Physics+ Hamiltonian Intro: UNIZOR.COM - Physics+ 4 All -Hamiltonian
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
The video introduces Hamiltonian mechanics as a refined mathematical framework designed to simplify and improve upon the traditional Lagrangian approach used in classical physics. While previous chapters focused on deriving equations of motion using the Euler-Lagrange method based on the difference between kinetic and potential energy, this lecture highlights several drawbacks of that older model. The primary issues include the reliance on second-order differential equations, which are more difficult to solve than first-order ones, and a lack of clear physical intuition regarding why the Lagrangian is defined as the subtraction of energies rather than their sum. To address these challenges, the presenter proposes shifting perspective by treating generalized coordinates and generalized momentum as independent variables, thereby transforming complex second-order problems into a set of simpler, coupled first-order equations.
The core transformation involves rewriting kinetic energy in terms of momentum instead of velocity, allowing for a new function called the Hamiltonian to be defined as the sum of potential and kinetic energies rather than their difference. This redefinition is particularly effective because, in simple mechanical systems where forces are conservative, this total energy remains constant over time. By substituting the Lagrangian with the Hamiltonian, the equations of motion split into two distinct but symmetric sets: one describing how momentum changes based on potential energy gradients and another describing how coordinates evolve based on kinetic energy relationships. This symmetry not only makes the mathematical structure more elegant but also ensures that each equation is a first-order differential equation, which significantly reduces computational complexity compared to solving single second-order equations for position alone.
The significance of this approach extends far beyond classical mechanics into modern theoretical physics fields such as quantum mechanics and statistical mechanics, where these simplified formulations are essential tools. In contemporary applications like the Schrödinger equation or path integral formulation in quantum theory, variables often need to be treated independently without assuming a direct relationship between position and momentum at every instant, making Hamiltonian formalism indispensable. The lecture concludes by emphasizing that while this method introduces twice as many equations—once for coordinates and once for momenta—the resulting system is far easier to manage because each component deals with first-order dynamics rather than the more cumbersome second-order derivatives found in Lagrangian mechanics. Ultimately, adopting the Hamiltonian perspective provides a clearer physical interpretation of energy conservation and offers a powerful foundation for advancing into advanced areas of physics research.
Read the full video transcript
Hi, I'm Zohar. Welcome to New Zohar
Education.
Uh today we will start a new chapter
called Hamiltonian.
So, today is Hamiltonian introduction.
Kind of short.
Um just to basically introduce you to
main concept of Hamiltonian mechanics.
Um and this is more, I would say,
mathematical rather than physical.
Um however, it's very important to
actually understand that um it leads to
a some more physical um approach to
um equations of motion.
What do we know as of now from the
previous uh chapters, Lagrangian and uh
Noether's theorem? We have related
um the equations of motion with
Lagrangian.
Now, equations of motion is basically
Euler-Lagrange equations, and let me
just write it down.
Um it's uh
partial derivative of Lagrangian by
coordinate
is equal to
time derivative of partial derivative of
Lagrangian by
generalized velocity. So, this is the
main Euler-Lagrange equation, which we
basically derived many times, explained,
etc.
Now, what is Lagrangian? Well, in
simple, relatively, you know, in
classical, simple cases, Lagrangian is
difference between
um kinetic and potential energy.
Now, this difference, which is called,
well,
it's it's Lagrangian, but I mean, what
what's the physical meaning of this?
Well, to tell you the truth, I feel very
uncomfortable
with in
>> [clears throat]
>> interpreting
t minus t t minus u
from the physical standpoint.
I I don't know basically what what
physical sense is in this
difference. So, it it feels
uncomfortable.
What else is uncomfortable?
Well, this is the second order
differential equation. C1
derivative, another derivative.
Uh so, it's the second order. It's
always difficult to deal with, much
easier to deal with one with the first
order with the
the first order differential equations.
So, there are certain draw points in
this approach.
Now, Hamiltonian mechanics kind of eases
out a little bit.
