Photo State: Experiments in Eaton-escence
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
Christopher Penny delivers the tribute lecture "Photo State: Experiments in Eaton-escence" at the Paul Mellon Center to honor the late art historian Natasha Eton, presenting twelve fragments that explore photography within a utopian alternative regime of value found in bazaars, shrines, and nawabi courts. His journey begins in Nai Surak, Delhi, where an old studio utilizing obsolete technology like typewriters illustrates how no technology dies predictably due to the avoidance of obsolescence, while defaced photographs from Madurai and Bombay demonstrate that iconoclasm creates new visual injuries rather than simply removing images. The talk further examines diverse practices such as villagers offering framed portraits resembling tablets for deceased relatives, gurus recording holy footprints known as *puglia* which function like vernicles, and the concept of "cool photography" during Holi where thermal exchange theories involving ghee and neem leaves help conquer heat alongside fire-walking rituals.
Penny distinguishes between reactive local practices termed "vernacular" and active engagements with cosmopolitan modernity labeled as "demotic," analyzing 1970s studio montages that use film canisters to symbolize connectivity rather than mere affluence, thereby challenging Walter Benjamin's notion of eroded aura by arguing for a persistence of cultic value in India. He investigates optical reversibility through brass cutouts and mirrored deity prints where viewers see themselves adjacent to the divine, describing an experience at Dantalab that shifted his perspective from external observer to attempting to see through the eyes of the possessed via camera lens prosthetics. In Lucknow, he critiques contemporary studios for producing generic images of Mughal architecture until one created a composite merging a Sufi gesture with light streaming from the Babri Darwaza and car headlights, while final sections discuss "magical doubles" in wedding albums where flipped negatives show subjects confronting themselves to illustrate that repetition always involves difference.
The lecture concludes by reflecting on how Eton's revolutionary approach has deeply influenced Penny's work, framing photography as a stream without beginning or end where resemblance and difference coexist paradoxically. This intellectual lineage connects their works through W.G. Sebald and Walter Benjamin, noting the tension between descriptive and transformational politics while emphasizing that Eton's commitment to viewing images as nomadic made her work explicitly political rather than merely instrumental. Her eclectic interests ranged from academic swearing to deep knowledge of pop culture like *Father Ted*, supported by vast bibliographies showing extensive engagement with art history beyond India and the 18th century, all viewed through a lens that distinguishes between neo-anthropomorphism and Bruno Latour's concept of agency without will regarding enchantment in artworks.
Ultimately, Eton's turn to Catholicism is interpreted not as a break from her earlier mysticism but as a continuity within a cosmist framework where traditions like Hindu polytheism and Catholic saints are seen as interoperable rather than mutually exclusive. This perspective allows for promiscuous thinking across normally separated domains, acknowledging the material agency of objects without attributing human will to them while maintaining an open curiosity that reads everything from academic texts to folk tales about magic pots doubling wealth and people. Through this synthesis of diverse influences and practices, Penny presents a vision where photography serves as a medium that bridges the gap between the mundane and the sacred, preserving the aura of images in a pluralistic context through active engagement with both local customs and global modernity.
Read the full video transcript
[bell]
My name is Shria H and I'm head of
research initiatives here at the Paulme
Melon Center. Um and it's really my
great pleasure to welcome all of you to
the center um today. This as you can see
is an intimate gathering. Um thank you
for being here. Um, we are here today to
honor the legacy of the late art
historian Natasha Eton, who was involved
with many projects at the center over
the years and whose sparkling insight
has left indelible traces on the ways we
think about British and South Asian art
history and the world more broadly. Uh,
we feel very lucky to have Professor
Chris Piney here to deliver a lecture in
Natasha's memory titled Photo State
Experiments in Eaton essence. The
lecture comes to Penny's own adventures
in rural India and South Asian photo
studios with the wider illumination and
brilliance of Natasha's distinctive
approach. I know that for most of us in
the room Chris Penny needs no
introduction. I will though do a short
intro. Um so Christopher Penny is
emmeritus professor of anthropology and
visual culture at uh University College
London. He has had held visiting
positions across the world in Australia,
the United States, South Africa, Turkey
and Poland. Um his research interests
cover the art and visual culture of
South Asia with a particular focus um on
the history of photography and
chromolithography in India. Se also
worked on industrial labor and Dalith
goddess possession. Among his
publications which have had an immense
impact on my work and I know and that is
the case for most of you in this room um
are camera indica photos of the gods the
coming of photography in India
photography and anthropology the
waterless sea and lessons from hell as
part of the photo demos collective he
published citizens of photography the
camera and the political imagination
um without further ado over to Chris.
Well, thank you for that uh
[applause]
thank you for that um uh introduction
and um thank you everyone for coming. Um
I feel it's a great honor to be able to
um offer a
a tribute to um Natasha. Um what follows
is intended as a heartfelt tribute to
Natasha.
It presents 12 fragments of a radically
different length from an already
fragmentaryary text photoate
which I hope will make her smile out of
recognition and the affirmation in her
own work of what she saw as the utopian
alternative regime of value to be found
in the bizaar the shrine and the nwabi
court.
Natasha's work is characterized by a
fascination with images not as fixed
outcomes of lineages or identities but
rather as volatile unruly migrants.
Uh translational vectors whose material
stickiness produces not a fixity of
place but a continual movement as it
fuses with something else that crosses
its path.
It is these qualities that I seek to
affirm.
I attempt periodically to confront my
own relatively conventional
conceptualizations and explorations in
bizarre shrines and nabi centers such as
Lucknau, but also in rural India and
South Asian photo studios with the
wilder illumination and brilliance of
Natasha's distinctive approach.
Uh earlier this afternoon uh when we
heard um wonderful series of um tributes
and engagements with her work, I had
caused a comment that reading her grant
proposals and her work more generally
always left me feeling rather quaint and
archaic.
>> [snorts]
>> I had a feeling that the new generation
was the next generation was racing ahead
uh leading the old guys uh uh bewildered
in their wake.
