys cheerleader
show, but it's something that I've been
addicted to for a long time. And one of
the things that coaches always say is
like if this girl doesn't get this like
kick right, like if she's too
complacent, we're just going to cut her
and like somebody new is going to come
in. And I think that's like the attitude
that we need to have with American
politics because I just think if your
kicks are are not high enough, you just
got to go. and there's a new young
person that is just as smart, just as
qualified, and maybe just needs the
money or the grassroots organizing and
support to like get off the ground and
like serve the people.
>> Yeah, definitely. I think that resonates
a lot with the research we've done as
well. Um, so I think yeah, Dustin, why
don't you tell us a little bit about
this? Because I think a lot of the
things Troy, May, and Sonia were saying
were things we were exploring in our
report, like the amount of money that it
takes to run for office, the lack of
support. You know, if you if you want to
run for office, there's very little
support, the lack of competition as
well, or just like incumbents holding on
to their seats for a long time. Uh, so
yeah, why don't you give us a bit some
of your take on on this? Totally. Yeah.
No, I'm feeling a little embarrassed
actually that I think Oscar and I took
us like a long time to to write that
report and I think it took this panel
like 20 minutes or something to to come
to a lot of the same conclusions. Um,
yeah. I mean, I I I guess it's worth
starting by by just saying one of the
top findings of the report, and we kind
of knew we would find this, that's why
we set out to write it, but uh it's that
America has an enormous age gap between
our elected members of Congress and
those that they represent. And it's
bigger than any other comparable
democracy, way bigger than any other
comparable country. Um, and it's it's
larger. It's a larger gap uh than it's
than it's ever been in American history.
Uh and that's not even particularly that
close either. Um and the gap is growing.
Uh so it's not like like others have
said, it's not that it's sort of the
fault of young people for not being
engaged. Um it's not even necessarily
the fault of older [snorts] people for
being too stubborn. It's structural
problems that uh that lead to this. Um
and so uh that's what um some of y'all
have been identifying. Um you know young
people we also found you participate in
politics
less at sort of every level every higher
level of participation. So voting uh but
also volunteering uh because they aren't
retired and have free time to to
volunteer um uh you know donating
because they don't have as many
financial resources and then of course
running for office uh uh they you are
are able and empowered to participate
even less. Um and one of the core
reasons for that is the electoral system
that we use in the United States. this
winner take all election system for
Congress um that cements the two-party
system in place and that's behind so
many of the uh structural barriers in
our politics that keep young people
locked out that keep the two party
system locked in that make uh that make
u most congressional races in this
country uncompetitive between the two
parties. uh like something like 80 to
90% of congressional districts are safe
for one party or the other. They're not
competitive. Um so that means I think I
I want to say Troy, you were mentioning
this earlier that uh districts are
secure. And so that means that uh you
know if if you're the incumbent in that
district, you don't have to worry too
much about a challenge um from from
young people from young people or from
anyone uh because your district is safe
and and uh um that's not a good system.
Uh it's it's exacerbating all of these
problems. Um and uh and and you know we
point to proportional representation in
the report as uh as an ultimate solution
to uh to fixing these problems. Just
simply put, a proportional
representation system is one where a
party's share of uh the vote directly
determines its share of seats. Um and so
you'd be electing Congress a little bit
differently. There's different ways to
do it, but um the the uh one of the
upshots is it it makes it possible for
fracturing within the two-party system.
It makes it possible for more parties
than just two to compete. Uh it makes it
possible for um competition to happen
everywhere across the country, for
conservatives to have representation in
liberal areas and progressives and
liberals to have representation in
conservative areas. Um, and this would
allow a fluidity in our politics that's
currently really cemented uh in place
that would make it more possible for
young people to be able to start their
own party. Um, young people to be able
to uh participate more directly in
politics because you wouldn't uh have to
face the same kind of threshold and
barriers that you do in our current
winner take all system. And we see in
countries across the world that use
proportional system, they have uh by far
um younger congresses um that are more
reflective of the people they represent.
So um that's what our report found and
like I said, it's really in alignment
with a lot of um what y'all are finding
out there. So uh it does make me feel
hopeful that um that uh people are not
um not getting too discouraged by the
system as it exists. And and you know,
we think there's some real chance to to
change the system, especially as we get
u younger people participating more and
and growing older and and uh you know
getting involved in the process
themselves.
