Video summary
Naval Ravikant challenges the prevailing anxiety surrounding declining fertility rates, arguing against the notion that low birth rates must be proactively fought or solved through government intervention. He contextualizes this shift by noting how societal fears often flip-flop over time; just as concerns about overpopulation and Malthusian limits dominated discourse decades ago, current doomerism has repackaged itself around population collapse. Ravikant attributes the drop in fertility not to biological factors like disease or microplastics affecting reproductive health, but rather to a conscious choice driven by women's emancipation, workforce independence, and increased earnings. He suggests that people are simply choosing fewer children to pursue more hedonistic lives and greater personal freedom, viewing this demographic shift as an evolution of human values rather than a crisis requiring immediate correction. The core economic argument presented is that the perceived problem stems from demographics interacting with rigid social structures, specifically guaranteed retirement ages funded by Social Security in democratic societies. As retirees rely on younger workers to fund their pensions and healthcare, a shrinking workforce creates pressure on the economy without offering viable policy solutions; politicians cannot easily remove these benefits for fear of losing votes. Ravikant warns that attempting to fix this through mass immigration often leads to cultural fragmentation, eroding social trust and turning societies into low-trust environments where citizens fight over limited resources. He posits that while having more children offers a "lottery ticket" benefit in terms of innovation, forcing people to reproduce is neither feasible nor desirable given the abundance of modern resources compared to historical constraints like land scarcity. Ravikant proposes that slow-moving disasters, such as population decline or peak oil, will eventually self-correct through economic incentives and individual adaptation rather than top-down mandates. He cites Scott Adams' "law of slow-moving disasters," suggesting that enough individuals with the right incentives will naturally find solutions to societal challenges over time. Potential adaptations could include retiring later, leveraging AI and automation to care for the elderly, implementing stricter immigration rules to preserve high-trust societies, or simply expanding housing availability as population pressures ease. The underlying philosophy is that humans are adaptable; if there were too many children today, society would immediately complain about a lack of space and resources, proving that people will always find something to manage once they stop complaining about the current issue. Beyond macroeconomic theory, Ravikant addresses the psychological narrative surrounding parenthood, countering studies that claim having kids reduces happiness by reframing them as measures of momentary joy rather than long-term meaning. He asserts that while parents may experience temporary unhappiness during tasks like changing diapers, they find a profound sense of purpose and meaning in raising children—a value system distinct from fleeting happiness. Drawing on his own observations, he notes an overwhelming consensus among parents who do not regret having children, contrasting this with the rare instances where individuals admit too late that they should have had kids sooner. He also touches upon pet ownership as a potential sublimated desire for children but distinguishes it by criticizing the confinement and neutering of animals, preferring to focus on human connection rather than surrogate relationships. Ultimately, Ravikant's vision for parenting centers on providing unconditional love and fostering high self-esteem in his own children, believing that this foundation grants them the freedom to make their own mistakes and pursue their unique desires. He emphasizes a parent's role as an output of love rather than a controller of outcomes, acknowledging that while he cannot dictate what his children feel or become, he can ensure they are loved unconditionally from birth. This approach aims to cultivate individuals with strong self-esteem who possess the autonomy to navigate life's complexities on their own terms. The discussion concludes by highlighting how these personal values align with his broader skepticism about forced societal engineering, suggesting that a combination of economic incentives and cultural evolution will naturally resolve demographic challenges without necessitating drastic or coercive measures from governments or institutions.
Read the full video transcript
You had a tweet that said, "I'm not
convinced that declining fertility needs
to be proactively fought." Uh, I forgot
that one. You're gonna have to I'm I dug
deep. Um, why? Well, I mean, think back
like what was it 30 years ago, 20 years
ago, everybody was saying overpopulation
of the earth is going to be a problem.
Malthusian ending, we're going to have
too many people. And now all of a sudden
we're going to have too few people. So
part of it is just the doomerism meme is
always alive and well, right? Or it just
gets repackaged. Yeah. We're running out
of oil. We have too much oil, right? You
know, it's like the world is cooling.