Okay. So there are 12 sections and the
first section is called photo state. One
scorching afternoon in 2018 I set out
for NY Surak in old Delhi. As usual, the
journey there from Ramnagar, a few
kilometers away, had taken about an
hour. My auto rickshaw stuttering to a
halt in the congestion approaching Chney
Choke. Dismounting by the Jane Bird
Hospital where in the 1990s I'd gotten
myself photographed by one of the few
remaining box camera wallers, I savored
the bustle and energy. I wandered past
the front of New Gramophone House where
I'd purchased so many remarkable early
78 RPM records of songs from films
including Awara and Mother India. Next
was Daragali where photographic supply
shop still sold hand painted studio
backdrops. And then I pressed on past
the Gurudoara and turned left into the
relative cool of Nai Surak heading for
the southern section where dozens of
calendar retailers were stocking up for
their pre- Diwali frenzy. Then on my
right in a tiny passageway that served
as a shopfront I glimpsed a hand pine
handpainted sign that seemed to say
photoate.
The heavily serif and irregularly spaced
lettering was a fine example of what
Botnik and Raja ulogize as subtle
technology.
Beneath the sign was an ancient
typewriter and a battered photocopier.
Both looked decades past serviceability,
but were clearly still viable and in
use. As Sudia Mahadeavan observed,
quote, "No technology dies a predictable
death in India." In his memorable
phrase, there is an obviation of
obsolescence.
There was no one in the shop, so I
waited and gazed at this profound
tableau, feeling comustrigated by this
defamation of the photocopying service
into a name that so perfectly described
my decades long fascination with the
ways in which the camera has been
embraced by Indians.
State conjured both the territory of
India that has been my chief interest
and the conditional manner of existing
that photography engenders.
Photo State also exemplifies the zone
which so interested Natasha. What in
mimmesis across empires she offers as a
utopian alternative to bourgeoa
modernity
and which she characterized as the
regime of value established in the
shrine the bazaar and the nabi court. It
is these locations with which the rest
of this talk engages.
Next section is called positively in a
certain shape.
It is one of those photographs that
seems to occupy the wrong time. On a
first casual glance, you might imagine
it was made in the late 1920s or 30s.
But as is often the case, evidence of
its actual date comes as a surprise.
26th June 1952 is the rubber stamp below
the name of the maker Mahanand Studio
Madai. The artful arrangement of a group
of men in two informal rows is testimony
to the photographers's skill in dealing
with large groups of sitters. The
figures are arranged in a pleasing open
formation and the photographers clearly
directed the sitters how best to arrange
their hands and arms. There are 10 adult
males all dressed in South Indian white
shirts and lunges and one younger boy at
the left. Conversely, we might say there
are 10 figures still present as the
camera caught them, and one figure who's
been subject to a furious defacement, a
scratchy blue pen, having been wielded
in an attempt to obscure the presence of
the figure at the far right. What
actions could have caused such offense?
Perhaps these these are 10 office
workers with their young peon their
assistant and the figure in blue was
found to have embezzled the firm.
Perhaps he was found guilty of adultery.
Perhaps having cuckolded the wielder of
the pen. Perhaps the figure in blue
contravened his cast strict dietary
protocols was made an outcast. Whatever
his crime, he was not alone. A Bombay
studio image scanned from a glass
negative exhibits the same vigorous
defacement. The Okconor class fury being
viscerally indexed by the energetic
scrolls that obscure both faces of a
couple. Yet the technique is different.
If the Maderai defacer sought an
impossible removal from the scene of
photographic presence, the Bombay
iconoclass seeks not oblivion but some
sort of highly visible injury on the
faces of those who remain recognizable.
As with other icono clashes, the attempt
to destroy instead creates or as instead
creates or as Natasha who was fascinated
by defacement puts it, the iconoclastic
hammer strikes sideways.
Next section is called tablet
19th January 2017. As frequently
happens, villagers profer images of past
events or deceased relatives for reef
photography. Gordon Lal Babal produces
an image of him and his wife seated
before the main chamunda goddess image
at a shrine in Nagda. It is perhaps 20
years old and is framed in rusted tin
with a glass front. Its shape, size, and
weight is remarkably like a tablet, say
a larger Samsung of the kind which are
popular with richer locals. Gur and Lal
offers it to my camera, classed in the
same way that the day before, Pratik
Punjabi, the son of a leading local
photographer, had held a shiny tablet
for me to view an opulent pre-wedding
shoot made at an upscale upscale resort
on the banks of the river Narmmada.
Next section is called photography in an
expanded field.
In November 2012, a Jane Guru Rishabch
Chandra Surji who spurned motorized
transport visited Batsura village pushed
all the way from Nagda junction in an
elaborate handcart by enthusiastic
devotees.
He was fated on his arrival. blessed a
warehouse owned by one of the Janes took
tea and read a newspaper in the center
of the village and then evaluated the
dynamics of the village puja room using
a vastu sacred space app on his mobile
phone. Towards the end of his visit, 10
puglia or panki nishan were made. These
were footprints permanently recorded on
small sheets of cotton after the guru's
feet had been dipped in a bowl of
saffron water.
Following this, the images were dusted
with Vashkip, a sandalwood powder that
had been blessed by the guru. These
puglia were imprints of the guru,
indexes of his presence, and were
treated with profound reverence as they
were distributed as holy relics. They
were what Natasha might have referred to
as vernicles, i.e. icons associated with
St. Veronica
uh which show her holding uh the world's
earliest photograph an image of Christ
uh on a veil with which he washed his
face
throughout throughout many of the
devities took photographs of the prince
with small digital cameras as though
these modern devices could pay homage to
this foundational moment of mimmesis. At
the close of proceedings, the Jane host
soaked the guru's feet in the water and
then pressed them to his head in the
gesture of subordination. Cheron Raj the
whole encounter laying bare as it did
the mechanics of transmission seemed to
present in almost mythic form a parable
of representation and authority and what
Natasha liked to call the magical
contract of photography.
Next section is called cool photography.
Perhaps situating photography in this
expanded field should also involve an
appreciation of its thermal properties.
There is straight photography,
pictorial, studio, documentary, and many
other ways of describing and dividing
photography as a practice.
Sometimes photographs will be
categorized as co as cool or hot but
usually this is intended metaphorically.
The image stuck with electrical tape to
the door of Ragna Samsung fridge
suggests that a literal interpretation
would be more appropriate.
