The FUTURE of Recreational Drugs & Their POTENTIAL Could Change Your LIFE | David Nutt
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
In this discussion, neuroscientist David Nutt argues that medical cannabis will drive a significant revolution in healthcare over the next two decades if utilized correctly. He explains that the brain naturally produces endocannabinoids like anandamide and 2-AG from nerve membranes to regulate neurotransmitter release through feedback inhibition, acting somewhat like a biological thermostat. Unlike psychedelics such as LSD or psilocybin, which decrease overall brain activity by disrupting hypotheses about reality—effectively turning off parts of the default mode network to reveal raw sensory data—cannabis increases metabolic activity while still detaching users from their routine thinking patterns. This unique mechanism allows individuals to focus deeply on specific topics rather than experiencing a broad expansion of consciousness seen with other substances, though individual experiences vary based on personality and prior context. Nutt highlights the adaptogenic nature of cannabis, noting that its effects can change over time as receptors adjust; initial unpleasant or anxious reactions often subside while sensitivity shifts in complex ways involving dopamine systems. He presents compelling evidence from his charity Drug Science regarding chronic pain management, where a combination of THC and CBD proved to be significantly more effective than opioids for neuropathic pain without causing the same level of harm or tolerance issues associated with opiates. The study involved over 2,500 patients in Britain, revealing that nearly half who switched from opioid painkillers stopped using them entirely after adopting this cannabis regimen. Furthermore, Nutt points out that while chronic marijuana use can lead to dependence and cardiovascular risks for those with existing heart conditions, it does not cause the structural brain shrinkage seen in alcoholism or liver cirrhosis; instead, cannabidiol appears to act as an antioxidant by soaking up free radicals produced during alcohol metabolism. The conversation also addresses safety profiles, where Nutt ranks drugs based on harm reduction data showing that psychedelics like magic mushrooms and LSD have the lowest rates of individual harm compared to tobacco, alcohol, or fentanyl. He clarifies a common misconception regarding lung cancer, noting historical epidemiological data suggesting cannabis smokers may actually face lower risks than non-smokers because they often inhale less deeply due to the drug's relaxing effects; however, he strongly advises against mixing cannabis with tobacco. Nutt emphasizes that while current pharmaceutical models favor synthetic drugs over plant-based remedies like cannabis, future research is likely to uncover even greater applications for treating anxiety disorders, PTSD resistant to MDMA therapy, and inflammatory gut diseases such as Crohn's disease. Ultimately, the dialogue concludes by challenging societal views on drug policy and medical utility, suggesting that we have missed a massive opportunity in America due to federal restrictions preventing systematic study of cannabis benefits despite its widespread state-level legalization. Nutt predicts that within the next decade, scientific consensus will solidify medical cannabis as a preferred treatment for chronic conditions where current options fail or cause severe side effects. He encourages listeners to view their brains not just as efficient machines designed solely for survival and reproduction but as adaptable systems capable of profound change when exposed to substances like psychedelics or cannabinoids that disrupt habitual thought patterns, potentially offering new pathways for creativity and healing without the destructive toxicity associated with traditional drugs.
Read the full video transcript
Medical cannabis is is going to be the
big revolution in the over the next 20
years if we use it properly.
David Nutt, welcome to the show.
Good to be with you.
I'm really excited to talk to you today.
I'm super intrigued by drugs in general,
by the brain, by the way that we can
manipulate our brain chemistry through
drugs, and your latest book Cannabis
makes a pretty compelling case for all
of the interesting things that
marijuana can do for us, and I'm
curious.
Why do you think like when I look at the
stack of things that you talk about in
the book that cannabis does, controls,
may potentially help with in the human
body experience,
it's a it's a long list. Why is cannabis
so active?
Well,
of course we discovered that in recent
years because
the brain makes its own molecules like
cannabis.
It makes several of them. We've
identified one called anandamide, one
called 2-AG, and it turns out that those
chemicals work on receptors, the same
receptors as THC, the active ingredient
in cannabis works on.
And
and it was a mystery for 20-odd years
when we cannabis receptors were
discovered, no one had a clue what was
going on, but turns out that the brain
makes its own
cannabis molecules, and it makes them in
a very special way. It makes them
from nerve membranes.
So, when nerves are activated,
they release some of the membranes into
the fluid around the and they get
converted into these these cannabinoid
substances, and they usually go
backwards.
And so they
affect the nerve that's releasing the
neurotransmitter. So, they're a very
novel form of what we call feedback
inhibition. What is feedback inhibition?
Right.
So, for instance, let's put it this way.
If you
a nerve a nerve fires and the way in
which nerve communicates
one nerve to the next is not by
electricity, it's by chemicals. Mhm.
