Video summary
In Romans chapter three, the Apostle Paul addresses two distinct sets of rhetorical questions to dismantle objections regarding God's faithfulness and justice. The first set of questions, found in verses one through eight, anticipates potential doubts from Jewish readers who might feel their heritage or adherence to the law renders them useless if they have sinned. Paul clarifies that while being a Jew offers advantages such as receiving God's oracles—comprising not just the Mosaic law but also promises, prophecies, and covenants pointing to the Messiah—it does not exempt anyone from sin. He firmly establishes that God remains true even when humans are liars, quoting Psalm 51 to emphasize that human unbelief cannot negate God's faithfulness or justice.
The core conclusion drawn from this section is the universal truth stated in verse nine: "all have sinned," applying equally to both Jews and Gentiles. Paul argues against the notion that one could sin so that God's righteousness might be highlighted, using the example of Judas Iscariot to illustrate that while God can sovereignly use sinful actions to accomplish His purposes, this does not make the sin itself righteous or excuse the sinner. The lecture explains that God's ability to bring good out of evil does not absolve human responsibility; individuals are still judged based on their deeds, desires, and motives. Consequently, the idea that we should "do evil that good may come" is a dangerous perversion of grace that removes moral accountability and mocks God's holiness.
Following this, Paul presents his key truth in verses twenty to twenty-four: justification and righteousness are received solely through faith in Christ Jesus, not by keeping the law. This leads to the second set of rhetorical questions in verses twenty-seven to thirty-one, where Paul addresses concerns about whether faith voids the law or excludes boasting. He answers that boasting is excluded because salvation is a gift of grace, yet faith does not destroy the law but rather establishes it. The overall structure of the chapter moves from proving universal sinfulness to declaring that no one can be justified by works, ultimately showing that God provides righteousness through faith for both Jews and Gentiles alike, thereby upholding His justice while offering salvation to all who believe.
Read the full video transcript
Good morning everyone.
Praise the Lord. Welcome to class. Uh
thank you online students for joining
us. Welcome to our e-learning students
as well. Uh so today we'll begin
studying chapter
>> chapter
>> chapter three. We just did the
introduction basic introduction. We'll
begin studying chapter three. Okay. So
let's just boss for a word of prayer.
who can lead us. Thank God for the month
of August. We are now in the month of
September. The year is running so fast.
Okay. And yeah, just lead us in praise.
Thank you.
>> Thank you, heavenly father. Lord, thank
you for this wonderful day, beautiful
morning. Lord, thank you for giving this
day to praise your name, to worship your
holy name, Lord. Lord, today we are
going to study your word of God. Lord,
open our hearts, open our minds to
receive a word into our hearts, Lord,
and help us to apply that word in our
hearts, Lord. Lord, I'm submitting each
and every student into your hand. I'm
submitting every session into your
mighty hand. Lord, speak to us, Lord.
Speak to us through your word and I'm
also submitting ma'am into your hand.
Lord, she's teaching to us. Lord, give
the good health to her. But I'm
submitting this prayer into your mighty
hand. In Jesus name I pray.
>> Amen.
>> Thank you. So in chapter 3 I said we
having two sets of rhetorical questions.
Rhetorical questions means what?
Whether answer is very relevant or in
the question itself.
Okay. Where uh Paul is asking the
question and he himself answers. Okay.
So um we see here two set of rhetorical
questions. The first set talks about
God's judgment about the Jews and the
law. Okay. And between is sandwiched
Paul's main conclusion and the key truth
that Paul presents. Okay. So the main
conclusion that he presents is all have
sinned. And the key truth is that
justification and righteousness is
through what? How do you receive
justification and righteousness?
through faith. Yes.
>> Yeah. By grace through faith. So the
first set of rhetorical questions is in
Romans chapter 3 vers 1 to 8. And this
talks about God's faithfulness and
justice. The first set of rhetorical
questions. And Paul anticipates that
when his um when his audience or the
people that he's writing the letter to,
he knows what kind of thoughts or
questions or objections that will come
up in their minds when they read his
letter. Okay? So he's thinking in their
terms because he's a Jew and he's
already raising these questions and he
is already and he is answering it
themselves. He's not asking the
questions for them to answer, but he's
asking the questions and he's going to
answer it for them. Okay. The first set
of qu first question is in verse one.
