Video summary
Louis Theroux explains his motivation for producing a documentary on the manosphere, stemming from observing his own sons consuming influencer content like that of Andrew Tate during the post-COVID era. He notes how young boys would cite Tate's outrageous claims—such as women not being allowed to drive or vote—as jokes, failing to recognize them as virulent clickbait and rage bait designed to commandeer social media algorithms. Theroux describes this phenomenon as a "final boss battle" of documentary subjects for him, combining elements he has covered in the past: cults, sex work, pro wrestling kayfabe, and gangster rap aesthetics. He highlights how figures like Tate, Harrison Sullivan (HS Tiki Toki), and Nicholas Balanthazi (Sneako) utilize performative personas and irony to obfuscate their true identities while delivering highly dubious content that is often abusive or factually incorrect. The core of the issue lies in an algorithmic feedback loop where creators are incentivized to maximize engagement by feeding audiences "red meat," leading to a spiral of increasingly extreme, antisocial behavior. Theroux illustrates this with examples from live streams involving staged predation stings and public humiliation, which he compares to self-inflicted Hunger Games or gladiatorial scenarios fueled by chat interactions. He argues that the line between entertainment and reality has blurred so significantly in digital spaces like YouTube and TikTok that there are no longer guardrails; content is curated for maximum engagement rather than appropriateness, pushing users toward a dopamine spiral where creators must constantly escalate their output to prevent viewers from leaving. This dynamic warps both audience preferences and creator identities, leading to existential burnout as individuals lose touch with who they really are amidst the constant surveillance of algorithms and virtual communities. Theroux addresses the difficulty in discussing men's issues without being lumped into a broad "manosphere" label that encompasses everything from legitimate concerns about male mental health to far-right extremism. He finds himself ideologically spit-roasted by both sides: accused of being too blue-pilled or misogynistic by legacy media and feminists, while manosphere figures view him as insufficiently militant. This conceptual creep renders the term "manosphere" highly inexact, failing to distinguish between genuine struggles regarding socioeconomic imbalance, declining traditional roles for men, and manufactured insecurity about looks that mirrors female beauty standards on Instagram. He suggests that much of this online movement is a reaction to a felt lack of sympathy for male pain, particularly among teenagers who are trying to figure out their place in a world where old entitlements have eroded but new pathways to legitimacy seem unavailable. Despite the prevalence of negative role models like Andrew Tate and Justin Waller, Theroux emphasizes that there are still positive examples available if one looks beyond the extremes dominating social media feeds. He points to figures like Gareth Southgate for embodying dignity in sports and David Attenborough as a model of naturalism and sensitivity. However, he warns against the "self-bimbofication" of masculinity seen in some influencers who reverse-engineer traditional male traits through cosmetic surgery or pantomime rather than genuine embodiment. He reflects on how many men feel they were born without value unless they achieve wealth, status, or sexual conquests to fill a void created by societal shifts like the decline of manufacturing and the rise of AI, leading them down paths that ultimately leave them feeling despondent even after achieving their goals. Ultimately, Theroux concludes that while technology has upended society rapidly, creating new crises around gender relations and employment displacement, what is most needed is sympathy rather than disparagement or moral panic. He acknowledges that young men often feel they are paying for the sins of advantages held by previous generations, yet he argues against inheriting an "original sin" simply by being male. The documentary aims to navigate this complex landscape without falling into traps of either dismissing these issues as a mere moral panic or validating harmful ideologies. By exploring both the performative nature of online masculinity and the genuine struggles behind it, Theroux hopes to provide a balanced perspective that recognizes the need for understanding rather than judgment in an era where half the workforce faces displacement due to AI advancements.
Read the full video transcript
Louis, you've got three sons, 20, 18,
and 11.
Why were you interested in doing this
documentary?
Uh well, for for reasons closely related
to that.
I mean
Yeah, that's obviously part of it. Uh as
a dad, I saw my kids were consuming
I mean consuming
maybe sounds more active than it was.
They were being exposed to influencer
content, manosphere-type content,
specifically Andrew Tate back in the
sort of post-COVID era
when he first blew up and and I remember
kids saying that you know, the the boys
saying um oh, Andrew Tate said this or
that. And and thinking like, well, who
who is Andrew Tate? Like, that's not
ever wasn't someone I'd ever heard of.
And then the content obviously turned
out to be things like, oh, women can't
drive or shouldn't be allowed to drive
or women shouldn't be allowed to vote.
Um and it was hard to you know, that
they were sort of saying like, well, he
just says it as a joke. Like, everyone's
freaking out about this and but you
know, we we know what it is. Like, it's
clearly
uh clickbait or rage bait. But
nevertheless,
its level of virality was kind of
I I I I I it would be too far to say
this is it was concerning, but it was
kind of weird. It was just weird to see
someone blow up like that that quickly
and to sort of
commandeer swaths of the internet
so purposefully. Like, he kind of hacked
he figured something out about the
algorithm about about uh Twitter and and
and social media in general, TikTok
really specifically, doing podcasts,
saying outrageous things, having an army
of clippers repurpose those into short
snippets, and those being picked up by
the algorithm so that everyone,
literally millions were being worldwide
were being exposed to his content. So,
fast forward a few years and he
continued to become famous. Other people
in his stead or or in associated
contexts were putting out similarly
viral clickbait content and the whole
culture felt like it was being
inundated.
I said the whole lot like swaths of
male skewing internet spaces were being
inundated with it.
And then meanwhile, I'm you know, as a
program maker of 30 years standing,
uh I'm always looking for ideas.
And I was with I was talking to Netflix
about making a program and it seemed
front and center of what I should be
covering.
As both someone I mean, I've been joking
that it's like the final boss battle of
the Louis Theroux subject. You know,
like I I someone who specialized over
the years I've done stuff about racist,
cults,
sex workers of different stripes,
um people involved in pro wrestling and
gangster rap. The man is this aspect of
the manosphere like this subset section
of the manosphere feels like all those
things mixed together. You know what I
mean? They look a bit like wrestlers,
they speak a little bit like rappers,
and and the content is clearly highly
dubious at best. You know, whether or
not it's sincere is a is a different
question. So, I was like, well, this is
this is made to measure for whatever my
skill set is in terms of making
documentaries.
I think the wrestling
analogy is apt because a lot of the
stuff that we see online even from, you
know, Trump sometimes is this weird
kayfabe. Well, I don't know it
is this is this a joke or is this real?
And if
what nobody wants is to be accused of
having pointed the finger at someone for
telling a joke saying that it was real.
And there's always the, you know, the
sort of the comedian get out of jail
free card of well, you know, like this
is I'm not I'm not being serious with
that. But at some points the seriousness
actually comes into touch reality.
Big time. You know, the wrestling
metaphor is um as you say is very
apropos.
We're in a now where everyone has access
to the media. Like we we all have our
own mini, you know, it used to be I'm
I'm older than you are, but I grew up in
an era of
three or four TV channels. Like when
cable arrived, that was a big deal.
Like, "Oh, wow, you got like 40
channels." Like, "What? Mind blown."
Now, there's a there's a real sense in
which we kind of have millions of
channels. Like everyone can have a
YouTube account and broadcast what they
like. So, we can all curate a media
persona and we all have um
we all have access to the airwaves of
our choosing and part of that is
employing personas and as you say,
kayfabe. Alongside that, you know,
someone who I mean, I'm a fan of
in a sense self-impersonation. Like I
find all of that
it's a it's not coincidental that I go
into these worlds where people take
off-the-peg identities. Like, "My name
is Waldo and I'm a wrestler." You know,
and actually, no, your name's Louis
Theroux and you're a BBC documentary
maker or Netflix documentary maker. Do
you know what I mean? Or or the worlds
of adult film stars. You know, a lot of
these worlds I've gone into are places
where um you take a new name.
And the online world, which I was
looking at, the same thing. One of the
main guys I looked at is uh
Harrison Sullivan's his name, but he
goes by HS Tiki Toki online. There's
also a guy called just um
um
uh Nicholas Balanthazi and he he uses
the handle Sneako. So, it's another
another realm in which you're performing
yourself and
you can employ irony,
uh you can employ hyperbole,
you can employ a sort of performative
self-parody,
all of them obfuscating
who you really are, but sneaking in the
whole time. I mean,
I sometimes say
puckishly like there's no such thing as
a joke. I I obviously there is such a
thing as a joke, but there's a sense in
which all jokes contain a masked truth.
And so, there's a certain You can be
racist as a joke
uh
up to a point, I guess, but there comes
a time when actually you're just being
racist.
Yeah, what's that line about um
any organization that starts out uh
pretending to be a cult or making a joke
about being a cult eventually becomes a
cult.
Very true. And so, there's this kind of
double-edged challenge that I had in
making a program um of wanting to take
it seriously as a subject and not
wanting to take it more seriously than
it deserved. Mhm. Right? I think there's
elements There's elements in all these
kinds of stories where you have to uh
you can't fall into the trap of
seeing it as a ca
a being a part of a moral panic, you
know? There's a sense in which we have
to keep things in proportion. I do think
that
kids, youngsters are very often able to
read media in a way that is quite
subtle, you know? And they they can see
the parts of it that are performative.
Like, I'm an old-school fan of rap.
Like, I I used to listen to some of the
lyrics, if you took them literally, are
horrific. They're literally about, you
know, going around killing people and
um
just committing violence and uh you
know, I'm talking about old-school
N.W.A. and and and and Ice Cube
and then uh that whole era. And you
know, Tupac to an extent, even to this
day. Like, I still like a lot of grime
and and drill music.
But um you sort of learn how to read it
as
not completely literal. So, with it's in
the manosphere, there's a similar
there's a similar issue, which is how
what parts of this
um
you know, you don't want to You got to I
try and employ enough of my own irony,
enough of my own sort of sense of
recognizing the parts of it that are
playful and irreverent and almost kind
of enjoyably outrageous, and then the
parts of it that are uh just over the
line, uh abusive, uh bullying, um and
factually wildly incorrect. Because the
the the the flip side of having a world
where everyone has a media channel is
not just oh we all have an ability to
become celebrities and perform ourselves
in public, but nothing is curated, and
so suddenly we're in a world where it's
widely believed by many young people
that the Earth is flat. It's become
relatively normal to say that um the
pyramids were built by space aliens.
They doubt whether we've been to the
moon. I mean,
call me old-fashioned, but it's like I
have a I have a limited patience for
that kind of nonsense.
One of the things that makes me think
of, do you remember the period, the sort
of the golden era of American comedy
movies, stuff like Anchorman, Talladega
Nights, Will Ferrell, Step Brothers?
