Video summary
The video presents an immersive tour through the creator's conceptual "brain," exploring the multifaceted concept of sensemaking as both a personal and collective endeavor. The speaker highlights that while individuals can engage in solitary reflection, true sensemaking often thrives within social contexts where ideas overlap and interconnect to form a useful web of knowledge. This exploration leads into the realm of collective intelligence, which encompasses various forms such as hive minds, crowdsourced problem-solving, and learning communities. A significant portion of this discussion is dedicated to "hybrid" intelligence, questioning how generative AI can augment rather than replace human collaboration, emphasizing that technology should serve to enhance our capabilities instead of substituting them entirely.
The narrative then shifts from real-world dynamics to fictional representations of sensemaking devices found in popular culture and literature. The speaker cites iconic examples like the Palantir seeing stones from *Lord of the Rings*, Charles Xavier's Cerebro from *X-Men*, Star Trek's Tricorder, and the Holographic Deck which inspired the simulation concept in *The Matrix*. Other references include precogs in *Minority Report* and Neil Stephenson's illustrated primer for growing into a great adult. These fictional tools serve as metaphors for technologies designed to help humans process information, solve complex problems, and navigate alternate realities or simulations, illustrating humanity's long-standing desire to externalize thought processes through advanced machinery.
Transitioning from fiction to speculative non-fiction and historical visionaries, the tour traces the lineage of ideas that have shaped modern computing. The speaker connects Vannevar Bush's 1945 concept of the Memex with J.C.R. Licklider's work on man-computer symbiosis and Douglas Engelbart's famous "Mother of All Demos," which introduced overlapping windows, document switching, and the computer mouse. This historical thread extends to Ted Nelson's hypertext systems rooted in Talmudic commentaries and concepts like Indra's Net from Buddhist philosophy, suggesting that everything is deeply intertwined. The discussion also touches on ancient texts like *The Diamond Sutra* as early attempts at creating non-discriminatory knowledge bases, paralleling modern efforts with distributed knowledge graphs and personal networks aimed at capturing and sharing human understanding.
Ultimately, the speaker reflects on how these various threads converge in the current era of artificial intelligence, which may finally act as the connective tissue needed to make global brains a reality. The creator apologizes for not being able to show specific moments of insight or "undo" actions within their mental map, noting that such clarity is often the result of collaboration with external memory systems like Jerry's Brain online. A key takeaway is the importance of having persistent places where knowledge remains accessible rather than disappearing into ephemeral search results; without these stable repositories for related and contextual issues, we risk losing the ability to revisit deep questions and build upon previous insights effectively over time.
Read the full video transcript
Sensemaking is one of my favorite words.
It it may also be a favorite word of
yours. And I think the last 30 years of
my life are revolve around this word. So
I'd like to tour you through my brain,
take a particular path through my brain
to show you what I've collected up about
sensemaking in a couple different
senses.
Under sensemaking, for example, there is
a topic called collaborative
sensemaking. And all I did was click on
it. In the brain, every anytime I click
on a thought, every note is called a
thought. The thought rotates into the
middle. Under collaborative sensemaking,
which which is really brings in the
social side of sense making because um
you can sense make by yourself. Here I
have things like collective
intelligence. So I'll click down there.
Now
we have very quickly descended into a
well populated part of my brain and I
apologize for that. And one of your
thoughts has to be well hey these aren't
clearly distinct categories. They have a
lot of overlap and you're completely
right.
What I am trying to do and what the
brain allows me to do is create that
kind of soft interconnectedness where
things are visible from like things in a
really useful way. So under collective
intelligence I've put hive mind uh
crowdsource problem solving largecale
collective IQ learning communities
senius I'll go to senius for a second
senior is a coining by Brian eno it's
actually a port nonto between genius and
the scene so special places have senius
uh I think we might have been in a place
or two like that and wish we could get
back to more of them one of my favorite
parts here under sensemaking is a more
recent termqi
or collective hybrid intelligence. Now
collective intelligence is usually meant
to be among humans. Hybrid brings in AI
and one of the questions right now that
we have is how can generative AI augment
human collaboration? Uh how can
generative AI augment human capabilities
in general? And this whole question
that's been around for quite a while of
technologies can either augment or
replace us. How do we how do we land on
the side of augment instead of replace?
If I go back to the post that is
inspiring this tour, um not everything
is brightness. We don't always have
sensemaking. Sometimes we have
dysfunctional group dynamics like group
think, a term coined by Irving Janice,
psychologist Irving Janice back in the
80s, which is about how groups sometimes
can't see outside of themselves. they
can't see a different perspective
because the group has so much strength
in enforcing its belief systems. There
are other dysfunctional group dynamics
around mobs for example uh there is mob
psychology or also herd mentality
similar terms not all the same.
Then to come back to sensem and go
somewhere a little more fun again. There
are a series um of devices and plot
points in fiction that absolutely are
about sensemaking. Uh Palanteer notably
the name for Palanteer technologies
which is uh companies and products named
after Lord of the Rings. Palanteer is a
seeing our seeing stones in the Lord of
the Rings uh series.
