Video summary
The podcast opens with a rapid-fire overview of current global and domestic events, including Andrew Cuomo's acquittal in New York City, which is framed by the host as part of a larger "blue wave" that signals deep ideological shifts toward policies he views as economically catastrophic. The speaker draws parallels between this political momentum and disastrous economic decisions, using Steve Jobs' decision to sell Apple stock during his cancer diagnosis—a move fueled by carbohydrates—as an analogy for how well-intentioned but fundamentally flawed actions can accelerate a decline. He argues that the current trajectory favors the wealthy in the short term while punishing everyone else through inflation and asset concentration, noting that only about 10% of Americans own assets, with a tiny fraction controlling the vast majority. The host expresses concern over Mayor Adams' victory speech and his association with figures like George Soros, suggesting these alliances prioritize ideological goals over economic reality, potentially leading to increased crime and social decay in New York similar to conditions seen in the Bronx during previous eras of rent control. The discussion shifts to the mechanics of government dysfunction, highlighted by a record-breaking federal shutdown that has left air traffic controllers unpaid for weeks and caused TSA agents at Houston airports to walk off the job. The host criticizes both parties for irresponsible spending habits but specifically targets deficit spending as the root cause of economic instability. He proposes "dead hand switches" in legislation—automatic budget cuts if the government shuts down beyond a certain number of days—as a necessary mechanism to force fiscal responsibility and prevent future standoffs. While acknowledging that politicians are often entertainers who rely on charisma rather than spreadsheets, he emphasizes that their private motivations differ from public presentations, leading them to manipulate narratives for power rather than addressing structural economic issues like the need for a thriving middle class. Further exploring the intersection of technology and society, the conversation covers recent breakthroughs in brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), such as nano-scale implants powered by light that have successfully recorded activity in awake mice for over a year without wires or batteries. The host notes that while these technologies are currently reserved for medical emergencies like quadriplegia or ALS to restore mobility and virtual reality experiences, widespread augmentation of healthy humans is likely 10 to 15 years away due to safety concerns regarding brain surgery. He predicts that as the technology matures over the next two decades, it will become a transformative tool available to younger generations, fundamentally altering human cognition and interaction with the physical world before AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) fully reshapes society in just a few short years. The episode concludes by examining international developments, including Tommy Robinson's acquittal on terrorism charges in the UK, which the host celebrates as a victory against politically motivated prosecutions that targeted individuals based on their views rather than criminal evidence. He contrasts this with domestic fears regarding geopolitical expansionism and authoritarian tendencies, referencing historical figures like Hitler to illustrate how leaders can manipulate populations through strongman rhetoric while claiming benevolent intentions for national security or economic dominance. Ultimately, the speaker maintains a skeptical outlook on current political trajectories, warning that without balancing budgets and empowering individual agency against self-serving impulses, society risks repeating cycles of violence and failure driven by policies designed to make things "free" at the expense of long-term stability.
Read the full video transcript
Mondani is now the mayor of New York. I
guess they're going to have to learn
once again how economies work. A UPS
plane still full of fuel crashes during
takeoff leaving a mile-long fire. Tommy
Robinson has been acquitted in the UK of
terrorism. The government shutdown is
now the longest in US history and TSA
Houston walked off the job and brain
computer interfaces have now reached
sci-fi levels. The world is about to get
very weird. All right, we got to talk
about it. If you're a Democrat, you're
on top of the moon today. They have
>> that that's true. Are you going to talk
about Mondani? Yeah, we're we're
starting with Mondani, but they the
government the governor of Virginia is
now a Democrat, the governor of New
Jersey is now a Democrat, Prop 50 in
California passed, and of course Mondani
won NYC. So, it was a blue wave that
kind of happened.
I have his
a portion of his victory speech up here.
What are your initial thoughts though of
Mondani taking the W? So, I'm a little
bit surprised that it it made me feel
some type of way. So, I don't usually
navigate life by a whole lot of
feelings. It's like where are we trying
to end up?
So, that caused me to pause. I don't
trust my emotions. So, but I felt very
negative. I felt very sad for
the direction of America.
I do think that Mondani in New York is
indicative of something larger
happening. And so, if I feel about
Mondani the same way that I feel about
Gary's economics where it's like you've
got the your finger on the right problem
and the answer is so catastrophic and
will accelerate this. It's like how I
felt when Steve Jobs was like, I have
pancreatic cancer and so I'm going to do
just like apple juice.
And it's like bro, that that is going to
make things worse. You're feeding a
tumor which survives on carbohydrates.
You're feeding it a steady diet of guess
what? Carbohydrates. So, Uh, it it's one
of those where when you don't understand
the fundamental cause and effect of
things, you can make the most like
egregious, obvious own goals.
And that's what we're about to see. So,
uh, the great irony of all this is I
want the same outcome they purport to
want. Now, I think that Mum Donny is
only understandable when you think of
him as somebody who despises the
wealthy, not as somebody who actually
wants to help the poor. Once you think
of him that way, then things are going
to make sense. You understand how we
could look at the world and see just
failure after failure after failure of
these policies
uh, and still want to do it. But, they
really do punish the rich as well. Uh,
so it beats everybody up. And that is
wild to me. And dude, sometimes really
when I'm writing the deep dives, I think
about you and I'm like
I never needed to be aware of all this
stuff, but Drew just wouldn't let it go.
He had to have me every week write these
deep dives. And they're they're
phenomenal for the channel. But, it is
uh, boy, oh boy, are they hard. Because
as you get into the
the meat and potatoes of the economy and
how it works. So, first of all, I've
said this many times, but uh, as the
island of your knowledge grows, so grows
the shore of your ignorance. So, you
come into contact with more and more
things that you don't know. And so, you
begin realizing, wow, like I really
thought I understood this stuff and then
you start encountering more and you
realize there's a whole lot more
complexity to this. But, so far none of
the complexity that I've encountered
makes me go, oh, I was fundamentally
wrong about something. You just see how
it like spreads even farther and farther
and farther. Uh, and so it just so
happened I mean,
none of this is an accident. We
obviously zone in on the things that are
really um, meaningful in culture at the
moment. But, I was writing about
basically the markets are about to crash
like 2 days before the market crashes.
So, um, Um, it seeing all of that,
seeing all the interconnectedness,
seeing that what everybody should be
focused on is getting a thriving middle
class, and then watching us do all the
things that like literally
mechanistically
from a physics perspective, you just go
"Oh, the things that are being pushed by
Mumford and are the exact opposite of
things that could even possibly work."
And that is there's something about the
Cassandra complex of knowing the future
but no one will listen to you that is
devastating. So, it's my favorite Greek
myth. I am convinced it was a parent
trying, you know, somebody writing it
was trying to explain to parents what
it's like.
>> Mhm. And basically you've lived through
it, so you know what the future is going
to be, and so you try to explain to the
other person this is going to be the
future. So, the actual myth goes like
this. Chick has an affair with a god.
Gods never like that, so they punish her
and they say you're going to know the
future but no one will believe you.
And so she runs around trying to tell
everybody if you do that this terrible
thing is going to happen. They won't
believe her, so they still do the thing
and the terrible thing happens. And she
knew it was going to come and the curse
is that people will not listen. That is
exactly how I feel about New York.
