The Journalist Who TERRIFIES Corporate America | Ash Sarkar Meets Amy Goodman from @DemocracyNow
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
In this compelling interview, Ash Sarkar sits down with Amy Goodman, co-founder of Democracy Now!, to explore the vital role of independent media in an era where mainstream outlets struggle to command public trust. Goodman argues that while building such a platform is expensive and laborious, it is essential for holding power accountable and amplifying the voices of the silenced majority on critical issues like climate change and racial justice. She defines her approach not as activism but as rigorous campaigning journalism, which involves following stories to their resolution regardless of political alignment and prioritizing authentic narratives from those directly affected over punditry. This philosophy extends to her belief that local community care is the foundation for addressing global concerns, asserting that one cannot ignore immediate issues like infrastructure or ICE raids while claiming to solve broader problems like genocide or empire.
The conversation delves into specific investigative triumphs and harrowing personal experiences that underscore the high cost of truth-telling. Goodman recounts Democracy Now!'s reporting on Chevron's involvement with death squads in Nigeria, which led to the execution of activist Ken Saro-Wiwa by the Nigerian regime after Shell attempted to silence his protests. She also shares her terrifying testimony from the 1991 massacre in East Timor, where she and her crew hid their equipment and were beaten by Indonesian soldiers who mistook them for Australians due to their Western privilege; they used this perceived status to escape and broadcast evidence of the atrocity that eventually contributed to a successful UN-sponsored referendum for East Timorese independence. These stories illustrate the dangerous reality journalists face when standing up against oppression, yet they highlight the ultimate victory achieved through persistence and international solidarity.
Beyond specific cases, the dialogue addresses the ethical landscape of modern journalism and the nature of their diverse audience. Goodman advocates against exclusives, believing that sharing stories across multiple outlets maximizes their impact and fosters a community that learns from one another rather than adhering to rigid political lines. She reflects on controversies, such as an interview with George Galloway regarding "family values," noting that some viewers mistakenly accused Democracy Now! of behaving like corporate media, whereas their global reach is built on early online distribution and open transcripts that offer truths unavailable in traditional outlets. Furthermore, she draws strength from her own family history, identifying as both rooted in her Jewish diaspora background and as an "anywhere" citizen who believes that caring for everyone is necessary for survival, a value instilled since childhood debates about the Vietnam War with her grandfather.
Ultimately, the interview concludes by emphasizing that audiences are increasingly seeking aligned truths online because corporate media no longer provides reliable information, particularly regarding issues like the lies of President Trump. Goodman's journey from reading newspapers at age eight to witnessing global atrocities demonstrates that independent journalism requires a heart for the truth and a commitment to expanding the media frame beyond corporate rhetoric. By focusing on real human stories and maintaining love even in the face of disagreement within her family, she exemplifies how journalists can bridge divides and ensure that the voices of the marginalized are heard. The segment serves as a powerful reminder that while the path is difficult, the necessity of independent media remains crucial for democracy and global justice.
Read the full video transcript
We understood then, um,
as the soldiers marched up, was there
any hope here?
And we always hid our equipment because
if anyone was caught talking to us, they
could be killed, disappeared.
I slung the tape recorder over my
shoulder that I had hidden in my bag. I
held up my microphone like a flag. Alan
put the camera above his head. We walked
to the front of the crowd. The soldiers
marched up 10 to 12 abreast.
Without any warning, without any
hesitation, without any provocation,
they swept past us,
and they just opened fire on the crowd,
gunning people down from right to left.
We could not succeed in stopping the
massacre.
>> [music]
>> We're in an era where absolutely nobody
trusts the mainstream media anymore.
Audiences are fragmenting and seeking
out truths which align with their
worldview online.
The result has been political
volatility, but it's not a political
volatility that the left has necessarily
benefited from, at least not as much as
the political right. But some of us are
trying. You don't have to tell me how
difficult it is to build truly
independent media. It's expensive, it's
laborious, and trying to get a story
into mainstream circulation can
sometimes feel like pushing a boulder
uphill. For 30 years, Democracy Now has
been doing just that. Covering global
politics for an American audience,
holding corporations and politicians to
account with impressive tenacity. I'm
really excited to be able to speak to
Amy Goodman, co-founder and co-presenter
of Democracy Now.
She truly has been one of those
journalists who has dedicated themselves
to the first draft of history,
witnessing massacres up close,
uncovering the truth behind American
corporate involvement with death squads
overseas. She's been at the center of
political stories in Washington, and
she's even faced arrest for her
journalistic work. Amy's extraordinary
career is the subject of a new
documentary, "Steal This Story, Please",
covering her work from East Timor to the
Niger Delta to Palestine to Washington.
And I am just really excited to be able
to pick her brains and understand what
it is that drives her as a campaigning
journalist. I hope you enjoy this
episode.
Amy Goodman, thank you so much for
joining us on Downstream.
>> Let me just take that gulp of coffee. I
can't tell you, Ash, how honored I am to
be directly sitting across a table from
you. It really is a pleasure and an
honor.
>> The privilege is is definitely all mine.
Um you have no idea how often we say
Democracy Now when we're thinking about
what is it we want to do next? Well,
like, what does what Democracy Now do?
Um so, I suppose that the the first
thing that I wanted to ask you about is
that on the Democracy Now YouTube
channel, your most viewed video is an
interview with the economist uh
Richard Wolff about the decline of
American Empire. Now, once upon a time,
you'd say, "All right, that belongs to
some dusty corner of the academy. You
might have a bit of a a lefty conference
and people show up with their tweed and
their elbow patches." And if you're
lucky, you get
80 people in a room discussing it.
>> You found an audience of millions of
people who are engaging with that kind
of material.
>> by the way, Ash?
>> 5 million people wanted to watch that
interview. Um
why do you think that is? Why do you
think that that is the kind of content
that is resonating with people at this
moment in time?
>> I mean, I think it's happening all over
the world, and I'm coming to you from
the United States, where there is a
explosion of interest and support for uh
new wave for example of people I don't
even want to say politicians of people
representing the public in Congress and
mayor being mayor and governor and
there [clears throat] are a lot of
issues that they care about and some
people call it sewer socialism
some people call it pothole politics
deep concerns I was summarizing it the
other day saying it's gas
it's groceries and interestingly it's
Gaza and each represent something much
bigger than that
but it's a new way of how do we take
care of this planet beginning with
individuals their families the
communities and communities all over the
world
>> I mean so that's an interesting thing is
that you've got these
two very different kinds of scale so on
the one hand you've got sewer socialism
right build the infrastructure you've
got the price of gas you've got potholes
I mean Zoran Mandani is he's a great
communicator and if he's fixing
something he's going to let you know I
saw him fixing a water leak today
you know this idea of you've got to deal
with these little problems that people
live with every day and then you've got
something on the scale of the genocide
um
you know
are there tensions between those two
things right how do you decide
particularly as you know someone
involved in media where your attention
goes do you go big but kind of far away
or do you go micro but very close
>> and also you have Andy Burnham who's
talking about nationalizing the water
supply right because as we came into
London we flew in from Edinburgh the
international festival there
that's what I learned was happening
possibly in London
and in the UK what exactly does that
mean? But I think it's everything. It's
why local newspapers
matter so much. We're losing hyper-local
news sites. But that's where we all
begin. That's where we live. Um if we
deal with those issues, it's not just
and then you'll care about bigger
issues. Those often represent the
biggest issues right in your own
community. I mean, when an ICE agent
comes into town and rips away an
immigrant family, um ICE of course is uh
the acronym for Immigration and Customs
Enforcement in the United States. I I
think it's pretty appropriate icing
people out.
