Video summary
Joe introduces himself as a disillusioned idealist who has grown weary of the transactional nature of relationships within academia, particularly regarding how people of color are treated unfairly. He explains his recent absence from live streaming was necessary to focus on gain-of-function research following advice from Anthony Fouchy, aiming instead to build powerful viruses for prevention while addressing deep distress over prominent academics failing to practice what they preach about equality and diversity. This disconnect between words and actions causes significant trauma, as Joe criticizes the individualism bred in academia which undermines collegiality among people of color, contrasting this harsh reality with his desire to support one another rather than pull each other down. He also details personal frustrations with technology companies like Microsoft and Adobe for being disrespectful entities that force unwanted updates despite paying for services, relying on ChatGPT to troubleshoot these issues while trying to share Torah and light through live streaming and a WordPress blog about Amy Wax's work.
Dr. Jason Arday discusses his academic background at Durham University, where he focuses on race, class, and social justice after recounting how a white supervisor discouraged him from studying minority children's educational experiences in the UK, forcing him to produce non-original work instead of allowing original contributions to knowledge. This reflects broader issues where Black academics are prevented from pursuing their research interests or lack access to resources like studentships compared to White peers, causing many to suffer significantly due to systemic barriers that often force them to leave academia early because the environment chews away at their soul, mental health, and relationships. Arday highlights the issue of gatekeeping within academia where information about opportunities is withheld from people of color while being freely shared with White individuals, a dynamic compounded by complicity among Black men who benefit from labor performed by women of color without adequately recognizing or supporting them. Nathan Kofnes shares his experience as a researcher expelled from Cambridge University after publishing essays on race differences in intelligence and advocating for hereditarian perspectives that challenged affirmative action policies based on university statistics, arguing that despite facing backlash and accusations of racism, his views are supported by evidence and reflect a desire to tell truths often ignored in mainstream discourse.
Jason shares his unique childhood story involving being diagnosed at age three with speech delays until eleven and remaining illiterate until adulthood at eighteen, yet still achieving professional football status, near-professional snooker skills, government construction work by fifteen, and participation in the famous "Seven Up" documentary series despite attending special needs schools alongside severely disabled peers. His mother Gy consistently encouraged him to achieve greatness despite these challenges, while Jason discusses how he adapts speaking styles based on audiences without slides, acknowledging both benefits of decolonization initiatives like those led by Dr. Bindiya Woodoo and noting that some current approaches cause harm through unsustainable demands placed on black academics' well-being without proper recognition or support. The speaker argues that institutions like synagogues and churches must deny obvious truths to function coherently because humans need precious little lies, as optimizing for truth twenty-four seven would be unsustainable, making attacking people's core beliefs a losing strategy rather than seeking confrontation over fundamental differences in belief systems.
Regarding universities, the principle of neutrality is questioned by suggesting that while it is often stated institutions cannot operate if they hold political or social values themselves, this will never happen due to human evolution since humans evolved tribally within communities where survival depends on group cohesion rather than neutrality. The speaker contends that maintaining true neutrality offers no evolutionary benefit outside narrow contexts like sports because humans are inherently tribal creatures who thrive in cohesive groups rather than isolated neutral states. Despite the harsh realities of systemic barriers, gatekeeping, and the unsustainable nature of demanding constant truthfulness from individuals facing immense persecution as academics with conditions like Asperger's syndrome and global developmental delay, there remains an optimistic outlook that life and society will improve over time attributed to Jason Arday's perspective on resilience and the eventual progress of humanity.
Read the full video transcript
and Joe, do each of you just want to
quickly introduce yourselves and then we
will start our conversation.
Joe, do you want to go first?
>> Okay. Where's uh where's Jason? Let's go
to Jason.
>> Stuff like that. And I I had this
presumption that we were all in it
together and and I am very idyllic. Uh
I'm an idealist. So, you know, similar
to Zena, I guess I'm I'm very naive. You
look for the best in people.
And I guess like over the last two or
three years you start you know you
yourself maybe don't see yourself as
something but you you recognize that
people deal with you differently because
something has changed and you find you
know a lot of the relationships you have
with people are transactional and in I'm
very naive you look how I would behave
and I don't behave like that anyway
generally speaking but you recognize
people deal with you because they want
something fundamentally
whereas that that helping interaction
>> doesn't come when you are in in need.
>> And what's really sad is that when you
ask
>> so damn, it's just so tiring setting
everything up. I've just been having
such a great time communing with God and
I've been getting together with my mates
and in my spare time instead of live
streaming and preparing for live
streaming, I've just been doing very
professional, very safe gain of function
research because it it's so important. I
learned this from Anthony Fouchy. So
just getting together with friends
mates and and we're we're following all
the protocols that Dr. Fouchy laid out
and we're just building the most
powerful viruses we can so that we can
then figure out how to like stop them
and and prevent harm. And so I've just
been so busy with my gain of function
research that I I just haven't had time
for live streaming. And I'm just trying
to catch up now on the Jason Aday story.
I'm really excited, really inspired by
this video. Decolonizing he doing the
work as a person of color.
>> When you, you know, if we work off the
premise of supporting one another and
not pulling up ladders, you know, you
you kind of ask for that help of, you
know, sometime a lot of the time in my
case for obvious reasons, it would be
people of color,
>> you know, senior academics. You know,
I'm not asking to be on a paper. I'm not
asking to be on a book. I just need you
to tell me how does this whole thing
work because I don't I don't I don't
know how to do it. And you don't get an
email. You don't hear nothing. You know,
all of these things. And And I
>> Why do people of color have to be so
racist against other people of color?
That's what what's so distressing.
So, I haven't done a lot of prep. This
is not going to be the typical high
quality 40 show where every sentence
counts. Like, I've got everything lined
up. No, this is just the chill stream.
Just like
I used to go to yoga almost every day
and then if for some reason I missed
three, four, five, six days of yoga
going back like on the seventh day, it
seemed weird. I I'd go to a Kundalini
yoga studio and if you're not doing it
every day, it seems weird. If you don't
go to Shaw every day, then you step back
into Shaw, it seems weird. If you don't
live stream regularly and then you you
haven't live stream in two months and
then you step back and you try to do it
again. It's it's weird. particularly I'm
on a new computer and there at new
settings and all sorts of things that I
need to figure out but uh we're going to
we're going to progress together.
>> I think the thing that was most dis most
disappointing that that was that this
was a bigger trauma than any other thing
that I might have experienced and it's
been a lot
>> man that is so sad. Why are people of
color doing trauma to Jason Aday when
he's just doing the work as a person of
color and I do my best to be an ally
was um the idea that you could have
these you know prominent academics say
like a lot of things they could talk
talk a really good talk about equality
and diversity
but like there was a massive disconnect
between their actions and their words.
So in education like you know people
always talk about the idea of practice.
>> Think about how upsetting this must have
been for Jason Aday. He did this six
years ago right? This is a video from
from 2020 and he's had to deal this is
April 3rd right? This is in co early co
uh the the pain and the trauma of being
an academic in Great Britain doing the
work as a person of color reaching out
to do work with other people of color
and the trauma that they inflict
>> and you know these academics there was
no aspect of practice in in their kind
of DNA like that they would say things
and when you kind of realize that the
business of academia you know you
realize how powerful it is to be able to
say things in a particular way and you
recognize the reputational and fiscal
rewards for being able to do it. And I
think it's kind of become the gig
economy, you know, and you sometimes you
question a lot how much do people
genuinely care. And I think that was
always a trope that was leveled at just
white academics, you know, that they
were exploitative of race,
race, politics. And yeah, in many cases,
they have a horrible history of doing
that. But I also think there are some
academics of color that don't cover
themselves in glory either. Um, and that
that for me has been the most
disappointing thing because like you
know I think there is a generation of
academics coming through that think
differently. That's not to say the
generation before haven't and there'll
be reasons for why they may be acting
the way they act. But I don't know. I've
just I've seen some things that I just
think just think that's wrong. I just
think that's wrong. And I just think
that like, you know, it's almost like
great world leaders, they all have they
all have the ambition to do great for
their own people, but then when they get
a bit of power, they go mad and they
forget the reasons why they got into it
in the first place. And I think sadly,
regardless of race, academia breeds that
in people. And what it breeds is
individualism. It doesn't breed like
collegiality. And if if there's any
trauma that has hurt me the most is is
that one because like you know you can
be standing next to someone on on you
can be sitting next to someone on a
panel or sharing a platform with someone
doing a keynote and sometimes you're
stood there and you're thinking this
person doesn't give they don't care. I
know they don't care. I know they don't
I know that they got a track record of
helping no one but themselves. Like they
don't you know they've not helped
people.
>> Right. He's he's dropping truth bombs
here about life in academia. And so he
may have been a fabulist and a
plagiarist at times and haven't we all?
But that doesn't mean that in some areas
of life he's telling the truth, right?
People aren't just liars or truth
tellers. People are situational truth
tellers or situational liars. They make
up things in one area of their life.
They may keep very clean books as an
accountant, but then they have this
passionate, exciting, sexy, fabulous uh
love life where they don't exactly
practice
the most high fidelity to truth.