And what me and my friends at university
used to do, we'd quote those movies. You
know, you'd make those joke I love lamp,
or you know, like wow, that escalated
quickly, or rich mahogany, and stuff.
Those would be the quotes that we would
make.
I get the sense that
a lot of what you're seeing here is kind
of
taking the place of that.
It's people who are
uh sufficiently
engaging and viral and
outrageous and
uh signature in their style Mhm. that uh
creates this sort of
meme
culture below it, where it's just thing
it's it's it's catchphrases and and and
ways of talking and and and little uh
artifacts, little cultural artifacts
that show that you watch this thing as
well. And um
I get the sense that that's
a lot of it is is that and the
difference is nobody looked at Will
Ferrell and thought, "Well, that's how
you should That's how a news reporter is
supposed to behave or that's what a news
reporter is doing." But because the line
between entertainment and real life has
now been blurred so much, it's live
streaming but it's also entertainment.
So, well, is it live? Is this life or is
it more kayfabe?
I I'd agree. I think come, you know,
with for me it was
it was both
alternative comedy of the '80s who who I
I looked up to and then maybe when I was
a little younger you were inspired to be
that outlaw archetype whether it was on
something like the A-Team or The
Professionals or, you know, just a
badass, a cowboy,
a maverick cop. Um, and and then, you
know, pop music for me later on rappers,
people who impersonated or or affected a
kind of an outlaw swagger
of being unapologetically into
fast cars, having big muscles, flexing
how much money you had.
I you know, the to me the YouTube you
you talk to kids nowadays
age 8, 9, 10. Ask them what they want to
do, they'll say, "I want to either be a
footballer or a YouTuber. I want to be
either, you know, astronaut or a
YouTuber." But YouTuber is basically
number one. And you know, it's it's kind
of in a way you know, every generation
says, "How am I different from my
parents? Like what have I got that
doesn't that belongs to me that they
don't really get?" You know, and uh,
you know,
but that's part of cultural regeneration
and actually
in almost Darwinian terms, there's a
sort of sense of like you join the
bachelor herd, you leave the the family
unit and you you you you you you you you
you begin to birth an identity
with your peer group that's independent
of the one that you've evolved in the
family setting. And and alongside that
go certain archetypes of role models and
and and and so this YouTuber community
is like they're their version of of
punk, alternative comedy, and and rap
all kind of rolled into one.
But the
the danger is
that the the stage is no longer just a
literal stage like you know on the set
of Top of the Pops or whatever. The
stage is now the real world and and and
unlike in the old days where there were
supervisors like in the BBC, you know,
watching
like something on the BBC what TV show
or whatever or
alternative comedy show, you had old men
in suits saying like actually you can't
make that joke and you know this bit's
going to be cut off and you know that's
a this is going up before 9:00, you
can't have people in scantily clad
outfits. Like everything was invigilated
and scrutinized for its appropriateness
for a specific vulnerable audience,
right? But that's all gone out of the
window. You could and so kids are on
their phones watching endless scroll of
stream of content that's maximized for
engagement. You know, it's the opposite
of how it used to be. It's maximized for
audience engagement so that if it's
women who are half naked and guys with
muscles and inappropriate jokes, that's
pushed to the top of the algorithm.
Uh and it's I don't want to sound like
an old fart, but maybe
maybe that's okay. Like you know, it's
just a weird maybe you know
Yeah, I mean it's and parts of that are
exciting. You know, I don't I really
there's parts of the kind of the new
media landscape
that genuinely like as a fan of pranks,
like there's some of the pranks are
funny. As a fan of like documentary like
fact-based interactions,
I enjoy that. Like stuff that goes viral
cuz it's a weird encounter or
something's awkward or but um, but
there's no guardrails that I can see and
the people who are rising to the top of
the heap
are are people like
Andrew Tate, Sneako, HS. And the last
thing I'll say on that is
and behind all of that, and maybe this
was the discovery going into the
documentary, behind all of that is is an
upsell. Is is is a is an attempt to
convert your eyeballs into sales for
some crappy product like a highly
dubious online university a questionable
crypto
project, an FX trading platform. And
because you these are your heroes, you
know, these are the people you admire
then you you end up, you know, some
portion of those viewers end up buying
these crappy products.
What do you think's driving this trend?
Why around men's issues? Why not around
something else?
Well, I think it exists among women as
well, but in a different form. I mean, I
it's not something I've studied, but my
instinct would be that there's a kind of
Kim Kardashian
maybe even Bonnie Blue sort of adjacent
realm of
induced insecurity about looks that
involves the upselling of
um, sponsored content and
uh, questionable beauty products like,
you know, I'm not a huge fan of the
whole Instagram look. Like, I I feel
like
that there's a whole new
female archetype that's being hatched
that is I I I don't it's like I I quite
like people to look
that, you know, natural for want of a
better term,
um, but I get that I don't I don't get
to set the um, the beauty norms. I think
for men, um, well, they say
Instagram is a way for you to compare
your insides with other people's
outsides. So, um if like a lot Yeah,
like I joked that I was an incel before
it was fashionable. Like I can relate.
>> [laughter]
>> You know, I can relate to the feeling of
like, "Wow, why am I not Why am I
the only one with a dance card with no
names on it?" You know, I was saying to
someone earlier today like that
Morrissey lyric, "There's a club if
you'd like to go, you could meet
somebody who really loves you. So, you
go and you stand on your own and you
leave on your own and you go home and
you cry and you want to die."
From How Soon Is Now? Like that's like
the incel anthem. Um so, I understand
why men especially young men cuz I think
that's important like we It's not guy
It's for the most part this isn't guys
in their 30s and 40s. This is teenagers
um 14 through 18 and 20.
And I say that based on hanging out with
spending time filming with HS Ticki
Tacki, Sneako, uh and others and and
seeing like the This is like sometimes
even 9 years old, 10 years old coming up
and saying like, "Oh mate, I love you.
Uh you're the best." So,
they're they're ki- kids uh some of them
uh and certainly young men who are
trying to figure out where they fit in
in life. And in a world where many of
the old entitlements and certainties
have been eroded and um
it in which they don't know uh
you know, they they they're looking for
some sort of parasocial relationship or
sense of connection. And um
and they want big muscles and and a big
fast car and lots of money and that's
that sort of speaks for itself, right?
Yeah, I
It's a good point around the age. I
don't really think about it that much.
The audience for my podcast which is uh
many of whom are men is there's
basically nobody below 18 and a
big big big chunk of them are sort of 20
to 40.
So, I don't really think about those
young kids, but
I guess what's interesting is yeah,
maybe if you're to talk about the
removal of previous role models,
the paths toward legitimacy that men
would have been able to hold on to in
the past that are no longer there,
socioeconomic imbalance between women's
performance and men's performance.
I I don't know
how I don't know how many of
kids that are 11 years old are thinking
about that, factoring that in. So, I
don't know that that explanatory
mechanism does work if you're
22,
but I'm not convinced and you've had
time to kind of be rebuffed by a world
that you felt you were promised but
never got delivered to you.
But I I'm not convinced that that's the
same. So, maybe it's more entertainment,
but there's less ability to discern
whether this is something that's a
turned up to 11 joke or it's exaggerated
or caricatured for comic effect or is
completely not meant seriously or
something else.
You know, it's a good point. I I suspect
it's it's a little bit all of the above.
I do think that
um
in in one sense,
if the if if Tik Tok had existed in the
18th century
or let's say 19th century at a time when
there were there were
jobs in factories and kind of
traditional gender norms and archetypes
and
I I still think actually people would be
kids young men would be enormously
beguiled by it. Like, there's a sense in
which none of the messaging, you know,
you could Andrew Tate's messaging, a lot
of it seems to be derived from books
like
Iceberg Slim's books where it's about
the pimp culture of the 50s and 60s.
The the you know, it's this sort of
sense in which uh
I can the idea is I can teach you how
women think and actually
you can't take women at their word.
They've got a different
they've got a whole different
vocabulary. It's It's sort of like
erroneous notions of like, oh,
breaking people's spirit and you know,
you know, ugly dark stuff, but it's gone
viral as a side effect of a of an
algorithm. So, I think partly
you know, even without the collapse of
manufacturing
in in the West, you know, parts of the
West and and even without the entry of
women into the workplace and even
without an attempt to
be less prescriptive about what gender
roles look like, it would still be
enormously enticing.
Uh, but then you add in some of those
other things
um, and clearly it's even more the case.
I mean, I I don't know like if you're 12
or 13, you may not be thinking about um,
entering the workplace, but you
obviously are thinking about
in some way aspiring to be more than you
are.
You know, in in fairly basic ways. Trust
really is everything when it comes to
supplements. A lot of brands may say
that they are top quality, but very few
can actually prove it, which is why I'm
partnered with Momentous. They make the
highest quality supplements on the
planet and their whey protein is
literally the cleanest on the market.
It's fast-absorbing isolate sourced from
grass-fed European cows, which means no
hormones, no antibiotics, no GMOs, plus
it's NSF certified, meaning that even
Olympians can use it. And unlike most
proteins, it's designed for gut health.
No fillers, no junk, low in lactose, and
it mixes amazingly. This is fantastic.
Clean protein usually tastes awful and
this is unbelievable. Best of all,
there's a 30-day money-back guarantee,
so you can buy it completely risk-free,
plus they ship internationally. Right
now, you can get 35% off your first
subscription and that 30-day money-back
guarantee by going to the link in the
description below or heading to
livemomentous.com/modernwisdom
and using the code modernwisdom at
checkout. That's
livemomentous.com/modernwisdom
and modernwisdom at checkout.
What do you think
the manosphere that you saw is trying to
remedy in the world. What are they
seeking to
achieve?
Well, I mean I think you might be giving
them a little too much credit. Like I
think they're trying to remedy their
pocketbooks to a great extent. You know
what I mean?
>> [laughter]
>> They're trying to achieve wealth
uh for themselves. Um and you could say
that doesn't explain everything. Like
well, they could do that by um
you know, I don't know, going out
prospecting or trying to find sunken
ships. But um but they clearly have
they clearly have found a way of
connecting by by in a sense of appealing
to the parts of I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I
the less evolved, the less
meritorious, the more primitive parts of
our identities, right? There There's a
sort of um what we're seeing living
through is a is a is a time which our
our most primal urges, you know, our our
kind of evolutionary strategies, our
drives towards
um whether it's sexual or tribal, you
know, those parts that are controlled by
the amygdala, like deep inside the
reptile brain, have been connected to
the most high-tech
uh forms of technology.