What advantage then has the
Jew? Okay. And the second question is in
verse three. For what if some did not
believe? Will their unbelief make the
faithfulness of God without effect? and
verse five, but if our righteousness
demonstrates the righteousness of God,
what shall we say? Okay, so three
questions uh there, okay, that he asks.
And then Paul reaches a major conclusion
in verse 9. Look at verse 9. Okay.
Yes. Somebody raise their hand.
>> Ma'am, can just uh spell the scripture?
Romans.
Romans chapter 3 verse 1 question Romans
chapter 3:3 is the second question and
verse five is the third question okay
and then Paul reaches the major
conclusion in verse 9 what is the major
conclusion
>> Jews and Gentiles water
what is the major conclusion he reaches
in verse N
look at verse M. Yes, all have sinned,
both Jews and Gentiles. So he says,
"What then? Are we better than they?"
Not at all. For we have previously
charged both Jews and Greeks that
they're all under sin. Okay. So this is
the main conclusion of Paul's argument
in the first part of Romans. that is
everyone has sinned or everyone is under
sin and both Jews and Gentiles or both
Jews and Greeks alike are guilty before
God. Okay. So Paul then presents his key
truth in verses 20 to 24. So what is the
key truth? He says the key truth in
verses 20 to 24 is we are justified by
faith in Christ and not by keeping the
law. We are justified not by keeping the
law but we are justified by faith in
Christ. And then you see that Paul moves
from all are under sin. Okay. Or all are
guilty of sin or all have sinned and he
moves on to therefore no can no one can
be justified by their works. But God
provides righteousness through faith in
Christ Jesus. So that is what he's
moving from. He's moving from proving
that we have all sinned. Chapters 1 and
two. So now he's telling us all have are
under sin and then he moves on to say
there is no one who can be justified by
works. And then God provides
righteousness through faith in Christ
Jesus. Okay. Now uh we see in verses 27
to 31 the second set of rhetorical
questions. So after presenting
justification by faith, Paul again
anticipates or he he's he knows that his
Jewish audience or the Gentiles will
raise up some questions or have some
objections or some doubts in their
minds. So he's asking these questions.
Verse 27, what is the question he's
asking in verse 27?
>> Where is the boasting then? Verse 29.
What is verse 29?
>> Verse 29. Is he God of the Jews only? Is
he also not the God of the Gentiles?
Verse 31.
>> Yeah. Do we then make void the law
through faith? And Paul answers each
one. He's saying no boasting is excluded
because salvation is by faith. So no one
can boast because of their works or
because of their herit
their you know their lineage they born
into or they're born as Jews or because
they have the law, the oracles, the
prophets, the commandments, you know. Um
and the second one is God is God both of
the Jews and the Gentiles because there
is one God who justifies both by faith.
Okay. And then he says faith does not
destroy the law rather on the contrary
we establish the law. Faith establishes
the law. Verse 31. So the overall
structure in chapter 3 is first set of
rhetorical questions verses 1 to8. Then
he comes to the main conclusion all are
under sin that is in verses 9 to 20. And
then he comes to the key truth
righteousness comes through faith in
Christ Jesus verses 21 to 26. And then
we have the second set of rhetorical
questions versus 27 to 31. Okay. So with
that brief introduction to um chapter 3
let's study chapter 3 in detail. Okay.
So let's begin. Any doubts before that?
Any questions? Any doubts?
>> Uh we study um one and two. Can somebody
read that please?
>> Uh Pastor I just have a doubt.
>> Yes.
>> Uh in verse 31 it says on the contrary
we establish the law.
>> What exactly does that mean? Or will you
come to it later?
>> Yeah. So I'll come to that later. But
then he says in verse 31, he asked the
question, do we make void the law
through faith? That means now we are
justified. Paul is making this argument
and presenting it and saying that we how
are we justified? Not by
the law, not by our works, but we are
justified by faith. Okay? By grace
through faith. So if we are justified by
grace through faith then the Jews will
ask this question. Is the law void?
