Video summary
The Pajaro Valley Unified School District Board of Trustees convened a working session focused on official business and student outcomes, beginning with administrative protocols for public comment and addressing attendance issues among trustees. During the governing board comments, Trustee Flores highlighted recent listening sessions regarding district goals, while Trustee Turley addressed a past violation concerning the use of district resources for a campaign. Student Trustee Allen reported on successful back-to-school events and efforts to improve communication channels, though a point of order was raised regarding the cancellation of an agenda-setting meeting without prior notification. The Superintendent celebrated Mexican Independence Day and presented data showing a significant increase in English Learner reclassification rates, attributing this success to intentional strategies that allow students access to electives by freeing up schedules previously occupied by language development courses.
A contentious debate arose over Item 8.3, the required annual Prop 28 report, which Trustee Medina moved to remove from the agenda because the accompanying presentation was not attached to the public packet, preventing community review before a vote. Despite arguments that legal requirements were met via posted documents and that a special meeting could be scheduled, the board agreed to remove the item and adjust the agenda due to quorum concerns for close session actions. In public comment, speakers addressed a wide range of critical issues, including honoring Chumash history at Amst Elementary School, expressing deep concern over resource cuts and staffing shortages in special education that are causing behavioral issues and safety risks, and criticizing the district's handling of audit discrepancies. Additional comments focused on equity gaps for dual language learners, concerns about wireless technology in classrooms, advocacy for restructuring Sabre School to avoid forced student transfers, and general feedback calling for the board to move beyond being a "rubber stamp" with increased pre-meeting outreach.
The meeting continued with discussions on human resources failures regarding credentialing data, discrepancies in arts funding models that have reduced access at specific sites, and strong opposition to installing artificial turf due to toxic chemicals. The Pajaro Valley Federation of Teachers announced the ratification of a new contract securing a 4% salary increase and other benefits, while representatives from CSEA advocated for a comprehensive classified classification study and fair compensation rather than relying on contractors or spreadsheet data. Financial updates revealed that actual ADA was slightly lower than projected due to attendance recovery programs, with property tax revenue increasing by about $5 million; the district ended the fiscal year with a general fund balance of approximately $100 million after deficit spending less than projected. Public questions also touched upon salary reductions for class size reduction, rising benefit costs, and concerns over undisclosed slides potentially violating the Brown Act.
Further discussions covered budget variances between adopted budgets and actuals, noting that while certificated salaries are projected to decline, benefits are rising due to rate changes effective October 1. The board initially failed to approve a motion regarding cabinet-level spending due to demands for written answers on transparency but eventually passed it after agreeing to an amendment requiring the superintendent to respond to specific questions within two weeks. An RFP was approved for a comprehensive classification and compensation study, which is the first since 2016, aiming to objectively review job classifications against actual duties without requesting immediate salary increases. Reports on expanded learning summer programming highlighted the successful use of $3.5 million in grant funds to serve over 6,400 students across various camps, achieving significant attendance recovery and offering specialized support for English Language Learners and students with IEPs. Finally, updates on Williams Act compliance revealed staffing vacancies and disputes over facility cleaning claims, while the Sustainable Schools Advisory Committee expressed frustration over being sidelined in consolidation discussions, leading to a heated debate that resulted in an adjournment without final action on several consent agenda items.
Read the full video transcript
Good evening
and welcome. I'd like to call the
meeting of the board of trustees a part
to order. Thank you for being here this
evening with us. I want to begin by
acknowledging that this meeting will be
livereamed and recorded. Whether you
were here in person or watching online,
we're glad that you were here.
Um, the purpose of this meeting is a
meeting of the board of trustees
convened to conduct official business on
behalf of our district and the students
we serve. While we deeply value
community participation, this is a
working session of the board. Our focus
tonight is on the items before us and on
the outcomes that matter most for our
students. One of our core values is
ensuring that the voices of our
community and each board member are
heard, respected, and given meaningful
space in this room. Everything we do
tonight is grounded in that commitment.
Our protocols are not barriers. They are
the structure that ensures every voice
has a fair and appropriate opportunity
to be heard.
Um, so as each item on the agenda is
called,
folks who have turned in speaker cards
for that item will be called. We
generally call in groups of 10. When you
hear your name, please make your way to
the podium. Please include your name on
the card and please state your name when
you are at the podium. I will ask for a
motion, a second on each item after the
public speaking piece is done. Um, if a
motion is not made and seconded, then
the item dies and we won't discuss it.
Um, staff or board members, um, actually
that's reversed. Staff or board members
will make their their comments or make
their presentation and then we'll ask
for a motion in a second. Um, then board
members will each have three minutes
times to speak on each one of the items.
Um and if a board member or some board
members have want to speak more than the
three, we'll go on and finish the round.
Um and then if the board collectively
decides that we want to have another
round, then we will do that. And then
the superintendent may respond to board
comments after that and then we'll call
for the vote.
Speaking on an agenda item, members of
the public are welcome to address the
board on any items on tonight's agenda.
Each speaker will have two minutes
unless otherwise announced. Once an item
has been called, cards will no longer be
accepted for that item. The board will
limit total public comment on each
agenda item to 30 minutes unless we
collectively decide to do something
different.
>> If you would like to speak about a
district related matter that is not on
tonight's agenda, please do so under 6.1
visitor non-aggenda.
Items on the agenda may be addressed in
one of two ways. Option one, if the
speaker wishes to speak on an agenda
item during 6.2, they may do so, but
then give up the opportunity to speak at
the time at the time when the individual
item is called, or you can wait until
the individual item is called and then
make your comments at that time.
Um, we ask that students or recommend
that students fill out the peach colored
cards and we do give priorities so we
can get you up and and off so you can
get a good night's sleep and be ready
for school tomorrow. Uh, we ask that you
stay on topic and complete your comments
within the allowed time. It is helpful
to us if you state your name at the
beginning of the for the record.
You're not required to, but it's helpful
helpful to us. In order for the board to
conduct its business, we ask that all
attendees refrain from shouting out or
holding side conversations during the
meeting. We generally want to hear from
you, but we can't hear the person at the
podium when others are talking. At least
I can't. If there are disruptions, I
will issue warnings. If disrupt
disruptions continue, I will recess the
meeting. Um ask that those causing the
disruption be removed and if necessary,
clear the room. Um the board's focus is
on student outcomes. We know that this
is important to each person who is here
and we appreciate your presence and
participation. Um I would like to note
that trustees Navaro and Flynn had other
obligations and won't be here. Trustee
Dodge um advised that he will be late
this evening. That brings us to 3.2
pledge of allegiance. Trustee Krasco,
would you lead us, please?
I should also note that there are four
trustees plus our student trustee All
Trustee Allen is here. Um but if any one
of the four trustees leaves the room, we
will have to recess for until that
person comes back. Um, so if we need to
take breaks, we will likely do that as a
recess.
On to 3.3
governing board comments, reports on
standing committee meetings. Um, would
you like to start, Trustee Medina?
>> Sure. Um, I don't have much, but um,
other than happy Mexican Independence
Day. Um to my family that's out there,
please save me a playada for when I get
home. Thank you. And with that, I'll go
ahead and pass my
>> Thank you, Trusty Cross.
>> Um I don't have any comments. Um I'll
just save them for the agenda.
>> Thank you, Trusty Florence.
>> Thank you everyone and welcome. Thank
you for being here with us tonight. Um,
happy Hispanic Heritage Month and I was
able since our last board meeting to
participate in a couple um, Zoom
sessions. Uh, one was for our goals and
guardrails. I want to thank the parents
who participated in that. Um, we love
getting more feedback. Um, and also I
was with uh, Trustee Turley um, for this
week's pre-board meeting listening
session. Um, I love that they do that
and give an extra opportunity to hear
more voices. Unfortunately, we didn't
have anyone show up, but I'm happy that
they keep doing it and I would take ask
the community to take advantage of that
because we're able to have more of a
conversation in that setting um and not
just give you two minutes. Um so, um
that's it for this for right now. Thank
you. Thank you for my comments.
I'd like to address my lack of action at
the last meeting when Trusty Navaro
promoted her campaign from the dis which
is a violation of government code 8314
use of public resources used for
campaigns and ED code 7054
disallows use of district supplies
resources meetings to promote a board
member's candidacy. Trustee Nabaro has
been counseledled about the violation. I
encourage all candidates to read the
Fair Political Practices Act and related
Gov and ED codes that relate to
campaigns as well as the Calrans form
that candidates are required to sign and
send to Calr saying you understand where
you can put signs and where you cannot.
Um candidates are responsible for the
actions of volunteers on their campaign.
Um, and in the future I will do what I
can in the moment when things like that
happen. With that, we will move on to 3
point. Oh, I should ask, do we have
I am so sorry. Um, Trusty Allen,
>> thank you. Okay, I have some updates
from our schools that was able to join
us on our in high meeting. My inner high
meeting is basically me meeting with a
bunch of the ASP students from each
school that are able to join and they
give me updates on each school. It's
kind of a happy update, I think. So, I
was able to meet with uh Pave,
Renaissance, and Apptos. They all had
super successful back to school nights.
Um Pave finished their first rally and
they had a super fun water balloon
rally. Renaissance um won their game for
their co-ed volleyball and they had like
an all-in spirit day where it was um
Hispanic or Latin American jerseys.
ABTOS had uh a has a formal clothing
drive coming up. So students who can't
afford like formal clothing for the
homecoming dance can go there and get
cheap or free formal clothing. Um moving
past those updates, I'm trying super
hard to get student feedback for these
meetings. Um, I've been making Google
forms that kind of uh summarize the
action items and the consent items so
students can read them and try to give
me feedback. I've been struggling a lot
with communication through like my
student trustee email. So once I figure
that out, those would be able to be
spread more widely throughout the
student population. And then along with
those Google forms will come um board
meeting summaries just for my notes that
I'm taking. Just in case students don't
have the time to watch these um often
lengthy meetings, they can try to read
the notes and make some more sense about
what's going on in the district.
>> Thank you,
>> Trusty Turley.
>> Trusty Medina.
>> Yeah. Point of information. Um last week
on Wednesday, did you cancel our agenda
setting meeting?
I didn't schedule it, but I didn't
actually cancel it.
>> So, was there a meeting?
>> Um, I I met with um the superintendent,
but we did not have a group meeting as
we have.
>> Okay. In the future, are you going to
notify the agenda setting when you're
>> I will do that
>> because this is
>> about the fifth time this has happened.
So, if we need to redo the rules so
we're consistent.
>> I think we also need a different time
because Trustee Flynn isn't available at
that time, but let's
>> Okay. Yeah. But, um, that's your
meeting, which us two are in. So, that's
why I'm really worried about this agenda
because you didn't get any of our input
for that. So, I just wanted to put that
on the record. Thank you.
>> And that moves us to 3.4. Superintendent
comments.
Are there any public comments on this
item? No. Okay.
>> Thank you, Sylvest. Um, so first I'd
like to say that on Sunday I went to um
Watsonville Plaza where we celebrated uh
Mexican Independence Day and we had a
lot of people who helped to organize a
really exceptional event and u me and my
family had a really great time. Uh Oscar
Rios I think was the um organizer and it
was really well done and we had some of
our students who got to be backup
dancers for Los Fuos and it was really
fun to watch and there were some great
pictures um that were in the Paharonian
uh this week. So great event and it was
really great to see a lot of people
celebrating Mexican independence this
weekend. Um so for my superintendent's
comments, the data that we are sharing
um this time is the reclassification
rate of our English learners. Uh our
English learners reclassification is
assessment that they take called the
ELPAC. The ELPAC assessment assesses
students on their progress acquiring
English and the goal is to reclassify
showing that they have the command of
the English language. And what is on
this chart right now is showing um
threeyear or fouryear longitudinal data.
The bars show the numbers of students
who reclassified each year at each
school. And so what you see there in the
blue bar is the numbers of students who
reclassified
uh in the 2526 school year. And you'll
notice, I'm not going to call out
percentages or numbers, but I think the
bar, the blue bar speaks for itself that
we had a very high number of students
who reclassified, and that is a great
source of pride. um students when they
reclassify and have a great command of
the English language do better in school
and uh go on to do better in their next
phases of um education hopefully going
on to uh junior college, college or
success in the trades. So we're really
proud of that data. Uh what is also
noteworthy is we always examine so what
what happened there? What did we do to
get these results? One thing is it's not
that we had more students because we've
been in declining enrollment. Um and so
that is not what accounted for that. We
had some very intentional strategies
that we engaged in and English language
development has been something that
we've been working towards over the last
couple years uh to ensure that our
students are progressing. So we're proud
of this data and uh that's the data we
wanted to celebrate uh this evening.
There's just a little bit of a closer
zoomin look for you so that you could
see uh the schools and uh their success
rate at each of them and the numbers of
students that we're looking at for uh
reclassification.
I'll let you look at that for one
minute. Sylvester, can you go back one
more just so everyone can look at it a
little bit closer? Yeah, there you go.
Just so people can see and have a moment
to do some I notices and I wonders.
And the next slide,
there's a more of our elementary
schools, but also into our middle
schools and high schools. And you can
see uh Watsonville High School and PB
High School done an exceptional job. Um
our students who um go into high school
need still needing to take English
language development usually then don't
get to take an elective. And so when we
are able to reclassify them in high
school, that frees up their schedule to
take an elective. And so that's a really
positive um accomplishment when we see
those numbers improve to that extent. So
we're really excited, great hard work by
our schools to get this type of results.
So great job um administrators and
teachers and instructional aids who have
gotten those results.
>> Thank you. That moves us on to 4.1,
approval of agenda. Are there any public
speaker cards?
>> No, there are not.
>> Thank you. Can I have a motion to
approve the agenda?
>> Trusty Turley.
>> Trusty Media.
>> Um, I have a question
for um
8.
Where is it at?
It's the Prop 28 report.
Is that an action? Okay, cool. Um,
>> okay, got it.
So, I would like Oh, yeah. So, a
question that I had before we approve,
um, is there a presentation attached to
item 8.3 other than a single document?
>> There should be.
>> Yep. Y
>> was that supposed to be attached to this
It should be attached.
>> Huh?
>> It wasn't attached.
>> There was only a single document. There
was no detailed numbers how we've been
doing. So,
>> Veronica, do you know about that?
>> Um, it was not attached, but she will be
doing a presentation.
>> Okay.
>> I can attach that if you would like.
>> I would actually like to remove that
from the agenda. So people could
actually look at that presentation and
they could come with questions if they
need to um opposed to just having that
here because that has been something
that this community has really wanted a
deep report on. So I don't feel
comfortable moving forward with that. So
I'd like to remove 8.3
or is it 8.3?
Yes, 8.3. Um until that presentation is
attached
and then also I would like to move up
8.5 to the beginning. um of action
items.
>> Okay. Um for future items, I'd like to
have a motion, a second, and then the
discussion.
>> Um
>> you want me to understand Understand
what you're saying. Is there a pressing
reason why we need to approve 8.3
tonight?
8.3 is the required annual report by CDE
and that is the only template that CDE
provides to for approval by the board
which is required and mandated by
September 30th. If we don't then we will
have to return the money back to CDE.
>> What did I ask you last meeting? It is a
presentation that is because that that
is an action item. The presentation we
have added the presentation but the
action report is not the presentation is
not required. So I'm bringing that
presentation. It is when I come.
>> This is my question. Was the
presentation attached to the agenda so
the public can see.
>> We've already identified that it's not.
So I' I'd like to move on.
>> So I I'm I'm not going to vote for this
if that doesn't get moved. and we have a
special meeting because I want the
community to be able to see that
presentation.
>> I hear what you're saying.
>> Point of order. I don't think somebody
should be speaking.
>> I call on um I I just want to clarify
deep the report that needs to be submit
approved and submitted to the California
Department of Education was included in
the board documents at the time of the
posting of this agenda for review by the
public. Correct.
>> Yes.
>> So that was posted on Friday. The public
had five days to review the actual
report that gets submitted and the
presentation is
>> is an added additional document to help
with the presentation for the public.
Right.
>> Correct.
>> So in order for the agenda to pass, we
need to have four four votes,
which means now Now we can talk about
what are the dates when we could have a
special meeting to talk about Prop 28
that comes before September 30th.
Anybody want to look at their calendars?
>> I don't know what else. Yeah, Trusty
Medina, we we really have fulfilled the
legal obligation and you can see all of
the budgeting, everything that has
happened with Prop 28 in what was
attached on Friday.
>> How many times have I asked you to bring
us a Prop 28 report?
>> That is what is was attached on Friday.
That is the Proposition 28 report. No, I
wanted a slide deck of the information
of what we are doing with our arts
within our community with Prop 28 that
has been emailed to you that has been
asked of you by this community
>> and you have not presented it to us.
>> So, you ask for a report. So, you were
unable to read the report California
Department of Education.
>> I did and you could go around all you
want, but right now I'm the hold out
vote. So unless you guys meet my
standards, I'm going to vote no.
>> Okay. So that leads me back to what is
the date where we're going to have a
special meeting to talk about this
because we have to get it done by
September 30th. Are we giving all that
money back? I don't think we want to
give all that money back.
Um,
next week is staff is not available.
Next week,
>> yes, it
reported
That's what I asked you last week and
you told me with clarity that yes, we
will bring you back that presentation.
>> I'm bringing and the presentation. I am
going to do the presentation
>> and it wasn't attached to the agenda
item so the community could see that and
ask questions about it.
>> Um, it was that this is an action item.
>> I think I've stated what I stated
already. So, I think we need to find a
date. I I think it's clear that we're
not going to change Trustee Medina's
position. I think our only alternative
right now is to schedule a meeting when
we're going to talk about it prior to
September 30th. And it's sounding like
September 30th is our only option for
that. Of course, there is the option of
we take a pause until Trusty Dodge
arrives.
And you know what? Let's try that. We're
going to take a fiveinut recess. We will
be back soon.
>> We're back. Thank you for your patience.
I appreciate it. Um, do trustees Allan
Flores or Carrasco have any suggestions?
Would you like to move on with the
motion that we believe Trustee Medina
will make
so we can at least take care of the
items we're able to take care of?
>> Okay. It's a shame we would have to
potentially lose funds for our students.
>> But if that's um
>> what we have to do, then yes, we do have
other important business to handle.
>> Um if I would like I I would just like
to make a quick statement. Had you met
with me last Wednesday, we could have
ironed this out and got it attached. So
I'm putting this on you for not doing
your due diligence and meeting up with
the agenda setting team to get this
completed. So my motion is to remove
item 8.3 and move item 8.5 up in the
action item.
>> 8.5 already is an action item.
>> I said move it up.
>> Oh, okay.
>> To the beginning.
>> So it's 8.1
>> 8.5 then 8.1.
>> Okay.
>> Then it continues from there.
>> I understand the motion. Is there a
second to the motion?
