Ted Cruz Reveals What Trump Told Him Behind Closed Doors | PBD Podcast #851
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
Senator Ted Cruz reflects on his 2016 presidential campaign, arguing that while he had a viable path to defeat Hillary Clinton, defeating Donald Trump required a specific coalition of energized blue-collar voters and suburban women that Trump successfully leveraged. He identifies two critical factors in his loss: an unexpected surge in free media coverage for Trump worth over $3 billion and a missed opportunity to unify the non-Trump vote by selecting Marco Rubio as his vice presidential running mate. Cruz reveals that Rubio canceled a planned meeting just before the Florida debate, prompting Cruz to drop out of the race. Looking ahead to 2028, Cruz emphasizes that voters must choose candidates based on their record of fighting for conservative principles rather than engaging in political posturing, noting significant differences between himself and rivals like JD Vance, who leans toward isolationism, and Marco Rubio, whose big-government stance Cruz opposes.
Cruz outlines his foreign policy as a "non-interventionist hawk" that aligns with the approaches of Donald Trump and Ronald Reagan, defining the strategy as "peace through strength" rather than isolationism. He strongly criticizes the Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA) as a catastrophic mistake that would have funneled hundreds of billions to terrorists, contrasting this with his view that Trump has largely listened to his advice on these matters. While he advocates for opposing nation-building and broad subsidies like ethanol mandates, Cruz maintains that military force remains necessary when vital national security interests are threatened, particularly regarding Iran's nuclear program. He also addresses the media narrative that labels Republicans as either "stupid" or "evil," asserting that his perception as evil stems from partisan bias, and he warns against the dangers of demagogues like Tucker Carlson who promote anti-Semitism and anti-Americanism.
In discussions about domestic policy and personal history, Cruz highlights his legislative achievements, specifically two major provisions he authored in a reconciliation bill: school choice allowing taxpayers to claim credits for scholarships, and "Trump Accounts" providing invested accounts for every child starting with $1,000 to help create a new generation of capitalists. He recounts advising Trump on using tariffs as leverage to open markets rather than as an end in itself, noting that Trump eventually paused the tariffs after Cruz warned of economic fallout. Cruz also shares anecdotes about acting as "bad cop" during meetings with Turkish President Erdogan regarding the S-400 missile system and Kurdish rights, allowing Trump to maintain a friendly facade while securing policy goals. His personal journey is rooted in his father fleeing Cuba after fighting in the revolution, arriving in the U.S. with only $100, and facing bankruptcy when the oil industry collapsed, which led him into multi-level marketing before he reconciled with his family.
The conversation also touches on Donald Trump's public speaking abilities and his relationship with the DeVos family, noting that Betsy DeVos was a key ally in passing Trump's school choice plan despite Democratic opposition. To ensure the bill passed, Cruz threatened to "burn the effing bill" if the provision were removed, successfully persuading Majority Leader John Thune to include it. Additionally, Cruz discusses his new book about Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, detailing Thomas's journey from poverty and a left-wing radical influenced by Malcolm X to becoming a conservative icon under the guidance of his grandfather Myers Anderson and economist Thomas Sowell. The segment concludes with anecdotes contrasting youthful impulse with mature restraint, such as refusing to party with Matthew McConaughey late at night, and covers McConaughey's role in *Dallas Buyers Club* regarding government regulation and access to medicine, before promoting Cruz's books and the FLB Icon Collection.
Read the full video transcript
So, I'm asleep and Matthew McConna comes
rushing into our bedroom. He jumps on
our bed on all fours and he's jumping up
and down.
>> Do you think there's anything you could
have done to beat a guy like Donald
Trump?
>> There was a moment in the campaign that
that that when I lay in bed and think
back about I think of as the most
consequential run.
>> So, let me ask you, are you saying this
to me because if you would have gone up
against Hillary, you think you would
have beaten her?
>> Absolutely. You think you would have
beaten her worse than Trump beat
Hillary?
>> The day of the meeting, Marco cancels
the meeting.
>> No explanation.
>> There's no explanation. Just I'm not
coming.
>> Has he said this publicly?
>> If he has, I have not seen him say it.
>> Who supports you on the Republican
[music] side that Trump doesn't have?
>> Do you know why I'm asking that
question?
>> Do you want me to give you the reason
why I'm asking that question?
>> Sure.
>> They know if they give their vote to the
wrong person, a socialist could be a
president in 2028.
>> That's humanity. They just hate Donald
Trump and they want to burn it all down.
>> Why?
It's confusing to me.
>> Tucker is the single most dangerous
demagogue in America. He now says Donald
Trump is
>> the Antichrist.
>> That is a lot of things, but that ain't
conservative and that ain't American.
>> Why can't we just go audit [music]
everybody and find that out?
>> The anti-semitic protest on college
campuses, Qatar and China are both
funding. Again, how do you know? Is that
factual? um
>> to weed out the people.
>> I get frustrated out of my mind with
people who say they're conservative and
they go to office and they turn into
jellyfish. Show me what you've
accomplished.
>> Respectfully, that didn't answer my
question.
>> So, I I get what you want me to say.
>> No, I don't want you No, that's not what
I'm asking.
>> And we became friends.
>> We're making the case to Trump. And in
the middle of it, that is when Elon Musk
tweeted that Trump was on the Epstein
list.
I learned some curse words I didn't even
know. That's a moment I will never
forget of just like, okay, there's a
hang grenade thrown in the middle of
everything. I'm a very easy guy to
understand. I actually believe this
There is an advantage to building
a reputation for being willing to blow
things up. Nobody thinks you're
bluffing.
Okay, so it's great to be sitting down
with a podcaster uh here, very famous
podcast. He happens to be a senator as
well, Senator Ted Cruz, but he's the
only guy that's also a podcaster. So,
it's it's great to have you on,
>> Pat. Thanks for having me. I'm thrilled
to be here.
>> Yes, likewise. I'm uh uh looking forward
to the conversation for the folks that
are watching. I know you just came out
with a book uh going further. I think
August 2050 incomparable Clarence Thomas
already number one on Amazon. If you
haven't ordered it, we're going to put
the link below. There's also a great
interview with him. Y
>> which maybe we put down as well at the
end if you want to go learn more about
him. I thought the interview was great.
So, I want to start off with some tough
questions at first and then we go to the
easy ones. Okay, good. Let's go into it.
You've been visiting Ohio, Iowa, you've
been visiting some of the earlier
states. You've been making endorsements.
You've been kind of playing around, you
know, with the stuff that's going on for
2028. I'm not going to ask you if you're
going to be running or not. I think if
I'm a betting man, I'm guesstimating
you're going to be running for 2028.
But if I were to hire you as a
consultant, I'm going to run for office.
Okay.
>> In 2028, I hire
>> Cruz Consulting. Give me three to five
issues to be running on in 2028. What do
you think those issues should be?
>> The fact that it starts with sitting
down and talking to a little old lady
who looks you in the eyes and said, "Are
you telling me the truth or are you
lying to me? I don't want to hear
talking points. I want to know who you
are. I want to understand
what kind of man you are." That process
is really important. Look at Iowa when I
ran the last time.
Corn is kind of a big deal in Iowa. Uh,
and I am against subsidies. I'm against
mandates. I think that's a bad idea for
the federal government to do. So, I am
opposed to the ethanol mandate. Now,
there's a whole big lobby in Iowa that
is really strongly in favor of the
ethanol mandate. and and I remain to
this day the only person in history to
ever win Iowa opposed to the ethanol
mandate. And the way I did it, and I had
a lot of those Iowa corn farmers who
ended up when they listened to what I
had to say, they ended up supporting me.
And I said, "Look, we shouldn't have
subsidies across the board. There's an
exchange, you can actually find it, I
think, still on the internet. It's about
a seven-minute exchange uh where this
big old farmer, I think in overalls,
comes up to me and a and he says
something like, "I really hate you and I
hate what you stand for." And I said,
"Well, well, sir, I'm sorry about that.
I I I'm happy to talk with you about it
if you'd like." And he said, "All
right." And he was a corn farmer and he
was mad uh uh that that I was against
the mandate. And I said, "Well, sir, if
you give me a minute, I'll explain to
you why." And what's interesting is
after that about that 8-minute exchange
where the guy started off saying, "I
hate you." That's how the conversation
began.
At the end of it, he kind of nods and
looks at me and says,
"Well, that makes sense. I I really like
what you're saying." And and it was
that's I I think that's what politics
should be is is listening to the voters
and having a conversation, not changing
what you say or do based on just today's
poll.
>> Okay. So then question would be you won
Iowa against Trump, right? You won I
don't know how many state 13 14 15
states. You won quite a few states. You
won 12 states. Utah, Wisconsin, Texas
was massive lead
>> and then it was Indiana and then from
there on it was you know he became the
king. You had 551 delegates. I think you
had three times what Marco Rubio had at
the time. But that's 2015, 2016. You
guys went up against somebody that's a
anomaly. One of one. You will maybe
never have a guy like that ever again.
Disrupted the whole thing.
>> You know, I went back and watched some
of the debates with you and him just to
kind of mentally get where you guys were
at that time. How different
>> is 2028 going to be because I think it's
a free agency election.
>> Absolutely.
>> The big guys out. How different is the
approach going to be in 2028 than 2015?
>> I I I think massively different. Uh
Donald Trump is a black swan event.
There is simply nobody like him. I I
don't think there's ever been anyone
like him that I'm aware of in history.
And I don't think we're going to get
another Donald Trump. Like I just think
he's one of a kind and he broke the
mold.
Going forward. I think debates are
always and elections are always a debate
about the future about what do we
believe where are we going to go where
where's the party going to go
>> where's the country going to go you know
if you look back for a second to that
2016 election
when it started we had 17 Republicans in
the race big crowded race uh strong
field
if you were laying odds at the very
beginning let's say March or April of
2015 who was going to And
>> had 140 million to start off with.
>> Nobody I think would have bet on Donald
Trump
>> and nobody would have bet on me. We
might well have been 16 and 17 in the
odds if you were in New York or DC.
>> Really? Why? Both of us.
>> Why not you?
>> Because I was a brand new senator. I was
at 1 or 2%. At the end of the day, the
single best predictor of what would
happen in that election
was bluecollar voters. If you looked at
the polling of blue collar voters, truck
drivers, steel workers, cops,
firefighters, waiters, waitresses,
bluecollar voters in almost every single
state,
either Trump was one and I was two or I
was one and he was two. And it
>> but not Marco.
>> Marco couldn't compete with blueco
collar voters.
>> Why do you think? Uh well, remember he
had been very vocal in support of the
gang of eight amnesty and and amnesty is
a great policy if you want to impress
the Republican donors because Republican
donors love amnesty. They view illegal
immigrants as cheap labor
>> and Marco's strategy, he had joined up
with the Democrats in the Gang of Eight
to propose massive amnesty. I'd led the
fight against the gang of eight amnesty.
It was terrible. Mhm. Um that's why all
the donors like Marco, but the actual
people whose jobs are being lost to
illegal immigrants, they were pissed at
him for it. And and if you look at how
that shook out,
the states where I was one and Trump was
two with bluecollar voters are the 12
states I won. The states where he was
one and I was two are the 24 states he
won. And no other Republican won more
than a single state.
>> Kasich won Ohio, Rubio won Minnesota,
and Trump and I won every other state in
the country. And it was bluecollar
voters. And then you fast forward to the
general.
You know, I had had a million
conversations where people say, "Okay,
how do you win the general? How do you
beat Hillary?" And at the time, people
thought Hillary was this unbeatable
juggernaut.
Um, and my answer was twofold. I said,
"Number one, bluecollar voters. And
number two, evangelical voters.
In 2008 and 2012, both of them stayed
home. When John McCain was the
candidate, when Mitt Romney was the
candidate, evangelicals and bluecollar
voters, they didn't vote for Barack
Obama. They just stayed home.