The photograph on the fridge is roughly
inscribed at the top in Devonaguri Omar
Shivai, an invocation of the god Shiv
and documents raath firew walking during
the festival of holi.
Despite the egalitarian ideology of holy
when it is claimed that everyone becomes
one, several cast specific bonfires are
lit at dawn on the morning of the first
lunar day of the month of Chetra. This
marking a period of seven days leading
up to Shitla Saptomy Shitla's seventh
during which only cooling foods are
prepared and eaten and water is poured
over the stones that littered the old
Shitla shrine.
Then follows a bangfueled carnival in
which color is thrown or rather
violently applied to the faces and
bodies of relatives, friends and
neighbors. And earlier today we saw a
great photo of this on used as the cover
to Natasha's color book.
The heat of midday and the exertions of
the morning encourage a lull in
proceedings until the afternoon's main
event. traversing a trench filled with
glowing charcoal in a collective effort
to contain the thermal and cosmooral
heat of the coming hot season. Known as
a jewel in the village I'm familiar
with, the trench is usually about 4 feet
wide and 15 feet long, although claims
are always made about neighboring
villages where supposedly the tulle is
40t long. Significantly, it is dug
directly outside the shrine to Shitla,
the cool one, goddess of smallpox,
besides the new Shiv shrine. Prospective
fire walkers disappear to purify
themselves in wells and tanks on the
periphery of the village while
preparations continue at the jewel. As
the embers burn down, the Shiv temple
priest fans the flames with large sprigs
of neem leaves and pours donated ghee
onto the fire. Neem is considered very
cooling, its shade being prized on hot
days by exhausted travelers. We could do
this some neem today.
The fire walkers emerged from the
surrounding terrain forming a long line.
Each person bearing a kalash, a brass
pot filled with water and topped with
mango leaves that they decant over the
shiveling near the Sheetla shrine. Then
along with Rag Ragunath, they traverse
the fiery chul. He was photographed on a
fellow villager's phone as he walks
barefoot slowly towards the end of the
fire pit.
I'm not sure how clear it is in this
image.
Um, a line of younger villagers
patiently files be behind as they all
undergo this public demonstration of
internal tranquility
and placidity.
There are two local theories that
explain how this is all possible. One is
expended by the higher cast grouping in
the village, James and Watis in
particular. This stresses Krishna's
cooling power. It is the ghee, the
clarified butter, they argued, which
releases heat from the cinders. And ghee
is intimately associated with Krishna as
a cooling and imperishable product of
the cattle which Krishna preserves.
for Rajputs and casts lower in the local
hierarchy like Ragunath. However, the
firew walking is made possible because
the participants like the god Shiv
mobilize their internal heat to conquer
the heat of the jewel. It is a model of
thermal exchange that also lies lies at
the heart of refrigeration
technology.
Ragunath prevented from birth from
sharing his complex cosmological
thoughts for he is both nonverbal and
deaf seems to be using photography and
his domestic appliances to communicate
clearly. Natasha I feel would have
enjoyed this literally sticky image.
Next section is called Nazar and Dulam.
It's not only that photography is
entangled in thermal exchanges.
We need to also consider the material
and embodied landscape in which vision
operates and in which images exert their
power. Firstly, consider an elaborate
practice that I witnessed in a rural
household in central India in 2012. It's
called naza utana or the removal of the
evil eye and is a procedure that's
deployed whenever anyone in the
household is affected by the evil eye. I
realize here that I sound like a modern
incarnation of Edgar Thirsten writing in
1912. Natasha was pretty much obsessed
with Edgar Thirsten. So um I'll take the
compliment if indeed it's offered as
such. In the case of this particular
household which has four members, this
is about twice per year. The person
afflicted with Naza, the patient sits
before the healer. In this case, the
healer was the patient's father, but
elsewhere, it's likely to be a Brahman
priest or Dalit shaman of Gora who
performs this procedure.
The healer prepares a one- foot long
wick made from raw cotton which is then
soaked in ghee. This is then placed in
front of the head of the patient seven
times before being tied to a short stick
and allowed to hang vertically over a
small water pot, a lot that is placed
directly in front of the patient. The
wick is then ignited and as it burns
with the accompliments of much hissing
and spluttering drops of burning ghee
regularly drop into the water pot below
where an accumulated slick of soot
starts to gather. This material process
visualizes a transference of the
physical presence of Nazar into the
water pot. the relocation of Nazar from
the body of the afflicted onto the
surface of the water. It recalls the
common anti- Nazar phrase to be seen
throughout North India which declares
buri naza term kala evil naza person
your mouth will go black except that in
naza utarna it is a kind of watery eye
that turns black. The Burin Nazo slogan
is often written on the back of vehicles
from which may hang a shoe or a totka, a
lime with green chilies on a thread, but
will more commonly display the grimacing
face of a demon or an apotropeic spot
pattern.
The demon's face and the vibrant dancing
spots are intended to deflect the
malevolent extra transmissive vision of
the Nazal.
This vertigenous exchange of form makes
me think of the endless transformations
that appear in Natasha's work. Shark
charmers who turn into telegraph poles.
telegraph poles that turn into pebbles
and shells that blur the boundaries
between mouth and ear.
The next section's called on the
category of the deotic.
Some popular photographic practices are
doubtless best described as vernacular.
If Pierre Bordeau's analysis can be
trusted, then 1960s French popular
photography perhaps qualifies. Although
he nuances his description by pointing
to a pervasive naturalistic popular
aesthetic, he chiefly emphasizes the
position photographic practices occupy
within hierarchies of taste. As he puts
it, barbarous taste is never entirely
free of all reference to good taste.
Popular practices, in other words, are
reactions to dominant practices.
The demotic following JF
Champolon
who elaborated this concept in his
engagement with the Rosetta Stone in
1822
denotes a groundup practice of the
people rather than the reactive top-down
trajectory of theories of vernacularity.
Deotic assumes a widespread subton
practice which is more than local and
less than global.
While vernacular based on linguistic
models assumes popular practices which
are reactive to dominant hierarchies,
the linguistic paradigm of
vernacularization
involves a distilling out of local
idioms from much larger cosmopolitan
structures or as the Sanskritist Sheldon
Pollock puts it in conscious opposition
to some larger world in relationship to
wi to which they choose. used to speak
more locally.