The motion is to adopt the agenda by
removing
8.3
and moving 8.5
before 8.1, but after public comment and
all that kind of stuff.
>> I'll second that.
>> Okay. I have a motion and a second. All
those in favor signify by saying I. I
see one, two, three, four. Would you
like to vote on this? You can if you
want. Okay, that
>> could have done this 5 minutes ago.
>> I know that is 50-0. So, we are now
moving on to action item on close
session. We did not have a quorum for
close session. So, there were no
actions.
Um, do I need to still read the items?
Should I still read the items?
Okay. So, I don't need to read them out.
All right. Okay. Visitor public comment
6.1. So, these are items that relate to
the school district but are not on this
agenda. Do we have any speaker cards?
>> Okay.
Jocelyn,
Omar Diez, Chris Webb, Tekashi Mazuno,
Brandon Denise.
Haku.
Haku is a chumash greeting word. Its
meaning is hello.
Oh, I'm wearing this necklace tonight.
This necklace is a gift of one of my
Chumash friends. Their Chimash ancestors
started to live and work as a farmworker
family in Paharabari in the 1850s.
They are one of the oldest families in
Pahari.
When I told my to my friends, Amst
Elementary School, which was established
in 1879
and the oldest elementary school of
PBUSD,
might be threatened to be considered for
closing by the sustainable school
advisory committee. They said that their
family members went to Amesty School.
As I said in one of the previous board
meetings in April, there are several
murals in the school. The old oldest one
was painted by Mr. Lar and the fifth
grade students with the support of art
council of Santa Cruz County and Co's
family foundation. Mr. a lot of has too
much cultural root as well as Mexican
cultural root
and there there will be an indigenous
people's day celebration at Sand City on
October 12th.
The celebration has been organized by
their cousin, Chumash cousin and one of
my Chumash friends, dear friend, Miss
Mary Anabon. She's a Chumash elder and
mayor of Sand City. It was she Marian
Cabon that initiated to change Columbus
Day to indigenous people's day in Montre
County, Santa Cruz County and beyond.
So let's honor history and culture of
Chumach people in Parabari including at
Amst Elementary School by protecting ASD
school from closing. Thank you. Thank
you.
>> I'm I'm here as a Watsonville Brown
Beret and I'm here to tell you a story
of a mother um who you're going to hear
from right now. Uh she's also a Brown
Beret and her son is a Watson of a Brown
Beret at the age of six. She's our
youngest bra and we see her come to our
meetings every week walking from work
and shows up with her son and there's a
moment in our meetings where we always
ask what is important to you what do you
want to talk about and her story or her
concerns are always I want to talk about
the lack of resources for my son who's
on the spectrum at schools
she always is is is wants to talk about
the same thing because it's a big
concern to her. She wants to know what's
happening. She wants to know how her son
is going to be given the resources for
him to be successful. She wants to know
how his IP IEP is going to be met.
She wants to know where she could turn
for help.
She's been giving many, many different
stories of people that are not even
qualified that are going to come in to
work with her son, you know. So, this is
a this is a reality of what the cuts is
is doing to our community.
And and to have a school board member
that's not even here today to say that
those students are an expensive
babysitting
uh is is a disgrace because when I see a
mother showing up to my meetings, to our
meetings, crying,
looking for answers, that's not funny at
all. That's that's that should be on
everybody's concern.
So, please give this parent some
answers. Give this community and these
students the answers that they are
looking for.
And on another note, um tomorrow I'll be
taking off to New York, Albany, Albany,
New York. And I will be participating in
a conference where I'll be talking about
the Baharo Valley and the pesticide use.
And I'll be taking all our stories to to
this conference. Thank you.
>> Thank you.
Okay. Hello everyone. Uh my name is
Jocelyn um Silva. Um I'm a mother of a
um stu of a student on the spectrum. And
I just want to reflect a little bit
about the first few weeks of school, how
the um cuts have affected us. Um on the
first day um just on the first day we
had a BT or I'm not even sure what their
title is or what their specific title is
quit on the spot. Um I am concerned to
the lack of with the lack of resources
that our students have. I've seen
unfortunately my son show a little bit
more of aggressive behaviors. I don't
know if he's um if it's due to the
changes that his school has had. I did
see that one of his favorite um BTS was
laid off. Thankfully, she's back, which
I'm I actually almost cried about it. Uh
but yes, there is a lack of resources
for our special ed schools, I mean
students. Um I am concerned for his
behavior. I did see that there's been
more incidents reported among other
parents that I've been talking to. So,
it is really concerning. Please give our
students the resources that they need.
um they deserve better and they're not
it's not glorified
glorified babysitting. It's actually
people students like them that deserve
the opportunity to learn to be part of
the community and um yeah please do
better for our students. Thank you.
>> Good evening. Reacting to broad district
actions within the first week of the
school year, one PBFT member asked me,
"Does the district hate its teachers?"
There are those who would claim they are
prioritizing student outcomes and that
the union presents false information. I
would ask us to reflect on what we've
seen the last year or so, then draw your
own conclusions. Think back to when the
superintendent gave herself a large
raise, about 11%, which should have gone
to her coaching, but went to her pocket.
Then after approving reckless and
destabilizing cuts to student services,
this board approved new coaching money
for her. Contrast this with the PVFT's
actions. We've carried the weight of
negligent and misguided cuts. Then when
it was our time, we made sure to improve
working conditions and codify
enhancements to student services. In the
process, the district insisted on us
sacrificing a raise for settling for a
nominal salary increase. remember who
went to bat for our students and who
appears to be here for themselves. In
spite of TA ratification, I'm annoyed
with the district because the current
leadership has operated in a regressive
manner. Annoyed because the district's
negotiations team was enabled to waste
so much of our time, so much of our tax
dollars, and because the district team
appeared to have zero concern for the
time teachers were losing with their
students to be there. annoyed because
when I've served on that team, it
impacted my relationships with people I
care about and and those people deserve
more. But I want to thank PVFT members
for rallying for the TA even though they
deserve more. I I thank you for proving
that PVF has the integrity and is
genuinely here to support student
outcomes, proving that support for stu
for teachers is support for students.
It's not just a slogan. It's a deeply
held value. I challenge this district to
redeem itself. People expect you to
further attack and undermine education.
Change your behavior and thereby enhance
student outcomes. Enhance equity and
opportunity by bringing a collaboration
period to all compies. Resin the sup
premature, obscene, and fiscally
irresponsible raise. Redistribute it as
a onetime bonus to all staff. Do the
same for the equivalent amount spent on
lawyers for the district's negotiations
team. Get on the PVFs level and prove
with your actions that you are here to
improve student outcomes.
Hold up. Let me get my timer ready.
I'll time myself
and go. God, Chris, way to go. That was
that was fine comments by Mr. Webb
there. Um, I do I'm going to try to
rapid fire get a couple things here.
Prop three, we need to pass a resolution
endorsing Prop Three. Prop 3 is an
extension of the tax on the wealthy that
we see in Prop 55. Since its inception
in 2018, this district has realized $128
million from that proposition. And after
this school year, we'll realize 144.
That resolution brings about $18 million
per school year. So, we need to be on
the same page and fighting at the state
level to get Prop 3 passed. Um, I also
want to speak to um the concerns of our
special ed programs. The layoffs of
instructional aids and BTS have created
so much chaos across this district. Last
year, this board specifically asked if
an audit was done into the amount of
number of one-on-one IIIA minutes. And
would we be able to meet those minutes
post layoffs? You were told yes, and the
community was led to believe that these
cuts wouldn't harm students and we'd be
be able to meet those minutes. Well,
guess what? I know that the district's
audit failed to account for some
one-on-one minutes. So, part of the
challenges we face now are due to
instructional assistants being assigned
who are assigned to classes who are
being pulled to go serve as one-on ones
because the district didn't do their
diligence. And then
even if the district made an honest
honest mistake, you and weren't acting
with mal intent, you all still made a
decision that's harming students and you
made it based off of inaccurate
statements by district officials. That's
abominable. Where is the accountability
here? Um, we also let you know that the
state was making more money available
for SPED and despite that information,
you still pushed through the cuts and
now we're being told, don't worry, we're
actually going to be able to improve our
ratios of students to staff from last
year because the state made this money
available. And it's like, how are we
going to improve on the ratios when
we're still scrambling to fill
positions? I just really hope that you
learn your lesson and we back off of
these layoffs because they're
unnecessary. Thank you. Thank you.
The next five speakers are Cassidy
Sullivan, Cynthia Fernandez, Bobby
Marsha Salt, Sammy Love, and Marilyn
Garrett.
Um, I'm Cassidy Sullivan, special
education provider. After layoffs that
disproportionately impact our special
education programs, the remaining
teachers, providers, and staff across
the district are barely able to keep our
programs safe and clean. Classes are
running on skeleton crews and the staff
go home exhausted and/or in tears every
day. Despite the dire situation, there's
no urgency to rectify the problems from
HR or from the superintendent's office.
Teachers have done everything that they
can and everything that they've been
told to do. They write their horror
stories in calm, professional emails
after long, hard days of kids not
getting what they need. And the district
still has not replaced the critical
staff after four weeks of being told,
"We are working on it. Students and
staff are getting hurt. Students aren't
getting their services. students are
regressing. There are days where all we
can hope for is to maintain safety and
change everyone's diaper.
The rest will require adequate staffing.
Yesterday, we were told that there were
four subs available for 24 absences.
This is a staffing crisis
and it's affecting the most vulnerable
kids in Pave. The district also has not
come clean to parents that the programs
are ineffective and that IEPs are out of
compliance. It turns out when a crisis
occurs, communication is the first
casualty. Isn't it reasonable to request
the support that's prescribed in our
students IEPs? We are asking that our
programs be staffed enough so that we
can provide instruction for our most
complex learners. Will one of you
trustees please ask the superintendent
when our programs will be staffed and
restored? Can you speak for the children
that this district is underserving? Can
you ask on behalf of the parents who may
not be able to advocate for their
child's right to a free and appropriate
education under the law? Please ask
these questions because when teachers
and families are asking, we are not
getting answers. Thank you.
Good evening board. Uh good to see you
all. As Brandon mentioned, I did want to
mention that you got email today about I
would love to see on the next agenda an
endorsement of Prop 3. As he mentioned
over $18 million every year that that
brings in for our district. Um, Trusty
Flores, one thing I've agreed with you
on is that we all need to work more at
the state level, right, to advocate.
This is a great opportunity to do that.
It is the business of the board. So,
let's do that together. While I'm here
also, and that would have been a great
comment during employee organization.
Um, I also will say I want to thank real
quick Mr. Herbs for his help working on
an issue at our school. Even after
everything we went through last year,
all of our teachers who do letters at
WCSA were not paid for their time this
past month. Uh, it was an error. It was
tracked down. So, I appreciate your help
on that and making that right. I will
ask that I hope we can find a way to do
that pronto, not wait another month
because $1,500 is a lot of money that
people expect and they budget for. And
if that has to wait another month, it
needs to come with uh daily legal
interest. All right. Uh and last thing
I'll say while I'm here because I have a
moment. Um I understand some of you
don't like the process or how it works,
but I do have to admit that Trusty
Medina is not wrong on 8.3. I tried to
look at that item. I know other teachers
who tried to look at that item. I know
other arts advocates who tried to look
at it and there was very very little
information on there and there needed to
be that presentation uploaded so that we
can ask those questions. Um, so while I
recognize it is very disappointing how
it went down, that should have been
there because I came to speak to that
with ideas of what I wanted to ask but
not really knowing what the information
was because while you said you couldn't
tell from those numbers, maybe you got
more info, but the public info, very
little on that. There's not much to
speak of. So, thank you for your time.
>> Good evening. My name is Cynthia
Fernandez and I am a parent at a hy. I
am deeply concerned and here to address
a critical equity gap at our school.
Twothirds of our students are enrolled
in late exit dual language program. Yet
the current support structure is
mismatched to this reality. Hyde only
has an Englishonly teacher for reading
intervention. Kinder through second
grade is a fundamental foundation of a
child's education. When the school fails
to provide targeted primary language
intervention early on, we risk widening
an achievement gap for the early
learners. Our students deserve an
intervention specialist who not only
understands the linguistic nuances of
their dual language instruction, but is
also able to provide intervention
support in their primary language.
Please prioritize the allocation of
funds for a full-time bilingual reading
intervention teacher by investing here.
We ensure that our staffing resources
truly reflect the district's commitment
to bilingual excellence. Thank you for
your time and your dedication for our
success as students.
>> Hi, I'm Sammy Love.
First time speaker, longtime listener.
Uh, so I uh totally started the wrong
stopwatch. Anyhow, um, hi. I'm an
education specialist. Some of you know
me, some of you don't. Uh, I like to
believe that I am solutionoriented
and I don't really make big complaints.
I think anybody who knows me is like,
Sammmyy's a cool cucumber. I do find
this job hard without the right help. Uh
some people know I have a nursing degree
from s University of San Francisco. I
used to work in tech. So when I say I'm
solutionoriented and I am resourced. I
mean I am a creative thinker. I like to
get things done. I like to do it myself.
I like to win.
If I have what I need to do my job, even
if I have most of what I need, I am
almost always successful.
And I I will say so far this year I have
been bitten, stabbed, I've been hit with
a trash can. That was yesterday. Broke
my cell phone. Thank you, student. I
have been kicked. I have had to stop a
couple of stabbings, a couple of fist
fights. Uh I've had to evacuate evacuate
my room a couple times. I did not have a
classroom aid for the first two and a
half weeks. I would like to do my
casework, but when am I supposed to do
that? Do I keep my kids and they don't
get art and music or do I go with them
to art and music and help support?
These are tough decisions. Guess what?
They went to art and music and they had
me there.
Um yeah, I um I do appreciate the help
that I do get. I do appreciate when I
feel heard. Um my kids did get speech
for the first time today, day 24. That
person is going to be here on Wednesdays
running a couple of sessions and then
I'm going to have to help support them
virtually on Friday because they don't
come in. So, I'm going to have to run
that for them in my classroom. And I
guess that's my time.
>> Thank you,
>> Marilyn Garrett. advocating for a safe
and healthy learning and working
environment.
We need education,
not radiation.
And personally, it's very painful for me
here with all the Wi-Fi, cell phones,
antennas on the roof, and I will not
stay long for that reason. We all have
symptoms of microwave radiation
poisoning whether people are aware of it
or not. I call to your attention a new
document
dated September 10th of this year.
International Scientific Commission
calls for urgent action to protect
children's health from cell phone cell
towers, power lines, and nonionizing
electromagnetic field exposure.
Drawing on decades of scientific
research, the experts conclude that
children's rapidly increasing exposure
to cell phones, wireless networks like
you have all over
power lines and other sources of
nonicing
electromagnetic fields requires
immediate public health action. The
technology shaping our future should not
compromise the health of the next
generation. We need wired
computers
and not radiation exposure. This is
harmful. You've been told this and
supplied documents numerous times. Don't
sit there and act like poisoning
children with radiation
is a good educational policy.
Thank you, Mrs. Garrett.
>> Next is 6.2 public comment on agenda
items. So, these are people who don't
want to stay for the rest of the meeting
when your item comes up, but you want to
be able to address the board. How many
cards do we have?
>> We have five. So I'll call all of you up
at once. I have Chris Webb, Tekashi
Mazuno, Mads Ramuo, Marilyn Garrett, and
Bobby Marshaalt.
>> Can I start?
This will be my last public comment
related to Sabre which I have been
concerned about since I advocated in the
Watsonville city council meetings in
2023 for Sabre to be to be able to
continue to operate at the current
place. I'm speaking tonight now to the
students and the parents of Sabre.
At first an idea to restructure saber
did not come from myself. I heard an
idea about an idea from a former teacher
of Sabre. The previous interim
superintendent of PBSD agreed with this
idea.
Since then I have communicated with the
members of the board of both PBUSD and
Sabre since early this year. Secondly,
regarding the proposal which I made in
the previous board meeting, it is not to
force the current students of Sabre to
switch to other schools of PBSC.
It is to reduce the number of students
whom Sabre will accept annually and
gradually between 2027 and 2032
in order to help address the problem of
declining enrollment in PBSD schools. I
believe that it is time for saber to
help students and parents as well as
teachers and classified staff of other
schools of PBSD.
This is a practice of decipity
is one of the core values of indigenous
cultures. I remember saber is ingenious
word for plant in El Salvador or Mexico.
I'm not sure but please remember the
name of Sabre
students of parents of Sabre. Thank you.
Thank you.
uh regarding 10.5 and 10.7 I'm I'm
concerned we might be supplanting the
work of uh PVFT members and then uh also
in light of an arrest that was made at
Watsonville High between the last
meeting and now I'm left wondering could
we have prevented that negative student
outcome had we still have our uh mental
health conditions and our social
emotional counselor at Watsonville High.
Um, also for 92, um, I I just want to
share something that, um, from from my
time at the California Continuing
Education Conference when, um, my
favorite school got uh, awarded a model
designation. U, one of the things they
had said was with um, with continuation
schools that it's appropriate like
really well, always we should be you
teach what you're credentialed for,
right? That should be the rule. And like
in the cituation world, the one area
where they allowed some leeway was for
art and PE.
So I just want to make sure we're we're
all schools that we always have people
who are um qualified to teach what
they're supposed to be teaching. Also
for 9.4
um as just a one of the one of the
standard protocols should just be that
we we allow public if you put in a card
you speak right the scout rule that we
we established. Now maybe you got to
restrict time fine but because of a vast
number also if you got a lot of people
coming probably you weren't doing enough
outreach between meetings. Um also
another just normal uh practice should
be that
really weekly but now we're we've we
used to do it um where it was just
before the board meeting but now we're
we've strayed from that. So we're
regressing even since this new era that
the PVFT president and the
superintendent should meet weekly. We're
we're getting away from that. Lastly, I
just want to say that for um 7.1 that uh
the incumbent for uh Renaissance, they
they lost my support by being a rubber
stamp and for not really valuing that
school enough.
>> Thank you.
>> Good evening, Mads Mutoo parent. Um
maybe I'm going to start with um 9.1
extended learning summer program. Jen
Bruno, I really want to compliment the
work that's been done there by the
extended learning program at the
district and what a great example of
working across departments at the
district and the work that they've done
with special education um both for the
summer program and into the school year.
I'm so appreciative of you and I hope
other departments can find a way to
follow that model. Um I also want to
compliment and commend many of the our
teachers and classified staff site
administrators for going above and
beyond at the beginning of this school
year. Um you've got 9.2 Williams Act
compliance. Um I submitted a request
about three weeks ago um to understand
um staffing for special education who's
credentialed, what openings there are.
Um HR has failed to get that back to me
um since then. And um it was a legal
request as well. So you're well past the
10 days. Um the school year's been off
to a rough start. We really depended on
teachers and educators, classified staff
going above and beyond. I feel like
we're taking advantage of them. Um, when
160 physicians were eliminated, we were
told there would be a continu continuity
of care plan.