And and so you know, we're and we're
defenseless. You know, we I don't want
to sound super kind of neo-Darwinian,
but you know, the senses which we are
still living with our own kind of
software uh which was evolved on the
savannas of Africa, right? And um and
and is adaptive to certain situations
there, fight and flight and whatnot. And
then uh and then so when someone
when those are deployed and weaponized
against us
on on social media, we are somewhat
defenseless.
Uh I would say what I suppose you could
say, well, what do they say that they're
attempting to remedy? They would say
they're attempting to remedy an overly
woke uh culture, a culture in which men
have lost touch with what it means to be
a man,
in which women I mean to quote Myron
Gaines, one of the main
people I speak to is is a guy called
Myron Gaines. Are you familiar with him?
Yes.
So, he's part of a double a double act
called Fresh and Fit. They have a
podcast in Miami.
Uh their content is is very extreme and
Myron Gaines wrote a book called Why
Women Deserve Less. And his idea his
whole
message is that women have been pampered
and they are over entitled. And as men,
we need to recognize that and give them
less and everything will go more
smoothly.
And so, his message would be
um
actually, yeah, men can
hack the game of life, you know, we I
can teach you the cheat codes of life. A
lot of it based on old PUA, pick up
artistry,
supposed hacks, you know, negging women,
um recognizing that women are
in that in that words or in that view,
status obsessed.
Uh and then you can build the life that
you would like and would deserve
by um employing his techniques.
I I I mean, there's a lot more that
could be said about that. I mean, I find
it so
inimical to the way I think about the I
mean, I was raised by a feminist mom,
you know, and and and and in South
London in a world where
Yeah, the the
that the idea that I you know, my mom
was a working mom. I grew up in the '70s
in South London. So, the idea See, these
ideas are so alien to me that
I had to try to get my head round them.
I think a lot of it seems to be based on
his interactions with um
cam girls and OnlyFans models. Like in
his world, he's like all he When he
talks about women, he only really seems
to be talking about Instagram models and
women who do a lot of social media.
Like that that gets you some way down to
understanding like what his mindset is.
Um but with it so within his sample
group, he's in this world where there's
this competition in which all women one
of his pieces is like women can't
shouldn't go on social media and if you
have a girlfriend you got to keep her
off social media.
Um
anyway, I'm going on a bit of a tangent
but that that message is is is an
unrecon it's too kind to call it old
school, I think. It's It's It's a sort
of almost a pastiche of a maybe a cafe
bar but certainly
a a parodic um sort of hyperbolic
version of some old school um
masculinity in which men should be able
to have a sex sex with as many women as
they like and women should really only
be virgins until they marry and then um
just sleep with their husbands. Maybe
old school but Genghis Khan old school.
Yeah, maybe you're taking about the
Genghis Khan would be probably
that that would be their ultimate alpha.
I look
I think it's interesting for me having
this conversation because I'm accused of
being a part of the manosphere very
regularly. I got in trouble at the start
of this year and a lot of the I got
called for the first time ever I got
called a looks maxer and um I realized
when that happened I realized that looks
maxer had taken the place of this sort
of catch-all term for some guy that we
don't like and probably has icky
beliefs. It would have previously been
right maybe some sort of right-wing
maybe it would have been like like you
like pick-up artist or or something else
and um it's interesting watching your
perspective from me as someone who the
manosphere has got a huge problem with
and I've never claimed to be a part of
it and we disagree on a a lot of things
and
the only real
alignment that we have is that men watch
our content. Uh
but
I think what I'm
taking from your perspective is that
it's not necessarily you don't see this
content as being mission-driven even if
it's framed as being mission-driven. You
see it as being
self-serving
primarily for
accumulating more fame and wealth for
for creators.
Uh but it's done under the guise of this
is part of a bigger mission.
That this is this is a a grander plan
and that that appears to be
an effective exploit kind of like in a
computer game that there's been a
a
a hack that's been found and if you
couch your pursuit for fame and money
under
a
bigger
desire for systemic change, uh that
seems to be that seems to be an
effective way to sort of camouflage it.
Is that
Is that a fair representation?
>> Definitely that. I mean, even to go
further
uh
>> [gasps]
>> I think there's parts of it where it
isn't even so much that it's camouflaged
as mission-driven, although it may be,
but also that it's
um
it's
it's exploiting vulnerabilities or maybe
deliberate parts of the algorithm in
order
to
uh draw more eyeballs. Like In other
words, I don't even
it's
even Myron Gaines would say a lot of
what he says
to be is to be outrageous, you know, to
get people's attention, to awake them
up. Like they do sort of walk back. Some
of the things they say are so horrific.
I don't even want to really repeat them,
but but you know, so sort of horrific in
terms of seeming to endorse
um
sexual assault or certainly minimize it
um
and saying things like as I said like
the women shouldn't vote.
Um
I think he said at one point he thought
gay people should be rounded up and put
in special camps.
Um
So you're I don't think I I don't know
like I don't know that he necessarily
believes that. In fact, if you talk to
him sometimes he'll start walking those
back. So so he'll be like oh well I'm
not literally saying and what I mean is
they start pausing it and sort of
um making it sound more acceptable.
Uh but then you're right. There is a
part of it where they are uh
advocating a return to a certain more
more male-centered version of society.
But actually it would be wrong to say
that that's their signature because
there's plenty of people, conservatives
let's say, who who might take a similar
position.
Um so that's not really their
identifying characteristic. Like the the
the really what singles them out and
defines them as extreme manosphere is
the willingness to embrace a kind of
paranoid conspiratorial mindset, to
employ outrageous, I would say utterly
cynical,
clickbait-based um
content creation.
And then all of it with a view to grift.
Like at the the behind it is a um
is is a is it's it's an angle. It's a
it's an attempt to reach a market. And
someone like
HS Titchy Titchy, he's he's Essex-born
uh
is
Like a lot of these guys
um
single parent home
a home in which
certainly for Tate like the chaos in
Tate's household growing up. He talked a
lot about how his
dad would come by and beat him up. You
know, you you grow up real quick. One
good ass whipping is one of his quotes.
Like the idea that there's massive
educational value in being beaten up by
your dad
uh is is kind of extraordinary.
And probably some kind of compensation
by him, right? Like some attempt to
You've you've got this line.
>> You've got this line in the doc you say,
"The romance, the confidence, the wealth
were all either illusory or out of reach
and the anger seemed a compensation for
the fear of being exposed."
Yeah. Well, uh because actually the
they're telling they're say they're
saying if you follow my part if you if
you take my advice, I'll teach I'll give
you the cheat codes to life.
I uh and you will be rich like me. But
the way they teach you to be rich
is generally not the way they got rich
if they are rich cuz the other part of
it is
it's not clear how much of it is even
real.
Um I mean I this there's so much
false content. There's so much
misleading uh advertising
in my opinion. You know, the idea that
oh, if you want to be a
multi-millionaire,
uh just do what I did and and and go on
this FX trading platform.
And you're thinking, "Actually, I'm
pretty sure HS Tiki-Taka made his money
by streaming for
10 hours a day, you know, and
um taking a cut of the products that
he's selling not by trading on FX." You
know what I mean?
And and so um
there's a sort of uh a bait and switch
going on.
Uh and then with Tate specifically, he
came up
kind of as an offshoot of the PUA
community, the pickup artistry
community.
And then using
this sort of Neil Strauss The Game
adjacent techniques in order to say that
I can teach you the psychology of women
and then you can run cam girls and you
can be a pimp. You know, is one of his
first products was the so-called um
pimp uh pimping ho PhD pimping ho's
degree.
He's tried to walk that back now, but
obviously the whole
paper trail is there online and and you
know, describing how you have to get a
girlfriend and
have sex with her
and then she'll fall in love with you
and then you introduce her to camming
and then you take her money.
Meanwhile, I just add Can I add one
thing to that? And then he'll say in
other interviews, "Oh yeah, I did this
thing where I taught people how to make
money
by being quote a pimp, but it doesn't
really work cuz you uh you have to be
like me to do it. Like you can't teach
that." So, the level of cynicism about
their own products um
is obviously extreme as well. A quick
aside, if you've noticed your energy
isn't quite what it used to be even
though you eat well and stay active,
there might be a reason for that. As we
age, our mitochondria, which is the
parts of our cells that produce energy,
become weaker and make less energy,
which is why I'm such a huge fan of
Timeline. They developed this pill right
here that helps clear out damaged
mitochondria, so your cells can actually
renew themselves. And this isn't just
theory. In clinical trials, people saw
mitochondrial renewal increase by more
than 40% in just 16 weeks along with
improvements in their overall energy.
Timeline is backed by over a decade of
research has more than 50 patents and is
the number one doctor-recommended
mitochondrial supplement on the planet.
I started taking it nearly 2 years ago
because it was recommended to me by my
doctor, and that is why I've used it for
so long, since way before I knew who
made the product, and that is why I
partnered with them. Best of all,
there's a 30-day money-back guarantee
plus free shipping in the US, and they
ship internationally. So, right now you
can get up to 20% off and that 30-day
money-back guarantee by going to the
link in the description below or heading
to timeline.com/modernwisdom.
That's timeline.com/modernwisdom.
What's the link with childhood
experiences here? You you mentioned sort
of some patterns of fatherlessness or
strife in the upbringings.
Yeah, I mean
uh
I hesitate to play armchair
psychologist, but let's do it anyway.
It's definitely the case that
of the people I interviewed
the ones whose backgrounds I looked
into, that was the business guy,
business guru, and friend of the Tates,
Justin Waller.
Um and also HS Ticki Tocki
um and Tate is obviously exhibit A.
There was this sense in which there was
no father figure present in the home.
You know
uh as a sort of like I self-identified
progressive like
um
I I you know there's a part of me that's
like uh
actually I think all kinds of flavor of
family can work, but it's noticeable how
much trauma there was
um in the homes of these people and and
also
uh yeah, just unpredictability. You
know, it might even be that you know,
the the the first go-to would be like,
"Oh, well, I guess a dad in a home
would be good." Like I think I tend to
think
if it's an option, you know, I dads
bring a lot to the table, you know, the
risk of stating the obvious.