Pollock contrasts vernacular place with
cosmopolitan space, describing
vernacularization as choosing, quote, to
write in a language that did not travel
as easily and as far as the welltraveled
language of the older cosmopolitan
order.
It is apparent how models of
vernacularization applied to media suit
a rather conventional mode of
anthropology
invested in emphasizing localization
as active cultural practice. It affirms
the heroic estimation of the human
subject [clears throat] who always
proves capable of overcoming the
potential tyranny of technology and
unwittingly feeds exnominating
narratives through its celebration of
divergent local appropriations.
Demotic seems a better description than
vernacular for much of the popular
practice encountered in India for two
central reasons. Firstly, a good deal of
popular photography reveals a desire to
engage with rather than withdraw from
the cosmopolitan. Telephones,
cityscapes, motorbikes, airplanes, or
hear radios are all symptoms of a
modernity and mobility that connects
rather than disconnects localities.
This melange of speed, glamour,
consumption, and aspiration forms the
repertoire of much global popular
photography.
Secondly, much global popular
photography looks very similar. This is
the more than local less than global
space of the demotic. A distributed
horizontal space of popular practice
whose dynamic space is quite different
from the vertical space of the
vernacular. [cough and clears throat]
Next related section is called modern
studio.
Photography offers a device for
encroaching on what is yet to be a space
for imagining and enacting a future. as
for the performance of new hybrid
identities through in messing the
subject of portraiture with
technological artifacts such as
bicycles, planes, motorbikes, radios,
and telephones. The subjunctive becomes
in an instant the prolleptic. As Karen
Strassler writes of Javanese practices,
quote, the studio portraits charge
emerges from its marriage of the
possible this might be to the actual
this has been.
But the material repertoires that inform
these local iconographies of modernity
repay study. So they are not simply
signs of progress at the level of
consumption. Unlike in Philip Auglia's
Garnan studio, Indians have no visible
desire to be pictured with fridges,
washing machines or shiny bathrooms. The
modernity that is invoked in South Asian
studios is not that of affluence or
success per se, but is rather
connectivity, speed and transmission.
James Seagull serves as a good guide
here. Writing about photography in the
colonial East Indies, he argued that
quote, "Photography emblematized the
pervasive fantasy of a lingua franker
that would offer perfect translatability
and open transmission, a medium ideally
suited for a new orientation to the
globalized world of modernity and away
from closed boundaries, rigid
hierarchies, and fixed identities.
We could say that photography provides a
medium through which all these various
proceses bike, radio, telephone,
television, etc. are united. But we
should also note that all these
technological artifacts involve the
mobility and liquidity, physical
movement across distance and through
space and transmission of sound and
image.
It is in this context that a late 1970s
Maja Pradeshi Swag Studio montage from a
wedding album showing the groom erupting
from a film canister seems
simultaneously archaic and foresighted.
analog film through this imaginative
presentation seems to preempt not only
the procession of simulacra whose egalit
egalitarian nature Natasha often
celebrated.
This image also seems to perfectly
capture the explosive nature of
Natasha's thinking about the visual.
Next section is called an accelerating
aura. The observation that the
proliferation of photography in India
has encouraged the production of more
rather than less aura has to be the
starting point rather than the
conclusion of any account of media
history in the subcontinent.
Walter Benjamin in his optimistic
Marxist incarnation had predicted that
photography's exhibition value would
erode the images cultic value. Natasha
was definitely interested in the
persistence of the cultic. Benjamin's
account is understandably monotheistic.
Its entire causitative and explanatory
logic is grounded in an assumption of
singular origins in which the cultic,
the authentic, and the hierarchical find
their ground zero.
The early missionary fear of
proliferating Hindu images was not
driven by a simple misrepresentation.
Despite attempts by Hindu reformers such
as Ram Moan Roy to monotheize their
religion, most Hindu practice continues
to affirm an originary multiplicity
which technological reproduction mirrors
rather than subverts.
An early montage print produced by
Suresh Punjabi of Swag Studio [snorts]
in the late 1970s features multiple
appearances of his brother Mahesh, who
is his go-to model.
At one level, it is a demonstration of
virtuoso printing techniques achieved in
very basic conditions by a new studio
keen to make its name, but is also
illuminated by the endologist Betty
Hyman's use of the metaphor of a crystal
to describe the Hindu worldview. Quote,
"Whatever man sees, he has seen or will
see is just one facet only of a crystal.
Each of these facets from its due angle
provides a correct viewpoint, but none
of them alone gives a true all
comprehensive picture.
Benjamin's fundamental assumptions about
images, origins, and authenticity arise
from what the Egyptologist Yan Aman
describes as the mosaic distinction.
It was Akenatan the pharaoh of the 18th
dynasty about 2700 years ago who tried
to end cosmism
a world of endless overlapping images.
Akenatan attempted unsuccessfully
thank goodness to overthrow polytheism
to put a stop to a proliferation of gods
and images through the imposition of
monotheism. He was the inventor of what
Ashman calls the world's first counter
religion. The source of the idea that
images were a betrayal of something
purer and less vis visible.
What he attempted to destroy was a world
of promiscuous images of a respect for
the visible where it was assumed that
different communities had arrived at
their own slightly different visions
that were all ultimately exchangeable.
What Ashman called techniques of
translation created an ecumen of
interconnected nations.
Indeed, Benjamin's utopian yearning for
a comprehensive liquidation of the
privileging of the original might be
seen as both embodying the legacy of the
mosaic distinction and also as a deep
aspiration to transcend it and
participate in a similar ecumen.
Natasha's work can be seen as a
re-energization
of this cosmistic
potential.
Next section, I think we've got three to
go, is called inverting the lens.
In North India, there is a strong
connection rooted in the Sanskrit prefix
prati between the representational and
political. Among the denotations and
connotations of Pratti, our copy, print,
likeness, comparison, repetition,
continuity, towards, against, and in
opposition to. It is suggestive of a
double-facing mirror that signifies
mimemetic reflection but also opposition
and destruction.
Some Indian objects dramatize this
reversibility in unforgettable ways.
