Video summary
The video explores how individual and collective suffering has evolved into a form of "pornography," where people perform their anguish, trauma, and pain primarily to gain social capital and financial monetization. While this phenomenon is not new—echoing the sensationalism of shows like Jerry Springer—it has been amplified exponentially by modern social media technologies that allow for self-publishing and direct access to audiences without traditional gatekeepers. This shift has given rise to a competitive victimhood movement, transitioning from an earlier phase focused on legitimate grievances and reparations to a malignant stage where the goal is no longer to make things right but to make life worse for perceived enemies while securing exclusive rights for one's own in-group.
This evolution culminates in what the speaker terms "performative victimhood," a third phase characterized by the ostentatious display of suffering tailored specifically to audience expectations and fantasies. In this environment, movements are increasingly infiltrated and led by individuals with dark triad personalities, such as narcissists and psychopaths, who leverage these dynamics for revenge, fame, and wealth. These leaders often employ "splitting narratives," portraying their group as angelic and blameless while depicting everyone else as irredeemably evil, thereby justifying aggression, defamation, and even violence against an invented or real enemy. This dynamic creates an echo chamber where followers redirect their pent-up rage, envy, and fear onto a specific target, effectively legitimizing otherwise illegitimate acts of destruction under the guise of moral crusades.
The organizational structure of these movements resembles cults, relying on transferred agency where members willingly become instruments of the group's agenda and abandon independent critical thinking. Followers are told they are part of an inexorable historical movement that gives meaning to their lives, leading them to overlook clear signs of manipulation by sadistic leaders who feign empathy while harboring vicious intentions. As these groups solidify into hierarchical mobocracies, members begin to obey instructions robotically, eventually facing a cycle of idealization followed by devaluation and discard once they are no longer useful. Ultimately, the video warns that without recognizing these manipulative patterns, participants risk falling victim to narcissistic abuse within their own communities as these vigilante mobs rigidify into totalitarian structures driven by collective delusion.
Read the full video transcript
Suffering
both individual and collective
has become a theater of pornography.
There are pornographic displays of
suffering. There's performative
victimhood.
People put on display
their anguish
their agony
their trauma
their pain their hurt.
And they do so in a way
which help them helps them to monetize
it. Not only financially
but also socially. They convert it into
social capital.
This is
not a new phenomenon. You remember Jerry
Springer?
It's not a new phenomenon but social
media and other technologies have given
it heft and reach
like never before.
My name is Sam Vaknin. I'm the author of
Malignant Self Love, Narcissism
Revisited. I'm a professor of psychology
and
not a pornographic sufferer.
>> [laughter]
>> Okay, Shoshana Nin. Let's delve right
in.
We are in an age of victimhood.
The sociologist Campbell said that we
have transitioned
from the age of dignity
to the age of victimhood.
We are perfectly willing to sacrifice
self-respect
integrity dignity, values, beliefs
social contacts
family, everything. We're willing to
sacrifice everything
just to be seen as a victim.
Everyone and his dog and her
mother-in-law
are victims. And the problem begins to
be where do we find enough abusers?
>> [laughter]
>> A sufficient number of abusers. If
everyone is a victim, who on earth is
abusing all these people?
And so the outcome, the offshoot of this
is the victimhood movement.
It's a variant on the social justice
movements of the 1920s, 1960s.
And it it's this There is a considerable
difference and distinction
between modern-day victimhood movements,
which I think started around the 1980s,
and these earlier variants.
You see,
in phase one,
there were legitimate grievances.
There was a real attempt to redress them
and to address them.
The emphasis was on civil liberties, on
human rights, on societal obligations.
It was a kind of Wiedergutmachung, as
the German say,
making it right again.
Reparations. The reparations
again don't have necessarily to be
pecuniary,
financial.
Reparations could mean, for example,
legislation.
Reparations could come in the form of
recognition of suffering. Re-
reparations could come in by way of
addressing grievances um via
infrastructure and via policy changes.
There are many ways to repair the
situation. And the first phase
of those social justice movement
movements turned victimhood movements,
the first phase was wholly dedicated to
making things better.
And then
we have transitioned
to phase two.
The transition to phase two was
facilitated by the emergence of
technologies which allowed for
self-publishing,
self-aggrandizement,
self-enhancement, self-promotion.
Everyone suddenly gained access to
technologies which were
reserved.
Technologies were with which were
usually
kept curated by gatekeepers and
intermediaries. There was a process of
disintermediation.
Right now, anyone can publish a book,
make a podcast,
shoot a documentary film on their
iPhone,
and consequently, there is a wild,
chaotic, anarchic
of so-called content, most of which is
slop, nonsense, defamation, and worse.