>> They didn't like the candidates. They
weren't inspired. They weren't
energized. They didn't come out and
vote. And my view was if you turn them
out, if you energize them, if you give
them a reason to be excited, that's how
you win. People would ask me, "What
states can you win in 16
that McCain and Romney lost?" And I
would say Ohio,
Iowa, Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania,
right up and down the rust belt.
Those states, I remember on election day
2016, November 2016. So, I'm out of it.
I' I've been beaten, but we're having an
election night party in Houston and I'm
sitting there uh with my team and we're
watching the results and as Trump's
general election results come in, those
are exactly the states he's winning. And
it just goes right down right down the
list. And and my wife Heidi, who who is
my best friend on planet Earth,
as it's happening, she looks at me and
she goes, "I'll be damned." And I'm
like, "What?" And she said, "I I've sat
next to you a thousand times while
you've told people, here's how you win
the general. You win these states.
>> I never knew you were right. Like what
you were saying is
>> she's telling you right." Yeah. Look, I
mean,
>> I totally get it. No,
>> you're married. You know, your wife like
like you say something, your wife's
trying to be nice, she kind of nods.
Maybe I but I don't know.
>> So, this is election night while they're
announcing him winning the states and
she's realizing you were right about the
states. So, let me ask you, are you
saying this to me because if you would
have gone up against Hillary, you think
you would have beaten her?
>> Absolutely.
>> You think you would have beaten her
worse than Trump beat Hillary?
>> I don't know. I will say this. Look, if
you look at how the party has shifted
in the last decade, the most
consequential shift has been a
socioeconomic shift. that the old
conventional wisdom was that Republicans
are the party of the rich and Democrats
are the party of the poor and the
working class.
>> Now, I don't know if that was ever true,
but if it was, it is totally flipped
today. Today, the Democrats are the
party of rich coastal elites. They're
the party of billionaire hedge fund
managers and billionaire tech leaders
and Hollywood and and academics.
And today, the Republican party is a
bluecollar party. That's something Trump
accelerated profoundly. That's something
I've been fighting for from the day I
got there. My base from the very first
day I ran has always been bluecollar
workers. Those have always been my peeps
and and the elites, the establishment
have fought like crazy against me from
day one. That shift,
I think, is really, really significant.
I I want us to be the party of workers,
the party of jobs. And here's the path
that is unbeatable.
So, blue collar voters moving right has
made states that used to be purple more
red. You take a state like Ohio, Ohio
back in the Bush years was perennially
purple. It was like right on the edge.
Missouri was another purple state, the
show me state.
Both of them, at least prior to this
cycle, and they're getting more purple
this cycle, but let's take let's take 24
the last presidential. Both of them were
bright red. Trump won them by a big
margin.
That's because they have a heavy
bluecollar population and that dynamic
moved them more right. There is a
countercuting
demographic move,
which is suburban voters, particularly
suburban women, have moved left
significantly.
And it's a lot of suburban women are are
not fans of President Trump. And you've
seen that in states like Georgia and
Arizona and Texas. So Georgia,
one of the most suburban states in
America. Most of the population are in
the suburbs surrounding Atlanta. You
know, Georgia a few years ago had two
Republican senators. Today it has two
Democrat senators. Arizona, most of the
population is the suburbs around
Phoenix, Maricopa County. Arizona a few
years ago had two Republican senators.
Today it has two Democrat senators.
That dynamic, whether we win a state
depends on the intersection of those two
vectors. If the blueco collar voters
moving right outweighs the suburban
women moving left, we win. But I'll say
this, the killer general election
coalition
is if you can turn blue collar voters
out, but do it in a way that doesn't
scare suburban women away from you. And
if you can bring some of those suburban
women back, that's an unbeatable general
election.
>> Okay. So, two questions for you. One,
when you go back, you know how uh
anytime I go and I'm doing a deal and I
lose the deal, we do a debrief and we
say,
>> you know, what could we have done? And
blah blah blah blah blah. Okay,
>> do you think there's anything you could
have done to beat a guy like Donald
Trump? Anything? Trump
generated an excitement and and was
ended up being seen as an even bigger
disruptor than I was. That so that was
one piece that was unanticipated and I
don't know that we could have
anticipated that.
>> There was a second component
which is the free media in that
election.
So in the 2016 election, my campaign
raised $92 million of hard money.
That is still the most money any
Republican has ever raised in the
history of presidential primaries. What
I did not anticipate is the free media
that the media would give Trump. Trump
received over $3 billion with a B in
free media. They just covered him
constantly. And it ultimately in the
last 30 days of the election before I
dropped out, Trump had $500 million of
free media. 90% of which was positive.
And that proved to be a tsunami that you
could not overcome.
>> Do you think the Democrats at the time
were thinking, you know, there's no way
Trump's going to win. Let's give him so
much cuz they're going to take out Cruz
and Cruz. You think do you think that's
what was a and then it backfired on him?
>> So we actually know that because if you
look at the Wikileaks from the Hillary
campaign, the Hillary campaign talking
to ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN said, "Elevate
Trump because he's the worst candidate
and we can beat Trump. push Trump.
>> Uh, and they did. And at the same time,
Fox made the decision to go in all in
behind Trump. And so it ended up, it was
just this $92 million is a lot of money
unless you have $3 billion on the other
side. And that proved
that proved too much to stop.
Now, that being said, when you know, you
asked about what could have been done
differently.
There was a moment in the campaign that
that that when I lay in bed and think
back about
the road not taken I think of as the
most consequential road
which is coming into the Florida
primary.
Uh we were getting ready for the Florida
presidential debate and and the day
before the Florida presidential debate
my team did some polling
and we pulled in particular what happens
if Marco Rubio and I joined forces. if
we run as a ticket with him as my my VP.
>> Marco doesn't know. You guys are
speaking. You haven't approached him
yet.
>> Have first. We just do the poll to see
see what the numbers are. So, we do the
poll and the numbers are compelling. I
mean, remember Trump at the time was
winning states with a with a plurality
with 28 30 32 points. So, you had 70%
who were not voting for him. And Marco
and I running as a ticket. What it did
is it unified the non-Trump vote. you
get the other 60.
>> And so what happened, we we looked
particularly our campaigns have always
been in intensely data driven. Uh
we looked at the numbers. If Marco and I
had joined together, we would not have
won Florida. We would have won it on
election day, but there were already
enough early votes that were banked that
Trump would have won Florida regardless.
But at the same time,
we would have won North Carolina,
Missouri, and Illinois by double digits.
I mean, the effect on the numbers was
massive. So,
I did the natural thing. We saw the poll
and my team delivered it to Marco and I
said, "Hey, we got to sit down and
talk." And Pat, it was very, it was very
cloak and dagger. It was the day before
the Florida debate and we were both in
Miami. We were both staying at hotels.
We picked this like little motel halfway
between our hotels and the plan was to
come and meet and talk.
The day the day of the meeting, Marco
cancels the meeting. Just says, "I'm not
coming."
Um,
>> no explanation.
>> No explanation. Just I'm not coming.
which was frustrating.
>> Is this public information?
>> Yeah, I've told the story since then,
but it was frustrating. And actually,
Mike Lee, the senator from Utah, Mike is
my closest friend in the Senate. I love
Mike.
Mike is also very good friends with
Marco. In fact, they used to be
roommates. They they rented a house
together. Mike had deliberately stayed
out of the presidential. He hadn't
endorsed anyone because Mike said,
"Look, there's going to come a time
when he felt he needed to broker the
peace between me and Marco." And so Mike
had stayed out. Mike flew down to Miami
to be there in that meeting. So Mike was
just going to be there when Marco and I
talked. And and listen, I don't want to
overstate it. I did not offer the VP
slot to Marco because we never had the
conversation,
but it wasn't rocket science. You looked
at the polling and the results just
leapt off the page. I think it changes
the entire outcome of the race.
>> Have you ever confronted Marco on this?
Uh after Trump won, when we were back
2017, I I asked Marco to go out to
dinner and I just said, "Hey man, why'd
you never come to the meeting?" Like
like why did we, you know, never have
the conversation?
And his response, he said, "Well, I just
think Trump was unbeatable, that nothing
would beat him and there was nothing we
could do to change that."
>> Has he said this publicly?
>> I if he has, I have not seen him say it.
>> Okay. So he thought Trump was So in in
his eyes, Trump is unbeatable. In your
eyes, collectively, we could have beaten
him.
>> You know, you could speculate that
Marco's team told him, "Look,
if Trump's the nominee, Hillary will
crush him."
>> Because that's what they believe, that
Hillary was the inevitable. Hillary will
be president
>> and then in four years, Marco, you'll
come back as as the golden child and be
the nominee four years from now.
>> That's what I I imagine his team told
him.
But it sure would have been nice to have
had that conversation.
>> So he would have been the VP, you would
have been the the the president and
that's kind of how you guys would have
gone. Yeah,
>> that would have been very formidable.
That would have been very interesting.
And if the announcement was made
earlier, now let me let me ask the
question maybe in a different way. So
when I think about leaders, I put them
in four different categories. I give
them a likability score. I give them a
respect score, fear score, and a love
score.
Trump is feared because Trump will
attack you hardcore. So Trump's got you
and Marco beat in fear. You guys can't
compete against him in the fear side. He
will come for your throat and use any
words possible. We're not accustomed to
this as a president talking like that.
That has never happened.
>> No president has like him.
>> No president has spoken like him. So
that naturally you and Marco tried to
talk like him. You guys feel you can't
talk like him. That's his world. Is that
a fair assessment? Because
>> I would tweak it slightly. Um, I think
Marco tried to talk like it like like
for example he came and you know said
Trump had little hands and tried to like
insult him.
>> I don't think I went down that road. I I
decided not to emulate Trump and and we
actually talked about like his nicknames
were very effective.
We talked about as a team do you come up
with a nickname for Trump and we came up
with a whole bunch of different ones and
I said you know what this is not real.
>> What was the best one? Oh, you know, I
>> give me one of them.
>> It's not It's not worth going into it.
>> You got to You You cannot leave the
audience hanging with
>> Listen, we went through things like, you
know, Crooked Donald at
>> Oh, like the Crooked Hillary, similar
>> before he done Crooked Hillary.
>> Oh, you were going to do Crooked before
he did it. that we batted around some
insult name cuz he'd come up with Lion
Ted, which by the way, look, Trump has a
marketing genius
that is instinctual. And if you look at
that race, my number one strength is
that voters trusted me,
that they believed I would do what I
said, that that I was telling them the
truth. It It's what made Lion Ted true
genius because it was literally going
right at the biggest strength of your
opponent and undermining and it did real
damage. Um, we went through lots of
insults
for Trump and brainstormed and I said,
"You know what? It's just not me. I I'm
not someone that stands up there and
insults and I think voters can tell if
you're not in." Is it fair to say if you
guys go pound-for-pound
in, you know, rage baiting comments,
you're not going to beat Trump? Is that
a fair assessment right there?
>> Absolutely. And I don't I never intend
to go great.
>> But what I did do
>> is I went headtohead to him in debates
on issues and substance. And if you look
at in that campaign, after every debate,
my numbers went up. But likability,
where would you score yourself or the
importance of being likable as a
candidate to win as a presidency?
>> Look, likability certainly matters. I
will say there is a differential that is
a partisan differential because the way
the American people
perceive candidates comes through the
lens of the media filter. And the media
filter is massively different if you're
a Republican or if you're a Democrat. So
in the media world, every Republican
is one of two things. You're either
stupid or you're evil. And they put them
into those two categories. So stupid in
in their telling, George W. Bush was
stupid. Dan Quail was stupid. Ronald
Reagan was stupid. Got it. evil. Dick
Cheney was evil. Richard Nixon was evil.
