Video summary
This webinar features Joe Bruno, an Instructional Supervisor of Career and Technical Education (CTE) at Glenbrook North High School, who presents findings from his dissertation on student motivation regarding CTE course selection. Utilizing Social Cognitive Theory and Social Cognitive Career Theory, the research explores how self-efficacy, expected outcomes, personal goals, and social influences drive students' choices. The study involved focus groups with 24 junior and senior "concentrators" at a suburban Midwestern school that boasts a significantly better student-to-counselor ratio than the state average. The analysis identified ten key themes explaining course selection, which were grouped into three primary areas: self-efficacy and course design, social influences, and expected outcomes alongside personal goals.
Students consistently reported higher confidence in CTE courses compared to core classes due to hands-on, project-based learning that fosters a sense of community and safety. This confidence is built through applied skill competence, early successes that encourage persistence, and interest-driven engagement where students exert more effort in content they care about. Social factors played a decisive role, with family emerging as the most influential factor for approximately 80% of students, followed by friends and peers who provide vicarious experiences through their own success or recommendations. Teachers ranked third due to their relationships and enthusiasm, while counselors were surprisingly the least influential, often perceived by students as prioritizing college preparation over genuine CTE exploration or treating these courses merely as graduation checkboxes.
Regarding expected outcomes and personal goals, students utilized CTE classes for exploration to identify interests, career alignment to confirm future paths, and the acquisition of essential workplace skills such as teamwork and leadership. For many, these courses also served as a necessary stress relief mechanism, acting as a "brain break" from rigorous core subjects to sustain motivation through enjoyment rather than pressure. Based on these findings, the presentation offers specific recommendations for educators and administrators, emphasizing that teachers should prioritize relationship building, reinforce verbal persuasion to boost self-efficacy, and ensure programs are rigorous enough to align with future goals rather than being viewed as easy options. Administrators are urged to provide counselors with additional training on CTE benefits, address structural barriers like scheduling constraints, and foster stakeholder collaboration involving middle schools, families, and community organizations to expand internship opportunities and real-world connections.
Read the full video transcript
Hi everybody. I'm Jason Klein, Senior
Director of Learning Partnerships at
Northern Illinois University, and we're
really excited to have you with us
today. We've got Joe Bruno who will
introduce himself and his topic in just
a moment, but I was privileged enough to
actually serve on Joe's dissertation
committee, and this is a really
important topic, and
particularly at this time when we've got
multiple pieces of legislation sitting
in the General Assembly as we record
this that relate to
student uh
course requirements and options that
affect course selection at the high
school level in Illinois. Uh and even
without those pieces of legislation or
other legislation that was passed a few
years ago, uh this still remains a
really important topic that affects
everything from uh parent perceptions of
what their children are doing to how
students interact with uh teachers and
counselors, um to even student kind of
peer pressure and peer relations around
what they're doing in school. And so,
with all that said, we're going to turn
it over to Joe. For those of you who are
here with us live, there will absolutely
be an opportunity for you to ask
questions, and you're welcome to either
put those in the chat, or you will be
able to unmute and ask those questions a
little later on. And in the meantime, uh
I'm going to turn it over to Joe.
Hi everybody. Can everybody hear me?
We're good to go before I get 20 minutes
in and it's like we can't hear anything
you're saying.
Uh my name is Joe Bruno. I am the
Instructional Supervisor of CTE of Am I
allowed to say what school I'm working
at right now? Okay, cool. Glenbrook
North, which is in Northbrook, Illinois.
Uh I Hi Amy.
I spent the last 2 years of my life pre-
creating this dissertation on student
motivation uh in CTE course selection.
So, I'm going to go through this
process.
As Jason said, you can write comments in
the chat. You can also just like wave to
me or just start talking over me if you
have specific questions or if you want
to talk about anything.
If you have questions about the
dissertation, there are some points
throughout because this was a
professional development that I've done
in the past where there's discussion
questions. Um
we'll see where we're at. I understand
that it is 1:00 on a Friday and I don't
know if people really want to get into
that, but if you do, we can. So, but you
can ask questions at any time. So,
here it goes.
Maybe.
Nah.
So, I'm going to give a little bit of
background, hopefully a few minutes
only, of just kind of where I was coming
from in terms of the dissertation, and
then you kind of need that information
in order for all of the research to
really make sense. So, my problem of
practice is I felt that there was a lack
of research on the rationale behind why
high school students are choosing the
CTE courses that they're picking. I
think this is detrimental, obviously, to
students, but also to counselors, to
teachers, to the local community. So, I
wanted to do further research on why.
Why are they taking the classes that
they take?
With that, we'll be talking about how
self-efficacy, students' expected
outcomes, their own personal goals, and
how
social influences also play a role or
factor into why they're selecting the
courses that they are.
Why? I've been a CTE teacher for over 10
years. I recognize the importance and
the benefits of this department
specifically on our students' lives.