Okay. Can we make the law void? That
means is the is the law now of no use?
Is it you know empty or meaningless?
What does he say? So he goes on to
answer that question which he raises up
because he knows the Jews will ask that
question. He says no faith does not
destroy the law. That means faith does
not make the law you know useless or
nothing but on the contrary faith
actually establishes the law. Okay, that
means faith actually moves along with
the law. It establishes the law means
yes it it makes good the law. It says
the law is necessary and also faith.
Okay. So that is what he is coming to
but I'll explain that in detail when we
reach verse 31. Is that okay Sonia?
>> Yes. Thank you.
>> Thank you. Okay. So, we'll uh look at
verses 1 and two. Can somebody please
read verses 1 and two please?
>> What advantage then has the Jew or what
is the profit of circumcision much in
every way chiefly because to them were
committed the oracles of God.
>> Okay. So here why is he starting about
um what why is he talking about um
circumcision here?
Why is he talking about circumcision
here?
>> Look at chapter two.
What did we study in chapter 2?
Come on. This is a letter, right? So
this is a continuation,
right? So why is he talking about
circumcision in verse one?
Look at chapter two.
What does he end chapter two with?
>> Circumcision is that of the heart.
>> Yes. Circumcision is not just a ritual
that you do of the flesh, but it's a
circumcision of the heart. That means
he's saying, hey, we just cannot as Jews
hold on to the law and the circumcision.
That's a sign of the covenant and say
that you can be made righteous through
that. No, but it is a circumcision of
the heart. What is the point? If you
have the law, you have the sign of the
covenant which is circumcision, but you
don't keep it. Then what are you doing?
You are good as the Gentiles. Okay? And
the law and the circumcision is of no
use. But the Gentiles who do not have
the law and the sign of the covenant
which is circumcision. But if they
themselves,
you know, uh they themselves are good
and they do things that are right, then
they're circumcised,
it says it's good for them. So he's
talking about circumcision of the heart.
That means transformation of the heart.
He's saying that you know we cannot be
made righteous or justified by law or by
circumcision. So he's continuing the
letter. So verse one he says what
advantage has the Jew or what is the
profit of circumcision. Okay so he
starts off by asking the question which
is obviously a Jew would ask. Okay. So
the the Jew will be thinking all this
time we are saying we are the chosen
people of God. Okay. And through us all
the nations will be blessed. But now
Paul is saying we are all sinners. Okay.
So we are are we of no use right because
we are going to be blessing to the
nations but he's saying we are all
sinners so we are we of no use or is it
useless or unprofitable
being a Jew that is the question will
arise in their minds if the Jews are
reading you know the letter that he's
written for us it is chapter one and
chapter two so they will ask this
question uh so are we useless or
unprofitable or being a Jew. So he asked
the question and he himself answers the
question. What does he say? Verse two,
what is the what is the answer he gives?
>> What is the answer? Is it use
>> with the God's word?
>> Okay.
So is it uh useless being a Jew?
>> No.
>> No. Why?
He says
>> God.
>> Yes. Yeah.
>> Cuz God chosen them very very fast.
>> Okay.
>> Okay. Thank you. What does he say? Of
course not.
Being a Jew has the advantage. What is
the advantage?
Verse two. Look at verse two. What is
the advantage?
>> They committed the
committed to God. What does it say in
verse two? Please read verse two.
What is committed to them?
>> It says that they were
the the oracles or the laws of God were
committed.
>> Yes, they were commit to them were
committed the oracles of God. So Paul is
telling them, hey, you're truly God's
people because God has committed to you
his word. So he's not saying that we,
you know, I'm totally discrediting the
importance of being a Jew. Okay? But
he's saying God has chosen us. Us means
I'm talking about Paul, okay? Paul will
be saying God has chosen us. He has
revealed his laws to us. He has given us
the oracles.
Okay? And so by stating this, he's
answering the question that hey, it is
profitable to be a Jew. Okay? It is an
advantage to being a Jew. Now, is there
a difference between law and oracles or
law and oracles? Are they the same?
What do you think?
Is law and oracles the same? Yes or no?
At least give me one answer. Yes. No.
>> No.
Some of you say yes.
>> Uhhuh.
