Video summary
The podcast features a conversation between host Chris and AI expert Sir Lord Connor McCarthy regarding the evolution from basic chatbot interactions to the emerging paradigm of Agentic AI. While many businesses are currently focused on mastering standard Large Language Models like ChatGPT or Claude as simple conversational tools, the discussion highlights that the next major shift involves understanding "Agentic" systems. These agents represent a significant leap because they move beyond passive responses to actively making decisions and executing tasks autonomously. The dialogue clarifies the distinction between simple workflows, which follow rigid if-then logic, and true agentic workflows where the AI model itself acts as the decision-maker, effectively taking over human agency to solve problems without constant intervention.
A key theme of the conversation is the practical application of these agents in real-world scenarios, such as managing email inboxes or optimizing digital advertising campaigns. The speakers illustrate how an agentic system can analyze ad performance data, identify patterns, generate new creative angles, and even draft ads for testing—all while maintaining human oversight through "guardrails." For instance, a human might review the agent's suggestions before publishing to ensure they do not conflict with recent news events that could harm the brand. This balance between automation and human judgment is crucial; while agents can handle repetitive tasks like sorting urgent emails or drafting responses, the ultimate responsibility for high-stakes decisions remains with the human user to prevent security risks and maintain ethical standards.
To enable these sophisticated interactions across various platforms, the industry is moving toward standardization protocols that allow AI models to access external tools seamlessly. The discussion introduces the Model Context Protocol (MCP) as a solution to the fragmentation seen in smart home ecosystems, where different devices previously struggled to communicate. Similarly, MCP allows AI agents to connect with diverse services like Salesforce and Google Drive through a unified interface, effectively giving the AI "arms" to interact with the wider digital environment. This standardization is essential for scaling agentic workflows, enabling engineers to build systems that can autonomously write code, run tests, and deploy features based on simple requests, thereby transforming how software development and business operations are conducted.
In conclusion, the video emphasizes a strategic approach to adopting Agentic AI: start small with tangible projects like inbox triage to demonstrate immediate value before scaling up to more complex autonomous systems. The speakers recommend tools like Claude Code for local development and stress the importance of careful implementation to avoid the pitfalls seen in early, less controlled experiments. As companies recover from past failures where AI initiatives were rushed or poorly defined, the focus is shifting toward fine-tuning these experiments to solve specific, high-impact problems. Ultimately, the future of work lies not in replacing humans entirely, but in empowering them with intelligent assistants that handle routine complexities, allowing professionals to focus on strategy and creativity while ensuring safety and control remain firmly in human hands.
Read the full video transcript
Hello and welcome to another marvelous
episode of 42 Causes podcast with Sir
Lord Connor McCarthy live from uh
Dublin, the largest city in the world
because it keeps Dublin in Dublin. Ah,
[laughter]
>> I haven't heard that one in well over 10
years. [laughter]
>> But um welcome. It's so lovely to chat
with you again. Um,
>> yeah. Yeah. Thank you. It's great to be
here.
>> For those of you who don't know, Connor
is uh is one of the world's leading
experts in in AI and uh helped us with
our AI course and and travels all over
the world telling people how they should
be using AI and as well as building
things himself. So yeah, it's a sort of
a marvelous chap and obviously in most
of our lives AI is affecting everything.
So I thought today
one thing that I that I think is going
to be probably the biggest change this
year in business is that I think we will
see lots of the bigger companies switch
from trying to master just you know chat
GPT and Gemini and Claude um into
trying to really understand and master
aentic AI. Um,
>> when I chat to to different people, I
think most people are probably still
stuck on trying to figure out how to
best use chat GPT and and Claude and
those kind of things just in as a normal
chatbot, let alone Agentic AI. So, I
thought since Connor knows lots about
this and I've been writing a bit about
it recently, I thought we could have a
conversation about that. But, um, yeah,
I'll leave most of this to you, Connor,
because you probably know way more than
me and you also see what people are
doing. No, like with AI, the rule of
thumb is if you think you know
something, you probably your knowledge
is going to change in the next probably
36 hours. So
>> I still take great uh solace from Andre
Karpathy saying that even he feels
behind. So uh and he you know he was he
invented vibe coding essentially. So uh
right good news for the rest of us. But
yeah, Gent. Yeah, it's it's God even
that is weird, isn't it? It's like I
feel like only a year ago it it came
onto the scene and now it's kind of
everywhere. But it's not, you know, it's
not buzzwordy in the sense that
Claudebot this week was super hype
buzzword
>> and is I think is slowly kind of going
away. Agentic is here to stay. I think I
think an understanding of the
fundamentals which we can maybe cover in
this call.