I feel there's not enough coordinated
thought into why is a student taking a
course rather than just saying, "Hey,
we've we've got to take one."
What do they really want? What do they
really care about? How are we properly
preparing them for a career in college
in the future?
So, my three research questions are
pretty similar, but I'm unique topics.
So, how does student self-efficacy
factor into CTE course selection?
How do social factors influence CTE
course selection? And how do students'
expected outcomes and personal goals
influence CTE course selection?
Quick background. I'm assuming if you're
here, you probably know what CTE is, but
it's providing learners with the skills,
knowledge, and confidence they need to
thrive in college and career. All
students benefit from CTE education.
Teaches real-world skills, uh selected
career focus.
Important to be able to differentiate
between CTE participants and CTE
concentrators as when we get into who I
took part in the focus groups with, um I
utilized concentrators. So, a CTE
participant is a student that has taken
at least one CTE course.
A concentrator is a student who's taken
two or more courses in the same
career-related program. So, if somebody
had taken an intro to business class and
then an intro to culinary class, they
would not count as a concentrator cuz
those are different career-related
programs. They would still be
participants. So, the students that took
part in my focus groups were solely
concentrators and I'll talk about them
more.
So, it may have been a bit since you've
talked about educational psych, but I do
need to cover social cognitive theory to
talk about my theoretical framework, so
I'll be quick here though. Um Albert
Bandura's work in the late '70s talking
about how we learn from our social
environments. This influences our
actions, it influences our motivation,
which is exactly what we're talking
about in terms of students selecting
courses.
This all impacts self-efficacy, which
I'm going to be talking about a ton.
Uh self-efficacy is a person's belief in
their ability to perform actions that
lead to specific outcomes. So, it's not
even whether or not you're actually
capable of performing an action, it's
whether or not you believe you're
capable.
I believe I'm self-efficacious in giving
this presentation right now. I might be
doing terribly. You might say, "No, you
are not good at this." But I feel I am.
I am highly self-efficacious in this.
So, good differentiator there.
There are four main sources of efficacy
expectations. We're going to focus or
I'm going to focus on the idea of
performance accomplishments or mastery
experiences. So, students actually
taking part in an activity and then
recognizing, "Oh, yeah. I I can do
this." and building that self-efficacy.
There's also vicarious experiences,
verbal persuasion, physiological and
emotional states, and those will all
come up a little bit, but mastery
experiences is what we're going to hit
on a lot.
So, from there, Lent, Brown, and Hackett
in the '90s created the framework of
social cognitive career theory playing
off of Bandura's work. And this focuses
more on interest in potential academic
disciplines, careers, how students Well,
how people make choices um in things
that are interesting to them, how they
succeed in those things.
And it focuses on three primary social
cognitive functions, and those are
self-efficacy beliefs,
outcome expectations or expected
outcomes and goal representations or
personal goals. So, why are we choosing
to do certain things? Are we doing it
because we have an expected outcome in
mind? I think that I want to attain this
career.
Um is it I'm just trying to set a goal
for myself and I want to intrinsically
achieve that thing? Um the reasons
behind why we're doing what we do.
And then they also added a piece about
contextual determinants.
So, kind of that external piece of you
might be self-efficacious, you might
believe that you're capable of doing
something, but that doesn't necessarily
mean that you can do it because there
are other supports and barriers that
come into play. So,
maybe you have a family member who is
already an accountant and they give you
practice in doing that thing. That acts
as a support. Maybe you want to go to
college to become a nurse, but you just
don't have the money to do it. you're
capable, you're self-efficacious, you
just that acts as a barrier, too. So,
those things will come up.
My research design,
I conducted focus groups. I had five
focus groups, so 24 students total.
Focus groups are more social in nature
than just conducting one-on-one
interviews.
Um for a prior project before my
dissertation, I did one-on-one
interviews with a couple of students and
I don't think they really wanted to talk
to me. Whereas in the focus groups, they
were super vocal and willing to share
with one another cuz they're talking to
other high school students. Although, I
don't think anybody wants to talk to me.
Uh they are more useful when attempting
to determine what motivates people, and
that's what this entire dissertation was
about. Why are students motivated to
take our courses?
They were 45 to 60 minutes.
I had junior and senior students who
were CTE concentrators. So, they had two
classes in the same career-related
program.
We have three sub-departments at the my
school. We have a business department.
We have family consumer sciences, so
culinary classes, fashion classes, uh
and then we also have tech ed, which is
woodworking, welding, um
uh engineering. So, we had students from
all three sub-departments.
The school itself is a suburban school
in the Midwestern US. 90% of our
students enroll in a two- or four-year
college.
They were selected because of my
interest in ways to better sup- uh
support student decision-making.
Just knowledge for you, 67% white, 22%
Asian, 5% Hispanic, 5% two or more, 1%
black.
And a useful point that we're going to
probably we will definitely come back to
later is that our student to counselor
ratio is 231 to 1.
