The KEY SIGNS That Relationship Won't Last & How To ACTUALLY Find Love! | Esther Perel
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
Esther Perel identifies several critical factors that can dismantle relationships, ranging from complacency and a lack of communication to profound distrust and contempt. She emphasizes that contempt is particularly destructive because it dehumanizes one's partner, while physical disconnection—manifested as a loss of touch or affection—is equally damaging. A key concept she introduces is the danger of "complacency," where partners bring their best selves to work but leave emotional leftovers for home, allowing small issues like unaddressed grievances to accumulate until they bury what was once beautiful under layers of resentment. Perel argues that relationships often deteriorate when individuals stop looking inward and instead focus entirely on blaming their partner, effectively turning the relationship into a "drop-off center" where each person projects their own narrative onto the other without acknowledging shared responsibility or context. To counteract these dynamics, Perel advocates for reconfiguring one's perspective to recognize that relationships are stories we tell ourselves about our experiences. She highlights the importance of naming emotions and defining terms within specific cultural contexts, noting that words like "marriage," "sex," and even "money" carry vastly different meanings depending on whether a person comes from an individualistic or collectivist background. For instance, she illustrates how two friends with deep affection can have fundamentally different stories about their relationship due to unspoken assumptions regarding race, gender roles, or family expectations; one might view a conflict as personal betrayal while the other sees it through a lens of broader social pressures. Understanding these underlying frameworks allows partners to realize they are often mourning different realities rather than fighting over simple content issues like a cup of tea or salary negotiations. Perel outlines three primary dimensions around which most conflicts actually revolve: power and control, trust and closeness, and respect and integrity (or recognition). She explains that the opposite of respect is humiliation and shaming, while true intimacy relies on being "seen" by one's partner, a process rooted in evolutionary biology involving mirror neurons and oxytocin release. Furthermore, she stresses the necessity of flexibility within a relationship system; partners must be able to adapt as they change over decades, maintaining an "agile" connection that evolves from their initial complementary differences into something more integrated. Without this ability to adjust roles and expectations while remaining curious about each other's shifting definitions of success and loyalty, even strong relationships can fracture under the weight of rigid assumptions. Ultimately, Perel suggests practical tools for nurturing connections, such as asking oneself what actions affirm relationship importance or helping others in the moment, which simultaneously reduces depression and boosts self-worth. She also proposes a visual exercise where individuals select two objects representing aspects of their story they wish to leave behind versus those they want to foster, using these daily reminders to guide their behavior. Her work extends beyond romantic partnerships to include colleagues, co-founders, and mixed-cultural families, emphasizing that relational intelligence—the capacity to hold multiple perspectives simultaneously—is essential for success in both personal life and the workplace. By defining terms explicitly and remaining curious about how others experience reality, individuals can transform high-conflict interactions into opportunities for deeper understanding and renewed connection.
Read the full video transcript
Everybody, welcome to another episode of
Impact Theory. I am here with an
extraordinary guest today, Esther Perel,
who I'm very excited about. She is
somebody that has clocked an unhuman
number of hours working on people's
relationships. She has podcasts around
this stuff
and is one of the most extraordinary
thinkers in terms of the
what makes a relationship work and what
makes it fall apart. Esther, welcome to
the show.
Thank you. It's my pleasure to be here.
I want to start with maybe something
that normally people want to know, you
know, what are the
the things that people need to do to
have a great relationship. And I want to
start with the inverse. What are the
things that kill a relationship?
Oh, there's a long list of things that
kill relationships between partners,
but you can apply a lot of these these
downfall principles to any other kind of
relationship.
And I'm not going to put them in order
of importance, but I could the first one
that popped in my head was complacency.
Pure laziness.
The sense that people often bring the
best of themselves suddenly at work and
in other areas and bring the leftovers
to their relationships, which supposedly
are meant to be so important.
A lack of communication, a breakdown in
communication, a profound sense of
distrust, a a sense that the other
person is out to get you rather than to
be benevolent and caring of you.
Contempt is the big killer. I think it's
the the the final blow
because it really implies the
dehumanization of the other person. It's
like I don't even I don't It's not that
I don't care about what you think and
what you feel is that you are not worthy
of any attention.
Violence, aggression of all kinds, the
myriad of situations in which people
attack each other.
