SOAS student expelled for Palestine activism calls out university’s moral collapse
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
The video features an interview between Vijay Prashad of *People's Dispatch* and Haya Adam, a law and international relations student at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) who was recently expelled for her activism regarding Palestine. Founded in 1916 as a colonial institution to train administrators for British rule in Africa and Asia, SOAS has long maintained an anti-colonial rhetoric while allegedly failing to live up to its stated values. Adam explains that she studied law with a focus on human rights, drawing heavily from revolutionary thinkers like Frantz Fanon and Edward Said during her time there. However, she argues that the university creates a profound hypocrisy by teaching students about international law, genocide conventions, and decolonization while simultaneously silencing those who apply these principles to criticize ongoing atrocities in Gaza or challenge institutional authority.
Adam details how the administration under Vice-Chancellor Adam Habib has systematically repressed student activism, labeling legitimate protests as disruptions rather than addressing underlying injustices such as high tuition fees that disproportionately affect Black students in South Africa and elsewhere. She highlights a stark contrast between SOAS's progressive self-image and its authoritarian practices, noting that only a handful of academics have supported her during her suspension and expulsion process. The interview also addresses the broader context of British state involvement, including arms sales to Israel and surveillance support from Cyprus bases, which Adam argues stains the university's reputation since student tuition fees effectively fund these operations. She emphasizes that this repression is not merely about one individual but represents a dangerous precedent for freedom of speech and assembly across higher education institutions in Britain.
Despite facing severe disciplinary actions based on false allegations such as harassment derived solely from political social media posts, Adam remains resolute in her commitment to justice and refuses to be intimidated by legal threats or injunctions that criminalize campus protests. She plans to appeal the internal university procedures and pursue legal challenges through civil courts, asserting that the administration has repeatedly violated its own guidelines regarding disciplinary timelines and due process. The expulsion is framed not as an isolated incident but as part of a coordinated effort to suppress dissent against genocide and settler colonialism in Palestine. Adam concludes by affirming that students are united in their moral obligation to stand up for human rights, rejecting the role of bystanders who would be complicit through silence or continued financial support of oppressive regimes.
Read the full video transcript
Hello, welcome to People's Dispatch. My
name is Vijay Prashad. Um, we're going
to talk about the school of oriental and
African studies founded in 1916 as the
school of oriental studies added the
African 20 years later. So, as was set
up as a colonial institution um to train
colonial administrators to go out there
into Africa and Asia and to take care of
the natives. That was the um instruction
given by the royal charter. But of
course times have changed, the students
have changed. They want a different kind
of world. In fact, for now almost 20
years, the Soaz Students Union has been
quite committed to the cause of the
Palestinians. In 2005, the SOAS student
union um passed a resolution to support
the boycott, divestment, and sanctions
campaign, the BDS campaign. Students
have been on the Palestinian front for a
while. Uh and then of course during the
genocide there was an encampment and
things like that. Today we're going to
be talking to Haya Adam who has been um
recently expelled
from Soaz. She was the she is the
president of the Palestine Society at
Soaz. No surprise that the expulsion
order went against her. Uh hia, welcome
to People's Dispatch.
>> Hi, thank you for having me.
Well, first, why don't you tell me what
you were studying in your second year at
SOAZ and what you've been reading and
learning while you've been at the School
of Oriental and African Studies.
>> Um, first off, we call it the School of
Occupation and Apartheid Studies now
given the repression that they've put
out on students. Um, but I study law and
international relations. Um I think it's
a good combination uh especially given
what's happening now and the field I
would prefer to go into is human rights
law. So obviously a very relevant uh
degree. We've studied a lot of things um
in the year that I've been at SOAS. I've
been suspended my entire second year now
expelled. Um but most prominently the
two sort of thinkers or revolutionary
figures that um I speak about the most
especially given the context of being in
SOASS is France Fenon and Edward Sed um
especially with international relations
and when you study the Middle East at
SOAS there's a big emphasis on
orientalism so of course that's where
Edward say comes in and his readings and
texts and then in order for soas to
continue pushing their so-called
anti-colonial radical rhetoric. We do
learn about people like France Fenon uh
especially they kind of put an emphasis
on the first chapter concerning violence
from the wretched of the earth um in
order to show you know sort of the
radical spirit of France Fenon and how
he navigated during um times when you
know Algeria was colonized by the French
and his involvement. Um I mention both
of them because they're really important
of course to learn about but so as tends
to teach about these revolutionary
thinkers and radical thinkers. Yet when
students are take these theories and
enforce it into their daily practice
they are silenced and they are repressed
because we are in the heart of
colonialism and these institutions are
protected by the British state. the same
state that puts out wider oppression
through mass arrests uh through
silencing those who stand up against
genocide. These western institutions,
these regimes in the west claim that
they are the protector of human rights
and democracy and justice and
liberation. Yet they are imprisoning and
arresting those who actually stand
against genocide. and the states that
claim they are the protector of human
rights are actually funding the
massacres we are seeing in Gaza and the
settler colonialism we are seeing
happening in Palestine now and then in
terms of law I think that's where SOAS
becomes the most hypocritical because
they teach about international law and
they're teaching us about you know the
genocide convention and all of the
Geneva conventions and we know typically
international law is a scam because
institutions like the UN are watching
what's happening in Gaza and they're
passing through useless resolutions and
these diplomatic gestures and yet
nothing is being done. Palestinians are
still being murdered on a daily basis.
