Submind YouTube summaries
Thumbnail for Seer 1 on the Presidental Petition received by Chief Justice

Seer 1 on the Presidental Petition received by Chief Justice

Watch on YouTube

Video summary

The video addresses public panic surrounding a presidential petition received by Chief Justice Dr. Mumba Malila, clarifying that the immediate cause for concern is merely an administrative irregularity rather than a legal challenge to President H.H. Victor's victory. The speaker explains that the Chief Justice acknowledged receipt of an electronic email sent to his private address, which he deemed highly irregular because official court documents must follow established procedures and be submitted through official channels, not personal inboxes. Consequently, the Chief Justice has referred this specific procedural issue to the Constitutional Court (referred to as "Concord" in the transcript) to determine if sending such a petition via private email was acceptable, effectively isolating the matter from any substantive challenge to the election results. The speaker argues that there is currently no valid case in court contesting President Victor's win, noting that the seven-day grace period for challenging the election outcome has already elapsed without a properly filed petition. He emphasizes that the only question before the Constitutional Court is whether the method of submission was correct, and he predicts with high confidence that the court will rule that sending official documents to a private email is invalid. This legal stance means that once the inauguration on September 1st occurs, any attempt to use this procedural error to overturn the election will likely fail, as the judiciary cannot accept public documents submitted through unofficial means. Beyond the legal technicalities, the transcript offers a broader critique of the political climate and the motivations behind the petition drive. The speaker expresses disappointment in certain media figures and intellectuals who he believes lack critical thinking and are driven by social media fame rather than genuine intellectual engagement. He suggests that the low voter turnout indicates a population not yet ready for change, contrasting this with scenarios where massive protests would signal an unstoppable force for reform. He also criticizes the advice given to the opposition, noting that external bodies like the UN will not intervene and that local protesters are being sent instead of their own families, highlighting the frustration and desperation within the political advisory circles. In conclusion, the speaker urges the public to stop panicking over a technicality and to recognize that President Victor's victory remains secure unless there is a massive shift in public sentiment or a legitimate legal challenge filed correctly. He calls on the UPND party to focus on filling the Heroes Stadium with supporters rather than engaging in futile legal battles based on procedural errors. The overarching message is one of calm reassurance, asserting that the system will correct itself by rejecting the improperly submitted petition, and that the election results stand firm as long as the proper channels are respected and the electorate's true desire for change has not yet manifested through mass mobilization.
Read the full video transcript
My children, you know, my fellow press singers, you have started again. Why is it that every small thing you start shaking? You told me now to come and make a video so that you will be sure of what is going on because Dudu Kwena children are celebrating. Number one, I don't know what they are celebrating. They are celebrating that because the Chief Justice say he has received a petition. Now, let me explain to you what happened here. This is the This is the acknowledgement letter. Uh that uh that was released by the Chief Justice. This is what our Chief Justice said. He said He said, "Receipt of presidential petition sent to Chief Justice sent to Chief Justice private email." Now, when you see that thing, when you see that Let me Let me show something to you so that you stop you stop panicking. I mean, to go and sleep. When you see that caption say private email, automatically automatically, what the Chief Justice is saying is that it has been sent to him privately. Of course, it's not a private matter. He is the wrong person to receive the petition. So, he said, "Lusaka, 25th August 2026. The honorable Chief Justice Dr. Mumba Malila SC acknowledge receipt of electronic email sent to him sent to his private email by a member of the public a member of the public a member of the public of course you know that automatically is a no-go area. The email contained documentation this designated as the people's presidential petition which seek challenge which seek to challenge the outcome of the presidential election held during the August 13th general election and the associated documents. >> [cough and clears throat] >> The chief The judiciary is aware of the ongoing social media association. >> [clears throat and cough] >> Sorry. claiming that the petition has formally and duly filed. Why the Chief Justice find the mode of communication of official court document through his private address to be highly irregular. >> [cough and clears throat] >> Sorry, I was eating granot. It's you people there because you panic too much. You are the one that called me out from where I was eating to come and explain to you. Why the Chief Justice finds the mode of communication of official court document Official court document should go through an official channel. Technically in two places here, this thing has been thrown out, but you guys are not following. You