This liberalization and democratization
of the means of production, the means of
intellectual production,
led directly to phase two.
When everyone has an audience,
everyone becomes an actor.
And this led to the rise of competitive
victimhood,
or as Gabay and her collaborators
called, TIV, tendency for interpersonal
victimhood.
There's a channeled
it's channeled externalized aggression,
coupled with rising intolerance, which
almost borders on religious fervor.
There's dogmatism,
doctrinarianism.
There is
um
a wish to eliminate, annihilate,
destroy, eradicate the other.
So, there's a lot of othering involved.
Phase two
is a virulent,
malignant transformation of phase one.
Where the emphasis is no longer on
making things right,
on making things better.
The emphasis is on making it worse for
the other side.
Making it Making it right only for
yourself.
It's This This is an exclusionary
and exclusive approach.
Only members of the in-group
deserve humane and civilized treatment.
All others
are justifiably mistreated.
They have no rights. The other has no
rights.
Phase two, the phase of ostentatious
competitive victimhood,
uh lasted a while
and segued seamlessly
into phase three.
The phase we're in right now.
Phase three involved an ostentatious
pornographic display of suffering.
Performative victimhood.
Victimhood with an audience.
Victimhood geared
to the expectations and needs and wishes
and dreams and fantasies and nightmares
of an audience, a specific audience.
The whole scene fragments fragmented and
fractured.
Victimhood became ala carte.
Victimhood became tailored and
customized.
And this led to a takeover.
Takeover by dark triad personalities.
People who are narcissistic, people who
are psychopathic.
And by narcissists and psychopaths.
Victimhood movements have been
infiltrated by them.
They took over.
And then they leveraged victimhood
movements against their enemies.
One manifestation of this is the
victimhood smear campaign or the
victimhood pile on.
The victimhood pile on or the victimhood
smear campaign
legitimize
externalized aggression bordering on
violence.
The
background notes are
our enemies should die one way or
another. We should deny them their
rights, but that's not enough. We should
eliminate them somehow.
The victimhood smear campaigns and
victimhood pile ons
are driven by narratives.
And these narratives are usually um
all good We are all good and they are
all bad. These are known as splitting
narratives.
We are all angelic. We are impeccable.
We are flawless. We are blameless.
And they are evil and dark.
Who are they?
They are everyone
who is not us.
There is otherness, there's they-ness.
And so this the victimhood smear
campaign and the victimhood pile on and
the and generally more generally the
third phase of victimhood
is about confrontation and conflict.
It's about fighting back.
It's about eliminating, eradicating,
obliterating, pulverizing the enemy, the
perceived enemy. And when there's no
enemy, they invent one. It's an
enemy-driven narrative, in-group
out-group.
And so victimhood smear campaigns,
victimhood pile ons, ostentatious
pornography of suffering, performative
victimhood, competitive victimhood, all
of them converge
converge on conspiracy theories,
on hate hate movements,
on hate-based identities,
no wonder anti-Semitism is is raising
its ugly head.
And you could stop here and ask,
who buys into all this nonsense?
Who are the ones who drive this forward?
Where's Where's the fuel? Where's the
engine of this?
Why would anyone believe in a conspiracy
theory? Why would anyone buy into some
nonsensical construct or narrative that
falls apart under minimal inspection and
critical thinking?
And one possible answer is people are
seriously stupid and gullible.
They would buy into anything.
I don't
Although I'm inclined
to I'm inclined to believe this because
I'm contemptuous towards the vast
majority of mankind,
I don't buy it in this case.
I don't think it's about gullibility. I
don't think people are stupid at all.
In this particular case, I think what's
happening is people are very angry.
They're angry.
They're full of pent-up rage,
aggression that has no outlet.
And these
movements, these victimhood movements,
victimhood smear campaigns, victimhood
pylons,
victimhood
social movements, these these
intolerant,
aggressive, and very often violent um
agglomerations of of people, this
in-group affiliation and belonging,
they satisfy this rage. They cater to
this anger.
Like they provide a legitimate outlet.
And so people
people put their blinders on.
They don't want to study the evidence.
They don't want to delve deep.
They don't want to exercise critical
thinking.
They don't care about any any of this.
They're angry.
And here's a hub, here's a place, here's
a locus,
here's a a local
where they can express this anger.
Where they can legitimately
destroy someone, kill someone, defame
someone. It
You know, it's it's like
finally
finally someone gets it.
Like-minded people flocking together
with a single common identifiable enemy.
Mostly invented enemy, mostly imaginary
enemy,
mostly concocted enemy, unreal, but it
doesn't matter.
