The FUTURE of Investing and How You Capitalize on The Current Financial REVOLUTION | Richard Craib
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
Richard Craib argues that the traditional financial system is fundamentally broken, characterized by excessive regulation and high barriers to entry that prevent young people from launching new banks or hedge funds. He posits that this regulatory environment creates a "class of compliance people" who maintain power simply because it is difficult for newcomers to challenge them, leading to significant friction between generations in an information technology economy where knowledge should theoretically allow the next generation to surpass the old guard. This tension has fueled the rise of decentralized finance and cryptocurrency as powerful alternatives that democratize access to capital without intermediaries. Craib highlights how regulations like accredited investor status artificially exclude capable individuals from investing, creating a system designed for isolation rather than opportunity, whereas crypto offers transparency through on-chain transactions and allows users to truly own their digital assets without fear of censorship or arbitrary shutdowns by centralized entities. The conversation delves into the mechanics of traditional finance versus decentralized alternatives, specifically addressing short selling and options trading as complex instruments that often function more like gambling for the average participant than efficient market tools. Craib explains how derivatives work but contrasts this with the simplicity of crypto assets, noting that while financial jargon creates a barrier to entry, blockchain technology allows anyone to build valuable infrastructure without needing permission from gatekeepers. He cites the GameStop saga as a prime example of distributed intelligence outperforming institutional hedge funds; when retail investors on platforms like Reddit coordinated to buy shares in shorted stocks, they forced institutions into costly cover trades that amplified losses for quantitative firms and disrupted market stability. This event demonstrated that crowd validation can challenge established power structures, though Craib acknowledges the risks involved with such volatility while maintaining that true ownership of assets is a profound shift away from being "slaves to a system." Craib also emphasizes the importance of mathematical literacy as a tool for understanding first principles rather than just memorizing formulas. He distinguishes between standard high school arithmetic and real mathematics, which involves constructing proofs—logical steps that lead to universal truths like Pythagoras's theorem or $E=mc^2$. In this context, he advocates for learning proof-based math because it teaches individuals how to think rigorously about what is true versus what is merely propaganda or temporary opinion. This mindset is crucial in the crypto space where understanding encryption proofs helps users distinguish between a hacked website and the immutable security of the Bitcoin protocol itself. By grasping these fundamental concepts, individuals can navigate financial innovations without relying on intermediaries who may not have their best interests at heart, fostering a culture of self-reliance and critical thinking essential for the future economy. Looking toward the future, Craib suggests that success in business and finance will increasingly depend on tying community validation to product value, a concept he calls "crowd validating." He outlines his own studio's approach where ideas are tested through fan fiction before moving to comics or animation, ensuring resources are only spent on concepts with proven audience interest. This methodology mirrors the way crypto communities build projects that cannot be easily taken down because they rely on decentralized networks rather than a single point of failure. However, he warns that this transition is happening rapidly and may decimate businesses unable to switch from extracting value to giving it back to their users. The inevitable future involves an unstoppable shift toward immutable technologies where ownership is permanent, but those who fail to adapt or understand the underlying mechanics will be left behind in a landscape dominated by new forms of capital creation that challenge old paradigms.
Read the full video transcript
Richard Craib, welcome to the show.
Good to meet you.
Dude, I'm really excited to have a
conversation about something that I've
been trying to grapple with since the
pandemic kicked off.
I trained myself to be good at making
money, but never really understanding
investing money, and um
have watched the frustration build with
people that feel that they're working
inside of a broken system,
and couldn't really understand like what
they were struggling with. And now, once
the pandemic hit and I began to see that
I needed to look more closely at
investing and all of that and what was
going to happen to the world financial
markets, I started to be unpleasantly
startled by the things that I was
finding in terms of how it's structured.
And as a person that I would say is the
future of finance and the way that
you're approaching things with Numerai
absolutely fascinating.
Talk to me a little bit about what is
the structure of finance?
Well, it's for sure broken. I mean, and
that's why there's so much energy and
new ideas around finance.
I mean,
one thing
I always ask people is like, "What are
What are young people doing?" And uh
young people today, you don't like meet
someone out of college who says, "Um my
idea is I'm going to start a new bank."
Or a new hedge fund even.
Um and the reason is the barriers to
entry are so crazy. Uh and it's
basically like controlled by
uh
by regulation. And the regulation sounds
nice at first.
Because it's designed to protect people
theoretically.
know, we all need protection. Um and
then
it creates like this crazy class of like
um
compliance uh people are sort of
required to to do to do anything. So, I
I can't imagine what it would be like
for us sort of a 25-year-old to apply
for like a banking license or something
like that. But, it's But, the sad thing
is got so so bad that it it's not even
in anyone's of It's not even in anyone's
affordance to even have the idea
uh to do anything about it or try to
change it. And um
and that's where crypto is powerful and
things like Numerai are powerful
uh because it's it's somehow
making it possible for people to be
involved in the financial system.
So, I
have this thesis that I'm working on.
I'll be very interested to hear what you
think. So,
I hear this idea that basically there's
all this tension happening between the
generations and the reason that the
tension is happening is because the old
guard is refusing to pass the baton to
the new guard, but that doesn't strike
me as the way that human nature works.
And I think that people cling to power
for every conceivable second. You have
to pry it out of their cold, dead
fingers.
And
I think that historically what happened
was youth and vigor, like so much of the
economy was generated around being able
to
um have a higher degree of stamina, do
physically demanding jobs, and therefore
the next generation was just able to
beat the old generation on that.
And now, as we go into an information
technology economy, what you see
happening is it's easy to get ahead of
people because you understand the game
better. And you can either do political
moves, or you can just be more
knowledgeable, and so that allows you to
hold on to power longer, and so that
creates all this friction uh between the
generations. And now,
what we're seeing is what I call [ __ ]
the man energy. And so, we're getting
this energy. You saw people with um
Occupy Wall Street.
But then, Satoshi writes a white paper.
And people that have been watching me
for the last like 6 months have heard me
say like this idea over and over, but
this is really interesting to me. So,
Satoshi writes this white paper and
creates
digital value out of thin air.
And people buy into this, and it creates
this decentralized, democratized way to
go about
money, and it's now starting to spill
over into other areas.
But, help me understand one, is it just
regulation? Is that the only problem
that makes this [ __ ] the man energy so
strong?
And what is it about decentralization
that seems to be the cure to whatever
the ill is?
Yeah, it does seem like the
a lot of the energy in crypto kind of
couldn't maybe wouldn't be that if there
were if it just were incredibly easy to
do normal business.
Um so, if it was if it was extremely
common for young people to start new
banks or um
or just people to IPO companies, uh even
that's like kind of weirdly rare. Um
if all that was a little bit more
possible, then it would be hard to
imagine the world of crypto developing
with so much energy. So, I do think it's
definitely related to to regulation.
Um
it's also like a kind of
I think there's something going on with
like technological literacy as well, uh
where you you there's the way that the
finance people uh talk about things like
exchanges, um it's like there's a lot of
jargon. You you you don't understand it.
Um you could never you could never build
something like this. We're much we're
much smarter than you kind of thing.
When actually, it's like 100 lines of
code uh to write Uniswap, um and you can
have digital assets being traded in a
decentralized way with no intermediaries
at all. Um and so, there's something
about it where it's like
it's like people are realizing
how bad it is and how uh easy to to
rebuild um
the whole the whole financial
infrastructure is
just with a just with new technologies.
And that's the sad thing. It's like when
you're growing up, you kind of think I
remember growing up and watching the
internet entrepreneurs uh doing amazing
things. And I always thought, well, when
I grow up, I'm going to use the latest
technology to do amazing things as well.
And somehow it's it's a little bit gray
area to be using blockchain or even AI
or kind of any
Gray area from uh regulation
From a regulate Yeah,
you don't know um
what what the US is thinking about uh
cryptocurrencies
and uh
and any new systems that challenge old
systems. And so it's like super okay to
build a social network
uh in 2006. But
even if you can write a new
stock exchange or a new bank or a new
type of hedge fund, even if you can do
it
and you have done it
uh
it's weirdly not
it's like not uh stuff like acceptable
yet. You don't know whether the
government's going to be like, "Wow,
yeah, we want all this wealth to be
captured by the United States."
You know? Or are we just going to ban
it? And people like me came here from I
came from South Africa
to be, you know, try to be like uh
an Elon Musk of hedge funds or something
like that, right? And I will I thought
this would be the place would be
definitely uh
very very pro-technology, but weird
things are happening in the culture
where it's it's not and I think it's
bad.
Yeah. Uh
tell me more about that because so I
never expected to do a single interview
where the words um
culture war were put together. Like just
did not think that that would be
something I would ever get involved in.
Not the the thing I want to focus on.
Like, I'm about the individual. How do
you empower an individual person
regardless of where they were born,
color, creed, nationality, nothing. To
me, none of that [ __ ] should matter.
It's like, can you add value to the
world? And if you can, you should be
richly rewarded.
And
now I find myself where the ideas seem
self-defeating to the very people that
are promulgating a lot of the ideas. So,
what do you see as going wrong? As
somebody who could look at America one
way when you were younger, and now that
you're in the thick of it, think, "Ooh,
maybe some of these ideas aren't as
useful as people are hoping." What is
broken in the parsing of that data?
It's something like a uh a desire for
like a static society. They don't
necessarily want uh innovation in
Because it leads to uneven outcomes?