But just stability, just some sense of
like knowing
that there's some regularity and some
kind of
sense of security in the home, both
financial and emotional. And um
yeah, it goes without saying if your
dad's coming around beating you up
that's going to kind of create an almost
apocalyptic mindset. Like I've I've said
in the past that there's parts of the
Tate message, this message where you
can't trust anyone. Only you uh
only you can depend on yourself. You got
to be a warrior, a warrior and go out
there and and and then and women risk of
being attacked and that's why you can't
let your wife out on a road because you
got to be a warrior and she could be
like It actually if you were living in
the time of Genghis Khan maybe or maybe
like there'd been a complete collapse of
society and marauding bands of warlords
were taking over the streets, you know,
the tumbleweed strewn streets, you know,
and we were sort of foraging in cracks
in the gutters. Like okay, yeah, I guess
you would have to be like a warrior. But
that actually isn't
not yet anyway the society that we live
in, but I do think that if you see if
you come from a somewhat apocalyptic
home life and you have to evolve this
sort of warrior strategy in order to
make sense of it, you know,
where your dad is marauding
into the house every now and then, then
you can see how that would be an
appealing mindset and and here and his
brother you get the sense of them being
trauma bonded and in a world where
nothing outside their tiny unit is solid
or quite trust trustworthy. And then you
roll that out and kids are like, "Yeah,
I want to be a warrior. It sounds kind
of cool. Like it sounds badass." And it
becomes an all kind of all encompassing
model for how society should be.
If that's the case, if it's so common
[clears throat] that a lot of [snorts]
guys who are
growing up to talk in a vociferous
manner about how to survive the world,
about self-sufficiency and sovereignty
and not being able to trust and standing
on your own two feet
and that's come out of difficult
childhood experiences,
fatherless homes, maybe some neglect or
dysfunction or abuse.
I don't know. I It You know,
in many situations you'd say, "Well,
that deserves sympathy."
Oh, I'd agree.
Yeah.
And in fact, I do think that um
I've attempted to extend empathy to um
you know, I I I I tend to think like
those categories of victim and
perpetrator uh can be too binary like uh
you you you
you you should have seen ways in which
these
guys these influences are I mean, I feel
bad for what Andrew and Tristan Tate
went through. Like, it's quite painful.
We have a little picture of him aged 4
years old. You think, "What did that kid
go through?" And then similarly,
uh there's a we've we've we meet someone
called Ed Matthews who's a um a friend
of HS Tiki Toki. He's another streamer
um who gives vent to some conspiracy
theories. And But, you also see him when
he's I think 9 or 10 years old going
online going on his
Yeah, eating marshmallows doing like
talking in a slight YouTube Mid-Atlantic
accent guy, "Can you say fuzzy bunny?"
or something. And he's You just see like
he's a guy who grew up more or less
online raised by YouTube, you know? Like
Like Like they used to say like kids
raised by wolves in the woods. He's been
raised by an algorithm. And what does
that What does that do to you? Uh well,
it turns out so it turns you into Ed
Matthews. So, yeah, I think it's
appropriate to have empathy. And I think
the part that we don't really dig that
deep into
is the tech side. Like, the ways in
which Well, who's behind this? Cuz it's
kind of gray engineers and and business
people who've programmed
uh social media platforms in order to
keep us online for as long as possible.
But, we're all defenseless. I have no
superiority when it comes to my
algorithm
uh has me by the short and curlies. I go
on to Instagram to send a DM to someone,
and then 20 minutes later I'm looking at
videos of a woman playing the piano with
her breasts. That was a real [laughter]
one that came up. Not naked. She wasn't
naked.
Someone sent that to me. I'm like, "What
the hell? Don't send that to me." It
These platforms are really good at
hacking the bottom of our brain stems.
And uh yeah, I guess it's it's an
interesting challenge to think
I I had this guy on the show, uh Stuart
Russell, and he wrote the book on
artificial intelligence up until
probably about 6, 7, 8 years ago.
And he
explained to me about how these
algorithms work, these black box
algorithms. If you ask a YouTube the
YouTube engineer, let's say there was
just one,
so what does what is the algorithm? What
does it do? Can tell you what the output
is, but it can't No one can tell you how
it works because it's self-training,
right? It's trying to maximize largely
click-through rate and time on site. So,
get people to press a thing, and once
they've pressed a thing, get them to
stay on the thing. That's kind of it.
Maximize time on site.
And what he taught me that was really
interesting, and I think adds a really
cool flavor when you whenever you're
watching anything on the internet,
especially if you see this kind of
runaway escalation effect of any type of
content,
is
the algorithm can do uh two things to
make
you more likely to click on a piece of
content. First one, which most people
understand, is it can become better at
predicting your preferences. I know what
you like, and I'm able to deliver that
to you in a good way.
The second one, which is way more
pernicious, is it can nudge your
preferences to be easier to predict.
So, if it's able to engineer you, and
typically if you're out on one end,
either right or left or up or down based
on whatever, you know, ideological map
you want to use,
it is far easier to predict how you're
going to behave. Cuz if you're in the
middle, you might fall one way one time,
and then another way the next. And I
realized as he was talking, oh well,
there's also an implication here for the
people making the content. Because if
the algorithm is training the feedback
mechanism of the preferences of the
people who are watching,
it's also doing it to the people who are
incentivized to maximize the people that
are watching. Cuz we, me and you, you've
got podcasts and stuff, you've got
metrics. You can see what you're doing
that is effective. There's a retention
curve. Oh, I said this thing. Oh, that
was an We should We should do more
segments like that on the show next
time. I I don't know what
reporting Netflix gives or has or
whatever, but yeah, I could imagine In a
documentary, screen People screen test
movies and stuff, right? Like that's
kind of the same thing. Why are you
screen testing a movie? Because you're
trying to be shaped by the audience. But
this is now being done en masse with
metrics all the time, 24 hours a day
with an algorithm. And you know, you
bring up the sort of dynamics of live
streaming and how that sort of
contributes. I saw for the first time
ever I was at Mr. Beast's Beast Games 2
premiere in Hollywood at the start of
the year. And for the first time ever I
saw a
a live streamer in the wild. And I'd
only ever seen it
this side of a screen before. And to
hear someone unironically say, "W
cameraman in the chat." To to hear that
in real life, to me kind of felt a
little bit like seeing your school
teacher at the supermarket. Like, what
are you doing here?
You shouldn't be here. Like, you should
Mrs. Henderson, you're supposed to be in
You're supposed to be in history class.
Um but yeah, this algorithm thing, it's
becoming better at predicting users'
preferences, but it's also shaping the
preferences of those users to make them
easier to predict. And
it has to be shaping the
incentives of the creators. And this is
what audience capture is, right? That
you just begin to throw more and more
red meat toward the audience to do the
thing, to say the thing that they
are going to agree with, that they're
going to respond to. So, yeah, the
algorithms are warping, but they're not
just they're warping in kind of all
directions, including kind of vertically
integrated back up the production stack.
100% and imagine if as well that you're
you're putting out content that is maybe
feels authentic to you, uh that, you
know,
maybe some of it is stunts and pranks
and some of it's uh skits or
interactions with people in the public,
but some of it's just monologues or you
just talking about stuff. And you're in
this continuous feedback loop of being
rewarded for some things and not for
others. What that does to your identity
like and and, you know, if your main
relationship in life is is with the
chat, like a virtual community,
uh the ways in which you would start to
second-guess who you are. And especially
in this realm where we talked about
kayfabe and this sort of sense in which
there's this unacknowledged fictional
dimension that's never really spoken
about. Mhm. You know, how confusing that
would be. You would start to think, "I
don't even know who I am anymore." You
know, that that that there's this sort
of existential burnout that takes place.
Um I'm really curious though when you
said the thing about how would they be
able to in that idea of nudging your
preferences
instead of just pandering to them.
How do they do that? Do we know? Just by
giving you more extreme content? The
algorithms. So, I I
Stewart didn't explain the dynamic to
me, so I'm just going to bro-science it
and pull it out my ass, but I think it
would be probably to do with a reliable
escalation of a a a pipeline. I hate
using that word because
it's always thin end of the wedge, you
know, you start off watching Jordan
Peterson and before you know it you're
at a KKK march, which I I don't think is
necessarily true. But,
I do think that if you were to come up
with a way to
imagine that the algorithm was able to
see, cuz what it's doing is it's using
the preferences of other users that are
like you, and it's using their path
to help predict your path, right?
Because you're a new user, you sign up
new you sign up with a brand new YouTube
account, how does it know what humans
like generally? Well, he clicked on
this, and other users like him also
clicked on this, and then they clicked
on that, and then they clicked on that,
and then they clicked on that. And if
you can become more and more reliable
over time,
I can't think of a better word for it,
it does create a kind of funnel. It
creates a sort of path that reliably
takes somebody toward a more predictable
version of themselves. And this is why
the biggest videos get the most plays,
beyond the fact that typically that the
best, right? Or that the most effective
at whatever keeping us on site, but also
that that the ones that are most
reliable from the algorithm's
perspective, uh being able to get people
to click on it. And especially if you've
pre-conditioned them, like Derren Brown
or something, it's going to be a big
Derren Brown game where you're trying to
sort of lay
the
lay the scenario so that this these
beliefs over time become and and also
are bucketed, people are bucketed into
um
more easy to understand groups. And I
think typically that that pushes people
out toward the edges.
What what I observed was that in the
streamer community, uh I mean this is
self-evident, it
that there's this pull towards obviously
engagement, and that
uh that involves antisocial behavior.
So, one thing that we filmed was
HSTikkyTokky setting up what he called a
pred sting. This was a big trend, I
think, last year, where people would set
up dates with someone pretending to be
uh, underage, and then the person would
arrive,
the alleged predator, and then
you would the streamer would humiliate
the person, say like, "You're a filthy
pred You're a filthy pred." And in the
case of the one we watched, they beat
him up,
um,
and it was it was really dark. It was
really dark. It was a bit, uh, it felt
like,
you know, we used to say, you know, back
in the day there was this vision for
what dystopian society would look like
where this sort of top-down justice,
public executions, or Hunger Games.
And my FSU was like, we've kind of
created a million Hunger Games that are
self-inflicted. You know, there's these,
um, sort of,
uh, yeah,
individually curated reality shows where
anything goes.
Um,
the other part of it was that in the
chat, because you've got these people
kind of
it's not like they're they're not quite
your friend. Like, you know, often
they're like trolls, right? And with HS,
because he started questioning,
I mean, I should wind up and say,
I should wind back and say that, um,
in in filming the documentary, I was
aware that they would be filming me. And
that was both a price of entry, but also
kind of an opportunity to tell the story
in a slightly different way where
we they'd be filmed I'd film them,
they'd be filming me, we could
incorporate some of their content into
the filming. Then after I leave, they go
back on stream saying like, "I don't
know what Louis' game is. I think he
might be trying to [ __ ] me, but I'm not
sure. Anyway." And then all these
comments come in saying like,
"Uh, bro, he's going to finish you.
You're cooked, bro.
Uh, HSL, major L for Tikky Tokky. Feruze
going to, uh, dunk on you, bro." And
then, um,
and then he he starts talking back to
the chat, and it becomes this sort of
spiral where
he starts questioning his decision to
take part. And we were kind of whipped
up, almost like a kind of gladiatorial
scenario, by the crowd, like, "Come on!