And I'm sure every parent feels that way
about their kid knowing, "Hey, like I've
done those things and it's absolutely
grueling to your heart and that's going
to haunt you for 20 years and you're
going to need therapy around that one
and you still can't stop them from doing
it." That's what this economic moment
feels like. Is there are knowable things
that are making our economy have the
outcomes that it's having which are as
terrible as people are saying. They are
horrible for the poor and working class,
just absolutely god awful. They are
wonderful for the wealthy in the short
term because eventually you actually get
murdered. So, it's like if you can just
get people to see all of that, then we
could go, "Okay, like what are the
actual things that will lead to the
outcomes that we want, a thriving middle
class, a place where people can get
rich, they can pull ahead of everybody
else, but it's not by such a grotesque
margin that the government and the way
that you stop that, by the way, is by
making sure that the government isn't
getting involved in the financial
markets because you need wealthy people
to get wiped out. So, like if you make a
series of bad decisions, you have to be
able to fail.
And we've removed that. And so, and then
the other thing is that we steal from
everybody. Nobody likes to call tax
theft, but it's theft. And so, when you
think of inflation as the ultimate it it
is both theft and it's secretive.
Uh
and they they take money from everybody.
And because of the nature of economies,
the only people that benefit from
inflation are the people that own
assets. Only 10% of Americans own
assets. I shudder to think what
percentage of the 10% own the vast
majority of the assets. So, call it
something like three 1 to 3% of
Americans like just get
wealthy in an unhinged way. And that is
what's creating our problems
mechanistically.
But,
when you start voting for Mondani,
you're saying I just need things that
feel right. I don't need things that
could actually yield a good outcome.
Yeah.
It's It's one of those things though
where I understand
theoretically why New York is the headed
for a disaster. I understand what's
supposed to happen. I understand all the
wiles and the whispers in the dark about
um the bad things that is associated
with socialism.
>> Yep. However, New York has made his
decision. So, just how as a father with
a daughter who I want her to do X and
she always tells me that she's going to
do Y instead, I can't just say, "All
right, well, go figure it out yourself."
and kick her out the house. I have to
figure out, "Okay,
you're doing the thing that I don't want
you to do. How can I best help her
through this situation?" So, now that we
woke up this next morning, he's elected,
he's in there.
What can we do or what can we learn from
this moment that we can actually utilize
to kind of help the young people? How
can we kind of reinvigorate the economy
in this way? Cuz I get it. If it was up
to us, we would stop money printing, we
would balance the budget. That's
priority one and priority two. But just
like similarly to the right and the left
both spend money, people are just
choosing the right cuz they're spending
less money. I feel like in this moment
some people on the left are choosing
Mondani cuz at least if we're going to
spend money, at least give me some free
[ __ ] in the process of the money
spending. And I think that's their kind
of rational from there. So, um do you
think that there is a way that we can
kind of mitigate some of these uh
quote-unquote catastrophes that will
come with his election? Is there ways
that we can kind of isolate the rest of
the US from it being kind of completely
off the rails? What are some ways we can
kind of look at it now that the damage
is done?
>> So, one, the the only thing that you can
count on at this point is the structure
of New York government. So, some of the
things he wants to do, he just won't be
able to do because the mayor doesn't
have the power to do that. So, um
there'll be many things like that. Yeah,
things just stymie his agenda. And so,
that's the joy of the gridlock of a
democratic system. Is no one person can
really like do too much damage. The
problem is they put in systems in place
and those systems over time do
catastrophic damage. So, rent controls
back in the '70s and '80s were just
absolutely devastating to the Bronx
specifically. Uh and so, if anybody can
conjure up those images of the
burned-out Bronx and all of that, that
was from the kinds of policies that
Mondani wants to put in place. That's
the great irony. It's not only has this
been tried before all around the world,
it's been tried in the five boroughs.
Uh and just led to disaster. And then
you should ask, how did they unwind it?
Yeah. Hey, guess what? They unwound it
by deregulating and capitalism. So, it's
like we're we're going to do the loop
again.
Uh but other ways to mitigate it are
basically none. So,
part of the reason I did not have
children was I understood that part of
the reason I became who I became was my
parents couldn't really help me once I
graduated from college. My dad had
already spent a ton of money to put me
through college. Um I had taken on a ton
of debt. My mom was not in a financial
position to help me. My parents divorced
literally 3 weeks after I left for
college. Uh so, my mom was financially
destitute working two jobs just
nightmare scenario. Um my dad had
already put himself through enough to
try to get me through college and shout
out to him. Uh so, they I I
from the day I graduated never received
another dollar from my parents and that
meant I had to figure it out and I had
to get hurt and I had to sometimes be in
a position where I was like, "Oh, wow, I
actually can't pay all my bills this
month." And so, you go, "All right, I'm
going to get some final notices from
these guys and uh I'll pay these guys
this month and then vice versa and you
do that for a while. Uh so,
I didn't want to I didn't think I could
trust myself to see my kids suffer.
And so, I didn't That was part of my
calculus around not having kids was I
would make them soft. And so, I was
like, "Well, I don't want to do that. Uh
and I also don't want to watch them
suffer. So, New York has to suffer. Mhm.
That is the thing that will make it
tough is that they'll go, "Oh, these
really didn't work." Or but hey, listen,
when I say
that my my money is invested in a way
that will show you I believe what I say.
Mhm. So, I think that's going to be a
good litmus test for a lot of people,
but um I think that these policies are
guaranteed to fail. Um so, at this point
it's like, "Well, you just have to step
back." Like you said, they made their
decision. See what happens. Let them go
through it. The thing that I want to do
is I want to plant flags and I want to
say here are the things that I see
coming. I don't expect people to listen
or to vote, but over time you do earn
credibility.
And also, a big thing for me is I need
to say what I think is going to happen,
so I can find out how close to mapping
the truth I have been.
Um, that helps me sharpen my own
thinking. So, um, crime is going to go
up, that's for sure.
All the things that he's trying to make
free, they will go down in quality.
Um, they're going to say that no matter
what happens, that they've done the
right thing and that the bad outcomes
are due to something exogenous. None of
them are going to go, "Ah, these are
just bad policies."
None of them. So,
until we get the middle class thriving
again, um,
effectively nothing is going to change
at the societal level. New York, though,
will become increasingly violent,
increasingly dirty, increasingly seedy.
Again, we we've already played this
movie. I was in New York in the '80s, I
know what it looked like up close. And
it was wild. And people will get sick of
it, they will the people living there,
and they will finally plug their nose
and vote for somebody that promises law
and order. That will be the start of it.
People that are obsessed with law and
order tend to be right-leaning.
Right-leaning people tend to be, uh,
more focused on sovereignty, so they're
going to get back to traditional
economic policies, not necessarily
because they understand the economy,
uh, but because they lean towards
sovereignty. And so, that'll be the
loop.
We'll get back to the show in just a
second, but first, let me hit you with a
serious holiday upgrade. The holidays
are about family, tradition, and showing
up with something incredible on the
table. But if you're still grabbing
mystery meat from the grocery store,
just because it's convenient, you are
doing it wrong. Because I care about
what I put in my body and I care even
more about what I serve to the people I
love. ButcherBox delivers 100%
grass-fed beef, free-range organic
chicken, humanely raised pork, and
wild-caught seafood straight to my door
on my schedule. And right now, they're
doing something absolutely wild for new
members. You get to choose between a
free whole turkey or ham in your first
box or ground beef for life plus $20 off
your first order. Go to butcherbox
.com/impact
and use code impact to claim your choice
of holiday protein. Ham or turkey in
your first box or ground beef for life
plus $20 off. Again, that's
butcherbox.com/impact.
Use code impact and now, back to the
show. Um okay, we had our conspiracy
theory hats on on Friday. I want to put
I want to put my my optimism hat on
right now. I found out went through the
Twitter rabbit hole.
Dragon flu dragon Dragonfly Jones went
like a Twitter commentator I follow who
does basketball commentary got into it
over my mind Donnie with like a Twitter
bot. And I found out through him
Richmond
passed free buses during the pandemic.