>> It's just good to for people to get
their heads around. It's um yeah because
it is it is different. I actually I'll
just maybe I'll just give something we
can we can talk about like kind of three
three levels of interaction you might
say with AIS that that I see um and
you know people think actually I'll just
I'll I'll just kick it straight in. So,
let's say there's LLMs, there's uh, you
know, the usual chatbot experience, back
and forth, back and forth. Nothing
happens unless you go in and start
asking questions, right,
>> and getting the responses and then
taking a direction and going on from
there. That's most people's interaction
with an AI tool at the moment. And
that's certainly most of my
interactions. Um, and that's great.
Obviously, you need to be there to do
any kind of uh you need your agency to
use the tool effectively. [snorts]
>> Then there's there's a kind of next
level up which is not agentic. Not yet.
It's workflows. Now, I I add this
because I think a lot of people kind of
go, "Oh, it's either talking to the
chatbot or it's agentic." There is a
middle tier of just workflows. Now,
workflows are interesting because let's
say tools that people might have heard
of like Zapier or uh N8 or things like
that. Workflows basically let you string
together a number of um of actions
um based on decisions that you decide to
make within that workflow to get you
from point A to point B.
>> Right?
>> So very very simple workflows could be
you know um when someone enters
something in a row on a spreadsheet, you
know, if that the thing they enter is a
uh customer name, then you know, put
that send an email to that customer.
>> So, it's it's it's very much if then if
then uh that's a kind of standard loop.
>> And you can get really fancy with that
workflow. I I had a client come to me
and say, "Oh, I need an agentic thing."
It turns out they needed just a really
robust workflow. There was nothing
special about it. They just needed to
make some decisions about what was
happening when,
>> right?
>> Okay. So, very kind of log logically
minded, you might say. Um, if if the
LLM, if the first case, if that's the
brain in the jar, um, the this next case
is kind of it's starting to get limbs,
starting to do things.
>> Yeah.
>> Then aentic, which is what we really
want to talk about. Um,
this falls, I think, under the the the
label of decisions.
And that's really what this comes down
to. Okay? Because with agentic
um usage,
the decision maker changes. So in in
cases one and two, you're still the
decision maker. You're deciding all the
things that happen. But in case three,
agentic workflows, the model is deciding
and you know nothing about that.
>> Okay? Okay,
>> a very a very quick rule of thumb that I
saw a kind of well- reggarded engineer
say online, he said a aentic workflows
are essentially LLMs running in a loop
that are able to use tools.
That that's it in a nutshell. And that's
very much true for for most use cases.
Um I'll stop there because I've been
talking. No, I mean I was I was going to
say it's
I mean as I'm exadvertising a lot of my
friends are still in there and and I
think the way they kind of when I ask
for updates on them and how they're
doing, how the different agencies are
doing, I see these kind of you they they
seem to be having lots of conversations
about aentic workflows and how they're
going to use them internally to
help things run smoother, more
efficiently, faster.
I wondered
what are kind of the you know what are
the most interesting use cases you've
seen on it and how
how prevalent do you think this would be
like is it and is this is this kind of
that you talked about um Claudebot
earlier the the thing that I can't
remember what they've renamed it to
>> um the the that that was kind of it's
almost like a very unsafe but first
iteration of essentially like Jarvis
from you know the the Matrix films where
you've got sort of a a
true I mean I wish this was already
possible but yeah I mean it kind of is I
guess yeah like a a true assistant who
sees what's going on in in your
day-to-day life and then goes hey like I
see you've got a podcast coming up in
you know later tomorrow do you want me
to send you some notes notes that might
be helpful for you so that you've got
some prep notes for it. And I've I've
not had to do anything. It's just done
that for me. It's been proactive. Or,
hey, I saw there was an email here that
needed an urgent reply. I know you're
busy, so I sent them an email saying
like, you're just in another meeting and
you'll get back to them in 20 minutes.
