Secret Service Agent: How To Stay In Control When Someone Is Trying To Manipulate You!
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
Former Secret Service Agent Desmond O'Neal shares his three decades of experience in law enforcement, including work with SWAT teams and polygraph examinations, to provide a framework for navigating difficult conversations where emotions run high or manipulation is present. He argues that labeling someone as a narcissist immediately hinders understanding because it allows one to blame the other party rather than seeking genuine connection. Instead, O'Neal introduces an acronym PLAN—Purpose, Listen (Ask), and Neutralize—to guide individuals through "dark conversations" involving supervisors, spouses, or friends who may be gaslighting them by making them feel at fault for situations they did not cause. The core of his approach is establishing a clear purpose before entering the interaction; without this mission statement, people easily get distracted by emotional triggers and lose control when faced with aggression or insults from antagonistic individuals. Central to O'Neal's methodology is the concept that empathy accuracy—the ability to correctly identify what another person thinks—is often low, dropping as little as 15% during high-stress situations compared to a baseline of around 40%. Consequently, he advises against assuming you know how someone feels and emphasizes asking questions instead. He illustrates this with his experience interviewing Phillip Garrido, the kidnapper of Jaycee Dugard, where O'Neal maintained his composure despite being called names and accused of lying by an aggressive subject who questioned his integrity. By refusing to retaliate or get pulled into a game of "who is bigger," O'Neal stayed anchored to his purpose, demonstrating that maintaining control in the face of hostility requires addressing specific behaviors rather than reacting emotionally. He notes that when people insult you during a conversation, it often signals they are trying to derail your mission; calling out these tactics specifically shows confidence and prevents falling into their psychological traps. O'Neal distinguishes between influence and manipulation, defining influence as honestly nudging someone in a beneficial direction for both parties while maintaining transparency, whereas manipulation involves lying or acting solely for one's own gain. He explains that building true rapport goes beyond superficial pleasantries like talking about the weather; it requires understanding another person's values and needs to make them feel seen and heard. This is exemplified by his story of checking on a detainee's sick mother after promising to do so, which built trust through reciprocity rather than transactional exchange. He also highlights common communication pitfalls that should be avoided: trying to be right in an argument, telling people "I understand" when you actually don't grasp their specific headspace, and offering unsolicited opinions or solutions before being asked. Instead of fixing problems immediately, he suggests sitting with someone in the mud—listening authentically without judgment—to foster a deeper connection that allows for genuine resolution later. The discussion concludes by addressing how people often suffer from "me me me syndrome," where they focus entirely on their own internal feelings and success rather than reflecting outwardly on others' perspectives. O'Neal recounts an anecdote about his sister remembering the TV in her father's room after he died, while he did not recall it at all, illustrating that everyone processes experiences differently based on what is important to them personally. He encourages listeners to own their decisions without falling into hindsight bias, noting that every choice made with available information contributes to who they are today and prevents regret from altering one's character negatively. Ultimately, the podcast emphasizes that effective communication in high-stakes environments relies on self-leadership, emotional regulation, and a commitment to honesty over manipulation, ensuring that even when conversations do not go perfectly, individuals can walk away without ruminating or feeling defeated by their inability to control others' reactions.
Read the full video transcript
I've got a difficult conversation I want
to have with someone. And they might be
a narcissist. So, let's stop there
because if you just blatantly label
somebody as being a narcissist, you're
not going to be able to really
understand who this person is and and
why they are the way they are. But when
you need to go into a dark conversation,
to make things simple, there are four
things that you can do. Because we all
have those conversations. We have a
supervisor who we feel is overlooking us
in a promotion, maybe our spouse we got
into a fight with, your friend who's
betrayed us. And they're cloaked in so
much emotion or so much tension that you
don't know how to handle that. But
there's also three things that you
should stop doing, such as stop telling
people you understand.
>> Telling me you understand. Why? This is
what we're going to talk about. For over
30 years, former Secret Service agent
Desmond O'Neill has used science-backed
interrogation techniques against some of
the world's biggest liars. He's trained
elite teams from the FBI to the CIA. And
now, in his first public conversation,
he's laying out the frameworks you need
to communicate effectively, how to lead,
and how to get anyone to open up. When
it comes to being able to communicate
with somebody, the victory lies in the
little things that you do. So, you need
to have a plan. P is for purpose. So,
why are you there? What is the goal of
the conversation? Because especially in
emotional conversations, it becomes
really easy to get distracted. And if
you lose your cool, you lose control.
And then there's the A, which is ask.
Because most of us think we know what
our partner's thinking, right? But the
research shows we're only accurate about
40% of the time. And if that
conversation gets emotional, that 40%
can go down as low as 15. It's called
empathy accuracy. And so, the power of
asking questions is important. But when
you fail to do that, you are going to
have a really hard time having a deep,
honest relationship with somebody. And
then there's the L and the N, which most
people do wrong. And we'll go into that.
And then, what about body language? Can
you tell if I'm being deceptive by how
much I look at someone? So, there's a
few indicators of somebody telling the
truth. And we'll talk about them. And
what about leadership principles? So, I
learned the true essence of leadership
when I was on a SWAT team from
situations like when you're hunting
someone and they're hunting you as well.
So, let's get into the details.
I see messages all the time in the
comment section that some of you didn't
realize you didn't subscribe. So, if you
could do me a favor and double-check if
you're a subscriber to this channel,
that would be tremendously appreciated.
It's the simple, it's the free thing
that anybody that watches this show
frequently can do to help us here to
keep everything going in this show in
the trajectory it's on. So, please do
double-check if you subscribed and thank
you so much because in a strange way you
are you're part of our history and
you're on this journey with us and I
appreciate you for that. So, yeah, thank
you.
Desmond O'Neal.
For those people that have just clicked
onto this conversation,
what are they going to walk away from
our discussion with?
So, I've been a law enforcement for 30
years and I've served a lot of different
roles in that.
And above everything else, the one thing
that I've learned is when stress is
high,
when emotions are strong, when it
matters, how do you authentically
connect and communicate with somebody
else?
There's something to be said
about when a conversation is easy,
right? When it's fun, when everybody
wants to be there. You can focus on your
handshake, you can focus on the eye
contact, how great your posture is.
What about the dark conversations? What
about those conversations that kind of
they live in the shadows of your mind
because you don't want to face them. You
don't want to have those, right? They're
they're cloaked in so much emotion or so
much tension that you just you don't
know how to handle that. We all have
that, right? We have a supervisor who we
feel is overlooking us in a promotion.
We have, you know, a family member who
we feel that we're just no longer
getting along with. Maybe our spouse we
got in a fight with. Maybe a friend
who's betrayed us.
So, how do you have that conversation?
Like, what does that look like? Because
it comes from
you know, for the 30 years that I've
been doing this, most of the people that
I I to didn't want to talk to me. And my
job was to connect with them,
to find a way to get them to open up, to
find a way to have some type of
understanding, and get the information
that I needed. So, this is not about
interviewing or interrogation. This is
This is human connection. If your
audience cares
to understand how to have a dark
conversation where
you can deepen that relationship,
or at least come to some type of
understanding,
or
at the very least,
not walk away ruminating on everything
you said, trying to figure out what went
wrong, what could you have done
different. If you've had that, and
you're interested in knowing, then this
is this is where we're going to talk
about that.
And to summarize in, I guess, 30 seconds
why you're the guy
that is best placed to deliver this
information.
What is What are the reference points,
the experiences, the the variety of
experience you've had that feeds into
the answers and the actionable advice
that I can give my audience.
My initial career started as a
corrections officer.
I became a police officer, and I was a
SWAT officer, as well. From there, I
went to the federal government, so I
went to the Secret Service. Uh with the
Secret Service, I also started a
polygraph career.
So, now I have people
that are giving me their deepest,
darkest secrets.
And just for context, polygraphing is a
lie detection test.
>> Polygraph is a lie detection test. So,
it gives you a psychological or a
physiological response in terms of how
somebody answers a particular question.
Where else did your career take you
after that point?
I went into internal affairs.
And so, that is now policing the people
within our organization. So, now I'm
talking to men and women who have had
some of my interrogation training.
They kind of know the questioning going
on. They know the interaction. They've
done themselves interviews and
interrogations.
Oh, okay. So, this is
law enforcement officers who have
committed a crime or some kind of
misconduct, right? Or been reported for
something, and your job is to
investigate them. Yes, but
think about that for a minute. Like,
you're now talking to somebody else who
you know, maybe a year ago you were out
in the street doing work with, and now
you're asking them
these questions
or these for clarification on some type
of allegation.
You got to be You got to be mindful of
that. Like, that's a big deal.
And the the interview methods that were
prevalent at that time, you felt were
outdated.
They were. So, there is in the US
there's a very historical
evolution of interviewing and
interrogation. You know, it started in
the 1900s when policing came in. In that
circumstance, it was physical abuse.
They called it the third degree.
Where you would go in and, you know,
people would grind down your teeth or
they would cause pain for you to talk to
them.
As we've evolved as a society, that
started to go away in lieu of
psychological manipulation. So, it was
less about hands-on and more about
trying to get people to talk to you from
a psychological perspective.
And right about
2014 when I went into
internal affairs, I was like, Steven, I
was like, I just
there's got to be something different.
Like, we've had to have evolved in some
way in terms of what that is. And so,
you know, you have my thesis there,
right? Right about that time, I was
accepted into the Naval Postgraduate
School to pursue a master's.