Trump is evil. By the way, between the
two, stupid is better. Historically,
stupid has been in less damaging. But
they put you in one of the two cate.
>> Which one do they put you in?
>> They put me in evil. Yeah. Yeah. I'm
>> Everybody knows you're not stupid. You
just
>> Those are the only two categories. So,
what I would say on the question of
likability because they've driven the
whole narrative. By the way, they say
just about every Republican they say is
unlikable. That's part of their evil.
>> I agree with that. I'll push back a
little bit. I don't know if I like to
me, I would say Marco Rubio comes across
very likable.
>> He Marco is very charming. Give me Give
me a second.
>> I'm actually curious to know where
you're going with this.
>> Give me a second example, though.
>> Give you a second example of likability.
>> Yeah.
>> Um I think there's a part of uh
President Trump that's very likable.
>> Not according to the media. Look, I like
>> No, not according to the media. So if if
I went based on media, there's a lot of
things I would be believe in that's
different. No, I think let's even talk
to Republican voters. Just take
Republicans, independents, the 12% that
maybe matters. I think people would say
Trump is likable when you're with them.
There is a
>> I think Trump is hysterical. I like him
a lot. But you know what? I know him.
You know him if you know him. I'm saying
the media narrative that they devote
millions of barrels of in
>> I think it's a very different world
today. the senator respectfully. I think
today he went on Theio Vaughn and you're
like, I freaking like this guy. He went
on a bunch of these jokes, you know,
that he does with Rogan and these,
you'll like him. He went on Schultz,
you'll like him. There's a certain level
of likability.
You're right. And and and the ins I'm
agreeing with you, but the insight
you're having is if you want to get
through to the people, you have to go
around the gatekeepers, around the media
that are trying to portray one specific
image. And I think Trump did a very good
job. Look, it's one of the reasons why I
do a podcast every week and I've got
millions of people who listen to my
podcast. It's it's one of the reasons I
do podcasts like yours because you can
actually get around the gatekeepers and
talk to people. How do you view yourself
when it comes on to likability for 2028?
>> Look, my job is to communicate who I am
and and what I believe. I can tell you
that when I go give a speech, when I go
sit down with people one-on-one or in a
group or breakfast or lunch or dinner
and I talk to them,
some of the most frequent comments I get
is, "Holy crap, you're nothing like I
thought you would be. You're supposed to
be this crazy bombthrower with with
dynamite strapped to your chest."
>> Like, I like to laugh. I like to cut up.
You know, I'm I'm on social media a lot.
I am a complete smartass on Twitter. By
the way, there's a general principle.
So, I do have a social media team.
Social media team has the authority.
They send tweets for me. If there's a
tweet that is say, you know, right up
the fairway, you know, if there's a
tweet, we should secure our border,
that's probably my team. They they know
what I believe and that they send them.
If there's a tweet that's just smartass
and getting in trouble, that is almost
certainly me on my phone typing it in.
So, like a couple years ago when the
whole Eric Swallwell thing broke,
um I sat down and I said, "Look, I can't
count how many times I've said screw the
Chinese communists."
Little did I know how closely Eric
Swallwell was listening to me.
[laughter]
See that? You're very good with that,
though. You see, that's the thing,
though. You have the And I don't mind
it. You're witty. You're sarcastic. you
you you you have that like I can already
picture what you were like at 20 years
old at 16 years old. I see that
childlike side of yours, right? But I
don't know if I've seen you go in and
sitting down with podcasts that may be a
a little bit to get into in front of a
new audience. Maybe that's going to be
the strategy in 2728. I don't know.
Maybe you're going to go and sit down
and talk to those guys. But I think the
game plan Okay, so now let's go to 2028.
If we go into 2028, what are the it
factors? I wrote a few things down. And
I wasn't even prepared for this. I think
number one, I want to ask you how much
you think this matters. Number one is
Trump's endorsement. Okay. Number two is
money. Number three is likability.
Number four is how bad the president is
doing at that time. Because, you know,
if if the economy is bad, the
endorsement doesn't mean that much. You
know how that works out. It's just kind
of how it is,
>> you know. So where where do you put
Trump's endorsement in whoever is going
to be the next president in 2028?
>> Look, there is no question that
President Trump's endorsement is
enormously consequential. Uh it carries
a a great deal of weight. I I don't
think it will be decisive in the
presidential race. It carries weight,
but I think the voters are going to make
their own determination. Uh, and I think
it is one thing President Trump has is
very effective when he's on the ballot
making the case for voting for Donald
Trump.
The simple reality is none of us are
Donald Trump. And the voters don't think
any of us are Donald Trump. And and to
be clear,
this is not going to be an election
where it's a never Trump election. I
think there is no never Trump lane in
the Republican party. Look, maybe it's
Liz Cheney and six people, but it's not.
There's no lane that matters. That is a
never Trump lane.
>> So, the chances of a massie Tucker,
where do you put that?
>> Uh, might they run? Sure. Um, I I think
they have no prospect for success. And I
think, look, Tucker and and Massie, they
just hate Donald Trump. Uh, and they
want to burn it all down.
>> Why though?
>> You you have to know you're in DC. It's
confusing to me. Why is that? I I have
my own speculations, but I want to hear
from you.
>> Yeah. Look, I I don't know why. If you
look at Tucker and I have been very very
outspoken on Tucker. I think Tucker is
the single most dangerous demagogue in
America. I think he is doing enormous
damage and I think he has made a
decision to go to a very dark place
where Tucker right now Tucker is almost
indistinguishable from Ilan Omar. If you
look at what he is saying,
almost every show he does is attacking
Israel and attacking the Jews. His
answer for everything wrong in life is
the Jews did it, the Judas did it, the
Jews did it.
Half the shows he's done are attacking
Donald Trump. He now says Donald Trump
is the antichrist. He hates Donald
Trump.
One of the reasons this is so dangerous
is is that I believe anti-semitism
is the gateway drug to anti- capitalism
and anti-Americanism.
That that it quickly leads to all three.
And you see that with Tucker. You see
that with Comrade Mandami in New York
where the Marxist and Islamists, the
Green Red Alliance, they come together
and they come together because they hate
the same people. You have Tucker who's
now done shows praising Comrade Mandami.
He's done shows praising Nicholas
Maduro. He's done shows praising Putin
repeatedly. He's done shows with the
president of Iran that were basically a
love fest.
Um, he's done shows
defending Sharia law.
That is a lot of things, but that ain't
conservative and that ain't American.
And I the problem is Tucker,
a lot of young people listen to him. and
and there's a whole cloud of influencers
that are around him that are Candace and
Matt Gates and Marjorie Taylor Green and
now Massie has jumped into it that are
telling young people
that
they hate Israel, they hate Trump
and
they're very quickly getting to and they
hate America too. I think that's
dangerous as hell. And so I made a
decision about a year ago that I'm going
to stand up and fight this because I
don't want that to be my party and I
don't want that to be my country. And I
will say in the Senate, most of my
colleagues, the Republican colleagues in
the Senate have told me privately, Ted,
you're exactly right. I agree with you.
And yet almost none of them are willing
to say it because he's got one hell of a
megaphone. Look, if you pull up my
Twitter right now,
I have if I tweet good morning,
I will get hundreds of anti-semitic
responses. Like, it unleashes a constant
barrage. Most politicians are scared of
criticism. So, they don't do something
that results in criticism because
they're scared of their own shadow.
I'm a big believer in AAM's razor that
the simplest explanation is usually the
best.
I I'm a very easy guy to understand. I
actually believe this Maybe I'm
wrong, but I believe it with all my
heart. And so standing up against what
they're doing, I think matter matters in
order.
>> Have you ever had dinner with Tucker?
>> Uh, have I had dinner with No, I have
not had dinner with
>> Have you guys broke bread? Have you guys
had oneonone couple hours sitting down
at his place at your place? Has there
ever been a relationship between the two
of you?
>> So, I have known Tucker for 25 years.
Um, we've never been terribly friendly.
We haven't been overtly antagonistic.
Uh, when he had his Fox show, and by the
way, I've reached out. I've invited him
and he he's not had a whole lot of
interest in getting to know me. He he
has never been a fan of mine. Um, I've
done his Fox show a number of times.
inevitably when you do his Fox show,
uh, you would know that he would come at
at me and he would come at me trying to
paint me as insufficiently conservative,
trying to attack me as being. And I did
a show periodically knowing that he was
going to be more hostile than Meet the
Press was going to be. He was going to
be more hostile than CNN. I But I would
do it anyway. Um, and he typically
failed in trying to prove that I wasn't
really a conservative because I am a
conservative. Um,
Tucker changed. He had had two rather
odd shows that that at the time I
thought were just a weird aberration and
they were both defending Nazis. So, he
had one crackpot professor on who said
there's a good argument that Winston
Churchill is the villain of World War
II.
And Tucker kind of ooed and aed when
that happened. And then he had a
different crackpot professor on who
said, "There's a very good argument. The
United States should have intervened in
World War II on behalf of the Nazis and
we should have supported Adolf Hitler."
And again, Tucker nodded. And those were
kind of weird outliers,
but he did not have this obsession with
Israel, Israel, Israel that he now has.
I think the show exists to attack.
>> What happened though? What? Like you
have friends that know him. What
happened with that?
>> I don't know. Um I will say
following the interview with me, which
which by the way was both unhinged going
after Israel and also utterly fact-free.
So listen, Tucker does a show where
facts don't matter. So at one point I I
said, uh, well, the Ayatollah is
actively trying to kill Donald Trump.
He's like, no, no, he's not. That's not
true. That's simply not true. And I
frankly wasn't prepared for an engaged
person in public policy to just lie. It
is true. Uh there are two different
instances of of hit squads that the
Ayatollah had hired to murder Trump. The
IRGC put out a video that they made an
animated video of a drone coming and
attacking Trump at Mara Lago. And they
put it out from their own own language.
And by the way, we now have at least one
person convicted and in jail for being
an Iranian hitman hired by the nation of
Iran to kill Trump.
Well, Tucker just insists it's not true.
It's not true. You're just you're just
lying. It just didn't happen. And then
bizarrely, he said,
"And if it was true, well, then we
should nuke Iran." I'm like, "Okay, no,
that's stupid. Uh, it is true, but no,
the right answer is not to nuke Iran. No
one's saying that. And like two weeks
later, he had the president of Iran on
complete love fest. You know what he
didn't ask him once? Why are you trying
to murder President Trump? Like facts
did not matter. So what happened? I
don't know.
But I will say the most common
explanation I hear is that almost
everyone I know believes he's being paid
by cutter and he's being paid tens of
millions if not hundreds of millions of
dollars. I don't have any proof of that.
>> You guys have access to I know Anna
Paulina Luna, you know, something came
out two days ago where she is working on
influencers that are getting paid by
foreign.
>> Great idea. Yes. This this looks really
interesting because I don't think he's
the only person being paid. Listen, we
know cutter cutter is the number one
foreign funer of universities in this
country. They spend about 7.6 billion
dollar.
>> Second is China, but Cutter's ahead.
Most people think it's China, but uh
>> China cutter is number one. Yeah.
>> And Look, I you the anti-Semitic
protests on college campuses, Qatar and
China are both funding those. Um
again,
>> how do you know that? How do you know?
Is that factual?
>> Um
I think there are reasonable inferences.
Can I point to documentary evidence to
show you that? No. And there's a
combination of Qatar and China and Iran
and then also Soros and the Bill and
Melinda Gates Foundation. The latter is
documented. I can show the latter.
>> Can is there any way you guys can
because that would put the end to
everything. Can you find a way to show
proof 100% that Qatar and China were
behind the anti-semitic, you know, the
whole movement saying? Is there anywhere
that you can find that out?