>> They're not, you know, and they say one
thing, but they're doing something
completely different because I mean,
let's face it, like at the moment,
>> see, right now, other people are playing
Nathan Coffnness clips, right? Nathan
Coffnes wrote the big expose essay on
Jason Aday experience exposing his
plagiarism. But I am an ally. So I'm
going to play Jason Aday clips. I went
through about 12 Jason Aday videos a
week or two ago and I got gold and this
is the most gold of the gold
>> and everything has its time right at the
moment. Race is big business. It doesn't
matter how you you know in any across
all of society's institutions right now
you know race is big business and there
are a lot of people profiting from that
plight and you know a big reason for me
kind of thinking okay you I think I said
this when we met in Sheffield Muna like
you know there comes a time where you
can't you can't continue to profit from
that plight um you know if things are
not changing that that I think that
morally for me and I'll speak for myself
I think that's wrong and so you do you
do vacate that space because then
there'll be people who can bring new
things to it. Um because yeah, I think
it is disappointing. um they're people
you look up to for many many years and
there's always that expression like you
should never meet your heroes and I and
I feel like I've had more experience in
academia like that and that's left more
of an indelible imprint on me than the
actual traumas I've experienced because
because yeah I just I I don't understand
how we're all in the same position as
academics of color and you know to my
mind you want to do everything you can
to support one another and every day I I
observe examples of complete opposite of
that. And that's not me trying to be
pessimistic. It's just I think it's one
of those things that a lot of people
know, but maybe a lot of people don't
say. And I suppose I've always known it
and I always thought it, but I never
said it because, you know, you kind of
think, "Oh man, maybe I'm the only one
who thinks like this." But, you know, as
time has gone on, it's it's a harder
thing to console yourself with. Yeah,
you kind of think to yourself like these
people, I I don't know how much they
care, you know, um how, you know, what
have they done to bring other people on
the ladder? What they done to help other
people? What have they done to What have
they done?
>> Okay, I accidentally split my Chrome
screen. I'm not a bloke who complains
much, right? You know me. I'm I'm a man
of the people. I'm a lover. I'm not a
fighter. But damn it just yeah you using
tech and you just have to fight this war
just to to do basic things and none of
the software companies none of the
computer companies none of them respect
your choices. I feel disrespected. I go
through trauma when so I I I buy my new
computer right new Windows 11 and first
of all I got a brand new new spanking
computer. I spent over $2,000. I get a
gaming computer and I do not game at
all. I just want a gaming computer so I
can do all the live streaming that I
need to in good quality so that I could
be of service to humanity. And then I'm
getting hardware errors on my brand new
PC11 computer that I spent $2,200 for
and the the screens going black and
blank and I'm getting hardware errors
every five minutes on my brand new
computer. As if I need this, I try to
spend all my time doing g either gain of
function research or study of Torah. And
now I have to deal with bloody hardware
errors on my new computer. As if I I
don't have enough Zurus in my life. And
so there is a redeeming
quality out there. It's called chat GPT.
So I just screenshot my problems, right?
When my computer wouldn't start. So
about a month ago, my bloody computer,
which I I've had since 2018, just
wouldn't start, wouldn't boot. So I was
taking photos and pulling and unplugging
this and and it wouldn't wouldn't ever
boot up. and then found out the com
computer was comput. So I get the new
computer getting bloody hardware errors.
I'm just trying to eat my brekie just
trying to read the New York Times with a
little bit of nice music going on in my
headphones in the background. I got
noiseancelling
headphones from Sony like top top drawer
$350
and bloody hardware errors like I need
this surus. So, I I whip out my my
phone, start taking pictures about
what's going on, and chatbt guides me to
update my driver for my what's that
video thing? Uh, so I I update the
driver and Baroo Hashem, thank the good
Lord, no hardware errors have returned.
But like, bloody hell, you have to
update the driver to get rid of
hardware. But then I I boot up my
computer for the first time about uh
three weeks ago and and I have to
register with Microsoft. I cannot use my
computer, right? Microsoft will not let
me use my computer until I register with
them and then agree to all sorts of BS
that I I don't want Microsoft in my
life. I hate Microsoft. But I do use a
PC. I'm a loyal PC man. So I I have to
agree to all sorts of Microsoft slop and
then as soon as I get my computer going,
I immediately switch to the Chrome
browser browser. I'm not saying Chrome
is just inherently better. I'm not
saying it is superior globally. I'm just
saying I like to use Chrome. I want to
be respected. I'm a Chrome man. I don't
judge you if you're an edge man, right?
I don't think you're less of a man
because you use a different browser from
me. I just want to be respected. I am a
Chromeman. Why can't you respect my
choice to be a Chromeman? But does
Microsoft respect my choice to be a
Chromeman? No. I have to fight a
neverending war with Microsoft just to
keep my browser. Why do I have to keep
fighting Microsoft? Why is it always
switching me without my permission to
bloody Edge browser? it. All these
software computer companies are
constantly raping me and doing things
that I very clearly said I don't want to
do. And I just gave up and I signed up
for Microsoft Office. I did not give up
my Chrome browser. I will fight day in
and day out to keep my Chrome browser. I
don't have a lot going on in my life,
but I have my Chrome browser. I'm not
giving up my Chrome browser. You will
have to pry my Chrome browser from my
cold dead hands. And yes, I have to
fight this unending battle with
Microsoft because it will not respect my
choices. Then
I I gave in. I used to be have to buy
just like for 60 bucks at some cheap
legal like it was advertised on Google
that means it's legal like cheap version
of Microsoft Word with my last computer
like spent 60 bucks I think and that was
good but I can't find those cheap
versions of Microsoft Word. So I sign up
for Microsoft Office. I I think I'm
paying like $15 a month, but I use
Microsoft Word, so forget it. I I'm
spending $15 a month. Then I spend $20 a
month for Adobe and I try to get
something done with Adobe. It just keeps
popping windows at me. Did you know you
can do this? Do you want an AI of that?
I just want to sign a document in Adobe
and it keeps flashing windows at me.
Like I may have a deadline to get
something done. I'm trying to get
something done in service of humanity
and Adobe does it respect my choices.
Does it allow me to use unhared unrated
the product that I pay $20 a month for?
No. I have to click no to 15 different
browsers just to use Adobe that I pay
for. And it is it's just like that
endlessly. I'm just doing my live stream
now. I'm just trying to share some
Torah. All right. and bloody Chrome
starts popping uh like separate split
browsers on me just cuz I click on a
link from the August Scholar Lootcraft
and now I don't I have enough Surus now
I've got a deal on browser number one
with a split browser I don't have enough
going on like Microsoft is raping me
Adob's raping me actually Google is my
favorite of the big tech companies it's
my favorite you ever tried to use
Facebook on your PC it is a horrible
experience. It takes so long. It is it
is just an awful awful awful experience.
And chat GPT, it has gotten so good in
the last two months. Have you noticed
how much better is now? Whenever I have
a tech issue, I just screenshot it, take
photos with my phone, talk to chat GPT,
and all sorts of issues, all sorts of
troubles. like I suddenly I was limited
to about 10 15% of the space that I used
to have to write a simple
WordPress blog post just my humble
service to the universe right I'm just
sharing light and love with the universe
via WordPress for my small elite
audience and then suddenly I could only
go 10% of the distance before oh this is
too large and you know what the problem
was it was one bloody plugin
and chat GPT found it. Thank God for
chat GPT. ChatGBT found the unnecessary
plugin. I removed the plugin. Then I was
able to get in to my Amy Wax profile and
collect about uh correct about 12
embarrassing errors. I'm a very
respectable man. I don't like to be seen
naked in public like with a cucumber
coming out of a part of me, right? I I
needed to get in there and fix the
errors because like a lot of people look
up to me. They respect me. They they see
me as an oracle of truth and and now
I've got this blog post on Amy Wax and
it's got errors in it that I need to
correct. But can I just simply go in and
correct the errors? No. Something's
happened to my WordPress and so I can't
go in there and correct the errors
because now the files too large. But
once I delete that one bloody plugin,
right, suddenly my WordPress works. But
that's just it's neverending assault
unless you like file a certain form with
the city of LA, right? you have to pay
them $400 in tax every year. It the the
assault on you, the the everything feels
like it's it's getting worse. And I know
that's not empirically true. It just
feels like it. This unending assault
just to like protect my dignity. I'm a
very respectable man and and I have to
and and I just want to get along with
everyone. I just want to share the light
and the love. I I'm I feel like a king
kindred spirit to Jason a day, right?
He's my mate. He's my bloke. Yeah, he's
done some bad things. I've done some bad
things. All right. I just because he
plagiarized, right, doesn't mean that
you can just dismiss the man. I I'm sure
he's got many great attributes. I I I am
inspired by Jason Aday's story
and and I just want to share the light
and love that I've learned from Jason
Aday. I just wanted to share and bring
it to you. But does Chrome just let me
do that? No, it has to start splitting
up my browsers and I'm just trying to
share the light and the love. What kind
of crazy world is this?
