Special Topics - Alien Life and the Probability of Life Part 1: Life as We Know It
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
The discussion begins by addressing the current limitations in our understanding of alien life, noting that existing perspectives are often too Earth-centric because they rely heavily on data from our own planet. Rather than defining life based on human-like characteristics, scientists use a functional definition centered on self-sustaining chemical systems capable of Darwinian evolution, with carbon being essential due to its unique bonding properties and low mass compared to alternatives like silicon. The fundamental building blocks for such chemistry were forged in the first stars following the Big Bang, while heavier elements necessary for complex life were created during stellar fusion and scattered across the universe when massive stars ended their lives in supernovae explosions.
To locate potential habitats beyond our solar system, astronomers utilize the concept of a "habitable zone," or Goldilocks zone, where temperatures allow liquid water to exist based on the host star's size; this includes systems around red dwarf stars which offer long lifespans despite having compact habitable zones. Detecting these distant worlds involves methods like direct imaging for bright hosts, measuring stellar wobbles via Doppler shifts caused by gravitational pull, and observing periodic dimming as planets transit their stars. The Kepler mission has identified thousands of candidates within this framework, including the TRAPPIST-1 system orbiting an ultra-cool red dwarf with only 9% of the Sun's mass, which hosts multiple Earth-sized planets in close proximity to its host star.
In the specific case of TRAPPIST-1, precise measurements of planetary transit periods allow scientists to calculate orbital radii using Kepler's Third Law, revealing that these worlds are tidally phase-locked so one side always faces the star while the other remains frozen. This configuration creates extreme temperature contrasts but potentially allows for habitable conditions in transition zones where ice, liquid water, and gas could coexist under a twilight sky. On Earth itself, similar evolutionary processes occurred after the planet cooled from its molten state roughly 4.5 billion years ago; carbon dioxide-rich atmospheres gradually sequestered into rock formations like white cliffs to regulate temperature, creating hospitable conditions for simple single-celled life to emerge around 3.8–3.9 billion years ago shortly after heavy bombardment ceased.
Ultimately, while experiments have successfully produced amino acids from primitive atmospheric conditions, they do not prove that abiogenesis occurred naturally on early Earth or elsewhere in the universe, leaving the origin of life as a scientifically complex and sensitive field requiring bold inquiry rather than avoidance. The search for extraterrestrial intelligence must therefore expand beyond our narrow biological templates to consider diverse environments where solvents other than water might support chemistry similar to what we know exists here. By studying these varied possibilities—from the twilight strips of red dwarf systems to the cooling history of early Earth—we gain a more realistic and less myopic view of life's potential throughout the cosmos, acknowledging that our current definitions are merely starting points for deeper exploration into how universal biological processes might unfold under different stellar conditions.
Read the full video transcript
okay welcome everybody i'm going to get
started right away there are a bunch of
announcements i put them on canvas so i
wouldn't have to say them today
and that will allow me to focus on the
subject of the last two lectures
of physics 1303
i like to add special topics and at the
end not every faculty member does it we
do have a set schedule of things we're
supposed to get to but i don't feel too
bad about this one today because not
only is it an interesting and engaging
subject about which we all care in one
way or another life what does it mean
could it be elsewhere and things like
that um
it also ties into gravity which was the
subject of last week's lecture and i'll
show you how
so okay that's going to keep happening
today
so i'm going to pause that
that's called stealing focus okay
so let me begin with a disclaimer on the
subject of alien life and the
probability of life and the subject is
the disclaimer is fairly straightforward
i am a physicist
that's my disclaimer
okay so what does that mean
it means that i have an area of
expertise and i am definitely going
outside of my comfort zone in this but
i'm going to try to tie it back to
physics as much as i can
because i'm going outside my area of
expertise i am relying on expert sources
as input material for this lecture and
many of them are collected in the
bibliography at the end of the slides
which i will make available later
so this is of course what biology which
really if you think about it is kind of
the thrust of these lectures although it
ties neatly to chemistry and physics in
its own way this is what a biologist
would view looking at a bird right
they'd see they'd know all the parts
they'd know that this is the crown the
nostril the bill the lesser converts etc
this is what a physicist sees when they
look at a bird it's got some bird over
here oh there's definitely bird over
here check out that bird there's a lot
of bird on this bird okay
so i i just want to be clear
that you know i'm i am doing this
because i like a challenge at the end of
a semester i want you to have a topic
that you feel engaged in i am going to
drag you screaming back into physics
during this lecture
but i i do want you to be aware of the
fact that this subject is too broad
to cover in two short lectures
and it benefits from a wide variety of
disciplines looking through all of their
lenses at the same question of what is
life
where can it exist and where might it
exist
okay so with that in mind
the theme of today is life as we know it
okay and here's a snapshot from life as
we know it as human beings but of course
when i talk about life i'm talking about
all living organisms
anywhere for example on planet earth
we'll look beyond planet earth in this
part of the lecture but this essentially
is a snapshot of life as we understand
it you know we are bipedal life forms
descended from long ago
from apes
those life forms appeared millions of
years ago on the planet modern humans
are only about 200 000 years old
and most of what we take for granted as
part of our modern memory of
civilization was really only laid down
in the last 10 000 years
and in the cosmic expanse of time which
is important to the formation of life in
the universe
that's a drop in the bucket