Like it's it's all this stuff that
that that you you know just kind of
almost like having a really smart, you
know, real life assistant and they just
do stuff and they're seeing like what's
coming into your inbox all the time and
sorting stuff out. Normally only
billionaires would have access to
something like that. Now we all come in.
Does that is that is that still an
agentic thing then or is it
>> Yeah, because when like again your sniff
test is like is this thing making
decisions without me?
>> Right. Okay.
>> So in those so um Claudebot does do that
the horror stories about Claudebot and
maybe their their um their good father
in this conversation because you know I
have one friend who installed Claudebot
and gave it access to his WhatsApp and
woke up the next day and I had sent
WhatsApp messages to people in his
contact list about something random that
he was doing that day on his calendar.
So obviously he didn't want that to
happen a and it was quite embarrassing
but Claudebot made decisions on his
behalf. right? For some obscure reason.
Um and this is the this is the um the
thing about agents is you are handing
over your decision-m small and large to
these agents.
>> And that opens up a whole world of you
know security, access, autonomy,
privacy, all that kind of stuff. Because
if Claudebot had that guy's credit card
details, Clawbot might have gone and
shared those or bought something or
whatever. It would have started making
decisions and that's that's where things
get a little bit sticky.
>> Yeah. Because I think a lot of people I
mean I I've had this this recently a few
times where
Gemini or Claude will will say, "Hey,
you can now link this to your email, to
your Google Drive. if you want to have
access to all these other tools like
Slack and
um I'm always rather hesitant at the
moment um with my main, you know, if I
had a burner laptop with with really bad
information, I'd probably do it. But I
I'm I've done it for some things where I
know up front it's like, you know, we'll
never I think with with Gemini, they
send tend to be quite um overly cautious
on it. So they're like, you know, we
we'll have access to it, but we'll only
use Drive if you tell us to go and use
Drive and blah blah blah. So with that
kind of instance, I'm kind of okay with
it. But
>> yeah, it's it's
for Aentic AI to really work. You kind
of need that. I guess for businesses,
it's different though because you're
just trying to create
is it plugins or sort of link them to
different tools that you exist that you
have existingly and and Yeah.
>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. So, so the tools is
obviously important like I don't know
maybe more maybe an example that would
suit this conversation is of an agentic
workflow
>> would be something that you know
>> if you're running ads running Facebook
ads Google ads what have you analyzes
>> the ad performance from the last month
finds patterns in all that data AI is
brilliant at doing thinks up new angles
based on the best performing ads
tests those ads
and either launches them or pings you to
say, "Hey, here are the three what what
I think are the best three performing
ads."
>> Right?
>> So there's little you could say in there
like if you gave it full autonomy, it
would go and just publish those ads and
and you would not know anything about
it. So it's making all those little
decisions or sorry that big decision at
the end I guess.
>> Mhm. But similarly the decision
which again is more of a workflow thing
as in right when you get to this point
send me an email.
>> You know
>> I mean that that's a lovely example when
when you're saying that like I mean how
>> right now like how how easy or hard is
that to build?
>> It's it's pretty straightforward. It's
one of those like
uh logically it's very straightforward
like you'd have to kind of get in and
there's a lot of testing of these things
to make sure that you have the right
guard rails up etc. And I should
highlight like you know what's the most
important part in that. Okay, finding
last month's ad ads that's easy. It's a
database call. Um finding patterns in
those ads that's relatively
straightforward and again AIS are really
good at doing that. Coming up with ideas
for new ads based on those patterns
like that's also like fairly
straightforward for an LLM at this
point.