A complete physical disconnection,
um, loss of affection, loss of touch,
loss of cuddling, loss of all the stuff
that really connects us physically
beyond sexuality to each other. I mean,
I can uh I can do a long list, right?
Major money issues, massive amounts of
tensions around money and around
discrepancies of responsibility,
imbalances in the relationship, in-laws,
major fights around
This this really is a an epic list. Now,
I I'm tempted to
I can imagine. Which by the way, the
couple's therapy that you do, both the
work show, How's Work, and then the
Couple's Couples, where should we start?
Those are the names of the two podcasts.
Where should we begin? Excuse me. I knew
I was like, I'm going to get the
sequence I'm going to get the right idea
with the wrong sequence of words.
Um
it They're amazing, and the way that
people bring vulnerability and the way
that you're able to tease things out is
is honestly, Esther, it is breathtaking.
Um I love those shows. I cannot speak
highly enough about them. And and
listening to them, you begin to sort of
recognize themes that undergird a lot of
the different things that you just said,
and the one that you started with is
probably the closest, complacency.
Um so, my wife and I, uh as I mentioned
before we started rolling, have been
together now for 20 years, and one thing
that we um identified early is what we
call don't let the dust settle. So, it
it seems to me that a lot of these
things that end up being huge problems,
even the mis- the profound mistrust and
all that, it started with love, and it
becomes profound mistrust. And so,
trying to identify like what it was, and
the idea that we came up with, and I'm
curious to hear if this tracks with what
you know,
is in any of the sort of little moment,
it's something small. It doesn't seem
worth bringing up, so you just let it
be. But then over time, those little
things begin to stack up, and suddenly
what once was, you know, a beautiful
credenza is now buried under 6 in of
dust. Um
is it that or is it more profound things
that people fail to address or don't
have the communication skills to
address?
I mean
it's a combination of a number of
things. You know, it's funny. I was like
I started talking and I suddenly
realized I literally was canvassing just
the sessions of the week and I could
just see the an enormous amount of
pitfalls that I could just list as what
what will, you know, degrade a
relationship. But when people start out
and they have a lot of goodwill and they
give a lot of benefit of the doubt and
they make a point of thanking the other
person, acknowledging what they do,
validating how they feel. The The
experience of being seen is part of the
building of the trust. The experience of
being known. The experience of having
somebody who has deep attention on you
and is curious, fundamentally curious to
get to know you. That kind of
penetration that is highly erotic as in
you feel alive, you feel you feel
vibrant. It's not in the sexual sense of
the word erotic.
This is what the charge that people
feel. You perk up. You sit like this.
Complacency looks like this.
That's the position. It's like whatever
you know, you don't notice anymore. You
don't really pay attention. You start to
feel like you're a function. You know,
you are defined by the tasks that you do
and no longer by the person that you
are. It's a multitude of those things
that ultimately create, step by step, a
disconnect. You know, um that's what I
mean by complacency. It's not It's um
It's a laissez-faire like that, you
know, a laisser-aller where you you
don't notice things, you don't
acknowledge them and the flip side of
that is that you just acknowledge the
negative. You know, you love you become
completely distorted in your perception.
You have a big bias. Whatever is good is
an is a given. There's nothing to say
about it. And whatever is bad can be
amplified to the nth degree.
It's interesting the way that you even
changed your posture and your movements
uh to really capture that idea. So, how
do people avoid that? Like when when you
bring people into your sessions,
it's so powerful because you see and
articulate things they don't seem to
see. So, how is it that people become so
blind to this stuff?
Because people in a relationship, by the
way, especially when they come to
couples therapy, you know, I'm a couples
and family therapist. Primarily, I'm a
systemically trained therapist. I deal
with issues contextually. Um
most of the time when people come to
couples therapy, they don't come to say,
"I came to check myself out."
Couples therapy is often a drop-off
center. You know, they come to tell you,
"Here, here's my partner. And and let me
tell you what I think is the matter with
that person cuz I'm an expert on the
other person." People stop looking at
themselves because they're completely
focused on what's wrong and what's off
and what's missing in the other.
And the first thing you do in couples
therapy is you say to the people, "We're
going to reach
reconfigure the lens." The day you come
in and you start the session by talking
about what you have done to improve
things or what you have done to
deteriorate things, we're working.