They're called neurotransmitters.
So, for instance, if a nerve and and
most of the
a large proportion of the nerves in the
brain actually release a chemical called
glutamate.
So, glutamate comes out of one nerve
ending, goes across the synapse, hits
the other nerve ending, stimulates it,
the nerve starts to fire. As it starts
to fire, it releases these
molecules which turn into these
endocannabinoids
which come back across the synapse and
turn off the firing. So, they it helps
regulate, like a thermostat in a house,
it helps regulate the functioning of
that particular synapse or that whole
complex of synapses.
I don't know if this is connected, but
one of the more interesting things that
I've heard you talk about with
psychedelics is that
part of what you discovered or has been
discovered in the research is that when
you take a psychedelic, it's not
activating areas of your brain, it's
actually turning off areas of your
brain. Is that Is that a similar kind of
function that we're seeing here where
the inhibition of something is creating
this I mean, I guess depending on where
you are, sort of euphoric feeling that
marijuana can bring about or is this
completely different?
That's a great question and the answer
is it's it's complicated.
One of the real paradoxes when we
discovered
that psychedelics actually turned down
brain activity
we scratched our head and then we looked
around to see what other drugs did that.
And And interestingly, the one drug that
does not do that
is cannabis. It increases brain
activity. So, I am I have used
marijuana. My wife is a big fan.
I'm a sort of
but
it feels like I'm sort of collapsing
inside of myself that I can get lost in
a single thought. That that one thought
just becomes so all consuming and not in
an unpleasant way, but just that I'm I'm
lost in that thought. So, it feels like
less of my brain is active. So, what
part of the brain is actually lighting
up that gives that sort of all consuming
sensation?
Well, the answer is I think think we
know because
despite the
fact that cannabis has been
both widely used for for for many many
decades and also has been a medicine in
America now for 20 years. There's been
very few studies
on
cannabis brain imaging.
But, what we think is happening is that
at one level, it is working like
psychedelics.
But, not at the metabolic level, but in
the circuit level. So, we think that the
circuits are similar.
And what
what we know happens with psychedelics
and we've got less data with cannabis,
but what we know happens is that
the
the normal mechanism that basically
tells your brain what to do, there's a
network in your brain called the default
mode network and that that basically
drives your current thinking.
And and makes you who we
what you are. It's where your sort of
sense of self is. That gets switched off
to some extent by the cannabis and by
psychedelics. And and that switching off
that basically detaches you from your
normal routine daily thinking, the
standard way in which your brain works
and that allows you to then think
differently.
Now, in your case, thinking differently
means that you get interested in a
particular topic and you get deep deep
deep deep into it.
In other people, it's different. In
other people, the mind kind of opens and
people get sort of broader sense of
being more out there, more
communicating, you know, more part of a
of a the outside world.
And why there are individual variations
in this is completely unknown at
present. It's
It's probably got something to do with
personality, with interests, with um
what you were doing the day before. Do
you think it has anything to do with
enzymes? Be And I'll I'll explain the
question and then you can either shoot
the theory down or let me know, but uh
so, the first time I had no interest in
trying marijuana. My wife finally
convinces me to give it a shot. And I
try it and I'm like, this is the worst
experience ever. This sucks. There is
nothing interesting about this. I feel
like I just want to lay on the couch. My
head felt heavy. I would be like, wait,
we're still watching TV. It was like
somebody was pressing play and pause on
my brain. It was horrible. And my wife
was like, you know, that's interesting
that you say that. She was like,
when I first started smoking, I had some
kind of like sense like that, but she's
like, it's not like that for me anymore.
And I remember thinking, that doesn't
make sense. Like, how could it be
different for you now than it was in the
beginning?
So, anyway, years go by, she gets me to
try it again. I have the same sensation.
This is lame, not interesting. Years go
by, she gets me to try it again. And
that time I had a body high. Now, that
is a whole different experience, which
we'll get into later. But that prompted
me to want to try it again. And so, then
all of a sudden, because I tried it a
week later,
it felt completely different. And I was
like, oh my god, she's right. And so, I
was thinking of it kind of like alcohol,
where, if I understand alcohol
metabolism correctly, you get to the
point where you have the enzymes that
can break the alcohol down, so you're
able to get it through your system
quicker. It takes more to get you that
same level of intoxicated.
And so, I was like, is there something
my it really feels like my body now
handles it very differently if I smoke
sort of with only a week in between?
What's happening there?
Well, that probably isn't it's probably
not
metabolism. It's probably some kind of
adaptive changes at the level of the
receptor.