And because I was looking for a better
way to interview,
one of my thesis advisor said, "Hey,
have you ever heard of the High-Value
Detainee Interrogation Group, which the
acronym is HIG?"
Had never heard of it, but the HIG when
it was created
was was three-pronged, meaning that it
had a a a research department, right?
And then it had a practitioner
department, so the people that would do
the the the interrogations. And then it
had the trainer department. Now, the
trainer department, we would do
interviews interrogations, but we also
understood the science behind that.
The reason that's important is because
you could be a really good practitioner
and not understand why something is or
isn't working.
And so, being able to cross the bridge
between
the the science and understanding that
and being able to apply it in the room,
that hybrid, that connection, that sweet
spot, that is what I did.
So, you did research and you continue to
do research on how to get people to give
information, how to get information from
people, how to get them to offer up
information. Is that the crux of it?
Yeah. So, if I'm, you know, I've got a
difficult conversation I want to have
with someone. This person is
antagonistic, they often gaslight me,
they might be a narcissist, and I'm
walking into that conversation or I'm,
you know, I'm overthinking it. I'm
thinking, "God, I can't need to have
this conversation."
Where's the first place to start?
So, the first place that I would start
is don't label the people how you just
label them. Okay. And that's a problem.
So, you just labeled somebody a
narcissist. Why does that matter to you?
I think it allows me to blame them, I
guess, and or Well, it allows you to
blame, but but tell me tell me in your
perspective, what's a narcissist? That
they are they are low empathy, they are
self-centered, they are a little bit
aggressive, maybe.
>> Okay. So, let's stop there.
Do you think, personally, that there are
times in your life where you lack
empathy? Yeah. Okay. So, empathy is very
situationally based.
So, meaning that it's also subjective,
meaning if you feel this person is not
giving you certain empathy,
okay, maybe.
Um a bit self-centered, a bit
aggressive. You The reason I ask you
these things is because if you just
blatantly label somebody as being like,
"This person is a narcissist." You've
just you've just made it easy for
yourself. You've just put blame on them
and you're not going to be able to
really understand who this person is and
and why they are the way they are. So,
the first thing that I would do is I
would take away the labels as how you
define them as you're going into that.
What was the other thing you said in
terms of what they were? They were a
narcissist, they were something else. Um
they
gaslight. So, second thing, uh which is
interesting because we actually within
our training
uh program, we just did a big class in
gaslighting because it's important to
understand
what is gaslighting and what it when is
it not gaslighting? So, for you, cuz you
said this person gaslights you, what is
what are they gaslighting you about?
Um when I bring something up, they
make me feel like
I'm to blame. When I When I bring up how
I feel, maybe they make me feel like I'm
to blame, like I did something wrong.
Okay.
Does that always happen?
More often than not.
>> Okay. More often than not. So, it's
something that it sounds like that when
you go in and you're talking to this
different person, whatever the
circumstances is, they are or they're
trying to discredit you or make you feel
like maybe you don't know really what
happened. They're not listening. They're
just always throwing it back on me
saying that I did something to deserve
it. And what was the third thing you
said? It's a little bit like aggressive,
antagonistic, so Okay. their their their
emotions go up and it kind of makes me
shut down.
Okay. They kind of flood the zone. So,
when you need to go into a dark
conversation, here are the four things
that you can do to stay engaged and
involved in in in what's about to
happen, right? In in how this is going
to hopefully go through. And what we say
is you need to have a plan.
And there's the acronym about that. P,
right? L A N. So, the P is for purpose.
And the purpose is why are you there?
What's the reason?
What's the mission?
You have to understand your mission
because your mission is going to drive
your tactics. Your mission is going to
determine
if things get off track, if this person
becomes aggressive, this person starts
being insulting, if my mission at that
moment is to deepen my conversation with
them, and deepen my relationship in some
way, and this starts to get ugly in the
middle, your mission should keep you on
track because you can get pulled from
that very quickly. There's something
called multiple goals theory.
And multiple goals theory is the
understanding that at any given time, we
will pursue simultaneous goals.
And typically those goals would be
something task-oriented. You know, I
want to I want to finish a task and I
want to get something done. There's
going to be a component of identity in
there, meaning that how do I feel and
what are my emotions going on during the
course of this? And then there's going
to be relational. So, it's going to be
my relationship with this person at the
time. Now, a lot of times within
multiple goals theory, those things can
align.
So, and I'll give you example. Like if
you're playing a sport, you're on a
team.
Uh the team goal, your goal within that
team, the task is to win, to put on more
points than the other person. That's the
task. The identity aspect of that is am
I a good player? Do Do I want the ball?
Do I get the ball? Am I contributing? Am
I the superstar? Is there some type of
identity and how this makes me feel
about myself being being a sports star
in some capacity? And the relationship
part of that is
how do my teammates feel about me? Am I
Am I a good teammate in terms of what
the was? Those things can align. You can
see when that is misaligned, when all of
a sudden somebody what they would call a
ball hog, somebody takes the shot all
the time and they won't pass it around
and you're like Ronaldo. What are you
doing? Right? And it's one of these
things where like you are more concerned
about your identity than you are about
the team winning. That's a problem.
That's when you can see there's a
misalignment of goals. Or something
that's even more simple
would be let's say you're in a meeting
with
uh a boss or a colleague and it's a
pretty important meeting. You're You're
trying to close a deal and your boss
says something that's wrong.
Now,
you have to make a decision. You could
either
correct your boss
in front of everybody.
Or you could preserve his or her dignity
and address them at a later time. You
have to decide which one of those is
most important. You have to understand
your purpose of being in that meeting
because maybe I could let this go, it's
not that big of a deal because if I
correct my boss this may affect my
relationship with them at a later time.
This could ruin my career in terms of
being transferred or not being on a
project. So when you're looking at goals
you have to understand what the overall
objective is. It becomes even it becomes
especially in emotional conversations
it becomes really easy to to get
distracted. Really easy. So I go into
that conversation with my colleague who
is problematic. My goal with them let's
say is to get them to stop. I'm actually
thinking about earlier in my career when
I used to work in call centers on the
phone. And um
there was one particular lady that sat
next to me that was always a little bit
rude and always put me down a little
bit, bit patronizing. So
I I in hindsight wish I could have you
know
got taken her aside and had a
conversation with her and said listen
the way you're speaking to me is very
disrespectful or you're putting me down
or patronizing me. Please can you stop
doing that. My goal would have been to
to get her to stop. It is to get her to
do that but the crux of that is to
understand why she's doing it because
that's going to allow me to
fix this in some way if it if it's
fixable. I'll share the story with you.
In 1991
an 11-year-old girl named Jaycee Dugard
was kidnapped by a man named Phillip
Garrido and his wife Nancy. And Phillip
and Nancy kept Jaycee Dugard for 18
years.
He fathered two children with her. One
when she was 14 and one when she was 17.
And in 2009
they found her and him at Berkeley. They
arrested him, arrested his wife. 2011
he was you know tried, convicted. Three
years prior to that
there was a young girl named Michaela
Garrett who had gone missing, never been
found, in a county over in west west of
El Dorado in a county named Alameda
County.
There is a lot of suspicion that Philip
was the one who did this as well. And
one of my one of my colleagues was the
prosecuting attorney for El Dorado
County, California. His name is Vern
Pierson.
And Vern said, "I'd like to close this
or get some type of understanding. Can
you go
and interview Philip?" So, I looked at
all the information on Philip. He had
written a manifesto in terms of how to
cure pedophilia.
And I went to Vern and I said, "All
right, I'm let's go do this." And he
goes,
"What do you need? Like a a day, couple
of hours?" And I said, "Need 4 days."
And my goal was to do a a deep dive into
the things that he had done. He was a a
serial rapist, a serial kidnapper, and
to understand his life in the time frame
by which Michaela Garrett went missing.
And so, this was the evolution of what I
was trying to do. So, I show up. He
walks in.
Says, "Who are you?"
I said, "Well, I'm Special Agent O'Neal.
I'd like to talk to you about um your
history. I read your manifesto and I had
some questions." And he said,
"You know,
uh when they told me I had a visitor,"
he goes, "I wasn't going to come in." He
goes, "But the angels on my shoulder
tell me that this would be a good good
talk." So, he said, "Let's do it." We
talked in detail every day for probably
8 to 9 hours. I brought him food. And
the end of each day, I would say,
"Philip,
um I will be here tomorrow. If the If
the angels on your shoulder tell you to
show up, please do. If not, then it was
nice to meet you." And every day he
showed up. Why did you say that?
There's a There's a depth of
understanding in terms of the head space
that he is in. And so, when you can
connect like genuinely connect with
that,
you truly try to understand another
person and
there's power with that. In the course
of those 36 hours, multiple times, he
was very aggressive.
He was very condescending.
He called me a liar. Things he accused
me of, you know, I don't believe you are
who you say you are. I don't believe
you're here for the things you're saying
you're here for.
Um, I don't even know if you work for
the federal government. And he's
essentially questioned my integrity.
Now, my purpose
is not to make him feel that I'm smarter
than him. It's not to
belittle or berate him or or have a a
question of, you know, integrity cuz I
could have said, you kidnapped
an 11-year-old girl and kept her captive
for 18 years, fathered two children with
her, the first one at the age of 14, and
you're questioning my integrity?