so i just want to start off by pointing
out that life as we know it is a very
myopic view and i'm going to come back
to that theme for for a lot of these
lectures
so let's talk about how our view of life
is constrained our view of life is
constrained by the fact that we human
beings
evolved on only one planet
in a single solar system
that is in the outer suburbs of a galaxy
containing half a trillion stars many of
them like our own sun
and our galaxy is one of hundreds of
billions of galaxies that fill the
visible universe there are parts of the
universe we can't see we assume they
also contain galaxies it may go on
forever
it hasn't been in existence for forever
but it may for all intents and purposes
be infinite in extent today
and in many ways i mean we look up at
the night sky and we wonder at the
wandering stars in the sky those are the
other planets venus mars jupiter and
saturn are the easiest to see with the
unaided eye here we are on the third
planet from our sun we have a single
moon that goes around us and so far as
we know there's no nothing alive as we
would understand it on that moon
everywhere we've looked we have seen no
evidence no clear and compelling
evidence of life as we understand it
anywhere else even in our own
neighborhood this is really our you know
that this is sort of our street this is
our cul-de-sac in the cosmos right here
now let's talk about earth since life
did appear on earth and it did appear
basically about as quickly as it could
have in the ways we understand it now
it's important to understand what are
the ingredients if you wanted to make
another earth
so earth has some major pieces to it of
course it's got the atmosphere which
we're breathing right now and we really
take for granted the atmosphere also
plays an important role in trapping and
maintaining heat energy that's ex that
comes from outside and comes from
underneath our feet and we'll come back
to that
we live here on what's called the crust
the crust is a very thin stiff outer
layer of our planet
underneath the crust is the larger
mantle which is still rigid
but going deeper than that we reach a
liquid part of our planet the outer core
the inner core composed primarily of
nickel and iron appears to be solid okay
now we've never drilled down into the
core we've never gotten more than a few
kilometers below the surface of the
planet we've basically only ever
explored the crust of this planet
everything we know comes from
observations using seismic waves if an
earthquake happens somewhere over here
the waves will travel along the surface
they'll also travel through the bulk of
the planet and we can learn about the
density of rock the kind of material
liquid solid things like that that are
under our feet
on the surface it's primarily water that
water can be in liquid solid or gas form
ice
appears naturally on the surface of our
planet obviously liquid water very
common on the surface of our planet
and water vapor water gas
fills the atmosphere and is an important
part of the atmosphere it's a humid day
today you might have noticed that means
we have a high degree of water vapor
saturating our air today which helps to
trap heat which makes it hard for us to
sweat which is why it feels hotter than
at the temperature outside okay the
so-called heat index water is essential
and annoying to all things
that are living on the surface of the
planet
the atmosphere itself however is
primarily nitrogen and oxygen
many things on the surface of the planet
need both of those things to survive and
i'll come back to that the crust is
mostly oxygen silicon
with aluminum iron calcium and then uh
some of some about roughly equal amounts
of sodium magnesium and potassium
there's a little bit of hydrogen and
then trace elements all those rare earth
elements that people are always freaking
out about having for smartphones and so
forth they're buried somewhere in that
half percent of stuff in the crust okay
so we need them but they're rare and
you'll see why they're rare hydrogen is
also rare which is which is strange
given what i'm going to tell you later
but there's a good reason for that and
if you're curious about it we can come
back to it helium is even rarer helium
somewhere down in this trace elements
thing
now the mantle under the crust is
similar abundance it's not exactly the
same but pretty close enough for what i
care about today the core as i said is
almost ninety percent iron about six
percent nickel there's sulfur in there
as well and then less than one percent
of is just trace elements other things
heavy things
why are the iron and nickel at the
center well there was a time when the
earth was molten and that means that
atoms were free to move around what
forces were in play well there was heat
and convection but there was also
gravity and heavy things tend to collect
toward the center of the gravitational
potential the center of mass of the body
that's gravitating so the iron and
nickel settle down in the core and
eventually hardened
but there's also a molten outer part of
it there
this is all left over from the formation
of the earth the lighter stuff tended to
float to the top
so if you think of the earth as once
being a liquid ball of of molten rock
that's a pretty good picture of what the
earth looked like when it was born it
settled down quite a bit in the first
500 million years of its existence now
heat obviously plays an important role
in all of this we get uh a lot of heat
from the sun we're far enough away uh
that it is not too cold and we're close
enough that it's not too hot and that's
how we're able to get all three phases
of water on our surface but we also have
an atmosphere that helps to trap and
regulate the temperature if we had no
atmosphere it'd be really hot during the
day and freaking cold during the night
we wouldn't survive but the atmosphere
regulates those swings from when you
have daylight sunlight to when you don't
have sunlight so it helps to trap heat
in the atmosphere and keep us kind of
toasty down here
now the earth also generates heat
there's heat left over from the
formation of the planet
and there's also heat from radioactive
decay of elements like uranium and
thorium and potassium okay in fact how
do we know this that about half the
radiation radiating from the surface of
our planet which is 44 terawatts of
power 44 trillion watts of power
radiates from the surface of the earth
um how do we know half of that is coming
from radioactive decay
the speaker today in the physics
colloquium professor bonnie fleming
studies the neutrino neutrinos are
produced in radioactive decay and if you
have a sensitive enough detector that
can trap neutrinos and figure out where
they pointed back on their trajectory
you can make a photograph of the
interior of the earth
using these phantom particles
and that's what we've done
