Post-debate Film | Changing Cultures | Urban Age Debates: Cities in the 2020s
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
The video explores the evolution of cultural infrastructure over the past three decades, highlighting how investment in arts buildings has traditionally been driven by urban policy rather than pure cultural strategy. For thirty years, this funding was primarily aimed at regenerating city centers, stimulating tourism, and fostering knowledge and creative economies. However, the landscape has shifted dramatically following the pandemic, which caused a near-halt to the sector and exposed deep vulnerabilities in both personal and societal structures. As international travel patterns change and visitor numbers become volatile, institutions are forced to question whether they are emerging into the same world or if their very nature must transform to remain relevant.
In response to these challenges, cultural spaces are redefining their purpose from mere repositories for research to becoming "living rooms" that foster community and imagination. Examples like the central library in Helsinki illustrate this shift, where institutions now function as meeting places rather than just book checkout points. This multiplicity allows for new civic typologies to emerge, ranging from community kitchens to tool-sharing spaces, creating hybrid environments that build specific meaning and networks. The pandemic has further accelerated this need for flexibility, leading organizations like Southbank Centre in London to adapt their operating hours and introduce Sunday performances to accommodate changing work patterns and a reluctance among older demographics to use public transport.
The financial sustainability of these institutions is another critical issue, as the post-pandemic era demands entrepreneurial thinking and diverse revenue models beyond traditional ticket sales or government grants. Publicly funded organizations face severe budget cuts during crises, while privately funded ones risk losing their artistic freedom to corporate agendas. Consequently, many institutions have had to rethink their business plans entirely, with some relying on less than forty percent public funding in the UK. There is also a growing call for broader urban strategies that capture capital gains generated by cultural projects and reinvest them into community building and innovation, rather than letting these benefits accrue solely to private corporations.
Ultimately, the discussion concludes that culture must move beyond monolithic definitions to embrace diversity and act as a vital social resource. Institutions are increasingly reaching out to build coalitions that extend beyond traditional cultural boundaries, allowing creative ethos to travel across different scales of the city. By avoiding rigid approaches and embracing hybrid working models and diverse community engagement, cultural sectors can enhance existing organizations and foster true innovation. The future of culture lies in its ability to adapt to new societal needs, ensuring that art remains a beautiful and essential part of life without being confined to a single way of being in the world.
Read the full video transcript
[Music]
it has been a long sweep of investment
in
culture
and particularly in cultural
infrastructure arts buildings if you
like that long sweep has been informed
by urban policy rather than cultural
policy if you think about all that
investment in arts buildings it's often
as a prompt to the regeneration of city
centers it's been about priming for
private investment in in downtown areas
it's been about the stimulation of the
knowledge economy and the creative
economy it's been about stimulating
tourism but the trajectory has broadly
been consistent over those 30 years um
the last four or five years before
covert there was an investment of about
10 to 15 billion us dollars per year in
cultural buildings but we are now
emerging from a period when in effect
the sector ground to a halt we know that
trends in international tourism are
going to be critically important
particularly for larger institutions and
city centers we know that behavioral
patterns may be changing as a result of
the period of covid we know that
people's sensibility about international
travel has become increasingly
significant as we emerge the critical
question is are we emerging into the
same world are the cultural institutions
that are emerging changed by the
experience and by other things that have
gone on
and cultural infrastructure i think is
starting to think about how do you
become
infrastructure for imagination if you
will i think that there's a
expansiveness in an experimentation that
is happening in the civic realm but
there's also this way of thinking about
civic space which is no longer about
strangers but how do you actually build
communities and networks that actually
have these specific meaning spaces i've
also been very intrigued with od and
helsinki with the central library that
is now thinking of itself as a library
yes but they call themselves like a
living room so nowadays it's not only
about doing research and going to check
out a book but it also is meeting rooms
on a smaller scale what i find
incredibly interesting is vis-a-vis this
multiplicity that was speaking about a
specificity how many communities and
many smaller projects are actually
functioning as places where new civic
typologies are possible so nowadays
you're seeing everything from community
kitchens that are also like tool sharing
and i'm quite intrigued about what the
future could be like the symbiotic
nature of both the shifts and the
changes in terms of the experimentation
nature and this expansion of
possibilities
my two lessons from the pandemic is a
learning about vulnerability a personal
vulnerability and the vulnerability of a
society
and which leads us