>> You should be able to. I will tell you,
I've had this conversation with the
attorney general, the head of the FBI 50
times from the beginning of Trump 2, and
I've said the number one thing you
should do is follow the money. That that
look, it's one thing to arrest some punk
who's violent and threatening people.
That's fine. But I'm not the only person
who noticed that that at the
anti-semitic protest,
the tents all matched. There was clearly
organized funding. Actually, your team
pulled up Neville Roy Singum. There's no
doubt Neville Royce Singum is an
American billionaire. Sold a tech
company for $800 million. He is a
communist. He is a Marxist. He's moved
to Hong Kong. He lives in China now. He
is clearly funding some of this. We know
that he is funding the anti- AI
movement, a a Chinese communist who
wants America not to build data centers
so that we are relying on China and
China can win the race for AI.
>> That's proven.
>> Yes. that he is funding the anti-AI data
center movement in the US.
>> Yes. And there's a report the House of
Representatives put out that detailed
it. I did a whole podcast walking
through the that that report. So I can I
can send you that particular
>> Okay. So if if you if you could you're a
heavyweight in the Senate. If you could
go find out who is getting paid by
foreign countries, foreign players, how
would you go about doing it?
>> The biggest thing you would do is you
would have the FBI and DOJ begin
examining it, begin following the money.
And and look, I I serve in the Senate.
The Senate is a legislative body. I
don't control executive authority. I
don't control subpoena power. I don't
have subpoena power. I don't control the
ability to surveil to get subpoenas for
bank records, for example. And and so
it's got to be an executive and law
enforcement function. And Pam Bondi,
Todd Blanch, I know them both very well.
Uh Cash Patel, I know very well.
I I've probably urged them to follow the
money 50 times.
I don't know the extent to which they're
doing so. I I wish they were doing more
on this because I think it is
absolutely critical.
>> It's dividing the nation. It's dividing
the Republican. It's confusing a lot of
the kids is what it's doing.
>> And on the Tucker side, look, if you
look back to Tucker, you and I are both
old enough to remember when George W.
Bush was president
>> and the Iraq war was happening. And
Tucker at the time had a bow tie on and
he was on TV basically as a cheerleader
just about with pompoms cheering on the
Iraq war. He was a big interventionist
and loved the Iraq war.
I think the Iraq war was a mistake. And
and I will say this, this is one thing
that I think is important to clarify.
Sometimes in political decisions, people
simplify. And so in foreign policy, they
think of Republican foreign policy that
they're just two camps. that's bipolar.
You are either
an interventionist and your solution to
every problem is send the Marines
or you're an isolationist and you just
want to withdraw from the world and
engage in nothing.
You know, interventionists include
people I think John McCain would would
be a very typical interventionist.
Lindsey Graham would have said he was an
interventionist. Uh Ran Paul and Ron
Paul are both both isolationist.
I have long believed that both camps are
wrong. I disagree with both strongly and
and I've described myself as a third
point on the triangle that what I
consider myself to be as a
non-interventionist
hawk. Now, what does that mean? Because
that's a little abstract.
It means that we should be very
reluctant to use US military force and
the sole touchstone for if and when we
do should be protecting the vital
national security interest of the United
States. So where we went off track is
doing other things engaging in nation
building. Look, Iraq,
you look at that 2016 presidential
campaign, there were 17 of us on that
stage. set Rand Paul aside as his views
being somewhat fringe.
Of the 16 who remained, there were two
and only two who opposed the Iraq war.
Donald Trump and me. Both of us thought
it was a mistake. The other 14 all said
it was a great idea. The reason the Iraq
war was a mistake is we were not acting
to defend our national security
interest. In instead we were engaged in
nation building. There was this idea
that we could go turn Iraq into a
democratic utopia. we could turn it into
Switzerland. I think the military is
terrible at that and that's not their
job. Their job is to protect America and
to kill our enemies. Now, I also
strongly disagree with the
isolationists. And where the difference
is is Iran is qualitatively different.
When the Ayatollah says death to
America, I believe him. And I think Iran
getting a nuclear weapon, the odds are
unacceptably high Iran would use that
nuclear weapon against the United States
or against our allies. And so I strongly
support what President Trump has done,
striking Iran to prevent that. I would
not support if someone had a proposal,
let's send 400,000 troops, ground troops
on the ground to invade Iran and try to
turn it into Switzerland. I'd be like,
no, that's a very bad idea. what we need
to do and and so a non-interventionist
talk. By the way, I also think where I
am on foreign policy is exactly where
Donald Trump is. And it is also where
Ronald Reagan was. What Ronald Reagan
referred to that as is peace through
strength. In eight years, the biggest
country Reagan ever invaded was Grenada.
But at the same time, he rebuilt the
military. He won the Cold War without
firing a shot. and he defeated the
Soviet Union which collapsed because he
was so strong that he didn't have to go
to war.
>> So you just said you just said this is
kind of how I heard what you broke down.
Republican has two sides big government
small government then foreign you said
isolationist and you know you have your
own hybrid model but somebody that is
more you know intervening. Okay. So, if
I'm reading this correctly, big
government, small government. You're
saying you're a small government and
you're pinning Marco as a big government
guy. Let me finish and he can correct
me. And on the foreign side, I'm
assuming you're putting in isolationist
as a JD and you being the opposite. Is
that a fair assessment?
>> Um,
look where Marco is, he'll have to
decide. Um, I will say
if you look at All right, let's take
isolationism.
JD on foreign policy has disagreed with
President Trump on almost every decision
Trump has made this second term. Uh JD
negotiated theou with Iran.
That was a terrible deal. And and I was
the first and for a long time the only
Republican senator to say that and to
say it publicly that it was a terrible
deal. Thatou
envisioned
flowing $300 billion dollars to the
Ayatollah and the IRGC.
That would have been staggeringly
foolish. And and and what I said
publicly is, look, history has shown
that giving billions of dollars to
theocratic lunatics who want to murder
us is a really, really bad idea. Joe
Biden and Kla Harris in an act of
colossal stupidity
flowed $100 billion to the Ayatollah.
And that $100 billion they used to fund
terrorism across the globe. For 47
years, Iran has been the leading state
sponsor of terrorism and in particular
to fund October 7th to fund the death
squads that murdered 1,200 innocent
people and that raped women and girls.
That's what a hundred billion dollars
produced. And theou proposed, let's
triple that to 300 billion. I think it
was a very foolish idea.
I spend a lot of time talking to
President Trump. I talk to President
Trump every week, sometimes every day.
And and on foreign policy, I will say he
has listened to me the vast majority of
the time. Not all the time, but a great
deal of time.
Theou thankfully collapsed. Had theou
gone into effect, Americans would have
died. That money would have been used by
Iranian terrorists to murder Americans.
So, I'm glad we're not sending them the
money. Uh, but I do think it was a very
serious policy mistake.
>> Who supports you on the Republican side
that doesn't that Trump doesn't have?
>> So, so look, I will say this, Pat, do
you know why I'm asking that question?
>> Do you want me to give you the reason
why I'm asking that question?
>> Sure. Every journey starts with a
choice. People who inspire us don't wait
for the path ahead. They create their
own. From handcrafted [music]
Italian leather by generations of
artisans engineered for life in motion.
Every piece is created with purpose. For
the work, the journey, the moments that
matter. For those who aren't defined by
a title, but by how they live, the
standards they set, the risks they take,
the work [music] they put in. Engineered
for performance, crafted without
compromise. Because the future isn't
something you wait for, it's something
you move toward. Introducing the new FLB
Icon Collection. The future looks
[music] bright. The reason why I'm
asking that question is because, you
know, you you have to look at what like
you you you covered earlier, you know,
suburban women, you know, you were kind
of talking about some of the stuff
earlier on where they're at and what
they're going to be voting for.
Trump Trump was able to get an audience
that the others didn't have. You kind of
talked about a little bit blue collar,
all that, you know, to get that
audience. But if going in 2028,
we know AOC I've been saying AOC is
going to be running for 18 months and
people thought I was crazy. Now finally
it's shown up on going to be running.
>> AOC is running 100%.
>> She's running and she could even be the
>> I think AOC and Gavin Newsome are the
top two front runners on the Democrat.
>> I think Newsome every day is just
flip-flopping. Make up your mind what
you are and don't just go be a socialist
just to say you have the social I think
his strategy is horrible. Horrible. No
backbone. He can't stand up for
anything. I think that's going to
backfire on him. So, so the
conservatives and and let's just say the
common sense guys, even some of the
people that are center leftists who are
like, "Look, there's no way I'm
supporting men competing in women's
sports, but I'm pro-choice or I'm, you
know, some of those guys, they they know
if if they give their vote to the wrong
person, a socialist could be a president
in 2028." So, then they have to choose
between who? Handful of names. You're
going to be one of them. Uh JD, some are
saying Rubio may not run. I hope Dantis
runs. I actually hope he's working
behind closed doors to want to run. I
think there's going to be a couple wild
cards that no one's even thinking about
right now that behind closed doors some
kind of a Trump's going to get in there
that no one is expecting and suddenly,
you know, he goes. But a betting man
who's protecting his vote has to sit
there and say, "Who do you have that the
others don't have?" Who do you have that
the others don't have? Uh, and and a
part of it is
is JD already have the endorsement from
Trump cuz Trump behind closed doors is
going and saying, "Hey, you think JD is
going to be the guy? JD's going to be
the guy." And almost saying JD and Rubio
need to run together as a on a ticket.
So, what is different from Ted Cruz than
the other two?
>> So, listen, I'll say that as we said at
the beginning, I don't have an
announcement about 28. I am right now
not running for 28. my focus
politically.
>> You went to Iowa, you've went to all the
states, you're making endorsements.
These are all signs that you're running.
And if you don't run, it's it's a fail.
You have to run. It's free agency. My
opinion, you don't have to make the
announcement, but that's my opinion.
Look, as a voter, I get frustrated out
of my mind with people who say they're
conservative
and they go to office and they turn into
jellyfish. And so if I'm deciding whom
to endorse,
I'm looking for show me your record.
Show me when you stood up and fought for
conservative principles. Show me when
you bled.
Show me what you've accomplished. This
is serious stuff. So I'm not interested
in tilting a windmill.
>> Respectfully, that didn't answer my
question. My question to you was, what
is difference between you, JD, and um
Marco Rubio?
>> So if that race happens, that'll be a
decision the voters will make. Um, I'm
not laying that out right now. So, I I
get what you want me to say.
>> No, I don't want you No, that's not what
I'm asking. All I'm saying it's you ask
me a question right now. What is the
difference between me and uh Tucker or
me and you know some of the other
podcast? I'll give you what the
difference is for me. I'm asking you
what is the difference? Forget running.
What what on what issues do you JD and
Rubio differ? And who do you have that
they don't have? What audience?
>> So, what I've said is a couple of
things. Number one, I think the election
is going to be a divide economically.
What do we believe? Small government or
big government? And foreign policy, what
do we believe? Isolationist or American
leadership. I think there are real and
meaningful differences on those fronts.
>> Okay. Okay. So,
>> I will say let me say another thing
which is I think this next election is
going to be a debate about who is best
prepared
to continue Trump's legacy to continue
winning victories and moving forward.
What is the best thing about Donald
Trump? The man has cast iron balls
in in a way that is epic. In a way that
we have never seen in the world.
>> This is documented. This is proven. He
is fearless and Trump
is willing to stand and endure criticism
and heat in a way we've never seen
anyone do. There is a reason that I've
spent 10 years as Donald Trump's
strongest ally in the Senate. And when
it comes to fighting side by side,
we have won massive victories. Now, I
think you're also going to have a
conversation
about what any candidates's record has
been. And if you look at
if you look at my record of fighting for
conservative victories and winning
conservative victories year after year
after year, leading you look at the one
big beautiful bill that passed last
year, also called the working families
tax cut. huge portions of that bill I
wrote and in fact there there are two
provisions in particular that I think
are the two most important parts of that
bill.
