The impact of AI on content creation, social media platforms, sports, and the future of technology
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
The hosts of this episode discuss their recent creative projects while highlighting a significant shift in how technology is being utilized across various industries, particularly concerning content creation and social media platforms. Lee Keebler shares the exciting launch of his new animated web series titled "Dig," which tells a psychological thriller story set against the backdrop of a solar eclipse in Iceland. He emphasizes that this project was created entirely without using artificial intelligence to ensure authenticity, noting the strange synchronicity between the release date and an actual total eclipse occurring on August 12th in Iceland. Meanwhile, Kathy Hackle updates listeners on her travel series featuring technology insights from Athens, Greece, reflecting a broader trend of creators seeking genuine human connection over algorithmic efficiency as they navigate these changing digital landscapes.
A major focus of the conversation is the growing challenge posed by AI-generated content, often referred to as "AI slop," which threatens to flood platforms like YouTube and degrade the quality of online media. Kathy explains that YouTube has responded by raising monetization thresholds in 2027 due to an overwhelming influx of low-effort AI videos, a move she argues may inadvertently force legitimate creators to rely on AI tools just to meet new content volume requirements. The discussion contrasts this with platforms like Roblox and LinkedIn, which are seen as more promising spaces for human creativity because they offer opportunities for building real products or leveraging professional expertise rather than simply churning out endless short-form videos. Additionally, the hosts touch upon Spotify's efforts to label AI-generated music and separate it from human artists, acknowledging that while some users find AI content repulsive, clear labeling is a necessary step toward maintaining trust in digital ecosystems.
Beyond social media, the dialogue explores privacy concerns regarding data collection by tech giants like Meta through devices such as Ray-Ban smart glasses, which many people now view with skepticism due to their recording capabilities and perceived invasion of personal space. The hosts reflect on how technology companies often lose sight of solving real customer problems in favor of chasing buzzwords or maximizing advertiser revenue, leading to products that feel unnecessary or intrusive rather than useful. They argue that the value of any technological advancement lies in its ability to enhance human experience—whether by helping athletes improve performance through data visualization during the Olympics or allowing fans to enjoy sports and music without feeling like they are watching a robotic simulation devoid of emotion and risk.
Ultimately, the episode concludes with an optimistic call for humanity to embrace technology that serves genuine needs while rejecting tools designed solely to exploit intellectual property or mislead audiences. The hosts encourage listeners not to hate AI itself but rather to hold accountable those who use it irresponsibly, such as generating deceptive content or eroding trust in journalism and sports broadcasting. They express hope that future innovations will prioritize user privacy and meaningful problem-solving over profit-driven shortcuts, urging startups to focus on solving actual problems instead of riding the wave of fleeting trends like NFTs or metaverse hype. By maintaining a critical yet hopeful perspective, they aim to foster a community where technology remains a tool for empowerment rather than replacement, inviting their audience to share positive stories that highlight the best aspects of human ingenuity in the age of artificial intelligence.
Read the full video transcript
[music]
Hello everyone and welcome to Tech
Magic. I am your host Kathy Hackle. This
is the podcast where we talk about
technology news, AI, spatial computing,
spatial intelligence, and everything in
between. I am joined as always by my
co-host Lee Keebler. Lee, how you doing?
I
>> I'm good. It's been kind of a crazy week
for me, but but doing doing all right.
We had a I had a big day today,
actually.
>> Oo. Can you share or No,
>> I can. Um, so a while back, I wrote uh a
short story. Um, and we decided that we
were going to turn it into a miniseries,
like a short series, web series. Um, one
caveat was no AI would be used in the
creation of this web series. And so
connected with some amazing artists and
talent uh out of Ringling uh College
down in Sarasota, Florida, which happens
to be my hometown. Um they're an art
school. Uh and I knew a couple of the
students down there. They read the
story, they dug it, and um yeah, so we
we put out we're putting out like a 20
episode series
uh animated. It's like still animated.
It's like a comic book series, but for
web. It's like a web comic. Um and so we
launched the first episode today. Uh I'm
not going to give away any of the story,
but the premise is basically the sun
goes out. And we decided, this is crazy.
This is genuinely crazy. I did not do
this on purpose, but I'm sure everyone
will think that I did this on purpose. I
wanted to just out of timing was like,
"Oh, we're going to release this in mid
August, whatever." Just looking at the
timeline cuz they're students. They had
to get back to school. Um, and we chose
today, August 12th, which this will
launch. This podcast will launch in a
couple days, but we chose today, August
12th, to launch it. And it and it takes
place in Iceland. Like the story, all of
this is true. This the story takes place
in Iceland. And it just so happens on
August 12th in Iceland right now there's
a total eclipse. So it just like the
timing was was crazy. It was insane. So
um yeah
>> synchronicity, my friend. Synchronicity.
That's what that's called.
>> I I I wish I had done that on purpose.