I didn't do that.
Because that's not why I was there.
And so, despite the fact that he got
upset, despite the fact that he called
me and accused me of all these different
things, I stayed on my purpose. I stayed
on my mission.
And when we were done, when we finished,
I went back to prosecuting attorney and
said he's not your guy.
And he said, "Are you sure?" And I said,
"I bet my career on it."
How did you know?
There's a lot of things in regards to
when you're looking at people from the
perspective of
telling the truth in terms of the way
that they they talk and engage with you.
Our conversation on Tuesday and our
conversation on Wednesday and our
conversation on Thursday and our
conversation on Friday all stayed very
consistent. If I'm asking him for
further clarification, he's providing
for for further clarification. If I'm
talking to him about, you know,
something and there's some type of
spontaneous correction where he's like,
"Okay, wait a minute. This happened
uh before this." Those are those are
indicators of truth.
And if there are things that,
you know, he he talks about in terms of
like things that are of complication.
Nobody's day goes perfect. And, you
know, there were many times when he was
telling me about the things he had done
because,
you know, he was
a serial rapist, you know, and a and a a
you know, kidnapper. And he would drive
around and pick up women and hitchhiking
and he would, you know, rape them and
let them go. Often times we would get
into the details of like when those
didn't go well, right? And when all of a
sudden that the girl would would fight
him off and run away. And so there was
all these different complications and
different things that he would talk
about. He handled the complications
consistently is what you're saying.
When complications are introduced to a
story, right? People who lie don't do
that, right? It's truth tellers will
often do that because it's just like
this is just what happened. Like these
are the things that happened. This is my
life in terms of where things were going
to go. Overall in terms of how that
conversation went, there were those type
of indicators that just made it
trend more truthful than not. Like there
wasn't this big gap or this big weird
moment when we're talking about Michaela
Garrett to where all of a sudden it's
like missing pieces that I have to put
in. There There are no cues to
deception. There are things that all of
a sudden seem different and require you
to do more
questions, more asking. But that didn't
occur around time that we were looking
for with that. Okay. So we finally when
we finished and then they went back and
they looked at the evidence, they found
a new fingerprint and were able to
uh charge and convict uh the person who
did that. The reason I bring all of that
up is because for the purpose aspects of
what we're talking about,
not losing sight of what your mission
is, being focused in terms of what that
is, the power of communication and
staying online as it relates to
what you want to accomplish is really
powerful because it keeps you on track
and it keeps you engaged and reminds you
of why you're there. Not every
relationship deserves that. Like there's
just some relationships you're like,
this just isn't worth it for me. If it
matters to you, that mattered to me. It
mattered to me not because for me, it
mattered to me before that family. And
there is a difference between having a
profession and being a professional.
Having a profession is what you do.
Being a professional is the culmination
of everything that you've done at that
moment at that time for a specific
purpose.
And that's what I had to bring in with
that because that was what was at stake
with us.
Um so you have
this these four cards in front of you.
We've done the P, which is staying
focused on your purpose and you're going
to conversation to to fend off the
emotion which might distort you and take
you off. And I'm so guilty of that.
Everybody is. So guilty of that with
especially with like, you know,
conversations with with my partner where
there's emotion involved and there's
some areas where, you know, blame might
be
prevalent. So the L
that you have there. So the L
is
listen.
This becomes the thing that people are
worst at
because it's a lot to do. Think about
right now. Think about my conversation
with you at this moment. I'm speaking.
So internally, my internal vocabulary
and the conversation that I'm having in
my head is running at about 800 to 1,000
words a minute.
I'm speaking to you in about 120 to 150
words a minute. There's a lot that's
being edited. There's a lot of things
that I think that I'm saying or I want
to say. I'm trying to engage with you.
There's also something called theory of
mind, which is me watching you and
trying to understand
is what I'm saying on point with what
Steven wants to hear or wants to hear
for his audience. Do I need to change
anything? Does this landing on him? And
then if your nonverbals change and your
verbals change, then I have to readjust
maybe what I'm editing and my theory of
mind will readjust, too, because I'm
like, "Ooh, I just lost him here. I have
to I have to readjust." Simultaneously,
you are listening to me
and you're listening to the 120 to 150
words I'm giving you, but your brain can
process this at like 4 to 600 words per
minute. So you have too much cognitive
bandwidth.
You have the ability to listen to me and
then do multiple other things, which is
often times why people will drift out or
you'll start thinking something else or
you'll think of your your notepad
because you got it. You got to figure it
out. And this is when it becomes really
easy to be
convinced and not curious because you're
like, "Ah, I kind of know where this is
going." And so you check out. So you
actually have to do something called
cognitive inhibition. You have to kind
of narrow that bandwidth to stay fully
engaged with me. That's why when you
hear people say like active listening,
it's hard.
It's hard to do because you have to be
attentive to the other person. You have
to listen. You have to look. You have to
pick up their verbal and their nonverbal
behavior. And you then you have to do
something with that. Stephen Covey says,
"Most people
don't listen with the intent to
understand.
They listen with the intent to reply.
And if you are simply just waiting for
your turn to talk,
then you and I are not are not
connecting.
Controlling conversation comes from
listening, not talking.
So if I'm trying to if I'm trying to get
some information out of someone,
I should have a bias towards just
letting them speak at me. You should.
You know, you you hear about this like
always let the other person talk more.
That's great, but if both people are
doing that, then the conversation's not
progressing. The conversation is an
extension of what you and I are speaking
with. And when we've gone from listening
in terms of what that looks like, the
next thing you have to do, which gives
into this, is the A, which is which is
ask, right?
So the A being this.
If you are paying attention to me
and you're picking up on things that I'm
saying,
the changes in my body language,
and there's something you don't
understand,
you need to ask. This is where you're
going to deepen the conversation. This
is where you show somebody that you're
active listening, you're curious, and
you're open, and you're trying to
understand them. If you look at empathy
research, we typically think that we can
get understand our significant other or
different people at a much higher level
than we actually do. For a stranger,
it's called it's called empathy
accuracy.
For a stranger, your ability to
understand their headspace is like 20%.
For
a friend, somebody close to you is like
30.
For your significant other, it's no
higher than 40%, which means that
despite you thinking that you know what
she's thinking,
you got a four out of 10 chance of being
right. And if that conversation gets
emotional, that 40% can go down as low
as 15 because you start to pull in to be
like, I'm I'm guarding myself here. I'm
guarding my ego. When your ego is on the
line, your ears go offline because you
stop hearing what she's having to say
and you start protecting yourself in
terms of what you're trying to do. So,
your ability to be empathetic when
things are hard becomes harder. And you
have to be very mindful of that. Let's
say you come home from early morning
workout.
And your spouse says, "Hey Steven, how
was it?" And you say, "It's pretty
tough."
There's a lot that you can do with that.
This is what she could do. She could say
nothing. So now maybe you understand
that maybe she doesn't want to talk
about this or she's not interested in
it. That's one.
The second thing she could say to you
would be like, "Well,
sweetheart, that's why you look the way
you do." She has now made the
assumption, right? Her her empathy
accuracy, that she knows what you meant
by the word tough. And so if she says to
you, "Well, that's how you look." And
that's not what you meant, now you feel
that there's a separation between what
you're hoping she would pick up on and
what she actually said. The third thing
she could say would be like, "What do
you mean by tough?"
Because the ambiguity of that is the
word tough. Who knows what that means?
It could be a lot of different things.
She's now showing you, I'm into you. I'm
tuning in. In the power of something
like that, when you talk about deepening
relationships and increasing that
connection, that's how it happens.
The same thing with your nonverbal
behavior, right? You look at nonverbal
behavior, 66% of what we give is
nonverbal. And so if I, through the
course of my conversation with you, if
all of a sudden we're talking and you're
just like
Folding my arms. So folding your arms
could be a sign of just you're folding
your arms. It could be a sign of you not
liking my question if you roll your
eyes. So if I see that and it matters to
me,
then I need to say something to the
effect of it seems like
versus I think. Cuz I think is the
pronoun saying that's about me and it's
just like I don't care what you think.
It seems like what you just did maybe
was because you didn't like what I had
to say because I saw you cross your arms
and roll your eyes.
Do I have that right?
So now you have a choice where you can
either say you Yes, you got that right
for these reasons or no, I just folded
them because I was comfortable and you
know, whatever the case may be. But it
is a matter if I see you and they're in
it's and it's in harmony with the
conversation that we were having that
seems like it's a, you know, something
that shows that it could be
potentially a problem, I need to ask
about it. You and I having a
conversation right now and you folding
your arms isn't going to be like a red
flag that I'm like, oh, I just saw you
folded your arms when I said that. But
if it's something that there's some
emotional layer on that and it's
important and I'm trying to express
something to you when I see you roll
your eyes or cross your arms,
Hey Hey Steven, I noticed when I brought
up this thing about our family, um you
kind of leaned back and crossed your
arms and rolled your eyes. It seems like
you didn't approve of that. Is Is that
Do I have that right?
So now it's on you to explain that or
not. On this point of body language, um
as someone that sits here and I guess
interviews people for like, I you know,
four, five hours at a time sometimes.
Over the last five years I have come to
learn certain body language um patterns
in my guests. Okay.
One of the most obvious ones is when I
ask the guest a question that is causing
them some potential discomfort in some
way. And when I say discomfort, I should
probably define that as
maybe
it's a difficult question for whatever
reason.
