Video summary
Pedro Andrade from Talkdesk introduces Customer Experience Automation (CXA) as a transformative operating model that goes beyond simply deploying isolated AI tools or chatbots. Unlike traditional approaches where AI is used merely to automate specific interactions or assist individual agents, CXA utilizes multiple AI agents, enterprise data, and cross-system orchestration to resolve customer needs from start to finish. This approach represents a fundamental shift in how organizations operate, moving away from purchasing standalone technology toward integrating a hybrid workforce of humans and machines. The goal is to ensure that when a customer reaches out, their issue is resolved end-to-end regardless of complexity, without requiring humans to manually move data between disconnected systems or navigate fragmented workflows.
A significant gap exists between companies that have adopted basic AI and those successfully implementing agentic AI with cross-departmental orchestration. While nearly all enterprises have deployed some form of AI, only a small fraction can connect these agents across different systems to handle complex journeys. The primary barriers preventing this advancement are not just technical but involve governance, security, compliance, and legacy infrastructure that creates silos. Talkdesk addresses these challenges by offering pre-built integrations for specific verticals like healthcare and finance, which accelerates the time to value. By providing out-of-the-box connections to critical systems such as ERPs and CRMs, Talkdesk allows organizations to bypass the months-long process of building custom integrations, enabling them to focus on orchestrating a seamless experience rather than fighting with technical blockers.
The business impact of adopting CXA extends far beyond simple cost reduction or call deflection, offering substantial improvements in customer satisfaction and revenue generation. Data presented during the summit shows that organizations acting as "CXA leaders" achieve four times the Net Promoter Score (NPS) gains compared to those merely scaling agentic AI, alongside significant improvements in churn reduction and personalized revenue opportunities. Furthermore, the implementation timeline for seeing meaningful ROI is surprisingly short, often ranging from two to four weeks depending on the specific pain points being addressed. Rather than viewing AI solely as a cost-cutting measure, forward-thinking companies are realizing that true value comes from using AI to optimize assignment, enable proactive outreach like cart recovery or loan pre-qualification, and ultimately transform the contact center into a revenue-generating engine.
Finally, the rise of CXA necessitates a cultural shift in workforce management, introducing new roles such as the CX Operations Manager who oversees both human and AI agents within a hybrid environment. This role focuses on behavior monitoring, ensuring quality before launch, and managing performance optimization rather than just writing scripts or building bots. Talkdesk supports this transition by involving customers from day one in co-development, alleviating fears about job displacement and helping supervisors adapt to monitoring the efficiency of the entire process rather than individual agents. Ultimately, the future of customer experience lies in securely coordinating people, data, and systems to deliver a unified journey, marking the evolution from isolated automation tools to governed, multi-agent ecosystems that drive measurable business outcomes across the entire organization.
Read the full video transcript
AI is rapidly becoming part of the
customer experience environment, but
many organizations are still using it to
automate isolated interactions or assist
individual agents. Now, talk desk is
taking a broader approach through
customer experience automation or CXA,
which uses multiple AI agents,
enterprise data, and cross-system
orchestration to resolve customer needs
from beginning to end. Hey, welcome
everyone to the CX Summit. I'm Bob La
Liberte, principal analyst, joined by
Zas Caravala, principal analyst and
founder of ZK Research. Welcome Zas.
>> Bob, thanks. It's uh this event's been
great. So
>> yeah, looking forward to another great
session here. And joining us to explain
talk desk strategy and its latest
innovations and and how organizations
can really translate AI investments into
measurable business results is Pedro
Andre, VP of AI at Talkesk. Pedro,
welcome to the CX Summit.
>> I thank you so much, Bob. It's a great
pleasure being here with you.
>> Absolutely. So, this is going to be a
fun session and I wanted to kick things
off and and obviously I mentioned this
in the in the opening, but you've been
positioning yourselves as this customer
experience automation company rather
than, you know, simply just a CCast
provider. What does CXA mean and how is
it different from the AI capabilities
enterprises may already have in their
contact centers?
>> Yeah, right. It's a great question to
start. So Bob um customer experience
automation u CXI CXA is um what we
defined as a operating model okay so it
it's not a a category of uh technology
um it's um it's the system that
coordinates um an hybrid workforce of AI
and human employees um then connecting
the systems connecting knowledge
And also connecting the workflows so you
know when a customer calls in, reaches
out to a brand uh they get what they
need resolve it end to end independent
of how complex the situation is or how
many systems you need to get and put
together to resolve that issue. Um so
for customers uh this is not acquiring
a technology just alone. It's a it's an
operating model shift. Okay. It's not a
it's not a tool purchase. Um majority um
of the enterprises um already have some
sort of uh type technology about either
generative AI or or scripted AI. And so
talk desk launched recently um a survey
on on that with a get very interesting
data. So around 74% of the enterprises
already have some sort of generative AI.