Consider the Jane Hawa Morti or air
statue, usually only to be found in
temples. These heavy brass artifacts,
afraid mine was too heavy to bring on a
hot day like this to show you. These
heavy brass artifacts present a cutout
of Mahavir, a powerful depiction of
presence through a figure ground
reversal.
So they're a brass outline where the
outline is the cutout. The presence is
the absence of Mahavalia. It's a genius
artwork. It's a tool for extraordinary
thought uh for amazing contemplation.
Mahavir's transcendence, renunciation
and power is conjured by presenting what
he is not. That is the surrounding
contours of his missing body.
Equally instructive are mirrored images
of deities still common in rural central
India. Usually the product of artisanal
work in pilgrimage centers, these prints
place elements of commercially printed
images of gods behind a mirrored
surface. Parts of the print are excised
and the remaining elements form
templates for areas on the mirrored
surface where the tain is removed. The
desired end result is a palims of
printed images of the divine and plain
mirrored surface. The final effect is
that when the beholder pays homage to
the god, she sees herself adjacent to
the deity in a perfect exemplification
of the mechanism of duran
[clears throat]
in which the devity looks at the god who
also sees them. This also recalls the
remarkable mirror story in Nisami's
Iscandam
with which Natasha opens mimmesis across
empires.
I reflected on the reversible or more
properly invertible nature of
representation. One blisteringly hot day
in a rather desolate field known as
Dantalab about 2 kilometers from the
village of Batsura. Dantalab, a mango
tree in the middle of nowhere, is where
the priest Sam Maharaj thrashes. It
becomes possessed sometimes as
frequently as every two weeks.
Though an exceptionally bleak location
in especially in the summer, remarkable
events unfold here and pilgrims travel
great distances to participate.
Dunelab is a place I always associate
with the burning heat of the brain
fryingly cruel variety. The flatness of
the terrain and the white light make
your eyes shrivel. And once you reach
the sagus's chosen spot, there is
minimal shade. I try and pack three lers
of water to see me through each jatra.
Ram Maharaja's jatra or choki involves
manifesting successively as five
different sagas archetypally the spirits
of warriors decapitated in battle
also known as juja in parts of
Rajasthan.
Um they all smoke cigarettes except
Ambbeal the head sagas who smokes ganja
in the chillum. The other sagases will
smoke any cigarette. They don't have
brand preferences and are usually
offered the cheapest. There's one called
Midlands. [snorts]
All the action unfolds
under the mango tree. Ram Maharaj
[clears throat] removes his battered
pugry turban and sways himself in a
thick blanket. Indifferent to the
insufferable heat, he starts to twitch
and utters a standard vocalization of
impending possession. Aim. This
functions as a dramatic stage direction
precaging the onset of thrashing and the
switch between the identities of
different sagases.
Meanwhile, the sagas' needs have been
attended to. They are offered their
chillum and cigarettes and incense stick
incense sticks are lit. Agabati. Soon
the area at the foot of the mango tree
acquires the look of a first world war
battlefield. A mini passionale wreathed
in the smoke of battle. Then the logic
of Pratty starts to make itself felt.
Maybe it is the heat. Maybe the
starkness of the location, maybe the
manner in which I'm using my camera, but
I suddenly have the sense of being
trapped in a Rabininoian i.e. uh
following Paul Rabinau's definition of
externality.
So the sense of being trapped in a
Rabinawian
externality as a distant spectator
looking at the sagas.
Until this point, my apprehension of the
sagas as representation
had simply involved a unidirectional act
of looking. What did they look like to
me? But this, I realized, was not
enough. And perhaps I heard Natasha
whispering in my ear. That the logic of
Duran demanded that I close the gap and
try and see what it was they saw. Using
my camera lens as prostthesis, I
positioned it to mimic the eyes of the
sagus, trying to capture what it was
like down at ground level, surrounded by
the stubbly goat eaten vegetation,
breathing the perfume of ganja and
tobacco, the hazy outlines of human
devities just visible on the horizon.
Uh next um section is called Sufi Light.
Oh, sorry. We had another slide of the
Sagas's view.
I suppose that I was still in search of
some kind of nomination, some visual tz,
some ethnographic booty to salvage from
my fieldwork, something like the allure
of the Muslim court that so enchanted
Natasha. I was in Lockchn now, North
India in 2018 and trying to get to know
the workers in a cluster of a halfozen
photo studios in Aminabad in the old
part or one of the old parts of the
city. Despite the vengeful destruction
reaped on the city by the British in the
wake of the 1857 rebellion, much of the
glory of Aad
endures and the old center of the city
Husseinabad
presents a bejeweled skyline comprising
the big and little Imamaras and the two
fine gateways, the largest of which is
the roomi daaza.
During research in the city in 2018 and
2019, I was struck by the sense of Avadi
architecture as a beautiful facade of
buildings turned into pictures,
structures made to be seen as much as
lived in. But there is a striking
absence in the Euroamerican imagination.
Luck now conjures the work of early
photographers Feliz Pat, Samuel Bourne,
and others.
uh Bato obviously was a huge interest of
Natasha's. It is a city that endures in
a sepia imagination and yet in
contemporary lock now there is zero
presence of that sepia strike.
Uh this is um borrowing Adorno's notion
of the radio strike, the continual
chatter of radio in the background for
the sepia strike strike that um one does
often encounter in um uh cities.
Uh so zero presence of that sepia strike
no postcards no calendar images no
posters of the many cities that Lucknau
has since become it is the new ones the
capital of India's most populous state
the dullit monumentalism of of anka park
that dominate
the one space where aad ud the old sheia
luck now which so fascinated Natasha met
the camera in contemporary luck now was
a fast reducing one. I recalled a much
earlier visit to the bar I imbara maybe
circa 2005 and seeing a small desk
display
under the interior of a photo interior
arch of a photographer a Mr. Raza. The
desk was covered with a sheet of glass
under which were which assorted
photographs were displayed including
several recording the visit of the film
and stage actor Puri.
In October 2019, Mr. Raza was still
flying his trade as he had for the last
42 years but only just.
Tisib was the fabled old luck now
etiquette which many people complained
was being destroyed by the new brutal
connibation of rural migrants that was
replacing the old city. Maybe it was
there in the requests often made that I
should not copy old photographs of
female Muslim clients that were
displayed within studios and sometimes
perceptible in the Polish politeness of
Sudep, the proprietor of student photo
and the courteous professionalism of
Baba, their striking chief studio
photographer.