[laughter]
>> You were jacking it, weren't you? No,
no, no.
>> But wow.
>> Yeah. So we'll see how that goes. Um,
but yeah, it'll be up on my YouTube and
and in my uh uh Substack and my
Instagram. Um,
>> yeah, you're going to share it on
Instagram as well. Fantastic. Okay,
we'll definitely be sharing that out.
>> Um, that's exciting. How many episodes?
>> Uh, we think it's about 20, but I know
that sounds like a lot, but no episodes
more than like 2 minutes long. It's all
>> designed to fit in like YouTube shorts
>> um and in like Instagram reels. So,
yeah, it's they're all about a minute
and a half to two minutes long. Oh,
that's fantastic. And is it like general
audience or like who do you recommend
who would like to watch this?
>> It's not for kids. Um
>> Okay. So, I can't like Okay. I'm glad I
asked.
>> Teen I would call it PG-13.
>> Oh, okay. So, my kids like my older kids
could totally
>> Oh, yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
Yeah. Yeah. It's It's nothing insane. Um
Okay.
>> But, you know, it's it's a it's a
>> I wouldn't exactly call it a horror, but
it is a psychological thriller horror.
You'll see as you get into it and things
are not as they seem.
>> Um,
>> well, they watched Obsession with me, so
then they're fine. I think they're fine.
And my son watched the back rooms, so
>> not even close. Not even close.
>> I think we're okay. I think we're okay.
All right. All right. So, that's
awesome.
>> I'm great. I am doing great. Um,
life has been wonderful. I put out the
second episode of my travel and tech
series.
>> Okay. Uh this time the episode is
actually in Athens, Greece.
So uh the first video is actually me at
the Acropolis where the Parthonon is um
talking about, you know, kind of
everything that came from Greece that
changed society
radically and then how the moment that
we're in. Uh so the next couple episodes
will will continue to be in Greece at
different locations. Um and my
perspective on technology and kind of
what I'm seeing. That's great.
>> Really exciting. Yeah. And it's it's I'm
getting so many great comments about it
and I don't know. I just you know when
you do something and this probably what
what your what your uh short story feels
like and your series feels like when you
do something you're just like I'm just
going to do it and then now it feels so
good that you did it.
>> Oh, I don't know if I feel that way.
>> I'm not there yet.
>> I feel great. I' This is episode two,
but it feels like aligned. It feels
really aligned to my passions and yeah
and I was I was doing it for anyone. I
was doing it for me and I think that
that comes off and then people huge.
Yes, that's when it's for you. But I
think like I'm feeling a little bit of
George McFly Back to the Future like
feeling of like what if people don't
like it? I don't know if I can deal with
the rejection. Like that whole thing
like I've got a little bit of that going
on for sure.
>> No, it's awesome. And it's called is it
>> called Dig, right? Cuz I said my kids
would dig it. I did the whole thing
there.
>> Yeah. Yeah. It's called Dig. Um
>> that's exciting. You know, and this is
like for people listening here. Um and
you probably know this. I'm not sure cuz
you've got you've got a good number of
followers on Instagram. You can create a
series.
>> Yes. I'm working on figure. Okay. But
see, here's the thing is that like yeah,
I my Instagram definitely has a huge
following for whatever reason and
>> I have no idea how to use Instagram. I
don't know how to leverage it. People
have asked me like, "So what what's your
method for Instagram?" I I throw crap at
the wall and see what sticks. Like I
have no method. I am a caveman just
seeing what I can paint on a wall and
there's there's no rhyme or reason. So
this is the first time where I've like
take a moment and asked myself about the
algorithm. Um
>> goodness there's so much you can do. We
should chat cuz there's trial reels. I
mean oh my goodness. I've started got
gotten really I've gotten really savvy
at it. I mean I'm doubling down on
LinkedIn. is that continues to be
amazing.
>> I'm kind of wondering if I don't move it
over to LinkedIn, too, because the the
whole end goal is to find like a
literary agent. I've got novels I want
to publish and things like that. So, I'm
taking I'm going flipping the whole idea
of like publishing as a grind to like,
okay, well, let me just do this over
here.
>> I don't know if it's going to work,
right?
>> I would put it I I mean, it's
strategically done. I think it's very
smart.
>> Yeah. Well, okay, then you and I need to
chat because I'm I'm [laughter]
literally just fingerpainting over here.
I have no idea.
>> Well, I think it should come to no surp
like it's no surprise to anyone
listening to this podcast that you and I
are podcast co-host, but we're also
friends. So,
>> yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. We're close friends
and could not be more different as
people. [laughter]
>> Oh lord. Yes. That's why we get along
though. That's why we get along. It's
fantastic. All right. So, getting to
tech news. Um Oh my lord.
I just don't think anything's slowing
down. I feel like these agents keep
breaking into all sorts of things. Uh
whether it's a gym, whether it's hacking
someone like hacking companies or banks.
