Sri Desikan, Elastic & Vrashank Jain, Dell | Cube Conversation
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
The conversation between Shriram Desikan from Elastic and Vrashank Jain from Dell centers on the transformative impact of injecting intelligence into data management systems, marking a pivotal shift in how enterprises handle information. The speakers argue that we are currently experiencing a "perfect storm" for innovation where large-scale systems are becoming increasingly intelligent through AI models, high-performance computing, and edge processing. This evolution is not merely about adding new tools but fundamentally changing the roles of data scientists, engineers, and analysts. Rather than eliminating jobs, these advancements enhance existing knowledge workers by automating routine tasks like evaluation and observability, effectively allowing a single expert to achieve the output of ten interns while maintaining human oversight in the loop. The industry is moving beyond simple dashboards and DevOps setups toward a future where platforms can manage complex, heterogeneous data types seamlessly.
A critical theme emerging from their discussion is the necessity for companies to build their own "brain" by unlocking the vast reservoir of unstructured data, which constitutes roughly 90% of all enterprise information. To achieve this, the traditional paradigm of relational and columnar databases must evolve into a unified "context database" that amalgamates time-series, document, and graph data. This new architecture relies heavily on concepts like context engineering, semantic layers, and ontologies to provide agents with a common understanding of business definitions. The speakers emphasize that simply having a good index is no longer sufficient; the next step involves connecting disparate data sources through graphs that mimic neural pathways, allowing autonomous agents to navigate complex organizational knowledge just as humans would by calling "friends" for answers.
The dialogue also addresses the practical challenges of implementing this vision, particularly regarding speed and orchestration. As AI agents spawn sub-agents to handle specific tasks, the underlying infrastructure must retrieve data with extreme latency and precision to prevent workflow bottlenecks. The speakers draw parallels between biological systems and computing hardware, describing GPUs as brains, data streams as blood, and processing units as cells, highlighting the need for a "data operating system" that can schedule and manage these resources efficiently. While ontologies are not new concepts dating back decades, modern generative AI now allows for their dynamic creation and maintenance, making robust knowledge graphs accessible to a broader range of enterprises without requiring years of manual engineering. This shift enables companies to fine-tune models with real-world data and generate synthetic datasets, creating a self-sustaining loop where the enterprise brain continuously learns and adapts.
Finally, the experts offer guidance for the next generation of data professionals who may lack traditional SQL skills but are native to AI technologies. They advise young engineers to focus less on memorizing specific technical syntax and more on cultivating deep problem-solving abilities, curiosity, and the philosophical skill of asking the right questions. Just as a brain surgeon requires specialized training beyond general medicine, future data leaders must understand how models behave internally and how to feed them the correct context at the right time. The ultimate goal is to maintain human agency and creativity rather than relying solely on AI to provide answers, ensuring that professionals remain in the driver's seat of innovation. By combining legacy knowledge with new AI-native capabilities, the industry can build autonomous organizations that leverage data as their primary asset for faster reasoning and decision-making.
Read the full video transcript
Hi, I'm John F with the cube here in our
PaloAlto studios for cube conversation
with Dell AI data platform with elastic.
We got two expert Shagir and Shri with
Dell and Elastic. Two experts in the
data platform. They've seen the movie.
They've seen multiple ways of
innovation. Guys, we are in a perfect
storm for innovation when it comes to
data. If you're in the data business,
it's almost like, man, I wish they had
this 10 years ago.
>> Um, all the mechanisms to manage large
systems are getting having intelligence
injected into them. They're being
figured out and abstracted away from
users so they can free up for more time.
More data sets are coming in,
>> more data types. Now you have AI models,
frontier and specialized models. So you
have intelligence coming into the data
business through these models and high
performance computing, AI factories, AI
at the edge. We're going to have a lot
of horsepower.
>> Yeah.
>> What does that do to the data industry?
Because you have data scientists, you
got data engineers, you got analytics
folks that have been building
dashboards. They're used to certain
things. Now you got the DevOps side.