>> Sure.
What I tend to see is I tend to see them
cross their arms. Okay. That's like a
really consistent pattern. It's almost
like a It's almost as if they're telling
me that this is a little bit difficult.
And it's it holds to be true.
>> Do you ask them? I noticed when you
crossed your arms, you know, when I
asked you that question, is it something
with this question that bothered you? Or
do you just let it go? I let it go. But
it But it's They've already told me.
Okay. So I've already They I don't need
to ask them because I I know I now know
that there's something there where
there's emotion. Sure. It's kind of the
way that I I see it.
>> It's what it is. More than likely it's
what it is. And I think there's power to
that because your perception, right? So
it's you bring this back like your
pattern recognition of all the guests
that you've done and the association or
the the connection of that in terms of
the question that you ask and they cross
their arms like that's where that comes
from. That's where that all of a sudden
that thing where you're just like I feel
it but I don't really know it. It's just
like you don't know that to be the case
because it could be a number of
different things. But because of the
pattern recognition you see it all the
time, that gives you the chance to say
in this is there's some emotion here. So
either engage it or tread lightly
depending which way you want to go.
>> Both. Yeah. And that's what happens. So
instead of saying like, you know, why
why did you cross your arms? I will
ask them maybe potentially how how that
memory makes them feel or what they they
feel about that and
and that tends to be It's just It's so,
you know, cuz people always talk, you
know, they say, does body language
matter? Does it count for anything? Can
you interpret someone's body language to
understand if they're telling you the
truth?
Is any of this stuff true in your in
your view? No.
You should You should look at body
language because it it it it is a
language
in terms of what somebody is is showing
you. You look at body language and if
you see something that is a change, just
like the crossing your arms, then you
need to be curious about it. So it's
really about a change in state.
>> It's a change of It's a change of what
somebody's doing and the timing of that.
So, you just said like when I ask
something that is
personal or emotional, they'll talk
about it, they'll cross their arms
because maybe it's just now like the
psychological thing where I want to
guard myself a little bit, maybe I want
to kind of close up a little bit. Who
knows?
But, if it's something where you're just
like I noticed it and you don't need to
use it. Like you could ask them if you
wanted to, but you're just like, "Oh,
they already they already told me so I
don't need it." But, for anybody else,
if you see that and you're talking and
somebody crosses their arms,
don't just assume that's what it is.
Because if you assume and you're wrong,
you're going down the wrong track.
Mhm.
And so, throughout this framework for
having hard conversations, we've covered
the P, which is
stick to your purpose, the L the list
which is listen, A which is to ask. Ask.
Is there anything else in the framework?
The N.
Which is the next steps.
So,
to have a plan
means to understand all of these
different things and the way that you
approach that. And the next steps is,
how do you want to resolve this? Like
what's the end goal with this? Is there
anything that I can do
that we can, you know, further our
relationship where both you and I can
can be in alignment. Do you ask them
would you propose? I would always ask
them. If I'm engaged, right? So, perhaps
let's go back to the
the conversation that you may have with,
you know, this this individual you're
just like this person's a narcissist and
so forth.
If you're engaging them and you're the
one who wants to really have this
conversation
and you're hoping that you can find some
type of resolution, you have to ask if
there's resolution with that.
So, something to the effect of, "Do you
think that you and I can find an
amicable way forward where when I when
you and I engage, you know, we can
really enjoy each other's time and and
this thing not go bad?" Like do you see
that in our future at all?
Yes or no. And then it's either yes,
okay, what does that look like for us?
Like how do we have that? Because I am
I'm having this conversation with you
because my relationship with you
matters, but there are things that
happen within that are that are
frustrating and that cause me not to
really want to engage. I do want to find
a way to do that because that is most
important to me. How best do we do that?
There is no magic bullet by which makes
everything every conversation go
perfect. There's none.
You are you are part of the
conversation, the other person's part of
the conversation, you have your
perspective, they have their
perspective.
You have what you think is right or or
or think is fair. Fairness is a
subjective because what you think is
fair is just means what you think is
fair. And so
the hardest part is to walk away and
feeling like you should there should
have done more you can do. The power
becomes knowing how to address that and
if it doesn't go right, then you walk
away and be like, you know what? It just
didn't go right and I'm okay with that.
What if they start insulting you in the
conversation?
Okay, what's your purpose of being in
the conversation?
I'm trying to get them to stop being so
rude to me when we're
on the same bank of
telephones at the call center.
So it is a matter of
if she's being rude to you it's it's
addressing that at the moment, right?
You know, I I noticed that we're having
this conversation that you're being
really aggressive, really rude and
really condescending. So you call it
out.
>> Yeah, be very specific in terms of what
it is. Like you know, if she if she
calls you and she uses you know, she
calls you a name or whatever the case
may be. You're like, you know what?
You're being rude and she's just like,
what did I do? And you're like, you're
just being rude. That's not helpful.
Like give her the context by which you
feel that she's being rude because maybe
she does something outside of a name
where you're like, you're being rude and
maybe to her that's not rudeness. Maybe
it's her directness, right? But if she's
like, you know what? You're
Stephen, you're just an or
whatever the case may be and I would
say, hey, it it seems like at the right
now like, you know, you're very
condescending. You've called me a name
to include an Can you explain
to me specifically right now why that
is?
And make her back it up. Make her
explain to you what it is that Is there
something about Is there something about
me you don't like? Is there something
about my my work ethic that you don't
like? Or maybe the way that I'm doing
this? You've been here longer than me.
So, is perhaps there's something else
that
I'm doing or not doing that you think is
wrong because I am not understanding
your anger and your venom and your need
to insult me and I would really try to
understand what that is.
So, you're having a very direct
conversation with her very specific to
what she's saying. It does not mean
that that's going to fix it. She could
just be an
And it's one of those things where you
have to be like, "I am going to address
this. I'm not going to return in kind. I
don't have to turn into that person as
well. I can walk away from that
conversation and be like, you know what?
I handled that the best I could."
Doesn't mean it's going to fix it. Are
there any tactics that interrogators are
taught or that you teach interrogators
for keeping your emotions in check?
Because, you know, we we go into these
conversations, someone calls you an
You you cortisol starts spiking, you get
into your amygdala, you get stressed,
you get emotional, you end up calling
them an back. But is there I
don't know is there breath work? What
what do interrogators get taught?
In the heat of the moment,
at the at that time, you have no time to
do breath work. This is real-time stuff
in terms of what you're trying to do. If
you go in and you understand your
purpose and again, I don't mean to go
back to the plan, but what happens is
you become you can be pulled out very
quickly. And all of a sudden, if you are
trying to get information from somebody
and one of their strategies, because
they maybe don't want to give you
information, one of their strategies is
to insult you
and now you're insulting them back,
one, you're not going to get anything.
Two, you fell into their strategy. So,
what you have to do is you have to
address that. I am Something to the
effect of I see that when I asked you
that or now all of a sudden like it
seems like there's a change in our
relationship to where now you're being
really aggressive. Why is that? So,
you're continually calling it out.
>> Yes, because
I am asking you to back up your
emotions.
It It because if it's if it's
BS, if you're just doing that because
you're trying to hide the ball someplace
else, I'm going to call you out on it.
It's also showing me that I am not
afraid to confront this type of behavior
and I'm seeing it and I am I am really
trying to engage with you in a very
amicable, genuine way.
And if you were going to treat me a
certain way, I am going to understand
what it is. You're also showing that
you're not doing it in kind. Is part of
the is showing that you're strong?
It's less about being strong and more
about being
competent
and confident in what you're doing.
Because if you allow
in anybody, not just an interrogation
room, in any in any conversation, if you
lose your cool,
you lose control.
You have to be mindful of that. I was
overseeing a an internal affairs
interview. Uh and I was going to go in
and talk to this person at the end. I
was thinking about doing a polygraph
with them, but before that was going to
happen, the the case agent, the person
who had the investigation, was talking
to the subject. It was a road rage
incident where this
uh agent uh had been accused of road
rage and pulling his gun out on a a
civilian. So, this was the conversation
they were that they were having. And I'm
listening to this
in an interview room, right? And then in
terms of like a two-way two-way mirror.
And
the subject
is very aggressive, he's very angry, and
he's very angry to the point like he's
like, "I don't know why you don't
believe me with this.
I keep telling you these things and you
keep asking me the same questions. I
think this is a bunch of BS." The
investigator comes back and he's just
like, "Because I think you're a liar
and you're not telling me the truth in
terms of what it is
and you're causing us to be in this room
a lot longer and this is a problem. So,
now they're both yelling at each other,
like yelling at each other.
And And was one of these things where
I'm watching this unfold
and
it wasn't the subject's job to maintain
his composure, it was the
investigator's. Because his goal is not
to belittle this other agent, his goal
was to find out did this or did this not
happen?
And he lost sight of that. And he came
out of the room to me and he's like,
"What do you think?" And I'm like,
"Well, I'm not going to polygraph him. I
mean, this guy's so emotional right now,
like that's not going to happen." And he
goes, "You know what? This guy's just an
anyway." And I'm like, "I don't
think he's the in the room."
The other guy was the in the
room. Because he allowed himself to get
pulled out of what he should have been
doing
because now he wanted to have the game
of who's the bigger who's the bigger
jerk in the room.