Clearly, there wasn't. Um, if you've
visited any any of the sites and seen
what this first month has been like,
I've witnessed teachers breaking down
and crying. I've watched administrators
be more stressed than they ever have
been. Um, and it it's really
disheartening that that's how we're
starting the school year. We already
have a hard time recruiting um,
especially for special ed to be burning
them out in the first month um, is
really poor practice. So, I am hopeful
with this new team that you've got um,
with SULPA. I just hope that um, we can
listen to their recommendations going
into next year.
>> Thank you.
I just wanted to speak to the um uh
sustainable schools committee update
that's coming up. Looking at the
materials for last night's meeting,
there is the slide deck on designing
school systems, one that's been used in
the past. If you look at slide 51 and
52, it shows a model and I'm just
concerned about this. I hope you'll take
a look. Um as it shows a model for
middle schools, it shows over a thousand
students at a middle school. And on the
breakdown on the right, it says one FTE
arts teacher with Prop 28. Want to
remind you that is not how Prop 28
works. That would be a loss of arts for
our students. So, please make sure
you're looking at that because that
information is faulty in there. I
understand that this board actually or
our staff applied for a CSBA award for
our VAPA arts for all programs. Um, I
would still like to know most of this
board voted to get rid of a full-time
theater teacher when we only had four in
the district and that was never
replaced. I don't believe the principles
knew that was happening and we're the
princ it was prop 28 funded which
principles should be deciding where that
goes because of that. For example, and
sold to elementary, we talk about arts
for all. All those students had arts
last year. They all had music and most
if not all had theater. This year only
TK to second grade gets music. That is
it at that school and that is because of
that decision directly. Same thing
happened at Lake View Middle where her
other site was. There was less art when
the year started. I know they hired an
art teacher last week. I don't know
where that's at, but these are things
that you need to look at as you look at
Prop 28. Why are we losing arts when
this should be expanding? And we should
not be given any awards because we have
great teachers who are doing great
things. But until the board and the
district can support those things and
that includes things like in that slide
recognizing that we can't do a whole
middle school with one arts teacher, we
don't deserve an award for that. Okay.
Thank you.
want to speak to item 10.12,
the proposal to put artificial turf at
Rolling Hills Middle School. This is
toxic turf.
And at your December meeting,
that's not funny, Superintendent
Contraras. Not at all funny. I want to
quote from Ralph Dater radio hour where
he interviewed the author of Beyond
Plastics
and this is titled the problem with tra
um plastic. Ralph Nater stated states I
want to shake up our listeners because I
was shaken when I read this. On page
135, you said under a subpar paragraph,
artificial plastic turfs. Can you think
of a sadder world than one where our
green spaces are replaced with plastic
artificial grass? We can't. Somehow the
plastics industry has been able to
convince an increasing number of
communities, schools, businesses that
they should install this horrible stuff
and it talks what it what it consists
of. And I gave copies of this to the
board members last December.
Ralph Nater asks, I want to ask you what
are the deadly cancercausing chemicals
in synthetic turf? Well, there is a lot
replies you to think benzene, arsenic,
styrene. These are all known human
carcinogens. We've got polyic aromic
hydrocarbons,
cadmium, a known carcinogen.
Chromium. This just goes on and on
and kids should not be playing with
this. Thank you. Gave you a copy because
you weren't here the last time. Thank
you. Vote no on this. Don't poison
children.
>> Toxic turf.
>> That's your time. Thank you.
>> That moves us to 7.1. Parro Valley
Federation of Teachers.
All right. So, thank you to the board
for giving us this time on the agenda. I
want to congratulate and express my deep
respect for the members of the PBFT. We
fought hard for a fair contract with no
benefits cap and we won. This victory is
due to the hard work of our negotiations
team, the actions of our organized
membership, because it was the pressure
that they put on this district that
brought you back to the table. This
victory took each and every one of us.
This contract put students first across
the entire district. Could we have
gotten an extra 1% if we gave up the
fight for two hours of instructional aid
support for our kinder classes?
Probably. But we aimed to negotiate for
our students' learning conditions and
not just our salary. The reality is that
a benefits cap would have been
devastating for our entire membership
and the community. Our pay would have
been cut and educators would have been
forced out of this area, leaving
students with empty classes. Our team
prioritized members and students across
the entire district over any one
particular issue or school site. In this
contract, we won no cap a 4% increase to
our salary schedule, two hours of Kinder
IIA time, a sped case management prep
for our ED specialist at the secondary
level, the ability to save 10 of our
sick days when we take pregnancy or
paternity leave, the palace stipen back,
optional work days, limits on what
department chairs can be asked to do,
increasing union time and staff meetings
by five minutes, and a whole host of
other wins. The PVFT worked tirelessly
over the last three weeks to engage in
an open and honest ratification process.
And at the end of the day, the proof is
in the pudding and we have a ratified
contract.
The negotiations team was intentional
about taking these agreements to our rep
council for initial approval. The
executive and site rep councils sought
to empower and trust our members to
ratify this agreement without us making
a top- down endorsement and telling you
how to vote. We uploaded all of the
agreements onto our public website. We
held a town hall online that was
intended by over 260 members. We had
three in-person town halls and we got
out and visited most of our school
sites. We followed our bylaws to a t. We
had 693 members vote, up 11% over the
last cycle and 20% over the cycle before
that. We ratified this contract with an
85% majority yes vote. That is a
mandate. Everyone, I will acknowledge
that the 15% who voted no, you all
matter and this is your union as much as
it is the yes voters. I've been out to
Aptas High School twice since reaching
these tenative agreements and I know
that we have a lot of work to do moving
forward and building an equitable bell
schedule. I know we have members who not
only wanted no cap, but you wanted a big
raise. I know we have members and
leaders who take issue with
representative democracy, our bylaws,
and wanted to use a strike as a tool
towards a better agreement instead of as
a last resort. I would encourage all of
you to lean in with us, keep organizing
with us, together. We have so much work
to do and we need to stay together as we
move forward. If our job as unionists is
to represent the will of our members
over our own personal and political
philosophies, then our members by and
large have spoken. It is our duty to
work on their behalf. Let us not be
prisoners of the moment or let
perfection be the enemy of progress. We
all should be celebrating the progress
that the PBFT has been making in
developing an organizing culture. We
will be launching an education campaign
followed by an enforcement phase. So
once these contracts or these agreements
become contract, we are expecting the
district to implement those changes. If
you're not getting our kinder teachers
two hours of IIA supports a day, we'll
grieve that. If you're not fixing our
schedules to give us that case
management prep, we'll grieve that. So
you all better be ready that when these
contracts when you approve them at the
next board meeting, we're ready to
enforce those agreements.
We also need to build out a better
benefits committee. We need to get our
secondary teachers together to fight for
equitable bell schedules for all. We
need to grow our bargaining team to
include a member from each school site
and each department because that's the
path forward and it's going to take all
of us working in solidarity together.
This is only the beginning of this
movement and come 2728
that 2829 school year when we're
negotiating a new agreement we're going
to be back bigger stronger and more
prepared so that if we have to strike we
will absolutely be ready. So let's work
together PBFT and district because we
have a lot of work to do and we can do
it together. Thank you.
California School Employees Association.
>> It's It's public comment already. So, we
don't allow
>> You're not supposed to speak on this.
It's public comment.
>> Go ahead, please.
Thank you. Good evening, President
Turley. Trustee, Superintendent
Conturus, staff and community. My name
is Ashley Euro Flowers, president of
CSEA Chapter 132, representing the
classified professionals who keep PBSD
operating every day. Tonight's agenda
reflects several decisions that directly
affect classified employees, our working
conditions, and the services students
receive. First, CSEA supports a com
comprehensive classified classification
and compensation study. We've been
asking for it for 10 years. This review
is overdue. Our employees duties have
changed significantly because of
technology, new legal requirements,
staffing reductions, and duties added
after positions were eliminated.
However, this study must be more than a
consult that we hire reviewing job
descriptions from a desk. Right? CSEA
must be included throughout the process.
The employees must have a meaningful
opportunity to explain the work they
actually perform and not what their job
description says. The study must examine
the internal alignment, regional market
competitiveness,
recruitment and retention, bilingual and
specialized responsibilities, and years
of uncompensated duty growth. We also
need safeguards against using this study
to consolidate jobs. Eliminating
classifications or justifying employees
doing more with absolutely less.
Classification accuracy is not just an
efficiency exercise. It's about equid
equity, legal compliance, and fair
compensation.
As the board reviews the unodudited
actuals and receives the sustainable
school updates, please remember that
classified staffing cannot be treated as
a number on a spreadsheet. We've learned
the hard way that that is not the case.
Following layoffs and reductions, we are
already seeing the operational
consequences and it is detrimental. My
people are suffering.
Offices are overwhelmed. Health offices
and coverages are inconsistent.
Employees are being asked to work
outside of their classifications.
Healthcare assistants are covering front
offices during their breaks and lunches.
Library media technicians are directed
to cover things that they should not be
directed to cover. Certificated
substitutes have been used in special
education settings to perform work
aligned with classification study
classifications that align with
classified staff. These are not
sustainable staffing solutions. Before
considering further reductions, school
consolidations or program restructuring,
the board must require
transparent staffing data provided.
It needs to be provided by department
classification and that review must be
and must have actual vacancies,
workload, student needs, legal
requirements, if anybody working out of
class, and the staffing lost through the
most recent layoffs. The district cannot
identify an optimal school model without
first defining the classified staffing
requirements that need and we need to
operate schools safely and effectively.
Tonight's agenda includes contracts for
outside staffing for special services.
CSEA understands the need to maintain
student services with legitimate vacancy
when legitimate vacancies cannot be
filled. But contractors should never
become a permanent solution for
recruiting, retaining, scheduling, and
fairly compensating district employees.
We are drowning.
The proposed Wolf School agreement
raises important questions, but we want
to know who's going to who's going to
contract who's contracting this staff
and this duties that these staff will
perform. Uh what qualifications and
supervision will be required? has the
district offered those hours and
opportunities to qualified bargaining
unit employees. The agenda also includes
additional instructional pay for
certificated employees um supporting
expanded learning. I love expanded
learning, but CSCA supports employees
being compensated for that additional
work in the classified workforce.
That same principle must apply to
classified employees who operate,
supervise, coordinate, deliver expanded
ser service learning services every
single day. We work until 6:30 7 8:00 at
night. Grant funding does not erase
bargaining unit work for the
Jen has worked very hard to try to work
with us and has met been met with many
roadblocks. So we appreciate that
opportunity, but we need to be able to
operate in parody across all districts,
not just expanded learning, not just
SULPA.
CSEA wants to be a partner in solving
these challenges. We want timely
consultation, accurate information,
respect for our collective bargaining
unit agreement, and meaningful
involvement. Our classified
professionals are not simply a cost to
manage. We are the people that love our
students and love our students fiercely.
Thank you. Thank you.
>> Next is 7.3 Communication Workers of
America, the Substitutes.
Is anyone here representing
CWA?
Okay. Okay. Not seeing anybody. We'll
move on to action items. Um when we
adopted the agenda, we said that we
would take 8.5
first um approve the charter renewal
petition for SA College Preparatory
Academy for the period July 1st, 2027
through June 30th, 2023. Presentation
will be by Chrissy Mlan, director of
alternative education. Um we ask that
you keep the report within five minutes
as stated on the agenda.
Good evening, President Turley,
Superintendent Contes, Board of
Trustees, and community. My name is
Chrissy Mlan, and today I am here to
bring forth the approval for the charter
renewal petition for SAB. Um la in the
last meeting we presented um the the
petition and Sabre was able to come and
present information to the board allowed
you all to ask some questions and then
um you received the um report the PBSD
report um on the renewal petition and so
you hopefully you've had been able to
look over it. you had it I believe it we
gave it to you about two weeks ago and
so tonight we are asking you to approve
that petition what's in line with our
findings in the report.
So with that we ask that you rep approve
the charter charter renewal.
>> Thank you. Are there any public speaker
cards? There are and um we do have one
that will require translation. Uh
Cynthia Himenez
notice.
Okay.
Hi. Um, I'm Christina. I'm proud I'm
proud mom to two students at SA.
and I'm here to ask for the approval um
for the petition
um for our school. Um really happy um to
be here and advocate for this. My
daughter um really wants to go to
university. That's her goal right now.
And as I'm mom, I firmly believe that
education is the way, is the most
important, and it's a nonnegotiable. And
that's what SA is giving us, a really
high quality education for our kids.
And I speak for um all parents too. I
believe we all think the same thing. We
all want the best as um family members.
Um we want the best for um our future,
our children's future. And um I really
don't see the point of being here and um
trying to vote for the continuation of
an excellent school. I think we should
be voting for um opening more schools
that are as excellent as SA is.
So, please um approve um this item.
>> And that's all. And we hope that you
vote yes.
Our next speaker is Fabian Lenor.
Get my reading glasses.
Good evening board of trustees. My name
is Favonor and I'm a community advocate
and also a SA parent and a proud
graduate of SA College uh class of 2023.
And then I have another son that's a
junior now and he's graduating in 2029.
Um
the reason I'm here tonight is to
express my strong support for uh for
this reertification of Saba College
Prep. This institution has been pivot a
pivotal force in shaping the educational
landscape in our community
and its continued operations is
essential for the success of our
students
for our student success and and and at
large in our community. SA Prep has
consistent consistently demonstrated a
commitment to the academic excellence,
empowering students to reach their full
potential and school innovative
curriculum and a dedicated staff has um
that have fostered an environment where
students not only thrive academically
but also develop essential skills, life
skills.
The positive impact of SA extends beyond
the classroom. Its students are engaged
and res uh engaged responsible citizens
who contribute to the strengthening and
vibrancy of our community.
By uh reertificating uh reertification
of SA College Prep, you will uh you will
be endorsing a model of education that
prioritizes
the the student success and community
engagement.
The school has built a strong foundation
that supports our youth and is crucial
that we sustain the momentum and the
potential of future generations to
benefit SA's unique approach and cannot
be overstated. I urge you to vote yes on
action item 8.5. Thank you.
>> Thank you.
That's it for cards. Um, can I have a
motion to approve?
>> I move to approve.
>> I hear a motion to approve. Is there a
second?
>> I saw Trusty Medina's hand first, so
Trusty Medina seconds. Um, are there any
board comments? I'll start with Trustee
Carrasco,
Trustee Allen,
Trustee Flores, and Trusty Medina.
>> Of course, I got to say something.
um this is in my area. So, um it looked
like it's going to pass. And um I also
just want to say too, you know, my
sister attended Saba. Um it's a great
school. She needed that small learning
environment and it really benefited her.
So, um it is a gem in our area. I wish
it was at a better location. All right,
I'm gonna say that. I wish it was at a
better location. Um, and hopefully in
the future we could kind of figure that
out because I wanted to, you know, um,
have more resources for the students,
like a big field, um, where students
could play and participate in sports,
right? And it doesn't jam up that area
in the morning. My grandma got stuck
there one time, and she got a lot to say
to you, Mr. Rip, but I'll keep her away
for right now. Um, but other than that,
uh, keep doing what you're doing.
Improve those English scores. And also
too, just remember too, the students and
the staff are just as important. That
culture there um also needs to expand
itself to the staff that may be feeling
a certain type of way, right? And every
family, right, has its problems. Um but
just navigate that as best you can so
people feel heard. Um and I think um it
it will be off to a really good start,
you know, with the staff. So that would
be my only comment. Congratulations on
that. It looks like it's going to pass,
but um we'll wait for the vote. Thank
you.
>> Thank you.
>> All those in favor signify by saying I.
>> One, two, three, four, five. Motion
carries. 5 Z
3.
>> And now we're back to 8.1 approve.
Oh, I just uh I just want to thank the
board of trustees, superintendent
contraras for your time agenda us
agendaizing us these last two meetings.
The SA community means a lot to all of
us, including me. I've been there 11
years. I'm really proud of what we've
done, and I'm excited to see what we can
do moving forward. Okay. Thank you.
>> And with that, we move back to 8.1
approved 2025 26 unudited actual report.
The report will be presented by Alexis
Persley, director of fiscal services,
and Douglas Craner, consultant.
>> Maybe we'll pause for a minute while the
kind of filtering out.
Actually,
I'm going
Oh, do I do I
>> cool? Thank you.
It's not too bad.
I'm going to apologize to you again.
We're going to do one readout. Um,
>> okay. Thank you. I should have done this
earlier. Um, okay. Announcement number
one and the only one. Nick Bach,
coordinator, student services. Are you
here with us, Nick? Hello, Nick. U PVUSD
is pleased to announce the selection of
Nick Beckage as the new coordinator of
student services.
>> Nick most recently served as vice
principal of grades K through two at
Navigator Schools where he led school
culture operations and instructional
improvement. After joining Navigator
Schools in 2014, he progressed from
teacher in training and classroom
teacher to vice principal of culture and
operations and grade level vice
principal. His administrative experience
in including implementing schoolwide
positive behavior systems, supervising
staff, overseeing daily operations, and
leading multi-tered systems of support
for academics, behavior, and social
emotional development. Mr. Beckage
earned a master's degree in education
leadership and a preliminary
administrative services credential from
Brandman University. He also holds a
bachelor of arts in history from Arizona
State University and a California
multiple subject teaching credential
from Cal State Teach at California State
University Mterrey Bay. He completed his
credential clearance induction through
the Santa Cruz Silicon Valley New
Teacher Project. We are excited to
welcome Nick to PBSD. Welcome
Okay, now we're at 8.1 approved 202526
unodudited actuals.
>> Great.
>> Tell us where the money.
>> Okay, there we go. Well, thank you board
and superintendent, members of community
and and staff. Thank you again. Um,
tonight I will be presenting the un
actuals for 2526. Um, it's I'd like to
note that my involvement in the unodit
actuals was significantly less than last
last year. Miss Pley has done an
excellent job learning what she needed
to learn last year and she took it led
her team and developed a great um
product and then I came in just to kind
of like review and follow questions
which which that's the goal right to
phase the consultant out and and so she
did a lot of that by her by herself as
well as with her um with her her staff.
So I wanted to put that out there. So um
good job Miss Pley. So, but tonight I'm
just uh presenting it and um I'll be
going just an overview. This is going to
be like a similar presentation that that
you've seen last year and it kind of
follows the same theme as the um
interims um financial highlights the
I'll go be going over the general fund
revenue and expenditure categories
education protection account um
contributions um from the unrestricted
general fund um general fund activity
reconciliation components in general
fund balance fund group summaries next
steps and of course address any
questions but as usual if you have any
questions um during the presentation
feel free to ask and again this is just
really just a summary of of the
narrative and the financials that were
that were uploaded.