>> That's what [laughter]
So, okay. What is law? When you say law
here, what is he referring to?
>> Huh? Old testament. What old testament?
>> Commandments.
>> Commandments. Okay. Uh he's referring to
the Torah, the first five books of the
of the Old Testament, Genesis, Exodus,
Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy, and
more specifically in Paul's writing, the
law. often in when Paul mentions a law
uh in Paul's writing he's referring it
to the Mosaic law. Okay, which is what
is a Mosaic law? The commandments, the
statutes, the rituals, the covenant
requirements given to Israel through
Moses. So first five books of the Bible,
Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers,
Deuteronomy. In that what do we find in
those first five books? The laws of God
means what? The commandments of God, the
statutes of God. Okay. All the rituals
means what are the rituals?
Statutes means the law, the decrees, the
orders. What are the rituals?
What rituals did God give them?
Ah, sacrifices. Yes, sacrifices. Kind of
foods they have to eat, right?
um the the days that they have to
special days they have to follow. Okay.
And also the covenants, right? The
covenants that he made to whom?
H what are the covenants that he made to
in Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers,
Deuteronomy?
Huh?
Who are the who did he make the covenant
to? People of Israel. But through whom?
>> Moses. Only Moses.
Abraham.
Okay. Promise and Noah also there was a
covenant that was made. Okay. Anyway, so
the covenant requirements God gave to
Israel through Moses. Okay. So it
includes the moral laws which is the ten
commandments. It includes the ceremonial
laws which includes the sacrifices, the
festivals and the temple regulations
what they had to do in the temple. Okay.
and the civil law that means the laws
governing the Israel as a nation. Okay?
How to treat the slaves, how to treat
visitors, how to treat the Gentiles and
all of those things. Okay? So civil laws
and um among themselves also how to uh
live together. Okay. So we see that you
know all of this is containing of the
law. So in short, the law is basically
the revealed commandments of God to
Israel, showing his people holiness and
you know how to live a holy life and
also the need for a savior. So all of
these laws, rituals, sacrifices, temple
regulations, everything was pointing to
Jesus. Now what is oracles? Now oracles
the Greek word is loia means sayings
utterances or messages of God. Okay. So
oracles are basically the things spoken
by God, utterances of God, messages of
God and sayings of God. And so Paul says
the Jews were entrusted with the oracles
of God which refers more broadly to the
whole revelation of God entrusted to
Israel. whole revelation does not just
include the laws but also the promises
the covenant promises the prophecies and
the scriptures pointing to the Messiah.
So all of this contains the oracles. The
oracles contains the promises, the
covenants, the prophecies and the
scriptures pointing to the Messiah. So
it basically oracles includes the entire
Old Testament revelation that God gave
Israel for the world. So in short the
oracles basically means the words and
revelations of God. That means his
prophecies, the promises, the scriptures
that are pointing to the Messiah. Okay?
And it's not just limited to the Mosaic
law, the law that God gave Moses. Okay?
So the difference is that law basically
is God's commands what to do what not to
do. Oracles is basically God's
revelations. That means the words that
he spoke the promises the prophecies and
the scriptures um you know uh containing
the covenant promises the promises and
the uh coming of the Messiah. Okay. Is
that fine?
Okay. The next question. Yes. SJ
>> no ma'am just it got dash sorry
>> okay so let's move on any questions
versus one and two
okay there no questions let's move on to
verses 3 and four
verses 3 and four. Can somebody read
that please
>> for what? If some did not believe will
their unbelief make the faithfulness of
God without effect. Verse four,
certainly not. Indeed, let God be true,
but every man a liar. As it is written,
that you may be justified in your words
and may overcome when you are judged.
>> Amen. So vers was vers three says if we
do not believe how does it affect all of
this. Okay. So the next question what if
some did not believe? So he says if you
do not believe the law will not change
anything about God. Okay. So Paul says
even if you don't believe it does not
change who God is because God is still
faithful. Okay. And verse four, he says,
"Let God be true, but every man a liar."