Finish him!" Like, the crowd is like
these comments that come in the chat,
and they're egging it us on to to sort
of ramp up the aggressiveness and the
tension. So, there's this there's this
natural tendency towards everything
becoming combat, you know, like a like a
whether it's is this a zero-sum
approach, which is entertaining, you
know, and goes back to the what you said
at the beginning about this sort of
metaphor of of wrestling, but I mean,
ends up being, I think, rather
exhausting, and it it's obviously a very
limited way
of of observing life.
We'll get back to talking in just 1
second, but first, if you have been
feeling a bit sluggish, your
testosterone levels might be the
problem. They play a huge role in your
energy, focus, and performance, but most
people have no idea what theirs are or
what to do if something's off, which is
why I partnered with Function, because I
wanted a smarter and more comprehensive
way to actually understand what's
happening inside of my body. Twice a
year, they run lab tests that monitor
over 100 biomarkers. They've got a team
of expert physicians that analyze the
data and give you actionable advice to
improve your health and lifespan. Seeing
your testosterone levels and dozens of
other biomarkers charted across the
course of a year with actionable
insights to genuinely improve them gives
you a clear path to making your life
better. Getting your blood work drawn
and analyzed like this would usually
cost thousands and be a nightmare, but
with Function, it's just 499 bucks, and
now you can get an additional 100 bucks
off, bringing it down to 399
bucks. Get the exact same blood panels
that I get and save 100 bucks by going
to the link in the description below or
heading to functionhealth.com {slash}
modern wisdom. That's at
functionhealth.com
{slash} modern wisdom.
Well,
what I saw with my live streamer in the
wild was it's kind of like permanently
edging your audience with no orgasm at
the end, Cuz if there's a payoff that is
a lull and that means that your numbers
are going to go down. The
the live the live stream numbers are
going to go down. So, there was always
it always felt like a cliffhanger at the
end of a TV show. Cuz we were studying
this we were studying the line for the
red carpet
5 10 yd away. So, I was and I was
fascinated. So, I'm just like locked in
watching this guy.
And
it was
we don't know what's going to happen
next. I don't know if we're supposed to
be here. This is the thing that's coming
up. There was always anticipation. There
was always this thing's going to happen
and this thing's going to happen and
this thing's going to happen.
And um
yeah, it
it is a
I think it it's maybe a little different
when it's not IRL stuff. If it's not if
you're sat in front of a computer,
typically you're
the pace is a little slower. You're
reacting to things as it comes up.
You're able to you know, converse a
little bit more with the chat. But yeah,
if you're in the in the real world
you're yeah, now we're going to go and
go down the strip in Marbella. Now,
we're going to go on the back line. Now,
we're going to go and
So, yeah, there is this um ever
escalating sort of dopamine spiral that
needs to be played and if not, then the
numbers go down. The number's going down
is bad and the chat says that it's you
fall off.
>> literally it's not like in the old days
oh, how how are the ratings last night?
They haven't come in yet. We'll get them
in a couple of hours. This is constant.
You can literally see how many people
>> know the ratings this second and next
second. So, I think
>> And also meanwhile meanwhile as they're
going some guy some clip there's a team
of clippers who are taking short clips
each one about you know, 5 to 20 seconds
long with a little headline like Thooru
finishes HS or HS wasn't expecting
Thooru to say this or HS's mom is is
having a pop at Thooru like
almost like you know, tabloid headlines
and then they just put them out like so
there'll be 50 or 100 or 200 of those
clips based on a conversation of a few
hours. And then whichever ones perform
well, like we're so you know, I have a
you know, podcast, we put out social
media content, we'll put out like two or
three clips. I mean, we're probably
still in the dark ages. And then uh one
of them did well, or maybe none of them
did well, but what we should be doing is
putting like these guys put out like
100, and then one of them gets picked
up, and then that that go gets
turbocharged, and it's seen. I had the
the dubious privilege of coming back
from location. This is the first time
this has happened. Uh and arriving back
and my kids would be like, "Dad, what
were you doing with HS? Like why were
you like I saw that what what were you
thinking when you said that thing? Or or
why did you like not answer his question
about such and such?" Or they had seen
it all already, not like on a live
stream. It had just been fed into their
social media feeds. I've never had this
weird sense of being eavesdropped upon
all the way through the filming process.
>> You were surveilled, but it wasn't it
wasn't by some secret police or a
private investigator. It was by the
camera team. Yeah, it wasn't you with
escorts in Middle America. It wasn't you
with some fundamentalist religious cult.
It wasn't you with whatever. And then
you coming home. I mean, I I
I have to imagine that probably your
kids
brought up more questions to you about
what was going on there than they do if
they've watched your documentaries,
because it feels live and emergent, and
it's going on in this way.
Yeah, I think it's I'm curious to see
what they make of it. Like I I well, I I
say that I'm already second-guessing
that.
I am curious, but I I also one of the
things
I grew up with a dad who had a public
profile. He He's an author called Paul
Theroux, and
you know, it's something I don't know if
you had a this or not, but it's
something when your parent is famous,
uh they have a dual persona, and you're
very conscious that the what the public
one feels false. Like, I just remember
thinking like the dad the version of my
dad that existed in pro newspaper
profiles or in as a as a kind of
character in his books wasn't someone I
particularly recognized. And I I I
imagine it might be the case with my
kids. And I'm obviously very keen that
they should see me as dad and not Louis
Theroux quirky documentary maker uh and
definitely not Louis Theroux like stooge
or a patsy or or kind of
uh sort of butt of HS Ticky-Tackies of
humiliating jokes, you know? But that
being the case, they see what they see
on social media. They've been quite
They've been surprised not surprised,
but they've been
a a
a kind of reassuringly relaxed uh about
me appearing on their streams.
I've been joking it's a Dad, you got
cooked by HS. I don't think they
actually ever said that.
>> [snorts]
>> Yeah. Well, look, not to me anyway. The
fact that you're in this sort of weird
panopticon of of
what was it that Stewart Lee referred to
it as?
Um uh
uh Starzy for the Angry Birds
generation. It's state surveillance run
by gullible volunteers.
Um That's a great that Now that's that's
panopticon You had me at panopticon,
actually. I'll keep Well, I shamelessly
ripped that off from Stewart Lee.
>> like but yeah, but but you panopticon
I the a term I think coined by Jeremy
Bentham, the utilitarian philosopher and
social reformer, which was the idea that
a prison of like 10,000 people could
theoretically be staffed by
one or two people
who were in a central kind of lighthouse
that surveilled the entire structure.
But you're right, we're in this sort of
uh mutually
Well, I can't really do better than what
you just did with the Stewart Lee quote.
We're in this a self-created kind of
all-facing panopticon. Yeah. Well, look
A digital panopticon.
I tell you what's interesting for me.
The the strange thing, at least a little
bit, is I know pretty much everybody
that was in the documentary in one form
or another. I've either
spoken to them, uh texted them,
uh haven't published any episodes with
any anybody.
Um but, you know, I've been for for
dinner and I'm I've been tangential, I
guess.
I think
the thing that's
weird for me, or that's a little bit of
a challenge for me, is that it's
difficult to speak to issues that men
face
without being lumped into this very
broad term that sort of concept creeped
out to include manosphere. I mean, you
know, feminism includes maternal
feminists, someone like a Louise Perry,
who campaigned against rough sex
killings and is very pro-family, and
sort of the most anti-natalist, super
liberal, super progressive woman. Like,
you know, feminism is a very big broad
bucket term that includes everything.
And I think that manosphere is
basically, meninism was just too weird
of a term. So, manosphere is sort of the
online equivalent of what feminism is.
And
shared audiences
don't really indicate shared motives.
But, I can say as somebody that I think
I do good work. I think I do I I I try
to create a a balanced approach for
helping men and women to understand each
other and improve their lives.
But, it's a
it's a difficult needle to thread to
just talk to men
at all. And, um
you know, I you use a a small clip, I
think, of Scott Galloway uh at one point
in in the documentary.
Um Richard Reeves, as well, from the
American Institute of Boys and Men is
sort of tangential to him, or Arthur
Brooks. Like, is Arthur Brooks and Scott
Galloway, are they really the the
[ __ ] cutting edge of of misogynistic
content online? And then I see someone
like a Scott Galloway talk about guys
should be strong or or they should go to
the gym or young people should go out
and have experiences and and make
mistakes and you know, he's concerned
about the decline of alcohol. He thinks
that people should be going out and
getting drunk when they're young and
whatever. Um
>> [snorts]
>> I think it's difficult or I found it
increasingly difficult to be able to
speak to the issues of men and boys and
what's happening with gender relations
and and sex and declining coupling and
all that stuff. It's been becoming
increasingly difficult for me to do that
without being
yeah, lumped in with
audiences that may cross over, but
ideologies that don't really have all
that much in common. And um it's really
it's it's it's been a really interesting
challenge because obviously people are
pointing at lots of the same issues uh
but their
uh diagnosis and then treatment plan uh
diverge an awful lot. So, yeah, it's it
was very interesting watching the
documentary. I I hear that and I'm
really curious to know Chris cuz you
mentioned earlier that you felt you'd
had a bit of
uh flak
for for something or other. Uh
are you are you able to share anything
about that?
Yeah, I mean I mean it's more general
flak. It's kind of
uh
rain rather than a atomic warheads, but
um
yeah, there's disagreements
around
typically it's that I'm too blue pilled
that I don't see I know the truth about
how men and women are supposed to
relate, but I'm not prepared to be
sufficiently militant or
harsh in my Really cuz
I thought you meant that you'd had flak
from the the legacy media Oh, I've also
got that. I've also got that. for being
too manosphere adjacent Oh, that's
correct. So, yeah, the manosphere think
I'm a blue-pilled cuck and the Guardian
think that I'm a misogynist
right-winger. So, I get I get kind of
ideologically spit-roasted from either
side. I've got sort of one in the front
and one in the back. Um but yeah, the
start of this year was
tons and tons. Manosphere influencer
Chris Williamson talks about this blah
blah blah blah blah blah. And uh hm
That's interesting because the term
manosphere has now been inflated to
encompass
so much that it basically
it it doesn't really mean anything if if
I am the same as
if me, Richard Reeves, Scott Galloway
are the same as Nick Fuentes and Myron
and Justin and Andrew and Sneako uh well
I mean it
it doesn't seem to be a particularly
granular or accurate presentation and I
don't think that they would agree that
they agree with much of the stuff that I
say. If you were to put it to a
sort of laid at their feet.
Agreed. I mean it's the term is highly
inexact and and and actually you're
right. And I've been on Theo Von and
I've been on Joe Rogan and
uh I I like those guys and and and I
know those have been characterized as
manosphere.
