The Invisible Rules Of Social Success You Were Never Taught - Charles Duhigg
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
Most people mistakenly believe that effective communication happens naturally, but Charles Duhigg argues in his book *Supercommunicators* that it is actually a set of learnable skills rather than an innate talent. Drawing on research from neuroscience and psychology, he explains that while our brains are evolutionarily wired for connection, we often fail to utilize these capabilities because we do not practice specific techniques. A key insight involves understanding the three distinct types of conversations: practical (solving problems), emotional (sharing feelings without judgment), and social (relating to society). Duhigg illustrates this with a personal anecdote about his wife; he would complain emotionally while she offered practical solutions, creating conflict because they were operating in different conversational buckets. By identifying which type of conversation is occurring—whether one wants empathy or advice—and matching the other person's mindset, individuals can build connection even when disagreeing on facts. To master these interactions, Duhigg outlines four core skills that supercommunicators employ consistently. The first skill involves asking deep questions about values and experiences rather than just surface-level facts; this invites people to share their authentic selves as experts in their own lives, fostering trust by avoiding judgment zones. The second skill is proving you are listening through a technique called "looping for understanding," where one repeats back what they heard using the phrase "what I hear you saying is..." rather than mimicking words or waiting for their turn to speak. This creates social reciprocity and validates the speaker's experience. The third skill centers on vulnerability, defined not as oversharing personal trauma but as sharing something that invites judgment from others; when two people engage in reciprocal vulnerability without immediate retaliation or dismissal, it triggers a neural cascade that builds trust. Finally, supercommunicators diagnose the current conversational mindset to ensure they are neurally entraining with their partner, causing heart rates and brain activity to align through shared focus on feelings rather than just facts. The application of these skills has profound effects on group dynamics and relationship health. Duhigg cites a Dartmouth study where groups that included even one "supercommunicator" who asked more questions and modeled listening behaviors achieved neural alignment faster, leading to quicker consensus among diverse individuals regardless of political or regional differences. In romantic relationships, couples often fall into the trap of "kitchen sinking," where a specific argument escalates into a fight about everything else as partners try to control each other's emotions or topics. The solution is for partners to jointly control their environment and conversation boundaries—such as agreeing on when to talk or what topics are off-limits—to remain teammates rather than adversaries. This principle extends online, where toxic discourse often stems from attempts to force others into ideological boxes; using polite markers like "please" and "thank you," which signal a willingness to share control, can significantly improve the tone of digital interactions just as effectively as face-to-face politeness does in person. Despite challenges posed by social media algorithms that highlight inflammatory edge cases over reliable data, Duhigg remains optimistic about humanity's ability to adapt communication skills for new technologies. He draws a parallel between early telephone users who struggled with voice-only conversations and today's Gen Z generation learning to communicate effectively via text using emojis and emotional cues; just as people learned to enunciate more clearly on phones in the past, society is currently adapting its online discourse norms. Furthermore, he addresses concerns about authenticity by comparing communication skills to physical fitness: improving one's "serve" or dinking game at pickleball does not make a player fake, nor do learning new vocabulary and cultural markers when moving countries diminish one's identity. Ultimately, Duhigg concludes that our brains are versatile tools designed for connection, and anyone can become a supercommunicator by committing to practice these specific skills—asking deep questions, looping back what is heard, embracing vulnerability, and matching conversational mindsets—to build stronger bonds in both personal relationships and broader society.
Read the full video transcript
what do most people get wrong when it
comes to understanding communication do
you think I think what most people get
wrong is they think that it's something
that should just happen naturally right
that it's something that that that the
best communicators are people who don't
think about communication but what we've
discovered is exactly the opposite if if
if you know someone who is just
fantastic at connecting with people at
communicating and you go up and you ask
them you know have you always been like
this inevitably what they are going to
tell you is no they'll say something
like when I was in high school I had
real trouble making friends and so I had
really had to like study how kids talk
to each other or or my my parents got
divorced when I was a kid and I had to
be The Peacemaker between
them the thing about communication is
it's just a set of skills it's not even
particularly complicated skills it's a
set of skills that anyone can learn
anyone can become a super
communicator but you have to realize
that there's skills and you have to
practice them a little bit and and you
have to commit to thinking about how you
communicate to get better at it I
suppose communication is quite tightly
tied to our sense of self you know it's
the it's our expression of who we are so
when we look at somebody that's a good
or a bad Communicator that's because
they are a good or a bad person sense of
selfworth comes through as well
absolutely I mean that happens a lot and
and of course um you can be a bad person
and be a great communicator you can be a
good person and not be a great
communicator um but you're exactly right
that like communication is very Central
to not only how we think about ourselves
but but how we move through the world
and and what's interesting is if you
think about it communication is so
communication is homo saian superpower
right it is the thing that has allowed
us to to be you know do better than
every other species to build families
and Villages and towns to pass Knowledge
from from one generation to the Next
Generation and so our brains have
evolved to be pretty good at
communication like like we have all of
the stuff in our head to be fantastic at
it
and as a result because it's so
important to who we are as a species
you're right we tend to judge people
like their moral worth on whether
they're a good communicator or not and
and that that can be a little bit
dangerous but it also means that if you
want to connect with someone and you're
someone who's an introvert you're
someone who has trouble connecting it's
really just a matter of learning how
learning these skills about how
communication works and you can form
that Bond
talk to me about the difference between
introverts and extroverts are there
advantages and disadvantages that each
have each sort of off the top of your
head you'd think well extroverts have
got all of the advantages here because
they're the ones that are more outgoing
they're going to have more experience
they're going to find Social um
engagements less energy sapping uh what
what did you come to learn about
extroverts and introverts in
communication so it it turns out it to
to answer that question let me tell you
a little bit about what we know about
the science of communication so um when
I started writing super communicators
the reason why is because I had fallen
into this bad pattern with my wife which
probably is going to be familiar to you
and anyone listening to this which is I
would come home from long day work I
start complaining about my day I was
working at the New York Times at that
point be like my boss doesn't understand
me and my co-workers don't realize what
a genius I am and my wife would say this
very like practical thing she would say
like why don't you take your boss out to
lunch and you guys can get to know each
other a little bit better and instead of
being able to hear her good advice I
would actually get more upset right and
I would say like you're supposed to be
supporting me you're supposed to be on
my side why aren't you outraged on my
behalf and she would get upset because I
was attacking for giving me good advice
was not a good scene right and I think
many people all relationships have some
version of this where where where one
person wants to complain and the other
person wants to solve the problem and
there's there's conflict there and so I
was trying to figure out like why this
was happening and I went to researchers
and I asked them and they said well
we're actually really glad that you came
and talked to us right now because we're
living through this golden age of
understanding
communication and one of the things that
we've learned by studying the brains of
people as they communicate with each
other is that when you're having a
discussion you think it's about one
thing right you're talking about your
day or like where to go on vacation or
next year's budget but actually they
said if you look at someone's brain
