Syria reintegrating with the west with Visa card and an English-language X account
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
Syria is actively pursuing efforts to reintegrate with the global community, marked by significant symbolic and practical steps such as the launch of an official English-language account on X and President Assad using a Visa card for a coffee purchase in Damascus. These actions represent a deliberate move to reconnect the country with the international financial system after decades of isolation under comprehensive sanctions. While these developments signal a potential recovery and may encourage major international banks and insurance companies to re-enter the Syrian market, they do not immediately grant ordinary citizens access to global banking services or fully address Western concerns regarding security, minority rights, and civil freedoms. The restoration of economic ties is viewed as a crucial foundation for stability, with the government aiming to position Syria as an economic center in the region by removing remaining sanctions.
The internal political landscape also shows signs of evolution, particularly through the recent integration of Syrian Kurdish forces into the central government and assurances that their rights will be enshrined in a new constitution. This shift suggests a departure from the previous regime's mentality toward greater unity and inclusivity, although the path forward remains challenging. Diplomatic outreach extends to Israel as well, where Damascus has expressed a willingness to engage in dialogue to address security concerns and build trust, rather than relying on military confrontation. However, progress is complicated by Israel's caution following the events of October 7th and ongoing tensions over border security, with Syrian officials arguing that Israel is missing a significant opportunity to establish lasting peace if it continues to prioritize attacks over diplomatic engagement.
Despite these diplomatic overtures, skepticism remains high regarding the sincerity of Syria's transformation, particularly concerning the ideological background of its military leadership. Many observers note that senior commanders in the restructured Syrian army are former jihadists affiliated with Islamist organizations, raising questions about whether the government has genuinely changed its stripes or merely adopted a new public image. Israel and other regional actors remain wary of rhetoric from security forces that still calls for the liberation of Jerusalem and labels non-Muslims as infidels, viewing these as warning signs that undermine claims of moderation. Consequently, while there is hope for a future where education systems promote peace and patriotism, current realities suggest that building genuine trust requires more than just financial transactions or staged public relations displays, demanding tangible changes in ideology and behavior before full normalization can be achieved.
Read the full video transcript
Syria, now making efforts to reintegrate
to the world. Damascus launched, well,
an official English language account on
X. The account promises updates on
Syria's politics, economy, security,
culture, and pushing back against what
the government considers misleading
reporting about the post-Assad era. But,
in another minor, but carefully staged
display, you see here President al-Assad
used a Visa card to pay for coffee in
old Damascus, highlighting the country's
return to the international financial
system. It hasn't been there in a long
time. But, it doesn't all mean that
ordinary Syrians suddenly have access to
the world, or that Damascus has answered
Western concerns about security,
minorities, freedoms. On that note,
we're joined by Omar Abu Dhab, Syrian
journalist, filmmaker. Good to have you
back, Omar. Uh this simply clever, I
would say, public relations, is that all
it is, or does it reflect a real change
in how the Syrian government intends to
continue engaging with the world?
>> Well, thanks for having me back on. In
fact, uh just
a quick note note here. Uh actually, I I
used the the MasterCard at the same
hotel where the president was using the
the Visa card in old Damascus.
>> real.
>> Yeah, that's a Yes, so it's a huge step
forward, in fact. Let's put it this way.
Uh
because, you know, Syria was under uh
every sanctions known to mankind. And uh
for you, me, for those who lives in
Europe, United States, this is a fine
tradition. We use that uh for our daily
purchases. There's nothing
like to to be like happy about here.
But, for Syrians who who actually been
living under 50 years of Assad rule, cut
off from the outside world, you know,
the um the banking system is not
connected to the international financial
institutions. So, this is a huge step
forward that this might indicate
in the near future that Syria is
actually recovering and that's might
encourage more and more international
financial institutions to come and
join the Syrian market. So, yes, it
might not reflect right away in the for
ordinary Syrians to suddenly have a Visa
card or Mastercards or first they have
to open a bank account. But yes, it's a
it's a long process. But
let's talk about the the the bigger
picture here which is
the giants, let's say the insurance
companies, the the banks. Bank of
America actually was considering joining
the Syrian market. So, these are my
these are steps might reflect on the
Syrians economy and you do know that
without having a strong economy you
won't be able to have a stability. So,
economy is key to stability and the
Syrian rulers understands that and
understood the lesson. This is why they
wanted Syria to be the economic center
in the region. And that's why they
they've been pushing for removing the
sanctions and now we start seeing some
of the results of removing the sanctions
that Syria is reconnected to the
international banking system and that's
a good step forward in my opinion.
