Video summary
Scott Galloway argues that young men are facing a multifaceted crisis rooted in biological delays, economic shifts, and sociological changes rather than the progress of women. He points out that boys' prefrontal cortexes develop later than girls', coinciding with an era where vocational jobs have been offshored and tax policies transfer wealth from younger to older generations. While he rejects narratives blaming female independence or conflating gender issues into a zero-sum game, he emphasizes the devastating impact of losing male role models due to divorce or death, which significantly increases incarceration risks compared to college graduation. Furthermore, Galloway highlights how big tech algorithms isolate youth by replacing meaningful human connection with digital engagement, contributing to rising anxiety and depression among teenagers, while noting that homelessness and addiction crises disproportionately affect men.
To counter these challenges, Galloway urges young men to adopt a proactive approach centered on community, faith, and traditional courtship norms where they can demonstrate excellence beyond superficial metrics like height or wealth. He suggests that religious institutions offer the necessary venues for boys to learn social cues, fail safely, and build resilience before age thirty, contrasting this with modern isolation that often leads to substance abuse. Faith-based communities are presented as stabilizing forces that foster higher birth rates and marriage longevity compared to secular trends. Additionally, he advises against the "incel" mindset by framing celibacy largely as a voluntary choice resulting from self-inflicted inaction rather than external circumstances, encouraging men to actively seek connection through consistent effort and adherence to traditional dating dynamics where biological asymmetries are respected.
Practical steps for young men include Galloway's "Rule of Threes," which mandates working out three times weekly, spending over thirty hours outside the home on meaningful work or community engagement monthly, and maintaining regular social interactions to enter the top five percent of viable partners. He also recommends a strategic approach to wealth creation where individuals aged twenty-five to forty-five focus intensely on mastering high-demand skills without prioritizing balance until they reach elite status in their field. This strategy involves practicing stoicism by aggressively saving early to leverage compound interest, diversifying investments after initial success rather than repeatedly going "all-in," and developing a metaphorical "spoon"—the resilience required to endure public rejection when cold-calling or pursuing opportunities—to eventually secure significant professional and personal successes.
The discussion further addresses systemic biases within the education system, such as the high percentage of female elementary teachers and boys being suspended at twice the rate of girls for identical infractions, suggesting solutions like "red-shirting" to align developmental needs with curriculum demands before increasing male involvement in coaching roles. Ultimately, Galloway concludes that while women's economic independence is beneficial, it challenges men to level up by having a concrete plan for financial responsibility and social contribution. By combining faith-based community building, disciplined skill acquisition, and emotional resilience against rejection, young men can navigate the modern landscape effectively, avoiding the pitfalls of isolation and despair while fostering healthy masculinity essential for societal flourishing.
Read the full video transcript
I think if you spend enough time telling
young men that they are the problem and
that they're predators, they begin to
believe you.
>> How much of a young men struggling today
is them versus the system.
>> And the most frightening statistic is
that if you go into a morg and there's
five people who have died by suicide,
four are men.
>> I I don't think we have enough voices of
men that are good examples and
challenging boys to become men. And if
you if you reverse engineer to the
single point of failure when a boy comes
off the tracks, it it's to one point and
that's when he loses a male role model.
The far-left hasn't been any more
productive because their advice is to
say, "Okay, you don't have problems. You
are the problem." And my advice to you
as a young man is to act more like a
woman.
30 seconds.
>> Did you ever think you were made? I feel
like I could taste sweet.
>> What's your point? The future [music]
looks bright.
>> My handshake is better than anything I
ever sign. It's right here. [music]
>> You are a 101.
I don't think I've ever said this
before.
So, I've been looking forward to uh our
visit today uh with uh Professor Scott
Galloway. He's got a great podcast. When
you speak uh on the topic of men,
fatherhood, and finance, I think
everybody's got to listen to it. Of
course, you know, New York Times
bestseller, done great work, made
millions, very successful. I even think
at one point you were a major, was it a
majority shareholder or New York Times
or something about New York Times? you
were sitting on the board. But anyways,
incredible, incredible voice for young
men. Professor Scott Galloway, great to
have you on the podcast.
>> Patrick, thanks for the kind words and
I'm glad to be here.
>> Yes. So, a question for you if we can
just get right into it because I I don't
think we have enough voices of men that
are good examples and challenging boys
to become men. And I love seeing the
stuff you say to I have have four kids,
two of them being uh 14y old and 12y
old. And a lot of things you talk about
were aligned when it comes down to men.
But I want to read you three stats and
I'll again get to a question and then
today I want to talk about fatherhood,
boys to men and finance. So seven out of
10 high school validictorians right now
are girls.
>> 20% of men 25 to 34 live with parents up
from 14% a decade ago. And 15% of young
men have zero close friends. Five times
higher than what it was in the 1990s.
How much of a young men struggling today
is them versus the system?
>> That's a thoughtful question. Let me
just pile on with a couple more stats.
62% of men under the age of 30 are not
even trying to date. 42% of men 18 to 24
have never asked a woman out in person.
And the most frightening statistic is
that if you go into a morg and there's
five people who have died by suicide,
four are men.
So, and if any other special interest
group was killing themselves at four
times the rate of the special interest
or the control group, we would weigh in
with programs. And one of the things
that's really hurt this community and
these efforts is there's a lack of
empathy
uh for this group because of what I
think is a fair
accusation or observation and that is
men of my generation have had a
disproportionate amount of advantage.
But we're seem to be holding young men
accountable for my advantage. Anyways,
to your point, is it them or is it
society?
I think it's both. I would say the
majority, it's a complex problem.
There's biology at play here. A a boy's
prefrontal cortex is 18 months behind a
girls. You're going to see, you said you
have two boys and two girls.
>> You're going to have I don't know if
you've already had this moment, but
you're going to have your 15 or 16 year
olds going to have a party and boys and
girls will come over and the boys are
dopes. Uh can't you look look you in the
eye? They look like boys. And then
there'll be two or three 15 or 16 year
old girls who will come who could be the
junior senator from Pennsylvania. I
mean, girls are just maturing faster
than boys. And they're excelling and
good for them. They're ascending. I
think it's wonderful. But the gap
between boys and girls, if a if two
seniors, a boy and a girl in high school
are applying to college, essentially the
the girl who's a senior is competing
against a 10th grade girl. The boy
biologically is 18 months behind
>> the girl. There's economic issues. A lot
of the traditional on-ramps into the
middle class for boys who don't get a
college degree. Do you remember that guy
Patrick in high school who was just
never going to go to college but he
could fix your car
>> and he was going to get a job. Uh there
was there was auto shop, there was metal
shop, there was wood shop, and primarily
was sort of vocational programming such
that men who weren't going to end up at
University of Florida or Carnegie Melon
could still find an on-ramp into kind of
the manufacturing sector. A lot of those
jobs have been offshored, so there's
fewer and fewer sort of on-ramps into
the middle class economically. Also
sociologically, I think if you spend
enough time telling young men that they
are the problem and that they're
predators, they begin to believe you.
And so,
you know, the way out here, the far
right, I would argue, and I'm curious to
get your feedback here, to their credit,
they recognize the problem before
anybody else. They said, "Look, there's
a problem with our young men. They're
struggling. Lack of empathy for them."
