Scale Your Impact: Building the Communications Infrastructure Organizations Need to Grow
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
Scaling organizational impact often hinges on building a robust communications infrastructure that can grow alongside operational programs, rather than relying solely on raw data to move audiences. As highlighted by experts from organizations like 1% for the Planet, B Lab, and Bark Media, effective storytelling is essential because it clarifies where funds go and builds trust beyond immediate circles in ways statistics alone cannot achieve. This infrastructure goes beyond simple advertisements or social media posts; it serves as a foundational system comprising four key layers: establishing a core narrative foundation, ensuring internal alignment on mission values, engaging diverse stakeholders like donors and investors, and cultivating thought leadership that provides field-wide insights. By first identifying specific audiences rather than attempting to reach everyone broadly, organizations can create meaningful connections that activate supporters and expand their collective reach without wasting energy on off-topic matters.
To achieve this scalability while managing limited budgets, successful strategies involve creating clear brand guidelines, approved copy templates, and actionable marketing guidance that empower members across a vast network. For instance, 1% for the Planet leveraged its diverse business connections to provide simple, free assets that resulted in significant increases in website traffic and social engagement during campaigns like Earth Month. Similarly, B Lab utilized a "fixed, flexible, free" framework to maintain consistent yet culturally relevant branding as their community tripled over six years, demonstrating that influence is driven by the size of the engaged community rather than just large corporate presence. This approach also addresses critical challenges such as declining trust and misinformation through concepts like "green shouting," which encourages companies to communicate sustainability efforts openly, accurately, and courageously using parameters like tone, abundance, and humility to craft authentic messages.
However, scaling impact requires more than just broadcasting; it demands a strategic focus on specific issues that build authority rather than attempting to address every relevant topic simultaneously. Organizations must prioritize owning expertise in one area, such as B Lab's focus on corporate governance regarding AI usage, while acknowledging imperfections and detailing improvement plans with humility instead of conflating certifications like B Corp or 1% for the Planet with perfection. In an era where Generative AI is disrupting traditional metrics like website visits, the emphasis must shift toward retention, user-generated content, qualitative feedback, and building owned audiences through newsletters to maintain direct connections amidst search engine changes. Furthermore, enterprises should lightly use relevant data points within compelling narratives to establish credibility without being compelled by raw statistics alone, ensuring that their communications remain authentic and avoid becoming mere algorithmic filler or "non-AI slop."
Ultimately, the path forward for capacity-constrained organizations involves a serious investment in understanding who they are reaching and why it matters before building tactics or campaigns. The panel concludes that scaling impact is not merely about expanding output but about fostering relationships within diffuse networks that yield high returns for distributed organizations by securing media placements and deepening long-term connections rather than chasing short-term metrics. By actively communicating their status as certified members using provided resources, companies can expand the influence of these certifications for themselves and the broader community while navigating a landscape where audiences seek trust backed by both data and relatable stories. This holistic approach ensures that communications infrastructure evolves to support genuine growth, enabling organizations to tell clear, consistent, and strategic stories that resonate deeply with their stakeholders and drive lasting change across industries.
Read the full video transcript
Welcome. Thanks for joining. My name is
Tova Lobats, and I'm the COO and
executive director of strategic
partnerships at SOCAP Global.
SOCAP is excited to host this
conversation, as we believe sharing
cross-sector insights is essential to
accelerating global change.
The impact space is at an inflection
point, and the work ahead isn't just
about scaling entrepreneurs and their
solutions. It's about strengthening the
entire ecosystem, the funds, funders,
and builders of businesses and
nonprofits making those solutions
possible.
We work with Bark Media year-round to
share the stories of the SOCAP
community, from our event stages to our
monthly money and meaning podcast. We
brought this webinar together to show
how that kind of storytelling can uplift
solutions and inspire others to build
lasting, meaningful change.
I'd like to introduce our moderator,
Chris Marquis. Chris is a professor at
the University of Cambridge, who has
been researching and teaching social
impact for over 20 years. Two of his
recent books on this topic, Better
Business and The Profiteers, are
essential reading for anyone in the
space. Thanks for leading this
conversation, Chris.
>> Great. Well, thank you so much, Tova.
Now, hopefully folks can hear me. I
actually I could not hear
Tova, but I saw myself appear on the
screen. So,
uh
very much excited to to be here,
and I'm going to be introducing I'm
going to be the moderator, but also
introducing our
uh very esteemed panel. So, first we
have James Stuffed. Uh James is
co-founder of Bark Media, which is a
content marketing agency that serves
impact organizations, foundations, and
nonprofits. It's both a certified B
Corporation and 1% for the Planet
member, an increasingly common
uh dual listing that I see among
organizations.
Uh James has more than 20 years of
experience in national magazines, media
partnership development, and developing
impactful impactful communication
strategies that move people to action.
Next up, we have Kate Williams, who is
CEO of 1% for the Planet, which is a
global environmental nonprofit that
certifies businesses committing 1% of
their annual revenues, underline
revenues there, to environmental
organizations. 1% has been using the
stories of its member organizations to
inspire not only increase participation,
but powerful global impact.
And finally, last but not least, we have
Charlotte Levy,
the global director of marketing
communications for B Lab, the global
nonprofit behind certified B
corporations, a community of businesses
that meet verified social,
environmental, and governance standards.
Charlotte led the creation of B Lab's
recent green shouting guide. Love that
uh name.
Uh which is an impact guide for
companies in our current area of green
hushing.
All right. Uh want to let all our all of
our audience members know they can drop
their questions in the chat,
uh and we'll have a chance to to address
um those particularly towards the end of
the session.
Uh as we as we dive in, want to start
with you uh James first. So, my question
is just sort of a a sort of open
an open question here to begin us.
Uh can we level set a bit? Uh why are we
having this conversation on scaling
impact through communications today? Can
you discuss why this is an an issue
today?
>> Yeah. So, I think a lot of funds,
foundations,
uh mission-driven organizations, um
they're doing extraordinary work, but in
many cases, their communication capacity
um
you know, hasn't scaled along with the
work. So, an organization may have great
uh uh strong programs, strong
investment, strong partnership data,
but if people outside
um
their immediate circle can understand
the work, trust it, remember it, or
explain it, um
the work stays smaller, well, smaller
than it should anyway.
So, this is where communications or
storytelling becomes really important.