So, somebody not receiving the word or
somebody not believing the word does not
change who God is. Paul is saying God is
still faithful. God is still true. So,
the answer is quite obvious, but for the
sake of his audience, you know, Paul is
asking these questions and then he is
answering. Okay? And then Paul quotes a
portion from David's prayer um of when
he sinned and you know he repents and uh
so he he's um you know quoting his u
David's prayer uh taken from Psalm 51:4
where he says against you you only I
have sinned and that what is evil in
your sight that you may be found just
when you speak and blameless when you
judge. So this is quoted once again here
by Paul. Why is he quoting it here? To
reiterate the fact that our unbelief
does not do away with the truth that we
have sinned against God. And God is
still just and blameless when he judges
us for our sin. Okay. So that way he
answers the second question. Now let's
move on to verses 5 to 7. So can
somebody read verses 5 to 7 please?
But if our unrighteousness
de demonstrate the righteousness of God,
what shall we say? Is God unjust who
inflicts wrath?
I speak as a man. Uh certainly not for
them. How will God judge the word word?
For if the truth of God has increased
through my lies uh lie to his glory, why
am I also still judge judged as as a
sinner?
>> Okay, so what is he trying to say here?
Okay, what is the argument here? So Paul
is thinking like a Jew and he's saying a
Jew might think or reason like this. So
Jew might think if my sin actually
demonstrates God's righteousness or a
Jew is thinking if when I sin it
actually shows how righteous God is then
why should God judge me for my sin
because only when I sin God is shown as
righteous and just and truthful then if
God is being glorified if God is being
highlighted through my sin then Why
should God judge me for my sin? Okay. So
let's understand the reasoning behind
this objection. Okay. So it is when I do
something wrong. Okay. My right
unrighteousness provides a contrast that
makes God righteousness more obvious. So
Jew must be thinking when I sin I become
unrighteous. But it is who's who's being
shown as righteous?
Who's being shown as righteous then?
>> God.
>> God. Yes. God is shown as righteous. And
it becomes more obvious that he is
righteous and I am unrighteous.
Unrighteous. So my sin makes God's
holiness and righteousness stands out.
So that is what a Jew might be thinking.
Hey, when I sin, it makes God more shows
God more holy and righteous or
highlights him as more holy and
righteous and he stands out. So, for
example, if I lie, my lie provides a
contrast to God's truthfulness, right?
It shows that God is truth and I am a
liar because there is a standard. There
is truth and there is lie. So I am lying
and it it is it is uh in in contrast
it's showing that God is truthful. So
God is true when I am a liar. So in that
sense my lie highlights the fact that
God is truthful. Okay. So the person
might argue okay that is what he's
saying. If my sin
uh you know makes God's righteousness
and truthfulness more evident and this
ultimately brings glory to God then why
is God judging me for the very thing
that makes him look good. Okay. So if my
sin is making God look righteous and
fruitful and good then why is God
judging me? Because my sin is ultimately
bringing glory to God. Okay, that that
is the argument Paul is addressing here.
So Paul gives us an example of this
reasoning in verse 7. So he says the
objection could be expressed in this
way. If the truth of God is increased
through my lie
and my lie ultimately brings glory to
God, why am I still being judged as a
sinner? In other words, if God can use
my sin to display his glory, right? Then
why should I be punished for that sin?
All of you are able to understand? Yes.
No.
Okay. So,
if you are
a sinner, right, then there should be
somebody who is not a sinner. If you are
unrighteous
then there is a standard that is how can
somebody prove you are unrighteous only
if there is somebody who is righteous.
So a Jew might be saying hey if I sin
God is being shown as righteous. Why?
Because he judges the sin and I am
unrighteous and he is righteous. There
is a standard right and I am being you
know um I am being shown as unrighteous.
That means it highlights God as
righteous. When I lie, it highlights God
as being truthful because he's somebody
who judges sin. So he's a, you know,
he's just, he's righteous. So if my sin
is bringing glory to God, that means
he's showing him as righteous and
truthful and honest and holy, then why
should God punish me? Actually my sin is
helping him
to be glorified. Right? So that is the
argument that a Jew can think or
something that they can reason or object
to. Okay. So Paul answer is very clear.
What does he say in verse six?
What does he answer? Certainly not.