But I would argue the solution
was to take was not the right solution
and that was to take non-whites and
women back to the 50s. And I think a a
lot of people on the right have
conflated or incorrectly correlated the
ascent of women with the descent of men.
And I don't think that's true. At the
same time, the far-left hasn't been any
more productive because their advice is
to say, okay, you don't have problems.
You are the problem. And my advice to
you as a young man is to act more like a
woman. That's not helpful either. I went
to the Democratic National Convention. I
know you're a conservative. I'm a
progressive. And I saw a parade of
special interest groups talking about
the very real issues that still face
special interest groups in the United
States. But not one word about the group
that has fallen furthest fastest in
America, and that is young men. So it's
it's a combination of economic,
sociological, biological,
uh political issues that have all
converged to basically rob opportunity.
And then the and the last comment I'll
make on this is that our tax policy has
effectively transferred wealth from
young people to old people. Uh the
average 70-year-old is 72% wealthier
than they were 40 years ago. The average
person under the age of 40 is 24% less
wealthy. Housing and education prices
have skyrocketed. Those are the two
primary means for getting ahead and for
building economic security and finding a
mate. And we've transferred wealth from
young to old. The two biggest tax
deductions, mortgage interest rate and
capital gains, who owns homes and
stocks, people my age, who rents and
makes their money from salary, uh, young
people. So, we've had a just a a series
of kind of moons line up that have
robbed opportunity and dignity and
cultural standing uh from our young
people and especially our young men.
>> Incredible answer. And I want to go a
little bit deeper into it because I want
to I want to see what you're going to be
saying about this because you went into
politics. You said, you know, the
numbers that we saw, young men shifted
18 points towards Trump in four years.
And when you look at these numbers, it's
not like they were sold on Trump. The
article says they felt alienated by
Democrats. But a part of it also, if you
think about, I'm sure you remember the
great the late Charlie Kirk. He played a
very big role in talking about family,
kids, faith. And these 16, 17, 18 year
olds are looking at saying, who would be
my role model? So for you, I think you
are a role model for young men. But if I
was to ask you right now, you know,
Scott, who would you say is a young
liberal role model for young men? Who
would that be?
>> Oh, I don't know. I
I think they're everywhere.
Representative Taler Rico, a man who
appreciates faith and family, but also
what are traditionally seen as
progressive values. I think there's
symbols of mas good masculinity
everywhere. I, you know, weird one,
Christopherson just passed away. Army
captain, road scholar,
a a poet, a great rock star, was known
for being generous,
>> married for 40 years, helicopter pilot,
but more than anything, the roles of
masculinity are next door. It's the guy
who wakes up every morning who didn't
dream of being a mechanic, but every
goddamn day gets up at o dark 100 hours
because he wants to support his family.
And he takes a lot of blows and he just
kind of toils away in relative
anonymity, but is very loyal to his
wife, loyal to his kids, works hard,
tries to stay in good shape, be a good
citizen. You know, I think there's I
think there's I think there's examples
of masculinity everywhere. I think we
lack generally speaking good public role
models across both aisles. But where I
find great examples of masculinity is in
everyday men who are loyal, who uh are
very patriotic, maybe have served and
find themselves trying to serve in the
agency of other people and see their
purpose is raising. You know, you have
four kids. I don't know for you what
happened to me. me. I was very selfish
for most of my life and I finally found
my purpose. My purpose is to raise
loving, patriotic men. But I think
there's examples of masculinity
everywhere. But I I would agree that
there is a dir of what I'll call public
figures that demonstrate an aspirational
form of masculinity.
>> That's interesting when you're saying
that. I guess my question the follow-up
question for this would be uh uh the
eight Jonathan Hyde which I think you
and him are either colleagues or friends
but you know he wrote the book anxious
generation right and I love that book
anywhere I go I recommend every parent
to read that book we were a couple years
ago I don't know when it was when it
came out probably two years ago or so
what what's the timeline yeah two years
ago when it came out exactly March two
years ago when it came out I had
everybody read it and one of the
interviews he did I'm curious to know
your thoughts the interviewers asking
him a question and he's talking about
how much anxiety young girls have,
right? And he asks, he says, "So, which
which philosophies
raise more peaceful kids and which one
raises kids with higher anxiety? Liberal
parents or conservative parents?"
Without hesitation, Scott, he says,
"Conservative parents." And then he
says, "So then why are you a liberal?"
And he says, "Because I'm academia. I
can't change my philosophy." So the
guy's integrity, the way he answered, I
respect the hell out of him. Why do you
think even he says that conservatives
raise more calm, lower anxiety kids than
liberals do?
You know, it's it's it's it's a good
question. I'm not sure I have a good
answer for it. the two primary
drivers according to Jonathan and Gene
Twangi who did breakthrough research on
this and by the way Jonathan's a friend
and a scholar uh he's probably the most
conse consequential scholar in the world
and you know there's entire countries
banning phones in schools because of
Jonathan's work but generally speaking
the two drivers they think of an
increase in anxiety amongst our children
are one some of it is our fault when I
say I mean parents and that what you
call concierge or bulldozer parenting
and that is we use so many sanitary
wipes on their lives that they don't
develop their own immunities and I
struggle with this. I keep wanting to
save my kids from themselves and every
you know I but I know my my more
rational self goes let them fail let
them fall down otherwise they're never
going to learn to pick themselves up.
Now, if you wanted to, if you were
looking for a thesis, you could argue
that maybe progressive parents make too
many excuses for the kids and think
they're loving them and being more
understanding as opposed to being more
kind of traded
much adversity. their parents have
cleared out every obstacle and then they
get there and they get their heart
broken or their first D and they
literally freak out because they haven't
known any failure up until that point.
>> So I guess the argument if you were
trying to bridge it would be maybe more
progressive parents in an effort to do
what they think is right end up
overprotecting their children and not
preparing them for the real world. The
second thing that appears to have driven
anxiety is about the time social went on
mobile about 15 years ago, you saw a
spike in depression and anxiety,
especially among young girls. And the
reality is we are every day up against
this indomitable foe of the deepest
pocketed, most talented organizations in
history that are all trying to do one
thing and that is sequester you from the
most meaningful thing in your life and
that is your relationships. And young
men seem especially susceptible to
believing that they can have a
reasonable faximile of life on a screen
with an algorithm. Why go through the
pecking order of friends when you can
have Discord and Reddit? Why put on a
tie trying to navigate the corporate
world, which is difficult and hard when
you think you can make money trading
crypto or stocks on Coinbase or Robin
Hood? Why on earth would you go through
the pain, perseverance, rejection,
showering, working out, the expense, the
resilience of trying to find a romantic
or a sexual partner when you have life
like porn? So, I think big tech plays a
bigger role than uh progressive versus
conservative parents. But I can see, you
know, if I trust Jonathan, one of the
things I love about Jonathan, I would
consider myself center left. I think
Jonathan doesn't like to talk about
politics, but I would consider him
center right, but he has incredible
fidelity to the data. So, if he says
that in general conservative families
are raising less anxious kids, I'm
inclined to take him at his word.