and based on just a handful of of events
neutrinos interacting with detectors
across the globe pointing back toward
the deeper parts of the earth
we actually know that the processes that
make neutrinos uranium
thorium decay all that stuff
uh those neutrinos are primarily coming
from those things and the rate at which
they come up from under the surface
suggest to us that they're about half
the that radioactive decay is about half
due to radioisotopes if we did not have
unstable radioactive elements the earth
would not be as warm as it is today
and that's another fascinating story it
actually
bears on an early fight in physics
between physics and biology about the
age of the earth okay
but based on all this today we know that
the earth is about four and a half
billion years old it's been cooling for
about four and a half billion years
now let's get to life because life is
the thing we care about now i'm going to
start off by saying there is absolutely
not
a universally agreed upon fundamental
scientific definition that everybody
walks away in quotes
there are some empirical rules of thumb
about what it means to be a living thing
and obviously you need to define
something if you want to go out and look
for life you need to know what you're
looking for you've got to have a
functional definition
so for instance in the 1990s emerged
this thing which is now known as the
nasa definition nasa needed a definition
of life if it was going to build
missions that take 20 years to plan 10
years to build and 30 years to operate
if you're going to go looking for
something you kind of need to know what
you're looking for because you're
probably not looking for the star trek
concept of life a bunch of
semi-humanoid-looking bipedal aliens
that also happen to speak english it
seems okay in every episode or at least
have a universal translator that allows
that to happen
right they all vocalize they all use
sound they all have eyes they all have
similarly exactly the same senses as we
do that's a pretty narrow view of what
it means to be an intelligent living
organism so the nasa definition is that
life is merely a self-sustained chemical
system capable of undergoing darwinian
evolution so what does that mean it
means the system can not only sustain it
can replicate copy
manipulate the environment around it but
it has some mechanism by which it can
pass along desirable traits that allow
it to adapt to its environment
and replicate in some way or another and
sustain itself through memory
effectively and replication okay now
again there are many definitions out
there so for instance patrick forte from
the institute pasteur
just says something like the following
life and living processes are simply
names for complex evolving forms of
matter that are now present on our
planet that's pretty vague
that's pretty broad right there was a
big debate um not that long ago maybe a
century ago or so about whether or not
crystals are alive
because crystals
self-replicate organize minimize their
energy
uh adapt to their environment right they
can fill whatever space you give them
they can grow within a space
um but now it's sort of understood that
crystals are not alive our virus is
alive okay by the nasa definition
they're not because they can't
self-sustain they don't have the
internal machinery required to make
copies of themselves they have to inject
their rna into other hosts use their
machinery to replicate
and then release more copies of
themselves to then invest more hosts and
make more copies
so but this is a lively area of debate
all right so i just want to tease this
to you because i don't want you to walk
around thinking that there's just a
subtle definition of what a living thing
is we're pretty myopic in our view okay
now the chemistry of dna and the
mechanism of heredity also mutation
these are important things this is what
allows evolution to occur
and it boils down on earth to a series
of nucleobases adenine cytosine guanine
thymine and uracil in rna
and these are the fundamental units of
the base pairs that are the building
blocks of genes and deep down inside
make up rna and dna which are essential
to replication mutation
heredity and so forth this chemical
subsystem on earth allows for traits to
be passed along
undesirable and desirable right we all
have the gene for sickle cell anemia
it's just a question of whether or not
it's expressed or not and you can
actually show that if you expose a
population to malaria over a century
that human population will naturally
over express its sickle cell anemia gene
because there's a conferred survival
advantage to being able to resist
malaria naturally and not die from that
versus also having complications from
sickle cell anemia it is a complex and
messy world out there so in less than
100 years a human population can
re-evolve to re-express its sickle cell
anemia gene when it's needed which i
find just haunting and fascinating okay
now nitrogen if you take a look at these
molecular diagrams over here you see a
whole lot of nitrogen hydrogen is
important for the bonds that tie the the
base pairs together hydrogen bonds which
fundamentally originate in dipoles which
you'll learn about in second semester
physics
are essential to the zipping and
unzipping of the dna
but nitrogen is the backbone of this
structure so you can already see
nitrogen really essential to life as we
understand it but also hydrogen oxygen
and carbon and speaking of carbon on
earth we know from our own experience
that carbon is essential to what we
think of as life it accounts for about
half of all dry biomass on the planet
okay let that sink in for a second
carbon compounds abound on the planet
and they dominate in living systems okay
now why is that and when you think about
it it actually boils down to physics and
chemistry
the physics is in energy and inertia
carbon has the right number of free
electrons
the right number of unoccupied places in
its orbitals that it can pretty readily
bond to most things and that makes it a
good scaffold for molecules
that's an energy issue
another energy issue is that carbon
isn't that heavy okay
it's only about 12 times the mass of the
proton or the mass of the neutron so
it's one of the lighter elements and
that makes it easy to manipulate it has
little inertia compared to other things
and i'll talk about silicon in the next
lecture
um so not only does it readily form
chemical bonds um it has a lower mass
and thus a lower inertia and enzymes
after they come into existence find it
relatively easy to manipulate
carbon-based molecules it's an energy in
a force game that's it and that's why
physics underpins a lot of this stuff
the why of this why carbon
why not silicon which has a very similar
chemical structure and the answer is
carbon's a lot lighter it's a lot easier