Interesting.
you're probably and and and this you
raise, you know, again, really
fundamental question which is almost
unstudied. Often when people start
smoking cannabis, they do get very weird
experiences and they often find very
unpleasant. They often get very anxious.
And then over time, that goes away. But
then over time, something else happens
and people begin to get
more sensitive to it in a different way
and they get more paranoid. And and
that's actually one reason why
quite a lot of people
give up smoking cannabis in their 20s
and 30s because of the the paranoid
feelings begin to develop. And so, there
are almost certainly two separate
processes going on. There's a process
where
the receptors or or the circuits begin
to adapt so that they they get less less
worried in if you can use that kind of
term for a circuit
by the changing brain function and that
then allows you
to
engage with the positives of that
function cuz you're not so concerned
about the change. But then over time,
something else happens probably in a
different circuit or different
neurotransmitter system which then
turns on probably something like the
dopamine system which then leads to
paranoia.
So, you've got to remember, you know,
cannabis can affect pretty much every
other neurotransmitter system in the
brain.
Yeah, that's In fact, I want to go back
to that. It seems to be impacting some
sort of master regulatory system. Well,
one I think it would be useful. Your
book talks a lot about seizures. But you
also and and the role that cannabis can
play there which is pretty
extraordinary. I had not heard about the
connection between cannabis and
seizures. Uh Um
and my first interaction, the first time
I ever saw somebody smoke weed, it it
like put a um
like my brain took it down as like
there's something here because this guy
would he had tremors, like really bad
tremors. Like the amount that my hands
are shaking right now, if you're
watching YouTube, you'll see uh if
you're just listening to this, my hands
are shaking a lot. And you could hear it
in his voice, like he had that like if
you're really nervous and your voice is
quivering, he sounded like that all the
time.
If he smoked, like literally 6 minutes
later, you can watch his tremors stop
and then he could talk normally. And I
was like, "What just happened?" It was
at one point I actually thought he was
[ __ ] with me. I was like,
"How's it possible?"
So, as
walk us through a few of the things that
you enumerate in the book that cannabis
does. So, we've got seizures, um
weight loss. Like there one, you've got
you you talk about this in the book,
you've got if people smoke, they tend
not to gain too much weight, smoke weed,
not not even tobacco, which is a whole
different thing. But they smoke weed,
they tend not to gain too much weight,
but they also don't lose too much weight
and it can be used on that side. That's
exactly right. You have that's a very
good example, isn't it? Of an
adaptation.
The cannabis helps it paradoxically when
you get the munchies, you don't get
diabetes because that somehow things it
normalizes the biological processes
relating to appetite.
All right, my friend, I have a big
announcement. My incredible and talented
wife Lisa is about to launch her new
book, Radical Confidence. In it, she has
managed to perfectly capture the process
of how to go from feeling lost and
insecure to taking control of your life
and doing amazing things despite feeling
fear, sometimes a lot of fear. Now, let
me tell you, nobody knows Lisa better
than me, but when I read Radical
Confidence for the first time and heard
her describe what it was like for her to
go from having these big, exciting
dreams as a kid to then as an adult
scheduling her life around the TV shows
that she wanted to watch or how lonely
and isolated she felt instead of
pursuing her dreams, it was brutal for
me. I would never say though that it was
worth it for her to go through all of
that just so that she could write
something down that allows others to
avoid it, but I will say that at least
she was able to capture the strategies
that she used to break out of that rut,
find her voice, and begin doing
incredible things despite her
insecurities and fears that she wasn't
going to be good enough to achieve great
things. So, while it hurts me to know
the dark place that Lisa went through, I
really am excited for people who are
going through something similar right
now to read this book. Radical
Confidence is an instruction manual for
how to become the hero of your own life
even when you're scared to death. Look,
I know better than just about anybody
how easy it is to get off track in life
or to just not have yet found your
calling. And it's even easier for people
to feel so insecure and unprepared that
they don't even want to pursue the
things that they want. But what Lisa
shows people in Radical Confidence is
that the radical part is that you can
accomplish extraordinary things even
when you feel fear. That's what Radical
Confidence is. Being afraid and unsure
and having a toolkit that allows you to
still make massive progress. Pre-order
your copy today because if you act now,
you can claim the bonuses that Lisa has
created for you at
radicalconfidence.com.
They're only available if you pre-order,
so act now. Then, once you've done that,
we'll get back to today's episode. All
right, guys. Read the book and get ready
to be the hero of your own life. Peace
out.
When you get people that are really pro
cannabis, they make it sound like a
panacea.
And
as an adaptogen that's very interesting
and I don't know if there are other
drugs that function in a similar vein,
but um
is marijuana a panacea or are there
limits like what's your general take?