It's the kind of um it's the decision in
there of like
Well, should this ad go out? Like, has
has it made the right call on these
three ads? The human judgment factor,
like maybe you want it to kind of ping
you and say, "Hey, these are the three
ads." And you as the as the account exec
or what have you, you might be able to
kind of go, "Oh, no. We shouldn't
publish this ad because this thing just
happened in the news and this would
reflect badly, you know, on us because,
you know, it's not very sensitive to
what just happened in the news." So
that's that's an example of a guardrail
and you could probably build against
that. You could probably kind of go you
know what just check the news in the
last seven days since sense check these
three ads to see you know will anything
you know cause a problem here.
>> Um but sorry your original question that
yeah I pretty sure um those marketing
automations there's a zillion of them
now. I'm I'm assuming that exists
somewhere right now.
>> Yeah. I mean, when you're chatting with
clients and trying to get them to think
about,
what things they might want to put an
agent an agentic workflow together for?
What kind of things do you suggest that
people think about um so that they find
the you know the the golden stuff rather
than just you know I've got this idea
let's try it because I I I have heard
also there's tons of data showing that
these big companies have been wasting
trillions of dollars on on AI
experiments most of them have been an
abject failure um maybe they tried too
hard too early
>> um there seems to be this course
correction on yes let's keep
experimenting but let's fine tune tune
those experiments so that we only do the
stuff that we really need to do. What
kind of recommendations do you suggest
when you're chatting with people and how
to think about, you know, what are the
key things that are going to really make
a difference? Um,
start like start small with
something that will make like a tangible
difference. So, like one thing that I've
done a few times for people because I
know it makes such a difference is like
an inbox triage. like just something as
simple as that where you can hand off
your your um your email inbox to a
simple agentic workflow. And even if it
does something like there's various
levels. Let's say you just wanted it to
label your emails in a certain way.
>> But emails can be tricky because you
know yourself there's everything from
spam through to super important emails.
>> Yeah.
>> And you can't you can't really if then
those emails,
>> right?
There has to be some kind of decision on
behalf of the LLM to kind of go, you
know what, this the voice in this email
sounds urgent and it seems to be, you
know, from a client, so this should be,
you know, top priority, you know, ping
ping Connor, ping Chris, say you really
need to check this out now. So like that
that sounds really kind of boring or
whatever. But I think when I've done
that for people and they see like oh my
god suddenly their email is manageable
again or suddenly their life is better
because they don't have to kind of
>> worry about things they're things that
are sipping through the net or all that
and they're saving hours every week.
Then they kind of go, "Oh, okay. Right.
So what else can we do here?" And then
then you get into
uh maybe some SAS platforms that they
would use that we can kind of hook
together, hook into something agentic
um and kind of start to figure out
better ways to um just help save time or
just save headache in a lot of cases.
>> I guess I had like two questions based
on what you said because I'd imag I'd
imagine you're absolutely right. I mean,
email just takes up so much of of most
people's time, especially now with
>> AI sending emails. I mean, I I I don't
know what happened, but there was last I
think it was last week or the week
before I got in one day probably 10,
you know, very personalized emails, but
obviously AI written
>> saying like, oh, you know, don't you
want to have this person on your podcast
or like
>> and they were all podcast ones and I was
like, how who's got my email and why are
you sending me 5,000 versions of
basically the same thing from different
random people I've never heard of in my
life.
>> Um, so I guess I guess the the but yeah,
sorting out your email is a good thing.
I guess the two questions I had was one
is like is there an easy sort of go-to
tool that that that's,
you know, not too complicated to use for
that? Um, and the second question I've
totally forgotten, but I'll remember in
a minute. [laughter]
That's okay. Um, one and the the the I'm
finding with AI the the recency bias is
very powerful because there's so many
tools and ideas floating around that I'm
like
>> I'm sure I've seen a hundred of these
before, but the one that springs to mind
is lindy.ai.
>> I'm not a reseller. There's no there's
no referral fee, but Lindy. I heard
someone on a podcast say um that they
started using it and it, you know,
changed their life essentially. Um you
can it's basically
uh easy to use automations. Um
everything from customer support, email
management, lead genen, um LinkedIn
outreach, it it kind of does everything.