So for the last 5 years, they've been
free buses. There has been a noticeable
increase in crime. There has been a
noticeable a noticeable increase in
attacks, violent attacks. No Ukrainian
immigrants getting shived or anything
like that there.
What how they are paying for it is that
the government funding that they
received from federal funds, they
reallocated it to make it free for the
bus system. Now, of course, there's
still other you know, you don't get free
trains and all these other things. You
still pay for those, but at least
specifically for the buses, they were
able to sustain free buses through the
subsidies that they received. There
literally isn't a thing you can't make
free. Yeah. You can make anything free.
Yeah, but
>> However, you're only making it free for
the people who use it. You're not making
actually free because people don't work
for free. So, if people understand
spending
>> coming from a different bucket.
>> Yeah. So, if New York is just going to
say, "Hey, listen. The things that
Mondani wants to make free or cheap,
we're going to pull resources from
everywhere else, and we're going to
reallocate them to that." Like, if
Mondani were like, "Listen, I'm about
balancing the budget. This is about
fiscal responsibility. I understand
capital flight, so I understand that I
can't just keep taking and taking and
taking from the wealthy because they
will leave.
So, this is all a balancing act." And if
he were appealing to
the like patriotism or whatever of
Americans, this is something that we've
done in times usually of war. But like,
if he were able to rally people around,
"Hey listen, guys. This is an economic
war. I think we can all agree that the
middle class and the working class, they
are suffering the most." And he could
lay out the cause and effect of how the
economy works, and he could say,
"Listen, rule number one, balance the
budget. Rule number two, we've got to
help bring back a thriving middle class.
We've got to put power from a
negotiating perspective back in the
hands working class. We've got to make
sure that we're bringing industry back
so that people have jobs." Like then, as
a wealthy person, you might be like,
"Yo, this guy really gets it." Like,
"Okay, I'm here for this. Like, I want
to be a part of this." And if that guy
were engaging with the business
community in a non-corrupt way because I
think that they're they're Like, when I
see Mondani posing with Alex Soros of
all [ __ ] people, I'm just like, "Here
we go again. Like, this is going to be a
fun loop." In fact, literally, I
mentioned George Soros in
the upcoming deep dive that I wrote. So,
get to part four. As always, I'm trying
to tell people this is a thing that I
think that you should do moving into the
future. And I was like, "Please don't
try to day trade against people like
George Soros because they understand
that when the economy is left to its own
devices, that it can be very
unpredictable. So, they don't leave it
to its own devices. They
spend money on NGOs. They have
um deals with like DAs. Like they
structure society in the way that they
want. They will go into different
countries and make sure that things play
out in a way that's good for their
portfolio. And it's like
guys, you hate the billionaire class for
a reason. Now, if that reason is just
vibes, that's [ __ ] If the reason is
uh when people meddle in international
affairs, not only does it create
political problems that can be horrible
for the people in that country, but
they're doing it because they're trying
to protect their portfolio. Now, you
can't paint anybody with a blanket
brush, but bro, that's going to get you
80 85% of the examples. George Soros
broke the back of the British pound. He
literally looked at the pound and was
like, "These guys are making a mistake.
Hey, Secretary Bessant." Not secretary
at the time, but like let's roll in.
Let's [ __ ] with these guys. They have
made a mistake. They've made it clear
like where the support has to be. I know
that they're going to just try to buy
buy buy buy buy, but they don't have as
pocket they don't have pockets as deep
as I do. So, I'm going to buy even
deeper. Okay, that's the guy the son of
anyway.
That Mamdani is arms around. So,
billionaire shouldn't exist. Here I am
with one of the most politically active
internationally billionaires on Yeah,
son of on planet Earth, but he's got all
the money now. So, Soros is toast. So,
if you hear like George Soros, at this
point it's Alex.
So, I don't know if you think that's
like a get out of jail free card. No,
but to your point of the kids are always
soft like Alex isn't breaking the back
of the British pound. I think Alex
>> not know how to do it, but he he is
I I would need to do a much deeper dive
to put forward any very concrete things,
but I assume that he's carrying on his
father's legacy. If nothing else, he is
still out there swaying markets. I hate
it when Elon does it. I hate it when the
Soros is do it. So, that one to me I am
an equal opportunity. It is a problem
when people put money in politics like
that and try to sway these markets like
that. Uh so, anyway,
that that is the nature of what Mumdani
is going to be trying to do. So, he
isn't doing what I wish he were, which
is getting the business community
together, balancing the budget, saying
we're going to make these things more
affordable by putting government dollars
because that's what the people want. And
as long as we're balancing the budget,
we know these other things are going to
have to give. Great, no problem. Uh
that's not how this is going to play
out. First of all, he seems completely I
think if you map him again as somebody
who wants to see the wealthy punished,
he'll make a lot more sense. He does not
care if the wealthy flee. He does not
care He's not paying attention to
capital flight. Dude, if you go back to
his 2020 tweets, they are so unhinged.
And so, he's asking us to believe No,
no, no, that's not me anymore.
Um
we'll see. Like, there's no doubt if you
look at my tweets going backwards, that
there are going to be some things I'll
be like, "Listen, I changed my mind
about that. Like, I looked at it
further." But, I'll be able to map out
for you the cause and effect that led me
away from those positions. Um he's not
going to be able to do that because he
he is doing whatever is politically
expedient is my mapping. I definitely
get the frustration. I get what you're
saying that we have to be very careful
about the billionaire class and how who
Mumdani is buddy-buddy with. And while
George Soros now I feel like is like the
Republican candy man that when people
whisper his name, they think like an NGO
is going to pop up and some trans person
is going to jump out.
>> It is actually true. I I feel like
though the game is the game cuz if we
could look at Rupert Murdoch, John
Stewart just did a talk with The New
Yorker where he talks about everybody
thinks the Republican Party and MAGA
started with Trump, but it started 10
years ago when Rupert Murdoch bought all
of AM radio stations that nobody was
listening to, that only 50-year-olds and
older were listening to. He bought
Sinclair
Broadcasting. That was the synchronized
local news network that was all saying
the same thing. Yep. So, they've been
setting these conservative seeds for the
a decade ago. You know what I mean?
That's how they were able to get support
for the weapons of mass destruction. So,
it's this is a political game. This is a
map, and we all were realizing that
everybody's grabbing for power in their
way. The left might be doing it through
NGOs, the right is doing it through
conservative media, but everybody's just
trying to grab power. I think
what we should really be focused on now,
and Vivek has a great tweet that I will
kind of want to bring into to help point
this out.
We thought Trump has been saying the
economy is booming, everybody's happy,
the markets is flying, and all these
things are happening. The market was a
bloodbath yesterday. A bunch of
Democrats won.
I know that Republicans still have
control of the office, still have
control of the executive office, they
still have control of the Senate, still
have control of the house, but that is a
wake-awakening to say, "Wait, the
midterms aren't a shoe-in. Wait, the the
economy isn't booming for everybody.
There are people that are still
hurting." And whether or not we can
point to the budget, whether or not we
can point to communism, whether or not
we can point to socialism,
the voters are saying, "Your your fear
tactics aren't working. I still want
change. I'm voting for something
different cuz status quo isn't working
for me."
Um let's jump into this video from Vivek
where he kind of breaks down what the um
what the conservative party should be
paying attention to after this election
victory.
We got our asses handed to us in New
Jersey, Virginia, and New York City.
Democrats swept all three. There's two
key lessons for Republicans. Listen
carefully. Number one, our side needs to
focus on affordability. Make the
American dream affordable. Bring down
costs, electric costs, grocery costs,
health care costs, and housing costs,
and lay out how we're going to do it.