Um so, we will convert basically with
this model into another model, which is
Hamiltonian mechanics, which looks
simpler.
And going forward, I can tell you that
Hamiltonians uh
mechanics
and all these whatever
uh formulas are related are much more
suitable for contemporary
um
theoretical physics like um quantum
mechanics, statistical mechanics, and
and others.
So, this is basically the motivation for
us.
Now, this chapter
uh of this particular course is
dedicated to basically research what is
the Hamiltonian mechanics and how it
really looks like from mathematical
standpoint with equations, etc.
And this is all part of the course
called Physics Plus. It's presented on
unizor.com totally free website, no
subscription, no
advertisement, no signing in,
just pure knowledge for your
consumption.
So, let me basically start with
this thing and try to to do it maybe a
little bit better.
Okay, so first of all, let's just
concentrate on one very simple thing.
In the previous lectures, primarily in
description of the Noether's theorem, we
were talking about
generalized
momentum, which we defined as
partial derivative of Lagrangian, which
is basically function of
time, generalized coordinates, and
generalized velocities. By general by
generalized velocities. So, we we have
defined it as
um
momentum, generalized momentum. It's a
definition, basically.
Now, obviously when I'm writing just Q,
I mean
Q1, Q2, Q3, etc. It's generalized uh
coordinates. Okay?
Now, why is this
um
making sense?
Well, look at the Euler-Lagrange
equation. What can we do right now is to
rewrite it as dL by dt
Q is equal to
uh time derivative of
this, of the momentum. So, time
derivative is
in Newtonian uh
notation is just a dot.
So, dot is time derivative here and
here.
So, this looks
This looks much better than this, right?
Well, what's the problem? The problem is
that we have only n
uh equations of the second order.
Here we have
uh also n equations of the second order,
but here we have n different unknown
variables, which are functions q of time
t.
Here we have
two n functions, q as a function and p
as a function. If we want to consider
this
as this simple thing, we should consider
them to be independent.
So, this is basically a very important
moment.
We are considering
momentum, generalized momentum, and
generalized coordinates independently.
So, this is something we should really
have to uh kind of understand because in
classical mechanics, we know that
momentum
is mass times velocity, and velocity is
time derivative of coordinate. So, they
are related.
Here we are considering them
independently
because it's not the old-fashioned
classical mechanics. So,
if we are considering them
independently,
because otherwise we cannot really bring
it to a first-order equation. Then we
have a problem of not having sufficient
number of equations. We have two n
uh independent variables, but only n
equations
for each i, basically, right? So, it's
for each i.
For each coordinate.
So, that's the problem.
And now I'm introducing a very easy
solution to this problem,
which leads to Hamiltonian equations.
And here it is.
Let's just recall
that in most of the
um
classical mechanical simple
um models simple mechanical systems, we
have this thing
where T is a function of what? Of
velocities.
And U is a function of coordinates.
Kinetic energy does not depend on
position.
It's basically
remember MV squared.
And V is actually
Q with a dot, time derivative of
coordinate.
And the potential energy depends only on
position.
Which means on coordinates.
So.
In classical mechanics, we know that
Q
and P are related. So, I would like
actually to to have it rewritten
as function of
P somehow.
So, what is this?
Well,
the kinetic energy
is MV
I squared.
For all um
different It's kinetic energy of the
whole system. So,
VI is the
uh the velocity of each particular
component of that system.
Now, if instead of this, I will put
this.
That's the same thing, right?
P is
uh
mv. Square would be m squared v squared
divided by m, it would be this.
Uh I really have to put 1/2 here. I'm
sorry.
So, that's the definition of T, kinetic
energy.
Okay, fine.
So, now if I'm using this particular
definition
for this,
I get
come up with the following thing.
So, if T is equal to 1/2 sigma
um
1 over m i p i squared,
then dT by dP
uh
i would equal to
So, for one particular
uh i, so it's a square and 1/2, so it
would be 1 over m i
p i.