>> You know, that helps anyone but themsel,
>> you know, I think any anyone can occupy
a platform and kind of, you know, be be
antagonistic and say all these things,
you know, whiteness needs to be
decentered and positionality and how
about recognizing some of the privilege
you've got? How about recognizing what
you can do to help, you know, before you
start telling white people all this
stuff? Get your own house in order and
think about things and think about the
things that you're doing to help other
people other academics of color before
you start telling other people what they
need to be doing and what they shouldn't
be doing. And I think there's there's
too many
>> truth truth here from Jason Aday,
right? He's dropping truth bombs, right?
PhD thesis probably not as many truth
bombs but here on this video
decolonizing he doing the work as a
person of color right Jason Aday right
he knows how annoying Adobe and
Microsoft are
>> any there's too many people who like to
tell other people what to do but they
themselves are not enacting the things
that they talk about and
>> listen to Jason now say Bob is is a
little too cynical for my taste he says
coughness it seems is destined for the
mainream dream now. Incredible. Really
like this is not a place where we see
some people rising and other people
falling. This is a place of light and
love, Bob. Right. This is a place of
radical love and inclusion. Except for
Microsoft and Adobe and other companies
that annoy me.
>> For me personally speaking, I always
felt, you know, that's why I say there's
a shelf life because it's exhausting to
do that. It's easy to say things put
them into I recognize that.
where maybe I can't do the two things.
Um, and when that day comes, I'll
happily
>> good on Jason. He's my mate.
>> Out. And you let other people who've got
the energy and the moral the moral
compass to do that because I think in
academia, one thing that is that a lot
of people are bere
>> sometimes it feels like all our heroes
are gone or in prison. Like, is Ron
Jeremy, you know, free to Rome anymore?
No, Ron Jeremy is not free to Rome.
Like, who what happened to our heroes?
They've all been cast down that there's
such a cold, cruel, cynical world out
there. But let's celebrate the light and
the love of Jason Aday. And I find he's
just for me, he's the wounded healer.
Like his flaws
like the Yeah, he he didn't check this
box, right? You can go, you can bang on
that he committed this sin and he
committed that sin, but for me he's the
wounded healer. Like he's been through
the mill, man. The amount of persecution
that this guy has faced as a as an
academic of color is just off the charts
>> of and disconnected with his morals and
ethics. Like they just, you know what I
mean? Like some of some of the things
people do, you know, you have people who
are doing who are perceived to do
exceptional things, but then the people
that they work for that they treat like
crap.
>> Yeah.
>> Sick with stress.
>> Yeah. I can that that in itself is is
mad is madness.
>> And I I really I really hear that and
never meet your academic heroes.
>> Amen.
>> Invariably, they're so much better on
paper.
>> Yeah. And I think this the issue with
that is we our expectations are
different for certain people.
>> And I think for me as soon as I see an
academic of color and I see someone that
is in
>> Right. So yeah, Jason Aday
has done some bad things, but that
doesn't make Jason Aday a bad man,
right? And he just he was just dropping
truth bombs. And and I know you're going
to say, "Oh, 40, I dismiss him because
he doesn't live up to my high academic
standards that I I I just don't think he
could pass peer review." And and then
you miss out on so much light and love
and wisdom.
>> In a position of power, my assumption is
always, okay, this person is doing
something to help others, to bring other
people into the space, to amplify.
>> Is Jason Ay better on paper? I don't
know. It just seems like an incredible
man. Like gifted, compelling, like big
heart. What an incredible story
>> by other voices and amen.
>> There have been times and unfortunately
it has been black men
>> in academia where I have felt extremely
disappointed in the fact that they
>> Yeah. Look, yeah, you really if you want
to get the premium Jason Aday
experience, he he's better in writing
just like Curtis Yavin,
right? his inspiration and courage Jason
Aday in conversation with Rajani
>> until I was 11.
>> No, I do.
>> Um and then
>> I want to get the full story here.
>> Amazing story generally speaking and
then the professorship which is like
>> the story which is like 1%.
So it's 160 plays 24,000.
So it's such a small number but I guess
where it all started for me was um
Clappam South London um which very proud
to be from South London and I guess
Clappam has changed a lot over my
lifetime in terms of um what it's like
and kind of I grew up between my grand
lived in Brixham and and or lived still
lives in Brixton and and I grew up in
Clappam
and um I guess to kind of keep it really
succinct my my childhood was sort
interesting. I mean,
>> I won't go into everything here because
it's probably not the place, but um the
kind of headlines were I was diagnosed
with um asperes
um and global development delay just
after I turned three. Um and basically I
I didn't learn to I I didn't speak so I
signed until I was 11. Um and then I I
learned to read and write when I was an
adult. So, I was just and I was just I'
just turned 18. I learned to read and
write.
>> Unbelievable.
>> Um, and I was part of a program actually
um which it doesn't really exist
anymore, but it was called Seven Up at
the time.
>> Wow.
>> He he was part of the most famous TV
British television documentary series
that I think started in was it 1950s or
early 60s
and and and people go, "Oh, I can't see
him in the series." But that's only
because white racists have like cut him
out now.
>> And seven up is basically when they
follow you over the duration of your
life. So they follow you at kind of 7,
14, 21.
>> And um I was pulled out of the project
when I was 14.
And basically um a lot of the a lot of
my childhood involved spending time with
kind of behavioral psychologists,
speech therapists basically who I guess
made all of these kind of predictions on
how things would turn out and how things
may.
>> But
if all he was was like a star of this TV
show Seven Up, I mean Diane, that would
be enough. That would be remarkable
enough. But his story is even more
incredible. I mean, I hope you're
sitting down.
>> May end up be well, not may how they
would be um at some stretch down the
road. And I guess um yeah, that's kind
of not how things turned out. But I
mean, I I um the things that kind of
really moved me as a child was was
sport. Sport was a big thing. And I was
fortunate to play football to quite a
good level um for a very long time. um
>> he was a professional football star
>> as a kid and then came out of an academy
system and then went into
um into playing some professionally but
like
>> yeah I don't know just interesting
that's the only word I would describe it
as and then um I took up playing snooker
when I was 10
>> it was a professional and um got to a
really good standard
really good standard um
>> I mean is there anything this man can't
do
>> um not good enough to be a professional.
Um, I did try and enter the professional
tour, um, but failed.
>> Wait, what happened? Did I I clicked the
wrong thing.
What the hell? I'm just trying to play
some Jason Aday
>> different way. So, not being able to
communicate with people
>> um was interesting.
Um, and I guess something kind of more
privy to that was the fact that I spent
all of my schooling in a special needs
school. So, um, I I I was with
>> I mean, he has had to overcome so much.
And then you have to add in the white
racism and the police, the the way that
they would harass him. And he wasn't
doing nothing. He didn't do nothing at
all except try to, you know, he played
professional football and he's on TV
shows and tried to be a professional
snooker player. He's just like living
his life, showing the light and the
love. And bloody police and white
racists
>> are the pupils that um had very severe
learning difficulties and um physical
disabilities.
>> That's not enough. And then you have to
add white racism and bloody police on
top.
>> Um and that in some ways opens your eyes
and your worldview to very different
things from a very young age. Um and so
I had a view of the world which was very
different um by the time I was like
particularly by the time I was 11 13
around that time.
>> I had a really interesting view because
I'd never had any formal schooling in um
in I guess what would be considered then
a mainstream school um if that makes
sense.
Yeah, it makes a lot of sense and it it
kind of shows and it's an alternative
view of the world and
>> Oh yeah,
>> there's a really interesting thing about
that because
>> so all his professional work contains
song lyrics but nobody has noticed until
now,
>> right? The man has the soul of a poet.
guess there's a there's a there's a
there's a kind of virgin perspective on
the world that you have which is kind of
situated in Melancholia sort of and you
have this kind of untainted world view
and and at 11 you know you're very much
a child and I guess what I couldn't have
envvisaged even though I'd been prepared
for those experiences by the time I was
11
I I didn't think I'd be in a situation
where I actually had to utilize
that wisdom at the age of 14 and um that
experience like right had
>> so let's go back notice him narrate two
completely incompatible childhoods and
nobody notices
>> probably not the place but um
>> now don't think you're superior to Jason
AD's enablers right people in on your
side in your coalition in your tribe say
ridiculous untrue things all the time
and you're not going to condemn it or or
challenge it because it's inconvenient
And so this is what we all do with our
own side.
>> The kind of headlines were I was
diagnosed with um asperes
um and global development delay just
after I turned three. Um and basically I
I didn't learn to I I didn't speak so I
signed until I was 11.
>> All right. So we got two incompatible
childhoods here. Nobody notices. So it
says he was non-verbal till 11,
illiterate until 18, educated entirely
in a special school among severely
disabled peers in the same breath. He
was in academy football then
semi-professional play. He was snooker
to a near profofessional standard. He
had an attempt at the pro tour. He was a
competent government in construction at
15 and he was selected for a
longitudinal documentary project. Right?
Any one of these is possible. Together
they are two separate lives.
Um, and then I I learned to read and
write when I was an adult. So, I was
just and I was just I just turned 18 and
I learned to read and write. Had to
apply my makeup on twice. So, I said to
them, "Expl." So, a black woman said
this to me. I said, "Explain. What do
you mean?" And they're like, "Well, I
know you like music, Jason." So, I'm
going to kind of explain it to you in
music terms. I was like, "Brilliant,
fantastic." And they said, "You know
that song by like Imitation of Life."
