Reconstructing a 19th-Century Riverside Community with Historical GIS - EMF 2026
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
Heidi, a professional genealogist with a background in UX design and library science, presents her dissertation project which integrates historical Geographic Information Systems (GIS) with traditional archival research. Her study focuses on Berserelden, a 19th-century parish along the River Hamble that transitioned from a shipbuilding hub to an agricultural community following the decline of maritime industries and the arrival of a railway in 1889. By utilizing a 19th-century tithe map alongside eighty years of census records, she aimed to move beyond static family trees to visualize how families and relationships persisted and adapted across generations within a shifting economic landscape.
The core methodology involves georeferencing historical raster maps, such as the tithe maps from 1840, by aligning them with modern coordinates using software like QGIS. Heidi overlays vector data, tracing residential buildings and plotting specific features to create dynamic layers that can be manipulated and filtered. This process allows her to cross-reference household heads on the tithe maps with census data, identifying movements, property changes, and internal migration patterns that documents alone often obscure. For instance, she tracks how a homestead disappeared from one map only to reappear elsewhere as residents relocated, revealing a fluid community structure rather than isolated nuclear families.
Through detailed case studies of five specific cottages along Land's End Road, the presentation illustrates how these properties served as adaptable spaces for extended kinship networks. Families like the Kohls, Jarvises, and Wilshires utilized multiple properties to support widowed relatives, apprentices, and aging parents, effectively creating a safety net within their neighborhood. The research highlights significant events such as probate disputes over pubs and the consolidation of land due to railway construction, demonstrating that these households were deeply interconnected through blood and marriage rather than being static entities. Ultimately, the project challenges the demographic history narrative of rural isolation by proving that these communities thrived on intricate, spatially defined extended family networks.
In conclusion, Heidi argues that Historical GIS transforms historical data models by showing properties as dynamic entities that evolve in response to community needs and economic pressures. While acknowledging the immense labor involved in managing name variations, missing addresses, and fragmented records, she asserts that this approach offers a deeper understanding of local history than traditional genealogy alone. Her work not only helps refine hypotheses about her own husband's ancestors but also encourages researchers to expand their focus beyond immediate lineage to explore the spatial dynamics of entire communities. By combining digital mapping tools with archival research, she demonstrates how technology can illuminate the complex social fabrics of the past, revealing stories of resilience and connection that would otherwise remain hidden.
Read the full video transcript
Hello, I'm Heidi. I'm a librarian, UX
designer, and plotter artist. But these
days, I work as a professional
genealogologist. I research family
histories through archives, census
records, parish registers, and sometimes
DNA. Um, recently I've used GIS to map
individuals and add them to family
trees. Before I started in sorry,
before genealogy, I worked in UX design
across um various industries. I hold a
master's in library and information
science with a focus on organizing
information and access. And today I want
to demonstrate how I integrated my
research into a single project. I relied
on a 19th century tithe map, a road
along the river Hamble and 80 years
worth of records. By aligning these
sources, I identified how families and
relationships persisted across
generations.
I mentioned I'm a sometimes plotter
artist. My husband and I run Forge and
Craft, our studio at Wimbledon Art
Studios. We experiment with technology
mostly using pen plotters. This weekend
we're here alongside Hack Wimbledon and
we brought some of our plotters and
equipment. If you want to um see them,
say hello, talk about genealogy, you're
welcome to stop by. Um so how did all
this begin? Last November, I completed a
post-graduate diploma in genealogical,
paleographic, and heraldic studies at
the University of Strathclyde. The work
I'm sharing today formed the basis of my
dissertation. I was curious whether
mapping people geographically rather
than only through family trees would
reveal insights that the documents alone
couldn't provide.
Before I got into the process uh get
into the process, I want to define a few
terms I'll use throughout the rest of
the talk. GIS is a system for capturing,
storing, analyzing, and displaying
spatial data. I use QGIS for this. It's
free, open source, and has um support
for beginners like me. HGIS or
historical GIS is a subset of GIS that
uses historical data to analyze change
over time and place. Um, a georreerence
map is one that is aligned with modern
coordinates. There are reliable sources
for georreerence maps. If you're
interested in historical ordinance
survey maps, for example, um, the
National Library of Scotland is the
first place I'd look. A raster layer is
a scanned map image incorporated into
GIS software. If the map isn't
georreerenced yet, you can add
geographic coordinates yourself using
the software by selecting reference
points. The shapes and points you draw
on your maps are vector data. These
include points, lines, and polygons.