But in the context of SOAS as an
institution, you can't claim to be a
decolonial institution and teach people
about what it means to stand up for your
rights and international law and at the
same time suspend, discipline and expel
them. So it really shows the true
hypocrisy of SAS as an institution and
they are showing their true nature of
how they were built as a colonial
institution in the first place.
>> I mean the interesting thing is ha you
are so articulate so clear so able to
bring what you've been reading in the
classroom into your daily life. How have
the people who've been teaching you, the
professors, reacted first to your
suspension and now to the expulsion?
What has been the reaction from the
faculty towards this targeting that you
have faced?
>> Um, before I answer that question, my
mom always taught me something growing
up and that's to liberate yourself
before teaching others liberation. And
that always stuck with me and this is
what she's been telling academics at
SOAS because unfortunately there's only
about two or three very supportive
academics. Uh recently there's been more
support because of the fact that it's
reached an expulsion but throughout the
entire year you'll only find maybe two
or three academics at most that have
been supportive uh of the SAS liberated
zone of the students facing
disciplinaries like myself. I want to
give a shout out to two spec in
particular Vana and River who have been
very supportive. The professors at SOASS
sometimes don't even speak up about
what's happening in Palestine enough
which is absolutely the bare minimum. Um
and you can see that you know Adam
Khabib is very clearly has very clearly
taken over the institution and academics
are very reluctant to speak up which is
disappointing and brings me back to what
my mom said is these academics have
gotten their own degrees to go on and
teach others about decolonization about
the practice of decolonization and the
methods in which you know we are
supposed to decolonize our curriculums
but ourselves yet they themselves are
colonized and aren't liberated. So
that's something that sticks with me is
my mom always tells them liberate
yourselves before teaching others
liberation. And I'm quite disappointed
to be honest because obviously there's a
genocide going on in Gaza. But as an
academic, you know, these are your
students. You're supposed to back them
up especially in times like these
because they are facing grave injustices
and especially given the so-called
rhetoric at SOAS. you chose to teach
here and you knew that so is profiting
off of this reputation so why aren't you
speaking up you know even just the bare
minimum of you know criticizing Adam
Khadib they're reluctant to do that but
imagine if all the staff and all the
academics at soas got together imagine
the amount of power they would have
especially in challenging Adam Habib as
the vice chancellor of the university
>> you've mentioned Adam Habib I think It's
important for people to know that Mr.
Hhabib comes as the vice chancellor of
the of SOAZ from South Africa. And I
mean I just want to share a few things
about Mr. Habib. His family for instance
um in the early part of the 20th century
were the ones who invited Mahatma Gandhi
then Mandas K. Gandhi as a young lawyer
to come to South Africa to defend their
rights against the South African state.
His family were the people who actually
brought Gandhi to South Africa for a
human rights cause. Mr. Khabib was
previously the principal at the
University of Witzwaterand where he
brought the police onto the campus uh to
suppress the students in 2016 during the
fees must fall protest. I went to see
Mr. Habib after that event when he sort
of tried to justify what he had done
saying that students have the right to
study and that you know the the fees
must fall students were disrupting uh
ability of students to study. By the way
he was also um you know uh you know
caught up in a scandal where he used
racial insult against um people and so
on. Had to apologize for that. Mr.