>> Yeah. And and I think both of you guys
are fair in where you're at. So, I think
that the two voices, center left, center
right, there's at least reason in there
when you're having conversations. When
it's the far left or the far right,
that's when you're going to have some
issues there that kind of pushes
everybody away. But why why does this
topic matter to you so much? I'm curious
because to me being a father matters to
me a lot and I love hearing other men
who you have two boys. I believe you
have two boys. You're married. You got a
family. You know, you're doing your
thing. Why does this topic of being a
great father matter to you so much?
>> [snorts]
>> Well, I mean I So there was a moment
kind of the aha moment for me was a kid
named Alex Karns
in uh fall of 2020 was trading stocks on
Robin Hood sophomore at Oklahoma State
and you know you see this you see this
kid Patrick and you just see your son
and he got an errand email from Robin
Hood saying he was down $60,000 and that
he needed to transfer 60,000. And of
course, it ended up that was an errand
email was a mistake. And he furiously
all night sent emails to customer
service saying, "I don't understand
what's going on because they don't have
humans involved." No one got back to
him. And in the morning, he took his own
life because he left a note saying he
didn't want to indebt his family.
>> Remember this.
>> And I started going down this rabbit
hole of teen suicide and young men. And
just the data was so incredibly stark. I
thought, people aren't talking enough
about this. This isn't
young men. It's clearly it's which is so
clear. We don't have a homeless or an
opiate problem in the US. We have a male
opiate and a male homeless problem.
Three out of four addicts are men. Three
out of four homeless or men.
>> Uh you know you you just men we might
have two to one female tomale college
graduates in the next 5 years. Only
>> when you're walking down the avenue of
America, one in three of the men haven't
had sex in the last year. And you hear
the word sex and your brain fires a
bunch of different ways. that if you
think of sex as a a key to the most
important thing in life and that is an
intimate relationship with a partner, a
lot of men just aren't having access to
that. So, I started going down this
rabbit hole. I was really interested in
it. I reached out to the Karns family
and just on a personal level, I relate
to it because I could have been one of
those guys. I didn't have a lot of
economic or romantic opportunities when
I was a young man and also I was raised
by a single immigrant mother uh who
lived and died a secretary and just
you'll relate to this as a as a dad you
start to see the difference between boys
and girls and also you see boys getting
mixed messages at universities
unfortunately we've created this
zeitgeist of oppressed versus oppressor
and I think it's gotten better because
we realized at universities that it was
it was damaging what we were doing. But
one of the ways we immediately
identified as the shorthand for
oppressor was how white and how male you
were. And I think a lot of young men
have started uh to get confused messages
around mating around their role in
society. So, as a dad, as someone who
worries a lot about their sons, as
someone who likes to think of themselves
as willing to wait in dangerous waters,
as being data driven, and as someone who
quite frankly just relates to young men
who don't have a lot of opportunity at
the moment, it just it just uh was
something I got fascinated with and I'
I've been on sort of this five-year
journey. And what I'll say is that the
dialogue, Patrick, has gotten so much
more productive because when I first
started talking about this, if five
years ago, if you brought up or in any
way advocated for men, I was called
Andrew Tate with an MBA
>> or they're like, "Oh, you're one of
those guys." And there was an immediate
gag reflex, especially from the left,
that, "Oh, this is another guy who's
going to blame women for men's
problems." And I have never done that. I
think we should celebrate our mothers,
our sisters, and our daughters progress.
I think it's amazing. If women hadn't
been gone into the factories in World
War II, we wouldn't have won the wars
quickly. If we hadn't protected women's
rights in the workplace in the ' 60s,
'7s, and ' 80s, we'd be a second rate
economic power to China. We have
benefited enormously from the progress
of women, but it's not a zero- sum game.
We can walk and chew gum at the same
time and recognize that if our young men
don't are flailing, our country and
women aren't going to continue to
flourish. And when I speak to young
women, you know, who wants more
economically and emotionally viable
young men, women. So, we all have a
vested interest in our youth and our
young men. It's not a zero- sum game. We
can we can have empathy for everybody.
>> And I think it's a common sense message,
you know, that that this is, which is
great. But Scott, what was what was your
relationship like with your father
growing up? What was that like?
>> Well, I I'll answer and then I'll put
the question back to you. My dad was
married and divorced four times as far
as we know. My mom was his second
marriage. He started his third marriage
while married to my mom.
>> Wow.
>> You know, not a very sophisticated
person. When they got divorced, he moved
to Ohio. So, he wasn't very involved in
my life. Wasn't a bad father. Never
abused me, but wasn't as generous with
his time and affection with me. Uh, and
also made my life difficult because my
mom and I struggled economically. and he
could have been just a little bit more
generous. He would have made a lot our
lives much easier. So my relationship
with my father was pretty distant. And
then as he got older, a big unlock for
me, Patrick, was I said, "Okay,
instead of having a scorecard and
thinking, okay, he was this good or not
good a father. That's how good or not
good a son I'm going to be." I thought,
"I really enjoy time with my father. I
want to think of what what kind of son
do I want to be? I want to be a loving,
generous son. So that's who I'm going to
be. and I'm not going to put away the
scorec card. And when I did that about
20, 30 years ago, it was a huge unlock
for our relationship. And the learning
and the advice I would give anyone is
instead of keeping score on your
marriage, your friends, you know, ask
yourself, what kind of husband do you
want to be? What kind of member of the
congregation, your church do you want to
be? What kind of business partner do you
want to be? What kind of boss do you
want to be? and just be that man and put
away the scorecard because you'll
naturally inflate your contribution to
the relationship and accidentally
diminish theirs. And if you have a
scorecard, you're always gonna you're
always going to be upset or angry or
feel like you're not getting the better
end of the deal.
>> So what the unlock I got from my father
was just be the person in that
relationship you envision and put away
put away the scorecard. And that was a
huge unlock for me and made my
relationship with my father much more
productive. What was your relationship
like with your father Patrick?
>> You my dad and my parents got a divorce
twice uh to each other. They married
each other and divorce divorce each
other twice. So married sisters born
divorce remarry unborn divorce. So in
Iran I would see my dad once a week. In
Iran the Friday was the Sunday here. So
we had one day off. So I would hang out
my dad on Friday was the best day of the
week for me. When we went to Germany out
of refugee camp, I didn't see my dad for
a year and a half. And I didn't have a
male role model. Then we came to the
States. I would see my dad once every
other week. And then of course I joined
the military. But uh he was my hero
since I was 6 years old. I wanted to be
him. The guy was a cashier at a 99 cent
store. Regular guy, eighth grade,
dropped out to support his parents in
Iran. Came from a very, very loving
family. I mean, these guys have each
other's back. And it was very weird for
him to get a divorce, but they had each
other's back, his side. But, uh, you
know, a part of this, Scott, for me is
like, you know, how you're coming like,
you know, I wish he did this and I wish
this and I wish that. How how much of
him do you see in you now where at what
point maybe you were critical and now
you're like, you know what, he used to
sell and and I learned how to sell, I
think, from him. you know, he used to Is
there anything that you look at now, the
way you raise your voice, that maybe you
picked up from him?