Absolutely terrifying.
>> force.
>> Oh, completely. In fact, they're talking
about investing in millions of dollars
um
in these gloves that have been
developed. We've heard individuals
talking about the policeman's glove
shock them as opposed to a taser, but
it's gloves that shock.
Um and but it starts locally and people
care locally perhaps more than when you
hear it on a national level. It's too
abstract. And hearing people speak in
their community, um
uh
I think about what's happened in
Minneapolis, for example, and I know I'm
sure your viewers and listeners have
heard what um happened there with the
ICE surge, with the killing of Alex Pret
and May Good, uh and the ripping away of
children from their families, and um
other people being taken out of their
cars. I think about one woman named
Ilhan Omar.
>> Mhm. Um she's in her early 40s,
extremely eloquent. Um she is autistic.
She was headed to the doctor. And uh
I smashed her car window.
They put their hand into the car. She's
the driver. And you know how you have
your seatbelt across from your shoulder
to your waist.
And they had either I don't know if it
was scissors or a blade and they were
taking it across or her neck and she
thought, "Oh my god, these guys have
died. I'm next."
Uh but what they did is they cut her
seatbelt at her shoulder. Ripped her
out. She's hanging from her shoulders.
They're holding her arms behind her
back. She's saying, "Please stop.
I was headed to the doctor. I am trying
to process this, understand what you are
all saying."
>> Cuz everyone's shouting all at the same
time.
>> is screaming and she's arrested, brought
to the um Whipple Detention Center, the
ICE jail.
>> [clears throat]
>> When she gets out, of course, we want to
talk to her. I don't want to talk to
other people about her situation. I want
to talk to Ilhan. And she came on and
she talked about what happened. Um
And uh
then Ilhan Omar, the congresswoman from
Minneapolis. You know, she's the Somali
refugee congresswoman. The congresswoman
>> symmetrical face I've ever seen. Like
she she really does.
>> Um well, you I don't know if that's why
uh the president [clears throat] calls
her garbage, but he does. It is hard to
believe. I'm talking about the president
of the United States, most powerful
country on Earth, or at least it was.
Um And well, he calls the whole Somali
community of the Twin Cities of
Minneapolis and St. Paul garbage. And
she invited Ilhan to be her guest at the
State of the Union. Uh where President
Trump would speak. And he she was so
injured. She was so hurt. But she was so
honored. And she went. And so
>> [clears throat]
>> we talked her about that experience. We
said, "Wait a second. Now you're going
to be in the Congress to hear this
address. Could we have you on again?"
After. She said, "Absolutely." We We're
going to have her on the next morning.
So she goes to the State of the Union.
You might have heard about this.
President Trump I think it was the
longest State of the Union address in
history. Uh the Republicans were
standing up applauding sitting down
standing up applauding I mean sitting
down. And it would have been the same if
it was the other way with the Democrats.
But to say the least raucous. And the
guests are up in the gallery where
Aaliyah was. She was between a police
chief of one town and a mayor of another
who were also guests like her invited.
And he starts to denigrate the uh
Minneapolis community. And she stands up
in silent protest. Just stands at her
seat. I mean I don't know if you could
even see her as people were standing up
sitting down standing up. But the
security saw her. And they dragged her
out. They dragged her out. She stood up
silently. So this is now happening to
her a second time. We didn't know this.
We were just wanted to have her
experience of being Congress.
She's arrested. Um
>> [clears throat]
>> she's let out at like 4:00 in the
morning. She did have a date with us at
8:00 Eastern Standard Time when we do
Democracy Now. She heads into the
studio. We didn't know all this had
happened to her.
And she was wearing I said to her, "What
can you What are you talking about?" And
she said, "I'm wearing the same clothes
I wore last night because I came to you
from the State of the Union after my
arrest. But I made a commitment that I
would be on your show." And then she
tells this gruesome story again.
And you know this documentary about
Democracy Now Steal This Story Please.
The title of it is because as Aaliyah
told her story all the networks picked
it up. Here was a woman telling her own
story, and that is why I think Democracy
Now and Independent Media is so
important. We don't have the pundits on
who know so little about so much
explaining the world to us and getting
it so wrong. But the person herself. And
as she told her story, the New York
Times reported, the Washington Post,
she's picked up on the networks. I
consider an exclusive a failure.
>> Well, so this is one of the really
provocative things in the documentary.
So you say an exclusive is a failure
because what you want is your colleagues
across the industry picking up the
story, taking it up almost like a battle
standard for themselves and and really
running with it. And that I I wonder if
there's a a sort of um political
provocation in there, which is an
exclusive is very individualistic, and
it's about me and my status as a
journalist, and look, I got the scoop.
And this is a way of I guess seeing
journalism a little bit more as a
collective enterprise across Oh,
different outlets.
>> Completely. And I want people to steal
the model of Democracy Now.
Um independent,
uh listener, viewer, reader supported
around the planet, and that's how you
can get by. I mean,
we just celebrated our 30th anniversary,
and
>> Masha Allah.
>> Uh thank you. Thank you. At Riverside
Church, where
Martin Luther King spoke a year to the
day before he was assassinated, he gave
his speech against the Vietnam War,
April 4th, 1967.
Um and he said, "My country, the United
States, is the greatest purveyor of
violence on Earth."
Um he was castigated by the corporate
media, right? Life magazine, I have a
copy of the Life magazine. I think they
said something like um he had done a
disservice to his cause, his country,
his people.
Um
but he just doubled down and he said,
you know, we have to take on the three
pillars of materialism, militarism, and
racism.
Um
that is a true sanctuary of dissent,
that place. And that's what I think of
public media as, radio and television.
It's what I think of Novara media as. Um
it's what I think of independent
cinemas, art houses as, public libraries
as, sanctuaries
of dissent. We have to make dissent
commonplace because dissent is what will
save us.
>> Well, let's talk about the model. And I
really want to know what the editorial
process is like inside Democracy Now
because at the end of the documentary
that we're talking about, steal the
story, please.
Um we we're taken to October 7th, 2023.
What was that editorial meeting like
when the news is coming through about
the Hamas attacks?
Um what are you thinking in terms of how
do we cover this story? How do we
anticipate what's coming next in terms
of the Israeli military response? How do
we frame this for our audience? What
were those conversations like?
>> based on what's happening that day, it
was actually a Saturday.
And I was spending the morning at a
hundredth anniversary of a Jewish
socialist camp where people like Marisa
Tomei went um and many others. Uh and
they were having a big celebration at a
community college in New York. I
remember it was pouring rain. Um and
then I was headed to the local mosque um
at New York University where
a friend's son was getting married.