They love love setting up these large
platforms. Shift left for developers.
Yeah.
>> All this comes together. What's the
biggest change when you inject
intelligence in?
>> Oh yeah, there's um I think it's
transforming how people work. You know,
there's a lot of talk about whether this
is going to take off take away jobs and
so on. What what I'm seeing personally
is um there's a there's a lot of um you
know enhancement that these tools give
to existing uh knowledge workers. So
let's take data science as an example,
right? What is the role of a data
scientist? Now if you really look at
different models and the data evals or
evaluations are the most important thing
for you to know whether an agent is
going to be accurate or not and that
eval is performed by data scientists. So
the role has become different right so
it's not eliminated it's different the
same thing with um observability
we have sur agents but then you have
human in the loop and the human in the
loop has to be part of the conversation
with the agents so it's like the s sur
having 10 more people or interns being
able to do the job 10x better right so I
feel it's more of a transformation and
not elimination right and then and I I
think that's going to get even better
with other knowledge work as well I I
actually think like we haven't even seen
the best of deal platforms yet. Uh I
mean they they were all the rage in like
2020 or something. Uh and then you know
chatb came along and suddenly it was
generative AI for a few years. Now it's
a Gent.
>> I actually think the the best of data
platform is yet to come and I think it's
because of the fact that it's finally
getting its hands on what is arguably
the largest data set that has always
existed which is unstructured.
>> We've said this before, right? 90% of
data is unstructured. It's dark. yada
yada yada. We finally have a killer use
case,
>> we finally have the path to tapping into
it
>> and I think the more people lean into
that side of the house, which is let's
start solving the hardware problems now
with with data platform. I think that's
where that's where we're headed,
>> you know, and I've been a um student of
enterprise search going back to the 90s
when when I was working on my search
products back in the day. It's always
hard in the enterprise. You have all
this legacy systems permission
>> that are actually outside the scope of
the schemas of the software. So you have
it was always hard to crack the code on
enterprise search. Now it's you guys
have done that with elastic. So you kind
of hit that. Now you got the the
retriever side of gen one and chat bots
check the box on that. You get vectors.
Now you got reasoning.
>> So I think the the the conversation
that's been happening on the cube is if
a company could have their own brain.
>> Yeah.
>> That's the company's knowledge. Yeah,
>> it's like going to school. You graduate
and you apply more. You relearn and
people who are curious, who are always
learning, that seems to be the memes and
best practices on Instagram and Tik Tok.
This is like how we're seeing the
enterprises start to think about their
business.
>> Okay. So, if that's like a preferred
future, where how do we get from here to
there? Graph databases have a good fit
because neural pathways are kind of
graphs. Yep.
>> You know, so
>> as the data will form, I think you're
right. I think the best is yet to come.
Yeah.
>> And no matter what you throw at it,
>> the brain will figure it out. The arms
and legs, the nerve centers. So, you
got, you know, there's a lot of like
biology examples being used in AI.
>> Um, systolic arrays, which I learned
over the weekend, is like a bloodstream
is the data. The brain is the CPU, a
GPU, and the processing units are the
cells. Yeah. Right. That was what they
were using at Stanford this weekend,
which I like because it's like, okay,
but how do we get the database if the
company brain
>> Yeah.
>> is the moat.
>> Yeah.
>> You just keep it fed, you keep it
knowledgeable. AI
>> keep it fresh. Yeah. I think that's
>> the AI helps that doesn't really there's
no competition to that. AI helps the
brain better. So, how does a company set
up their brain? If you had to kind of do
it all over, what how do we get from
there to there?
>> This is what we've been talking about as
context engineering and context layer,
right? But if you really think of the
paradigm for databases over the last 20
30 years relational columnar and you
have graph and the question is you know
data is in different shapes and sizes.