Medical cannabis is is going to be the
big revolution in over the next 20 years
if we use it properly.
In the same way as in the last 20 years
the big revolution has been in
immunotherapy.
But medical cannabis is a
way way cheaper than the new
immunotherapy. And potentially
as for many disorders as effective. The
big problem and and this is particularly
what is an American and Canadian problem
really is is that the opportunity's
already almost been missed because so
many people are using medical cannabis,
but it's still illegal under federal law
that until very recently you couldn't
get federal funding to study the medical
benefits. So you you've genuinely missed
a huge opportunity in the states for by
having this complete mismatch between
what the states are doing and what the
government wants you to do.
But hopefully at some point that will
change and then we would start doing
very systematic analysis on a range of
different disorders.
And and actually can I just tell you
that's one of the things we're doing in
Britain. In Britain we have
we hardly use medical cannabis at all
because
we have socialized medicine.
And the NHS is very is and the doctors
in the NHS are resistant to cannabis.
And we can't therefore go out and buy it
like you can in the in the you know, we
we don't have the that that that
facility that cuz we you know, you have
recreational cannabis in many of your
states.
We don't have any at all.
So what what my charity Drug Science did
was we set up a registry. We we worked
we found some cannabis suppliers.
We found some doctors who wanted to
prescribe outside of the NHS. We brought
the price of medical cannabis down to be
equivalent to what people would buy on
the illicit market. And and we've given
we've set up this large database of
people who are getting medical cannabis
privately. We've got 2 and 1/2 thousand
people in that database now.
Of which half of them are using it for
pain. So that's 1/5 of the total number
of people in the world who have had
measures of pain taken on cannabis.
And 44%
of the people who were using opioid
painkillers before they went into this
study have stopped using them. 44%
nearly half.
That's absolutely transformational. So
one of the interesting things we've done
in the last year again through this
charity Drug Science is
is to evaluate different forms of
cannabis
for pain.
And we and we've compared them with
other drugs like antidepressants,
gabapentinoids, and opioids.
And also the simple painkiller called
ibuprofen.
And we use the special technique called
multi-criteria decision analysis which
allows us to
properly evaluate both the
the benefits in terms of pain relief and
in terms of quality of life. And also
the benefits in terms of safety.
And when we did that we discovered that
the best overall
product for pain relief was actually a
combination of THC
and cannabidiol.
And that's actually what I wanted to say
cuz we have patients involved in this
analysis as well. And this is more than
opioids?
Oh much more. Much more than twice twice
twice as good as opioid. Is that though
just based on the danger of opioids or
is there actually
sort of close proximity to pain
management as well.
Bit of both. So, that combination of CBD
and THC, so you're looking at maybe, you
know, 10 to 20 30 mg of CBD and 5 to 10
mg of THC, that produces pain relief
which is actually greater
than that of opioids in in chronic pain,
not acute pain, not not surgical pain,
but with people with chronic pain,
opioids aren't very good in chronic
pain.
Cuz you get tolerance
and
Can you Can you differentiate between
the two types of pain at a nerve level?
Like can Could I look at a scan of some
kind and say, "Oh, this is acute pain or
this is chronic pain?"
Um
That's not
yet possible, but what is clear that
chronic pain When pain starts, you know,
you break your leg You have your leg
amputated and
you get run over by a truck, your leg
gets crushed.
Right? It's a lot of pain. Opiates good
for that.
You cut the leg The leg gets destroyed,
you cut the leg off, you amputate. What
happens then? Eventually, the pain
starts to recite itself in the brain.
So, this chronic neuropathic pain
becomes a brain disorder rather than a
a what do you call it? A traditional
pain disorder from the nerve endings in
the periphery. And when it gets embedded
in the brain, opiates don't work
particularly well
cuz they tend to work at the level of
the spinal cord.
But but cannabinoids work pretty well.
They work as pretty much as well as the
antidepressants
and the gabapentinoids. And and they're
also better than um
the opioids. But they have quite a high
side effect burden, whereas cannabidiol
THC is it came out higher on our scores
because it's very well tolerated as well
as very effective.
Well, that's really interesting. So,
does that tie back to what you were
saying at the beginning where you get
this quieting of the nerve signal when
you're um taking in I guess it's both
THC and CBD, but is that the mechanism
that you suspect is at work?
I think that's the mechanism at work for
the THC.
We're still it's still a bit of a
mystery why cannabidiol helps there. I
think it it might simply be that it
makes the THC
more focused in its action, so it takes
away some of the unwanted effects of
THC. It may have an effect like so. It's
almost I mean there's almost zero almost
zero research on the brain effects of
cannabidiol.