Um,
the cerebro is a fictional device in the
X-Men uh series that Charles Zabri uses.
Uh, in Star Trek, we have the triricorer
and we also have the hol. So, here is
the holo deck as well. And the holc
inspired the matrix's construct which is
where Morpheus tells Neo that they are
just living inside of a simulation.
Um, the movie Minority Report uses
precogs bathed in a solution with the
jacks in the back of their heads in
order to prevent crime, to find
pre-rime.
And there's and then um in the book The
Diamond Age, Neil Stevenson's book, The
Diamond Age, and here are all of
Stevenson's books. uh he invents a young
lady's illustrated primmer which is a
book that is meant to help a young
person grow up to be a great adult. Uh I
put this under the solution to the
future is a special book realizing that
there are a series of books uh like the
foundation series from Azimov
uh that say the future is a is a special
book and that actually bubbles me up to
another thought that I wanted to bring
you to which is kind of speculative
non-fiction. Uh this is we just came out
of fiction. So we just came out of a
place where writers have full creative
leverage to imagine alternate realities
and so forth. This is more the world of
visions views that people have had. One
of the more famous ones is Venivvar
Bush's uh article as we may think in the
Atlantic in 1945 in which he profiles
the memex or memory index. This is back
in 1945 where he's thinking in terms of
microfilm and a desk that has kind of
endless microfilm but can allow you to
research whatever you want to look at.
This this MX vision inspired
um the man computer symbiosis by JCR
Licklider, one of the pioneers of
inventing the internet. Uh this in turn
uh inspired Douglas Engelbart's 1968
mother of all demos
where he and a small crew of people at
SRRI uh effectively demonstrated things
that we take completely for granted
right now but were totally novel back
then. The idea of windows on screen,
overlapping windows, the idea that you
could switch between documents. the
idea. They invented the mouse with a
couple of little potentiometers uh and a
and a box of wood rolling around on
their table. From the mother of all
demos came a whole series of things. So
this is under visions that inspired
builders of global brains. Uh there's
also Ted Nelson and his computer lib uh
dream machines who gave us hypertext
has been played out in many different
ways and goes back to actually annotated
uh com talmutic commentaries in the
Talmud. I should actually make a link
between hybrid text and the Talmud like
that.
And then also we have uh the
hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy which
is the solution to everything is a
special book. There we go. Although this
hitchhiker's guide in this book is full
of errors and mistakes but still it's
inspired some people to do some fun
things. And then we can go way back to
the Diamond Sutra,
which was um also an existential project
aimed at achieving an embodying a
non-discriminatory basis for knowledge
or the emancipation from the fundamental
ignorance of not knowing how to
experience reality as it is.
Um this dates back to about 868 AD.
Wasn't found until 1900 and then became
part of our culture. And it runs
parallel to this notion of Indra's net
where um and I've got this kind of as an
example of Ted Nelson's expression
everything is deeply intertwined.
In the intervening years a lot of people
have tried to create technology that
would instantiate these many different
things. So we have knowledge graphs
which also have personal knowledge
graphs or distributed knowledge graphs
or enterprise knowledge graphs or if we
go back here distributed knowledge
repositories,
personal knowledge networks. Um all of
these are really uh ver different
versions of technology
trying to create some way of capturing
our knowledge and sharing it. And I have
to say until the worldwide web and the
web is more like linked magazine pages,
but until the web, I don't think any of
these efforts got very far or or solved
things for enough people. U but we're
getting to the point now where AI is
might actually be the the connective
tissue uh that makes this work. Uh, in
demoing my brain to you, I regret that I
can't show you the moments where I I
can't kind of hit undo enough times to
get back to the place where I realized I
should have a thought called visions
that have inspired builders of global
brains, a thought I had in 2021, uh,
July of 2021.
uh and then what happens once I've
created some collective uh nexus is that
later when I hit something I realize oh
wait a minute that needs to get
connected there so delqatari's notion of
ryomes that's also a vision that has
inspired builders of global brains so I
will connect delatari their book a thou
milborn a thousand plateaus
u and then here's some things about
ryomes and ryomal connecting and so
forth ryomatic learning why we teach.
Um, written by Dave Cormier. I don't
remember putting this in my brain. He
teaches at University of uh, Prince
Edward Island.
So, I I I'm sorry that I can't rewind to
show you the moments of insight because
it's those moments of insight that
are the fruits of the collaboration
between me and this external memory.
Now, there are many others. Uh, I get a
lot of feedback from other people who
use my brain because this, uh, if you go
to jerry'sbrain.com, you can browse my
brain online for free. And there are
many other kinds of payoff from having
done this for a while. But, but this is
one of the really big ones is having a
neighborhood where you can see related,
connected, contextual issues and you can
see who wrote about them, who explored
them. You can ask yourself big
questions. you can answer your questions
with the best knowledge available uh and
you can keep coming back to the same
places. One of the things I think we we
fail uh on these days is having
persistent places that we know we can go
back to. Everything is eancent.
Everything is a new search, a new query.
We don't really have a place where we
put things where it stays.