Video summary
The webinar introduces the NSF EPSCoR Research Fellows program, a congressionally mandated initiative designed to enhance research capacity and advance geographic diversity in STEM within targeted jurisdictions like New Mexico. Hosted by representatives from the New Mexico EPSCoR, the session features Professor May, Dr. Whitley, and Professor Cigitt as expert speakers who guide attendees through the specifics of this funding opportunity. The primary goal is to inform researchers about a program that supports Principal Investigators (PIs) from eligible institutions in developing collaborative research projects. The most recent solicitation, released in January 2024, offers up to $300,000 over two years with a submission deadline of April 8, 2025, aiming to catalyze career trajectories for the next generation of research leaders through extended visits to host institutions.
The program operates under two distinct tracks: the NSF Research Fellow track and the NASA Research Fellow at NASA track. While both allow PIs to spend one to six months at a host site to learn new techniques and access state-of-the-art facilities, they differ in eligibility requirements for the host institution. The NSF track accepts any research institution within the United States or its territories, whereas the NASA track restricts host sites to specific NASA research centers and requires applicants to collaborate with NASA subject matter experts on priority topics. Applicants must provide strong justifications for their choice of collaborator, ensuring that the partner's expertise complements rather than duplicates their own, and must secure necessary support letters from their home institution, the collaborator, and the host site administrative office before submission.
Successful proposals are evaluated based on two national merit review criteria: intellectual merit and broader impacts, with additional program-specific questions focusing on the transformative nature of the fellowship. Reviewers assess whether the proposed activities can be achieved within the fellowship period, how the experience will alter the PI's research career trajectory beyond the funding duration, and what tangible benefits the home institution or jurisdiction will receive. The budget must primarily cover salary and fringe benefits for the PI and one additional training-level participant for the specific months spent at the host site, along with travel expenses, while excluding sub-awards for host personnel. Furthermore, applicants must maintain their status within an eligible EPSCoR jurisdiction throughout the award period, as funding is not transferable if a PI moves to an ineligible institution.
To maximize success, the speakers recommend that PIs consult early with their research offices regarding internal competition limits and begin identifying potential collaborators well in advance of the deadline. For those interested in the NASA track, reviewing focus areas to find alignment with available opportunities and contacting the NASA EPSCoR coordinator is essential for matching with scientists or engineers. The webinar concludes by encouraging attendees to utilize upcoming outreach events and office hours for one-on-one guidance, while also inviting non-submitters to register as reviewers. Ultimately, the session emphasizes that this fellowship is not just a two-year research project but a strategic investment intended to expand research directions, strengthen partnerships, and positively impact the careers of investigators and their home institutions long after the award period ends.
Read the full video transcript
here we
go hi everybody um I'm going to give it
like 30 seconds for people to come in
and then I'll get get us started
okay I think that's 30 seconds oh
there's 20 people here how exciting all
right everybody Welcome to the webinar
so glad you're here um today we are
delighted to have um Professor May from
NMSU one of our very own uh Professor
cigit might join us a little bit later
and Dr Whitley um to share information
about the epcore research fellows
program all three of our speakers are
rock stars and they're here to help you
submit a successful proposal and we are
extremely grateful uh that they're able
to join us
today before we get started though uh a
little bit of housekeeping uh my name is
Britney vandor from the communication
and Outreach manager at New Mexico
epcore NM epcore is part of the larger
NSF epcore ecosystem which has a mission
to enhance the research competitiveness
of targeted jurisdictions like New
Mexico I'll be your host for today's
webinar along with my partner and
webinar hosting Prime Miss Selena canel
who will be working behind the scenes um
to make sure everything runs
smoothly uh our webinar will be about an
hour long today if you have questions at
any point please type them into the Q&A
box and our presenters will take them at
the end of their
presentation and finally a recording of
this webinar will be available on our
YouTube channel um or our website you
can get to it there as well which is
www.ne nmf score.org
okay now the point we've all been
waiting her let me introduce our
speakers we have um Professor May is a
Luke Barry shrin endowed professor in
the department of chemical and materials
engineering at New Mexico State
University she received her PhD degree
in chemical engineering from Tain
University and then worked at Los Alamos
National Laboratory before joining NMSU
in the fall of 2009 her group researches
her group research focuses on EX
taxil idot taxil oh man oxide and
nitrate fil nitrate thin films and Nano
materials for lithium ion batteries and
Electro Catalyst for fuel cell and other
electrolyzers in 2023 she joined NSF as
a rotating program director in the NSF
epcore program and is currently serving
as co-lead for the epcore research
fellows
competition Dr Whitley is also here
today um and she's the NSF epcore
program director she currently manages a
$17 million portfolio of 26 standard
grants and Cooperative agreements and
focuses on building basic science
research infrastructure and promoting
Economic Development and broadening
participation in St she is also if that