So,
data matters, metric matters, um
reporting matters,
um
but the data by itself doesn't really
always move people. So, strong
communications help translate impact
metrics into stories that can actually,
you know, move people or make a
difference. I I An example I'd use is we
worked with an endowment for a large
university.
So,
it was a fundraising program. They're
trying to raise money, they're trying to
do things and touch people, reach
people, do all that stuff. Um but at the
end of the day, in in working with them,
we realized most people didn't actually
even know what that endowment went to,
what did the money actually pay for. So,
when they're giving money to this
endowment, where's it actually go,
what's it actually doing? So, we did a
little research, a little work with
them, and found out, you know, most of
that endowment for the university was
going to, say like, cancer research or
paying tuition to med students, or they
it built a a monarch garden for for
research programs, they're doing things
like that. And so, when you take those
stories and make it relatable to people,
then push that out to the community and
ask for money, it becomes very easy for
someone to say, "I want to give money to
cancer research." and not just "I want
to give money to the, you know, $2
billion uh endowment." So,
you know, the stories help people um
know who's benefiting and and why the
work matters, but you know, I think in
this world, a lot of people for a long
time have just relied on relationships
and reputation, um and word of mouth.
And and while those things are
important, in order for this whole world
to scale,
we have to start reaching out to a
deeper community, a bigger community,
and actually using our communications to
do that.
So, you know,
for for this group, it's you know, it's
it's donors, investors, it's it's
founders,
uh uh
and and they're asking for more clarity,
they're asking for proof,
accountability.
So, the risk really in this whole world
right now isn't to be under marketed. Um
the bigger risk for organizations is is
is limiting its own impact. So, if
you're not going out and reaching out
beyond your circle and trying to build
that, you're missing partnerships,
um
you know, new funders,
activating your group, activating your
your advocates, and and really helping
the field understand what you're what
you're working on. So,
I think this is the whole is good,
especially for people like 1% and B Lab.
Um being that there's a membership group
and who they're working with. So, if
we're not communicating the impact, and
we're not reaching out to all those
people that are part of the membership
group, um we're not learning from each
other, we're not activating things from
each other, we're not like learning how
to build support from one another,
um
and things can can stay small, or or
that impact stay small, and it doesn't
scale along with everything that's going
on. So, I guess I'd say uh bottom line
is if we want to be serious about
scaling impact, um we have to get
serious about
helping people understand the impact, uh
trust it, remember it, and and and and
that will help scale it.
>> Fantastic. I always uh so appreciate
your your wise thoughts. I I'd mentioned
in here I I was having problems with my
audio, but I've sort of resolved that,
so was glad to be able to catch your
always uh wise thoughts, James. I always
appreciate your comments.
Uh so, next really want to actually get
a get a sense from Kate and Charlotte.
Um can you describe a bit your
experiences with communications and uh
scaling impact. Um you know, you both
represent really important uh uh
uh organizations in this broader
ecosystem field. So, maybe Kate, we'll
start with you.
>> Yeah, and I'll just build on um James,
what you were saying about, you know,
getting serious about scaling impact cuz
for us about 10 years ago, we realized
that
to get serious about scaling impact, we
had an important brand role to play,
meaning building the 1% for the Planet
brand would kind of make the whole
system work because we would have the
consumer we would build the consumer
recognition, which would build the
business case, which would build the
business awareness, which would build
the overall value, which would drive
impact. So, we really thought about
like, how do we do this? We're a very
small nonprofit without, you know, any
sizable marketing budget. Um and we
realized we have the, you know, kind of
gold of a great network of businesses
and nonprofit partners. And so, we
really tapped into that network and
it's, you know, thousands of
stakeholders across both of those
groups. We are across 65 different
industries. We're small businesses.
We're multinational businesses. We're in
multiple different geographies. So, you
know, we really had this great asset.
So, our work was to figure out how do we
equip those um
everyone to have a sort of win-win
opportunity to communicate about 1% for
the Planet. So, you know, there's really
nothing very sexy about any of this. It
was pretty brass tacks, like
creating really good clear brand
guidelines, creating approved copy and
templates, um creating marketing
guidance so that in our account
management work with our businesses in
particular, we could, you know, really
guide them about the value and
opportunity for them to be talking about
their 1% as a way that they built their
brands and also building the larger 1%
for the Planet brand. And then we also
excuse me, uh leveraged our own
storytelling and and work to um you
know, really uh build on that. And over
the last decade or so, we've gotten, you
know, increasingly sophisticated, but I
really think this work of
thinking like and operating like a
network and then doing whatever we can
to provide the tools and resources in
really clear actionable ways always with
that win-win uh mindset has been very
helpful.
>> Yeah, plus one to all of the things that
Kate said. So, I mean, the the B Corp
movement's actually celebrating 20 years
this year. So, we've been around for two
decades. And you know, really for the
first decade plus, there was very kind
of um steady growth, but it was like
relatively slow. It was a kind of
manageable uh slope. And in the last 6
years, uh we've kind of tripled uh the
size of the community. We're now over
10,000 companies. Um the number that's
more exciting to me though is that uh
those 10,000 companies represent a
million workers within those businesses
who are now part of this network that
Kate was talking about. So, it's a lot
of people that you can potentially
mobilize. Um our teams around the world
grew as well. So, our own employees in
markets all over the place were um
increasing. And where we sit today is
that we see in the United States
aggregate brand awareness for B Corp is
about 40%. Um it's strongest with
millennials and Gen Z. So, my
expectation is that we'll grow over time
as as those generations continue to um
come into um leadership roles in
business.
Uh
and I think that the
thing that's been really key has been
how do you create a brand that's
consistent, um but also relevant across
different cultures. And so, in this
phase of really global growth where now
our largest markets are outside the US,
um how do you make something that is
recognizable, but feels particular to
the market in which you're operating.
And so, some of that is internal. Um we
have this a kind of framework we
sometimes use of fixed, flexible, and
free. And so, we tell teams, this has to
be the same everywhere. That's like
basic things like brand guidelines,
taglines. Flexible is things where we're
giving you some direction, but you can
adapt it. And free is areas where you
really have a lot of liberty to kind of
adapt and make things relevant. And very
much like Kate said, we really focus on
how do we empower the B Corps, the
companies we certify to help us grow
through campaigns like we have one
that's recurring called B Corp month
every March. We get tens of millions of
free impressions through that campaign.