Vectors, vector layers are powerful
tools when working with mapping
software. I think your limit your
imagination is is the the limit when
visualizing your data using these
layers. And in this case, when I say
plot, I'm actually referring to a
numbered feature or section on my
original tithe map that I followed
during the study. Um, I will explain
tithe maps a little bit more in detail
later, but I have included information
about them in the resources link I will
share at the end of the presentation.
So, I often switch between the plot
numbers and the modern names. Most
modern names for the properties in my
study weren't used throughout the
research. Um, so now most of the
properties can be linked to their
current names. I find it easier to
visualize the names rather than numbers.
So I I use them interchangeably.
So my research is centered on
Berseralden, a parish in the river h um
on the river Hamble between Southampton
and Portsmith. Historically, it was a
ship building village renowned for
constructing HMS Elephant in 1744, which
later served as Nelson's flagship. By
1840, when my study begins, um, ship
building was already in decline and the
local economy had shifted focus to
agriculture and other maritime trades.
Along the riverside, mariners, boatman,
and fishermen lived and worked close
together, constantly adapting to change.
In 1889, a new railway to Southampton
not only changed the landscape of
Berserelin, but also altered how people
committed and found work. So, I
initially attempted to map the entire
parish. However, for my case studies, I
concentrated on five c cottages along a
single road. This is where I will focus
today. This road is now called Land's
End Road on modern maps, but it was not
labeled that way until long after my
research period. The road runs around
along the river. It serves as a key
maritime hub. This photo was taken
around 1900, kind of near the end of my
research period, and it also features
two of my case study locations in the
background. Some merchant ships are um
visible here and likely resemble those
that navigated the river. They were
typically wooden sailing ships operated
by a master and a mate and often used to
deliver goods along England's southern
coast to the aisle of white or to
France.
Some of you may recognize this pub. I
don't know. This is um I think the photo
itself is actually from the 1980s TV
series Howard's Way. I'm an American.
I'm less familiar with that reference.
The pub, The Jolly Sailor, is located
directly on the river. Um, while the TV
connection is intriguing, I find the
stories of the residents here and along
this road even more fascinating. My
initial interest in this place was
personal. While researching my husband's
family, I found in the census that his
great-grandfather was living on this
road, close to the pub. Um, as a master
mariner, he might have found it
convenient to live near the river. I
wanted to find out precisely which
cottage the family lived in and how
close it was to the pub. This question
led to my dissertation topic. I believe
that mapping the families might bring me
closer to the answer.
I realized the most effective way to
understand um the situation was through
GIS. I mapped Brazil's residents using
the tithe map from around 1840 and
census data from around 80 1841 to 1921.
In genealogy, we often refer to a fan
network which includes friends,
associates, and neighbors. In this case,
I focused on the neighbors. Family trees
often follow a direct lineage, but our
real experience encomp encompasses the
people in our communities. I began by s
seeking a single master mariners's house
and eventually map the entire riverside
community. The maps reveal community
movement and connections that the
documents alone didn't show, providing
me a much different under um deeper
understanding of this road. Um I just
want to briefly discuss how I process my
data. I'm not a GIS expert. I will say
I've learned enough of the software to
work with the historical maps and
records. Um, in my project, the tithe
map for the parish served as my
foundation with the tithe aortionments
crucial determining people's locations,
at least for the years 1839 and 1840
when these maps were produced.
The method I followed to import my ties
map into the software would be
applicable to any other map whether it
is a digital scan digital digital image
or a scan. The software enables
georreerencing of raster images by using
alignment points or identified reference
points on the map which can then be
matched to current landmarks. Um then
the software automatically determines
the appropriate scale and projection.
You can also access pre um georreerenced
app sources online, map sources I should
say. For example, I mentioned the
National Library of Scotland earlier.
Their map collection is a valuable
resource for early ordinance survey maps
and they already have already
georreerenced their map scans enabling
you to connect them directly into the
software. I provided some details about
their georreerence maps on my resources
page for this talk. In my project, the
maps I show you on these slides are
either added as a as the raster layer I
mentioned or geo reference layers. And I
can switch between these layers easily,
which makes this really useful. So using
the tithe map, I traced each residential
um building as a vector shape, allowing
me to manipulate them. Um after
overlaying my data layers, I kept my
data separate from my mass u mapping
software, managing all the
transcriptions, data extraction, and
analysis in Air Table. I exported
specific data segments as CSV files.