That is powerful. A drop-off location.
Uh it's Do they both show up saying
like, "Oh, it's obviously them." or is
is it often one of them is like, "Yo,
this person is
you know, doing all of this wrong." or
is it just sort of equal combativeness?
You can have three types of dances in a
couple. You can have confrontation,
fight-fight. You can have fight-flight.
One is fighting, the other one is
leaving. And then you can have
total distance and, you know,
separating, stonewalling, whatever it
is, you know, fight flight-flight on
both sides. So, it you have all the
dances. You can have one in which each
person comes in and basically says, "But
you."
He, she, they. It's the other, you know?
And then on occasion, you have somebody
who finally says,
Look, Tom, the most amazing thing about
this is I do work with individuals as
well. You hear the story of a person.
You enter into their subjective world.
They tell you, "This is what's going on
in my house with my partner, you know,
whoever else is in the house."
A few months later, you finally meet the
partner. And it's like Swiss cheese.
Everything that one person left out, the
other person fills in.
And you begin to really understand that
you you really need to hear the multiple
voices in a relationship. A relationship
is a story.
When you only listen to one voice, it is
phenomenal how the mind will curate,
select, discard anything that is
unconvenient, uncomfortable about me.
It's like
and we comment about that among
clinicians all the time. It's like
it's uh it's like because he did this,
you can't believe that she said that.
But of course, the next person comes in
and says, "Well, you know, she did this
and this and this." Or he did this and
this and this. And then I flipped.
But all the preceding stuff gets taken
out by the first person to only talk
about what the other one did to which
they reacted. This notion that the you
know, deteriorated relationships,
high-conflict relationships are often
highly reactive. And then you only see
what what the other person did to which
you reacted, and they made you do this,
and if they hadn't done A, you wouldn't
have done B.
Without realizing that
your B is their A.
So, how do we How do we begin to unwind
this, and does it tie into the concept?
So, even just now as you were going
through that, you were naming things.
There's three types of dances. Well, now
that I know the three types of dances, I
can go look for that in my own marriage.
Are there times where we're
fight-flight? Are there times where
we're fight-fight? Are there times where
we're flight-fight? And just having
those words allows me to um introduce a
new category to my life. Do you familiar
with Lisa Feldman Barrett by any chance?
No. I've been on a big kick about her
since I had her on the show, read um her
book, and she talks about basically
having to create categories. That the
way the mind um generates an emotion is
the body feels some kind of way, and
then you go, "Oh, this is anger,
frustration, sadness, whatever." And the
more categories you create for yourself,
the more nuanced you can be in your
response. Right. And I'm curious if as
people start to untangle this, if it's
about giving them the words to begin
grouping what's happening.
So, it's a combination of things. I am
fluent in nine languages. Wow.
Yes. So, language and words and naming
is extremely important to me.
I think that it absolutely organizes
ourselves cognitively, physically,
emotionally. So,
um
it Naming is framing.
But the naming itself, you know, needs
to then become also particular to the
person. So, what you will notice when
you hear, "What should we begin?" or
"How is work?" is that I will
I will paraphrase a person. I will talk
in the first person imagining what it is
that they may be feeling. And then I
will say hot or cold. Like is you know
the old game I used to play as a kid.
And then if they say hot, then I will
say now say it again in your own words.
Because language shapes the experience.
That's Foucault. That's not me.
And once you tell a story, you
experience the story the way you have
told it.
I would say that in Where Should We
Begin and in my clinical work, because
they're the same,
my goal has always been that you come in
with a story in session one and at the
end of the session, you need to leave
with a different story.
Because we come wedded to that story.
And that story articulates our
experience and the meaning we give to
our experience and the title we give to
our relationship and the fate we give to
our relationship. If by the end of the
three hours of the first session, you
leave with a different story, there is
movement. The words no longer stick to
your skin. And now we can begin to
explore what else is here. When people
ask you for sort of blanket statements
about relationships, you always push
back and say, well, that depends on the
culture that we're in.
And I found that very interesting
because of the way that it shook me out
of thinking that in my own relationship,
I had simply uncovered a truth of the
human condition. When in reality, I had
uncovered something only about the
cultural context in which I'm in.