Um and finally, I think it's also about
how do we make the kind of work we do
continually relevant to the
conversation. So, in the US, we
published op-eds on the governance of
AI. Um in Brazil, during COP, we
published new research on the climate
impact um if every company behaved like
a B Corp, how would that change global
temperatures? Um in Australia, there was
like a really clever ad about fat cats.
Um Google it. It's really fun. Uh kind
of trying to like personify uh our enemy
as this cat lolling around on a board
table. And so, you're continually having
that balance of like, how do you know
what has to be fixed, but how do you
give people the freedom to really
innovate and be relevant?
>> Excellent. Well, thank you. Lot lots of
lots of great points. I'd like to stay
up with you for a bit. Uh Charlotte, you
know, as I mentioned in the
introduction, you you you did this green
shushing guide which I really want to
you know, learn more about and get get
more into. And I think that is so
important now. I mean, I think one of
the reasons why we're having you know,
so many times so much trouble um
engaging on these impact topics is, you
know, the trust is declining. We have,
you know, issues of misinformation. We
have issues with, you know,
you know, media, government, etc. Uh so,
could you
describe a bit the green hushing guide
and what you're recommending for
companies?
>> Yeah. I think it's important when we
talk about macro trust declining and
skepticism, which I think is true, to
differentiate that that's true on the
whole, and yet I'm looking at I just got
the data back from the US brand
awareness study on B Corp trust in
certification, our certification
specifically, but probably others, is
actually rising. So in a low trust
environment, people are looking for
people that they actually can trust.
>> Uh-huh.
>> Um so
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah. I mean so the the green shouting
guide was really um our idea was how do
we
uh empower and embolden um the people
who are doing the work and have the
right to talk about sustainability
because they have already done a lot of
work to earn that. Um make sure they
keep talking. Um so I think I have a
couple of like examples that I can show
that we can pull up. Um and the first is
what what is green shouting? So we we
decided that we needed a word for what
we wanted because we had a word for
everything we didn't want, green
hushing, green washing, and we needed a
word for what we wanted people to do,
which we decided was green shouting. Um
and this is how we defined it. The
practice of communicating sustainability
efforts openly, accurately, and
courageously, grounding claims in
evidence, acknowledging challenges, and
strengthening ultimately a transparent
information ecosystem. So this is about
how what I do for my company to talk
about the efforts I've made actually
also kind of raises the the tide for
everyone in the sector. We genuinely
believe that. Um and if we go to the
next example, what we what we did was
kind of give people a framework of how
do I actually talk about sustainability
confidently in the current landscape?
And so we have these dials. I'm not
going to go through absolutely every
single dial today. You can um scan that
QR code that's on your screen right now
and and download this. But we basically
looked at hundreds of campaigns from
brands that were were shouting um loudly
and also clearly and effectively about
sustainability action, and we came up
with these sort of seven parameters that
we think of as like things you can tune
in order to get your own kind of unique
message that works for you.
Um, and so it's everything from uh tone,
which I'll give you of an example of uh
in just a a second, to abundance, which
we do see a lot of in like clean energy
kind of messaging, the notion that it's
not just that it's um, you know, nice
for the planet, it's also that it's
cheap, it's available in a power outage,
it it feels great um in your home, that
kind of thing, um all the way over to
humility, which I think um a lot of us
in this room really value. How do I
acknowledge where I fell short as well
as where I succeeded. So to bring this
to life, I have a couple examples. The
first one I think is from Tony's, if we
go to the next, it's tone. Um, this is
one I think is really helpful for us who
are deep in the space to remember, which
is that when we talk about
sustainability, it should sound like us.
It should sound like the way our brand
sounds when we talk about anything. Um,
I love this example. They launched this
new product that were like these little
crunchy chocolate candies uh and the
tagline was it takes balls to end
exploitation in chocolate. Um, you know,
their whole thing is about how do you
have a more ethical supply chain, but
you can talk about this in a way that's
quite um plain but also a little bit
cheeky and memorable. Um, if you go to
the next, I love this example too. So
Valentine's Day this year, they placed
these full page personal ads uh in like
major business publications because they
were targeting business leaders
actually. They said they were looking
for long-term lovers, which was that
they were recruiting for people to use
their sustainable supply chain, which is
one of the things that's like really
unique about Tony's and that we love to
see in the space, which is not only do
we build something better for our brand,
but now we're opening up and sharing it
with others and so they have many other
companies who can access their cacao
supply chain, um but But didn't say it
in that jargon, right? They they put it
in the in the frame of like a personal
ad during um the Valentine's Day. I
thought that was super clever example of
tone.
Uh and the second dial I'll talk about
is is disruption, which I think also
is something that sometimes feels maybe
uncomfortable, maybe it feels like too
commercial or like techy uh for for us
in the impact space. But the reality is
that most of us have designed businesses
to disrupt dominant paradigms that are
not working. And how do we lean into the
reality of actually how radical that is?
So, my my last illustration is the next
one.
This is just one. I don't know if people
know the the brand Back Market. I think
they're doing an amazing job. Um uh
another B Corp from the community. This
is just one of many campaigns that
they've run um about planned
obsolescence in tech. Again, like a kind
of boring technical topic um but they
turned it into something that felt like
really undermining kind of the man and a
dominant system that wasn't working.
There were basically millions of um
computers that were going to be bricked
and totally useless. Uh and they said um
the way we're going to respond to this
is we are going to actually change the
operating system on all these computers.
And it's actually like a revolutionary
idea to resist the the effort to make
these computers obsolete. Um so saving
usable machines
uh from landfill. Um I think that
leaning into that notion uh I love this
tagline in the upper left. The computer
we're not supposed to sell you anymore.
Uh it really gets into the sense of like
we are doing something um
radical and exciting. Uh and I I think
we could use a lot more excitement in
our space.
>> Yeah, fantastic. I and really, you know,
one thing I'll take from both those uh
examples, but also something you
mentioned about, you know, um B Lab
itself is that, you know, in these times
where there is a lot of misinformation
and lack of trust that actually you know
organizations have certain like levers
of authenticity that they can they can
pull that actually could cut through
that. So you mentioned certificate that
in this high trust and high distrust
environment you know having a
certification that means something
actually you actually you know receive
much more
you know support and I'd actually like
to ask a follow up for Kate actually
with respect to 1% um
in this in this situation. How have you
seen
you know your communications shift and
in the reception of it
as you know more and misinformation
is out there? Is this something where
having that you know 1% for the planet
label is something that companies can
say you know you know want to draw on
more and and how do you actually
communicate with them on that?