Then I imported them back into my GI GIS
software. So I I viewed the mapping
software as an extension of my database
um where I could integrate the
historical data that I was collecting.
Here's a tithe map of Berserden around
Land's End Road. It's drawn on light um
brown paper with some buildings shaded
in light orange and others in light
gray. After thorough research and data
collection from the aortionments, I know
that at the time this map was made, the
light orange buildings in this village
were residential properties. I recommend
using the full color versions of these
maps where possible. You can find these
maps on the genealogologist, which is a
commercial genealogy website, but um
note that their images are scanned in
grayscale. While this collection remains
very useful for checking if your area or
ancestors appear on the maps, working
with a grayscale map can be challenging,
especially if you want to inter
interpret the maps shaded areas.
I did pay for the color maps, but
availability and costs vary by county
really. Um, I've added some resource
information again on the resources page
I will share covering tithe maps, what
they are, and how you can locate them.
So, this here is a tithe aortionment
that I mentioned. Um, these act as
detailed ledger books indicating the
amount of tithe or tax owed at its
location. I think they contain valuable
data for map enthusiasts such as precise
land use descriptions, the types of
residences on each plot, and lot sizes,
too. So, for my study, the most helpful
information were the columns listing the
owners and occupiers names at the time
of the survey. This allowed me to
identify residents even if they were
renting or leasing the land.
Additionally, each individual was
identified by plot number on the
corresponding map. So that eliminated
any ambiguity.
So with my map now imported into the
software, I can draw vectors over the
relevant shapes to depict the
residential buildings in my study. I
particularly enjoyed this step. Um I
completed the entire parish, but here's
a small section with my shapes overlaid
on the map. I colored these shapes green
to make them more visible. Additionally,
I used the software's labeling feature
to add my tithe map aortionment data to
the vector shapes. Since I was mainly
working with heads of households on the
maps, I developed various filtering
methods in my data set to address this.
Without these filters, every resident at
a property would be listed, which could
become chaotic very quickly.
So, I can now utilize my maps for data
visualizations that I need. These
vectors add another layer you can
manipulate typically through linking and
filtering. Some basic programming skills
can help maximize the safe software's
capabilities. At this stage, I was
confident I can match the households
between the tithe records and the 1841
census. So, I successfully matched 55
households across the entire parish,
which was roughly 50% of the households.
Variations in names and properties with
multiple residences require careful
cross referencing. For households with
multiple residents, um I split the
vectors in half to assign distinct head
of household names. I also revisited and
refined the data as new information
emerged. So this is what an 1841 census
looks like um for some of the residents
on the this road. These records are
notoriously tricky to interpret. They
were the first census recorded in
England and Wales. They do not provide
exact ages, relationship details or p
precise birthplaces. Instead, they
indicate whether someone was born in a
county and um they offer estimated ages.
However, they do include professions
which can be helpful.
And this is an 1851 census by
comparison, so 10 years later. By this
time, census taking had improved
somewhat. You can see more detailed
locations, although addresses were still
often omitted in rural areas. The data
now includes relationships, uh, marital
status, ages, professions, and more
precise birthplaces. Using my 1851 data,
verification to my tithe map reduced the
data set to 12 linked households.
This reduction in matches is
understandable as households have may
have moved or heads may have died over
the past decade, resulting in family
members with different surnames.
However, I did find this number low
enough to warrant a visual review during
which I looked for miss surname
variations instead. This approach
successfully expanded my the data set by
adding 26 more households. This is where
I want to stop and note that managing
this across an entire parish is
extremely challenging. While it's
understandable to want to uh want a
clear understanding of your population,
numerous data factors make a perfect
matching nearly impossible. For my
dissertation, I had to balance a broader
study area with a more focused case
study. But if I were to approach this
again, I'd likely concentrate more in
the smaller area initially and then
expand from there. To illustrate the
scale of the area, Brazilian's
population in 1841 was 523 with 110
households and in 1851 it was 500 with
113 households. Even for a small parish,
mapping each household over 80 years is
quite an enormous task.
