Video summary
The webinar, led by Nadia Ortelt from the Center for Open Science, focuses on leveraging OSF's paid services specifically designed for organizations and institutions. The primary offerings discussed include OSF Institutions, which provides a single sign-on system to automatically aggregate user content; OSF Registries, which allows groups to create branded collections of registrations with custom moderation policies; and OSF Preprints, a service for hosting moderated preprint repositories. These tools enable research support staff, library administrators, and integrity officers to brand their scholarly outputs, demonstrate a commitment to open scholarship, and maintain governance frameworks that align with specific institutional or funder requirements.
A critical component of the presentation addresses the strategic shift away from traditional "projects" toward a focus on registrations and study plans, effective February 2027. Under this new model, OSF projects will transition to a read-only archive state, while the platform will prioritize permanent, timestamped records that separate planned from unplanned work. This evolution enhances research quality by ensuring transparency, allowing for the reporting of null results, and reducing publication bias through persistent identifiers and linked data. The webinar emphasizes that these changes are designed to foster an ecosystem where research plans, preprints, and outcomes are fair findable and robustly documented within a broader repository landscape.
To support this transition and ensure widespread adoption, the Center for Open Science offers comprehensive training solutions alongside its technical services. These include group training sessions for up to 40 participants and self-paced courses available on the Canvas LMS, where learners can earn badges for their professional profiles. Institutions receive significant discounts on these educational resources, reinforcing the organization's commitment to helping researchers understand the benefits of pre-registration and data management. The pricing structure varies by service, with annual fees for institutions and registries set at $5,000, while preprint services utilize a tiered model based on submission volume, ensuring accessibility for groups of various sizes.
In conclusion, the webinar outlines a clear roadmap for organizations to integrate OSF's advanced features into their research workflows before the February 2027 deadline. By adopting OSF Institutions and related services, organizations can automate the affiliation of all public materials with their brand, gain real-time administrative metrics for compliance reporting, and provide their researchers with the tools necessary to conduct rigorous, transparent science. The session serves as both an informational overview and a call to action for research offices to engage with the Center for Open Science team to tailor these solutions to their specific needs, ensuring that their institutions remain at the forefront of open scholarship practices.
Read the full video transcript
Hello everybody and welcome. Um as folks
trickle in. Um I'll just give uh a
couple admin um pointers at the top. Um
so if you have questions throughout this
webinar um uh my colleagues who are also
here will introduce um we'll be able to
answer your questions. Please put them
in the Q&A so we can make sure we're
answering all the questions that
everybody has. Um couple other things.
The slides um and a recording of the
webinar will be sent out to you um if
you are a registrant or an attendee. So
you should be getting the slides with
all the links um and um everything that
I say uh in a follow-up likely tomorrow.
Um, if you want to introduce yourself
just in the regular chat, not in the
Q&A, feel free to drop your name and the
institution or organization you're
coming from. Um, and whether or not
maybe you're already a uh subscriber or
member to some of our services uh
including OSF institutions, registries,
preprints or um or you have taken our
training.
Um, excuse me. Um, one other thing is
that um, [clears throat] if uh, there is
something that I say that's unclear or
um, or you want to follow up and not put
it in the Q&A, um, there'll be an
opportunity at the end uh, for just some
open time for you to to put questions
in. Um, I might answer them throughout
the course of the webinar. So keep that
in mind um, as you're asking questions.
Um, and with that, I think seems that
the trickling has slowed. So uh we'll um
jump straight in. So today what
[clears throat] we'll be talking about
is how OSF can be leveraged and utilized
for organizations and uh institutions.
Um and in particular we'll be focusing
on um the paid service offerings we have
including OSF institutions, OSF
registries, OSF preprints and um our
group and self-paced training. And I'll
just say also that today is really um uh
the audience we've built this for is you
know research support staff, library
administrators, research offices like
VPR offices um research integrity
officers. But if that's not you and you
are a researcher or a PI uh or a student
um you might get something out of this
also. So don't go away. Um my name is
Nadia Ortelt. I'm the strategic
partnerships manager at the Center for
Open Science. Um, and I'll also say that
I work very closely with my colleagues
who are here on the call, including
Gretchen Gigan, who's our information
services and communities manager. She's
an amazing librarian. She knows so much
about the OSF. Um, and she's here to
help answer questions. [clears throat]
Excuse me, Ken. Um my colleague Crystal
Selenpole is also here who builds out
all of our really powerful educational
tools and um does a lot of evaluation um
and education work um at the center for
open science um and in relation to OSF
can also answer a lot of questions um
and I also have uh our amazing marketing
team um Teresa here as well who is
helping to run this webinar. [laughter]
Okay, so feel free to email us. Um,
you'll also be getting these emails in a
follow-up, but if you want to jot them
down, I'm a great person to talk to if
you are interested in a service. If
you're already um paying for services or
you're with uh affiliated with an
institution or organization that pays
for services, please reach out to
Gretchen,
[clears throat and cough]
excuse me. Um, and a couple of resources
to bookmark even while we're doing this
webinar. Um the OSF paid products uh
page includes links to um some um
marketing pages that kind of give an
overview of what OSF institutions,
registries, preprints, and training are.