>> Manosphere. Jordan Peterson would be the
same. Andrew Huberman would be the same.
And in fact, as you say, there's a huge
gulf
there's a huge spectrum within the the
so-called manosphere community. It We
debated it a lot in the process of
making the film. I was I said many times
like I'm not about to make a film where
it's like, "Look at these guys. They
like to have big muscles and they want
to make a lot of money, you know, hustle
bro culture and what not. That's not I
don't find that interesting. I don't
find it particularly It might not be my
lane, but I I actually I like working
out. You know what I mean? And I And I
And I feel like self-reliance can be is
can be super important.
And that I And it's healthy to have a
kind of mixed diet of kind of media
intake and
so my thing was like oh
And we do try and clarify in the
documentary like this is the extreme end
of a certain world. And they are a
self-identified
community, the ones we look at.
They they very much see themselves, you
know, Sneako,
Justin Waller, Myron from Fresh and Fit.
They all They all They all They are all
quite tight, those three.
Somewhat adjacent to Nick Fuentes in
fact and certainly Andrew Tate is tight
with them. It's a certain So there's I I
think the more we can avoid a conflation
of
you know, everyone who happens to have a
male audience or everyone who advocates
for some sort of sense of like there's
certain things that are helpful for men
tend to find helpful and it's good for
their mental health, you know, as
opposed to oh the world's
run by a shadowy room of, you know, like
these kind of It's very There's a
There's a conspiracy mindset in the
world that I was looking at. There's a
It's a It is quite a specific
rather paranoid, I would say
narrow a kind of narrow
understanding of how the world works, a
narrow understanding of what men and
women are, narrow sets of what
achievement and success look like.
And that was that was very much the
precinct that I wanted the film to take
place in. Yeah, I mean, you're right to
say that men's self-improvement often
gets lumped in with this stuff, but, you
know, male forms of self-repair are
often treated with suspicion.
It's as though sort of any attempt by
men to rebuild themselves outside of
approved
therapeutic and ideological channels is
is is contaminated in some way. If you
are That's a probably the best example I
can think of, and I'm sure that he's
been accused of it, Andrew Huberman, Dr.
Andrew Huberman of Stanford, is part of
the manosphere because what he talks
about like evidence-based ways to sleep
better or gain muscle or
how much caffeine you should have per
day or something. Um
it
it seems to be that there's sort of two
things happening at the same time.
One is a big push, of which I'm
like unapologetically a part of, that I
think that the issues of boys and men
need to be spoken about more. That I
don't think that we need to do this
ideological land acknowledgement throat
clearing before where we identify the
problems that all other groups are
facing before we can turn our attention
to men because we don't have to do the
same in reverse. We don't have to
acknowledge how many men take their own
lives, are addicted to drugs, are
involved in violent crime, or go to
jail, or end up home, etc. etc. before
we can then talk about the problems of
girls and women. Uh but so, one thing is
happening, which is
I think that there's been some
upending of
previous routes toward a sense of
belonging and fulfillment and status
that men would have previously relied
on. And I think that that puts them in a
kind of a very uncertain world. Uh a lot
of the rules that they would have
learned from their parents' generations,
certainly their grandparents'
generation, it's been such a huge
generational shift. We've now grown up
This generation's grown up on the
internet, relying with online content
creators, a changing socioeconomic
landscape where women out-earn and
out-educate men up to the age of 30. Uh
all of this Okay, so how am I supposed
to navigate this as a man? I don't know.
We've got the most fatherless homes that
we've ever seen. So, the previous
patriarchs that would have probably
stepped into those shoes and would have
filled those sorts of roles, they've now
vacated. Okay, so who do we turn to?
Well, I've got the internet and there's
things on there. Now, again, all of that
is, I think, important to be addressed
and that
young boys and men need to be given some
really great
role models, archetypes, game plans,
blueprints for how to do this. I'm sure
that you would even as a present father,
it would be like, I'd
the more good information that my boys
can access on the internet, the better.
That seems like a good very pro thing to
do.
And also, at the same time,
there is a massive moral panic around
extremist vociferous content online that
is pipelining boys and men to believe in
these sorts of crazy things. And
it seems like
the uh legitimate concerns about the
second one are used to sort of smear
everything from the first one.
That as soon as you start to talk about
male self-improvement, that the the the
term I mean, again,
the fact that I was accused of being a
looks maxer, a term that's been around,
as far as I can see, for about 3
seconds.
>> Who Who Who accused you of being a looks
maxer? Some news
some news article. Uh looks maxer, Chris
Williamson. I I I mean, that feels a
little bit like telling somebody
uh it's it's a little bit of a a strange
sort of insult, I suppose, uh given that
I haven't tried. So, you know, I just
sort of that I just woke up like this
looks maxer thing.
Um
I It's It's just interesting these two
worlds exist at the same time. Yeah,
yeah, yeah. I think that's really well
put. I think you broke it down
beautifully. And and um but in just
parenthetically as well, if you've been
following the whole clavicular
phenomenon
>> I you I was I was going to ask whether
or not you have a an intention of of
maybe looking at the world of looks
maxing in future.
Clavicula, as they said like after cuz
we finished filming our documentary,
which by the way is on Netflix. I'm
going to do a brazen plug as of I don't
know if it's It'll be out yes. It's out
now. It's out now. It's out now. And and
which is exciting cuz I've made stuff
mainly for the BBC and and and and this
is my first foray as as a Netflix as
maker of a Netflix original. It's It's
crazy to think how many like
Well, I don't know how many people are
going to stream it, but it's available
worldwide. But
the we filmed it until about late last
year like maybe August, September having
started early in the year like January,
February and then
and then in the following few months. I
remember one of my kids came down and
like "Dude, check this out." and I it
was some piece of con Clavicula content.
And I did not think he was going to blow
up the way he did. I just thought oh
well, he's he's
he's kind of very good looking guy who
he seemed I don't know like he was just
doing what he was doing. But and then Ed
Matthews comment was like oh, he would
have been in the documentary, but he
spawned into the game too late. I just
like to It's true. It's true. But it's
kind of true. It's kind of true. They're
all avatars of some sort of social media
game.
>> the the the Clavicula thing is is I
think different. Um and the reason that
I think that and I I I actually think
that we're seeing the what could be if
it takes hold the beginning of sort of
the new
phase of the manosphere. So I I had this
I had this conception. I'll see if you
agree with it that the manosphere kind
of had three waves kind of like
feminism. So the first one was pick up
artistry
and that was Neil Strauss in the game.
It was negging
and it was
basically completely whitewashed when Me
Too came along because there was no way
that this sort of brazen
we just want to have casual sex with
women, use them and discard them thing
could have survived Harvey Weinstein. It
just It straight-up couldn't couldn't
have existed anymore. It was too It was
seen as too unsanitary. So, then what
comes out next is more red pill, and
that's alphas and betas and cucks and
soy boys and you know, that's kind of
the world that you inhabited. And then
it seems to me
that the next one that might be coming
online is actually a disregarding of
women. Like if you listen to what
Clavicula talks about, he's not bothered
about women. It's actually much closer
closer to the black pill than it is to
the red pill. It's not about Maybe to
some degree it's about gaining money,
but I don't even hear that as a stated
goal. It's literally about male male
intersexual competition. That's what
mogging is, right? It's about I am the
most formidable-looking, even if I'm not
the most formidable. I'm not seeing
people talking about actually becoming
fighters, actually becoming sort of hard
men, but just looking like hard men.
It's actually a really feminized way of
becoming super masculine, right? It's
using
cosmetic surgery, it's using
beautification and enhancement, it's
using different clothing, it's think
spending a lot of time thinking about
sort of the way that you look, not
necessarily what you can do. So, it's a
focus on appearance rather than
competence. And
it's not in any way concerned with
women, the approval of women. You know,
you
There is a
a world in which you could have said
that the red pill was the romantic pill
because regardless of whether or not it
was particularly typically romantic, it
was still very much concerned with the
approval of women, even if it was in
their disregard,
the the the relationship between women.
And I don't think that we're seeing
that. I don't think we're seeing that
with
>> That's interesting. Yeah, it's reminding
me a bit of MGTOW, men going their own
way. And and you know, which is all as
you say, like the ultimate black pill
where you sort of think, "You you what?
women I can't deal with them. You know
what you was I was also thinking about
because I think in addition to the
message
you have to think about the means of
delivery and so much of this as I said
earlier with like Iceberg Slim versus
Andrew Tate the message might be similar
but the means of delivery
makes it something else like I think
Andrew Tate in many respects with this
with the side effect of kind of Tik Tok
algorithm. You mentioned PUA the pick up
artistry community were communicating
largely through books and seminars like
come to Las Vegas for a three day
immersive in how to pick up women. You
think about the red pill that was
communicated in podcasts and YouTube but
whereas this new iteration is a live
streaming phenomenon and and
specifically clavicular he's not the
first looks maxer at all but he's the
first looks maxer that live streams
that I'm aware of and in that live
streaming environment you're not really
conveying it's not like a how to as such
it's a much more fluid experience of
kind of forming an attachment to someone
and seeing them exploring the world and
getting into scrapes. So he sort of has
the luxury of not really needing a
message. His message seems to be other
than the fact that if you're really good
looking you can kind of hack the system
right. That's there's not a
you know he seems politically ambiguous.
He seems to say almost anything
I mean I would say say it with almost
anything but you know his whole thing
like he supports Gavin Newsom over JD
Vance because Newsom's better looking
and Vance looks like a hobbit right?
Subhuman. And everyone and every all the
red pill community was kind of a you
know weird way of genius move as a way
of distinguishing himself from the red
pill right? He's like I don't really
care but I'm so empty I'm so utterly
amoral that I'm going to endorse
the person who embodies a sort of a kind
of California progressive mentality,
right? And everyone was like, "What the
actual?" Like, that was the most
outrageous thing he could do at that
point. You know what I mean?
>> better looking.
Yeah.
In other news, you've probably heard me
talk about Element before, and that's
because I am
frankly
dependent on it. Uh and it's how I
started my day every single morning.
This is the best tasting hydration drink
on the market. You might think, "Why do
I need to be more hydrated?" Because
proper hydration is not just about
drinking enough water, it's having
sufficient electrolytes to allow your
body to use those fluids. Each
grab-and-go stick pack is a
science-backed electrolyte ratio of
sodium, potassium, and magnesium. It's
got no sugar, coloring, artificial
ingredients, or any other junk. This
plays a critical role in reducing muscle
cramps and fatigue while optimizing
brain health, regulating your appetite,
and curbing cravings. This orange flavor
in a cold glass of water is a
sweet, salty, orangey nectar, and you
will genuinely feel a difference when
you take it versus when you don't, which
is why I keep going on about it. Best of
all, there's a no-questions-asked refund
policy with an unlimited duration. Buy
it, use it all, and if you don't like it
for any reason, they give you your money
back, and you don't even have to return
the box. That's how confident they are
that you'll love it. Plus, they offer
free shipping in the US. Right now, you
can get a free sample pack of Element's
most popular flavors with your first
purchase by going to the link in the
description below, heading to
drinklmnt.com/modernwisdom.
