Video summary
The recent controversy surrounding streamer I'm Dontai serves as a catalyst for examining the complex role of gatekeepers within the modern music industry. Following his comments on song war streams where he criticized certain artists, many felt disrespected and argued that he had become disconnected from the underground scene or was abusing his influence to filter out talent they disliked. However, this conflict highlights a deeper truth: whether an individual is perceived as a gatekeeper often depends less on their intent and more on how others interpret their filtering of music. While some view these figures as essential curators ensuring quality control, others see them as barriers that prevent deserving artists from reaching audiences, creating a polarized discourse where the definition of "gatekeeping" varies wildly depending on who is speaking.
The video argues that gatekeepers have not been eliminated by the internet but rather evolved into new forms driven primarily by scarcity and limited attention spans. Historically, human gatekeepers like radio programmers, label executives, and magazine editors decided which music reached the masses based on taste or business strategy. Today, while artists can upload songs directly to streaming platforms without permission, they still face a massive bottleneck: there is simply not enough time for any single person to listen to thousands of submissions daily. When curators like Cato receive over 4,000 tracks for an event, their decision-making becomes a mathematical necessity rather than a judgment on talent; if they cannot review every submission due to capacity limits, some artists must inevitably be filtered out regardless of their skill level.
This evolution extends beyond human influencers to include algorithms as the ultimate gatekeeper in contemporary music consumption. Platforms like TikTok, Spotify, and YouTube now act as invisible decision-makers that determine which songs gain traction before a fan even sees them, replacing traditional industry figures with engagement metrics and brand partnerships. Unlike human curators whose biases can be understood or negotiated through networking, these digital systems operate on opaque logic that artists cannot directly influence. Consequently, the music landscape is no longer defined by one monolithic gatekeeper but by a network of diverse entities including independent reactors, playlist editors, label infrastructure, and algorithms, each controlling different aspects of an artist's career trajectory from discovery to distribution.
Ultimately, the debate over gatekeepers stems less from disagreement on their existence and more from differing definitions regarding what constitutes fair access versus necessary filtering. The video concludes that artists should stop viewing these systems as personal attacks or unfair censorship and instead recognize them as structural realities where attention is a finite resource that must be strategically managed. Rather than trying to eliminate all forms of gatekeeping, which seems impossible given the nature of human psychology and digital infrastructure, successful artists learn to navigate this ecosystem by identifying which specific bottlenecks matter most for their goals and finding allies within those systems. By understanding that every industry hurdle represents a different type of filter—whether based on taste, quality, discovery potential, or capacity—artists can develop better strategies to ensure their music reaches the right ears without taking every rejection personally.
Read the full video transcript
It's going to keep happening, okay? I'm
very humble, but in this point at this
point when people are talking like this,
calling me a loser and a nerd and nobody
cares about what he got to say, [ __ ]
I'm the goat of this [ __ ] I am the goat
of this [ __ ] When an album drops,
[ __ ] search up I'm Dontai before they
type the title of that album. Shut your
[ __ ] mouth, okay? And you will
respect me, you little hooligans. You
will respect me, okay? Cuz I guarantee
you that if I asked you what I what
album or what artist I should react to,
you will gracefully, with quickness, at
top mock speed type your favorite artist
seeking my reaction to it. Clock that
clock that tea.
>> Recently, streamer I'm Dontai found
himself in the middle of a controversy
after one of his song war streams. Some
artists felt disrespected and felt like
I'm Dontai's comments were a signal that
he was no longer in touch with the
current underground music scene. And the
internet really was split over his
decisions. Some fans rallied online to
defend him, while others argued that
creators like I'm Dontai have become
gatekeepers and they had too much
influence over the music that people
discovered. Now, whether I'm Dontai was
right or wrong isn't what really
interested me about this story because
if I've learned one thing is that the
relationship between the music industry
and gatekeepers has always been
complicated. Artists hate being kept out
and feeling like they may be forced away
from a potential audience just because
one person or a group of people doesn't
like their music. And fans hate feeling
like someone else gets to decide what
type of music they should like.
Meanwhile, the people or the entities
that are being called gatekeepers will
argue that they're just trying to help
people discover quality music. And at
this point, it feels like everybody
hates gatekeepers until they need one.