Um there's a link here to uh the OSF uh
platform um as well as some big changes
that are kind of underway right now on
the OSF and I'll talk about how those
impact our services uh as well. And you
[clears throat] can also create a free
OSF account if you haven't already. Um
just go to osf.iogister.
And um I'll be talking a bit as well
about our um self-paced paid training um
which you can sign up for um as well.
And again, you'll be getting these
slides with these links, but then just
just some flags of some of the things
that I'll be talking about. It already
[clears throat] only takes a minute to
make a free OSF account. Um so I
recommend, you know, as you're listening
to me talk, if you don't have one, it's
helpful to make one.
So, we're gonna uh Teresa's going to
launch a poll right now. And I'll just
wait uh just a minute or two while folks
um answer this Zoom poll that Teresa
will launch. This is super important.
So, I really ask that all of you fill it
out. It takes just a minute. Um it's
really helpful for us to understand, you
know, are are we marketing this webinar
to the right people? Are you coming? Um
and is this the right place for you? um
and are we uh you know leveling the
material um in in such a way that it
meets your expectations and needs. So
please fill this out. It's about your
familiarity with the OSF, your
familiarity with registrations um and
your your kind of role and
responsibility at your institution or
organization or research group.
[clears throat] I'll just take a sip of
water while you're filling out
So I believe that that poll can kind of
remain in the background um while I move
on. So I am going to move on and talk
give a little bit of um background to uh
what we're talking about here today and
how the OSF works.
So, um you may be familiar with the OSF.
It is free for individual users. Um our
terms of service um uh require that a
user on the OSF is a person uh not an
organization or institution. Um so if
you are using the OSF in a in an
incorrect way where you have a login
that is representative of a institution
or organization, talk to me. Um but
creating an account for an individual is
free. Um, and creating and publishing
material on the OSF um, is free. So if
you want to create and publish a
registration, if you want to create and
publish a pre-print or for now um, until
some changes are made um, in February,
you can create and publish a project and
that's always free for individuals. Um
what we'll be talking about today are
the kind of layers that sit on top of
that free utilization of the OSF by
researchers um which uh aggregate uh
affiliate um and help moderate and
collect those objects. So,
registrations, preprints, um, and
projects. Um, and there's a caveat
asterisk for projects because, as some
of you who are here might know, we are
deprecating um, and transitioning um,
projects um, starting now and um, with a
a hard hard stop in uh, February. I'll
talk a little bit about that. But just
as [clears throat] a top layer um you
know if you are a representative of an
organization or an institution um these
paid services OSF institutions
registries and preprints allow you to
work with those published objects that
your researchers um uh students uh may
be publishing on the OSF or that you may
ask to publish on the OSF. So very
briefly, OSF institutions is a single
sign on automatic aggregation of uh
affiliated users, registration,
preprints and soon to be archived
projects. Um OSF registries is a way to
um uh aggregate and moderate OSF
registrations in a kind of community
operated branded registry. Um and
similarly OSF preprints is a way to
moderate and aggregate and collect
preprints um in a brandable or branded
um uh registry of preprints. Um
the the benefit of OSF institutions
registries and preprints is that as an
organization or a discipline
disciplinary group or research group,
you're able to um brand uh material that
you want all in one place. Have it
affiliated with your organization or
institution and demonstrate to both uh
readers and people within your community
that you support um uh different open
scholarship practices.
um uh and open scholarship uh more
generally. [clears throat]
So, one thing to note up top, it's
really important is that OSF projects
which were um one of the three workflows
on the OSF um that researchers used will
be transitioned in early 2027. So,
effective February 2027, OSF projects
are going to move to a readonly archive
state. So no new project can be created
after this date. It might be a little
bit confusing because I'm going to be
essentially talking um from that point
in time February uh forward because I
we're trying to not encourage people to
um utilize the OSF project workflow when
we know that it will be transitioned. Um
but so that you know today you can
publish and create a project or
registration or preprint but starting
February projects will be transitioned
and then moving forward OSF um is a
place that we hope um will be a primary
repository for registrations of study
plans and linked material as well as uh
preprints the publication of preprints.