It's
It could be that, but it's also just uh
if you're if you're
if you're older, it's also annoying.
Uh
Change.
to have things change. Um and uh and
have to learn a brand new technology or
something. So, I think there's something
like it's and it's like it's fine if if
if all you're doing is um
kind of a joke. That's why I think it
kind of like NFTs are interesting
because it's like it's like a joke, and
and so it's like it's like can't be
illegal cuz it's just art. And so, the
same people who I think So, I have a
friend who um created an NFT project,
and he's like got a computer science
degree, really good at machine learning,
and like
he decided to make
NFTs um
out of college. And it's like
on the one hand, that's cool, sort of,
cuz it's like a protest art thing,
maybe. But on the other hand, it's also
like
is that the only thing not banned?
Like if you can't sell shares in your in
your futuristic new bank or hedge fund
or something on the blockchain, but you
can sell pictures of uh cats or
something.
So we just did a big NFT drop and dude,
the number of hours that I had to spend
with attorneys trying to figure out
like, "Hey, I want to make sure that I
can keep supporting this thing, that the
SEC's not going to come after me."
Yeah.
Of course, the the first words out of
their mouth are like, "Hey, this is just
a big question mark."
Yeah.
Some of the attorneys are like, "You
shouldn't do it. There's questions and
so our job is to CYA and so just, you
know, don't." And then other people, you
know, were far more thoughtful in their
guidance, but it is So the thing that
winds me up about the system now that
I'm like really looking at it. So the
old system worked very well for me,
right? I generated a tremendous amount
of wealth.
So while I was doing that,
I
it seemed like everything was working
perfectly. But then once I had wealth
and I was like, "Oh, I want to do
something with this." And then I needed
to look at the way the system is made
for somebody who isn't an entrepreneur,
which is the vast majority of humanity,
then I started to just be dizzy and it
started with accredited
investor regulations. And I was like,
"Wait a second. I am the dumbest
investor of all time,
but now because I have over a million
dollars in liquid net worth, I can
invest like it was so strange to me that
the value of an idea or a company or
whatever is captured long before an IPO.
And it's now captured by VCs or, you
know, who accredited investors. And so I
remember the day that I learned about
it. I forget who told me, but I was
like, "Why aren't people rioting in the
streets over this? Like this is crazy."
And
that's crazy to me. And so to your point
about NFTs,
how do we get How do we deal with that?
What's like the path forward?
Well, I mean, it's it's so obviously bad
that and then and I one thing that's
kind of interesting, I think, is I I do
think there's quite a lot of research
coming out on
like um
marginalized groups, let's say,
traditionally considered marginalized
people are actually much more likely to
be involved in cryptocurrency.
Mhm.
Um and uh any of these new things
because in some ways the other stuff is
clearly not available to them. So, you
could have two friends and um
uh they can't invest in each other's
companies. Uh and it's like crazy.
It's so crazy and I I actually didn't
know about that law, either. I thought
America was like clearly, you know, the
place to be for capitalism. And I met a
young guy who was like 23 or something
and he wanted to invest in my company
and uh he wasn't accredited. And he was
super smart, knew exactly what he was
doing, but he couldn't
invest and he had to yeah, kind of
figure out other ways to be involved. Um
but that's so how could you make how
could that any anyone think that was a
smart law to pass? And it's very much in
the in this framing of like protection.
Like how can we protect people from
themselves? Um and that's the opposite
of the American value of like individual
responsibility and being able to pursue
whatever dreams you want to pursue.
Going back to my um question about like
what do we think is broken in the
culture? That to me is a big part of
this is I love the energy of wanting to
protect people and making sure that
they're safe and you know, that there's
like in in business, number one rule is
avoid a mortality event, right? So, you
have to learn to hedge your downside.
So, I'm going to try this thing and if
it works, we've got upside, but if it
doesn't work, I've got a way to make
sure that this isn't a catastrophic
moment. So, I get that. Like I
I can put on my um you know, my hat of
giving them the benefit of the doubt,
but at some point you have to look at
what is the result of that system and if
you're looking at the result of that
system becomes pretty apparent that
you've made things so hard that it's
only people that can cross this
incredibly insane threshold that are
going to be able to take advantage of it
and so that is where this starts to
really get wonky. Um
but now if we take that
hat off and we put on a cynical hat for
a second it really starts to be
outrageous of you created the ultimate
game to isolate people that don't know
how to play that game and then it
creates this sense of overwhelm which
shuts people down and then they don't
engage. Um and so when the crisis the
COVID crisis kicked off whatever we're
filming this like 18 19 months into it
I started having like some of the
biggest brains in finance on
and I I didn't know how to do those
interviews to be helpful cuz I was
trying to help the average person.
And I just could not get them to
articulate like how do you
you don't want to put the average person
in position where they have to
understand what's going on in China and
trade wars and stuff like that to be
able to make a decision. Um
how do you think of that like as you
look at all right we have we're wearing
our cynical hats for a second we have
this system that seems designed to
isolate the average person.
It is an incredibly complex system.
I think that there is an answer that was
presented
which I'll give my answer once you've
had a chance to speak but
how do we help people
in this new era navigate that without
having to just tear down the old system.
Well it is
it's I mean I don't know I mean I so
Numerai we have a hedge fund and it's
it's kind of um obviously you have to be
an accredited investor to invest. So,
anything I'm working on
probably not for the normal person, but
it's not for lack of trying. It's just
the way it is. So, I mean
I but I do think that they are I mean
there are more people a lot of people
involved in the stock market through
things like Robinhood and and ETFs and
and things like that. So, I don't think
like
in some ways there is more access than
ever, but then there's always like this
underbelly story, which is like well,
Robinhood's selling the order flow
uh to Citadel Securities, and they they
have this
uh huge entity that's kind of like done
all this regulatory capture and
stuff. But like so, it's every That's
what's sad. It's like every story you
hear was like about financial inclusion
is like something in the background that
isn't that's like the dark side of it.
But then, when it comes to crypto, it's
kind of like weirdly public. You know,
it's like there's every everything is on
chain. Uh you can see all the
transactions. You kind of you kind of
know what you're getting into. And then,
when you have applications like
decentralized applications, you know
that there are no intermediaries. And
and so, there's something compelling
about that uh to for the normal person.
However,
it's sad that many of those things can't
be what are considered securities. So,
you can't say I'm going to make a
company
and my company's going to be on the
blockchain, and we're going to turn
we're going to make a thousand shares
and
sell the shares to people to fund the
business. Uh that is like completely
illegal.
Um and so, people are doing things where
they almost are told they're not allowed
to make their blockchain projects
valuable.
If if if if it makes return,
really bad.
Uh and if you tell people it might go
up,
really bad.
Uh
and that seems strange that you're kind
of pushing this energy into more and
more um
things that aren't securities. It's It's
like it would be better if um
some of these things could uh be more
valuable or could have an open uh
like they could do what they wanted to
do.
Um
so it's uh
it's very hard I would say it's very
hard for for people to to navigate. Um
and
I don't really have any personal
financial advice people.
That's very wise since I'm sure that
would get you in trouble. But I
It's another regulation.
Yeah, right. I think you actually though
have your finger on the answer. It's
interesting to me that you're doing it
within the sort of traditional hedge
fund world, but here is the my core
thesis. This I'm building literally
Impact Theory is built on one idea and
that idea is if you want to scale in
today's age, the fastest way to do it is
to crowd validate. So, I came onto this
idea which probably was self-evident to
people long before me, but it took me a
minute um because we're a studio. So,
we're trying to tell stories and in any
creative endeavor, you can expect a one
in 20 hit ratio.
And so, as I'm thinking through that,
I'm like, okay, we have to then start
with the most inexpensive way to bring
these ideas to the public.
And then in the inexpensive version, you
want to get the crowd to vote with their
attention essentially on what do they
like, what do they not like? And as they
validate that, then I spend more money.
So, the our value chain starts with what
we'll call fan fiction, so it's just
prose, right? Somebody's writing a story
and people are either responding to it
or not. It's often called light novels
because it's not like, you know, Nabokov
where, you know, it's like some really
deep [ __ ] It's fun stories. It's done
serialized, so you know, maybe you do a
few pages a week or whatever and people
just tune in and every week they know
they're going to get something. And so,
okay, cool. If that's popping off, then
you move it to a comic book. Then if the
comic book pops off, then maybe you do
short animation. If the short animation
pops off, then you pitch to Hollywood
and you do like the full-blown thing.
And so, you've got this trail of value
where you can point back and say, "Hey
Netflix, the reason you should get this
is look how many people read the weekly
thing. We've already got, you know,
100,000 people that read that every
week. The comic book has a million
people in it a week. Our Our animated
shorts, you know, have done hundreds of
millions of views. So, this is something
that you know people are going to be
interested to check out."
Now,
you're going to have to explain to
people exactly what Numerai does, but
the fact that you're essentially and I
don't know that you would use the word
crowd validate, but you're using this
intelligence of the crowd to create a
totally new paradigm for approaching the
market and
I think you've tapped into something
that is universal. It will work
everywhere. You just happen to be using
it for finance.
Exactly. I think you're
you're right. The that thesis is going
to be completely right. The this idea
that you could make kind of communities
and then those communities could have
huge impact over the long run because
they get bigger and bigger and bigger.
