Farhat Lectures. The # 1 CPA & Accounting Courses

📊 Repurchase Agreements: Put Options — CPA FAR Exam

Duration: 15:28 2689 transcript words EN summary

Video summary

The video session focuses specifically on the accounting treatment of repurchase agreements involving put options, building upon previous discussions regarding forward contracts and call options. In a standard sale transaction where a customer holds a put option, they possess the right to force the seller to buy back an asset at a predetermined price. The core distinction in this scenario lies not just in the existence of the agreement, but in whether the customer has a significant economic incentive to exercise that option and return the product. This determination is crucial because it dictates how the entire transaction should be classified on the financial statements: as a sale with a right of return, a lease arrangement generating rental income, or a financing agreement involving interest expense. To assess these incentives, one must compare three key variables: the original selling price, the repurchase price agreed upon in the option, and the expected market value of the asset at the time of potential buyback. If the customer has no economic incentive to return the product—meaning they can sell it on the open market for a higher price than what is offered under the put option—the transaction is treated as a sale with a right of return. Conversely, if the repurchase price exceeds the current market value, creating an incentive for the buyer to force the seller's hand, the classification depends further on whether the buyback price is lower or higher than the original selling price. When the customer exercises their option because it is financially beneficial and the buyback price is less than the original sale price, the arrangement functions essentially as a lease, where the difference between the two prices represents rental income for the seller. The session illustrates these concepts with practical scenarios involving specific numbers to clarify the logic behind each classification. For instance, if an asset was originally sold for $500,000 and can be bought back for $450,000, but the market price is only $300,000, the buyer will definitely exercise their option to sell it back at the higher agreed-upon rate. Since the buyback amount ($450k) is less than the original sale ($500k), this generates rental income for the seller over the period of the agreement. On the other hand, if the market price drops so low that exercising the option to sell it back at $450,000 still yields a significant profit compared to selling on the open market (e.g., only getting $360,000 elsewhere), but the buyback price is actually higher than the original sale price, the transaction shifts into financing territory. In this case, the extra amount paid above the original principal is treated as interest expense rather than revenue. Ultimately, the video concludes by emphasizing that successful analysis of put options requires a step-by-step evaluation using common business sense to determine if an economic incentive exists before applying specific accounting rules. The process involves first checking for incentives; lacking them results in a sale classification regardless of prices, while having them leads to either lease or financing treatment based on the relationship between the repurchase and original selling prices. By carefully comparing these figures—original price versus buyback price versus market value at maturity—one can accurately classify whether an entity has effectively sold goods with retained risk (sale), leased out assets for profit (lease income), or borrowed money against collateral (financing). Mastery of this logical framework is essential for passing the CPA FAR exam and correctly reporting complex financial arrangements.