Um I don't know. I like I don't even
know. I don't even know where to start.
>> I I want to start with YouTube because I
think YouTube is proving where there's a
problem. Um, so this week YouTube
announced that in 2027 they are changing
significantly the requirements of uh
traffic needed for a YouTube creator to
monetize.
It's almost double.
It's significant. I'm not going to get
into the weeds of the numbers here, but
it has caused a stir of these numbers
might be unobtainable.
>> Um, especially for new
>> you people new getting into YouTube. Um,
and
[sighs and gasps]
it's
indicative of YouTube trying to solve a
problem
>> that their parent company is responsible
for. And this is where I start seeing
maybe we as like outsiders we can see a
little bit of like the internal politics
of what's happening here.
>> Mh.
>> Um
what happens when your parent company is
going all in full throttle on AI and
generative AI content. Mhm.
>> But you have a platform that is now
being so heavily bombarded because of
how easy it is to make this content
with slop and then expecting that slop
to get paid because if you throw enough
data fast enough,
>> you will hit the necessary required
margins. Right?
So now YouTube's got a problem that
they're getting so much AI garbage that
they have to increase the threshold to
monetization
because they're trying to not monetize
AI generated content.
It does make sense at like an upper
management level problem solving, but it
doesn't make sense from the creation
point of view because effectively, and
I've heard a couple of other YouTubers
uh talk about this as well as I'm going
through and I'm watching these reactions
of like pretty big YouTubers. We're
talking people who have got millions of
followers
>> and they're just saying this is
potentially having the negative effect
of now I've got to create so much
content that I have to use AI to hit
these numbers.
>> And so a lot of the creative stuff that
may not hit the is unlikely to hit that
threshold, the new threshold is going to
go away and now we're just going to see
a bunch of Mr. Beast clones
>> or AI generated Mr. Beast clones.
>> Oh god, no.
>> And so there's this there's this there's
this issue happening in YouTube right
now where they spent the last 3 years
making shorts
>> the the the golden child of YouTube,
right? Like this is where we want to
move everything.
>> And then AI came in thanks to Gemini and
everything else that's generating
content and said, "Oh, this is an easy
target because I can output short form
video." So now their golden child is
just be it's it's like a kid being born
into a world full of like natural foods
and then you're just shoving sugar down
its throat, right? Like it's it's
>> what a great analogy, [laughter]
>> but it's what we're doing.
>> I'll add this to your commentary because
I think it's really indicative of the
moment we're in.
>> Here's a couple things I've seen. Um uh
our I don't know if you know Corey
Williams.
>> I don't. So Corey Unreal, he uses Unreal
Engine for development. I mean, I know
him from the XR space. Uh, but he
started uh creating something called the
Silly Crocodile, which was a series on
YouTube for kids.
>> He was doing he was doing so well. He
was doing amazing. I mean, I follow him.
I follow him on LinkedIn of all places,
but Corey's fabulous, and I actually
would love to have him on the pod. Um,
he was doing great, really great with
Silic Crocodile. I mean, exceeding
everything. AI slop just starts hitting.
His numbers go way down. his like
potential for earning goes way down.
Eventually he does like he complains
eventually like his silly crocodile gets
elevated because it's a real like he
uses Unreal Engine to create it but not
AI like he's he's a real creator like
this is a real children's series with a
real messaging a really good like like
there it's thought out for for the good
of children
>> right
>> okay and then it gets elevated so he's
back to where he used to be I love his
story that's in juosition to the story
of this other woman that I actually saw
on Instagram where she's Let me show you
how I've made $20,000 a month creating
AI videos with for kids, but there's no
no reasoning behind the videos. It's
just feeding them slop. It's like using
create create a story about this and
this, but it's bad. It's the stuff that
these little kids get hooked on and they
watch on YouTube Kids or on YouTube, but
has no real meaning or story. And I was
like, you know, she's she's doing it to
gain her, you know, a living or
whatever, but I'm like, at what cost?
So, it's this interesting juiposition of
a real life human creator who uses
technology to create amazing work, who's
been doing great, who's trying to do
something better for kids, as opposed to
someone that's like, let me just hijack
the system, make as much money as I can,
feeding kids sugar.
>> Right. Right.
>> Exactly. So, I I see this juxtaposition
on how people are approaching this. So
very interesting. Um, so I don't have
any comment on that cuz I've got two
other things I want to bring up related
exactly to this.
>> Go for it.
>> No. Okay.
>> Oh, go for it. Yeah.
>> So, here are two other things I see. One
of them is that this is a really
interesting opportunity for several
platforms.
>> Yes.
>> Okay. One of them is Roblox.
>> Okay. Roblox. You and I have talked
about this many times, but actually
there's data that shows that Roblox is
minting quote unquote more millionaire
de more millionaire teen teenage
millionaires quote unquote than YouTube
because they're building games now
Roblox Studio. There's more access to
tools. Yes, they're using AI to create
some games, but like they're they're
actually making games and getting money
there as opposed to how hard it's
becoming to get become that in YouTube.