So, here's some initial maps I enjoyed
creating over overlaying um tithe ve
tithe vectors on an ordinance survey map
during my research highlight um patterns
of property loss or change. So, in this
example, there's a homestead in the
middle um I'm about to present you.
You'll observe a homestead loss. So,
look at Alexander McKenzie's homestead
in Hackett's farm marked on the tithe
map.
So, this homestead does not appear in
the ordinance survey map surveyed in
1859. So, I've marked it in red, the
location where it used to be. What's
interesting about examining the census
alongside the maps is that I was able to
trace Alexander to a different nearby
residence in the village. He relocated
there with his servants who had earlier
lived in another cottage at the bottom
of the farm. This eternal internal
migration is visible on a map, though
it's less apparent between the 1851 and
1841 censuses. Identifying this movement
from the census data alone would have
been um challenging.
The difference between the 1859 and the
1895 ordinance survey maps are more
significant primarily due to the railway
construction in the village and um
shifts in the local economy. So at the
bottom of Land's End Road here, we have
several small smaller cottages um that
have been removed completely.
Additionally, you can see a few new
buildings have appeared on this parcel.
So this indicates some consolidation.
There's another out building that was
removed around the Jolly Sailor.
And then in this area where the railway
was constructed constructed, there is a
noticeable decrease in the number of
cottages compared to earlier maps.
When choosing my case studies, I
selected five properties on Lansen Road
to explore household dynamics. I
intentionally avoided the railway
corridor since I expected these cottages
would be gone during my study. As I
mentioned earlier, I use plot numbers
and modern names interchangeably, though
some properties may not have
consistently been known by these names.
The cottages starting from the northern
part of the road to the bottom include
plot 22 elephant boatyard,
plot 23 called yours, plot 25, the jolly
sailor.
Plot 27 is called Myrtle Cottage and
then finally at the very bottom of the
road is plot 31. It's called Shipin or
sometimes it's known as today it's known
as Lans End House.
A census page may seem like a simple
list of names, but connecting those
names to specific physical coordinates
reveals that these properties were more
than static structures. Instead, they
were adaptable spaces, some offering
half a century of stable family life,
while others were continuously
repurposed as safety nets for relatives
with nowhere else to go.
Um, I don't begin at the top of the red
road. Instead, I I start with plot 23,
now known as URS. In 1840, tithe records
ind indicate it was owned and occupied
by James Kohl's and his wife Rachel
Carpenter. After James' death in 1842,
his will left the estate to Rachel for
her lifetime and explicitly safeguarded
his daughter's shares from any future
husband's um financial influence. The
household was multigenerational from the
beginning. The 1841 census indicates
that their daughter Elizabeth Brain and
her young son Jane John James Brain were
already living there. After Rachel's
death in 1852, her estate was herit
inherited by her unmarried daughter,
Charlotte Kohl's, who had lived
independently there her entire life.
Charlotte cared for her for the house
for many years and upon her death in
1880, she bequafed the property to her
nephew John James Brain. John's life
illustrated a clear migration pattern.
He moved from Bersereldon as a young
man, spent 20 years in London, working
as a sugar broker and commission agent,
and later returned to the family home.
By 1891, he was living there once more,
leading the household with his unmarried
sisters, Elizabeth and Sarah. Here's a
photograph of viewers from historic
England. It is a listed building, so I
imagine it hasn't changed much since the
Kohl's and brains live there. The
family's hold on the property endured
for 50 years during my study period,
primarily through the female lineage.
The hold ended after 1891 when John's
health deteriorated um leading to his
admission to the county lunatic asylum
where he inevitably died. I believe the
house remained unoccupied for the rest
of my study period. I couldn't find any
other household in the census record
after John's death. Since this family
had lived here for so long though, it
provided a baseline on the map for
comparing changes along the rest of the
road.
Right next to yours is a jolly sailor,
which I've mentioned, serving as a local
social and commercial center of the
riverfront. Since census takers seldom
recorded precise street addresses here,
the pub also served as a reliable
landmark for locating nearby neighbors.
The property illustrates how local
residents adjusted their livelihoods
over time. Charles Darvis, the owner,
began in 1841 as a sawyer or probably a
barrel maker. He quickly moved into
brewing and pub ownership after that.