Um that's okay that that mean that gets
the work started. You you can have some
answers to your to your questions. It
can eventually draft responses for
agents. You can follow a script. But the
problem is that it that situation alone
without having a this operating model is
that it stops the moment where you need
um a judgment or an action that needs to
cross multiple systems. Okay. So
basically then you need uh to have a
human to take the data from place A to
place B so things continue working. So
that's the change. CXA is a layer that
keeps that work moving um across
different systems and so you get your
work uh done across systems, knowledge,
humans and machines.
>> Yeah, thanks you know Pedro. Um thanks
for the update on on what CXA is and
it's a great pivot for Talk Desk. Now
Talk is though by and large one of the
leaders in the context industry, right?
and uh you scored very well on all the
the different rankings and so talk about
the relationship of CXA to the context
in our platform. Is it a replacement
force on top? How do you how does talk
to us think about the the relationship
of the two?
>> All right. So different from other um
situations or other companies, other
providers that um we sell technology
infused in the contact center. We hear
that that term um very very often about
infused AI actually talk when when we
decided many years ago um on that we
want to move from a human picking up an
interaction a phone call or an SMS or an
email and try to do that manually. Um we
we understood that other contact centers
also have the same the same problem and
so instead of building a platform in
fully uh infused on the contact center
we built CXA as a platform as a
different offer. So talk desk has two
offers CXA and Cass and the CXA platform
can be offered on top of other contact
centers beyond talk desk contact center.
Um because the reality uh Zus is that
majority of the seats are still on prem
and those customers that are still on
prem uh for multiple reasons contract
reasons because moving into the contact
center to the cloud is still a big
project they they can't afford to miss
the opportunity of AI. So CXA works as
well as a as a standalone on top of
other contact centers to help relieve
that pressure for the customers that are
still on on prem that cannot uh get the
latest and the greatest of AI on their
onrem system but to be able to again to
use CXI to relief that pain and gain
start gaining those productivity um
gains on top of an existent contact
center.
Okay, thanks for that explanation and I
think the ability to to work with the
legacy ones actually you know it really
helps customers modernize. Now um you
mentioned some of the research that uh
talk desk has done. We actually looked
through it in preparing for this and we
saw an interesting data point that 98%
of companies have deployed AI somewhere
and that's probably going to be 100%
pretty soon um somewhere in the customer
journey but only 15% combine agentic AI
with cross departmental orchestration.
So why do you think that gap is so big
right now?
Well,
the reality is that um adoption is easy.
The orchestration is the hardest part.
So um adoption is easy. You you can you
can get to a uh to a provider, buy a
chatbot, put it to run and it's easy. um
the problem uh that you are mentioning
and the reason why only 50% use um a
genetic cross department and
orchestrating um this journeys um is
specifically for two reasons. Number one
is that agentic orchestration requires
AI to maintain um a context across all
those systems. A solution is not just
get my balance where it's only in one
place. You are going to resolve a
problem of uh a situation with your um
with with one of your transactions that
may require multiple uh interactions
across multiple systems to get that
problem solved. So majority of these
steps are steps that require um an
interaction between a a human. Someone
is going to approve something. It's a
world journey that that embeds multiple
systems, multiple um humans involve it,
machines involve it. And today that
situation is fragmented that those
workflows are fragmented. they are not
um linked and connected to each other.
So orchestration is really the hardest
part. Currently Z you know this right we
have still have companies that are
information in silos when and when you
ask them to to solve this end to end you
will need to orchestrate across these
multiple systems. There are those this
is a um the the reason why um this
requires the connections between
multiple systems. Uh gets a blocker when
um you reach customers that are still
working with systems in isolation and
then expect humans to connect the dots
and to transport the data from one place
to the other. Um and reality is that for
example six in that report 64% of the
organizations they already running some
sort of uh AI agents for specific
functions like for example I don't know
uh billing or for example identity right
it may sound that is coordination but
the reality is that this end off between
those agents still requires someone to
go there and move the data from one
place to the other
>> um and I told you there are two reasons
for that gap So for the 98 to the 15. Um
the second reason is governance. Okay.
