Passive Income Expert: Buying A House Makes You Poorer Than Renting!
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
JL Collins, author of *The Simple Path to Wealth*, argues that achieving financial independence requires a fundamental shift in how one thinks about money: moving from viewing it solely as a means of exchange for goods like houses and cars to treating it as an asset class that works for you. He asserts that buying a house is often detrimental to wealth accumulation because the industry incentivizes buyers to stretch their budgets, leading them into debt with high maintenance costs, taxes, and renovation expenses that sit idle rather than generating returns. Instead of purchasing real estate, Collins recommends living in modest housing—such as an apartment—and investing the surplus income directly into low-cost total stock market index funds. This approach leverages compounding interest over time; for instance, contributing $500 monthly at an 8% annual return can result in a portfolio exceeding one million dollars after 35 years, with the majority of that value coming from growth rather than initial contributions. A critical component of this strategy is adhering to strict frugality and avoiding lifestyle inflation, which Collins illustrates through the "4% rule" derived by Bill Bengen. This guideline suggests that if you need $100,000 annually for living expenses, a portfolio of roughly $2.5 million provides financial independence because withdrawing 4% covers those costs without depleting principal. Collins emphasizes that many people fail to recognize their own independence due to the psychological shock of compounding taking off suddenly; they cannot believe the math until it happens. To maximize this potential, he advises starting early and utilizing tax-advantaged accounts like Roth IRAs for children's earnings or 401(k)s with employer matches in one's own career. He clarifies that while these accounts defer taxes rather than eliminate them entirely—requiring Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) around age 73—the time value of money makes tax-deferred growth essential for long-term wealth building, especially given the compounding effect over decades. The podcast also delves into the psychological aspects of wealth and happiness, challenging the notion that material possessions equate to contentment. Collins shares a parable about a wealthy minister who must cater to a king versus a humble monk living on rice beans, illustrating that true freedom comes from needing less rather than acquiring more. He recounts his own experience realizing that buying luxury items like Range Rovers or fancy houses provided only temporary happiness and often led to anxiety once the novelty wore off. Furthermore, he discusses the dangers of divorce as a financial event, citing an example where legal fees consumed tens of millions in assets due to inflated valuations by opposing counsel. This reinforces his belief that choosing a compatible partner is not just an emotional decision but a crucial financial one; if you cannot afford your spouse's mistakes or their lawyer's bills during a separation, the marriage may be financially unsustainable regardless of love. Despite the rigorous advice on saving 50% of income and investing in stocks, Collins acknowledges personal regrets that highlight human fallibility rather than strategy failure. He admits to rejecting his father's gift as a child out of immaturity and regretting not being present for his dying wish when he was young enough to understand it but too emotionally unprepared to handle the gravity of death. These stories underscore his view on time horizons, noting that our future selves feel like strangers to us today because we prioritize immediate gratification over long-term security. Ultimately, Collins concludes with a philosophical perspective derived from reading poetry and observing life: while there may be no cosmic meaning or afterlife waiting for us, the point of existence is simply to treat people well, avoid harming others, and make the best of our finite time on Earth without arrogance about bearing special significance in the universe.
Read the full video transcript
If your goal is to become financially
independent at a young age, this is a
very controversial thing to say. You
probably don't want to go buy a house
because people typically buy a house
they can't possibly afford. The bank
wants you to do that cuz that's how they
make the most money. So you're putting
your capital into that house and now
it's not going to be earning thing. It's
going to be sitting idly. Some people
say, "Well, you know, I can buy this
house because my mortgage is the same as
my rent." Well, yeah, but your mortgage
is just the starting point. So what
comes to mind
>> if I want to be financially wealthy?
Okay, so we've got a lot to go through.
JL Collins is a renowned financial
expert known for his book The Simple
Path to Wealth. He's teaching millions a
straightforward and realistic avenue for
achieving wealth
>> so that anyone can have financial
security. What is the simple path to
wealth? So first of all, avoid debt
because you can never be financially
independent if you're carrying around
debt. Next, live on less than you earn.
[music] But the problem is the way our
culture has taught us to think about
money is solely in terms of what can you
buy with it. But the more must-haves you
have in your life, the less likely you
are to become wealthy. And then the
final one, invest the surplus. So stocks
are the single most effective, strongest
wealth-building tool that's ever been
created. But the biggest pushback I get
is from people who say, "Well, that's
great. I mean, if you got a big income,
$100, $200, $300,000 a year, then yeah,
the simple path to wealth will work for
you." That's not the truth. For
instance, a friend of mine, he was
making a million dollars a year and he
was broke because people have large
incomes are much more likely to be drawn
into the competing with the Joneses.
Whereas the people who make less money
probably don't have those same social
pressures and are more readily able to
do it. So let's talk about investing
then. Where do you think we should be
investing our money at this moment of
time? Should I buy Bitcoin? Do I need a
financial adviser? So my advice, and
this is a little different than the more
common advice out there, would be
This has always blown my mind a little
bit. 53% of you that listen to this show
regularly haven't yet subscribed to this
show. So could I ask you for a favor
before we start? If you like this show
and you like what we do here and you
want to support us, the free simple way
that you can do just that is by hitting
the subscribe button. And my commitment
to you is if you do that, then I'll do
everything in my power, me and my team,
to make sure that this show is better
for you every single week. We'll listen
to your feedback. We'll find the guest
that you want me to speak to and we'll
continue to do what we do. Thank you so
much.
>> [music and singing]
>> JL Collins.
You wrote a book, a very iconic book
that sold
millions of copies called The Simple
Path to Wealth.
Why did you write this book? I actually
that book was an outgrowth of my blog.
I started the blog
to archive information I wanted my
daughter
to have available because if you get
money right, your life is so much
better. You have so many more options.
And
the world offers so much to people who
have the resources with which to access
it.
And so little for those people who don't
have the resources to access those
things. And and if you don't have it,
it life is just so much harder than it
than it needs to be. When you think
about the average person listening right
now, what is what are some of the
fundamental sort of misconceptions or
misunderstandings or what would you call
it, black spots that they have as it
relates to money?
The things they walk around assuming
about money that are incorrect. That
that you were maybe trying to get out of
your daughter's mind. Right. So there's
a chapter in the book called How to
Think About Money.
And
the fundamental way I think the vast
majority of people think about money,
because this is what our culture has
taught us, the way our culture has
taught us to think about money,
is solely in terms of what can you buy
with it. So [snorts] if you go to the
average person, that lottery for
instance is like a billion dollars at
the moment. So people are buying lottery
tickets.
And if you interviewed people standing
in line to buy lottery tickets and said,
"Okay, if you win this million dollars,
what are you going to do with it?"
Well, what you're typically going to
hear is, "Well, I'm going to pay off my
debts and I'm going to pay off my
mortgage and I'm going to buy my parents
a house and I'm going to buy myself a
Lamborghini. I'm going to buy I'm going
to buy I'm going to buy."
That's the way most people think about
money.
And that's certainly one of the things
that money's very good at. It is a means
of exchange.
But the other thing your money can do
for you is work for you.
Your money can make you more money. So
you can exchange your time and effort
and labor to earn money and that's what
most of us do.
But you can also divert some of the
money you earn into investments, into
what I call buying your freedom.
And now your money is working for you.
So instead of just thinking about what
your money can buy, you can start
thinking about what can your money earn.
You can buy your freedom.
>> You can buy your freedom, your financial
freedom.
Why is that an important reframing of
the role of money in your view? What
does that do if I start thinking about
it through that lens? Well, because as
long as you are dependent on exchanging
your effort, time, and labor
for money,
you are beholden to whoever is willing
to pay you to do that.
That's a limit of freedom. It's a it's a
form of
without being too dramatic, a form of
slavery.
If you are always living paycheck to
paycheck to pay the mortgage or the rent
or whatever, if on the other hand work
is optional,
you're a good example. Man, you've been
a very successful guy.
>> [snorts]
>> You're not doing this podcast because
you need the money.
If you were still stuck at a job that
paid you a wage, you wouldn't have the
option to do this because you'd have to
devote all your time to that job so you
could pay the mortgage, so you could pay
the rent, so you could put food on the
table. Money buys freedom. How does one
get out of that situation? You know, if
I used to work in call centers
um answering phones and selling people
things.
>> Sure.
How does one in your view realistically
get from that place where you are kind
of beholden to the paycheck?
>> Right. I was I'd spend my wage within
the first week or so of the month. Sure.
And then I'd just suffer for the next 3
weeks. In the UK we have like a 4-week
paying cycle. I think in the US it's 2
weeks typically, but I I took a I think
a reckless road out of that life. The
thing that gave me the proclivity to
take the risk is like some kind of
insecurity and trauma. Well, like I
couldn't I didn't have a plan B because
I wanted to be I wanted to like validate
myself or something.
And so I wonder if the the skill or the
thing that I was given that I'm most
thankful for is like some kind of
chip on my shoulder. Some kind of
trauma.
But but no, no, no, genuinely cuz I
think like what would make you take a
risk, like some of the risks that I took
to leave university to then like be be
broke and
I was like, well, I just I was driven I
was dragged by some kind of trauma.
Right.
One of the things that I've observed and
I think to the extent that I've had some
success in my life, this is true,
that successful people do tend to have
trauma in their background. At least
that's my observation. Now, I'm sure
there are exceptions to that.
But it does seem that people like us are
striving to overcome
those past traumas, to have that chip on
the shoulder, to prove something.
I've also met people who are very
content
to be completely lacking in ambition.
And to have enough to have a comfortable
life and kind of do what they want to
do, to have financial independence
maybe,
but they don't have this drive to be
successful, to to make a mark on on the
world.
And
they tend to have had better childhoods
and and and I think that there is
that wasn't me, that doesn't appear to
be you, but I think there's a lot to be
said for for that, right? You you I
mean, you open the book about talking
about a parable of the monk and the
minister.
>> And the minister.
>> Yeah.
Can you tell me about that parable cuz
it seems to somewhat relate to what
we're saying here? Yeah, very very much
so.
And that's the reason I opened the book
with it. So the parable is
there are these
uh two boys who grew up together.
They're childhood friends. As frequently
happens, they go their different
directions in life as they become
adults.
And one becomes a very successful,
powerful minister to the king. And the
other becomes a humble monk in tattered
robes with a begging bowl and what have
you. And years later they run into each
other in the road.
And they're getting reacquainted.
And as they are, the minister to the
king takes pity on on his
poverty-stricken friend in his tattered
robes.
And he says, "You know,
if you could learn to cater to the king,
you wouldn't have to live on rice and
beans."
To which the monk replies,
"If you could learn to live on rice and
beans,
you wouldn't have to cater to the king."
And for me, I've always been a little
bit more towards the monk side.
I'm
I'm not a very materialistic person and
I'm
comfortable and able to get along on on
very little.
And I think there's something beautiful
about needing less. I have from my
interviews met people who are very
wealthy, even actually off camera,
who are very very wealthy and appear to
be happy. Yes.
>> But I think I I think it's safe to say
that the richest people I know are
amongst the least happy people I know.
So if I think about the very top, the
billionaires that I know off camera,
they are amongst the least happy,
typically. Mhm. Um because I think
whatever's taken them there
is still haunting them while they're
there.
So, it could be the chip on the
shoulder, the insecurity, whatever
happened to them that made them so
driven and obsessed with validation and
climbing is still haunting them now.
But I do also I do know people like I
say that are very very rich and that
live
remarkably content lives. I think part
of it is their relationship with the
stuff.
Like I think it is possible
>> keep it at arm's length, right? They're
a little psychic distance from the
stuff. Yeah, and I
just speaking from my own journey, at a
very young age up until the age of 25, I
was convinced that buying a Range Rover
Sport was going to like really make me
really happy. And
the anticlimax once I got those things
was was like stuck it was staggering. It
was a complete
mental it was like someone had shaken my
head. My reality distorted for a second
because I thought this was meant to be
it.
And now I can still get things that I
like, but I was saying to Will the other
day that when I walked into my new house
in LA,
I pre-prepped myself to know that it was
going to have zero impact on my
happiness. And that meant that I
actually enjoyed it, weirdly. Right.
Like I was actually super grateful
because I'd pre-prepped myself to have a
healthier relationship with the thing.
Bring the expectation down.
>> Exactly. So, there are a couple of
things at play there, I think. One is
it's the journey that's really
satisfying. Mhm. The destination tends
to be less so. And I think that's one of
the problems with
being very materialistic because
you know, if your definition of
happiness is if I only owned this watch,
right? If I only had this watchmaker
make me this intricate watch, then I
would be happy.
Well, I mean
maybe, but probably not. You're probably
going to have that watch and you're
going to look at it and say,
"That's really nice. Wow, that's good."
And then
well, what's next?
But if you enjoy the journey or and I
think you made a very wise decision if
you reset your expectations
and say, you know, I'm going to have
this nice house or this nice watch,
but I don't expect it to make me happy.
But it's going to be a nice thing to
have in in my life. And somebody once
said much wiser than me, you know, money
doesn't change who you are. It It can
magnify who you are. So, if you're an
unhappy person and you have lots of
money, you will probably still be an
unhappy person. Mhm. Uh if you're a
happy person, I mean, one of the happy
In fact, the single happiest guy I know,
his life was the biggest financial
disaster of anybody I personally know.
And this guy's He's the literally the
happiest human being I've ever met. Cuz
he was happy before. Because he was
happy before and there's other things
besides money that makes you happy.
Money
and the reason that I I it was so
important to me to teach my daughter
this, money gives you options.
Right? Money allows you a lot
wider range of choices in life.
But it doesn't necessarily make you
happy.
Right? If it allows you to pursue an
option
that otherwise you couldn't pursue and
that option makes you happy, that's a
different thing. I think if I was
listening to this and I was broke like I
used to be very broke, I would still
pursue wealth at all costs. Because I
know I had this phrase the other day
which was
it is easier to get rich than it is to
give up the idea that getting rich will
make you happy.
