Video summary
The Paris Agreement, adopted on December 12, 2015, at COP 21 in Paris and entering into force shortly thereafter in November 2016, represents a landmark shift in global climate governance by achieving near-universal participation from 195 countries. Unlike its predecessor, the Kyoto Protocol, which was limited to developed nations under a rigid top-down structure, the Paris Agreement introduces a universal bottom-up approach applicable to both developed and developing countries alike. This framework was designed to overcome the limitations of earlier treaties, particularly the narrow coverage of Kyoto, by allowing every nation to set its own specific climate targets through a mechanism known as Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). The agreement's core long-term goal is to hold the increase in global average temperature well below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels while pursuing efforts to limit the rise to 1.5 degrees Celsius, reflecting a collective ambition to prevent catastrophic climate change.
The operational structure of the Paris Agreement relies on a dynamic cycle of five-year reviews where countries must submit updated NDCs that reflect their highest possible ambitions and demonstrate progress over previous submissions, ensuring no backsliding occurs. To monitor this progress, the agreement utilizes a Global Stock Take conducted periodically every five years to assess collective advancement toward long-term goals; notably, the first stock take at COP 28 in Dubai called for an urgent transition away from fossil fuels, while subsequent cycles aim to reinforce these mechanisms and enhance financial transparency. Additionally, Article Six establishes international carbon markets and cooperative mechanisms to help countries meet their targets, alongside significant advancements like the Loss and Damage Fund launched at COP 28 to support vulnerable nations facing irreversible climate impacts, thereby creating a more inclusive and financially robust system for addressing climate resilience.
Despite its broad consensus and innovative design, the agreement faces ongoing challenges including the volatility of national commitments, insufficient current pledges to meet the 1.5 to 2-degree limit, and repeated withdrawals by the United States under different administrations which have questioned its long-term effectiveness. Developing countries continue to highlight inadequacies in climate finance disbursement relative to their actual needs, emphasizing that enforcement relies heavily on transparency and peer pressure rather than binding penalties. India plays a significant role within this framework, having ratified the agreement in 2016 and committing to net zero emissions by 2070, while also pledging to increase non-fossil fuel energy capacity to 50% by 2030 under its Panchamrit commitments. The agreement ultimately replaced a narrow binding structure with a universal system that progressively raises global climate ambition, though its success remains contingent on overcoming implementation gaps and securing consistent financial support from all sources.
Read the full video transcript
Hello I welcome you all once again to my channel
Explore Education I am Dr. Rashmi
Singh Assistant Professor Department of
Education S S Khanna Girls Degree College
University of Allahabad and this time I am
going to discuss with you a new topic
actually the second last topic of your
unit four of Environmental Education ok so it is
the Paris Agreement
Environmental Movements and Laws
NDCs Global Stock Take and 1.5°
centigrade goal to reduce temperature.
Ok? So let's start with
what is its background and context? Adopted on 12th
December 2015 at COP 21 in Paris Entered
into force on 4th November 2016 One of the
fastest ratifications of any global
treaty, that is, if we talk about its background,
it was adopted on 12th December 2015
in Paris and
came into force on 4th November 2016, which means it is very quick, isn't it? One
of the fastest ratifications of any global
treaty, no global treaty comes into force so quickly.
We read earlier that your
Kyoto Protocol took many years to come into force. Isn't it
? Then achieved near
universal participation.
Like the Montreal Protocol, it also had almost universal
participation. 195 countries
signed it. Succeeding the Narrow Cut
Protocol Framework. That means
it was better than the Kyoto Protocol. Did to overcome
Kyoto's weakness. Isn't it? The weakness of Joe Katos
was that he covered only the developed countries of NX One.
Limited NX One Only coverage and rigid
top down binding target is designed to overcome the same.
And the US withdraws under President
Trump, resolves under President Biden, and
withdraws again in January 2025 under Trump II. Isn't it
? So this is the US location.
Sometimes he withdraws himself. He
then rejoins. Then he withdraws it.
This is the way of accounting.
If we look at its objectives and core structure, it has a
long term goal. It
said that global average temperature
rise well below 2 degrees Celsius. Above
pre-industrial levels and pursuing
efforts to limit it to 1.5°C. This
means that its long term goal is to stop the
rise in global average temperature.