Governance um connects and and then
connecting to that report. Um
it is more related to um an inter an
enterprise readiness. Is this more
related to an enterprise readiness than
actually just an AI capability? And if
you take a look at the the four uh top
reasons why um people um to justify that
difference of adoption is because number
one compliance taking 15% of all the
reasons um to for that adoption cross
the predamental and this orchestration.
Second with 48% of responses is about
security.
disconnected systems takes third place
with 45%
of the responses uh pointing that as a
as the issue and with 44% are legacy
infrastructure um systems that don't
talk systems that are legacy still on
prem um and so that was the kind of the
four reasons z to you answer your
question is you need to orchestrate that
but uh beyond the orchestration comp
governance including compliance security
disconnect ED system and silos is being
the top barriers
and that differentiates those customers
that are part of the 98% that deploy
something versus the ones that are able
to actually um harnessing uh those
agents into uh one um experience that
goes cross departmental and cross
system.
>> All right, thanks for your thoughts on
that.
>> Yeah, Pedro, I'm I'm I'm interested in
this as well because it sounds like
there's, you know, some organizations
are a little bit more mature. Clearly
you've seen a lot of this activity these
organizations what works what doesn't
work how are you at talk desk helping
customers integrate those AI agents with
all those systems of records right
whether it be CRM or ERP or others and
helping them to to get over this
bottleneck get over these challenges
that they're happening accelerate that
time to value
>> right so
over time um talk desk gen created um
a gazillion sets of um integrations over
time because automation Bob is not it's
not new right we we already have
automation on IPR press one press two
and you still get your balance you still
file your claim um and the fundamental
piece that was required to do that level
of automation is that one way or the
other some cases needed to put some of
these places the solutions in place some
of the some issues use right sometimes
is that um
building an integration requires a wall
project that takes month with talk desk
specifically on industries that we
relieve that pain uh because all those
integrations that you require to have an
integration let's say with epic right
that requires integrations with specific
healthcare protocols or with majority of
the banking systems if you are that talk
desk offers that out of the box you have
those integration out of that and allows
you to with minimum configurations and
setup allows you to have these agentic
systems ready to connect to those data
sources with quality uh reli with um
security that is that is fundamental. So
over years we created those connections,
we created that relationship with those
partners, with those providers uh that
now we are reusing um especially then on
on our verticals to accelerate the
adoption and the time the time to value.
>> Excellent. Yeah, that that makes a lot
of sense and especially for those
specific verticals where you've got
those tight integrations to be able to
accelerate that. And it leads me to
another question I have for you because
we know there's a lot of right the CX
leaders other business leaders they're
all under a lot of pressure to show that
AI is creating value and in the in this
space right it's about you know just not
call deflection and maybe even headcount
reduction when you're thinking about CXA
what business outcomes should
organizations expect and are there new
measurements excuse me new measurements
and new metrics that they should use to
measure
Oh absolutely yes and if I had $1 every
time that I get this question I could
retire myself today.
>> So Bob majority of times I get this
question is is going AI to help me to
reduce my uh my ad count. People are
just so so crazy about this and nothing
wrong about that. But let me share some
additional data uh that we also got in
that survey. And I think that that kind
of a needs to be used to change the way
you need to think when you look at
adopting AI. If you are just thinking
about reducing count and and and do
these savings, you are missing part of
the story. Okay. So I'm going to give
another example for um so let me give
some data and some examples here. Um in
in our report we we created four
categories uh of different customers
depending on their maturity level okay
or their maturity to adopt uh to adopt
AI.
The top ones are what we call CXA
leaders. Um, compared to the one the
ones that are right be right right
before uh these ones right below these
ones. Um,
they are getting uh much more um results
in terms of NPS games than the ones that
we call agentic scalers. So we have the
agent scales and uh on the top the agent
the CXA leaders um in terms of N in
terms of NPS the difference is crazy.
It's about four times. So you have 5%
uh more better NPS scores uh for the
ones that are agentic scalers. So they
have some level of maturity. They are
running a gentic AI in their contact
center. They are deploying it in
production. um but they are just not
like the leaders that they are
harnessing those agents to resolve end
to end. The difference between those two
is four times 22% for the CXA leaders in
terms of NPS gains versus five 5% more
on um for the agentic scalers um in that
in that KPI. So what is interesting is
that the cost per contact also
improves but not
dramatically as uh as NPS for example.