The state average is 494 to 1.
So, that's useful to note when we get
into social influences and we talk about
uh the counselors influence on a
student's course selection of just
recognizing that
ours is 230 to 1 to 1, the state average
is 494 to 1, so we'll come back to that.
All right, so the themes themselves,
after conducting all the research,
analyzing the data, I came up with 10
themes about why students are selecting
the courses that they're selecting.
None
These are not ranked in any order, so as
I go through it's not like this was the
most important thing or this was the
least important thing.
I tried to to sort them based on the
research questions.
First theme was the idea of academic and
mastery experiences.
Yeah, and then of there there's four
subthemes, so I'll talk about each of
these.
For each of these subthemes, I'm going
to have a little bit of research or
information for you from the focus
groups, but then I'm going to end each
one with a quote that I feel best
encapsulates what the students were
getting at there. So rather than
hearing me talk, you're going to kind of
hear me talk in the voice of a high
school student.
So
applied skill competence supports the
work of Usher and Pajares who said that
mastery experiences are the most
influential source of self-efficacy. So
if students are actually
taking part in experiences,
that raises self-efficacy. If they feel,
"Yeah, look, I'm I've done this thing,
I've tried this thing, I feel that I'm
actually capable of doing this." That
raises efficacy.
What we heard in the focus groups,
students talked frequently about taking
part in things like accounting
simulations. You walk into accounting, I
don't know what a T account is, I have
no idea how to do this. Very low
self-efficacy, but then they take part
in the activity and they're like, "No, I
can balance this, this actually makes
sense, I can totally do this." Raises
their self-efficacy, they feel, "Yep,
I'm capable, I can do this."
They talked about mock trials in
business law classes, lesson planning in
early childhood classes of actually
building their own lessons, presenting
them. Yeah, I can do this.
Uh baking a cake without a teacher's
help, uh sewing costumes without
teacher's help. All of these things that
you walk in, I don't know how to use
this machine, in a couple of weeks,
yeah, I can actually use this machine. I
feel good about it.
And a quote here, I felt confident when
I was able to sew an entire shirt
without needing my teacher's help. That
just made me realize that I'm really
capable of creating things.
And to have a high school student voice
this idea that like, yeah, I'm capable
of doing this, I think is pretty
powerful. So,
applied skill competence came up a lot.
CTE course design had, I think it was in
the top five most comments, the way that
CTE courses are designed compared to
what we would think as a typical core
course.
Sorry, I was checking the chat. Thanks,
Amy. I love hearing it, too.
So, CTE courses are more hands-on.
There's more project-based learning, and
it led to higher engagement and higher
self-efficacy.
Students were more active in class. They
liked to learn to collaborate in groups.
They loved experiencing what
professional work is really like.
And one of the quotes, with CTE classes,
it's really nice to have a really
hands-on, you're doing activities
constantly class, because it keeps you
interested in experiencing new things in
the class, and it makes it more
exciting. So, just the way that our
courses are designed are keeping them
engaged, building that self-efficacy of
being interested in material.
Early success and persistence came up.
Students who had early success and were
persistent were more likely to continue
taking further courses in a pathway.
Uh at our school, we do offer stacked
coursework. So, we do have,
for example, a student taking
a fashion design one class would be
working alongside students that are
taking fashion design two and three.
And that stacked coursework acted as a
vicarious experience for those students
um
of seeing, "Hey,
I know what they're doing in fashion two
and three. I'm self-efficacious enough
to recognize that I'm capable of doing
those things, too. And those projects
seem pretty cool. I want to do those."
So, they were more likely to take more
courses when seeing what other students
were doing.
And as you relate it back to kind of
your own schools or your own programs,
even if you're not offering stacked
coursework, like think about what can
you do to show off those higher-level
projects to students so that they see,
"Oh, yeah, based on what I'm doing in
one, I could do the stuff in two or
three or later courses in the pathway."
Confidence in the pathway was low in the
first course, but early mastery
experiences show them that, "Yep, I'm
capable." So, I'd say now my confidence
is pretty high, but that's because I
took four levels of the same course. I
feel like when I was starting out, it
was definitely low. So, they continue to
take it. They like taking the courses.
Uh in terms of self-efficacy, students
talked about prior extracurricular
activities and experiences they had
there. So, experience with material
covered in these courses in their own
personal lives offered them the ability
to build their confidence and learn new
skills.
Students talked about how they've
already started their own like lawn
mowing business. So, when they went and
took a business class, they already had
that experience. They already felt
self-efficacious in it. They felt more
engaged with the course content. They'd
worked as teachers' assistants at local
grade schools, so they wanted to take
the early childhood courses.
And then transferring those experiences
made them feel ahead of their peers,
built that self-efficacy, they felt
truly capable of completing what
whatever was expected of them. So,
"When I took entrepreneurship, I just
felt like I was really ahead of the game
cuz I'd already started my own business.