And number two, cut out the identity
politics. It doesn't suit Republicans.
It's not for us. That's the woke left's
game, not ours. We don't care about the
color of your skin or your religion. We
care about the content of your
character. That's who we are. So, with
that coming, do you think that this will
be a wake-up call for the Republican
Party, especially with the midterms
happening
uh next November. No. They They know
that they're in a political game. They
will certainly understand the history.
It's like only three times does the
midterms not flip things. So, it's like
uh
That That isn't the game. So, keep in
mind, I want to be very clear. I'm not
Republican. Yeah.
>> So, I
look at the Republican Party and I say
these guys are god-awful.
And the bad news is the only people that
are worse are the Democrats. So, you
just have to look at how much money they
want to spend. And you've got the
Republicans that passed the catastrophic
big beautiful bill, and then the
Democrats were like, "Hold my beer. We
want to add more to that." It's so wild.
So, they're all irresponsible. They're
all doing something that is going to
continue to hurt people. They are
caught. So, uh you're in a simulation,
Drew, and and I'm almost defiantly am
deciding to think like that, which I
need to be careful of, but
um
you're living in a simulation. You've
been programmed to act this way. And
watching this play out, like once you
understand the code that's running in
all of our minds, I am not immune to
this at all. I am as stuck in all of
this as everybody else. I'm having as
much of a biological experience as
anybody else.
Uh but Jesus,
like we just respond in the most obvious
ways to these things. And so,
politicians only make sense when you
think of them as somebody who will do
anything, say anything to get elected,
and to get reelected. All they are
trying to do is maintain power. So, my
only hope is that because we live in a
moment where we have high velocity of
information, that we are able to um
lay everything bare, make everything as
transparent as possible, not spill into
conspiracy brain, but really get people
to see enough of the picture that they
can start putting things together from a
cause and effect perspective. So, um
pick an area. For me, it's been
economics. You pick an area and you just
start mapping out how does this happen
from a cause and effect perspective?
Because if we are in a simulation, even
if we're not, God laid out rules. But
the world clearly
is built on top of rules, which is why
when people say history repeats, all
they're saying is that there's a set of
rules that everything obeys. Economies,
the way politicians act, the way humans
respond to politicians and money and
power and fear and all that, we respond
in a very narrow-banded way. Mhm. And
so, once you understand that, it's like,
oh yeah, then as circumstances arise
that are familiar to something that's
happened in the past, we will respond in
familiar ways. They we do not become
perfectly predictable at not at least at
the level of data that a human mind can
process and retain, but boy oh boy, are
we predictable. So, that's why when you
look at uh whether it's okay, uh the
trains worked in Richmond. Oh, great.
Let me explain how that works. Like, you
can point your money at whatever you
want, but what you can't do is deficit
spend. And so, what I want people to
understand is socialist policies don't
work because they are trying to make
everything free. Zoran Momdani in 2020
uh tweeted the Communist Manifesto from
each according to their need to each or
from each according to their ability to
each according their need or vice versa.
You get the idea.
And so, he tweeted that out. That's not
somebody who's like, oh, look at this
terrible idea. Uh but it is a terrible
idea because it is as if humans are
fictional characters. It's like when
economists think of humans as a
perfectly rational being and that you
can map all economic movements based on
humans being rational beings that will
always do the thing that
uh is the obvious like financial
incentive and then they don't and they
completely surprise you. Uh so
once you understand that the very thing
that capitalism works on top of which
people may love or hate, I don't care.
It is how humans work.
The very thing that makes capitalism
work, again, China used capitalism to
rise above a poverty. Uh every time you
want to cure a socialist system, you
give it capitalism. So, the thing that
that rides on top of is man's inherent
impulse to do what is self-serving.
And the second you take away
man's desire to do what is self-serving
uh it all breaks. And so, that's why
resentment around people who are good,
like they do what is self-serving and
they're very good at it. When you resent
that person, you become completely
unhinged and and let's call a spade a
spade. The policies force you to use
guns.
So, I know people get weird about when I
give real historical examples about how
far that goes, but you need only ask
uh what if, Drew, your
uh 27-year-old daughter
was not living life the way you wanted
her to,
but you have to force her to because
everybody has to do what you say or the
system falls apart. So, what do you do?
You eventually get guns out.
And eventually, if that person just
really won't get into line, you lock
them up or you kill them.
Mao said plainly, um cuz there was a
person way back in China's history that
was infamous for having buried alive a
bunch of people that were disagreeing
with him.
And he jokingly said, "Oh, we've
done that guy but a hundred times more."
In In honesty, it's a hundred thousand
times more, but like, that's where
people go. They realize
or they form a mental
frame of reference that says, "I know
best. When you disagree with me, you're
going to break society, and so I will go
all the way to killing you if that's
what I have to do to get the system
working in the way that I want it to
work." But because humans disagree,
humans are intrinsically selfish,
everybody has a different frame of
reference, so everybody's pulling in
different directions, um
you run into a problem. You You run into
a problem that requires violence.
We'll be back to the show in just a
second, but first, most people think you
need massive funding to start a business
or a full team or years of experience,
but you do not. You need five AI
employees and 60 minutes with me. You
need AI woven into every stage of your
business, research, strategy, execution,
and launch. And that is exactly what I'm
teaching you in my free 60-minute
masterclass. I'm giving you the exact
system we use at Impact Theory, the one
that cut payroll costs by roughly 50%
while growing revenue. You'll walk out
with five AI teammates doing real work,
a researcher, strategist, copywriter,
builder, and marketer. By the end,
you'll have everything you need to take
your business idea from stuck in your
head to live and testable this week.
Click the link in the show notes to
register now. You do not want to miss
this. All right, now let's get back to
the show. All right, let's jump over to
UPS Flight 2976.
Um for those that don't know, this was a
cargo flight with three people on board
that had a crazy explosion. It crashed
into a nearby petroleum factory that
just ran out
>> what it hit? That's why that's where
that's where all the fire came from. Oh
my god. In Louisville we have the video
of here.
Um as you could tell this thing looks
like the Tropic Fire the Tropic Thunder
like fire scene just like a row of fire.
>> Um so much smoke.
>> are some other angles where you can
actually see the plane.
Um
and that is brutal. Do was it on
takeoff? It looked like it was on
takeoff.
>> Yeah the engine was on fire as it was
before even got off the plane. Um it
looks like it's the left engine off the
ground yeah. And then this is the one
that you see where it's actually on the
ground.
Like even as it's trying to lift the
fire kind of started early. Oh my god.
So three people dead on the plane
another 11 injured but authorities said
that total is going to grow.
When you keep going cuz we've got even
more angles. There's one from the inside
of a truck
and you just you see the plane like
break apart and tumble and oh my god.
Like I can't imagine dude. I can't
imagine. Listen we all die some way but
like oh that'd be one of the craziest
ways to go.
Yeah.
Oh god look at that. Sheesh sheesh.
>> Oof.
That's so wild. There's other ones it
might even be this one later or maybe
the other anyway. There's one that shows
like an overhead view and you just see
that line just a fire. It looks like
it's going through like a industrial
area. It's like oh man.
That is rough but there were no other
fatalities huh other than the people on
the plane? Yeah they said that number is
going to grow though cuz everything it
had like you said a path of destruction
so that was early reports as of this
morning.
>> I was like man you might have dozens of
people so if it's only 11 like phew that
is thank god. That is terrifying. Um in
related news um In related to plane
crashes.