>> So that's one. The other the second
comment is the opportunity for LinkedIn.
You know, I'm a LinkedIn power user.
LinkedIn is my platform of choice. I
absolutely loved it. I would not be
where I am today if it were not for
LinkedIn. Um, you know,
>> I don't think you and I would know each
other if it weren't for LinkedIn. If I
if I'm going far enough back, I
>> I don't think so.
>> Oh, thank heavens for LinkedIn then.
>> Yeah. I think I think like in the early
days of LinkedIn, we were like very
quickly connected.
>> Yeah. And I also see an awesome
opportunity if it becomes harder for
people to quote unquote monetize
YouTube. It's, you know, Instagram, you
can still monetize. The game gets a
little bit harder as you go. But,
>> you know, where would you monetize? I
mean, I'm not interested in monetizing
on Tik Tok. That's just not my audience
necessarily. I feel like LinkedIn has a
good quality audience. Granted, there is
still there is also a lot of AI traffic,
but there there actually there's a
button now where you can press and say
this looks like AI slop or this is like
AI this looks like it's AI generated,
>> right?
>> And LinkedIn is in the process of uh
finding ways for creators, real life
human creators that have, you know,
business expertise to monetize a little
bit more. Um, so I'm excited. I'm
excited about what it also means for
LinkedIn. I just don't want LinkedIn to
become YouTube. You know, that makes
sense.
>> It's interesting because in in in
another part of my life, I've been
fighting this battle um trying to get
people to like pay attention
the music industry, which is a big chunk
of my background is really interesting
because it's so ingrained in like
credit and and getting your percentages
and who owns what in publishing.
And so when music came and got its own
platform like Spotify, there was at
least an expectation that if it gets
played, it gets paid. And yes, it is
down to fractions of pennies of
nothings. And I get that that's a whole
other argument in discussion.
But that is still more than what the
average person uploading content to say
YouTube or Instagram is getting paid,
right? Because there was this
expectation, this legal precedence that
was already put in place thanks to
television, radio and broadcast. So now
we are trying to throw as much content
as we can at this machine that is
ultimately going to make money off of it
because even if you just scroll past it
cuz it's content to keep someone in
>> but you have to hit a threshold for you
to in order for you to make money. See
like Spotify doesn't have that. Like we
just know it's fractions of pennies and
if it does better it makes more money.
>> Now we've got these weird zero to
pennies threshold in all these other
platforms. Spotify because of this has
had to take this way more seriously and
they have started implementing AI
detection, AI reporting because this is
really going to game their system if
they can't get under get it under
control. So for me, of all the platforms
to watch on how do they solve this AI
slot problem, Spotify, maybe Apple Music
is the one to keep an eye on because
they have the most at risk immediately.
>> Um because they can't just say, "Well,
we're not going to monetize any of these
songs until it hits 5 billion plays."
Like I they would love to do that, but
they just can't, right? Um, but YouTube
can. [laughter]
So,
>> that's an interesting point because I
literally just saw the news that Spotify
is going to not start to recommend AI
artists or songs cuz it was bothering a
lot of people. Like I I have Spotify and
Apple Music. And it happens a lot more
on Spotify. I mean, 100% honest in my
experience. And when we would get like
an AI recommendation, my kids would
literally skip. Especially my son who's
a musician. He's like, "Ew, gross." Like
he gets physically like, "I don't want
to listen to an AI artist. let's like
move on.
>> Well, in part of what they're doing is
the the AI persona, right? So, they're
letting you
>> they're not necessarily stopping AI
music.
>> Yeah.
>> And I kind of understand that.
>> Yeah.
>> From a business perspective,
>> but they are asking you if this is AI
generated. If you're trying to make an
AI generated artist, you have to define
that as an AI generated persona that
goes into its own like artist space
because ultimately and this I can see
this coming further down the road from a
legal legality position. Spotify is
trying to separate what is a real artist
that has intellectual property in this
other uh kind of wishy-washy area that
we don't know if it's intellectual
property. if it doesn't if it is even
legal to pay it out because it's based
on learning from actual intellectual
property. And so there's such a gray
area. They really
>> for the future prosperity of the company
need to separate that and say, "Well,
y'all got to figure this out and we're
just going to call it an AI persona."
And if people skip it because they don't
want to listen to AI, that's on you.
Welcome to the free market. Right? And
I'm all for that. And if you hear
something that you suspect is an AI
persona, not labeled as such, as a
listener, you can actually report it.
Um, now, how well that will work, I
don't know. But the fact that they're
doing it at all,
>> it's better than what I see on Facebook
and and you know, better than what I see
on Instagram. Um, so
that's that's the thing sometimes. I
mean, I I enjoy Instagram. Like, I've
been able to kind of curate it in such a
way that most of the stuff I it feeds me
is relatively good for my soul.