>> Yeah, definitely. And I think one
important thing there is how just having
more electoral competition would make
parties
um healthier and like you know they'd be
more interested in actually you know
they have to win an election. It's not
enough to not be the other party that
they actually have to run and be a lot
of good candidates and because they can
run multiple candidates. They don't have
to put all their eggs in, you know, one
kind of like generic type of candidate
that would appeal to everyone, but they
can on the party list have a young
candidate, you know, candidates from
different groups that can appeal to
different voting voting groups within a
district. Um, I'm curious, um, May,
Troy, and Sonia, like what do you think
about some of these like big electoral
reforms,
um, that some people propose like
changing like the way that the elections
are held or like having multiple members
or in a district instead of only one?
Um, is that something that seems like is
it like confusing or is it like
exciting? I don't know.
I mean, I can start because y'all have
like got my heart racing because I love
talking about this. I'll give you a
brief history of Alabama. You'll never
guess how Alabama votes every single
time. It's not a surprise to anyone. And
that's um [clears throat] a lot of the
reasons why I started the podcast is
because we were a supermajority
Democratic state until one election
cycle. And after that election cycle,
we're super majority Republican. And
we've stayed that way since, you know,
today. And that's a lot of reason
because of straight ticket voting,
because of voters not knowing who
[clears throat] like the candidates are,
but really just knowing like, oh, I'm
this party, I'm not that party, I'm I'm
going to mark Republican at the top of
my ticket. I'm going to vote every
single candidate Republican. And I mean,
that's who gets the seats because I live
in Alabama. And so I started the podcast
so that people could know more about
these candidates beyond just the party
and know actually who they are. But um
proportional representation, I mean like
we've had lots of um stuff in the news
lately about gerrymandering. And I mean
at this point the the people that are
voting are not being represented in a
big way. I mean I live in Birmingham,
Alabama. That is a blue city and a red
state and we are just not getting the
representation that we are voting for
because of these congressional districts
and because of this winner takes all
system. So I think proportional
representation is definitely a very
exciting idea for me for me to feel
represented in my own state.
>> Yeah, I'll pipe in cuz I'm from Texas so
we had the same problem with the
gerrymandering. We kind of started it.
So uh sorry guys. Um I think for me
especially um I live in a suburb of a
very very blue city, right? So this
suburb specifically is split to where
the Dallas County portion of the city is
blue and then the Denton County portion
of the suburban city is strictly red.
And it's crazy because as soon as you
cross this boundary, people who just
like live right here, they may vote, you
know, Democratic, but they just lose all
their representation because of the
winner takes all system, right? Like you
got like a couple of Republican voters
that live all the way like up here in
the county. they can just vote straight
to get down the ballot and then these
people who live down here in the county
just get no representation. I think for
me specifically, one of the things that
I like most is multimember
districtricting or multimembers within a
district because I do think that it
allows not only just for um proportional
representation and like you know, hey,
at least you know, we have us people
like down here in this part of the
county have like, you know, more dem
democratic representation, but I also
think it allows for more diversity in
political opinion and political thought,
right? like a Democrat from, you know,
New Jersey or New York is not going to
be the same as a conservative Democrat
who's representing probably where I'm
from. And I think that's important
because it allows for not just that
representation of, you know, democratic
values, but it allows for more specific
representation of what policies that you
actually want to see change. So, for
example, because you don't just have to
be tied to the national party fully. Um,
and like they said, you have more
freedom in how you want to run your
campaigns. you can have more independent
candidates propping up. You can have
like more Democrats who may represent
your values because I know like for us
like with James Tarico um who's like
there's a lot of criticism of him being
like a Austin Democrat which I don't
personally see but like the the
sentiments there of like we may have
these kind of one things but we don't
want to be represented by the same kind
of person and the same kind of
ideologies even if we belong to the same
political party. So, I think that's what
excites me most about multi-member
districtricting. And I'm also in favor
of rank choice voting. Um, I know we
didn't bring this one up fully, but that
one is one that I really like. But yeah.