Secretary Duffey's Oh yeah, to the
government shutdown they are considering
now setting down certain American
airline air spaces because of the lack
of air traffic controllers. For those
that don't know, air traffic controllers
haven't been paid, TSA hasn't been paid
going on 35 days now and this is the
record as of today. Oh, it is. So, we
have broken the record.
>> broken the record from Trump's last one.
So, he winded up himself.
>> That's crazy.
>> Um so then yeah, this is Secretary Duffy
speaking about it.
One payment, 80 to 90% of one payment.
They missed the second paycheck. Uh on
Thursday, they get a email pay stub
that'll show what their next payment is
going to be. So, this Thursday, they're
going to an email that shows that their
pay stub is a big fat zero.
Many of the controllers said
uh
a lot of us can navigate missing one
paycheck.
Not everybody, but a lot of us can.
None of us can manage missing two
paychecks. So, if if you bring us two a
week from today, Democrats, you will see
mass chaos, you will see um mass flight
delays, you'll see mass cancellations,
and you may may see us close certain
parts of the air space because we just
cannot manage it cuz we don't have the
air traffic controllers.
Yeah, and then
in
related news, Houston TSA has literally
walked off the job leaving thousand It
looks like hundreds, maybe thousands of
travelers just stranded. Yeah.
And this is all happening while the
three of us are here in Florida. I was
like, "Oh, this will be fun." Perfect
timing. Perfect timing. We talked before
we started rolling that I had a delay on
Sunday because LAX had to restrict air
space because they only had so much air
traffic controller. So, our flight was
pushed back an hour to allow other
traffic I guess to coalesce. So, it it
seems like it's only getting worse. How
do you feel about us breaking the record
for government shutdown? Uh this is
horrific. So, there are two things going
on right now. So, one is just we have a
world that we expect to work a certain
way. The government has made certain
promises. You need to make good on those
promises. So, there are things that I
wish we had never agreed to fund, but if
you've agreed to fund it, then you've
got to fund it. And if you're going to
unwind that, you need to do it slowly.
You can't just furlough God knows how
many people and then be like, "Oh, and
by the way, some of you are never
getting paid and we're just ending your
job."
That is a very rough way to go about it.
So, in the beginning, when they were
dozing it and they were like offering
people exit packages and all that, I was
like, "Yeah, that that's cool. I'm here
for that."
You reduce the strain on the economy me.
First of all, like even if you're not
going to look at it, just the the human
cost of it all,
you want to see that done as elegantly
as possible. And I'm still I don't know
who I'm mad at exactly, but I'm mad at
the way that America reacted to doze. I
really God, what do I feel?
Despair, hopelessness,
just That one really wound me up. It's
like people had knee-jerk reactions
because it was Elon, because it was
people saying they were going to cut the
budget. People just went off their
rocker. rocker, and they should have
been like, "Yes, please." Like even if
this is just a nod to now getting into
fiscal responsibility, like I I want to
remind everybody the word fiscal means
government government spending. Fiscal
responsibility is government spending
responsibly. We've used fiscal now so
loosely just to mean basically monetary
that people don't understand. Fiscal
policy is government spending.
Government spending is so unhinged. So,
when I say fiscal
policy
is the problem. That's what's driving
this.
Once you understand that, that the
government deficit spends, and the
government covers bailouts, and the
government
inflates the currency, you realize,
"Oh, we have a spending problem." So,
you need to reduce spending. So, anyway,
seeing people react like that to doze
just really wound me up
because it's going to make their lives
worse. They're literally It's like when
you're training to be a lifeguard, one
of the first things they teach you is a
drowning person will drown you. They
don't have a single qualm with that.
They're just trying to get oxygen. So,
as you get closer, like, they'll push
you under, they'll hold you down. So,
you have to be if they're not calm, you
have to disengage.
And I always remember thinking, "Ooh,
that's rough." Like, you go out there,
they're panicking, and you just got to
be like, "Sorry, not going down with
you." Uh
but that really is the reality. And so,
that's what that felt like was these are
drowning people. And as we get closer to
try to help, they just start throwing
punches, pulling us under. It's like,
"Oh my god, like, come on."
So, uh hated that. So, that's the second
part of this is that we have it's like
40%
of Fact check me on this, please. I
believe 40% of Americans work for the
government now.
You can't do that.
You can't do that. It's either 40% of
GDP or 40% of people by per capita.
You absolutely cannot do that. Hard
pass.
Out. It's a sign of sickness. Like,
there's call it, I don't know,
7% is reasonable. 40% is you can't do
that.
Uh I see a much lower percentage. What
percent? I see federal government is
1.9%.
>> No way. The public sector is 13.4
according to This is out of as of 2022.
>> to look this up if it's GDP, but there
was some number that either was number
of people that work for the government
or GDP that was so
horrifying.
Anyway, off the fact, maybe I'm just
wrong. That's always possible. I'll have
to look it up.
>> GDP is 23% of government
>> Okay, that's zero, just for the record.
So, government work should not count for
GDP. So, that gives you an idea of how
little we actually grew. I wish I had a
better like answer for this government
shutdown. I wish I had something more
like interesting to talk about, but like
at some point in time, I don't know
where that line is. Have you ever been
in like a tough negotiation maybe at
work or it's kind of like the standoff
where it's like
I'm I'm hurting other people by doing
this. I need to cave. Like how do you
balance that pressure from I need to do
this so that way my team can get this
win that long-term I think would
benefits the most amount of Americans
versus the current pain is too much to
handle. Um you can map out ahead of
time. These are the things that I'm
fighting for that are an absolute must
that if I don't get those I'm willing to
and then you map out like how far you
would go and then you map out what your
breaking point is. Uh you should go into
a negotiation knowing all of those
things. Now, there's always going to be
surprises and things you didn't expect
or an outcome that maybe you didn't
think of ahead of time all that for sure
for sure for sure. But you should have
that kind of stuff mapped out. I think
the thing that would really surprise
maybe not our community because I do
feel like we collect a pretty bright
group of engaged people. But the average
person I think would be very surprised
to see the gap between the way
politicians present themselves and the
way they really are. And so the really
are the behind the scenes all the
negotiations that kind of stuff are
yeah, they'll neither side cares if the
American people are suffering. Both of
them will say that's all they care
about. The reality is they want to get
reelected and so they've got a position
they've got to spin. Now, I think they
also both have agendas that they are
trying to push through. Like if you're
going to play the game, play the game
and so
all of the rockstar people are going to
make a lot of noise around what they're
trying to do. They won't all pass bills,
but they'll all make a lot of noise the
rockstars. So the rockstars get it. I've
got to show leadership. I've got to say
we should be doing this thing. This is
the part that Mondani is very good at is
he's able to articulate the outcome that
he wants. He is [ __ ] and therefore
does not understand how he's actually
going to get you there, but he at least
can say like oh, this I'm going to get
you free stuff. Okay, great.
So he can make a lot of noise. He can go
up. he can argue. He's good at debate in
that he knows how to obfuscate. People
will say that he's a weak debater from
the perspective of he's not going to be
able to argue cause and effect because
that's not what he's about. Once you
understand that's not what he's about
and that he understands some
It's better to think of him as an
entertainer who is very good at
emotionally moving people and his um rap
genre now is politics. And so, you've
got gangster rappers, you've got pop
rappers like Will Smith, and you've got
political rappers like Mom Donny. And
their game is to go out and say things
that make people feel a certain way and
that's that. He's very good at that.