Aims to Strengthen the Ability to
Adapt to Climate Impacts and Build
Climate Resilience. It also aims to
empower countries to
develop the ability to adapt to climate impacts.
Aims to Align Global Finance Flows with a
Low Emission Climate Resilient Development
Pathway.
Its objective is also that
according to the global finance flow, we should have low
emissions, that is, we should reduce harmful emissions
and do this work with the global finance flow.
Adopts a universal bottom up
approach applicable to all countries developed
and developing alike, right? As the Q2
protocol covered only developed countries.
It said that
we will follow the bottom up approach for all developed and developing countries. Isn't it?
Ok. Then nationally determined contributions are
its. Which is its core mechanism. It
said each country sets its own specific
climate targets. Nationally Determined
Contributions Submitted Every Five Years.
Every country will have to set its own climate target
and submit it every 5 years.
This is called Nationally Determined
Contribution. NDCs must
reflect a country's highest possible
ambitions. It is not that we
build a structure that looks like it is falling apart. No, we should
reflect our highest possible ambition
through NDC. And show
progression over previous submissions. No back
sliding. It should not mean that if we have
achieved so much this year then next year we will lag behind.
No, we have to show progress in that. There should
always be a progressive
increase in this. And the
targets themselves are not
internationally binding. The procedural
duty to submit and report on NDCs
is legally binding. Target Themselves Are
Not Internationally Binding. The
procedural duty to submit and report on
NDCs is likely binding. He is saying
that you should set the target yourself. Isn't it? It
is voluntary. But it is
binding on you that you will have to
submit the NDC report every 5 years.
Countries submitted new NDCs in 2025
covering the period to 2035 as part of this
five-year Russia cycle. That is, countries have
submitted those in 2025. Then we will do it in 30. We will do it
again in 2035.
Global Stock Take like this What's it all about? A
periodic five-yearly collective assessment of
progress towards the agreement's long-
term goals. That means, according to the long term
goal we have set, you will have to
show your assessment every 5 years. The first
global stocktake concluded at COP28
Dubai 2023 calling for the first time for
transitioning away from fossil fuels. It is being
said that you should stay away from fossil fuels.
One thing is that it will end.
Not renewable. Isn't it?
Non-renewable is finding speed
directly into the next round of
NDCs, reinforcing the agreements, rush
mechanisms for raising ambition, and what is being said is that
the second global stock take is now
underway, feeding into the 2028 NDC updates,
meaning if the first one happened in 2023, now it will happen in 2028.
Ok? To enhance
financial transparency and support,
the Enhanced Transparency
Framework requires all countries to
report GAGs. What was GHG? Greenhouse
Gas Inventories and NDC Progress
with Flexibility for Developing Countries. It
is a little flexible for developing countries. Then COP 29 in Baku adopted a new
collective quantified goal targeting at least 100% of the total GDP
by this much. Isn't it? So this
is your target. You can remember. So an
aspirational call was also made to
scale up climate finance to dash from
all sources and the Loss and Damage Fund
agreed at COP27 and formally launched at
COP28 supports vulnerable countries facing
irreversible climate impacts. So this is all the
mechanism of how you will adopt it. Isn't it
? So you can remember. So
remember this. What is Article Six? There
is an international carbon market, right? We have
talked about this before also. Establishes
cooperative mechanisms alongside countries
to meet NDCs partly through carbon
markets and trading. Firstly, Article
6.2 enables broad cooperative approaches to
internationally transferred mitigation outcomes
between countries and Article 6.4 creates
a centralised UN-supervised
crediting mechanism, the successor to the
CDM. That means it came after the Kyoto Protocol. This is what the
international carbon market is talking about. Isn't it
? And it is saying and
it has taken both developed and developing countries
within its ambit. You can
understand it like this. Its achievement is that almost
everyone agreed with the coverage of KO's Limited
Nx1. This is better. Isn't it?
Catalyzed major renewable energy
investment and a wave of net zero. Meaning, a
pledge of net zero has been taken that we will make
carbon emissions zero. Over 140 countries.