Like think about the Ethereum community
or something like that.
Um and and Numerai is trying to do that.
So,
basically
the trad finance uh
What's trad finance?
traditional
Got it. Got it. Got it.
is uh it's like you have
a lot of thousands of of really bright
people going into Wall Street and you
have thousands of sort of associated
paper pushing kind of like imaginary
[ __ ] jobs that uh
that, you know, we all know about. It's
kind of a whole fake system. Um but you
would think it would be it would be
worth it if if they were good at their
job. Um
but
it's like more like 80% of fund managers
actually underperform the market, don't
beat their benchmark,
and they charge huge fees, and they just
they just keep getting money because
they're it's a often an agency problem.
So, a big pension fund will say,
"Oh, yeah, you guys have a have a bunch
of our money." And the pension fund gets
to go to drinks with them, and and then
they slowly what lose money over time,
and and and the but they keep
entertaining the guests. It's the kind
of thing. And the pension the people who
are in the pension fund don't even know
where their their money is. So, they
don't have any agency to uh
stop that problem.
But um anyway, Numerai was uh the idea
was could we make a completely new kind
of hedge fund where uh
anyone could contribute
ideas to the hedge fund,
uh signals to the hedge fund. And the
hedge fund would combine them all
together and trade a really smart uh
model that had a lot more alpha than a
traditional fund. Um
So, people are basically giving you,
"Here's what I think is going to predict
the success of a given stock."
So, yes. Um but it's a little bit more
uh it's very quantitative. So, every
model that is submitted on Numerai is a
machine learning model.
And so, it's not really for everybody.
It's not like you got to tell us your
favorite stocks or something like that.
It's much more um complicated. So, we
give out a huge data set of thousands of
features and decades of financial data,
and all the data's completely
obfuscated, meaning no one knows what
the data even means. Like, if you looked
at our data, it's like millions of
numbers between zero and one.
That's it.
And you're supposed to do something with
that. And people can't do anything with
that data because they
can't they don't know what to do. It's
It's too vast.
It's too vast and there's too many um
features and they don't even know what
the features mean.
But a machine learning model can model
any data set.
Uh machine learning model
uh can look at patterns in any data,
right? And so
everyone is
downloading our data and using machine
learning models like neural networks or
uh tree-based models or any any anything
they want and
finding patterns in that data that no
one else has found before.
And submitting signals to us on 5,000
stocks in the world. And again, they
don't even know what stocks they're
predicting on. It's kind of complicated,
but it works. Um and they're predicting
on 5,000 global stocks and giving
Numerai a deep uh edge
over anything else that's been done
before because we have by far the most
models. Uh if you take a big hedge fund
like a
Renaissance or Bridgewater or Two Sigma,
the number of people who are actually
modeling data cuz they have a lot of
compliance people and all those kind of
things,
it's like a maybe a few hundred. And
Numerai already has uh
like about 4,000 models uh that
uh every week are submitted uh to power
our hedge fund.
Yeah, so this to me is incredibly
interesting. I don't understand though
and we'll we'll come back round to the
idea of just um
using the crowd validation, but
machine learning, why doesn't a machine
learn the same thing? Like why why do
all of these different models end up
adding more value? I don't understand
how machine learning works to be honest.
That's a good question. Um
it's a very good question. So actually,
if you think about one way to think
about machine learning is that it's like
fitting a line. So, fitting a curve. So,
if you have an XY scatter plot of data,
right? You can draw the line of best
fit, right? The linear regression. So,
uh would find the mapping between those
two variables
and find the line that fits the data the
best. So,
for for a linear model uh like that,
there is um
there's always a right answer. So, given
any scatter plot, if you computed the
line of best fit and I computed the line
of best fit, we would get the same
answer.
And
Numerai, what we're doing is there's not
just an X and a Y coordinate system,
there's the there's about 10,000
dimensions of the data.
And
uh and uh and you can um
anyone can model the data. So,
they can use any type of model. And so,
some
many what a neural network is is a
it's a non-linear model. So, it can
combine those features in all kinds of
ways.
And so, the more features we give out
and the longer the data sets, um
the more types of models could be
discovered.
And so, actually, many of our users are
finding things that are that are really
strange and might never be um
found by another hedge fund.
But, by having thousands of those
unusual, uncorrelated models, you can
create a very, very high Sharpe ratio,
which is like very high um
return per unit of standard deviation
uh in your returns.
So, that I can see if I'm I can
understand machine learning at a really
basic level. I'll give you the example
that I I saw a video of, I fell in love
with it, and just think this is so
extraordinary. And I use it as an
example of learning from your mistakes,
but now I want to actually understand
under the hood what's going on. So
there's a game called Break Through and
it's like an old Atari game and you've
got a paddle and a little ball and then
you've got these bricks at the top and
the idea is to break all the bricks as
quickly as you can basically. And when
the machine starts playing, the little
paddle is just wiggling like mad. It
clearly the machine doesn't even know
what it's supposed to do. So I don't
know if they told it get a high score
and so it's like, "Okay, like I know I
can move paddle." And so it moves paddle
randomly. The paddle finally ends up
accidentally colliding with the ball.
The ball then breaks something. Now the
machine's like, "Oh [ __ ] I see
how this is goes." And then now tries to
hit the ball and then it hits the ball
and it starts getting points. Then one
time it breaks through all the way on
one side and now the ball starts
bouncing automatically at the top and
and automatically killing everything at
the top and the paddle doesn't have to
do anything. So then the machine starts
to optimize for how quickly can I break
through one of the sides and get the
ball to do this auto bounce thing at the
top and break all the things. And so
what is the person doing to explain to
the machine like is it giving it an
incentive get a high score? Is it
telling it wiggle the paddle? Like what
does it do so that then the machine can
actually learn?
Great question and that's a great
example of machine learning. So
uh what's happening there is there are
features, right?
Uh what do I mean by features? Just like
the at any given state there's stuff to
know about the system. Uh and so you
know where the paddle is and you know uh
where the ball is maybe and based on the
pixels in the screen, those can generate
a bunch of features. And then you're
basically fitting a model to those
features
um
and learning from experience.
Are you teaching the machine that there
is a good state and a bad state or a
better state and a worse state?
In that particular game I think they did
give it the score, and they just said
optimize the score. And
uh and in a similar way,
how
sometimes these machine learning
algorithms can become so good, they have
almost like an alien intelligence. Uh
like the way it breaks the breaks up
into the top of the of break
breakthrough. Um
it uh and just sort of like starts it
just becomes like, "Whoa, you're like
perfect at this game."
And I my hope is that uh with Numerai,
the the longer we we go on,
the more alien and peculiar the types of
trades uh we make.
to reach into your mind and figure out
what you mean by alien, and I think it's
this, that there's no emotion.
There's no emotion, and there's it's
also unexpected. It's like it's like uh
a creativity um
that emerges. And it's like, "How Why
did you think to trade Tesla now?
Everybody doesn't like Tesla or
whatever." And then you're like, "Well,
I don't know why, but the models
have started to get really really
intelligent and do things where we're
like, "Whoa, that was a good trade."
This is so interesting. So, I'm going to
keep pushing on this. Um
all right. So, you're giving you're
telling the machine to look for states.
I'm guessing if we're Numerai, well,
you're going to tell me that you don't
know. I'm going to I'm going to say
things out loud. I get that there going
to be flaws in this. Uh if I'm trying to
come up with a Numerai signal, so I'm
saying, "Here's the thing that I think
will accurately predict what trade to
make when."
Um
that
I have to tell the machine that's
parsing that historical data, I have to
tell it that there are certain things to
value over other things.
One of those I'm guessing is return on
investment.
Yeah, exactly. That's your first guess
that you might want to tell it to
choose to make return. So, the the
target variable, the thing you're
optimizing for, is return.
And where this becomes alien is that I
think, "Ooh, actually don't optimize for
a return. Optimize for this." And it
happens to give me a bigger return.
Yes, in fact, we don't optimize for
return.
Uh it's much more complicated and you
Cuz on when the stock market, you're not
just trying to choose one stock and put
all your money in it and hope it goes
up.
You're trying to build portfolios.
And in fact, with Numerai's fund, we
don't really mind where the stocks go
as long as the portfolio
Meaning I don't care if they go up or
down.
Yeah.
Most people don't know what a hedge fund
is.
That's true.
Even So, I'm going to give you a
definition of hedge fund and you're
going to tell me how off I am.
Here's what I think. So, I try to make
sense of the word hedge. So,
that most people think of the stock
market is you choose the right stocks
that are going to go up. Whereas a hedge
fund is going to be able to go in either
direction because they're hedging
something. So, either if the stock
market is going down, you could hedge,
"No, I actually think it's going to go
up." Or if the stock market's going up,
you can hedge and say, "No, actually I
think it's going to go down." How close
am I?
That's correct. And yeah, most a a
market neutral hedge fund is kind of the
purest version of a hedge fund where
every
long position, every stock that's
bought, there's also a corresponding
short position.
How doesn't that just always equal zero?
It should. Uh yeah, that's what's cool.
Um
if you if you have lots of longs and
lots of shorts and you bought them
randomly
And all a long means is it's the the
value is going to go up and a short
means the value is going to go down.
Exactly.
Okay.
So, you've got longs, you've got shorts.
The expected value of that is 0%.