Very talented. And this is where I think
people make a mistake. Obviously, when I
say he's [ __ ] I mean that tongue in
cheek. He is quite smart. Um so, that is
uh
you want to make sure that you
understand how your opponent really is,
that you can really think of this. But
anyway, people would be very surprised
to see that their politicians are just
wildly different creatures um when
they're not having to pose for the
populace. Do you think that I don't know
if this is the populist moment uh agenda
or not, but do you think the spreadsheet
politician can be elected? Is there Is
that possible? Cuz I feel like the best
politician that I can remember over the
last 20 years have always been vibes.
The actor Ronald Reagan like to Obama to
even Trump. He's an entertainer. He was
a reality TV
>> Vibes is always going to be a part of it
for sure. Um
chemistry is a big deal. And so, having
chemistry with the country, having
chemistry in um backroom deals, all of
that stuff goes a long, long way.
Uh watching the All-In podcast deal with
Trump was really fascinating because
even Jason Calacanis, you could see he
was struggling. He found Trump charming,
but he didn't want to say that I found
Trump charming. So, it was um fun to see
that. But, you that's just how
politicians are. Like when you sit down
with them,
um
if they're just pure spreadsheet, and
I'm going to guess I don't know Thomas
Massie well at all, but given that he
wears the debt pin, I'm going to guess
this is him, that he's like the
spreadsheet guy. And so, when you're
with them, it's probably a little
spectrum-y. It There isn't the charm and
charisma that you're going to get with
an AOC. Like did you see AOC? First of
all, super attractive. Second, she's got
her hair like coiffed over to the side.
She's like
"I've got some tea for you." Right? And
she spills the gossip. And I was like,
"I'm entertained right now." And there
There is something, even though I think
her policies are murderous,
uh she is engaging. So, it's like, "Eh."
Anyway, the point that I'm trying to
make with all of those um decorations is
that there's there's a wild difference
between what they're going to be like
um privately, the way they think about
the world, which would disgust people,
the way that they'll use people as
pawns, manipulate them, move them around
the chessboard, all of that,
uh and the way that they present
themselves. I think about this a lot as
a CEO.
So, um no one will believe anything you
say now because you're on camera and
you're sitting next to me, but I know
this to be true. So, if somebody gets
sick, for instance, I really do want
them to rest. And so, even though it
slows the company down or whatever, like
one, it's what I want to do, and I don't
want to treat anybody on my team
differently than I would want to be
treated. So, I'm going to extend to
people the thing I want extended to me.
So, uh if somebody's sick, I'm going to
say, "Hey, let me know how I can help."
I'd go get somebody,
um or if I'm being really honest, I
would send somebody to go get you
chicken broth, uh if that's what you
needed.
Um I want you to sleep in and get your
rest. And so, for me, my like ultimate
game is I want to earn my own respect.
And so, a huge part of earning my own
respect is being who I am outward-facing
and inward-facing. Now, listen, I talk
to my wife in a way that I would never
talk if I were on camera. So, don't
think that I don't have gears. I
definitely have gears, but in terms of
my value system and what I believe and
don't believe
>> across the board.
>> it's very consistent. And so, people
would be like, "Oh, wow, like he um
he's much more playful when he's with
his wife." Like I'm the the number of
times I will be silly on camera will be
very low compared to how often I'm silly
in real life.
>> Mhm. Uh because my wife has rewarded me
to no end because she loves that side of
my personality. So, anyway, uh
politicians are not like that. Let's go
to that AOC clip that you brought up
about the tea. So, for those that don't
know, Marjorie Taylor Greene has been
pivoting recently about the government
shutdown. She was on The View. She's
been very vocal um in opposition about
some of the Republican policies just as
she was about the Democratic policies.
Um
AOC says she has a reason behind her
sudden switch.
Here's some tea for you.
Um MTG, people are like, "Oh my god,
she's saying all of these things." Like
"What's gotten into her lately? Oh, like
she's bucking against Trump. She's
bucking against the administration."
Marjorie Taylor Greene wanted to run for
Senate in Georgia.
Uh she wanted to run for Senate earlier
this year
in the state of Georgia.
She wanted to be the Republican nominee
for Senate.
Um
so,
she was gearing up
for that statewide race and Trump told
her no.
Trump said, "No."
And the White House
and Trump land shut down Marjorie Taylor
Greene's personal ambitions to run for
Senate. And she has been on a revenge
tour ever since. Um so, that's the
reason for the sudden switch. It's It's
weird hearing it the behind the scenes
cuz we're all like, "Nah, they're
probably doing this behind the scenes.
This is probably a political move. And
then hearing somebody like AOC come out
and say, yes, this is definitely a
political move.
>> This is one of the things, I don't know
whether I love this or hate this,
but the social media age, the fact that
we're going to hear ultimately so much
of this stuff come out is God, I'd be
lying if I said I wasn't here for it. I
want the tea. Like
when she like leaned in, I was like,
yeah, you go girl. You tell me.
>> She did look good, too. Oh my goodness.
I'm not going to lie. She is very
attractive. And we can all be mad that
God saw it fit to
make us care, but we care. And so she
knows how to play it. God bless her. How
do we
quantify that? I know you're you're Mr.
Metric. You always want KPIs to kind of
steer us toward. Is there a KPI we can
put in in Congress? I know we joke about
the Warren Buffett thing every time the
deficit is too much, everybody gets
fired.
>> whoa, whoa. I am not joking.
They should do that.
>> That is is good, but everybody would get
fired. They would That's like me That's
like me advocating for cause and effect
theory. Like if our numbers don't get to
a million, I get fired. Like
>> They They will do whatever they need to
to get elected. And so they would cut
the budget.
And they would just be like, we're not
going to get reelected unless we trim
the budget.
>> After we fire this whole wave of people.
>> they're never going to do it cuz they
don't want to put that restriction on
themselves. But in terms of it
generating the behavior that we want, it
would. And so that's one of those this
is how you get a small government light
touch. You put a regulation like that
that's just it's blind. And so your
favorite
politician may get caught in the
crossfire. I'm just like, yep, tough
break. Is what it is. And if you're
willing to live and die by those
policies, cool.
Also outside of the fiscal one, is there
something we can do where it's
the government has been shut down more
than this time. People need it like I
just feel like we're going to they're
going to end up signing something.
Somebody's going to cave. And then in 6
months, a year, 2 years, whatever that
number is, we're going to be back here
again. Just like the debt ceiling
conversation. Every 18 months we're
having that argument. Is there something
mechanistically you think we should put
in that can kind of prevent that? Um I'm
just trying to figure out how we can fix
Congress without
firing everybody through a dictatorship
and going straight Mao and just like
killing and reinstalling a bunch of
other people. Like I mean there are
things that you could do
mechanistically. I I I'll give you
ideas. It's entirely possible that the
Constitution blocks some of what I'm
going to say. So this is where I'm not a
constitutional scholar, so it's it is
very possible that the things I'm going
to put forward are like a business guy
thinking through these problems, not a
politician. Uh so but you could do
things like you put dead hand switches.
So if the government is shut down for
more than X number of days, budgets get
cut in the following ways to bring us
back to solvency and the government
automatically reopens. Uh so for
instance, if you said something like um
every department is cut in equal measure
with the exclusion of the Department of
Defense and whatever, pick a the
entitlements with some sort of like
caveat, right? So it's like if they're
over X percent of the budget and it's
not wartime, then they can still be cut
up to this amount. Like you'd have to
get pretty specific, but if you had a
dead hand switch like that, then unless
one of the parties is like that's what
we actually want, um and that's the only
way that we can get it, then nobody's
going to let the government go that
long. Now, admittedly, my biases are
leaking like crazy because my brain goes
to what is a dead hand switch that I
would want
uh because that's also one of the things
that's happening right now, at least at
the level of rumor, is one of the things
that's being said is that there's a
certain number of days, I forget how
many, but it's not that many. It's like
45 or something. And Trump is able to or
the administration, whatever
administration's in power, is able to
start making permanent layoffs.