Um so the 2526 unodited actual
go. So it reflects the um the um
district activity and financial position
through June June 30th of 2026 and also
contains detailed supplemental
information um education code requires
the districts close their books um and
adopt a report of financial um
activities of positions by September
15th. Please note that even though the
board is acting on it today, it was um
sent to the county office um prior to
the 15th and the um information of
course is submitted to Santa Cruz can
house of ed and forwarded to the
California Department of Education for
their review.
So um here's some um financial
highlights. The actual ADA for 2526 was
um 13,550.
However, due to declining enrollment, um
the funded ADA was closer to to 14,000.
Um and that was based on the average,
there's a new rule that came into place
a few years ago where um if you're
declining enrollment, you either get the
greater of the prior three averages or
the or the last year. So, we took
advantage of the prior three averages.
Um, also it's important to note that the
expand expanded learning implemented an
expansive attendance recovery program
which definitely did um increase the um
the ADA. Now since we're declining ADA
that that impact will be um seen in
subsequent years um but um that would
that played a key role in um in the
multi-year projections at um at um at
adopted budget and also at first um
first interim for next year.
Um during the fiscal year property taxes
um we received aboutund 107.4 4 million,
an increase of about 5 million from the
prior year. And of that amount,
approximately 11.3 represented property
taxes net to the charter schools. So
charter schools don't get property
taxes. They it gets funneled through the
um the parro valley um unified school
district. And um that way there's more
of a constant cash flow rather than um
um intermittent. So it just helps with
with cash flow. And then what's
important to note that any amounts any
property taxes forwarded to the charter
schools, the the school district gets
gets it back in state aid. So it's a
balancing game. So, you know, the
district will always get an X amount,
but it's just made up of different
different types of flowers. That's kind
of like the analogy. You know, they're
going to get 12 flowers, some will be
tulips, some will be roses. If they give
more tulips, they'll get more roses.
Does that make sense? Okay. The district
um recorded approximately 4.6 6 million
um dollars um of district um operational
support which includes oversight costs
from the charter schools. So they um get
um oversight cost as well as direct cost
from them. Um lottery revenue was
$200.41
$20041
per ADA for unrestricted purposes and
$95 for restricted purposes. That
resulted about 2.7 million um for
unrestricted purposes and 1.2 for
restricted. Um please note that the 2.7
does in encounter um any adjustments
from the 24 2425 um projections done.
Then
the mandated block grant relating to
school districts was $39
for um K8 ADA and $7648 for 912 ADA. And
that's funded on the prior year ADA. was
based actually on the 242588, not 2526.
Um the district's food service program
was self-sufficient. I mean, it did
deficit spend a little bit, but it went
into its own um savings account to
absorb that that small deficit spending.
So, um the the uh the general fund
wasn't required to um give any food food
service assistance to the the cafeteria
program. So, they're for all intent
purposes acting like a business, right?
So, they're self-sufficient. Um and
except for all um except for what I'll
be going over on the contributions to
research programs, all the other um
federal and state categorical programs
were self-unded.
Here's just a snapshot of the general
fund revenue combined. It was um 66% for
general purpose. That's pretty much your
your your money from your ADA, the local
control funding formula.
um federal revenues um 7% and other
state revenues 24 and other local at 3%.
There's just a little short little
description of what comprises of all
those for general fund expenditures. Um
here's just a graphical representation
of how that was spent. Um approximately
89% of general fund expenditures was
comprised of salary and benefits. And
when you look at um combined it was 81%.
A little bit less because there's more
um contracted services in the in the
programs that um that are grant funded.
And here's a snapshot of the education
protection account. Um the actually when
it was all said and done based on
calculations the district received um
about the the general fund received 6.6
6 million and spent 6.4 with a carryover
of 654 for total 790. You'll note that
there were various um
that's right doesn't work on these
screens. Um there were various amounts
with zeros because what happened was the
pro the initial um education protection
account revenues were a lot higher
during that we were getting from from
the from the state. But then when
everything was tabulated they're like
okay actually you're not getting you
know 14 million you're actually getting
six. Now again, that wasn't a reduction
of our gross revenues. It goes back to
the flower example. You know, since we
went from 18 roses to six roses, then we
were just back filled with with some
tulips.
So, it's just so that's why we didn't
there there are no there's zeros in
various um
um categories because there wasn't
enough to do that.
Oops.
There we go. Um, earlier I said that
most of the programs were self-funded
except for a few. Here's the handful.
Um, there was a district portion
relating to the local electric vehicle
infrastructure grant, restricted
maintenance account, and other
facilities. we actually have to by by
law contribute 3% of total general fund
um expenditures and alco to restricted
maintenance because the state says well
if we're going to give you funds for
your buildings you're going to have to
be able to upkeep them and by doing that
we have to make sure that you put funds
into that special account. So that's
what that is and then special education
was 30.2 for a total of 41.4 million.
Here's just the snapshot of the general
fund summary. Notice um kind of like in
the kind of green. It's kind of light,
but um the actual the um district
unrestricted general fund deficit spent
by about 2.5 million. Restricted was um
3.4 for a total of six um about $6
million which resulted in an ending
general fund balance of um of 100
million.
So um and that
um let me go back a million and then the
2.5. So at estimated actuals
um it was projected at to deficit spend
by 11.5 million um and it was 2 point we
ended up deficit spending by 2.6 so for
a difference of around $9 million.
And on page
u page five it here's just a summary of
what was in page five. So interest
related and other local revenue
accounted for about 1.8. Um during the
the last part of 2526
um it was
district administration was going to
contribute um additional funds to the
retirey benefit fund because that trust
is actually significantly underfunded.
>> Yeah. So, um, eventually we're going to
want to start doing something and
actually funding that because right now
there's enough pretty much money goes
into the trust to pay for current
retirees then it kind kind of comes out
but eventually want to um want to want
to increase that but that was deferred
just based on um projections and once
you put it in the trust you can't take
it out for any other purposes except for
paying for retirey benefits. So that
decision was deferred and it'll be um
looked at again in 2627.
Um there are operating cost savings
relating to the following utilities, bus
repairs and other operating um
activities um legal and other
administrative costs utilizing one-time
restricted resources and other contracts
um not expended as projected. So, um
that will definitely be a goal of next
year to limit that that variance. Um
probably the one that would be um not
limited would be like utilizing one time
restricted resources because as you're
closing your books, you see what those
balances are. You see what you can shift
over to those restricted funds to free
up that unrestricted. That happens every
year. But um with utilities and other
other contracts kind of like you know
you have your plan at the beginning of
the year and then during the year you
just want to just kind of chew those up
a little bit more. So then you have just
not as a big variance at the end of the
year
um where there are less contributions to
special education restricted maintenance
count than was projected. And because
the restricted general fund spent less
than projected, that resulted in the
unrestricted general fund receiving less
um less indirect cost support, which is
normal
and other net adjustments of 181. So
that total the 8.9 million. And again on
five of five of 34, each item is
detailed out with a specific number.
Before I um I explained that we ended up
with an ending fund balance of 100 100
million. Here's the components of that
100 million. So 250 is revolving cash.
We had stores of 31,000, prepaid
expenditures of 21, legally restricted
of 40.7, stabilization commitment 15.2,
assignments 33, and um your economic
uncertainty reserve of 10.4 for an
unassigned general of 464. and the
specific amounts like that 40 40.7 is
detailed in the in that packet. I just
figure we don't want to waste this
evening just to read the packet, right?
Um and really just to address any
questions. And then the um assignments,
the same thing. It's assignments by by
category.
Oops.
And then here's just the um just a quick
summary of the fund groups. So the
special revenue funds which includes
like food services, deferred maintenance
and so forth ended with um 33 million um
capital project funds 81 um debt service
funds at 27. Um please note that the
debt service funds is really it's
primarily relates to um bonds that were
issued and that we're paying back. So
really the board really can't go oh 27
million let's spend that for this. Well,
it's really just a pass through because
they are the district's bonds. So, we
have to record that in our um financial
activity, but it's really not at the
board's discretion on how to spend
because they've already been sold. The
money collect the taxes are collected,
put into the district account, and then
it gets paid through there. So, really,
it's a big pass through account. That's
majority of it. And then proprietary
funds at 10 and fiduciary funds at 2.6
for a total of 256.
So the next steps are
um every school district must conduct a
independent audit. So they'll be out
here in the fall to audit the unodudited
actuals and then they'll render opinion.
And then um at first interim the new
balances will be incorporated in that
first interim. And actually when I wrote
this I forgot about the AB1200. So next
month you will um get a public
disclosure of the agreement with the
district and PVFD. We will have those
new numbers in that since we have it
we're going to use that that amount. So
even though I don't know if you remember
but at budget adoption we were looking
at significant deficit spending in the
future years. So right now
closing up 9 million higher just kind of
helps
with time to to help um um address that
deficit. that didn't change the full
year deficits or the subsequent year
deficits. It just it's just really
increased the floor to give us more time
to um to address that situation. And one
thing that will be part of that is going
back and and analyzing
the the four the four million in
operating costs. So we know that a
portion of that was one time like
utilizing onetime restricted resources.
But what we're going to need to do is
look at utilities. Is that constantly
always being um overbudgeted or not? So
is, you know, is it a onetime savings, a
one time anomaly, or is it something
that we just have to just sharpen the
pencil and bring that budget down? So
that that that's what's going to be done
at at first interm so we don't have
those swings. I know last year we didn't
have as high of swings, but um we were
looking at more of a of a hole. So
that's the task for for first interim
preparation already.
Okay. Are there any questions?
>> I'm going to ask first for a motion and
a sec. Oh um public comment.
>> How many public comment?
>> We have three. Bill Beecher, Chris Webb,
and Brandon Denise.
>> Thank you.
>> Thank you, Bill Beecher. Glad to be
back. Uh I'm going to talk about page 18
and 25 of the handout.
There are some questions on page 18. The
certificated salaries does not show that
reduction of 60 teachers that happened
when we did the class size reduction.
Were they reassigned or did we forget to
show that deduction?
On page 25, stirs and purr are up seven
and a half and 11.7% respectfully. Do we
expect this to continue in the future?
Health and welfare are up 12.1.
Benefits are now 80% of wages. In 2010,
they were 48%.
And in 2029, they'll be 90%. And if you
use the rule of 72,
in less than seven years, we will have
doubled the benefits.
Then there's a question about the
unemployment insurance. It dropped 27%.
Is that real or a mistake?
Without school closures, the district
will file a negative first interim and
all will be lost for the students,
teachers, and the district.
PBFT may have won the battle but lost
the war. The district took actions to
keep the schools open. And how do you
reward the district? No cap. That was a
mistake.
>> Mr. Denise,
>> uh, a couple of questions that I have.
um how much did we spend on lawyers
specifically for the negotiations team
for this cycle? And then also because
the cycle was so long, it was drug out
um artificially because basically they
they came for our benefits and um when
that wasn't going to be a thing, when
they finally decided to play ball, we
got things done pretty quick, right? So
how much did we spend for the district
negotiations team like their perdm total
to be at those meetings? um how much
have we spent on overages payments to
teachers who we've overfilled their
classes and like basically had we
followed the contract the plan for
language we could have prevented that
also um something to think about is that
when you do things like that that
negatively affects the community like I
know um if I had to move my child three
weeks into school um especially if it's
a kindergartener who's like this is
their very first school experience that
would leave a bad taste in my mouth and
um that might contribute to declining
enrollment. Um also with respect to
recouping ADA through after school
programs I I still would just like to
see like for Renaissance in particular
like did we recoup any money on ADA
their after school program this last
year for that site and then compare it
to 1819 the model continuation year. And
then just one last thing, I'll just say
that um at the health and welfare
benefits committee last year, I thought
our presenter here made a very good
point when he spoke to how the district
should lead by example. So when they're
talking about cutting our benefits, if
cabinet and the soup were to cut their
benefits first and kind of show us how
it's done and how that is, that's a
better cell. Also, I think just uh
generally speaking, um you if you want
more people to switch over plans, try
increasing the rebate. Let's think about
adding carrots and not just sticks.
Thank you.
Okay. So, I want to point out that the
slides that we just saw aren't on the
agenda and not made public. So, I don't
know if that's a Brown Act violation,
but we don't have access to those slides
via the agenda. I want to thank Radika
Kirkman, Amy Shrek, and Jason Chin for
helping me learn how to read these
budgets. I've heard this board on a
number of occasions state that we need
to trust the experts. But when the
experts or people like Bill Maguire or a
CBO who told us that this community was
their home only to leave to go back to
Sacramento, maybe we should learn how to
read these budgets for ourselves. I sat
down earlier today and compared the
adopted 2526 budget that was approved
back in June of 25 to these unodudited
actuals you're seeing today. Um, and
comparing these has led me to have some
questions that I hope can be asked on
the record. How can the district account
for or explain the fact that the
combined ending fund balance grew by $39
million from the adopted budget to the
unodited actuals? Did we get an increase
in grant funding or discretionary funds?
And what are these funds earmarked for?
Next question. The district did revise
the unrestricted ending fund balance
from the adopted amount of 45.2 million
to 56.7 at second interim, but still the
ending fund reserve has grown from the
second interim by $3.2 million. How does
the district account for that growth?
Next question. The district spent $3.8
million less on certificated salaries
than they projected at the adoption of
the budget. Where does that money go and
why can't it be used to bring back some
of the counselors that our students and
staff desperately need? In the current
budget, we are spending 2.6 million less
on certificated salaries, equating for 6
million less from the previous year.
Where's this money going? Um, last year
the in the estimated actuals, the
district projected total general fund
expenditures on benefits at $15.9
million. According to these united
actuals, we spent $116 million. We're
often told that the cost of benefits
goes up 10% every year, but the math
doesn't show that the district is
actually spending 10% more year in this
budget. The district is projecting to
spend $128 million on benefits this
year. How can we trust you when your
numbers vary year after year? Thank you.
>> Thank you.
>> Is there a motion to approve?
>> I move to approve. Is there a second?
Um, we'll start with board comment with
Trusty Ellen.
Trusty Flores.
>> I don't have any right now. I have
>> because if I don't vote on this, it
doesn't get approved. So, give me a
second.
You got something to say, Miss Contas?
You can say it on the mic. All right.
Um,
so
did the district revise the unrestricted
um ending fund balance from the adopted
amount of 45.2 million to 56.7 million
at a second interim. Is that true? I'd
have to go look, but at adopted budget,
that's at adopted budget in for 2526,
you don't have you haven't closed out in
2425. So that does change. That does
that always changes because you're going
off of an estimated beginning balance.
And then once you close at first
interim, then you incorporate those
actual ending fund balances. kind of
like how I said in in today's
presentation where in 26 for the 2627
first interim we'll will reflect the
actual fund balances and not the
projected.
>> Got it.
>> Yes. So yes, there are variances but
because we just don't know where where
exactly where we're going to land but I
do remember at um when I was presented
last year I did that reconciliation that
similar reconciliation between um
estimated and um and um urine closing.
So yes, there are variances on that.
>> Okay. Um, another question I have is how
much did PBUSD pay teachers during uh
202526 for class size overages or
overloaded classes and how many
teachers, classrooms, and students were
involved and how would that cost compare
with um opening additional sections or
hiring staffing required by the
contract?
>> I I do not know that.
>> You don't know that? Okay.
>> No, that would take some a lot of
research on that one.
>> Okay. Um
the district projects certificated and
classified salaries to decline. Um yet
es um esters as um Mr. Beer said rises
7.5, PERS rises 11.7 and health and um
welfare rate rises 12.1. Um what
specific rates staffing levels and
enrollment assumptions explain benefits
increasing while wage decrease?
>> I have to I have to look at those. I
don't
>> look at that. Okay.
>> I'd have to look at that. I I don't
>> All right. Sorry I'm putting you on the
spot. I'm just curious. Yeah.
>> No, no, that's all right. Now, with the
health and welfare when we say like 12%
because or any percent that you say it's
not going to be reflected in that fiscal
year because because health and welfare
rates don't change July 1. They I
believe they change October. So, there's
going to be that pration effect. Yes.
>> Got it. And then do you know um what is
the increase that we're going to be
receiving for ADA for the 26 27 year
because it changed from 2526 like you
stated correct?
Yes. So um right now let's see here I'd
have to look at the LCFF calculator in
terms of what that funded ADA would
would be. um it probably won't vary a
whole a whole bunch because when the
adopted budget was adopted in June, we
already had our um P1 which are I mean
our P2 numbers which is 88 through
through April and then but we just
didn't have annual because right because
you present the budget in June but you
don't finish up calculating so those
those will change but the primary of the
funding is actually on P2 but it
shouldn't be a significant variance. The
only way that there'd be like a
significant variance, which I'm not sure
if enrollment speaks, is like for
example, let's say that our enrollment
just shot up, right? Then yes, then
that's a big game changer and that
changes everything because then we would
be funded on current year ADA and not
the prior year. So, but if but if we're
declining to that point, but if we don't
decline as much, well, then we may be
funded on the prior year ADA and not the
prior three-year ADA. So it's it's all
depending on what the 26 27 actual ADA
is. So yeah, so it's but I can
definitely you know bring up the LCFF
calculator and go okay this is what
we're be projected to be funding on. But
really first interim that's the story
that's the main story because that's
where budget world and actual world come
together and then you have to sort all
that out. You know, it's it's just like
we we we had projected sections, we had
projected FTEES, now we have the the
staffing and making for all those
staffing adjustments. So, you you'd see
all those changes in first interim and
that's why there's so much there's a big
difference between adopted budget and
first interim because budget is just
that it's just a projection. There's no
actuals. I mean, you use act, you know,
past trends for the actuals and to get
your budget, but it's just okay, we have
Um, a person in position 1, two, three,
four, five. Did that person leave? Okay.
Are we filling back back filling the
position? Okay. Well, maybe they're
coming in at 34,000,
whatever. 34,000 less or 34,000 more.
It's all different. So, I definitely see
what um what the what what he was
talking about in terms of all those
variances and then and they're very very
good questions. Thank you. Um but that's
it's just really um we would probably
make like a budget study to go into
those into those details. Yeah.
>> Yeah. I mean I I wish we had more
transparency with the budget um from the
district, but it doesn't really come
that way. Um another thing that I would
like to state is I I remember at one
point um when the superintendent came
in, she stated that we weren't going to
hire any more admin positions and all
this stuff because we had a smaller
amount. Do you know how much the cabinet
level was um in that year compared to
the previous year?
>> No, but we have that information
available because it's on a separate
salary schedule and they're separate
positions.
>> Okay. Would you say it increased or
decreased?
>> Well, let's see. From from 2425 to 2526.
>> Yes.
>> I would probably say well maybe even
decrease only because of the vacancies,
right? Mhm.
>> So,
>> cabinet level positions.
>> Yeah. Yeah. Like for example, you didn't
have a you didn't have a CEO for
>> Yep. Yep.
>> Yeah. And um
>> and who was brought in there? I don't
>> Well, we added a deputy superintendent.