I already had a lot of prior knowledge
about it. A lot of the activities we did
in the course were similar to stuff that
I've done in real life."
And we'll see that come back again, too,
right? How do we tie it into things that
they're interested in or things that
they know?
Second theme was interest-driven
confidence. So, how interested they were
in the material.
Students inter- I mean, I'm not telling
you anything that you don't know, but
students' interest in course content
played a significant role in CTE course
selection. They their confidence grew
when they were doing things that they
were interested in doing. They voiced
the idea that they put more effort into
these courses because they actually
cared about them. They weren't being
forced to take them. They chose the
elective.
Uh they were more likely to pay
attention. They were more likely to do
work outside of school if called upon to
do it because they actually cared about
what they were doing.
This led to higher confidence, led to
led to a greater self-efficacy, and it
encouraged students to pursue more
careers in CTE-related fields.
Couple quotes. I enjoy what I do, so
then I put more effort into it, so then
I in turn get more confident overall
with it.
I was confident because I was learning
things I was really genuinely interested
in.
Great. That's awesome.
The theme that had the theme the
something that had the most comments of
all was the idea of comparison to core
classes.
Students had higher confidence and
greater interest in their CTE courses.
Uh these are key components of
self-efficacy and career interest.
Students felt CTE courses were easier.
Uh and I think this would be super
interesting if anyone is interested in
pursuing their own dissertation.
Figuring out uh are CTE courses actually
easier or are students just more
self-efficacious in them because they're
interested in them? Uh they feel
confident in their own work, and then
thus it feels like this work is actually
easier. They're more engaged, or are the
classes just easier?
I don't think so, but
uh they understood the applicability of
their CTE course content to their own
lives. It was a lot easier to tie it in
than they spoke about in a lot of their
other courses.
In my CTE courses, I'm not as scared to
make a mistake as I would be in a math
class or a science class. I honestly
just feel more confident to raise my
hand, especially because it's something
I'm more interested than than like a
math or science class.
I just think there's more of a sense of
community in these classes, especially
with group work. So, uh that theme came
up again and again and again of
comparing it to what they're doing in
their core classes,
uh the interest that they showed in
these classes and how much they cared
about them. Um
I think a student being willing to say
I'm not as scared to make a mistake in a
CTE class is also pretty amazing.
Students talked about how they wanted to
build essential skills. We'll talk later
about the extrinsic portion of it, but
they also talked about it intrinsically.
Essential skills are kind of those
workplace skills that we're talking
about that we feel that students need uh
to perform
in the future. Um some people go
calling them soft skills or whatever you
want to call them, but we're going to
use essential skills. I don't want to
upset Jason, and that's what I've used
in the paper. So, these are essential
skills. Um they talked about how they
wanted to just build interest in
cooking, in sewing, in becoming better
public speakers, not because they felt
that it was going to benefit them as a
career in the future. It was just
something that they just wanted to learn
how to do. So, it wasn't grade related.
It wasn't even career related. It's just
like, I want to learn how to sew. That
is a useful skill that I think I'm going
to maybe use for myself in the future. I
just want to know how to do that.
I'm trying to push myself to explore
areas that I'm more that I'm not
confident in.
The biggest factor that pushed me to do
CTE courses is my interest in building
skills that the course provides.
>> [snorts]
>> I'll offer these up if anyone wants to
talk and not hear me talk for a couple
of minutes, but again, I'm not expecting
it.
Um but as we cover all of that thing all
of that content related to the first
research question, how does
self-efficacy play a role?
Um where in your curriculum do you
students get early low-stakes
opportunities for success that motivate
persistence? So, how are we tying that
into our curriculum?
Uh how do current course structures and
schedules actually allow for repeated
mastery experiences? So, I don't know if
anybody wants to talk or if you want to
just jot those down and kind of think
about them yourselves just for your own
programs, but
Turn this off.
Okay, I'm going to move past it.
Next research question was focused on
the idea of social influence.
When I conducted my focus groups, before
any focus group actually started, I gave
um
a sheet of paper to each student and I
asked them to rank these five things in
terms of um most influential to least
influential social influence when
determining what CTE courses you enroll
in.
And then later in the focus groups,
about 75% of the way in,
the group came together and we did this
ranking activity again.
And I said, "Now that we're all talking
with one another, let's try ranking
these again. We do not have to come to
consensus. You guys can disagree on
certain things, but let's see how we
feel together." Uh they every group, all
five, came to consensus pretty easily.
Um and then I analyzed that data
compared to individual versus the group.
The
only thing if I if I did my dissertation
again, the only thing that I really did
not like is the idea that I needed to
add another category down here
because there could have been other
influences that I just didn't know
about. I don't know if maybe kids just
watch Tik Tok all day and they're like,
"That's how I pick classes. Somebody on
Tik Tok told me to." Uh so I needed to
have that piece. Or maybe they have
outside college counselors or anything
else that I just didn't know about uh
beyond obviously schoolmates, teachers,
school counselors, family members. Um
but
that ranked last because the kids had no
idea
what I was getting at. So that was
number five.