And I
>> [laughter]
>> I thought to myself
>> Right.
And if you hadn't gotten rich, you would
always think 100% you'd always wonder if
that was And you know what? So much of
the unhappiness or anxiety that I had
when I was you know, my early early
innings of my life and my career came
from looking down and seeing the bailiff
letters or came from the credit card
debt or how am I going to eat today or
you know, can't go out and see my
friends. So much of my mind was occupied
by
my inability to have freedom. Right. My
lack of freedom. My need to get up at
8:00 and walk for an hour and a half to
a call center was you know, so what I
managed to remove was that. I wouldn't
say I I added happiness, but I removed
the unhappiness.
>> Well, and that's a that's a key point.
You know, money doesn't necessarily make
you happy, but the lack of money Oh,
yeah. can be
terrible challenge, especially in this
modern culture we've created. Okay, so
if you have kids listening right now,
please cover their ears cuz I'm going to
say a swear word. Parents always message
me and ask me to stop swearing. So, I'm
going to say a swear word. Um a lot of
people are obsessed with this idea of
[ __ ] you money. Right.
Let me just give you a definition. So, F
you money refers to a financial
situation where a person has enough
money to live comfortably without
needing to work and it gives you the
freedom to say F you to anyone or
anything you don't want to tolerate such
as a job, a boss, or a situation that
doesn't align with your values. What
does that mean to you?
Yeah, so for me, so that's a good
definition, but I would substitute in
that definition financial independence.
F you money for me is the money you
accumulate on the way.
Right? So, for instance, if you're a
bodybuilder,
you know, financial independence is when
you're on the stage and you're winning,
you're at the elite level. But along the
way, from the moment you start working
out, you get a little bit stronger, a
little bit stronger, a little bit
stronger, right? Same thing financially.
The moment you start setting aside money
and investing it, you become a little
bit financially stronger.
And that builds over time. That in my
mind is the F you money.
Because
long before you're financially
independent, that money gives you
enormous freedom. You might not be able
to never work again,
but if you need to, you could leave a
toxic job
knowing you could survive for months or
even years while you looked for the
better job because you have that F you
money. So, it allows you to say F you in
that case to an employer. And if you do
it daughter turn around, what's her
name? Jessica. Jessica. If Jessica turns
around to you and says, "Dad, what are
what is something I should not do with
my money if I
um want to be wealthy?"
What is the what are like the big What
is the first thing that comes to mind to
as a no-no
if I want to be financially wealthy?
The most more common advice that I think
you should avoid if your goal is to
become financially independent at a
young age,
you probably don't want to go buy a
house.
That's very controversial thing to say.
The reason you're why buy a house is
because houses dramatically inflates
inflate by and large your cost of
living.
You know, you're you're putting your
capital into that house and now it's not
going to be earning thing. It's going to
be sitting idly.
Along with owning a house, you have the
expenses of maintaining it, paying the
taxes on it, blah blah blah.
If you stay in a
apartment that is just enough to meet
your needs, which by the way is what my
daughter has done and continues to do,
your costs will be lower. Explain that
to me. Explain why my cost of living
goes up if I buy a house. Sure. So,
people it doesn't have to, but people
people typically
buy the most house they can possibly
afford. The industry drives them that
way. If you go to a real estate agent,
you say, "I think I'm going to I want to
buy a house." Right? First question
they're going to ask you is how much do
you make?
How much you want to spend, you know?
And And then you go to the bank and you
say, "Okay, I want to buy a house. How
much will you lend me?" And they'll
they'll how much you make and then
they'll come back with a large number
of how much they're willing to lend you.
If you follow those guidelines, you're
going to wind up with a house that's
going to be a burden. You are not buying
it from a position of strength. You are
stretching to buy it. You are borrowing
the most money a bank's willing to give
you. You probably don't want to do that.
I mean, you can. That's the bank wants
you to do that cuz that's
[clears throat] how they make the most
money, but that's not the best thing for
you to do. But that's what you get drawn
into. And then when you buy that house,
I don't know that I've ever known
anybody, including me by the way, and
I've owned houses most of my adult life,
who's owned a house without doing
renovations on it. So, you've got those
costs.
You're going to furnish that house cuz
you're probably buying more square
footage than you were renting before.
You're going to need new furniture or
maybe you just want better furniture for
your new house. Maybe new appliances,
landscaping, taxes, maintenance. I mean,
the the list is endless and people
say, "Well, you know, I can buy this
house. My mortgage
is the same as my rent."
Well, yeah, but your mortgage is just
the starting point. You've got all these
other expenses with the house. And the
other thing is they are variable
expenses. Variable expenses.
>> Yeah, with your rent, you know, if if
you're renting an apartment, you're
paying $2,500 a month for your
apartment, right? You know exactly what
your housing costs are for the term of
your lease.
Right? $2,500 a month.
If you own a house, maybe your mortgage
is $2,500 a month.
And then you need new roof. And that's
20 grand.
Or you need a new septic system, which
by the way I'm
looking at having to put into my
cottage. You know, well, that's another
25 grand, right? And so and you don't
necessarily know when those things are
going to come at you.
It is a bit of a trap, isn't it? It's a
trap. Um I didn't realize this until I
bought a house and And most people
don't.
>> Like I even sit here on this podcast
doing this for a living and then I I
made this stupid mistake of buying a
house. And I do think it was a stupid
mistake because I
I will talk about opportunity cost in a
second, but it was in hindsight it was
like a terrible decision.
I spent all this money on this house. It
was a house abroad. It was also like a
holiday home, I guess.
And every time I come, all I see is
things that I need to change. Yeah, it's
Look at the United States. For instance,
if 20 years ago, 30 years ago, you'd
bought a house in San Francisco,
well, you've done very very well
financially. If you bought a house in
Detroit,
not so much.
So, then the question becomes people
will say, "Well, obviously you don't buy
a house Detroit, you buy a house in San
Francisco.
Well, I'm not an expert in real estate,
but
I am reading more and more commonly that
San Francisco is has a lot of very
challenging problems at the moment.
Detroit, on the other hand, where I was
just visiting a couple of years ago, is
enjoying a renaissance. Detroit's coming
back.
So, who's to say in 20, 30 years people
won't be saying, you bought in Detroit
back in 2025,
you were golden. And if you bought San
Francisco, yeah, not so much. Sometimes
real estate, buying a house, can work
out in a spectacular fashion. And that's
the stories people tend to hear.
But not always.
>> And that's what I tend to see in the
comment section when we talk about this
issue of buying a house. I've just
looking at the comment section actually,
and
on a previous conversation where we
talked about whether you should buy a
house, someone said, I bought a house
and it's the best thing I ever did. It's
launched my mindset in new directions.
Remember that your own space has
profound psychological impacts and can
be life-changing for some of that don't
live in a healthy environment. The
psychological impact of buying a house.
What that commenter just said is is can
be and for him obviously is absolutely
true.
I am not anti-house. As I mentioned a
moment ago, I've owned houses most of my
adult life.
But I've never bought them because I
thought they were an investment. I
bought them because I thought they would
enhance my life in a way I wanted it
enhanced. They would make my life
better. They are, in my view, an
expensive indulgence.
I have nothing against expensive
indulgences. That's one of the reasons
we accumulate money. Right? I like some
expensive some I don't care about, some
I like.
Um but that's what they are. And if you
can easily afford it, then by all means
buy the house. Looking at some stats
here, it says home buying was once a
solid investment due to rising property
values and lower mortgage rates.
However, for younger generations, this
is no longer the case because of
skyrocketing home prices. Since 1980, US
home prices have increased by over 300%
outpacing inflation and wage growth. In
2023, mortgage rates surged past 7%
making monthly payments significantly
higher than before and medium wages have
only risen by about 15% since year the
year 2000, while home prices have more
than doubled making home ownership less
affordable. And lastly, the cost of
renting is often cheaper than buying,
especially in cities where prices have
outpaced wage growth, leading many
younger people to choose renting for
flexibility. This point of flexibility
as well is one we don't talk about.
>> Right.
>> Which is the ability to go do something
else in another country.
>> Exactly. And my brother said this to me
when I was 20. My brother's very smart,
he's a year older than me.
He's a financial genius and has a much
different brain to mine. And I remember
when I was 20,
maybe 24, and I was talking about do I
buy a house? And he both told me it was
the worst investment I could ever make,
but he also told me to think about
flexibility and my ability to get up and
move.
>> Yes. And I was what do you mean? And he
said, well, listen, you're in a certain
era of your career where
you might be
called by someone in San Francisco who
offers you a great opportunity and you
might want to go next week. And it
actually, when I look at how my career
transpired, that's exactly what
happened. I was in Plymouth and then I
went to Manchester for business and I
went to London for business. Then I went
around the world to San Francisco, to
New York for business. And I'm I'm
moving with the opportunity.
And if I was anchored somewhere because
a mortgage does
>> that along.
>> Yeah. And and a mortgage does like
psychologically anchor you. This is what
people don't talk about. It creates a
huge amount of guilt if you then want to
get up and go because you in your head
you're going, well, I'm going to be
paying
double. Well, you said I agree with
everything you said. I agree I agree
with your brother. Flexibility,
especially when you're young and your
career is in a dynamic phase, [snorts]
it is not to be underrated. For my
daughter, I mean, she loves living in
Savannah. They've been there for 3
years.
But
she has an adventuresome soul and
you know, she says, I don't know. I
mean, maybe at some point I'll want to
go live in Europe or somewhere else.
Well, if you have a house that
complicates that decision. And even if
you are fortunate enough to buy in a
market where your values are rising,
the cost associated with buying and
selling a house is are enormous.
The, you know, the real estate
commission and the taxes and what have
you. So, getting in and out of a house
is an expensive proposition. Getting in
and out of an apartment doesn't cost
anything. I mean, maybe your security
deposit, right? But that's it. That's
that's very clean and simple, but if
you're if you were to buy a house in
Savannah and then to say, you know, I
think I want to go live in
Portugal.
Well,
now you got to sell that house or maybe
you have to rent it. Now you're a
landlord. You're an accidental landlord,
which was subject to my second book.
You know, that's not optimal. That I
mean, if you set out to be a landlord,
great. But if you become an accidental
landlord because you can't sell your
house that you don't want to live in
anymore, that's not so great. So,
flexibility is is enormously important.
If I if I were to ask you, what is
the simple path to wealth and you had to
respond in a sentence,
what would that sentence be? Avoid debt,
live on less than you earn, invest the
surplus. So, let's talk about debt then.
Okay.
>> Why did you say avoid debt?
You can never be financially independent
if you're carrying around debt.
It's a ball and chain that you drag drag
along, especially consumer debt. Now, to
be clear, if you're in business and your
business is
is carrying debt as a as a function of
of running the operation for one reason
or another, that's kind of a different
thing. But in terms of personal debt,
uh if you're running up credit card
debt, if you're leasing expensive cars
or or borrowing money to buy expensive
cars or what have you, possibly a
mortgage
>> [snorts]
>> is in a slightly different category, but
it has all the disadvantages we just
talked about. Yeah, debt's a ball and
chain. It's it's like asking a swimmer
to
compete and and strapping a weight
around their waist. Uh it just is it
possible? Sure, I guess it is, but it's
a whole lot a whole lot more difficult.
So, job one if you have debt is to blow
it out. And I mean, blowing it out is a
dream for many, but it's uh easier said
than done, I guess. It simply means that
you have to organize your life in such a
fashion
that you can divert some money to either
buying your freedom investments or if
you have debt,
paying off that debt.
You just you have to do that. And people
say, well, I can't do that, you know, I
I need to have this I and the more, you
know, I need to have the these the two
least luxury cars and we need to live in
this neighborhood and we need to send
the kids to these schools and we need to
and I call that the tyranny of the
must-haves.
The more must-haves you have in your
life, the less likely you are to become
financially independent. Now, that's
your choice. That's an individual's
choice. It may very well be that those
things
are more important to you than buying
your freedom. And it's your money. It's
not for me to tell anybody
how they should spend their money or
what's important me or what's important
to them. For me, there was nothing I
could spend my money on that was more
important than my freedom, which is why
from the beginning I diverted half of my
income to buying that thing. It was
never deprivation.
Right? Most people say, well, that's
this is a path of deprivation. I can't
spend my money.
Well, not for me. I you know, I spent
every dime that ever came my way.
It's just that I spent half of those
dimes on the thing that I wanted to own
the most, which was my freedom. And you
own that by owning assets.
So, I wasn't I wasn't depriving myself
any more than if somebody said, you
know, I'm looking at buying a a Mercedes
or a Volkswagen, right? If I'm buy the
Mercedes, I'm in this big fancy car and
people will be impressed.
If I buy the Volkswagen, yeah, I'm in
this more modest car, but then I've got
a whole bunch of money left over that I
can spend on a wardrobe or going out to
dinner or a more expensive apartment.
It's just a matter of choosing where you
spend your money on, right? So,
one of the choices that I I do I am
under no illusion that most people who
read my book will actually follow the
simple path because I I think there's
just way too much cultural influence to
spend your money elsewhere. But at least
the people who read the book and listen
to this interview will be aware that
there is something else they could buy
with their money.
And that's their personal freedom. And
you do that by assets.
And there was nothing more important to
me. Nothing I wanted more. So, it was
not deprivation at all.
I am I reflect back on
where I used to be in my life and if I'd
heard this conversation then,
I really really struggled with um saving
money because saving spending money was
so closely linked to my sense of self
and my self-esteem. A lot of people feel
that way. I've shared this story before,
but when I I was working in those call
centers at
which one? Swinton Swinton's car
insurance where I used to work, I would
get my paycheck and it might be, I don't
know, 1,500 pounds or 2,000 pounds,
whatever.
And like on my way home on payday, I'd
go buy a 60-in TV.
>> [clears throat]
>> And [laughter] I'd put it in the house
and then I'd try and see if I had enough
money to buy a PlayStation.
And then about a week later, when I
realized that I was broke, I would sell
both.