We moved director up to a a cabinet
level position for no reason. So, I'm
just curious what the impact of that is
on the budget um from the prior years
because like I said, it was stated in
public that we were not going to be
expanding the cabinet level or admin
positions that we were going to reduce
it and it looks like we just expanded
it. So, I'm just curious how much that
was that we're putting towards people
instead of our students.
>> That's very especially definitely on the
volume and the way the position controls
coded. We can find that out.
>> Okay, cool. Trusty Medina, that was your
time and I'd like to
>> Well, until I get an answer, I'm not
going to approve this.
>> Okay. I'd like to give trust answer
about the cabinet level position.
>> It's okay. I'm good. Thank you though.
>> No, I'll answer it because you're
putting false things on the record. And
>> do do you want to go about false things
on the record? Because I could pull up
that video clip right for you because
you have a history of being dishonest
while you're making public comments.
>> That's not accurate.
>> That's very accurate.
>> Trusty, Medina. So, some of the uh
directors that you're saying of pulling
up to cabinet didn't mean that they were
cabinet level positions. They sat on
cabinet so we could gather more
information and have different input.
>> Your CTO, was that moved from a director
to a cabinet level position? Yes or no?
>> I'm sorry. Please let me finish. I'm
>> Well, I know. But whenever you speak,
it's just
>> curving everything and we all know that.
So, okay. Go ahead. Let's hear the lies.
So several cabinet level positions went
unfilled for two years
>> and so definitely cabinet level
positions were underfunded and we did
not spend as much money on cabinet level
positions over the last two years.
>> It's interesting because I remember this
district was doing so well with only
three cabinet level positions at one
point
>> and now we're staffing more. Okay, go
ahead. I will vote. I don't know how I'm
going to vote.
>> If the board wants to do another round,
we'll do that.
>> Trusty Crosswell,
>> I don't have any questions.
>> Would the board like to have another
round of three?
>> I'm feeling that they're not wanting to
have another round of three. Recognizing
the risk. Um, so we have a motion and a
second. I'll call for the vote. All in
favor signify by saying I. One, two,
three. All those opposed.
All those abstaining.
Okay. So, the motion does not carry.
Three 0 one three.
>> I am willing to change my vote if um
Brandon could field the questions to the
superintendent.
>> We're not going to do that. But thank
you for this suggestion.
Okay, 8.1 fails. So, we do not have
adopted a budget and we have not met our
obligation and I don't know what that
means. But I think
>> we'll contact the county because um we
actually forwarded the um the
>> Oh. Oh, wait. Was this signed already
and you guys submitted it?
>> Oh, no. No, we for we forwarded to the
county.
>> Okay. When's the deadline? Wasn't it the
15th?
>> Yeah.
>> Mhm.
>> What's today?
>> 16th, I think. Right.
>> So, it was due yesterday.
>> They gave us a two-day
Okay.
>> Yeah.
>> Which would be
>> tomorrow. We're not going to have a
meeting tomorrow.
>> All right.
>> Well, the reason why it's a deadline to
the county because the te county needs
to review it so that they can make their
deadline to the state.
>> So,
>> yeah, because because really it's they
have a month to review it and they have
to forward it to this to the state by
the um October 15th. I am willing to
change my vote if I send an email to the
superintendent with questions that I
would like answered within a week. And
if they do not come in within a week,
I'm going to come back and I'm going to
change my vote. That's what's going to
happen. So, I will make that stipulation
if you want it to pass.
>> Are they basically the questions you
ask? Now,
>> I I'll send her an email with the
questions. Yes.
>> Okay. But I mean, it's like things that
are obtainable.
>> Yeah.
So, if she gives me those within two
weeks and I'm going to hold it to that
deadline, I will vote yes on this. And
if no, we're gonna have to go back. I'm
going to change my vote and you guys are
going to have to deal with the county.
>> Is there a reason why you couldn't have
asked the questions
>> cuz I need you to say them on paper so I
could read them verbatim to you when you
are being dishonest. That's why I want
them written down in email from you and
I would appreciate that. So if you want
this to pass, that would be my amendment
that I get that information within two
weeks.
>> Okay. So you're going to send in
questions related to the presentation.
We just had the budget that we're
looking at the unodudited actuals and
I don't think there's a reason why we
shouldn't be able to give responses to
those within two weeks. I know we don't
have a CBO. I know we don't have a CVO
but um it should
>> I don't see that being a problem seeing
as how other trustees were able to ask
questions when we saw this report had
our answers our questions answered
>> before the board meeting so I don't
think that would be a problem
>> maybe the superintendent should meet
with people how about that
superintendent did you meet with me this
week or reach out
>> trusty medina let's let's move on
>> soend or trusty floors whatever your
name is
you get your facts rightusty Carrasco
has the floor question.
>> Okay. So,
>> Trustee Krasco has the floor.
>> Um,
>> Trustee Krasco has the floor.
>> If if we are not able to move forward in
two weeks, could you explain a little
bit what will happen?
>> I I don't I don't know. Actually, I
don't know. I mean, they may suspend.
They may I don't with a budget then you
can't spend anything but with unauorit
>> I'm giving you an ultimatum just to
answer my questions.
>> So
then if for whatever reason this doesn't
move forward because of what is being
asked. Can we put it on the special
meeting?
>> If we're even able to get a special
meeting on the 30th I think we may have
a lack of staff but maybe we can find a
way to make that happen. Are we a
question? Sorry. Are we able to do an
emergency meeting like within 48 hours?
>> I don't think for something that's
routine you can do that emergencies like
something burned down.
>> Well, this was an emergency.
>> Just send me my questions. You guys are
Why are you protecting the
superintendent? That's what I want to
know. She can answer questions by email
>> and I'll pass it.
>> Okay.
>> No, my my question to that is not to
protect the superintendent. It's to
protect the district. So, I just want to
clarify that
>> the superintendent is supposed to be
protecting it and she hasn't been doing
that.
>> I I believe that an audit actual report
needs to be u approved in a regular
board meeting.
>> It can't be a special board meeting. It
can't be an emergency board meeting. It
would need to be in a regularly
scheduled board meeting. And I'm happy
to answer any questions that you have.
>> I would like to rechange my vote.
>> I'm not sure.
>> I think it would be a new motion.
>> Yeah, I'll make a new motion. Yeah.
>> Right. Okay. I would like to make
>> So, we had a motion that failed. Now, we
could start with a new motion.
>> I'll make a new motion to approve this
item with the stipulation that the
superintendent is to respond to my
emails within two weeks of the date that
it is sent.
And that's my motion.
>> Is there a second to that motion?
>> I'll second that.
>> Motion made by Trustee Medina, seconded
by Trustee Krasco. All those in favor
signify by saying I. One, two, three,
four. And you can vote if you want, but
you don't have to. Okay. So, that passes
4 0 03.
Thank you.
Well, you got to send it first, right?
>> Okay, that's enough. That's enough.
That's enough. Let's move on. We got
other things to do. Let's move on. 8.2
to approve resolution 26 2702
GAN limits amendments for 2526 2627
prepared by Alexis Persley director of
finance.
>> Yes. So I'll be speaking on on that.
It's kind of rolled up into the um un
actual. So that's one portion of the um
uned actuals is the GAN amendment. So
it's really it just takes all the data
that we have in the financial systems,
puts it in there and it just says okay
do we you know did are the revenues that
we received exceed the the the growth
and what is it? It's um um the prior
year limit um percentage change in per
capita personal income and average daily
attendance. So, it's they look at how
much money we're getting versus our
growth. And if we have to and if our if
we receive more money than our growth,
then we would have to Well, back in the
day, you'd actually had to contact the
Department of Treasury and then they
would adjust their appropriations limit
in a in a similar in in a similar
fashion, but now they just get it
automatically. So, it's really statewide
revenues can exceed growth. So, so the
state
if we had to adjust our appropriations
limit say by $100,000 then the state
would reduce theirs to be in balance to
for all government agencies and vice
versa. If we're below our appropriations
limit then the state can maximize on
that so it's all balanced out for the
whole the whole state of California. And
then actually school services has a
really good article in terms of what it
is where they just say think of it as
bucket. So if one bucket is low then
another agency can utilize that bucket.
If the if another state agency has a too
high of a bucket then then we utilize
other buckets.
Yes. It's kind of interesting. So, but
it's just really just a
um a resolution that has to be done
saying that our bucket doesn't need to
be adjusted
or actually increased.
>> Our bucket does not have a hole in it.
>> No.
>> Do we have any public comment cards?
>> Okay. Um
>> is there a motion?
>> It came in after. Is there a motion to
approve?
>> We have a public comment.
>> Okay. I've never had a public comment
again. This is interesting. It didn't
come in before the item was called, but
go ahead.
>> Sorry, the agenda was moved 500 times,
so I don't know. It's hard to keep
track. Um, so as you guys consider 8.2
and the district's fiscal position, CACA
appreciates the work that has gone into
stabilizing the district's finances. We
understand that declining enrollment and
long-term fiscal sustainability require
difficult decisions, right? That's what
we've been told. But financial sust
sustainability also requires consistency
in how we evaluate staffing over the
same period that classified employees
have experienced reductions.
Um PBSD executive structures has also
changed and in some argument might say
that it grew that included the deputy
superintendent and the designation of
the chief technology officer as a
cabinet level position. I'm not
suggesting that those positions are
unnecessary. However, it hurt. Um I'm
asking that we apply the same analysis
at every level in this organization when
we look at budgeting approvals and um
passing. What does the position cost?
How does this um 8.2 or 8.1 right? How
does it affect us in the long term? Is
it an investment or does it ultimately,
you know, not benefit students? Um, as
we move into sustainable schoolworks, I
want to talk about optimal staffing
models. That's something that exists for
a reason. Um, our district um and the
work that we're doing on different um,
you know, we we can't say what an
optimal staffing model is, and that's
scary. Thank you.
>> Thank you.
Is there a motion to approve?
>> Move to approve. Is there a second?
>> I'll second.
>> Uh, comments from boards. I'll start
with Trustee Flores.
>> Trusty Medina,
>> no comment.
>> Trusty Carrasco,
>> no comment.
>> Trusty Allen.
All right. Um, all those in favor
signify by saying I. One, two, three.
Motion carries for 0
03
and we pulled 8.3. That takes us to 8.4.
Approve the issuance of a request for
proposal for a comprehensive classified
position classification and compensation
study. Report will be given by Lisa
Sandaval.
Hello. Good evening, President Turley,
board of trustees, Dr. Contrarus,
cabinet, and our me or lovely audience.
My name is Lisa Sandaval and I am your
new director of classified for human
resources.
As I begin this role, one of my many
priorities is making sure that our
classified positions and compensation
structures ac accurately reflect the
work being performed across our
district.
Tonight, I'm asking for your approval to
issue a request for information or an
RFI or comprehensive classification and
salary classification and salary study.
PBUSD has a large and diverse
classification structure spanning
multiple job families and employee
groups. The purpose of this study is to
take a comprehensive look at those
classifications, the duties currently
being performed and the salary
relationships across comparable
positions.
The study will provide an objective
review of whether our job
classifications accurately reflect the
work being performed and how our salary
ranges compare with similar positions in
comparable school districts. Ultimately,
this study will provide us with the
information necessary to make informed,
consistent, and responsible decisions
regarding our classified workforce. Our
last study was in 2013.
This is not a request to approve salary
increases. Rather, it's an opportunity
to gather reliable, objective
information that will help the district
and personnel commission better
understand where we are today and
identify any areas that need to be
addressed in the future.
We will also be bringing this request to
the personnel commission for their
approval tomorrow as required in a merit
system district. We I respectfully
request approval this evening because
the studies of this nature are time
consuming and can take several months to
complete. Beginning the process now will
allow us sufficient time to conduct the
study and present the findings to the
board and the personnel commission
within the school year. So I
respectfully ask for approval.
>> Are there any public comment cards?
>> Okay.
Yeah, we had a comment card.
>> Oh,
>> over here.
>> Did it come? Did it? It came in after
Lisa started.
>> If you don't take the card, I will get
up and leave this meeting and we will
shut it down.
>> No, you all hijack this board by the way
you act on it and don't follow the
rules.
That's what's a hijacked board.
What's the consensus? Go ahead.
>> All right. Go ahead.
>> Thank you. Um, CSEA just wants to say
that we appreciate the collaborative
work that we've been having with the
district and Lisa, our new classified
director. Um, we
beg and plead for this to vote
unanimously through. Please and thank
you. We've been asking for this since
the day I stepped foot in as CSEA
president in February 2025. Thank you,
Lisa, for making this happen. And CSA
looks forward to collaborating and being
at the table because that's what we've
been promised and the work and the
relationship that we're building is
pretty amazing. And I think that we're
going to do great work. So, we really
really encourage a yes vote. Thank you.
Thank you. Is there a motion to approve?
>> I'll motion
>> and a second.
>> I'll second.
>> All those Oh, wait. Um, comment board
deliberations. We'll start this time
with Trusty Medina.
>> Lisa, I think they know if they put you
in front of me, I'm going to vote for
whatever you tell me. Um, just kidding.
Um, no, but um, I'm really glad you're
in this position, Lisa. Um, and you are
just a wonderful person to work with.
I've seen you in action especially what
you did in Paharo um in being a part of
that group. So I have really high hopes
for you and I if you need any of us as
trustees to come and support you in
anything please do um so that way we
could help you achieve what you need to
especially for our classified staff and
and did I get this right? We haven't
done a study since 2013
>> 2016 started in 2013 and we uh finalized
in 2016. Oh, that's like 10 years.
>> Doesn't feel that long now. Okay.
>> All right. Cool. Well, thank you, Lisa.
I appreciate it.
>> Trusty Krosco.
>> No comment.
>> Trustee Allen
>> and Trusty Flores.
>> What you had mentioned that you'll
compare it us to other districts? Do you
also compare us to like county? For
example, when I first came on the board,
we had a school bus driver shortage and
I noticed Metro was hiring at a quite
larger, you know, salary than we were
with less, you know, training necessary.
And so I had asked, you know, Dr.
Rodriguez at the time, what do we need
to do to be more competitive? and she
mentioned something like this, a study
like this that we would have to so does
this study also look at compar like for
example bus drivers not only school bus
drivers but our county because we lose a
lot of our potential school bus drivers
to the county.
>> Yeah. So um when I start going out um
well in the district so we can't even um
present an RFI but that can be something
when we start asking companies and
asking organizations as to what they do
we can ask if that's something possible.
>> Thank you and thank you for taking on
this position. I think you're going to
do wonders in this position.
>> I hope I I hope I live up to everyone's
expectations.
>> I will call for the vote. All those in
favor signify by saying I. I.
>> One, two, three, four, five. Motion
carries. 5 0 0
three.
Uh, let's see. We already took care of
8.5.
That brings us to public hearing 9.1.
Report on expanded learning summer
programming. Report by Jen Littleton
Bruno.
Good evening. I'm Jen Littleton Bruno.
I'm so glad to be here. Thank you for
having me, President Turley, Dr.
Contras, and board of trustees. Tonight,
I'm here to share about our summer
programming in PBSD.
There we go. This is our vision and our
mission in expanded learning. We use the
same vision and mission as our school
district.
Our programming that we're going to be
covering tonight focuses on four of
these goals. academic excellence,
climate, culture and community, fiscal
responsibility, and human resources,
summer at a glance.
So hopefully across our community, you
were able to see our posters, our
banners, our booklets that went to our
students. And so this is a collective
program.
We engaged 6,400
students over the summer. We utilized
$3.5
million of grant funding. No general
funds were used.
We thanks to our partners in CSEA and
PVFT and CWA hired 446,
yes 446
staff members had extra jobs over the
summer making money. So when they would
normally not be making money and working
for a school district, 446
staff members were working with us and
our students.
Of that, that was 215
of Brandon's PVF staff members. teachers
that are teaching with our students in
the school day, making those
relationships, working with us in summer
school, keeping those relationships
going.
In addition, we had 35 unique summer
camp programs.
We ran from the first Monday we were out
from school and we ran all the way until
that last Tuesday. We were still running
program. We also ran some night programs
you're going to learn about and some
weekend programs
one coordinated summer system.
Years ago, PBSD had many different
programs from many different departments
and they were scattered and littered all
over Watsonville throughout the summer
with no coordination. And so I'm so
pleased to share with you that we really
offer a comprehensive program where
multiple departments are working
together to ensure that our students and
our community get the resources they
need, that our funding is used the way
it should be, and that we're not
duplicating or competing against each
other for services or students.
The programs that we offered this summer
is summer school TK through 12th grade
extended school year with our special
services for students who have ESY which
is extended school year in their IEP. We
work with those students and those staff
at our same summer schools. We run the
high school program which is credit
attainment, credit recovery, dual
enrollment, drivers education thanks to
our partnership with Nancy in the back
in adult ed and career exploration.
We earlier you heard about our
attendance recovery program and we had
over 9,000
hours recovered in our summer program.
So those are absences that we are making
back the money that the students earlier
you heard about P1, P2. And the great
part about this attendance recovery
program is we have so many high
schoolers who end up with us during the
summer. They may have had absences in
October. They actually those July dates
that they work with us backfill their
absences. And so we're going back and
we're getting those absences during that
P2 time that counts the most. So we were
able to recover where we had over 2,800
students participating in the attendance
recovery summer programming.
And then one of my favorite parts is our
summer camps and family events. And
those are the programs where we looked
at what do we see in affluent areas?
What do students who are able to off
get access to programming because of
funding? What are you know those are the
barriers that our families are having.
We are very aware that when they are
paying for gas, rent and food and they
have to decide which of those there's no
way they can go horseback riding. They
don't get to do swim classes and that's
not okay. And so what we do, our
programs offer these programs at no cost
to our families.
I'm really having a hard time with this
little clicker here.
Before I move on, I just want to really
share with you what a collaborative
program this is. For the summer programs
to work this way, this is not just an
expanded learning program. This is so
many departments and so many staff. This
is just a couple. As I was sitting
thinking about what I was going to say
and make sure I had all my notes, I'm
like, "Oh, no. Purchasing isn't there."
And they go through 40 contracts. They
work with me for 40 contracts. You guys
approved them all last, you know,
February. Um, we work with M in planning
and facilities to be able to offer both
summer school at our school sites and
then we have community partners who are
still using our school sites so that
Quicksilver can offer swimming to our
students at no cost. They need to be
able to access the pool and so the YMCA
needs a playground to use so they access
the playground at Radcliffe. We work
very closely and Hurley and Sergio
really help out our team in ensuring
that we can coordinate services um to be
able to keep things going and that
schools can get clean before we go back.
And so I just want to take a minute to
think then we have special services,
human resources. We are a huge push on
human resources as they're getting ready
to start the new school year and
staffing. We're hiring 446 people for
limited time positions. That's a huge
partnership that we're really thankful
for. In addition, transportation for
summer school. We offer busing to our
school sites and home for our families.