Right?
Okay.
And what is this?
Back to
P is equal to mv.
So, if I divide it by m, it would be v,
right? So, it's q
with a dot.
Now, this is an interesting equation.
Now, this is also an interesting
equation.
So, let's rewrite this
as
T minus U.
Now, we know that
kinetic energy is independent of
coordinate. So, this is actually minus
dU
by dQ i.
T is independent of q1. Q depends on
qi. It depends on
the velocity.
So, we have an interesting two
equations. One is this one.
pi is equal to minus du
by dqi.
And another is this one.
Q
Uh sorry. We have
Is it dot? qi with a dot
is equal to
dt by
dpi.
Look at the symmetry of this.
It's definitely much better.
And now we have two n equations.
What's the problem?
Well, the problem is that
the first one is a function of
of potential energy.
And the second one is a function of
kinetic energy.
And these are two different functions
and this is really doesn't look that
doesn't look good. However, we can
definitely very easily repair it.
Again, T
is independent
of Q. It's function only of
uh
of
momentum.
Now, U
is independent of momentum and is
function of coordinates.
So, what I can do is
I can put here
instead of U
I can put T plus U.
And it doesn't really change anything.
Because T is independent of coordinate.
Instead of this, I can put also T + U.
Because U is independent of
uh momentum. It depends only on
uh position.
Now, I have the same function.
Right?
I call this function Hamiltonian.
And now, my
2N equations now look like this.
Now, we have two independent 2N
independent equations
where QI
and PI are independent variables and
variables each and N variables this. We
have 2N different
differential equations of the first
order
and quite frankly, it looks much
beautiful much more beautiful than this
one.
So, this is the main
kind of road which introduced us
to Hamiltonian mechanics.
And what's one of the very important
issues for myself, what is this?
Well, this is the sum of potential and
kinetic energy which is
total energy of the system. So, in these
relatively simple mechanical systems,
whatever
whenever this thing actually is an
energy,
we have some meaningful
meaningful um
uh
system of coordinates a system of
equations
where the function from which we do this
partial differentiation is energy.
I mean, it has certain
meaning
much more than this one.
The difference between kinetic and
potential.
So, this is the main
uh
road where we introduced a concept of
Hamiltonian.
In classical simple cases, it's full
energy of the system, mechanical system.
Um
again, everything basically is related
to conservative mechanical systems.
Um we have certain forces like
gravitation and some some something like
this. The the the the forces which which
have the field and you it's uh
conservative forces.
Um so, in all these cases, like planets
are moving around the sun
uh along their orbits. I mean, this is
typical example of conservative system.
So, and in these cases, we have this
particular thing.
So, obviously, it's very natural to
generalize it to generalized
coordinates.
And uh in as much as we need the
Lagrangian as a function
uh
which characterize the behavior of the
system,
we need for this theory, for Hamiltonian
mechanics, we need Hamiltonian to
basically describe the system. And then,
the system of equations would be much
much more um
uh
I don't know. Beautiful, if you wish. I
mean, I do like how it looks much better
than than this one. Although, there are
two n equations and only n here, but
each equation seems to be much simpler.
So, the more complicated problem
we have
divided into more less complicated
problems. And then each particular
problem is easier to resolve because
it's a first-order rather than a
second-order equation.
So, as a result, I can say that the
Hamiltonian mechanics is um used in many
different contemporary
theoretical physics theoretical physics
fields. For example, the statistical
mechanics, quantum mechanics, and and
some others which I don't really know
myself about.
Okay, anyway.
So, that's it for today. I do suggest
you to read notes for this lecture.
Uh every lecture on unizor.com has video
part and
textual part. Textual part is similar to
a textbook. So, you I suggest you to
read.
That would be you go to unizor.com, you
choose physics plus course.
Uh
the chapter is called Hamiltonian, and
then that's the first lecture called
introduction um to Hamiltonian. That's
where you will read whatever I was just
talking about. So, thank you very much
and good luck.