Now,
you know, you got to get in there and
use these tools. And you got to be
really careful again with agentic stuff
like how much do you want certain tasks
taken off your plate entirely safe ones
>> versus how how much do you want to step
in and you really need to kind of get
into the nitty-gritty. um like a lot of
the a lot of the talk about agentic
workflows and I think one of the reasons
that they're so popular is that in the
in the engineering world in the software
development world they've been and the
they're doing like unbelievable amounts
of work good work for engineers
engineering like it's it's usually the
canary in the gold mine for a lot of AI
stuff for obvious reasons but it's um
engineering is kind of a kind
environment as well like it's code it
either it works or it doesn't. You know,
you can generate tons of it, but you can
also test like does this work? Is this
any good?
>> Right?
>> So, agentic workflows in engineering
have really taken off and now
if they're to be believed like you read
stories of um engineers just literally
overnight
um you know a customer request would
come in for some feature to be added, be
picked up by an agent. it would, you
know, create a a pull request in GitHub.
D would, you know, write the code, write
a series of tests to test the code. If
you're really brave, it would post the
code and and you're done. Um, that kind
of stuff is happening. Like people are
literally opening up their email in the
morning kind of going, "Okay, it took
that problem and solved it and there's
actually nothing for me to do here."
>> Yeah.
>> Like that's that's happening now with
with certain types of software. I I
remember reading an article yesterday.
There was a I think it was actually even
a tweet last week from the CTO of of um
of of of
Claude um saying that they they don't
they actually he's not written a line of
code.
>> Oh yeah.
>> The whole year. So so far this year he's
not written any code. He's just been
using claw code to do all of it and then
since checkeing it
>> 100%. And and just the the caveat with
this and with all things like someone in
the comments I saw that tweet and
someone was like like you wrote
everything using flow code and he's like
no just the code the architecture the
security the tech like he named five or
six things that he was like obviously
they were done by humans or assisted
>> you know AI AI assisted with humans and
you know code is is just words on a page
there's so much more that goes into
developing goods software.
>> Yeah. And I remember my second question,
the you because we're talking about the
Genti and you've got, you know, it has
to then talk to so many different
services.
Um, it made me think of of a of a of a
similar sort of thing where in in in
smart homes, if anyone is a is a gadget
nerd a bit like myself, in smart homes,
one of the things that was always
infuriating is everyone used a different
standard. So,
>> you know, if you had Philips light
bulbs, they would only talk to other
Philips products, but maybe your Google
or Apple Home or Amazon wouldn't Alexa
wouldn't talk to certain things. So, you
ended up having to always have a million
apps. And finally, I think it took them
10 years, they figured out, okay, well,
we use matter as the kind of uh the the
the common ground uh base that every
everyone everyone interacts with. Is
there a similar one for Aentic AI that
that that people are using? I heard I
think there's one that's been done by
Anthropic and or champion mainly by
Anthropic and and Google. I couldn't um
yeah uh I'm also a smart home nerd. The
um there is well Anthropic released they
they created and and generously kind of
released for free this this idea of MCP
servers.
>> So yeah, model context protocol. Such a
clunky name. Oh my god. Model context
protocol and you're called everything.
But yeah, that that's um that's a way of
giving AI tool or giving LLMs access to
um
platforms and services outside of
itself. Again, it's got it's giving you
more arms.
>> Yeah.
>> Um so it's similar. It's like
superpowered APIs. I don't know if you
know what APIs are that
>> Yeah.
>> I mean, you can you can you can share a
belief explanation. anyone who doesn't
doesn't
>> that's a programming interface. It was
essentially a way for systems to talk to
each other. Um so uh so you're able to
kind of ping a silo of let's say all
your information is in Salesforce. It
would have an API and I could write a
piece of software that I could ask the
API hey can you get me all the customer
data and it will return that customer
data and there's a whole authentication
thing going on. So that was the simple
back and forth let's say remember
earlier the back and forth LLM thing
APIs were v1
>> right
>> then MCPs were released and suddenly it
was more of a fully featured
conversation where through um through
claude let's say literally in claude
um I could I could add the Salesforce
MCP server and now I can have an English
language conversation with all of my
Salesforce data
>> and and similarly a clawed agent could
do the name and it brought this just
really rich really powerful interaction
where suddenly you could chain together
um you know uh something like a a
Salesforce MCP with your Google Drive
with like looker with all these
different services and and it's it's a
proper conversation between these tools
you know
>> it's um there's another kind of
underlying layer that all the big
companies have kind of come up with to
try and system it to make sure there
isn't the same uh Alexa theory problem.