Uh let me take you back to April of last
year. So April of last year we have a
retreat of all the Senate Republicans
and we're talking about what do we want
to put in the big reconciliation bill.
And I stood up at the time. I said,
'Look, there are lots of things in this
bill that are really important that that
that we all care about. Securing the
border, yes. Rebuilding the military,
absolutely. Cutting taxes, passing the
biggest tax cut in American history,
absolutely.
But I said to my colleagues, I said,
"Look,
at the same time, we ought to stop and
take a minute and think about legacy.
think about what in this bill
will make a difference in 10, 20, 30
years. And I said, if I could, I would
like to humbly suggest two things.
Number one, school choice, which I think
is the civil rights issue of the 21st
century. And number two, what are today
called the Trump accounts.
Now, both of those provisions I wrote,
both of those provisions are in the
bill.
What do they mean? Let me let me talk a
little bit about it because a lot of
people don't know the details of these
and I think it's enormously
consequential.
On school choice, what we passed, it
starts next year. So, it hadn't kicked
in yet. So, people have not yet seen the
benefits in their own lives. They will
starting next year.
Starting next year, every taxpayer in
America can give up to $1,700
to a scholarship granting organization
in the States.
If you do so, you get a dollar fordoll
tax credit for doing so. Not a
deduction, a credit. That means if you
write a check for $1,700 to a
scholarship granting organization here
in Florida, you owe $1,700 less to Uncle
Sam. So from your perspective, it's free
money. It cost you nothing. You're
sending the money one way or the other.
Do you send it to the IRS or do you send
it to a scholarship granting
organization? Secondly, the Trump
accounts. On July 4th, the Trump
accounts launched.
Every child in America, all 70 million,
will have an individual Trump account
open for them, an investment account.
Newborn children will have it seated
with $1,000.
Parents, family, employers can all put
up to $5,000 a year in a tax advantaged
account. And this is the critical piece.
All of that is invested in the S&P 500.
It's invested in the stock market in a
broad broad-based equity index. Now,
there are two massive advantages to
this. Number one, something you
understand exquisitly.
Every child in America is going to
experience the miracle of compound
growth.
Roughly half of Americans don't own a
single stock or bond. That's going to
change for our kids. A little girl born
this year. She gets a Trump account
open, $1,000 is seated automatically. If
her parents, her family, or an employer
puts 5,000 a year in that account. If
you assume the historical rate of growth
of the S&P 500, which is 7% a year after
inflation,
by the time she's 18, she'll have
$170,000 in that account. And if she
keeps contributing, by the time she's
35, she will have more than $700,000
in that account. And that's not just the
kids of rich people. That's the kids of
a single mom waiting table.
>> Yep.
>> That changes this country. But here's
the second advantage of Trump accounts
that that that Pat makes me really
excited. It's why I was proud to to
champion and author this provision.
We are going to be creating an entirely
new generation of capitalists.
All of us have seen the young people who
say they're losing faith in free
enterprise. They think socialism is a
good idea.
Our kids now, I've talked about, look,
10 years from now, a little boy is going
to pull out his phone and look at his
app. And instead of being told
corporations are big, mean nasty things,
he's going to say, "I own a h 100 bucks
of Apple. I own 50 bucks of Boeing or 75
bucks of McDonald's."
>> You know, it's it's when I size you up
and I watch you and I watch you very
closely because I I used to come and
watch you and Mike Lee in DC. Yeah, I
would sit there and just watch you do
your thing. This guy's freaking good.
>> I love my
>> uh 10 years ago was something like that.
2015. But um
this is I don't I'm not looking for a
response. I'm just kind of sharing my
thoughts. I think in your eyes
JD's not at your level and Rubio is not
at your level. It just so happens the
responsibilities that they got. Rubio
was highlighted the last 18 24 months in
a massive way. Massive way. And Marco's
done an excellent job.
>> Excellent job.
>> And Marco is a gifted communicator. He
always has been.
>> And super likable. And you're seeing
he's smart. So he's he's got the
trifecta.
>> But I I don't know if the audience can
make a case that JD's ahead of you in
except for being a VP. I don't know if
the market's going to be like, well,
what has he done compared to Ted? I can
see that being made, but if Trump
endorses him, MAGA is going to go this
route. So, you were about to talk about
the Republican party and maybe and then
we I asked you a question about Massie
and Tucker. We got a little bit
sidetracked. Maybe break down what the
Republican party to you is and what's
going to happen with MAGA post Trump and
and even what role Trump's going to
play.
>> Oh, look, Trump is not going to ride off
into the sunset. Trump is always going
to be engaged and and say exactly what
the hell he thinks [laughter] and and
it's a beautiful thing.
>> Yeah.
>> But uh
>> but he's going to get in the way. I
mean, you have to He's going to get in
the way because he's not going to give
up that power. He's not going to do it.
That's not his personality.
>> He and I have a different relationship
than most politicians in Washington have
with him because he
he views a lot of politicians in
Washington as beta males. He doesn't
view them as very strong.
I'm the only person who's ever stood in
the arena and he's punched me in the
face as hard as he could and I punched
him in the face as hard as he could and
I ended up winning 12 states, winning
over and over and over again. Now, he
ultimately won. He beat me and I made
the decision to be at peace with that
and became his strongest ally and a good
friend of his. But having been through,
look, you'll sit down with Trump and
he'll go on and on with, you know, tons
of people in his administration where
like, you know, they they backed Ted.
They backed Ted instead of me. They
shouldn't have backed Ted, but they did.
I mean, I've had a thousand
conversations with senior [snorts] Trump
appointees where he just gives them
grief on that. And look, that's that's
his prerogative. Um,
I deeply respect the strength he has
had. Now, what is Trump going to do in
28? Who knows? Nobody knows. I I could
easily see
him essentially letting something like
The Apprentice play out of, you know,
you guys fight it out. Let's see what
happens.
um he might not. But at the end of the
day, I don't lose a lot of sleep
speculating on things that that neither
I nor anyone else on planet Earth knows
the answer to. And so my approach to
President Trump, I've spent a decade
encouraging him to do good things and
discouraging him from doing bad things.
Now, on the discouraging side, I mostly
do that in private because it's not
helpful. It's not my job to go on CNN
and attack Donald Trump. That is not
helpful. And it's actually not
productive. If you go do it, it pisses
him off and it does the oppos
It's
>> privately privately I'd call them out
publicly always support.
>> But all right, look, I I'll give an
example. Let's let's take trade and
tariffs. This is a story I've told
before.
>> So let's go back to April 2nd of last
year. Mhm.
>> That's when the president announced
massive new tariffs and you'll remember
the market collapsed.
The next Tuesday
there were a group of I think seven
senators. We called the president. It
was about 11 11:30 at night. Called the
president and we were saying, "Mr.
President, we've got to change the path
we're on. This this current path is not
working well." and and my view on the
question of trade and tariffs is is that
there are two camps in the Trump
administration.
Camp number one views tariffs or the
threats of tariffs as leverage to get
our trading partners to open up their
markets to reduce their tariffs to to
repeal non-tariff barriers.
Um I think Scott Bessant is in that
camp. I am very much in that camp.
There's a second camp that views tariffs
not as leverage to to open up foreign
markets, but as the end in and of
itself, that they just want high tariffs
forever.
And it's it's pretty closely linked to
an isolationist foreign policy. The idea
is we don't want to deal with the world
at all. We want high tariffs and just
just stay at home and say to hell with
everyone.
>> Who's there? Who's in that camp?
>> Um
>> JD would be in that camp. I I I think
that's where his instincts fall.
What I told the president on this call
is I said, "Mr. President, my advice,
pick a country. Pick any damn country
and tomorrow morning announce that we
are slashing the tariffs to that country
and announce simultaneously that they
are slashing tariffs on American goods."
And I said, "If you do that, two things
will happen. Number
one, it will calm the markets because
the markets were in freef fall at the
time. And I said, number two, it will
give people some confidence that we're
on path number one and not path number
two. People are not sure which direction
we're going to go. And if you do that,
people say, "Okay, these tariffs are
meant to open up markets and expand
trade."
Trump did not like this conversation. He
was in a bad mood. Um, I've had
conversations when he's in a great mood.
He was really in a sirly mood. He did
not like what we were saying to him. And
I went on to say, "Mr. President, look,
if we get to November of next year and
and people's 401ks are down 30%." and
people are going into the department
store or grocery store and spending 30,
40, 50% more to buy groceries and buy
the goods they need, we'll face a
bloodbath in November and you'll spend
the next two years being impeached every
damn week.
To which his response was, "F you, Ted."
Although he did not abbreviate it.
And that's look that that is not
atypical of a rough and tumble
conversation with the president. Now the
conversation went past midnight. We hung
up I think about 12:30 at night. As we
hung up the phone, Lindsey Graham was
one of the other senators on the call
and Lindsay goes, "Well, that didn't go
well."
The next day, Wednesday,
at noon,
Trump announced the pause and he halted
all of the tariffs that he had announced
the week before
and the stock market took off.
And I will say, even though Trump was
pissed,
12 hours later, he implemented what we
were urging him to do. That was the
course of action we urged and he did
precisely what we were encouraging him
to do. And I actually I was in the oval
the next day on Thursday. He was signing
a bill that I just passed and I said,
"Mr. President, congratulations. You
just produced the single largest one-day
increase in the stock market in the
history of America."
So, I say that to say, look, a good
friend
doesn't just say to someone, everything
you're doing is perfect. It's great. A
good friend helps you solve a problem.
And by the way, I wasn't saying this
with this level of cander on television.
I was saying it directly to the
president. And that's part of why he and
I have a good relationship because I
think he knows I will tell him the truth
if he likes it or not. And in my view,
that's a better friend.
>> Have you ever broke bread with JD?
>> Oh, yeah.
>> Oh, so there's a relationship there as
well.
>> Look, I like JD. JD is a friend. I I
barnstormed all over Ohio with JD to
help JD get elected. I was very glad he
got elected to the Senate. Uh I've had
JD as a guest on my podcast. Um I like
JD personally. We we get along and we're
friends. Uh he and I have meaningful
differences on polit on policy.
>> What's your uh do you have a funny uh
President Trump story? Everybody, you
know, people have spent a lot of time
with them. They all have some great
stories. What's your one? um first term
uh Erdogan from Turkey was was visiting
DC and he was in the Oval
uh and Trump invited five senators to
join him in the meeting uh with Erdogan.
And so it was me, Lindsey Graham, it was
Jim Ris, Rick Scott and Jon Erns. It was
the five of us who were there and we
were talking beforehand. The meeting was
about two hours and and what what Trump
did there was unusual. something I've
never seen him do in another meeting
before.
Two-hour meeting,
Trump spoke
maybe 5 to 10 minutes. He was quiet
almost the entire meeting. That's not
typical. He usually has a lot to say.
What he did instead is he let the five
senators speak almost the entire time.
And I think Erdogan came in believing
that the Congress was a rubber stamp,
that Trump could do anything he wanted
and we just stamp it because that's
that's the situation Erdogan has.
Whatever he does, he gets a rubber stamp
from his parliament.
And and so what I told Erdogan was I I
said two things. I said number one, as
long as you have the Russian S400
missile defense system, you are not
going to get the American F-35 fighter
jet because we are not going to train
the Russian missile defense system on
our advanced our most advanced fighter
jets. Pick one or the other. You don't
get both. If you get rid of the S400,
you can have the F-35, but you can't
have both.
And and I told him, I said, "Mr. Mr.
President, let me be clear.
I have probably 95 votes in the Senate
for that proposition. This is not close.