And I said, "Yeah." And I know you like
MM Jason. So like um you know there's
this line where it says like come on
come on no one can see me cry. And when
I come into work I feel this horrible
sense of doom and I encounter racism
every day. I go into a toilet I cry. I
get out of my system and I say to
myself, I need to hold myself together
for five more hours. And then I reapply
my makeup in this small mirror in a
cubicle and people just must.
>> Bob says, "For all we know, Jason is a
post irony comic doing a decades long
practical sketch on western academia."
Bob, that's brilliant.
>> And you said, "People must just think
I've got the worst digestive problem
ever because I go away for like 40
minutes a day to do this." And it was
just so sad, you know, that that idea
really kind of embedded itself in my
head. I apply my makeup on twice.
>> Now, despite everything he's been
through, right, all the white racism and
the police, it's still quite um
self-deprecating.
>> My own journey or experiences. So,
please forgive me. I'm I'm so sorry.
um
>> powerful.
>> I think in terms of people who kind of
help you get get across get onto the
bridge first and foremost and get over
the bridge, I would say that there
there's two um there's there's two
people who were like instrumental. Um so
my mom Gy who I never call mom actually
call um her whole thing was like you're
going to do something great. She like
she would say that every single day and
I and I can remember hearing that as a
child, not particularly understanding
what she meant, but she was just so
fixated on this idea that you're going
to do something great and you'll do
something that no one's ever done before
and people will be in awe of what you've
done. Now, probably all mothers in some
way, shape, or form to lessing or
varying degrees will say that to their
children.
>> All right, this is Jason Aday. Things
can only get better.
This is one of my favorite all time
speakers.
>> Thank you so so much. Um first and
foremost, how are you all keeping? Are
you all well?
>> See, he thinks about other people.
>> It's really good. Um it's really good to
um be here to be honest. And um it's
really funny when when you do these
things, one of the things that's really
interesting is like the first question
I'm always asked is do you have any
slides? You got anything you prepared
anything? And um I mean probably part of
it is a little bit experience but the
bigger part of it is that um in a
previous life I was a PE teacher and um
>> so he never has any slides. But this guy
he's got charisma to burn. I could just
listen to Jason Aday all day. I just
find it so elevating.
>> One of the things that was always really
interesting with that kind of life is
that you prepare these lessons, these
amazing lessons and then after lunchtime
>> I bet they were great. Right. I I bet he
prepared really original, detailed
lessons. I I bet he was a fantastic PE
teacher. I wish Jason Aday had been my
PE teacher.
>> Everyone comes in and you know, you got
kids wired, people's wire, and you're
like, "This plan is not going to work.
You're going to have to change on the
spot." And very often,
>> so such wisdom there. Like he recognizes
that he is not the boss, right? The
situation is the boss.
When you're talking about issues around
race,
decolonizing, the insection, generally
speaking, one of the things you actually
never know is who you're going to be
speaking to. So, you're invited to speak
to places, but you have no idea who
you're going to be talking to. So, in a
lot of cases, you have to be adaptable
to the situation. So, you know, you have
a conference like this, but I wouldn't
know who would be here. So, a lot of the
time, you're kind of getting a feel for
what's happening, and then you're kind
of responding or being agile to that. So
he's asked to speak at a lot of places.
He has no idea who he's speaking to, who
he will be speaking to. So he just reads
a room and he gives the room what it
wants to hear.
>> What a lovely thing.
>> Particular situation. So um a lot of it
is kind of running through thoughts, but
hopefully it'll it'll correlate and make
some sort of coherent sense.
>> Um so I guess the easiest thing
>> is always the hook. So, um, you know, I
think in terms of legendary one hit,
>> I I think he's pretty good. There's a
story, some some trash novelist, but I
think James Clevel, that's a novelist,
right? And I think did he do a novel or
something called The Rat? Anyway, it was
about someone who was like king in
prison, but then outside of prison, he
was nobody. So like my father Desmond
Ford, he was a star in Seventh Day
Adventist world. Outside of it, he was
nobody. He nobody outside of Seventh Day
Adventism like ever heard of my father.
My father didn't matter. Like outside of
Seventh Day Adventism, my father didn't
have any accomplishments. He didn't
matter. He didn't contribute. He wasn't
in the discourse. He he was nobody. But
inside Seventh Day Adventism and in a
selection of ex 7th day Adventists, he
was mammoth. He was a star.
hit wonders. We got Dar and um Dar's
legendary one hit was Things Can Only
Get Better and I guess it became the the
soundtrack to you know New Labor
Labor fire brand in terms of Tony Blair
etc etc and what's really interesting
with this idea is that you have this
kind of space that's been changed you
know in terms of galvanizing a whole new
focus in terms of how people think when
we kind of think about um I guess race
and higher education what's happened in
the last 5 years is quite remarkable. Um
to give to kind of provide some context.
So we're seeing you know we've seen a
huge increase in kind of the numbers of
black and ethnic minority students going
on to postgraduate study through lots of
different schemes um that have happened.
Um
Dr. um Bendina Woodoo has been huge in
that leading route. Um
>> so so good at telling people what they
want to hear, right? No slides, right?
He he's describing the exact conditions
that make his work unuditable. No
slides, no knowledge of who is in the
room. He has thoughts running through
his head. He hopes they're coherent.
Right? This is his style. And it's just
so charming. He's got the disclaimers,
right? He doesn't know anything. He's
not an expert on anything. He includes
himself among those who don't
understand. Doesn't claim that his
conception is correct. Right? This is
disarming. This feels sincere. You can't
challenge this. Right? You can't press a
man. You can't challenge a man. You
can't order a man has just told you he
doesn't know anything.
Right? You press this kind of man and
you are a bully. Right? You press the
humble man and you are the bad man.
He's got some really sharp critiques
here about decolonialism.
You'll be glad that you stuck around.
>> Paul Williams and Dr. Shantel Lewis have
been huge in that. There's been a lot of
mechanisms around that. um the broken um
pipeline leading routes report which led
to 8 million pound funding competition
from government um to the OFS. So
there's been a lot of kind of
advancements, but what has kind of
perforated those advancements in that
time are kind of little fads that have
happened in that time. And probably the
biggest fad that's happened is is
decolonizing. And the reason why I I I
say that because that particular term
has been franchised and it's been
packaged really really well and it's
kind of happened within the storm. The
Iowa
>> He's absolutely right. He he says a lot
of true things, right? He says some
bollocks but he also says a lot of true
things
>> to you know walking running or jogging
running but what we've done is
completely accelerate straight to
decolonize
and I'm yet to meet a person who can
define to me what decolonizing means
because people
>> right who could press who could give a
hard time to such a humble charming man
and Bob knows I must say Luke
presentations without slides are often
better them with slides. Absolutely.
Right. People often rely too much on
slides. They read directly from them
instead of using them as props or
illustrations. Right. Jason knows the
truth.
>> Do it one in such different ways and in
and and one in a way that actually
doesn't
it's not actually sustainable. If
anything, most of the decolonizing
processes that exist in in of the last
two or three years have actually caused
more harm to black and ethnic minority
people because they find themselves at
the sharper end having to mobilize those
interventions
at a cost to their own physical and
mental well-being
also without the professional
recognition for doing that as well and
it being valued as professional
currency. So in terms of the idea of
decolonizing and in relation to I guess
a subject area and look
>> right it's getting a question here from
the audience.
>> Hi I'm Dan Bar from uh St George's
University of London. Um I hope my
question doesn't come across as all
lives matter because it's not meant that
way but the the modern world is the
product of colonialism. I think you can
say that but it's not all rubbish. So,
how do we go about distinguishing, you
know, what we want to decolonize versus
what we and what do we do with the good
parts of colonialism? I mean, you know,
within the context that I meant the
question, right?
>> That's that's a great question. Um, my
mom went to St. George's.
Yeah, she graduated from there. Yeah.
Um,
so I guess from from from from my point
of view, um,
the good part to decolonizing is is
almost like someone asking me what
>> Okay, let's uh he's just completely lost
here, right? Someone asked him a serious
question and uh the port bloke is just
uh lost at sea. So, I I don't want to I
don't want to focus on that. I want to
try to stay positive. Let's uh
let's talk about five benefits of
getting an early autism diagnos. And I
can remember hearing that as a child,
not particularly understanding what she
meant, but she was just so fixated on
this idea that you're going to do
something great and you'll do something
that no one's ever done before and
people will be in awe of what you've
done. Now probably all mothers in some
way, shape or form to lessing or varying
degrees will say that to their children.
But um I I really believed it. My mom
kind of really emphasized the fact that
whether it's something domestic, whether
it's something because it was never and
and or lives still lives in Brixton and
and I grew up in Clappam
and um I guess to kind of keep it really
succinct
my my childhood was sort of interesting.