So you sort of need a context database
so to speak and and that database is an
amalgam of so many different things time
series data column data documents
>> and uh that's where elastic is going in
terms of capturing all of this context
>> and allowing the agents to use that
context at the right time and pass it to
the models right so so a database sort
of becomes no longer just a relational
or a column database it's all of the
above
>> you can have everything it's like when I
used to tell my teenager frontal loes
not developed. You know, like you can
have a brain that has different
databases contributing to the overall,
you know, where you are in the journey.
Time series here, relational here, tons
unstructured, and that's essentially
this the tissue. I think you're right
about that. So, I think you're going to
it's not about the database, it's about
how do you connect them all?
>> Yeah, I I think what I think the there's
going to be a few words that are going
to get thrown around a lot in the next
year or so, and it's going to happen.
context layer, semantic layers, uh
knowledge graphs, and ontologies and all
these things. If you cut the noise out
for a minute, basically what we're what
we're trying to tell people is
don't just stop at having a really good
index. Don't stop at having a really
good database or a view or whatever it
may be. Go maybe three or four steps
forward. The first step, I think, is to
your point, we need a common set of
definitions so that agents actually know
what the heck they're talking about.
when somebody says I want revenue from
the past quarter I should know what
quarter stands for and every company you
know has a little bit different the
second thing is I need to be able to say
if I ask for a quarter revenue I should
also be looking at margin and that lives
in as a different database that should
be connected somehow and therefore
there's a graph which is effectively our
brain but then I think we take it one
step further which is and it's really
imitating the way our organizations work
which is when you wanted to ask a
question
>> and you didn't know the answer what
would you
You would call a guy who knew a guy
>> who knew a guy.
>> Those people
>> phone a friend and say, "Help me figure
this out."
>> Exactly. That's what agents are doing
now. They're phoning a friend. And so I
think the next step in the data platform
is now exposing data platform as a
collection of really highly curated
agents that are really good at a
particular part of the graph. They just
know the financial part of the graph
really, really well. They have access to
the financial contract documents. They
have access to financial databases. An
agent should come in and say depending
on the question am I supposed to ask
this guy or that guy which basically
says which agent am I supposed to call
on
>> and that agent should also be able to
call another agent. So it's
>> replicating the org in a way
>> in an agentic fashion.
>> Shri it's almost as if you know I know
you guys are in the search business but
you mentioned graph multiple time but
still a search paradigm under the
covers. Yeah,
>> the search engineers and the search
practitioners, this is the time that
they're the ones who have the superpower
because
>> all the value coming out of this
connective tissue where we go to the
graph, brain, database management, data
management,
>> that's driving revenue because you get
faster thinking.
>> Yeah.
>> Faster thinking, faster reasoning,
faster knowledge and retrieval. And I
think I think part of the thing that
gets lost in you know in what's
important for the AI world is the
there's there's the there's the human
world of curating data and you know
storing it as a graph and a a table and
so on right but we always forget that in
the non-human world in the agentic world
retrieval is so important because you
need to retrieve it
>> and retrieve it fast because an agent is
probably spawning you know five sub
aents or 50 sub aents and as Rashank
mentioned each one is having a
particular task and you need to all of
this to come back in a reasonable time
otherwise no one's going to sit so um I
think retrieval is as important as just
>> you got to get it out of the database
and into the into the mathematics of the
>> and look at different data shapes and
still retrieve it fast right so that's
an a very important part of uh the the
equation here uh so so when we talk
about context it's not just about
storing the context as a graph and
ontologies and so on it's also being
able to retrieve it really really fast
at the speed at which you know agents
need to be operating and and agents are
part of a larger workflow typically
right we we don't we haven't talked
about orchestration and workflow
>> so a workflow could have multiple steps
and and each step could be a call to an
LLM so this entire mechanism needs to
work really fast with the right recall
and precision and speed so
>> yeah if you want to tap all your brain
and be that movie like Limitless we all
seen some the movie on that
>> you want to tap into all aspects of the
brain that's latency that's
orchestration
>> you don't want Wait for the brain to
warm up retrieval.
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah. Go. I would say my left brain,
right side of the brain. Go be more
creative.