>> Yeah. I was actually just thinking about
rank choice voting like but um since
everyone I guess gave like a history
lesson about their state, I will talk
about New Jerseyy's county line system
that I like learned about recently. And
basically what it was is that like the
county leaders were endorsing people
that they wanted to win an election and
they would be on this side of the ballot
and then there would just be like a
whole like two row gap and then you have
the other people that haven't been
endorsed and are maybe newer candidates.
And so it just created this what we've
been talking about this whole session is
just this stagnation of who's actually
um being a candidate and who's looking
like they're a candidate on the ballot.
And it was really destructive, I think,
to democracy in New Jersey. And
actually, at the New Voters 250 summit,
I met um Yell Bramberg, who was a
litigator on that case, and she was
like, in her words, she made them eat
dirt when it came to the county line.
So, that was exciting. And I just think
that just to add on to what May and
Sonia were saying, it's just that I am
totally in favor of rank choice voting
and of um proportional representation
because I just think that we need to
sort of get rid of this comfort that
politicians have like I was referencing
earlier like I know that was kind of a
joke to the DCC's but like I do really
believe that when we have complacent
politicians it just it just puts us in a
place that is not productive. no matter
how you look at it from whatever party
standpoint. And I think a lot of people
I'm like I talked to adults I think it's
always frustrating to talk to an adult
and hear that they're not going to vote.
But so I talked to a lot of adults that
weren't going to vote and they I think a
lot of people mention the um lesser of
two evils and they're like lesser of two
evils, lesser of two evils and just it's
this whole thing and then you're like so
why aren't you at the rank choice voting
like meeting? Why aren't you like there?
I just feel like we always talk about
the lesser of two evils, but then we
like who set that system up? Because we
keep on coming back to this, we keep on
coming back to this system and it's like
if you guys don't want the lesser of two
evils, then you should support rank
choice voting. If you guys don't want
the lesser of two evils, then maybe less
you should support um proportional
representation. I just think that there
needs to sort of be not an overhaul, but
there needs to be like a a big change
when it comes to that if people want to
stop having those conversations of who
is who is like better but still bad.
>> Yeah. Yeah. That's super interesting to
hear. And so before we go into the Q&A,
we have a lot of really good questions
from the audience, but I wanted to ask
you guys if if you were to run for
office, would you start your own party?
Would you run within a party? Um,
I'm curious like what would be your your
platform as well?
And the world's there's no limit to this
just like
I guess the easier question for like
would you want to run for office?
I mean, going off of what I said before
about politics kind of being the thing
that affects everyone's lives, it is um
it is super attractive to me to run for
office and to become that representation
for people, especially when I feel so
discouraged about like, hey, whoa,
there's a clear answer to this. Like, we
could be helping people and we're just
like doing the opposite. Um, like
obviously for me it feels like, yeah,
why don't I just run and, you know, do
the things that I think are right. Um,
I mean, I would love for a system that
allows for me to be more than Democrat
or Republican because I think a lot of
youth these days are um just kind of
disassociating with either of those
titles. Just feeling like, oh, both
sides are bad, so I'm going to be
neither. And that kind of helps no one
because like if the moderates are
leaving the party, it's just further
polarization between the two sides
making them, you know, like super
extreme either way. And then there's
people just like abstaining because they
don't want like to be one of the two
evils. Um, so I love everything that
y'all are saying about um, just kind of
party divisions and making space for
like variations between what people
think. And I hope that's a system that
we have when I would be um, at the age
to run for office so that I could be
more than a Democrat or Republican.
>> Wait, Sonia, what about you guys?
I also I will say yeah I also feel that
inclination to run for office um for
especially because I am like a policy
junkie and I care a lot about like
researching policy and stuff. Um and so
I do feel that need to like or that
inclination or inkling to like you know
run for office yourself and then you
know try and lobby for those policies
yourself and have the power to actually
um try and like affect that change. I
will say though I would probably run on
the Democratic ticket as the that's
where my values do personally align but
I would say like like May I do think
that there's kind of like I have my a
lot of criticisms of the Democratic
party as it stands and so I do think
that me personally or I would be fine
with running on their ticket but I think
a lot of people with the kind of
ideologies that I have that are
generally um more economically
progressive or more like socially
progressive on certain issues um might
find themselves that they'd rather be in
kind of like a more independent lane
because you don't want to get your
aspirations bogged down by kind of a
ticket that or people from areas that
aren't necessarily representative of
your experiences, right? Like I from
Texas am not going to have naturally the
same political opinions as someone from
New York and California. But you do see
that those two states dominate whatever
like policies that Democrats tend to
adopt in their national platform. Um,
and so I think I personally, um, to
answer your question about where I would
be when it comes to like whether I run
run on my own party or not, I would
personally run on the Democratic ticket
and I personally would have a lot of
like um, in terms of actual platform,
I'd probably run on enforcing accountab
accountability and campaign finance
reform as that's something I'm really
passionate about. I also do enjoy um
kind of regulating big tech industries
and policies that kind of encourage
smart technology innovation um and
investing in public education.