every discussion is made up of multiple
kinds of
conversations and in general these
conversations tend to fall into one or
three buckets there's these practical
conversations where we're like solving
problems or making plans together but
then there's emotional conversations
where I tell you what I'm feeling and I
don't want you to solve my feelings I
want you to
empathize and then there's social
conversations which is about how we
relate to each other and and society and
they said what we've discovered is if
two people are having different kinds of
conversations at the same time they
usually aren't even aware of it but they
literally can't hear each other they
literally can't understand what the
other person is trying to say and they
don't feel connected at all but if you
can figure out what kind of conversation
is happening and you can match the other
person or invite them to match you then
suddenly you feel connected even if you
don't agree with each other you suddenly
feel like you have some type of
connection and and it feels like a
conversation so what does this have to
do with introverts and
extroverts a lot of the research that's
coming out particularly now says that
introversion and extroversion is not
necessarily something that we're born
with or something that's hardwired into
our brain it's a set of habits that we
become comfortable with right extroverts
often times get more opportunities to
practice having conversation to practice
having conversations such as emotional
conversations right or practical
conversations or because they have
practice somebody comes up to them with
an emotional problem and they try and
give them a practical solution and it
doesn't go well and they say okay next
time next time I'm GNA handle this a
little bit differently I'm G to do
better I think one of the big
differences between extroverts and
introverts is simply how much time and
space we have and we give ourselves to
practice because like anything that's
skills-based the first time you play
soccer the first time you play Crick it
the first time you go and lift weights
you're not you're not great at it you
got to practice it you got to learn how
to do it and it Communications exactly
the same
way what would you consider the
component skills of communication if you
were to bucket them together okay so
there's a couple of them um and we
should talk about what a super
Communicator is because I think that'll
help people kind of visualize this in
their head so so let me ask you a
question which is let's imagine you
having like bad day right like just
terrible day you come home after work
you're
like and you want to call someone
because you know calling this person
will make you feel better like you'll
just like it do you know who you would
call like does that person pop into your
mind yeah yeah probably either Luke my
tour manager or George who is a friend
and has been on the show 10 times okay
okay so Luke and George are for you
super
communicators and you are I guarantee
you a super Communicator back to them
right you you do it without even
thinking about it you just know how to
like you know how to ask the right
question you know how to show that
you're listening you know how to show
that you care you know how to each of
those things that you're doing with with
those two guys are skills and you might
not recognize them as skills right now
because they just feel so natural to you
but they are skills and once we identify
them as skills they become fungible we
can you can talk to a stranger the same
way you talk to Luke and if you do it'll
have the same impact that it has on Luke
which is that it feels like you're the
most wonderful person on Earth okay so
what are those skills
so one of the things that we know about
super communicators and this is the
first skill is that and as I mentioned
we're all super communicators one time
or another but consistent super
communicators people who can connect
with almost anyone is that they tend to
ask more questions like 10 to 20 times
as many questions as the average person
and some of those questions we don't
even register as questions or things
like oh you know what' you make of that
or like oh did you like that restaurant
like like little things that just invite
us into a
conversation but some of the questions
are what are known within psychology as
deep questions and a deep question is
something that asks us about our values
or beliefs or
experiences and that can sound a little
bit intimidating but it's like as simple
as like if you meet someone who's a
doctor instead of saying you know oh
what hospital do you work at saying oh
what made you decide to go to medical
school right it's as easy to ask the
second question as the first but the
second question like invites them to
talk about who they are it's a deep
question it doesn't appear like a deep
question but it allows you to have a
real conversation so this is the first
skill super communicators ask a lot more
questions and they they ask deep
questions they ask about instead of
asking about the facts of someone's life
they ask how they feel about their
life it's interesting thinking about uh
the two guys that I mentioned because
they would both both a lot of the time
drop into that and I
think there's a sense of being seen when
somebody asks you a question about how
did that make you feel because at no
point are they denying the fact that you
felt that way or should have felt that
way that it feels like a judgment free
zone totally totally and the thing I
love about that too and I think that
this is that's a really that's a really
smart comment because what it also
recognizes is when I ask you about your
personal experiences I'm asking you
about something that you are an expert
on and so so let's say we're having a
political debate and we disagree with
each other and I've got all my facts in
my pocket you've got all your facts in
your pocket but if I ask you like how
did you feel on Election Day like when
you saw the results come in how did you
feel that you're the expert in how you
feel I can't be like oh you didn't feel
that way you actually felt this way
right like and and then when you ask me
how I felt I'm the expert in what I feel
and so instead of us trying to out
expert each other and out and outd duel
each other
we're both coming with these authentic
experiences that we have and and it
allows us to find all the things we have
in common because if you voted for
someone that if you voted for the person
I didn't vote for and vice versa my
guess is actually that was the smallest
part of that week right was was casting
that ballot there was also like waking
up the morning after there's taking your
kids to school there's you know talking
to friends about the election those are
all things that we have in common and
finding that commonality really helps us
also talk about what we don't have in
common which is really
powerful okay next skill okay so first
one is asking deep questions second
skill is that once we ask those
questions we often think that it's just
our job to listen to people and that's a
little bit of a misunderstanding of what
listening
is so what's interesting is that most of
the time when we think about listening
what we think about is we think about
remaining silent right two ears one
mouth remaining silent listening to what
you're saying maybe we'll nod our head
maybe we'll like look you in the eyes
and and say like that's
interesting that's not that's not
listening that's the first condition of
listening but you need more to actually
be a good listener and in part it's
because particularly when we're talking
about something that's really sensitive
or really important or really
controversial or something we have feel
conflict over that we disagree with each
other there's always a sneaking
suspicion in the back of our head
that you are not actually listening to
me you're just waiting your turn to
speak so what do I do to overcome that
suspicion well there's actually this
technique let me give you the answer the
answer is that you have to prove that
you're listening you have to prove to
the person you're paying attention and
there's actually this technique that
they teach at like Harvard and Stanford
and all these other fancy schools that's
called looping for understanding and
this is what this is what it is there's
three parts to this when you're talking
to someone and you get to that point in
the conversation where like things are
getting real step one is you should ask
a question right preferably a deep
question try and use like you know ask
someone how do you feel about that what
does that mean to you why' you decide to
do X and then listen to what they're
saying in response and when they're done
answering the question repeat back in
your own words what you heard them say
now the key here is it cannot be mimicry
right this is what bad salese do they
just say back what you just said to them
or the last thing that you said
what what it has to be is you have
you're trying to prove to them that
you're actually processing this so it
has to be something like you know what I
hear you saying is this and and that
reminds me of something you said last
week because I think they're connected
right you're proving to them that you're
thinking about what they said and most
of us do these first two steps
intuitively right this is just like we
kind of learned this in school it's step
three that I always forget because once
you've said to them here's what I here's
what I heard you say am I getting this
right or you say did I hear you
correctly you you ask if you got it
right because what you're really doing
in that moment is you're asking for