And again, if you have any questions as
I'm talking, please drop them in the Q&A
so that my colleagues Crystal and
Gretchen can answer those questions.
The thing that you know um is important
to keep in mind and part of why we're
shifting um from away from uh projects
towards uh registrations and study plans
is that um the thing that makes us
distinctive is that we allow for the
publication of a pre-registration with
linked um data with linked preprints
outcomes and we allow for them to have
persistent identifiers um for them to be
fair findable and discoverable. Um, and
this is different from uh the way in
which a lot of other repositories work.
And we think that it's um the way that
we can work within an ecosystem um of
many many other repositories that have
um in many cases um uh better and more
robust ways of doing things that we will
no longer do moving forward in February.
Things like sharing uh just data files
only within a project, for example. Um
so our focus is going to be on the
linked OSF study plan record um moving
forward and this will impact the the
ways in which I'm talking about things
like OSF institutions um OSF preprints
and OSF registries.
>> [clears throat]
>> So, first, for those of you that may not
be familiar with a registration or
pre-registration,
um uh this is important because it sort
of underlies the paid tooling and um
paid infrastructure that we have that
sits on top of the free OSF. So, any
user again can create a a
pre-registration or registration on the
OSF. Generally, what a registration is
uh is not singular to the OSF. Um it's
utilized differentially across
disciplines but the general definition
is that it's a time timestamped archived
record of your research and analysis
plan which is created before you start
your study. Um and a way to think about
it is that pre-registering separates
planned from unplanned work and it can
improve the quality, transparency and
reportability of a study. Um and on the
OSF um an a registration or
pre-registration is timestamped. it's
permanent. Um there can be updates made
to it, but you cannot remove a
registration from the OSF.
Um on the OSF, uh a registration is uh
read only. Um it's a snapshot of your
study plan. Um you currently can create
a registration from a project, although
as you recall, you will not be able to
do that moving forward in February. You
can start a registration from scratch.
You can embargo registrations. Um once
submitted and made public, the content
of a registration can't be edited,
although you can make very clear
updates. Um registrations are assigned
to DOI, they become a part of the OSF
registry, so they can be searched and
cited. Um if they're uh submitted to a
community operated registry, which is
what we call OSF registries, and I'll
talk about that. Um they'll also be
searchable and and findable, but also
affiliated with that uh registry.
Um this is different than a project on
the OSF. Um the words that we use are
sometimes a little bit complicated
because often research is called a
project. But the project object on the
OSF, the one which will be deprecated in
February is an editable object on the
OSF. Um it can be deleted for example
unlike a registration. Um a project is a
lot more flexible. um doesn't
necessarily have to adhere to a template
um unlike a registration which um uh
requires the the um utilization of a of
a template when publishing on the OSF.
Um here's just an overview of some of
the templates that we have. Um some
[clears throat] of them like the OSF
pre-registration template is a very
comprehensive template for um those who
are perhaps publishing a study plan for
the first time. It really guides you
through a lot of detailed questions
about for example study design variables
and your analysis plan.
Excuse me. But we also have a selection
of templates uh for specific research
types. Um we have you know generalized
systematic review templates which are
used by a lot of our users for
systematic reviews and scoping reviews.
Um if you're interested in that uh we
actually um have a webinar which I
believe is publicly available where we
talk about that. Um we also have a lot
of resources around pre-registration
um and many templates which may apply to
specific disciplines or specific types
of research that you're doing. Um you
can download any template as a Google
doc before you commit to it because
again registrations are permanent. So we
encourage users to do that. Um uh and uh
we will send out um links for you to
look at all these templates in a
followup. I think also my colleagues
might be able to drop one too if you're
unable to find it. So what is OSF
registries then? So OSF registries is a
paid product for organizations or
institutions and it provides a branded
kind of collection of registrations. So
this allows you to have your identity on
uh every registration on on the uh page
that aggregates all the registrations.