It's really interesting. So, you had a
conversation with Peter Attia that I
liked very much and one of the things
that Peter brought up that you said
really resonated with you is this idea
that
if you're taking a drug and you have to
like take it forever to keep getting the
benefits, that's less ideal than
something that you take and it actually
creates a long-lasting change. What
Peter called it changes your trait. So,
I have these obsessive thoughts. I'm
having to intake
marijuana to keep it at bay to make it
manageable,
but are there things that I can do in
certain circumstances like psychedelics
where I might be able to completely
disrupt that pattern?
Well, that's what we believe and in fact
we're doing a study now of
of psilocybin in chronic pain trying to
see if we can
as you suggest break down those
repetitive thinking processes which have
become over learned and
and so you can see pain as a thinking
habit in the same way as twisting your
hair or picking your nails as a motor
habit, yeah. And that study is about to
start, so
in a couple of years we'll be able to
answer your question.
Hello my friend. You know that I believe
success requires you to see failure as
the ultimate learning tool. Success
requires you to be disciplined and
gritty and to never ever quit on your
dreams. I say all of that because one
thing is certain, the road to achieving
your goal is not smooth or linear. I
wish it was, but it's not. It's going to
be bumpy, sometimes scary. Some days
you'll take two steps forward and slide
10 steps back. And that's why success
also requires you to know how to pull
yourself out of a rut and get unstuck
fast. Life is short. You can't be
messing around with your goals. You've
got to make progress every single day.
So, I've pulled a class from Impact
Theory University called How to Get
Unstuck, which you can watch for free
with the link on your screen or by
clicking below. When you join me for
that free preview of that workshop from
Impact Theory University, I'm going to
teach you my strategy for how to
understand exactly where you need to be
going, how to identify the obstacle
that's blocking you, and the best way to
make the most progress towards that
goal, and keep your momentum. All right,
click that link and let's get to work.
All right, I'll see you on the inside.
Uh psychedelics,
as we talked about earlier, are turning
things off, not on.
Do we have insight into what exactly it
is that they're turning off that creates
this It's like we're seeing things that
we would have seen maybe as a child, an
an infant, and it's sort of bringing us
back to a more primal I don't think you
ever use that word, but what what are we
shutting off?
So,
yes, it's
the way the brain works
is uh to create hypotheses.
Well, if let's take the example of
vision, cuz that's the easiest one to
explain. Your brain is not a camera.
You're looking at me now, but you're not
your brain isn't taking photos of me.
What your brain is doing is analyzing
the lights that's coming from from me
into your eye or from your from your
computer into your eye.
And then it's turning that those
different light signatures into
electrical impulses. Electrical impulses
are then going into your
back of your brain, the visual cortex,
which is a large chunk of brain, as you
know, it's like a bigger than an orange.
And it's going to different parts of
those cuz different parts of your brain
deal with different parts of the vision
visual system. And and then over over
period of multiple layers of analysis,
you you go from between the very primary
electrical impulses to you start your
brain start to construct multiple levels
what it ends up being an image that you
see.
And
when you're a baby,
it's all buzzing and and complicated and
your brain isn't very good at making
hypotheses cuz it's never made any
before. It hasn't met things. But as you
as you start to grow up, you start to
make these
ideas that something out there, you
know, there's your mother, there's a
chair. So you might see a chair
you know, you something sticking out,
you know, a wooden thing. And then you
might touch it and discover it that oh,
that's right, that's a solid thing. And
then your brain learns
okay, what I thought was there is there.
And that process of gradually creating a
whole series of estimates of the world
and then testing them and retesting them
and is actually why the brain is the
most efficient computer ever known. It's
10 times more efficient at computing
things than the best computers we have
today because cuz it it's much cleverer.
It makes these estimates and when it's
worked out what something is, it doesn't
bother to re-update them.
It doesn't bother to spend energy
repeating it. It just knows it's there
and carries on.
Now, when you take that process of
building up requires interactions in the
visual system,
probably 10 billion neurons are working
to make a visual image. When you give a
psychedelic, the neurons in the brain
the visual system which connect the
color center to the movement center to
the darkness center
to the shape center to make an image.
Those neurons are disturbed by the
psychedelic
and don't exactly know why they got so
many receptors for psychedelics, but
they do have. And and and that when you
disturb those neurons, you can't
reconstruct the full image. So what you
see
as these
Christmas tree lights, these what we
call elemental hallucinations under
psychedelics. You're actually seeing the
very early first stage processes of
visual reconstruction when the impulses
from the eye first get into the visual
cortex. We know from physiological
experiments in in in in frogs for
instance that
the way the brain works is to construct
simple shapes, squares, circles, spider
webs.
Simple colors and it puts them together.