Okay. Certainly not. That means God's
ability to use something sinful for his
purpose does not make the sinful action
right. Okay. God can use our sin yes to
you know glorify him but uh you fulfill
his purpose but that does not make the
sinful action right. Okay. Now in your
notes you have uh an example that is
given of Judas Escariat. Okay. Now
Judas's Scariot. You know who's Judas's
Scariot, right? Okay. He may he could
have made this his argument like this.
Lord, if I had not betrayed Jesus, Jesus
would never have been crucified. People
would not have been saved. So why are
you judging me for betraying
Jesus Christ? I know that I betrayed
Jesus, but you used it for
for his glory, for good. In fact, if I
hadn't done what I did, Jesus was be
Judas is saying this, okay? If I in
fact, if I hadn't done what I did, Jesus
would not have gone to the cross at all.
People would not be saved. So what I did
even fulfill the
scriptures then how can you judge me for
what I have done or how can you judge me
at all. Okay. So that illustrates the
kind of reasoning that Paul is
confronting here or that people will
have in their minds. But we must
understand the error in that kind of a
reasoning or argument. The fact that God
can bring good out of evil does not make
evil good. God can bring some good out
of the evil. But that does not mean that
God can make evil good. Okay? God may
sovereignly use even sinful actions to
accomplish his purpose. But the person
who commits the sin is still responsible
for his or her sin because that is their
choice. God can bring out something good
from their sin but does not justify them
and the person who commits a sin is
still responsible for that sin. So the
key point here is Paul is not saying
that our sin actually makes God more
righteous. Okay? And he's telling a Jew,
hey, our sin doesn't make God more
righteous. Rather, he's responding to
the argument that if God receives glory
when his righteousness is contrasted
with our righteousness, then perhaps God
has no right to judge sin. That is what
they are saying. Okay. If God is shown
as righteous because of our
unrighteousness or God is glorified
because of our sin, then God has no
right to judge our sin. So that is the
argument he is confronting here. So Paul
completely rejects that kind of
reasoning or argument. And if that
argument were true, what would have
happened? God could not judge the world
at all. Yes or no? Because every sin is
going to glorify him and bring our
righteousness. And God could not judge
the world at all. And that is Paul's
point in verse six. He says, "For then
how will God judge the world?" Okay. So,
God's judgment is righteous because he
judges sin according to his
righteousness. Okay. God's judgment is
righteous because he judges sin
according to his righteousness
regardless of the fact that he can use
even human sin to accomplish his
purpose. So, the argument is my sin
brought glory to God. My sin means a Jew
saying my sin brought glory to God.
Therefore, God should not judge me is
completely incorrect and false. So the
principle we need to understand here is
God's ability to use our sin for his
purpose does not excuse our sin. Okay?
Doesn't mean God uses all of our sin to
accomplish his purpose. Even without our
sinning, he can still accomplish his
purpose. But God's ability to use our
sin for his purpose does not excuse our
sin. God remains righteous and human
beings remain accountable for their
actions. So this prepares us for Paul's
larger conclusion in verse 9. He says,
"Are we better than they? Not at all.
For we have previously charged both Jews
and Greeks that they're all under sin."
So he's saying the Jews cannot escape
God's judgment simply by arguing that
God can use their sin to display his
righteousness. You cannot use that
argument and say that you cannot be you
will not be judged. Okay? God is
righteous. We are responsible for our
sin and God's grace does not turn sin
into righteousness.
Okay? So that is what we need to
understand. And then look at verse
eight. Can somebody read verse eight
please?
Verse eight.
>> Join not say as some slanderously claim
that we say let us do evil that good may
result. Their condemnation is just.
Amen.