And And if you bought
the because the the basket of random
stocks you're buying have an expected
return of the market. So, it'll kind of
go up as much as the S&P if they're
probably got 500 random stocks.
And then the expected return of the
shorts are also are negative
uh the market. And so, together they
make a portfolio that shouldn't move.
And uh the
the trick is what if um you didn't
choose randomly
and you chose with intelligence? Maybe
you could have the risk of cash cuz it's
just if if it's not supposed to move,
you're taking the risk of cash. You're
not taking the risk of the market.
Um and
know what that means. You're taking the
risk of cash, not the market?
Yeah, so it means like if you have $100
and um in your account and you go long
$100 and short $100,
you haven't spent any money.
When you short a stock, you get money
for selling it even though you don't own
it.
Oh god, this gets so complicated. So,
I've I've Thankfully, I've walked
through this with my money manager and I
think she wanted to punch me in the
mouth because I was just like, "I don't
[ __ ] understand this." But now I have
a loose enough grasp. So, basically, if
I am betting, which you're probably
going to hate that term, but if I'm
betting that the stock market is going
to go down, there's somebody else who's
betting that
um
that it's going to go up. And so, people
are willing to buy
my position.
And there's like they're paying me to
guarantee me to buy it.
They are They are making a little deal
with a broker to borrow your stocks
uh for shorting.
And they can borrow your stocks. And
then once they've borrowed them, they
sell them.
And uh so they're selling something they
didn't they don't own, but they will
they will return your stock later when
uh you know, whenever you need it. Um
But somewhere in here we get into Wall
Street Bets and how you can really [ __ ]
people up with shorts and stuff. Um
maybe explain that why how does it end
up being dangerous? Because I still can
feel that my brain is confused, and I've
had this conversation like a dozen
times.
it is it is kind of confusing. So, yeah,
that's quite weird. Like if you have
$100 in your account, and you short $100
of stock, you get you will have $200 of
cash.
In theory or in reality?
Yeah.
How?
But you'll
because you you borrowed stock from
somebody. You just said, "Hey, can I
borrow some stock?" And they're like,
"Sure. We'll give You have to pay us a
little bit of interest, but like you can
borrow my stock." So, now I haven't done
anything. I've still got my $100, and
I've borrowed $100 of stock. And now
because I have borrowed it, I'm also
allowed to sell it. It's mine to do
whatever I want with. So, I sell it.
And then I get $100 of cash proceeds.
So, now I have $200.
Have I doubled my money? No, because I
have a short position. I have to return
the stock eventually to the person I
borrowed it from.
And therefore,
if that stock doubles,
I will lose everything.
Cuz I have to buy it back at the higher
rate.
it back at 200.
So, if the price actually goes down,
then I was okay because I sold it, and I
don't have to buy it back.
You can return it at the lower price.
So, if it goes down to 50,
And it goes down even further to 50.
And I got the vig on the delta. I guess
not even the vig. I got the delta.
Yeah.
[ __ ]
So, that's how shorting works. And you
can see why it's scary because there is
no
legal? Like this is complex [ __ ] This
is like really gambling. But this So,
you're going to say something I'm
guessing
about the efficiency of markets?
Yeah. I would I would like to say
something about that. But yeah, I mean,
if someone knows something about a
stock, knows it's going to go up,
um you want them to buy it because
they're putting their they're making the
market more efficient because they're
putting buy orders on that stock and it
becomes more valuable.
If someone
knows something about a stock, like it's
going down, why shouldn't they be be
able to express that knowledge in the
market so that the price of that stock
uh
tends towards the sort of
Cuz it's mean and it will influence
people's perception.
Now, I'm not saying you actually
shouldn't be able to. You probably
should. I don't know [ __ ] about it. But
that would be one That's one thing that
freaks me out about shorts is if you're
paying attention and people see, "Ooh,
that person who I think is really smart
is shorting it." Now my psychology flips
and I think it's going down. And that
brings us right to [ __ ] Wall Street
Bets where it's like you really can
influence markets.
Yeah, for sure. And I I There's maybe
some questions about whether you should
be able to short and then also take out
a front page ad in the New York Times
that says this company sucks and
everyone should sell it or something.
Which people do, I take it?
People do that kind of thing and that's
what was happening with Tesla even.
You'd had
these kind of normie analysts on Wall
Street making up stories and trying to
get Tesla to go bankrupt. And that would
have been a very bad outcome
for the world if that happened. And it
was quite close. So,
then, you know,
but but yeah, it it worked out in the
end. Um so, I would say that
we when we short, we're shorting like a
very small amount, a very small and
we're not we're not actually not
interested in the company losing. We're
just interested in hedging our risk
uh with a company that we think is like
average.
And so, those are the companies we we
tend to short. And I do think there's a
big questions about the sort of activist
shorting where they're like, "This
company's a fraud. It's going bankrupt."
And uh they get huge positions.
But,
in to some in to to you know, thanks to
markets, they've been killed already.
So, the GameStop people killed killed
those types of shorters. In fact, they
shut down their firms.
This is the craziest story of the last
like
5 years. I mean, this is absolutely
bananas. Walk people through that. I
don't know how familiar my audience is
with what happened with GameStop and
Wall Street Bets. Walk them through it.
What is Wall Street Bets? Let's start
with that.
Well, I'll tell you a funny story
actually. I was coming back from South
Africa after Christmas and uh
I was it stopped by the
immigration.
And they were like, "What what are you
doing in America?"
What do you
What What do you What's your job? And I
was like, "I work at a hedge fund." And
he just started laughing. He's like,
"Did you Did you Were you short
GameStop?" And he was just like
laughing. He was like so happy.
He was like so happy that um
the hedge fund people were were
struggling under the
Wow.
the the Wall Street Bets thing. So, it
was a very interesting kind of movement
where
uh GameStop considered kind of a bad
company uh
not many prospects and um
but Reddit people decided they really
liked it. And uh kind of got together
and pulled off this massive short
squeeze
where they knew a lot of people had
shorted this company. And they knew that
the more the price went up, the more
they'd have to cover their short as in,
you know, do this what we just described
where you have to go out and buy it
buy the company that you don't even want
to buy
in order to
return it back to the person you
borrowed it from.
And why can't you just wait for the
price to come back down?
Because you have um
some kind of risk mandate in your fund,
and you you maybe you have a deal with
your investors where they say, "You
know, we don't have more than 30% in one
name." Otherwise, you know, we're going
to pull the money or sue you.
And so, they maybe put 10% into GameStop
short, and then it went to 30% Suddenly,
it's 30% of their positions.
Because the value would be so high for
them to have to buy it that on the books
it changes the ratio.
Exactly, yeah. So, it's suddenly this
huge position, and they have just a a
rule they they can't keep holding it
even if they think it's going to
eventually go down.
Their their risk limits say they have to
sell some. And so, as an exit the
position uh so, they end up um
needing to go into the market to buy the
exact thing that they think is going
down, and that pushes the price even
higher.
That is crazy.
Yeah.
And so, it was a very interesting thing
to watch because it was a bit of like
maybe crowd crowd validation because
it's like you have all these people and
um they're posting screenshots of their
accounts on Robinhood
proving that they're they're they're in
and that they're diamond hands. They're
not going to sell.
Uh and and suddenly people like maybe we
can
we can do this. And in this kind of
distributed way
decentralized intelligence, they end up
doing something that was actually very
smart. Um and and did and did cause big
ripples in the hedge fund industry
because a lot of the
those stocks were
when that type of thing is happening,
um it affects all kinds of other stocks.
So, there was almost like a huge rally
in these kind of junk stocks.
And all the hedge funds are short the
junk stocks. We were even short some of
them. Not GameStop, but some of them. Um
and
they they don't know how to deal with
that type of um event, and it's almost
like unprecedented. And so, you had
funds like two one of two Sigma's funds
was down
8.6% which is like one of their worst
years one of their worst months on
record. Um and many many other quant
funds did terribly because of this. So,
it really did have
the
a negative effect on the on those
markets.
Okay, so what was going on there is so
uh Wall Street Bets is a Reddit sub a
sub Reddit. And so, it's just a bunch of
humans that are in a space sort of
together talking about were they saying,
"Hey, let's go. Um I believe in in
GameStop and I want to see it go up." or
"Hey guys, if enough of us buy into
this, we can [ __ ] over the hedge funds."
There Yeah, it's hard to know what the
sort of like aggregate motivation was.
Uh but there were people who liked the
stock
uh like even Michael Burry uh
big short guy. He owned it. He thought
it was a bit undervalued at a time.
This is why maybe it was on $4 or
something. And then um there are other
people that came in and
for their own reasons liked it.
Um
but then it started to become like,
"Well,
someone's posting that there's this huge
hedge fund that has a huge short
position, and all we need to do is to
get this up by $50 or more.
Um
and they will be toast. And uh we can
literally take their money out of their
fund into our Robinhood accounts."
Dude, that that that is insane. The what
you just said, we can literally take the
money out of their accounts and put it
into our Robinhood accounts. That's
bananas.
That's the short cover.
here's why I always encourage people to
don't think about things, think about
the nature of things. Once you
understand what's really going on, like
I could never have pulled that off cuz I
don't understand it well enough, and
because I don't understand it well
enough, I can't think from first
principles. And if you can't think from
first principles, you can only follow,
you can't lead.