>> Yeah it's a it's a great question and I
think for us the
answer is
essentially not to shift how we're
communicating but to really unders
to really scale the how we're equipping
our members to communicate because they
are hungry for that because I I do think
and I love Charlotte hearing that stat
that the trust in certifications is
strong because I think that you know
really reinforces what anecdotally we
have been experiencing which is
you know a desire to communicate clearly
what they what our companies are doing
um
and
maybe I'll just like dive into sharing a
building on that a little bit of a how
we do that and I love the spirited
examples Charlotte that you shared and I
think we you know we see a lot of that
as well and
we absolutely encourage that because I
think one of the
vibes of 1% for the planet that we found
to be really important is,
you know, super serious rigorous
certification
balanced with,
you know, this is the the life we're
living. This is the world we're living
in. Let's
Let's be inviting and engaging and like
point towards the solution as opposed
to, you know, pointing towards the
problem. And so, you know, to do that
and to sort of build the strategy and
scale to enable us to really bring our
members into that um opportunity to to
communicate that story. We've We've
essentially kind of approached it from
two broad um angles. One is providing
really simple, clear, free, like prepped
assets that they can download and use.
And then the other is providing the
guidelines that enable them to
customize. So, very similar Charlotte to
your three-part framework. So, I have a
few slides on that. If we can um bring
those up, I can just walk through those.
And Earth Month is a great kind of focal
point. And so, I'll just use some
examples from Earth Month to to showcase
kind of both of these. And you know,
again, it's not um it's not rocket
science or um
you know, super exciting. But I think
the results are really effective and
exciting. And that's exactly what you
want. So, on the back end, um you know,
our focus with our amazing team, I will
say like building out a team that has
the kind of combination of skills and
spirit to do this is really really
important. And I'm so grateful to our
team for like having that in spades. Um
but so, Earth Month, um we provided both
assets. And if we can go to the next
slide, I can just share some examples of
how members
took the assets and then used them to be
very much themselves as the the
businesses that they are, but to do it
in a way that was very aligned with the
shared brand so that we were able to
communicate this, you know, pretty big
story at scale. And so these are
just a few examples which you can peruse
and I think this deck will be shared.
And then the next slide showcases
examples
members that did a more used our brand
guidelines, used the value of Earth
Month and that sort of pop to tell very
much their own stories. And I'll just,
you know, hover for a minute on the one
on lookers right, so the far right on
this slide. And that's
our member Goodr. They make sunglasses
sunglasses and they did a campaign that
they started a few years ago maybe in
2020 of around the idea that these
shades are trash, meaning they had
recycled frames. And then they were
super psyched to do a very meta um redux
of that by reusing that campaign these
shades are still trash. And so everyone
had a lot of fun with that, but that's a
you know, an analog Charlotte to I think
what you were saying of it's serious
work to create a way to do recycled
plastic for something that is accepting
a color dye cuz it doesn't work very
well, but it's important to do it. So,
you know, all of that, but to engage um
consumers in a really joyful fun way.
And with all of this just to, you know,
share a few results is this year's
campaign drove a 200% increase in
traffic to our website year-over-year
and a 30% increase in engagement on
socials. And then what was really
interesting to see this year and like
2026 over 2025 is a super interesting
comparison given what we all know has
been going on in the world over this
time, but we additionally saw a 119%
increase in total donations to 1% for
the planet year over year, '26 to '25.
And again, this is the this is the power
of equipping and supporting and
encouraging and being able to articulate
the value to a global network of
thousands of stakeholders in telling a
story that has a shared core, even if
there's a lot of differentiation and we
really encourage our members to
differentiate and I think, you know, our
examples and Charlotte's examples also
show that there's this beautiful
differentiation, but also the common
ground that just has a real pop and I I
it would be very interesting to do some
like trust testing around those
companies that really have that balance
of their individual differentiation, but
then also the um
kind of trusted certification branding
um that we're able to bring to it.
>> So, thank you.
Yeah. The the love love love those
examples. It was great great you know,
great great great to see those um those
slides and I'd like to
in a minute hear a bit from Charlotte
around results like you had presented
and what the feedback has been from the
companies, but before before that
uh James, one of the things I took from
both Charlotte and Kate's uh discussion
is, you know, they're really about in
some ways creating infrastructure for
communication and tools and processes to
help the different members. And given
your purview at at in some ways in a
more sort of umbrella type perspective
across many different types of of of
partners and organizations you have, uh
can you say a bit about communications
infrastructure, maybe how you define the
term and what you're seeing
uh some best practices as far as
different organizations engaging their
supporters, donors, investors, um
whatever.
>> Yeah. So, I guess I would say this is
this is the really unsexy part of all
this. This isn't just the ads, it's not
the website, it's not the newsletter,
it's not reports, it's not social media.
Those things matter,
but but they're outputs. And so the
communication infrastructure
is the system underneath the outputs. So
it's the foundations that help the the
organization communicate clearly,
consistently, and strategically. So it's
it's that
um you know, ecosystem or like holistic
approach to everything. So it's the
narrative, it's the core message, it's
the audience strategy, the channels,
the content rhythm, you know,
measurement.
I think communication infrastructure
or I guess I think of communications
infrastructure in sort of four layers.
So there's the narrative foundation or
really like who are you, what purpose do
you serve,
why does it matter, what are the what
are you trying to change, what are the
challenges you're facing, like
just as important
do you have the stories that reach
different audiences. So it's really
understanding who your audience is,
understanding what you're trying to do,
and then
building a structure around that. Then
the next part of all of that would then
be your internal alignment. So like
are you all telling the same story
internally, right? Do you all have the
same message, the same mission, the same
values, the same everything. So after
whatever it's been 10 years of us doing
this and doing consulting,
often we'll do these workshops where we
help people align on all these things
and you'll get six different employees,
six different stakeholders, board
members, whatever all in the same group,
and you say what's your mission
statement, and I can't even tell you how
many times the mission statement's
different by each person that says it,
and then at the end of all that they
start arguing over what the mission
statement should be, right? So like
before you can start really effectively
communicating with others, you need to
be able to effectively communicate
within. So you you you need to really
like have that internal alignment. And
then once you have that, now you're
getting to the point where you're doing
like stake or stakeholder communication.
