Video summary
The Backrooms movie introduces one of its most enigmatic entities in the form of Archabald Leland Sutter, a figure first encountered during the chaotic Christmas tree scene. Unlike other characters whose origins might be traced to specific memories or locations within the complex, Archabald appears as a warped still life with his body seemingly fused to a wheelchair and his legs protruding through the seat. His physical description is unsettling, featuring misaligned eyes, extra fingers, and a large, flat nose, while he obsessively toggles a lamp attached to his chair. This initial presentation establishes him as an unknown and perturbing presence, serving as a mystery that fans have spent months trying to solve by analyzing every frame of the film.
Since the movie's release, viewers have proposed various theories regarding Archabald's true nature, ranging from simple explanations to deep symbolic interpretations. One basic theory suggests his initials, ALS, refer to the disease that causes paralysis, though this lacks direct evidence in the narrative. Another straightforward idea posits that he is merely a misrendered customer or an Ottoman Empire entity who sat near a lamp, which the Backrooms incorrectly copied into a humanoid form. However, more compelling theories suggest that Archabald represents furniture itself, specifically lamps, as Clark treats people like inanimate objects that can be moved and used at will. In this view, Archabald is the realized version of a lifeless object given sentience solely to perform the function of turning a light on and off for his owner.
Beyond the concept of furniture, there are significant artistic and historical connections drawn between Archabald and real-world references that may have inspired the character's creation. The name Archabald Sutter Watt closely resembles a real artist known for paintings featuring yellow and white palettes similar to the Backrooms aesthetic, while the poet Archibald Lampman wrote about themes of loneliness and labyrinths that mirror the Backrooms experience. Additionally, a popular theory suggests that Archabald was the original owner of the building or store before Clark took over, accidentally falling into a null zone decades ago. This would explain his vintage clothing and imply that the Backrooms has existed for over a century, making it an ancient, timeless problem rather than a modern phenomenon.
Ultimately, while there is no definitive proof to confirm which theory is correct, the ambiguity surrounding Archabald adds a layer of horror and depth to the film's narrative. Whether he represents a forgotten owner, a piece of furniture brought to life, or simply a plot device to emphasize the agelessness of the Backrooms, his presence challenges the audience to question what else might be hidden within the complex. The creator of this analysis leans toward the idea that Archabald signifies the long history of people getting lost in these null zones, serving as a reminder that the Backrooms is not a new invention but an enduring reality. As with many mysteries in the film, such as the identity of the fat man or the motivations of Async, it may be better to leave some questions unanswered to preserve the strange and otherworldly nature of the story.
Read the full video transcript
One of the most memorable entities that
we see in the Backrooms movie is the
wheelchair guy or Archabald Leland
Sutter. The only problem is before the
Christmas tree scene in the movie, we
know next to nothing about his
character, who he might be, how Clark
found him, and who he represents, or
even what his motives might be inside
the film. But since it's been a couple
months since the movie has released,
myself and other Backrooms fans online
have been theorizing and kind of
deducing who Archerald might truly be.
And in today's video, the one you're
watching right now, I'm going to analyze
this character bit by bit, frame by
frame, layer by layer, and I'm going to
try to explain who the actual person is,
maybe what his backstory is, what he
represents, and how he fits into the
greater narrative of the movie and
backroom story. There's going to be a
ton of theorizing and a ton of guessing
in this video. Some of which might be
wrong. I've been wrong before. But
either way, it still should be a fun
time without more talking. Let's get
into the video and let's dissect the
wheelchair guy, Archabald Leland Sutter,
and let's get into his backstory and
everything about him, shall we?
Going into this movie, we knew none of
these characters at all. We didn't know
who they were, what they look like,
their backstories, or anything at all.
The only things in the movie that we
have previously heard of is the company
Async and the concept of the back rooms.
That's it. We first encounter Archie,
who I'm going to call him for the rest
of the video, inside of the infamous
Christmas tree scene where Clark is
running around for his life trying to
find Cat and also not trying to be eaten
by Pirate Clark. I have an entire video
breaking down that scene if you would
like to go watch that after [music] this
video, of course. But we can see inside
of that specific moment that Archie
appears to be a man sitting on a
wheelchair dressed up in a late 1800 or
1900 style of clothing. And yes, I said
sitting on his wheelchair, not sitting
in his wheelchair. His nose is large and
flat and misshapen. But the most notable
thing about this person is that his eyes
are warped and misaligned. His entire
face is kind of construed and warped
around. And he's not just sitting in a
wheelchair like a normal individual
would be because if you look closely,
you can see that his waist has fused and
melted to the chair itself. And his legs
are actually clipped [music] through the
bottom of the chair and are sticking out
below. His hands are mangled and they're
bent in very odd ways. and he's got more
fingers than five on each hand. He's got
like 10 fingers on each hand and they're
warping around each other. Very strange.