That's drinklmnt.com/
modernwisdom.
So, I think one element
What What do you agree with them on?
What do you
>> Okay, good question. And by the way, and
I also want to say like I think your
point about people talking past each
other. Like, one of the things I
have observed like in all the years of
making documentaries is very often
people who are disagreeing aren't really
disagreeing, they're just sort of
selecting a different data set and then
um and then arguing past each other. You
know what I mean? And none of them's
particularly disconnected from the
facts. Like they just
you know, there's some truth in that
concept of alternative facts. Like they
they can be different groups of facts
and then you select the data set that
supports your argument. So, you I could
identify toxic manosphere figures and
then call you manosphere and then
suddenly you look toxic, right? Um so I
I think the conversation has become
characterized by bad a little bit of bad
faith in terms of uh attempting to
stigmatize anyone who expresses
relatively uncontroversial opinions
about um
well, maybe there are some differences
between many men and many women that are
worth considering while never allowing
that to kind of be overly prescriptive
or lock people into preordained
identities. The part that I I agree with
um I think in general
Like well, I think I've answered the
question. Like I think in general it's
helpful to recognize there are
differences between men most men and
most women. Like without privileging
them or reifying them, you know, it
would be
Again, I don't it's it's kind of crazy
that I have to be careful how I say
this, but This is the throat clearing
thing. This is the the sensitivity
around this discussion. And that
actually I'm a fan of um
I tend to think uh you know, so so in
terms of the content like
I like self-reliance. Like I like
exercise. I think the idea of aspiring
to be the best version of yourself is
valid. I think attempting to fix
yourself first, think about
um
ways in which you can kind of obtain
some kind of
mastery over your life, right? Don't
spend your hours endlessly looking at um
the internet, playing video games,
looking at adult content, you know?
Uh you know, it's a paradox of the world
that many of much of the you know, much
of the Andrew Tate messaging is around
like stop you know, stop playing stupid
video games and stop looking at internet
porn." But, I sort of agree I agree with
both of those points. Do you know what I
mean?
But, actually
the thing the thing I disagree with is
well, the fact that it comes packaged
with a bunch of toxic or or you know,
just degrading and demeaning content.
If you separate like I follow Joe Wicks.
Like I'm a subscriber to You know Joe
Wicks? He's like a fitness He's a
fitness guru in the UK. Like
and I subscribe to his app. He doesn't
pay me anything to say that. And um
and and and so 5 days a week uh I'm not
a gym bunny, you know, maybe one day,
but I've got three kids and a business
and whatnot. You know, it's I'm making
excuses, but so but I've got 20 minutes
or half an hour in the day and I switch
the phone on
and and I watch Joe and he leads me
through a workout. Not live. They're
obviously they're recorded. And um and
that makes me feel great. So,
uh yeah, the all of that I'm fully on
board with, but what I'm not on board
with is um
is the horrific content that's being
amplified and the ways in which it's
become so small. And they're
role-playing they're sort of
role-playing as multi-millionaire
oligarchs and it's it's so paper thin,
you know, the it And it's idea of
chasing money and I'm just not a fan of
what they call flossing. Is that Is it
flo- Like the idea of like showing off
your like Oh, look how
Fl- flexing is I yeah. Flexing's the
more conventional term. I think flossing
is something. I'm not sure what it is.
Okay. You familiar with flossing?
The dance, I thought. I don't know.
Okay.
>> [sighs and gasps]
>> I don't know. Anyway, okay, so you agree
>> four granddads, but you know that whole
thing about, "Oh, I'm better than you
because I'm on a yacht." I find that so
cringe and it just rubs I mean, I get
that like if you're you know, I just
think that um
actually we we should be better than
that. And I also think that, you know,
the other like how can I make a ton of
money? Like dude, just follow your
passion. Like don't don't sign up for a
seminar on how to be a millionaire. Just
find something that you're good at.
Well, suddenly becomes self-selecting
that if you're trying to find
quote-unquote a good woman who isn't
concerned with your material wealth, but
what you spend most of your time doing
is flexing your material wealth, you're
going to attract the sort of woman that
is picking up what you're putting down.
And
>> Yeah.
it just reinforces
I don't know. It's like
every interaction just further confirms
what your priors were. And every time
that you step further into that world,
it just continues to reinforce it.
Big time. You you I couldn't have said
it better myself.
But they're in this village. And you
know, the other thing is that there's
this world in which you think, oh well,
you're looking for this like I'm looking
for
you know, what's your body count? Oh, my
body count's 150.
What's your body count? My body count's
like 780. I mean First of all, that's
that whole I find that whole thing
really cringey and embarrassing. But
then it's like, but you're you you
should really marry a woman with like a
low really low body count, ideally a
virgin.
I mean, that's already really annoying
and objectionable. But then they
surround themselves with
only fans girls. And then and then
they're like oh, you know, they're like
women are just in
they characterize women as
overly
either mercenary or overly sexually
active.
And then you're like, but what So but
you're in this world you're in this
world of adult content creators. Like
you you you None of this is matching up.
If you want to be traditional values,
head up to Utah or Idaho or something
cuz Miami is not for you.
Miami is a hotbed of the opposite of
whatever you're looking for. Yeah,
that's a good that's a good point. Look,
I think again, it's it's really strange
for me to be thinking about sort of
talking about this from the outside
given that so much of my content crosses
over, but
I think that uh
much of the hunger
for what
I I'm talking about and these guys, too,
is a sort of reaction to a felt lack of
sympathy and sort of denial of male
pain. And I think if there were if there
was more of an acceptance of
guys are having a tough time of it at
the moment through pretty much any
objective metric. I don't think that any
group has fallen further faster than
men. That's Richard Reeves' line from
the American Institute of Boys and Men.
Uh
if it wasn't for the fact that there was
there were no places to go, I think
fewer guys would go to the internet.
Um and that
creates both kind of the cause
uh it creates an opening in the market.
What's that line about um
if there is if there are no role models,
if you can't propose any. And I think
that this is a really great question.
Uh in fact,
for you, who do you think are some good
examples of of sort of genuine positive
role models that you would say to your
boys you should
th- this would be the sort of man that
you should emulate.
Uh well, I mean, the answer that gets
banded around a lot over here in the UK
is Gareth Southgate, like the the former
England manager.
Um I think he embodies a certain uh
sort of
dignity and and and and so so that's a
fair play with and and obviously in a in
a in a in a in a pursuit that many boys
aspire to excel in, many many girls,
too. Mhm. Um
uh
I mean, how long I mean, should I come
up with a couple more? Like, you know,
there's clearly a in the pantheon of
program makers, my field, David
Attenborough, you know, an an
a world-bestriding colossus of of
naturalism, a sensitive human being.
I mean, I think it is worth saying in
that in that scenario that you've
depicted of um
kind of male failure, if you like, like
you know, it's it's it's a me me men
despairing, like that thing of deaths of
despair, like
suicides and drug overdoses. We should
also like as a father of boys,
I I often remind myself that, you know,
the two things that matter most
to my kids at various times have been
football,
English football, obviously Premier
League football, and rap, grime and
drill. And those are both worlds in
which most of the preeminent,
world-famous, highest-paid,
highest-achieving
exponents are men. And worlds in which
in fact homosexuality is considered
still rather questionable and taboo.
Like not many openly gay footballers,
not that many openly gay rap artists.
So, there are I I I guess I'm pushing
back ever so slightly in the sense that
there are still realms in which um you
know, most of the most successful
comedians are probably still men. Like
there are still realms in which
uh not just men, but a kind of
traditionally masculine presenting man
is still ascendant. No, I I would agree.
I think the difference is between where
do the guys who raised to the top
and where does the mean, the average man
end up sitting? Because the average man
is not going to become a Premier League
footballer or Ricky Gervais. Uh the
average man is increasingly slipping
away from going to university,
increasingly slipping away from getting
a high-paying job, increasingly more
likely to be addicted to drugs or video
games or porn or weed or whatever. And
um
you're right. You're right to say that
men dominate the
uh the extremes, but they dominate the
extremes at both ends. And uh it's a
denial of the slipping back. I I that
this this is my read that if it wasn't
for the case that I am struggling as a
man, well, look at your privilege. Look
at all of these CEOs. Look at all of the
football players. Look at how well and
he goes, yeah, but
but I'm I'm struggling and and maybe
many of my friends are, too, and there
doesn't seem to be a sympathetic place
to land for that. Yeah, I totally agree
and I think I'm not a fan of like the
casual disparagement of men and I think
very occasionally, maybe more than
occasionally, that happens. Like
typical man or um
you know, step back as a man, um
check your privilege. Especially as a
father to boys, like boys uh I I never
want to be in a world in which boys have
kind of inherited an original sin by
dint of being boys. You know, it's like,
oh well,
you have to
you know, as a boy, you've you've
somehow your bequest is the fact that
men have tended to run society for
hundreds of years. Like,
>> No, he's like 5 years old, like 7 years
old. Like, don't
>> [laughter]
>> I don't know what I am, but you know
what I mean.
I know, I was joking the other day, like
I remember growing up and they were
like, you remember that nursery rhyme
what are little girls made of? And it's
all like, sugar and spice and all things
nice. And what are little boys made of?
Like, pigs and puppy dogs' tails. I'm
like, I remember I was like 7 years old.
I'm like, why am I made of puppy dogs'
tails? Yeah. You know what I mean? And
then that's kind of trivial, but I don't
like that sort of
um
like frivolous denigrating of of the of
the
of maleness. And then maybe I'm being
oversensitive, but I think it kind of it
it it's a little unfair. Um so, maybe
I'm agreeing with that. But and I think
you I think the other thing I'd say is
if I want to say I'm really apocalyptic,
uh we are all, both men and women,
but uh now
inhabiting a world in which technology's
upended so much and promises to upend
even more because God knows when
you know, in a world where I know a lot
of it's traced back to the decline of
traditional manufacturing, also birth
control, women entering the workplace,
uh globalization of the economy, you
know, and the fact that a lot of like
you know, traditional manufacturing jobs
moving to places like China and then
what actually most of the jobs like now
you can be done equally well or better
by women, but in a world where AI is
going to eliminate most of the jobs uh
that involve sitting in front of a
screen as is sometimes promised, there's
going to be this whole other ruction.