Read the full video transcript

Hello and welcome to this session. This is Professor Farhat in which we would look at the repurchase agreement and specifically we would look at a put option. And the reason I'm mention a put option because in the prior two prior session we looked at the forward contract and the call option. So if you did not view the prior session I strongly recommend you go back and view it because this session carries from the prior session and the prior session talks about a repurchase agreement when we make a sale and there's some sort of an agreement where we buy back the product or the the customer can force sell it back to us. And this session will focus on the put option. In the prior session we looked at the forward contract where the seller is required, they have to buy or the call option where the seller has the right but not the obligation to buy back. They can if they want to. In this session we would look at the put option. In a put option the customer things reverse. In a put option the power holder is the customer. The customer can sell you back the product and you have to buy it back from them. So the accounting treatment depends on what type of agreement do we have. Do we have a forward contract? Do we have a call option or do we have a put option? So in this session we will focus on you guessed it, the put option. Let's go ahead and get started. >> Before we proceed any further, I have a public announcement about my company farhatlectures.com. My AI turns any lecture into a complete study system. You can create summary table, formulas, and example from each lecture. Flashcards builds from the lesson itself. A quiz built on the lesson. And as a As a convert any lecture into a portable short audio on the go. So, it helps you with the retention. No noise, no generic responses, it's just clarity based on that specific lecture. Don't just watch, interact, test yourself, and retain the material using Farhat AI. Now, go to farhatlectures.com now and see how the AI can help you understand, practice, and retain the material. >> First, let's make sure we all understand what a put option or put options. A put option when you have the right to sell something to someone else at a particular price. So, here we have a customer because in a transaction we have a seller and a customer. Here the customer can reverse the transaction and force you to sell it. Now, remember we talked about the forward and the call where it's the opposite. Here, the customer can sell you back and you have to buy it back from them. So, the accounting treatment for a put option will have three important factors. If you remember under the forward and call option, if you remember under the forward and the call option, we looked at the original selling price and the repurchase price. For the put option, yes, we would look at the original selling price. We would look at the repurchase price, but we have a third variable to take into account. And that third variable is the economic incentive of the customer. In other words, we ask ourselves, does the customer have any economic incentive to sell you back this asset? What does it mean economic incentive? It means they they are better off economically if they sell it back to you because they have this option. Do they or do don't they? Because we have to make that determination. And based on that determination, we'll determine the treatment of the transaction. So, yes, the original price would still matter, how much we sold it to them originally. The repurchase price matters. If we need to if we have to buy it back, how much do we pay? But the third variable is, does the customer have incentives to come back and sell it back to us or they have no incentive to do so? So, there are various scenarios that could happen. Let's look at the first scenario. What could happen is this, the purchase price is less than the original selling price. So, let's assume we sold something for $500,000. That's the original selling price. And the purchase price the purchase price is 450. So, the purchase price is less than the original selling price. What's going to happen is this, we ask ourselves, does the customer have a significant economic incentive to exercise? If the answer is no, they don't have any incentive to exercise. Hold on a second, why wouldn't they have any incentive to exercise? So, let me ask you, just from an economic business perspective, under what circumstances, if you're the customer you purchase something for half a million you can sell it back to the you can sell it back to the seller for 450, but you have no incentive to do so. Why would you have no incentive? Because you might have a third party that will buy this from you for 550,000. So, if you have a third party you can go online, post this product online and sell it for 550. You have no incentive to go back and exercise it at 450. So, what would happen is the seller, if they know that if they know the market out there gives the buyer the option to sell it at a higher price, they know the buyer will not come back to them. Therefore, there's no incentive, it will be a sale with the right of return. Simply put, it will be a sale. Why? Because you we gave up control. Now, you you you purchased it, that's it, you keep the asset, You can do what whatever you want to do with it. You're not likely to come back and ask us to buy it for 450 if you can sell it for 550 somewhere else. So, you have no incentive, therefore it's a sale. If you have an incentive to come back and sell it to the seller, sell it back to the seller. You purchased something for half a million. You can go back and sell it for them. Why? You will do so. Let's assume Let's assume you went back to sell it and you can get for it 300,000. So, if you go back to a third party and you wanted to sell this product, you can get for it 300,000. Guess what now? Now you have every incentive to do what? Go back and tell the seller, "Look, um we have an we have an agreement here. You have to buy it back for 450." And why? Because it's it's in your interest to It's It's in your interest to do so as the buyer. >> [snorts] >> So, you have an economic incentive. So, exercising the put option provide the customer with a meaningful economic benefit. Under those circumstances, how do we treat this transaction? We treat it as a lease. Simply put, it's rental rental income. We basically rented rented you this product 450,000. We sold it for 500, we buy it back from you for 450. We have a rental income over that period of 50,000. So, we treat this as a lease income or rental income. Now, let's assume the purchase price is greater than the original selling price. So, the original selling price is 500,000. You You are willing to buy it back from them for 550. Again, now what I have to do is we would look at the market. So, we look The purchase price is greater than the original price. Okay. Is the repurchase price is than the market? So, now we do as the buyer, we bought this thing, whatever that thing, that building, and if we can go