I mean, I won't go into everything here
because it's probably not the place, but
um the kind of headlines were I was
diagnosed with um Asperers
um and global development delay just
after I turned three. Um and basically I
I didn't learn to I I didn't speak so I
signed until I was 11. Um and then I I
learned to read and write when I was an
adult. So, I was just and I was just I
just turned 18 when I learned to read
and write. Um, and I was part of a
program actually um which it doesn't
really exist anymore, but it was called
>> He was part of Seven Up, the most famous
documentary in British history. Okay.
>> Is so excited to be with you today.
>> Yeah. Okay. Um, so is so just to say to
your listeners like this is the first
time the book came out last week and
this is the first time we're kind of
talking about it and now it's out.
>> Wow. His books didn't seem to have much
impact.
>> So this is like really interesting. So
it's going to be it'll be quite like
organic um as all good interviews should
be. But um yeah, I think that
Jason and I would often have
conversations about the ways of the
world um whether that was work,
relationships, families,
and how we as neurode divergent people
that also are black happen to experience
these different parts of social life. Um
I think in particular, um the kind of
heart of the
Very cool. Yeah. And Jason
>> Julie, I I don't have anything. I never
have. But um I've But what I will say is
that
>> he has no online presence. He's saying
here this is uh from about 10 months
ago.
>> It it would be available from the
Princeton bookshop anyway online. And
>> Oh, yeah. Buy the book.
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah. He he he Princeton, right?
Princeton published a book on which he
was a co-author.
>> Yeah, it can kind of
>> that's a big deal. Like that's a very
big deal and I know you both are in
academic space but that's the Princeton
review. Like that's a a big deal to get
published. So yeah, be sure to find it,
support the book, share the book and and
like you said just like one person like
it just takes one person to create
massive change and can be like dominoes
to other things. So really appreciate
the work you both are doing.
>> Such powerful powerful work.
>> Everyone for coming along. Um I'm Sha
Atri. I'm an associate evening uh
displaying information and research
about Oxford's first black women
students. So um do come along and have a
look at that too. It's up up until
Monday. So um I'm going to now introduce
Dr. Jason Arde, our associate professor
of in the department of sociology at
Durham University. and um very prolific.
I was scrolling down your your list of
publications. I can't begin to talk
about them all, but um mainly addressing
questions of race, education, race and
class, social social justice,
intersectionality. Um has a new book
coming out.
>> People who have done the same thing and
with a straight face they say this is
original contribution to knowledge.
You're like, "No, it's not. No, it's
not. My PhD is not an original
contribution to knowledge, BUT I DID
IT." WAIT, KNOCK ME over with a Yamoka.
He came out and told us October 27,
2021, his PhD is not original
contribution to knowledge because my
supervisor told me if you do that,
you'll pass. And then it's like I've not
published anything from it. I don't
think anyone's ever read it. It's on
reflective practice. So this is what I
mean like you end up doing what your
supervisor wants you to do. And it's
this idea that, you know, I and I wanted
to study, if I was able to choose, you
know, the educational experiences of
minority ethnic children or migrant
children settling in the UK. But they
said that that was a bad idea. Now, when
you're green and you work behind the
ears, you're like, "Okay, I believe you.
I'll do what you told me to do."
>> See, he could have done original
valuable work, but some white racist who
was I assume was his PhD supervisor like
forced him to do a thesis, a
dissertation where he could add nothing,
right? If only he'd been allowed to do
the work he wanted to work to do. Like
he could have made original
contributions to knowledge
>> do. But you know your ears seem a lot
der than mine was back then. So I think
you're going to make better choices than
I did. So I think it's really important
that you have that courage and
conviction. And if that's what you want
to do, you do it. But you that's the
sword. That's the hill you've got to be
willing to die on,
>> you know, because obviously your
supervisor going to be waiting, not your
supervisor, but super and say told you
told you so. Yeah. Right. Well, yeah.
>> So, that's really important that Drew
just said, not your super. Yeah. So,
>> right. He wanted to to do an original
contribution to knowledge and he was
prevented. Let's let's get back here.
>> Don't be swayed on that. My job is to
guide you. My job is not to tell you
what is right and what is wrong. You
have the hypothesis that's and you work
with that and your idea is to make this
contribution to knowledge. And you can't
do that if somebody's influencing your
you need to do this. you need to do you
need if someone's doing that all the
time you end up producing you know
that's why there's so many clones of the
same people in academia right there's so
many people who have done the same thing
and with straight face they say this is
original contribution to knowledge
you're like no it's not no it's not my
PhD is not an original contribution to
knowledge but I did it because my
supervisor told me if you
>> no he just essentially told us that he
uh plagiarized but he's he's been
advising parliamentarians for years
>> right metaph
speaking, but I think it requires us to
dig this up and actually find out the
reasons why certain things happen. So,
you know, for me, I've spoken to
parliamentarians.
I have been an adviser to
parliamentarians for nearly six, seven
years now. And one of the questions I
ask is I I don't understand how can
there only be like 38 black female
professors? How how is that actually
possible? How come we don't see more
people from workingclass backgrounds in
the academy? How come we don't see black
and ethnic minority people residing in
the numbers that we find at the
undergraduate level, postgraduate level,
and post-graduate?
>> Yeah, I don't understand why why don't
all groups have exactly the same life
results?
Like I I hear all sorts of racists out
there telling me that different groups
have different gifts, but I I think
every group should have the exact same
life result or it's bad
>> collectivism.
So for example,
there's the secret to becoming an
academic.
>> Now it's interesting who knows those
secrets and who's obscured from those
secrets. Now it's not by coincidence
that people of color don't seem to know
these secrets.
I did a PhD uh in 2015.
Two days after I finished my PhD,
someone said to me, "Jason, mate, you've
um you're in so much debt." I was like,
"Yeah, yeah, I know." Like, um he's
like, "Why didn't you just do a
studentship?"
So, I was like, "What's a studentship?"
This is 2015. It's not that long ago.
It's like, "What's a studentship?" He's
like,
>> hey, why are why people withholding
valuable information about studentships
from black academics? It's disgraceful,
>> mate. They pay you to do to study. They
pay you to a PhD. It's taxfree money. I
was like, a studentship? He was like,
yeah, surely you know what a studentship
is. And so I asked other um I guess
black aspiring academics, do you? I
don't know about you, but like every
white person I know was clued into
studentships. Like we were kids. Like we
all knew there was this gravy train.
Why weren't black people taught about
this?
>> You know what a studentship is at that
time and they're like no I've not heard
I've not heard of one. And what's kind
of really interesting is yeah that I
mean it seems foreign because everyone
knows that now but it was only up until
recently that that se
>> speaking of Dr. Aday what does Mr.
before think of Abdul say being referred
to as doctors often as
so I I think you should only refer to
people as doctors if they're medical
doctors licensed medical doctors but uh
a lot of people love being called doctor
so it's just fun right who doesn't enjoy
who who does not get filled up right
replenished
like just experiencing the light and the
love flowing out of one at the
opportunity to say Dr. Joe Biden right
for me it's just a transformative
experience I am never sweeter kinder
more vulnerable and more full of light
and love than when I am talking about
Dr. Joe Biden like I stubbed my toe the
other day my first question was where
can I go see Dr. Joe Biden
>> secret was let out the bag and that
those ideas around individualism and
selfishness and how people keep
gatekeeping
who doesn't have hold of that
information. Now if you take for example
organizations like Leading Roots which
is spearheaded by the wonderful Plet
Williams and Chantel Lewis those
organizations have let the cat out the
bag. Now everybody knows the secret.
Now, that's the closest you're ever
going to get to making it a level
playing field. Now, what's really
interesting is that there was this
program on channel 4 called the talk.
Um, and the talk was about the
conversations you have with young people
of color about race. And at the end of
it, Lenny James said, "You know what?
People waste so much time trying to make
things equal. What would just happen if
we all started at the same start line?
if we all started at the same start
line, what would happen? And it made me
wonder, what what would happen?
>> What would happen?
>> Because, you know, people of color, this
is the start line. People of color are
like they're out, they're outside,
they're outside if we all started, if we
all started at the same line. What would
actually happen? Because my point is is
that you have these people of color
navigating this crossfire hurricane and
still finding a way to not only get in
the academy and survive it but thrive
it. And it comes back to this idea of
suffering. You know, when I've spoken to
those people and I've interviewed
probably over 500 academics in the last
5 years.
>> Yeah, I I'm sure he has. He wouldn't be
lying, would he?
>> Of color. And I would say that's pretty
much most of the sector because there's
not, you know, a massive spread of black
academics in the sector. It's only 12
13%. As of 2019,
courtesy of Advance H.
When I've interviewed all of them, the
one thing they have said is that I have
suffered. M
>> my family life has suffered, my mental
health has suffered, I have lost
relationships,
I have lost, you know, aspects of my
personality that I can't get back. I've
lost years that I can't get back.
>> This is awful, right? How how they've
suffered.
comes I'll happily bow out and you let
other people who've got the energy and
the moral the moral compass to do that
because I think in academia one thing
that is that a lot of people are bereft
of and disconnected with is morals
>> and ethics like they just you know what
I mean like some of some of the things
people do you know you have people who
are doing who are perceived to do
exceptional things but then the people
that they work for that they treat like
crap.
>> Yeah. you know,
>> sick with stress.