So,
this is where your communication starts
to create real relationships. So, for
funds and foundations, it's, you know,
donor updates, investor reports,
board communications, you know, case
studies, impact reports, all that kind
of stuff. But the goal isn't just just
inform people. Um
the goal is to keep people connected to
the work, confident in the work, and
clear on, you know,
how how to engage with you and how to
actually move forward. And then the next
step in all of this is is thought
leadership, which is kind of what what
uh uh
B Lab does so often, but it's it's not
just conveying your own work and what
you're doing, but talking about what's
happening in the field, what's going on,
how to build upon it, and how to convey
that to others in the field so they can
learn, build, grow, do all this stuff
together, right? So,
in the end, the whole point is, if
you're not creating this holistic
structure of how you're coming about it
and how you're talking to people, then
in the end it it ends up feeling
disjointed, and then we say this all the
time on our team, you can't talk to
everybody. If you think you're talking
to everybody, you're actually talking to
no one. So, defining who your audience
is and then engaging with that audience
in particular. Another thing I always
say is, you know, a 16-year-old in a
16-year-old girl in LA
communicates completely different than a
75-year-old woman in Maine, right?
They're not not the same channels,
they're not talking the same, they're
not coming coming from the same place.
So, if you're not coming with your
communications knowing, "Hey, I'm trying
to reach the 75-year-old woman in
Maine,"
but then you're on TikTok and you're
doing dances, you're doing whatever it
is, you're you're not reaching this
person, right? So, coming at it with
that holistic approach, all the unsexy
stuff that's built underneath, then
you're actually reaching your goals, and
then you're putting all the measurements
in place to where you're now
understanding what it is you're doing
and why you're doing it and can look
back and say was our ad campaign
successful or what is our newsletter
successful? Are people opening it up?
Are we getting more donations? Are we
doing whatever you're trying to do?
Um, you can go back and and see if it's
working.
>> Excellent. Yeah, super.
>> No, sorry. That that I think Kate
both of you actually just really
explained all of this so nicely that I
feel like I was just repeating uh
what you both just said.
>> No, I I I didn't sound like repeat to to
me actually but I you know I saw I saw
really some really great case studies
that both B Lab and 1% for the Planet
are doing and really appreciate you know
sort of you putting it together in a bit
more sort of generalizable type fashion.
So thank you. Um,
thank you James. Uh,
Charlotte I mentioned you know after
hearing about some of the in some ways
positive um
I don't know sort of metrics and
outcomes that that Kate shared with. I
was wondering from the B Lab side, you
know, thinking about sort of tracking
and and measuring and using that for
your own internal um, development of
communication programs but also maybe
being transparent externally. Can you
talk a bit about um, you know, in some
way success outcomes and and how you
think about that in designing your
programs?
>> Yeah, definitely. I mean in terms of the
external piece I I was mentioning
earlier some data from um, our brand
awareness study. So we do we do studies
of awareness of B Corp certification.
Um, we also look at awareness of other
certifications and we look at attitudes
towards certifications in general
because all of those add up to be super
relevant to us and all of the companies
in our community and we publish all that
information. Um, so I think the US is
going to be publishing the study for the
US in the next coming weeks. Um,
we recently did a synthesis actually of
like all the studies all around the
world which was really interesting to
look at what's similar, what's
different. Obviously different markets
have different levels of of awareness.
Um, one of the things that was really a
big outcome of that study, well, two.
One is that, as I alluded to earlier,
younger audiences are generally more
aware and more invested in this topic.
Um, and that, I think, is an enormously
positive sign for for the field going
forward.
Um, and the second is that the strongest
predictor we found of awareness was the
size of the community. This touches on
what Kate is saying. Really, there's
this huge network effect that happens
when all of us speak together about
these issues.
Um, and the more companies there are
that are talking about it, the better it
is for the whole field.
Uh, and we found, particularly, we kind
of
uh, did all kinds of fancy regressions
for nerds out there to say like, how do
we disambiguate like which of these
factors is driving this? Cuz there's a
lot of kind of things that could be
explaining it. And you could say that
with certainty that the number of
companies is more important than, for
example, the number of large companies.
It's more important than, for example,
the kind of market penetration. So, the
size of the market relative to the
number of certified companies. There's
really like a sheer numbers effect of
movements. And when we all talk
together, we are much more powerful. So,
that's kind of the external piece.
Internally, in terms of how we manage
our efforts and our team, I mean, I
think that most organizations on this
call will probably identify with the
fact that there are more worthwhile
things one could do than you possibly
can execute on in any given quarter.
Um,
we tend to try to focus on um,
deciding first what actually matters to
our goals before we get distracted by
all the data that's available. I think
that this is a moment in marketing and
communications where because you can get
numbers on so many things, it's very
easy to get distracted by shiny objects
and start chasing the latest metric that
other people think matters. And so, you
have to really start from first
principles. What are we trying to do and
what matters to us? Um, for us, that
tends to be at the focusing on retention
and engagement indicators. things like,
you know, um, um not how many people are
in the email list, but how many people
that open an email are actually
clicking. Um it's more about how much
user-generated content about these
topics is happening um than it is just
about how many people our posts reach or
how many people follow us on a given
social channel.
Um
that tends to be where we look. I think
the really big opportunity challenge
developing thing in this space is really
how GenAI is going to totally upset the
apple cart of all of our measurements,
um including uh social, including earned
media, uh and including all of the
website data. So, it was interesting to
hear you, Kate, talking earlier about
increases in website traffic. Uh I can
tell you like we're not necessarily
seeing increases in website traffic.
True for most businesses right now
because people are just asking Claude.
And they're not ever coming to your
website. They're getting the information
they need without ever going there. And
so, that's going to be a a huge
unprecedented um kind of uh uh
rate change in the way that we measure
success. It's also a huge opportunity.
Like, for example, for our 20th
anniversary, we've done a a campaign to
ask our community for input on the
future of the B Corp movement. We're
able to ask tons of very open-ended
questions because we know we'll be able
to analyze all of that totally
unstructured data in a way that before
it would have been enormously
labor-intensive. So,
pluses and minuses.