Um and all of this was happening as this
was taking place from this huge Jewish
gathering to a Muslim gathering. Um that
was Saturday. That was just a day in the
life. And then of course we do the show
Monday through Friday and it's just as
it's happening, we're learning, we're
trying to get the voices on. Who would
have thought it would be a revolutionary
act to speak to a Palestinian
journalist? I mean, that's where it's
happening.
>> Mhm.
>> But according to the rest of the media
it is. It is astounding
when you [snorts] see what's ensued over
the next two years. The lack of voices
of just Palestinians, whatever their
view. I'm not talking about sound bites
of a official.
I'm talking about people describing
their lives. That's also why I think
hyperlocal media is so important and
that's where you start in this. Because
that's when people identify when, you
know, you've got your arm around your
baby and you're trying to ensure that
your baby survives that night. That's
what it's not about Republican,
Democrat, it's not about a political
position. You just identify.
And it's hard work and I want to say at
Democracy Now, I am part of a brain
trust of love. I mean, people deeply
committed to independent media.
Videographers,
journalists, producers, graphic
designers,
uh directors, uh camera people, all
committed to the same thing to ensure
that we get as close to the story as we
can.
And the only time we tell someone else's
story instead of them telling it
themselves is
when they're afraid, when their
livelihood is threatened, when their own
life is threatened, when
um you know, there is a reason that they
can't speak. Then we get people closer
to them who can tell the story until
they can tell their own, if they can.
Um and that's the power I called
Democracy Now news with a heart. And
it's news with a heart because it's
people describing their own experience
and there's nothing more powerful. I
think it's also why there's such a large
youth audience cuz young people, you
know,
connect with authenticity.
Um and it's not one political line. It's
understanding when someone is pulling
the wool over your eyes, when someone is
just um repeating something that they
have heard, but that's not actually
what's happening. And that's what we try
to do every single day.
>> Interrupting this episode of Downstream
to let you know that tickets have just
gone live for our next Downstream IRL.
We are super excited that mega big deal
cultural theorist Katherine Liu is
making her way across the pond. She will
be in the UK with us for an event on
trauma farming, all about the
commodification of suffering in the
attention economy. And if that's not
enough for you, we will also be joined
by Darren McGarvey, aka Loki. Basically,
we're going to be talking about how pain
became a leading personal brand. Join us
at Earth Hackney on Monday, 21st of
September. Doors open at 6:30, so come
along. Look your friends in the eye. Get
a drink at the bar. Just get off your
screens for one evening.
Looking forward to see you there.
>> What do you make of
this emerging cohort of right-wing
journalists who have actually begun
questioning and calling out the American
government's backing of Israel. I mean,
do you think someone like Tucker Carlson
really cares about Palestinians?
>> You mean the America First party that
Marjorie Taylor Greene, Tucker Carlson,
um
uh Congressman Massie uh from Kentucky
uh
who was
very vocal with Ro Khanna from
California, Massie and Khanna
in demanding transparency around the
Epstein files.
Uh
>> [clears throat]
>> I It is in its infancy and uh I mean,
well
probably
a lot uh you can learn a lot from just
their name, America First.
>> [snorts]
>> I think we are so far
beyond that um unless they mean by it
that the only way
we can protect our country is by
protecting everyone, but I don't exactly
think that's what they mean.
>> I mean, let let's talk about that that
sort of relationship between the only
way we can protect us is by protecting
everyone because
when I was watching steal this story,
please, I was thinking what would a a
right-wing critic say? And so, somebody
like David Goodhart who's, you know, a
sort of right-wing communitarian, he's
got this theory of somewheres and
anywheres. So, he says that somewheres
are connected to a real sense of place,
tend to be more socially conservative,
they care about themselves, their
families, the people in their immediate
communities, um tend to have
uh
lower educational qualifications, so
didn't necessarily go to university and
all that, don't tend to move very far
from where they live. And he'd say that
anywheres are people like me and you,
all right? So,
um
live in big cosmopolitan cities, have
big cosmopolitan values, often went to
university, very um, comfortable with
social change, and quite fast-moving
social change. And his accusation would
be we're more interested
in other places than we are
the nation, our home, our immediate
communities. And he would say that
organizations like Novara or indeed
Democracy Now, we're media for
anywheres. We're not media for
somewheres. And I was wondering what you
would say back to that critique.
>> Well, this is the first time I have
heard that, and
you know, one of the things that the
documentary [clears throat]
Still the Story plays explores is where
I come from. Um, is [clears throat] my
Jewish background, and
I think that has informed so much of how
I view the world, and I don't I'm not
really speaking from um, a religious
place, a secular place, but the fact uh,
that my family, you know, came out of
the Holocaust, and some survived, and
some didn't. Um, that people came
ultimately to the United States. My
grandfather, my mom's father, was an
Orthodox rabbi who ran a yeshiva in
Brooklyn. Um, my father's grandfather
was the Henry Street rabbi,
uh, on the Lower East Side. He was a
Hasidic rabbi, and that went back to my
great great great great grandfather, who
is the Baal Shem Tov, the founder of
Hasidism.
Um, but,
uh,
I was imbued with a sense growing up
through my education. I went to the both
schools, you know, I went to Hebrew
school, I went to regular school. Um my
mother went to Yeshiva. She went to uh
religious college and to Hunter College,
the public school.
Um everything was just sort of done uh
parallel until in her last semester,
senior year at Hunter and at I think it
was Jewish Theological College. Um she
said, "I'm going to follow the secular
route. Why am I trying She would do her
homework on the subways between the
schools and she was coming home and she
came out of the subway and my
grandfather who would, you know, be with
a top hat or a yarmulke waiting for her
and then walking home. She said, "You
know, Dad, I think I am not going to
finish with the other school." He said,
"Fine."
And she said, "Fine."
After all of these years,
you don't care? I did this for you."
And so he said, "Whatever you want,
Dorothy." What uh her name was Dorothy,
Dorie. "Whatever you want." I mean, and
that I had these long conversations with
my grandfather walking through the
streets of Brooklyn, him with his hands
behind him back his back at his waist
and we would walk Many people as we
passed, they would say, "Good day,
Father. Hello, Father." Although he was
a rabbi. He could have been a priest, he
could have been a
rabbi. He could have been an imam.
>> [laughter]
>> Um
and we debated everything. And that's
what was encouraged. Um
>> And so you were possibly I'm actually
such a somewhere. This is so rooted in
the sort of experience of the Jewish
diaspora in New York. Nowhere else could
have made me.
>> Well, it's
it really was about seeing what could
have happened and I was always stunned
when I was growing up
um that when I learned about the
Holocaust that non-Jews helped Jews.
That a Christian family would help a
child and hide him in the barn when
they're jeopardizing themselves. Um you
know, the story of Anne Frank, of
course. I mean, hidden in an attic, a
whole family.
And why would non-Jews do this? Why
would someone who's Christian who's only
everything to lose?
Um
I you know, they're called the
righteous, and that is absolutely true.
And I think I was imbued with the sense
from very early on, never again for
anyone
anywhere. So, maybe with the somewhere
the anywheres, I mean, and especially in
the world we live in with uh internet
connecting us all, um we are so
connected everywhere. And that that is
what I deeply believe that um we cannot
get by unless we all get by. And so, we
have to care everywhere,
in each of our communities, and we have
to ensure we all move forward.