I'd asked many local photo studios to
produce images that featured a luck. Now
I'd attached a few adjectives and clues
in my commission paramper traditional
ithasic historical and so on in the hope
that this would precipitate visual
tazib.
Most of the resulting photographs were
unimaginative conjunctions of my
portrait placed in front of obvious
facads referencing Loch Now's striking
architectural heritage in ways that did
little or nothing to illuminate the
history and traditions they embodied or
the sentiments that might be attached to
them.
Strikingly different was one of the
images produced by the aforementioned
student photo service. The process of
having my portrait made had already
alerted me to the distinctiveness of
their approach. Barbara, the photograph,
the photographer, sorry, took great care
in posing me and directing my line of
vision to his raised finger held on
either side of his camera and sculpted
my hand gestures in what I understood to
be an archetypal Sufi declaration of
appreciation.
offered most commonly when listening to
music. The gesture always put me in mind
of Rishi Kapoor's ecstatic kowali
performance in Amma Akbar Anthony
uh the man moan desai 1977 film. The
resulting photoshopped image was
remarkable. It montaged my studio pose
against the dramatic backdrop of the
roomy Darvaza at night. my upraised
hands seeming to respond to and also
usher forth a stream of light that burst
at seemingly immense velocity from the
base of this late 18th century archway
adjacent to the bar I imbar in the
center of old luck now maybe this was
new the heatless light of Allah that
light was of course the effect of
innumerable car headlights captured on a
slow exposure
I would later see this visual appearance
mirrored in a series of street
advertisements in the same part of town
advertising Vodafone's 4G services. The
river of light materializing the
unimaginable speed of data transmission.
Both these images involving the room
darwaza babas and the vodafone
adversement seem to materialize light as
an effect of speed of vision and
information as mobile and unstoppable.
That Sufi gesture also invoked memories
of the portfolio of images that Suag
studio had prepared in 2010 for Sonagiri
Sarkca from Mansour, a town about 100
kilometers from Nagda junction. Sonagiri
was an aspirant healer and sage who took
inspiration from the nearby shrine of
Hussein te at Jara, a renowned
pilgrimage center known for its great
therapeutic powers.
He had met Suresh Punjabi at a function
and admired his work so much that he
commissioned an ambitious set of
publicity images for use on largecale
flex banners and for printed momentos to
be given to devotees. Although the true
beauty of some of them only works
digitally.
I think Natasha would have enjoyed that.
The photographs captured Sonagiri's
distinctively expressive hands in ways
that I'm sure student photos Baba would
have admired.
Uh the final section is called the
magical double.
Photography's duplicatory propensity is
often celebrated in portraiture. Many
Nagda studio wedding albums in the 1980s
including double included double
portraits of the bride and the groom.
These involve printing the negative on
one half of the paper and then flipping
the negative so that the face of the
subject is shown symmetrically
confronting itself and testifying to
photography's uncanny mode of
production. what Natasha termed its
magical contract. The Kiran Kala Mandia
studio in Bombay active during the 1950s
and60s specialized in mirror montages.
There was one on the left that seemed
designed to render a woman's dress fully
visible revealing the full extent of
skill in tiring tying and wearing a
sari. However, in the Kiran Kala Mandia
images, the mirror does not simply
duplicate. Rather, it provides
additional iterative information that
would otherwise be concealed.
They bring to mind the folklorist AK
Rammanagen's observation that quote
mimmesis is never only mimmesis for it
evokes the earlier image in order to
play with it and make it mean other
things making mirrors turn into windows
or you might also say to echo Dur and
Derrida
and also Natasha there is No repetition
without difference.
Doubling starts with a fantasy of a
desirable moreness but quickly dissolves
into a destabilizing multiplicity.
The cinematic notion of the double
provides one pathway into this. Richard
Allen following Ashish Nandi points to
the prototype of deities who quote
incarnate and thereby reconcile
differences
and which the film star quote playing
the double role allegorically
incarnates.
Allan further suggests that the
centrality of the double tradition
within Bombay cinema is quite an
expression of the mimemetic textuality
of Bombay cinema itself and functions as
a form of selfmicry
that allows a redemption
of its products from their quote
incipiently abject status as derivative
even degraded copies.
The numerous Indian versions of the
magic pot tale express the conclusion
that repetition never occurs without
difference rather perfectly. One
memorable version from Uttar Pradesh
describes the joyful amazement of two
poor farmers Kalu and Razia who found a
large pot in their fields. Kalu dropped
his tobacco pouch in it and Razia
extracted two pouches.
So they put almost everything they had
into the pot to magically double it and
were delighted with their new wealth.
Then while cooking, Razia slipped on
some potatoes and fell into the pot.
Kalu immediately pulled her out, but
then saw a second Razia struggling to
get her hands and feet out of the pot.
Kaloo pulled her out as well, whereupon
Razia shrieked, "Where has this woman
come from? Why did you pull her out?
Just stuff her back in again."
Khalu faced a dilemma. quote, "If we
stick her back in, won't we just be
making the same mistake again?"
The tale ends with Kaloo losing his
footing and falling into the pot so that
there were two couples whose households
were supplied through the magical
properties of the pot.
Quote, "The neighbors were surprised to
see how wealthy Callu and his wife had
become, and they were still more
bewildered to discover that next door to
them were another couple resembling
themselves." Exactly. "It must be his
brother," they concluded.
I hope Natasha enjoyed all my stories
from the bizaar, the shrine, and the
Nabi court, but I think she would have
enjoyed this last one most of all. It
captures something of her joy in the
figure of the copist as someone swept
along in the river of mimmesis.
For her, the copierist subverted western
hierarchical models of mimmesis, being
able to see it, as I quote from mimmesis
across empires, a stream without a
beginning and an end that undermines its
banks and picks up speed in the middle.
It captured the paradox of mimmesis that
so fascinated fascinated her the fact
that as she wrote the more it resembles
the more it differs. This is one aspect
of the vitigenous dynamic which her
thought and writing so brilliantly
embodied. Thank you.