Khabib is not standing on firm ice by
the way given his own reputation um sort
of already insulting the fact that his
ancestors brought Gandhi for a human
rights cause and here he is expelling
you um but let's let's come back to you
ha you you have been very involved in
the encampment for Palestine and so on
lots of students in Britain are deeply
moved by what's happening by Britain's
role in not only arming um the Israelis
in the genocide but also supplying
surveillance information from the air
base in Cyprus. Uh what has been the
reaction of the students to the fact
that you have now been expelled from so
>> um first of all just a quick note on
Adam Habib. I think we can see now how
he very much fits into soas's false
illusion and anti-colonial false
rhetoric that they have especially given
the fact that he calls it disruptions
but there were injustices happening in
South Africa because these tuition fees
were very high disproportionately
affecting the black students in South
Africa and he was brought to crack down
on the student movement here as well
given now we are seeing what is
happening at SOAS um And obviously the
fact that he got away with using a very
severe racial slur which is absolutely
ridiculous and absurd that he got away
with it. Um which is why we continue to
hold him accountable. I think students
have been very angry and rightfully so
because I have been saying this. This is
not about me. This is not about one
individual or one student. What happened
is an attack on all of us. It is an
attack on our rights to freedom of
speech and assembly. This is setting an
extremely dangerous precedent for what's
to come because now some students may
feel that if they speak up this could
happen to them. So that's a very
dangerous precedent to set and this is
not the first time so has done something
like this. Recently the University of
London granted an injunction on our
campus. The University of London owns a
lot of land for multiple universities
across London and they basically
criminalize protests on our own campus
and it means that if we were to seek
permission sorry if we were not to seek
permission and we would go out to
protest then we could be contempt of
court sanctioned up to two years in
prison. And what happened after that? So
as said the president Cambridge followed
after with a much more severe injunction
that covered more than university
grounds. So again, I say that students
are angry and rightfully so. Um, but it
doesn't mean that they're intimidated.
It actually means that our conviction is
stronger and that students want to fight
this repression because this is an
attack on our democracy and an attack on
all of us. So students are finding ways
to challenge this. We are finding ways
to challenge this because this cannot
stand. And it is our moral
responsibility and obligation as
students to stand up against genocide
because we always say that if management
carry blood on their hands because of
the fact that they are investing in
companies that are funding the Gaza then
we as students also have our tuition
fees stained in Palestinian blood and
this cannot stand. We cannot be
bystanders because that means we are
complicit as well.
Hya, you are such a brave person and so
bright. Uh I wish I had a university
where I could immediately give you a
seat so you could come and study at our
university. It's a it's a real uh it's a
stain on Soaz that they've decided to
expel somebody as bright as you. But
what's the next step? Is there a way to
appeal this? Are you going to take this
to court? What is the next step for you?
Well, first of all, thank you so much
and it's a pleasure to be here with you
as well. So, thank you. Um, obviously I
have to appeal the internal sort of
university disciplinary procedure and
challenge that and then of course there
will be legal roots uh in order to
challenge this university um because
they cannot get away with what they've
been doing uh especially the fact that
their allegations are completely false.
They've alleged things such as
harassment, abusive behavior, and
operational obstruction. They've alleged
these things on the basis of a social
media post. A social media post in which
I was the voice over criticizing,
politically criticizing someone in
authority called Safia, a sabbatical
officer in the students union who failed
to uphold her political manifesto. It is
well within my rights, especially my
rights uh under articles 10 and 11 of
the human rights act to politically
criticize anyone in authority. This
applies to all of us. So this just shows
the authoritarian nature of this
institution that if you criticize
someone in a high position of authority
or management, you warrant a
disciplinary, a suspension or now as you
can see an expulsion. which means that
these people believe that they are above
the law. You're allowed to criticize the
government. You're allowed to say what
you want about Kir Star and the
government rightfully so because they
are complicit in genocide. But when it
comes to our institutions, these people
working inside them truly believe they
are above the law. Which is why it's
imperative that we challenge them um
within their own disciplinary procedures
which they have broken multiple times
especially how they prolong it. They
say, "Oh, you've broken the fact that
you didn't follow our guidelines." Their
guidelines state that every 10 working
days they should give an update.
Throughout the entire year, sometimes a
disciplinary procedure was delayed by
one month. So, they have broken their
procedures time and time again and they
continue to make up these allegations in
order to prolong the disciplinary
procedure and to try to aim to get what
they want. which is why we need to show
that we are the majority and that this
institution despite the fact that it's
protected by the wider British state
will not get away with this because the
thing they fear the most like what the
British state fears the most is the
power of the people and the power of the
masses because they know that we are the
majority.
>> I have best of luck with your challenge
your internal legal challenge first. I
very much hope that you succeed in that
and you return as the president of the
Palestinian Society and continue doing
what you rightfully are able to do. Um,
you've been with People's Dispatch.
Thank you very much and see you next
time.
>> Thank you so much. Thank you.