>> Yeah, lots of lots of great points. And
you know, the one thing that really
stuck out to me having been sort of
observing and studying the B Corp
movement over all these years, also is
just the importance of momentum really
and sticking to it. And, you know, it is
very easy to get sort of captured by
that shiny thing, but I can remember you
mentioned that I think in your initial
comments that awareness
generally of B Corps is 40-some percent,
obviously even higher among, you know,
in the US. And yeah, you know, when I
did a book which is right over here, my
little marketing
background back back back here in 2020,
I think that
it was around 7% and actually this was
something a lot of B Corps was telling
me that this was a problem. They didn't
think that that actually the word was
getting out as much about what the
movement is, what a B Corp is, why it's
important. And so I think that sounds
like just in a number of years some real
real big progress. Um
you know, this idea of momentum though
also
pre-supposes companies might not have,
you know, where to where to sort of put
those bets, how to get started can be a
challenge too. And this is where I think
some of your expertise, James, may also
come into this. I'm I'm wondering about
questions of getting started um in the
communications program, things that you
want to build up over time, obviously,
and particularly for um like capacity
constrained organizations. What what
your what your recommendations for them?
>> So,
you know, the the simplest way I could
put this would be
um
don't just jump into tactics.
Don't just say I want a newsletter, I
want to build more stories, I want more
content, I want whatever it is, right?
First thing is who is your audience?
Um
what do you need from them? What do they
get from you? Like just define those
basic principles right away. And from
there, that whole system kind of comes
together, right? Again, like I was
saying earlier, like if you're trying to
talk to a 75-year-old woman in Maine,
you start knowing, hey, I I need to
reach out to whatever it is, the local
Maine magazine or something and get in
that. That's how I'm going to
communicate with her. I need to go to
that event and actually talk to her
there. She's not going to be on social
media and she's not going to have a
LinkedIn presence. She doesn't care
about uh generative AI, whatever it is
that's going on, right? This is how
you're going to be talking to her.
Versus if you're trying to reach, you
know, again that uh uh young tech person
that's in the Bay Area or something,
right? Then it makes more sense to have
a big LinkedIn presence or do something.
So,
who you're trying to reach, why you're
trying to reach them, what you're trying
to say to them is like the first thing
I'd say to any organization that gets
missed all the time. They're just like
it's it's like saying I'm starting a
business and what's the purpose of your
business? To make money. Well, then you
you don't you don't have a business,
right? So, what is your communication?
My communication is to reach this person
to ask them this specific thing to make
all those things happen, right? So,
whether it's, you know, donations or or
you know, selling a product, it doesn't
really matter, but you have to get clear
on what you're trying to do and what
your intentions are. Then you get to
build out all the exciting things that,
you know, B Lab and 1% do over the years
that that make people say, "Oh, I know."
cuz it speaks to me, right? That's as as
Bart, we're a we're a what do you call
it? The the B1, right? Where we're a B
Corp and 1%.
You you speak to us and who we are, so
then we listen and we want to know and
we want to learn from you and we want to
do that. So, you both have done a
wonderful job, which is why you're
probably on this uh uh uh this webinar,
but nonetheless, and actually
understanding who your audience is and
then reaching out to that audience who's
who's me and Chris, probably too, I'd
imagine, and then communicating with us.
So, uh uh I'm I mean, you can go down in
a bunch of things with all this, but I
really think if anybody takes anything
from this, it's figure out who your
audience is and what you want from them,
prioritize that audience, prioritize
what you want from that what those
people what they need to know, why did
what's your impact and how is it going
to help for them to know? Then you can
scale all that, create your
infrastructure like we were talking
about earlier, do fun things where you
create social media campaigns, you can
green shout and tell everybody what
you're doing and why your impact's
important, but make sure you know who
you're shouting to, right? Not just
everybody, cuz that doesn't mean
anything. No one hears that. It just
kind of goes away. So, uh uh that's my
my long-winded short answer.
>> Yeah. No, no, thank you. Super super
helpful uh as always. Okay,
we want to remind our our folks that are
that are here on the call. If you have
questions, please put them in comments.
I'm going to ask one final question of
of both Charlotte and Kate and then jump
over to your questions. I saw a couple
in there, but please keep adding them.
We're monitoring them and we'll sort of
pull them out and ask them
at at the very end in our last 10
minutes or so. So So anyway, so I want
to turn to
you know, the two of you Charlotte and
Kate. Maybe we'll start with you
Charlotte and Kate would love your
thoughts on the same question. So in
some ways this is a general
communications tip question, but but in
particular interested in what you've
learned from potential missteps,
things that have paid off versus not.
We talked a bit about data that that you
use, but you know, particularly
vis-a-vis this maybe things that didn't
work out.
You know, type of type of feedback
you've gotten that have really helped,
you know, push push those programs
forward.
So Charlotte Charlotte will start with
you then Kate the same question.
>> Sure. Yeah, I mean I think that one of
the most likely challenges which I
alluded to earlier is that we
need to prioritize what issues we
actually want to speak on.
We you know, a lot of us who work in
this space have a very sophisticated
kind of systemic
understanding of how so many things are
connected.
That's like a wonderful way to develop a
theory of change and understand the
landscape. It also can be challenging
from a communication standpoint if you
think that you are the authority on
everything.
To kind of like own an issue becomes
pretty tough. So for us, we use kind of
our standards for B Corps
and the fundamental ask we make of them
which is that they change the legal
structure of their business to be
accountable to more people than just
their shareholders
Um, to be the North Star for us. I'm
like, okay, therefore what should we
talk about? Um, and that's how we get to
the point of view of saying, okay, there
are lots of consequences to AI, for
example. There are environmental
consequences, there are questions about
the use of people's intellectual
property. There are many issues that one
could talk about and that are relevant
to responsible business.
Um,
but for now, the issue we know that we
have some degree of understanding and
authority on is the question of like,
how should you structure your business
if you are either using or building AI
such that you have the right people
making the right decisions with the
right set of considerations
to make good choices about how you use
this incredibly transformative
technology. So, that's code for
governance, which is not a word I would
ever use in the subject line of a pitch,
but that's our turf. Like, that's the
place where we have the most authority,
the most expertise, the most experience.
Um, and so I think the most common
misstep that I have come across is just
the desire to talk about every issue
that matters um, to you, to your
leadership, to the people in your
organization. It's really tempting to
want to talk about everything because we
feel strongly about it and we feel we
have relevant experience, but we do kind
of need to pick in order to actually
have an impact.
And I think the other, and this is
somewhat particular to being like an
organization that's growing, an
organization that's international,
but figuring out how we can invest in
connection and relationships between the
people in these very diffuse networks
for us always pays off. Um, it is not
easy to get people in a distributed
organization or a distributed movement
together in the same place and yet
literally every single time we do it,
everyone says, that was the best
investment we ever made.