permission to ackowledge that you were
listening and when you acknowledge that
I was listening I become many many times
more likely listen likely to listen to
you in return this is basic social
reciprocity so that's the second skill
is prove you are listening ask deep
questions prove you are listening
through a technique like looping for
understanding or maybe just asking
followup questions or maybe saying oh
man that sounds so hard I I kind of know
what that's like I've been through
something myself prove you're
listening so third oh sorry go ahead no
just it it it makes an an awful lot of
sense that it it can conversations bad
conversations can feel like a game of
tennis where everybody is just waiting
that turn oh the ball's coming over the
net it's coming over it's going to
bounce and then oh it's now it's my turn
to hit it yeah and those aren't that's
not fun right like it's not like and and
by the way if you look at transcripts of
great
conversations what you see is that
they're a total mess like like if you
have if you have a transcript and
everyone's being really eloquent they're
saying things in like these really like
practiced ways that's not a great
conversation it might be a great
transcript but like if you were in that
conversation you'd be like this is the
most boring thing on earth like
everyone's just waiting to hit the
tennis ball a good conversation is kind
of messy and it's it has these nonlinear
aspects and that's that's important
that's that's how we connect with each
other what's the third skill okay so
there's two
more the third skill is that you need to
understand vulnerability and the role of
vulnerability in a
conversation because most people
misunderstand what vulnerability is we
we this word has gotten used so much we
tend to think it means like you know
crying on someone's shoulder talking
about like when your mom was mean to you
that's not what vulnerability is is
vulnerability has a very very spe
specific definition in neuroscience and
psychology and it's something that our
brains have evolved to do which is that
when I tell you something that you could
judge it creates a sense of
vulnerability in me now I might tell you
something where I don't care about your
judgment I might tell you that I like um
I like Star Trek better than Star Wars I
think it's a better sh better better
plots better acting and you could be
like that's the dumbest thing I've ever
heard like like the Star Wars is
definitely better than St track I don't
care I don't care if you agree with me
it's not like it's a high stake saying
but the act of me telling you something
that you could judge it sets off a
neural Cascade in my brain that creates
a sense of vulnerability and here's what
we know is that when I do that if you
don't judge me if you choose to withhold
judgment and even more powerfully if you
share something about yourself that I
could
judge then it is impossible for us not
to trust and like each other a little
bit more our brains literally have
evolved to use vulnerability as a signal
as to whether we should trust other
people and that doesn't mean that like I
might agree with you it doesn't mean
that I might like think you're you'd be
a good friend but as as once I am
vulnerable with you and you are
vulnerable with me once we engage in
reciprocal vulnerability and reciprocal
authenticity we will trust each other
and like each other a little bit
more have you thought have you looked at
this from an Adaptive lens through okay
so can you give me the uh oh totally
totally so let's so let's talk about
like why why commun from an Adaptive
perspective why communication is so
important why this particular trait
might be even more important so it
clearly it's adaptive to be able to
communicate right if I can if I can we
we know that societies do better than
individuals and the way that I can
coordinate with a society is I can talk
to them and we can become we can share
goals together so communication is
clearly adaptive but then there's this
question about like why would
vulnerability be something that's that's
adaptive instead of maladaptive
something that helps us and the answer
is that once we build a society it's
very very hard to police that Society
without it being really expensive so if
if we have rules like you should not
murder someone or you should not
steal and we have to get cops on every
single corner to watch people all the
time to if they're stealing it's
incredibly expensive it's not efficient
it take it undo all the advantages of a
society so what we need is we need some
system where people learn the rules and
they just want to live by the rules
right they want to stick by the rules
and more importantly if somebody breaks
those rules they take real offense at
it in a system like that when a stranger
comes to
town I have to determine whether that
stranger poses a risk or not because I
can't follow them around with a police
officer for a long time and so one of
the things that happens is if they show
me something that I could use against
them if they show me their underbelly if
they admit something to me that I could
judge they're giving they're giving me a
little bit of Leverage they're giving me
a little bit of power and and that means
and and if I do the same thing back to
them we've given each other some power
and in that situation we don't have to
worry about the police keeping everyone
in line
because you and I now know something
about each other we owe something to
each other we've we've taken the measure
of the other person by giving them a
chance to attack us so if they're the
type of person who's an attacker we like
gave them a perfect opportunity and they
didn't do it and that doesn't mean that
like everyone in that Society is going
to be moral and ethical all the time but
it does mean that in a very when I need
to very quickly evaluate whether you're
a risk or not looking to the
vulnerability and whether it's authentic
vulnerability is going to be a real test
and there's another interesting part to
this which is when people aren't
authentically vulnerable we detect it
almost immediately incredibly yeah so
like if I say like hey you know I just
wanted to let you know like
um you know I spent all this money on
this yacht and like I'm a little
stressed about like how much money I
spent on it but bro it's a sweet yacht
like that does not that's that's clearly
not me being vulnerable right that's I
mean I said something that aens it's a
humble break I said something that you
could judge you could be like yeah you
spent too much money but like the so
that's that's inauthentic or if I go if
I ask you where you went on vacation it
doesn't take you long to figure out I
don't care where you went on vacation I
just want to tell you where I went on
vacation so I can brag about like this
cool Safari I went on our brain If you
to ask if you were to ask a question of
have you ever gone on a vacation and
with your partner and it's been
emotionally difficult have you ever had
that oh totally that's that's a great
question that that was something that
happened to me recently and and dude
it's weird because you've got this sort
of bit of Sweet Sensation you're away in
somewhere that's so beautiful but you
you and your significant other aren't
really getting on and I I don't really
know I mean is that common like has that
ever happened to you you know like
that's an interesting yeah that's
exactly that's a fantastic deep question
because what you just did is you
admitted something vulnerable to me and
it didn't cost you much it's not like
think like oh this guy's like such a
jerk because he went on a vacation with
his girlfriend like there's no cost to
that type of vulnerability but it is
authentic you're you're trying to share
something real and meaningful with me as
opposed to trying to like send some
signal and so so we're very good at
detecting authenticity
BS yeah I
think I've been pretty fascinated by
parasocial relationships and um
the incentives for online writers
YouTubers podcasters you know influences
of any kind to try and growth hack or
speedrun this sense of relatability and
authenticity and connection and um I
think faux vulnerability sort of
performative vulnerability maybe we
could call it um is definitely one of
the places that you see this happen um
and you know at it's dream this is kind
of victimhood
pedestalize iation tends to not actually
happen from the person it tends to kind
of be bestowed on them by by everybody
else in a way you don't tend to
pedestalize yourself as a as as a victim
um but yeah that performative
vulnerability that sort of tuning up of
things that didn't really affect you all
that much or maybe didn't really happen
or or a surreptitious way of you're
getting gossip in or maybe you're trying
to vent to tell somebody something about
someone else you know venting this have
you looked into venting much as a
adaptive mechanism yeah I've looked into
office gossip but not venting tell me
about it venting is so [ __ ] sick so
venting is very much a female
intersexual competitive trait uh and the
reason is venting allows you
to distribute gossip about a potential
rival under the aaces of you being a
caring compatriot so I'm able to say uh
Charles I'm I'm really worried about
John uh because you know he's just like
he's sleeping with in fact let me I'll
pretend we're gonna be we're gonna be
women so I'm I'm Christine and you're
Charlotte um so Charlotte I'm really
worried about uh Johanna uh Yanna is
just she's sleeping with all of these
guys and like I'm really worried that
she's going to get hurt you know like
I'm just she doesn't really seem like
she's being herself and like you know