It allows you to set your own moderation
criteria and scope um and allows for all
of um the affiliated material with that
registration. So for example, linked
projects or preprints to be um traced
back to your organization or your
institution. Um through registry, you
can create a moderation or governance
framework um that your community may
want to share publicly or just have it
uh be an internal framework that's
affiliated with submission of
registrations to your registry. You can
also work with us um to create custom
registration templates that ensure
alignment with your um editorial
frameworks. And I'll say that OSF
registries um are utilized by
organizations that really want to
advertise their commitment to research
rigor and transparency. So funders,
research communities, um research groups
um so you know from really large sizes
to very small sizes that are committed
to supporting transparency um and
research plan sharing. They utilize OSF
registries. So in some cases um the
implementation of open scholarship
policies for a group or a funer is
really well aligned with the creation of
an OSF registry and um that's a great
use case for starting one up. Um, so
funders, for example, many of whom have
registries on the OSF, may require like
that grantees submit an embargoed
pre-registration of a study plan that
they hope to fund and then their branded
registry becomes a place to to
highlight, um, all of the research that
that organization funds.
[clears throat and cough]
So, um, a registry gives you again that
branded landing page, submission
control, and the ability to create
custom templates. It allows you to
affiliate all of the submissions with
your registry and you can also build
internal editorial policies um and
research policies that are necessary to
then moderate your registry and those
are up to you. Um so we don't um engage
with um sort of like the editorial or
like governance of a community operated
registry. Um
okay so I'll just show you an example of
what a registry looks like. So this is a
branded registry from a a foundation on
the OSF. Um and all of the um 167
registrations within this uh funders
registry are funded research projects um
that have had their uh study plans um
submitted to the registry by grantees.
the um the uh funer has its own policy
for um moderating and uh allowing for
those submitted registrations to be
approved. Um and um as part of the
registration interface on the OSF, if
data or code or materials or uh
preprints or supplementary material are
linked to that registration, it will
show you um within the um the branded
registry on uh for each registration
whether that material is there. So this
is the view that your researchers and
the broader community will see once a
registry is up and running for your
institution. Um
um so moving on to OSF preprints is very
similar kind of framework. Uh community
operated preprint services let an you or
your institution or group or community
run um a moderated uh or unmodderated
preprint service. Um uh the degree of
which again similarly to a registry um
is internal. So you can create um
editorial frameworks for approval of
registries uh criteria for approval etc.
Um and these research outputs in the
form of a pre-print a PDF with metadata
um can be shared you know at whatever
point um you determine via your
editorial policy. So that could be ahead
of or alongside formal publication. Um
you can connect those preprints directly
to registrations to projects as well.
Um, so you can keep the full research
record uh traceable in one place. Um,
and what a pre-print service includes is
again a branded landing page. You can
have submission control uh via
moderation of your service. There's also
tiered pricing. So the preprint service
is um has a lower uh floor um and it
depends on the number of submissions you
have on an annual basis. Um I'll talk
about that pricing at the end. Um and uh
all of the submissions to your preprint
service have affiliations. So here's
just a couple of examples of types of
preprint services. We have um a research
group. Um this is international society
for the study of emerging drugs. Uh we
have an open archive for legal
scholarship um which is called the law
archive which is actually backed by a
number of um legal uh institutions and
schools and programs. We also have an
example [clears throat] here of a funer
um a foundation that uh focuses on a
specific um type of research and they
have their own uh pre-print uh
repository.
Um so I'll talk a little bit now about
OSF for institutions. So we've talked
about um projects which um will be
transitioned. We've talked about
preprints and we've talked about
registrations. Um, OSF institutions
aggregates all of that material across
your institution in a single branded
page. Um, the difference here is that
OSF for institutions uses a single sign
on. Um, so any user uh or excuse me,
researcher from your institution that's
already using um, uh, your single sign
on can use that to log onto the OSF and
any material that they then publish on
the OSF. So any new registration or
preprint will be automatically
aggregated um onto your institutional
page and affiliated with your
institution. Um, one of the great things
that we do um uh as part of onboarding
of uh institutions that that um sign up
for OSF institutions is that we help
provide you with supported materials to
um bring on as many researchers to the
OSF as possible who might be able to
leverage our workflows um and utilize
the platform. So there are as many
institutions as there are guides um and
guidelines for how to use the OSF. Every
organization has its own um ecosystem of
software tools, repositories internal
and external that they use and we try to
help you determine if OSF institutions
is a good um uh tool and how it can fit
in for your students, for your research
groups, for your departments.