And so that's often about 50 routes a
day. And so transportation comes
through. In addition, food service.
Jeanie and her team, they make sure that
we are giving out food to our students.
Breakfast, fresh fruit during summer
school, lunch, snacks. In addition, we
partner with our contractors that we
offer the summer camps and they can get
food from our services so that we offer
food during summer camps and lunch in
our summer camp time as well.
I keep doing this you guys. I'm so
sorry. Okay, summer staffing creating
learning and employment opportunities.
Again, I just when I was running the
data because I really wanted to bring
you guys some data of numbers, I was
like, "Wait, is this right? Did we
really have 446
staff members?" That's bigger than many
of our districts have, our neighboring
districts have for their whole school
district is what we have during summer.
So, just think about that for a minute.
Our summer program is bigger than and
staffs more than many of our other
school districts. That's amazing that
we're able to do this. And so I just
really want to thank CSEA and PVFT
because those teachers, those
instructional aids, those bus drivers,
we could not offer this to our students,
our families, and our communities if it
wasn't for these staff members.
The school sites that we offered at was
Landmark, Hyde, Rio Delmare, Minty
White, Aloney, and CCMS.
Um, we worked very closely with Sergio
and Hurley to see where we had projects
going on and to be able to look at
different regions to make sure that we
were able to get feeder schools
together. We ran into some issues. We
have huge projects going on with Measure
M right now, which is great and makes
running summer school a little tricky.
So this year we actually bust Calabasas
students and Bradley students to the
nearest school was Rio Delmare and it
was beautiful. We had the largest aptise
apttoass summer school program that
we've ever had in PVUSD. We had over 300
students on some days. 240 was our
average but there were days that we had
over 300 students. I can tell you that
normally we get 60 to 80 students in our
ATS summer school program and the
district loses money offering it because
we can't get the number of students and
so we were able to look critically at
which students could we get there
Bradley Calabasas easily with
transportation and we were able to then
offer a summer program in Aptos without
making it a deficit funding program. Um,
those are our averages,
our alignment to core day curriculum.
Lisa Diamond really dove in and worked
with our curriculum and instruction team
asking, "What curriculum are we adopting
in August? What are we going to be doing
in the school year?" And so, um, we were
able to do that in summer school. And
the feedback that we got from teachers
was incredible. Crystal Martin who
teaches at Aloney was like, "Jen, I'm
testing out what I have to do. You're
paying me to work with the students I'm
going to see next year. I get to sample
the curriculum. This is awesome." So, we
had some really good feedback with UFly
and our other pieces that we were able
to do. In the middle school, we tried
out a book study and the students really
enjoyed that. And then in the high
school, we offered so many really fun
things. Um the piece at the high school
that I want to share that I'm really
proud of Nancy uh Zuniga and Luis Medina
and what they have done is at one point
PvD started to offer just online credit
uh recovery and that is not fair to our
students. They don't get to engage in
critical thinking. they don't get to
talk to each other. And so we changed
that two years ago and this was our
second year. What we did was we made an
AM wave and a PM wave. One wave had 700
students. The other wave 600 students
and in the morning the AM wave is with
teachers and they're engaging in
instruction and then in the afternoon
they go home and do that online learning
so that we can make the minutes that are
needed for them to actually get credit
for what they are doing. So, they're
doing 50 to 60 hours of instructional
time. Half of that in person and half of
that at home by themselves.
So, here's a little bit more about our
high school credit uh attainment and
recovery program.
I want to make sure that I give you guys
the correct information.
So, we offer um we've always offered
credit recovery. And something that I
think is really important and is
important to Nancy and our whole team is
that our students get access for those
overachievers. What about those students
who don't need to make up credit? Right?
I remember Trusty Flores asking me,
"What kind of credit uh attainment do
you have?" This summer we had art,
ethnic studies, elective work
experience, folklorico dance, physical
education and drivers education and
those were credit attainment. So
firsttime credit um getting and then we
also offered so many A throughG credit
recovery courses as well. One of my
favorite and my pictures are not so
great, but if you look on the far right
side, those are chemistry labs. So, the
students in summer school got to do six
chemistry labs. In the school year, they
get to do three chemistry labs in a
semester. Our teacher, we were able to
pay him extra hours to come and work and
do have more time to do prep. And those
students, we had a parent come talk to
me and she said, "My student wanted to
go to school. He loved doing it. It was
fun. It was engaging. It was hands-on."
And that's what we want summer learning
to be. We want learning to occur, but we
want it to occur with a big smile and
enthusiasm because we understand
students don't have to come to school in
the summer. And we we want them to want
to come to school and we are only funded
when they do come to school with us.
This is the number of credits that each
um program each high school had for
students. We had over 1,200
high schoolers attending our programming
this summer.
This is one of my favorite pieces of our
summer program. We offer a graduation
program. These are graduates that were
not going to graduate with their class.
We had our largest year. We had 41
students graduate.
One of those students was an early
graduate. She was supposed to be a 2027
graduate and she had one class she
needed to do to graduate early. 40 of
those did not get to graduate with their
peers in June at the beginning. At the
end of the June, they got to have a
graduation ceremony at the Melo Center.
It was beautiful. We had our students
from summer school who would learn
dances, dancing. Mr. Burman ran it for
us. It was a great piece. And if you
look, the picture shows up so dark here.
The pride in joy in these students.
They chose themselves and we chose to
show up with them every day and they
graduated and that just meant so much.
And seeing their parents, it was a
beautiful, beautiful ceremony and they
really earned it. They dug in deep and
they showed up with all the grit that
they had. And our staff, Crystal and
Thalia at the high school, they they
kept on them. They every day. Where are
you at? I don't see you. Where are you
going? Hey, I don't see you. We want you
here. Are you going to graduate? Let's
come sit down. These lovely ladies were
working 10 to 12 hour days. These are
our CSEA staff that were committed. They
went to our high schools and they're now
they're showing up for their same
students in their community. And because
of them, these 41 students got to
graduate.
Summer camps is so much fun in our
programs. Georgia, Karina, and Jackie
run our summer camp programming and um
we had over 4,23
students enrolled. We filled
almost 9,000 spaces. Maybe I'll be back
here next year saying we filled 10,000
spaces. Um, we had two 28,000
individual student days this summer. And
we serve students TK through 12th grade.
These are a couple pictures of our
programming. We do swimming, we do
soccer, we do martial arts, we do back
writing, STEM, robotics, career
exploration, film classes, theater,
music, uh, family engagement. We offer
9-hour programs. We offer 4hour
programs. We offer programs to meet our
famil family's needs. We really, we
don't want to be the ones deciding what
families need, right? So, we want to be
able to offer programs. Some families
only want their students to go for three
hours. Other families need nine hours.
We also have program families that need
12 hours. So we have a wide range of
programming. We offer breakfast and
lunch in almost all of our camps. Many
of our camps offer transportation from
local school locations so that our
students can access them. And we partner
with over 35 local small businesses and
nonprofits, bringing in pushing in $3.5
million
into our local economy with contracts
that you guys approved this spring.
We really take feedback seriously in
expanded learning and we have grown.
Just a couple years ago, we our budget
was 13 million. We now operate a budget
of 32 to 35 million. We used to serve
2,000 students a year. On an average
year now, we serve over 11 10,000
students. And one thing that we heard
from our families after the first years
of summer camps, they loved summer
camps. So much fun. But our enrollment
process was hard and difficult. And so
we rolled out a new platform. Um it was
called Inplay. And so when families
before registering we launch online a
magazine and we know that many of our
families can't access online. So we have
a Spanish English hard copy that are
sent home to students. It's
full of pictures and good information.
And then we sent out a campaign on
InPlay where we text families both
through our parent square and with
inplay asking them, letting them know
about this. And it was a really cool
pilot program because what we saw from
our camps the last couple years was we
were using them, families were using
them, but were we when we dug into the
data of which families were accessing
them? Were our English language learners
were were our students with IEPs? Were
our migrant youth being able to access
these programs? And I'll let you know
the answer was no. Not at the numbers
that we wanted to see. And so we ran a
new program within play. And what you
see the pictures, the red, orange, and
green, those are our priority
programming. And um we were able to see
which students in our priorities that we
set were registering. And every week I
was bringing these to teaching and
learning either weekly or bi-weekly and
sharing, here's the information. I'm
noticing that our priority one is way
lower than our priority three, which is
our general population. I'm concerned.
This is not what we want. We want to
make sure that those students who
especially need it, who need this extra
help, get resources, and our team every
week made adjustments. We started going
to markets, community events. We started
calling families. We have a hub at
Watsville High. Jackie and Karina, we
call them our camp fairies. They have a
parent hub and parents come in and it's
beautiful. There's plants, there's
chairs, it's very welcoming, beautiful
pictures. I ask that all of you come by
at some point and parents came to us and
then they started calling families. All
of our afterchool programs could
register families. So, it was online
registration. But what I really want to
make clear is a parent could call us and
we could register them online for them.
They did not need to be the online
and look at the data. We got our
priority one students higher than our
priority three. It took a lot of work
and it was something so exciting in our
priority two. So, we still have some
struggles that we want to do because
what we noticed when we dove deeper into
this was that they signed up for summer
school in one camp. Why didn't they sign
up for eight to nine camps? And so we
were calling and they were getting no we
don't want anymore. Leave us alone. But
this is, you know, pieces that we want
to grow as a department because we
really want to be open for all and
making sure that students who need it
the most, their parents are able to
access it and know this information.
The other piece that we heard from our
community is we have really tried to
strive to be an inclusive program. We in
expanded learning believe that we are
here for all students whether they have
an IEP, they have different uh learning
developments. We want to be able to
offer programs to them. That's our
responsibility as a district and in our
community. And so I just cannot thank
Georgia, our assistant director, Georgia
enough. Um, we rolled this out last year
where we could have we had a couple
students who needed one-on-one aids to
be able to access program and we had a
couple and we used an outside agency and
every day the student had a new
provider. This is not this year, the
year before and we were like, you know,
um, a parent Mads was like, "This is
great. you're you're really showing us
that you care and you're providing it
like you need to, but it's not really at
the quality that we want it to be. And
we heard that. And so what we were able
to do is work with HR and we hired uh
staff as enrichment specialists because
they are actually accessing the
enrichment programming. Like the staff
aren't just normal BTS or IAS. They're
not just with the students. they're
actually participating in farm camp in
doing enriching activities. And we had
um on average 16 aids a week for our
students to be able to access. We had 45
students with varying learning supports
be able to access program this summer.
So we were really really excited about
this and we got great feedback from our
parents.
our community partners. We had three to
3.5 million 35 camp programs from
different partnerships live live earths
farm discovery quicks art day cortisone
uh x academy we had so many the YMCA
city of Watsonville so many programs
that our students could access to be
able to have a fun and engaging summer.
We had three focuses that we felt that
we really needed to work on this last
year. Our first one was our registration
and students who were accessing program.
Our second was our inclusion model. And
then our third was when we were looking
at camps that you can we could contract
with. There was nothing in uh North
Monterey County for our paruro students.
And we had looked every year and my
grandma was a migrant farm worker and it
killed me. Every year this is where she
grew up and I like we are not doing our
jobs. We're not offering the students
who need it the most an opportunity.
And so I was like you guys we have to
find we were Google searching and there
was no one. And so what we said was I
called up Sergio and Hurley and I was
like, can I use some closed down
portables that we are not using anymore
at Aloney because we need to find a way
to offer a camp out here. And so as soon
as summer school ended, we offered the
first time ever North Monterey County
camp. We heard from our migrant families
that a 9-hour day would not work because
they needed to be at the fields by 6:30.
Our camp started at 6 and ended at six
and we had 60 spa 60 spaces every day
for families and it it was great. We
found a provider who would come. Edmmo
would come and provide the camp for our
students. But this was a really big push
for us because we really wanted to
address those three areas. our
inclusion, our North Monterey County,
and our enrollment process of who we
were being able to target to ensure the
right students had access to these
programs.
I talk about a lot of our partners um
and when we partner with organizations,
the reason we do we always hire our PVF
and our CSEA PVUSD staff members first.
We don't have enough staff to work after
school and summer school and so we have
to partner with outside agencies such as
America scores wolf school. The cool
thing when we partner with these
agencies is the resources they bring.
America scores called me one day and
they're like Jen this is going to be
hard but Quaker just called us Quaker
Oats and they want to bring your
students to the World Cup. It's going to
be hard. Can you do this? And I was
like, and he's like, "And the game's
going to be at 11:00, so they'll
probably get home at like 3:00 in the
morning." And I'm like, "I don't know. I
don't think I can say no." I was like,
"Ham, I don't think I can say no." Like,
these students
just got uh experience of a lifetime.
And the organizations that we partner
with, we use an RFP process, right? So,
they have to apply to work with us. We
do all the legal pieces, but they're
invested in our community. And so it's
almost like PVSUSD is our own community
foundation because we're able to invest
in them so that they can invest in our
students. Um so this was just I mean
this really was a special special piece
to the summer was this cost the district
nothing. They Quaker wanted to bring our
students and so this was so exciting.
Moving forward,
we love our summer camps and we hear
such great feedback and so we launched,
you may have heard of it, Parero
Pathways and so these are on these are
during the school year beyond after
school programs. So Elsa Mariachi, the
orchestra program, Pacific Arts Council,
wrestling with Becky with Grit and
Grace, we have Quicksilver, we now have
a swim team, a PBSD swim team. These
programs are either reduced rates where
we do a stipen if you're with PBUSD or
we able to have it at no cost. And so as
we have declining enrollment and
families are choosing where they send
their students, we're able to show
families we choose you. We are offering
after school program, free summer camps.
One family let me know we probably save
them $8,000 in child care because of the
costs that they would normally pay as
outside agencies. So, we are super
excited for our summer program and how
we're bridging that into the school
year. Thank you for your time tonight.
>> Thank you. Are there any public comment
cards?
>> Yes, we have Brandon, Denise, and uh
Ashley.
I don't think I'm going to need my whole
two minutes, but I just wanted to
congratulate Jen Bruno on the programs
that she runs, be it summer school or
ELOP. I feel like she is one of the
absolute best administrators that we
have in the entire district. Um, and an
example that we can work together when
there's mutual respect and the a shared
purpose of putting students first. So,
it's always a joy to work with Jen and I
just want to find ways to keep these
programs alive and continue to empower
her. I know the ELOP program has lost
some administrators over this year,
which typically you'd hear me being
like, "Yeah, that's a good thing." But I
know those are from restricted funds and
I know that those administrators
overseen multiple school sites. And so
we've been working together to come up
with a job description for our program
specialists who are going to kind of
help fill that void. But why why do we
cut her administrators and not some of
Conterus's administrators? But don't
want to get too sidetracked because this
is about the programs that Jen runs and
their effectiveness. And so it's really
great to hear that our students in North
County are getting those opportunities.
And that is because of her determination
and the determination of her team. It t
takes those adults putting in that
effort and making that sacrifice. And so
I just want to shout out Jen and all the
staff who serve these programs.
>> Good evening board. Um, I just actually
um speaking on behalf of CSA Chapter 132
and um I really wanted to take this
opportunity and be here with bags under
my eyes just to um recognize Jen for the
amazing work that her and her team does.
Um you've seen the numbers which are
astounding. 6800
students had access to summer
programming. Um 33 unique camps served
31
thou 3,100 students. That's amazing. And
approximately 28 individual student days
of enrichment. I I could cry because um
those numbers don't fully capture the
amazing work that this team does. Um, it
was a a blow to to to hear that
administration was cut for expanded
learning. Like Brandon said, it made no
sense to us. Um, but I I just want you
to really digest what care and thought
and every opportunity like what that
looks like and what students first looks
like. That is what students first looks
like. that voice, that energy, that
aura, she exudes that into the rest of
the expanded learning team and that
filters into our students and our
parents. And we
hear praise from and about Jen and
expanded learning all day long. CSEA is
proud to be a partner with expanded
learning and I am proud to be an
expanded learning employee but it's not
my biased opinion that amazing work
helps build classified and teaching
workforce and that is what PBSD is
about. Thank you.
>> Thank you. That's the last comment on
this one. Okay. Um I'll bring that to
board comments then starting with Trusty
Krosco.
Um, okay.
I just want to say that I am a little
biased too because I used to work for
some of these programs, but even when I
was part of those programs, I have seen
it evolved and get bigger. Um,
especially with the Pajaro Valley
Pathways. I'm hoping my daughter's in
one of those swimming classes. Um, but I
I've been seeing so many programs from
when you all started to more and more
hands-on learning. For example, the
driving school, that's amazing. When I
taught, a lot of students didn't even
get their license until they were 18
because they didn't want to pay for the
class. So, this is an amazing um
hands-on learning um opportunity. I've
gone to the American scores games and
I've seen
>> it's it's amazing because um by talking
to some of the parents, not all of the
kids either can afford or transportation
or you know they're on specific
parenting plans that cannot fulfill the
entire season. So, um having this
program allows a lot of children to be
exposed to soccer because of, you know,
whatever it is that they have going on.
Um, the other thing is I I love that you
had that really great idea of having
camps during holidays. I always said
this when I used to work for the city of
Watsonville is why aren't we, you know,
nobody has somebody to watch their kids
on the days that there's no school and I
love that you're incorporating that
because a lot of our families need that
as well. Uh, for example, camp while on
Saturdays or those Mondays that we are
off, parents still have to go to work.
So, thank you for providing that. Um, I
think it was about a year ago, I was
working at Aliansa at a mural and I
turned around and I saw kindergarteners
do Zumba and I thought that was the
cutest thing ever. their instructor had
a little microphone and she was doing
the whole thing and all these kids were
just moving along with her and um I
thought this is this is beautiful and
this is what I wish more people would be
able to see and the good things that are
happening in the school district. Um I
was very blessed to be part of the
Monterey Bay Aquarium event that you
guys had. I had a blast. Um, it was fun
making jellyfish hats with all of the
other parents and their, you know, their
their children and eating all of the
food and the orange juice. And I could
hear, you know, kids saying, "The orange
juice is really good. Go get more." And,
you know, that was beautiful. I also I
haven't been to the Gilary Gardens one,
but I heard that one is awesome. Um, I
know I can't make it, but please invite
me.
>> I can't make it, but I definitely would.
If you have any more, invite me. And
then um props on giving out the
stainless steel water bottles for summer
school. Um I had conversations with moms
who were like, "Yeah, they just gave us
these water bottles and they're great
because they keep the water cool the
entire time and there's no plastic." And
um I thought I'm going to eventually
tell Jim that. So
>> thank you. It's great to hear.