And I look at that behavior as such
absolute like it's objectively like
crazy behavior. They're like repeatedly
doing
crazy things. But it shows the extent to
which
I got a dopamine hit from having a nice
thing and I was trapped in that cycle of
like buy the nice thing, dopamine hit,
feel validated, feel like I'm a
successful person and then have to sell
it a week later.
So I really have a huge amount of
empathy for people that are stuck in
this
spending for self-esteem cycle.
And they hear these, you know, they hear
people like me and you talk about these
things now.
And it feels easier said than done.
That to me seems kind of insane and and
Yeah, one of the things that somebody
pointed out one time is if you're
driving around in a Ferrari,
you know, maybe you're thinking to
yourself if you're bought the Ferrari
because you want to impress people,
everybody's looking at me and they're
thinking, "Wow, what a cool guy that is
driving driving that Ferrari." No,
that's not what they're thinking.
They're looking at you in that Ferrari
and what they're thinking is, "Wow, I
would look cool if I was driving that
Ferrari." They're not thinking about you
at all.
It doesn't it you're making no impact on
on what their opinion of you is.
So on this point of debt, I did have
some people contact me that were
childhood friends of mine recently and
asked ask me for advice on getting out
of debt.
And one particular friend said that he
had 40,000 dollars worth of debt and
asked me for advice on it. And I I
really [clears throat]
I'm not an expert in this, so I kind of
hesitated to give any advice.
But the advice I'm hearing from you is
essentially you have to make a
concession. You have to
pull back your spending and get things
back under control. You have to, I don't
know, sell your house. So here's some
good news. So you okay to your friend,
he's got like $40,000 in debt, right?
My advice would be and this is a little
different than the more common advice
out there, but I would look at all my
debts
and I would pick the one that was
charging me the highest interest rate.
And I would I'd pay the minimums on all
the others and I would focus on paying
that one down as fast as I could because
that's the biggest return on my
investment. And when that one was gone,
I'd go to the second until I worked my
way through.
It's going to be hard
and the more quickly you do it, the
harder it's going to be cuz you're going
to have to make more dramatic
adjustments to your life.
That's the bad news. Here's the good
news is once you are out of debt, if you
do this,
you've developed a wonderful discipline
of living on less than you earn and
diverting the excess to something else
that you want more. In this case, the
something else you want more is being
out of debt.
If you continue with that discipline,
you now have the cash flow to begin
building those assets and becoming
wealthy. You've already developed that
lifestyle and that discipline.
So that's the one ray of sunshine, if
you will, in in the process of getting
out of debt. Okay, to play devil's
advocate with me then on this one. So
when I was 18, 19 years old, my
strategy, I was well aware that I'd
[ __ ] up my financial situation. Like I
was it was
plain to clear that I'd figured out what
a credit score was and I realized that
I'd destroyed mine. I also had these
letters that [laughter]
all of these failure letters.
And and I had I had mounting issues. I
was avoiding
finances, bills, envelopes, you name it.
I just thought
if I don't look at it, it doesn't exist,
which I know a lot of people do. Because
when I was writing a previous book that
I wrote, I looked into some of the stats
about humans' ability to avoid,
whether it's health situations, if a
friend of yours gets a bad diagnosis, I
was reading a study that said some
people are more likely to not go get
checked
even if their friends had a because they
just want to avoid it. Um and then with
national finances, I was reading a study
that said we're incurring billions and
billions and billions and billions of
debt as a society just because we don't
look at our bank balance, we don't open
envelopes. So I know I'm not the only
one. No, not at all. My strategy
was
My my and this is such a dumb strategy.
>> sure I want to hear it.
But go ahead. Honestly,
and I do this sounds like crazy talk,
but it's just the truth in my head. My
strategy was
I'm going to get so rich that I outpace
this debt
and then I'll deal with it later. My
strategy was if I can just get really
rich, which is kind of the inverse of
what you're
advising,
then this debt won't be a problem.
At 18 or 19 years old, you don't know
the world.
You are guessing. And I was guessing
that I could earn my way out of it. The
probability says I was wrong.
The probability says that I was like
delusional or some or just like I
watched too many rap videos or
something.
Um so objectively, that is a reckless
choice. Even if even if it's true and it
ends up being true for you, you end up
being it's still a bad choice because
probability is stacked against you.
Well, that's true. And but you you just
made a critical point in that
you can make a bad choice where things
work out well for you. Yeah, exactly.
It's a bad choice. So a great example of
that is investing in Bitcoin, right? I'm
not I'm not a proponent of investing in
Bitcoin.
Certainly for those people who bought
Bitcoin 10, 15 years ago, they've done
extraordinarily well.
They got lucky.
Lots of speculations don't work out that
well. So if you are speculating,
then you it might work out
extraordinarily well for you.
But it's
you're taking some pretty heavy risks in
doing that.
All right, it's same thing with a
lottery ticket. I mean, the chances of
winning the lottery are infinitesimally
small, but people buy lots and lots of
lottery tickets.
Somebody somebody does win it.
But that's probably not a good way to
spend your money.
Bitcoin? Mhm. You know the five Bitcoin?
No.
And I'm not I'm not opposed to Bitcoin
existing in the world.
Uh but for me it's a speculation and I'm
not a speculator.
When you say spec give me some color cuz
I'm sure there's some people who,
listening now that really thinking about
Bitcoin or have invested in Bitcoin. I
mean, if you want to speculate that
Bitcoin so I I would recommend against
it. So people and they might push back
and say, "Well, but JL,
you know, you were recommending against
against it 10 years ago, which I was,
and you and you've been wrong. I mean,
absolutely wrong. It's been great 10
years. It's blow it's done far better
than the S&P 500."
Well,
that's true. If you'd had a crystal
ball, if I'd known that 10 years ago,
yeah, well, I would have been in
Bitcoin, right? We don't have crystal
balls. So the question isn't
how has Bitcoin done in the last 10
years, it's how how is it going to do in
the next 10 years. I don't know the
answer to that, but
that's the question. Is it worth
$100,000 a coin now? Is it going to
continue to grow at that pace
that you
regret that you missed over the last 10
years? That's the question you have to
ask yourself.
But I could say its success is evidence
that it's serving some kind of utility
for some people somewhere.
Its success means that there is demand
for it by very nature that the price has
increased so crazily over the last 15
years.
Yeah, that and that's an argument that
people make and there's a lot of debate
around that, right?
Is
you know, what is the function that it
has or that it's going to develop?
And you might well be right. I don't I
don't know the answer to that question.
It's not currently at least a currency
because it's way too volatile to serve
as currency unless you're doing illegal
things that
make it more attractive than the
volatility makes it unattractive. So
that's not necessarily good for society,
but
but so it can't function as a currency.
So right now it's just a speculation. Is
it going to grow into something that's
more functional?
Well,
you're listening to one of the other
interviews you you you did. Um
That woman absolutely believes that
that's what's happening.
And then Cathie Wood, so that's why
she's in Bitcoin. And she may be right,
but she's speculating.
And
again, I have nothing against
speculating as long as you understand,
as I'm sure she does, that that's what
you're doing. You'd prefer investing. I
prefer having engine creating wealth
behind where I put my money. I had a a
text message from a really good friend
of mine who my audience will know
because they've been on the show before
as a guest and
they're very well known in the UK. Um
they text me and said, "Please can I ask
you a question?
If you had mortgages and you had a lump
sum of money, thinking about the future
of AI, potential market crashes, would
you pay off chunks of the mortgage or
would you invest? My feeling is that
stocks aren't really safe. Am I being
paranoid?"
Well, there that's there are a couple of
questions embedded in that. So the first
question is
would I pay off a mortgage and the
second question is
are stocks safe?
All right.
>> [snorts]
>> So the mortgage one first to me is is
pretty easy. It kind of depends on your
interest rate. What is an interest rate?
>> So an interest rate is what you pay to
borrow money.
So when you when you get a mortgage,
you're borrowing money, right? You're
borrowing it from a bank or a financial
institution
and they they want to be paid for
letting you use their money. And three,
three and a half percent or less,
that's really cheap money.
I would hold on to that. I I would be in
no hurry to pay that off.
On the other side, if you have a
mortgage rate that's say 6% or higher,
well, when you pay off that mortgage,
essentially you're locking in a
guaranteed return of that
interest rate, right? So, if you pay off
an 8% mortgage, you've locked in an 8%
return on that money effectively. And
then, to finish the thought is if your
interest rate's between those those two,
like 3 and 1/2% to 5 and 1/2 6%, then I
would say it would depend whether you
pay it off or not is what makes you
emotionally more comfortable.
And there's value in being emotionally
comfortable. So, if you are comfortable
carrying the debt, you might say, "Well,
I think I can do better in the stock
market, so I'm going to carry it." If
emotionally, like me, you just would
rather not have any debt at all, then
you then you pay it off. Do you think we
could use the coins as a
example of what an interest rate is?
Sure.
Let's say I'm sitting on this pile of
gold,
and you want to borrow some of my gold.
I'm happy
to loan you, Stephen, these 10 very
valuable old pieces,
but I don't like you well enough to just
let you borrow them for free.
I want to be paid. I want to get a
reward back for that. So, when you
return these gold pieces to me in a
year,
you're going to return 11 gold pieces to
me. You're going to pay me 10% cuz an
extra gold piece is 10% of these 10,
right? Make sense? Yeah. That's what
interest is.
>> So, I if I say, "Okay, well, I'm going
to buy a house." Right. You're going to
take You're going to take those 10 gold
pieces. Go ahead and take them. So, I'm
buying a house that costs 10 gold
pieces.
>> Right. Right. So, I'm going to accept
your 10% interest rate. Okay. Am I
paying 10% a year on on the total on the
total?
>> On the balance. So, the way a mortgage
works is in the Let's say it's a 30-year
mortgage.
You're going to be
giving me a certain amount of money
every month, right? That's your mortgage
payment.
And in the beginning, most of that
payment is going to be interest to me,
and a very tiny sliver of it will be
paying down the principal part of the 10
gold pieces that you bought.
Or that you Yeah, that you borrowed.
A very tiny sliver. And then, over the
course of 30 years, that ratio changes
as you pay down the debt,
and less and less of it is interest
payments, and more and more of it is
paying down the principal until at the
end of 30 years, you've paid all the
principal, and you've paid me a fairly
enormous amount of money in debt over
that period in uh interest over that 30
years.
And how do I get a good interest rate?
How do I get a very, very low interest
rate? And what is a low interest rate?
>> On mortgages? Yeah. So,
the only way you can get a
So, first of all, you're going to pay
basically whatever the current interest
rates are. Who sets the current interest
rates? So, the Fed sets an overall
interest rate. You've heard the Fed will
raise or lower interest rates, and that
will influence what lenders, like bank
and mortgage companies, will charge. It
doesn't require them to do a certain
level, but it will influence up or down
how much they're going to expect in
return for their money. The Fed is a
government
>> Fed is a government agency. Partially
because the the Fed is anticipating
inflation
by how they set interest rates. So, if
I'm lending you money,
and I'm worried about inflation, if
[clears throat] I lend you my 10 gold
pieces and say, "I want 11 back in a
year, 10%", but inflation is 15%, well,
I've just made a very, very bad deal.
So, if I think inflation is going to be
15%, I'm going to want two gold pieces
back and maybe you're
you know, so I so I'm I'm making a
profit above and beyond inflation. So,
going back to your question, how do you
get a good mortgage rate? Well, you shop
around
to various lenders at the time you want
the mortgage and see, you know, who's
offering what. And there'll be some
variation within a eighth of a percent
or a quarter of a percent or something.
But for the most part, they're all going
to be very tightly put together cuz
they're looking at the overall
projection of what inflation's going to
be, what they can charge, what the cost
of money is, what they can charge in
interest, and then competitively what
they what they have to do to get your
business.
So, there's not going to be a lot of
variation, and you're not going to get a
a significantly better interest rate
than somebody else, but if you shop
around, you can probably do a little bit
better.
And interest rates have been fluctuating
quite a lot over the last 20 odd years.
In the early 2000s, interest rates in
the US were relatively high, peaking at
almost 7%
in 2006 due to efforts to curb
inflation. And then, after the financial
crisis, um
they dropped a little bit. Um
And I was looking here, post-2008,
central banks around the world adopted
ultra-low interest rates to revive
economies. US rates were slashed to near
0% by 2008, and remained there for
nearly a decade.
Right. Damn.
Um COVID-19 pandemic interest rates led
to another record in cuts globally with
the US Fed lowering interest rates to 0%
to 0.25% to combat economic disruption.
So, does this mean I should really be
waiting for a time when the interest
rates are really, really low if I want
to buy a house?
Well, not necessarily because you never
know when that's going to happen. I
mean, be some some people have said
predicting what the stock market's going
to do is very, very difficult.
Predicting where interest rates are
going to go, even more so.
So, I think if you're going to if you're
going to buy a house, then again, you
buy it based on whether you can easily
afford it, whether it meets your needs
at a given time, and you deal with the
interest rate you have to deal with. And
of course, they'll be part of the
equation in terms of how much you can
afford cuz the interest rate on your
mortgage is going to have a lot to do
with how much you have to pay every
month. And it's quite high at the
moment, interest rates.
High compared to what? So, the first you
know, right now, mortgage rates are 6%,
7%, somewhere in there.
The first mortgage I took out was 18%.
18%. That would have been in
1979.
Cuz in the 1970s, we had really high
inflation. And when you have high
inflation, you have high interest rates.
Right? So, to me, I hear a 6% mortgage
rate, and it's doesn't sound bad to me.
But for people who grew up where
mortgage rates were
2 and 1/2 3%, well, yeah, I mean, it's
huge.
It depends on your perspective. And the
other half of the lady's question who
sent me that text message was around is
investing in stocks safe right now. And
she did sort of preface it by saying the
question's in the context of AI, all of
this disruption that's going on in the
world. People are going to lose their
jobs, etc. etc. Like
is it safe to invest in stocks right
now? So, depends on your time horizon.