So for the CXA leaders you get 57%
um improvement on cost per contact
versus 48%
which is a moderate reduction in uh in
terms of your uh between the C agitic
scalers versus the CXA leaders. Um so
that suggests that savings alone don't
tell the whole story. they they they
understate the the value that you can
get with you can get with AI. So the
other way then to look at that is to
look at um retention and revenue
>> and let me give you some date some some
numbers. So for example, the customers
that are using CXA to run predictive sh
modeling, they are getting uh way better
results if they are on the top tier of
this adoption. 51% better results in a
productive sh modeling versus the 28%
that um the the the group of customers
the agentic scalers right after um they
are they are they are seeing also
personalized recommendation. All right.
44% of the companies that are running
personalized recommendation, they are
seeing gains in um um if they are part
of the uh CXA leaders versus 19%. So
again, it's almost double um of the of
the gains if you are increasing your
maturity of your um your your AI um your
AI adoption. And again there's um using
it as a as an harnessing system um that
connects those Asians humans systems and
and knowledge. So in some um reality is
that if you took a look at all the
spectrum of companies that are adopting
AI um it's true that only 5% can say
that oh I have a clear way of measuring
uh measuring impact but the reality is
that 46% of the all CXA leaders they
have the impact they have measured and
it is a good impact across metrics that
are just not cost-saving. They are red
um reduction of uh churn and um increase
uh increase their revenue through
personalized for for example
personalizer recommendations.
>> Now Peter, I'm glad you're actually
focused on a lot of the revenue
generating type of metrics, right? we
see a lot of cost cutting and and I'm
curious within the customer base
what's the typical time frame for these
customers to start seeing meaningful ROI
because I think a lot of companies
really aren't they want to invest but
they're not sure of when they'll start
seeing the upside.
>> Well, that answer is less of a pattern.
Why? It's going to depend a lot of um
where your current pains are. Um you may
have a solution that can you can spin
and put to run in a few a few weeks,
maybe two weeks, you can put it to run
uh to three weeks. And if you for
example have a problem of um optimizing
your assignment of the right people.
Imagine that you are you are a company
you are an insurance company. You you
need you are in a season of renewal of
policies. The biggest problem that you
have is that you need to guarantee for a
specific scenario of a customer. You
need to have the right person to do that
because it's sales. It requires a touch
a personal touch. The AI job here is to
connect the right people. So rout for
example intelligent decision routing is
one of typical use cases that may affect
uh those uh a customer um in an
insurance company. It can you we we you
can you can put them to run in uh in a
few weeks. um understand the business
rules, understanding their business, put
that into an in an energetic system and
make guarantee that the user is not um
forced to press one, press two, press
five and hopefully it gets to someone
that is going to help to um to to renew
their policy. Or if you case you are
doing outbound you need to make sure
that you you you connect the right
people depending on the right uh in the
right customer profile. So other
scenarios uh may take a little bit more
time depending on what is the pressure
the pressure point. Um you can run for
through uh two weeks to four weeks. Um
if you if if it goes more than two
months maybe you are trying to bowl the
ocean. there's so much uh to do that you
should break the problems in smaller
pieces and and maybe you are not
attacking the right painoint there and
understand so understanding first the
what is your journey where are the
friction of your journey is the first
thing that we when we interact with a
customer doing um consult um consulted
service trying to understand where we
can help them that's is the first thing
that we Instead of answering yes, we can
do whatever the customer asks, we do the
questions first. We try to diagnose the
pain points, the friction points and
trying to see where we can automate.
Sometimes it's not a voice system. It's
not a a bot. Sometimes it's an operation
on the back office that is breaking the
whole experience that you have. This is
where we we start. So you basically we
are in a to answer it directly your
question Z is this is a matter of weeks
not a multimonth project something is
going to be really wrong if you need to
spend multi multimal month doing a a
project in the CX space
>> yeah now I suspected your answer would
be it depends which it sounds like it is
but I'm glad you time bound that within
a couple months because I think that
gives uh businesses some sort of frame
of reference to work with now I want to
shift gears a little bit uh here pedro
into the workforce and talk just
recently introduced your CXA operations
uh center uh to manage both AI and human
agents and I know workforce is really
you know a hot topic right now and so
when when you look ahead with what CXA
is what's that operating model that CX
organizations will work with is AI
agents assume more responsibility but we
still have to rely on our humans. Yeah,
it's a great point and is one of the
most one of the strongest beliefs that
we have at talk desk. Um we believe in
uh the hybrid workforce and so the CX
operation manager is a role that emerges
from
that from this when you have um when you
have imagine this imagine a convoy belt
you are going to place machines and
humans as the work passes through the
the convoy belt this harnessing is the
most important thing it's the that is
what optimiz izes your operation. So the
place where that shift is from having
people that before they were doing the
job now they are monitoring. So the the
supervision for example shifts from
building scripts into behavior
monitoring. How is your harnessing uh
your agent your machinery your hybrid
workforce working? Are you seeing
problems when um an AI ends off to a
human? Are we losing something here? And
what about when a human engages with an
AI to complete part of the job? Are we
losing something? So that behavior uh
that behavior monitoring, it's important
and exactly what it means. It means
basically three things. guarantee that
your
nonhuman workforce is ready to go before
you launch them in uh into production.