>> Yeah. I mean, how can you that that in
itself is is mad is madness.
>> I know. I really I really hear that. And
never meet your academic heroes.
Invariably, they're so much better on
paper.
>> Yeah. And I think this the issue with
that is we
>> So, we all feel bad. We're all wondering
how Jason is doing. He's been sued so
much. But the great news is he told us
April 3, 2020 in this video he's had an
exit plan for years
>> academics and students and the one
common theme particularly around
academics of color who've been in it a
long time is that it it b it chews away
at them. It chews away at their soul and
I I don't want to be that person you
know I really don't want to be that
person and I've always said like my
daughter will be 18 in 5 years and I
think that would be a good time for me
to knock it on the head and in 5 years
I'll be 40 or nearly 40. So that was uh
last year he turned 40.
>> So that would be a good time for me to
find something else to do because I
think then you create spaces and
platforms for a new generation of people
with new ideas, a new vigor, a new kind
of energy that you you need to have to
challenge it because I think if you stay
>> Bob says our day has not suffered. He
has taken advantage of lack standards,
lack of good judgment in the wider
society. But can you imagine how how
hollow that made him feel?
I mean that sounds like a heck of a lot
of suffering to me. I
>> think this the issue with that is we our
expectations are different for certain
people. And I think for me as soon as I
see an academic of color and I see
someone that is in a position of power,
my assumption is always okay this person
is doing something to help others to
bring other people into the space to
amplify other voices. And there have
been times and unfortunately it has been
black men
>> in academia where I have felt extremely
disappointed in the fact that they they
haven't recognized the contribution of
black women.
>> They haven't cited the work of black
women. They haven't created spaces for
um black women to be given a voice. And
it it really really disappoints me more
because you see in their writings and
you see in the platforms that they're
offered that they are positioned as
people that can speak on race from an
intersectional lens,
>> but within their practice they are
upholding patriarchy.
And it's and that for me that's the part
that I find really jarring. And I put um
a tweet out a couple of months ago where
I I named you Jason and I said you were
the first black academic that I had
actually seen that was doing a keynote
and took time to actually recognize the
women that had paved the way for you to
actually be in that space. And the fact
that you can actually name someone is
the most disheartening thing because you
think if you look at the people that are
in um positions of power and influence
within academia at the moment,
particularly around the issue of race,
it is predominantly men.
>> It is. Yeah. And you know, and the thing
that has always just been the saddest
thing for me is that like
let let's be honest, those men that
don't do that labor and yet and and I
include myself. I do do the labor, but
what I'm saying is I profited from the
labor and the blood, sweat, and tears of
women of color, particularly black
women, to end up in that position. And
there are a lot of times when you're
stood there when to be honest with you,
you're a little bit ashamed. Um, because
in some way you're complicit in that.
It's like I told you the story of when I
first started in academia and you see
things happening, but you're thinking,
well, if I jump in, I'm going to get in
trouble, you know? And then and then you
get to a stage where you realize you're
you're complicit in that. You're part of
that. You're part of that. you're part
of that horrible um
dynasty of men of color who stood by and
watched their sisters suffer, you know,
and then at some stage someone will talk
to you and and you and you begin to kind
of think people telling them how good
they are. So, you just surround yourself
with people,
>> wow, he's got some sharp insights into
the world of academia here. You need to
hear
>> you're privileging you're you're
benefiting from something at the expense
of other people. That's the time you
kind of say to yourself, you get you get
out or you kind of you ground yourself
with good people. So they can tell you
that. But I think in academia most of
the time most people are not grounded by
good people because a lot of academia is
people telling people how good they are.
A lot of academia is people telling
people how good they are and it's
matched by people telling them how good
they are. So you just surround yourself
with people like that. So you don't you
never really engage in any kind of
honesty because people just tell you all
the time you're great which is
>> right.
He
honesty he's telling us here honesty is
such a lonely word but it's what he
mostly wants right he's just looking for
honesty
>> like like you know I do a lot of stuff
like that anyway like um but yeah my I
think the thing that kind of separates
me from my consciousness cuz sometimes
my own head is just you know getting
away from from that is I suppose um you
know my biggest thing in life was always
to I wanted to help other people as much
as I could. That was my only real
ambition in life and so you know a lot
of um you know I'm in a very privileged
position as I think we all are and a lot
of the money I get for things.
>> He is so relieved and so happy and so
glad now that he is no longer in a
position of so much privilege.
>> Um I I spend it on basically
homelessness. So what we do is we kind
of buy a lot of goods
um in a box and this was like
toiletries, clothes, shoes and things
like that and then we um and then we put
some money and it's enough normally for
three nights in a homeless shelter
around London and what we do is we kind
of go around different parts of London.
So we
>> look you may have plagiarized a bit but
this guy has helped thousands of
homeless people. He he's guided them up
out of the streets and now the people
he's helped, they've become
astrophysicists and professional snooker
players. They they are now producing
movies. They are doing like
groundbreaking innovative work in
physics, right? Thousands of people he
has lifted up from the streets. And and
this poor bloke, he only ever wanted to
be a a concert pianist,
right?
He he he's not a complicated man. He
just wanted to bring he just wanted to
play the piano and bring
>> students off descent. So it was a lot
around aspiration. So if a student
turned around and said, you know,
particularly students of color and they
would say, you know, I want to be a
concert pianist, which a student once
said, and I was when I had to observe
another teacher in class, the teacher
said, well, I think um I think that's a
bit unrealistic, but I do think you're
quite good at sport and maybe you should
concentrate on doing that. Um and that
kind of stifling
of ambition kind of really pricked a
conscience in me in terms,
>> right? If only you'd had more
encouragement, he would be a pianist
with the London Philarmonic right now.
But because he's black, right, I presume
this white person told him, "Oh, you're
good at sport. That's more realistic
>> of kind of thinking that you kind of
have a responsibility to um to try and
help these students as much as
>> powerful. Powerful." I wrote um I
interviewed one particular person and
they knew that they know that I
obviously love music as I told you at
the beginning and uh in particular I
likem. So they said to me like Jason you
know that song by like a imitation of
life. I was like yeah yeah I I know that
song. It's a great song great song.
They're like you know that line it where
they kind of say like come on come on no
one can see me cry. I said yeah that's
that's a great line like um yeah this
sugar cane this hurricane I'm not
afraid. Come on come on no one can see
me cry. So I said to them, "Yeah, yeah,
that that's that's that's a great
lyric." And they was like, "Yeah, is a
great lyric." And you know, every time I
come to work, I apply my makeup on
twice. So I said, "Uh, what do you
mean?" They were like, "Well, I have
this horrible feeling at work when I get
there. I I encounter the first two
hours, you know, racial microaggration."
So many of these Jason Aday videos are
being made private and being removed
from the internet and it just kills me
because it's like we're telling Jason
hide your light under a bushel, right?
Don't share the light and the love,
right? People are are preventing me from
sharing with you the light and the love
that you need to hear right now.
>> Sorry. Racial microaggression after
racial microaggression.
I have to find a way to deal with it. I
can't cry in front of people because if
I cry in front of my colleagues, they'll
see this is weakness. So, I go into a
toilet. I cry for about half an hour.
I'm fairly certain they think I've got
the worst stomach problem in the world.
And then I reapply my makeup in the
toilet in my small mirror where no one
can see me cry. And I come back out.
And you know beyond the jovialness of
kind of having this song reverberate in
my head I was literally thinking of the
practical application of applying
putting your face on for another
expression in the morning
crying in the toilet because you're
>> awful awful
it's been through so much. Welcome to
the surviving society collaborative and
on
>> and a lot of scholars and colleagues of
mine noticed of color was that black and
ethnic minority people weren't actually
being given the opportunity to tell
those stories themselves. When they
started doing that, what emerged was a
policing and a trivialization of the
research that they do as not being
empirical, as not being rigorous,
um as being theoretically flawed.
>> Yeah.
>> Um when this research was being done by
white scholars, and this research is
helpful by white scholars, but just to
make a comparison, that that wasn't
happening. M
>> in fact there wasn't even a questioning
that black people and ethnic minority
people weren't actually involved in the
knowledge construction part of the
process. In fact parts of it were
probably quite um exploitative.
>> Yeah.
>> Um and as a sector there's a
responsibility on all of us to reflect
on that and to look on that and how we
change things. Now, we've been presented
with an amazing opportunity to really
think about how we center the voices of
black people in academia and give them
the autonomy and the emancipation to
talk about their lived experiences
without
>> Yeah, absolutely.
It's a great point.
Okay, what do we mean? What do we mean
here? I mean, one of the things that you
kind of speak about which is a a
recurrent tenant. It's almost a spine of
the trice is the white narcissist bit.
Could you just unpack that for people
that will be engaging with this will be
listening, you know, as far as I'm
aware.
>> All right. Maybe a maybe a plagiarist.
Sure. But he's a pretty good
interviewer.
>> I haven't heard of that term before. So,
I would credit you with, you know, um
the development of the term. So, what
does that mean for people who will be
listening in and who might be using who
may be able to use that as um a proxy to
explain their experiences with
whiteness?