So, stocks are are
the
single
most effective, strongest
wealth-building tool that's ever been
created.
But they're also very, very volatile.
So, when she says, "Are stocks safe to
invest in right now?",
what I hear is very short-term thinking.
And stocks are never safe to invest in
for the short term because they're
volatile. At any given moment, they can
take a deep plunge, and that's a
perfectly natural part of the process.
People get all crazy, especially if you
watch the news, they people go insane
and panicked, but crashes and pullbacks
in the stock market are perfectly
natural part of the process.
They're very, very difficult, if not
impossible, to predict when they're
going to happen.
But that's the reason you never
want to invest in stocks for money that
you're going to need in the near term.
If you zoom out
for longer periods of time, which is I
which is what I recommend,
stocks are stunningly reliable.
I mean, there are very few times over
the course of 10 years where stocks have
not given you a good return. And you go
out 20 years and I I mean, it's very
rare.
So, if you look long-term, stocks are
extremely safe and extremely powerful in
building in building wealth, but they
are very volatile along the way. So, you
have to be willing and able to endure
that volatility. If you're going to
panic and sell when the market drops,
not if, because the market will drop.
It's a perfectly natural part of the
process.
If you're going to panic and sell when
that happens, you do not want to invest
in stocks cuz they will leave you
bleeding on the side of the road.
Following my advice will leave you
bleeding on the side of the road if you
panic and sell. It's 100% dependent on
tying yourself to the mast during the
storm
and ignoring the volatility and
continuing to invest into it because now
you're actually accumulating shares on
sale cuz prices are down
because the storm never lasts. It always
blows over,
and the sunshine comes back out, and
prosperity returns.
>> You're talking here about the emotional
side of investing, which Which is
critical. Yeah. If you if you can't
control your emotions, you're you're
going to be selling at the wrong time
and buying at the wrong time. So, this
is such a huge part of it that people
don't talk about enough. They talk about
tactics, strategies, what to invest in,
etc. But they don't talk about the
emotional side, which is really like
arguably a even bigger element of this.
Because if you think about even how the
brain is set up and
what drives us most, it's it's fear,
it's it's emotion. Fear and greed. And
when the when the prices
you know, I mean, we've all got a story.
So many people listening. I remember my
first ever investment, I put 10,000
pounds into Facebook stock a long, long,
long, long time ago. And then it went
down and I sold. I thought, "Fuck, I'm
never investing again."
And if I just left it Yeah. Um God, that
would be worth so much money. It'd
probably be worth six figures now.
>> Right. But I I hadn't No one had ever
taught me about the emotional side. And
actually, part of the reason I sold it
was because I needed that money. So,
there's two things what there. One is
the emotional side of selling it. The
other thing is investing money that is
not for the long term. Cuz you turned
out you should never invest in money in
the stock market that is you're not
willing to commit for decades. This is a
long-term horizon because that's what
allows you to weather the storms. If
you're saving for a house, for instance,
well, you probably don't want to be in
the stock market. The best investor I've
ever met is my girlfriend.
Uh because she she loses the password.
>> [laughter]
>> To the investing app. But honestly,
every like 2 years I go, "Babe, do you
remember I was like you bought loads of
that index fund or Bitcoin or whatever
it is." I was like, "Do you know the
price of it?" And she's like, "No, I
forgot. I've forgotten the password to
the app." And we always like log back in
once every 2 years and look at it. And
I'm like, "Oh my god, babe, you're
rich." And she's like, "Oh, okay." And
then she loses the password again. She
forgets it. This is an incredibly
important point you just touched on.
So, Jack Bogle, the guy who created
retail index funds that we can invest in
now, created the Vanguard Group in 1975.
Bogle once said, "You know,
invest in the S&P 500
and don't even open your statements when
they come. Just let them sit. Don't even
open them for 20 years.
And then open the final one and have a
cardiologist standing by because you
will be stunned at the level of wealth
that you've accumulated."
One of the things that I wrote this this
book for my daughter, right?
My daughter is sounds like she's kind of
like your girlfriend. She's very smart,
but she has zero interest in this
financial stuff.
That is a superpower because unlike me
and maybe a lot of people listening to
us who are interested in this stuff and
who are watching the market all the
time,
she and your girlfriend are never going
to be tempted to panic when the market
drops cuz they're not going to notice
the market dropped, right? Because they
they don't they don't care.
And the less you tinker with your
investments,
Charlie Munger, who was Warren Buffett's
partner, once said, "The worst thing you
can do as an investor is get in the way
of compounding,
right? And that means
dancing into the market, trying to sell
and buy back in and what have you. Just
[clears throat] let the compounding run.
I get so many people who read my work
and they say, "Wow, JL, I I I really get
it and it's wonderful and you're
absolutely right about everything, but
if we just did this one little thing
differently, it would be even better."
And they are I've come to think of them
as the tinkerers, right? Are they men?
They I think a lot of them are men. I
think I think women are a little less
inclined to tinker because men put their
masculinity on the line in doing these
things and that's not useful. I asked
the question about men and women because
I got some stats here from actually from
Vanguard that says men are 70% more
likely to invest in high-risk assets
like individual stocks versus safer
assets than women. Men's portfolio are
50% more volatile, which leads to higher
potential returns, but also huge greater
losses. It as it relates to men again,
despite having higher risk-taking, men
underperform women in long-term returns
annually due to overtrading, tinkering,
and timing mistakes, tinkering. And men
trade 45% more often than women,
resulting in more fees because every
time they make a trade they pay a fee,
and lower gains. That's according to
Berkshire Hathaway.
The summary here is that men take more
risks, but in the long term tend to earn
less because of frequent mistakes and
emotional trading, whereas women are
more cautious and their approach tends
to yield better returns. So, you know
what we've learned here? Yeah. I have a
very strong feminine side.
>> [laughter]
>> Oh, yeah. Gosh, yeah. Damn.
Protecting your business's data is a lot
scarier than people admit. You've got
the usual protections, backups,
security, but underneath there's this
uncomfortable truth that your entire
operation depends on systems that are
updating, syncing, and changing data
every second. Someone doesn't have to
hack you to bring everything crashing
down. All it takes is one corrupted
file, one workflow that fires in the
wrong direction, one automation that
overrides the wrong thing, or an AI
agent drifting off course. And suddenly
your business is offline, your team is
stuck, and you're in damage control
mode. That's why so many organizations
use our sponsor Rubrik. It doesn't just
protect your data. It lets you rewind
your entire system back to the moment
before anything went wrong. Wherever
that data lives, cloud, SaaS, or
on-prem, whether you have ransomware, an
internal mistake, or an outage, with
Rubrik you can bring your business
straight back. And with the newly
launched Rubrik Agent Cloud, companies
get visibility into what their AI agents
are actually doing. So, they can set
guardrails and reverse them if they go
off track. Rubrik lets you move fast
without putting your business at risk.
To learn more, head to rubrik.com.
You talked about compounding. You talked
about how one should maybe not open the
envelope Right. that has their
statements in it.
>> Jack Bogle said that, but I agree with
it, yeah. I I don't have to explain the
graph I've just passed you for you to
know what that is.
>> Right. The on the bottom, the red line
is 11%
>> Mhm. returns. So, the blue line that's
that's running fairly flat is the
contributions to this hypothetical
investment. And the red line is the
value that that how it how it grows. And
what's striking and this is this is
what's striking about compounding in
general is that the two track each other
almost exactly for a surprisingly long
time. And then they begin to diverge.
And then the compounding makes the value
of the investment skyrocket. It hockey
sticks.
And I didn't know you were going to show
this to me. But what's interesting to me
about [clears throat] this is I used to
do these Chautauquas. They were events
where we take a small group of people to
some cool place in the world and hang
out. And there were people followed my
work and and I would have one-on-one
sessions with them and we'd talk about
whatever they wanted, but mostly it was
their finances.
And very commonly, these people would
lay out their their investments, their
their finances, and and
they would ask, "Am I financially
independent?" And that's a very There's
a very simple mathematical formula about
that. How much do you spend? I spend
$100,000 a year. Okay. If you take the
4% guideline What's that?
>> withdrawal, so guy named Bill Bengen
came up with the idea that you could
safely withdraw 4% of your portfolio and
it would continue to survive over time
and it would so you could you could pull
that out without depleting the
portfolio. There was a woman who came to
one of our Chautauquas. She was a
banker. So, obviously knows her way
around basic math,
right? She was
at the end of Chautauqua, she was going
to take a new job starting that Monday.
Was going to pay her a million dollars a
year.
>> [snorts]
>> And we're going over her finances and
she said, "Yeah, I've I've got $5
million invested. Okay.
Am I financially independent?" Well, I
can't answer that question until I know
how much you're spending.
She said, "Well, I'm spending $100,000 a
year. Okay.
Well,
$100,000 a year,
if you multiply it by 25, you get two
and a half million dollars.
4% of two and a half million is 100,000,
right? So, that's how that math works.
So, if you need 100,000 to live on, you
need two and a half million invested.
Make sense? Yeah. Okay. So, you can look
at it either way. You can say I've got
two and a half million. If I take 4% of
that a year, that's 100,000.
Or I
I'm spending 100,000. How much do I
need? You multiply that by 25. Two and a
half. So, just to make sure I'm clear,
>> [snorts]
>> if I look at my investment portfolio and
I have $100 in there,
if I can live Are you saying that if I
live on $4,
which is 4% of my investment portfolio,
then I'm financially independent? Right.
That's a good Now, that's a good
guideline. I mean,
there's lots of variations, but this is
a guide guideline that this financial
advisor Bill Bengen came up with.
Uh and then there's thing called the
Trinity study, which was done I want to
say in the '90s that looked at a lot of
these scenarios and basically verified
that this was a very good baseline.
Um
so, 4% is I don't like the word rule
because
that implies that it's hard and fast,
but it's a great guideline. If you want
to have a have an idea of whether or not
you're financially independent or not,
this is a good guideline. So, anyway,
this woman
says she's spending $100,000 a year and
she's got 5 million. She wants to know,
"Am I financially independent?" And
financially independent and I said,
"Times two."
I mean, you have twice as much money as
you need given your level of spending.
So, the question that I always had,
going back to this little chart,
is how and I would get this question a
lot, Stephen. You know, they'd show me
their numbers
and they would very clearly be
financially independent on that based on
that math we just discussed.
And these were smart people who can
easily do basic arithmetic.
So, how how is it that they're asking me
this this question?
And suddenly it dawned on me, this is
how.
Because compounding
is a is a hockey stick. It goes along
and and kind of doesn't appear to be
happening and then it slowly starts to
happen and then all of a sudden it it's
way up here.
It happens so quickly and so stunningly
they can't quite believe it.
It turned out it's not that they
couldn't do the basic math. They
certainly could do the basic math.
What it was is they couldn't quite
[clears throat] believe what the math
was telling them.
And they wanted me to It's like
You you see what's on that wall over
there?
I mean
Are you seeing what I'm seeing? Cuz I
can't quite believe that I'm seeing
that. I need you to confirm that yeah,
you're seeing the same thing I'm seeing.
And in this example, all it is is
someone has
you know, they started with zero. Mhm.
And they've paid in a small contribution
every year to their investment. The
investment is getting 11% return a year.
Mhm. And suddenly the thing goes whoop.
And I I think that was one of the most
pivotal moments in my life where I went
online
5 6 years ago and looked at a
compounding interest calculator. So it's
stunning. It is It is stunning. It is
absolutely stunning.
And it shows that if you just leave your
money
in a place where it's getting
this kind of return
over time
everything seems to take care of itself.
So let me let me close the circle in a
sense
on on that subject because
one of the things that I think gets
overlooked with my book is this is the
simple path to wealth.
Which means if you follow it, you will
become
wealthy.
Right? So we go back to you know, buying
those things that people maybe want to
buy, whether it's the fancy car or the
or the house.
Well
once you become wealthy, you can not
only buy those things, but you're buying
them from a position of power.
Right? You can easily afford them.
You've become financially independent,
which means that your investments are
throwing off more money than you're
spending. My wife and I are basically
pretty naturally frugal people and
that's one of the ways I suppose that we
got to where we are.
But that doesn't necessarily serve us
with the level of wealth we have now and
so
we still have this tendency to say, oh,
we're thinking about getting this stuff,
how much does it cost and do we really
want to spend that money and
depending on who it is, either she'll
turn to me or I'll turn to her and say,
doesn't matter, it's free.
Everything's free. It doesn't And that's
a very liberating way to look at things.
So that's where the simple path
ultimately will will get you. That's
what I bought
all those years ago. One of the thoughts
that I had, which I do think is somewhat
illogical was my brother and me are very
different people. So he was very very
frugal and I was reckless. Mhm. And
one of the ways that I self-justified my
recklessness was, well, you know, you've
got to enjoy life.
And I'm only young once. So I'm only
going to get the opportunity to do some
of these things that are
part of being young once, going to a
nightclub and buying champagne and
partying.
You know? So I thought yeah, I could
save and save and save and save and I
could get to you know, 70 80 years old
and have all this money, but what is the
point if I haven't like enjoyed myself?
I think it is a mistake to think
that you need to spend money to be
happy, to enjoy yourself. And the other
thing I will say is that
it's a lot more useful having money at
this age than it would have been in my
20s because
money buys comfort among other things
and comfort becomes much more important
to you as you age.
They did a study where they put people
in a brain imaging scanner
and they asked them to think about
themselves tomorrow. Then they asked
them to think about themselves in a
couple of years, then they asked them to
to think about themselves in 10 years
time and they looked at the brain. And
then they did another study where they
got the same people to think about a
celebrity Mhm. that they didn't know. I
think it was Matt Damon or someone
famous like that. And what the study
proved was that we think about ourselves
in 10 years time in the same way that we
think about Matt Damon.
The further away
the time horizon
>> Right. the more it becomes a total
stranger. Right. And so I was writing I
was writing recently for a chapter in my
upcoming book about this idea that our
future self is a stranger. To the brain,
thinking about me when I'm 60
is like thinking about Matt Damon.