[applause]
Thank you so much Chris. That took us to
so many different places and kind of
ideas and thoughts. We have time for
questions and conversation really. So
>> do you get water if people want?
>> Yeah.
Yes.
>> And also if there are questions online
that's um feel free to put it in the
chat or thoughts um are fine.
>> I can ask myself a question [laughter]
>> which is that um I imagined before
assembling this that I would be able to
counterose
my perspective with Natasha's. And as I
hope I've made clear, Natasha's was a
far more revolutionary, challenging,
wilder, more imaginative. I mean, at
heart, I'm basically applauding
empirical anthropologist
who likes living in his Maj Padeshi
village whenever he can. Um but I
realized in assembling it that um
Natasha's work had um had had infected
my work so much that I couldn't really
usually easily disentangle a position
that was hers.
So there was um yeah so I I I found
myself wanting to add on what would
Natasha have thought but I feel that
actually in the weave and
>> heft of the thing she's there in her
presence is there
>> in ways without naming it.
Yeah,
>> Chris is is she is she unique in your
exper is she unique in your experience
in having that effect on I mean effect
on your perceptions and your
understanding and your looking back at
at things. Um have you ever experienced
that sort of response to other any other
>> scholars or does she have a very
particular position with you?
>> Barack Obama might have said she's at
the front of the queue. I'm not sure
she's unique. I mean, she's
>> very distinctive and um yeah, there's a
quality of firstness about her work. I
think one of the things that as you were
speaking because you talked about so
many things like the magic contract of
photography but also u my messes and
repetition difference it it sort of
flowed very organically and one and I I
was wondering how that was it
conversations how did you exchange um
work was it you know was it were you
tell her
>> stories from Madhya Pradesh for instance
were you sending each the drafts and
>> yeah, we read each other's work. Um I I
didn't read the most recent book for the
publisher, but I read um the first two
books.
Um so I Yeah. So,
so it was as a colleague. I mean, it's
actually kind of now I think about it a
bit odd that um um the publishers sent
them to someone in the same
Anyway, it was my good fortune that they
did.
>> Um,
so um, so I was I was very deeply
engaging with her work.
>> I mean, there was also a kind of common
set of conversations that, um, were
multi-olar, I'd say.
>> So, you know, my Taik's work was very
important to hers,
>> very important to mine also. M
>> um
then the the kind of historical lineage
of Benjamin especially
>> hugely important.
>> Um and I think um a lot of her
apheristic style
>> derives from Benjamin.
Um,
so I think my LSE, my social
anthropology LSSE training taught me to
write in long sentences with verbs
rather than aphoristic poem lists.
I guess I just wanted to say it's not a
question and it's not a clear thought
but I had the luck of being supervised
by both you and Natasha I mean mainly
Natasha
and when you were talking I was thinking
yeah what are the strands that I took
from each of you and what is it that
Natasha gave to me I think for sure this
ability or this cur curiosity to read
everything
not that I did it justice but I think
that's what she passed on to me and even
the books that I have from her. It's
like Benjamin and it's Bart's the
neutral and Christa Thompson's shine.
I was just thinking of the things of
myself but something I guess I was
wondering about. Yeah. So what is it?
Did she give me a way of writing or a
way of reading a set of arguments? I I
don't actually know what the arguments
if she did and I something I'm wondering
about when I listen to your talk is like
what was politics
for Natasha and maybe for you and also
in this word photo state because on the
one hand
I've been trying to understand politics
actually or like my way of understanding
it through Natasha was actually
description and reading and just
describing the way that the world has
come to be and can be. But then there's
another part of me that's like politics
should be transformational.
And
yeah, I guess I was just wondering if
other people had thoughts on this
because I I I'm trying to think how I
would
if I now presented Natasha with a set of
arguments that I've made because she I
haven't talked to her in a long time.
And
>> yeah, I guess I was just wondering a
little bit about politics specifically.
>> Well, I think her work's explicitly
political but not in instrumental ways.
Um, I mean, she's a prime candidate for
potentially being cancelled.
>> Yeah. Uh
so so I mean I think her impulses are
all admirable
but I I I don't recall instrumental
pragmatic political discussions with her
but I think her commitment to the the
image as a migrant
you know to no that nomadic quality
is I think profoundly political
especially on um especially this week
which um not only did I manage to get
through this lecture but um it looks
like uh uh the forces of evil may have
peaked in this country.
We have a question from one of our
online um audience members, Thomas
Travers. Um asks, "Do you think there
were particular intellectual encounters
or influences that gave Nadasha her
spark and her nimleness?" Um her
personal encounters in India and with
the 18th century seem important, but
were there also uh art historical
currents she picked up on?
her in I I can't speak about her
influences. I mean, I can speak about
the influence she's had.
>> I mean, I was very struck looking in the
um bibliography of um
uh Tom Young's recent book
>> making and unmaking of the East India
Company
and then Holly Schaffer's grafted
history. two brilliant and I might say
brilliantly produced
um books from Paul Melon Center um you
know your average painter has one or two
references in those the bibliography of
those books but there's like you know
Natasha's is kind of six inches
um so so if um size is any or length is
any indication of inference
um I think That says quite a lot.
>> Yeah.
>> Um
I mean the thing about Natasha is um I'd
like to be able to offer indepth
conversations about Benjamin
which I'm sure we did have but I
remember the kind of the
the frivolous things. They're the things
that stick in one's mind. I remember I
got her when I was briefly teaching at
Northwestern in Chicago. She came over
to do a talk and um it became expletive
laden at the end for reasons that were
you know in a very good humored way but
it completely shocked a rather prim and
proper
um audience. There was a reference in
one of the uh talks uh this afternoon to
Holly Clayson who was part of the
audience I remember. Um so I remember
swearing
um Natasha I remember um organizing at
UCL
um uh disc a conversation between Will
Self and Jonathan Lamb the 18th century
literary historian and um author of the
brilliant book um uh preserving the self
in the South Seas.
a conversation on travel writing and
travel literature.
Um and Natasha was invited to the um
afterevent dinner which for fiscal
reasons had to be in um the fish and
chip shop [snorts] around the corner
from Jud Street um where which did turn
out to have an interesting history
because apparently it's where um Arthur
Scarle and the NUM executive used to
dine during the minor strike and they
were bugged by MI5.