>> One of the things which I like the most
about the documentary is when you talked
about your family newspaper. So, you
weren't the first
uh journalist in your family. It was
your little brother.
>> brother David. I have three brothers. My
younger brother David, when he was 8
years old, he started Dave's Press. Um
and I'm very proud uh that we just did a
swing through Vermont. He's a Vermont
journalist. Um and
>> [clears throat]
>> I was with the editor-in-chief of Dave's
Press.
He's my brother. [laughter]
Yes, at 8 years old we put he put out
I'm not going to say we put out the
family newspaper. I just dunned everyone
for money. My grandfather, my great
aunts and uncles, my cousins, you've got
to pay your one penny subscription per
year, or you're You're getting this
paper. And then I would put the
newspaper under my parents' pillows and
my brother's pillows. I would slip it
under people's doors.
>> And there was some exclusive stories
including the day where you got hiding
from your mom.
A spanking?
>> That we call it a spanking. Yes.
And my mother was absolutely furious and
she sat David down, the editor-in-chief
of Dave's Press. And she said, "David,
you are not to air anything personal in
this newspaper. You're not to cover
that." And he said, "Well, Mom,
this is the news of our family,
[laughter] like right now." And she
said, "Nothing personal, David." And he
cried censorship. And he really cried
because he was 8 years old.
>> Oh, that's so sweet.
>> But this is where we debated the Vietnam
War in the letters to the editor page.
My grandfather would write, "Dear David,
um I so admire you and your newspaper,
um but I have to say I disagree with
your views on war." And David write
back, "Dear Grandpa, um I love you so
much. Thank you for being the first uh
subscriber to my newspaper, but your
views on war are stupid."
>> [laughter]
>> And that's And then my uncle would weigh
in and he would say, "Shlomo,
um
uh [ __ ] was his name, uh Solomon.
Uh how could you criticize your
beautiful grandson David like that?" And
that's how [laughter] it would go.
>> I mean, do you think
I I feel a little bit that we're in an
age where you can't have love and
disagreement at the same time.
>> That's exactly what we learned we could
do. I mean, our My friends when they
would come either for Shabbos dinner,
Friday night, or any dinner, they'd say,
"My God, you guys talk to each other at
dinner. We just eat." And I'd say, "We
try to remember to eat." Um
uh and we don't really have food fights,
but we have roaring battles.
>> Yeah. But still I love my family. And
that's what I learned from an early
point on that the two
um
go together. It's not just they don't
take away from each other, that it's an
expression of love to debate and discuss
the critical issues of the day.
>> I think people see things really
differently now. So like in one of my,
you know, little side jobs, I moonlight
as an advice
uh not really cuz it's on a podcast, but
an advice columnist. Oh my god. And and
you so often get these dilemmas.
>> advice on what?
>> So, everything cuz I'm very nosy. I'm
very nosy. I just want to know
whatever's going on, right? I don't have
to know the people. I just need to know.
And very often I'll get dilemmas written
in from, you know, younger people,
often, you know, young people of color
who themselves have radical politics
saying um you know, I've got this
friendship with someone whose views are
really opposed to mine and I just can't
feel
friendly towards them anymore. Or a big
one is of course people feeling very
divided over the genocide and it's it's
such a morally stark issue to go I just
feel that if you're on the wrong side of
this one, how am I supposed to preserve
any kind of
um respect of relationship for you? And
you know, I think the Vietnam War is
obviously a hugely polarizing moral
issue as well, but you guys were able to
hold it together. Whereas I sort of
think in this day and age, if you were
to say, "Well, actually you you'd still
need to love each other across these
differences and hash it out." Some
people might look at you and go, "Well,
you're not you're not politically
committed enough." It would become a
test of your political commitment.
>> mean that you're changing your views,
although it is very helpful to hear
people express different views, but that
you can
go back and forth, that you're
confident about how you feel, and you
appreciate um
uh I mean, I learned so much from people
in all different ways, and
uh I'm less likely to
cut someone off um than
I mean, maybe the next argument they'll
change.
>> Do you think that you you're one of
life's optimists?
>> Yes. I think there's no question. Um
You know, on the big issues like
democracy, I don't ever think you
achieve it. I think you have to fight
for it every single day.
Um but I think that fight, the process
matters. We have to treat people with
respect um with love, with care, um but
we also have to move forward uh to make
things more just.
>> When
>> And I think there is a value in that,
and yes, we're experiencing
some very deep valleys right now,
where people are stopped from moving
forward, and we just have to keep going.
>> When you first um started with community
radio, so WBAI,
I think. I'm really bad at that.
>> Ask my colleague Bernard White, who you
see in Still the Story, please, who my
beloved colleague, we did Wake Up Call
so many years together. As he would say,
we be all in this together. WBAI,
we be all in this together.
>> I mean, it's just it
I I loved the footage from that time,
and it was it was just so it was so
beautiful, and there was such warmth
that was in it. It's that it also sort
of made me think, you know, what was it
like at that point thinking about
American race relations, right? Like,
there's you,
East Coast white Jewish woman, there's
Bernard White, only thing white about
him is his name.
Um
>> [laughter]
>> You know, what was that editorial
relationship like when you're you're
telling the story of a of a moment um
where you've got a black power movement,
you're following after the assassination
of Martin Luther King, you've got the
rise of the Black Panthers and the
Puerto Rican Young Lords. What was it
like for the two of you to work together
at that time?
>> We navigated our way
through it all. We came from very
different worlds. We came to know each
other's worlds.
Um he also was a stained glass artist
and every time I go to the home of the
editor in chief of Dave's Press in
Vermont, I gave him this beautiful
stained glass that Bernard had made and
to this day it hangs in their living
room window. But I love Bernard White
and um we covered so many different
issues together. And when Dave Ice Say
came, as you saw in Still the Story, and
I want to say the directors of the film,
Carl Deal and Tia Lessin, are a big deal
and they teach us many great lessons.
Um Oscar nominated work for Michael
Moore for years as producers, did
amazing film about a Hurricane Katrina
called um
uh Trouble the Water.
Um they found that footage, like you're
talking about me and Bernard in a radio
station in 1996
at WBAI.
Um it was actually Martin Luther King
Day, 1996.
We weren't doing TV, but they
said, "Wow, when Maurice Bishop came
into your studio, you know, when they
interviewed me, I talked about these
great moments." They said, "Were there
any video footage?" I said, "It's a
radio station."
And so they said, "I know, but did
anyone I said, "Oh, wait a second."
One of the local stations wanted to film
this and then someone else, I don't know
if anyone else had a camera. It was such
a big deal. And what touches me most is
when
Maurice Spickam, I mean, dare I say, in
the United States, he started
StoryCorps, which is people talking to
each other. It's like, um, peer
interviewing. There's peer counseling,
this is peer interviewing. So, you bring
your grandma into a van down the street
or he builds a
uh, a little booth for people
um, and you bring in your coworker and
you interview each other for half an
hour. This has become enormous,
thousands of interviews and hours now
being archived by the Library of
Congress in Washington, D.C.
And Dave was the had gone to Angola
Plantation Prison,
um, which was this
prison of thousands of mainly
African-American men.
>> And it was called Angola cuz it used to
be a slave plantation and that's where
>> the slaves came to and the slave people
were from. And Maurice was there from
1958
to
>> Maurice Spickam?