to a
more enhanced thinking about communities
what we have seen in western europe and
all the countries a sharp decrease in
attendances in the museums in the public
sector with a
high amount of money spent just to
maintain the infrastructures which is
good on the one hand on the other hand
here continue to sustain organizations
which do not longer fit
to the effects of the pandemic and which
do not correspond to the needs of a
society to rethink about a reshaping and
the redesigning of a public space of a
citizen space to deal with the two key
issues diversity and sustainability the
effects of the pandemic will last and we
are trained in that model will change
because
they are to be seen under the criteria
of sustainability we export products or
we deliver services and people come to
request those products and services i'm
thinking about the berlinale festival
even on the khan festival what we are
doing as governments or as cultural
institutions to try to export culture by
buying a ticket for an airplane
and by sending a film abroad that will
tremendously change
weed south bank are an eleven acre site
with four venues we used to be open
seven days a week we are closed
currently on mondays and tuesdays but
that is partly to cater for that issue
of london just not being as busy as it
has been visitor return is pretty
volatile tourism obviously was a huge
part of our ecosystem our visitor
numbers were something in the region of
four and a half million we have 50 000
so we have had a massive impact in terms
of overseas tourism and to some degree
out of town tourism as well i think that
he's not reluctant to come to the halls
which i think people understand are
incredibly coveted safe but they are
very nervous about travel so we are
definitely impacted by people's
reluctance to use public transport
particularly the older demographic we
keep saying that thursday night is the
new friday night because
many people are choosing to work from
home now on fridays so we're finding the
site very lively on thursday nights
we're sort of hammering out what sort of
lasting effect this change in work
pattern is going to have on us so in
terms of our audiences there's no
question that you know deciding to go to
an event after work when you work in
central london is an easy hop and a step
if you've been working at home it
involves the commute in it's all
together a much different schlep one of
the things that west end has done has
been to introduce the sunday performance
historically of course the yet has never
opened on sundays here in the uk but
because of that shifting pattern we're
all having to think about slightly
different ways
of providing art and activity for people
it seems we're caught in a catch-22 if
you're publicly funded a crisis comes
and then certainly the huge budget cuts
actually put so many museums
simultaneously at apparel and then if
you're privately funded then you're
strapped into a more corporate agenda
and you lose your freedom so this
expansiveness and this poetry and this
freedom that comes from artistic
practices or something to maintain
perhaps one of the places of imagination
and creativity that needs to happen is
are there other financial models do
budgets come from elsewhere the one
thing that the last 20 months has taught
leaders or certainly institutions is
that they will sink if they're not
entrepreneurial flexible thinking
outside the box i mean we have all been
so challenged by business plans that are
frankly totally irrelevant and had to
most of us completely rethink the
structure of our organization as well as
every business plan we might have
hatched in the past in the case of south
bank center public funding is only 37 of
our total funding so we have always been
necessarily entrepreneurial flexible on
our toes thinking about opportunity a
lot of that in the uk has to do with the
decline in public funding we have
increasingly over the last few years had
to find other ways of making raising
revenue imagination and creativity that
needs to happen is in terms of urban
agendas when cultural institutions come
into specific places within the city and
what happens in terms of the real estate
value
why is there not more thinking on
broader terms in terms of the surplus
capture of the capital gains that are
made by cultural institutions coming in
and that are actually not captured by
corporations and by private
companies but actually by the public
money should be spent
to foster to enhance and to enable
in the field of innovation this is the
way
you can enhance community building in
the existing organizations and that's
actually what's happening because i see
many many of the important public
players opening up to another kind of
community building opening up to more
diversity but there is still a need for
more innovation in latin america in
general i am seeing museums reaching out
to other communities a lot more
frequently of truly trying to build
coalitions that go beyond the cultural
and very much thinking about
a creative ethos as a social resource
so in that sense i find that this need
to reach out not being able to maintain
like a monolithic relationship to the
rest of the city and the rest of your
society can be incredibly interesting in
many ways because again like you become
more multiple you're reaching out into
other communities this creative ethos
can travel in very different ways it can
travel the scales of the city you can
become a lot more hybrid in the way that
you work
in many ways
sometimes i believe we suddenly come
across certain ideas of what culture is
or what culture does that become
monolithic in nature and again that we
should not necessarily cinch art to just
like one way of being in the world
because art for our sake is also a
beautiful thing and so how do we just
add the growing repertoire
of what culture and arts does within
societies
[Music]
you