>> Not everything. Um, but sometimes I'll
find if I like if I get one of those ads
for like a supplement or something, we
talked about this last time.
>> I will literally stop for a second. I'm
like,
>> is this a real person like trying to
sell me this or is this fake? Like, I'm
like, it's so sad that you got to think
about that now, right? Is this real or
fake? Um,
>> I don't Well, and I think courts are
starting to decide a lot of that of what
this damage actually costs. I mean, it
looks like Fed uh Facebook or Meta's um
>> uh lawsuits actually going forward. They
can't stop it from going forward that
didn't not get appealed. So, we'll see
how this plays out. I think there's a
lot of questions that are starting to
come up uh when it comes to things like
the Meta Ray-B bands and like the
glasses that are recording and things
like that. That's starting to spiral out
of control. We have a as people I feel
like we're coming up against a lot of
privacy concerns, but at least it's
actually getting harder for the tech
companies as well. Um, and that's put
that puts you and I in this very awkward
position of trying to keep uh tech
podcasts going of like how cool is this
technology when
nine out of 10, you know, news articles
are like this is not so cool.
>> Yeah,
>> it's getting rough.
>> It's getting rough. I agree with you.
It's like hard. It's like how do you
comment? How do you comment on
something? Um well, especially, you
know, like if we eventually want to, you
know, we're starting to get some
interest from like um advertisers. Yeah.
>> Right now, we don't have to get
advertisers. We'd like to, you know,
that's I think a different story, but
it's more like how do you, you know,
walk that fine line between,
>> you know, saying, "Hey, we'll accept
this company as an advertiser, but we're
have we retain the
>> the editorial, you know, independence of
being able to be critical of something."
So, I think that's it's a very fine
line. Um, I think also even with you and
I being so different, I think we are
excited most of the time about new tech.
>> Yeah.
>> Right. Um, I mean, I was excited about
the Ray-B bands when they came out. I
was like, "Oh, this is so cool."
>> Now, I've taken a step back. So, I have
them. I own them. Am I using them right
now? No. Cuz it feels icky.
>> It feels really icky out there to use
them. Um, and I'm even seeing it in the
context of the dating space.
>> Please,
>> uh, at an event that I went to the other
day. One of the guys was wearing them,
and I could tell that I don't think he
was wearing them cuz he's he apparently
uses glasses and they're prescription
and and he's got those. Um, but I
remember just like a couple women were
like, "Oh, gross. He's wearing those
meta glasses." Like, I had read stories
and I hadn't experienced it in real life
until I saw this and I was like, "Oh,
lord." Wow. Like there's a real ick.
>> Yeah. I you know I looked at the glasses
and I almost bought a pair and I'll tell
you the reason I almost bought a pair
was really simple. Not to wear out of
every day. I spend a lot of time on
stage as a music performer with a band.
And it's a really convenient way for me
to get B-roll for our, you know, social
media and for whatever we're going to
piece together. But when I really
started looking into what I would have
what that re reaction would be, I was
like, man, I I actually don't know if it
if the juice is worth the squeeze, as
they say, you know, and uh so I backed
off. Um it it does say something for
society. I'm really happy that people
are at a position where they're finally
starting to ask the question of why was
this made?
>> Why is this being put in front of me?
That is a wonderful place to be in
because as millennials, we typically
think that we've done everything right
and the rest of the world is wrong. But
we royally screwed up from about the
year 2005 to about 2015
where we were just like social media is
the greatest thing ever.
>> Greatest thing ever. [laughter]
>> We didn't uh to to Gen Z Jin Alpha, our
bad. Uh we didn't know. Uh
>> yeah, [laughter]
>> my kids don't enjoy it. Like I'll be
honest, my kids do not enjoy like the
social aspect like social media. they
don't really enjoy it. Like my daughter
was um I had I had let her choose a
social media platform. I said you can
choose one because granted she is in
high school and she is a teenager and it
took me forever to give her a phone but
then I was like she was asking for
social and I said okay choose one
platform.
>> She initially wanted Snap. We did Snap
and then she was like I don't like how I
feel and I'm like okay. I mean I kind of
like Snap personally but whatever. Um
she was like no. So then she did
Instagram and then she didn't like
Instagram either. So, her go-to is
Pinterest. [laughter]
>> That's the one she loves.
>> That totally makes sense because
Pinterest had an end goal that
>> still focused on the user.
>> Where a lot of this had gone wrong is
when the when they stopped focusing on
the user and started focusing on
>> the advertiser,
>> the advertiser, you know, or the
algorithm, right?
>> Or the algorithm really more so than the
advertiser. Yeah.
>> And so, a lot of the advertisers aren't
even like the first and foremost. I
sometimes I'm watching this stuff kind
of come together and I'm like who's
who's thinking of this? Good example.