And if you're a part of the 40% of
artists who subscribe to this channel,
then just know that if your opinion on
music ever becomes popular, then people
are going to eventually start calling
you a gatekeeper, too. But after looking
into this I'm Dontai controversy, I
don't actually think that artists hate
gatekeepers or really feel like they
shouldn't exist. I think they disagree
about what a gatekeeper actually is. Let
me explain.
But before I do, make sure you hit that
subscribe button because apparently, if
enough people on the internet like your
opinion, then the internet promotes you
to a gatekeeper. And I ain't going to
lie to y'all, I'm trying to get that
title. So, make sure you do your part
and hit that button. Now, let's get back
into the video. Now, I think the most
interesting part of this whole situation
wasn't even the controversy itself. And
it was really what started happening
afterwards and the discourse that it
started within the underground music
community. Because I started to see
people call I am Dondre out of touch.
They were saying that he no longer
represented the voice of the
underground. And I started to see the
word gatekeeper being thrown around over
and over and over again. Now, the issue
is nobody really seemed to be saying the
same thing. Some people thought that I
am Dondre was abusing his influence,
while others felt like he was just a guy
giving his opinion. And I think it
started this really interesting dialogue
within upcoming artists about whether or
not music even needs gatekeepers. Some
artists will argue that we actually do
need gatekeepers and they're a very
important part of the music industry
ecosystem. While other artists will
argue that gatekeepers are actually
ruining music and ruining the discovery
process for a potential fan. And that
whole discourse made me stop and ask,
what even is a gatekeeper? Because
depending on who you talk to in the
music industry, you'll get completely
different answers.
>> Do you think gatekeeping in the industry
is real?
>> I think gatekeeping is real. I think
gatekeeping needs to come back. I think
the reason why the industry sucks is cuz
nobody's gatekeeping.
>> Listen, break it down.
>> I'mma ask you a question. When you put
out your record, it was work. You had to
get the DJs, you had to go outside.
Don't know you, got to perform in front
of people. It's so much work that goes
into what we did. Now, look at today.
Somebody on Afghanistan right now can
upload a song on Spotify and we can hear
it today.
>> Mhm.
>> I think that we have to allow
gatekeeping to come back because
we have to have someone to say, you're
good, you're good, you. And And right
now, nobody's saying that. So, we won't
even know who's real and who's fake now.
>> So, I think that the way that Ray
Daniels describes gatekeeping is the way
that a lot of people in the music
industry see it. They don't necessarily
see it as censorship, but as quality
control. I mean, really think about what
he said because he's right in the aspect
that almost every single form of
entertainment has some type of
gatekeeping involved. Not every guy that
can hoop on the playground makes it to
the NBA. Every single actor in an
audition doesn't make it past the
casting director. And even books have
editors. Almost every single major
industry has people that decide who gets
opportunities, who gets recognition, who
gets distribution, and who gets to even
play the game. And Ray's argument is
music shouldn't be any different. And
also want you guys to pay really close
attention to who he started to describe
when he talked about gatekeepers. He
didn't talk about some exec or A&R at a
label. He started off by talking about a
very simple component of most music
artist discovery, and that's the DJ. So,
you can already start to see how
different parts of the industry or
people who play different roles within
the artist discovery process get the
title at one point or another. And
what's really interesting is that if you
could talk to people from different
sectors of the music industry who have
been doing whatever they do for however
long they've been doing it, you'll start
to see that a lot of people feel exactly
how Ray feels.
>> But that's why in hip-hop there has
always been gatekeepers because some of
y'all don't deserve a [ __ ] opinion.
Because you haven't been doing this
professionally, consuming, playing, and
critiquing hip-hop as your life. You're
just a fan. You're just And we love you.
You're just a consumer. You're a
customer as we call them. That's why
sometimes your opinion, customer,
doesn't [ __ ] count because you don't
[ __ ] do this for real.
>> So, notice that Ray Daniels and Ebro
have two things in common when it comes
to their opinion on gatekeeping. One is
that they believe that the professionals
and the people that have worked within
music in some capacity are really the
ones who deserve a voice at who gets
next up. And two, neither one of them is
really talking about power. They're
talking about filtering and curating.