So
one of the most remarkable things about
psychedelics are putting you back to
seeing what
what you used to see when you're a very
very young baby before
your brain learned to make the these
simple images into much more complicated
ones. And I find that really kind of
appealing because it's
You obviously can't remember seeing them
as children because you didn't have the
memory system, but now you can you can
infer what what it's like to to start
seeing things afresh.
That's really intriguing. So I've never
done Well, so I've microdosed
psilocybin, but always micro, so I've
never had any hallucinations or
anything.
But my understanding from hearing people
talk about it is
that they will see and sometimes
interact with like a dragon or a flower
comes to life. And so it isn't, at least
as they've related to me, it isn't just
like sort of shapes and things like
that. It does seem like they're putting
something on it.
Um
and I don't know how much you get into,
you know, the collective unconscious or,
you know, how many Like, are those
things that we just are carrying with
us, or it's an overlay? There's some
sort of reversion to
what you how you would see as an infant
just getting sight for the first time,
but there's also this sort of layer of
abstract meaning that's laid over it.
Like, what's that interaction like? A
really important question. So, yes, so
there's much more to a psychedelic trip
than just seeing Christmas tree lights.
I mean, they're pleasant, but there's
And And but people often see much, much
more complicated kinds of imagery. And
also they have a low whole range of
other experiences, like that their body
might dissolve, and they might go to
heaven, and you know,
go into another universe, or different
dimensions. Or actually, we don't
understand why some people have
different kinds of
of content.
I think we do understand that the
that the
the change from normal consciousness to
to psychedelic consciousness does
involve perturbations across the whole
of the brain.
Our imaging studies, particularly with
LSD, show that the powerful, really
complicated, rich, dream-like
hallucination, visual hallucinations,
and often beliefs that people have under
LSD when their eyes closed, they're due
to the brain becoming hyperconnected.
So, normally, the visual system is just
embedded in the visual system.
But under psychedelics, because
you break down the default mode network,
the visual system can then connect
everywhere in the brain. And that
contributes to things like synesthesia,
where, you know, you might, you know,
see sounds, or It's already connected,
right? It's not like the connections
happen during the trip, but there's a
the inhibition is shut down, and so now
they can actually communicate. Exactly.
The whole point
human brain development
But why do Why do we have a brain
after, you know, several billion years
of evolution? It's it's come from a food
targeting process. It wants to get out
get you out there and get food. And of
course, the second main role of the
brain is to find mates so you can
reproduce. Okay?
Uh
now everything else on top of that is
kind of incidental cuz the brain you
know the brain really just wants to make
sure there's another brain in the next
baby. So you get big enough to have
reproduce have a baby. Right? So the
brain it's become really efficient
at doing the things it needs to do.
Uh and and that's the problem. The
default mode
in in many ways creates that efficiency.
But it also because it it distorts
it and it it limits the capacity of for
many people to do other things. I mean
there are people who don't there are
people you know who do have spontaneous
visions. There are artists who see the
world in a very different way and
and can create you know completely new
ways of thinking. But for most of us the
brain is a pretty boring it creates a
pretty warm world because it's that's
the most efficient thing to do. Just do
the same old thing and then pass it on
to the next generation. And psychedelics
break down those habitual processes
which limit our vision and limit our
vision in the sense of opportunity
rather than just seeing things.
That's a really intriguing way to think
about psychedelics that it's
one the connectivity and I saw an image
that you um put up where it's like
here's what you know the normal level of
connection or communication maybe is a
better way to say it. The normal level
of communication and then here and it
was like all these extra um lines of
communication. This is what it looks
like during psychedelics.
And
as somebody who and this is your your
really intriguing uh me around trying
psychedelics because I consider myself
just obsessed with hyper efficiency. And
something has changed in me as I've
gotten older. And
I do wonder
if in getting more and more and more
efficient, if I'm not narrowing
something wonderful out of existence.
And so, yeah, that's that's a very
intriguing idea. That was originally why
I microdosed was I had heard that
microdosing makes you feel more
creative. And so, I just I wanted to try
anything that was going to make me feel
more creative. Tried it, nothing. Tried
marijuana, nothing. They don't make me
feel more creative. Um marijuana does
shut down my default mode network. I
think that's a perfect way of explaining
it. But um I don't feel increased
connections. Now, the only thing that I
do feel like does that is meditation. I
refer to that state as calm and
creative, where I feel like weird areas
of my brain that don't normally talk
start talking.