You can do it. And again, if you want to
burn that bridge, burn it. But if if you
want to maintain a relationship or you
want to maintain your profession or you
were trying to get to some resolution,
you cannot lose your cool. I guess that
was what it comes down to is most of the
time we're not clear on the goal going
into the conversation, so
we we have nothing to be anchored to. So
>> True. it's it's we it's just like
getting into the washing machine.
Absolutely what it is. We just spin
around and around and around and
walk away with a less relationship. the
power really comes from if this person
is insulting you and they're angry and
they're doing these things and you're
sitting there and you're asking good
questions, you're keeping your
composure, there is a lot of power with
that.
And I mean power in a in a way that
shows like I'm in I'm in control of
myself.
I am
well aware of what's going on
as this relationship and this
conversation is is happening.
Uh I am not going to fall into this
because this matters to me in terms of
this other thing. I've heard you say
that you think people suffer from me me
me syndrome.
What does that mean?
So, the me me me syndrome is
everything
everything is about me, right? I mean,
it seems obvious with that, but like you
can even look at things from like a
cultural perspective. You can look at
like here, you know, in the in the US
and Western civilizations, like we are
primarily like a dignity culture. Well,
we are it's all about us, right? It's
all about that internal that internal
feeling that that we have. And so
everything is predicated on our job, our
success, the things that we do. The
external world doesn't really matter in
terms of our our success or failure. So,
a lot of it is
what is in your headspace and how do you
manage that? The problem that I see and
what I think
comes within communication is
we do
a lot of self-reflection.
We rarely do a lot of outward reflection
on the other person. Some of the best
negotiators there will spend more than
half of their time thinking about
somebody else. So, a very personal
story.
Um when I was 21, my father passed away.
And he had been battling cancer for for
3 years. And so when he passed away,
uh I have four siblings and my mom was
there. So, when he passed away, he
passed away at home and all five of us
were there.
Several years later,
uh I'm having this conversation on the
day that my dad died about the day that
my dad died. I'm having this with my
my sister and my three younger brothers.
And we're talking about where we were
and so forth. And my sister says, "Yeah,
I I can't watch The Simpsons without
thinking of of Dad." And I said,
"What do you What do you mean?" She's
like, "Well, the the the TV was there
and The Simpsons were on and she's like,
I always just remember that." And I was
like,
"There's a There's a TV in the room?"
She's like, "You don't remember TV being
in the room?" And I'm like, "I have
absolutely not. I have no idea that
there was a TV in the room. I didn't
code it. That wasn't the thing that was
important." Her perspective
and the way that she saw that moment
affected her differently than everybody
else in that room. And so to go back to
the me me me, when you fail to take in
consideration that other people have
other experiences
based on
how they
pick up the world, how they do things in
the world, and you think that it's just
about you,
you're you are going to have a really
hard time having a deep, honest,
connective relationship with somebody.
If it's just about you. You can do it,
and a lot of people do it. You know,
they're looking for that that way to
you know, make people drawn to them and
make people connect to them. And and
that's fine,
but if you are trying to
I guess Stephen, if you just want to be
like a genuine person and you want to
have a relationship, don't make it about
you.
I've just finished writing my third
book. I haven't firmed up the title yet,
but I have started mocking up some
different designs, and I've been doing
this with Adobe Express, which is one of
our sponsors. What I love about Adobe
Express is that it makes it so easy for
me to obsess over the tiniest details,
the typography, the font, the color, the
text placement.
The stuff that might sound petty to most
people, but actually compounds to create
something that stands out, something
that's one better than the rest. And
designing my cover art has reminded me
of how many creative things I've learned
over the year, but it's also reminded me
that there are so many creative minds
around me that are also sitting on their
own secrets. So, I've created the one
better guide in Adobe Express to bring
those tips to you. And in it, you'll
find principles from the very, very best
in their industry turned into quick and
easy practices for you to apply. So, you
can train yourself to create exactly
like the best performing teams in the
world do. Just head over to
adobe.ly/onebetter
to download Adobe Express now. And make
sure you visit the learn tab to discover
how you can become one better than the
rest.
I was thinking this earlier. I was
thinking one of the things in the this
podcast that I've learned is if I
if I want to increase the probability
that someone opens up and tells me
something,
one of the things I do is I share
myself. Yeah. So, you know, I might be
asking someone about their childhood.
And it's quite clear to me now that one
of the ways, especially if they end up
crossing their arms and get up
uncomfortable,
>> Yeah. is just to pause for a second and
share my own childhood. Yeah. So, if
I've identified that one of your values
is, I don't know, you want to be a good
family man,
might you mention that you're a family
man yourself as a way to build a bridge?
So, if it's honest. So, so that's a
great question, but this becomes a thing
where you have to look at things if you
were trying to influence or manipulate
somebody. If it's honest
and it fits within that conversation at
that moment because this is what I,
based on our conversation, I think this
person needs to hear,
then sure, if it's real.
If it's not, if I'm lying to him because
I'm trying to say, "Well, I'm a family
man, you're a family man, like we're
we're good." Now you're
Now you're manipulating the person.
And that's a whole different
conversation. So, to go back to what you
said, if if I understand this guy's
values and I understand that there is a
sense of
Let's say a sense of honesty. Maybe
there's a a part of this person that's
also honest or there's also a sense of
he wants to be
I don't know, he wants his kids to see
him as a as a as a man of integrity.
Right? Let's just say that. So, maybe
maybe that starts to become a
conversation that we have as it relates
to,
um, you know, I can only imagine, you
know, the difficulty that this has with
you as as you've told me, you know,
you're a family man. I'm not going to
say you're a family man. I'm going to
say as you told me you're a family man.
And one of the things that you said
about being a family man was
how important is your kids to to kind of
like lead by your your model, like your
role model aspects of that. By honesty
and openness
and and and those type of things. So, do
you hear where I'm going? So, I'm
trending in the direction by which that
I am trying to bring online still his
father, but a different value under what
it means to be a father. Cuz I don't
want to talk about being present cuz
that's probably going to go away, but if
he is trying to teach his kids
to own your mistakes, then maybe that's
the direction I go. But, how am I going
to get that? I'm going to get that
because I'm going to start off my
conversation with him in a very honest,
genuine way that I'm going to try to
understand who is this person across
from me.
And what's the difference between
manipulation and influence?
Influence is about nudging a person
in a certain direction at a certain time
that's beneficial for both you
and them.
That's influence.
Got it? Mhm.
Manipulation is you nudging a person in
a specific direction
because it's good for you.
It's not good for them. And so, you'll
lie, you'll you'll do whatever you need
to do to to close the deal, to get them
to do something, to give them to give
you something. That's manipulation
because it's often one of those things
that it has negative consequences to it
in terms of the person who did it. You
know, maybe they never know, but you
manipulated them. Which is
interrogations, no? Because this guy's
going to go he's going to get life in
jail if he admits that he killed this
child.
So, I'm that's not in his interests, but
it's in mine. So, I'm going to
manipulate him to give me the secrets.
If that's what you want to do, and
that's the direction you think you need
to do,
then by all means you can do it. And
here in the US, it is legal that you can
lie to
Oh, so subjects, but So, you're saying
lying is the the the moment where it
becomes manipulation? Yes, that becomes
the shortcut, and that becomes a way not
just within the interrogation room.
Like, I think what becomes important and
I've seen this come up a lot, people are
all about like influence, like you hear
that come up quite a bit.
If you want to influence somebody, this
is how you do it. You're honest with
them, you're clear, and you're
transparent because influence is about
how do I feel about you? Not about all
the things that you're doing at that
moment. Because if I don't if trust
isn't isn't even on the table, if I
don't trust you to begin with, or I
think that to go back to what you had
said, there's this pattern recognition
where I'm like, I just think there's
something wrong with this, you're not
going to be able to influence me.
If I am honest with you in everything
that I do because that's how I carry
myself.
Not only does it lower your cognitive
load because you're not lying to
somebody else, but it underscores who
you stand for and who you are as a
person. And with that people are going
to see that and say, "You know what?
Steven's very transparent. He said this
was a good deal and I believe that for
these reasons." It's a matter of you
being honest with that. I
I always question now like it cuz I see
it a lot and it came up in the in the
questions that that I was talking to
your team about. It's like
why does everybody want to influence
somebody? Like why
why do they what what is that? Do you
know?
Like why does it come up all the time?
Because
what are people trying to accomplish?
Is they want to accomplish something.
They have a goal. For who? For
themselves.
>> Right. So is that is that influence?
But it gets the job done for some for
some people.
>> Sure, it does. I was thinking about
that. Is it Carnegie? What's that book?
But it's probably behind me somewhere
called influence and it talks about the
the
five pillars of influence. Things like
it gets you to
>> so it's Robert Cialdini. Oh, yeah. We
teach that, right? It's one of those
where you can understand why influence
works, the different strategies of
influence, like what they all stand for
and when they fit within the within the
conversation. You can do it. I do it,
but I can I can tell you Steven, being a
being a communication specialist,
I don't spend my day walking around
trying to influence people.