>> Does how much does it reflect, you know,
the reality inside the country? You
touched on this a bit and definitely
there are changes happening. But you
know, how the government is seen
behaving, I guess for lack of a better
word inside
the country itself. I mean, it you know,
what what kind of hindrances might there
be for Damascus' effort to
rebrand themselves internationally?
>> Well, I think as far as I'm concerned, I
I was there. I I keep going back and
forth to Damascus, Aleppo and elsewhere
around the country.
And I can see that the government has a
totally different mentality from Assad
regime. They're They're
so hard to pull the country together.
Actually, the
last uh couple of days ago, there was
an achievement by SDF announcing that
they joining the Syrian government and
the unity of the government. That's a
huge step forward. There was
assurances were given to Syrian Kurds
that they will get their rights in in
the constitutions will be written there
and everything is
it's not as people thought is going to
be. So, yeah, there is some
some efforts been put forward to allow
the country to come together. The
government has actually
working so hard on on that regardless
of the the challenges and the Syrian
challenges that they're still facing the
the government in Damascus. This is
still
a long
road for the
government, but hopefully with the with
what happened 2 days ago with SDF
joining the government and the United
States removing the remaining sanctions
in Syria, that would help the government
and
push the government
give the government a push to to to do
what's necessary
to pull the country together and to
allow the the Syrians to to breathe
again.
>> Yeah, definitely an underrated piece of
news in much of the world. We spoke
about it here like that integration of
of the Kurdish forces into into the the
central government
and that definitely letting credibility
again to what Damascus is doing with
minorities in the country.
What can you tell us or what do you know
you know about the open channels of
communication with Israel too, which
from our perspective are a significant
part of the reforms taking place in
Damascus?
>> Well, actually since day one the
the entire government tried to reach out
to
the Israelis. They sent messages
actually to Israel. Let's sit down.
Let's talk. Let's tackle all the issues
that we have. If you have any security
concerns that we can sit down and talk
about it because the new doctrine of the
new Syrian government is to tackle any
issue through diplomacy. It's allowed
diplomacy to take over but, you know,
the Israeli government is still in shock
of what happened in October 7th. That is
why they decided, "No, no, no, we can't
move move on with this and we have to
to do whatever is necessary to protect
our northern border." But for Syria, the
the dialogue is still on. Actually, the
Israeli delegations and the Syrian
delegations met a couple of few times
at different
places around the world and Syria said
it's willing to sit down and address the
Israeli concerns. And at the same time
that Israel also needs to understand
that Syrian sovereignty is on the line
here and
respect our sovereignty, we respect your
safety and security. And we we give time
to build the trust if we stick to the
the security agreement and after that
trust was built, then we can move on to
the next step and start talking
seriously about long-lasting peace
between the two countries. But until
that happened that, you know, Israel
advances inside the Syrian territory,
they have to move back from the buffer
zone back to the to to where they come
from and then we can
start talking about about peace. But,
you know, Israeli leaders doesn't seem
to me are interested to do that at this
moment and they are wasting by by the
way they are wasting a huge opportunity
to establish a really a serious peace
with important country in the region,
Syria. If they decided to reach out to
the rulers of Damascus instead of
attacking them and offering help, that
for me would do more than the attacks
and your fighter jets there.
>> Yeah, that's that's something we hear
increasingly. Omar, thanks for being
with us.
I want to bring this issue in studio and
root through this directly at you. Kind
of his closing claim there about Israel,
you know, being increasingly perceived
as sort of the warmonger that's
derailing efforts from Damascus to
establish relations and that there, you
know, these are so many things we hear
in various circles or that I hear from
analysts that, you know, Israel's
squandering a moment and opportunity,
derailing the efforts, the outreach.