to move around and if you're in a cool
environment like the one we find on the
surface of this planet carbon is the
lowest barrier for entry into building a
scaffold for life as we understand it
but this all bears on the following
question
where did all this stuff come from where
did carbon come from where did nitrogen
come from where did iron come from all
of the stuff is essential to our planet
and life on this planet
and the story of where we come from as
living organisms is tied directly to the
story of the universe
we are inevitable in this universe
let's begin at the beginning
the big bang
13.78 billion years ago this universe
came into existence
okay we don't fully understand this
moment we have a pretty good idea what
happened back to about a millionth of a
billionth of a second after the big bang
but a lot happens in the first 10 to the
negative 44 seconds of the universe
and that's a lot of stuff we don't
understand yet but here's what we do
know
once neutrons and protons and electrons
came into existence electrons were
basically there since the beginning
protons and neutrons formed a little bit
later once the universe cooled down so
that protons and neutrons could bond
through fusion
you basically seeded the formation of
the atomic elements
so nearly all the hydrogen and helium in
our universe today
owes its existence to what happened in
the first three minutes of the universe
that baked in essentially all the
hydrogen and helium in the universe
today
that number has really not changed
appreciably since the beginning of time
the hydrogen that is in your dna and rna
was forged most likely at the beginning
of time
the helium that is a byproduct of this
process as well would go on to play
important roles in the first stars and
the deaths of the first stars
and in fact the deaths of those stars do
in part to helium would see the universe
and the remaining elements
so while it's true that hydrogen and
helium were produced and in fact once
you know basic particle in nuclear
physics you can predict in a universe
that formed the way ours did what will
be the ratio in this cosmos of hydrogen
to helium and you find out that helium
should be one-fourth of the universe by
mass so you go out and you count you do
atomic spectroscopy and you count how
much hydrogen's in that cloud how much
helium is in that cloud how much
hydrogen's in that star how much helium
is in that star how much hydrogen is in
jupiter how much helium is in jupiter
and you always get 1 4 by mass helium to
hydrogen
it's been baked in since the beginning
of time
that is astounding
lithium and beryllium the first metals
they did come into existence near the
beginning of time but fusion cut off
very fast there wasn't time to form
anything heavier than beryllium
and so the universe would enter a
neutral cold dark age
where molecular hydrogen and helium were
sifting about through the universe
slowly clumping under the force of
gravity
and over 100 million years fought 500
million years something like that
they would collect into the first
molecular clouds the first cold clouds
of gas
that under gravity would compress and
ignite into the first stars
and that's where the heavy elements came
from
the first stars formed
very early on and without them there
would be no carbon there would be no
oxygen there would be no silicon there
would be no iron in the universe
these first stars formed from big
molecular clouds
they collapsed and they were heavy they
were bright they burned hot they were
much bigger than our sun
probably tens or hundreds of times
bigger than our own sun
and the problem with this is that stars
operate by physics
and once you bake in the amount of
hydrogen and helium and the mass of
those things in a star its fate is
determined
it will burn helium for in the case of
heavy stars millions of years a blink in
cosmic existence remember the first star
is formed after about half a billion
years the universe is almost 14 billion
years old 10 million years is nothing to
this universe okay
so these stars formed
they began to cluster into the first
galaxies around that time as well they
lived fast and they died young and when
they died they died spectacularly
they burned through their hydrogen
leaving helium in their core
the star begins to compress as the
hydrogen runs out which ignites helium
fusion
now you start forming things like
beryllium again carbon oxygen but
there's not a lot of helium in these
stars
so maybe in one tenth of the time it
turned them took them to burn their
hydrogen they burn through their helium
and if they're not heavy enough at this
point that's where it stops
and now you have carbon and oxygen and
nitrogen and all these other things
if it keeps going on if they start
burning carbon and eventually get up to
iron that's where it finally stops
that's burning iron is the desperate end
of all stars if you're forced to burn
iron it's like taking the remnants of
your campfire and trying desperately to
light it on fire to stay warm you've run
out of options at that point it's not
energy efficient to ignite ash on fire
okay and similarly when you have iron
ash built up in the core and that's all
you have left to burn you have nothing
left to burn and so the star compresses
and explodes and it sprays all the heavy
elements that it's made out into the
cosmos
those explosions can collapse nearby
molecular clouds reigniting star
formation in those regions meanwhile
seeding the universe in heavy elements
iron carbon oxygen nitrogen these were
forged in the first stars
so
that's the story of our cosmos that's
where the building blocks for life came
from they came from the life and death
of stars in the very first billion years
of the universe and i love this quote
from carl sagan astrophysicist and
science communicator who passed away
about 30 years ago now and in his famous
series cosmos which was rebooted in the
arts um maybe the teens of this century
he said the nitrogen in our dna the
calcium in our teeth the iron in our
blood the carbon in our apple pies were
made in the interiors of collapsing
stars
we are made of star stuff
the only thing that's original in our
bodies
to the big bang is the hydrogen
the rest of it had to wait for stars to
die another way of putting it in a
modern context is from the band modest
mouse we are between we are between yeah
we are somewhere between dust and the
stars
the dust that was blown out in these
explosions eventually recollapsed into
new stars and some of that was left over
and formed planets
and down the long chain of history here
we are okay we are we are made of old
rocks and salt and that's not wrong
that's my interpretation of the song
it's an indie anthem these days enjoy
you can interpret it any way you want
okay
so
let's take a look at a timeline of earth
and life on earth
so the time here is in giga years