Yeah, I would say that like Sonia, I
would probably run on the Democrat
ticket, but I don't think that being
part of a party necessarily means that
you have to like swear your allegiance
to a party and like defend to the death
everybody from that party because I just
feel like that's kind of where we might
be at right now. But I think like even
running as a Democrat, I would criticize
other Democrat. I definitely criticize
other Democrats and I criticize
Republicans and criticize everyone that
is not sort of representing their
constituents. I feel like when you're a
politician like your loyalty should be
to your constituents or to the people
Yeah. to the people you represent. So I
feel like in terms of a platform like
Sonia was mentioning I definitely agree
on sort of reforming big tech and um
like the just the threat of sort of AI
data centers is something that's very um
on my mind right now especially living
in New Jersey where it's potentially
become a reality for us. And I also
think um climate change is something
that I would be really strong on. I
think that we have the potential to have
so much more green infrastructure and so
I would probably run on that as well.
>> Awesome. Well, now turning to some of
the questions from the audience. I'll
I'll start first with some of the
technical ones. Um, and Dustin feel free
to jump in here. Uh so there's a
question of whether term limits would
help that we talked a lot in our report
and I think one of the things we found
was that not necessarily because it
seems like people are starting to run
for office quite later in life. So even
among the primary candidates like most
candidates are in their 50s or 60s. So
it seems like a lot of the older
politicians would be replaced by
soon to be [clears throat] old
politicians as well. Um but Dustin, what
are other reforms out there that could
help for um either young people to run
for office or participate more in
politics?
>> It's it's true. Um it's a it's a really
good question first of all, but it's
true that um terms of members in
Congress are actually getting shorter.
Um so it's not that uh politicians are
getting elected and staying in office
forever. That's sort of like the common
narrative about it. And we do have a
couple examples of like really old
politicians who have been around
forever, you know. Um, but that's not as
common. Like you said, a lot of them are
are getting elected when they're when
they're older. Um, and and I think, you
know, we certainly don't come down uh uh
against experience, per se. That's not
that's not what we would argue against
that like you you sort of shouldn't have
older politicians getting elected and
that you shouldn't have people who have
even served for a really long time. Uh
you just want Congress to look like the
people and right now it doesn't. It's
it's really heavily skewed towards older
people against younger people. Um so a
reform like age limits um would would
probably make a lot more sense than term
limits in tackling this problem. saying
that for you know maybe maybe the the
age of 76 for you know for 1776 maybe
that's the cutoff age for serving in
Congress or or or something like that uh
to prevent these you know u uh
situations where you have someone
serving who's maybe uh maybe not fully
equipped to do so. Um uh I think that's
a that's a serious proposal that you're
seeing more people talk about a lot
more. Uh but yeah, term limits probably
wouldn't be that useful for tackling
this problem. Some ways could make it
actually worse. Um but you know, we we
come down hard on on uh on the side of
proportional representation, but reforms
to money and politics uh have been
mentioned several times here, and that
obviously is a is a huge one that would
um that if we can if we can do something
there to uh to change the incentive
structure for running for office,
that'll be really positive. you'll never
be able to truly get money out of
politics. Um because uh money is how
people value things and uh uh and
politics is very valuable. But uh
there's there's certainly reforms that
that that we could do uh to um to change
the incentive structure in a positive
way.
>> Right. And part of the question is also
asking here whether things like
mandatory voting would help. And I think
one of the maybe not mandatory voting,
but one of the most successful reforms
out there for for getting young people
to vote is same day voter registration
just because young people move for
college or move for different jobs. Uh
so just being making it easier for young
people to vote um and like day of
registration could help a lot. Um
there's one question here on the role of
media and how media influences
um your politics. So I'm curious um Troy
on in May like what do you think of the
role that media plays here?