>> I've been and you can see it in the
background if you're watching this on
video. I've been a proponent of Metav VR
since you know since it was Oculus and
it got purchased like I' I've wanted to
see this work. Metav VR is in a with the
Quest series is in a real dire straight
situation. They've let go a lot of
developers but they've kept moving
forward. The new user interface is an
absolute atrocious mess. And their big
announcement this week was we got
Threads working in the Quest VR headset.
Nobody asked for that.
>> I'm like, whoa. Uh yeah, I didn't even
see that. [laughter]
So Threads is working on the VR headset.
Okay.
>> As a native app
>> because we're all needed that. Yeah,
>> that's that's not that but that's not
actually what that headset is ever going
to be good for to do, right? Like it's
great once you get it working on mobile,
but [sighs and gasps]
there's just some headscratching moments
in in a lot of watching the news roll
out just going
>> who asked for this like why is this uh
yeah I mean I will tell you this going
back to my Amazon days because I worked
at AWS for a short period of time
>> um that is very customer focused like
that's one of the one of the main
mandate like not main it's one of the
main ways that people operate within AWS
is like customer obsessed that's the
word and it's like you're trying to
solve an issue for the customer.
>> So um and customer is very broad.
Customer could be you know the partners
or whatever. So or whoever but yeah it's
like what is this solving? What is this
solving? Um technology I think when
technology technology can be great but
if it doesn't have
>> a problem to solve right there's no
product market fit. It doesn't have a
problem to solve. It's not making
someone's life easier. Then
how is it useful? Right? How is it
useful other than being a nice shiny
thing?
>> Um, Amazon is consistently one of the
companies that while everyone wants to
shake their fist at them and say, "Oh,
they're Amazon's big and it's evil." And
I'm not saying that they don't have some
work practices that could use some
improvement. Don't put me in that
company, right?
>> But I understand
why they're as powerful as they are.
I can look at them and say, "Yes,
all of the money makes sense. All of
it." Um, I might not like how they
generated some of it. I might love how
they generated some of it,
>> but I understand it. It's kind of like
looking at like a chip manufacturing
company or any big boring company that's
like you have to make a product and you
make the money and then it goes out to
the people and it's it's like basic
economics. A lot of social media
companies right now, a lot of digital
entertainment companies, a lot of of
just internet web service companies
don't fit in that for me. I can look at
it and go
>> this the the math ain't math. Um, and
>> I don't know what it means for for a lot
of these these product driven but not
customerdriven
>> Yeah.
>> you know, projects that I see coming
out. I don't get it. I don't get it.
Maybe that's just me getting too far.
>> I don't know. I'm with you. I'm like,
what problem is this solving? What
customer needed this? Who needs this?
>> Yeah. Yeah.
>> I think it's like who really needs this?
Is there a real market here? Um so I
don't know. I think as someone that has
worked in, you know, in launching
products and services um across my
career, like I always wonder that like
how does this how does this fit? Even in
my time at Magic Leap, which was I was
on the enterprise side, I could
definitely see a big need in enterprise.
Did I see a marketing consumer? Not
really. that wasn't really what why they
hired me. I was more on the enterprise
side, right?
>> Um so there's got to be a need. Here's
where I do think there's a need
>> with AI and consumers is privacy.
>> It's like,
>> oh, totally
>> right. Like it bothers me to think that
all these people are using whichever
platform they're using and they're
inputting all this personal data in
these platforms not realizing that, you
know, this is not private information.
This is not private. Does not remain
private. It is your private information.
But once you input it there, this is not
private information. This is not
remaining private. The company's using
this in some way. Um, and I don't know,
I want to feel I want people to feel
better using AI because it can be very
useful. I think it can be very useful.
Sure.
>> But the amount of data that people are
sharing with these platforms that are
corporations concerns me. So, I think
you should be able to own your data and
still be able to use AI. What are your
thoughts?
>> Until we have any form of legislation
that understands what you're saying, it
won't happen. Right? Uh the only entity,
there's only a couple of ways that you
can absolutely guarantee what you're
asking for and that is one and I cannot
believe I am saying this but Apple in
their Apple intelligence staying on
machine is the best design. As simple as
it is, it is the best design for
generative AI functionality. And no, it
is not as powerful or as amazing as what
you're going to get out of OpenAI or
Anthropic or whatever, but it is on your
machine
>> um or running a local LLM, which can be
surprisingly powerful if you can get a
powerful machine enough to do that. And
right now, component shortages are
keeping the masses from being able to do
that. And if I put on my tin foil hat, I
start wondering if that's not by design.
>> Um,
>> okay. I don't know. Let's not be like
this. Don't let's not go down that
rabbit hole of conspiracy le this is not
that type of podcast. Okay. [laughter]
And it's neither not not a true crime
either. So, we're um I will say I think
there are startups out there that are
trying to do something good for
humanity.