What's your response to that in terms of
how Israel's been, you know, dealing
with Damascus in light, you know, of the
strikes last week against a Turkish
facility. All these things framed as Is
Israel just out to derail all this, you
know, good effort and goodwill from
Damascus? How do you respond to that?
>> I'm very, very skeptical about this
line. In fact,
I'd like to stress that I don't doubt
what the former speaker has been saying
and I'm sure that the way that he
perceives it from his point of view
perhaps is extremely authentic and
sincere. However, Israel is not trying
to derail
any peace talks.
Israel is watching objectively public
videos of officers' courses of
Al-Jazeera
screaming that they're out to get and
free Al-Quds, Jerusalem and Allahu Akbar
and
uh
we have ears, we have eyes.
We have a mindset that did change indeed
our perceptions on October 7th, opened
our eyes to the fact that we are not
liked in the region
and that's okay as long as we actually
get it.
But yes, there is a whole lot more
caution and in the meantime, while we
are talking and while
there is
a tendency to lower the flames and to
try and
agree upon some kind of arrangements,
not normalization, not peace talks, not
any of those
big issues. Unfortunately, by the way,
because certainly Israel has no
hard feelings against the Syrians.
There's there's just no such thing.
Perhaps it is told to the Syrians that
we do, but we do not.
And yet, there is a caution, and this
caution is very well placed because we
saw the massacre of Druze. Very
recently, we saw the massacre of others
other minorities within Syria.
>> Alawites, the Kurds.
>> And we see and hear the rhetoric and the
public statements that are being made by
official security forces of al-Julani.
And we also hear and follow
the commentary and the declarative
policy of Turkey, which is the patron of
the patron at the moment of Syria. And
hence, yes, Israel is cautious for the
safety of its own civilians and not in
an attempt to derail
security arrangements and or peace
negotiations.
>> Um Yacoub, on a
granular military level,
what are the things I mean we saw, you
know, Israel tried basically to stave
off their Damascus incursion into
southern Syria to the borderlands here.
You know, we saw Israel again try to
stave off further Turkish encroachment
into Syria.
You know, from Israel's side, what what
are the main concerns on the ground
militarily that they're looking at here?
>> Let me give you an indication of what
the Israeli concerns are. At the end of
June, beginning of July, there were lots
of reports in the Syrian media about a
restructuring of the Syrian army. Now,
what did this actually entail? Well,
they divided themselves up into regions.
Now they have five regional core
commands. And every commander, every
senior commander now in the Syrian army
is a former jihadist, at least
officially, and we don't know what his
ideology is today. These are all Hayat
al-Tahrir,
which is the Islamist jihadist
organization that Ahmed al-Shara led.
Before that, it was Jabhat al-Nusra,
which branched off from al-Qaeda. This
is where they come from. Now,
the idea that Israel's just suddenly
going to believe that they've changed
their stripes because he's swiping a
credit card and you know, whispering,
you know, sweet you know, poems to
President Trump is not it's not going to
cut it. We have to see who these people
are, what their intentions are, why are
they indoctrinating people in their
education system to jihad. Why are they
calling Jews and Christians infidels? At
least at the very least, if I would see
the Syrian education system producing
moderate curricula and teaching children
towards peace, and if I would see uh
soldiers or or students finishing their
courses and not screaming that they're
going to liberate Jerusalem, as as Ruth
just said, but saying stuff about, you
know, Syrian patriotism, then I would
lend a more hopeful ear to what's
happening in Syria. That's not what
we're seeing. We cannot afford to ignore
those warning signs, and so I think
Israel's suspicion is very skeptical,
but I will just add, just like in the
other arenas, I think what we need to
see from our own government is a clear
diplomatic vision put forward saying
these this is what we need to see if
we're going to dismantle our buffer
zone. Let's have something out in the
open so that at least we can be measured
by by our word and our vision, rather
than inviting once again others to fill
in a diplomatic vacuum.
>> Tell the story.
>> Yeah, exactly.