Uh I think Google Google called it a
agent to agent and that's a more of a
kind of underlying platform, but I won't
get into that now. [laughter]
>> Yeah, it's uh I mean I know I know
you've got to dash off in a minute, but
um
>> I mean what what's your
is the end of January flown by in a
flash. What's um at the moment what's
the the tool that you're using the most?
that's your your AI dayto-day like go-to
go-to things. Is there anything that's
that that's been standing out to you
recently that you think people should
have a go with or
>> um
I'm using Clawude Code a lot and I
mentioned this last time. It's and I
think you were playing with it too. Um
>> yeah.
>> Yeah,
>> it's I really it's a funny one to
recommend because it means using the
terminal.
I've started saying to people, you know
what, it's just another chat box and
we're using chat boxes anyway and let
let's just go for it. It's extremely
extremely powerful because
um you know now you've got Claude's
brain on your computer and it can do all
the things on the internet that Claude
can do you know through a browser but
now it also has access to local files
and local services. It's really really
powerful when you get into it. It also
has a lot of tools at its disposal.
skills and as you said MCP servers and
everything. I don't know. I I I would
just implore anyone who's who's looking
for like you know what's something
really powerful that I'm missing. I
think it's clawed code at the moment
anyway. Um it's it's it's very safe.
It's very easy to use. Um
yeah, I've just got a million situations
where it's like, h this isn't working
with chat. Hey Claude, can you blah blah
blah blah blah, you know, connect to my
thing and do this and make sure this is
working and it it's done. It's fixed and
it it blows my mind all the time.
>> So you're not using it just to to make
websites. You're using it for sort of
>> Oh, like all these AI tools once you
realize, oh, it can do that. Oh, maybe I
can use it for this over here. So, it's
everything from, oh god, building pieces
of software for myself, um, to fixing
problems I was having in notion with
really complicated formulas,
uh, doing pieces of research. Um, I'm
creating more and more skills to help me
just kind of do marketing for my
consultancy, that kind of stuff. Um,
yeah, my my ultimate goal is maybe to
create uh that the the kind of what
Claudebot should have been like the the
personal assistant, right? But using
Claude so at every step I can kind of
manage what's going on.
>> Yeah, that sounds brilliant. Um, look, I
know I know uh I know we ran out of time
already. Time replies. Um,
>> sorry. I I just I just blabbed the
entire time, but thank you for
>> Amazing. It's super super helpful. So,
thank you so so much. Um, and also good
timing because I can hear uh
>> I can hear our little
>> um Yeah, I hope this was useful. God,
yeah, it's um it's it's interesting
times, but we should we could do another
session on Agentic if if you're still
kind of going, but what about this?
>> Yeah, it'd be interesting to to maybe
try and actually have a have a little
mini project and and show people what
it's like to to build something. Um
>> probably more uh YouTube friendly than
podcast friendly, but uh we'll make make
a plan. Um but yeah, we're um yeah,
we'll uh love you and leave you and
thank you so much for for your time,
Connor. I really really appreciate it.
You're amazing.
>> Thank you everyone for listening. Yeah.
>> Yeah, we've just updated the agentics
section in our in our uh in our AI for
marketers course as well as well as
adding new lessons on uh on GEO, which
is AI search and uh and all sorts of
other bits and bobs. So, uh, yeah, if
you if you want to have a little, uh,
easy to understand read up on this, go
have a look at the course. Um, yeah,
>> loads of love and can't wait to chat
soon. And thank you so much for the
time. You're amazing.
>> Thanks, Chris.
>> Talk to you soon.
>> Thanks.
>> We hope you enjoyed listening to this 42
Courses podcast. If you did, please like
and share. Uh, any comments are also
very, very welcome. And of course, if
you want to learn more about us, visit
our website at 42courses.com.
Thanks again.