But
anybody want to take a shot at what the
fourth least or yeah, fourth most
influential, I guess,
uh social influence was? The next thing
that kids cared about least in terms of
selecting their courses. Friends, peers,
teachers, the school, the community in
general,
school counselors, or family members?
You can even type a number into the chat
if you don't want to voice your
opinions.
Oh, there we actually got some numbers.
Teachers.
Amy four Oh, actually different Amy for
the win. Yes, it was school counselors
as number four. And we will talk about
that in depth in a little bit, but
counselors came in number four. Kids did
not care about their opinions at all.
Number
three, I will tell you and then maybe
I'll let you vote for the final two.
Three was teachers, school, the
community.
Two and one. Anyone want to guess at
what the most important social influence
was?
Most important.
Schoolmates. Schoolmates. Thanks, Don.
Schoolmates.
Schoolmates was number two, actually.
Yeah. I was very surprised that family
came in first in terms of social
influence. So, I will talk about each of
these.
Nice job, Derek. Derek guessed family. I
wouldn't have guessed it.
Familial influence was the most
influential social factor when
determining what CTE courses students
enrolled in.
Individually, 14 of the 24 students
ranked family as most important. Five of
the 24 ranked it as second most
important. So, about 80% had them in the
top two.
As a group, all five groups ranked
family most important.
Again, as I'm talking about this stuff,
like you kind of think in the back of
your mind, like how are we engaging
families uh in our schools or in our
course recommendations or how are we
getting them involved?
Because this is showing that they are
important when students are signing up
for the courses that they're selecting.
So, parental recommendation was a sub
theme. Parents were encouraging students
to pursue their goals related to their
futures.
They were supportive of not only their
college and career plans, but also just
their interests more generally.
One student said, "I think the biggest
influence was my parents freshman year.
I didn't really know what I wanted to
do. They said they would actually This
would actually be a really useful class
for my future. They know me." So, having
that relationship, these people know who
I am. They know what I might be
interested in. How can we leverage that
as we have students enroll in courses?
Sibling recommendation came up a lot,
too.
Older siblings' endorsements and
oppositions steered enrollment. Uh they
acted as a form of just proximal social
capital and contextual supports. So,
stu Younger students relied on their
older siblings' advice, and they trusted
their own judgment on on areas of
strength, but also negative things, too.
So, you should take this class cuz of
this teacher, or I just know that you're
interested in this area, so you should
do this, which I think is actually Yeah.
My older brother told me that I would
really enjoy the childhood education
classes because he knew that I liked
working with kids. It was kind of his
influence that he even knew about the
classes that made me want to join.
This student specified that like her
older brother didn't even take any of
the childhood education classes.
Um he took other stuff. He was a
different type of student, I guess, but
uh he knew that they existed. He knew
his sister, and he said, "Hey, you
should probably take those." So, sibling
recommendation comes into play.
Students brought up uh familial
experience in the field and how that
played a role in their course selection.
Familial role models led students to
enroll in similar CTE courses. So, they
talked about parents, grandparents,
uncles, cousins, how they had a certain
uh job or a career.
Negative experiences also guided them in
what they didn't want to pursue.
So, one student said, "My mom's an
accountant, so I knew I didn't want to
do that because she seems very bored."
Sorry for anyone who's interested in
accounting out there. Um but just
showing that it isn't necessarily all
positive. They were also hearing other
negative things too or recognizing
even though that could be the greatest
thing in the world from what they're
seeing and experiencing, I don't want to
do that.
Both my dad and my grandpa have
extensive business knowledge. If I do
have any questions, there are plenty of
people I could talk to in that field.
That I'm sorry. That was really one of
the major things that drove me to take
these courses.
School made influence.
Uh
It's important to differentiate friends
and peers here uh
cuz a lot of times they're used
interchangeably, but they are different
things. So, when we talk about friend
recommendations, that's
typically an individual with whom uh
student shares like a personal, mutual,
some sort of meaningful relationship.
So, a little bit closer than a peer who
is someone who's just grouped with a
student based on like shared
characteristics. So, they're just in the
same grade, um same social status, they
play the same sport. Uh, so when we talk
about friend recommendations, this was
the second most important social factor.
Half of the students ranked it number
two.
Um, three ranked it one. Uh, I'm sorry,
in the top two. Three ranked it one,
nine ranked it two.
As a group, four of the five ranked this
as the second most important.
They talked about how their friends
shared their own experiences in CTE and
gave them suggestions. You get to hear
about their experience, you can share
your experience. I'd heard such great
reports from all of my friends, they
loved the class, so I ended up taking it
sophomore year. I feel like my friends
can be really influential.