It's an enemy
that can be attacked. It's an enemy that
can be criticized. It's an enemy that it
can be
demeaned and humiliated and shamed and
And so this gives
this allows the participants
to vent
their negative affects.
A lot of the aggression is driven driven
by envy.
A lot of it is driven by anger.
A lot of it is is driven by fear.
All these negative affects coalesce
and they are redirected
like a laser beam
onto the target.
This is perfectly described
in nine in the novel novel 1984 by
George Orwell.
The conspiratorial smear campaign
focuses
and redirects diffuse rage, frustration,
and envy.
It tells you this is the enemy. This
person needs to be taken down. This
collective needs to be attacked and
smeared. This group needs to be
eliminated
or assassinated,
which could easily lead to genocide.
The There is a demonization of the
other.
Irredeemably, there are no redeeming
features.
The other is all bad and only bad. The
other is the reification of evil, which
makes you
the reification of good, makes you an
angel.
Who can resist this? It is
self-idealization
via the group.
It's an echo chamber. It's a It's a
collective delusion. It's known today as
mass psychogenic illness.
And so, conspiracy uh smear campaigns,
which are focused based on
a conspiracy and an identifiable enemy,
they
serve as a channel.
They focus things.
They allow people
to somehow
uh
legitimize
that which otherwise is totally
illegitimate,
inappropriate,
and should I say evil.
Conspiratorial smear campaigns
are actually the embodiment of evil
masquerading
as good.
These are extensions of the prosocial
narcissists that are driving them.
They are infested with psychopaths,
covert narcissists, and narcissists.
The leaders of these conspiratorial
smear campaigns
are invariably mentally ill people,
cluster B personality disorders, and
worse.
They're invariably sadistic, vicious,
unrelenting, callous, disempathic.
They're great actors.
They pretend.
They feign empathy and compassion. They
cry ostentatiously on camera
and
make you witness it.
They
But deep inside
they're creatures of the dark.
They're horrendous people.
Dangerous.
The organization of these movements
is is like a cult.
It's a cult-like in-group.
The need to belong
and the need to be told what to do
is the are the common denominators of
the members of the group. There's
There's a transferred agency.
Agency is transmitted onto the group.
The individual becomes an extension or
an instrument or a prop or a tool.
Willingly.
This is not a some kind of pernicious,
stealthy, surreptitious process. This is
perfectly open and visible.
The leaders of these groups tell you
"We are doing the hard work. We are
fighting for you. We are your heroes."
Consequently
you should listen to us and obey us. You
should do everything we tell you to do.
You should never ever exercise
independent critical thinking. You
should never doubt us. You should never
question us.
They're very totalitarian
uh in this sense.
Self-righteousness
and self-enhancement
is some kind of morality play in a moral
crusade.
And all this is cast as a kind of
payback
for perceived past victimhood.
It's like your time has come. You have
been victimized. You have been
assaulted. You've been attacked. You've
been humiliated. You've been shamed.
You've been ignored. You've been held in
contempt and disdain. And this your
moment has come. Now you can strike back
at the people who have done all this to
you.
Now your life has a meaning.
Now suddenly your meaningless life has a
meaning.
Now, you are a participant in a global
historical movement which is both
inexorable
and righteous.
Unscrupulous individuals leverage these
dynamics
to exact revenge on their enemies and
adversaries,
to to attain celebrity,
to garner a following,
and of course,
to get rich.
They do all this in plain sight. They're
not hiding.
And yet,
the anger and envy and rage of their
followers is such that they're willing
to overlook anything.
They're willing to reframe everything.
They're willing to ignore
the clear signs that they're being
manipulated
cold-heartedly
and ruthlessly
by the so-called leaders.
And
this capacity
itself denial,
this hidden
this hidden monologue,
"I'm so angry that I don't care anymore
about my independence,
my critical thinking, my personal
autonomy, my agency. I don't care
anymore about my life, my family. I
don't care. I need to express this anger
before it consumes me. I need to act
upon the objects of my frustration and
my
past abusers. I need to do all this."
And of course,
gradually,
these phase three
victimhood movements become vigilante
mobs.
And
there's mob rule, mobocracy,
and they rigidify and coalesce into
hierarchical structures which resemble
as I said cults very much.
Grad- increasingly and incrementally
followers, members, fans, participants
begin to automatically and robotically
obey instructions unthinkingly.
And before they know it
before they know it
they're bound to go through a process of
narcissistic abuse.
Idealization is the first phase.
But later on
devaluation and discard
when they are no longer useful.
So if you're a member such a group
prepare yourself.
Judgment day is coming.