what am I in that one sentence what am I
telling you I'm telling you how much
promiscuous sex Joanna is having yeah
I'm positioning myself as somebody who
is you know I would never I would never
do that I would never stoop that low you
know I just I care about her so much I
have to bring it up exactly so like
implicitly you're derating her facundity
and her Chastity whilst positioning
yours above hers but it's culpably
deniable because you're not doing it to
gossip I wasn't gossiping like I'm just
so worried Joanna I I you know I didn't
mean to tell Charlotte like I wasn't
trying to like talk behind your back I'm
just so worried about you with all of
this stuff and it venting it's a very
unique uh type of manipulative it can be
totally unique type of manipulative sort
of social really interesting about that
and I think this is true of parasocial
parasocial lism in general is
lisans parasocial ism is that how we say
it oh I
I par socialism yeah is it there is
something authentic happening there but
the authentic thing is I hate Joanna so
much that I want to spread [ __ ] about
her right like like like that's actually
an authentic thing and so oftentimes
when we see people who engage in
performative um
vulnerability it's very easy for us to
say like oh if they're doing it for
thousands of people it must not be real
but of course you know that's not true
right sometimes sometimes we say
something to thousands or even millions
of people and it is very real it's very
authentic
the thing that makes the difference
is is are you committed to saying first
of all do you know your own mind do you
know your own feelings are you genuinely
committed to trying to understand what
you're feeling and thinking and if
that's like I hate Joanna and I want to
smear her then like own that live up to
that like accept that that's your goal
and once you do that if you share it
with other people in an authentic way if
you say like look like I really want to
tell 10,000 of my closest friends that
like I have cancer and I'm
terrified that's not inauthentic that's
real but it's real because the person
thought about what they're thinking and
feeling they questioned their own
motives and values and then they tried
to be as transparent with the audience
as possible they weren't trying to use
any subterfuge they're trying to say I
want you to understand me so I'm going
to speak to you in as clear and direct a
way I as I can I suppose there um yeah
the the yacht example is kind of
interesting it's almost like
it it it's a something which in the
wrong hands I guess vulnerability is
something which is uh potentially
destructive or embarrassing if if in if
put into the wrong hands that might be
one way to to put it I suppose yeah I
think that's a that's a good way of
putting it is that like I'm telling you
something that actually you could use
against me yeah but if you start
spreading the rumor that I bought a cool
yacht that does nothing except for you
know yeah make me seem cool
okay okay what's the final skill okay so
the final skill
is once you're asking deep questions
once you're proving that you're
listening looping for understanding and
sort of showing that once you're you're
willing to be vulnerable under the
correct definition of what vulnerability
is it's really important that we pay
attention to what kind of conversation
is happening I mentioned before that
there's these three kinds of
conversations the
the Practical the emotional and the
social and and in the book super
communicators there's all these stories
about like a CIA officer who's like
recruiting overseas spies and a and why
the Big Bang Theory became such a hit
because it was a flop when they when
they made the pilot and at the core of
it is this thing
that if I if I become attuned to
diagnosing what kind of mindset you're
in if I can just ask myself like does
this seem like he's in a practical
mindset or an emotional mindset or a
social mind mindset and then I can just
do the smallest thing to try and match
you there right like like you mentioned
that you went to your kids graduation
this weekend and and and I say instead
of saying like just congratulations
that's awesome I say oh man what did
that feel like to watch your kid walk
across that stage because clearly you
are you're this is kind of an emotional
experience for you to go to your kids
graduation I'm just going to ask about
it when we can pay attention just the
smallest amount to what kind of
conversation is happening when we can
match others and we can invite them to
match us all of a sudden our
conversations get much much better and
there's actually a scientific basis to
this which
is because of again how our brains have
evolved because communication is so
important to our species when you're in
a good conversation like this
conversation we're having right now
without our us realizing it our bodies
start to match each other so you and I
are breathing at as basically the same
rate our heart rates are matching each
other or the actually even the P the
dilation of our pupils is starting to
mirror each other
and more importantly if I could see
inside both of our brains what I would
see is our thoughts are becoming more
and more similar literally we're using
the same parts of our brain with the
same type of energy we're we're moving
through similar neural Pathways and that
kind of makes sense that our brains
would become similar because if you
think about it when I tell you about an
emotion I'm feeling you actually
experience that emotion a little bit
right or if I tell you about an idea you
experience that idea so it makes sense
that our brains become become aligned
but what the neuroscientist that I
mentioned earlier have found and there's
a guy named Erie Hassan at Princeton
who's kind of the grandfather of This
research is
that the more our brains become aligned
the more we're thinking the same
thoughts at the same time the better we
understand each other the more we feel
connected to each
other and most importantly the more we
like the conversation within
Neuroscience this is known as neural
entrainment we become neurally entrained
and when we are nearly entrained it re
it releases this reward sensation this
Cascade of of neurotransmitters that
make us feel good and in part this is
adaptive because you know our brains
want us to communicate with people they
want us to have real conversations they
want us to connect and
bond and so when we feel
good even if we disagree with each other
we still feel good about the
conversation we still feel like the
conversation was a
success now the thing is these three
types of conversations that I mentioned
they use different parts of our brains
right so when I'm talking to my wife and
I'm in an emotional mindset I'm using
the the basil ganglia the interior
structures of my brain and when she
responds by giving me some practical
advice she's having a practical
conversation she's using her prefrontal
cortex so it's very hard for her
thoughts to become similar if she's
using the front of her brain and I'm
using the interior of my brain that's
why matching each other is so powerful
is because literally what I'm doing when
I ask you oh what did it feel like like
to watch your kid walk across that stage
at graduation what I'm doing at that
moment is I'm activating the same part
of my brain that I know is active in
your brain and it's going to make it so
much easier for us to become nurly
aligned and then once we're aligned we
can move from emotional to practical to
Social and back to emotional all
together and we'll understand each other
so much better the entire
time was this what the Dartmouth study
was looking at and that's something to
do with a guitarist as well yeah there's
a ton there's a ton of studies that have
looked exactly at this right like like
you mentioned the Dartmouth study they
would have people watch these confusing
movie clips together um and and then
they would actually turn off the um the
sound and they were oftentimes foreign
movies so the people were actually not
even speaking English and there was no
subtitles and they would have people
just watch watch these movies these
movie clips they were super confusing
and then they would put them in groups
to try and have them answer these a
bunch of questions like what's going on
in that scene X and Y and Z the group
has to come to a
consensus and what they found is that
some of the
groups would came to a consensus faster
and easier than others and when they put
them in MRIs and they showed them the
clips again what they found was that
those groups that came to consensus
really really quickly and not quickly
but but easily fully came to consensus
their brains all looked like each other
after they had had this conversation the
first time they were watching the movie
in the MRI their brains all look
different but the conversation somehow
got their brains to look similar to
remember and watch these scenes as if
they were all sharing kind of the same
perspective and so they're trying to
figure out why does this happen in some
groups and it doesn't happen in other
groups and B silers sers is the name of
the researcher who did this
research and what he found is that in
the groups that came to consensus in the
groups that became nurly aligned there
was at least one person who was a super
communicator there was someone who like
would just ask a lot more questions than
the average person and again a lot of
the questions were like oh like what
what did what did you think of that
scene or like you know oh what do you
think of what happened next they're just
questions that invite us into the
conversation they would also do things