I will be honest with people. I will be
transparent. I will answer their
questions with the best information that
I have and if people are inspired by
that and and and that causes somebody to
be influenced by the things that I said,
that's that's what I want, right? And I
brought this up earlier, but the the
training academy that that you know that
I instruct with, it is all about
openness. It's all about honesty. It's
all about trying to help people based on
why they've come to us
and it's not about manipulating people
to to come in and be a member. It's
about why are you here and how can we
help you? And this is the best way we
can do that. And that influences people
and that inspires people to to listen to
what you have to say. Why why is your
podcast this successful? The first time
you and I met you said something that I
disagreed with. What was that? And it
was you were talking about Fight Story
and you were talking about the different
things you you you know with Fight Story
and the success of the podcast.
And you said it's not because I'm a good
interviewer, it's because they're really
good at marketing. You're a good
interviewer because of the
vulnerabilities that you do. Every time
I've been surprised on how vulnerable
and open you are in terms of sharing
with yourself like there's that story
arc in terms of how that connection is
because of that you influence me
not because you were trying to, not
because your team reached out, but
because of the way you carried yourself
in your podcast and the questions that
you ask and the vulnerability that
you're showing, there is a level of
trust that comes with that. And so you
in you weren't trying to influence, you
were being you. And there's a part of
your self-congruence, who you are, your
ideal self, which is just like this is
just what I do. And my life's not
perfect and I'll share the parts that
are messy and I'm trying to use this as
a platform to help millions of people.
That's a big deal.
And is this how you build trust with
people?
Or is trust a different or adjacent
point? So trust is about being
vulnerable.
Trust is about being open
and sharing a little bit about yourself.
So truly Steven, the question becomes is
what I've shared with you in good hands?
Because if it's not, that's a problem.
Right? Mhm. Let me ask you a question.
Do you have a secret
that maybe you've never told anybody or
you've told just one or two people?
>> Yeah. You do. You got one in mind? Yeah.
What is it?
I can't. There's millions of people
listening.
>> Okay, but but if these millions of
people weren't watching, would you tell
me?
Yeah. Okay. So, the reason that you're
not telling me or in front of these
millions of people is why?
Why are you not Why are you not telling
us your secret? Um because of
consequence.
Okay. Some Someone's going to clip it.
Someone's going to put it on the
internet. Someone's going to me up.
There's a reason for it, right? There's
a reason that you're not trusting in
terms of what it was. Maybe you trust me
just because of the the relationship
that we've built to this point.
Um but there's probably other things
that you wouldn't trust me with. When
you talk about trust,
if you look at concentric rings, you
know, in terms of the the the trust
around you,
the center ring should be self-trust. It
should be you. You should be able to
trust yourself more than you trust
anybody else. If you don't, you probably
need to do a little bit of work, right?
What does that mean in reality of me
trusting myself?
Do you trust that you will do the things
that you
want to do or you ought to do? Or do you
do you keep yourself in that direction?
Do you keep yourself accountable? Right?
That becomes this thing where can you
make decisions or are you a person like
I don't make any decisions, I let
somebody else make decisions, or I run
everything by everybody else because I
don't trust myself to make the right
decision? Then you have to work on your
decision-making because you have to find
a way to build your trust up.
Outside of that initial ring, it's it
should be a ring of
a handful of people that have
unconditional trust, right? And these
are the people that no matter what, like
you've given them
that trust. You You believe in them.
And it should be a small circle. And
this is where I think people go wrong.
They're like, "Ah, you know what? I I I
share everything with people."
Then they then they're crushed when
one of those people that they you've
given unconditional trust with break it.
That's a problem. I have probably
you know, my siblings are all really
close to me, so I have them. There's
four of them.
Um outside of that, I have my, you know,
I have my wife and a select few friends,
you know, that I know that enough if I
call they're like, but I'm we're good.
Um outside of that,
you should everybody else should be
conditional trust. People should earn
your trust, right? They should be
honored to have it. Like don't give it
away for free. And if you have
somebody's trust, you should respect
that if they've given that to you. Be I
But I think and I've seen it I people
give away trust way too much because the
person will be amazing in this one spot
and all of a sudden they get the halo
effect and they're like, well, they're
great here, they must be great here.
It's this it's this arc of they're
awesome everywhere and so I'm going to
trust them with these other things.
Then when, again,
they break it, they violate it,
the way you feel
is just this this this this violation
of, you know, somebody took what you
gave them and just destroyed it. It's
hard to come back from that. It's hard
to Once you Once you lose trust, like if
you lose somebody's trust, it's really
really hard to get back. Is there
anything you can do to get back, do you
think?
What I know that you can do, it doesn't
always work,
you have to be accountable for why you
lost it. Whatever that is, very
specific,
it's going to take time and a lot of
consistency. To consistency meaning that
you show them consistently time and time
again that you are a person that, you
know, can be trusted. On um
on leadership principles, something I've
heard you talk about as well.
Um
What do you think are the most important
principles as it relates to leadership?
Because we've talked about trust there
and other things around communication
and all these things. Is there Is there
anything we haven't covered as it
relates to being a great leader in your
perspective?
Somebody who's calm under chaos, that
would be my definition of a leader.
However, and I say that because
leadership is a feeling, Steven. How do
you make these people feel as it relates
to my qualities as a leader? Do I do the
things that register with you as
leadership? Cuz I can tell you when I
was on a a SWAT team, which is the
special weapons and tactics, this is
where I learned the true essence of
leadership because I had some amazing
commanders
and and team leaders on that team were
under
high stress. Under a stress like that,
if you have people around you that are
keeping their composure, that's
leadership.
One of the elements there, I guess as
when you're in the SWAT as well as
dealing with huge amounts of uncertainty
when
pressure's on, when your life's at risk.
I was reading about a study which I
think you mentioned sometime ago
where they look at three groups of
people doing the same exam and we're
sort of trying to ascertain how people
make decisions with different degrees of
certainty and information.
>> Yeah, what the the study showed was
there were a group of students that, you
know,
were taking a test in college and they
were told that, you know, they had
either passed or failed or they had no
idea whether they passed or failed. But
prior to that, they were asked if they
would, you know, take a a vacation. And
the people who passed and the people who
failed, there was a higher percentage of
them who chose to take a vacation after
getting news that they had either passed
college or failed college.
The group that didn't know, there was a
third group that was just like,
I'm un- I'm unsure.
weren't able to really make a decision.
And and so what the what the
>> to be clear then on that third group,
they didn't have their exam results
back, so they didn't take the action to
book a vacation.
>> were told They were told that there was
some malfunction in ability to score
their test and they would get their
results at a later time. Okay. And so
then they were asked to,
you know, if they would also buy a
vacation. and uh a farther fewer
percentage, I don't remember what it
was, but a farther uh a much less
percentage of them would take it than
the people who both passed, cuz I think
there was like half the people who
passed or or were told they passed like
took the bought the vacation package. It
was like a vacation trip to Hawaii.
Around the same percentage, I believe,
who failed the exam bought the vacation
trip, but the people who
couldn't decide just they didn't have
the cognitive bandwidth to to really
make a decision. So, the ambiguity
of not knowing
really lessens our cognitive ability to
to go in a certain direction. And so,
when we don't know where to go, we often
don't go anywhere.
That is a hallmark of great leaders that
they're able to decide even when there's
very low certainty. Sure. I would think
that would come with
you know, the territory. I think if
you're if you're only a leader when it's
calm, then you're not really a leader,
you're somebody with a higher salary and
a title. Like leadership really shows up
in those type of circumstances when when
things are uncertain. And so,
you know, having the ability
to
manage things when not all the
information's there and doing the best
you can with it because,
you know, often times that the best
decision to make is the right one and
the worst one is to not make a decision
at all. And so, if you have those type
of leaders who just can't think through
that problem, then that's not a leader.
I remember when I spoke in South Paulo
many years ago, Barack Obama was on
stage and he said that as president,
like when he went and got Bin Laden in
that compound in Pakistan,
that they didn't know if Bin Laden was
there. They'd never visually properly
ID'd him. So, he had to make that
decision to risk American lives with, as
he said, 51% certainty. Yeah. Or a very
low certainty. And he says that's the
the thing about being the president of
the United States. You make huge calls
with very little certainty. Yeah. And
I've always thought about that in in
terms of my day-to-day life and
it all has made me conclude that
the most successful people that I've met
do have that ability to be low certainty
and make big calls. Yeah. Um with the
peace of mind that they've made that
call with the best available
information. And then the sort of
inverse of that is some people listening
right now
with even small decisions are trying to
get to 100% certainty when obviously
100% certainty only exists in hindsight.
You know, and that that's that's a
really good that's a really good point.
I think that's a lot of people struggle
with that when it comes to just just own
your decision. Like like own it. Like
whatever you choose to do
if you if you make it not under high
emotion and you do the best you can with
the information that you have at that
time, make a decision. Like, you know,
as as they say it's you know, if you
make the wrong decision then it's
experience. If you make the right
decision then it's confirmation.
I think about this a lot. I think about
um how
maybe everyone listening could have a
conversation with themselves about their
own relationship with uncertainty. Like
how good are you dealing with situations
where you don't have much information?
Yeah. Um are you the type of person
that's able to make a decision and not
like sit in sit in paralysis and
many people that come up to me in the
street and say they want a new life or a
new this or new that
are um are choosing like the certain
misery of their current life versus the
uncertainty they see as they look out
into the void of like quitting the job
and going and playing violin in Peru or
something.
And um
You know,
you you you bring up you bring up
something that um so in one of our one
of our recent classes that we taught
this month, we talked about owning
decision, right? And I shared this story
with the community and it had a pretty
profound effect. And so
I was uh as a police officer I was on
patrol. It was late at night. I'm
driving down just this two-lane road
kind of in the middle of nowhere and I
pull over to the side and I'm just kind
of like watching from a from an angle
just people driving up and down this
road.