This idea was, uh, also a surprise to me
because we know that as students move
beyond kind of middle school age into
high school age, they kind of start
shifting away from peer or from uh,
family familiar recommendations into
peers, right? Talking about friends and
peers. So, I thought for sure this would
be higher. Uh,
my friend told me I should take this, I
should take this. But, all of the
conversations were no, we're so
resorting back to families first. We do
listen to what our friends have to say.
Peer recommendations, broader network,
upper classmen in classes, just their
general classmates, friends of siblings.
Uh, they acted as vicarious experiences.
So, just hearing their experience was
helpful to gain more honest or clear
information.
The idea of a sense of community in CTE
came up frequently.
Relationships with peers and teachers in
CTE courses had an impact on why
students selected these courses. It
built student confidence, it built
student self-efficacy.
Students in the focus groups talked
about how CTE courses fostered a more
welcoming environment. They felt more
comfortable engaging with their
classmates and the course content. They
enjoyed working with students from
different grade levels. Um,
rather than just having a class full of
all freshmen or all sophomores, they
actually enjoyed working with upper and
lower level students.
CTE classes, in my opinion, are a lot
more like a community and welcoming cuz
you're always working together. I feel
like I'm more comfortable talking to
anyone or my friends or my teacher. I
just feel a lot more comfortable and
then that makes me feel more confident.
>> [snorts]
>> Counselor influence. All right.
I debated whether or not even having
positive comments as a sub-theme because
only two of 24 students spoke positively
about their guidance counselors.
Um
they talked about how they were
comfortable asking them for advice. Uh
their counselors had prior knowledge
about student work experiences and then
they used those to help them make
informed course decisions. Um so the
students that spoke about it they said,
"Yeah, this this was beneficial. This
helped me make my decision."
I [snorts] believe my counselor is
great. I can ask him questions and he'll
give me an honest answer about my
schedule and how a course fits into my
career path. But even so, two of 24
making positive comments about
counselors is probably not great.
Negative comments. 18 of 24 students
made negative comments about their
counselors.
14 of the 24 ranked them either four or
five in rank of influence on the courses
that they chose.
They talked a lot about how there was
only minimal logistics-only guidance.
They had no real relationship with a
student.
Students didn't believe that their
counselors acted in their best interest.
They felt that counselors prioritized
college prep over CTE course selection.
They talked a lot about CTE just
checking a box, just saying I know that
I have to take one of these to graduate.
So once you take that one, we don't talk
about it anymore.
Uh
I should have prefaced it that like the
counselors at our school are wonderful
and the students even recognize that
fact. They're like it's not them,
they're just super busy. They're just
doing so much all of the time.
So it's not even a matter of that, but
if we go back to the
information from the beginning,
we have like what was it? Two 43? I
could go back a couple of slides
compared to the state average,
we're in a much better spot and we can't
even pull it off. So how can other
schools that have four and 500 to one
really take the time to build
relationships with students?
But they are verbalizing here that they
don't have relationships
and I feel that's a part of their job.
That's why that's what they do. They
enroll them in courses and what kids are
interested in what kids want to do in
the future. So what systemically has to
change um
in order for students to be enrolled in
courses that they are saying that they
want to take?
Counselors were not necessarily
contextual barriers. These were CTE
concentrators. They were still taking
CTE courses, rather they just had no
influence. They just didn't listen to
what they had to say if they talked to
them at all.
As long as you complete one CTE course,
you're set. They don't really encourage
you to take any more or explore any more
areas.
My counselor doesn't even know my name.
I'm not going to trust them with what
classes I should take if they don't know
my name.
>> [snorts]
>> Teacher influence was a little bit more
positive. They talked about the idea of
the importance of relationships, which
again I'm probably not telling you
anything new. Relationship building is
very important in schools.
They ranked three out of five in terms
of um students hearing from teachers and
then selecting courses. They played a
direct role in self-confidence,
self-efficacy. They felt more supported.
They would then take advice from those
teachers of other courses that they
should possibly take.
Students talked about how they selected
additional courses again just because
they wanted to have the same teacher.
So, uh,
the quote might be later, but a few came
A few mentioned like, "I wasn't even
that interested in the class, but like I
just wanted to be with that teacher."
I think I do a lot better in my class
because I have a relationship with my
teacher. If I don't have a good
relationship with my teacher, I'm not
going to feel comfortable asking them
questions or going in in my own time to
see them.
Uh, regarding taking a second course in
a pathway, the teacher was very
supportive and I wanted to experience
that more. So.
Less about the course itself was just
this teacher was supportive and I want
to experience that sense of support. So,
really building those relationships,
getting them to enroll in our courses.
The quality of teacher came up. So,
students' decision to enroll in CTE
courses was influenced both by real and
perceived qualities of teachers, both
positive and negative. This teacher's
good, this teacher's bad. Uh, I want to
take it because of this reason. I don't
want to take it because of this reason.