>> Maurice Spickam was just a guy, a young
man, two white sheriff's deputies came
to his home. They often, they also
happened to be members of the clan and
they shot at him and he picked up his
rifle and he shot back. He killed them
and there was like a one-day trial and
he was found guilty and he was given,
um, he was sentenced to death and he was
put in Angola Prison and he stayed there
year after year, decade after decade.
And Dave was doing a story, um, he had
come to, he had called WBAI for to for
us to do a story on something entirely
different, two heroin addicts were
trying to make a museum on the Lower
East Side and each day he would call me
after, I didn't know who this guy was.
Each day he would call me after the news
show we did and I would say, "How come
you haven't covered this museum that I
said, "What museum are you talking
about, sir?" And so he said, "What do
you mean? Well, it's not been made yet,
but two people have a dream of a
museum." I said, "I don't I don't even
know about it. Sorry, we're covering
wars, we're covering" And so, okay, next
day, after headlines, "How come you
didn't cover this dream of these two
people who have" I said, "Sir, after the
fifth day." I didn't know if this was a
crank or what. I said, "You seem to find
it so interesting. It doesn't even exist
yet." It was a museum he said they
wanted to build of drug paraphernalia.
I said, "Why don't you go do it?"
And he came in
with tape recording of this couple
and I listened to it. In the morning I
was sweeping up, put it on, whatever.
And I said, "Whoa.
Oh my god, who are you? This is the way
he could listen and draw them out
without speaking much." And I asked the
other news editor of the WBI evening
news, that's what I did at the time,
take over the news of the day? I want to
make sure this happens." And we played
it and that night, um,
uh, I gave it to a reporter at NPR,
National Public Radio, and said, "This
is an amazing piece." And it played on
Morning Edition around the country that
weekend. Um, and Dave, uh,
was going to be a doctor and that's what
his parents wanted, but he loved doing
this. So, he heals the world in another
way and he came to me and said, "I want
to go down to Angola. I want to
interview him." It's complete almost
completely black population. He
discovered Maurice Beckham. Maurice
spelled m o r e e s e, Maurice Beckham.
And he got a lawyer, that was Dave did,
to try to get him out. I said, "This guy
doesn't believe go, you know, shouldn't
be in prison." Couldn't get him out and
so he came to me and Bernard and he
said, "I don't know what to do." And
this is the role of journalism.
>> I mean, so
let's let's sort of like meet you at
that point, all right? Someone comes to
you and says
I've got this story, I've got this case.
So, it's not just a story to tell, it's
kind of a campaign to run.
What's your strategy for it?
>> Just to keep covering the story Well,
look,
I you talked about being an advice
columnist. I grew up on soap operas. And
every day I'd run home and I would see,
you know, in the United States it was
called General Hospital, One Life to
Live. I didn't identify with any of the
people. I mean, they wore evening gowns
in the middle of the day.
>> the slaps that I remember. I just love a
soap opera slap, just a real like
>> [laughter]
>> Perfect.
>> Oh my god.
>> I don't know if I was into into as much
violence as you [laughter] are, but I
just every day I What I
In fact, that's very interesting you say
that because it was precisely that it
wasn't violent. You know, all the other
TV shows that my brothers watched and
everything. I grew up with three
brothers. This wasn't violence. It was
just, you know, who is with who and then
who broke up with who and then who went
off with who and I And every day you
wanted to find out what happened. Yeah,
it was meaningless, but
um
it was exploring relationships. And I
was very taken and I would run home to
find out each day.
And in a funny way, I
that really is a model for me with the
news. I don't just do a news story. And,
you know, okay, we did it, whatever. I
wonder if he'll ever get out of jail.
Let's go look at something else or
another country. Um anywhere. Nope. Um
what happened to him? We covered that
guy. Is he still in prison?
And to follow, I mean, the texture of a
life, why should people care unless we
call them on the phone?
And then we call Maurice, and we call
his grandchild, who he's never gotten to
see, and they talk on the phone to each
other. And then, there's so many ways to
cover story. You know, when in the US,
the corporate media is very good when
soldiers are going off to war, they go
to the base, they interview the family,
what's it going to be like for their
family member to leave, they follow them
to the bus, and each day it's in a funny
way like a soap opera. And I want to do
the same thing with a
activist who's leaving their home, and
they're going to go to a protest. It's
pouring rain, or it's snowing, or it's
100° outside. It's not easy to do this
stuff.
When you could just be playing with your
friends, or hanging with your friends,
to go out and to do this. And what is it
about them? And I want to give value to
what people do, whether they're staying
home, or whether they're going off to.
And also, by the way, on those soldiers
going to war, the media stops at a
certain point.
If they come back,
and suddenly, and I think they're
probably
I don't know if you can say there isn't
a larger population those who are
against war than those who come back
from war, but there are a lot of
anti-war soldiers, because they've
experienced it. They want to know why
they were in Afghanistan. They want to
know how they were told to go to Iraq. I
mean, they cared about what happened on
9/11, and they want to protect their
country, and they're sent then to where?
Iraq? To save the people there?
I mean, to bomb the people there? I
mean, what is it? And what did they have
to do with 9/11? Were there any
hijackers from Iraq?
And so, when those people came home,
they had a lot to say. The media isn't
covering them anymore when had a very
different message. Deeply concerned
about what our country was doing. And I
like to
you know, we have to follow through on
stories. And so with Maurice, um no, he
wasn't getting out. And then well,
what's the obstacle? Oh, well, the
governor decides. In fact, just this
last week
>> [clears throat]
>> we broadcast for 2 days from Edinburgh.
>> Mhm.
>> Uh at the we covered the Edinburgh
International Festival. And Fringe is
absolutely amazing there.
>> Um but
uh
while we were there over the weekend
into Monday, um
a case we've been covering, Keith Lamar,
a man on death row in Ohio. The
Republican Governor, Mike DeWine, gave
him a 3-year reprieve on execution. I
don't you don't have this, but it's
absolutely unbelievable. In fact, as I
speak to you, three people scheduled to
die on Thursday in the United States.
Can you imagine? Scheduled to die.
Um the state will kill them on Thursday,
unless some other power intervenes. So,
with Keith, he's scheduled to die
January of next year.
And the governor said, "We're going to
give him and a few other men three more
years, until 2030 they have to live."
Why?
Because the pharmaceutical companies
don't want their drugs injected into
them to kill them. They have a bind
here. You've got these large drug
companies, and they don't you know,
harkens back to the Nazis, right?
Injecting people with drugs that stop
their heart. But interestingly, it's not
only that, but the Republican Governor
of Ohio, um
has turned against the death penalty. He
hasn't yet said no, vacated the death
sentence. But he has put it off for a
few years and we'll see what happens.
Um, and so Keith called in, Keith Lamar,
and everyone should check out his story.
He was nominated for a Grammy for his
music. I went to Joe's Pub, which is
part of the Public Theater in New York
City, where a band played and Keith
Lamar joined them from Ohio Death Row.
And he's a musician.
And I'm nominated for a Grammy.