What is the quality of this skill that
you are about to launch as part of your
team? It's like recruiting exactly the
same thing. Do you do interviews? Well,
in AI world, you are doing evaluations
and that's a job for the CX operation
manager.
After you hire that um agent, you not
human agent but uh AI agent. The second
thing that you are going to do is
exactly what you do with human agents.
You are doing evaluations of
performance. You are going to do
observability. You are going to
understand how is it performing. are
what is the errors uh what are the error
rate that they are doing. So and do you
do course correction, you do training,
you do um an optimization of an
instruction. Uh that is again the job
for the operation manager is not a
technical skill but is a beh is a
behavior changing or a behavior
monitoring skill. And final finally is
the last the last piece of this skill of
this emerging role is understanding how
your hybrid team is operating and how
this is affecting your uh business KPIs.
It shifts now you don't measure just
alone ever gend you are going to measure
how much time it gets to from opening of
a problem until it gets closed. No,
because average time just measures the
time of an agent. But what about the
rest of the process or what about the
other systems? What are the people on
the back office? They are not counted
traditionally in those KPIs. But now
that you have an hybrid workforce, you
need to measure the efficiency of the
whole process from the beginning until
the end. Even if it takes 300
interactions to get solved.
And Pedro, this is really fascinating
for me because, you know, developing
these new skills and in a lot of cases I
often look at AI and refer to it as the
time to comfort with the technology and
so forth. And now you're talking about a
kind almost a cultural shift of these
supervisors having to manage these
hybrid environments, learning new
skills. So, how is TalkE helping them
make that shift? Are you actually
offering some guidance classes, things
like that to help them accelerate and
understand this is going to be their new
role and these are the new skills that
they're going to need?
>> You know, Bob, I at the beginning I
thought that it will be much much
difficult. Um, reality shows that
when you talk about
bringing AI into the contact center,
a first reaction that you get is
scare. People get scared. People get
fear. Um, that's fear is the first
reaction is this is going to mess up big
time because I see ship ship messing big
time as well. Um so the question is how
do I guarantee that this is not going to
create a problem for me? So the the
answer to your question comes very
natural. It's a need. People didn't even
know that they need a role in the
contact center that is the CXI operation
manager. The reality is when you present
it as that is the response to their
fears. So the except the adoption and
the reorganization internally to remove
people from previous roles into this
role comes very natural. Um they from
day zero they are involved in the the
the the designing of the solution. So
Bob, this is not like a traditional
uh SAS uh sale where you you install the
product and then here's the the the
video, here's the training team.
Actually, the customers are involved
from the very beginning in
co-development. So we work with them and
as we work, we present these tools. We
present here's what here's the the agent
that we're just deploying. Here's the
quality provided by this evolve report.
And after the launch we are keep
monitoring and they have access to all
of that data. So for them it's it's a
fundamental part of their journeys. We
you don't need to have a specific
specific action on that because it comes
very natural. They customer are involved
in those tools and in this role as
operation manager from the very
beginning.
>> Excellent. No that's great. And I also
this next question I wanted to ask you
is kind of a follow-up. We've talked
about it a little bit earlier on and
you've talked about the value of it, but
I know you've done a lot of specialized
capabilities for verticals, whether it
be healthcare, financial, right,
insurance, retail, etc.
Why do you believe that vertical
specialization is going to be essential
for that successful agentic AI adoption?