>> Yes, this is actually exactly what my
project is about is about media's impact
on people's political attitudes. And I
could like yap about the psychology
behind why like media is so pervasive in
our personal views, but I think the gist
of it is and people will agree just
based on their own experience. It's just
that everything that we consume sort of
imprints on us. And so when you are on
social media and one of the terms that
gets thrown around is ideological echo
chamber, which is when um your algorithm
shows you more of what you like. So you
won't be exposed to new viewpoints. And
so I think that the way just I mean I
guess there's just been this theme of
stagnation but like media will really
have you believing the same thing
because it thinks oh this person will
keep watching if they are shown more of
what they like and they'll click off if
they're shown more of what they don't
like because we don't like new things in
general people which isn't that's just I
guess how the world works. But I do
think that um in terms of short form
media that's the case. But also um long
form media I think has become so
polarizing even the news. And I just
think we see this like this us versus
them narrative where it's like that
Sonia was talking about earlier where
it's like always me versus you. How can
like I get a leg up? How can I um do
this and do that and inflict harm onto
somebody else or ruin somebody else's
agenda? And I think that it's just
become sort of media has become such a
huge part of politics, especially like
as like we're now in a digital age and
we see AI and we see like AI generated
videos becoming a problem. But I do
think that overall if people like it's
something that I think takes agency from
people. And so that's why I think that
like as individuals we should just be
really careful with what we believe just
because of what we've seen online.
Yeah, and I wanted to jump in here
because when Troy was talking about um
how not just short form media, but long
form was impacted, I was reminded a
little bit of how his project uses
media, but specifically comedy. And that
reminded me that I think that although
we kind of see media as like this doom
and gloom for politics, right? Like oh
my gosh, like it's just an echo chamber.
Like we're seeing everything is so
polarized. I do think that there are
avenues of media that have personally
kind of shaped the trajectory of my
politics by exposing me to things that I
would have not heard. And that's what I
see with movies and TV and film. Um, and
so like for example, right, I don't know
why I was watching South Park when I was
in 8th grade, but I watched South Park
when I was in eighth grade. And I
initially was like very
like I I didn't have kind of like the
political views that I have now in terms
of kind of like rejecting sort of what's
been told to me by what I should believe
or kind of like more typical like
establishment viewpoints, right? But I
think that the streak of independence
that I saw from South Park of kind of
being able to freely criticize both
parties, right? I kind of like you know
picked up on that and I was receptive to
those criticisms because you know it
made me laugh and it related to me on a
personal level. I think likewise I think
a lot of people are able to find those
experiences with media with you know
some of the movies that they've watched
or the TV shows that they've watched
right like I know with Superman people
saw kind of a lot more of like relations
to kind of like the immigrant experience
with the Superman movie. I know the
Odyssey also has like its own
undertones. Um, and so I think that in
that sense, media can be a good tool
like in terms of shaping who you are as
in political um, and the political
positions that you have and exposing you
to new viewpoints. Um, and it's a shame
that short form and long form content
has been ruined, but I think that
political like movies and TVs kind of
show the way that we can reform short
and long form content. Um, but yeah,
that's my two cents.
Yeah, I mean I've definitely had a
similar experience to both of you. I've
definitely experienced the ideological
echo chamber. I mean my for you page
looks um a certain way. It's like mostly
left leaning and then I get like uh like
a mega TikTok. I'm like whoa, I'm in the
wrong place, you know, like scroll past
that. And I kind of it does kind of make
me feel more extreme in my views because
it's like oh all these other people
agree like obviously we're right because
all these people are agreeing. I did
want to shout out um someone that I met
at the New Voters 250 retreat, Nina
Harris, and she had this um like this
podcast, this listening group that's
called Unfortunately Not a Soapbox, or
you can correct me if I got that name
wrong, but she and um one of her peers,
they purposefully listen to um like
right-wing MAGA content to kind of
understand the um the strategies that
they're using to get their viewers um to
believe this certain ideology and the
kind of things that they're saying. And
so that is interesting to me and that's
kind of going off what you said Sonia
about how media can be used to
understand these different perspectives
if you're super conscientious about it
and um purposefully trying to integrate
different perspectives. So I definitely
can see how media can be used both ways
to kind of polarize and to kind of help
us understand each other.