And [snorts] uh he called in from Death
Row. And he talked about what it meant
both what it meant to have this
incredible reprieve. I didn't know
whether to say congratulations or what
it means to say you will have death
hanging over you for another few years.
You've got another few years to live.
Um, but to continue to tell these
stories so people say, "Hey, what's
Keith doing today?"
>> I'm going to be devil's advocate again.
I'm going to pretend to be a BBC
senior editor.
And what someone at the BBC would say is
this is all well and good.
But activists have just as much an
interest in cherry-picking facts,
creating a certain narrative because
there's a political end that they want
to see in the world. So just like a
politician or a lobbyist will come along
selling you horse [ __ ] because there are
things that they want to see in the
world, an activist is just as likely to
do that.
What do you make of of the role of a
campaigning journalist
vis-a-vis
activists? Is it your job to be
skeptical, to apply pressure?
If not, why not? If so, how do you do it
whilst at the same time holding your own
values and sense of mission? How How do
you approach that?
>> I mean, you call it a campaigning
journalist, I call it uh
just being thorough. We start to
investigate a story. Um,
>> [clears throat]
>> we start to to talk to people around
that story and we continue to follow it.
We are a daily grassroots global
unembedded, non-embedded in the state,
independent international investigative
news hour. So, we continue to cover
every aspect of the story.
Um,
>> even the bits which might make activists
look bad.
>> Um,
even the bits that make activists or
non-activists. It's it's a forum for
people to discuss and debate the
critical issues of the day.
Um, and you [clears throat] know, the
media often will have a debate between
the far right and the mid right. So, you
know, when it came to, for example,
Iraq, uh, do we invade? Uh, do we just
bomb or do we put boots on the ground?
And that's the debate. Um, well, what
about those who don't think you should
be involved in a war at all? And so, we
widen the debate and we widen the
number of people who participate in that
debate. So,
you know, my colleague Nermeen Shaikh,
who's co-host on Democracy Now, uh,
talked about the frame of the media. We
expand the frame and take people who are
outside that frame, not only bring them
into the frame, but center them. And who
are these people? Um, I mean, I really
do think people who care about war and
peace, who care about the climate, who
care about racial and economic justice,
who care about the immigrant crackdown,
who care about um,
inequality,
who care about LGBTQ issues are not a
fringe minority. I'm not talking about
Edinburgh here in the Fringe Festival.
Are not a fringe minority, not even a
silent majority, but the silenced
majority, silenced by the corporate
media. And so, we have to build a media
that brings in all these voices, that
continues to cover these issues, not as
some abstract thing and then you move on
to something else. I mean, actually the
people you're talking about, the people
in and I don't call them mainstream. I
call them the corporate media because
I really do think that those who care
about all those issues, they represent
the mainstream.
That's what I think. I when I walk down
the street and talk to people, I think
the vast majority of people care about
all of these issues and you can have
really important discussions and they
will talk about people they know that
deal with that are involved
[clears throat] with these different
issues or the victims of the target of
some kind of policy. And that's what we
try to get at, get away from the
rhetoric and go to the real fact of
people's lives. I don't think we're that
far apart.
>> I mean
there's an example that's in my head of
a time when our audience
got very angry with an interview that we
did with a politician who they saw as
being on the left. So, the
the sort of details aren't important,
but sort of what happened was is that
there's a a politician called George
Galloway interviewed by my colleague
Aaron Bastani, who's very pro-Palestine,
who's very against the war in Iraq, also
quite a socially conservative guy. And
so, my colleague sort of pressed him,
you know, what do you mean by by family
values? Like
what do you mean? And he said, well, you
know, I don't like my children being
taught that gay relationships are
normal." And so Aaron pressed him
further and he was like, "Well, do you
mean typical?" And he was like, "No, I
mean normal."
And so
we published it and it became hugely
controversial.
But there was a really big part of our
audience
who felt that we [ __ ] him over.
And who thought
>> Are you allowed to use that word in our
media?
>> I do all the time.
>> Oh, I see. I see. You know, in the
United States you can be taken off the
air if it's a broadcast.
>> So, because this is YouTube
>> [laughter]
>> you can even use the C-word if you like.
It's less offensive here in the UK.
Um but they really felt that we stitched
him up. And the some of the feedback
that we were getting back was, "Well,
you behave just like the corporate
media."
And so
>> They might not have cared as much about
the issue of LGBTQ equality. So, they
might not have pushed that.
>> I I suppose that the the thing which I'm
kind of
wondering about because it's very rare
for me to talk to someone whose funding
model is so similar to ours, right?
That's so reliant on audience donations
is
are there times where you have felt the
temptation to self-censor
because of how your audience, on whom
you are financially dependent, might
receive something?
>> I mean, I think we have such a
wide-ranging
audience.
I I couldn't characterize what they
feel.
I should say, you know, I I started
telling it in somewhere in some stream
of consciousness I never finished, but
30 years ago when we started uh we went
online right away. We were among the
first news organizations, but we did
that cuz necessity's the mother of
invention and
the networks could afford to send This
is before the word podcast, okay? We had
an MP3, the radio show, before it was a
TV show.
59 minutes, how do we get it to
stations? They could afford to pay
satellites, we couldn't, so we put it
online.
And so the radio stations could take it,
but then people would take each segment
and transcribe it. So someone in London
would take the first segment, someone in
Texas would volunteer to take the second
segment, someone in Mexico would take
the third segment. They would transcribe
it, or there would be a bunch of people
on each segment. They would send it to
We hired a transcription coordinator. We
post the whole thing online right away.
Most networks even to this day don't put
full transcripts, but we felt
Well, steal the story, please. Then
network reporters would take our stories
and because they're transcribed and not
your typical pundits, they would take
them to the State Department press
briefing, White House press briefing,
Pentagon press briefing.
They would base questions on them.
Um
But um my point here is we posted it all
online, which built this global
audience. I remember one of the networks
did do transcripts, but they didn't show
them because the problem was how would
they come up in searches if they didn't
put the words there, but they didn't
want to post them. So it somehow at the
back end they would put them, so they
would come up higher in a Google search.
We just put it all out there. And that
built this global audience from early
on. We asked some tech consultant to
look at our website at some point, and I
think he worked at Fox on the tech end,
and he said, "Are you kidding? All the
networks are looking at you." I remember
when Time magazine first started and I
think they spent $20 million building
their website and they put up a paywall.
First mistake. And um
it failed.
And we just kept saying, "Steal these
stories, please." And the more we did
that, the more
um we reached out. There was a global
audience. I remember once having
Arundhati Roy, the great Indian writer
and activist on the show. Some guy calls
up from California said, "It was like
3:00 in the morning." He left a message.
He said, "I heard this Arundhati lady
and uh wow." And he certainly wasn't a
progressive guy. Um
I don't categorize people as easily as
others do. I do think liberal and
conservative lines are breaking down.
They're not as meaningful. And um we
just take on issues and we just keep
going with them.
>> I I I take that point that your
your audience is very diverse
geographically, ethnically, age, gender,
all of this. I I I take that point.
But I still I'm interested in has there
been a time where perhaps a section of
your audience
has said
we I don't like how you've covered this
story.