Well, exactly. I mean, that
A week after we published our first the
first paper on the altered state of
psilocybin consciousness,
a group from Yale, uh Jed Brewer's group
from Yale, wrote to us and said, "Look,
that's just what happens when people go
into transcendental meditation. They
switch off the default
We thought, "Wow, that is truly
remarkable." The difference is, of
course, you know, it is quite hard, you
know, you've got to get a lot of
practice to switch off that uh is it to
get into a transcendental state with
meditation. But if you do, you're
actually pretty close to that the same
state as on psychedelics. You are you're
you're you're disabling, and that's what
you're trying to do in meditation,
you're trying to disable that inner
mind, the default mode network, you're
trying to disable it
to allow you to think differently,
because it doesn't want you to think
differently. It just wants you to go to
work and get up and have break- you know
what I mean?
And you've got you've got to fight with
it to disable it with meditation, and
psychedelics do it a bit more easily.
It's really, really interesting. Talk to
me about safety. So, you rank drugs by
order of safety.
Anybody listening to this conversation
could probably um
take away that, you know, we don't think
there's any danger in all of this. Is
there danger in this? Is there danger in
marijuana? Is there danger in
psychedelics? Um yeah, how worried
should people be?
Well, there's danger in all drugs. When
we look at the deaths from drugs
in your country, in my country, tobacco,
cigarettes are way at the top of the
list
followed by alcohol
and then then followed by opiates.
And at the very bottom of the list are
psychedelics.
And and so forth.
takes into account like the totality.
So, I would In fact, I'm I'm curious
if
you had the same number of people
smoking, the same number cigarettes, the
same number of people smoking marijuana,
the same number of people doing opiates,
like then does it does it still come out
the same or are there some that are just
way more deadly? Like is marijuana 10
times more deadly or is just way fewer
people smoke it? No, no, no, no. Well,
it's the other way around. Fentanyl is
10 times more deadly. In terms of harm
from the drug to the user
fentanyl
other strong opiates like heroin
crystal meth
they are the drugs that kill the
individual.
Uh
lower down alcohol, tobacco
and at the very bottom drugs like magic
mushrooms like LSD, smoke MDMA they have
much lower rates of harm to the
individual. Now, cannabis is a bit
between the two. Cannabis is less
harmful than tobacco but more harmful
than psychedelics.
And and that's really because people
tend to use cannabis much more than use
psychedelics. Most people don't use
psychedelics more than a few times in
their life. And if you try to use it a
lot, you get tolerance so it doesn't
work.
And so it's it's no point. Whereas a lot
of people who use cannabis do use it
maybe for 10 or 20 or 30 years. And the
more you use a drug, the more chance
there is of it causing harm. And what is
the mechanism of harm for a cannabis?
So, very few deaths. Okay, I mean,
older men with cardiovascular heart
disease, hypertension, it does put your
blood pressure up. You know, and they
get, you know, you can see that with the
red eyes. So, there are people, you
know, who occasionally get very stoned
and then a heart attack or heart attack.
They might have had a heart attack
anyway, but it's not good for people
with heart disease. Um
Uh um that's the main harm. But, then
the other harms as in terms of dying, in
terms of other harms, there's
dependence. If you get dependent, well,
it can be um really quite upsetting and
quite disabling to your life. So, over
the last 10 years, we've done an
an enormous imaging study. We've studied
uh
over a hundred people with opiate and
cocaine addiction and alcohol addiction.
And and compared their brains to with
people who haven't had such an
addiction.
And before we started, my researcher
said, "Well, what are we going to do
about cannabis?" Cuz everyone smokes
cannabis. What happens if they smoke
cannabis? And I said, "Well, what we're
going to do is we're going to divide the
group, the drug-using group up into
those who use cannabis and those who
don't. Cuz if you get rid of cannabis
users, you have the number."
And I'm I said, "I'm going to bet you
that the cannabis users have better
brains than the non-cannabis users."
And I was right. Interesting. Cannabis
use is associated
bet that?
Well, because cannabis is an adaptogen.
Cannabis is an anticonvulsant. Cannabis
is possibly neuroprotective against
brain trauma. I bet it I bet that
because I it just seemed to me that
from what I knew about cannabis 10 years
ago, it was likely to be probably
neuroprotective. And what was the the
mechanic that you used to judge that?
How how did we say it's healthier?
Brain volume.
Brain volume. Brain volume.
So alcoholics shrink their the brain
alcoholics brain shrinks
as a result of the toxicity of alcohol
and cannabis protects against that.
But since then
Why then is weed known for like oh
you're you forget it's bad for your
memory?
Is that just a cliche that isn't true or
is there something there? No no of
course it's there's truth in that if
you're stoned all the time yeah you
you're intoxicated in terms of alcohol
you're intoxicated all the time it it
will impair memory it will impair but it
doesn't produce an enduring damage to
the brain like alcohol and alcohol is
the only brain the only drug you can say
on a x-ray look that's for a CT scan or
a MRI scan
that's the that's a damaged brain.