>> I don't know. I'm
>> I remain hopeful. I agree.
>> I remain hopeful.
>> I I do too. I mean, one of the things
that I absolutely miss is the the days
of like startups trying to solve a
problem. You know, I think I said this
on the last episode, right, of of like
startups should try to solve a problem,
not try to hitch their wagon to a
buzzword that will get them the most
investment as fast as possible. And
again, that is a product of the 2015
technology boom of like we're just going
to build startups that hitch their wagon
to
>> Bitcoin or NFTTS or VR. We we I mean it
was it was all of it and we're still
doing it. Um but how many of those
companies actually broke out outside of
Oculus, right? Oculus was one of the few
that got acquired for the big bucks. Um
Instagram being another one uh you know
of the 2013 2014 era
>> um and WhatsApp. But a lot of people
forget that like Snap was originally
what Meta tried to buy and they said no
and so they bought Instagram instead.
Instagram was the backup date.
>> That's so funny, right? That was the
backup plan. [laughter]
>> That was Look at what the backup plan.
>> That was the backup prom date. You know
what I mean? I'm like,
>> prom date. [laughter]
>> They got the pink p even though they
wanted the yellow one. [laughter]
Oh, no, no, no. Oh, that's funny. That
is so true.
>> I think we forget a lot of those things.
I'm I am curious to see how it plays
out. I want to see more kind of come in
to play. I I I still think wearables are
something that's interesting. I still
think that there's a lot that this
technology can do. We just need it to do
first and foremost. And I think a lot of
the stuff would get adopted faster
>> if they just put out stuff that people
want it to do. They might slide
the darker stuff in on the once you like
that's how social media was, right?
>> Do it more more covert. Is what do you
think?
>> No. No. Really? Okay. This is going to
get problematic, but let's go there. The
reason any of these companies that we're
talking about today and they're all in
these negative lights, they started by
doing something that people actually
wanted.
>> Mhm.
>> And then they abandon that and now
they're wondering why nobody likes them.
This for real. Let's just just say it is
what it is. So if you're a new tech
company, you kind of have to look at
that and go, well, you can't just go
straight to the dark side, right? like
you you can't but they all are trying to
go just straight to the dark side
because that's where they see the money.
>> Yeah, but that's not how this works.
That's not how any of this works.
Well, here's and I'm not making any
judgment here, but there's uproar in the
journalism world because USA Today has
decided to par to partner with
Palanteer. Yeah.
>> Did you hear this?
>> I did. to kind of create a better idea
of their readers and how to monetize
their readers. And there's like giant
uproar in the journalism world. And by
the way, we are not journalists. I used
to be a journalist many moons ago, many
many years ago. I'm not a journalist
currently. This podcast is not done by
journalists. We are tech executives
here. Um but yeah, there's like big
uproar in the media world because of
this like USA Today Palanteer
partnership. Thoughts?
um h
>> it was a good run. I don't know what to
tell them like because it it's going to
be indicative of the quality that comes
out that people actually want to
understand and if people if you start
losing that trust
>> it becomes problematic, right? Um, you
don't, regardless of your
political affiliations while you're
listening to this podcast, whether you
watch CNN, MSNBC, or Fox News, when you
turn on that channel, it's a real human
being.
>> Mhm.
>> There isn't a single news channel, cable
news network or late night or even
streaming to your phone that is putting
up AI generated news hosts. Not yet. And
>> I honest I said not yet, but I honestly
believe that that is because when you
are watching someone speak to you and
you know that that person is not real,
their opinions are no longer
>> attached to
anyone, right? And whether the person
giving those opinions on screen believes
them or not, whether they are real or
not, the fact that you emotionally
attach that to a real person talking is
what holds the value of I'm going to
watch this person. I'm going to watch
this show. Cuz otherwise, you're just
watching a generated feed. And I don't
believe humans
actually consume media that way. They're
trying. They would like that to be the
case, but I I don't I don't see it. The
personality um carries weight. Uh
>> yeah, it still does. I I agree with you.
Um we're still humans living in the
human world and personality carries
through. Um Wire did have a story about
AI reporters breaking news. I didn't dig
into it, so I don't Maybe we'll talk
about it next time.
>> Sure.
>> Um but alluding to what you're talking
about, and I always go back to this,
right? as someone who loves motor
motorsports and got invited to the
Freedom 250 Grand Prix in DC, which I'm
excited about. I know not everyone's
excited about it, especially people that
live in DC cuz the streets it's a it's
mayhem. It's mayhem. If we ever get a
Formula 1, it's going to be insane. Like
I don't I don't even know how we're
going to handle that. Um but I've always
been of the premise of like I love in
Formula 1 when they use technology,
right? They're using AI um for but I
still want to watch Lewis Hamilton or
Versappen or whoever it is or Lando
Norris where it is racing the car. I
still want to watch a human taking the
risk doing the strategy. I love the
dynamics of the team members, the
dynamics of the competition. I just
don't feel it would be the same if it's
an autonomous car or if it's a robot
because there's not there's skin in the
game, but there's not that much skin in
the game. So once again, I always go
back to like I still as a human want the
excitement of watching another human
accomplish amazing things,
>> right?
