Sampling Techniques (An Overview) | Applied Biostatistics | BIO733_Topic067
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
The video provides a comprehensive overview of various sampling methodologies used in applied biostatistics, distinguishing between probability and non-probability strategies. It begins by detailing four primary probability sampling techniques: simple random, systematic, stratified random, and cluster sampling. Simple random sampling is highlighted as the ideal approach for homogeneous populations where every unit shares similar characteristics, offering the distinct advantage of ensuring a high degree of representativeness; however, this method is noted to be time-consuming and tedious. In contrast, systematic sampling is employed when population members are similar on key characteristics, allowing researchers to avoid the need for random number tables after selecting the first unit randomly, though it is acknowledged as being less random than simple random sampling.
Stratified random sampling is introduced as a technique specifically suited for heterogeneous populations with significant diversity, ensuring that all distinct groups or strata are adequately represented within the sample. While this method guarantees strong representativeness across different layers of the population, it shares the drawback of being time-consuming and labor-intensive. Cluster sampling is then discussed as an alternative used when the population consists of units rather than individual elements, making the process easy and convenient to execute. Despite its practicality, cluster sampling faces a potential limitation where members within the selected units may differ significantly from one another, which can decrease the overall effectiveness of the technique compared to other probability methods.
The discussion shifts to non-probability sampling, focusing on convenience sampling as one of the most commonly used approaches in this category. This method is typically utilized when the population is easily accessible, when a sampling frame is unavailable, or during cross-sectional and observational studies where data is collected on the spot, such as observing patients entering hospitals. Although convenience sampling is inexpensive and quick to implement, it carries a significant disadvantage regarding generalizability; researchers must question whether results derived from such a sample can be accurately applied to the broader population. The video emphasizes that using a robust sampling methodology is crucial for guaranteeing good results and ensuring that the selected sample truly represents the target population.
In conclusion, the selection of an appropriate sampling technique depends heavily on the nature of the population and the specific goals of the study. Whether choosing between various probability methods to ensure statistical rigor or opting for non-probability methods due to practical constraints, the ultimate aim is to achieve good generalizability from the sample to the population. The speaker notes that while other types of sampling exist in the literature, they will not be covered in this module. Ultimately, researchers must carefully evaluate the trade-offs between advantages like cost and speed against disadvantages such as bias and lack of representativeness to ensure their study yields valid and reliable conclusions.
Read the full video transcript
We have discussed various types of
sampling methodologies.
In this module, we will be talking about
an overview of all these sampling
methodologies, as well as their
advantages and disadvantages. There are
various type of sampling techniques we
commonly use. It's simple random
sampling, systematic, stratified random,
and cluster sampling, which comes under
the umbrella of probability sampling
strategies. We very often use simple
random sampling when our population is
homogeneous. When each and every unit in
the population shares a similar
characteristics,
the one of the very important advantage
of using simple random sampling is that
it help us to ensure high high degree of
representativeness.
But, the disadvantage comes with this
that it is time-consuming and tedious.
Whereas the systematic sampling is used
when the population members are similar
to one another on few important
characteristics. Systematic sampling
ensures a high degree of
representativeness
and no need to use a table of random
random numbers to select the sample for
to select each and every individual from
the population. But, the first unit
should always be selected using a random
numbers.
But, it has a disadvantage
that it is less random than simple
random sampling. Stratified random
sampling,
unlike simple random sampling, it used
more for heterogeneous population. When
there is a whole lot of diversity in the
population and we want to counter all
these diversity and we want to get the
good representation from each group.
That's why its advantage counts that it
ensures a high degree of
representativeness
of all the strata or layers in the
population. Whereas doing all this
procedure, it is time-consuming as well
as tedious.
Whereas the cluster sampling is used
when the population consists of units
rather than individuals,
which is easy and convenient, but the
drawback is that it's possibly the
member of the units are different from
one another, which decreases the
effectiveness of this technique.
One of the very most commonly used
non-probability sampling is convenient
sampling. It is used when the members of
the population are convenient to sample,
or you really do not have your sampling
frame available to us to you, or you are
doing some kind of a cross-section study
or observational study where you get all
the observations right on the spot or
when people walk into the hospitals.
In those situations, we understand that
convenient sampling is very inexpensive,
and sometimes it's really quick, but one
of the salient disadvantage is that it
always questions that how we are able to
use our results coming from the sample
for the population. One should know this
that if you are using a good sampling
methodology,
it will guarantee that you are going to
get a very good results for your
population.
That's why
to get the good generalizability from
the sample to your population, one need
to make sure that you're using the right
sampling technique as well as your
sample selected is a good representative
sample.
There are few other types
of probability and non-probability
sampling
which are available in the literature,
but we won't cover here. Thank you.