>> Sure. Um, and I I've been very kind of
I've been very careful and cognizant
about the term white narcissist because
it has lots of implications and
underpinnings from, you know,
psychoanalytic and psychological
therapeutic work, uh, clinical
psychological formulations of
narcissistic personalities, etc.
For me, I've I've been very careful to
say I'm not talking about an individual
psychological structure, but rather what
I'm trying to do is I think something
that we all do really, which is make
sense of this very real uh effective
thing, right? It's it's inside us. We
feel it. We experience it. We observe it
in in schools, in in classrooms, in uh
boardroom meetings, and in lecture
theaters. We observe it in the canteen
in the cafeteria but we can't quite make
sense of it. the literature and the
research has very very um you know in a
very rich way talked about whiteness and
whiteness grammar whiteness systems
um and but for me there was something
missing from that
>> vid Starky talks and today I'm delighted
to be talking to a chap if I dare call
him that who is very much in the news
Nathan Kaufnas the the David um I'm a
David but this is a real David a hero
who brought down the monster of DEI at
Cambridge. Nathan, we have a lot in
common. We both have lots of degrees.
They happen to be real ones. But shall
we abandon them and just call each other
Nathan? The other thing we've got in
common, just so everybody understands,
the reason we are both grinning is that
we are enjoying vengeance.
Good, honest, straightforward and
Christian vengeance. Cambridge spat you
out after.
>> So I had a writing teacher who who said
that when someone tells the truth, an
unexpected amount of truth, like it
feels like very molecules in the air
change around you.
>> After a couple of years, it spat me out
after 56.
You were a junior research associate of
a college. I was, I think, senior
honorary fellow.
You were spat out over two articles. I
was spat out over a word. So we can we
can rejoice together. And can we begin
then? Uh we're going to talk about our
day obviously the the the man that you
brought down and that you deserve
enormous credit. And by the way, the
other thing that deserves credit is what
we're doing now talking online. The
world of X and the world of the social
media broke this story. If it had been
left to the mainstream media and
especially the BBC who has been
throughout our day's most ardent patron
and defender, none of this would have
happened. But can we begin with you? I
don't want to go on. Well, we may come
back to my story and Cambridge. Give a
brief summary of your Cambridge
experience.
>> Well, uh, thank you very much for having
me. Now uh Sophocles himself could not
have come up with a more appropriate
person to break this story than me. Uh
>> give a brief a modest comparison if I
may.
>> Well, I think when when Cambridge heard
that that that the story had had broken
out, they must have thought let it be
anybody but Nathan Koffnes. Um
now uh how did I come to get the story
in the first place? Uh um uh and also uh
the fact that it was not a random was
not random and the response by Cambridge
and by Ard's defenders was in part
determined by the fact that I was the
one breaking the story. So to understand
their response and how it it was very
different than it might have been if for
example times higher education had
broken the story uh you have to know a
little bit about my background. So
actually I first came to Cambridge as an
MLI student in history and philosophy of
science in 2015. Uh then I did my DIL at
Oxford and then I returned to Cambridge
as a Lever Hume early career fellow in
2022. So that was a three-year contract.
Uh, so set to expire in 2025.
>> Wait, what the heck?
>> I, while I was employed at Cambridge, I
simultaneously had a uh a research
associate at Emanuel College, which was
separate from my job in the philosophy
faculty.
Now, um, my area of of research is the
philosophy of biology. So I'm interested
in evolutionary theory uh and its
relevance to a range of problems in
philosophy and science and as part of
that I'm interested in evolution of
different human groups and how different
ancestral populations may have diverged
from each other in the average
distribution of traits due to different
selection pressures over the last um t
you know 30 40,000 years.
That's a long way of saying race
differences and race differences in
intelligence.
Um
uh in uh
uh January
2024,
I started the Substack newsletter,
Nathan Koffnes' newsletter. The first
essay that I published was called Why We
Need to Talk About the Right Stupidity
Problem. And uh sorry,
>> can you just say that again more slowly
and loudly? You began by talking about
how stupid people like you and me are.
In other words, those of us on the
right.
>> So, as I say, I am very much on the
right. And I specifically looked at uh
found evidence from the general social
survey that people who are raced realist
like me, which is the correct view, have
the lowest IQs of all. like like very um
very few people getting you know because
they they administer abbreviated
intelligence tests to people in the
general social survey which is a
population representative group of
Americans that are surveyed regularly
for the last few several decades and uh
so they ask them questions like can
racial disparities be attributed to uh
genetic differences and then if you say
yes then uh you you know you do poorly
on logic test that they give you and you
you you do poorly on a vocabulary test.
So I I'm just saying that that's just
how it is. Like it's about it's about
telling telling the truth and that's the
truth even though that's the correct
position and even though you know I
think a right-wing perspective is in
some ways the correct way of of un of
viewing the world.
>> Can I just ask you to just one second?
Can I ask you to pause there? What
you're saying is that the traditional
label of the Conservative Party as the
stupid party is broadly right. That if
you look online at the slop that passes
for conservative thinking, all the stuff
about Fabians being a secret society,
this kind of stuff, it is rubbish. And
it's embarrassing rubbish, isn't it?
>> So in psychology, this is called
stereotype accuracy. one of the one of
two or three effects in psychology
that's actually real. So stereotype
accuracy
>> uh I mean okay once in a while there's
an unfair stereotype but for the most
part you know if you think that
Jews are rich or uh you know Jamaicans
are fast sprinters
that's not only based on irrational race
hatred like there is it doesn't mean all
Jews are richer all Jamaicans are fast
sprinters uh but you know there are
>> generally speaking generally speaking
it's more likely to be true than false.
>> So, for example, if uh the richest
person in Jamaica is a Jew,
uh and the fastest man in Israel is the
son of the ambassador from Ghana.
He's the the record holder for for the
sprinter. So, it's not that's not like a
total coincidence. And the stereotype
about those those people is is based on
statistical generalizations which are
which are in in many cases true.
>> And of course nobody raised a peep about
this paper. Nobody would
>> that's the point. So I I spoke in very
frank terms about how the right in its
as it currently exists attracts low
human capital. the people who ident that
doesn't mean that it's an inherently
unintell it's inherently unintelligent
intelligent to be on the right as I say
I'm on the right uh so
but uh um that that's just the way it is
people who are on the right low
intelligence for genetic reasons no one
at Cambridge said anything about that
was that essay got a lot of attention so
it's not like people didn't know about
it but they didn't care nobody said oh
how would a conservative student feel if
they read this like
>> uh or h how can we trust you to grade
the conservative students paper? You you
discriminated.
No, not a word. Then a month later,
I wrote a follow-up article which is uh
developing some of the ideas in the
original uh in the original essay where
I said that the only way to create a
philosophically coherent right is to
talk about the reality of race
differences because all right-wing
positions are just utterly indefensible
if you can't talk about hereditarianism.
uh you end up tying yourself in knots
trying to explain why you don't care
about these group disparities and the
the leftist will always get have the
better argument and will always appeal
to to smarter people.
Okay. So month later, February 2024, I
write a guide for the hereditarian
revolution.
And this essay includes a frank
discussion of race differences,
particularly in the American context.
what would happen if we got rid of
affirmative action because many
conservatives think that the solution to
uh race racial issues is a color-blind
meritocracy.
So everything will be fine if we just
treat everyone as individuals. Very
common idea like the National Review
Hoover Institution crowd. That's what
they say. So my point or what one of the
points I make is that you don't
understand what would happen if we
actually had a colorblind meritocracy
where uh
representation of of certain groups such
as African-Americans would be decimated.
It would it would fall um
not just a reduction of 10% but it would
fall to 10% of what it is or even less
than that. Can I can I just again ask
you to to um um just
go back over that ground and and talk
about evidence? You know, I'm a
historian, so I'm peculiarly alert to
the question of evidence. When you made
that remark about the collapse of I
mean, let's take the example the number
of black students enrolled at Harvard.
The evidence that you relied on was not
evidence that you had produced. It was
evidence that Harvard had produced. I'm
correct in that, am I not?
>> Well, there are very few people who are
capable of understanding that. Um, the
the widespread view is that I made it up
out of hatred for for black people. Um,
in fact, it was Harvard's statistic. And
what this just one second again just so
as we spell this out because it's so
important we get this point clear. What
Harvard did was to say if it applied the
normal entry criteria based on SATs that
kind of thing to black students they
would fall and I may not have got the
precise figures from 14%
is it to.7.
>> Yeah. In the year that the study was
conducted, I think blacks were like uh
12 a.5%. Now it's uh and and they said
that that uh if admissions were based
only on grades and test scores, i.e.
merit, then they would be actually a
little less than 0.7%
black. 0.
>> Again, let's let's as we're flattering
each other, one of the things I always
tried to say to my students or used to
say when I had more students was orders
of magnitude. get your orders of
magnitude right. then it doesn't really
matter too much about the detail of you
know is it 6 or 7 but get that though
it's very important to understand which
is the bigger which one of your critics
didn't of course um but so so in other
words Harvard itself said that there
would be this catastrophic failure of as
it were black representation at Harvard
uh if ordinary the the ordinary
standards which apply to all other
students including Indians including
Japanese including Asians as well as
whites were applied to blacks. That's
exactly what was said.