>> This becomes interesting. You mentioned
ontologies and you guys were talking
earlier. We did a segment for your
October 6th event which is going to have
all the the right people in the room to
talk about this direction.
>> Yes.
>> Is when I hear Palunteer talk about
ontologies and everyone on Wall Street's
like, "Oh yeah, it's ontologies." It's
like the hottest word that's been around
since 1985. Yes.
>> Or actually 70s, I think, was the
original. But
>> it's not a new concept.
>> No. But it does highlight what we were
just talking about on your preview video
of your event is that it's integrated.
It's it just shows that you can't
actually run an antology and a knowledge
layer or graph or anything without being
in some sort of status system. Yeah.
>> Or like explain this phenomenon. It's
not an operating system per se, but it's
kind of like a data operating system.
They have to if we're going to have a
brain better know what's going on. Has
orchestration kind of has scheduling if
you want to think of it that way. Yeah.
>> So these are computer science topics now
applied to the data world.
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah. You mentioned SR, the whole SR
fleet and of agents in our heads.
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah. I mean, onto like to your point,
ontology isn't new. It's it's it's like
a it's a combination of a standard
operating procedure and a constitution
all built into one, right? And we've
been trying to build ontologies for
decades at some point. And a lot of
companies have tried to do it manually.
>> Now you got intelligence and ages and
coding on the fly.
>> Yeah. The demand for ontology Exactly.
The demand for ontologies is is only
getting bigger and bigger and bigger.
But uh I think what Palanteer did really
well in the in the last six years or so
is they really cracked the nut on how do
you build robust ontologies and I think
what they realized
>> is that you're going to have to do it
custom
>> which is why a lot of palenteer
engagements tend to be longunning. They
tend to be deep uh you know obvious
solution
>> right and it's they don't promise
results overnight. They say, "Look,
we're going to have to sit with you for
about 12 months or so, 9 months or so,
and we're going to get you over the line
here." But Palant
>> and the benefits are pretty
quantifiable.
>> Exactly. Right. The benefits are
obviously from a national defense
perspective, you get tremendous amount
of benefits. Uh but even for regular
enterprises, we're seeing that. I think
what's Palanteer has proven is that you
needed you always needed ontologies. You
could really do them well now with data.
And I think finally, if we're able to
crack them out on on using generative
models to build it and maintain it.
Yeah,
>> we're able to I think spread this
benefit of ontology to everyone without
having to sign up for 12.
>> Well, the graph database is a nice tell
sign for the direction because what now
said okay I can recurse through things.
Another computer science word that you
hear now in the data world a lot. AI
models speak recursive too and you hear
that a lot
>> is that you can actually get more faster
taxonomy builds. So you actually use the
intelligence but you have the frontier
models are going for the AGI that's
general intelligence they they crawl the
internet right
>> they're not crawling the enterprise
>> that's not in the general intelligence
yet but now that the specialty of the
enterprise
>> so specialized intelligence that's why
we see companies like fireworks AI doing
extremely well because they're asset
light y
>> they're not really spending any capex
they're just a layer between a
specialized intelligence the open weight
models Yeah, this points to the future
because I can run a really great model
for a thing that I know I want to run it
on and I don't have to bring everything
else in.
>> Yeah. So you you mentioned Fireworks. So
one of the things that I think is new in
the enterprise in the last few months is
so people are realizing that they can
fine-tune post train models right and
fireworks does that. Um so where does
that where does data fit into it? In
order to post train models you need
data.
>> It fits nicely into it actually.
>> It fits nicely. It does. So uh the real
real world data as well as being able to
generate synthetic data and use that for
post training is becoming people want to
do that because
>> so this is where I think the brain comes
in enterprises actually probably have
their own brain now that would be a good
board pitch because hey your mode is
your data
>> so you want to have an autonomous
organization which could be a kind of a
visionary statement. Yeah.