Right. I don't know the [ __ ] guy.
So what do I care? What do I care about
protecting him?
And I think this kind of speaks to what
we were saying there is young people and
even me as a young person kind of didn't
really give a [ __ ] about 60-year-old me.
Right.
Like I I it's so far away that I I don't
really care about protecting his
interests. I almost think that's a
different person. He can figure that
out.
>> Right.
And you know, you are How old are you
now? I'm 75. So you have the the wisdom
of hindsight. So you can tell me as a
33-year-old what it's like to be both 33
and 75.
When I was 33, I didn't think about
me at an older age at all. I mean, it
never crossed my mind to do such a
thing.
Right? So I was not doing what I was
doing
for the benefit of 75-year-old JL. I was
doing it for the benefit of 25-year-old
JL, 30-year-old JL.
Right? Remember, going back to the early
part of our conversation
what at my definition of FU money.
It's the money that you're accumulating
before that gets you ultimately to being
financially independent, which is
when you no longer need to trade your
labor for money, right? Your money is
doing all that.
I wanted that right now. So when I was
25, I'd saved the princely sum of
$5,000, which
just as for inflation would be about 25
$30,000 today.
Uh and I wanted to go backpack around
Europe. Right? But that meant quitting
my job, which I kind of liked.
But the fact that I had that money
gave me
the financial strength to go in and
negotiate that deal.
If I was living paycheck to paycheck, I
wouldn't have had that. I was far from
being fully financially independent. So
I wasn't doing this for 75-year-old JL.
I was doing this right now for
25-year-old JL. And it's just like when
you work out and clearly you do, right?
You don't go to the gym thinking, at
least I'm making a presumption here, I'm
doing this for 75-year-old Steven.
You're doing this because you want to be
stronger tomorrow than you are today.
For 33-year-old Steven.
So that's my way of thinking about it. I
I never did this for future me.
Maybe maybe some people do and that's
probably not a bad exercise. It's
probably a bit of wisdom in that. I
wasn't that smart. So you would you
would save $5,000 a year.
Well, in those days so my first
professional job paid me $10,000 a year
and I saved 5,000. Yeah, I saved half of
it.
Going back to the point of compounding
and how
how important it is to start investing
in things that will offer you
compounding returns.
If you started investing $500 per month
and you got an annual return of 8%
because you're investing in some of the
things that we'll talk about in a
second,
in 35 years
you will be a millionaire.
You'll have more than a million dollars.
You'll have 1.043 million dollars.
>> Right.
Over those 35 years, you would have
invested about $200,000, but you would
have made $850,000
from the
interest over that period of time.
>> Well just to be clarified, not
necessarily the interest, but the
growth. Cuz that 11% is not interest.
It's it's growth. Some of it might be uh
dividends in the case of which is a kind
of a form of interest you'd think of.
But it's not just just to be technically
correct.
Right?
Which is which is interesting. So if if
I was
when I was born
if my parents had put $500 a month away
in an investment that we'll talk about
now, Mhm. by the by the age I am now, I
would have roughly been a millionaire
just from them putting $500 a month away
for me.
>> Right. Right. It's pretty crazy. Yeah,
but that's the power of compounding. I
mean, they you know, it's it's very
gratifying to me that twice a year I am
a guest lecturer for a friend of mine
who's a professor at University of
Colorado in Boulder.
And it's always fun to talk to her
students cuz they're exceedingly bright.
They ask great great questions and it's
just stimulating for me.
But I think about these young people. I
mean, these are 18 19 20-year-olds
who are thinking about doing this stuff
at that age.
And the remarkable amount of time that
they have for this compounding to work
for them. It's it's just incredible.
They're going to be so much better off
than if not.
Um
so
let me throw out a tip for for you if
and when you ever have kids and for
anybody who's listening who has has
young children,
you know, as your kids start to grow and
hopefully they get
part-time jobs, right? They start
whether it's shoveling snow or
bussing tables at a local restaurant or
whatever it is
and they start earning some income.
Well, you can take that income and up to
I think it's $7,000 is the limit now.
Put that in a Roth IRA.
Which will never be taxed.
It will grow tax-free
forever. And they're going to be by
definition cuz they're making almost no
money in in they're not paying any
income tax so you don't need any any
deduction from that. And it doesn't have
to be their money. So let's say your kid
makes $3,000 during the course of a
year.
You can take $3,000 and fund a Roth IRA
for them. Imagine just if they never
added anything other than that, you
know, you do that until they they get
out of college or whatever.
You know, that baseline is going to grow
tax-free for an extended period of time.
That's one of the
great keys to wealth building is just
time.
And and is that advice that you still
believe in that people should be saving
50% of their income? Yeah, I think it's
a good rule of thumb. It gets you to
financial independence in a pretty
reasonable depending on what the market
does
in say a 10 to 15-year time period. The
pushback that you might anticipate is
from people say that's impossible.
Nobody can save 50% of their money. Just
that's that's that's silly. And I'm
sorry but I did it and then I've now at
this point I've known countless people
who've done it. So
it's certainly you may choose not to do
it but it's certainly possible. Let's
say you're earning
48,000 dollars
a year which is the low end.
The average medium household. So that
would be let's say $3,000 a month.
So you're you're earning $3,000 a month.
You're then going to pay tax on that.
This is what my my math says here. It
says very little tax would be would be
paid after all of your taxes. And so
you're still you've still got roughly
$3,000 a month but 2,900 um which you
you would take home.
I So I would need to save 1,400 of that
which means my total expenses need to be
1,400 a month. So first thing I need to
do is live
somewhere very very
affordable depending on where I live you
know what city I live in.
Then I need to basically radically
reduce my my expenditure.
>> Right. To be able to save 50% a month.
And I guess the question is most people
would assume they wouldn't like that
lifestyle.
They wouldn't like to prepare their own
lunches every day. They wouldn't like to
not have a Starbucks coffee. They
wouldn't like to live in a small small
shoebox and probably socialize a lot
less.
So I guess that's the key rebuttal is I
guess yeah it's possible.
There's a chapter that talks about this
with an even lower because when I was
writing the book um I think I used a
$25,000
annual income.
So the math works. Is is it easy? No.
But it goes back to fundamentally
what is it that you want? You said well
I may not like that lifestyle. I might
want to have lattes and all these other
things.
Well, that's your money. That's your
prerogative.
But
time is going to happen regardless of
what you do and if you say instead of
having those things now I'm going to
spend my money on buying my freedom
you will get to the point where
everything is free including those
lattes.
So let's talk about investing then.
Um we have two buckets here on the
table.
We're an analogy Uh-huh. around
tax-advantaged investing.
I'm going to take your lead on this.
Okay. So if you dump that bucket in
there I'll dump this bucket in here.
Okay.
The idea is that
and I'm going to speak in terms of the
United States. The government provides
savings vehicles that are
tax-advantaged to encourage people to
acquire money for their for their old
age, right? So the United States there's
things called a 401k or 403b
uh and these are employer-related plans
where you can divert part of your income
and the government specifies how much
you can divert
and they won't tax you on that and you
put it into an investment bucket into an
investment account of some sort. You get
to choose how you want to invest it.
But that would be the bucket and that
means that if you had however much money
this represents
uh went into your 401k or your IRA which
is something you would do on your own
privately which is also tax-advantaged.
Right? So
in the example that you've just
>> [clears throat]
>> handed me they're saying that this would
represent $20,750
which is
uh before tax and with a match. So
401k's companies will frequently match
part of your contribution. So you say
I'm going to do 5% and they might say
okay we're going to match the first 2%
or whatever which you should always take
advantage of cuz that's that's free
money.
So this is not taxed immediately. And
you invest this money. Let's say you
invest it in a total stock market index
fund which would be my recommendation.
So you get to invest all this money in
your total stock market index fund.
If instead you do it
after you pay taxes on the same amount
of money
well by the time you pay taxes you're
going to have about half of what it was
before which is $10,340
which is what represented in here
roughly half the number of of gold
coins.
Now both of these things grow at the
same rate cuz we've invested them in the
same thing, right? So they're making 11%
a year whatever it is. So this is
obviously going to grow into a much
bigger pile
at the end of 30 years or 40 years or
whatever it is than this is cuz you're
starting with a bigger pile.
So that's the advantage of
deferring taxes.
Now the thing that people
tend not to think about or talk about
that's incredibly important is
that
it is not avoiding taxes. It is
deferring taxes. Which means that
ultimately the government is going to
want their money. They're going to want
their cut.
And typically that happens I think in
the United States the age is 73 or
something when you're required to begin
taking money out of these accounts. It's
called an RMD a required minimum
distribution.
So if you haven't started withdrawing
money from these accounts by then the
government will require you to begin on
a schedule based on your life expectancy
to start pulling that money out because
they figure they've waited long enough
and now they want their cut. Okay?
>> [clears throat]
>> So it's not tax-free. It's tax-deferred.
Important thing to understand.
If you start taking this money out
before a certain age and if memory
serves me it's 59 and a half in the US
then you will pay tax on it as you do
whenever you withdraw the money and also
a penalty.
Right? So they want you to keep it in at
least until you're 59 and a half
but they want you to start taking it out
at some point in this case I think when
you're 72 or 73 or something like that.
And that's when they collect their
money. So you say well okay if that's
the case then what am I doing here
because I got to pay the taxes
eventually anyway.
And mathematically if your tax rate is
the same it doesn't matter if you're
tax-deferred or not. The end result and
bottom money that you have will be
exactly the same.
The speculation is and it's true in the
vast majority of cases that when you
retire
and you start living on this money you
start pulling it out you will be in a
lower tax bracket.
So you will have to pay some taxes but
you won't have to pay as much as when
you were working and you were in a
higher tax bracket.
So that's the gamble you're taking.
Now looking at me personally as an
example this didn't work out for me.
So I did IRAs and 401k's when I was
working in my corporate career.
We decided a fair amount of money in
them.
Now as it turns out I'm in a higher tax
bracket than I have ever been in
because of the success of the activities
that I do today.
I had no idea that that was going to
happen. And now I'm at that age where I
have to take RMDs. So RMDs are coming
out at a higher tax rate for me than
when I than the tax benefit I got
deferring it. But that's unusual. Most
people will benefit from doing this
because in their retirement they won't
have an income or their income will be
very modest and their tax rate will be
equally modest and it'll work out very
nicely for them.
But that's
basically how that works. Does that make
sense? It does, yes. And to try and
summarize it um in a way that I fully
understand just check I understand is
every month when I'm paid I have an
opportunity before that money comes to
me to invest some of it. And around the
world whether it's Japan, Switzerland,
India, South Korea, Germany, Australia,
UK, Canada there's always some kind of
system to do this.
>> right? Yeah. So I can say okay I'm going
to get paid
a thousand dollars this month.
I'm going to put a hundred dollars of
that before I even get it into one of
these investment accounts. It's not
going to be taxed until And your
employer may match part of it or all of
it.
>> Yeah. So my employer might also add a
hundred dollars to it [clears throat] or
a part of it.
That's going to compound over time.
I can take it out whenever I want but if
I take it out early I get a penalty. And
you pay tax. And I pay tax.
But assuming that I'm not going to be
earning as much as I do now when I am
older,
when I take it out at 65 years old, I'm
still going to pay tax but at a low rate
of tax.
>> There's no penalty at that point, but
and presumably you'll be at a lower tax
rate, right?
So, it really only works if you're at a
lower tax rate when you're older.
>> Exactly.
So, most people work and then and then
they retire at a certain age
and that income from their job goes
away. So, by definition, they're in a
much lower tax bracket. So, for the vast
majority of people, this works out very
nicely. And you talk about
you know, cuz people will
will still have to make a decision what
they want to invest in. Right.
What Where do you think we should be
investing our money at this moment of
time? The If the average person, what
what should they be putting their money
into with everything you see happening
in the world?
Yeah.
>> You said not Bitcoin, but what where
where should we put it?
>> I'm an advocate of investing in
broad-based, low-cost stock index funds.
What is that? That is An example of that
is VTSAX, which is Vanguard's total
stock market index fund.
It invests in virtually every publicly
traded company in the United States of
America. That's
very The number of those varies, but
it's roughly 3,600 companies.
>> So, you're basically investing in
America. There are a lot of private
companies that I that I'm not invested
in, but I'm in every publicly traded
company in in the country. And that
means everybody from the factory floor
to the CEO is working to make me richer.
Now, some of those companies are going
to do extraordinarily well
and they're going to succeed
dramatically. And because this fund, as
most funds like it are,
is cap weighted,
and I'll explain that in a minute, the
more successful the company is, the more
of it I will own.
So, cap weighted simply means
that the largest larger the market
capitalization of the company is, the
valuation. The valuation,
[clears throat] right? The market cap
The larger that is, the greater the
percentage of the fund it will
represent. So, you may have heard people
say that the top 10 companies in the S&P
500 have an outsized representation
uh percentage-wise of what they Well,
that's the reason. It's It's cap
weighted. So, I benefit from that
success, right? Now, if one of those
companies falters
and
starts failing on their execution
or a more aggressive, better organized
competitor comes along and displaces
them,
then they will drift away, but I'm okay
with that because whatever that new
competitor is, I don't have to predict
who it is,
I will own them.
And that's a process that I refer to as
self-cleansing. I'm very proud of that
term that I that I coined. So, a great
example of that is Sears. When I was a
kid, Sears, company you may not even be
aware of,
but Sears was the Walmart and Amazon of
its time combined. But Sears at the turn
of the last century, the turn of the
1800s, looked around and said, "You
know, we have these brick-and-mortar
stores,
but there are all these people living
out in rural areas who are never going
to get to our brick-and-mortar stores.
We could send them catalogs."
Is this beginning to sound familiar? And
then they could send us letters and
money ordering things from our catalog
that we could then ship to them.
So, they became, you know, Walmart with
the brick-and-mortar stores and then
Amazon of its time. Absolutely dominated
for 100 years.