And wow, like that is really really
fascinating. So, this whole idea of um
distributed anything. We're moving into
a really fascinating period in human
history, and my mission has slowly
become over the last 18 19 months since
COVID kicked off,
getting people to um recognize that
we're going through something
unprecedented right now, but in any
moment of disruption is tremendous
opportunity.
Um
I wanted to have you on the show because
I see you applying that to an area where
I know people have told you to your
face, like this isn't going to apply to
finance, which you're really pushing
back on. But going broader than finance,
why do you think there is
um why is decentralization
as a movement
Well, one, do you think it's inevitable
and the future? And if so, why?
Um
Someone said to me that what
decentralized thing has ever really
worked? And I was like, what?
Literally capitalism. It like
that is a decentrali-
that is the story of it. Um so, it's
it's like this idea that if you leave
people to their own
uh
de- decision making and let them start
things and create capital, um
it will just kind of do an amazing
things. And no, there was no central
planner who
called Elon Musk
15 years ago, 20 years ago, and said,
"You have to start an electric car
company. Um please do it. We need it."
No one It was from him. And uh and so
you can have
a system like the capitalist system
where you have have an amazing outcomes
um
from people following their own
instincts and and uh motivations.
And um
and so with but decentralization now
means a lot like cryptos related stuff.
And it's like, "Why is that
decentralized?" Um well, no one's in
charge. There's no one who can stop you
from building uh a small set of
instructions on on the blockchain and
have that become a very valuable piece
of uh
financial infrastructure.
Uh and that's so um empowering for
people. Uh
and and
and as to make it even more intense
uh why crypto is a kind of
hypercapitalism,
even if that thing is doing something
wrong, uh like it's a little bit scammy
or a little bit
scary, there's no one who can stop it.
And so in the in the in the capitalist
market in the United States, if a
company's doing something wrong, they
can just be shut down.
Uh but in crypto, it's it's a more uh
it's more free.
Uh but it's also more dangerous for that
reason. But the the benefits um
so far seem to be outweighing the the
bad things. I mean, the the good things
in crypto uh are are very good. Um
What are the good things in crypto?
Well, I mean,
some of the things like say
Uniswap is a really interesting
exchange. And it suddenly got it's a
decentralized exchange has no
intermediaries. You don't need to sign
up to it. You don't need to
KYC yourself. You don't need to do
anything. You can just trade and
it's got some some days it has more
volume than Coinbase. And it was started
like I don't know 18 months ago or
something. Um so there's that type of
thing that it and it's it's also got no
one working there in some way. So
there's some coders who work at a
company that sort of support the
protocol. But
the protocol's out there and it can't be
it can't be taken down ever.
Ever.
Uh so it's kind of cool.
Um this is the closest I've ever felt
There's there's two things I will say.
There's two things that I'm like
you have to stop and look at these two
things because it will change your life
so profoundly that I've given my entire
professional life to getting people to
understand two things.
The first one I knew would be a thing
because mindset. So that like changed my
life. It took me from scrounging in my
couch cushions to find enough change to
put gas in my car, which is a real
story, to you know, having serious um
success in business. And so I was like,
"Whoa, this is teachable. It's
repeatable. Other people can do this."
And now the other is I don't know what
word to shorthand it to. Maybe
decentralization.
Um maybe uh
crypto. I don't know. But the the shift
in cultural energy to
things that can't be censored, stopped,
broken, whatever. Going outside the
system. Maybe that's it. And
when I see what's happened like this the
number of people in fact I'm saying it
now to everybody listening to this.
You have to do your own research. I
cannot see the future. This is not
financial advice. I'm not a financial
advisor. I do not know what the [ __ ] I'm
doing. So, all I want people to do is
look at it. And if they look at what's
going on in crypto and they reject it,
fair enough. Maybe you know something I
don't, and maybe my gains are short-term
gains. This is so possible, and I cannot
stress enough that people need to do
their own research.
But now, having said all of that, what I
want people The reason I want people to
do their own research is
the rich getting richer is not a
phenomenon I find interesting, even
though I am wealthy, and so this like
crypto is playing out extraordinarily
well for me. All I do is dollar cost
average. I buy a little bit every day of
what I'll call the blue chips, like the
safest ones, cuz again, I do not know
what the [ __ ] I'm doing. I do not spend
my time in this
ones are pretty risky already.
Ultra volatile.
But
like getting in there and learning about
where all the cultural energy is
flowing, and at least looking at it,
like otherwise, dude, this is going to
be another thing where a small number of
people who are in the know end up
reaping all the benefits. And so, I am
so eager to get people to even forget
like crypto as currencies.
Anybody out there who's contemplating
starting a business, understand why the
culture wants that to happen, because
you can deploy that as you have done
with Numerai into a business,
uh whether it's finance, whether I'm
doing it on the studio level. This is
going to happen everywhere. This is what
I think is the inevitable future, which
I'll sum up as saying this.
You have to find a way to tie the
community into the success of a product
and company. And if you fail to do that,
you will fail in business, you will fail
in finance, you will fail in everything.
And it is it's a transition that's
happening so rapidly, that there will be
outsized success over the next, I don't
know. I don't know if it's 5 months or 5
years or 50 years, I don't know. But
it's happening so terrifyingly fast and
it's absolutely thrilling. I'm having
the ride of my life.
Most businesses will not be able to
switch from extracting value to giving
value and that will
I think will decimate them and is
exactly why
um there's a huge opportunity in this
moment of disruption. But I'm just so
eager for people to really look at that.
Yeah, it's very hard for people to get
their head around that simple fact of
like uh
unstoppable or immutable
uh technology one and because they've
grown up in a world uh that is very
controlled.
Um so
if you've had the experience of posting
a picture
on Facebook or something and then it
gets reported for some some violation or
and and then you realize you're not this
isn't your profile page.
This is like and it and even they could
change the design of the page. They
could change what what content is shown
to your friends.
You could be sort of shadow banned.
Um and so if you think like that you you
don't have any kind of relationship with
any of the web two things that you've
been involved with like a Facebook or
Twitter or something.
You are um
you're not in any position of real
ownership.
And and that is what crypto changes and
the
and that's very very powerful
difference. Um
if you upload and that's where maybe
what you're seeing with NFTs if you if
you can if if you can upload an image to
your your Facebook profile and everybody
can see that image um
that's extremely extremely low value
compared to if you can own that image or
a token that represents that image. One
is worth nothing and some are worth $60
million on the blockchain. And so the
difference between owning something
forever and being this kind of like
um
sort of like slave to a system is a very
different uh mindset. And uh people it's
like my one of my friends said, Fred
Ehrsam, he's a co-founder of Coinbase.
We went on a hike a long time ago and
like 2013 or 14 or something, 15, and he
was just like, I think people want to
like own their stuff.
And I was like, what is this guy talking
about? Uh he's like, I think people want
to own their stuff. And I've always
remembered that because that's exactly
what it is. You You don't it doesn't
feel like we own things anymore. Like
even if you own a house, it's like
somehow vulnerable to some government
change uh of of the way they
Dude.
Yeah.
It's crazy. Like I'm I'm in my 40s. I
shouldn't feel this way, but I do.
It feels weird.
Yeah.
You feel like you don't own your
Yeah, like it feels like
there's just a lot of like meddling, a
lot of and maybe it's just restriction.
I don't know, but it there is something
really intoxicating about this idea of
actually owning your [ __ ] And I've
become way more enamored with
virtual goods, which I would not have
believed if you'd told me this a year
ago. I would have said, "No, no, no,
I'll always Like I dig it. I get virtual
stuff. I've always understood that.
That's just made sense to me, but
I would have thought that I would always
value the physical more and somewhere in
the last 12 months that changed.
Yeah, that's a incredible thing to
change um to feel like your relationship
with your physical world is somehow
fragile. But then the your relationship
with the digital world is is actually
fixed and permanent and doesn't need
police um
and so that's a very powerful thing to
to be aware of and I do think you're
right that it over the next few years
people that don't get that quite right
on are going to be in a bad place. And I
think
even the the big owners of the big
monopolies like Facebook or Google or
Twitter that or any of those things,
they
they are they're totally aware at this
point
of this of this huge sea change. Um
and
they've built out a lot of
uh relationships with the deep state,
you know, basically. They've they've
joined the
the they follow the party lines, but
they are also run by in some cases
entrepreneurs who maybe don't want to
play that way forever.
And if the internet can be is going to
be free, which seems like a a thing that
will continue in the United States,
hopefully,
then all this crypto stuff is part of
it. It's not like we can really have a
free internet and not have uh
crypto. Either the whole internet's free
um and kind of unregulated
or it's not and and it's it's a very
different game. If if the US starts
saying, "Well, no, you can't use this
application." and
What do you think will happen?
I'm very curious to see. I think it's
going to be very intense the next couple
of um years. I'm kind of worried about
like some of my friends
in crypto um because
there's a lot of good intentions and a
lot of good um
good actors in the space, especially in
the United States. Like the people here
are nice. They're trying to make nice
things. They they're really wealthy.
They don't they're not uh worried about
making money.
They really do want to make something
special, something new. And if the good
actors get targeted, then it's like
a a
sad state. Like if you like Brian
Armstrong, co- uh
founder of Coinbase, he uh he had the
situation where like he's like been
fighting well, he's been
uh
talking with the SEC about these issues
for so long and they've put so much
thought into their regulatory policy.