The world is warming. Like there's
always something to scream about. The
world is ending. Uh there's no progress
in technology. AI is going to blow up
the world, right? So people tend to
overdo in both directions. Now, what is
the actual fertility problem? Right?
Well, people are having less kids. Are
they having less kids because there's a
disease? Was there a virus? Did they
lose their fertility? The microplastics
in the testicles, right? No. It's people
are having less kids because they're
choosing to have less kids, right? Women
have gotten emancipation, independence
in the workforce, and they're making
more money. Um, people don't need kids
as insurance policies. They have less
kids. Maybe they're living hedonistic
lives. God bless them, right? They want
to have more fun. They want to have less
kids. I don't see the act of choosing to
have less kids as a problem. Okay? So,
let's move one level up. Uh, it's
because of retirees. It's because a
large percentage of the population is
essentially retiring at the guaranteed
age of 65 or 70 thanks social security.
And so, they need other people to pay
for it. They need more workers in the
workforce. And if the workforce is
shrinking, then you have a small number
of people Exactly. who are supporting a
large number of retirees. And in
democracies, you can't take pensions
away. The voters vote you out. So they
slowly strangle the economy. So what do
you do? Then you have a bunch of
immigration and then the whole culture
changes. You end up in a low trust
society and people start fighting over
limited resources and how do you control
which immigrants come in? How do you
make sure that they're good taxpayers
after they're in and so on. M so you end
up with in in kind of this trap where
the low fertility rate is upstream of
the downstream problems that are
cultural and societal.
But I'm not sure that you're going to
solve that by making people have more
kids. How are you going to meme them
into having more kids? And I'm not even
sure it's necessarily a problem because
keep in mind you have more resources
now. You have less of a burden. Now
there's there's a flip side where every
kid is a lottery ticket and an
invention. So there's some benefit to
having more kids but you can't you can't
force it. I think it'll work itself out,
right? The Scott Adams has this great
law which calls the Adams law of
slowmoving disasters. When disasters are
very slowm moving like peak oil or
global warming or population collapse
and everyone can kind of see them
coming, economics and society is a force
solve them because enough individual
people has incentives to go solve them.
So I don't know exactly how it gets
solved but I think it could get solved
in various ways. Uh one example could be
um you know maybe people retire later.
Maybe AI and automation and robots take
care of the older people. Maybe we
figure out how to have immigrants while
still keeping a high trust society. We
kind of put more rules around
immigration that protect some of the
high trust benefits. Maybe we outsource
more things. Maybe we just, you know,
have more land and housing to go around.
Believe me, if we were having too many
kids, everybody be complaining about how
there's no housing and there's no land,
right? So, they'll always find something
to care about. So, I just don't view
this as like a thing that any individual
or government action is going to solve.
I think economics and incentives over
time will solve it. And I'm not even
convinced it's like that big of a
problem. Is there anything that you do
think is a it may be self-correcting
too, which is that if there are too few
kids in society and the returns to
having kids literally might just go up.