This is overwhelmingly bipartisan. You
ain't getting the F-35 if you keep the
S400.
And then I said, secondly, the Kurds.
Erdogan hates the Kurds.
>> You're saying this in front of Erdogan?
>> I'm saying this to Erdogan. I'm I'm in
the oval saying it right here. Trump's
sitting there. Erdogan's sitting there.
I'm sitting right here like this. This
is face to face. Erdogan is as close to
me as you are and Trump's right kind
right over there.
I said, secondly, the Kurds. We are not
going to sit by quietly
while you exterminate the Kurds. The
Kurds have been exceptionally loyal to
us. They have stood by us in military
conflict after military conflict and
we're not just going to let you
exterminate them. And Erdogan hated it.
But it was an interesting dynamic
because what Trump was doing, it was
fascinating. was brilliant
is we were playing bad cop and Trump
kind of leaned back and he said see what
I have to deal with and we were the bad
guys. Trump said at the beginning we
before Erdogan got there he said I got
to say I like the guy. I I don't know
why I like dictators. I just do. We're
like yeah we don't know why you do
either. Stop like like don't do that.
But it was a very savvy diplomatic move
on Trump's part because he didn't have
to play bad cop. He just he knew what we
believed. So he actually just said, "You
guys explain it." And it became
absolutely clear. And by the way, they
didn't get the F-35 because he wouldn't
give up the S400.
And he substantially reduced his efforts
to go after the Kurds. So it was a very
successful foreign policy meeting. But I
remember thinking and learning a lesson.
This is something a president should do
more often like bring in the bad cop to
move a negotiation in a way you want to
move it because I thought in that
negotiation it was very effective.
>> Which world leaders have you met or have
you been in the room with? Have you had
meetings with Putin or Silinski?
>> Zalinski multiple times. I've not met
Putin.
>> Got it. So Erdogan, is he as intense as
he seems to be or is there a softer,
lighter side to him behind closed doors?
Um, oh, look, any world leader in the
oval with the president is somewhat
restrained. Um, Donald Trump is the most
powerful man on the face of the planet.
Other than Zalinsky when he came in and
was a jackass and it it will go down as
one of the most disastrous Oval Office
meetings in history. But Erdogan was
more restrained because he understood
the power differential there.
>> You think in 2028 an outsider stands a
chance to win like Trump? Listen, there
are
a number of self-declared influencers
uh who frankly monetize right now
politics and and MAGA is profitable for
them. I think the voters
Trump changed politics and made the
Republican party a bluecollar party.
That ain't changing. That shouldn't
change. I don't want to go back to
country club Republicans. I've spent my
entire career in the Senate fighting
against the country club Republicans. I
think we ought to be fighting for the
truck driver, the steel worker. You you
you look at the two bills that that
I authored in in the reconciliation
bill, school choice and Trump accounts.
They're both focused on building
accumulating wealth and savings and
getting education to achieve the
American dream. Uh, you look at another
another bill I authored in that bill. No
tax on tips. That's my legislation. I
wrote that legislation, passed it into
law.
>> No tax on tips as you.
>> Yes.
>> Really?
>> Now, I'm going to give credit where
credit is due. That was Trump's idea.
>> But you executed it on the writing of
it.
>> Yes.
>> Got it. That that's a that's sometimes,
you know, genius is in simple ideas.
What is what is simple idea to pitch
that Kla Harris had to copy and hok said
no, Trump didn't come up with it. Did
did you hear the story of of how he came
up with it?
>> No.
>> All right. So, he was having lunch with
all the Senate Republicans and it was a
couple of days after he'd had a big
rally in Vegas and he said he was he was
having lunch before the rally at a
restaurant and he said a waitress came
by and he said, "And she was beautiful.
She was beautiful." We're all cracking
up laughing. And he said, "I was just
sitting there talking and she was
complaining
about how burdensome it was to keep
track of her tips that the Biden
administration had made it harder, made
it more expensive to pay taxes on tips."
And Trump said, "I he" He said, "I just
pulled over a notepad and I got out a
pen and I wrote no tax on tips." He
said, I handed it to her and said, "What
do you think?" She's like, "That's
awesome." So then he had the rally and
he said, "So I went to the rally and he
sort of jokes and he says,"I know you
guys think I must have had a white paper
and studied it. I didn't at all. I just
stood up and said said to the crowd,
"Let's see how this goes. NO TAX ON
TIPS." And the crowd went wild
and they just loved it. And so he's
telling us this story. This like two
days later.
>> Yeah.
>> And I went back to my office. I grabbed
my policy team. I said, "This is a great
frigin idea." It really was.
>> Let's go draft it right now. So, we
wrote the legislation
>> uh that became no tax on tips.
>> It's massive because you know folks who
make money on tips to by the way you
could flip Democrats with a simple thing
like that.
>> Do you know in Nevada
25% of the workers in Nevada are tipped
workers.
>> That makes sense.
>> Which is why when I introduced my bill,
both of the Nevada Democrats immediately
co-sponsored it.
>> They don't have a choice. I went to them
and said, "Hey, do you want to SP?"
They're like, "Absolutely."
>> Why is that important? Why is it
important when you co-sponsor deals with
a Democrat? What does it do? It just
gives you more credibility with the
Democrats and the Senate.
>> It it helps you pass it.
>> Got it.
>> To to get it passed into law,
>> uh you've got to be able to work to
build a a a broader coalition. You know,
look, I've authored and passed over a
hundred different pieces of legislation.
And doing that means
I know how to fight and I know how to
battle
ferociously.
And and all right, let's take school
choice for a minute because I'll I'll
tell you a couple of stories about
school choice. All right. All right. You
want a Trump story? This is another
Trump story you'll appreciate. So with
the school choice provision, I went over
to the Oval to talk to Trump because I
wanted to get him really enthusiastic
and engaged in. And the case I made to
him is I said, "Mr. president, we get
this passed in this reconciliation bill,
you will go down in history as the
greatest civil rights president of the
21st century. Now, I said your critics
will never give you credit for that. But
if we get this done, millions of kids,
many, if not most of whom are low-income
African-Americans and Hispanics, will
escape failing schools and be able to
get a real education and have a real
shot at a job and a future and at the
American dream. And so we're making the
case to Trump. And in the middle of it,
that is when Elon Musk tweeted that
Trump was on the Epstein list.
[laughter]
And so Trump now, he's not he he's not
on his phone anymore nearly as much. So
what happens when some something gets
tweeted is they print it out. Natalie
comes in, print it on a piece of paper,
and hands it to him. And he literally
reads that tweet and I'm sitting in the
oval and his knuckles turn white.
>> You don't you you also don't know the
tweet yet.
>> I don't know what it is yet. I mean, he
shows it to
>> it happens that second
>> like he that second they hand it to him
that second. I don't know.
>> Sure. I get it. Yeah.
>> It was and he was so pissed. I I I I
joked I learned some curse words I
didn't even know. And I will say our
school choice meeting went went off the
rails that like we were done talking
about school choice and and Trump had
some technical views to say about Elon.
Now I'm glad they have patched it up.
I'm good friends with Elon as well. It
was not good for America to have the two
of them battling, but it was uh that's a
moment I will never forget of just like
the okay, there's a hang grenade thrown
in the middle of everything. Here's
another question for you that since you
brought that up, you know, I I I got a
call from a chief of staff of a country
right now that's, you know, in war and
they're having certain challenges. And
we had a call and it wasn't about, you
know, it was about Elon Musk. And from
talking to the entire team over the
weekend, this past weekend specifically,
it was very obvious how much they the
way they put it is they felt Elon's
power was going to be longer than
Trump's and they feared Elon more than
they feared u Trump.
Is it at a point right now where an
endorsement from Trump is valuable, but
also an endorsement from Elon is just as
valuable as Trump and as Trump in 28 or
no?
>> Look, hard to say. Elon has not made a
lot of endorsements. Now, he writes
checks, which is a different thing.
>> It's a form of an endorsement.
>> It's a form of an endorsement. And I
mean, he spent hundreds of millions of
dollars in politics, so that that is
valuable. He has not typically been in
the endorsement role. Listen, Elon has
become a a good friend. You mentioned I
had him on on my podcast. It was a
fascinating interview. And it
>> it's great. One of the best interviews I
watched for the year.
>> Thank you. Look, he is hands down the
smartest man I've ever met. And and you
and I have both been blessed. We've met
some really smart people. And Elon is an
order of magnitude. just, you know, the
line I use is it's not that he thinks
outside the box, it's that he doesn't
know there's a box.
Um, so like one exchange I had with him,
I asked him the question. And I said,
"Okay, most of my the conversation was
about his business career." And and I
said, "Look, in in in business and life,
there are people who are big picture
people who can see big ideas and and and
have grand visions,
and there are people who are execution
people that are really good at getting
things done." And I said, "Generally,
they're different people that they're
normally not the same person. Somehow
you seem to be really damn good at both
of them. How is that? Why is that?
and he stops and you know Elon is you
know he kind of looks off in the sky and
he and he's silent for like 10 seconds
and he processes I mean and he'll answer
you but he's like processing the answer
and he says to me
I think I probably know more about
manufacturing
than any human being who's ever lived
and my first reaction is okay that's an
audacious statement like like Henry Ford
would beg to differ. And then I start to
think about it. I'm like, okay, the guy
is the CEO of Tesla. He's the CEO of
SpaceX. He's the CEO of the Boring
Company. He's the CEO of Neuralink. He's
the CEO of XAI. And at the time, he was
running Doge.
Like what he said was not crazy. And and
I will say, have you ever been down uh
to Starbase? Uh it's amazing. I've been
down there several times. um was down
there with both Elon and Trump for a
launch uh December last year. So like
six years ago, Bokeh Chica was just an
empty beach on the southern tip of
Texas. Not there was sand dune and a
couple of lizards there. There's nothing
there. They built a whole city. They
have manufacturing facilities where they
are building a rocket ship a month with
precisions
down to less than a tenth of a
millimeter. It is. And they're giant. I
mean, the size of the Empire State
Building that they're building.
It is extraordinary. They're launching
them there.
As I'm walking through
with Elon, he he's pointing at the stuff
and he says, "You know, this is all
alien technology." And then he says
something really unusual. He says, "We
don't patent any of it." He said, "I I
assume everyone is going to steal
everything I make.
He says patents are for the weak,
but he said by the time they steal it,
I'm going to be five or six generations
down the road and it won't matter. Now,
we've both known a ton of businessmen.
I've never heard any other business
leader say that. That is
>> what a powerful thing to say. What a
powerful thing to say. Can you imagine
like how little you It is like an insult
to your competition to say, "Guys, I'm
not even thinking about you." like
you're not
>> two two topics before we wrap up and I
appreciate your you being gracious with
your time is
your father was an Amway at one point
was he look my dad's history has a lot
of similarities to yours um you fled
Iran my father fled Cuba and and my
dad's background in Cuba he was born in
Cuba grew up in Cuba and when he was a
teenager when he was 14 he began
fighting in the Cuban revolution
and he was actually fighting with Fidel
Castro. So he was fighting against
Batista. Batista was corrupt. He was a
dictator. He was in bed with the mob.
And my dad was throwing Molotov
cocktails. He was blowing up bridges. I
mean, he was a gorilla.
When my dad was 17,
he was captured and he was thrown in
prison. Uh and they tortured him. uh
they they beat my father halfway to
death
and he got out of jail
and at that point my grandfather myo
said, "Look, they know who you are.
They're just going to kill you.
You got to get out of the country." And
so my dad at the time was a freshman at
the University of Havana. He applied to
three US universities.
>> What year is this?
>> This is 57.
>> Oh wow. Okay. Uh he applied to
University of Miami, LSU, and University
of Texas.
UT lets him in.
So
>> while he's in Cuba escaping.