>> Amen. Thank you. So why not say let us
do evil that good may come as we are
slanderously reported and as and and as
some affirm that we say their
condemnation is judged just okay so
verse eight some people are falsely
accusing Paul that he's teaching people
no let us do evil that good may come or
god may be glorified so they saying that
Paul is actually teaching these kind of
things that we can do evil that good may
come or God can be glorified. So Paul in
those days had to deal with the false
reports about him and his ministry. So
Paul here is basically opening up and
he's teaching them the right uh thing
and in the right context. Okay. So Paul
is responding to their objections and
you know uh the uh the the false things
that they're bringing about his
teachings. And here in Romans chapter 3
he has just explained that human sin you
know um uh highlights God's
righteousness. When people are
unfaithful God remains faithful. But
some have twisted this to mean that if
our sin makes God looks good, then isn't
that sin actually helping his plan? And
shouldn't we just keep on sinning since
our evil makes God's goodness shine
brighter? Okay, so that is what is what
people are saying that Paul is teaching
that our sin makes God look good. Then
isn't sin actually helping God in his
plan and his purpose? And shouldn't we
just keep on sinning since our evil
makes God's goodness shine brighter?
Okay, so Paul is saying this is actually
a perversion of God's grace or deviation
from God's grace or it's turning God's
truth into an excuse for sin. And that
is why Paul says there is condemn their
condemnation is just okay. So their
condemnation is just means that God
condemning them for their thoughts and
their way that you know they're thinking
and living is just what he's doing is
right. So Paul declares that those who
argue this way deserve condemnation.
Why? Because they have misinterpreted
the gospel. Paul never thought that we
should sin so God's grace may abound.
But he addresses this more directly in
verses 1 and two where he says, "Shall
we continue to sin that grace may
abound?" And what does he say?
Certainly not. We cannot keep on sinning
so that grace may abound. So those who
accuse him of this twist of his words,
you know, are just perverting the truth.
The second thing why he says they
deserve condemnation is because they
treat sin as a tool instead of rebelling
against sin. Okay. So to deliberately
choose evil
that thinking God will somehow you know
use it for good is to mock God's
holiness and it is willful rejection of
his righteousness. Okay. And the third
thing why he says they should be
condemned is it removes moral
accountability. That means people claim
evil brings good. That is what is
written there. Right? If you look at
verse 8, he says um you know let us do
evil that good may come. Okay. So when
people claim evil brings good then no
sin could ever be condemned. Yes or no?
Yes. Since everything could be excused
as we are helping God fulfill his plan
and purpose or we are helping God be
glorified or we are helping God to be
shown as more righteous and more holy.
So this is actually dangerous and it is
undermining God's judge uh justice. And
the fourth thing why he says they need
to be condemned it's it's a heart issue
that those who say such things reveal
that they do not love God or
righteousness right they're looking for
ways that they keep on sinning and their
sin can be justified or covered you know
and he says for such hearts judgment is
right and deserved okay so Paul's uh
response
uh to That is in verse six. Does God
want us to do evil so that he can look
good?
No. God does not want us to speak lies
so that he can look good as a God of
truth. And God does not want us to
commit unrighteousness so that his
righteousness can be shown. Okay. So
that is why he says this answer this
question. Is God unjust who inflicts
wroth? I speak as a man. Verse six,
certainly not. For then how will God
judge the world? So God is not unjust.
He's not an unjust God. He's not, you
know, going to judge. He's going to
judge the world and he's judging our
deeds. So what do you think God's
response would be to Judas, which we
just now read, right? What would you
think God's response would be to Judas?
It's your responsibility that you need
to be away from sin.
>> Okay?
>> God can still accomplish. Okay? God will
tell Judas, "Yes, you know, um, God used
your wickedness, but it was still your
wickedness, right? There was no good or
pure motive in your heart at all." Okay?
So it is no credit to you that you
brought good out of evil. You stand
guilty before God. Right? So Judas will
be judged on three counts. What are the
three counts? His deeds,
his desires, and his motives. Okay? So
on all three counts, he will be judged.
He judged on his deeds, his desires and
motives. Okay?
uh and his deeds was an act of betrayal
of his friend, of his master and his
teacher. What was his desire to do this?
Yeah. 30 pieces of silver. And what was
his motive?
>> What was the motive?
>> Become rich.
>> Huh?
>> Become rich.
>> To become rich. Okay.