>> And you know, so yeah, like I I think
about that
>> in 2020, 2019, 2020, I was working at
Intel and I worked on one of their
projects that was kind of the first
their one of their earliest AI
uh broadcast solutions. And this was for
the Olympics in Japan. Um, and what our
system did was it would watch the it
would watch the track and field runs and
it could from way back in the stands,
way back in the stands, it could
utilizing AI, pick up on the runners,
pick up on their stride and basically do
a heat map of how they were running and
really close to real time, it could
broadcast this information. It could
also send this information to to the
commentators. And so we were not trying
to replace the runners or even the
commentators. We were simply leveraging
AI to show us what humans could not see.
>> Mhm.
>> I'm all for that. And one of the things
that I have yet to find, and I have this
conversation a lot, I'm sure that you do
too, is like you will talk, you will
bump into people that will tell you how
much they hate AI. And I get it. I
totally understand. But as soon as I
talk to somebody who says, "I absolutely
hate AI," I ask the question, would you
hate AI if it could generate the
solution for curing ALS or cancer or
fill in the blank of whatever it is that
someone in your family is currently or
had gone through,
>> cancer, whatever. Yeah.
>> Nobody would hate that.
>> What you hate is that the company
generating this technology isn't doing
that.
>> Mhm.
>> Right. You don't hate the technology.
You can hate that it's being predicated
off of the creative intellectual
property of artists that you respect and
love and deserve credit. And you can
hate that it's being utilized to
generate content and garbage that is
misleading and lying to people. But you
don't actually hate the hammer, right?
>> Cuz the hammer can be used for such good
things in the world.
>> So someone get on that, will you?
Please. [laughter]
>> Well, the promises have been made,
right? I hope. And I do think there's
startups working on this and I do
>> and everything. I just need to make sure
that these startups, you know, I don't
know.
>> I I I will say something to this topic
is like and you know I love I love live
sports. I love live music all these
sorts of things, right? And the World
Cup for me is an example of like there
was so much technology being used uh you
know on the field on in the field and
the pitch and everything. Um but what
people what people will remember from
the World Cup will be the stories the
human stories of like the goalkeeper
from Cape Bird from Messi you know
Messi's last game all these sorts of
things is what people will remember from
the World Cup and yeah if their team won
and how many goals they scored and
everything but um but the human stories
remain what we kind of hold on to as
humans and at the end of the day the
ones that are watching the games are
humans.
>> That's true. if there were robots and
agents, and some of them are, uh, but at
the end of the day, we're still the ones
watching this. So,
>> so I agree with you. Don't hate the
hammer if the hammer can be used for
good.
>> People still want to watch Twitch
streams of
>> of gamers beating a video game, but
nobody wants to watch a a Twitch stream
of a computer beating a video game.
>> Yeah.
>> No one cares.
>> Mhm.
>> It's If that were a thing, it would it
would already be up, right? like and and
I'm sure there's roundabout use cases of
like look this computer beat you know
Super Mario level in the world's fastest
time because it played it perfectly.
That was a news story in 2013 that I
remember because that was the one time
and I watched that video because I
thought it was really interesting that a
computer had figured out the most
optimal route of beating Super Mario
Brothers. Would I care to watch that
50,000 more times? Nope. Once was
enough. You did it. Good for you. Moving
on. But I'll watch someone else try to
beat it.
>> That's where we're at.
>> That's where we're at. That's where
we're at. [snorts]
>> All right. So, um, yeah, I think
anything else you want to talk about
before we kind of switch off.
>> You know, I Is there anything I'm going
to ask you this? I'm going to put you on
the spot because we we didn't we haven't
covered this. Is there anything
currently happening that you see in the
tech space that you find incredibly
positive?
incredibly positive
in the text space.
>> H
I actually Nothing comes to mind right
off the bat. There probably are great
stories. I just
I No. Yes, but I have They're out there.
I just don't know
why. What did you see? I no this is part
of the bleakness that I'm trying to work
myself through
>> if I'm if I'm being completely
vulnerable on this podcast to all of our
listeners of
>> hey
>> you follow us you know where to find us
LinkedIn Instagram whatever you got that
positive story send it to us we could
the world could use some positivity
and you know how to find us you can find
us on our Instagram our LinkedIn
or our substacks. You just have to look
for Kathy Hackle or Lee Keebler or Tech
Magic. That's where we're at and you can
find us and message us there. And with
that, I'm going to say thank you for
tuning in to Tech Magic, where we always
invite you to come for the tech. Stay
for the magic. I'm Lee Keebler with the
incredible Kathy Hackle. We will be back
[music] next week.