Basically, having a system to separate
potential stars from the noise and being
able to make decisions around that. Now,
I'll be real with y'all. At first, I was
kind of like, "Damn, his opinion kind of
applies to I Am Dantae." But then I was
like, "Nah, I Am Dantae's been reacting
to music professionally for 10 years at
this point, so he still fits the bill."
And the more I thought about what Ebro
said, the more I actually started to
agree with him because when you really
think about it, gatekeepers have always
been around throughout music industry
history. Radio programmers, magazine
editors, record labels, A&Rs, DJs,
promoters, even venue owners. And for
decades, those people largely decided
who even made it to the masses. And this
next music exec explains that history
perfectly.
>> For a long time, the music business
revolved around a very small group of
gatekeepers who would decide what music
can go out to the world. Today, we are
seeing a very different model. Artists
today are building careers. They are
owning their music. Many times when you
would sign those record label deals, you
would give up ownership. It's all about
building the direct relationships with
fans. Artists are building a much
different, deeper understanding of both
the creative and business side. Which is
kind of making them a little bit
dangerous because when they sit across
tables to negotiate, they know much
more.
>> And that clip is important because it
establishes a point that I really want
younger artists to understand. The
internet didn't invent gatekeepers, and
in fact, they've always been here and
they've always existed in some capacity.
In fact, one of the biggest promises of
the internet is that it would help to
eliminate gatekeepers. Artists were told
that wouldn't need labels anymore, and
anyone could upload a song, and fans
would discover their music directly, and
any artist could build an audience. You
guys were told that no one would need
permission, and that you could go out
there and build this on your own terms.
Or at least, that was the dream. But
then something happened that I don't
think anybody expected. Instead of
eliminating gatekeepers like the promise
that was made, it started to
accidentally create new ones and a
different type of gatekeeper. And I
don't think that anyone illustrates this
concept better than the curator Teresa.
Check this clip out.
>> This video is to go over my goals and
purposes when I'm reviewing super small
artists like under 5,000, under 2,000,
maybe even under 100 monthly listeners.
Because a couple years ago, I was trying
to be an independent artist on Tik Tok
and I was like, what am I doing? I don't
even know if I sound good or not. I
would love some feedback. Then I took a
whole two-year break from the internet.
When I came back, I was like, nah, I'm
going to build a platform so I can shed
light on other super small artists
because while I may not be the talent, I
know that a lot of other people probably
are and I have the ability to yap and
get them attention.
>> Now, if you don't know who Teresa is,
she's a rising personality and curator
within the underground hip-hop scene.
And a lot of younger fans and fans of
that style of music really do look up to
her for her music opinion. And the
reason I love this clip is because
Teresa never says, I wanted to be a
gatekeeper or I want to have some kind
of power and influence within the music
industry. But instead, she just wanted
to help smaller artists get discovered
and that became the main driving force
on why she started to review music. And
in her journey, people started to trust
her taste and people started to trust
her curation. And as her audience grew,
more artists started to reach out, more
artists wanted to submit to be on her
platform. And before she knew it, she
had influence in a side of the music
scene. And again, none of this came
because she was chasing power. It came
because the people decided, hey, we like
what you have to say and we want you to
stick around. So basically, people
voluntarily gave power to her, which
made me realize something. I don't think
that most of the new internet
gatekeepers actually planned on becoming
gatekeepers. I think that they were like
most people and just fans of music who
decided to share their opinion and share
what they thought about upcoming artists
and then they accidentally became a
gatekeeper. And it's actually really
simple on how the internet takes these
everyday consumers and everyday fans and
accidentally turns them into
gatekeepers. Because the moment enough
artists decide your attention could
change my career then your opinion
becomes valuable and valuable attention
eventually becomes limited, which
started to make me wonder if people like
Teresa and so many of the music curators
and reactioners and the people that are
deemed gatekeepers by a lot of upcoming
artists never really decide to be a
gatekeeper then how could we ever truly
stop gatekeeping when the internet keeps
accidentally creating so many? So what
actually creates a gatekeeper? And at
first I thought the answer was your job,
right? I thought it was as simple as
that. Someone works at a record label or
they're becoming A&R or they write for a
major publication or they're a publicist
or they're a marketer. Basically having
a position inside of the music industry
that gives you the power to decide who
gets opportunities. And then I thought
maybe it's building an audience and the
bigger your audience becomes the more
control you have over deciding the
direction of music careers and in return
the more of a gatekeeper that you
become. But after seeing Teresa's story
and thinking about I Am Dante's story, I
don't think that influence is actually
the cause, it's the consequence. Because
influence doesn't create gatekeepers,
scarcity does. I mean really think about
it. If I Am Dante only had five artists
a week sending him music to review then
nobody would call him a gatekeeper. He
could listen to everything, he could
respond to everybody, he could help
every single artist that he wanted to
help. The problem starts when five
submissions become 50 and 50 become 500
and 500 become 5,000 and the pressure
and the stress from these rising
submissions is often what causes these
influencers to start to create systems
and boundaries around how they take
artist submissions. And I don't think
it's a coincidence that when these
boundaries start to show up, that's
usually when these people start to get
the title of being a gatekeeper.