You know, I feel um disappointed,
betrayed, or you should have done it
like this or
>> think our audience learns I think we
learn from our audience and our audience
learns from us. And certainly if someone
says you've left out this aspect, so
we're interested and we always say, you
know,
write to I mean, this is conventional
email, uh stories@democracynow.org,
or respond on Instagram, YouTube,
however you want to respond. But if you
have a suggestion of someone to talk to
and how they can be contacted and what
their story is, let us know. This is a
dynamic process all the time. It's not
It's not we're putting out a point of
view on one day and that's it, take it
or leave it. Um Uh love it or leave it
at all. It's a process, right? The same
thing. We never achieve democracy. We
have to fight for it every day. And as I
said, those debates on the right, you
know, do you bomb by air or do you move
in the troops? We've got it not only to
expand that debate to why war at all,
but also there are progressive debates
on every issue. I know that from my
family.
And um and teasing out those, having a
forum where people can say, "That's not
really a debate at all." Oh, we know
it's a deep debate. And really going for
it. And we're not perfect and on every
issue we can do a lot more.
>> I suppose
my my feeling is that I think that
people increasingly see their media diet
as an expression of their politics. And
that's coming from a real critique.
People can see that corporate media has
served political purposes, that it's
served the interests of, you know,
oligarchs and, you know, the capitalist
classes is how I would put it. People
can see that. And they want to support
media that they feel um represents a
different set of values. So, it's not
just I'm here because I want the truth,
it's I'm here because I want truths that
I can't get elsewhere. That's an
important thing.
>> And there's no the truth. I mean, yes,
uh when it comes to President Trump, um
he lies continually. It's just
astonishing to see and the fact that you
can prove it really makes no difference
to him, right? There is something called
video and audio recordings and he says,
"I never said that." Or he just said
something opposite from the truth. Or
with the bombing of Manab, he says, "Oh,
it's fake news what they put out about
the US doing this." When obviously it
just flies in the face of the truth. Um
but
on that point of truth, just going back
to it, um
there I want to bring out the voices of
people who express also different
truths, the truths about their lives
that make people say, "Oh, that's why
they think the way they do." You don't
have to agree, but you can come to
understand. I mean, the media is so
important because unless you personally
know someone and know their views, the
way we learn about other countries,
about other populations is through the
media, and it's got to be through
something other than a corporate lens.
>> I mean, I I I suppose coming back to
that thing of of people see it as an
expression of their their politics,
right? And I think that many of your
viewers will look at you not just as a
reporter, but sort of as a as an
embodiment of a set of values that they
align with.
And if you were to say, for the sake of
argument, give Jeremy Corbyn a really
hard time, put him under a lot of
pressure politically, there are some
people would go,
"I don't like that you did that cuz I
see him being put under pressure by Sky
News and the BBC and, you know, the
Guardian and The Times, and I'm looking
to you to be supportive of left-wing
things."
You know, how how do you guys navigate
that part of the
media?
>> left-right thing, and I want to ensure
that we get out views that are so often
not heard in the corporate media, and
you just
keep going, and you raise these issues.
It may not be in one interview, but at
different times, and um
there is so much that is left out of the
corporate media,
so many people that are left out, the
vast majority of people, and so many
different views that, yeah, we have a
lot of work to do.
>> Um
in the documentary, the part which was
about the work that you guys did in the
Niger Delta, so
uh this was during a time when Chevron
was operating in the Niger Delta, and
what you guys were able to find out, and
most importantly find proof for, was
that Chevron was involved in uh these
death squads, right? The The kill and go
team, right? These These soldiers who
who came in and shot people.
>> soldiers or police, and the way Chevron
was dealing with them was flying them in
on Chevron helicopters. And into the
Niger Delta, and you know, the people
would protest the pollution of their
mangrove forests. And um in the case
that we found, and I did this with
Jeremy Scahill when he started at
Democracy Now.
>> He was a baby. He was in his early 20s.
He was like 22, 23, or something.
>> you see Jeremy there when he started
Democracy Now. You see Sharif Abdallah
Kadu.
Um Jeremy would go on to co-found The
Intercept and now Dropsite News. But
yes, Jeremy and I um went to Nigeria, um
Africa's most populous country, and
>> a dangerous time to do so. Like it was a
very dangerous time to do so. Um and
>> And let me say that uh
the reason I went is because of Ken
Saro-Wiwa. Now, I hadn't actually, I'm
embarrassed to say, heard of Ken
Saro-Wiwa,
um who is this remarkable
writer. He wrote soap operas in Nigeria,
very popular, but he threw in his lot
with his own people, with the Ogoni
people. And he saw what was happening as
as in that case, it was Shell
Corporation was crisscrossing his
community in Ogoniland.
Um and they were flaring off gas. The
kids didn't know a dark night. Um and he
took it because he was a very prominent
person in Nigeria, he could go out
globally, and he took the um
He took the protest against Shell
globally, and he came to our studio. A
Nigerian activist brought him in, and I
said, "I'm sorry. We have a book show
today." They came in like that day. He
said, "Well, we're here." And I said,
"Who?" And they said, "Ken Saro-Wiwa."
"Ken Saro-Wiwa what?"
And they said he only can come today at
2 minutes. I mean, we'd have to bump
someone else for him. And he talked
about what he was doing. And I was just
looking at this man. He just exuded an
aura. And as he spoke, we dumped or
bumped the next guest and next guest and
next guest. And I said, "Well,
are you going back to Nigeria?" And he
said, "Oh, yes."
Um I said, "What's going to happen?"
And he said, "Well, I am a marked man."
And he went home
and he was executed by the Nigerian
regime. Um
uh
his brother, a doctor, told us that
Shell had approached him and said if he
would call off the international
protest, uh he didn't have to die.
Um and I knew then uh that we had to go
to Nigeria. Uh and we discovered uh this
other oil company, Chevron, in the Niger
Delta was
um
bringing in the military, the kill and
go, the kill and go. And they were uh
killing or arresting journalists. And uh
you know, Chevron is based in
California, in San Rafael, California.
And we felt it was absolutely critical
that we tell the story.
>> Um tell me about your time in East
Timor. Um
because you were there and you were
present
a first-hand witness to a massacre that
was carried out by the Indonesian army.
And I was wondering
about the line, if there is a line,
between being
a Western journalist who's present
somewhere is powerful by virtue of being
from the West.
Um seeing things, witnessing things, and
experiencing things as well. You were
you were very brutally beaten from from
what I understand.
And not making yourself the story.
You know,
how do you sort of deal with like I
guess the subject position in a in a
context like that?
>> East Timor was, you know, just very
briefly cuz most people don't know about
what happened was one of the great
genocides of the late 20th century.
December 7th, 1975,
the Indonesian military armed, trained,
and financed by the United States. Uh
Britain did its part. Um 90% of its
weapons were from the United States,
invaded East Timor by land, by air, and
by sea. This was 75.
Uh
it was President Ford, Secretary of
State Kissinger. They met with Suharto,
the long-reigning dictator there. And as
they flew out to meet with another
dictator, Ferdinand Marcos of the
Philippines, uh
Indonesia basically, Suharto felt he'd
gotten the go-ahead that he could invade
without the US cutting off the weapons
supply.