Well, we're unfortunately uh running up
on time for the questions, but uh I
wanted to thank the audience for the
questions. this for some really engaging
uh it made for a really engaging
conversation. And before handing it over
to Alex, I just wanted to say you guys
are so eloquent and I'm so excited to
see uh where your projects go, what you
do next, and you've been able to say so
many of the things that we say in the
report in such a dry language and just
like in such an eloquent way. So, um
yeah, I'm really excited to see what you
guys what you guys do next. and I'll
hand it over to Alex who will do the
closer remarks for the event.
>> Thank you so much Oscar. Um well hello
everyone. I like all of you have had the
pleasure of being a fly on the wall for
this incredible panel conversation. Uh
and I know I've had lots of little like
light bulb moments um throughout this
entire conversation. And I also got my
start doing voter engagement work in
high school and did not speak eloquently
at all [laughter] about any of this. So,
so major props to May Troy and Sonia.
Um, but my name is Alex Edgar. I am uh
23 years old and the co-founder of a
national initiative called Youth 250 uh
which has been focused over the past two
and a half years on elevating young
people's leadership and voices in
preparation for the US 250th which we
are now already in and really the the
goal that kind of launched this
initiative was the idea that I think
really came out very strongly from this
panel conversation. It's that actually
the problem fundamentally with our
country is not the people. It is the
systems and structures that prevent
every person, not just young, not just
old, every American from accessing our
country, our democracy, um, and all of
the, you know, incredible opportunities
that exist here. Um so UT50 for us we
focused primarily on cultural
institutions, government agencies,
nonprofits and others um to help them
understand how do you tell the American
story in a way that connects with a
younger audience uh and really designed
250th initiatives that would engage
young people in the story of our
country's founding. Um and I saw so much
of that in our conversation today. A
couple of the things that like really I
think like jumped out at me um in
particular was kind of like the
conversation about the vibes of our
democracy versus like the reality of the
political system. I love Sonia you
bringing up rage baiting as so much of
how our politics is done today. Uh, and
the effect of May, I think you pointed
out the idea of it's like this confusing
paradox of like they're kind of doing
things for you and they also are like
yelling at you all the time. And then as
Troy said, there's a savior complex and
it's kind of just like this big mess
that as I think all of you pointed out
like it our generation decides to
disengage from the traditional political
structure. That doesn't mean they're not
engaging in their communities of course.
Um, but they see this as kind of like
the, you know, ball of chaos over in DC.
And then it's like, well, I love my
local community and like I love giving
back and engaging with my local
community. And I think the New Voters
250 fellows were a great example of
that. Young people care a lot about
what's going on locally and are trying
to get their peers engaged. Um, and I
think the the last thing I'll share kind
of in closing thoughts on this wonderful
panel, um, is the idea of the
generational tensions. Uh, and if I
could leave everyone who's listening,
um, regardless of where you're coming in
from, whether you are a family member,
community member, you are someone who
runs an institution or works at an
institution. um to really take this
conversation today as an invitation to
all of us to think through where there
are opportunities to improve, to shift,
to change the systems and institutions
that we currently are a part of um to be
more accessible to all people. I think
the uh you know so uh kind of correctly
called out by Dustin, the idea of it's
not the youngs or the old's faults, it's
the structure. Um and I think really to
um for all of us in our own communities
to think through where where are those
kind of norms as I Sonia May and Troy
all pointed out so much of our current
generational uh distrust and politics is
based on on norms uh and the idea of
needing to wait your turn the desire to
consolidate power um a and to really
feel more repres represented. Uh, and I
see this as an opportunity both this
panel but also the great work that Oscar
and Dustin are doing um and their
incredible report the age divide and the
great work that the new voters team is
doing all over the country to invite us
all to look at our own organizations and
see where change is possible to make it
more accessible. So on behalf of the New
America team, New Voters uh and myself
want to thank you all so much for coming
and joining us for this panel
conversation. Um, and be on the lookout
for a follow-up email with more
resources and information uh, and
reporting of this panel.
Take care, everyone.