>> I got over 4,400 submissions
for my South by Southwest show. There's
no shot
>> [laughter]
>> that I'm going to get through 4,000
submissions in time for South by
Southwest. So, I closed submissions.
>> So, this is the clip that started to
change my perspective more than any
other clips that I've shown you guys in
this video. Because at this point, I
didn't even think that it was
gatekeeping anymore. It just became
math. I mean, think about it. Cato isn't
saying, "I don't want to listen to your
music." He's saying that I physically
can't get through all of these
submissions I have. I mean, bro said he
had over 4,000 submissions. So, if we
assume that every song is at least 3
minutes long, then that's like 200 hours
worth of music to go through. And that's
before he sleeps, that's before he eats,
runs his business, or even gets time to
just put the showcase together. Even if
Cato wanted to give every single one of
those artists an opportunity, he simply
doesn't have the time to do it. Which
means that somebody has to get filtered
out. And it's not because they're not
good enough, that's not because they're
not a talented artist, but because
attention is limited. And honestly, the
bigger the music industry gets, the
bigger of a problem this becomes.
Because every day more music is uploaded
and more artists start to compete for
attention. And more of these creators
and these gatekeepers get more artists
who are trying to get them to put them
on in some type of way. Which means that
the demand for attention keeps growing,
but the supply doesn't grow with it.
Even the best curator and DJ and manager
and A&R and label exec only gets 24
hours in a day. And I think that's the
part of the gatekeeping conversation
that a lot of artists overlook. I mean,
for years whenever artists would talk
about gatekeepers, they were usually
talking about someone that has some kind
of power within the music industry. But
I think someone like Dante or Cato
represent a new type of gatekeeper. And
that's someone who isn't making a power
decision, they're just making a taste
decision and a time decision. Someone
like Cato isn't necessarily deciding who
deserves an opportunity. He's deciding
what do I have time to pay attention to.
And as painful as it might feel to a
artist and their ego and the work that
they put into their music, those just
aren't the same thing. Which made me
realize something. A lot of artists
treat gatekeepers like they're doing the
same job, when in reality they're not. I
am Dondae was talking about taste. Ray
Daniels was talking about quality
control. Teresa was talking about
discovery, and Cato was talking about
capacity. Four completely different
people with four completely different
roles. But somehow all of them have been
called gatekeepers by some artists out
there. And honestly, I think that's why
the gatekeeper debate gets confusing and
really never ends. Because artists will
keep arguing over the same word while
describing completely different
experiences. Which made me realize
something else. If scarcity creates
gatekeepers, then every time the
industry creates a new bottleneck,
doesn't that create a new gatekeeper,
too? Because artists aren't just
competing for people's attention
anymore. They're competing to get
through the systems that decide where
attention goes. And I think that's where
the biggest gatekeeper in modern music
enters the conversation.
Congratulations, you've officially made
it about halfway through the video.
Which means that you probably spent more
time today thinking about gatekeepers
than most artists spend thinking about
their next release strategy. And one
thing this episode has made me realize
is that attention is one of the most
valuable resources in music. And the
artists who are consistently getting
discovered aren't always the artists who
are making the best music. They're
usually the artists that have systems in
place that help them get in front of the
right people. And that's exactly why we
built Placement. Now, after spending the
last 7 years marketing artists, I
started to realize something. Most
artists spend more time on doing
research on where to promote their music
than they actually spend on promoting
the music. And that made us at No Labels
Necessary want to build a platform to
help solve that problem. With Placement,
all you have to do is describe what type
of artist you are, describe your
release, and tell us your budget, and
Placement will find platforms that fit
your genre, your goals, and your budget.