wasn't enough a molecular biologist and
her research of DNA repair and DNA
signaling Pathways offers insights
towards the molecular biology and
Neuroscience immunology and cancer
biology she earned her PhD in pathology
at the University of Chicago um our
third presenter or who may join us today
is professor clickett she is also an NSF
epscor program director and is a
professor in anthropology and a former
department chair at the University of
Kentucky she received her PhD from
Indiana University in anthropology and
held a melon post-doctoral Fellowship in
population studies at the University of
Pennsylvania before joining the
University of Kentucky in 1999 she is a
co- uh lead for the epcore research
fellows
competition all right with that
introduction uh ladies please take it
away I'm going to stop sharing my screen
and let you do your thing
okay can you see it yes okay
excellent thank you uh good morning
everyone my colleages and I are offering
this webinar to the abscore researcher
fellows opportunity abscore stands for
established program to stimulate
competitive research abscore research
fellows is the one of the four research
infrastructure Improvement strategies in
the NSF
appcore go to the next
slide during this webinar my colleagues
and I will provide an overview of the
NSF abscore program the abscore research
fos funding opportunity and overview of
successful proposal contents and
requirements as well as the Merit review
criteria by which proposal will be
evaluated we encourage you to ask any
questions you may have at the end of The
Talk today uh next slide
Chi the primary goal for today's webinar
is to inform the community about the
abscore research fellows funding
opportunity that supports pis from apps
call eligible institutions in the
development of research
collaborations the most recent sortation
NSF
24
528 was released on January 22nd 2024
this opportunity provides up to
$300,000 over two years and the deadline
for this year cycle is April 8
2025 you can find the stition using the
web address below please also know that
while this webinar we are discussing
many aspects of the
stition please read the stituation in
its entirety it's very important to read
the whole
subtitution next slide
please the NSF abscore program is a
congressionally mandated program it
originated in
1978 with a mission to build research
capacity and Advance the capability of
enable jurisdictions to conduct
competitive research currently five
Federal Agencies have abore programs
including NSF doe DOD uh NASA ni and
USDA all abscore programs share the same
Mission but each agency has different
Focus the goals at NSF apps call
advances Geographic diversity in stem
through catalyzing research capability
across and among targeted
jurisdictions establishing stem
professional development Pathways
broadening participation of a variety of
groups and institutions in stem
effecting engagement in stem at National
and Global levels in order to accomplish
abscore Mission and the goals ABS course
investment strategies seek to build
capacity and as a result of this
investment positive impact the economic
development of abscore
jurisdictions next
Slide the term abscore jurisdiction
refers to States Commonwealth and the US
territories that are eligible for
funding from the NSF F score program
jurisdictions are eligible for funding
if the the most recent fiveyear level of
total NSL funding is equal to or less
than 0.75% of the total n budget this
eligibity eligibility is monitored
annually and is available in the website
the chips and the chips and sense Act of
2022 effectively free NSF F score
jurisdiction eligibility through fiscal
year
2027 currently there are 28 abscore
eligible jurisdictions the institutions
Within These jurisdictions that are
eligible for the abscore research fellow
program next
Slide the abscore research fellows
program arose in discussion with the
broader abore community and during these
discussions the NSF abscore recognized
and Unity to catalyze the career
trajectories of the next generation of
research
leaders this is a single pii proposal
for and meal
investigators including tan track or tan
assistant of social professors nonan
research assistant professors all
research ass social
professors the abscore research fellows
provide opportunity for the pis to
further develop their individual
research potential through extended
visits to other private federal or
academic institutions within the United
States this opportunity will provide
fellows and the ability to learn new
techniques to benefit from access to
state of art equipment and facilities in
the host site strengthening
collaborative Partnerships and shift or
extend their research toward
transformative directions
this opportunity amounted to providing
time for fellows to develop new research
directions or expand the current
research Direction and to provide a
pathway for strengthening research
connections with partner
Partners the fellowship provided
experience that will benefit and
positively impact the Pi's career in
years to come in alignment with apps
Commission Fellowship outcomes are also
expected to enhance the research
capacity of the Pi's home institution
and all
jurisdiction next
slide on this stition there are two
tracks abscore research fellow NSF and
abscore research fellow at Nasa for the
abscore research fellow NSF track the
host site may be any research
institutions including universities in
abscore or non abscore State National
Labs or NASA research centers within the
United States or its
territories also any topic that NSL
fonts is eligible for this program next
slide
please for the abore researcher fellows
at the NASA subject
the H site are specific NASA research
centers in addition there are specific
institution types that are
eligible this include minority Serv
institutions twoyear colleges
institutions primarily serving students
with disabilities women's colleges and
primary undergraduate
institutions I would like to emphasize
that in The Proposal for both tracks you
need to have a very strong justification
why you need this whole site why you
choose this collaborator you the
collaborators expertise
area should be different from your
expertise area your exact travel