billions of years okay because that's
the currency of the universe
a century for a human life
barely shows up in i mean it won't show
up in any of these decimal places okay
all right so you need big time to think
about the cosmos so the big bang
happened at zero time
prior to now that would be 13.787 give
or take a little bit billion years okay
that number is measured from various
astronomical observations that's the
uncertainty on the age of the universe
it used to be a factor of two when i was
a kid it was a factor of two science has
come a long way in 30 years
okay
the first stars in galaxies appeared
about 0.2 to 0.5 200 million to 500
million years after the big bang that's
about 13.3 to 13.6 billion years before
now so this column has always since the
big bang and this is before now so if we
think take now is our zero time we can
go backward right
the milky way galaxy's core our
sort of urban center in our galaxy that
formed about 800 million years after the
big bang or about 13 billion years ago
where kind of where we live in the outer
spiral arms that actually formed later
the milky way collided with another
galaxy gaia enceladus something we only
learned about recently and absorbed it
and it absorbed it and formed the outer
spiral arms of the milky way that
happened about 2.8 to 5.8 billion years
after the big bang or about 7 to 11
billion years ago
the sun our star was born about 8.8
billion years after the beginning of
time think about how many generations of
heavy dying stars
happened right they all lived roughly
ten to a hundred to maybe a thousand
million years tops and then seeded the
space around us and the heavy elements
which eventually then collapsed to form
our sun
and our planets
that all happened 8.8 billion years
after the beginning of time or just
about 5 billion years ago
okay
the earth formed around the same time as
the sun so the sun bursts into existence
spraying radiation out into this corner
of space
light elements hydrogen and helium too
close to the star are blown away
the heavy elements iron nickel carbon
oxygen they remain closer to the parent
star
and so it's no accident that in at least
in our solar system we find rocky worlds
close to the sun and gaseous worlds far
from the sun
those planets were formed from whatever
was abundant and collected in the
regions of the solar system where they
now exist and while it's also possible
that planets have moved around in the in
the history of the solar system for the
most part where we are is roughly where
we've been since we formed
so um the earth formed about 500 million
years after the sun so about four and a
half billion years ago
and at that time it was molten and
uninhabitable think of rock and dust
slowly clumping together in space under
gravity getting bigger and bigger and as
it gets bigger the gravity gets stronger
and it compresses and as it compresses
it heats and the rock becomes molten and
liquid this was not a hospitable place
to live this was quite literally hell on
earth
but
something like 200 to 400 million years
after our planet formed as a molten ball
it does appear that the first life as we
understand it appeared which suggests
that the crust settled down it might
still have been being bombarded by
things and there was a lot of carbon
dioxide in the atmosphere that had to be
drawn out and that was done by carbon
chemistry in the rock
uh what liquid water could finally
settle down on the surface of the planet
when it wasn't molten anymore and being
vaporized by by this hot magma
okay so water collected and then
multicellular life
so life appeared
multicellular life appeared only about
one and a half billion years ago right
so many billions of years after the
earliest simplest forms of life appeared
on the planet
modern humans appeared only about 200
000 years ago but how remarkable is it
how young a species we are how much
we've learned i find that fantastic okay
so if the earth is habitable
are there other worlds that are
habitable what makes a habitable world
and that's the part of the of the that's
the next part of this lecture
because clearly
things worked out on earth
it was a ball of magma and then it
wasn't
it was a carbon dioxide rich atmosphere
chemistry took care of that
water settled down liquid solid gas and
somewhere in all of that mix what we now
think of as life emerged and relatively
quickly after the conditions sort of
basically what we've ex what we
experienced now ish on this planet had
settled into what we kind of see at this
point i mean i'm sure it wasn't pleasant
back then in the early earth but it
wasn't as bad as when it was molten rock
okay so are there other places in the
universe where we might find life as we
understand it forming under similar
conditions
well this goes to the idea of what's
known as a habitable zone around a star
or the goldilocks zone for those of you
unfamiliar with the fairy tale of
goldilocks it's about a young girl that
sneaks into a into a house owned by
three bears uh find some porridge all
right so the father's porridge is too
hot so she tastes it and spits it out
the mother's porridge is too cold she
tastes and spits it out the baby's
porridge is just right okay the father's
bed is too hard the mother's bed is too
soft the baby's bed is just right it's
the just right zone okay so not too hot
not too cold just right that's the
goldilocks or habitable zone
what do we mean by just right
just right so that water stays put in
any of its various phases that's kind of
what we're talking about because water
is the essential solvent in which life
as we understand it formed water is a
fantastic solvent all kinds of chemicals
can be dissolved in it reactions can
take place in it
i'll talk about silicon based life
tomorrow and the solvent that might be
required for that to occur it's not
unreasonable and it does exist in our
own solar system in large amounts um but
water water is a nice solvent i mean any
chemist will tell you it's pretty good
for dissolving things right not
everything but many things
okay so um of course different stars are
going to have different habitable zones
a star that's
bigger and hotter than ours you're not
going to want to be this close to it
you're going to need to be further away
for water uh to be liquid solid and gas
and stay put on the planet
for a planet that's for a star that's
smaller than ours a so-called dwarf star
like a red dwarf the smallest and most
compact and oldest of all stars in the
universe they can live a hundred billion
years before they die
our sun will only live 10 billion years
red dwarf stars can live 100 billion
years
in other words the red dwarfs that
formed near the beginning of time are
still burning today
their habitable zones are much more
compact because they don't burn as hot
that's why they live longer they're a