Um, and so it's it's about your
employees, but it's also about your
clients, your customers, your community.
And then part of that is also about the
the that then those people get to have
experiences of talking with peers in the
ecosystem and and learn from that. So,
like relationships are also
infrastructure, I think.
>> Excellent. Thank you, Charlotte. Great.
Kate.
>> Yeah, um I think
translated we've been talking or I've
been talking Charlotte and I have been
talking mostly from the standpoint of
managing networks. So, I'm going to
shift into just like you know, how do
you What are some of the things I've
learned that I think are translatable to
organizations most of which are not
operating as networks. I just want to
like name that. And so, I think one of
the things that is very universal is
that stories
are the currency and they are
everywhere. And so, I think
what's been so important for us and that
I and again, I think this translates to
organizations, entities of all different
types is to build the systems, the
strategy, the internal processes to get
really clear tapping into some of what
you're saying, James, about like how are
you going to surface the right stories
to deliver at the right moment to the
right channel um
and you know, make sure you've got
really good clarity on what's the right
audience and all that whole chain of,
you know, getting it right, right, right
means that there's a lot of things you
don't do. And having the system so that
it's not a lot of like brain energy
every time you're deciding not to do
something.
Um
you know, having the system so you're
like, "Okay, we know our lane." And we
have processes for when
you know, things happen out of the blue
that we need to evaluate. Is that in our
lane? Is that not in our lane? We don't
know. Let's have a conversation about
it. But most of the time you're not
investing all the energy on determining,
you're just telling really good stories
and sourcing really good stories. So, I
think um that's one thing that I I would
really encourage people to think about.
And another thing on stories themselves
is one of the things that we've learned
is
you know, people want to trust
the stories are true, so they want some
data, but they're not compelled by data
in and of itself. So, figuring out how
you again in the you know, terms of
picking the right stories for the right
audience, distributing it through the
right channels,
also understanding for you, your
particular enterprise, you know, what is
what are the data points that are
relevant that you can like lightly use
to kind of pinpoint or sort of pin down
some credibility. And then how do you
surround that with the story that makes
it, you know, something that is
compelling and that does um reach
people. I think really, you know,
working on that is important. And then
um the last thing that I'd add on that
just as the kind of closing the loop is
and Charlotte was touching on this a
little bit too of
really figuring out what data points
help you to understand the ROI of those
efforts cuz that's that is hard and
getting harder. I mean, we had great web
traffic in Earth Month, but overall,
exactly to your point, it's been down
because that's just not as much of a
thing anymore.
Um but so an example of sort of how
we're evolving some of what we're
measuring is that in our PR strategy,
we've um
identified the number of media desk
sides.
Um so these are, you know, conversations
that may or may not result in anything
in the short term. They're
relationship-building conversations.
We've identified that as part of our
strategy this year because that deepens
these relationships for the long term
and helps us to deliver better stories
to the audiences that we want to. Like
back to the first point. So this year
with that focus, we've had some really
awesome uh desk sides with Wired, with
New York Times, with Wall Street
Journal.
It's a long-term
uncertain outcome investment, but it it
aligns with our overall infrastructure
around that storytelling chain.
>> Great. Lots of super helpful thoughts
and ideas there. Thank you. Thank you,
Kate. Great. So, I'm going to turn to
some of the questions we've got from the
audience. Um
in the interest of just
sort of trying to be a little more
concise. So, I apologize. I'm going to
paraphrase them if people don't mind.
So, the first one I'm going to go from
Rita Soni,
who has a really great question about
impact. And people can read it there,
but I'm just going to sort of summarize
it. So, you know,
the B Corp certification is sort of the
gold standard of impact for companies.
But companies still sometimes might get
criticized, challenged for for a variety
of reasons. And as I read this, it's
about how how do you help companies with
their communications,
with their identity and brand to help
really reinforce that, you know, if
you've passed the B Corp certification,
you know, that that actually means
something in regards to the impact of
the company.
>> Yeah. It's a great question. And I think
it springs from like a really common
conflation that people have, which is if
I've earned this certification, then it
must mean that my company is perfect and
will never do anything wrong.
Couldn't be further from the truth.
Like, this is not true.
You know, in fact, our new standards
actually introduced due diligence in a
really particular and prominent way. The
entire point of doing due diligence on
your supply chain is to understand
what's happening that is not good. That
is actually the first step.
And I was at Tony's actually in in the
Netherlands not that long ago, and they
talked about the fact that the entire
founding purpose of the company was to
go
source cacao in places that were more
likely to have forced labor, more likely
to have
children involved in labor
because of the fact that in order to
improve something, you have to go to
where the problem is.
And so I think that's a story that we
have to continually get better at being
able to tell. Tactically, if I'm a
company who's getting attacked for doing
something imperfect,
always a really good tactic is to
acknowledge what you did that was not
perfect and to talk about what you're
going to do in order to get better.
At that moment in time isn't usually the
right time to deflect and start talking
about everything else you did that's
really great.
And so we have to hold this tension of
being able to say, "Listen, these are
all of the criteria we've met. This is
all of the work we have done. And also
it does not mean that everything we do
is in fact perfect. There's a small
company that's a brewery
that's in the green shouting guide
called the Brussels Beer Project.
Really small business. When they publish
their annual report, they call it what
we do good, what we do bad.
And that's the whole format of the
report. They talk about things they've
done that are great and they talk about
things they've done that are not there
yet. So I think the dial in the green
shouting guide that speaks most to this
is humility and I think it's super
essential. And and you get to talk about
both. It's not that you always talk
about what you did wrong, but I I think
that you have to find a way to be able
to hold both of those things.
>> Yeah, and and and and I think could I
just ask I think it's I agree it's a
really great question. Ask Kate you sort
of a version of this because you know,
you have a certification and you have a
brand that companies use. You know, 1%
is
pretty literal. I mean people can sort
of understand it, but but as a third
party viewing the brands you know,
messaging
like helping make sense of why that 1%
is is important.
You know, curious how you help companies
with that.
>> Yeah, it's a it is a really important
question. Um
1% for the Planet, our certification is
we're certifying an activity, an annual
activity that businesses do. And we have
kind of built the system in which that
activity is happening, the business is
implementing that 1% of revenues going
to nonprofits that we have vetted.