Um
how does that become important? And is
are you looking for ways where maybe the
culture of the two different people is
causing the disconnect? Like what's the
power of that four step?
So, this is very much this is crucial
for me at all times, but it is uniquely
important in thinking about work and
relationships in the workplace as well
because
we may use the same language as in we
may use the same words, but the meaning
of these words
have something completely different.
So, you really want to make sure that
you don't assume I know what you're
saying. Ask. Remain curious at all
times. What does that mean for you?
And who told you that?
So, if I talk about money, if I talk
about gender equality, if I talk about
the role of the woman in the home, if I
talk about the role of the child in the
home, if I talk about the aspirations
that we bring to marriage,
you know, I work with people who come
from cultures where marriages and
happiness have nothing to do with each
other.
The happiness comes from the children.
The happiness comes from doing the right
thing and maintaining your status and
your place in the community. The
happiness doesn't come from talking
intimate pillow talk with your partner.
That's it That's not the point. So,
marriage is the word, but the definition
of marriage is completely different. I
did a course now for three three weeks
in a row. It was called Forbidden
Conversations: Death, Sex, and Money.
I had people from 41 countries.
The word sex is a word, but the meaning
of it, how it is taught, what you're
allowed to experience, what you're
allowed to expect, how do you establish
the trust, all of these are culturally
defined. Money, you bet, you know. So,
when I ask people, what is a couple for
you?
How do you define a marriage?
What are the expectations that you bring
to marriage and how are your
expectations different from the
generations that preceded you? Let's do
a genogram. Let me go down three
generations. What did your grandfather
and your grandmother think is marriage?
What did they think was the role of the
parents vis-a-vis the children? What was
their alliance or their loyalty to their
own parents? How much were they allowed
to do what they want and they should do
what is right for them? And how much did
they learn that what is right for them
is never separate from how it affects
those that are close to them.
As in individualism versus collectivism.
Why does all that matter? I have a
hypothesis. Mhm. But why why does that
matter? I have a guess, but I'm very
curious as to why you get people to
contextualize themselves
after starting with you're saying a
word, but you don't necessarily know for
each other what it means.
This thing about doing the right thing
When I arrived to the US I worked for
many years, almost 20 years, with a a
real focus on working with mixed
couples, interracial, interreligious,
and intercultural families. And this
notion of do I have a right to marry who
I want?
That's a given for you in North America.
That is not a global given. And so, when
people struggled with that, somebody
would say, "You should do what's right
for you."
Well, the vast majority of the world has
never raised their children to do what's
right for them.
They raised their children to do what's
expected from them.
You bring that person and everybody
today is a global nomad of sorts.
You know, people are moving around all
the time. And it looks like because they
work in tech or they work in some some
enterprises that look like they are
homogenized in some way, that they think
alike.
And they don't.
If IBM takes 20,000 people that work in
their company, they don't think alike.
They don't value trust in the same way.
They don't have the same conception of
what does it mean to speak up?
So, I may think you never say anything.
Well, you may think that that's how you
maintain harmony.
I think, you know, you don't you're not
engaged. You think you're engaged in
preserving the well-being of the group.
I mean, do you want me to go on or are
we
Well, I have a another question for you.
So, I mean, sense what I just said.
Very much so. And so, here's what I hear
you saying. Let me know if this is
accurate that
in any context, you're going to be
coming from a slightly different place.
You could be coming from a different
place because of your particular family.
You could be coming from a different
place because of your particular
experiences. You could also be coming
from a different place because of your
cultural background or whatever. And you
have to essentially define terms in
order to know what your values are, know
what each other expect, so that when
you're talking
and and I've often said it doesn't
matter what you say, it matters what the
other person hears. And so, effective
communication is about making sure they
hear what you mean.
And
that's sort of what I hear here is that
people have to be aware of their
context, aware of their partner's
context, and then bring that together so
that they're actually having the same
conversation.
Is that what lends this so much
importance?
And I will add one piece.
The defining of the terms is directly
connected with the meaning of these
terms. We are meaning-making creatures.
We don't live outside of meaning
frameworks.
It's not just what what is this? Is
therefore what does it mean for you? How
does that define the way that you look
at your life, the way that you define
success, the way that you define
loyalty, the way that you define
closeness?