If you're an artist, you'll receive
curated opportunities that you can
approve and start working towards, or
you can reject it and start looking for
something else. And if you're a
marketer, then you'll get full database
access so you can start building
campaigns your own way. Because success
isn't just about making great music,
it's about getting it in front of the
people who might actually like that
great music. So, if Placement sounds
like something you need, then click the
link below this video to start your free
7-day trial. Now, let's get back into
the video. So, if every bottleneck
creates a new gatekeeper, then who
decides where attention goes today?
Because if you ask most artists, they'll
probably point at the labels, or at
reaction channels, or at playlists. But,
the more I thought about it, the more I
started to realize that all of those
things have one thing in common. They're
all trying to satisfy one gatekeeper,
the algorithm.
>> You're never going to meet the biggest
gatekeeper in the music business,
because it's not a person. It's the
algorithm. A lot of people talk about
how the music industry has been
completely democratized. A lot of the
human gatekeepers that once existed no
longer move the needle, or are no longer
necessary to move the needle. Whether
that's a major record label deal,
late-night show performances, press,
etc. All these people combined led to a
successful artist career at one point.
But, now that stuff is not necessary. In
many ways, that's a beautiful thing.
But, it's kind of like a the devil you
know versus the devil you don't kind of
thing. At least with human gatekeepers,
you knew what their tastes were, what
their biases were, what they were
looking for. You might actually be able
to get a meeting or a chance with them
someday. But, with an algorithm, you
have no insight into anything about it,
and it changes when you can't expect it.
>> Well, I think that Kristen from
Billboard said something that completely
changes this conversation. And honestly,
it's something that should make artists
today feel more grateful for the
gatekeepers they can see. Because the
generation of artists before you had all
human gatekeepers, and the artists back
then knew exactly who they were. They
knew about radio programmers, they knew
about magazine editors, they knew about
the venue owners. If they wanted their
music to spread, they knew exactly what
person they had to convince. But today
it's different because the first
audience you might have to convince
might not even be human. I mean, really
think about how you discover music or
how a lot of people discover music
today. TikTok decides what videos you
see, Spotify decides what song pops up
next in your radio playlist. YouTube
recommends videos, Instagram decides
what makes it to your For You page. Even
if your best friend, your dog, your
homie uploads a song today, there's no
guarantee that you will see it because
before your music even reaches people,
it usually has to get through a
algorithm first. And honestly, that's
kind of crazy when you think about it.
For years, artists were trying to
impress A&Rs and label execs and DJs,
but today's artists are trying to
impress brands, influencers, and
engagement metrics. And that last one is
really the biggest one because the
biggest gatekeeper in the music industry
today isn't even a person that you can
convince. And the craziest part is I
don't think that most artists even think
of the algorithm as gatekeeper because
unlike the radio, you can't just call
them. And unlike those A&Rs, you can't
just bump into them at an underground
showcase and network with them. And
unlike I Am Donte, you can't just email
them or DM them and pitch them. The
algorithm is invisible, but it
influences what millions of people
discover every single day. Which brings
me back to a point I made at the top of
the video. The internet promised you a
lack of gatekeepers, but instead it
created entirely new beast. And the
cherry on top is that even with all of
the new types of gatekeepers, even with
all of the hurdles that you guys have to
face, it still never got rid of
traditional gatekeepers.
>> You can't get to that point without a
label. You can't get to that Drake
level, that YoungBoy level. You're not
going to get there without a big machine
behind you that's going to put you on
these playlists. These labels got a
whole building them up that's just going
to work your song.
Like you couldn't tell me an independent
artist right now that's on the charts,
that's on top 40 right now.