>> Yeah. So it it's fundamental um because
uh
when you look at industries um their
level of maturity um differs a lot um
from from from one to the other. Retail
is the most uh mature vertical um where
for example around 24% um of the all the
the retail organizations reach uh the
top tier of maturity um for example
comparing um to what the average in
terms of maturity is of 15%. So this
this tells you that um your um adoption
um and the way you adopt you adopt is
going to be very close to your level of
maturity of those industries. The way to
accelerate that maturity is by bringing
um pre-built solutions that are
preconnected
uh to their systems. Don't expect to
bring an empty platform and expect the
customer to connect the dots, connect
the systems and transform the
organization on uh alone that that that
is not going to work. So verticalization
is important because it brings resolves
part of the pain which is bringing the
systems together, bringing the knowledge
together and for that that is not just
about integrations, APIs, it's not about
instructions. This is also about
having people on our side,
specialists in each of those verticals
that we can talk about. We know your
market. We know how you operate. This is
how um this um the this orchestration
should work. This is what we have been
seeing in other uh companies within your
market. This is what works. This is what
doesn't work. this is what it worth to
invest.
That differentiation for us is
fundamental is and we invest a lot in
technology and in people that knows uh
those knows those verticals. So the
whole goal is to have people process and
product that helps customers to reach
higher levels of maturity.
>> Make sense?
>> Yeah, absolutely does.
Yeah. Yeah. And I wanted to uh you know
finish up talking about the the the way
customers can think about CXA as a way
of transforming their organization. So
I'm one of the the interesting things
about CXA is it's extended AI beyond
just using it for inbound services and
answering calls quicker, right? and you
do things like proactive interactions,
you know, such as cart recovery, loan
pre-qualification, collections, customer
outreach, things that we historically
didn't think of as a part of the service
organization. And so when you when you
think about that vision, how do you
think this changes the organization?
Does the contact center become revenue
generating or does it merge with you
know the CX organization and and talk
about that? Yeah. So absolutely it it is
a change um it is a change and is
happening now especially because um we
and the customers are seeing
this transformation
not at the lenses of only automate one
use case but automate the whole journey.
And guess what majority of the journeys
are not just inbound. Inbound is kind of
the last piece of a journey is when
everything broke people call in.
So the when you speak start talking
about CXA automation orchestration you
start uncovering those journeys. Come on
let's talk about that journey. Where
does it start? Where what what is what
is the trigger of this? Oh people are
calling because um they want to schedule
uh their um to get their car serviceed.
Hold on a second. Why is that? You know
when the car gets needs to get serviced.
You know when um an u an AC equipment
needs to get serviced. Why don't you
when is that part of the journey? And
that's when starts you you know you
start you you almost hear uh the gears
changing moving in in the customer's
brain when they start thinking oh yeah
the reality is that is in another place
somewhere in the organization. All
right, let's bring them in. And then
that that's when you start automating
the the whole journey. So basically
instead and instead of just waiting the
call to want someone to get their car or
the AC services, basically you have an
AI agent that automatically verifies
periodically what are the customers
today that I need to contact that are
going to get their car service or their
AC service in the next x amount of time.
And then they start outbounding those uh
those messages or phone calls depending
on the strategy and then they may not
pick you pick up the call. They may call
you back like 10 minutes later. But
because you start the journey, the
customer is already on that journey. So
when you pick up the call, you know what
this is all about because the context is
shared across these multiple agents that
are taking care of that. So
it come it it comes naturally when you
start looking at
at use cases that are not isolated and
that's where that pains me when majority
of the AI thinking is about oh I have
this issue I'm going to put a chatbot
here it's going to answer those
questions no man there's there's a
reason why that is happening look at the
whole spectrum look a whole journey and
put your journey all in a paper and now
start thinking about the automating the
wall journey instead of just having a
onepoint solution that takes you
nowhere.
>> Yeah, that's a that's a great
explanation. Thank you so much and this
has been an awesome discussion.
Unfortunately, we are running out of
time. So, Pedro, thank you so much for
joining us.
>> It was a great pleasure. Z and Bob,
thank you so much for inviting me.
>> Yeah, thanks Pedro.
>> Yeah, absolutely. So clearly the key
takeaway is that that next phase of AI
and customer experience won't be defined
simply by how many interactions it can
automate. It's really going to depend on
whether AI can securely and reliably
coordinate people, data, and enterprise
systems to resolve customer needs and
deliver measurable business outcomes.
Now, Talk Deck's evolution towards
customer experience automation reflects
that broader shift from isolated bots
and co-pilots toward governed multi-
aent systems capable of supporting the
entire customer journey.
Zas, thanks again for co-hosting and
thank you to everyone for watching this
segment of the CX Summit.