And India's target is for 2070 that by 2070
we will reduce carbon emissions to zero. Its
ratio mechanism, five-year NDC
cycles plus the global stock take, is designed
to progressively raise ambition over time. And
that is why it has been created so that you keep
increasing your target by becoming more ambitious every time and finally achieve it.
Net Zero Deliver Landmark
Institution Such as the Loss and Damage Fund
at the COP 29 Climate Finance Goal.
Look, the climate finance goal is being talked about now. Isn't it
? What are the criticisms and challenges
? The volatile non-purgative nature of
NDCs means current prices remain
insufficient for reducing the 1.5 to 2 degree
Celsius limit. He is saying
that there is a need so people should not do it. This
criticism is non-pure. You are
not even giving any punishment to them for this. Isn't it
? Repeated US withdrawal. Sometimes he goes to the US
, sometimes he comes out. Underlying global
momentum and financial commitments gave it
status as a top historical limiter. Isn't it
? Because the stance of the US is
not clear. Developing countries
continue to flag inadequacy and slow
disbursing climate finance related to
actual need. The developing countries have
very little climate finance. Isn't it?
If it is much less than the actual need then it is slow
, inadequate, insufficient.
Enforcement realises on transparency and
peer pressure rather than binding sections
raising questions about long term
effectiveness. Since it is a warranty, its long
term effectiveness is questionable.
How long will this app last? Then
what is India's role and engagement?
India's India ratified the Paris
Agreement in 2016 is not very old.
Signed in 2016. It's the updated
2022 NDC targets to
intensify emissions by 45% from GDP by 2030,
right? So India is its ally. India is
working on it. Look, you
see CNG in many places. Electric buses
are visible. All this is the result of this. And
we have pledged to achieve net zero
emissions by 2070. We have to increase non-fossil fuel
electric capacity to
50% by 2030 and Panchamrit commitments have not
submitted updated NDCs. We submitted
in 2025 and now we are raising our ambition further
for 2035. Continue to
emphasize CBDR and advocate climate
finance. Technology transfer as
prerequisites for higher ambition from
developing countries. The takeaway is that the
Paris Agreement replaced a narrow
binding structure with a universal
bottom-up system of NDCs and this is much more
goal. So the Paris Agreement has replaced the
narrow binding structure of Kyoto with a
universal bottom-up system.
Global Stock Take and Five-Year NDC
Settlements Form a Rational Mechanism to
Progressively Increase Global Climate
Ambition. And the NCQG of COP 29, which
finalized Article 6 rules,
marks major recent advances in finance
and carbon markets and despite
universal buy-in, repeated US withdrawals,
and an ongoing emissions gap, highlight the
agreement's continuing implementation
challenges. Although almost everyone accepted it, there
is a challenge in implementation due to the repeated withdrawal by the US. So the Paris
Agreement was adopted at which
COP, then COP 21 will be Paris. Isn't it?
Then the Paris Agreement long term is 1.5
to 2°. Well below personally limit to
1.5 this one will happen. Unlikely, this is a
bottom-up approach. Universal bottom up approach
applicable to all countries. This will be
submitted every five years, it is
expected to show increasing ambition than the
first monotonously called for
transitioning away from fossil fuels in the
energy system, this should be than the new
collective
targets at least, this was what we had
called, it was a figure, so I did not
read it carefully, now we will see it in the answer, maybe this is it
and check
how much emission we have taken till India's updated 2030.
So checked COP 21
is correct. This is also correct. This is also correct. This
is also correct. Transitioning this see this one
is also correct. This 45% is International Carbon
Markets and Cooperative Mechanisms.
Ok? So this is the Paris Agreement.
My throat is a little sore today but I thought
I should finish this long pending work. After this,
one more International Solar Alliance remains. So,
this unit of yours will be finished. There
is a complete memorization unit. I have to remember everything. Which
agreement has been made for what?
What is the Montreal Protocol for?
Why was the Paris Agreement signed?
Why did the Kyoto Protocol happen? Who
is the predecessor of whom? Who is whose successor? Who
is criticizing whom? Who has what success
? You have to remember all this. These questions will also be
asked in the same manner.
Ok? So, thank you for watching and happy
learning.