like repeat what other people said a lot
more often you know Jim Jim you had a
really interesting thought that you
mentioned that you thought that this one
scene was about death right they're
proving that they're listening and in
that group people begin modeling
themselves after that behavior so other
people start it's so proo that it sets a
tone everyone else wants to follow
absolutely one super Communicator in a
group can cause everyone else to become
nurly and trained and when they're nurly
and trained they hear each other so much
better they like each other so much
better and that doesn't like they had
people in these rooms who like were like
conservatives and liberals and people
who are from the south and from the
North like these weren't people who
necessarily like all natur would have
been friends but just putting that super
Communicator in the room having them
model those behaviors it made everyone
else feel like that group came together
that it clicked and that's really
powerful yeah it's um it's interesting
how one correctly positioned person can
sort of change the the dynamic of a
conversation and I often think about I
often think
about I had this idea recently about why
around some people it feels like we have
so much to say and around other people
we don't feel that interesting I'm sure
that you'll have read the story about
Winston Churchill's mother meeting no
have you not heard oh you're gonna
absolutely love this one so I wrote
about this in my newsletter a couple of
weeks ago so um Winston Churchill's
mother I never realized she was kind of
a bit of a uh how would you
say like a socialite type thing sort of
a little like a Hollywood socialite type
thing she's called Jenny Jerome so uh
she got to dine with prime minister
Benjamin Disraeli and William Gladstone
on consecutive nights so there the two
the the two Rivals that were vying for
leadership and she got to dine with them
on consecutive nights and she said when
I left the dining room after sitting
next to Gladstone I thought that he was
the cleverest man in England but when I
sat next to Disraeli I left feeling like
I was the cleverest woman and it sort of
perfectly explains
why around some people it feels like we
have lots to say and around other people
if feels like we're boring and um I
realized a lot of the time what people
want they want to be charismatic you
know gen Z even had to recreate it as RZ
because car Charisma Charisma was too
sort of boomering and uncool um and
everybody wants RZ but when you actually
think about okay so how do you become
charismatic which is sort of energetic
outgoing extroverted likeability with
sexiness I guess um it's really hard how
do you make an uncharismatic person more
charismatic it's really difficult but
reverse Charisma which is not trying to
be interested interesting to other
people but trying to make them feel
interesting around you that's way easier
that's significantly easier to do way
it's way easier and and this there's
this quote that I'm sure you've heard
from my Angelou that no one remembers
what you said they only remember how you
made them feel and it turns out that
actually the science tells us that's
that's right like if you think back to
the a great conversation you had in the
last week and I would asked you to tell
me what people talked about you could
probably come up with like two or three
topics that came up and you will
remember nothing specific about what
anyone said right like like when we're
in a conversation it's not like we're
transcribing it we're not paying
attention to the words what we are
paying attention to now if I asked you
how you felt during that conversation
you'd actually be able to tell me with
like surprising accuracy how you felt at
different different periods in the
conversation and You' certainly remember
how you felt at the end of it that's
what we tend to remember yeah I I mean
Adam mastriani has this great Insight
around uh everything is just Vibes
basically which is the same the same
sort of realization you've come to you
know he's a guy who I think is still in
Academia uh he did uh postgrad PhD did
all of this stuff and I think maybe he
did his undergrad 15 years ago something
like that and he was on the quiz team
the qu quiz oh really I didn't know that
I know Adam I didn't know that he was on
the Apparently uh and uh he tested
himself to just remember the names of
the classes that he took in his first
year of undergrad just the names of the
classes and I think he got 40% of the
names of the classes right there's no
way I would get
40% like I might get one of those right
yeah exactly um and but he said he can
remember how one of the particular
lectures made him feel when he explained
about some of the different I think he
threw a packet of um malteasers into the
into the lecture uh audience and someone
caught them and then he he talked about
prediction and prediction errors and
then he talked about uh Disobedience and
obedience when the guy threw them back
when he asked and um you know he
couldn't remember the name of the class
but he could remember the way that he
felt so one other area you know we've
sort of talked about the Deep
conversations uh something which
a lot of people have a mortal fear over
is small talk you know the sort of
awkward elevator the water cooler thing
the SAT waiting for whatever how can
people better survive small talk so so
this gets to these deep questions again
so I I I give a lot of speeches right I
give speeches about and and it's usually
like a room of say you know thousand or
5,000 um people who are like in a
tradeit show and so when I'm talking
about super communicators I always start
it the same way I say in 30 minutes
I'm going to ask you to turn to the
person next to you and ask and answer
one question and that question is when
is the last time you cried in front of
another
person and then I ask like who's excited
about this and literally no hands go up
right nobody wants to do this they just
came to some conference they're at Vegas
and now here this like guy on a stage is
telling them I'm gonna force you to like
have a convers have a therapy session
with this stranger who's sitting next to
you right nobody likes this idea and
then I spend the next 30 minutes
explaining why this is a good idea what
we know about deep questions what we
know about neural entrainment and then
we do the experiment and I ask people
and this is based on some work that Nick
Epley a professor at the University of
Chicago has done because he's done this
experiment thousands of times and and I
ask people to estimate how much they
think they're going to enjoy this
conversation that they're about to have
right how awkward they think it'll be um
whether they're going to feel close to
the other person and when Nick does this
he actually has it has him take a poll
on a phone and what finds is that people
say before they have this conversation
this is going to be super awkward right
like this is not I'm not they actually
say that they they might enjoy it a
little bit because like if you're
sitting next to your boss everyone
everyone doesn't mind hearing how their
boss cried last time so there's a little
bit of pism but it's not it's not a huge
amount of enjoyment they anticipate and
most importantly they do not think they
will feel closer to the person
afterwards they think they think they
will feel even more distant from them
because it's just weird to talk about
crying with this stranger so then and I
do this from the stage we do it you turn
to the person next to you spend two
minutes asking and answering the
question then you switch places spend
another two minutes the room like fills
with this cacophony of
noise and then finally if I can get
people to shut up fast enough I asked
them what that experience was like I
asked them for a show of hands how many
people enjoyed that that that that
experience much more than you thought
you would every single hand will go
up because people people are bad at
estimating what it what a real
conversation is going to feel like so
this gets to Small
Talk the problem with small talk is not
small talk the problem with small talk
is the anxiety we feel when we go into
it and the anxiety we feel about asking
a deep question and yet again and again
and again if we ask that deep question
we will discover the other person loves
to answer it
they want to hear us answer our own
question and we will walk away having
enjoyed that conversation well I'm I'm
aware a lot of people get worried about
that level of opening up I don't want to
be seen as sort of too Keen or too
serious that doesn't seem very fun
doesn't seem very exciting but as a to
you know fight the fight as a a person
that likes deep conversations uh who
likes small talk no right no one no one
likes Small Talk regardless of what it
is and it's it people are very uh
publicly uh castigating of small talk as
well so it's the worst thing in the
world we're talking about the weather
you know somebody brings up the weather
and he like can you believe that all
they had to talk about to do their thing
um okay so practically let's let's think
the weather as an example because you're
exactly right that nobody likes small
talk but you don't have to ask that if
someone brings up the weather you don't
have to ask them the last time they
cried in front of another person you can
say something like you know it oh yeah
it's really been rainy and you mentioned
like don't like the rain so I'm
wondering like what what got you to move
to Seattle like like why'd you move here
since it's kind of a rainy place like
what was it about the city that you like
and suddenly that's an easy question to