And so it's entirely possible that the
Republicans are like, well
we win either way. So either we rebuff
all of their desire to grow the budget
in ways that Republicans don't like.
>> Extend the ACA, roll back some of the
bill cuts, yeah.
>> Exactly. Or we get all the way to we get
to start firing people. And now we can
actually start tightening up the
government.
>> Those those effects that we wanted to do
that were overturned can now be done
free hand free hand. Exactly. And I'll
be honest. I want to see the size of
government reduced so dramatically, so
dramatically.
So yeah, I I am it look, doing it all at
once is probably a bad idea. I would
much rather in reality, I would much
rather see it happen slowly, but if you
back me into a corner, I would rather
see it happen fast, deal with whatever
pain that causes over the next two or
three years,
and have it permanently be smaller than
it never happen. Uh and again, what is
the metric I'm steering by?
The thriving middle class. As defined by
just what percentage of Americans are in
a well-defined middle class. Like I'm
not trying to pull a fast one. Like the
middle class is everything. The life is
so much better when the middle class is
thriving. It's better for the wealthy,
it's better for obviously the middle
class. So it's like dude I don't
understand how people have lost sight of
when somebody's in the middle class and
they earned their way there, like the
euphoric
vibes of like not only did I get here,
but I earned my way here. I think
there's going to be some permanent
damage from this, cuz just like
Secretary Duffy said, you know, a month
without a paycheck is hard for
everybody. Like 60% of Americans can't
afford a thousand dollar
emergency bill.
I don't know how many percentage of
Americans can afford missing two
paychecks, but I feel like that number
is higher than 60%. Like they're going
to feel some reasonable pain. Oh,
they're going to feel a lot of pain,
yeah. Yeah, if we extend to the 45 days
and then those people are now
permanently cut. Let's say in a perfect
world they get back paid, but now they
have lost their job.
>> Yep. Is this similar to the AI Utopia
that we've been pitching as well where
there's just going to be a waft of pain
then hopefully they can find purpose and
the private sector can kind of help out
on the other side of that, but we just
going to have to go through that valley
of the second and third year of the
Trump administration will kind of have
breadlines and then by year four
everybody's back to humming like cuz we
can't act like you know 40% of GDP
disappearing is going to just make like
people just walk into Walmart and get a
job. Like there's going to be some some
pain there.
>> There's going to be some pain there. It
could have a psychological effect where
people lose confidence in the markets.
That is for sure.
Um
it is one of those where there is no way
out of the situation that we're in right
now without pain. There is no way. There
is no way. So now just becomes a
question of how
um
effectively can we deploy a beautiful
deleveraging and I
will say the chances that we do a
beautiful deleveraging aren't
approaching zero. They are zero. Oh,
100% like it's never happening. We we
psychologically do not have the makeup
in America to do that. So um we're in a
position where a beautiful deleveraging
is not going to work. Uh no one's even
going to try it. So the only thing that
we're going to try right now is growth.
That's it. We're going to try to grow
our way out of this and remember that if
the Democrat party gets their way that
they will accelerate the demise because
the demise is very simple to map out. It
is how much are you deficit spending.
And when you say accelerate that demise
like what you're just saying they're
going to be spending more money at a
faster rate than the Democrats.
>> Yeah, so it is money we don't have.
>> trying to make it as completely clear.
>> They're they're going to they're going
to deficit spend and they will deficit
spend even faster than the lunatic
Republican Party. So, now you have a
problem where you
you lose in both ways, just one way you
lose a little bit faster. So, there is
right now I will credit Trump with he's
at least
delusional enough to believe that he can
grow his way out of this, and he is
trying to grow his way out of this. I
don't see any way to grow your way out
of the problem unless you balance the
budget first. If he balance like if the
big beautiful bill had balanced the
budget and then he was doing all these
things, I would then actually become the
pro-Trump guy that people think I
already am, because I'd be like, "Okay,
we have a balanced budget, so now we've
stopped all the bleeding, so we're no
longer damaging the middle class and the
working class, and we're going to try to
grow GDP." Now, I think the way that he
would grow GDP would not match my ideal
scenario,
but nonetheless at least we would be
moving in the right direction, and that
122% of debt-to-GDP ratio would start
going down. So, if that were the case,
I'd be like, "Yes, he is unhinged. Yes,
he has authoritarian tendencies, but
he's at least bringing back a thriving
middle class." And by the way, I don't
think he has the authoritarian
the amplitude of authoritarian impulses
that people try to map him to. So, he's
I don't believe he's ever going to go
anywhere near down the path of Hitler, I
don't think.
He's doing his best to try though with
the National Guard marching through the
parks and the it's very close like This
is Have you watched to look like So,
first of all, read Mein Kampf.
Read Mein Kampf, and you're going TO BE
LIKE, "OH, I get it. There's a real
scale problem here."
And then second, look at the footage of
Hitler.
Bro.
So, if politics are a genre of rap, he
was gangster rap.
Like, it was wild.
>> smiling at and waving it I'm not a Nazi.
>> He He was He was
unbelievably
effective at deranging people and
getting them to get behind uh murderous
ideology. It was wild. And when you
listen to him, like uh
imagine Nick Fuentes,
but like really good at like big
marches. Put Nick on meth, and you're
maybe for real He was a total speed
speed addict.
>> Whether it was meth or not, I don't I
don't think it was meth, but he was a
speed addict. He was totally out of his
[ __ ] mind, but he had a very clear,
unflinching,
I know the way, I'm going to get you
guys all out of this, like it's got to
be me or nothing else.
Um yeah, he he was
wild. Dude, he was looking at From the
beginning, he was looking at Russia and
saying,
"They're going to be our American
dream."
So, the Ukraine is going to be our
American West. And Germans are going to
get to spread into the Ukraine and live
on the frontier and take over all of
that, and it's going to be amazing. Now,
listen, Trump says wacky [ __ ] about
Canada being the 51st state, but he's
not saying, I can't fathom, even in the
darkest of closed rooms, that he's
saying to somebody,
"That's our Canada's our new American
West. We're just going to expand in." He
had his little plan plan for a for a
win. going to take everything. So,
Greenland is a military installation,
and he always approaches it from, "Your
country's doing you dirty. We will do
you well. Uh you're important to us
anyway." These are bad things. I hated
it when he was doing it then. If he
starts doing it again now, I hate it. Uh
what he's doing in Venezuela is
horrifying. I wish he would just talk
about [ __ ] China, so we could at
least understand this is just about
China. It's not about the oil, I don't
think. Partly, I guess, but like the big
play is
China can't have you.
That's the big play.
So, now, at least if you were being
honest about what's going on, we could
say, "Okay, do we want to be bullies
like that?" And then I'm going to say,
"No, [ __ ] we don't. Get better
policies. Get better policies."
That's how we win people over. We don't
try to out-China the world. We don't try
to strong-arm and bully and all that
[ __ ] Be savvy like you were in World
War and World War where you're like, "We
are the greatest manufacturer on planet
Earth. We know our worth. And dear
Europe, if you guys want to keep killing
each other, that's your business. We'll
fund the [ __ ] out of it. We'll loan you
money. We'll give you weapons. And we'll
get rich off this while you [ __ ]
destroy yourselves." If America wants to
play that game, I'm here for it. If
America wants to be some [ __ ] bully
that's running around the world slapping
everybody around, putting $50 million
bounties on Maduro's head, uh bro, that
[ __ ] is [ __ ] wild west. So, this is
not me saying, "Oh, I dig Trump. I like
the way
No. What I'm saying is he's not Hitler.