Um, gradually expending his property
over the years. In 1875, the property
was um the center of a significant
probate dispute. Following his wife
Sarah's death, Charles, realizing his
own death was near, quickly rewrote his
will on his deathbed. He had no children
and his wife um with his wife gone, the
estate would normally pass to his eldest
nephew who is also called Charles
Jarvis. Um he would have been considered
the legal heir. However, Charles
bypassed him by creating a new will that
left the pub to his great grand nephew
Charles Bevvis who had been living in
the household as a servant but probably
a brewery apprentice and divided the
rest of the estate among 12 nieces and
nephews. The court records show a messy
probate fight over his mental capacity
um at the on this day revealing that
Jarvis told his gathered relatives, I
have left you all something. Don't
quarrel.
Charles and Sarah were buried together
in a church cemetery on the same day as
their deaths were only days apart.
U this is a jolly sailor again. It is
also a listed building, still a working
pub by the same name today. The court
confirmed the well and Charles Bevvis
operated the pub until 1891 after which
he left the trade to become a laborer
and farmer in Swanik across the river.
Management was then handed over to
Hunite, an outsider reloc who relocated
from Swanmore to Dublin before
ultimately settling at the Jolly Sailor
where he spent at least 30 years as an
inkeeper and market gardener.
Next to the pub is Myrtle Cottage. While
a typical map might show it as a single
residence, historical records reveal it
as shared by two workingass class
families between 1841 and 1871. One part
was occupied by Solomon Bevvis, a
fisherman and lighterman, while the
other was occupied by the Wallace
family, headed by Phyllis Wall Wallace,
formerly Turner. For decades, the census
names Phyllis as the head of her
household. But her husband Richard
Ballis was away working as a rope maker
in port sea dockyards. So she managed
the household locally, often through
agricultural fieldwork as necessary. The
key connection here though is the
landlord. In 1846, the cottage was
auctioned and bought by Charles Jarvis,
the owner of the Jolly Sailor. This made
Jarvis not only the publican, but also
the landlord of his neighbors. Um,
this includes Solomon Bevis through
marriage. Bevvis was also the
grandfather of the young man Jarvis
selected to inherit the pub. The family
relationships helped sustain an informal
succession.
So here's Myrtle College around 2001.
This is the last of the listed
properties on our road. I also recently
found out you can rent this as an
Airbnb.
So after Solomon and Phyllis aged out,
the cottage was occupied solely by
Joseph Wilshire, Phyllis's nephew and
also Solomon's relative through
marriage. Joseph worked as a river
mariner and fairyman for 30 years. By
1921, the teny had been inherited by his
son-in-law, William James, who managed
the property and supported Joseph's el
uh Joseph's elderly widow, Margaret,
under the same roof. Further along, plot
31, also known as the ship in,
illustrates a significant shift from a
commercial property to a busy multif
family residence. In the 1840s, Thomas
Harkort was the first um I I'll say
publican um succeeded by John Wilshire
who ran it as a licensed fixer.
By 1861, the building appears to have
ceased functioning as a formal inn and
transitioned into a shared residence.
The 1861 census lists four different
surnames, Wilshire, Turner, Brock, and
Talbot. As residents in the census, they
are shown either as separate households
or as individual lodgers. However, when
mapped against their family trees, a
strong network of kinship becomes
evident. John Wilshire, whom I consider
the patriarch of the property, lived
here with his sister-in-law, Elizabeth
Goddard, previously Turner, um, who at
one point served as his housekeeper.
Also present was Elizabeth's brother,
William Turner, a water laborer married
into the Brock family, and Mary um and
Mary Talbot, an unmarried sister of his
wife listed as receiving alms from the
parish.
This um this house has been known by
several names. The ship in the ship and
launch locally I think it's called the
cast um castle house. Today it's known
as Lanzen House. It stands as a grand
residence with continued easy access to
the river. These families intentionally
use the old in space to gather resources
and shelter their vulnerable relatives.
I also suspect that although not
explicitly mentioned in the records,
this house also served as an important
stop for passing mariners. The photo of
the house shows not only its size but
also the easy access to the river. The
house sold for 1.6 6 million in 2003,
likely a remarkable amount for these
previous residents.
Finally, we have the Elephant Boatyard.
It's at the north end of the road, a
historic site where the warship HMS
Elephant was constructed in 1744. In the
1840s, it belonged to Master Mariner,
William Holyman. After 1841, Holyman
relocated his residence to Southampton
and Milbrook, leaving the boatyard
vacant for about 30 years. I suspect
William probably primarily used this
property for commercial reasons, perhaps
as a storage location for his ship or um
fleet after moving. By 1881, the
property reappears as a residence with
some familiar residents returning.