Their interest and engagement in the
content was shaped by the particular
teacher. So, if the teacher was
passionate, if they were enthusiastic
about their content, they were more
interested in the material.
If they were able to relate the content
to students' lives, they were more
interested in the material.
I think somebody else could also do a
dissertation about this idea. I think a
lot of a lot of CTE teachers are second
career teachers. Um, we are passionate
about our content. We Not to say that
other teachers aren't, right? But, uh,
we chose this as a second career. We
really want to do this thing. We're
passionate. We want to teach other
people about it. Uh, and that showed up
in students saying that the more
passionate and enthusiastic they are, I
care more about that, too. So.
I think a teacher's high expectations as
far as work goes will drive students to
work harder and feel better about their
work and in turn be more passionate
about the class.
I'm going to skip discussion questions.
But if you I'll share the presentation
too. You can kind of stew on that
yourselves.
All right, the last research question
talked about students' expected outcomes
and personal goals, kind of what they
were hoping to take away from these
courses and how that played a role in
the courses they selected.
The seventh theme was just general
exploration of the future.
Students talked a lot about just general
likes and dislikes. They took a CTE
course cuz they were exploring their
interests. They're exploring their
passions. It was also an avenue for
identifying areas that didn't align with
their preferences. I'm recognizing in
high school, is this a thing that I
actually want to do
um in the future. I'm just trying to
figure it out. I'm trying to figure out
things that I like and dislike.
Talked about planning next steps,
diversifying their experiences,
assessing, what am I actually good at?
What am I confident in?
Students said, "I was honestly just
interested to see if that would be a
future pathway I wanted to take. I feel
like the more classes you take in your
field, you start to figure out what you
want to do, but more importantly, what
you don't want to do."
I think high school, that is a great
time to figure that out. That is why
we're here, I believe. Like, what what
is it that Let's try a couple of
different things, figure out what we're
engaged in, what we're interested in,
what we might be passionate about doing
in the future.
Students mentioned CTE courses acting as
a base or a foundation for the future.
So, they learn things that would be
beneficial to their future selves.
Coming back to those essential
employability skills.
Uh their interests for what they want to
do potentially in college. Just taking
part in occupationally relevant work
experiences, building onto what they
think they might be doing in the future.
Acting as a stepping stone.
Originally, I took the courses out of
curiosity, but now I'm signing up for
more experiences and more courses based
on wanting to improve my skills and gain
more experience for college and for my
future career. So, just trying it,
figuring out. Now, it's a base or a
foundation for what I want to do in the
future.
College prep came up.
A few student 13 of 24 students spoke
about purposely enrolling in CTE courses
because of the expected benefits they
would derive from the courses related to
their college apps.
They believed that taking CTE courses
aligned with their intended major would
be viewed favorably by college
admissions counselors. I wish every
student felt that way. That would be a
dream to me.
Um they felt they would improve their
odds of acceptance instead of taking 400
AP classes.
If I were to be a freshman again, I
would only take business-related classes
and I would show colleges that I'm
really dedicated to this topic instead
of taking a variety of different
classes.
>> [snorts]
>> Dual credit came up. So, eight of the 24
students cited the opportunity to earn
college credit as a reason they enrolled
in CTE courses. This was an expected
outcome that factored into their course
selection. I am taking this course
because I am expecting that I'm going to
gain something from it. Whether it's
college credit or it's going to be
beneficial to me in the career that I
want to go into.
This wasn't a primary motivation, but it
did contribute.
They recognized it would strengthen
their college apps.
Earning college credit bypasses that
intro course sometimes, so they were at
least cognizant of it.
There was a question about the main goal
in taking CTE classes. A student said,
"Originally, it was probably just the
dual credit for me. I would see it as a
benefit for college. Like, if I needed
to take that class, and maybe I already
have that credit, that's awesome."
A lot of the conversations, a lot of the
head nodding that took place,
um was like, "Yeah, the dual credit was
was helpful. Um that wasn't maybe the
primary reason that I took it, but it it
didn't hurt."
Yeah.
Two themes left here.
Obviously, we were going to talk about
career prep. This is CTE.
Students talked about career alignment.
They enrolled in courses that match
their intended career. I know I want to
go into business. I know I want to go
into education, into design, into
engineering.
Taking multiple courses in a pathway
helped them to confirm their interest in
that career, and it allowed them to gain
additional experience.
I've known I wanted to be a teacher
since second grade, so these classes
just confirmed that that's what I want
to do.
These classes influenced me and made me
realize this is something I'm good at,
something I really enjoy doing, and I
want to continue that after high school.
So, having the experiences, yep, this is
what I want to do in the future.
And then we talked about course utility
and essential skills intrinsically of
like, I just want to learn to bake a
cake. But students also talked very
frequently about the idea of
extrinsically, I'm gaining something
from this. So, 15 of the 24 talked about
how taking CTE courses helped them to
develop essential workplace skills that
they felt were going to be valuable for
their futures.