So, he's got his own set of problems.
All right, let's jump over to the UK now
where Tommy Robinson beat the terrorism
charges.
The judge was blistering in his
criticism of the police saying their
testimony lacked credibility and that
they in fact targeted Tommy for
political reasons which is illegal.
Incredible outcome.
This is a journalist from the Rebel News
over in the UK.
Ezra Levant here for Rebel News. I'm
standing outside Westminster Magistrates
Court. Huge news today. Tommy Robinson
acquitted of charges under the Terrorism
Act. The judge blistering in his
criticism of the police saying they
lacked credibility and their testimony
could not be relied on. In fact, the
judge went further saying that he
believed that the primary reason the
police arrested, detained, and
interrogated Tommy in the first place
was because of his political views,
which is a protected characteristic in
the UK. That is, you can't go after
someone just because of their politics
or their religion. And in fact, the
police had no recollection of any
questions they asked about terrorists.
The judge particularly floods about
that. It's very encouraging for Tommy to
be acquitted because sometimes you feel
like you have to give up on the system
that maybe Tommy can't get a fair trial
anywhere in the UK. Today is proof that
sometimes the system does work. Yeah, I
have to say this is very encouraging.
Uh
what what
I mean, this is the ultimate values
debate is playing out right now in
Europe and um
Tommy has sort of become the firebrand
at the center of it all and
seeing them go after him, seeing them
lose faith in themselves as a nation, as
a British identity, not a white
identity, but a British identity, is
uh that's been hard. I have so much
family over there. So, um yeah, I mean,
we'll see. I don't know if they're going
to be able to back out of this or not,
but um it is certainly This is a tick in
the right side, for sure. Um as we were
joking earlier at the show, like you
move into Florida, things like that. Uh
Lisa was in the chat like, "Yeah, moving
to the UK is not an option." So, even
with family ties there, she's like, "I I
would never go there." Yeah, the funny
thing is I doubt she was saying that for
political reasons. When I met her and
none of this was on our radar or
something to be concerned about at all,
she was like, "Get me out of here." I
was actually uh I loved it because I I
not only grew up in America, I grew up
on the West Coast of America, in the
Northwest. So, and not even in a city,
in like a small like town sort of. Um
and it was going to London for the first
time was one of the coolest experiences
of my life. Like you can never sort of
re-experience that first time you see
something truly different. And I said, I
was like in hysterics laughing cuz I was
just so excited.
And I was like being here is like being
on the set of Mary Poppins. I'm like
this is so wild to see all the roofs and
you know that look in that like classic
British way of just house after house
after house after house with all the
chimneys and they're all in a line. I
was just so surreal. Um but it was
awesome and I worked in Central London.
So I was commuting into the center of
London every day and was just like this
is amazing public transport. First of
all, this was like
um
just one of the most fascinating I was
reading Clive Barker at the time. Clive
Barker is a British author and he was a
book set in London. Oh man, just like
all of it was so cool to me. And so I
was like I don't know if you want to
like stay here for a year, I'd be open.
She's like absolutely not. She was like
we are leaving right now. So as a Greek
girl, she just could not stand the
gloom.
So for me, I grew up in Tacoma,
Washington. There's only two places on
planet Earth. This is one I probably
should fact check, but I read once from
a Lord knows if it's a
reliable source, but I read once there's
only two places in the world that have a
marine climate and that's the Pacific
Northwest and London. And I was like oh
yeah, like this is so recognizable being
in the UK. I'm like this is exactly what
it felt like growing up. She might be
right, it might be a little more sort of
damp,
but Tacoma's very similar. Very similar.
Let's Um we talked about this at the
beginning of the show. A new sub nano
night light rate wireless brain implant
just recorded activity in awake mice for
a year. That's crazy. No wires, no
battery, light powers it. Light
transmits data. The brain machine merger
is near. So they kind of show that they
made this like they inserted this nano
into the mice's brain. It has sending
signals to a computer and which they
were able to measure like processing
power and things like that. So,
I know we already have um
what Elon Musk is doing and how he's
already doing uh in Neuralink and then
already implanting it in the patients.
Now, we have this nano um technology
emerging as well. It seems like we're
going to have augmented brain activity
definitely next 5 10 years, it seems
like.
>> Well, so you already have it. It's just
a question of safety. It's a question of
the risk. So, when you've got somebody
that's a quadriplegic and it's like,
well, either you are totally uh
inoperable and people have to do
everything for you, or we can do this
risky thing and we can put electrodes in
your brain, and we can allow you to uh
move a robotic arm, move uh play video
games, move a wheelchair, all that kind
of stuff. Obviously, if you're a
quadriplegic or you have ALS and you're
just deteriorating by the day, it's
like, yeah, I'll bypass all that
[ __ ] and go straight into
essentially living in a virtual world.
Now, you can live in the virtual world,
or you can come back out and via the
virtual world, live back in the physical
world with robotics and all that. That
is a no-brainer for anybody in that.
Now, what I think you're getting to is
when will a healthy human begin
augmenting themselves? That's not going
to be in 5 to 7 years. That's going to
be in 10 to 15 years. But, it will
happen, and it will like if you have a
5-year-old,
it might happen before they graduate
high school. Wow. So, it it's like when
you get it in that perspective of how
near term it is, it's like, oh, woah,
like this is transformative. Remember,
Elon is estimating AGI is coming in the
next 24 to 36 months.
Uh AGI is effectively the thing that is
going to usher in
um
ASI because AGI would be you can have as
many humans as you want, as as many as
you can produce the compute for, but you
would be able to bring on
call it
10 million
Einsteins. What does the world look like
when you have 10 million Einsteins,
right? Like that's
Bro, that's wild. What's the moat? Is it
just waiting until it catches on?
>> Energy and compute for No, for like
yeah, yeah, yeah,
for healthy humans to say yes.
>> Safety and utility. So, right now
cutting your brain open is about the
most dangerous thing you can do. There's
a saying in brain science is like once
air touches the brain it's never the
same again. So,
you want to keep that thing locked down
as tight as you can. Now, as we get
better at that, like my mother-in-law
had brain surgery and I was just on a
loop. She's one of my favorite human
beings. On a loop, I was like once air
touches the brain it's never the same
again. And I was just like expecting her
to be different. She is 100% the same.
And dude, literally thoughts and
prayers. Like, bro, I was like
Yeah, I I was beside myself with that
result. I was just so so so hoping for
Uh so, anyway, the years ago now and
she's normal. So, hopefully that's a
sign that things are just getting better
and better and as more of these people
get these implants, I think it'll take a
good 5 to 7 years for there to be even
several hundred of them. And so, that's
why these kind of things like getting
the approvals and all that stuff that
really does take time. But you start
getting out to 10 15 years, you probably
see the first small handful of people
augmenting their brains. Now, someone
like me, when am I going to do it? It's
like first gen tech is always pretty
weak. So, it's like I don't want to look
like a cyborg, I just want to feel like
one. So, I'm probably in the 20 to
30-year range where I start going, yeah,
80 like, you know,
>> 17 Pro comes out, that's that's when
I'll grab it.
>> Exactly. Exactly.
So, I think most people will um wait
quite a ways, but it's really going to
happen. All right, everybody. Till next
time, my friends. Be legendary. See you
guys on Friday. Peace.
If you like this conversation, check out
this episode to learn more. The
Israel-Gaza ceasefire has been broken
and at least 100 people are dead. The
Biden auto pen scandal is gaining new
momentum. The government shutdown
continues and the question now is what
happens when SNAP benefits expire. A
British man was stabbed to death by