If you had said to somebody when I was
first investing in the 1970s
that Sears Sears built the biggest
building on the planet back in the '70s,
what was then known as the Sears Tower
in Chicago. If you had said Sears, its
days are numbered. I you would have been
laughed at.
But its days were numbered
because leaner, more aggressive
competitors came along and ate its
lunch. Nobody could have predicted that,
certainly not me,
but I didn't have to if I own the index
because then when Walmart came along and
then later Amazon and Sears faded away,
I own those as well. That's that
self-cleansing process.
>> And just for anyone that really doesn't
understand this at all, you're not
actually having to do anything because
that index fund is just automatically
making the decisions.
>> Exactly. I don't have to do anything. I
just have to own it and I can own it
forever. So, if I went and I bought
Sears stock as an example back in the
day,
well, whenever you own an individual
stock, you're going to be thinking
about, "Okay, how long am I going to own
this?
And what is going to trigger my sale of
this particular asset? And what I mean,
what has to happen to it that would make
me not want to own it anymore? And then
if I want to get rid of it and I want
something in the same space, what do I
buy? Do I buy this new upstart Walmart?
You know, do I buy this Amazon that back
in the '90s is run by this wacko guy,
Jeff Bezos, who kept saying no, profits
don't matter, profits don't matter. What
Who Who invests in a CEO that says
profits don't matter? I mean, that's
nuts. And but those are the kinds of
things you have to be have to be
thinking about if you own individual
stocks.
I don't have to think about any of that
owning the index because if Jeff Bezos
turns out that his wackiness is
brilliance,
which it turns out it was,
then he's going to rise to the top,
which it turns out Amazon did, and I
benefited from that. If it turns out it
was just wackiness, it would have just
faded away as a lot of companies have.
And but it wouldn't have mattered cuz
whatever succeeds, I will I will own and
benefit from. I was asking um the
research team beforehand, Mhm.
in the last 10 years, which index fund
has performed the very very best?
>> Mhm. And it said that the Nasdaq 100,
which is
very tech heavy,
>> Right.
has performed at almost 20% a year for
the last 10 years. And when I think
about what's going on in the world at
the moment and the advent of this new
technology called AI, which is driving
everything, it seems, and our lives are
going to become way more technological
with robots and automation and full
self-driving,
it appears to me like if there was ever
a great time to be investing in an index
fund, one should aim at the very tech
heavy index funds like the Nasdaq 100.
>> Mhm. Is that Is that Is that logical
thinking or is that
>> It's It's logical thinking. Yes, so
first of all, it's logical thinking.
And actually, had you done that same
analysis 10 years ago, you would have
done better than than VTSAX, right? Cuz
technology has absolutely dominated for
the last 10 years. It is a reasonable
speculation that that will continue into
the future So, why don't you invest in
>> of time.
Well, because
the truth is that technology has not
always dominated.
>> But we're not going to go backwards
though, are we? Well, no, but the point
is that that it changes. So, just like
in my Sears example, Sears would have
been at the top of the index for a long
time and then it drifted away and got
replaced.
So, that's an individual stock. Sectors
of stocks have also done that over
time, right? So, right now, the dominant
sector is tech.
Wasn't always the case.
Might not always be the case in the
future. I don't know cuz I can't see the
future.
I understand people who would say that
clearly that's the best bet, to go with
tech.
And your crystal [clears throat] ball is
clearer than mine and you might very
well be right, but I don't have a
crystal ball.
And
I don't have to worry about that owning
the total stock market because if you're
right, I will still benefit very nicely,
thank you very much.
If you're wrong,
whatever replaces it, I will own.
So, you have an analogy you came up with
that involves beer
and a glass. Right. I probably came up
with the drinking beer, but go ahead.
Well, let's show me Show me the analogy.
So,
thanks for that sh- Whoa. No, here we
go.
>> going to say, thanks for not shaking up
the can.
So, beer, right?
So, I'm pouring it right down the middle
so we get a nice, thick head.
That's even more thicker than I hoped
for. Okay.
So,
imagine for a second right now, we have
a glass and we can see exactly how much
foam there is and how much actual beer
there is, right?
But imagine this was that I poured it
into this vessel instead where we
couldn't see that.
The analogy is the stock market.
So, when most people think of the stock
market and when most people turn on
uh CNBC, they turn on you know, they
look at at at the investment news and
what have you,
it's all this churning and trading, you
know, what stocks are hot now, what
stocks are rising, what stocks are
falling, what's you know, it's all this
trading.
That's not the simple path to wealth.
That's the foam, right? So, the value in
a stock,
whatever the stock is,
what makes up the price of that stock is
a combination of two things. It is the
beer
and it is the foam.
And the problem is, unlike that glass,
it's in a vessel like this. So, it's
hard to see exactly how much beer there
is
as opposed to how much foam there is.
>> And the beer is the value, the foam is
the speculation.
>> Exactly. The beer is the fundamental
operating value of the company, right?
The sales and the expenses and the money
that's left over that you call profits,
right? Yeah. So, that's the beer. The
foam is what the market
determines
that's worth at any given moment based
on emotion. And hype Based on and hype
and speculation and fear and greed. And
so, up here is the total value of the
stock.
Right, exactly. The total value of the
stock. But, this is all foam that can
come and go very quickly.
Right? So, let Think about Tesla for
example, right? Tesla has a lot of foam.
Cuz a lot of people are speculating
about the great things Tesla's going to
do in the future. Robotic cars, humanoid
robots, you know, all these kinds of
things which very may well come to pass.
I mean,
Elon Musk is a stunningly brilliant guy.
So,
who knows?
But, that's the speculation. That's the
foam. The underlying beer of Tesla, the
actual operating company,
does not justify the price of the stock.
I mean, the the PE ratio
of Tesla, you can look it up, is some
huge number, right? So, there's a lot of
speculation, a lot of foam in Tesla.
Now, if things go to plan,
then that foam will become as as in our
example, you notice the foam is
dissipating, we're getting more and more
beer.
If things go to plan for Tesla, that's
what will happen. The foam will will
eventually settle out into more and more
beer,
and Tesla will justify that high price
and maybe then some. And I guess Warren
Buffett's greatness, if I've interpreted
his writing correctly and why he was
often considered as the greatest
investor of all time, was he was able to
pay for stocks where it was mainly beer,
and he paid at the price of the beer,
not for the foam.
>> Or he he looked for times where the
sentiment was so negative that he was
actually paying a little less than the
price of the beer.
Benjamin Graham, who who wrote The
Intelligent Investor, who was a mentor
to Warren Buffett,
uh basically said what you should do is
look for value companies and try to
determine where the beer is and then try
to see if you can
get a buying opportunity, watch it where
you can buy it for less
than the actual value of the operation.
That's ideal. And in those days, when
there wasn't so much information freely
available, that was probably a little
easier to do.
Well, Warren Buffett has said since
then, and that's a great foundation if
you're going to pick individual stocks.
But, what Warren Buffett has said since
then is he learned, and I think you
don't quote me on this, but I think it
was Charlie Munger who actually made
this point to him,
that
it's going to be very, very hard in this
day and age, even when they started back
in the '60s, to find companies where you
can actually buy it for less than the
actual beer value. So, don't try to do
that.
Just try to find companies that you can
pay a fair price for
that have a lot of beer in the mix, that
are mostly beer. Because if you buy
those companies, they are, by
definition, very well-run companies,
strong brands, big moats around them,
which makes them hard to compete I guess
to To do this, you're you're going to
have to have a framework for valuing a
company. Exactly. And you're going to
have to have great discipline. Which is
Yeah. hard. And that's what, you know,
as Warren Buffett said, I was blessed
with an ability
to allocate capital effectively. And
that's basically what he has done. He's
has capital and he is
got the ability to look at different
companies
and say of all the different companies I
could allocate capital to,
he's pretty skilled at picking the ones
that are are the best bets. One of the
things that I really admired about
Warren Buffett was his ability to do
nothing.
Which is one of the key things because
that goes back to Charlie Munger's
thing, don't get in the way of your
compounding, right? And there has been
recent times where I think we can all
think of where,
using your beer analogy, something
happens in the world and
the true value of a company
is higher than the selling price. I
mean, if you go back to March 2020
during the the market sell-off when the
pandemic happened and everybody
panicked, Amazon, for example, the stock
briefly dropped below roughly to about
$1,500 per share, Mhm. well
[clears throat] below its intrinsic
value, um because people were panicking.
Right. Uh and then it quickly rebounded
again past $3,000
a share. So,
theoretically, if you had noticed that
drop, you could have
made a 100% return on your money.
Um and this
>> the whole market did that. The whole
market dropped, yeah. Yeah. So, you
could have done that with your index
fund. This is why if you panicked and
sold, Yeah, you screwed.
>> Let's say you owned Amazon or you owned
VTSAX, and you panicked and sold, well,
you would have you would have lost
everything, and then it it recovered.
So, it works both ways. That's why I
said earlier in our conversation, you
you have to stay invested so that the
dip doesn't matter. And if anything,
take advantage of the dip and buy more.
So, you own Amazon, you see it dip, you
say, "Well, I still believe in the
company. I still think it's a good
company and it's got a good future."
Well, then maybe you buy some more in
the dip and you do still better. But,
the important thing is you don't sell
when it's down because there's panic in
the air.
And I think this is um this speaks to a
broader sentiment throughout this
conversation, which is to do what others
don't do.
You know, and Warren Buffett's famous
for saying, "Be fearful when others are
greedy and greedy when others are
fearful." But, generally, the sentiment
on social media, especially for younger
generations and especially for men,
which is supported by the data,
is that the way to make money is by like
trading crypto or buy Right. I mean,
there's so many people that sell This is
such a We need to address this. You
know, it's a platform It's like
gambling. It's just gambling in the day.
>> it's a gambling platform. And so, that's
going You know, people sometimes say to
me, "You know, I never invest in the
stock market. It's just gambling."
I say, "Well, you're half right." If our
foam [clears throat] is all dissipated,
but if there were still foam here, I
would say, "Yes, if you're doing it
short-term and you're playing with the
foam, absolutely there's no different
than going to Las Vegas."
If you're investing for the beer, it's
an entirely different story and you're
investing for the long term.
And there's lots of young people that
are being tempted into buying a course
that's going to help them learn how to
trade. That's great for the people
selling the course.
There's such an There's such an
incredible like obvious irony to the
idea
that I have some secret
about trading
that's really going to make you know,
that is capable of making one wealthy.
Right. And I'm going to give it to you.
Or even sell it to you. Why would I need
to if it worked?
>> Right. Like this is such an obvious
question to me. Like why would I need to
sell it if it worked?
>> It it is the obvious question. I mean,
you know, And I feel sorry. I have great
empathy because the people that buy
these things are people that are
desperate to get out of their financial
situation and they've run out of
options. And so, it's very compelling to
hear that there's some secret that you
can predict the stock market. It's very
compelling. You know, in another
interview I I said one time we were
talking about is the same
[clears throat] line of conversation
we're having, and I said, "You know,
I blame my mother.
I would be a lot richer if she hadn't
instilled a conscience in me.
You know, she's cost me millions of
dollars instilling this conscience. I I
could have courses, I could be, you
know,
but no.
I am saying that there is a path
that will give you great results.
And it's a pretty well-proven path at
this point. So many of us are pursuing
passive forms of income and to build
side businesses in order to help us
cover our bills. And that opportunity is
here with our sponsor, Stan, a
can help you take full advantage of your
own financial situation. Stan enables
you to work for yourself. It makes
selling digital products, courses,
memberships, and more simple products
more scalable and easier to do. You can
turn your ideas into income and get the
support to grow whatever you're
building. And we've just launched Dare
to Dream. It's for those who are ready
to make the shift from thinking to
building, from planning to actually
doing the thing. It's about seeing that
dream in your head and knowing exactly
what it takes to bring it to life. Enter
to win $100,000 for your dream. All you
have to do is share what it is. Learn
more at dare to dream.stan.store.
This is something that I've made for
you. I realize that the Diary of a CEO
audience are strivers, whether it's in
business or health, we all have big
goals that we want to accomplish. And
one of the things I've learned is that
when you aim at the big, big, big goal,
it can feel incredibly psychologically
uncomfortable because it's kind of like
being stood at the foot of Mount Everest
and looking upwards. The way to
accomplish your goals is by breaking
them down into tiny, small steps, and we
call this in our team the 1%. this
philosophy is highly responsible for
much of our success here. So, what we've
done is that you at home can accomplish
any big goal that you have is we've made
these 1% diaries, and we released these
last year, and they all sold out. So, I
asked my team over and over again to
bring the diaries back, but also to
introduce some new colors and to make
some minor tweaks to the diary. So, now
we have a better range for you. So, if
you have a big goal in mind and you need
a framework and a process and some
motivation, then I highly recommend you
get one of these diaries before they all
sell out once again. And you can get
yours now at the diary.com where you can
get 20% off our Black Friday bundle. And
if you want the link, the link is in the
description below.
Do I need a financial advisor?
Cuz a lot of people out there listening
now will be thinking, "Yeah, I will
figure out my money situation when I
have enough money to pay financial
advisor." Yeah, I think
my attitude is by the time you know
enough
to choose a good financial advisor,
which is no easy task, you probably know
enough to do it on your own, at least on
the investing part.
Now, there
are there other life kinds of decisions
where maybe advisors would be
more useful, but again, you have to be
careful.
And And it takes you you need to really
educate yourself as to how advisors get
paid, for instance. My answers, by the
way, are colored by the fact that I I
hear so frequently from
>> [clears throat]
>> my followers about bad experiences with
financial advisors. So, I have a
negative opinion. To be fair, I know
there are good ones out there, and all
due respect to those good ones.
But let's suppose you have a financial
advisor
who gets paid
based on the assets under management,
right? The amount of the amount that
you've given them. Exactly, right. So,
maybe it's 1%. So, you give them a
million dollars and they get 1% a year
to manage that money for for you.