>> Well, okay. So, a couple things. First
off, it sounds like you had a strong
male role model, even though maybe just
logistically wasn't around as much. If
you if you reverse engineer to the
single point of failure when a boy comes
off the tracks,
it it's to one point and that's when he
loses a male role model. When a boy
loses a male role model through divorce,
death, or abandonment, at that moment,
he becomes more likely to be
incarcerated than graduate from college.
And what's interesting is that girls in
single parent homes have similar
outcomes to girls in dual parent homes.
They're a little bit more promiscuous
because they're looking for male
attention in the wrong places, but they
have the same rates of college
attendance and the same income, same
rates of self harm. It ends up that
while being physically stronger, boys
are neurologically and emotionally much
weaker than girls.
>> So, one thing we need to instill into
our society is that the moment there's a
divorce or a death, the community needs
to weigh in and the mother needs to
recognize that boys need men in their
lives. And even just saying that 5 years
ago triggered people, especially on the
left, what? Women can't raise boys. No,
lie to my life, my mother. But boys need
uh men in their lives. As it as it
relates to my dad, the biggest lessons I
took from my dad and around fathering.
Quite frankly, he tried. He he checked
an instinctive box around evolution. And
that is he was a much better father to
me than his father was to him. His
father was alcoholic and actually
abusive of him. My father was never
abusive to me. So he he checked the
primary box. The thing I have taken away
is my father was not physically
affectionate with me. I have gone the
exact opposite way. I kiss my boys. I,
you know, read with them. I I, you know,
I I constantly I hug them. My, my,
unfortunately, my, when my oldest turned
16, he no longer wanted me to let me hug
him. But now he's come back a little
bit. You know, I I try to be just
physically affectionate. I tell my boys
every day, and if I can't get a hold of
him on the phone, I text them that I
love them and I'm proud of them, and I
try and give them a reason why. uh
because I didn't hear that and I realize
how important it is. But on the flip
side, I like you, I make my living
storytelling
and and I make an exceptional living
telling stories, finding data, creating
a narrative arc, and then getting on
podcasts or writing books or getting in
front of a a corporate audience. I do a
lot of speaking gigs and I got that from
my father. It's through no fault of my
own. I practice a lot because when you
teach you get a chance to it's like
being a comedian doing standup you you
get to practice your stuff. I get to
practice my stuff or at least I used to
twice a week in front of 160 kids paying
a lot of money visav tuition. So I had
incredible practice but I think 51% of
it I inherited from my father. My father
could hold a room like no one's
business.
>> Really?
>> Oh yeah. He's fantastic. Uh really
>> he was a great storyteller.
>> Yeah. And he had this Scottish accent.
He was handsome. So that's why he
probably was the reason why he was
married four times and divorced four
times. But there's no reason why you
can't be grateful even if your even if
your parents didn't didn't intentionally
give something to you. You know, I'm
tall. I have broad shoulders and I I'm a
decent storyteller and all of those
things I got from my father. So there's
no reason I can't be grateful for those
things that I'm looking at a picture. I
don't know if you see it or not. This is
your Berkeley graduation. Can he see it,
Rob, or no? Is it shared with him on his
end? Okay. Okay. So, I see a picture of
you 1992
flashback uh Berkeley graduation. Dad in
the background, big smile on his face.
You got your smile with the whole I wish
you could see this here. What a cool
picture this is. You posted it 27 weeks
ago.
>> You know, to me, my father showed up.
I'm at boot camp at South Carolina
>> and they say, "So, but David, who's
going to come and visit you?" I said,
"Nobody. I don't have any family coming.
They live in LA. They don't have the
money to fly."
So, I'm upstairs in a barracks and then
a guy named Wiggins, he says, "Your dad
is here. Come on, Bed David." I said,
"There's no way my dad is. I'm telling
you, your dad is here." I said, "My dad
can't come." I He says, "There's a man
with a sombrero on. He's downstairs.
He's telling everybody he's your dad." I
said, "Dude, you got he's not going to
come." He told me he's not going to come
down. I go downstairs, Scott. My dad
drove 2500 miles. He rented a car. They
didn't ask him how many miles he was
going to put on. He returned the car
$24.99 a day with 5,000 additional
miles. He was at graduation. It was
priceless to see the guy there uh with
me at the military. So, the role is a
very important role. Let me let me ask
you a different question. I saw a stat
the other day about birth rate.
>> We we used to be at 3.57 birth rate in
1950. We're now at 1.58.
And as we got deeper into it, three
times in the history of America, we went
on a run of making four million babies a
year. One time it was 5 years, another
time was seven years, another time was
11 years that we made four million
babies every single year. And I think
the biggest year ever was 4.3 million.
And one of the stats that came up and
I'm curious what you think about this is
in 1950
where the birth rate was a higher birth
rate workforce women and workforce was
35%.
>> Today it's 70%.
How much of an impact do you think that
has made in raising kids of women now
competing with men saying, "I don't know
if I need you. I can go make my own
money. I don't need you. You know, I can
make my own money. I'm an independent
woman. There's no need for me to have a
kid. I don't need to go out there and
make kids." You know, women in 50s used
to have kids at 20 years old. Now it's
28, 30 years old. How much do you think
it's getting women into the workforce
that impacted what we have today?
>> Well, it's complex. So, first off,
I don't think there's any doubt that if
women are in the workforce and
and it's more difficult to or or they're
not as focused or their quoteunquote
purpose, they find purpose somewhere
else other than having children is going
to result in lower birth rates. But I
also don't think that's necessarily a
bad thing. And I think corporations,
the reality is men and women have
largely
equalized their income. Women and men
under the age of 30 in urban areas make
about the same money. Now where you do
see some impairment professionally is
when women decide to have children. Now
the issue is has women's ascent
professionally resulted in lower birth
rates and I think the answer would be
yes but I think some of that is a good
thing in the sense that women have
leveled up economically and are no
longer as dependent upon a man for their
economic independence
>> and so they are demanding more from men
and they are demanding more quite
frankly fewer women just feel trapped.
divorce rates have gone up one because I
think my generation is more selfish and
doesn't see marriage as a commitment but
an enhancement to their life but also
women have more economic freedom and I
do think that you asked before how much
of it is men's problems of society
versus their own problems or their own
issues. I do think men need to level up.
Um, I hate So, just to your question,
there's no doubt about it. Women's entry
into the workforce and their economic
independence has resulted in lower birth
rates, but I think some of that is a
positive. I think that women deciding
that they have other options than just
being tied to somebody and uh
necessarily, you know, I think women
having more freedom around the choices
they make is good and that it's
incumbent upon men. No one has the right
to reproduce. Only 40% of men have
reproduced throughout history. So if
women have more economic independence
and don't feel the same obligation to
reproduce,
I think that's probably a good thing.
And it should be a motivator for young
men to level up. There's a cartoon, and
this is where I sort of I think I
disagree with uh some of Charlie Kirk's
philosophies, and that is there's this
cartoon of a woman in her 30s who never
found romantic love. She pursued a
career. Now she's alone and depressed.