This is an example of a institutional
page. So this is the University of
British Columbia. Um you can see here
that you can um as as a reader um you
can see uh and parse by projects,
registrations, preprints, files and
users. Um and you can also search um uh
using OSF search um in the same way that
you would just on the OSF general um
repository. So it's um uh a branded
page. Uh this is automatically
aggregated so it does not require the
moderation um of a single for example
librarian or a research support staff
team. Um we can give um uh as many
people as you'd like administrative um
backend access. Um but this kind of runs
on its own after we've set up a single
sign on service. Just an example of what
the affiliation looks like for different
types of objects on the OSF for. So on
the upper left hand side here you can
see um a project DOI for example and the
fact that that specific project is
affiliated with UBC with the branding.
You can see on the um left uh in the
middle there there's an abstract um from
a um preprint which is actually in the
center of the page here. Um, and this is
actually interesting because it has two
affiliated institutions, so Princeton
and UBC, but it has also been submitted
to um our community operated pre uh
preprint service archive. Um, so you can
see that affiliation in the top left.
Um, and the idea here is that we're
trying to make a robust fair um uh
object on the OSF with with as many
affiliations um and persistent
identifiers as possible. So, so this can
um be found in as many locations as
possible both on the OSF and off. Um you
can see on the right hand side there,
this is just a a selection from a
registration which is affiliated with
UBC. Again, you can see that affiliated
institution um as well as an associated
project link um as well as you know some
other metadata like licensing um and the
registration DOI. [clears throat] So
this is um all what happens when you
sign up for um an OSF institutional
membership is that we set up single sign
on for you and we help um uh users
understand that they can use single sign
on the OSF and then affiliate all of
their um public material with your
institution.
Um it's really important um for creating
fair uh uh data and metadata on the OSF
both for us and for your institution
that institutional branding is not just
visual. We also append roar identifiers
um on all of the preprints uh projects
and registrations that are affiliated
with your um uh or published by your
affiliated researchers or users. Um and
uh the metadata and data that's then
affiliated with your institution shows
up in data site commons. Uh if your
users are linking their orchid records
to their OSF account, it's also linked
there. Um and that that uh data uh shows
up as well in crossref um and in uh any
library discovery layers that utilize uh
those uh platforms.
One [clears throat] of the other great
benefits with OSF for institutions is
that you can see your institutions's uh
user activity in two different ways. One
is via a real-time admin metrics
dashboard and again we can provide
access to as many admins um as you need.
Um this shows you information about you
know number of users, the number of
individual objects like registrations,
preprints or projects. Um it can show
you public file counts, total storage
counts. um uh the number of active users
you have, things like that. Um and you
can download data. Um you can uh there's
a way in which you can um uh engage with
users around um data curation. Um and
one of the other things that we do is
that we have a really hands-on
relationship with you. I say we but it's
often Gretchen Gigan who has this
relationship um with our member
institutions and she works to look at
longitudinal data. So um what is
happening with total page views over
time? What are we seeing in terms of
downloads of material or the private or
public um uh types of data that your
institutionally affiliated users are
putting on the platform. And we have
worked really hard, Gretchen has worked
really hard and our whole product team
has really um tried to make um the
interface for administrators as useful
as possible. Um we we've built our
dashboard and built OSF institutions to
try to be um of utility to research
administrators, librarians um and we
work really closely with um with our
institutions to see if we can build out
features that are uh helpful to them. Um
our dashboard is a really helpful tool
for any kind of evidence for compliance
um and accreditation reporting. you can
look at um uh search criteria uh via OSF
search but also within our dashboard. So
looking at things like um you know
funder metadata um may be helpful
depending on your role um at your
institution.