Now, let's suppose you go to that
advisor and you say, "You know, Stephen,
I've I've been thinking about paying off
my mortgage.
I've got a half a million-dollar
mortgage on this house.
It's 6%. Let's say it's 5%, so in that
middle range, it's 5%. I'm thinking
about paying it off. What do you think?"
Okay. Well, now Stephen has a bit of a
lever because
he can certainly give you the most
accurate financial advice he is capable
of giving you in answering that
question.
But
if that leads him to say, "Yes, pay off
the mortgage,"
he has just reduced his income by half.
Because when you pay off that mortgage,
half a million dollars is going to go
out from his management and paying off
the mortgage company.
So, you have just asked Stephen to give
you advice potentially that is bad for
Stephen.
Now, if Stephen's a honorable, capable,
honest guy, then maybe Stephen does
that.
But let's suppose Stephen
has two kids in college.
Let's suppose Stephen just bought a
boat.
Let's suppose Stephen has gone through a
divorce.
Let's
think about that, and maybe Stephen is
honest and capable and and decent as he
ordinarily is has financial pressures
that might play a role.
Right? There is a conflict of interest
frequently. So, you have to understand
how your advisor is being paid.
How does your portfolio look? Where have
you allocated your money in terms of
percentages? How much money do you have
in real estate versus cash versus index
funds? Oh, I don't even think about
about the real estate. We have this
cabin in Wisconsin on the lake, and then
we have a condo in Florida.
Um
they're both very modest, so pretty
small part of our net worth. I like to
buy things from a position of power.
My stocks, I'm probably about 80% in in
VTSAX, total stock market index fund.
And probably 15% in bonds,
a total bond market index fund, and then
the other 5% in money market fund.
I keep some money in the checking
account to pay the bills.
And to break it down a little further
for you, my wife and I both have IRAs.
We have a regular IRA and a Roth IRA.
So, there are four IRAs.
All four of them hold VTSAX. We have
taxable accounts, and part of that is
VTSAX, part of it is the bonds. What is
a bond? A bond is money that you have
lent to a company or to the government.
So,
when you buy a bond, you are essentially
lending money to
a company or a government entity. So,
they pay you interest. So, the you will
the companies and the government sell
bonds of various maturities, so they can
be very short, like a money market fund
is basically very short-term
bonds, you know, like 30 days or less,
right? Which makes it the equivalent of
cash.
But you could buy a a certificate of
deposit is a kind of a bond. So, you
could buy one of those for 3 months or 6
months or a year, 5 years, 10 years. Buy
US Treasuries going out 30 years. Why
would I do that instead of buying the
index fund? So, the index fund is
stocks. It's It's very Stocks, as we
talked about,
big growth engine, great long-term, very
volatile.
>> [snorts]
>> So, if you want something to smooth the
ride,
bonds are not very good for long-term
growth, but they are not nearly as
volatile. Are they so they're safer?
Short-term, yes, because they're less
volatile. Long-term, they tend to lose
value to inflation.
Stocks, on the other hand, are riskier
short-term because of the volatility,
but long-term,
they outpace inflation, and so they are
safer long-term. So, it depends on your
time horizon is which is which is safer,
but traditionally, people think of bonds
as being safer.
And really, the way you should hear that
is less volatile, and stocks being
riskier,
you should hear that is more volatile.
So, is it broadly true to say that if we
exclude your real estate, 70% of your
assets are in stocks, 20% in bonds, and
5% in cash?
Probably more 80-15-5.
So, 80% stocks, 15 bonds, and cash.
Okay. It's interesting cuz um Which
would be considered very, very
aggressive.
And I
wouldn't necessarily recommend that for
most people my age.
I thought it would be curious, cuz we
now have this new alien amongst us
called AI. I thought it would be curious
if I went on ChatGPT and I asked ChatGPT
the question,
"I'm a normal person who earns $50,000 a
year. I want to be financially free in
the future.
Give me a one-sentence answer based on
all of the wisdom in the world taken
from every expert in investing ever."
Well, there I know what the right answer
is. I don't know what the answer.
What do you think it's going to say?
Read The Simple Path to Wealth. I don't
think that's what it's going to say, but
that's the right answer. And the The
Simple Path to Wealth talks about three
principles, right? Right. What are those
three three I'm going to check it
against what it says. Avoid debt. Yeah.
Live on less than you earn. Invest the
surplus.
It said,
"Focus on saving and consistently invest
in low-cost, broad-based index funds
like the S&P 500 while living below your
means and allowing compounding to work
over time."
I then asked another question,
"How do I earn more?" I should assume
them from mining my book.
They probably did.
>> [laughter]
>> I said, "How do I earn more?" What do
you think? You know, if you if you
thought if your daughter came to you and
said, Earn more in a job or I just asked
a very broad question, which is, "I now
And now, how do I earn more?" was my
question.
I would say develop develop your skills.
Okay. Yeah. It said, "To earn more,
focus on developing high-demand skills.
>> Oh, there you go. Seek opportunities for
career advancement. Explore side hustles
or invest in assets that generate
passive income like real estate with
dividends."
But I really think that, you know, I
really think there's a really important
part there about developing high-demand
skills. What are those going to be in
the future? Yeah. With AI. Cuz
programming, for instance,
used to be a very high-demand skill, and
people said, "Learn how to program."
Yeah. From what I understand in the age
of AI, yeah, that's not so much.
I even think about my own life. 18 years
old, I started learning about social
media. I dropped out of university doing
my business management degree after one
lecture, and I started learning about
social media because I was building a
business in social media and technology.
And although that first business failed,
I I was
19 years old
in 2000 and what, 14 or something?
Really understood this thing called
social media, which led me to spend a
year as a consultant flying around the
world to all these companies doing
social media. One of those companies
turned around and said, "It's been so
great. Could you turn this into a
company?" I said, "No, I've been through
the
founder PTSD of starting a startup. I
don't want to do it." Three months
later, I said, "Yes." Turned it into a
company called Social Chain, and that
changed my entire life.
>> out well. High-demand skill. I had, even
though I'd failed, I had this
high-demand skill that was honestly at
the time paying me 70,000 pounds a
month.
>> had it because you went through the
process of failing. Yes. Failure is You
know, it used to be in some cultures
that if you failed once, that was it.
You were a pariah. Nobody would even
look at you anymore.
Failure in our culture is just a
stepping stone. I've heard venture
capitalists say they won't even look at
an entrepreneur fund if they haven't
failed at least once.
>> 100%.
The advice I'd now give to my kids based
on that is I would ask if my kids came
to me and said, "Dad, what should I go
learn?" I would say,
"Go and work for a startup." I said
startup because you're going to be very
close to the CEO and founder because
there's going to be less desks, so
you're going to be closer to the
proximity that is failing at the cutting
edge.
So, if it's AI, I'd say go work for an
AI startup.
I I probably not going to work out.
You're probably going to be the company
maybe busting in a couple of months'
time, but you're going to be so close to
the failure, you will learn so much.
>> Yes.
>> I wish somebody had given me that
advice. And that's that's like in a way,
I guess, roundabout way what I did is I
started a company that failed at the
very forefront of a wave coming into
shore, which meant that as I hit, you
know, as the wave crashed down and I was
left there on my surfboard, I now had
this high-demand set of skills that
people were like begging me for, which
set me myself up. And frankly,
the Diary of a CEO would not be
successful
had I not spent the previous 10 years
understanding how social media content
creation, growth worked.
Is there a favorite story in this book
of yours?
Well, there's so many great ones, so
Share some of them. I already I already
alluded to my favorite one, which is my
friend Tom.
You know, because he has I mean, Tom was
a guy who
got to the age of 62. He'd been through
multiple divorces. He lost his house to
foreclosure. He lost his job.
He was broke. He went bankrupt. And yet,
his life has turned out pretty well.
He's an extraordinarily happy guy.
That's my favorite story.
But, the one of the reasons I like this
book so much, and one of the reasons,
candidly, I did it,
is if you read through it, you will find
there are some stories from
people who were tech bros, right? Who
made big incomes, and they read The
Simple Path to Wealth and applied it,
and it worked very well for them.
But, there are many, many more stories
of people who have accomplished this
from much more humble beginnings. Give
me an example of I have a very good
friend of mine, high school buddy.
I don't think he's ever made more than
$40,000 a year. He is financially
independent because he followed the
basic principles that I talk about in
that book.
I have a different friend. Name was in
the financial business. He was living in
Chicago. And over lunch, he told me that
his Christmas bonus had come in at
$800,000.
That's back in the mid-90s, when that
was real money, right?
And he was already making, I don't know,
a million dollars a year, whatever it
was. Big income.
And he was broke.
And
you see, most people listening to this
are going to say, "What are you talking
about? This guy got a bonus for 800
People paid me $800,000 a year, I'd be
done forever, right?" And then
that'd be me, and I'm good.
How can he be broke? Well, when you
listen to him talk
about the house,
the cars, the schools, and you start
doing the math, you realize that
no, his income is not enough. He's
barely barely making it.
So, here's a guy with a big income, who
is, unless he changes his ways, is never
going to be financially independent
financially independent. Here's my guy
with a tiny income, comparatively,
who got there.
I've come to believe that a large income
actually can be an impediment to
accomplishing it. And my reasoning for
this is that I think people have a large
income
are much more likely to be drawn into
the competing with the Joneses scenario
because they associate with other people
have large incomes, and they're all
driving a certain car, living in certain
neighborhood, sending their kids to
certain schools, and that probably
becomes very hard to disengage with.
And making it perhaps even
less likely that they are going to
decide to spend a large portion of their
income on buying their freedom.
Whereas, the people who make less money
probably don't have those same social
pressures, and are more readily able to
do it.
So, starting from humble beginnings is
no obstacle. And that's was the point of
doing Pathfinders.
Interesting.
It does track that. I think
the goalposts continue to move in
different ways, and
>> Yeah.
I guess you go from competing to the
Joneses to competing with the size of
someone else's yacht, which is
all slippery slopes to bad places. Or
your own or or your own demons,
as we talked about earlier, right? Yeah,
you mentioned a word in there as well.
You mentioned I think you were talking
about your friend Tom. Tom had a
divorce? Multiple divorces, yeah. I
Which is bad for your [clears throat]
wealth.
Yeah, I didn't really I didn't I didn't
realize this cuz I've never been through
one before. Um I spoke to James Sexton
on the show, who's a divorce lawyer, who
kind of opened my eyes to it. But
actually,
I had a private conversation with a
friend here in New York City
I'd say a couple of months ago, who's
going through a divorce.
And he's he sat me down, and he talked
me through the specific consequences of
of divorce that he's going through.
He said to me, he's a very successful
person. I reckon he's probably worth 500
million, right? He said, the divorce
proceedings have now dragged on for 5 or
6 years. So, I'm I'm having to go and
see lawyers all the time. And he said to
me as well that he is paying for her
lawyer.
Which I was like I I didn't really
understand, but he was like, "No, I have
to also cover her lawyer costs because,
you know, I'm the the breadwinner. She
doesn't have money, so I'm covering her
lawyer costs, which is what I have to
do." And he said the law firm have gone
from being a very, very small practice
in those 6 years,
now they have a massive building. And he
goes, "I know, it's my money. I bought
[laughter] it.
He was like, "I have paid for her
lawyer, and now they're doing really
well, and they're milking this this
case. They're drawing it out Yeah, they
have no incentive to this
>> this ending, yeah. So, he's like, "I've
spent tens of millions on her lawyer,
who is basically dragging me,
um and now they've got this massive
building." What else did he say to me?
He said,
"Because some of my assets are
subjective in value, like my company,
her lawyer
>> [laughter]
>> is inflating the price of my assets
because she's going to get half of
whatever they can convince a judge my
assets are worth. So, he, you know, for
his example, his business might be worth
100 million, but the lawyer is making
the case to the judge that it's worth
500 million, so that she gets 250
million." He also said to me
>> Which really isn't there. Which really
he doesn't have. And then he was saying
to me, he goes, "You know, I bought this
particular stock."
>> So, he is I'm sorry to interrupt, but
now he's forced to fight it. He's
fighting it as well.
>> like he can just say, "Okay, she can
have half." Yeah, because this is a
judgment
that is going to create a an obligation
on his part for assets that don't
actually exist.
>> So, it's more than half. Right? She
could end up taking 60, 70, 75%. And the
other thing he said to me, which was
quite sad, he was like, "You know, I was
one of the first He was one of the early
investors in a big company that we all
know.
And um
he said to me, "I bought that stock 15,
20 years ago." It's actually quite
emotional to him that he was so early in
backing that company. And now he's
forced to sell that. So, he has to
liquidate investments he made 20 years
ago because, again, she's entitled to
half.
>> And that'll be a huge tax hit. A huge
tax hit.
>> Right. And I think some people don't
realize that wealthy people can
get a loan against that stock without
ever having to sell it.
>> Right. So, he's probably, if he's smart,
he's probably got a big loan against
that stock.
>> Right.
Probably a 50% loan. So, just for anyone
that doesn't understand this, cuz I only
understood this in the last couple of
years where I where I started doing
similar things, is if the stock is worth
100 million, he can get 50 million
tax-free from a bank just by keeping
that stock there, and really never have
to pay it back because it's such a great
stock.
Um
and
it was also just looking in his face and
just seeing the stress and the toll of
having to go to court all the time and
fight this thing for 6 or 7 years that I
thought, "Wow, we we give people
financial advice all the time about the
best stocks to pick or investing index
funds. We don't talk enough about the
how divorce can just destroy your life."
You know, you have to be so careful in
choosing your spouse. I've had pushback
on that, and people say, "Well, that
you're choosing your spouse is not a
financial decision. It's, you know, it's
emotional, it's romantic, it's Well,
yeah, it's all those things, but it you
better take finance into account for all
the reasons that we're discussing. This
also, by the way, loops us back to an
earlier part of our conversation, where
does money buy happiness? Does, you
know, being richer
is that always necessarily better? Well,
this guy is more of a target because of
his wealth than he would be if he were
So, is his money really making him
happier at this point in his life? You
know, probably not so much.