Okay,
>> there's probably some examples of that
of women said, "I was totally focused on
my career. I didn't spend enough time
trying to find a mate and I've missed
out on a family and I'm really bummed
out about it." Let's just be honest. I
think that happens. At the same time,
she when women don't have a
relationship, a romantic relationship,
they tend to pour that additional
relationship energy into their work
>> and into um their friend at work.
>> Yep. When a dude doesn't have a
relationship, he often times pours that
energy into video games, conspiracy
theory, and porn. It ends up that men
need relationships more than women.
Widows are happier after their husband
dies. Widowers are less happy. A woman
in a relationship does live longer. She
lives two years longer, but a man in a
relationship lives four to seven years
longer. It ends up that men need
relationships more than women. And
something I've said that upsets people
on the left and what I tell my boys,
I think men should pay for everything in
the company of women. And people say, my
dad's like, or my dad, my my 18-year-old
was like, "Dad, that's so boomer." I'm
like, "Look,
a woman's fertility window is shorter.
Men benefit more from relationships than
than women. The downside of sex is
greater for her than it is for you. And
if you're on a date, you're in the back
of your mind hoping maybe at some point
you'll have sex." Mhm.
>> So the asymmetry in risk value of the
relationship or fertility window means
that there's asymmetry. And every mammal
has a courtship process.
And when you're dating, you're courting
and you want to demonstrate valor. And
one way you demonstrate valor and
recognize the asymmetry is that you pay
for everything. And if you can't pay for
everything, you don't go out and you
don't go on the date. And I've gotten
pushed back from the left. That's so
boomer. And I've just said to my son
when he says, "Dad, that's not true."
I'm like, just keep in mind any woman
you split the check with is never going
to kiss you. Let me just just say that.
That's just that's just real. [laughter]
So, while I do agree that in the US, if
you look at us demographically, we're
actually not as screwed as many other
nations because of immigrants and
because um there are certain populations
that are having kids. We demographically
look challenged, but not, you know, in
in South Korea, it's like one out of 17
people are going to have a grandkid.
There are some places that are really
demographic Yeah, we keep hearing about
the whole sexless society concept. When
we set out to create a shoe that blends
[music] comfort, function, and luxury,
we had the choice to make it fast. We
had the choice to make it cheap. We
chose neither. Instead, we chose
Tuscano. We chose true Italian
craftsmanship. Each pair touched by 50
[music] skilled hands. We chose
patience, spending two years perfecting
every detail. And we chose the [music]
finest quality at every step.
Introducing the future looks bright
collection. Not rushed, not disposable,
not ordinary, rather intentional,
luxurious, timeless.
So, I think the the the the notion that
women going into the workplace has
resulted in a lot of unhappy women and a
declined birth rates. There's a kernel
of truth there. But I also think women
getting economic independence
has for the most part been a good thing
for them. As somebody who came from a
family where my mom not being
economically independent but being
independent in other words we didn't
have anyone else to rely on
>> was a huge source of stress. So I would
never tell a woman discourage women from
pursuing economic independence. For me,
the big message is that as women ascend,
it's a challenge to men to level up. And
the movement I hate, and I'd love to put
this back to you, Patrick, I hate the
incel movement.
>> And that is there's a group, there's
this movement that says, okay,
>> women aren't interested. Men, 80% of
women want 20% of the men. I give up.
And it's like a badge of honor to say
I'm involuntarily celibate. Well, okay,
I was involuntarily celibate the first
19 years of my life. [laughter]
I I I wanted to be unelibate at high
school, but no one would participate in
my plan.
>> Yeah.
>> And 99% of men for 99% of history have
been involuntarily celibate. There are
few men who wouldn't rather be having
sex right now than whatever it is
they're doing.
>> Yeah. They have issues, but I get it,
>> right? Something.
>> So, I leveled up. I started working out.
I took Accutane. I went to UCLA. I made
friends with girls
>> so that I could learn what women wanted.
They could introduce me to their
friends. And what I coach a lot of young
men, I have something called the rule of
threes. And that is if you work out
three plus times a week, if you work at
least 30 hours a week outside of the
house, and at least three times a month
you're in the company of others in the
agency of something bigger than you,
whether it's church, temple, a
nonprofit, a sports league, you're
immediately in the top 5% of men. What
does that mean? If you are in the top 5%
of young men for long enough, you are
going to be voluntarily incelibate,
which is awesome. So, what I would argue
is that the vast majority of men who
claim they're incelss aren't incelss,
they're ves. They're voluntarily
celibate. And that is it is up to them
to level up. So, while I think there's a
lot of obstacles facing men, they have
more agency than the majority of men
throughout history. Only 40% of men have
reproduced in America. It's now 75%. So
you have more agency than most men
throughout history. So for most men
claiming to be incels, it's like boss,
this is on you. We've all had to level
up and you probably have to level up
more now because women are kind of, you
know, doing it for themselves now. And
that's a wonderful thing,
>> but level up and you will be voluntarily
incelibate.
>> No, I agree. And I think also there's
the the other uh the the Playboy model
which is like look go get what you can
smash them run you know never get
married if you're going to have kids
have a structure in place that you can
have kids with a bunch of different
women. There's also that messaging
that's uh very strong today that the
women all they want is money and if they
they'll leave you for a guy with more
money with better looks with better
this. So screw women. All you want to do
is just take advantage of them. There's
that as well that's becoming very
attractive. I think both of those
arguments, the one on the far left,
which is, hey, feminism, you know, equal
power, we're the same. That's a lie. And
on this side, you know, hey, you know,
screw everybody. You know, the women,
all they want to do is take advantage of
you. That's also a lie. You know,
>> um, you know, I like the rules of three.
I guess maybe let me ask you this
question.
>> U, I know you're an atheist yourself.
You can correct me. I read that you're
an atheist. Maybe you're not. I just
read. Okay. So, how big of a role do you
think faith plays? Because, you know, I
had a guy on a podcast, his name is Dr.
Taylor Marshall, and he's a YouTuber.
He's got a podcast himself. He does very
good. And I said, "How many kids do you
have?" He says, "I have eight." I said,
"You got eight kids?" "Eight kids." He
says, "Yes." I said, "Wow." "How many
marriages?" He says, "No, I've just been
married once." I said, "To the same
woman?" "Yes." I said, "Your wife has
given you eight kids." "Eight kids?"
"Yes." "Wow." "Why?" "We're traditional
Catholics. Go look it up. Nobody has
more kids than traditional Catholics. I
pull it up. It says it was either 3.9 or
4.9, more than Muslims, more than
Mormons, more than anybody else. I was
blown away. The other day, a guy comes
in, one of the lieutenant governors, he
was running for governor himself. So he
comes to his team and one of his
right-hand guys, very successful guy,
Jewish guy in um Miami. And I said, "So,
uh, how many kids do you have?" He says,
"I got 11 kids." So, okay. You know
yours? No. Me and my wife. How old are
you? 46. How long you been married? 20
years. How many twins did you guys have?
None. How many adopted? None. Wait a
minute. Your wife had 11 kids. Yes.
Jewish, traditional Catholic. How much
of a role you think faith plays in us,
you know, kind of getting men and women
to realize they need each other? Kind of
getting this whole concept of women not
competing with men. And also to be able
to increase the birth rate we have now
down to 1.58 to the 2.1 2.2 number.