>> Yeah. So he gets um Batista is still in
power. So you could get a student visa.
So he comes on a student visa because he
was admitted to UT. He takes a ferry
boat from Havana to Key West and then he
takes a Greyhound bus from Key West all
the way to Austin, Texas.
He's 18. He can't speak English. He has
a $100 that my grandmother had sewn into
his underwear. And he gets a job washing
dishes, making 50 cents an hour.
And he goes to school full-time,
ends up being a math major. Um,
your mother's a math teacher, wasn't
she? A
>> Both my parents are math majors. Oh,
>> okay. So, that's how they met.
>> So, my mother is Irish and Italian. uh
born in Wilmington, Delaware. Blueco
collar family.
>> Uh her mother was the second youngest of
17 kids.
>> Wow.
>> So Irish Catholic family.
>> You know, I joke they didn't know what
else to do on Saturday night. And so
>> boom.
>> I've got hundreds of cousins in
Delaware. My mother becomes the first
person in her family ever to go to
college.
And she ended up going to Rice and
getting a degree in math in 1956.
>> Wow. and she goes to work at Shell. She
gets hired as a computer programmer. And
then the two of them meet in the 60s in
New Orleans working together uh at a
seismic data processing company. They
meet there together, fall in love, get
married, they move to Calgary, and they
start their own small business in
Calgary. They start a seismic data
processing company.
Um I'm born in Calgary, 1970.
And my dad at the time is a young man.
and he's partying quite a bit. He's
living life. He's not a Christian. And
my father was partying a lot and
having, you know, being out on the town
and he ends up leaving my mom and me. So
when I'm three years old, he decides, I
don't want to be married anymore. And so
he gets on a plane and he flies back to
Houston.
And I'm back in Calgary with my mom.
He's in Houston for several months and a
colleague from the oil and gas industry
invites him to come to church invites
him to Clay Road Baptist Church
and he goes there and and he becomes a
Christian. He becomes born again. It
turns his life around.
And my father goes
and drives to the airport
and he buys a plane ticket and he flies
back to my mom, mom and me. And it is
because of that that I wasn't raised by
a single mom. And and he and I was
raised both my parents, they're still
living. I'm incredibly close to them
both. My dad is 87, my mom's 91.
And it a year later we moved to Houston.
I
>> When was the gap when he was gone?
>> It was uh maybe four to six months.
>> That's still a long time.
>> It It was several months. I don't
remember it. I was three. Yeah.
>> So, I know the story, but I was too
young to remember it. And then I grew up
in Houston and they started a small
business in Houston.
>> Where does a multi-level where does the
network marketing come in?
>> So, it's they start the small business
in Houston in 75. It's a seismic data
processing company. They have some
success. It's doing well. Oil and gas is
doing well.
You get to the mid 80s and the mid 80s
oil collapses
and my dad like he had 25 employees and
demand went to zero. Like he had he had
clients who were regular clients who
said I don't care if you can tell us
where oil is. We don't want any. Like
the price is too low.
And my father ended up he had some
savings and he kept putting his savings
into the business trying to save the
business thinking okay oil's going to
turn around. It'll turn around. I still
remember there was a day that I called
Black Monday and it was a a Monday
morning when of his 25 employees he laid
off 19 of them. And I saw him I was in
high school at the time. I saw him come
home.
He looked like he'd been beaten with a
2x4. It broke his heart. And he had
employees arguing with him. Raphael, I I
don't want to leave. I'm not going to
leave. And he would say to them, look,
you have a wife. You have kids. I can't
pay you.
>> There's no salary. You need to get a job
that will feed your family because I
can't.
>> They ended up going bankrupt. So, they
went personally bankrupt. The company
went bankrupt. And so, I'm in the middle
of high school with my parents in
bankruptcy. And so, when I went off to
college, my parents were bankrupt. They
couldn't pay a penny. And so, I ended up
being financially on my own at age 17
and had to take student loans. You know,
it's interesting. A lot of people think
senators are born with a silver spoon in
their mouth. That there's a trust fund.
I I don't got no trust fund. That that
that is not my world. But I took student
loans. I came out of college and law
school with about 100 grand in student
debt. I you know I joke that I had a
mortgage but I didn't have a house. And
I didn't pay it off until I was 38. So I
paid on the loans for, you know, decade
and a half. But my dad when when the oil
business collapsed and Houston went into
a recession. I mean and it was a
depression really. I mean it was the
city it crushed the city and my dad had
a period of time where he went from job
to job to job and was just trying to
find a way to earn a living. And so he
did multiple different multi-level
marketing companies because he's a good
salesman. And so he liked multi-level
marketing because you could go and and
and help people build their businesses.
And so he spent several years doing
that. And then he ended up becoming a
pastor and and actually my father should
have become a pastor 40 years earlier.
He is much happier as a pastor than he
was at any stage.
>> Is he was he always a good public
speaker or you know how how did that
happen? Because he so he always was a
because you can see him. He knows how to
rally. He knows how to get up and do his
magic.
>> He he is a great public speaker. He is
passionate.
Um when I was a kid, he used to I did
competed in speech contests and he would
be a a harsh taskmaster. He would
literally if you'd give a speech and
you'd say um or ah he'd be like what are
you a cow? Moo. And it but it was look a
father who demands excellence of you.
That's a real gift.
>> Respect. You know, I always heard
stories about Rich Dvas, never met him,
delayed Rich Dvas, but he wrote a book
called Compassionate Capitalism. And a
man named Bill Vogel, who became a very
good friend of mine, he said he heard
Rich uh give a speech in 6069, it was
called Selling America, and he knew how
to sell America in a very good way. And
of course, the Devos family now gives
money to a bunch of different things.
Betsy Devos, you know, she's done what
she's done. Last but not least, before
we wrap up,
>> and Betsy is a great friend, by the way,
Betsy. So Betsy
was Trump's education secretary.
>> I remember. Yeah.
>> And she and I worked hand in hand. So in
the first term when Trump rolled out his
school choice plan. I authored it and I
rolled it out with Betsy Devos at the
Department of Education and then Trump
in the State of the Union leaned in and
said to pass it, but we were trying to
pass it in a way that took 60 votes and
we couldn't get any Democrats. We tried.
We actually linked
uh scholarship tax credits for kids in K
through 12 to tax credit for workforce
development because we were trying to
get unions. We were trying to get trade
unions to back it and to get some
Democrats and the Democrats just didn't
budge. But I will tell you when we were
passing the school choice bill, Betsy
was a huge ally. I was working with her
day after day. School choice has been my
passion for 35 years. Um, I think it's
the most important civil rights measure
in our lifetimes.
So, I decided to argue it myself, which
is weird. You normally have staff
arguing it. I went in to argue it to the
parliamentarian.
Three different times the
parliamentarian
struck the bill down and said, "No, this
doesn't meet the bird rule." And so,
three different times my team and I, we
rewrote it to get it to fit the bird
rule.
We were right at the end. It was We were
right at the point when the bill was
about to be voted on the floor. We were
still not in yet. And and I went to John
Thoon, the majority leader. John and I
worked together very closely.
And I pulled John aside. I said, "John,
look, I I've been an easy vote on this
bill from day one. I've been a yes from
day one. This is important. We're doing
a lot of really important things on this
bill."
And I said, "John, I want you to hear me
very, very carefully.
If the school choice provision
is pulled out of this bill,
I will burn the effing bill to the
ground.
Now, there is an advantage to building a
reputation for being willing to blow
things up.
Nobody thinks you're bluffing, and John
did not think I was bluffing. I was
prepared to do exactly that. We rewrote
it one more time and we got it in the
bill and it it is the most millions of
kids are now going to Betsy was involved
in this. Is that is that was part of
I've heard great things about the the
Betsy Devos myself as well. Last thing
when I when I saw the book I thought I'm
like okay this makes sense why you would
write going further the incomparable
Clarence Thomas which if you're watching
this we're going to put the link below
to go buy number one uh book right now
on Amazon for you to go place the order.
Why choose to write this book?
Because I think it's an important book.
I think it's a book that needed to be
written. So this is my fifth book and I
spent some time thinking about what do I
want to write? What what do I want to
say? What do I want people to read? And
and I think Clarence Thomas is an
extraordinary hero. I I've known him for
30 years.
He has a remarkable personal story. So
two years ago, I went to Justice Thomas'
chambers and I told him then that I was
thinking of writing a biography of him.
And and I asked if he would sit uh for
interviews with me to work on the book.
and he kind of leaned back in his chair
and he thought about it for a second and
he said,"Ted,
if it were anybody else, if you were a
law professor, I'd say no." And Thomas
is famously reluctant. He gives very few
speeches. He gives very few interviews,
but he said, "Because it's you, I'll do
it." And so, we spent 9 and a half hours
in one-on-one interviews where I'd go
over to his chambers 8 a.m. sit there
just him and me in a room. I'd put a
tape recorder down and I'd ask him
questions. And and what the book does is
really three things that are important.
Number one, it tells his personal story.
And I will tell you his personal story
is astonishing. He
>> fascinating.
>> He was born in abject poverty in rural
Georgia,
>> right?
>> Uh faced withering racism.
Um
he was raised initially by a single mom
in squalor. Then he was raised by his
grandparents.
>> Uh his grandfather Myers Anderson, most
important man in Clarence Thomas' life.
If you want to understand Clarence
Thomas, you need to understand Myers
Anderson. He called him daddy. And he
was tough. He was a disciplinarian. When
Clarence and his brother showed up to
work to to move into the house, uh,
daddy said, "Boys, the damn vacation is
over." And he worked them. He would get
the boys up at 3:00 and 4 in the
morning. They would deliver heating oil
in the frigid cold in the winter. He
would not let the boys wear gloves. He
thought gloves were for the week.
Um, and he would work them from way
before dawn until late at night. And the
one exception is school and reading. And
and both of Thomas's grandparents were
illiterate. Neither one could read or
write.
And they wanted their grandkids to have
a better future. So
>> young Clarence Thomas would sit in the
library and he'd read book after book
after book. And he became an excellent
student.
And he decided that that his vocation,
his passion, he wanted to become a
priest.
And so the world almost didn't have
Justice Thomas. the world almost had
father Thomas. So he went to seminary
both in high school and college. Faced
enormous racism in seminary.
This is early 60s.
And
he ultimately got disillusioned with the
church. And the reason he left the
church is he thought the church was not
doing nearly enough to stand up against
racial prejudice and racial
discrimination and not nearly enough to
fight for civil rights. And sort of the
the the straw that broke the camel's
back. He was at seminary and Dr. Martin
Luther King was assassinated
and several of the white seminarians he
was there studying with were cheering
and celebrating and that just he said
I'm done. He left
and he went to college. He went to Holy
Cross College and then Yale Law School.
And at the time he was angry at the
church. He was angry at God.
And he became a left-wing radical. He
became a radical. He was wearing, you
know, camouflage pants and combat boots.
He had a poster of Malcolm X on the
wall. Um, he would go to Black Panther
rallies. He participated in a riot in
Harvard Square. I mean, he describes
himself as an angry young man. He hated
he hated God. He hated America. He hated
white people.
And so, what I try to do in the book
is three things. one chronicle his
amazing personal story which is really
inspirational that he rose from abject
poverty and and vicious racism to the
pinnacle of American law. But secondly,
I also chronicle the the journey he had
personally from a left-wing radical, an
angry college radical to one of the most
important conservative thinkers in the
history of America.
And then third, who flipped him? Was it
Thomas Soul? who who fl who played the
role on
>> so it was multiple people um I would say
the person who flipped him was his
grandfather and he didn't realize it so
Thomas Soul there's an interesting story
he is in law school and a friend gives
him a book
>> he's in law school or Thomas soul he's
in law school
>> Thomas is in law school and a friend
gives him a book by Thomas Soul the
great economist black conservative
brilliant gives him a book by Thomas
Soul and and Tom Clarence Thomas reads a
few pages of it and throws it in the
trash and he says No black man has a
right to think like this. Look, he was a
liberal. He voted for George McGovern. I
mean, he was a left-wing radical. He
didn't want to read what Thomas had to
say.