are not following. An official document of the court should go through official procedure. Should go through official channel, not through his private address to be highly irregular. The irregularity here that the Chief Justice is talking about is that this is an official assignment that needed official channel. It needed official The people that wrote this and sent to him in his private email made a mistake. I'm so disappointed with Linda Ikeji Sunday. These are the people that I held so high. I thought this This were intellectuals. Kansiime Busingye Wanyera >> [laughter] >> Nothing nothing nothing in the brain. Thank God for this election. Like I said, the people that I used to respect and [snorts] fear, especially in the judiciary, if I have to stand in court with against them as C 1, not as a lawyer, these guys stand no chance against me. Because I have seen that many of them uh we are just receiving glory for nothing. So, this thing didn't go through an official channel. Now, what is the Chief Justice doing? He said, "Anyway, I have referred this matter to the Concord. Remember the matter that the Chief Justice is referring to the Concord is not about uh the declaration of presidential candidate as the president. No, he's referring a matter to the to the Concord trying to find out is it good for an official petition to be sent to me as a private individual, not in my government email, but in my private email. So, he has sent the matter to Concord for Concord to go and determine. Why the Concord is determining because there is no one challenging President HH Victor. What is in the Concord now is that is it good for them to send it through a private email. That is the matter in court. So, automatically it means there is no matter in court challenging the victory of President HH. So, the secretary to the government should now make an announcement of the day HH will be inaugurated inaugurated because the 7 days that was given as a grace period for challenge of the outcome of this election has elapsed. And there is no current petition against it. The only petition that is available now is that the Chief Justice has taken the matter to the Concord asking the Concord, is it good for these people instead of going to court to challenge the outcome of the election, is it good for them to send the petition to me in my private email? So, after the inauguration this coming inauguration on the 1st of September, after the inauguration, the Concord will now say, "Okay, it's good or it's not good." If the Concord say it's not good, then it is bye-bye. If the Concord say, "Okay, they did the right thing." We have to now find a way. >> [laughter] >> Do you understand the mathematics there? If the Concord say, "Why am I laughing?" This is a serious matter. Ah. Spirit of love, out Jesus' name. Amen. Let me educate my people, especially my children, because they panic a lot. See everyone, see everyone, where are you? Where are you? These people are celebrating. They're celebrating because they are they are also down like their lawyers. So, if the Concord say the petition was that was sent to you the the petition that was sent to you was sent through the normal procedure. That is remember that is after the inauguration. Then we'll say okay, let's proceed with Concord. A government was also challenged. I don't want to go that side. Then if the court say no, this is not the right channel, which is exactly what the court will say. Because you can never send a public document, an official document to an individual just because you have his email. It's not possible. So if the court say no, that is the end of it. At the end of the day, Duduku is increasing his crime. I told him this is a system. You can never fight a system and win it if you are in the country. There is a way to fight system. If you want to fight a church, you would have won this election with over 3 million. You should be having over 3 million votes. That way it was going to be difficult for a church to stand. But in an election where turnout you have 50% 50% 50%, you didn't even need to go to court. You would have known that people we are not ready for change. When people are ready for change, you will see them on the street. There is no amount of pressure that government will put in place that will stop them. People are not ready for change. This election I told you it was a waste of time. How many people voted? Look at Look at the voters turnout. 50 30 40. When people want change, they come out 90 80% and that way they are unstoppable. Do the question that seen this and I mean his advisers would have seen this. The people that advise him are these social media hungry people that want to find themselves back to Zambia at all costs. Uh-huh, they are frustrated in this land getting small small money from Facebook. Now they want to come into Zambia and they know >> [laughter] >> Those are people advising him. Don't give up. I even heard some of them saying go go to the street. Go and start protesting. UN will not help you. United Nation will not help you. They are in their houses. They are sending other people's children to the street to go and meet the army commander General Zile and his boys. Why don't they send their families that are here in Zambia to go and start the protest? So, I hope you understand what is there now. There is no case against HH victory in court. The only case that the Chief Justice took to Concord is is he good for the petition to be sent >> [clears throat] >> through a private email. The Concord will say it's not good. An official petition should go through an official channel. UPND, let me tell you we now have a task to fill up the Heroes Stadium. Chop.