It It's not we we need to be aware of
it. It's a total given that when a
person speaks
in their speech is them, their family,
and the group that they grew up with,
the world they grew up in. These things
are always intertwined with each other.
I make it explicit because otherwise
people swim in molasses and they have no
idea what's happening to them.
It clarifies. It lightens up. It brings
air. It
you know, it
That's why I never knew. You know, you
say we never talk. I think we don't
stop.
Yeah, I had so in my previous company, I
had two other partners and there would
be times where we would just be butting
heads and they seemed stupid to me, I
seemed stupid to them, and I remember
thinking, "Hold on. I know this guy's
really bright." And he's not being
obstinate for the sake of being
obstinate. So, what's going on? And I
realized that people have base
assumptions that are driving the use of
words or an expectation. And so, like
you're saying, you know, here I am
thinking we talk all the time, they're
thinking we never talk. And so, I'm
coming from the base assumption of we
talk all the time. Why do we have to
talk more? They're coming from the base
assumption of we never talk. So, like
come on, engage. And
that has been
that 65%
of startups fail because the
relationship between the co-founders
breaks down?
I cheated. I did know that because I
listened to so much of your content. But
yes, you were the one that taught me
that. I know that comes from a a
professor at Harvard actually. Um um and
of course now I'm going to blank on his
name,
but it'll come back. I I found that
incredible because I'm thinking what an
enormous waste of great ideas because
probably among these people there were
some unique discoveries that will be
completely wasted. But what it also says
to me is that relational intelligence,
which is also the ability to hold
multiple perspectives,
multiple ways of viewing something at
the same time. And to be able to tap
into nuance and ambiguity is key.
You know, it's really that that is it's
not just there's there they're not
stupid, you know, of course I know this
guy. It's kind of
What are these people doing to each
other that they're landing in a place
where they end up saying such a thing
when in fact they think the opposite?
And and what
How do you train somebody to get good at
the holding that perspective? So one
would just be like they have to know
what the other person's perspective is
and I'm curious if I'm not in a room
with you and you're very good at it, but
how do I
grow to understand their perspective,
whether it's my business partner or my
significant other?
So I'm thinking, you know, to put it in
context, yesterday I worked with a
session on a session for how is work.
Um, and
the woman the she she's a white woman
this white woman who has worked with a
black gay male supervisor. They've had a
very very close relationship for working
together for a number of years and a
deep friendship.
She thinks she left the job because they
were stuck in a salary negotiation.
And on some level she feels that he
didn't stand up for her.
But she is a she thinks this is the
story of two dear friends.
And that's the context. He thinks
this is not just two friends. This is
two friends of which one is black and
one is white and of which one person it
was going to look a certain way if he
continues to negotiate on behalf of a
white woman's salary while there's a lot
of other people there whose salaries are
not being touched.
She can psychologize their relationship
and individualize it and make it just
about him and her. He can never separate
the friendship from the larger
categories that they both inhabit.
A few days earlier, I'm So, this is what
I This is the clarification. It's like,
you know, it's to to allow him and her
to to basically realize that they've
been mourning a different story.
And they came They've had a conversation
in their heads for a year with each
other. And they literally came to try to
have this conversation once and for all,
you know,
by me basically holding a container for
them. And a few days before, I'm working
with a couple that own a gym.
He
He's the tech. He's the thinker. He's
the synthesizer. He puts it all out
there and then he, you know, she goes in
She's the intuitive, you know.
In the beginning, this was very
attractive to them. It was a
complementarity. That's another major
rule of relationship. The very thing
that people often come in fighting over
is what was once originally very
attractive to each other.
When the meaning of the difference was
different. So, now I'm tracking with
them. How did this thing that once was
so attractive to them become a thing
from which they fight with each other at
home? They go and have staff meetings
and they basically do their fights in
front of the staff. Not good. Not a good
idea. Right? So, we're looking at how
did the complementarity turn into a
polarization?
You know, but here is the the as I'm
saying this
probably the the last thing This is a
whole seminar I'm working on
relationship is to explain to people
this.
You never fight
over the thing that you think you're
fighting over or talk or argue, whatever
it is. It's not the content.
It's rarely the content.
If I think that you don't care about me,
no matter what we talk about, the fact
that that's what I think is going to
permeate how I interpret what you're
saying.