>> How do you do that? Well, it's going to
come from your data
>> the data world and we're seeing the new
implements of some of the graph stuff
with with good search um platforms
>> just turn into instant value. So all the
interviews I've done in the past year
hits this hard. Yeah.
>> People just get and they have to explain
to look it's really good. You know I
have the answer.
>> Yeah. You know
>> it's just been hard to I think it's been
traditionally hard to convince people
that you could actually build it and
maintain it. Like the idea isn't novel.
It's just that we knew just how hard it
was to build an enterprise brain and
actually keep it
>> high quality and and worth investing in
beyond the first six months.
>> All right. My my final question on this
little little riff here with you guys on
this kind of podcast format is there's a
lot of young people and systems people
that are, you know, over the age of 40
that have been doing database work,
ontologies. They're now back in the
game. You got this fusion between young
and old data pros. Yeah.
>> But the young guns don't know their data
pros yet. they're just AI native. So you
have this kind of confluence for folks
that are getting into the game on AI
native. What do you think they should
learn knowing all the legacy knowledge
we have in the history of it knowing
kind of what's been and where it goes.
What advice would you give to these new
young engineers that don't even know the
semantics of SQL? I already kne agent I
don't need to learn SQL. So they
probably don't even do SQL.
>> So they're they're already past the
point of us saying that. So what do they
need to learn to get to that that to be
a contributor in the community? What
would that you give them advice would
you give them?
>> You want to go first?
>> Yeah question.
>> Uh it's it's a really good question,
right? Um we grapple with it with our
own engineering teams like as they
evolve and what are the key skills that
are needed, right? So first an
understanding of how models work, right?
You know in terms of you know what what
causes some a model to behave a certain
way. So that's always good. And you
mentioned young people who are not
exposed to data. They start at the model
and then work their way down. And if
you're a person who already knows data,
then I think we talked a lot about it
today. What are the types of data, the
data shapes that are needed in order to
feed the right context at the right time
to the model, right? So you sort of
approach this from both ends and and
there's probably a sort of a nirvana in
the middle, right? the old
>> it's like we use the biology example the
highest paid physicians are brain
surgeons heart surgeons and neurology I
mean your nervous system your brain and
heart I mean that's the number one thing
so the brain is the models right
>> your brain surgeons
>> right and then and then the hands are
the tools so what what what are the
right set of
>> robotics I just saw some great demos
from unitry this weekend um yeah I mean
but this kind of this is a a rhetorical
question but this is what's on the mind
of people how do I tune my intellect and
energy to maximize.
>> Yeah. I I I think my my answer would be
like less technical and much more sort
of I don't know philosophical but
>> just continue to build your problem
solving skills and just don't give up
because we're seeing just I it happens
to me too like I think my brain is
getting lazier just because I'm
expecting a model to help me out
whenever I reach a certain issue and we
shouldn't give that up. We shouldn't
give our give up our own agency to to
think creatively, thinking out of the
box and only relying on a on a on a
clawed model to actually tell me what
else I could be doing.
>> Yeah. Yeah.
>> Um so just focus on
>> it's like going to the gym. You want to
keep that mind going, be curious,
>> work out, keep that
>> and there's plenty of opportunity to
drive intelligence.
>> Yeah. Exactly.
>> The ingenuity and engineering mindsets
could
>> you don't actually have to know the
answer. You just
>> know know how to ask the question.
>> Know ask the question.
>> I think that's the key skill, right?
because you you need to extract
everything possible out of the models
and and the skill for that is being able
like the Socrates skill, right? Yeah.
Ask the right questions.
>> Yeah.
>> Not spend two days trying to figure out
a great SQL query or merging tables and
then that's
>> and then the question changed.
>> So that's all taken care of. Guys,
thanks so much. Um you know, if you're
out there, you want to get into data,
brain surgery is the new model.
Understand how the models work. The
future is really kind of leveraging the
data. We're seeing that now as
infrastructure gets commoditized, it's
still about mathematics and feeding in
those engines with the data is going to
be a very big skill. I'm John for with
the cube. Thanks for watching.