It might just be easier to have the
incentive to now have a child because
there's so few around. They're going to
get the best job. They're going to have
most resources like everyone wants to
everyone's I suppose if you could come
at it from a pain side which is you look
at all of the other people around who
don't have kids. Let's say that um
pensions completely drop off and the
only way that old people are able to
survive is if their children pay them
some sort of stipend like reverse you
know send send money back up the
generations. You go okay well that's a
pretty [ __ ] good incentive. That's a
good incentive. I also think that people
have been me'd into thinking that uh
kids make your life worse. And that's a
that's a pretty pretty bad what's your
experience been? Uh kids make your life
better in every possible way. If you
want if you want an automatic built-in
meaning to life, have kids. Uh and I
think there are these bad psych studies
like most psych studies unfortunately
that say that people are unhappy when
they have kids. Yeah. It's because
you're catching in the middle of
changing a diaper and you're saying like
are you glad you had kids or not? Or or
they don't even say that. They say are
you happy or not? And they say no I'm
not happy right now. But what they don't
realize is that person has found
something more important than being
happy in the moment. They found meaning
and the meaning comes from kids. And if
you ask parents, do you regret having
kids? I think it would be 99 to1
against, you know, it would be no, I
don't regret having kids. I love having
kids. I'm so glad I had kids. It's it's
incredibly rare to meet a parent that
regretted having children. It's pretty
good odds. It's it's extremely good
odds. And I think so I think I think a
lot of people get late into life and uh
you know then they can't admit that they
didn't want kids that that that they
should have had kids. It's kind of late
in the game. Um but you know a lot of
times you see everybody who has a pet,
right? Uh and they're pushing them
around in a stroller, right? What is
that? That's a sublimated desire for
children. Yeah. Uh Malcolm Collins says
that uh having a pet is to children as
using porn is to sex. He basically
thinks that it's sort of a surrogate. It
it's definitely in that direction. And
you know, I don't I like pets. I like
animals. I don't but I don't like the
idea of like neutering or spaying
something and then keeping it as a
prisoner in the house and having to
train it. You know, it's just I don't
want to be responsible for that. Given
that you've been thinking more about
child rearing kids, what do you hope
that your kids learn from their
childhood?
They should just be happy and do what
they want. I don't I don't I don't have
particular goals in mind for them. I
think that's a that's another route to
unhappiness having. That's different
though, right? Than learn versus goals.
It's not necessarily what do they want?
What what do you want them to want out
of life? Like what is it that you had
that idea around your number one job as
a parent is to provide unconditional
love to your kids? That's it. Yeah,
that's it. Right. So I can be loved or I
am loved unconditionally. Is that one of
the things? I want my kids to feel
unconditionally loved and I want them to
have high self-esteem
as a consequence of that. Mhm. But I
don't get to choose any. All I get to
choose is my output. I can output love.
I can't choose what they feel. I can't
choose how they behave. I can't choose
what they want. I can't choose what they
turn out to be. And downstream from
that, there should be freedom. There
should be a degree of freedom that comes
from the self-esteem that comes from the
unconditionality. They should make their
own mistakes and learn their own lessons
and uh have their own desires and
fulfill them as is appropriate. Uh I
like any parent, I wouldn't want them to
be hurt. I wouldn't want them to be
unhappy. But I cannot control these
things. A quick aside, you've probably
heard me talk about element before. In
fact, you might be thinking, "For sake,
Chris, will you shut up about element?"
And the answer is, "No, I won't."
Because when I take it, I genuinely feel
the difference. I genuinely believe that
proper hydration makes a massive
difference to your performance. So, I'm
going to keep talking about it until you
start drinking it. Element is a tasty
electrolyte drink mix with everything
that you need and nothing that you
don't. Each grab-and-go stick pack
contains a sciencebacked electrolyte
ratio of sodium, potassium, and
magnesium with no sugar, no coloring, no
artificial ingredients, or any other
junk. It plays a critical role in
reducing muscle cramps and fatigue while
optimizing brain health, regulating
appetite, and curbing cravings. This
orange flavor in a cold glass of water
is how I've started my morning every
single day for over 3 years now, and I
genuinely feel the difference versus
when I don't. Best of all, they have a
no questions asked refund policy with an
unlimited duration. So, you can buy it
and try it for as long as you want. And
if you don't like it for any reason,
they'll just give you your money back.
You don't even need to return the box.
That's how confident they are that you
love it. Plus, they offer free shipping
within the US. And right now, you can
get a free sample pack of all eight
flavors with your first box by going to
the link in the description below or
heading to
drinklnt.com/modernwisdom. That's
drinklnt.com/modern
[Laughter]
wisdom. Thank you very much for tuning
in. If you enjoyed that clip with Naval,
just a mere taster. The fulllength
episode is available right here.
Go on.