little cooler and they take it easy
they're coasting the big stars they're
the ones that live fast and die young
our star is kind of in the middle
somewhere it's going to live about 10
billion years it's got 5 billion left
okay
so these habitable zones depend on the
star that you're in
so how would we find planets
in habitable zones around other planets
around other stars we've been cataloging
stars for centuries
with great greater and greater accuracy
and precision in the last 100 or so
years although ancient astronomers were
pretty damn good at what they did okay
they just didn't have the technology yet
to do it at the speed rate and precision
we can do it which is building on the
shoulders of giants
how do we find planets going around
those stars well there are four ways you
can directly go in a telescope and look
do i see a planet or not direct
observation
you can take advantage of gravity and
center of mass something called the
wobble method
you can look for the star to dim
periodically as if something's going in
front of it between us and the star
that's the transit method i'm not going
to talk about gravitational micro
lensing but you can take advantage of
this feature of space time that it can
warp the planets can warp space time and
you can look for microscopic effects of
the warping of space-time from changes
in the star but i'm not going to get
into that that is a way that planets
have been discovered but i won't talk
about it that's a little beyond the
scope of our course oh direct
observation is the easiest one right the
problem is stars are so damn bright so
if you look at a star with the telescope
it dominates and it dominates because
it's really small right even alpha
centauri which is four light years away
it's just going to look like a bright
starry point of light in a telescope
those you know sort of starry lines
that's just an optical effect in truth
that star should appear as a perfectly
bright point but the limits of optics
make it stretch out in your telescope
what you need to do is you need to find
a way to subtract the star so you can
literally mask over the star with
something small or you can image the
star in multiple wavelengths of light
and subtract them from one another
deduct the star from the picture and
then see what's left
and that's what these researchers did so
around this star uh
hr8799 they actually found three planets
there it is b c and d we label the
planets with letters the star is always
a the planets are always b c d e f g h i
j et cetera okay
so um this is an a type star it's a lot
harder a lot hotter and a lot bigger
than our star so planets in its
habitable zones would be really far away
from the star that's how we're able to
see them for a sun-like star this
technique really doesn't work their
habitable zone is much closer to the
star and you we haven't really found a
reliable way to directly observe planets
in those habitable zones they're too
close to the parent star to play games
like this so this works with big stars
where the habitable zones are
multiples of the orbit of jupiter away
from the star itself really far away so
that you can block the central star and
then hope to see the worlds around it
and that's exactly what was done right
here
all right great that's my cue so another
way you can do this is you can use
what's called the wobble method all
right and i kind of
illustrated this
a little bit in class when i talked
about center of mass and gravity we
orbit the sun but the sun is wobbling as
we go around it because we're actually
co-orbiting a common center of mass
now you don't notice it you know you
don't see the sun getting closer and
further away but in fact it does by a
little bit and if you're really good at
astronomy you can actually measure it
okay we've done this with other stars
and the way we do it is as a planet goes
around its parent sun and the sun goes
around their common center of mass it
gets a little closer and a little
further away from us during its during
the planetary orbit okay so our sun
technically wobbles as a result of our
orbit once a year back and forth one
oscillatory cycle okay one sinusoid one
cosine okay
now how do we see this we can't actually
see the planet we um we you know we're
looking at the star how do we know it's
moving back and forth and we use
something called the doppler effect so
just like when a siren on an emergency
vehicle is approaching you and it gets
higher and higher and higher in pitch
but then as it moves away from you as it
goes past you and moves away it gets
lower and lower and lower in pitch light
does that too it gets bluer as it
approaches you and it gets redder as it
recedes from you so as the sun as that
star wobbles toward us we see bluer
light from it and as it moves away from
us we see redder light from the same
star so we just look for these red blue
wobbles in the star and it's actually a
fantastic way of seeing this many worlds
have been discovered not directly but
so-called indirectly around stars using
this method
the other method is the partial eclipse
the transit mercury and venus transit
across the sun every now and then if you
have a telescope with a solar filter you
can actually look at the sun don't do it
with the unhated eye burn your retinas
but there are solar filters that you can
put on telescopes and you can look at
the sun and you can watch mercury pass
in front of the sun in between us and
the sun venus too much bigger easier to
see
when a planet passes in front of its
star it dims it right blocks some of the
light so all you have to do is look for
the light of a star to dim and then wait
sometimes stars dim all on their own
they don't need our help
okay
but the transit method just you have to
be patient you have to wait for the
planet to go around a few times okay and
this is especially easy in small dwarf
stars the planets orbit really close
they go really fast around the parent
star
and they they transit frequently so you
get lots of periods of the oscillation
that you can observe with your telescope
okay so you're just looking for the
light from the star to be some amount
some average output and then at some
time when the planet goes between you
and the star you'll see it begin to dim
boom okay it's not as sharp as this
usually and then it then it brightens
again when the planet's done going in
front of the star and then you get that
average light back again that's the
transit method when you have multiple
planets along the line of sight you have
to do some fancier statistical
techniques to deconvolve these effects
but you can see
many worlds going around planets using
the transit method in fact there's a
really famous one i'm going to show you
at the end of the lecture today
so these are so-called exoplanets these
are planets not in our own solar system
but orbiting a different star