Uh so first off, Patrick, are you
religious?
>> I am.
>> Um I think that that church attendance
at an all-time low or religious
attendance or attendance of religious
institutions being at an all-time low is
not good for America.
>> And your faith,
>> I won't say I'm jealous or envious, but
I respect it. And I would like at some
point
I I you know when I was younger I
considered myself a scientist and I was
somewhat derisive or disparaging of
people. You know I used to say I don't
have an invisible friend or I believe in
one less God than you. I really do
respect and admire
people
of faith. And I think that young people
I I really I like I said I coach a lot
of young men. I mean go to a church
group and they're like I don't buy into
that stuff. I'm like, "Okay, when you
say that stuff, it's a group of people
getting together that want to be in the
presence of other good people who are,
you know, want to love the poor, want to
shake each other's hand, want to figure
out how to help their community.
Uh, I was exposed to a lot of religious
institutions growing up because my dad
was married four times. So, I went to
temple, I went to church, I went to
Unarian church. And generally speaking,
I benefited from all of it. I generally
I think religion is a bad brand right
now because of some unfortunate
actions uh mostly in the Catholic church
and what gets reported in the news is
basically sometimes people from the
extremist side of religions but I think
we're we're better off for religion and
I I encourage young men to find
community in religious institutions so
what you have in religious institutions
is similar to what you have in in office
work and that is going back to the
mating crisis, right? If you talk to
people who've been married longer than
30 years, 80% of them, four and five,
say one was more much more interested in
the beginning than the other. And it was
almost always the men.
>> Men have millions of sperm. Women have
one egg. So we've been taught for
millions of years that our job is to
spread our seed to the four corners of
the universe. And women are taught to
put up a much finer filter to pick the
strongest, smartest, and fastest seed.
And that's the reason why every
generation is taller and smarter than
the previous generation. Although
Jonathan I would argue we're getting
stupider.
But what men need is a place to
demonstrate a venue to demonstrate
excellence. And when you interview these
couples, you hear stuff like, "Yeah, I
didn't like him, but we went to church
and I loved how nice he was to his
parents. I hung out with him and his
friends and I found out he was a great
dancer and really funny and I started
getting attracted to him. I worked with
him and he was so good at what he did. I
found myself drawn to him. Where do men
demonstrate excellence right now? Most
people are now meeting through online
dating which distilled down to a number
of anodine anodine metrics specifically
your ability height and your ability to
signal wealth. And everyone else gets
shut out and doesn't have an opportunity
to demonstrate excellence. And
traditionally when when people meet met
each other at temple or at the mosque or
at church it was kind of like okay here
are the eight single guys here are the
eight single women and they kind of
paired off based on if you will their
attractiveness weight class but they had
the opportunity to demonstrate
excellence or men need venues to
demonstrate excellence and when they're
not going into work remote work is a
disaster for young men when they're not
going to religious institutions
when they're not connecting through
school because fewer men are going to
college. Where does a man have an
opportunity to demonstrate excellence?
Not only demonstrate excellence, but to
fail and learn and iterate. And if a man
hasn't been in a relationship by the
time he's 30, if he hasn't cohabitated
with a woman or been married, there's a
one in three chance he's going to become
a substance abuser.
So men being in the company of others,
friends, mentors, and potential mates,
and quite frankly, falling flat on our
face, and then getting up and maybe
learning a little bit about how to
approach someone and express romantic
interest while making them feel safe,
developing a sense of humor, developing
a kindness practice, having a plan. You
don't have to be a baller. You don't
have to show up with a Range Rover and a
Panerai, but you have to have a plan.
I'm planning to go to junior college,
then to vocational school. I want to
learn how to install HVAC energy
heaters. This is a great job. You have
to have a plan. Even if you don't stick
to the plan, every young man needs a
plan. You have to demonstrate economic
viability because distinct of what the
Atlantic or the New York Times will tell
you, 75% of women still say economic
viability is central or key to a mate.
It's only 25% of men. Men effectively
don't care. The
>> zero. Yeah.
>> It's that Chris Rock joke that Beyonce
could work at McDonald's and marry
Jay-Z. The opposite is not true.
>> That's right. So, and I've gotten push
back for this, but I say to young men,
you have to have a plan to be
economically viable. And by the way,
part of that plan may be you end up with
someone who's working at Goldman and for
a certain amount of period, you're going
to take more responsibility for the
household. Fine. Maybe maybe you're more
supportive and get out of the way of
your wife who's better at that money
thing than you. But at the outset, you
have to assume that at some point you
need to take economic responsibility for
your household or societyy's going to
judge you harshly. You're going to judge
yourself harshly and you're going to
have a difficult time finding a mate.
See, my my concern isn't for guys like
us, you know, and and I love when you
said in one of your interview, by the
way, I saw a clip yesterday. It could
have been some could have been you. It
says, "Sometimes all women want is a man
that's got a vision, selling a vision.
One day we're going to do this. One day
we're going to be this." They need to
have a man be in a pursuit of a vision
and a dream, whatever that may be. But
going back to it
in regards to this with, you know, uh uh
you know, the idea of faith and all that
stuff, I'm assuming you're a big reader.
>> Uh have you because I was an atheist for
25 years of my life. And for me, I
didn't believe in God. I lived in Iran.
I saw the war. I saw people dying. There
was nothing for me to say if there is
such a loving God, why the hell is he
allowing this stuff to happen? That was
my biggest disconnect. I'm like, listen,
I got kicked out of Bible study. I'm
like, don't even bring me any of this
stuff. So, I was the opposite. I didn't
like going because I didn't believe any
of it. And I thought it was BS for weak
people. And then I read two books. One
was by CS Lewis, Mere Christianity. I
don't know if you've read it or not. If
you've never read it,
>> CS Lewis,
>> CS Lewis wrote a book called Mere
Christianity. And by the way, I don't
know if you're a fan of Anthony Hopkins,
one of my favorite actors of all time.
Anthony Hopkins uh played CS Lewis in a
movie called Shadowlands. I think you
would enjoy watching the movie
Shadowlands. Phenomenal love story. And
what happened to CS Lewis? But Mere
Christianity, great book to read. The
other side, if you're a math guy, I'm
assuming you are because you went to uh
uh Arthur, I think you went to UCLA,
right? You got your MBA in
entrepreneurship and and uh
>> Yeah, I think I like math. Yeah. Yeah.
So if you like math, Case for Christ was
written by an atheist who's a
mathematician. I think those two books
for you consider it. If you're if you
said I' I'd like one day, too. I'd like
to be open to it. I think you would
enjoy those two books because CS Lewis
came from a Oxford professor atheist who
eventually is like I don't know, man. I
think there may be something there. You
may enjoy those two those two books. But
I want to ask you something. So, you
know, I was a, you know, I was like the
teacher. You know, I was a student that
teachers couldn't control. It's like,
"Oh my god, I'm going to do this." I was
always hard charging, moving. I was
selling something. I came to school with
two backpacks and, you know, I'm like,
"Hey, one backpack was books. The other
backpack was hats. I would buy the hats
for 99 cents and sell them for seven
bucks." And I was my my way of making
money when I was 14, 15 years old.