Yes. His motive was to please the chief
priest rather than staying faithful to
his master and his teacher who had
trained him the last three years. So
even though God brings out something
good out of the wrong as in Judas's
case, God's purpose was carried out yet
he judges Judas's sin. The same way we
will also be judged on these three
counts. What are these three counts or
three things? Our deeds,
>> desires, and our motives. So God is not
going to overlook the wrong we have done
because he brought out something good
out of the wrong we did. Okay. So the
apostle Paul does not take time to hear
respond to his slander and false report
about himself, but he simply states
their condemnation is just. That means
what? He essentially leaves it to God to
handle such people knowing that God will
judge righteously. Okay. So this is
something that important lesson that we
can learn on how to deal with people who
slander, who speak evil and falsely
accuse you in the ministry. You know,
let God deal with them. You don't deal
with them. Let God deal with them, you
know, because he's a righteous judge.
Okay,
before we move on to verse 9, any
questions?
You understand the whole thing about
you know uh our unrighteousness making
God righteous being glorified? Yes. Any
questions? Any doubts?
>> Ma'am, uh I have a question.
>> Yes.
>> Yeah. when uh uh Paul and Silas were
there in the prison
uh when they've been uh uh taken out
there was a uh uh uh religion of uh
soldiers who died who have been killed
for their sake.
>> Okay.
>> So how God is going to judge them?
>> How God is going to judge them?
Judge whom?
>> Judge the soldiers because soldiers who
died?
>> Yes.
>> That
judgment is death, right?
>> Yes.
>> But after death, we have the judgment.
>> Oh. Oh. That ways.
So we know what happens to those who do
not believe,
right? We know what happens to those who
do not believe. What happens to those
who do not believe? There's eternal
death,
eternal condemnation for those who do
not believe.
Do you have a doubt about that?
SJ.
>> No, ma'am.
>> Okay.
Okay. There's eternal death or there is
eternal life. One of the two. Yes. You
choose. Believe in Jesus. Eternal life.
You don't believe eternal death.
Okay. Why you looking so lost and
puzzled, Sukkesh? Huh? Okay. Any other
questions?
Okay, no questions all of you. I hope
you understand verses one to eight. Yes.
Huh?
>> So, uh, Sri Raj he said right ma'am that
soldier died and how they are judgment
and and you said that uh maybe it can
have they can have eternal life or
>> what maybe?
>> Oh yes. Ah when you choose even Jesus I
said eternal death if you choose Jesus
you have eternal life if you don't
eternal death
>> if
[laughter]
question didn't come properly
>> a soldier kills people huh take the mic
uh Rajuh
>> quickly quickly
If if soldier kill people so it will be
how it will be counted like
>> kill a Christian
>> a policeman is a Christian
>> so what do
>> he encounters
>> yes Yes,
>> a military man is a believer. Okay,
please take the mic and you have are all
my students also need to hear
>> and he's in a war and he shoots
>> and he kills people.
>> Uh what is uh what happens? Okay. When
when it comes to police people and their
encounter, they don't have to shoot them
down there. They always try shooting
them on their their legs, their feet.
>> It's not that like that. Okay.
But you try at the mo you tryh
you try your best not to kill the
person. You shoot at their legs so that
they don't run.
That's it. But when it comes to milry,
the person is dead.
>> The person is dead. God will judge them
separately. I don't know how.
>> Yes,
>> that's a question.
>> He's a criminal
>> or a terrorist and a military uh trying
to protect
judge,
>> how will we judge? I think God has uh
his own way of judging them,
seeing their
um seeing their situation.
Yes.
So for example, even you know,
I don't know if I give should give that
example, but let's just leave it.
Somebody's protecting their own life,
right? And accidentally in that whole
thing they they they do something to
protect their own life. And the person
the the person who's trying to you know
um uh
to to harm them sorry the person is
trying to harm them you know and uh the
person is trying to defend themselves
but ultimately kills the person who's
trying to harm them. I'm sure God sees
he understands. So we'll be judged on
three things. Our deeds, desires, and
our motives. Why we did what we did,
right? So God knows that. He knows. He
judges the desires and our motives. Our
desire is as a so policeman, military
man, just shoot down everybody. God
knows. So the the the motive is to save
somebody and protect somebody. God
knows. So those three three things he
will judge on deeds, desires and
motives. So we'll come back after the
break and continue. Thank you.
>> Excuse me madam.
>> Yes. Yes.
>> Yes. It's just a clarification from what
Siraj was asking.
>> Okay. They