and one of the key missions that just
exploded our knowledge of exoplanets in
the universe was the kepler mission
which is no longer operating i think it
stopped taking data in about 2008 2009
there's another satellite now tess the
transiting exoplanet survey satellite uh
that one is used now to look for
transiting planets around stars
okay and i just want to show you how
many planets this thing has discovered
every dot every blue dot on here is a
planet of a certain size with a certain
orbital period observed by kepler using
the transit method okay
a total of 4034 candidates
2335 have been verified as definitely
planets not some other effects okay the
yellow dots are just the ones that came
out in the 2017 planet counting catalog
they do periodic releases of catalogs as
they observe new planets okay the data
is still there and you can still look
for it you can go planet hunting in this
data if you want to okay
we've discovered a whole lot of
earth-like planets earth-like planets
would be about here and there's tons of
them there are neptune-sized planets and
jupiter-sized planets but you can see
there's a big collection of planets kind
of around the size of earth
these may be small gas worlds but
they're most likely rocky planets okay
there are actually ways of seeing
whether or not they have atmospheres and
if you're curious about that you can ask
during the q a
here are just here's the hall of fame
from the kepler mission these are small
habitable zone planets about the size of
earth roughly they're they're slightly
maybe slightly super earths okay in many
cases
um they are all various distances so 62e
where 62e 62e right there pretty close
in size to earth a little bit bigger
about 1200 years the speed of light away
uh the closest one in this catalog would
be
i guess
uh 186f yeah it looks like 186 f which
is right here very close to us okay very
similar in size um it's in the
constellation cygnus it's in that
direction uh and it's only about 580
years at the speed of light away okay
now the closest star with planets is
proxima centauri four light years away
four years at the speed of light and it
definitely has a super earth going
around it proxima b
okay
um
that star is complicated like many other
dwarf stars proxima is a dwarf star and
it's kind of a nasty environment around
those stars so it may or may not be
habitable we don't know okay that's
going to take more time to figure out
habitable as we understand it
okay so i want to show you one of my
favorites here which is the trappist
system
so the trappist system uh the trappist
star okay it's named after the telescope
that observed it the trappist uh
instrument
and it is a red dwarf star its habitable
zone as a whole
very close to the star itself these
planets orbit much faster than the earth
does around
our own sun
and a whole bunch of planets roughly in
the habitable zone of this one star were
discovered about four or five years ago
now it's about 40 light years from earth
okay and the way it was discovered again
is you look at the brightness these are
brightness measurements and you look for
dips dips dips dips and you wait you see
is there a periodicity to these dips and
their intensities the intensity tells
you the size of the planet
the depth of the dip tells you the size
of the planet how much light it shaves
away from the parent star the frequency
is just counting the gap in time between
the dips and inverting it to get the
frequency
okay it's actually relatively
straightforward to see this once you
know the recipe right so the dip tells
you the size big dips big planets small
dips small planets okay they don't
occlude as much of the star
uh and uh you just look at the average
and then look for dips from that right
and then count count the frequency and
then what's the look for regular
periodicity between the same dips in the
data
okay and a whole bunch of worlds were
discovered this way
now here's where intro physics comes
into play here okay
uh quick intro physics tie-in in
you can actually you know having gotten
the period of the orbit from that data
you can actually estimate the radius of
the orbit very simply using the law of
gravity newton's second law and
rotational motion so f equals m a i hope
that's okay by now for all of you
the f here is gravity it's the mass of
the star pulling on the mass of the
planet little m
at some separation r and this assumes a
circular orbit but you'll see it's a
pretty darn good approximation the
acceleration is centripetal our old
friend from the beginning of the class v
squared over r the orbital radius
in rotational speed we can rewrite that
as
omega squared the angular speed squared
times the radius you can work that out
and see that that works out but that's
what you get
now you just solve so now you just go
ahead and shove that into f equals m a
do a little manipulation oh the mass of
the planet cancels out on both sides
that's cool now in real orbital
mechanics there are some corrections to
this that where that doesn't quite work
out but this is good enough
and then oh great well omega omega is
the angular speed that's just two pi
over the period i measured the period
using my telescope no problem so now i
can relate the period
and the orbit radius and it's
the only thing you need to know is
what's the mass of the star and
astronomers have been able to figure out
masses of stars from the color of their
lights there's a relationship between
those things color begets temperature
temperature begets mass those are all
baked into a star it's inevitable for
stars that the mass determines the
temperature determines the color of the
star
so um we know that the trappist-1 star
is an ultra-cool red dwarf its color
category is what's known as m we're a g
type star m is uh smaller than us it's
the smallest type it has a surface
temperature of 2600 kelvin and its mass
is just about nine percent out of our
own sun that's just from astronomy
that's an independent measurement
this equation right here is known as
kepler's third law of planetary motion
and it applies to circular orbits
so let's plug in some numbers we can
take trappist-1 f
it has a period that's observed from the
data of 4.0499
five nine days that is precise to the
last decimal place there okay that's how
good these satellites are at measuring
time and periods from these occlusions
these transits
fine plug it in crunch the numbers and
you find out that the orbital radius of
that planet is about three billion
meters
in terms of what's known as astronomical
units one a u is the distance between
our earth and our sun one a
okay about 93 million miles
um
that's 0.0223 a u the accepted
measurement from astronomical methods
for this is 0.0227 plus or minus 0.0019
a au that ain't bad for estimating from
intro physics okay
you are more powerful than you think you