ask right that doesn't that doesn't seem
like a deep question but it actually is
because inevitably that person is gonna
say something like oh I fell in love
with someone and I moved here to follow
them or I got this job opportunity and
it just seemed so great but then it
didn't work out and I now I'm working
someplace else small small talk is kind
of what we talk what we the word we use
to describe boring talk but you can
transition almost immediately to
something that's real and meaning for
how can people better start deep
conversations in a less awkward way and
how can people better receive deep
questions in a less awkward way yeah
it's a great question so so this guy
Nick Epley I mentioned who basically he
studies deep questions once um once a
month he'll get on a bus in Chicago and
he'll sit down next to a stranger and
his goal is to ask that person about
their hopes and dreams within three
questions and when he told me this I was
like oh this sounds miserable man this
sounds like the like I don't want to do
this this sounds terrible and he was
like no no it's the easiest thing I've
ever done because it usually only takes
two questions like usually I sit down I
introduce myself and I'm like hey what
do you do for a living and they say oh
I'm an accountant and he goes oh did you
always want to be an accountant was that
your dream as a kid and they say no no
kid wants to be an accountant like I
want to be an astronaut but now suddenly
he's like oh so what happened like did
you did you try and become an astronaut
now now they're actually having a
conversation right they're talking about
like oh I had kids and I had to raise
them and Nick can say like I have kids
too you know I have five kids actually
and and I know it's there's these
challenges to raising kids now you're
having a real conversation so I think
the way to start it and to
respond is to ask something that you're
actually curious about when I ask you
where do you live
basic small talk question I do not care
where you live it is not something I'm
actually interested in maybe it is right
I you live in Austin and I want to learn
a little bit about Austin but but if I'm
asking you something that's genuinely
interesting to me like like why did you
decide to move from the UK to the US
what was it about that that's actually
like really fascinating to me that's
something that could seem like a small
talk throwaway question but if I'm
actually curious about it and I ask it
with curiosity we're going to be having
a deep conversation within minutes you
mentioned astronauts there didn't you
look at Nasa did you learn a bunch of
stuff from NASA what did you learn yeah
so um so this is one of my favorite
stories from the book so about 15 or 15
years ago NASA started developing plans
to build the International Space Station
and they realized that in addition to
all the technical plans they came up
with there was actually this big problem
that they needed to solve which is up
until then about the the longest
National NASA Mission had been about 10
day 10 days in space and they had
basically realized you can send like the
biggest jerk on Earth up into space for
10 days and it's going to be fine right
like they're gonna pick fights with
their Co with their co- astronauts
they're gonna pick fights with Mission
Control they're just GNA be like a pain
in the ass but it's fine it's only 10
days but the thing about a space station
is you're sending astronauts up there
for three months or six months or 12
months at a time and if you send a jerk
into space for 12 months he's going to
drive everyone else crazy so NASA
realizes we need to start choosing
astronauts finding astronauts who have
emotional
intelligence this is actually a lot
harder than it sounds though because the
problem for NASA is when you make it to
the final rounds of an astronaut
interview you are awesome right you're
like you're handsome or you're beautiful
you have like two phds and most
importantly you've been doing interviews
your entire life like you know the right
answers to every question and what they
realized is they couldn't tell the
difference between the people who were
faking emotional intelligence from the
ones who actually had it so they turned
to this guy Terry Maguire the lead
psychiatrist for man space flight at
Nasa and they ask him to come up with
with an interview question that will let
them figure out who actually has
emotional intelligence and for nine
months he works on this problem and he
can't come up with anything he keeps he
tests a bunch of questions none of them
work and then one night he's listening
to recordings of old interviews with old
candidates and he knows which of those
candidates went on to be really good
leaders inside naswi kind of like washed
out and as he's listening he realizes
the really good leaders They're laughing
differently than everyone else in the
interview so he comes up with this whole
new way of doing his interviews now what
he does is he brings the astronaut
candidate into a room they're sitting
there by thems he walks into the room
and he's holding this big stack of
papers and he trips as if on accident
and he spills the papers all over the
floor and then he laughs as big boy left
he goes like h
I cannot believe I did
that and then he pays attention to how
the candidate
reacts because everyone reacts in one of
two
ways some people go like this that's
really silly let me give you a hand and
some people
go that's really silly let me give you a
hand everyone knows what's going on in
that moment right you made a mistake by
dropping the papers and then you made
the mistake even worse by overreacting
by laughing this huge kind of like
inappropriately big laugh like we've all
been embarrassed that way and some of
the candidates were like oh I'm I'm just
going to pretend this didn't happen I'm
going to just help you put this under
the carpet and some of the candidates
were like you know what I know what
you're feeling right now like I I know
that you're embarrassed and the best way
I can remove that embarrassment is I can
jump in the boat with you so I'm going
to laugh this big boisterous laugh I'm
going to match you I'm going to mirror
your energy and your
affect those were the people who had
emotional intelligence and those went on
to be some of the best leaders in NASA's
history and it's all just paying
attention how they laugh in an interview
that makes the difference why do humans
laugh did you look at this what is it
it's really interesting there's a guy
named um Provine Robert Provine who's
now passed away he was at the University
of Maryland he actually studied laughter
for years he would he would go like to
malls and restaurants and hide tape
recorders so he could tape people
talking to each other and what he what
he found is that about his initial
thought was like we laugh when we see
something funny and he actually wanted
to figure out what like the science of
funny was but what he discovered was
totally unexpected he discovered that
80% of the time when we laugh it is not
in response to anything humorous right
like you're not a comedian I'm not a
comedian our friends aren't comedians
like and yet we laugh all the time so
what's happening when we laugh when we
laugh we're often times show the other
person I want to connect with you and
when they laugh back that same
reciprocity that I mentioned before and
it's because a little bit vulnerable
right like if I laugh if I laugh I'm
kind of saying like I think that's funny
and you could be like oh my God you're
such a jerk for thinking that's funny
right so so I'm showing you a little bit
of vulnerability when you laugh back the
most normal
reaction you're showing me that you want
to connect right back laughter is how we
Forge connections with other people the
fact that we to do it in response to
something funny is actually almost a
byproduct it's not the main function of
laughter yeah that's interesting it's I
don't know I just what an
odd sound that
emanates but I suppose that also
explains why watching a recording of a
standup set on Netflix in your house on
your own versus going to a comedy club
surrounded by 150 other people the level
of laughter is way different that's
exactly right well in there's actually
some so I I don't think someone told me
this Theory and and my understanding is
it hasn't been proved out but that
there's some research behind it oh my
favorite my favorite place for Theory to
say ex as yet unproven it maybe to be
replication crisis out of
existence so if there's if if you if
you're looking at a group of
primates there's a noise that they will
make that means that there's like lion
or a danger nearby and that noise sounds
like laughter and so the theory is that
laughter evolved because it's inherently
pro-social it's a noise that I make to
warn others of danger and most
importantly there's a huge sense of
relief associated with it because when I
know that there's a danger out in the
woods and I'm up in the trees then
suddenly like I actually feel a sense of
relief because I'm not in
danger and so the theory is that this is
why that weird noise has evolved is it
actually has these roots in this very
pro-social Behavior which would also
help us make sense that like oftentimes
a joke is about building up tension and
then saying something funny to relieve
the tension that's interesting what
about when it comes to couples the
potentially the most fraught most
important communication the the Genesis
of your story as well yeah the
absolutely best and worst ways that
couples communicate so there's there's a
lot of um in in the book there's
actually like a whole chapter about um