Like, it's going to play out really
interestingly, I think,
to say the least, in terms of how how
men and women interrelate. Like, whether
you know, the how sustainable I know I'm
taking us a bit off tangent, but
um
I sometimes think like that
you know,
male mental health versus you know, and
how it figures in wider society
will be subsumed by some vastly bigger
social crisis.
>> Wow. Yeah, I Do you know what it is? I
hadn't
I hadn't drawn that part of the
path down the circles of hell, but
you're probably right that
it's all well and good talking about the
issues that both men and boys and women
and girls are facing,
but when 50% of the workforce is
displaced by AI, I don't know whether
that's going to happen. When some
percentage of the workforce is displaced
by AI and people don't have meaning
certain jobs have jobs and other people
don't feel like they've got a path
forward, but it does loop back to what I
said before, which is
that if anything, if it requires
anything, it requires sympathy.
Like, it needs You need to be
sympathetic. Wow, the world changed
really [ __ ] far, really [ __ ] fast.
That's hard to navigate. That's hard to
navigate, but because
at least at this of it, the men were
part of a previously
beneficial group. They were part of one
that seemed to be afforded privileges
in certain domains, not the privileges
to go to war and die and etc. But, you
know,
opportunities that weren't afforded to
the women. It
it felt, and I think it feels to a lot
of young men now like they are being
made to pay for the sins of the
advantages that their fathers and
grandfathers had. Like they they they're
accused of being part of a patriarchy
that they no longer feel a member of. Um
you know, when they're looking around
and saying, "Well, where where is my
privilege?" And I think that it ties in
with
you talk to these two guys
and there's a line that they say, "In
life as a man, you're born without
value."
And I think what they mean with that is
it feels to me like there is a kind of
love and belonging and acceptance and
pedestalization that's given to
women and girls
that I haven't felt has been afforded to
me. I haven't felt as special. I haven't
felt as cared for unless I do something,
unless I sell make myself big and
impressive. And again with that,
sympathy. To go, "Fuck, yeah." You know,
previously it probably there would have
been a pretty linear progression for you
to have found a place in society and
done these things and cost of living and
and and uncertain turbulent times and
all of these different stimulus that can
cause you to be addicted.
And if you believe in life as a man,
you're born without value, that that
probably requires some sympathy, too.
Yeah, you're talking about Matty and
Chris who come up to Justin Waller,
Justin Waller the business guru, and we
travel we just walking around the
streets of Miami and they you can see
they're in awe of Justin Waller and
they're like, "You're our you're our
biggest uh role model and we you know,
we aspire to be like you. And they talk
about, yeah, they they feel they've been
born without value, which I think is a
red pill talking point. Um
just to say in passing, like there's a
there's a book, I haven't read all of
it, but I've read in it by Susan Faludi,
a feminist writer, published in the late
'90s, I think, called Stiffed, that
talks about the kind of manufacturing
and the struggle for male identity in a
kind of post-manufacturing era. But, um
I would also say though that, you know,
in what sense he says like Well, I say,
"What do you mean you were born without
value?" And then Justin Waller says
like, "You know, if you're a beautiful
woman, you get invited onto a yacht.
Who's going to invite these guys onto a
yacht?" It's kind of a funny moment. It
wasn't intended as such. Uh but,
actually though, I'm then then later I
was like, "Yeah, but what if you're not
a beautiful woman? What if you're just a
normal-looking woman? Like, then you
don't get invited onto a yacht." And
also,
it's a kind of Instagram um it's kind of
Instagram
paradigm Miami currency for value,
right? It's like you you he's sort of
saying like, "Uh if I put my picture on
Instagram, no one's going to click on
that, but if you're a beautiful woman,
they'll click on that." Like, dude, like
you have the whatever value you have
from
studying hard or becoming a professional
or apprenticing in a in some kind of
occupation. You like, he's just talking
about the value
that
a certain kind of Instagram beautiful
woman will accrue.
But, that's very that's a very narrow
uh lens through which to view life.
Well, it's it's no coincidence that much
of this is sort of been born out of
Miami and Vegas
because it's the caricature of that
culture. It it isn't it is kind of skin
deep, at least in terms of what's
supposed to be traded around. Yeah, it's
kind of it's it's kind of like
you first you're like, "Oh, I guess."
And then you're like, "Well, what Marie
Curie?" Like, did what was did she
uh do her Nobel Prize-winning scientific
work based on having a big Instagram
following? Like, did she like, "Oh,
she's hot. Marie Curie is really hot.
Like, you know, that that that's such a
weird
kind of way of understanding
uh how women achieve success in general.
Even think about who you want to spend
time with. You know, when I think about
when I think about the sort of people
that I want to hang out with at dinner
on a night time, some of my friends are
horrendous in the way that they present
themselves. They are not fashionable,
that but they're like
smart or thoughtful or
really interesting or really interested.
And every time that I walk into a room,
I just feel like I'm lit up to find out
what they've been working on or what
they've been thinking about, what's been
going on in their life. They're really
patient. They're super patient and
they're able to sort of sit with with
silence and awkward or they hold space
for someone who's going through a good
time or a tough time or whatever. You're
like
all of those things are impossible to
flex online.
All of those things are. And yet when I
look at when I look at the people that
I've
spend my most time with,
I'm surrounded by people who are like
some of them most many of them are
successful in the real world too, but
that's as a byproduct of being an
awesome person.
As opposed to
doing this
It's almost like a
if you took it to the extreme, it's
almost like a self-bimbofication
of the most extreme versions of
masculinity. Louise Perry calls it a
male-to-male transsexual
uh
uh procedure.
Where you sort of parody the most
masculine traits that you can. I mean,
you could say that for Clavicula, that
it really is almost like a male-to-male
transsexual treatment where
you start off being a man and make
yourself as much of a man as you can be
through cosmetic surgery and
beautification and enhancement.
Big time. I mean, I I like that. I mean,
the other part of it is and it's
reminded me of the game as well, this
idea that oh, you can win at life by
using these hacks.
And then you realize actually if you've
been around those guys who are using
sort of life hacks like that
it's quite a weird experience. You don't
feel good afterwards. You know that that
feeling of whether it's being nagged or
someone who's
sort of deploying certain
forms of
whether it's neuro-linguistic
programming, you know, and then you
think like something a little off like
there's something a little off about
this encounter like or if you're in a
situation where you'd have you'd slept
with someone like that. That's
that's got to that's got to feel
afterwards quite dark I would have
thought like it feels like a very
like a a quite a limited strategy for
succeeding at life.
You're performing masculinity. You're
not embodying it. It's you're reverse
engineering what would a man
who is this sort of a man do
and rather than make myself into that
man, I'll just pantomime his actions.
And you know, this is the problem. It
don't forget I'm sure that you did this
as part of your research, but the red
pill was born out of the PUA hate.
Right. Right. Like that was the
beginning of both red pill and black
pill was PUA hate and the reason that
these guys had PUA hate was that they
had gone through the pipeline of picker
artistry and either
found themselves unsuccessful in that I
am such a genetic dead end that it
doesn't work at all or and I think that
this is way more common cuz I
I
grew up kind of tangential to the era of
the game.
Guys realized that they could be
successful with women by following
neuro-linguistic programming and you
know,
manipulating social mores to be able to
get a woman into bed. But what they
found was
look at how much of a different person I
have to contort myself into in order to
achieve this. This further reinforces my
own perspective that I am unlovable as I
am, that I need to perform in order to
be able to be cared for, that I am not
enough, and I have to do this strange,
you know, like
Cinderella and the pumpkin thing in a
desperate attempt to make me
sufficiently likable to bed, and then I
wake up the next day and realize I did
it successfully, but look at the
contrast between who I am and who I need
to be in order to get love from a woman,
and therefore love from the world, and
love from society, and be able to
belong. And yeah, you're right. If If
you And I think we're going to see this
increasingly, and you saw this with Neil
Strauss.
I had Neil on the show two years ago
here in Austin. And Neil has now gone
through
almost a full horseshoe 180 to be
completely
family-pilled. He's got
no desire to be sort of in that world
anymore. He's writing books with Rick
Rubin about creativity. He's
co-parenting with his ex-wife, which I'd
never I'd never heard of someone doing
this, that he He says that they're a bad
couple but great parents. So, they
decided to, after their divorce, have
another child
that they would co-parent together.
And I mean, that is it you
>> Wow, that's interesting. Isn't that
fascinating? But think of That's the guy
that wrote The Game.
And I think that when when guys that are
socially awkward or feel like they've
got a chip on their shoulder, or they
weren't recognized in the past, or
they've got some
daddy issues or some trauma that is
either conscious or subconscious or
unconscious,
then they achieve everything that they
thought the world
was going to give them that would fix
the void inside. They've done it. They
realize the void's still there, and they
go, "Oh, [ __ ]
That now I'm really [ __ ] because
when I was poor and miserable, I had
hope, but when I was rich and miserable,
I was despondent. The thing that I
thought was going to fill that void,
I've now got and the void is still
there.
And I guess there's two two paths after
that. One is, I need to look deeper.
It's evident that my gold medalist
syndrome indicates that the gold medal
wasn't the answer. And the other path
is, ah, it was two gold medals or three
or four or five. That's the solution. I
just need more. The dose wasn't high
enough, not that the medicine was the
wrong type.
>> [gasps]
>> Chris, I need to I I can have to make a
move in a second. Um
it'd be I've got a child to pick up, but
I really enjoyed talking to you, man.
It's been I hope you I hope you're happy
with the chat. I am very much indeed.
Where should your people go to keep up
to date with everything? Oh, Netflix.
People can go and watch the documentary
on Netflix.
We've got we've got our film dropping on
well, it's already out on Netflix
worldwide. I've got a podcast I do for
Spotify and
I make documentaries with through my
company Mindhouse and other stuff's
swirling around wherever you happen to
be watching this.
If you're in the UK, it's a lot of stuff
on iPlayer. In the US, there's something
called BBC Player, I think, which no one
subscribes to.
And then some stuff pirated content on
YouTube, which is fine. Go and check
that out.
Beautiful.
Louis, I appreciate you, man. I'm
looking forward to seeing what you do
next.
>> All right, thank you, Chris. I'm really
glad we could hook this up. It was
I would it would have been even better
in person, but
we made it work. That's the important
thing. It's a privilege to be on.
Thank you for spending the time and for
for a great conversation.
Appreciate you. Thank you, man.
Congratulations, you made it to the end
of an episode. Your brain has not been
completely destroyed by the internet
just yet.
Here's another one that you should
watch.
Go on.