are at this point you are like little
gods who with just a few numbers can
actually calculate a whole bunch of
things about the universe without ever
touching a planet in the trappist system
the trappist star is about 8 billion
years old
and it's 40 light years away
and the planets that orbit it let me go
back well i'm not going to go back to it
the planets that actually this is good
here the planets that orbited are what
are known as phase locked
like our moon
the same side of the moon always faces
down on the surface of the earth okay
there is no such thing as the dark side
of the moon the moon goes around the
earth once a day its backside gets lit
by the sun okay it's not it's only dark
to us because we don't see it the same
side of the moon is always facing down
on us because we're tidally phase locked
it's it's an actually an inevitable
consequence of orbital mechanics
all right it's more common than you'd
think it would be
the planets around the trappist system
go in these resonances you can look at
the periods of their orbits and the
ratio of the periods and they are phase
locked to their parent star the same
side always faces the star
so it's roasty toasty on the sun's side
freezing cold on the dark side because
it never gets sunlight on that side
but in the transition zone between the
two ah
that's where ice and gas and liquid
water could exist
so in the transition zones between night
and day you go 20 miles this way it's
day you go 40 miles back it's night and
right in that region and that strip of
dark and light around that zone life as
we know it could have emerged
so that's the question i'm going to
leave you with
this is a very volatile star in fact
this is what an artist's conception of
what a view would look like from the
trappist-1 g i think uh planet you'd see
all your sister planets in the sky these
orbits are
days
so you just things move around in the
sky a lot it's straight out of sci-fi
and because these transition zones would
have the right temperature at this
distance these many of these planets are
in the goldilocks they're in the
habitable zone of this star
if there's water there it could look
like this and the sky would be this we
don't know what the chemistry of the
atmosphere is there but it could look
reddish orange because of the light of
this star this is pretty much what it
would look like unless there's
interesting chemistry in the atmosphere
of these planets and we can actually
work out the chemistry of the atmosphere
believe it or not okay
so i'm going to leave you with that
that's where i'm going to close today
i'm going to take questions we've got a
couple of minutes left that clock is
always fast so we have about three or
four minutes here two minutes any
questions don't pack up yet pause ask
questions savor the moment
okay
any questions must have something
ellie's got a question she's just hiding
him i can see it
andy yawn it's okay
i'm i'm right there with you
oh yeah tommy what's up
yeah
yeah so um
it's sort of a conspiracy of two things
one based on the thermodynamics of an
early rocky magma world how long would
it have taken to cool and for carbon
dioxide by carbon chemistry to be pulled
out of its young atmosphere because it
would have been a carbon dioxide rich
young atmosphere
um so once that co2 gets pulled down
into the rock in carbon chemistry you
get you know all that sort of like the
white cliffs of dover kind of rock
that's forming right so that's where a
lot of carbon is trapped is in rock
formations like that
um
then you've got a more hospitable
atmospheric environment for the earliest
simplest kinds of single-celled life to
start emerging and the the evidence of
their existence in the history of our
planet goes back to about the same
roughly few millions of years
where the planet would have probably
just cooled and drew its carbon dioxide
down
at that moment it could have been
hospitable and it seems like the records
of life's existence in the geological
record
where we can date it back that old
there's evidence that there were living
things at that point they were simple
living things they weren't plants plants
wouldn't evolve until much later right
and then take advantage of carbon
dioxide and then produce oxygen right
and so forth we rely on them heavily
today
um so that's what it means it's sort of
the thermodynamics of a cooling planet
and carbon chemistry lines up roughly
where in the geological record we see
evidence of the earliest forms of life
to within our ability to actually
measure those things accurately
it emerged around 3.8 to 3.9 billion
years ago so certainly within the first
few hundred million years of the planet
i mean after the planet came into
existence about four and a half billion
years ago as a as a body there was a
bombardment at that stage the evidence
of that bombardment is not left because
it was bombarding a liquid rock world
and it absorbed those blows okay and
then took that rock for itself
um but that bombardment period ended
around
3.8 billion years boy this thing loves
to steal the focus um
and as a result of that it's uh it's
around that time that the evidence of
life emerges on this planet i mean it's
really quite remarkably fast and when we
get to drake equation the probability
that intelligent life exists elsewhere
in the universe this is something we
factor in i mean the probability of life
is could be one
on a planet like this it could just be
inevitable if you've got carbon oxygen
nitrogen hydrogen
it's good to go like it's just waiting
for the temperature to get to the right
place it's waiting for enough solvent on
the surface for those
you know molecules kind of do their
thing right
um i will say though that you know the
study of the origin of life is still
fraught with mystery you you know
there's a famous experiment from like
the 1950s or 60s where somebody sparked
all the stuff that they thought was in
the early atmosphere and they got some
amino acids and that's cute but that's
not a demonstration that life emerged
and that that research is actually
fraught with peril if any of you are
ever thinking of getting into like the
biology of life and the origin of life
um because a lot of people have come in
and mucked that up scientifically
funding agencies are a little hesitant
to hand money out for that because
they're afraid of getting caught up in
some kind of political nightmare i just
want you to be aware it's a legitimate
area of scientific study but because it
intersects in this boundary of the
general public sort of interest and ire
sometimes um it's fraught with peril and
i just want your eyes open on that
that's all there's no reason not to go
into it it's just a reason to be brave
and be bold okay
all right you've been a very excellent
audience and i'll see you tomorrow for
the last day of class