>> Trusty Ellen,
>> Trusty Flores,
thank you for this presentation. I'm
always impressed every year with how
much you just improve over each year and
um this year I really was impressed with
the booklet and the ability to register
got easier. So, thank you for that. I'm
sure I know you guys work really hard to
make sure that we are accommodating, you
know, any reasons that where the parent
might not be able to sign their child
up. Thank you so much for that and um
yeah, I look forward to seeing you know
what we what you keep doing with after
school and um summer school and all of
it. Thank you so much.
>> Interesting Medina.
>> Yeah. Um
do you sleep? Like I don't know, man.
You got so much going on. Um I know Jen,
we started off on the wrong foot with
Calto Media. That's done and over with.
One thing that I heard from you that I
have not heard from some people who are
running this district is looking at
North Monterey County and knowing that
we don't get that attention that we
deserve. I have yet to hear what you
said from the superintendent and that
bothers me so much. While I was sitting
here because you actually recognize that
we are left out, that nobody comes to us
a whole lot and we don't get a lot of
support out there. I had teachers hit me
up from Maloney because you you guys ran
like a food program with the students. I
think
>> community schools specialist did that.
>> Okay,
>> I won't take credit. It wasn't us.
>> I don't know what it was, but to get
students interested in just eating good,
healthy food is something that we should
be doing across the district, not just
during summertime, during the regular
school year. And it it it's so amazing
to me that instead of cutting jobs like
the superintendent did, you're providing
jobs. Instead of telling parents who
have students with special needs like
the superintendent does, you're telling
them, "How could I help you and make
sure that your student succeeds in this
program?" Those are words that need I
don't know why we're paying a consultant
$188,000
when you are here and you are actually
fulfilling all these goals that we want
to achieve with our students. Well,
these people up here have been meeting
and talking around a table for almost
two years at $188,000.
When you just showed us in one
presentation, what it means to actually
listen to the community and be there for
them and recognize that from north to
south is completely different. And I
really appreciate that that you did
that. Um, another thing, do you remember
the penny club? I actually went to some
of the meetings when they were talking
about remaking the penny club.
>> Okay, this is crazy. I have a few family
members who attended the um summer
school programs and one of my cousins
said she's a little older than me. She
said, "This feels like Penny Club again.
Like it feels like it's coming back to
Watsonville." And when I heard that I
was like, "Oh, dang. That's awesome."
>> That's a great Yeah.
>> Exactly. Because we've been wanting
something like that for the longest
time. And you know I why you're not
running this school district. I don't
know. It's beyond me. What you are doing
is something that
I cannot put into words because it is
just such great programming. You're
meeting families where they are. You're
learning to say, you know what, it's not
that we can't do it. Let's figure out
how we could do it together. And that's
what I need from some of these cabinet
level people. And to hear that they
slashed. How many administrators did
they slash from um your department?
>> Um so I wouldn't say slash. How many did
they remove?
>> We lost due to the um ratios. We lost
eight administrators and then we got
eight program specialists which are PBFT
positions. And so we have the same
number of staff. They're not
administrators anymore due to some
issues that were occurring with the
ratios of administrators in PBSD. Well,
it sounds like we need to beef your
program up a lot more. And I think
trading off a deputy superintendent to
get you the staff that you need is
something that we really need to
consider coming into this new board
because I want to get you that money
that you need so we don't have these
wasteful positions that we're seeing a
whole lot of. So, um, that's going to be
my commitment to make sure that you're
going to get staff.
>> I mean, I do want to say Mark's my boss
and you know, the deputy superintendent.
Like,
>> I'm his boss, so it doesn't really
matter. You're good. Support me, just so
you know that. Um, and um, thank you for
your kind words. We are just so grateful
for the board support, Dr. Contrera's
support, and cabinet support as we roll
out our programs.
>> Can um, also can I see your brochure?
Like I I thought we had a copy, but
>> I just wrote on this one. Oh, that's
fine. I forgot to say when you said the
food program, we did offer what you
might be talking about is we run the CTE
a science garden program. So, in
addition to the afterchool programs, we
run 19 school gardens where we are doing
fresh produce cooking classes and those
ran this summer and and into the school
year.
>> Okay. I mean, y'all are starting to look
like a whole college community college
with this book right here. That's
awesome.
>> But you did give out food uh like for
the American school.
>> We do. Yeah. And tonight in your consent
um agenda, please vote yes. um is a
contract with Second Harvest Food Bank
because um we actually pay Second
Harvest Food Bank. It's way cheaper to
pay them with their subsidies of cost.
And then every time we do a American
scores game, which is on once a month
and we get anywhere from 300 to 400
families, we give out produce bags
because we understand that our families
are making some really hard choices
right now. Yeah.
>> Rent, food, gas, and so we every family
goes away with some perishable and non-p
perishable items
>> and books.
>> And books. We love books. And we love
anytime that we can stack function and
expand in learning. If you're going to
get parents out there, you might as well
have a good time, give them some
literacy, get some books, and give them
some food.
>> Yes.
>> So, thank you. All right. So, um this is
a report only. No action to be taken. Um
And we'll move on to 9.2 report and
update on the Williamson act compliance
ensuring access equity and quality for
every student 2026. Report will be by
Deepipika Survastava.
>> Good evening board members, Dr.
Contreres and members of the community,
it is my pleasure to provide an update
on Bajaro Valley Unified School District
compliance with Williams Act requirement
for 2627 school year and the district's
ongoing efforts to uh ensure all
students have access to sufficient
materials, qualified teachers and safe
and clean and functional school
facilities.
Our
work is grounded in PBSD's vision and
William process supports this commitment
by ensuring that all students have
access to instructional materials, safe
facilities, and qualified teachers they
need to thrive.
The William review process aligns with
our district strategic goals and our
commitment to equitable access and
student success.
William visits are statemandated
compliance reviews established under the
Williams act of 2004 and conducted by
county office of education. The review
focus on three essential areas. Ensuring
students have sufficient standards
aligned instructional material,
verifying that school facilities are sla
safe, clean and functional through the
facility inspection to report and
confirming that schools are staffed with
appropriate credential teachers.
The William process follows a consistent
cycle beginning with county
notifications, school selection followed
by preparation at school sites
ensuring department districts ensuring
instructional materials, staffing
information and facility records. During
on-site visits, county representative
review instructional materials and
facility conditions through their fit
report.
This outlines the 26 27 Williams uh
visits scheduled across elementary,
middle and high schools. Visits are
distributed throughout the month of
April. We are still going through uh
Aptas High tomorrow and then HA high
will be next week and that would be our
last.
I just want to briefly describe that
while it's just a compliance what goes
into it 27 school sites 96 courses
offered because Williams takes care of
the core courses at K8 and then at high
school it adds the uh physical uh
education
uh and uh health and sex ed and what it
means is that we are ensuring that each
of those 14,600 students have access to
curriculum and good quality education
and facilities.
Also, what goes behind the scene to
ensure that every classroom has
sufficient instructional material is a
collaborative process starting at the
teachers because this year we started
with two big adoptions at elementary
level and high school level and then we
have youly implementation. So it was
first cleaning before the summer
cleaning of the classroom so that we can
move in new materials and starting from
that to the district office where we
were improve uh approving those wrecks
going through our support staff who were
placing the order business service uh
services providing funding and then the
purchasing department when they received
all that curriculum and getting it to
every school site every classroom
and so it's just not one person there.
So many people behind the scene working
with our curriculum and instruction
department and the business services to
making sure that every student has
access to uh curriculum.
Uh facility reports uh it has every
category on this is reviewed at each
PVSD site to ensure the campuses are
safe, clean and fully functional.
And also once again what goes behind the
scene. While most of us take summer
break, our custodians went from school
to school, every site to make sure every
classroom was cleaned, the deep cleaning
was provided. So many of our staff did
not have that time off when most of us
took some time off. Facility and
maintenance making sure that every
campus is fully functional. operation
teams ensuring that every staff room,
every restroom is completely stocked and
business services coordinating the
entire district-wide process.
>> Are there any public comment cards?
>> Yes. Um Ashley and Cassidy Sullivan.
Um
Cassidy um special ed again. So
regarding qualified teachers um despite
knowing of program needs and services
documented in IEPs, our district waited
until July to post over 20 special
education jobs uh that were critically
needed on the first day of school. So
here are the vacancies.
um I heard about from Sulpa employees in
the first weeks of school.
Um the
Minty White Mild Mod SDC for kinder
through 2 grade had no teacher. The
Duncan Holbert extensive support needs
SDC had no teacher. The landmark TK
through K autism SDC, which we piloted
this year and which was full, had no
teacher. The EA Hall resource specialist
um
was not staffed. Pave High School didn't
have a resource specialist or an STC
teacher. PV Elevate didn't have a case
manager for their special ed um
students. Bradley didn't have a resource
specialist. Radcliffe didn't have a
research specialist. CCMS didn't have a
special day class teacher. Hide didn't
have a special day class teacher.
McQuitty didn't have a research
specialist. And Lake View was down two
sped teachers. That's on the first day
of school.
So, that sounds like a violation of
having qualified teachers to me. Um, we
still don't have support at some sites
from behavior specialists, from
psychologists. Some kids are not getting
AP. Some kids are not getting OT. We
also are missing speech therapists
except for now we're getting some
virtual ones. So, these should have
these jobs should have been posted back
in the spring. These kids have IEPs.
They were we they're on the record. We
know that they were coming. Um the
vacancies are now being filled by agency
people and subs and like our friend
earlier mentioned virtual therapists.
Regarding safety, we don't have nurses
or healthcare aids on campuses daily for
students who have diabetes, students who
have seizures, students who require tube
feeding, and that's just at Duncan
Hullbert. So the medical piece is super
problematic for safety and for
liability. Okay. Thanks. Thank you.
Good evening, trustees. Ashley or
Flowers, President CSA. Um, I need to
address some important classified
employee context to this report. Um,
because what we're hearing tonight is
that classrooms were cleaned, prepared,
and ready for the first day. But CSEA uh
represents those employees, and we know
what actually happened.
um our custodians were pushed to the
brink of exhaustion.
We were not ready for the first day of
school. And so I am frustrated to hear
such untrue reporting by Deepika.
We began this school year following
classified staffing reductions,
including impacts to the workforce
responsible for maintaining and cleaning
our schools. But our people still showed
up and they still tried. Our custodians
did work incredibly hard, including
additional hours and overtime overtime
to get campuses ready by August 12th.
Um, but we're saying that the classrooms
received deep cleanings and full deep
cleanings and have had um, you know,
concerns with the character
characterization of that report based on
what not only I've heard, but I've seen.
And just so you know, I deep cleaned two
classrooms myself, including my office
space. And that is just because that's
what I do. I help. Um, this report
raises so much important questions. Um,
what exactly was the standard used to
determine that our facilities were clean
and compliant? And what documentation
supports that determination?
I'd like for maybe uh Deepika to go to
each site and do that report. Um and um
why isn't the Williams Act
complete? We're It's September,
midepptember. We should be done with
this review. But you just heard it in
this report that it's not. That is me
speaking out of frustration for my
people.
Thank you.
>> Thank you.
We'll start with Trusty Ellen.
>> Okay. Thank you for your presentation.
Um I'm hearing a lot of concerns from
the public comment in this meeting and
in the last meeting about um people like
kind of on the ground level feeling like
there discrepancies in staffing. So, I'm
wondering like what I guess because I'm
not really clear on what the standards
are. Um, so like what standards did you
guys use for this report just because um
I feel like that presentation was
showing us that everything was like up
to satisfaction. Um, and I'm just
wondering where you think like the
discrepancies lie from what like the
people are saying that I'm hearing and
then also like what the report says.
So in this presentation I'm providing a
update on the process. We are going from
site to site and with our county uh
partners and they are verifying the
information that we are giving them.
They're walking through the classroom
checking the curriculum. They're walking
through the restroom, libraries, uh,
cafeterias. So, and gym and making sure
that what we are telling them is true.
And then they will come back. They're
compiling a report in collaboration with
our curriculum and instruction
department, our facilities department,
and our human resources. And they will
come back to give us a report and we
will bring that report back to the
board.
This was just a update on the process
that is going through.
Thank you, Trustee Flores.
>> Thank you for this explanation because I
know some people don't know what the
Williams report really covers and so
that's great that we have that and I
look forward to seeing how we're going
to pan out with all the once the report
is done.
>> Trusty Medina.
>> Yeah, I'll direct this question at the
superintendent. Um, do you feel like
we're supporting our special needs
students?
So are you asking in relation to the
Williams report?
>> Interpret it however you want. I just
want an answer.
>> So this year as we started the school
year, we were deficient in our staffing
and we have been working to get our
classrooms staffed. So right now I
acknowledge that we have had classrooms
that have been understaffed um as of
Monday or Wednesday. And Mark, I might
defer to you.
>> Um I'm going to reclaim my time. Thank
you. I want to know also
Do you think that this pre this this
presentation that was just given to us
is honest and truthful?
>> So the information that was presented
here is information that is in tandem
with our county uh people who are in who
work in conjunction with us. So this
isn't just our internal information.
It's with outside people who help us
with the Williams report to ensure that
the information that's provided is
honest and has integrity.
>> I would think this is honest.
>> I would believe that this is probably a
very accurate report and the board will
receive um a report that has any kind of
findings to demonstrate if we have areas
that are in need of of improvement. And
that's actually why the Williams report
was established. It actually was based
on the Williams Act that was put into um
into effect to keep districts
accountable because there was back in
the history of this deficiencies in
districts where they weren't providing
the right type of access for uh
students.
>> Have you apologized? Have you apologized
to our parents, our community, our
special needs students for what you did
to them these first three weeks?
Trustee Medina.
>> That is a no. Got it. So th this is why
we need new board members and I'm glad
there's an election coming up because
this board has not held this person
accountable which is why your students
are not getting the services that they
need. Instead they put money into the
cabinet level positions hiring people
from Modesto
self-s serving themselves by giving
themselves 15K
when we know that our special needs
students need help. You should be
ashamed of yourself, contradas, and you
need to resign. That's what you need to
do. Because every time that we get a
report from one of your little goons
over here, they spin it a certain way.
>> Going way off,
>> they spin it a certain way and it is not
truthful.
>> So, how can you explain that, Dr.
Contas?
>> I'm going to ask you a little more.
>> No, no, no, no. You're not going to tell
me how to act. Okay,
>> this is my time.
>> I've already told you. No, you like
controlling people. I get it. But if the
superintendent, when are you all going
to hold her accountable for what has
happened? How many more times does she
need to do this?
>> We'll move on to Trusty Krosco.
>> You're such a waste.
>> My question My question is um does this
report have a due date or what where is
it due to be completed? So the county is
uh going to have aptas hide uh tomorrow
and then HA height next week on
September 22nd. They have until November
to compile all the reports and they will
put it together and they will send us
the report and then we will bring it
back to the board.
>> So what you're saying is they go by
campus,
>> right?
>> And then when that campus is done, then
they check mark it and they go to the
next one. When all campuses are done,
then the report is completed.
Yes. So the visitations are completed
and then they compile their report.
>> Okay. So and while they are doing it
they have started emailing to the school
sites what is working, what is not
working and what they need to fix.
>> Okay.
>> So every
>> this is an annual process too. It is an
annual process and every day when we are
at the Williams visit. So if it is an
elementary school, our curriculum and
instruction director Rich Moran is there
with the facilities person Kevin Roth
and the two people from Sanra County
Office of Education and we and the with
the principles and we walk every
classroom to make sure that every grade
level has English, math, science and
social studies curriculum and all the
classroom and the facilities, restrooms,
cafeteria, any facilities they are all
checked so that we are in compliance.
Okay.
>> And same thing when it is a middle
school or high school, I am walking
those uh schools with the county office
of education with the facilities person
Kevin Roth and uh with those two people
and the principal.
>> And then how many janitors do we need
per campus?
>> I can uh get the number. Uh I do not
oversee that uh piece, but I can get you
the number.
>> Okay. So in in an email you could
probably get that info because I know it
varies because a campus like Watson Ohio
is is very big compared to a smaller
campus. I understand that. Um but could
you get us that information?
>> Okay.
>> Trusty Krosco, there's a square footage
formula on that u and and we can get
that actually in my top of my inbox.
Okay.
>> All right. Thank you.
Uh, okay. That concludes 9.2, the
Williamson Act compliance report. That
moves us on to 9.3, Sustainable Schools
Advisory Update Report by Mark Herps,
Deputy Superintendent.
>> Well, thank you. Uh,
good evening, President Shirley,
trustees, Superintendent Contraras,
members of the public. Uh, Mark Herps,
deputy superintendent. Just want to say
thank you for the opportunity to serve
on the sustainable uh, schools advisory.
It has been a learning experience for
me. I have not had that experience in
terms of the possibility of
consolidating schools. So, it truly has
been a great opportunity to hear
perspectives and get to know members of
the community, but also also navigate
those challenging times. So, I
appreciate that. Um, I want to start off
with we met yesterday still a lot of
discussion regarding the elementary
optimal program design. And really what
that's looking at is a certain number of
teachers per grade level. they call it a
cohort and different sizes whether it be
a three cohort model, three TK, three
kinder, nothing's quite that pure, but
really analyzing that as well as a five
cohort etc. So, a lot of discussion
there and then some time devoted to
different scenarios and scenarios were
to if we were to look at consolidation,
would a priority be the age of the
facilities? Would it be disrupting the
least amount and then looking longterm
at our five-year forecast on what that
does from an enrollment perspective and
the impact it has on the enrollment uh
uh based on the scenario. We also had a
presentation from MGT. There's a link on
our website to where it's it's a
boundary analysis done by software. You
can actually look at the software and
see as you shift boundaries the impact
it has on the number of individuals that
would attend those region schools. So
it's a very very cool tool open to the
public. I I uh uh definitely advocate
for anybody interested to take a look at
that. And then finally, we spent a lot
of time on the communication. We have a
couple community um uh uh input sessions
coming up in October. Also, a lot of
feedback on surveying. So, we plan to
survey and poll individuals and we are
forming a small subcommittee of
individuals to help draft that to make
sure that we gather enough community
input as we continue down this process.
Um, I would like to say I truly
appreciate the individuals who devote
their time for that committee. It's a
tough it's a it's a it's a tough job,
but it's worth it. So, you know, with
that, that's my report.
>> Thank you. Are there any public comment?
>> Yes.
>> Chris, before that, um, I think our
trustee might want to share because the
students also met yesterday uh on this
topic.
>> Perfect.
>> Yes, we did. I don't know the number on
how many people ended up being here. Dr.
T says 40. Um we had about 40 students.
We had about um 40 students here. Um and
with the help of two other
superintendent core council members um
me and them helped lead discussions on
different topics regarding the
sustainable schools update.
We also all received a presentation from
Dr. Contras around the information and
like just a bunch of information about
the advisory or about the sustainable uh
schools kind of program and what was
going on. The goal of that was to inform
students and also gather opinions. We're
going to be meeting in the future as
well to gather more opinions because it
was more of an informational meeting. We
did have quality discussions, but we
also got a presentation. We were able to
like learn more about the advisory and
about what was going on. Um, in addition
to those meetings that will be going on
in the future, if it is on any of the
agendas in the future, which it will be,
it'll be going out on the Google form.