timeline and the specific research tasks
that you are going to do in the whole
site with the
collaborator how will this Fellowship
experience in impact your career and
benefit to your home institution and our
jurisdiction next slide
please we will share with you some
strategy to F the collaborator with the
NASA research centers so the pis
interested in this opportunity can
collabor with NASA subject matter
experts for the duration of the award
the subject the matter expert expert
will serve as a research collaborator a
technical Monitor and will have sport
from NASA to conduct extended
collaborative visits with the
pis so NASA apps score supports matching
faculty with collaboration collaborators
in both NSF appcore research fellows if
you choose NASA Center as a whole site
and also NSF SC fellow at Nasa
subtract so the topics have received
like over 200 Focus
areas to try to match research
investigators to work on research of
important priority to
NASA so any P interested in this you are
required to spend one to six months over
two years period with NASA scientists
and all
engers for NASA research
centers some research centers require
pis to be US citizen some research
centers require at least Noel permanent
resident next slide
please to found a collaborator at a NASA
research
center please send your resume contact
information and research interest to the
NASA abscore coordinator using the email
here the NASA abscore coordinator will
assist in identifying a NASA
collaborator arrange a meeting and a
facinated collaboration the NASA abore
coordinator will provide a letter for
the proposed submission this is a
required letter in some cases pis may
have prior research collaboration with
NASA scientist or Engineers you should
share this information with the abscore
coordinator to proceed with the proposal
submission for additional information on
potential research project please go to
the link this link is also in the
sociation please start earning to
increase your success of being matched
with a NASA scientist or engineers
if you have any questions please contact
the NASA apps score
coordinator go to the next
slide we will share with you some the
budget request so this the the maximum
budget is
$300,000 and the award duration is up to
two years so if you want to just budget
for one year that is
fun um also remember this is a two years
award duration is intended to provide
Flex in planning Fellowship
Logistics and pis can spread one to six
months of work over two years but
remember this is not a two-year research
project and the research top research
task should focus primarily on the
fellowship Fellowship period of one to
six months in the host
site the budget request may include one
to six months of salary and a Fring
benefit to support the pi and one
additional training level
participant the one additional training
level participant can be undergraduate
graduate postal or research
staff up to six months of support can be
applied per person not per year the
support may be for academic semesters or
summer
months if you buet for tuition insurance
for students you can so it may be
included if it's
appropriate the budget request for
travel expenses for the pi and the
training level participant are no longer
kept so you can buy the multiple trips
between the home institution and the
host site while feasible pis are
expected to budget for logging
arrangement in manners consistent with
extended visits remember you need to
follow your institution's travel policy
so we strongly encourage you to talk to
your school understand your school's
travel policy when you do the budget for
travel
expenses also note that no sub award no
salary can be requested for The Hite
Personnel but up to
$10,000 he requested for the
collaborator to travel to visit you in
the home institution or go to
conferences while the collaborative work
is
presented for the abscore research
fellows at Nasa applicants May request a
research infrastructure development
award up to
60,000 from NASA abscore so you do not
include this request in budget to NSF in
The Proposal but after the the NSF award
is issued the NSF abore office will
manage this additional CK to you to be
anible an applicant must have their
primary employment
at any abscore
jurisdiction funding from this program
is not transferred to another fellow if
a pi takes an position in institution
that is not within abscore jurisdiction
the fellowship award will be terminated
so if you know you are going to move
please send us an
email pis must be in eligible status by
The Proposal deadline if you have been
notified that you will be promoted to
for
Professor effective in August or
September
2025 you are still eligible to submit
This appsort research fellows in April
2025 because your status will change
after the proposal deadline so you'll
still be
eligible thank you I go to the next
slide for the letter requirement
please provide all letters as
supplementary documents with your
proposal submission regarding letters
for research fell and S track required
to have three
letters one from home
institution and
generally from like your department head
or de the second letter will be from
your collaborator the third letter
letter from your whole site
administrative letter if you choose NASA
Center as a whole site the NASA abso
coordinator will provide this
letter and for the NASA track so you can
see from this table K isue two letters
are required one from home institution
one from NASA abore
coordinator uh if the institution is a
primary undergraduate institution you
will need additional letter from the
home
institution so uh I will will not show
detailed the letter content here but
please read the stition it has all the
letter content requirement for each
letter additional letter from other
parties may be submitted only if they
are needed to verify specific tangible
commitment that are related to the
research activities that you describe in
The Proposal if these letters do not
meet the standard we will ask pi to
remove letter from The Proposal
package now I will invite Dr Whitney to
continue the webinar thank you
all right thanks Dr
May for this opportunity successful
proposals will present exciting vibrant