Charles Goddard, a lifelong sailor,
moves in with his elderly mother,
Elizabeth, the same Elizabeth Turner
from the last case study. Elizabeth was
widowed by Levi Godard, and the family
had earlier lived at plot 31. Remember,
she was also John Wilser Wilshire's
sister-in-law at that location.
Additionally, Charles's widowed niece,
Sarah Clemens, formerly Goddard, lives
here with with her own her own
household. She works as a needlewoman
and raises four young children. Sarah's
parents are Levi Goddard Jr. and
Maryanne Bucket, making Elizabeth her
grandmother. The key connection occurs
between 1891 and 1901 when John
Wilshshire Jr. moves into the boatyard
with his wife, Maryanne Bucket. Decades
earlier, in 1851, Maryanne managed her
own household at the shipin, while her
first husband, Levi Goddard, Jr., was at
sea. Her marriage to John Wilshire Jr.,
the son of the former ship ins publican
and patriarch, and her move to the
boatyard further embedded the Goddard
and Wilshshire families. They formed a
large blended blended family that used
the property to support stepg
grandandchildren, widowed sons and
daughters and other relatives. During
periods of economic hardship, they
adapted by using the boatyard's
residential space to strengthen their
kinship network and extended along the
road. Elephant Boatyard remains an
active ship building site today. It's
hard to get a clear view of the house or
its historical appearance because it's
blocked by the commercial property on
the riverside. However, satellite image
shows its location, illustrating how
advantageous this spot would have been
to those involved in the maritime
trades.
Um, so mapping the residents of these
five properties reveals that the
families on land were not isolated.
Apart from the Kohl's in our initial
case study, the others Jarvis, Bev,
Bevvis, Turner, Wilshire, and Goddard
and their extended families were deeply
connected through blood and marriage.
This is one of my favorite charts from
my dissertation. It's a descendant chart
illustrating the tur Turner Wilshire
Goddard kinship network which is the
largest from my research. While it might
resemble a fan chart to
genealogologists, it focuses on
descendants rather than ancestors. Um,
we start with Elizabeth Turner's parents
at the center, the earliest rooted
couple from the branch. The chart uses
color coding to indicate which
properties were occupied by specific
household heads within the network. Of
my five properties, three are
prominently visible throughout the study
period.
For years, traditional demographic
history suggested that modern
developments push rural populations into
isolated nuclear family units. However,
examining this community geographically
reveals the opposite. These families
depended on intricate extended kinship
networks to adapt and thrive within a
shifting maritime economy. Census
structures in rural comm communities
often don't accurately represent living
arrangements due to missing addresses or
unclear property boundaries. For
instance, nearby households at plot 31
might appear as separate cottages even
if they are part of a single large um
property with four to five households
sharing a support network. Oh, and I
nearly forgot. Was my husband's
great-grandfather among that those
featured in this case studies? The
answer is no. However, my research
helped me refine my hypothesis about his
possible residence. I believe he was
likely in the railway corridor. They
didn't relocate far, just across the
across the river to Swanig into the same
row of cottages where my mother-in-law
was born and by coincidence where
Charles Bevis, the former owner of the
Jolly Sailor Pub, also lived after he
gave up the business. If I were to
continue this research now, the next
logical step would be to systematically
shift focus to that railway corridor and
apply this method again with a new group
of cottages.
I want to be entirely transparent about
my approach. This process can be quite
demanding. Historical GIS isn't just a
matter of inputting data into software
and letting a map appear on its own.
Mapping this one road over 80 years
involves reconstructing the life stories
of each neighbor and extended family
member. It requires overcoming data
barriers, managing name variations,
locating wills, and consulting registers
to verify census info. Expanding to a
whole parish is a huge labor intensive
task. Balancing broad geographic scope
with detailed local studies. The effort
though radically transforms our
historical data model showing that
properties are dynamic and evolve in
response to community economic needs. A
key contribution of this work is demon
is the demonstration of how spatial
analysis and property based methods can
aid genealogical and historical
research. It encourages expanding the
focus beyond the immediate family and
extends our research into areas that map
community interests using tools that
complement family trees to explore
spatial dynamics. Thank you. Um,
[applause]