There's also a lamp that's attached to
his wheelchair that he seems to really
enjoy turning off and on over and over
and over again. And from our initial
seeing of this character, that's all we
can deduce from that first glance. Now,
in this movie, us as the viewers really
are not supposed to know anything about
any characters when we first see them.
That's the entire point. They're
supposed to be creepy, unnerving, and
unknown. And especially in this
Christmas tree scene, the main still
life entity that we're supposed to pay
attention to is Clark's ex-wife, the one
that's chasing after him. With that
being said, Archabald's presence
himself, it's simultaneously perturbing,
but also comical at the same time. It's
obviously really scary to see this
random guy that you've never seen before
flicking a lamp on and off and rolling
towards you. But it's also weird because
we don't know how he relates to any of
these characters. But to figure that
out, we can break it down a little bit
further and we can try to see what sort
of details can be uncovered from the
other scenes in the movie.
We know that the backrooms works by
taking things from real life and then
copying them down over and over and
over, remembering less and less of that
thing each time it copies it. What we
don't know for sure is exactly where it
takes those memories from. Obviously,
some parts of the complex are copies of
Clark's store, his business, other
businesses from nearby, his memories
like his ex-wife, and other things from
the community like misremembered houses
and people and rooms. But as for the fat
man, these other rooms that we've never
seen before, the pitfalls, the throne
room, and archerald, we don't know where
these things come from. We don't see
them in the film beforehand, contrary to
popular belief, and we don't know what
they represent specifically. So, all we
can do is jump online to our little echo
chambers here on the internet and
theorize what it might mean. So, for the
next few minutes, I want to dive into
some basic theories and kind of spitfire
them at you to get them out of the way
before diving into some more advanced
theories that might point to a strange
origination for Archabald. We know
obviously that Archabald Leland Sutter
equals ALS. Those are his initials. And
ALS is a disease that incapacitates
people and it leaves them wheelchair
bound. Now, I'm not really sure what the
backrooms would need to remember ALS
for. Maybe someone in Clark's life was
afflicted with ALS. I don't know, but we
do know that that is some kind of
connection. Another theory states that
Archabald is just an Ottoman Empire
customer. This one is the simplest and
kind of least interesting theory in my
humble opinion, but it states that the
backrooms just incorrectly rendered a
guy who came into Clark's store, sat in
a chair, and there was a lamp next to
the chair, and the backroom saw that and
created Archabald thinking that he was
in a wheelchair with a lamp attached to
it. It's not as fun, but it might be the
most simplest answer. I don't know.
Those are kind of the basic theories
that people throw around on Reddit and
on Discord, but I personally prefer some
of these deeper theories that kind of
look a little bit further back into who
this person might be and who he might
represent. And now I want to get into
those deep theories. The first deeper
and more strange theory that I want to
discuss is that Archabald Leland Sutter
represents furniture. Specifically, fans
have pointed out that the names
Archabald, Leland, and Sutter are also
the names of existing lamp brands and
styles from real life. Perhaps Clark
sold these brands in his store. Maybe
the Ottoman Empire had different types
of lamps and the backrooms misremembered
them as living human beings. Maybe the
backrooms doesn't truly understand how
lighting or lamps work, so it thinks
that there has to be a person attached
to the lamp for it to turn on. It's a
pretty interesting theory, but I want to
move it just a little bit further down.
What if Archer Bald represents furniture
in the sense that he actually represents
the physical pieces of furniture that
Clark sells? We see later on in the
movie that still lives in general seem
to be images and metaphors for actual
pieces of furniture like couches and
stuff. when he rips the people open,
specifically the fat man, you see that
there's this fluff that's inside of them
and he eats them and he doesn't care
about them and he obviously doesn't take
their opinions into consideration cuz
Clark kidnaps them and keeps them, you
know, captive. He treats them like
furniture, like pieces of inanimate
objects that can be used however he sees
fit. But that's not the case because
they're actual they're still lives.