This car flies by, goes through a stop
sign, doesn't stop. It's a very nice
luxury sedan. So, I turn on my lights,
pull him over, and I said, "How you
doing?" And he's like, "I'm all right."
I could tell this guy is just like he's
flat drunk. And I shine my light into
his passenger, and he's just like he's
passed out. Like he has he has
he's not even coherent that I'm probably
standing there. So, I get his driver's
license and I'm like, "Look, man, you're
you're pretty bad off." And he's like,
"Are you going to call my dad?" And I
said, "Why would I do that?" He goes,
"Man, he goes this is his car. He's like
he's going to be upset."
I said, "All right." So,
I go back to my patrol car and I I I
look at this kid in terms of he's had no
priors. He's 16. He has no prior driving
record. So, I'm making So, what's my
decision now? I can call for a DWI unit
to come and and give this guy a field
sobriety test and he's going to fail
just because I could tell how drunk he
was. Or I could call his dad.
Now, I have to make a decision cuz I
have that type of discretion. So, I have
to think, do I take this kid to Do I
have this kid go to jail and tow his
dad's car?
Or do I call his dad and hope that's the
right decision because his dad will find
a way to make sure this doesn't happen
again.
So, I had our dispatch give me his phone
his parents' phone number and I called
his dad. It's 11:00 at night and
mom answers and I'm like, you know,
um you know, Mrs. Smith, this is, you
know, Deputy O'Neal. Um
I'm out here with your son,
Jacob. Oh my god, how is he? I'm like,
he's fine. And I'm like, I think he's
been drinking too much and I want to
know if you want to come get him.
She's like, "Can you talk to my
husband?" I said, "Sure." He gets on the
phone, same thing. And he's like, "Thank
you.
I will make sure this doesn't happen
again. I will be there in 5 minutes."
I have no idea what happens at the end
of this, but I made that decision at
that time. The reason I'm sharing this
is because when I told that story in our
community,
I asked everybody on the platform
because it's very engaging and I said,
"And Abby asked this question,
actually." And she said, "How many of
you would do the same thing Desmond
did?" Probably should give context there
that Evie is your wife.
>> Evie's my wife. I'm sorry.
>> I had to pump ours. Yes. A lot of people
put in the comments like, "I would do
the same thing. Good for him. The kid
shouldn't go to jail." And Evie was just
like, "I would do the exact opposite
thing. I would have taken him to jail.
I would have towed the car because I
don't know if the consequences of what
his dad would do is is going to outweigh
the fact that he's going to go to jail."
And she's like, "What if I let him go
and he does the same thing next week
because he's not
you know, he doesn't care what his
father thinks."
And she's like, "That to me was the
decision that I would have made." So, I
bring that up for this purpose.
We both made a completely different
decision. I made it for the reasons I
did. She made it for the reasons that
she did. Metaphorically, mine was true.
This is just what she said she would
have done.
The point was is that
we both owned it.
And a lot of times I think what happens
going back to what you just said is
people are so afraid to make a decision
for a number of different reasons.
And so they just choose not to. Now,
again, people could look at this you
know, your audience could look at this
and be like, "He should have taken him
to jail." I understand all of that.
I had the discretion and that's the
decision I made and I would make that
decision every time. But it's it's it's
less about that story and more about
when you decide on something with the
information you have at the moment, do
you own it? Or do you as you said, do
you look back later and have hindsight
bias and be like, "Ah,
I should have known." You can't do that.
So many people try to live their life in
reverse like that and looking back, it's
impossible. It's impossible to know. So,
I do think in kind of like to expand on
what you said, I do think when it talks
about owning your decisions and and
being
being thoughtful as it relates to
why you're doing or what you're doing
and
taking command of yourself and being
being a self-leader, decisions is making
that is is what it is. To go back to the
uncertainty aspects.
Protecting your business's data is a lot
scarier than people admit. You've got
the usual protections, backups,
security, but underneath there's this
uncomfortable truth that your entire
operation depends on systems that are
updating, syncing, and changing data
every second. Someone doesn't have to
hack you to bring everything crashing
down. All it takes is one corrupted
file, one workflow that fires in the
wrong direction, one automation that
overrides the wrong thing, or an AI
agent drifting off course, and suddenly
your business is offline. Your team is
stuck, and you're in damage control
mode. That's why so many organizations
use our sponsor, Rubrik. It doesn't just
protect your data, it lets you rewind
your entire system back to the moment
before anything went wrong. Wherever
that data lives, cloud, SaaS, or
on-prem, whether you have ransomware, an
internal mistake, or an outage, with
Rubrik you can bring your business
straight back. And with the newly
launched Rubrik Agent Cloud, companies
get visibility into what their AI agents
are actually doing, so they can set
guardrails and reverse them if they go
off track. Rubrik lets you move fast
without putting your business at risk.
To learn more, head to rubrik.com.
Last month, I told you about our
sponsor, Function Health, and their
team, who've developed a way of giving
you a full 360 view of what's going on
inside your body. They offer over 100
advanced lab tests, covering everything
from hormones, toxins, inflammation,
heart health, stress, and so much more.
So, Jack, who started this show with me,
got his first blood draw done a couple
of weeks ago, so I thought I'd let him
tell you a little bit more about his
experience. This test really opened my
eyes to personally what I should be
doing with my health. I hear a lot of
information in this podcast. I sit in
every single recording. So, to know how
I can relate each one to me personally
is super valuable. You sign up, and you
schedule your tests, and once you're
done, you get a little report like the
one I have here. I can see my in-range
results, my out-of-range results, and
there's a little AI function, too. So,
if I have any questions about my
out-of-range results, I can just go in
there and ask it any question I want.
And these tests are backed by doctors
and thousands of hours of research.
>> an annual draw done and a mid-year
follow-up. So, if you want to learn
more, head over to
functionofhealth.com/doac
where you can sign up for $365 a year.
I'll put the link in the description
below. It is just $1 a day for your
health.
Of that research you've done on
communication,
is there anything we haven't talked
about today that really surprised you in
the research?
That really caused a paradigm shift in
what you thought communication was and
now what you think it is. Yeah. The
research showed that
your ability to build rapport with a
person
is what gives you the most power in
terms of that connection. And different
people, you know, And how do you build
rapport?
Most people think that this is one of
those things where you're just you're
just you're overly kind, you're very
complimentary.
Uh you're talking about the weather. And
now we've built rapport and then we're
good. It's not how you build rapport.
Rapport Rapport is understanding values
in terms of a person. Rapport is
understanding, you know, a person's
presence and what they're needing from
you. If I'm paying attention to you
and I'm engaged with you
and I'm making you feel seen and heard
and understood and by proxy by the
reciprocity of doing that, you do the
same thing for me,
that's rapport.
When it comes into
building rapport with somebody,
read the room.
If I came in and I have a list of
questions
and I see you that you're there's some
emotional state that you're showing,
if I want to connect with you,
I ask about that. I need to put my stuff
aside. Before I can have the
conversation I want to have, I probably
have to have the conversation you want
to have. And at that moment, it may be
understanding what is going on in your
headspace. I could say, "Hey, Stephen,
you know, I'm Desmond O'Neal. You know,
I know you were brought in this morning
for for these reasons.
It's obvious to me right now that you
seem really upset. Can you tell me
what's going on right now?"
And you could say, you know, "I don't
know what's going on.
I'm super scared. I've never been in
jail before. My mom's sick at home and I
don't know if there's anybody to take
care of her." Now, how much information
now do I have by the way that I can
connect with you? Because if you tell
me,
"I am freaked out. I don't know what's
going on." What do I now do? Do I go
back to be like, "Well, that sucks." and
go back to my list of questions? Or do I
say, "How best can I help you with
that?"
>> And this builds rapport. Yes.
Because what I'm doing is I'm showing
empathy. I'm listening to you.
I'm I'm giving you what you want. I'm
lessening your ambiguity. I'm orienting
you in terms of the direction that
you're asking me to take you. You're
asking me for clarity in terms of what's
going to happen. I'm going to answer
that.
I'm showing them that I am paying
attention to them. I'm being authentic.
I'm going to follow up with the things
that I do cuz I'm going to come back
later and be like, "Hey, we checked on
your mom. She was good. We pulled your
aunt in. Your aunt came and took care of
her. If anything else comes up, let me
know. I do have some questions that I
need to get to. This is an important
part of the investigation, but I I can
only imagine that there's a lot on your
mind and if things come up through our
conversation, please please ask me."
And that's rapport. In those situations,
I'm hearing
many of the things that I read in that
book Influence by Robert
>> Cialdini. Cialdini.
I'm hearing reciprocity. Yep. You've
done them a favor so now they're more
likely to answer your questions.
Reciprocity is
giving somebody something with with the
the expectation that somewhere in the
future they will give you something
else. It's not a transactional thing.
It's not like, "The only reason I'm
doing this
is because I want something from you in
exchange." That's
transaction.
So So when you
checked on that person's mom, that was
reciprocity.
That was me following up with the
commitment of saying that this is what
I'm going to do for you. You can do with
it what you want.
>> But you know that doing that is going to
increase the probability that they
answer your questions.