>> Good lineage.
>> Um but what I remember from that
>> Yeah. What I remember from that whole
event was um being nabbed by Natasha
outside afterwards pointing out that was
it called Colling and Clark. There was a
very up market private press bookstore
that had served as the TV location.
Right. My walking rig chain. Yes. It
would served as the um filming location
for the um TV series Blacks. So she then
got on to a Graeme Lahan, the collected
works of Graeme Linhan and inevitably
Father Ted. So we had 20 minutes gazing
into black books and her giving me a
rundown of all the best bits of Father
Ted and I have to say her her knowledge
was extensive. [laughter]
So So I can't really comment on the
serious stuff.
>> I think that's great.
Hi Chris. Um I was just I was struck by
a phrase that you use the magical
contract of photography and as I was
kind of doing my own sort of review
work. I um I did pick up we're on
Natasha's often talking about
enchantments
and magic and um there's a there's a
brilliant article
in literature compass I think there's a
journal about enchanted traps
>> as well but there's I was wondering that
sort of where
>> you think that her her magic was was
placed or where she was driving or
receiving that kind of sense of the
magic particularly of photography as
well. I think there was something or
>> maybe not just photography but um
reproductive images or um and and what
kind of magic she was drawing on because
it does seem to be a trope or a a way of
describing the again the power the she
often talks about the agency
>> and maybe that's something again that
she was connecting with your work and
Talig and maybe an anthropological
tradition as well which allows for
>> um a magical agency of photography of
not just photography of image making and
I wondered whether that was something
that you had discussed with her or was a
was a was a kind of theme that
>> um connected you. Well, I think there
was discussion earlier about in fact I
think you
no Rosemary in her introductory comments
um spoke about the the breadth of
Natasha's interests
um whether she was really an art
historian what what other discipline she
could have worked within and I think
anthropology is the obvious one. I mean
one of her earliest um pieces which
became the Kolkata print chapter in um
mimmesis cross empires was published in
the anthropology department journal
journal material culture. I think the
title was excess in the city.
Um, and I think she took from in
particular, but from a much broader
range of anthropologists,
you know, what one could call a kind of
neoanomism,
>> but I think it was a neoanomism that was
tempered by Lour. I suppose one of the
kind of things we used to talk about
were Yeah. What what what's useful about
neoanomism and what's um what's silly
about it? Someone had a quote from her
on the screen earlier where she said
enough of vibrant matter.
>> So I think that was her kind of
distancing herself from the sort of Jane
Bennett excessive neoanomist
discourse. And I think one of the way
well one of the the kind of things we
spoke about were how lour among others
helps one modify the more absurd claims
of neoanomism which see which the danger
of which involved simply
generously exporting human qualities to
nonhumans
and I think there's one bit in lour's we
have never been modern that we both
fixated ated on where he talks about um
Boil's air pump and he says that it was
it was it lacked will but was capable of
showing
so it's not it's not humanlike
it it has agency but it lacks will it
can show
so that there's a theory of materiality
in there and I think she she you know
ran with that much more nuanced, useful.
So, so alongside the kind of wild
poetry, there's a much more considered
um
perspective, I think, and and magical
traps. I mean, as she's riffing there
off um the anthropologist Alfred Gel,
who wrote a very um uh celebrated piece
called Vogal's net
um which was basically on artworks and
enchantment.
Um, and I think she, you know, she she
liked the the cabalistic mystical
Benjamin rather than the rational
Marxist Benjamin that, you know,
obviously most time intimately curled up
against each other.
>> I think
I have a big voice.
>> Oh, it's recorded. Okay.
No, I was just thinking um one of the
things that I've noticed about Natasha
in recent years is her turn to
Catholicism and the level of it. And
then I thought it was actually very much
part of her earlier beliefs in other
kinds of mysticism and uh various uh
forms and that they she actually
connected the two or the more than two
because she was as somebody said
promiscuous with her thinking and um I
sometimes would say Natasha but that's
not you're you're talking about certain
issues around you know she became very
attached to her church and all that. And
she said, "I don't see the difference."
And it it struck me that she thought
about that. She thought about the the
shift in a way, but also the something
that she didn't think was as much of a
shift because for her, I think she
suffer.
She just moved if she wanted to. And I I
hearing more recently about her interest
in mysticism, I thought I wonder if that
Catholicism was a continuity in a
different way um to attach to that or it
was communitybased because she was very
very fond of her community in the
church, you know, and really relied on
them for and did so much work for them.
she did a lot of work for that church um
and gave money as well. So there's some
way in which her thinking
moves through things that we normally
separate or we normally think that you
know there's some way in which uh I like
your point though about her um her the
nature of her uh thinking about Benjamin
because she had a very uh difficult
relationship right uh she was she never
really liked to have the theory thrown
at her or to be have to account for it
unless she had already gone through it,
you know, kind of thing. But it it
struck me that her thinking had moved
almost to multiple types of areas that
we normally don't connect as being
conjoined. Uh she found I think no
problem with that.
>> Well, re read the Catholicism. I think
that's her cosmism.
See,
>> so you know this is where Yan Aman's
>> obsession with Akenatan is is really
useful. So the idea that the mosaic
distinction, the Akenatan's counter
religion, monotheism, attempted
monotheism is fundamentally different.
That's what signals a break in
traditions of cosmism which are
intrinsically polytheistic
promiscuous
interransatable.
So the cosm Aman's model of cosmism is
basically to say that prior to the
counter religion moment
everyone understood that they had their
own version of basically
the same thing. So there was
translatability overlap
interoperability.
So I think you know it's poly
Catholicism
presumably it was the polytheism of
Catholicism. I'm blanking on the name of
that famous book on religion in Naples
which basically argues that you know
it's saints that are uh as important as
Christ or the pope. Um
it's like Alan Daniloo's Hindu
polytheism. So I think you know that's
an easy transition
and um you know I can think of um
several great scholars of Hindu
polytheism who had um Catholic convent
educations.
>> That's very interesting.
>> No no it's really good we have time uh
for conversation with a glass of
something as well. So if you wanted to
um continue or Is that okay?
>> Um, so we want to say a very very big
thank you to Chris Penny.
[applause]