They're copied. They're they have this
small level of sentience even though
they're not, you know, like we are. So
maybe Archabald is the perfect thesis of
that. Maybe he represents furniture to
Clark. The only thing we see Archabald
do is turn his lamp on, and he does so
when Clark tells him to. So maybe that
is exactly what he's meant for. Who
knows? As we know, Clark tends to treat
people around him like they're useless,
like they're little play things that he
can move wherever he wants to and use
them however he wants to, like I said
earlier. And if they're lifeless and
they don't talk and they can't move
around their own, that's pretty much
exactly what Archabald is. He's the
realized version of that. The second
theory I want to discuss is that Archie
equals real life art references. This is
one of my personal favorite theories in
this entire video I'm discussing. And
it's also one of my favorite things to
do in real life is to compare art to how
we do things cuz the famous saying is
life imitates art. In the history of art
and in the history of the world, there
are many depictions of what we would
call liinal spaces inside of those art
pieces. I've compared different versions
of liinal spaces in different videos.
Like I talked about the Minotaur's
Labyrinth and the Complex sharing many
similarities in this video if you go
check that out. And there are another
multitude of examples of this sort of
thing existing in our history. There's
astral plains where you're forced to
wander different mazes for the rest of
your life. And all of these things are
very similar to what we call the back
rooms. But for this specific theory,
there is an artist from real history
named Archabald Sutter Watt who created
this painting titled interior back end.
Now this painting is nearly the specific
exact color palette that we see used in
the complex with its yellows, its white
and its different playing with lights.
It also has furniture as a prominent
focal point of the painting, which the
movie does as well. Maybe Kane really
likes this painter or this specific
painting. And maybe that's why he
created Archie, the character, as a way
to reference it. I mean, the real life
artist's name is literally Archerald
Sutter Watt. That's pretty close to
Archabald Land Sutter. I mean, Leland is
a lamp brand. Lamps use wattage to power
their lights. Archabald Sutter Watt is
the real artist's name. You see what I'm
saying here? Am I cooking? A sub theory
from Archabald equals art is that
there's a Canadian poet named Archabald
Lampman who was responsible for creating
a poem titled The City of the End of
Things that apparently according to the
internet has very similar themes and
messages to the backrooms concept.
Themes of getting lost, loneliness,
labyrinth and structures and losing
yourself in life. Now again, that poet's
name is Archabald Lampman, which could
you get any more on the nose? Of course.
I mean, literally Archabald Lean Sutter
has a lamp on his thing. Archald
Lampman. I don't know if if that's a
connection or a correlation, but it is
really interesting. Theory number three,
Archbald Leland Sutter owned the store
originally. One of the more unnerving
theories about Mr. Archie is that he was
actually the original owner of Captain
Clark's Ottoman Empire or whatever the
building used to be before Clark owned
it. And he used to own the actual
building and maybe run a store there.
This theory states that maybe he got
stuck in the back rooms decades before
Clark even found it. We know that null
zones seep into our reality, like soft
spots in random places, and we know that
you can just walk through them at any
moment's notice. We're not told in the
backrooms movie how long ago the
entrance to the backrooms actually
opened up in Clark's basement store.
Like we know that the slit through
reality is there, but we don't know how
long it took Clark to notice it. He just
started living in his store because his
ex-wife kicked him out of his house. He
just started doing that a few weeks ago.
For all we know, this opening could have
been there since the beginning. Or maybe
Archabald owned a store nearby. After
all, the Ottoman Empire is in kind of a
strip mall. Maybe there's another
entrance inside of another store. Maybe
it's in one of the stores we see at the
end of the movie that had been copied
down into the back rooms. We have no
idea how old the back rooms is. We we
just know that it doesn't listen to
time. It doesn't obey what we know to be
as time. And we know that Async didn't
create the backrooms. They merely tapped
into it. So perhaps a null zone has
always existed, even way back in the
early 1900s or late 1800s. If Archabal
truly is that old, he's kind of dressed
like it. So maybe he accidentally rolled
his wheelchair into a null zone and he
couldn't find his way out. And maybe
he's been stuck there and copied down
over and over and over ever since for
over a hundred years. And now in this
modern day, we get this still life
version of a person that used to be a
human. Like he used to be real, but he
just got kind of disfigured and copied
over and over after a hundred years of
being stuck here. I personally like this
theory because it makes the back rooms
concept feel a lot more ancient, a lot
more encompassing, and it's it's like
it's been a problem for so long, and
it's going to continue to be a problem
for the future. It also adds this degree
of otherworldliness because it kept this
person alive perhaps for all this time.