out there, okay, and sell it for 650, we have no incentive to sell it for 550. We have no incentive. Why? Because why would we buy it for five Why would we sell it back for 550 if we can sell it on the market for 650? If we have no incentive, great. The seller would will treat this as a sale with return. That's it. What does that mean? It means I I you you you are going to ignore the put option. Therefore, as far as I'm concerned, I made the sale. And my sale is half a million. That's it. You're not coming back because you you have no incentive to come back. And unless you are crazy enough to sell it back for me for 550, I'll go back and sell it for 650. Do you guys see there's no incentive? You would not do something like that. Now, let's assume Let's assume uh the the purchase price. Now, the expected market, if you want to sell it at the market, uh [snorts] you can only get for it 400,000. Well, if you can only get 400,000 for it, what you will do, you would say, "No, I I want I want to force you into buying it for 550. I want to exercise my option." Here you have every incentive to do what? To force the seller to buy it back. So, what do we have here? Here we have a financing agreement. You got [snorts] 500,000 originally, then you have to go back and pay 550. So, that 50,000 is what? Is financing cost. It's an interest expense. And we looked at it at the transaction in the prior session. So, here in the put option, you just have to use common sense and a sense business common sense, business economic sense. Would the buyer have every any incentive to come back? If they have no incentive to come back for the option, great. You just made a sale. You just made a sale. If they have If you have an incentive, you have to determine whether the purchase price is greater or equal to the original price. If it is, it's a financing agreement. If it's not, but they have an incentive to come back, it's a it's lease. Yeah, you have lease income, rental income. And this is a matrix that shows you how to deal with this. Again, slow down when you are analyzing these situation. >> [snorts] >> But look, if the buyer lacks significant incentive to come back, they're not not they're not going to come back. If they're not going to come back, you made a sale because you sold them something and they have no incentive to come back. How would you know if they have incentive? Look at Look at the Put yourself in their shoes and ask yourself, am I better off exercising the option or am I better off uh selling it to a third party? If I'm If I'm going to exercise the option, I'm coming back. So, I have I have I have some incentive. Therefore, I have significant incentive. But if I lack significant incentive, the seller would say that's it. Going to come back, I'll treat this as a sale. Now, if the customer has significant significant incentive, well, you have to under- you have to look at your situation. When I buy it back, is it less than the original? If it's less than the original, I have rental income. I made rental income because I'm buying it for less when I sold it for. If the repurchase price is greater, I have a financing agreement. I'm buying it back for more, therefore, the extra more is finance cost. I had to borrow money. I sold it for half a million. I have to buy it back for 550. As always, the best thing to do is to look at numbers. Look at an example with numbers. So, let's assume we have Summit Equipment, the seller, uh originally sold a bulldozer for 480,000. That's the original selling price. And they provided an option for the buyer, they will buy it back from the buyer for 430. So, let's go back and see what we are looking at here. So, we have a repurchase price that's less. So, we are looking at this scenario here. A purchase price is less. Okay, the repurchase price is less than the original option. Now, we have to determine whether the buyer have an incentive to come back. Yes, they come back or they have no incentive to come back. Let's see what we have here. And that's on or before December 31st. The deal is for 1 year. You're willing to buy it back from them for 430. If they want to go out to the market and sell this bulldozer, they sell it for 360. Are they going to come back and sell it back to you? 100% You guessed it, they will. Because what's their incentive here? Their incentive is an extra $70,000 for their incentive. Now, for you, what did you do really? What you did is you rented them this bulldozer and you got $50,000. You You sold something for 480, got it back for 430. As far as you're concerned, you made $50,000 in profit in rental income. So, here, if we go back to this example, the customer have every incentive to come back. Have every incentive to come back. You have lease income, lease income. Now, uh so, so here's the lease income. The lease income is $50,000. And why would the Why would the buyer come back and sell it to you? Because if they don't, their option is the market and the market is 360. Now, you know that they are that they are rational enough to come back and force you to buy it. Exit not force you, exercise the option. Yes, force you to buy it. You have the obligation to buy it for 430 and you will be happy to do so because you made $50,000 and you have back the asset. Maybe you can sell it again at some some, you know, down the road and rent it again and quote rent it again and get some lease income. So, just remember in a put option you compare the repurchase price to the original selling price. Then you Then you compare the repurchase price to the expected market at the repurchase date. Then you have to determine if there's a significant economic incentive for the person for the for the buyer to exercise or not exercise. If they have no incentive to exercise as far as the seller is concerned, the original seller, it's a sale. If they have If they have an incentive, then it all depends on what was the comparison between the original selling price and the repurchase and the repurchase. If it's less than the original selling price, you have rental income. If it's more assume the repurchase the the repurchase is 550 then guess what? Then you loaned money you you borrowed money and the difference is 70. Let's make it 500,000. Let's assume the repurchase is half a million. They're going to come back at and they're going to say buy it back from me for half a million. They're not going to sell it for 360. They're going to exercise. Then what you have, you have you had a finance agreement all along and you are you are being charged you are being charged technically $20,000 of interest expense. Just slow down with these questions. If it's a put option, slow down truly truly understand it. But how should you How how would you do this? Go to FAR Hat lectures. Look at additional AICPA questions, multiple choice questions, um cases, simulations, exercises, true false, AI, podcast. Your job is to learn this inside out so you can do well pass your exam move on with your life. The best investment you can make is invest in yourself and God bless.