Transferable, workplace ready, such as
collaboration, learning to be better
leaders, to get better at public
speaking for the thing that they want to
do in the future, to learn to problem
solve, all things that they they spoke
about in the focus groups.
These classes help you learn to
communicate with other people that might
be different from you. They teach you
how to work with others.
A big thing I really wanted to work on
with these classes was teamwork and
problem solving. So, I'm taking them
because I want to get better at this
thing.
And then the last theme is the idea of
affective states or CTE acting as a form
of stress relief throughout the school
day.
Half of the students emphasized the
affective advantages of taking a CTE
course. So, they were thinking about
when they were signing up for courses,
I want to take a CTE course because of
the stress relief that it provides from
my more academically rigorous courses.
Uh it acted as sustained motivation. It
acted to sustain motivation and
engagement. They had less joy in CTE
classes. They were less anxious about
CTE classes.
They had the awareness of how enrolling
in this course would lead to less
overall stress throughout the school
day.
Talked about all the work you do is in
class and that it was nice to have a
brain break during the day where I'm
doing something I really enjoy doing.
The word brain break came up a couple of
times throughout the focus groups of
I'm just going to take a break from all
these more rigorous courses and just do
something that I actually want to do.
I feel the CTE classes are a good break
in the day because they are classes
where you do value you do learn valuable
things, but they're not as rigorous as
our other classes.
As a CTE educator, it might be hard to
hear that and to like no, like our
classes are as rigorous as these other
courses and you might want to kind of
back away from from that cuz I feel that
our courses are just as valuable, but
half of the students brought up
specifically they're enrolling in these
classes because it's not as anxiety
inducing as hearing a math teacher talk
to me for 90 minutes or whatever it is.
Um I won't talk about those either.
So, to wrap up just recommendations that
I had based on my dissertation research
for teachers,
make sure you're really prioritizing
relationship building in classes. Take
time to reinforce verbal persuasion.
Encourage students to help build their
confidence and their self-efficacy.
Make sure we're delivering high-quality
rigorous program of study.
Students were enrolling with expected
outcomes and goals in mind. They do want
to prepare for their futures, so make
sure that we are making sure that we are
preparing them properly. Shouldn't be a
blow-off class.
Incorporate mastery experiences early
and incorporate them often. So, as soon
as we can start building experiences for
them in the classroom to recognize,
"Yeah, I am totally capable of doing
this thing."
Do it. Do it frequently.
Make a concerted effort to highlight
vicarious models in class. If that
involves bringing in guest speakers,
having student mentors, having outside
mentors, partnering with families,
having upperclassmen mentor
lowerclassmen, anything to show off the
things that we're already doing in our
classes and showing, "Hey, if this
person can do this, I can also do this."
Or that's of interest to me.
Uh create a classroom environment where
mistakes are a part of learning.
That helps to reduce stress. It
encourages persistence. We want our
classes to be immersive. We want them to
be fun, but we don't want to compromise
that rigor.
And then from an administrator or
leader's perspective,
counselors need additional training on
the benefits of CTE coursework and its
impact on self-efficacy in career and
college plans.
The ability to This enhances their
ability to steer students towards
courses that are in their best interest,
which I think is what school in general
is all about.
We need to reduce the structural
barriers to CTE course enrollment.
Students are saying they want to take
these classes, but scheduling
constraints are preventing them from
enrolling in additional courses that
they want to take. So, how can we go
about reducing those barriers so they
can take them?
And then work with various stakeholders
to better promote CTE coursework. And if
that's talking with middle middle school
counterparts to really spark that
interest earlier, so then they have
those experiences and then they get
excited about doing it in high school
and college or career beyond.
Any sort of family engagement
initiatives, taking part in weekend
workshops, having information sessions,
getting the courses out to the families
because they are clearly a social
influence on what students are
selecting, what courses students are
selecting.
And then engaging community
organizations. This helps to expand
mastery experiences. I'm talking about
like internship courses or just going
to a local Rotary and seeing what's
going on, but building those connections
to get students engaged in the content.
And that was a lot of talking. Thank you
all for sticking through it. If you have
questions, feel free.
So, first of all, thank you, Joe.
Obviously, one of the things that's
really important for all of us is that
there are these takeaways for teachers,
for administrators, thinking about the
counseling piece, thinking about what
we're doing with families, right?
There's a There's a lot to unpack here
from this one study and
a lot to consider and reflect upon. So,
Joe, we we thank you for undertaking
this work and as you said there
for those that are interested in in
pursuing their own additional research,
there's some real opportunities here to
use this as a jumping off point in a few
different
directions, excuse me, for additional
research. If you do have any questions,
please feel free to jump in with those.
We'd be happy to answer those and either
way, we're we're thrilled to have you
here.
Or if anyone wants to try the focus
groups at their school, I can share that
information with you and we can I mean,
the more data the better, but it was a
super interesting experience.