And um
but they they keep getting kind of kind
of uh treated badly, I think, by
regulators even though they're so
clearly good actors.
Yeah, this will be it'll be really
interesting. I'm
worried about what happens if the US
tries to clamp down on it. There's so
much cultural energy pouring into it.
And
look, you used a great word earlier that
crypto is it there's a sense of danger
to it. So,
I just had an experience this morning
that was absolutely hilarious. So,
because there was a period of my life an
un-
a a an extended period of my life in my
20s where every dollar counted in my
life. And so, I developed this real
frustration when banks acted like my
money was their money.
Yeah.
And now that it's on a grander scale, I
still have that sort of rage-inducing
mechanism. And just today I was trying
to wire a non-inconsequential amount of
money,
but
first of all, they trapped it. And so,
they stopped it. And I called them,
tried to deal with it. Nope, they wanted
me to go into a branch. I'm like, "Guys,
I I do not have time, A, and B, COVID,
no, thank you." Um so, not super keen to
go into the bank. Let's just deal with
this over the phone. They were one, you
have to stand hold for ungodly periods
of time. And then, second, they were
like, "What why are you wiring the
money?"
And that's like my red line. I'm like,
"That's none of your [ __ ] business.
Like, this is my money. I'll [ __ ]
wire it to whoever I want. Like thank
you for the protection but like asking
me what I'm doing with it like that
drives me [ __ ] crazy. And so once you
get into crypto and you see how easy it
is. One it feels a little scary cuz
you're like I could send this to the
wrong address and it is gone forever.
Like there is no getting that back.
But
the first time you send a payment and
it's like point two seconds
it is amazing. And so the reason I had
to wire the money not that I was willing
to tell my bank this not that it nothing
bad but I was trying to buy an NFT and
Coinbase limits right the amount that
you can send in any one day.
And so that's important thing to note is
there are some parts of crypto that are
centralized and so you run into the same
issues. But once you get into your
wallet you can do whatever the hell you
want. So anyway I was having trouble
getting enough into my wallet to buy
this NFT. So I pinged a friend and I was
like yo I'm trying to get this and he
was like cool I'll send you the ETH then
just wire me the money. And so the
hilarity of it took him point two
seconds to get me the ETH and it's
taking me like four days and like
battling with my bank to get him the
money. I was like oh my god this is so
obnoxious.
Well it's funny you say this like I I
just had this kind of experience so
for some reason just because I made a
I I sold some crypto that I had not
um
one that I bought a long time ago from a
like a friend's project
and uh sent them to my bank account
shut my bank account down.
Uh card blocked everything and I was
like what are you guys doing? And I have
like a private wealth person who's
supposed to be like looking after my
interests
and she's like well um you know we
needed to do some KYC you know, like ask
your like I'm like, "What are you
talking about? Like you do know me like
me. I have been like at the bank for
like 12 years." And now I'm like I paid
I I got my um
an assistant who works for me, this guy
Pedro.
Uh
he
had to draw money from a cash
mail it to me
by FedEx to the hotel so I could afford
to like buy a cab to go to the
conference that I'm going to.
And like it's still in process. My
Netflix is I can't even watch Netflix. I
have my PayPal's off.
And I'm like
kind of a good citizen of the financial
system. And I paid like a lot of taxes.
And like
[ __ ] it, man. I hate it. I was just like
maybe I should just not
get the card fixed.
Oh, dude. Literally
rejected from every credit card I've
applied to. I have no credit.
Why?
Don't know. I'm probably because I'm
South African.
Uh-huh.
So, yeah. It's actually terrible.
And it's also this feeling of like, "Oh,
wow. I'm actually powerless." Like if I
move banks
Mhm.
that's the next bank is under the same
regulatory
regime and has the same people working
there shuffling the same papers and
annoying their customers on purpose.
Yeah.
So,
I just don't think this is going to
last. Like if it's that if it's that
hard to like
use just to like my like I'm locked out
of my Uber. It's like so crazy.
That is crazy, yeah.
What for?
It will be very interesting to see. It
feels to me inevitable that the
the decentralized web web 3, however
we're going to think about it, is going
to happen. That people are, I hope,
going to be willing to trade some of the
risk. And look, I am not looking for no
regulations or anything like that. I had
a conversation with Robert Breedlove and
I was saying, like sovereignty is a
double-edged sword. I don't want 100%
sovereignty. Like I like the idea that,
you know, the cops will show up if I've
got an issue. I don't want to have to,
you know, deal with everything myself.
So I'm certainly not that guy.
Um but getting to a world where there
are options, where we can make different
trade-offs, um and it seems to me that
crypto's a leading edge of that.
Exactly. Um
and I also agree. I actually
I don't think the the US the story of
the United States would would have
worked out so well
um
without the SEC.
Uh like they did a lot of good clever
things um to make America like they do
want to be the financial capital like of
the world. Um and they've done things
that made a lot of sense. But I feel
like somewhere around like 2008 or
something,
they just started going just like into
this insane
uh direction where it seemed
like
it is let's just say 0.001%
of
of transactions are are are kind of
sketchy.
Is it worth wasting your time
or my time as entrepreneurs spending 6
days a year locked out of their bank
accounts
so that you can like do your compliance
[ __ ] Like no.
It's uh it's uh absurd and it's ugly and
it's like not what's what we we should
be doing at all.
Yeah, this is so companies, as I'm sure
you know, um they reach a point where
the system you used when you were
smaller stops helping you. And so it's
what I call the dragon begins eating its
own tail. And I think there's that sweet
spot where you want regulation, you do
want protection, but then there comes a
point where it starts being destructive
and it's creating more problems than
it's freeing up. You're using a tactic
in Numerai that I think is part of the
potential solution to this, which is
staking.
Yes.
Talk about staking cuz you I haven't
heard anybody else say what I've heard
you say many times and no one ever asked
you a follow-up question, so here we
are. Which is you've said not only is it
working in Numerai in finance, but I
think that this would work across the
entire internet.
Yes.
So, what is staking and why will it
help?
So, staking is um
where you lock up some crypto assets,
any coin,
and and because you've locked it up, uh
you get some kind of benefit. Um and you
can unstake and get your stake back.
And
that simple mechanism uh is really nice.
In some ways, you know how like this
things on the internet is either free
or paid. And I think like the middle of
free and paid is is like staking, where
it's actually not paid.
It actually is free. You can stake
and then unstake. Um but you can do
things when you're when you're when you
do staking. So, for Numerai,
we had uh a really good start to the
company. Had lots of people join and
amazing data scientists submit
predictions to the to the fund. And
for after a while, what happened was uh
people realized, "Well, if I just make a
thousand Numerai accounts,
um then I'm going to increase the chance
of me having one model that's just
lucky, and then I will win the Numerai
tournament."
And that's like a civil attack, it's
called, sort of, and it's uh it's uh you
don't want that in a system like this
because we want to know you believe in
in your model. We don't want to have
thousands of of models just hoping to
get lucky.
just creates noise?
It creates noise, and we wouldn't know
which models are good.
And with staking, we say, "Well, in
order to make any money on Numerai,
you have to stake
our cryptocurrency, NMR, on your model.
And
that is how you earn money. Like, if
your model performs well, you will earn
more NMR tokens. And if your model
performs badly, we'll destroy some of
your stake.
And
that simple mechanism of having the
rewards be linked to the stake means you
can still make go and make a thousand
accounts,
but
which one are you going to stake? Or
which is going to have the most stake?
The one that you believe in the most.
And that's this big problem that we
solved, where
this it's so easy to make a quant model
that looks good. It's like it's got a
good back test, it looks like it's going
to work on the future.
But with staking, we we only pay based
on if your model's going to work in the
future, and we get you to say up front,
you put kind of skin in the game and
say, "I believe in this model so much,
I'm willing to stake $100,000 on it."
And um
and that's uh
how
advantage them to instead of doing $10,
why $100,000? Do they get a bigger
payout?
Yeah, so the payouts are based almost
like a percentage of their stake. So, if
they have a kind of 2% correlation with
uh
returns or risk-adjusted returns, they
will end up having their stake go up by
2% or burned by 2% if it's bad.
Did you watch Squid Game?
Yeah.
It reminds me of the marble thing. How
much did you bet? So, you've got whether
you were right, and then you've got the
Oh, [ __ ] bro.
Not that that gave anything away, but uh
yeah. Peeps got to watch Squid Game. So
good.
Okay, so how does this then carry across
to the rest of the internet?
So
because um
it solves the sort of spam problem. Like
what if you could on your Twitter
account, you know the Twitter check
mark.
Uh
what if there was another check mark, a
green check mark, which is just like
the person who owns this account
has staked more than a hundred dollars
on their account.
Well,
what's it what's the big deal? Like
what would that do? Well, it would make
you whenever you see that be like, well,
this guy's probably not a bot.
Because a bot army would never be able
to afford
staking
all of them.
And then you could um
you know, and if you ever want to
unstake, people would be able to see
that on the blockchain and then you
maybe lose your check mark or something.
So that simple thing is not like
Twitter's now charging you to have an
account
or charging you for it. It's actually
not to do with Twitter. Just like
staking isn't actually to do with
Numerai. Staking is happening on the
blockchain.
And so when people stake, it's like a
blockchain transaction. And
and so there's no intermediaries and we
can't steal your stake or anything like
that because it's not an agreement with
us. It's agreement with Ethereum kind
of. So I think that those mechanisms
could and will reach the broad web
very soon and change the way we we do
things.