You know. You know, and he's he's going
to be fine either way. Like, you know.
Um which is a point point worth saying
of nuance. But also And the other point
of nuance worth saying is that
>> He's going to be fine financially, but
emotionally, it's he's still going to go
And she's probably going through it,
too, on the other side.
>> 100%. Yeah.
>> [laughter]
>> And the other point of nuance here is
that she did raise the four or five the
the three or four kids Yeah. while he
was off building the business for, you
know, 20 odd years. So, one could argue
that he wouldn't have that wealth
without her being at home to look after
the kids, and she made huge sacrifices
to her own career.
Sure. So, you know, there's balance, but
I I just think with um
James Sexton said to me, "Even if you
don't get a pre-nup,
there's still a pre-nup. You either use
the government's pre-nup,
which is Or you create your own.
>> Or you create your own. Either way,
there's a pre-nup. Absolutely. Do you
want to let some judge decide, or do you
want to be intentional before you get
married with your partner about how
things will be split?
And even when I think about my partner
at the moment, and we're probably going
to get married soon. Congratulations.
Thank you. I haven't proposed just yet,
but I'm working on it. Don't tell her
that. We we just let that secret out.
>> She doesn't She doesn't WATCH THIS
ANYWAY.
>> [laughter]
>> SOMEONE'S GOING TO DM HER. BUT I'M on
this time, so this is the one episode
you're going to watch. True. Well, I'm
very fortunate is if this spring, I will
have been married 44 years.
>> Damn. And [clears throat] I I tell
people I Congrats. I married my wife out
of the gate. Why? Wait. Do you have a
framework for choosing
the person, or for sustaining for 44
years? Cuz I'm what, 6, 7 years in with
my girlfriend, but you've got 44 years
in. Funny story about that is
people used to ask me, "Did you and Jane
sit down and discuss money before make
sure you're on the same page financially
before you got married?"
>> [snorts]
>> And I always used to say, you know, it's
a great idea. You should do that. But
no, we never did that. I just I just got
lucky. You know, we never talked about
it, but as it happens, we got married
and we were very, very compatible
financially, which we are.
But just got lucky. Well, I told that
story in front of her one time.
And she leaned back in her chair and she
said,
"What are you talking about? On our
first date, you said to me,
'You need to be saving 50% of your
income.'"
He said, "What do you mean we never
talked about money?"
I guess that's such a natural part of my
persona, I didn't even remember doing
it. Interesting. [laughter]
>> [snorts]
>> My last question for you is about
regret.
You said you're 75? I am.
What are your biggest regrets?
So, I I think regrets are are tricky.
Then I and I will I'll answer your
question directly and that's a couple of
things that or at least one thing that
occurs to me that might be surprising,
but
the reason they're tricky is because
there is an assumption like you you
regret doing A
and you think if only I'd done B, things
would be better.
But you don't know that that's true. But
you might say, "Boy, I regret starting
that company that failed because it was
a failure."
Well, yeah, but it led to something much
bigger. You learned so much. Mhm. Now,
maybe if you'd said, "Instead of
starting that company that failed,
maybe I took this high-paying job and
and I worked my way up through the
corporate organization."
And you'd be saying there, you know,
you'd be sitting at some high executive
level in this corporation and looking
back and saying, "Well, am I glad I
didn't
do that startup that failed." Right? And
yet, you're so much further ahead now
than if you So, who knows? Who knows
what choice you made that appears to be
the wrong choice
as to whether it really was. Maybe it
was exactly Maybe things would have
turned out better, maybe they wouldn't.
So,
I'm very hesitant to look back on There
are many things I can look back on and
say, "Gee,
I do wonder what if I'd gone down the
right path instead of the left path.
What would that have looked like?"
But there's no guarantees it would look
better and my life has been pretty damn
good. So, in that sense, I have no
regrets.
Two regrets I do have, very personal
regrets. I don't I've never shared these
publicly.
When I was a kid,
my father was a very handy guy. He loved
building things, working on the house,
that kind of stuff.
I was not that kind of kid.
And I don't know, I was 8 or 10 years
old at one point and
for my birthday or Christmas, I don't
remember,
he brought me a bought me a jigsaw,
which is a
for people who don't know, it's a it's
an electric saw. It's got a little blade
that goes up and allows you to cut wood
in very fine kinds of patterns.
Last thing in the world
this kid wanted.
And I let my dad know
and he was crushed
because for him,
it was the best gift he could possibly
think of to give to an 8 or 10-year-old
or whatever it was.
And so, one of the regrets and I give
myself some grace cuz I was very young
and
reasonably you could expect that I
didn't have the maturity to deal with it
the way I would have. But I I do regret
cuz I could see the pain in his face
when I I kind of rejected
that gift.
Right?
And maybe that
taught me a good lesson in being more
empathetic going forward. So again, do I
really regret it? Well, I regret that I
hurt my father,
but
I learned something pretty valuable. And
you've let you've remembered that for 70
years. I've remembered that for 70
years, yeah.
Yeah.
I've got similar stories of things ways
I reacted as a kid. I think most people
will do. Yeah, you know, yeah, sucks.
And then my second one and this is even
bigger. [clears throat] I was 24 when my
dad died.
And he died of emphysema.
And [clears throat] slow, lingering
death. He died in the hospital.
And
the night before he died, the day before
he died, I was visiting him.
And um
he was sitting on the edge of the bed
and he said to me,
"I'm going to die now.
You know, I'm I'm
going to die tonight."
Turns out, of course, he was right. He
did. That was the night he died.
And instead of recognizing that
this was a moment where
he wanted to talk to his son about this,
this
probably the most momentous event that
any of us will ever face,
right?
Instead of recognizing that,
I went to the typical trope of "Oh, Dad,
don't don't talk like that. You you're
not going to die. You got a long way to
go. There you're going to be fine." I
went to all that [ __ ]
instead of just
recognizing whether he was right or
wrong,
that [clears throat]
he was facing a momentous thing and
[snorts and clears throat] he didn't
want to hear
"Don't Don't think about that. Think
more positively." He He wanted to
share with his son
what he was facing.
And
I regret that I wasn't there for him
in that moment.
But I regret that I didn't get to
experience that with him in that moment.
So, that's my biggest.
I can still see it still in your face.
That was 50 years ago.
Is there a reason why
you think in that moment you didn't
want to go in that direction with him?
It wasn't a matter of what I wanted cuz
it's not like I considered
>> [clears throat]
>> I can either blow it off, which is what
I did,
or embrace it and go there with him. I I
didn't even think that way. It's not
like
it's not like I made the wrong choice.
I wasn't mature enough to recognize
there was a choice. I wasn't mature
enough to recognize
the real dynamic of what was happening.
And for that, you deserve grace.
Thank you. And I agree with that.
But I still regret it cuz how much
better
for both of us would it have been
if I had recognized it.
Jay, we have a closing tradition on this
podcast where the last guest leaves a
question for the next.
What is something that you think is true
that you haven't yet been able to
validate?
I think at at this point in my life, I'm
I feel pretty comfortable about what I
think is true.
Right? So,
I'm not sure this answers the question,
but um
but a good example is
I am pretty sure that there is no
afterlife.
Right?
I I have a high degree of confidence in
that.
But of course, as the song once said,
"We'll never know by living, only our
dying will tell."
And
I am very curious about death.
I am very curious as to
what is on the other side, if anything.
So, in a
perverse way, I guess, I'm I am looking
forward to my death.
Right? I I don't want to get there too
soon. I mean, I'm as long as I am
mentally and physically capable, I'm
happy to continue living. Thank you very
much.
But I do have a great curiosity about
death and I'm
almost 100% sure that when I'm dead,
that's just it. It's over.
But I'm curious and it'll be interesting
if I die and it's like, "Oops."
You know, it's like, "Oh, there is a guy
with a white beard and
okay, I'll just show myself out. Thank
you very much."
>> [laughter]
>> There's one last question I wanted to
ask you, which is kind of just about the
subject of happiness. Again, at 75 years
old, you have a retrospective clarity
that I don't yet have on what actually
mattered.
What actually matters?
Nothing.
Nothing really matters ultimately.
Nothing? Yeah.
I think
that's kind of like asking what's the
meaning of life, right?
And I don't think there is a meaning to
life. When you look at the scale of the
universe, the scale of the cosmos,
the concept that
we as individuals bear some meaning
seems to me to be silly.
Human beings have been around for, I
don't know, two, 300,000 years depending
on when you define Homo sapiens.
I mean, that's that's a
infinitesimally small smudge of time
in that has happened already and that
will happen in the future. Even if
humans last for another few million
years, it will be an infinitely
tiny bit of time
against this huge cosmic universe.
And our individuality within that is
infinitesimally small.
And I think there's some great meaning
behind that. Seems to be to be the
height of arrogance.
So, I think that if you go through life
and you treat people pretty well
and you have a a pretty good good run of
it,
I think you've done well.
I don't but I don't think there's
something profound in that.
So, what is the point then?
Is there a point? Is that the wrong
question?
>> no there is no point. I mean the the
point is we happen to be here
and it can be a good fun ride. It can be
a very difficult ride depending on what
you make of it.
And in some cases depending on your
circumstances, there have certainly been
people in history that have born
been born into circumstances that
you know, made it a a miserable
existence with no options out of it. I
mean, what's the meaning of that?
And now you and I and the vast majority
of people listening to us, probably I
venture to say 100% of them, have a lot
more autonomy over
over how we can make our life.
And
will it have great meaning? No,
ultimately not.
But it's the only life you have and you
might as well make the best of it.
I actually listened to something last
night by a guy called Lucas Jones who is
an actor. Um he has some great books.
He's also a poet as far as I'm aware.
I'll link his books below. Um but he he
made wrote this poem which I thought was
quite related to that that I'm just
going to play for you because I think
it's kind of captures the essence as
well of what you're saying.
He starts by saying, "I saw God on the
train." Okay. Saw God on the train. Ah,
God. Okay. I pretended I didn't. So, I
sat far away from the seat he was
sitting at.
And then he got up, I think probably to
piss, and he noticed me there and said,
"All right, what's this?
What you saying? You heard it from me."
I said, "Oh, mate, nah, just comfy
seat."
And he looked at me like I was a kid
covered in chocolate surrounded by
wrappers saying, "Don't know what
happened."
And he goes, "Come in then, mate. I've
got a few minutes.
Tell me what's wrong, but don't [ __ ]
around with it."
And it showed me then that it fit in one
sentence. I said, "Just think heaven's a
stupid incentive.
Like what, a [ __ ] life for a beautiful
death? And those who are evil can
suddenly repent like a killer or nonce
can live like a monster then right at
the end say, 'I'm sorry, dear God, so'
and end up in heaven right there with my
nana. She's doing some knitting. He's
waving a hammer. So, Jesus, God, what a
horrible deal."
And he goes, "Yes, [ __ ] Don't know how
you feel."
I'm like, "Mate, you're the one spinning
the wheel." And he goes, "Listen, I'll
tell you a secret.
All that stuff, mate, I didn't speak it.
Like the old joke says about liars and
men, if God wrote the book, why are you
holding the pen? Now, the rules I wrote
I wrote on your heart. Truth I spoke,
you've known from the start. Be kind,
don't harm. Isn't that hard? Heaven's
just life if you're doing your part. You
want white clouds and endless skies? Uh
yeah, look around. You don't have to
die. And I know it probably brings you
some pain to think of the dead as just
dust in a grave, but humans can't
comprehend it when I say life is the
cloud and death is the rain.
And I got to my stop and felt kind of
mad. Not sure he answered the questions
that.
And I looked up and saw the sun rising.
Said, "You're looking for heaven,
but you're the one hiding."
>> [laughter]
>> LJ, thank you.
Thank you for writing these incredible
books that I highly recommend anybody
who is on their own journey to financial
freedom
and is looking for a free life, a
financial independence, or just
independence from one's own
tormenting psychology should have should
should buy. This book Simple Path to
Wealth has been an absolute smash hit
for
understandable reasons once you read it.
Sold many millions of copies from what I
understand, more than a million copies
at least, and I highly recommend
everybody goes and starts with this book
and then
picks up Pathfinders. I'm going to link
both of these books below. And there is
a third book, a slightly smaller, called
How I Lost Money in Real Estate Before
It Was Fashionable, a cautionary tale.
Um
I'm going to link all of them below. And
if anybody else wants to find more of
your work, is there anywhere else that
they can get in contact with you, read
your work that I should recommend? So,
probably the easiest thing is the blog,
which is jlcollinsnh
at or dot com.
And uh you know, you'll find a lot of my
writing. I don't write on the blog too
much anymore, but the material that's
there is evergreen. It's the source
material for the books that you were
kind enough to share.
Uh the last book, the How I Lost Money
in Real Estate, is if somebody wants to
have a laugh at my expense, that's the
book they want to pick up. Thank you for
doing so much of what you do. Um I know
what the comments are going to say
already. They're going to be people
talking about how soothing your voice
is.
And I
>> [laughter]
>> I happen to agree.
Thank you so much. My pleasure. Thank
you for having me.
If there's anything we need, it is
connection, especially in the world
we're living in today. And that is
exactly why we created these
conversation cards because on this show,
when I sit here with my guests and have
those deep, intimate conversations, this
remarkable thing happens time and time
again. We feel deeply connected to each
other. At the end of every episode, the
guest I'm interviewing leaves a question
for the next guest, and we've turned
them into these conversation cards. And
we've added these twist cards to make
your conversations even more
interesting. And there are so many more
twists along the way with the
conversation cards. This is the brand
new edition, and for the first time
ever, I've added to the pack this gold
card, which is an exclusive question
from me. But I'm only putting the gold
cards in the first run of conversation
cards. So, get yours now before the
limited edition gold cards are all gone.
Head to the link in the description
below.
>> [music]
[music]
[singing]