So, we'll be able to get a bunch of
input and I'll share that.
>> Thank you.
Uh, we'll start with Trusty Florence.
>> Hold on. I'm sorry.
>> Uh, Chris Webb, Brandon, Denise, and
Ashley Yuro.
>> I have anything written down and you do.
Um, yeah. I, as a member of this
committee, like I still can't even tell
you what we've been doing because
we just get talked at the entire time.
We get talked at. We sit there and we
get talked at. and maybe we do a stupid
little poster activity, but we just get
talked at. And this committee in between
these last two sessions, members of the
committee put together a survey and
sought to get community input. I'm being
told that the superintendent may not
believe that like that's our role to get
community input, but when I have had
conversations with certain trustees,
they say, "No, your role is to go out
and to engage in the community." So, we
put together a survey and it should have
been the first item of business in our
last meeting. The members of the
committee should have the latitude to
steer this committee instead of it just
being controlled by the consultants like
that failure Bill Maguire. But instead
of empowering the members of the
committee, we sit there and we get
talked at and we get, oh, this four
cohort model that could see the closure
of nine elementary schools with these
cohort models we're looking at. I think
that goes way too far and we should
actually trust the people in that room
to have conversations of how many
schools should we close, what should the
criteria be, but we haven't had any of
those conversations because we just get
talked at. And even with this last one
where we came where members put together
a survey, we were told by Mark that the
district is actually going to put
together a survey and if we want we
could meet with him in between meetings
and he can bring the survey that the
district is putting together. That's the
same crap you pulled with the
sustainable budget team. Like if we're
working as a committee to be empowered
and we're coming up with surveys,
empower us and adopt that as your
survey. Don't say, "Oh yeah, cool. good
job. But we're just going to brush that
aside and do what we're going to do. And
don't worry, we're going to have like
three community listening sessions. Like
this is a fraud.
Well, as a fiscal responsibility matter,
I think I should just take over for Mark
and all these all these consultants. On
January 14th, 2026, in the recording for
these board meetings, at the 5 hour 23
minute 45 second mark, I made the first
recommendations with the survey. I spoke
to it again in on the 18th of March, on
the 17th of June, and the 24th of June.
And we also heard hero talk about it.
It's been it's becoming a recurring
theme. and by choosing not to do this.
Um and and really if you look at just
that last meeting um at the twoh hour 10
minute 16 second mark um the deputy
superintendent kind of made clear that
like um it's basically they're not
interested in hearing from the community
and that they it seemed like there's a
predetermined um agenda from and that
you will only survey in a way to get uh
some type of result that you
specifically want and I just don't think
it's going to be a good result. It's so
frustrating for me hearing about the
optimum program model when you're you're
going off the max class sizes and that's
not optimum. That's like the most we'll
legally tolerate. What you should be
doing is looking at what did PBFT um
first propose in our negotiations. That
would be more optimal if you want to
talk about like what's really what's
best. Um also
I think let me see here. uh it's we
shouldn't do one-sizefits-all and in our
models we should do a survey and in that
survey should be a community focused
model and also one of the things that's
frustrating for me is like okay hey time
to look at we got the data I'd say no
you don't got the data because you also
don't have adequate facility um data
because you know what you didn't
consider AC and then you didn't consider
the fields and the if you're really
interested in people coming to school
you need to these things considered.
Thank you.
>> I want to speak I want to speak honestly
tonight as we both um as as both a
member of this committee and president
of CSEA. Um CSEA came into the
sustainable schools advisory process in
good faith. We understand that declining
enrollment and that this just district's
fiscal realities require difficult
conversations and decisions, right? Um
we are not here pretending that that
does not need to change. Um but we need
to acknowledge where we're actually at
in the process. Um according to the
district's um SSA schedule, this
committee, and according to my schedule,
we've met 11 times since April. Um,
after 11 meetings, we have not even had
the substantiated like the conversation
about middle schools or high schools.
We've only spoke about elementary
schools. Um, and that matters because we
are being asked to develop an optimal
program model or OPM for PBSD schools,
right? Um and um I don't believe we have
even been able to establish the OPM
floor yet. Um so before we start
deciding what can be consolidated,
reduced, moved, organized, reorganized,
um we need to establish what we believe
every PBSD student should have access
to. Um it cannot only be uh community-
based, it has to be student focused. I'm
glad that Natalie mentioned that that
was what was happened the other day
because actually I saw their notes on
the wall and the notes were amazing. Why
didn't we survey our student advisory
team,
our schools? And I'm sorry, I'm
frustrated, but because it's really
important to us, this work that we do
that we're doing. Mark is right. It's
hard. It's difficult. We're having very
difficult discussions and for many of
us, it it it is deeply rooted. Um I I
just want to say really quick because I
know my time is up. Um, but you know, we
we do need to come up with an OPM and
and we need to have this informed
conversation on the backs of the
students and their beautiful little
sticky notes. Um, and the community and
the survey and we shouldn't we should be
there already. We should be there
already.
We've met 11 times.
Natalie, we we would love we would love
to hear what you guys have to say and we
would love to come to your next pizza
party because I like pizza. Um and and
we would love to present to you guys and
we would love to hear what you have to
say because I think your voice matters
more than just a pizza party and talking
about ideas. We want to bring your brain
to that room honestly.
>> Thank you.
I'll start board comments with Trustee
Flores.
>> Okay, Trusty Medina.
>> Okay,
this is interesting to me. So, just
correct me if I'm wrong. Somebody who is
not from this area is running the
sustainable schools group, who did not
grow up here, who has not worked here
for more than a year, who doesn't know
the ins and outs of this community. And
now they're telling our group that we as
a board gave directions and autonomy to,
and now they're being roadblocked by the
superintendent and her deputy
superintendent.
What could we do as a board in order to
give them more power in that space?
Because if they're just going to be
directed, why do we have that group if
the superintendent and her little buddy
over there already know the direction
that they want to go in for these
schools? What's the point of having that
group? I I you can't answer most of my
questions. So that's why I'm looking at
you. But what I'm trying to get at is
these people that are in there are in
our classrooms. They're in our
community. They're not from somewhere
else. They've been here for quite a long
time and they need to have their voices
heard. the superintendent should not be
blocking them. Right? So I think we need
to have a motion where we are giving
that group more authority over the
superintendent and the deputy
superintendent.
And um I know this is just discussion,
but that's something that I think we
need to talk about as a board preferably
once these people are gone. That way we
have a fresh board coming in who
actually knows what they're doing and
cares about our community. because I'm
not seeing that from these people right
here who are running this group.
>> Trusty Krosco.
>> Okay. Um I've actually have been keeping
up with the um with the meetings. One
suggestion that I have is um when you
all split up in groups, I can't hear
anything. Um so I really want to hear
those conversations. Um because I see
people pointing at the, you know, the
the paper, but I don't know what's going
on.
>> I think it's a great suggestion. is
tough from a live stream perspective.
I've got Misty look look over here. We
can discuss. Yeah, that the discussions
in the small groups are rich and I
understand it's live streamed whole
whole room, not individual by group. So,
yeah.
>> And I can't be there. Huh?
>> I just want to hear. Yeah,
>> I just can't speak.
>> Okay.
>> Okay. Um my my other u my other question
is um you said that you wanted to have
um community input sessions. Those are
awesome. Have we thought of also doing
Zoom for people who can't make it to
those?
>> Yes, I believe one of the three is
scheduled to be live via Zoom.
>> Okay. And and and interpreters will be
present through everything. Yes. Zoom
and in person.
>> Yes.
>> Okay. Um my my other question is the
surveys, will they also be in Spanish?
>> Yes.
>> Okay. Um,
>> and how how will you get people to take
the survey? Like how will you do your
outreach?
>> A lot of advertisement in terms of what
we're going to do on on that end. We
also uh plan to poll which is going to
be a nice way of getting actual
anecdotal feedback through conversation
and make sure that that is diversified
throughout Bajaro Valley.
>> Okay. Okay. So, we're not not just
capturing certain groups or whoever
would just fill out a survey, but really
going into the different regions of
Pajaro to have authentic conversations
with those individuals from those
neighborhoods.
>> Okay. Can I make some suggestions just
because from what I've seen when I do my
own outreach um some s I have seen many
many people line up for the food
distributions. Um they're waiting there
to you know get their food but they're
there have nothing else to do. That
would be a great time to to get um
people um farmers market on Fridays in
downtown Watsonville. Set up a little
table, bring some goodies, have people
come in. You know, every time they get
out of work, that's where we we go and
we hang out and we buy produce and
flowers and stuff like that. Um and also
parent groups. Um because what I'm
scared of is that we're not going to get
um some of those parents who are working
who are you know it I'm on the parent
app and sometimes it's a little
overwhelming with everything you know
and sometimes I'm mentally not ready to
do something. So I I just want there to
be outreach for a lot of our Spanish
speaking communities and I want you guys
to be able to to get them. So that's why
I'm just giving suggestions.
Thank you, Trusty Ellen.
>> Okay, I think I have three suggestions.
Um, I like the suggestion of having um
CSCA come in and present just because it
seems like they do have a differing
opinion and I think that having two
perspectives would be helpful and just
having a more well-rounded like
education when the students do come in.
Um, my second suggestion would be I
think like it would be helpful I the
timeline is, but I think it would be
helpful to have some models just because
I think the discussions that we were
having last time were really valuable
and they had like quality opinions from
students, but I think it's hard to
envision like taking those opinions and
putting them into like what we're
talking about here. Like I think that a
lot of what people were saying was very
agreeable and I think like they were
saying like we want strong communities
and we want well staffed schools but I
think that transferring those opinions
into like a plan of what it would
actually end up being like for our
district would be super helpful because
I think it's hard at least for me to to
envision like yeah I want a strong
community but what is that going to look
like in terms of like cutting elementary
schools potentially? Um, and then I
think my third suggestion would be
having like with those models like for
me at least it would be super helpful to
have like super objective data on if
this plan was to go through how would
that be positive like it I know that
that would be in the report but I think
that like having that with the multiple
models and saying like oh this is what's
going to be positive this is what's
going to be potentially negative and
then in those models being able provide
the students the opportunity to say,
"Okay, this is what I like about this
model. I think I like this model better
because I value these things that it's
going to benefit." So, I think that like
the last meeting that we had was super
beneficial, but I think that having like
more um like I don't know like tangible
things to see would be helpful.
That moves us on to 9.4 for report on
board listening sessions implementation
timeline
>> and next steps.
>> I would like to make a motion to um
table this item.
>> Is there a second?
>> It's gonna be really short.
>> Okay. All right.
All those in favor of tableabling 9.4
signify saying I reluctantly.
>> Okay.
>> Okay. Let's finish our agenda. So that's
900 Z or not nine
four zero zero3. Okay. and that
>> and we can't do anything. Okay, we're
moving on to 10 consent agenda. Any
public comment on consent?
>> Okay, no comment on consent. Um
>> I would like to make a motion.
>> Okay,
>> I would like to pull one second. 10.5
10.7 10
>> Slow down. Slow down. Slow down. 10 5 10
7
>> 1.12
>> 12
>> 10.9
>> backwards nine.
>> There you go.
>> Uh the items Trustee Medina would like
to pull approve 2026 27 memorandum of
understanding between PBSD and Santa
Cruz City Schools,
which as I understand provides um
services for special needs students.
10.7 approve the addendum to non-public
agencies and contracted service
providers for special services. Uh 10.9
approve agreement for expanded learning
wolf school after school staffing
supports.
>> Sorry, not 109. 1012. Approve resolution
number 262703 authorizing the purchase
of supplies, equipment, and services for
Rolling Hills Middle School Field
improvement project via cooperative
agreements in California multiple award.
Um, so there is a motion to adopt the
consent agenda with pulling off three
items to be deferred to 11 deferred
consent items. Is there a second to
that?
>> Second. I hear a second. All those in
favor signify by saying I. That's one,
two, three, four. Okay. Uh four Z3
absent. All right. So everything passes.
So now except three, we will move on to
10.5
under
>> All right.
>> 11.
>> Trusty Charlie,
I would like to move to suspend the
rules.
Uh yeah, we can do that if we have all
four vote because three can't pass
anything. Okay. Um
>> I would like to move to suspend the
rules so we could um talk about 10.5 and
10.7 together and vote on them together.
>> Okay. Is there a second to that?
Yeah.
>> Was that okay? A second. Okay. So, there
is a first and a second to suspend the
rules and combine
105 and 107 in discussion and
approval. All those in favor signify by
saying I. One, two, three, four. Okay.
Motion carries
with our usual four Z003.
Um
>> okay.
>> Okay. So that was just the suspense
part. Okay.
>> So now we can make a motion in a second
on those two and then have discussion
about it. Anybody want to make a motion?
Um, I will make a motion with an um
amendment that the superintendent come
back to the next meeting with a detailed
report on the first four weeks of what
happened um during the school year uh
the opening of this school year. So, as
I understand it, the motion is to
approve 10.5 and 10.7
with the stipulation that within two
weeks
>> at the next board meeting, the
superintendent will give a detailed
presentation on the roll out of the
first four weeks of school.
>> The next regular meeting, I believe, is
107.
Are you able to do that in that
timeline?
>> I don't need to ask her. We're telling
her. It's our directive. We need to make
sure staff has I mean because I don't
know exactly what's involved and what
pieces she has already. Okay.
>> Because she probably doesn't want to do
it because it turned out so bad.
>> We have a motion. Is there a second? Do
we need another explanation of what the
motion is?
>> Pardon?
>> You go for it.
>> Sure.
>> Yeah. I was just wondering what would be
um expected in the presentation and I
think like it would be a good idea but
like what are you looking for and then
what is that like what are you looking
for to say like oh okay I see that in
your presentation and I like what we
approved last time.
>> Yeah. So good question. I want clarity
on um the amount of BTS IAS um that we
did not have at the opening of the
school year despite knowing that. I want
to know how many parents put in a
request because their needs weren't met
with the students. And I also want a
overview of um services or students that
had to be transferred um despite their
parents asking them to stay there. So, I
just want a general overview of how um
the first four weeks opened because it
sounds like it was a huge mess um that
we need to make sure doesn't happen
again.
>> Can you help me draw the conclusion that
the request relates to the two items
that we're talking about 105 and 107?
>> What are we approving, Trusty Charlie,
for 5.7 and 5 and the two items that we
just did? What are we approving?
>> I'm just asking you to help me
understand your connection. I'm not
going to help you do your homework.
These are on special education. If you
had listened to the public like they had
asked us, they said, "This is something
that we should approve now, but make
sure that we're actually filling in
these roles so we're not having to do
outside contracts."
>> Okay. So, the connection you're making
is that they relate to special ed. You
want to make sure we have a report and
understanding of what's happened in the
first four weeks,
right?
>> Did I get that? Just to clarify these
two items, one is related specifically
to speech pathologists and the other is
related to a particular service for one
particular child.
>> Is it a special needs child? Is it a
special needs child? Is it a special
needs child?
>> Thank you. That's what I was asking
about. So I want a whole report on
special education. If you want to keep
talking over me, it's my time. So
>> I give you your directions
>> and I am trying to answer your question.
You don't really answer my questions.
>> Yes. You do.
>> No, you don't.
>> What you're asking is to give a report
that is outside of these two items. The
these two items are specific.
>> Are these items dealing with services
for special education? Yes or no?
>> Two services
>> for special education. Yes or no?
>> Two services.
Special education.
>> People are watching this, you know,
which is why people do not want you in
this role. All right. If you want to
keep spinning me around, go for it. But
you are a dishonest person, so we don't
want to listen to you. Okay.
>> I would like to hear
>> what I'm hearing in um
>> the what I'm hearing is speech, right?
So, a report on speech.
>> No, I didn't ask for that.
>> Well, that is on
>> Do you guys not know what special
education is?
>> Yeah, I do.
>> Okay, then. Yeah,
>> I'm asking for a report on special
education. Whatever she is trying to
explain is that one of those services is
only for one child. So, do you want a do
you want a presentation on just that
child?
>> Did I ask that?
>> That's what we're clarifying.
>> I told you report on the first four
weeks. How
>> I'm relating your question for those
services is through speech. Correct.
>> What did I just tell you? I want a
special education a general special
education report. The concern here is
related to Brown Act violations because
you're pulling something off of the
agenda and now you're bringing it back
to something that's not related to that.
>> So now I'm violating the Brown Act when
she was violating it for seven months
and you said nothing. So let's talk
about the Brown Act. So this is what I'm
asking you guys. I want a report on the
first four weeks on our special
education students and if they were
giving the services that they needed.
I believe that's a a valuable report and
>> obviously you guys don't care about our
special needs.
>> See it connected to the items the two
items that we have on the agenda.
>> Look it y'all said trust us we know what
we're doing and look what happened Jess
we're in the gutter now. What I'm
saying, Gabe, is I understand and like I
agree with you, Professor Professor, um,
Trusty Chirley, that that it is a valid
report, but what we are trying to make
you understand is that that report goes
outside of these two agenda items. I'm
trying to relate what you're asking
through speech so that you could look at
that report through speech because that
is what you can ask. That's what I'm
I'll have no stance in telling me the
rules cuz you guys can't even follow
them or know them.
>> I'm not saying I'm letting you know that
this is a stipulation that I want on the
report. I just want a special education
report
>> and you can ask that. That's fine. Let's
close this up. Get your speech report
and then ask it later. I agree. I want
to see it too. But we are trying to
clarify because that is too broad and
it's outside of this. I'm trying to help
you and I'm trying to move forward as
well and I would love to see that report
but I don't ask for it. You guys have
been in the majority and you haven't
asked for it.
>> That's exactly what I said. Let's move
forward and get your speech report and
and this students services and then ask
for it. I would love to see it. I
support you on that.
>> Do you not hear my amendment? It's to
approve these two items with that
stipulation that we're going to get a
presentation on our special needs the
first four weeks. How is that hard to
understand? I think what what everyone's
trying to say, Trusty Medina, is we will
I I will gladly
>> No, I want it in writing. I because you
have been dishonest.
>> You do not say what you're You tell me
you're going to give me a report and you
don't give it to me.
>> I don't think that's happened.
>> Really? Where's Prop 28? Where's the SRO
report you said you're going to bring
back?
>> We tried to give the prop report.
>> We tried to give the report.
>> Where is it?
>> We couldn't get it approved.
>> Okay. Anyway, can we can approve this.
>> I will walk out of here. I want that
stipulation in place.
>> I don't think any of us, the three of us
are willing to approve it with that
stipulation because we can't see the
>> nothing gets approved.
>> It's just a presentation and y'all are
dragging it on.
We are adjourned at 10:02. Good night.