>> See what you're saying. Now I think that
DDG brings us back down to earth because
there is this idea online that artists
can just upload a song, go viral, and
build these massive independent careers
all by themselves. And while that is
true to some extent, the reality is that
labels still hold a lot of power. And
it's also what confuses me when I see
artists beefing with curators or beefing
with reactioners or these kind of
independent new age gatekeepers because
you guys have bigger problems to deal
with. And these people are really your
allies in conquering the internet and
having an advantage over that side of
the industry. Because the internet
didn't erase the advantages that labels
have, it just gave artists a different
way to compete. And to be real, it is an
interesting predicament for artists to
be in because the internet didn't erase
all gatekeepers and it added new ones.
And I think that's something that
artists don't think about, even the ones
that do have relationships with these
"internet gatekeepers", is that labels
have relationships with them, too. The
labels also are trying to understand the
algorithm. They also reach out to the
curators. They find people to help them
get in contact with the reactioners.
Labels have found themselves navigating
the same system of new age gatekeeping
that a lot of artists are currently
trying to figure out. And thinking
through this finally made something
click for me. If Rae, Teresa, Cato, DDG,
and I am Dantae are all talking about
gatekeepers, why does it feel like
they're all describing completely
different things? And I think I've
finally figured it out. I don't think
that people, and even artists, really
disagree or really disapprove of
gatekeeping. I think they disagree about
the definition of it and which part of
the definition affects them personally
at some point in their artist career.
Because think about it again, I am
Dantae was talking about taste, Rae
Daniels was talking about quality
control, Teresa was talking about
discovery, Cato was talking about
capacity, Christian was talking about
the algorithm, and DDG was talking about
the label infrastructure and industry
access. All completely different people
with completely different roles that an
artist might get turned down from at
some point in their career. So, while
yes an artist could argue that all of
those things are gatekeepers, we have to
at least agree that they're not the same
type of gatekeepers, right? And after
looking into all of this, I think that a
gatekeeper is actually much simpler than
we've all made it be. A gatekeeper is
any person, any platform, or any system
that decides who gets attention. And I
think that if more artists started to
look at gatekeeping that way, then more
artists would take it less personally
when one of these levels of gatekeeping
personally affects their career or they
feel like it's their career growth.
Because as much as it might hurt for
that curator to tell you that they don't
like your music or for that promoter to
tell you that you can't be on the show
or for that A&R to tell you that they
can't take a meeting, these people's
roles are very important inside of the
music industry. And I think what makes
it so hard for artists to accept this is
something that I said at the top of the
video. The internet promised you guys
the elimination of gatekeepers, and for
a long time it really did feel like you
didn't need them. You could post your
music, you could post on TikTok, you
could go straight to the people and
build an audience around yourself. But
if you keep building long enough, then
eventually you will hit one of those
walls. And in my personal opinion, the
new age style of gatekeeping is much
easier to navigate than the old school
style of gatekeeping. Because back then
there may have only been one radio
programmer or one guy working at MTV,
but today because the internet has
created millions of micro gatekeepers,
you can always find a different way to
navigate and find someone that does like
you and can help you move on to the next
level. You don't have to take every
single opinion personally because there
are so many opinions out there. And if
your music really is good, then
eventually one of those opinions will
wait will vouch for you. So, I think
that the real lesson for artists isn't
how do we eliminate gatekeepers, I think
it's which gatekeepers actually matter
for my career and how can I find ones
within those positions that actually
support me. Because to be real, I don't
think we'll ever see a version of the
music industry that doesn't have some
type of a gatekeeper. And I also don't
think that attention will ever become
unlimited. Someone or somebody or
something will always decide where
attention gets directed. And if you can
learn to cope with that, if you can
learn to strategize within it, if you
can learn to not take it personally and
feel like it's going to bring your
career down, then you'll be able to
navigate the music industry better than
99% of music artists. And if you enjoy
these kind of videos into how the music
industry works, consider becoming a
channel member today. On that side, we
do exclusive discussions,
behind-the-scenes conversations, and
members get early access to select
content. So, if that sounds like
something you'd enjoy, then hit that
join button below this video. But guys,
I want to know what you think. Do you
think that the music industry could
genuinely survive without gatekeepers?
Or do we need people and systems and
entities that decide what gets
attention? Let me know your thoughts in
the comment section below. Other than
that, if you like this video, make sure
you hit the like button, subscribe,
share this with the artists and these
little bit of game in the name. My name
is Corey, and I'll see you all next
time.