And he attacked East Timor. And for the
next quarter of a century, they killed
off a third of the population. So, the
story is the people of East Timor. And I
didn't know about this in 1975. I mean,
I um
uh but I was going to Guam to cover
fascinatingly an abortion story. It's
territory of the United States. And they
were introducing an anti-abortion bill.
And if Guam [clears throat and snorts]
approved this, and
uh a lawyer there, uh who is Guamanian,
um
uh
sued to get the law overturned, it this
case could go to the Supreme Court, and
it could overturn Roe v. Wade in the
United States, which ultimately was
overturned, but not because of Guam. So,
I went to Guam to check that out. And I
was near East Timor.
And I went with my colleague, Allan
Nairn, an investigative reporter who had
done so much on Latin America,
particularly places like El Salvador and
Guatemala, and the US role there in
supporting and um coups and military
regimes.
And after I went to Guam, I went on to
East Timor, and it was a hell on Earth.
I went in 1990, and then again in 1991,
and it was November 12th, 1991. At the
beginning of our trip, we were going
there then
because we'd learned the UN was going to
send a delegation for the first time to
investigate the human rights situation,
so we wanted to be there.
And it was horrifying still.
People were taking refuge in the
Catholic churches. It had been occupied
by Portugal for hundreds of years, but
Portugal had pulled out in '74.
Um and
the question was, was Indonesia going to
invade? And
>> [snorts]
>> people were taking refuge in the
churches, in the Catholic churches, the
only place they could gather.
Um we went to the Catholic church. The
women were wailing, crying in the
church, and we learned the Indonesian
military had killed a young man the
night before. We saw the his blood on
the steps of the church. And we went
around the country, and we learned that
at the behest of the United States, the
UN delegation was not going to come.
And on November 12th, the people just
went to communion in the morning,
and thousands then marched to the
cemetery where so many people were
buried
um to protest the occupation. They said,
"Free
um long live Viva East Timor, Viva
Sebastião, Viva um independence." And uh
when they got to the cemetery, and yes,
we were there, Western journalists in
the middle of a crowd saying, "Why are
you risking your life? They've killed so
many Timorese, 200,000 Timorese."
And they say, "For my mother, for my
father, for my village, it was wiped
out." And yes, we understood then, um,
as the soldiers marched up, was there
any hope here?
And we always hid our equipment because
if anyone was caught talking to us, they
could be killed, disappeared.
I slung the tape recorder over my
shoulder that I had hidden in my bag. I
held up my microphone like a flag. Alan
put the camera above his head. We walked
to the front of the crowd. The soldiers
marched up, 10 to 12 abreast.
Without any warning, without any
hesitation, without any provocation,
they swept past us,
and they just opened fire on the crowd,
gunning people down from right to left.
Um,
we, uh, a group of soldiers came at us.
Um,
uh, they
beat me to the ground. Alan threw
himself on top of me to protect me from
further injury, and they took their US
M-16s like baseball bats, and they
slammed them against his skull until
they fractured it.
As we lay on the ground, they were
shouting, "Australia, Australia, are you
from Australia?" But we knew exactly
what they meant because
in October of 1975, right before
Indonesia invaded, there were five
Australian journalists in a place called
Balibo. There's very good movie called
Balibo to see what happened to them.
Um, they were from ABC, Australian
Broadcasting Corporation, and other news
networks.
And the Indonesian military lined them
up against a house and executed them.
The Australian government hardly
protested the killing of their
journalists, we believe because years
later Australia and Indonesia would
divide up the oil spoils in the Timor
Gap. Oil is a source of so much pain in
the world.
Um and so we knew we had to be very
clear where we were from. No, not
Australia. America. America. We were
from the same country their weapons were
from. They would have to pay a price for
killing us they'd never had to pay for
killing the Timorese.
And they moved on.
A Red Cross Jeep pulled up to help the
Timorese. We were able to get into this
Jeep. We got to the hospital. The
Indonesian military killed more than 270
Timorese on that day.
Um we knew the only way we could not
succeed in stopping the massacre at the
cemetery where they had all gathered was
to get word to the outside world. And so
we raced to the airport. We First I we
had to clean up Allen he was covered in
blood. Um Oh, I went to the bishop's
house who'd later win the Nobel Peace
Prize, Bishop Belo. I asked him to help
me and we cleaned up Allen. He gave him
a shirt and we raced to the airport.
Only one plane was out that day.
Um
somehow we were able to get onto the
plane. We didn't know if they'd
consciously decided not to kill us or
there was a gap in communication but we
said we had to leave.
Um we have to use our Western privilege
um because what was happening was
because the West was allowing this to
happen was providing the weapons and the
support for this to happen. And we got
on that plane. We flew to West Timor. We
flew to Bali. Um we had made a call to
the West. We said the Indonesian
military has uh
committed a massacre. At first Indonesia
denied it. Then what happened to us?
Just the two of us what happened. I had
taken Allen's shirt and I wrapped it
under the bishop's towel that he'd given
me around my waist cuz I wanted to have
the evidence and someone we gave them
our camera someone Oh, no, they had
taken our camera but someone took 20
pictures of us and gave me the film I
had
secreted away. And uh um they developed
it on Guam, and we showed what happened
to us then if you're not going to uh if
you're going to deny that what happened
to the Indone- to the Timorese people.
Um when we got back to Washington
after Allan got out of the hospital, he
held a news conference at the National
Press Club, and we said this was done
with US weapons. And a nationwide
movement grew up. There was a movement
all over the world, but the US was the
main supplier of the weapons. Uh and for
8 years people really rallied as they
did in all over. I mean, the Timorese
were so unbelievably brave. And in 1999
I remember being at the UN on this day,
and it's such a lesson overall.
We heard that the UN was going to
sponsor a referendum for the people of
East Timor to get to vote either for
their freedom or to be part of
Indonesia.
You never know when that magic moment
will come, but if you're involved with
social change um
in building a foundation
um you will make history or you can
determine the future.
And they said, you know, who knows how
it'll turn out. I tried to get back into
East Timor for this vote. The Indonesian
military caught me twice as I tried to
go in through Bali as I tried to go in
through um Jakarta. They caught me
coming into the country, and they
deported me twice. But Allan did get in.
And as Indonesia
burned much of East Timor to the ground
the on the days of the vote
the people of East Timor voted for their
freedom. For the next 3 years, they were
run by the United Nations.
Sergio de Mello, who would die in Iraq
in a bombing.
Um, he was the point person for the UN.
And I was able to get into Timor the day
of their independence and in a place
called uh Tasi Tolo right outside Dili,
the capital. 100,000 people gathered.
Xanana Gusmão rose to the podium. He'd
been long imprisoned by Indonesia, the
first president of an independent East
Timor.
Um
the Democratic Republic of Timor Leste
of Timor of East Timor. He spoke in four
languages putting everyone to shame. And
there was this fireworks display and you
could see the light reflected in the
tear-stained
faces of the people of East Timor. They
had resisted and they had won. At an
unbelievably,
unacceptably high price, but they had
won.
And they had something to teach every
one of us, whether we're journalists,
artists, doctors, nurses, educators,
employed or unemployed. We have a
decision to make every day.
Whether we want to represent the sword
or the shield.
>> Amy Goodman, thank you so much for
joining us on Down Stream.
>> Oh my gosh, thank you for all that you
do.