If I think that you want my well-being,
I will interpret everything you say from
that angle. The process shapes the
experience. The form is more important
than the content. This is like golden
rules. If you want to write down the 10,
you know, and with that
comes the notion
that people fight over three things
primarily: power and control,
trust and closeness, respect and
integrity.
Mhm. And once you know that, you start
to look you don't listen for the noise
and the content. Especially when people
have 20 years together, you know,
there's a lot of stories they can come
back to. You just look, what is it that
they are really fighting over?
What do they experience from each other
at that moment? Is it about power? Is it
about trust? Or is it about recognition?
That is so powerful. And just to echo it
very quickly, my the biggest fight my
wife and I have ever gotten into was
over a cup of tea. And of course the
punchline to the argument was, we're not
arguing about the tea. What is this
really about? And once we got to what we
were really arguing about, then we
could, you know, diffuse the situation.
What was it?
Um it was that I was feeling
disrespected because I wanted to take
her away, which that's actually not
true. I at the time, I work a lot now,
but then I worked to the point of
damaging my marriage and my wife pulled
me aside and said, "You're damaging the
marriage. We need to take some time." I
was so panicked about taking time off at
that point in my career, and we were so
poor that spending what, $149 on a hotel
was like an unimaginable amount of money
to me. And so when the only way I could
justify it was the second we wake up, we
need to get in the car, get to the
hotel, so that the moment we can get
into the the room that we get in, we
make the most of it. And
Maximizing, maximizing.
Yes. And she wanted to like to connect
and to bond and to go slow and for once
me not trying to be efficient and and so
she was you know wanted to have this cup
of tea and just relax into the day, but
she wasn't saying that and I wasn't
saying my side of it. So I was just like
Yo, you're going to have a cup of tea
now? And you know it just like escalate
escalate escalate until it was absolute
madness. And finally me saying this is
how I feel, this is why I'm you know
upset
and then she could explain to me her
perspective. Then it was like
ah, you know what you were saying of
like when you know what their
perspective is and you can step inside
that and go, oh wow this isn't an
assault on me. This doesn't mean that
you don't have respect for me or you
don't care about what this means to me.
It's that you didn't know what it meant
to me because I never articulated it.
And both of you had actually a shared
goal.
Which you lost sight of.
Very aggressive.
wanted to make this a special day.
You had a different idea of how to do
it. That that umbrella notion needs to
be added on there as well. Yeah,
completely.
said. You know.
Okay, so I want to go back to the the
three reasons that we fight. Respect and
and integrity and maybe what I didn't
understand about that is I don't
understand how respect and integrity go
together. Help me understand that. Um
it's it's actually respect and
recognition, but the recognition is
about integrity. This is coming from the
work of Howard Markman. This is not my
my uh original thinking. And he has a
they have a few more, but what it means
is
um
am I seen?
Is the question of recognition.
Am I seen? You know, and this seen is a
very very important
experience of bonding. It you know, you
like evolutionary thinking. You know, it
is the 18 cm between the baby and the
parent. It is through the eyes that this
bonding takes place. The mirror neurons
are are are formed, that the the the
oxytocin is released. I mean, it is
really profound in our
scheme of bonding. So,
you have one is power.
You have one is trust, and then you have
another one, which is
you can call it respect and recognition,
and you can call it integrity. But, in
the end, it is about,
you know, the full word, the full
definition of the word integrity,
integritas, which is integrated.
As well as it is morally unified, it is
also integrated. So, it's essential to
people. Um it's that that you don't
distort my intention. It's that you know
where I'm coming from. It's that you
um
They're all interrelated, you know.
They're all interrelated, but that's
that's the that's the notion.
The opposite of respect and recognition
is humiliation, shaming.
Yeah, which that to me is, along with
contempt, and I don't remember what the
official four horsemen of the apocalypse
are. I remember that that
Criticism, defensiveness, stonewalling,
and contempt. That's John Gottman. Yeah.
Absolutely amazing. Each one of those
more terrifying than the next. Talk to
me about roles. How much do we need to
define roles coming in? Because I found
in both business and in my marriage that
being very clear about roles,
expectations, desires,
um it meaning desire for your partner,
like I desire for you to do XYZ,
um have been very important to finding
harmony. Yes, that's one piece. But, the
second part
is the ability to have flexibility in
the system that allows people's ideas,
beliefs, expectations, desires to
change.