>> Well, they hold each race to a different
standard depending on his hierarchy and
and its position in the woke totem pole.
So, uh actually if you had meritocratic
admissions, the proportion of white
students at Harvard would not change
that much. I think it would rise by like
a couple percentage points according to
to some some study. It would mainly be
that blacks are being replaced by
Asians.
>> Exactly. Exactly. Right. So you said you
said this there was then this vast
outcry and what happened?
Um,
so
I I should say as background in 2022
when I received the offer for the Lever
Hume Early Career Fellowship, I also
received a a similar uh offer from a
very uh prestigious university in Asia.
And uh many of my friends told me just
go to Asia like
you you know if you go to Cambridge
don't you know what happened to Noah
Carl uh at Cambridge the same thing is
going to happen to you but I said no
it's impossible because after Noah Carl
was fired in 2019 the following year in
response to the Noah Carl affair the
university adopted a very uh uh strong
free speech policy. to prevent something
like that from ever happening again.
Anything that's lawful speech, speech
within the law will be protected.
Nothing can happen to you. You can't.
>> So you said you're fine.
>> Free. So I said, "Yeah, Derek. Look,
it's there on the website. They say you
can't get in trouble for free speech.
>> Can we get
>> Right. That that is such an autistic
comment, right? Just because you've got
some standard on the website or some
abstract value. I I got shocking news
for you. The values that are extolled by
corporations such as Starbucks, they
they don't necessarily embody them. In
fact, there's absolutely zero connection
between what corporations,
firms, universities, churches,
synagogues,
uh individuals. There is zero
correlation between the values that
people and organizations and
universities claim and their actual
practice. Right? The reason that people
communicate is not primarily to tell
truth. People evolved to communicate, to
advance their own interests, to signal
whose side that they're on, to signal to
their tribe that they love and support
and protect their tribe, to show that
they're a good person.
The primary reason that individuals and
firms communicate is not to tell the
truth. Sometimes telling the truth can
be useful. It's not that people are
automatically
lying. It's just there's absolutely no
correlation between what people say and
truth. There are very few instances in
life
where telling the truth is the primary
value of whoever's speaking or writing.
Think of it as akin to playing tackle
football, right? the type of behavior
that you can engage in once the whistle
goes and the play is live on a football
field where you are legally playing
tackle football. You cannot engage in
that behavior outside of the football
field without putting yourself at great
risk. So too with telling the truth,
right? There is a time and there is a
place where your primary objective
should be to tell the truth. And those
times and places are about as common as
the times and places where you suit up
and you play a legal game of tackle
football.
There aren't many places there aren't
many situations in life where your
primary obligation is to tell the truth.
In almost every situation in life, there
will be other higher values in your best
interests. So, at work, you need to just
tell your bosses and your co-workers and
everyone else what they need to hear,
what they want to hear. You start
telling the truth at work, you're going
to get fired, right? You start telling
the truth at church, you're going to be
expelled from your church. You just
start optimizing for truth at your
synagogue, you're going to be thrown out
of your synagogue. There's no group that
I can conceive of that has any numbers,
power, or influence where their primary
request from you is that you optimize
for truth. Life doesn't work that way.
Very narrow segments of life can you
play tackle football and that's aokay.
There are only very narrow segments of
life where your most important
obligation is to tell the truth. And
there's absolutely no correlation
between the statements that people make,
firms make, churches make, synagogues
make, universities make, and what they
actually stand for. People do not
primarily communicate to tell the truth.
People primarily communicate to signal
in their own best interests. So they
want to signal to a neighbor that
they're a good neighbor. They want to
signal to people at church that they
belong to the church and they will help
other members in the church and they
will give out the right signals that
they are aligned with this particular
group. At work you need to
say the things that you're expected to
say. If at the big Christmas dinner,
you are expected to stand up and extol
the firm's virtues, you need to stand up
and extol the firm's virtues or you're
not going to have a job. And when you're
extolling the firm's virtues, if you try
optimizing for truth, you are not going
to have a job. You go on a first date
and you start optimizing for truth,
you're not going to have a second date.
That's not because people are evil.
It's because we have a lot more
requirements. We have a lot more things
that we put much higher priority on than
than telling the truth. So when I do
this live stream, I I try to optimize
the truth.
But uh it's akin to someone strapping on
a uniform and going out and playing
tackle football. I haven't live stream
in about two months. This feels really
uncomfortable. It feels really tiring.
It feels
I don't like what I'm been feeling
because this is a challenge. I got a new
computer, new settings, things aren't
lined up right. I don't have the the
music. I'm just putting myself on the
line. It's just so easy to to say, you
know, one stupid sentence that would
forever ruin my life, destroy the most
important relationships in my life. When
you start speaking online or you start
writing emails, right, there is a
tremendously strong current and that
current only goes in one direction
against your best interests, right? You
start posting on social media, sending
emails, and you start telling the truth,
you're going to destroy your life. You
start speaking honestly from the heart,
you're going to destroy your life. You
have to be so disciplined. You just you
have to fight as hard as I have to fight
off Microsoft to keep my bloody Chrome
browser. I you have to fight as hard to
maintain your safety and best interests
when speaking online or when sending an
email as Adobe
popping all sorts of nuisances and
announcements on you when you're just
trying to get some work done under
subscription that you pay $20 a month
for and you're trying to get something
done in time and you have to constantly
go to war with Adobe just to use the
product that you pay for. Right? So
there will be very few instances in your
life where people want you to tell them
the truth and the correlation between
the number of times people want you to
tell the tell them the truth and the
times that they tell you that they want
you to tell the truth. There's
absolutely no correlation when someone
says I want you to tell me the truth,
right? They are no more likely to want
to hear the truth than if they had never
said such a thing.
So this notion that oh Starbucks says
that they stand for XYZ values therefore
there's going to be some correlation
between the practices and the business
operation of Starbucks and the values
that they put on their website. There's
no correlation, right? They may do some
things towards what they say, but
there's no strong connection, right?
When you have your annual review at
work, you'll most likely be asked about
uh how well have you lived up to the
firm's values. Right now, in all
likelihood, most places you've wor you
had no idea that the firm, the
operation, the business had values.
But talk to other people who've done the
annual review and get your answers in
order. And it you don't need to say
anything approaching the truth. Just say
we stand for diversity. We stand for
equity. We stand for inclusion. Uh we
want to make the world a better place.
We stand for truth and for we we're here
to help people. Like whatever people
want to hear, tell them what they want
to hear.
I was set up with a woman because she
told another woman, I just want a man to
tell me that I'm beautiful. And she
said, ah, I know just the person. Luke
will tell you that you are beautiful.
Now, objectively, was this woman
beautiful?
Not so much. But I was happy to tell her
that she was beautiful because I'm
someone who wants to bring light and
love and I recognize that the times in
life where I should be like optimizing
for truth are indeed quite narrow.
Again,
pause just so that everybody understands
a little bit more about what happened.
That brought down the vice chancellor.
That brought down the appalling woke
international lawyer, vice chancellor
Steven Tupe, who disgracefully had been
uh he'd been the vice chancellor and
president of the University of British
Columbia and Cambridge insanely thought
that somebody of that background was
worthy to lead worthy to lead Cambridge.
So, when you get caught like telling a
lie, like there are many good reasons to
signal that you're a truthful, honest
person, right? You always want to be
signaling that you're a truthful, honest
person, right? Even if you're not. And
then like when you get caught out,
right, you just just have your
explanations in order like, you know,
I'm autistic or um you know, I made a
mistake or you know, I'm turning things
around or you know, I'm getting the
monkey off my back. But he was brought
down, wasn't he, over essentially one
word that the formula on freedom of
speech which he wanted required you to
be respectful of all other opinions. And
the university led by your department,
led by the philosophy department argued,
no, you've to be tolerant. And it also
the the terms of the uh of of the of the
uh uh revised policy on freedom of
speech also uh played down the
importance of welfare and sort of
coddling students. And it drew on
another great tradition, didn't it? It
drew on the tradition of the Chicago.
>> Now, it's great fun to talk to people
who are low in agreeableness and higher
in optimizing for truth, right? I love
it. I think is fantastic as long as it's
not self-destructive or antisocial.
Right? Every community, every society,
every synagogue and church, every firm,
every operation has all sorts of obvious
truths that it has to deny to cohhere,
right? We'd all go crazy if we optimize
for truth 24/7.
So, we all need our precious little
lies. And and if you go to war with
people's most precious lies, it's not
going to go well for you.
principles be which state that no
university can function if the
university itself has political or
social values. The university has to be
neutral. Everybody participating in the
university.
>> Yeah. And and that's never going to
happen because we didn't evolve. There's
no evolutionary benefit to being neutral
except in very narrow circumstances such
as when you're playing football, right?
Life evolved tribally. We evolved to
live in a group strategy in within a
community and no community that survives
is neutral. So time and a place for
neutrality
generally speaking not an effective uh
life strategy. Okay. I I so I think this
works. It will get better. Life will get
better. Jason Aday says so. Talk to you
later, mate.