Even even in a
cocaine and crystal don't damage the
brain the same way alcohol does. Whoa.
It's recent study out of Harvard and
School of Public Health they looked at
people who drink alcohol and with or
without cannabis
and they looked at
liver cirrhosis.
The people who use both have much much
lower rates of cirrhosis of the liver
than the people who just use alcohol.
And they're now doing trials it may be
that cannabis can protect or treat
alcoholic liver cirrhosis it may be an
adaptogen in the liver.
Okay that's
this is where it starts to just seem too
good to be true. So if and I know that
it hasn't been studied so you're going
to be guessing here but when we think of
it being an adaptogen in the liver what
I know about cirrhosis and maybe I'm
just wrong but that it's scarring. So
I'm curious as to what your guess would
be on the so we understand the in
inhibition where
cannabis is going to trigger the release
of a signaling molecule that's going to
tell the nerve to stop firing
but
if we're
punishing our liver by drinking too much
alcohol we're running so much toxins
through it that it begins to scar.
What mechanism would
the cannabis be using to protect? That's
so confusing.
Cirrhosis is caused by
uh the production of what are called
free radicals
from the breakdown of alcohol.
And
um cannabis, particularly cannabidiol,
soaks up free radicals. It's
anti-inflammatory.
Wow.
Man, okay. So, we You said at the top of
the thing that we should have been
looking at this stuff all along and that
we've missed a lot of insights.
Make some predictions for me, knowing
full well that you're a scientist and so
these are hypotheses and you're more
than happy to see them disproven. Um but
where do you think like as we spend,
let's say, the next decade really
looking at this stuff,
what are we going to find?
Well, we're going to find that medical
cannabis is uh
the preferred treatment for chronic
pain,
for quite a few forms of anxiety,
for people whose PTSD hasn't been
remedied by MDMA or or psychedelics,
for people with chronic inflammatory gut
disease like Crohn's disease, ulcerative
colitis. A lot of people are using it
and getting benefits there.
We're probably going to find it's also
got enormous utility in some cancers.
One of the most horrible
aspects of the of the um
bans on cannabis was that there was a
systematic attempt to stop the
publication of papers showing that
cannabis had anti-cancer ability.
ability. Back in 19, I think back in
1978,
the most senior lung physician in
America
had a study which showed that cannabis
smoking had less lung cancer than the
normal population. What?
because the I was literally going to ask
you about
lung cancer.
But didn't you say that it it seems to
have, I mean if I'm inferring correctly
from what you said, that it would be
protective, not curative, but protective
in some way in that you if you are
smoking cannabis, you fall into a cohort
of people who are less likely, could be
correlation, but are less likely to have
lung cancer. Is that true? Yeah, that
was that was that was the
the that was the epidemiological data.
It's never been trialed as a as a
protective thing. But what we say and
what I say in Britain, in Britain most
people who smoke cannabis
smoke it with tobacco. I say don't do
that. Do what the Americans do and smoke
it neat, but it's it's harder for us to
get neat cannabis here because it's
illegal. So we you know, so but
the it's to my mind it's none of this is
surprising given what we know
subsequently. We didn't know then, but
what we know now about the the ability
of
of cannabidiol etc. to have this this
anti-inflammatory and and possibly
anti-cancer properties.
It needs to be tested. We need to be
doing lots of studies, but we're not
because it's a plant product and it
doesn't fit into the current model of
pharmaceutical drug development.
Wow.
Well, David, you've certainly piqued my
curiosity on this and make me want to
learn even more about it. Your book was
phenomenal. Where can people find out
more about you, about your
nonprofit? Yeah, what should they do to
engage?
So the best thing is to just go on to
the website and look up
drugscience.org.uk and then you'll see
my charity. You'll see all
all the publications there's there's
lots of publications about cannabis. All
I've talked about now in terms of our
research is on there for free. There's
slide sets, there's podcasts of me
talking about this.
Yeah, and then become a follower because
drug science is
you know, we we tell the truth about
drugs and a very very few other places
you can get that kind of truth.
Amazing. Man, thank you so much for
joining me today. This was a lot of fun.
Guys, check it out. This is really
intriguing. Our brains are neurochemical
processing plants. So, once you
understand that you're dealing with
chemistry all the time,
uh not that I'm a huge proponent of
exogenous chemicals, but there might be
enough research coming out in the near
future to warrant some further
exploration. So, check it out. Speaking
of further exploration, if you haven't
already, be sure to subscribe. And until
next time, my friends, be legendary.
Take care. Peace.