the story that involved
um the the the growth of marriage
therapy as a as a field of research and
one of the things that marriage
therapists have found is that there's
this one pattern that's basically
disastrous um they call it kitchen
sinking so every couple fights that's
just totally that's part of every
relationship yeah right there's always
like little like yeah disagreements or
tension but when some couples fight a
fight about one thing becomes a fight
about everything right so we start
talking about like where are we going to
spend Christmas and like within minutes
it's likew your mom hates me cuz like
and she's not nice and by the way if we
earned more money we'd be able to go to
Hawaii instead of right so a fight about
one thing becomes a fight about
everything kitchen sinking that is
disastrous that will make the fight
toxic and so researchers were trying to
figure out why does this happen because
it happens pretty consistently even to
like couples that like are well matched
and they found that what happens is that
when we're in a conflict when I feel
threatened I want to control something
like that's just a normal response to
find something to control and the
easiest thing for me to control is you
like the person I'm talking to so I'm
gonna I'm gonna do things like I'm gonna
tack you back I'm gonna bring up your
mom I'm gonna say things like I'm not
going to talk about that I'm gonna try
and control what what what topics are
allowed if you're upset I'll say things
like you shouldn't be upset about that
like that's a dumb thing to be upset
about I'm going to try and control your
emotions that's toxic that's where
kitchen sinking comes from so what's the
solution well the solution is not to say
you shouldn't try and control something
because everyone feels that impulse for
control that's that's very human but
instead of trying to control the other
person in the relationship try and find
things you can control together like
controlling for instance the environment
you start fighting at 11 o'clock at
night if one person says look I really
want to talk about this can we wait
until 9 tomorrow morning when we both
wake up and we're not exhausted is that
okay like now we're controlling the
environment together or to say like I
want to control the boundaries of this
conversation to say like let's talk
about Christmas let's not talk about
moms let's not talk about money if
that's okay like let's just focus on
making a decision about Christmas now
we're on the same side of the table
we're controlling the boundaries of this
conversation together and the reason why
this is really important why why the
best couples the best couples it's not
that they don't fight it's that they
fight
and there's no lasting consequences of
it because they they're basically sort
of
teammates finding things to control
together even if they disagree with each
other where does that where does that
sense of teammates come from well
because if you and I are controlling the
environment together we're on the same
side of the table right like we might
disagree about like you know how we
should raise our kids but we've both
decided like we're going to wait till
9:00 in the morning we're going to do
this together we're just going to talk
about whether like Jimmy's are allowed
to eat like snacks after 3:00 we're not
going to talk about like how you were
raised and spanking and X right now
suddenly we're kind of Partners and
figuring out like what's our goal what's
what are the how are we going to control
this conversation together and what's
our goal
in now the reason why I think this is
really important is because it turns out
the exact same thing happens online with
social
media when social media goes bad when
people start screaming at each other
when social media becomes like a
cesspool it's often times because people
are trying to control each other right
you make some argument you say I think
guns are great and I say you're a [ __ ]
you're not even thinking about like all
the guns that like kill kids in schools
like why are you a fascist like at that
moment what I'm trying to do is I'm
trying to control you I'm trying to
force you into a box I'm trying to force
you into the fascist box I'm trying to
force you into you're thinking about
second Amendment but you should be
thinking about the
kids when we try and control each other
on social media it's very very natural
it's very natural online because we're
not seeing each other face to face it
can become toxic but if we take a step
back and we say like look like I
actually want to talk about this guns
thing like like let's try and figure out
like what aspect of guns are we talking
about then an online conversation
becomes just as good as any other
conversation and in fact there's all
these interesting studies done by
someone again at Dart
where he found that even just adding
please and thank you if one person in a
thread says please and thank you the
tenor of the whole conversation
improves because please and thank you is
a way of me showing you that I want to
share control with
you as opposed to I want to control you
yeah as opposed to like I I'm powerful
and you're a dick and so like let let me
try and control you as much as I can m
what do you think online discourse has
done to our expectations of
communication so it's a good qu well let
me ask you because you you you're online
a lot like
what do you do you feel like do you feel
like the conversations you have online
how do they compare to the conversations
that you have offline I'm pretty good at
posting and ghosting so I'm not maybe
the best uh avatar for someone who sort
of gets into maybe the kind of
interesting cantankerous
style back and forth conversations that
people are thinking of uh I certainly
know that it's done one thing which is
which is pretty interesting which is
it's given
people a sense of surrealness when the
real world doesn't reflect the world
that they expected from what they
learned online um for instance let's say
that you are a successful young woman
and you have moved up within your
industry and have managed to get
yourself to a place where where you feel
uh pretty sort of competent and well
respected and you keep hearing all of
these stories online about how you know
women are oppressed and there's rampant
misogyny everywhere and and you look at
your own life and you struggle to see
that and you think well actually to be
honest sort of being a woman's kind of
helped me in many ways I I've I've I've
been given opportunities that I'm not
sure I would have been given if I was a
man but the way that the discourse is
put forward online the uh type of
conversations that rise to the top the
ones that are the most inflammatory
obviously it's edge cases right edge
cases are exactly what gets the Gana the
most attention it's never the reliable
woman who worked her way up step by step
and didn't encounter any catastrophe
along the way it's the the the one that
had a awful predatory boss who was
making them do terrible things in an
attempt to try and climb the totem pole
and rightly so that's newsworthy because
it's interesting and scandalous uh but
you lose the vast majority of the bell
curve like the boring Bell curve uh and
you just get these edge cases um but I
think what that leads to or you know any
other highly politicized topic online um
I mean you've seen this in uh surveys
right when uh people are asked how many
X type of people are shot by police
every year it's like thousand th%
10,000% 100,000% overx estimations
because what is presented online and
what is newsworthy if it bleeds it leads
doesn't NE necessarily represent what I
think is people believe like the number
of people that get shot versus the
number of people that die by cancer or
something and you're like well because
people die by cancer every day and it's
not newsworthy unless it's some
celebrity or whatever um so we have this
skewed perspective of how the world's
supposed to treat us how other people
are supposed to see us different social
groups different classes different
genders different races different
positions within society and then when
we encounter evidence in the real world
which should be the most real thing that
have that doesn't agree with what the
online World told us that we should do
we end up in massively and you know I
realized this when having a conversation
with Freya India who's on substack uh
she does a Blog called girls brilliant
and she was saying a lot of the time
jenz gets sort of um criticized
for well this the Internet isn't the
real world and he said these kids are
spending eight to 10 hours a day online
then they may be spending twice as much
time on the internet as they are asleep
the internet is the real world it's real
world for them yeah that that is the
boundaries of your world and so I think
one of the things that's happening there
there's a there's a researcher named jay
van Bal at NYU who's kind of looked at
this phenomena particularly on social
media and what he's found is that the
problem with social media and the
problem with online conversations is
that often times they highlight one
aspect of
identity very very prominently when in
real real life that's one of many
identities that someone contains right
so the thing that we know is that like
if I knew that you were Republican I
would assume a bunch of things about you
that you must be proun you must be Pro
Trump you must be anti-immigrant right
and if you knew I was a Democrat you
would assume a bunch of things about me
I must be protrans I must like think
kamalo is the greatest thing on on Earth
I must like want to just taxs everyone
to death whenever we see someone