No, I do that regardless. I could have
He could have said, "You know what? I I
appreciate you. Thank you for checking
on my mom.
Um
I I want a lawyer. I don't want to talk
to you." You know what I'm going to do?
I'm going to check on his mom. You know
why? Cuz that's what I said I was going
to do. You know why? Because that's my
self-congruence. That's what I do as a
person when I give somebody my word I'm
going to follow up with it. So, in a
situation like that, I will do those
things because that's what he he's
That's what I've told him I'm going to
do.
Is there anything else on on the point
of having difficult conversations that
we haven't covered in your mind? Cuz I
know there's loads of people that they
want to get better at having those
tricky conversations and also just
dealing with
a thing we see a lot is like people very
keen to deal with difficult people. Is
there anything there that we haven't
touched on? We've got the plan
framework, but just
just want to check there's nothing we've
missed. No, I just think it was I just
think it was a plan framework and it's
not about making things complicated.
It's actually about you know, there's
there's things that you should take out,
you know, when it comes to
communication as opposed to always
adding things in. You know, it really
becomes like extinction before
acquisition. So, I can I can tell you
when it comes to better communication,
there are three things that you should
stop doing right now.
One of them is to stop trying to be
right.
One of them is to stop telling people
you understand.
And the third one is
stop giving people your unsolicited
opinion.
Now, to break those down, stop Stop
trying to be right. We talked about that
one a little bit. The The second one
is
stop telling people you understand. This
is what I mean by that. You can
understand You can understand a person's
words.
You will never understand their
headspace in terms of the specificity of
that. And so, what you will see is
if if you're sharing a story, like if
you shared a personal story with me.
Let's say, you know, let's say your
father had passed away.
And I'm like, you know what, Stephen, I
completely understand.
Um my dad passed away too when I was
young. So now we're connected. I have
just
I've just taken away
a moment for you because I made it about
me cuz I I thought that I understood
something that you had experienced. In
fact, your experience of a death or your
experience of your father at that moment
is going to be completely different than
mine. But for me to tell you that I
understand
is is short-sighted. My girlfriend tells
me sometimes that she wants me to say
that I understand.
And I think what she's saying is that
maybe she wants to feel understood.
And so she might be explaining how she
feels and then
if I say, "Do you know what? I I know I
I I do understand."
But do you?
Sometimes I get to the point where I I
do understand what she's saying. You
understand what she's saying, but do you
understand how she truly feels?
>> No. Okay. But that becomes cuz I don't
feel that. You don't feel it.
>> But she just wants me to acknowledge
>> She wants you to acknowledge it. So the
difference is in terms of it was being
genuine where you're like, "Look, I I
really understand how you feel." You
probably don't.
>> How do I make her feel understood in
that regard then without telling her I
understand?
To feel understood is to is to listen to
her, to be like, "Look, you know, I I
sounds sounds tough. Sounds, you know,
like this is something really on your
mind." Like and it kind of goes into our
other thing where like, "Stop giving
people your opinion." You know, if she's
if she's expressing things to you and
she's sharing how she wants to feel,
she's probably not looking for you to
tell her what to do unless she's asked
you for that. The first thing that we
always do and it happens all the time is
like, "Let me tell you what I think."
Try and fix it. Try to fix it without
having all of the the emotions and the
the complexities of why it's not being
done. And so to go back to with your
girlfriend, it really is just a matter
of trying to understand, seeing where
she's going with it, asking her, you
know, if there ways that that, you know,
we can we can work to make it better or
help you with this. But if Stephen is
she's just like, "I I want you to
understand." I would just tell her I
understand. Just because that's what
she's looking for.
You're not going to have it in there,
but if you generally went to somebody
and you're like, oh, I understand,
that's what I'm asking you not to do.
That's what you shouldn't do.
You shouldn't generally think that you
truly understand another person because
then you're going like you're convinced
that you know and you're no longer
curious in terms of how they actually
feel. Mhm.
And on that last point about giving
giving the opinion, a lot of the time
people, you know, when they're sharing
something, they
just want you to create the space. Simon
Sinek said to me, he goes, most of the
time people just want you to sit in the
mud with them.
And like, I I naturally show up with
like my toolbox to try and fix the
situation, but a lot of the time,
especially with my my girlfriend, maybe
she just wants me to listen.
Most people do, right? It becomes like
this identity headspace where people
just are looking for the sounding board.
For you, for your girlfriend, like
you're the you're the guy, you're the
person, and that's what she comes to you
for. That's your job in a lot of ways.
And I don't mean that in a negative
thing, but it's just one of those things
where if that's what she needs from you,
then that's what you give her. And a lot
of people just want as as as Simon Sinek
said, where you said it like, just sit
in the mud with them, and that's what
they're ask you. If she turns to you and
says, "Steven, what would you do here?"
then she's asking you. But if not, then
don't give it.
Something I need to work on.
Yeah, we all do.
Yeah, cuz you cuz you I don't know,
something about maybe the male brain,
but it's probably not just men.
Can I talk real quick and just about our
training community before we go? Is that
okay with you?
>> Yep.
Because it is one of those where like
now
uh what I spend all my time with is is
I'm an instructor for Beyond
Bulletproof, which is a training
platform that that Evy and I that Evy
and I host, and it really comes down to
three prongs of how do people helping
people think, helping people act, and
helping people lead with purpose. And I
know we talked about those things, but
the reason I bring that up is because
there are so many people, Steven, that
just as you had talked about, they're
they're looking for
they're looking for some help, they're
looking for some clarity, they're
looking for somebody to influence them
in some way because they don't have good
emotional regulation and they're trying
to get better in their relationships.
We've been fortunate to to have that and
that's kind of where, you know, I don't
I don't do a lot of social media, you
know, I don't do
uh a lot of other other things cuz I
spend my time here. As you know, we have
a closing tradition on the podcast where
the last guest leaves a question for the
next. And the question that's been left
for you is
what decision do you most regret and
would things have turned out better if
you had made it differently?
Ouch, that's a spicy one.
So,
I hm
as much as this wants to be a spicy one,
I can I can categorically tell you that
there's not a decision that I've made
that I wish I would have re- made
different. And I say that because it
kind of goes back to
I own my decisions in terms of the
things that I have done. I mean, even
when the story that I shared about, you
know, when I was a police officer with
the kid who was drinking, like, I own
those decisions and
in truth, like, all of those decisions
have manifested itself for me to sit
down here with you today and have this
conversation. And so, I can't tell you
that there's something that I look back
to that I regret because I think that
there's things we learn from, but I
think for the most part, I don't use
hindsight bias. I don't look back to say
I wish there was something else. I use
those things to uh to grow and to learn
and be better and you know, had I made a
different decision, maybe you and I
wouldn't be sitting here. So, none.
But you still I mean, if someone asked
me that, I'd have loads of answers. Like
what? Just like ways that I handled
situations in my life as an employer.
Like, actually, no, I shouldn't have
shouldn't have said that. Shouldn't have
done that. I Do you know when my
girlfriend said that, do you know, I
should have just listened. And I wish I
had because I think our relationship
would be better or
you know, some grudge I held or
whatever, you know, like the the
messiness of being a but emotional
human. So, let me let me ask this. And I
think you know,
I I do question at times that that type
of I wish and I regret,
I think that also changes
who you are as a person. If you're like,
I would have gone back and done the We
We can all do that in some And I don't
mean that's petty, but in all some petty
way. When I was writing my my thesis,
I would always come to my thesis advisor
and she'd be like, "No, this isn't good.
This isn't good. This isn't good." And
so, when I was done,
there was like I had like 30 pages She
was like, "Just put this in the parking
lot. Like, maybe we'll look at this,
maybe we won't." So, when I was done
with my thesis, I had 30 pages that were
in the parking lot. And I went to her
and I go, "I feel like this is
a lot of mistakes." And she goes, "You
had to have this
to have this." And so, when when I hear
that, when it's just like, "Oh, I wish I
would have done these things different."
You would be a different person, right?
It's all those perspectives. It's all
those little things that you code and
become a different person. You would be
a different person if you had done those
things differently. I'm not saying
better or worse, but I'm saying I don't
I don't think that's a reason to look
back and regret things. Yeah, I probably
would still have those mistakes in my
future if I hadn't made them in the past
as well. So, maybe maybe the very fact
that I can identify them means that my
self-awareness grew based on them. I
like I'm never going to treat someone
like that again, or I'm never going to
say that thing again because
I learned the lesson, so I'm a better
person
today because of that. Yeah.
Desmond, thank you. Thank you. Thank you
so much for doing what you do. And uh
this is you you said this is your first
podcast, which is
exciting.
>> It's my first podcast. Thank you so
much. We're done.
>> If there's anything we need, it is
connection, especially in the world
we're living in today. And that is
exactly why we created these
conversation cards, because on this
show, when I sit here with my guest and
have those deep, intimate conversations,
this remarkable thing happens time and
time again. We feel deeply connected to
each other. At the end of every episode,
the guest I'm interviewing leaves a
question for the next guest, and we've
turned them into these conversation
cards. And we've added these twist cards
to make your conversations even more
interesting. And there are so many more
twists along the way with the
conversation cards. This is the brand
new edition, and for the first time
ever, I've added to the pack this gold
card, which is an exclusive question
from me. But, I'm only putting the gold
cards in the first run of conversation
cards. So, get yours now before the
limited edition gold cards are all gone.
Head to the link in the description
below.