Fellowship ideas will positively impact
and potentially transform a Pi's
individual career trajectory more
broadly it is expected that the
fellowship will impact the research
field
institution and or home jurisdiction of
the
pi all proposals should include the
motivation and research context for the
research to be conducted well-defined
well reason and well organized research
objectives that are driven by specific
research questions or
hypotheses and specific plans for the
fellowship period they should also
include a discussion of how the benefits
gained from the fellowship can be
sustained beyond the funding period with
a clear description of Fellowship goals
performance metric
and the timetable of
activities successful proposals will
explain how or why the award will
advance the Pi's research program for
example how the fellowship provide
opportunities to the pi that would
otherwise be unavailable and what are
the partner uh parameters for the
partnership successful proposals also
describe how activities could lead to
longlasting impacts for both the Pi's
career and the Pi's home institution or
jurisdiction the plan should focus
primarily on the fellowship
period now let's discuss the criteria
for the Merit review of
proposals all NSF proposals are
evaluated through the use of two
national science board approved Merit
review criteria these criteria include
intellectual Merit and Brader
impacts both Criterion are to be given
full consideration during the review and
decision-making processes and each
Criterion is necessary but neither by
itself is
sufficient when evaluating NSF
proposals reviewers are going to be
asking when they look at your proposal
the following items to consider
they will want to know what the
proposers are trying to do why do they
want to do it how do they plan to do it
and how will they know if they succeed
as well as what benefits could could
acve if the project is
successful these issues apply to both
the technical aspects of the proposal
and the way in which the project may
make broader
contributions to that end when reviewers
have your proposal in hand they'll be
asked to evaluate all proposals against
the criteria of intellectual Merit which
encompasses the potential to advance
knowledge and the criteria of broader
impacts which encompasses the potential
to benefit society and contribute to the
achievement of specific desired societal
outcomes for each of these criteria the
following elements should be considered
as part of the review
process for both criteria what is the
potential for the proposed activity to
advance knowledge and understanding in
its own field or across different fields
and to benefit Society or Advance
desired societal
outcomes for both criteria to what
extent do the proposed activities
suggest and explore creative original or
potentially transformative
concepts for both criteria is the plan
for carrying out the proposed activities
well reason well organized and based on
a sound rationale and does the plan
incorporate a mechanism to assess
success for both criteria how well
qualified is the individual team or
organization to conduct the proposed
activities and for both criteria are
there adequate resources available to
the
pi either the home organization or
through
collaboration to carry out the propos
activities for this program additional
solicitation specific criteria will be
included to highlight specific
objectives for the
program so when propos when reviewers
have your proposal in hand we will ask
them to evaluate your proposal according
to the following
questions what evidence is presented to
demonstrate the proposed research Al
comes can be achieved within the
constraints of the fellowship period
with the work being performed primarily
at the host
site how will the fellowship have a
transformative impact on the trajectory
of the Pi's research career goals during
and after the funding
period how will the fellowship yield
tangible benefits to the home
institution and or jurisdiction that's
beyond the individual benefits to the
pi what evidence is there that the home
institution and the host site are each
committing the necessary
resources to lend confidence that the
fellowship will be successful in
achieving its intended
outcomes okay so I know we've said a lot
thus far but if you have additional
questions regarding proposal submissions
you're welcome to contact
myself my colleagues especially Dr L and
cig uh and for the epcore research
fellows at Nasa please also remember to
reach out to our colleagues NASA epcore
via the contact information on the
slide piis are also encouraged to attend
Outreach events such as office hours
that will be taking place in the coming
3 to four months and there we'll be able
to answer your questions oneon-one
please consult the fscore program
website to register for these sessions
and when they're ready we will send an
announcement out to the community so
that uh pis can uh
register I'll end with next steps for
piis and interested in submitting a
proposal to this
opportunity first consult with your
sponsor research office regarding
internal competitions required to submit
proposals because there's a li on number
of proposals that can be submitted per
institution next identify a collaborator
at a host site or a NASA Center and this
is regardless of track right uh for
abscore research fellows at NASA
review the focus areas to find alignment
with available opportunities and contact
the NASA upcore
coordinator of course write the proposal
narrative as early as you can and obtain
letters of
support early into the
process and you can contact us at NSF or
at
NAS regarding
questions so submit your proposal
through research.gov well well well
before the deadline of April 8th
2025 and if you're not planning to
submit a proposal in this
cycle and are interest in reviewing for
this
opportunity we welcome you to send your
CV to NSF program officer using our
contact information and you'll be asked
to complete a reviewer survey survey in
advance of the deadline
thank you so much for this time to
listen and we look forward to answering
your
questions thank you so much um Dr May
and Dr Whitley I see that we have Dr
cigit here with us now welcome