Do you think that it has implications
beyond just sort of validating who you
are?
It has it for any anything that you want
to have stake on. So for Numerai, we you
actually all of our data scientists are
anonymous.
But they're doing it to express
something else. It's their confidence in
their predictions.
And um
anything that involves like proving
authenticity or proving you're part of
the the crowd. I mean, even say the
GameStop thing. Imagine you could make a
stake on a blockchain
that proved
that you held GameStop.
And you weren't going to sell. And
anyone could maybe see on the blockchain
that if you did sell,
that's the type of thing that's going to
be able to happen where you could have
collective uh contracts
uh and and be able to do incredible
things once you have the proof that
you're you're staking a lot.
This is really interesting. So, I was
taking notes on you and like what I
wanted to touch on and I was like, man,
I
oftentimes my intuition leads my ability
to articulate why something feels right.
Heard a lot of people talk about
staking. I've never staked anything in
my life, but obviously being in the
crypto space, I hear it a lot.
Hearing you talk about it, I was like,
okay, that's a really interesting way to
do it. When you're into crowd
validation, you need to know that your
crowd is validated. And that people
aren't able to uh mimic the crowd or be
a bot in the crowd or whatever. And so I
was like, wow, this is really
interesting as I think about, you know,
trying to build out a studio and do it
in a different way and use all these
layers of crowd validation. I was like,
woo, there might be something there with
staking. I don't yet know exactly what
it is, but I can feel something tickling
at the back of my mind that this could
be useful.
Totally. Uh it's it's so it's so useful
to us and it changed our business. Like
there's so many businesses that I think
couldn't exist without it. Um and so we
don't even know what those are, but I
think the idea of a crowdsourced hedge
fund
um it seems obvious that you should be
able to have an internet hedge fund.
Like there's an internet everything. Why
isn't there an internet hedge fund? And
the reason is
you've never been able to get the
contributors
to that system
to be able to put skin in the game.
Uh
with and we are doing that with staking.
Talk to me a little bit about So this
whole idea of being a quant, it's so
foreign to me.
Um have you just always been naturally
drawn to math? Do you find math
incredibly useful?
I actually uh only really got into math
in college. I just decided to um
get good at it because I realized there
was so much of the world uh was written
like in that language basically. And um
you don't really get enough knowledge
from high school.
And uh
but I was also always interested in
stocks. My dad like gave me stocks when
I was 8 years old and I I just followed
them and and uh
traded options when I was 15 um and
started
And are options the same as shorts and
Options are even more funky than shorts.
Yeah.
So what are options?
Um
it's where you have an agreement uh to
buy
something at
a right to buy something at a future
date at a certain price.
Okay.
So
So I can say hey if this goes down it's
like a limit order.
It It except it is um
it's
it just a right. So there's no
obligation to have it.
happen automatically.
Yeah, so you
And I'm paying for that right?
Yeah, you're paying a premium like an
option premium. So um
what would the option
to buy
Google
Imagine you had the option to buy Google
shares at $2
per share.
Yes, please.
That option would be like yeah, I'm
definitely going to exercise that
option. And so that option would be very
very valuable.
Um
But but then there's also put options
which are So that's a call option and
then there are put options that are
making money when the stock goes down.
So it's like insurance if the stock goes
down.
That I have somebody who's willing to
buy it from me at that price.
Exactly. You have the right to sell
the reverse of each other?
You have the right to sell the stock at
that price.
So I can only do a put option if
somebody's done a call option at the
same amount?
No, actually they're different.
Um
But But usually they'll be calls and
puts on the same asset. So let's just
say Well, I don't know what Google's
trading at, but let's just say you had
the right to sell Google shares
at $100,000 per share.
Somebody has to be guaranteeing that on
the other side.
So yeah, banks and things are kind of
underwriting these options.
Really? Banks?
An individual person can't do it?
Uh actually, no. Uh because of how risky
it is.
Uh it's quite hard to get the the
ability to write options. It's easy to
buy and sell them,
but it's hard to get the right to create
them.
So wait a second. It's easy to buy and
sell them. There's only two sides to
that equation. So what's the difference
between buying and writing?
You're um it's like you're the
counterparty of the of the whole uh
deal. Like
um
Yeah, like if you and I buy and sell an
option, it's basically at the exercise
time when you you can exercise this
option, someone's on the hook for that.
So it's a bit like you and I are
if we if there was an insurance contract
or something that we had on a house,
you and I can trade it, but we're still
hoping that the insurance company is
good on the on the deal. It's like that.
Dude, this is why I think crypto is
long-term just going to suck in so much
capital. This [ __ ] is confusing. Now,
I'm not the brightest guy around, but
I'm also not dumb, and I find all of
this extraordinarily difficult to wrap
my mind around. Whereas when I looked at
crypto, I was like, "Oh, this is very
basic. It's arbitrage. This is like a
currency." And so, just like when I
first got married, my wife is British,
it was like, "Hey, if, you know, she's
got pounds in an account in England, and
we've got dollars, like you can sort of
transfer them back and forth based on
where the exchange rate is going, and if
you think that's going to change." I was
like, "Oh, cool. Like, I get that." So,
if I buy a pound today, and the pound
goes up in value compared to the dollar,
then I'm laughing. This is amazing.
That's at least
like a far simpler thing. I just heard
you explain it twice, and I still don't
understand like how the writing of a put
and a call and all that stuff. And look,
I know I could buckle down and finally
figure it out, but Jesus. Like, that is
far more complicated.
It is It is complicated, but it's um but
it's it's a little bit like fake
complicated. I mean, like it doesn't
need to be this way. And then
we
we could have had these kind of
options be something else. Um it's not
like a a deep thing to understand. Um
so, I think if you
Could it have been made as simple as,
"Hey, I want to guarantee that I can buy
if the price drops" too? Cuz this is how
I This is what I do on crypto, right?
So, I only I limit buy all the time. I
almost never buy from market value. So,
I'll say, "Okay, the price is whatever.
If it drops, you know, $500,
uh then cool. I'm in. Trigger a buy for
whatever."
Uh but that means that somebody else has
to sell at that moment. If no one's
willing to sell, then I'm done. There's
nothing I can do. So,
is that the simplification of this whole
thing, or is there
Well, anything I mean, anything can
become a market. So, like that the the
it's still true that a call and put
options or anything, you know, has a
market and then people have bids and
offers on that market. So, once you get
to the the market point, it's it could
be anything and it's easy to understand.
But,
but yeah, with derivatives it's it's
it's just often a more leveraged scary
version of of like just buying the
underlying asset.
What is a derivative? This is a word I
hear all the time and I've never gotten
a definition.
is a kind of anything to do with
anything based on the underlying stock.
A put, a call, a short.
Yeah, exactly. So, an option was is a
derivative of the stock.
Um
and it just means it's its value is
derived from the price of of the stocks
the pri- all the prices something else
and so
um
all the all kinds of derivatives in the
in the market.
I want to go back to math for a second.
So, I am very sad that I didn't pay
attention to math in high school. It
doesn't come easily to me and people who
are like, "Oh, no, like it describes the
world and it's beautiful." I I believe
it. I just my brain like there is there
is an actual blankness. Like when I
encounter math, my brain doesn't fire.
Nothing happens. So, if I um
if I read a book, encounter a
psychological principle, I see a
painting, my brain sparks.
But, math is like an absence of
something for me. And so, I really have
to like get in and try to anchor it
around something so that I can sort of
trigger my visual brain if that makes
sense and then I can start to grasp the
concepts. Um
or even break it into its constituent
parts. So, I found in high school if I
would force myself to go to the
chalkboard,
I would be able to figure it out because
I was forced to go, "Okay, wait. Here's
where my brain goes blank. I don't
understand this." And then the teacher
would go, "That's where you use this
formula or whatever." Okay, cool. And I
would just memorize that and then it
would I could get it. Um
but
now that I'm in business, I'm like, holy
[ __ ] I use math every day. And it's so
important. But if you were talking to
somebody who's 15, they're in algebra,
and they want to know, why does this
matter? Like, do you have an
explanation?
Uh I think it definitely does matter and
it's very important. Um
but it's also there's this interesting
thing in culture. So I'm I'm I'm I
admire you for saying that you don't you
have like a block of math because many
people can become um
bad at math because they're too afraid
of saying they
of asking for help or saying they don't
understand something. Because there's
something in our culture which is like,
if you're good at math, you're smart.
It's like very related concepts. Which
is just I don't know, because of media.
Like probably there was some movies that
had like yeah, like Rain Man or
something. I don't know. Um but it's not
true. Anyone can I think anybody can do
math and should do math. I used to tutor
math uh to
students. Um
So I mean, why is it important? I think
it's it's it is a type of uh kind of a
way of thinking, I think. But the the
sad thing I would say is that almost the
entire of high school math is not real
math.
What do you mean?
It's just it's not to do with um
arithmetic.
Which is, you know, what's your
what's what's nine times nine nine or
something like that. Like even in movies
when they have a smart person, they'll
solve something quickly.
And that's like an indication that
they're good at math. But actually,
that's again a complete distraction
uh from what like real math is. Which is
is much more about constructing proofs.
How can you show that two things that
seem different are the same.