So, talk to me about that. You've said
that we may have multiple relationships
with the same person throughout our
life. What do you mean by that?
It means that the relationship is
flexible and nimble or what you like to
often call these days, we call it agile,
enough to
adapt itself to the changes that people
go through. If we live as long as we do
and we want relationship that lasts
decades, they're not going to look the
same at 60 that they were at 25.
Esther, I could literally talk to you
forever and ever and ever about this. If
we were going to give people a very
brief sort of
list of tools that they can use to get
the most out of their relationships, not
necessarily their
romantic relationships, just
relationships. What does that small bag
of tricks look like?
I
would say this. Ask yourself,
what have I done lately
to affirm the importance of my
relationships in my life?
Is there someone I owe a phone call to?
Not a text.
A phone call. Is there someone I need to
talk to that I've been meaning to reach
out to?
Is there someone I owe an apology to?
Is there
someone who I could help in this moment?
Anytime you do for others,
you actually A, are less depressed and
B, you feel better about yourself. So,
that's the first one.
Second one is, what have I done to
nurture my connections?
You know, am I feeling How am I doing?
Just kind of sit them in for a minute
and just draw it on a piece of paper.
How am I doing? Then you take two
objects.
Just right now, as you sit wherever you
are in front of you and you look. One
object that represents
an aspect of your relationship story
that you would like to leave behind,
that you would like to free yourself
from.
That no longer serves you. And another
object that represents an aspect of your
relationship story that you would like
to foster, to harness, to maintain, to
develop further.
And put these two objects next to you on
your desk. And every day, you just ask
yourself, "What have I done about this
one? And what am I doing about that one?
Where am I coming from and where do I
want to go?"
I love that.
Esther, where can people engage with
you? What's the best place to get more
of your magic?
Huh. The The portal of living doll is
estherperel.com.
Um for any of the people who are
coaches, educators, relationship
professionals, HR people, it's sessions.
Um and the podcast, Where Should We
Begin, which is in season four,
finished. And How Is Work, which we are
actually casting for season two. Any
pairs, colleagues, co-workers,
co-founders who want to deal with some
relationship issues at work, this is the
time.
Um Mating in Captivity and The State of
Affairs are the books. And Rekindling
Desire, if you're a couple that wants to
reinvigorate your own relationship. Um
those are probably some of the main
ones. And the the new one thumb that I
can whisper to you is that I actually am
having a lot of fun creating
what I think is going to be a fantastic
card game.
Really? Yeah. All right. Well, sign me
up for that. I I am all about that.
Nice. That's cool. Is it for couples?
It's for friends. It's for couples. It's
for people who've just met and who It's
actually No, it's not a relationship
game per se, but it is
a
It speaks about our relationships
through stories, but it's a game. It's
not just cards to answer questions. Wow.
It's a game where you can really, you
know, I like to play games.
That's exciting. Do you have a
a date when that's going to be
available?
Probably end of February.
Okay, soon.
Well, that's
I'm excited. But
but it's really all on a step real.com.
So, um I think that I've said the main
ones, right? You can do that part. It's
very hard
to sell one's own.
Yeah, we'll also have all the links. But
guys, trust me when I say that you're
going to want to read the books, listen
to the podcast. It's really amazing. It
she is one of the unique people that her
breadth of what she can talk about is
extraordinary and the different types of
relationships that she dives in. As you
listen to the podcast, you will realize
that she is as adept at handling work
problems as she is at handling the
sexual frustrations of
a couple that's, you know, beginning to
disintegrate. It's really really
breathtaking. So, be sure to engage
heavily. And speaking of things that you
should engage heavily in, if you haven't
already, be sure to subscribe. And until
next time, my friends, be legendary.
Take care.
Once you start to develop a spiritual
relationship of your own understanding,
you'll notice wild synchronicities in
your life. You'll notice invisible doors
open for you. And even though you're a
science guy, you have a lot of God in
your life whether you realize it or not
because you wouldn't be sitting here
right now being driven by this great
force of inspiration doing the major
things that you've done in this world if
you hadn't been tapped into that source.
Mhm.