Fast forward. So, he comes out of Yale.
He's a very good student. He's done
quite well.
No law firm would hire him. Every firm
he went to said they wouldn't hire him.
And he saw firsthand the negative
consequences of affirmative action.
Because when the schools were publicly
letting you in based on your race and
not based on merit, it meant that
employers didn't believe you could do
the job. And in fact, he took a uh 15
cent sticker from a cigar box and stuck
it on his Yale law degree because that's
what he said it was worse was 15 cents.
The only job he could get is he got
hired
by the attorney general's office in
Missouri, a Republican, Jack Danforth.
And several years later, a a colleague
of his guy named Dick Wiler who was
actually a quadriplegic was was
paralyzed
called him and said, "Clarence,
there's another one who thinks like
you." And Thomas says, "What do you
mean?" And Thomas Soul had just written
a new book and there was a book review
of it in the Wall Street Journal. and he
said, "Another black man who thinks just
like you do." And Thomas at the time
read it. He remembered, "Hey, that was
the guy I threw in the trash and
wouldn't read." He read the review. He
went and bought the book. And he
realized, you know, if you go back to to
Myers Anderson, he did not consider
himself a conservative,
but he was a rugged individualist and he
believed in individual responsibility.
So for example, even though Thomas's
grandparents lived in poverty their
whole life, they never once accepted
government welfare. And Thomas's
grandfather told him, Clarence,
if you take welfare from the government,
you give the government license to come
into your home and to tell you how to
live your life, and it's none of their
damn business. I don't want them coming
into my home. And that his grandfather
believed. believed he believed in truth.
He believed in it's your responsibility.
When Clarence Thomas quit seminary, it
ruptured his relationship with his
grandfather because his grandfather did
not want him to quit anything. And it
and it it that remains the most painful
chapter of Thomas's life when his
grandfather
broke with him, threw him out of his
house.
>> How old was he? How old was he at the
time?
>> 21 maybe.
>> His early 20s.
>> Yeah. Threw him out of the house and
said, "You're a grown man now. Go live
as a grown man. I am done supporting
you. you've decided to quit and he said
you're going to end up you're going to
end up a failure and a and and no good
just like all these others.
You know, his grandfather also had a
phrase he had a lot of phrases, but one
that I really like is he said to Thomas
boy, "If it don't make no damn sense, it
don't make no damn sense." And and that
I think is a throughine
Clarence Thomas's opinion. So, he's been
on the court over 30 years. He is right
now the second longest serving Supreme
Court justice in history.
>> In two years, he'll be the longest
serving Supreme Court justice. But Pat,
you asked why did I write this bill,
this book? Because our world is so
divided, so angry that there's a
shortage of role models in the world.
And I think I believe Clarence Thomas is
an American hero. And I think a young
person, I think anybody,
we all need role models. And I I don't
think you could do better than Clarence
Thomas. I hope people buy the book. I
hope they buy it for their kids and
grandkids.
>> No. And by the way, I I want to show the
clip. You've seen this clip. This is the
clip we've shown on the podcast multiple
times. You just feel the man's character
and conviction. Go for it.
>> Any friend of his to refuse is just not
worth it. And judge, you're here though.
Some people have been spreading the
rumor that perhaps you're going to
withdraw.
What's
What's Clarence Thomas going to do?
>> I'd rather die than withdraw.
>> If they're going to kill me, they're
going to kill me.
>> Got it.
>> Intensity, the conviction.
>> So, you'd still like to serve on the
Supreme Court?
>> I'd rather die than withdraw from the
process.
Not for the purpose of serving on the
Supreme Court, but for the purpose of
not being driven out of this process.
I will not be scared. I don't like
bullies. I've never run from bullies.
I never cry uncle. And I'm not going to
cry uncle today whether I want to be on
the Supreme.
>> How do you not love this guy?
>> It's who he is. It It is so real.
>> [laughter]
>> Um, as you mentioned, he did my podcast
an hour and 20 minutes. The only podcast
he's ever done in his life and and and
he's open and candid.
>> We're going to put the link to the pod.
They got to watch the interview.
>> I'm going to tell you a final story just
be just because I think you'll like it.
>> So, [sighs]
good buddy of mine, uh, a guy named
Eddie Margane in Austin. He's a good
friend of mine. He's from Monterey,
Mexico. He and his wife are dear friends
and and Heidi and I vacation with them
frequently and they have kids about the
same age as our kids. So we go out and
go to the beach and have fun. So several
years ago,
uh Eddie and Lena invite us to go to
Wajaka, Mexico. I don't have you ever
been to Wajaka? It's beautiful town in
the interior. Just a gorgeous town.
>> And
Eddie and Lraine are good friends with
Matthew McConna and and his wife and his
family. So they invite the McCahes to.
So the the three couples and all the
kids go to Waka. So people would come up
and and they'd ask for pictures. And it
was fascinating is Matthew would always
say no. And I'd always say yes. And I
felt bad because they wanted a picture
with Matthew Mccan. They got stuck with
a picture with me. I'm like I'm sorry,
but if you want a picture, sure. So the
last night we're there,
we rented the basement of a bar that was
a karaoke club. And our kids went on
stage and did karaoke and they put on
skits and did musical theater and it it
was awesome. And we were just, you know,
the parents were sitting back and they
did a performance for a couple hours.
So the next morning, Heidi and I had to
leave to go to the airport at 6:00 a.m.
So at midnight,
uh, we forced the girl girls. We're
like, "All right, you're going to bed
now." And the girls are so unhappy.
They're like, "Dad, this is terrible.
Why are you making us go to bed? Come
on. Come on. It's midnight. Got to get
up at 6:00. Let's go." So we go back.
We'd all rented a house. So, we're all
in this house. So, we go to bed.
Little bit after 2:00 a.m., Matthew and
Eddie come back
and let's just say they had been
drinking steadily in the two hours since
they left.
>> Mascal is powerful.
>> Ah, it is powerful stuff.
>> Yeah.
>> So, I'm asleep and Matthew McConna comes
rushing into our bedroom.
He jumps on her bed in all four on all
fours and he's jumping up and down
going, "Ted,
come drink with me."
[laughter]
And Heidi looks over and she says, "I
don't care what you do, but please get
this man out of our bed." [laughter]
And I reached over and I grabbed my
phone. And I remember it was 2:37 in the
morning. And I got to say, Pat, this is
the first time I think I've ever felt
old. At 25, I would have gotten up and
partied the night away.
>> Of course,
>> I'm not 25 anymore. I said, Matthew,
I don't care what you do, but I'm going
back to bed. Please leave our bed.
>> You said no to partying with Matthew
Mcc.
>> And I went back to sleep. And it uh
and it did make me think that my wife
had just thrown an Academy Award-winning
actor and people's sexiest man alive out
of our bed, which I guess I felt pretty
good about that. I'm like,
>> throws you over, right?
>> Look, I was glad she didn't tell me to
get out. So, that that much, but it was
just sort of
>> What was he like?
>> Actually, I like him a lot.
>> Is he Would you say he's a conservative?
would you say cuz you know sometimes he
went on the view and you know that whole
scene and
>> he's not super political. It it's
interesting he's he's emotive. He's
sensitive. He's an actor. Like I thought
he'd be like his characters. I kind of
thought he'd be like a frat boy. All
right. All right. All right. Like that's
just sort of and he can obviously play
those roles really well, but he's he is
very much an actor.
>> What year is this? Uh this would have
been like 2018 19.
>> Did he you you are you would be
considered a super conservative guy. Was
he worried about hanging out with you?
>> Didn't seem to be. And we're still
friends. I mean I saw Matthew last year
at the UTA&M game. I mean we're
>> good for him that he didn't but you know
there's rumors that he may run there. He
has some interest.
>> Look he is charming at a level just
oozes charisma. I mean he's fun. I had a
and I'm a massive movie junkie. Like I
love movies. So hanging out with him, I
would sit and talk about his movies.
He's not super political. Look, he grew
up in in East Texas, which is a pretty
conservative place, but but his he he's
not deeply political. I pointed out one
of his best movies, Dallas Buyers Club.
>> Sick.
>> Is one of the most conservative movies
ever made. And he's like, "Well, what do
you mean?" And and so Dallas Buyers Club
is a true story uh about a rodeo cowboy
who gets badly injured and gets a
transfusion and gets AIDS. And this is
right when the AIDS epidemic is
beginning. They didn't know much about
it.
>> And so he's got he's got AIDS and he's
dying from it.
>> And
the early cocktail of medicines to treat
AIDS, the FDA was incredibly slow on
approving. But McConna's character
begins driving down to Mexico and buying
the medicines that are needed to treat
AIDS and then driving back up to Dallas
and the overwhelming majority of the
people that had AIDS were gay or
lesbian. So he's like in the gay lesbian
community like providing them
life-saving
medicines and saving their lives. And I
said, "Look, Matthew, this whole movie
is about how you have ridiculous
government regulations that are stopping
people from saving their lives." I think
that's immoral. I think if you're sick,
and I've been a big advocate of right to
try. I've been a big advocate of
reforming the FDA so that particularly
if if you're sick and dying, you
shouldn't have to drive to Mexico or a
foreign country to get get life-saving
medicines and you should be able to take
a risk on an experimental medicine
particularly if it's if it's your life
and you understand the risks and so but
but it was an interesting discussion
because I don't think he had ever
thought
about the policy implications
of the movie. Now, he did lose something
like 60 lbs. I mean, he was emaciated.
>> Doesn't see. By the way, it it seemed
like some of it stayed off. Like his
body changed. He looks different after
that movie. A lot of people say
>> it's a great movie.
>> Uh he's done a bunch of stuff. He's a
phenomenal uh guy to watch. And uh I
hope he gets into it. I think he, you
know, the book he wrote, the what is it?
The green uh uh what is the book called
that he wrote that
>> green doors? I think is that
>> what what is the book? Can you just type
in uh Matthew McConna book? Did this
thing this thing sold millions on top of
millions of copies and people swear by
this book. Let's just give him a quick
shout out for the book as well. If you
can go to it, Matthew McConna right
there and then just type in book next to
it.
>> What? Green Light. That's what it is.
Green.
>> A good book. I was a little grumpy
because that book came out at the same
time as my last book and so he beat me
and [laughter] so I was kind of grumpy.
>> Thank god he's not writing a book this
time.
>> And I'm I'm glad this week there's not a
new Matthew McConnA book. But Senator,
this was phenomenal uh of talking to you
and uh I'm excited to see what happens
the next couple years. I'm sure we're
going to see you a lot for about an
18-month period. You'll be on TV on a
daily basis. I have a feeling that's my
speculation. But I learned a lot about
you uh that I didn't know. And for the
audience that's watching this, if you
enjoyed it as much as I did, please go
click on a link below, show support,
order the book, one for yourself, your
kids, your boys, your peers to uh gift
them. But with that being said, thank
you so much for coming out. This was
phenomenal. Appreciate you.
>> Every journey starts with a choice.
People who inspire us don't wait for the
path ahead. They create their own. From
handcrafted Italian leather by
generations of artisans engineered for
life [music] in motion. Every piece is
created with purpose for the work, the
journey, the moments that matter. For
those who aren't defined by a title, but
by how they live, the standards they
set, the risks they take, the work they
put in, engineered [music]
for performance, crafted without
compromise. Because the future isn't
something you wait for, it's something
you move toward. Introducing [music] the
new FLB Icon Collection. The future
looks bright.