Who knows throughout history how long
other things or other creatures or
people have been stuck here. But those
three theories I just got into were the
main ones that are tossed around on the
internet. There are a couple other
theories that are going to get honorable
mentions here that I did not include and
I'll go ahead and talk about those now.
The first theory in the honorable
mentions is that Archie is Clark's
wife's divorce lawyer. One of the most
important story lines in the entire
movie is Clark's separation from his
wife. It drives his drinking habit, his
anger, his hatred towards people, all
that stuff, and his devolution into
resentment. And in fact, the entire
pirate Clark entity is literally a
representation of that hatred, of that
anger, of that drinking, of it awe
encompassed into one entity. So, we know
the backrooms does sometimes take
feelings and put them into people. And
we already know for a fact that the
backrooms takes things from real life
and puts them into the back rooms, too.
So, maybe this still life archabald
entity could represent someone from
Clark's life who he thinks about a lot
in a negative way. We see the still life
of Clark's ex-wife. And we know that
Clark thinks about her constantly. So
using that same logic, maybe Archabald
is the divorce lawyer of Clark's
ex-wife, and he thinks about the lawyer
all the time because he hates him. Maybe
he's the actual lawyer that convinced
the divorce court to give his ex-wife
the house instead of giving it back to
Clark. Clark always talks about how is
it's it's his house. He pays the bills.
Maybe this lawyer convinced the court to
do otherwise and give it to the ex-wife
instead. We could take this one step
even further and say that maybe Archie
was either the divorce lawyer or the
judge in the lawsuit between Clark and
his ex-wife and the lamp attached to his
wheelchair. Maybe that symbolizes the
light in his life, so to speak, being
turned off. Just how the spark in his
life was taken away from him when his
marriage ended. I don't know. Could be a
reach, but it's pretty interesting to
think about. Another honorable mention
theory is that Archabald literally means
nothing and he was put in the movie for
wow factor. This could honestly be the
reason like we don't have actual hard
evidence of anything I've talked about
today, but the backs movie was kind of
meant to be bombastic and crazy and
otherworldly and strange and liinal of
course and what better way to do that
than put some random guy in a wheelchair
that turns the lamp on and off. You
know, maybe he doesn't symbolize
anything, but I don't know. So, now that
you've heard those main theories about
Archabal's character and even some
fringe theories and some honorable
mentions, I want to know what you think
he represents. Who do you think he is?
Who do you think he represents or fits
into? Why do you think he's in the
movie? How do you think he's going to
change the the concept as a whole?
Because my personal theory after doing
all this research is as follows. I like
to think that Archerald maybe represents
the person who used to own the Ottoman
Empire or maybe used to own the building
or something like that. Or maybe he was
the first person that clipped into the
back rooms in this specific null zone.
And I think this is the case because
he's deliberately dressed in an older
kind of outfit to show the audience that
the backrooms is not a new thing. He
could be just a plot device to show that
the backroom's concepts always been
there and people have been no clipping
there for a long time. And maybe that's
all it is. Maybe I'm kind of over
theorizing, but where's the fun in that?
You know, where's the fun in thinking
it's so simple? Maybe Archbald was some
old scientist that discovered the
bathrooms many years ago. in his quest
to understand it, he got lost here. He
kind of looks like Stephen Hawking.
Maybe that's what Kane was going for. I
don't know. But the complex existing for
that long makes it more horrifying and
more powerful to everybody watching and
to me, too. But don't forget to tell me
in the comments below what you think
he's included for. We'll probably never
know exactly why or how he fits into the
greater picture of the narrative, but
these theories are going to be as close
as we can get to discovering that at
all. The same way we don't know who the
fat still life is or what Async's
motivations are, I think it's a good
thing. I don't think we should know
everything, but I obviously like to
theorize and you all like to watch
theories. So, thanks. Thanks so much for
watching to the end of the video. If you
did enjoy this sort of character
breakdown and analysis, uh, please leave
a like. I would really appreciate it.
Helps the channel out significantly. And
I do want to thank you all so much for
the support recently. It means the world
to me. I really, really appreciate you
all for that. If you want more content
from me that's that's not back rooms or
internet horror related, go check out
Spooky. I make like creepy documentaries
over there and real life true mystery
stuff. It's cool. It's awesome. You
probably love it. Or you can check out
Instagram. I'm always posting what I'm
doing on there. With all that said, I
will see you all in the next video on
any of my channels. And I hope you had a
great day. Honestly, I do. And I hope
you uh are ready for what's to come on
this channel. Peace.