Um and the that type of thinking, proof
proof-based math, is very useful. So, to
any 15-year-old out there,
I would say try to um
learn some proofs.
Um what are I remember these happening,
but I cheated in high school, so I did
not learn. What is a proof?
A proof is a set of um
statements that
uh
But mathematical statements, right?
mathematical statements.
went to the store. It's
Yeah.
x = y or some crazy [ __ ]
there could be some uh explanation and
and written component to it, too. But
ultimately, the logic is so uh rigorous
step that step by step you get to the
point where at the end of it, you know
that the statement is true.
Not in the way we normally think about
what's true, but in a deep, permanent,
universal way.
Can you give me an example?
Well, like Pythagoras's theorem, you
know, the
if you have a right angle triangle
and a² + b² = c². I think that's it.
Um and c is the hypotenuse of the
triangle, and a is one side, and b is
the other side, and and um
that is uh important
uh you know, geometric result.
And e = mc², is that a proof?
That is a a physics um
statement, but there would be a proof to
that would lead to to that um based on
other uh arguments. Uh so,
um
but yeah, uh I I think it's a it's
it's very nice to know things for sure,
especially in this world. And that's one
of the reasons I studied mathematics was
because
I was I could learn all sorts of things
about kind of the
um
political fashion de jure
uh
from like say studying politics or
something like that. Um but that would
be almost like various kinds of
propaganda in some way. That might not
be true. Uh
you know
something Yeah, controversial like say
something like human rights.
Maybe not a not so so important as a
concept or or something like that.
And those things change with time.
Whereas with mathematics, you are
learning things that are going to be
true in a deep and permanent and
universal way. And so
that that's really nice especially when
you trying to navigate the world that
you can know it you can know a few
things and they they they can be true in
a in a in a deep way. And um thinking
back to in uh crypto like
there's some encryption proofs that show
that why can't I just take the money out
of your Ethereum address and put it into
my address? Why? What is the thing
stopping me from doing that? And it's
mathematics. It's a
it's the way that that the encryption
works.
So um it's nice to know a few things
that like that for sure because a lot of
people can be very confused um when they
put things in the same bucket.
Uh
if you've heard of a website being
hacked
why couldn't Bitcoin be hacked?
And the the two very different types of
uh
systems and you wouldn't know the
difference between them without thinking
through the the math of it.
And I don't. Is there an easy way to
explain?
Well, the the main thing is to do Yeah,
the with Bitcoin is just like it's on so
many different um servers and they are
following this protocol and uh
they there's certain security guarantees
that you get when you have a system
that's distributed like that.
Mhm.
Is it simple way to explain?
a proof around the number of
uh nodes that it's installed on by like
how they parse that data. And so if you
make a request that it knows, "Ah, we've
got an errant request over here." And so
mathematically, based on the number of
cycles it takes an average computer to
run that equation I'm trailing off here,
but like I sort of get how they work.
Um
well, that's the type of thing I think
that is uh
that is worth
at least knowing at least knowing the
the nature of things can be can be
different. And uh
hearing that some some bank had their
website hacked
would not surprise me, but hearing that
Bitcoin was hacked
it it wouldn't even make sense. It it it
doesn't make sense. I mean, you
I've heard you you could lose your keys
or someone could rob you. And an
exchange could go down, but Bitcoin
protocol itself would be a a lot more
resilient to anything like that.
Very interesting. Okay, so do we just
memorize proofs? Or is there a way to
discover
them?
Yeah, people discover them. That's what
real mathematicians do. That's
uh professors are trying to prove
something that has never been proved
before.
That this equals this.
And they're not
always about finding that two things are
related or identical?
Or that they are not identical, that
they are different. Sometimes there'll
be a conjecture that these two things
um
don't equal each other or do equal each
other. And if you could show it either
way, it would be profound uh
outcome.
Because then everybody else can just
memorize it. And so now we've just sort
of laid another brick in universal
understanding.
Exactly. Everybody then even you know
100 years from now in a Martian
civilization, they could rely on that
mathematics.
Uh and
and use it for whatever they wanted to.
Very interesting. Have you by any chance
read Project Hail Mary?
No.
Oh my god, it's so good. So this is you
know talk about science that I can
digest easily. It's written by Andy
Weir, the guy that wrote The Martian,
which is what triggered my thinking on
that. Um and it's absolutely fantastic.
And in the book he goes through
I say that it's math, not really, but he
articulates science in a way that's fun.
Like hey, if you know the you know the
pressure the tensile strength of this
material and you know the the
amount of gravity exerted because we're
spinning or whatever, then you can get
this outcome. And it just makes math and
science sound like wow, if you really
knew these things, there are a lot of
problems that you can solve in life that
you would not otherwise be able to
solve.
Yeah, exactly. And that's really
important. You want to be like a
magician. You don't want to just be
um
following others. And by able being able
to build things
is very valuable.
Why do you say like a magician? That
rings true, but I'm curious.
I mean
you know like
coming up with something from nothing.
That type of
practice you can get from mathematics
and another things like that. Because
you
you're faced with a problem
and you only have your mind to work with
and and other knowledge that you have.
And if you can construct
something and show it's true um in some
creative way, that's is always going to
be
the same type of thing will
happens in your real life, too.
Where you have to solve a problem with
just by yourself with the only the
knowledge you have.
Pretty sure I said this early in the
interview, but that's why I um certainly
I myself try to think from first
principles and why I encourage the team
to do it. Because if you can think from
first principles, you really can do
something original. But if you don't,
you can't.
Exactly. And it also is like a um
you can rely on it even in when you have
um
when things are going badly. Because
it's coming from a place of first
principles. So one one um thing I often
say about Numerai is
uh to investors or something. It's like
if let's if there were to be a hedge
fund
with all of the data
all of the best talent connected to it
and all connected with a perfect
incentives through staking
why wouldn't that be
the the best hedge fund ever?
Why couldn't that change the whole
world? And so if you just think from
those three basic principles
cuz we already have all three now
uh it's very easy to predict um the
future
when you have a few things to rely on.
And then something could happen like
um
an important employee uh quits the
company
or an investor pulls out or whatever.
Let's just say something in the
operations of of life
are any of those three things not true
after that happens? No, they're all
still true.
And uh so you keep you keep going. And I
think it's extremely important to me
when I like look at investing in
companies, not that I do it often, but
to have a couple of those like first
principles things because that
entrepreneur is going to need them. Cuz
it's going to be hard.
But at least you can know that if the
configuration of this project
gets to that point
that the first principles express
themselves
then all you need to do is need is time.
You need time to get to the right
configuration.
And do you have thoughts around that
with entrepreneurship? So it's going to
be hard. Are there other things that
surprised you as you got into building
companies that you know that somebody
just starting out they won't have
thought of it yet?
Um
yeah, I mean it's certainly it is very
hard and it's definitely it's like it's
so hard it's not even recommended. Like
I I don't want I don't think we need
more entrepreneurs. Maybe maybe we
don't. I don't know.
what is so hard about it that makes it
not recommended?
It's like very lonely kind of. Uh you
you usually if you're
So I'm always talking about kind of
venture back startups. I don't know what
it's like to start a restaurant or
something. It could be very different.
But um
if you're doing a technology company
usually you're talking about something
that doesn't yet exist and you're trying
to get investors, employees, and all
kinds of people
um excited about this thing that doesn't
exist. And then um you go home after
working extremely hard
and you're like, "Oh, it still doesn't
exist."
And I'm just here alone.
Um
and so it's it's very hard to um to
continuously be
be kind of uh
have this energy to keep to keep
something going. And with Numerai mean
we've had
like the there was this huge crypto
crash in 2018 and
areas and and market neutral funds have
had a really tough time. So there's been
so many times where you you would quit.
Um
but then the last two years it's like uh
so glad we didn't quit.
Why didn't you quit though at the
hardest part?
Because I I just knew I wanted to
Something I say to entrepreneurs is
don't start a company unless you're
prepared to make it your life's work.
And that's gets around so many of the
problems that people have like they
might start a company in an industry
that they don't even like.
Cuz they think well I'll just do it for
two years and then I'll sell the
company.
Oh yes, I did exactly that.
And and then it's like not long-term and
it's like
So if you if you have it in your in your
in your game plan that you're going to
be doing this for a long time, it
changes your whole mind. Um you don't
want to hire somebody who you don't
really like because you know that
you might have to you know it's not
going to work and if you expect thing to
work with him for a very long time,
you'll hire better people. And all your
decisions will be much longer term. Um
we've had so many things where uh
there's so many opportunities to follow
some
some new fashion or something
and we've always had a lot of resistance
to anything that doesn't make perfect
sense for the long long-term and that's
such a nice thing to rely on too.
I think that is very smart.
Dude, this has been so much fun. Where
can people follow along with you?
So you can go to um
numer.ai is our website if you want to
join as a data scientist.
Uh you can go to numer.ai.fund
if you want to learn about our hedge
fund.
And
you can follow me on Twitter.
Richard Craib
There it is.
Nice and easy, man. Thank you so much
for coming on and guys, dude, I had so
much fun researching him. As you know, I
think there's something really happening
in the world right now and the way that
he looks at it is incredibly incredibly
interesting and useful mostly done
through the lens of finance but highly
encourage you guys to check him out and
speaking of things that I highly
encourage if you haven't already be sure
to subscribe and until next time my
friends be legendary take care peace.