described as by their label then we tend
to
maximize what we assume their beliefs
are into that
label now in real life oftentimes if I
met you and I'm like oh I'm a Democrat
but we're like at our kids soccer game
together and you know that I'm also a
journalist and like also like I like to
do model rocketry and you and I ride
bikes together right like that one
identity I'm a Democrat there's so many
other identities around it because all
of us contain multitudes that it doesn't
it doesn't shape what you assume about
me whereas when we are on Twitter and we
go to our little thing our little
description in Twitter it's like proud
to be part of the resistance or like
January 6 was the best day ever like
we're actually just giving into one
identity we're giving into one label and
it makes that
conversation harder now you asked though
what's happening to our conversations as
a result of this right with Jen Z
Spending All This Time online that that
the internet is their real
world so what I would say is this
there's actually a lot of room for Hope
um and the reason why is this this story
from about a hundred years ago so when
telephones first became popular around
the world but also particularly here in
the US when phones first became popular
there were all these articles that
appeared that said no one will ever have
a real conversation on the telephone
because up till then every conversation
had happened face to face right and they
were like nobody will be able to do this
on the phone if you can't see the person
and make eye contact with them if you
can't hear all the nuances in their
voice you're never going to have a real
conversation and what's really
interesting is if you look at the
transcripts from those early phone
conversations they were exactly right
people did not know how to use phones
they used them like telegrams they would
call up and they would say here's what I
here's like here's here's here's what I
need on the stock market or they call up
and say here my grocery order and then
the other person would say okay and then
they would both hang up like there was
no back and forth there was no give and
take now you fast forward a little bit
to like when you and I and everyone else
listening was in Middle School and we
could talk on the phone for like seven
hours a night right like we loved
talking on the phone and so and they
were some of the most important
conversations of our life at that point
and so what what happened what changed
what changed was we learned how to use
telephones and and we we we learned how
to use that technology and what's
interesting is when you are on the phone
you actually talk differently all of us
do you will over enunciate your words by
about 30% on the phone you'll put about
15% more emotion into your voice than if
you're talking to someone face to face
because you know subconsciously that
they can't see you you need to you need
to signal so you actually learned a
bunch of skills for phone
conversations right now we are living
through a period of people learning
skills for online conversation
and like we're like those we're like
that first 15 years after phones came
out and became popular right like it's a
lot of screaming it's a lot of like a
lot of lot of mistakes but it's from
those mistakes that we learn and gen Z
these I have two teenagers at home I'm a
dad both my teenagers they know how to
have real conversations over text I
don't know how to do that they have
emotional conversations with
Emojis like they are we don't need to
despare for the future
because we learn how to be good at
communication uh be good communicators
our brains crave being good
communicators and they teach us how to
do
it dude awesome let's bring this one
into land what a great place to finish I
uh I I I love it I've been very much
thinking about communication over the
last few years and uh I think an
interesting element is how closely tied
it is to our sense of self that
um what maybe some some people have got
in the back of their mind is well you
know it's all well and good you saying
that I can work on my communication and
I can build up these skills but I don't
want to be fake you know I want to be me
and it's so funny how nobody attributes
their natural god-given pickle ball
ability to them and if I was to say well
you went and got a coach didn't you and
you you improved your dink game and you
improved your serve but did you not want
to have you know your real were you're
not worried about your real serve coming
out like what about that you've lost it
your inner your inner pickle baller like
you've repressed them you've ruined it
yeah exactly I started working with a a
speech therapist about three four years
ago addiction coach and um one of the
things that a bunch of friends said to
me was dude you I mean you got to be
careful what if you what if you totally
lose all of the the character you know
and but nobody says that about well I
you know you're
270 and you know 28% body fat and you go
but what about all of that beautiful fat
that you spent all of this time building
up what you know you going to replace it
with this Muscle really is that the real
is that is that muscle really you and
it's just odd you know and when you see
it you can't and see it there's certain
things that we have that are very
tightly tied to our sense of self right
our thought patterns the texture of our
mind the way that we speak the language
that we use the way that we enunciate
and um there's other things that aren't
like our waistline uh and when you
confuse the two when you confuse I mean
you you get into some pretty hot water
you stop learning right you stop
improving yourself because you assume
that something is inherent or god-given
or inborn or unmut and the truth of the
matter is all of it's just skills can I
ask you a question actually hey on that
so I mean what what's interesting about
so you moved here from the UK right you
moved to the UK to the US you're still
clearly still clearly a Brit like I I I
doubt anyone bumps into you and they're
like oh that guy GRE grew up in Austin
yeah Australia I get accused of a lot
but yeah okay okay so do you feel
like have how you communicate has it had
to
change since you've moved to the US a
little bit because yeah well the
cultural way markers that you rely on
it's it's interesting being an immigrant
which I am to a country that speaks the
same language as you because you forget
that you're an immigrant if I was in
Mexico or Thailand I would be
permanently reminded of the fact that
I'm not from there people don't look
like me people don't sound like me uh
but you you're snuck under the radar
here and um
it's odd because you're culturally
displaced you know if I want to use an
example for a chocolate that everybody
would have eaten as a kid I can't really
use Cadbury's because Cadre is a British
brand I can't really talk about
Yorkshire Tea or Newcastle Brown Ale or
The Inbetweeners so I have to do this
weird sort of projection and I have to
think okay what would Charles what is
the
equivalent sort of ruminative thing that
Charles knows that is the parallel of
the thing I'm trying to use so you have
to sort of go around the houses quite a
lot um there's certain sort of lexical
things we have an interesting uh
difference with plurals versus you guys
so um we would say uh Manchester United
are having a bad season this year
whereas you guys would say Manchester
United is having a bad season this year
um trash can sidewalk you know little
bits and pieces like that um but I just
sort of I don't know it it's becoming
more natural to me uh and yeah maybe
this is what going native is like and
I'm gonna have a text in tne within the
next few years who
knows well and what I love about that
about this going native aspect is that
like it's actually like what your brain
what your brain was created to do right
was to make it easier and easier and
easier for you to communicate and and my
guess is if you went back to the UK you
would slip right back into mentioning
cadburry and and the pluralization and
if I moved there eventually I would too
and I'd start seeing lift and boot
and and it's it's I our brains are
amazingly versatile when it comes to
communication and a huge part of it is
just giving it the skills that it needs
and then thinking about this and
and and working on it and being willing
to experiment and practice and then we
become super communicators I love it
dude so good where should people go with
everything that you do and write and
talk about yeah absolutely so if um I
have a stack if people want to come sign
up for my newsletter it's called the
science of better um you can find a sign
up for that on my email or on my my
website which is Charles dog.com DUI g g
or if you just Google The Power of Habit
which was the first book I wrote or
super communicators you will definitely
find um my website and actually I have
my email address on my website and I
will say I read and respond to every
single email I get from a reader so you
may regret that after this uh after this
episode
sometimes sometimes it takes me a little
while go for my pretties and Destroy his
inbox but I would love to hear from
folks and and if you do want to buy a
copy of super communicators you can find
it at Amazon and brns and& Nobles and
and most importantly your local
bookstores so heck yeah Charles I
appreciate you until next time thank you
so much thanks for having me on do you
think that your algorithm on YouTube is
a bit of a God is able to know things
about you that you don't know about
yourself well the YouTube gods have
selected this episode spe specifically
for you bespoke so go and go and check
it out