>> By the way, that's so Iranian. That's so
[laughter]
>> Let me just say I've been I've been
getting a ton of [ __ ] because I'm one of
the 10% of Democrats that's supportive
of military action in Iran.
>> I grew up in Los Angeles. Largest
concentration I think of Iranians
outside of Tehran.
>> And my roommate my sophomore year
Iranian. I I've said this before.
Iranians are the only immigrants I have
ever met who are more American than
Americans.
Love education. super into capitalism.
And I say that in a good way. Like
they're they're traders. They they love
making money. They love to have a good
time. I've always thought for me, and
I've been saying this, I have this
vision and it's probably a bit of a
naive vision. I think Iran and America
someday are going to be outstanding
allies.
>> I agree. The Iranians in my life, my
mentor Hamid Mogadam, Bak Baseri, a
friend of mine, Alex Dilei, my roommate
David Ail, more American than Americans.
And I've always thought if that culture,
and I believe it does, still exists in
Tran and everything I've in Iran,
everything I've read about it, it's more
it's more non-seular than people
believe. It's less anti-West than people
believe. I think that the unlock of the
21st century could be an incredible
alliance between Iran and America.
>> And by the way, you know, I watched your
entire interview beginning to end with
Fared Zakari. It was a phenomenal
interview you posted and I heard you say
that there as well as him and it was
interesting to see where both of you
got. It was a phenomenal phenomenal
conversation between the two of you
guys. I watched it this morning. It was
great. But going back to it, you know,
you know what the question is? So, you
know, one of my sons, sports guy, if you
see him, he's like a little Bo Jackson.
He'll play all sports. He plays soccer,
travel, he plays football, basketball,
and straight A student. Just one of
those kids that cannot sit still, right?
But then I look at the, you know,
education system. You almost, you know,
rigged against boys. Boys develop
slower, but school, uh, but start school
at the same age as girls. We kind of
talked about that a little bit at the
20-minute mark. Schools reward sitting
still, following instructions, pleasing
teachers, behavior traits more natural
to girls. Okay. All right. So then when
I'm looking at the stat that my guys
gave to me this morning, I said, "Can
you pull up what percentage of public
school teachers in elementary are
women?" 89%. Okay. Only 11% are men. So,
what do you do when your kid gets in
trouble and it's like, "Hey, go to
detention. You're going to sit there for
one hour every day. You're not going to
go out there and play for one week."
That that may work for a punishment for
a girl, but it may not work out for for
men. And by the way, K through 12, it's
77% women, 23% men, but specifically
public. Elementary, it's 89% women. How
do we fix that? How do we fix, you know,
women teachers understanding young boys
better?
But you've just zeroed in on one of the
problems and that is look the K through2
primary education system in America is
biased against boys.
A boy is twice as likely to be suspended
for the exact same behavior as a girl.
>> That's two kids two kids both cheated on
the chemistry exam. Yep. Exact same
infraction. If it's a boy, he's twice as
likely to be suspended when he leaves
the office. If he's a black boy, he's
five times as likely. And it's
understandable if if you're a a young
woman in teaching, you're naturally
going to champion the people that remind
you of yourself at that age and you're
going to feminize the culture around
you. And so seven of 10 high school
valadictorians.
When they have boys onlyly schools,
within a year of their founding, they
have twice as much recess. Even if you
think about what are the natural
advantages of a boy, a boy has greater
gross motor skills. He's faster and he's
stronger. A girl has greater fine motor
skills, writing and oral skills. What do
we ask kids to do in in primary school?
Push around a pencil and answer and ask
questions.
>> So our education system once we leveled
the playing field and quite frankly it
wasn't level women girls just blew by
boys. So what do we do? I think one we
red shirt and this is my one of my Yodas
here uh Richard Reeves the American
Institute of Boys Men. We red shirt
boys. I think boys start school at the
age of six, girls start at five and
girls will still be ahead
>> wow
>> still be ahead of girls. We need to get
more men involved in K through 12. And
I'm not suggesting affirmative action
where we pay men more than women. What
I'm suggesting is that small small
fixes. Men are more inclined to be
coaches after school, but that's unpaid.
We need to start paying men and women
who stay after school to coach athletic
teams.
>> I like that. So there's, I think, a
series of little tweaks to try and get
more men. My male role models growing up
were coaches. I was a decent athlete. I
became quite close with my baseball
coach. He bought me my uniform. He came
over for dinner a couple times. He was a
nice role model for me. So we need to
get more men involved. Absolutely.
In K through 12.
>> Yeah, that's a that's a very good point
about six and four, right? red shirt him
and keep him and then put him in there.
Uh um I like that. But to me it it's
it's what do you do to get because if I
if my son is being coached, he's never
he's played sports with a lot of
different organizations.
Never once has a coach called and said,
"Hey, we have an issue with your son.
Never, not one time. And he's a very
very feisty, competitive, strong
personality guy." But thank God forbid
they sit him down in school. You get a
complete different side of them. We have
a few minutes left at the end. I want to
focus on the topic of creating wealth.
[snorts] You made a lot of money. And
the part I like about how you made your
money is you started with nothing and
you ended up, you know, getting into
schools that you probably shouldn't have
gotten into, right? You you went into
school with a 2.2 GPA. And I think you
told the story at your TED talks, which
was phenomenal. And you also told the
story how you got into college and how
at first they didn't look at you, but
then you're like, "No, you got to give
me a chance." And you went and sold
yourself on how to get in there and now
created wealth. I saw one of the stories
about you invested into Apple and Amazon
in 2009 and today it's worth $40
million. So, you've made some very good
investments as well. I'm 22. I'm 25. I
want to marry a beautiful girl. I want
to be a stud. I want to be a father, but
I also want to make a lot of money. What
advice can you give me about creating
wealth?
Uh, first off, have an honest
conversation. If you expect to be in the
top 10%, much less the top 1% from an
influence or economic standpoint, you're
going to have to work your ass off. I
just don't know anybody who has attained
a certain level of economic security or
influence who hasn't spent 20 or 30
years doing not nothing but work, but if
if you keep using the word balance in
your objectives,
fine. but move to a less expensive place
and recognize you're probably not going
to be that wealthy. From the age of 25
to 45, I did pretty much nothing but
work. And by the way, my way isn't
necessarily the right way, but if you're
looking to be economically secure, as I
was as a young man, buck up and get
ready to work really, really hard. So,
the first thing is I kind of have an
algorithm for wealth. And that is the
first is focus. Your job in your 20s is
to find something you're good at where
maybe you could be in the top 1% that
you could be great at it. Like your job
isn't to find your passion. My I thought
I was going to be an athlete when I was
in high school and I when I went to UCLA
I found out what real athletes were. So
but I found out I was pretty good with
numbers. I found out I was a good
storyteller. So I went into academia and
I started writing books and I started uh
speaking and I started p you know I
started an analytics company business
intelligence company where I take data
and I tell companies essentially a story
on what their strategy should be. Find
something you're good at and go allin on
it. I hate side hustles. If you have
side hustles that means your main hustle
isn't working. Find something
>> funny. I'm with you on that.
Find something you're good at that you
could be great at. And then if you get
to the top 1% of something within a
decade, the accutrants of being in the
top 1%.