Um so what our seal or logo means is
this company has done what they said
they were going to do, which is, you
know, the opposite of greenhushing cuz
uh or greenwashing. Greenwashing is, you
know, saying you're doing stuff that
you're doing more or less of in negative
ways. But 1% for the Planet doing
exactly what you said you were going to
do. And so
what that does for us is we we we try to
make that really clear in our
communications about what 1% is. And we
try to be really clear that the the work
in our theory of change is
that it's not about engaging perfect
companies. In fact, we want to have
companies at all different stages of
their journey using 1% for the Planet as
a step in that journey. And so
um
you know, we can't communicate all of
that information to a consumer at point
of sale, but I think the the surround of
all the stories, of all the like what
we've been talking about thus far,
you know, we're bringing back into focus
why that's so important because we want
to be able to have conveyed
this is not a mark of perfection. This
is not uh um
this is not saying that um this company
has solved for everything. What it is
saying is that they're really good at
doing exactly what they said they were
going to do and they're part of a
community um that is um
that is also doing this and that is, you
know, kind of annually like raising the
bar together. And what we have seen is
that we have very strong purchase
intent, meaning that the logo influences
consumers to purchase and that's at 41%
of uh
surveyed consumers who see the 1% for
the planet logo are influenced to take
the step to purchase that product, which
is enormous. So, I think again it's like
a
can't do it instantly. It's a long-term
surrounding story building into
providing meaning into that logo.
>> Yeah, great. Yeah, very long-term and
it's great throughout the you know that
you're able to actually have all these
measures that you're that you're you're
bringing forward to that actually help
really show show the importance of this.
Uh I'm going to move on to another
question here, which I'm going to
actually direct towards James from Patty
Simonton. Um
A really thoughtful question about AI.
You know, AI obviously
is everywhere now.
Huge role in communication, of course.
You know, there's the term AI slop,
which
we all sort of know about and you can
think about that as it relates to our
conversation. You know, James, one of
the things I took from you is the
importance of being sort of focused,
knowing your audience, but actually if
you just apply AI, maybe that actually
results in much less effective um you
know, sort of targeting that a human
made or might be the the opposite. I'm
not sure, but that's why I'm going to
ask an ask expert like you. Um what sort
of considerations as you think about AI
in communications infrastructure do you
recommend that organizations keep in
mind as they implement these changes? As
you can see here, um the question of
Patty Simonton put.
>> So, I think there's a couple I mean,
there's a ton of things. There's a lot
of unknowns with AI of like how is this
all going to affect things? And
obviously, you know, with Google
changing its search and all this stuff,
nobody's going to websites anymore. All
the all the doomsday stuff that's going
on. But but really what I think it's
highlighted is that
what you've been doing what we've been
pushing all along what B Lab's been
doing all along what 1% been doing all
along becomes more important. So, A,
building your own audience and being
able to communicate with your own
audience is incredibly important. So,
actually having like a newsletter list
that you've built out your own people
that you're talking to is now so much
more important than it's ever been, but
it's always been important, right? And
then also creating content, like real
content that isn't AI slop, now AI is
going to prioritize that and come back
to you and reference your website. So,
it may not going to your website, but
it's referencing your website. You're
now becoming the authority. So, like I
was saying earlier of like you know, you
want internal buy-in, you want
you know, you want your narrative, you
want all of that, but a huge part of
that was thought leadership. If you're
creating high-quality content and then
you're putting it up online, you're now
part of that thought leadership engine
and AI is going to start using your
content as a part of thought leadership,
and it does point back to you. So, how
does this all work? How is it all going
to end in the long long run? I mean, I I
think some of this is an unknown, but
what we've seen, you know, for the 20
years I've been in in in media and in in
marketing is the same things always hold
true.
Tell real stories, tell use real data,
use real information, be authentic, tell
what you're what's going on, build your
actual audience, find out who they are
and talk to them, and the results are
going to be positive. I mean, it's in
Google or whoever is best interest to
make that happen, right? It's not in the
search engine's best interest to make it
to where you get to something that you
don't want.
The AI works, it becomes exciting to
people is if when you type in
what's a certification that works for
me, it leads them to be a lab or 1%,
right? It doesn't want to lead to
something else. So, that's how I'm
taking it right now and we've had
success with that, so I I think that's
important. And I also want to just take
a second to go back to the the first
question is that if you are a 1% or a B
corporation, this is the the that's how
you're scaling your impact, right?
You've made the impact by being a B corp
or 1%, it's now your job as an
organization to then talk about that,
tell people about the fact that you're a
B Corp. These two organizations are
providing wonderful amounts of
resources, tremendous amount of
resources, all the things you need. You
now need to make that a part of your
communications platform. It's sort of
like, I would say how we look at it is
it's not 1%'s job to make sure everyone
knows that we're 1% or what we're doing.
It's our job to take the resources they
give to us to then increase that and
scale that. So, that's like a huge part
of scaling the impact. So, then it
scales your impact, it scales B Lab's
impact, scales 1% impact, and it scales
the community's impact as a whole. So, I
really wanted to say that. So, sorry to
eat up on that, but I just wanted to
throw that
>> No, no, no. That's great. Good. Good.
Glad to get your voice in on that
question, too. Good. So, we are we are
just about out of time. I apologize. I
think we had a question
from Melissa, as well. Apologies,
Melissa, for not getting getting
in there. We're going to be sharing the
the contact information, so you can
certainly reach out or there could be
some other, you know, afterwards
communication on that that topic, which
is certainly very important. But, just
to wrap up,
want to say a couple things. First, you
know, it's been an amazing to be part of
of this discussion with all three of
you. Three people that I've known for a
long time and have tremendous sort of
thought and respect for and really
learned a lot. The couple things that I
took from the discussion,
one is just the importance of being
thoughtful in in some ways being focused
and picking your lane. You know, this
relates to audience, knowing who to
speak to and how, you know, James I keep
thinking of the 75-year-old
woman in Maine you you talked about a
number number of times or someone doing
TikTok. But, also this idea of focus
relates to the audience, too. It's
really important, you know, if you want
to have this trust and authenticity,
actually knowing where to leverage your
assets appropriately makes a lot of
sense. And then finally, just very
quickly, I think this is going to be an
amazing resource for people, just the
number of different items of
infrastructure, tools,
uh processes that were listed. I think
will be tremendously helpful
to the community moving forward. So,
thank you all very, very much. You can
see here we have all of our contact
information. You know, please of course
feel free to reach out to any of us. And
thank you Socap for hosting this. Thank
you Bark for also being part of it. It's
really been a fantastic hour.