One of the things that I think is very
important to note um because it's
related to some of the reasons why we've
deprecated or we will be um deprecating
and transitioning projects and why we're
having a renewed focus on
pre-registration use is that we know
that pre-registration can benefit
researchers and scholars in a number of
key ways and we're really trying to um
uh to help institutions and
organizations to to build OSF adoption
of prior registration um so that you can
increase the quality of your research
outputs. So this is related to some of
those poll questions that I asked at the
beginning trying to understand you know
whether um it is within your role or
remmit to care about research quality um
or research integrity or research rigor
um because these are questions that um
that uh our focus on pre-registration um
can can help with. Um, we know that, um,
you know, documenting research plans in
advance can really provide teams with an
opportunity to think more about aspects
of the research plan, how they're
design, you know, relates to what they
hope to learn. Um, memory. So, research
studies take a really long time to
complete. It's easy to forget important
details. When you really document a
research plan in advance, there's a
record um, so that uh, you're not
relying on memory for what was planned
and why. Um I think shared understanding
is really obvious um between you know
internally and externally um you know in
collaborations
um and credibility. So peer registration
can really help avoid skepticism from
reviewers um uh transparency um can
provide others with insight into your
research process um to help you evaluate
evidence. Um, and in general, the
transparency of the pre-registration
helps to increase readers ability to
assess the credibility of claims and the
evidence that's then used to support
those claims. Um, it also makes any kind
of deviations from research from the
initial plan uh much more clear. Um, and
it can really help authors and readers
calibrate confidence in the claims that
they've made. Um, a very important
aspect of pre-registration is that it
enables reporting null results. It
provides a lot of opportunities for a
more reflexive engagement with research
practices and in uh a field. So not just
as it relates to a research project if
pre-registration is you know used
appropriately it it has been shown to um
uh show uh increases in accuracy of
effect size estimates and reduce
publication bias. So there are there are
real um reasons why pre-registration use
and specifically pre-registration use on
the OSF can be helpful for um increasing
the quality of research outputs. Um we
have an entire research team, evaluation
team, um education team on the OSF
outside of or sorry at COS outside of
the OSF. So if you have questions about
pre-registrations
um and uh pre-registration generally as
a concept um please reach out ask
questions um send us an email but also
we have a lot of training resources
which I'll talk about um in a moment.
So um we have two types of training um
uh that we offer at COS. Um the first
kind I'll say is group training. Um
we've offered that for many years. Um we
can train up to 40 people in a webinar.
Um we uh try to often offer a version of
this um for every new institution that
comes on board just to to get uh at
least an initial team or group um uh to
sort of understand some of the basics of
OSF institutions and the OSF. But we
also offer um specific types of uh group
training. Um, and if you are an OSF, if
you're uh paying for OSF institutions,
you get a 25% discount on that group
training. Um, that group training, um,
there's some links that folks can drop
and and in the slides, but the group
training, the standard price is $2,800
for 40 people in that group. It's led by
Crystal, who's here um, uh, in the
webinar. Um, it allows for different
types of group dynamics to play out um,
in real time in the webinar.
synchronous. We also have self-paced
training. And that self-paced training
allows for individual researchers to um
take a course. It's it's we use the uh
Canvas LMS. Um they can uh receive
badges that they can use on LinkedIn,
for example. Um and we have been
releasing uh Crystal has been releasing
self-paced training modules on Canvas um
for for during this year. We're there's
a new one that's about to drop within
the next month. Um but if you enroll um
you can take that course at any time.
You can take your time in taking that
course. Um and you can also as an
institution or an organization buy uh a
bundle of licenses so that a group of
people can do the self-paced training
within your organization.
Um right now we have the fundamentals of
open scholarship uh pre-registration and
registered reports and a data management
and sharing course that are available as
self-led training. Um uh again, OSF
institutions get a 25% discount on group
training, but we also have uh various
discounts for this year on bundles of
self-paced licenses. So, please email us
at training@cos.io
if you have questions uh about that.
So, just some uh costs and pricing to
talk about. um OSF institutions is uh
the our price for that which includes
single sign on a branded uh landing page
um administrative dashboard access um
metrics uh quarterly metrics as well as
real-time metrics dashboard um the
ability to uh curate some of the data
and material on the platform is $5,000 a
year OSF registries which again is a
moderated branded landing page um the
ability to moderate um submitted
registrations
is also $5,000 a year. And OSF preprints
is tiered pricing based on submission
numbers. Um so it starts at $999 a year
for up to a hundred submitted preprints
a year. Um and our self-led and group
training, the pricing is linked on our
page, but group training for up to 40
people is $2,800. Self-led training is
just $100 per seat um per course. Um if
you are part of an institution however
or an affiliated institution there's
some discounting so please just reach
out to us or out to me um uh
nadiacos.io.
Um if you are already you're here and
you're from a subscribing institution
you're you uh have an OSF institutional
affiliation but you have some questions
um please reach out to Gretchen coos.io.
Thank you to my colleagues and to
everybody who's come to the webinar. We
welcome your feedback. Please reach out
to me at nadiacos.io
if you have any questions about anything
we've talked about here. I can also
direct you to the right to the right
person if you need to talk to Gretchen
or Crystal or somebody on our research
team or policy team.
Thank you very much.