Relevance, economic security,
camaraderie, prestige will make you
passionate about whatever that thing is.
And here's the key thing. Find something
you be in the top 1% that has at least a
90 plus% employment rate.
>> You want to be an actor, a model, design
jewelry, be an athlete, be in sports,
open a nightclub, a restaurant, fine.
But now you got to be in the top 0.1%
because there's an overinvestment of
human capital. The top 10% of tax
lawyers get to fly private and have a
much larger selection set of mates than
they deserve. The top 10% of actors
can't even get health insurance. So be
clear, if you're picking a romance
industry, you got to be in the 0.1% not
the top 10%. So be have a sober
conversation. Find a focus. Then
stoicism. What I mean by stoicism, and
it might be the wrong word, from the age
of 22, you got to start putting 10, 50,
100, then if you can, a,000 bucks a
month aside in lowcost index funds
>> because I was always I was always
waiting for the big hit, a best-selling
book, going allin on things. Someday
I'll sell my company. If I had just I
bought my first bonus from Morgan
Stanley. I went out and bought a $35,000
BMW, hung swim goggles from the rearview
mirror because I thought that would make
me more attractive to women. If I'd
bought a Hyundai for 12,000, [laughter]
23,000 into the market, I think it'd be
worth 1.9 million now. You do not
realize,
take advantage of the fawn the species.
We do not realize how fast time will go.
Like, I mean, literally, Patrick, we
were 22 yesterday.
>> I know
>> it will go like this. Yeah. So, if I
said to you, there's a magic box, and
for every hundred bucks you put in this
magic box, I'm going to give you $4,000
back in an instant, that's called
investing in index funds when you're
young.
>> So, you want to have some stoicism and
find a way, whether it's not having that
Starbucks every day, not taking Uber as
often, whatever it is, find a way to put
10, 50, 100, then a,000 bucks a month
away while you're young. And by the time
you're my age, you're younger than me,
you're going to be set. And it doesn't
matter if you don't have go double
platinum or you ever make a million
bucks as an investment banker. If you
just have that discipline, you'll be
fine.
>> The third thing is diversification.
And that is don't be like me and go
allin on things. I went all in on
things. Technology, my own companies,
and I've been wealthy three times, which
means I've gone broke twice. I went
broke for the first time in 2000. I was
looking at jets in 1999. By 2000 with
the dot bomb implosion, I was broke.
Crawled my way back. 2007, money again.
2008, again, not diversified, all in
tech, wham, broke again. And that was
about the time my son had the poor
judgment to come marching out of my
girlfriend. And it was a hugely insecure
and anxious time for me.
Diversification. And then let time take
over. Put stuff away. Ignore it. Lowcost
index funds. Take 30% of your portfolio
and have some fun and things where you
think you can pick stocks or crypto. And
then you'll figure out a lesson that you
do not know how to pick stocks, that you
can't beat the market. But if you do
those things, focus, stoicism,
diversification, and let time take over,
by the time you're our age, even if you
don't hit it big, you're going to be
economically secure. And that's the key.
Such that you cannot have the economic
anxiety in your life and you can focus
on what really matters, and that is
relationships.
>> I love that. And but when what year did
you work at Morgan Stanley?
>> Oh god, I'm old. I I joined there when I
was 21, right out of UCLA. Uh I was
there. It was my first job, 87 to 89. I
was in the analyst program.
>> So I worked at Morgan Stanley at 21. I'm
the only kid they hired without a
four-year degree. I got my serious 766
3126 life and health. A day before 911
is when I started with Morgan Stanley
Dean Wither in Glendel, a man named Dave
Kirby hired me. I'll never forget that.
And
>> what office?
>> Glendel. Glendel, California. And then
New York Life building. I think it was
eighth or ninth floor.
So you were just smiling and dialing.
>> I was just smiling and dialing is what I
was doing. And then later on I went to
insurance, Transamerican, and then built
my own insurance company from 66 agents
to 60,000 agents in 50 states. And we
sold it to an aggregator where the money
came from Silver Lake and Harvest three
years ago, three and a half years ago.
So
>> you just brought up I wish I had a fifth
thing. It's called the spoon. And what I
mean by the spoon is the following.
99% of people aren't willing to get out
a spoon and eat [ __ ] When you called
people at 21, I bet what 98 99% of you
them didn't want to hear from you.
>> Nothing.
>> Nothing. Yeah.
>> And you develop resilience. And if you
if you are if you want to be really
successful, if you see a guy who's got
real money and a mate that's more
attractive and higher character than him
and doesn't appear to be a genius,
here's what that guy has. He has a
spoon. He's willing he's willing to
endure public failure. He's willing to
call people that don't want to hear from
him. 99% of the public isn't willing to
start calling strangers and say, "Have
you thought about single premium
variable life?"
>> That's right. which you were doing at
the age of most people just don't have
that resilience. I don't know if it's
you played with the wrong toys or the
right toys, but the people who are
really punch above their weight class
all have one thing in common. No. You
know, Patrick and Scott, I can guarantee
you, have heard millions of nos to get
to a couple dozen really important
yeses. And there's no way to short
circuit it to the yes. You got to be
willing to endure the endure the nos.
You got to have the spoon. No question
about I'll tell you a funny story and
then we can wrap up. So I I called I
would call clients. I'm like yes this is
Patrick B David from Morgan Stanley Dean
with her office in Glendel. You know you
have to give the address and where
you're from. Like okay. And then I went
to a couple clients. They're like wait a
minute you said your name is Patrick and
last name is B. I said yes. You don't
look Irish or Jewish. What are you? I
said I'm from Iran. My mom's Armenian
dad's Assyrian. I thought you were Irish
or Jewish. You know listen. So, it it it
it worked in some instances and I had to
learn how to break the ice very quickly,
just like yourself. You got a sense of
humor. Scott, I wish we had a couple
hours together. I know you're in London,
it's tougher for you. Next time you're
in South Florida, I'd love to do a
couple hours with you here in house. I
got I have so many questions to ask you
and we barely uh touched the surface,
but for the hour that we had together,
it was phenomenal. The audience that's
watching this, do yourself a favor. Go
order the book, Notes on Being a Man.
what Scott teaches young men need and
fathers. You need to read it so you can
raise stronger men as well. Scott
Galloway, thank you so much for your
time.
>> Patrick, thank you. And I I just a shout
out or just a recognition that center
left, center right, we're all Americans.
My parents are immigrants. Uh it sounds
like you're an immigrant. Uh we have
more in common than than separates us.
So I really appreciate the opportunity
to come.
>> I agree, brother. Appreciate you. Take
care. Take care, everybody. Bye-bye.
Bye-bye.
When we set out to create a shoe that
[music] blends comfort, function, and
luxury, we had the choice to make it
fast, we had the choice to make it
cheap. We chose neither. Instead, we
chose Tuscano. We chose [music] true
Italian craftsmanship, each pair touched
by 50 skilled hands. We chose [music]
patience, spending two years perfecting
every detail. And we chose the finest
quality at every step. Introducing the
future looks [music] bright collection.
Not rushed, not disposable, not
ordinary, rather intentional, luxurious,
timeless.