Video summary
The video argues that regardless of whether Donald Trump or Joe Biden wins the upcoming election, the fundamental nature of the American political system will remain unchanged. The speaker contends that both parties operate under a shared set of policies that ultimately benefit the elite "inner circle" while extracting more taxes and reducing rights for the average working person. Historical examples are cited to illustrate this continuity, noting that Trump's administration increased military spending and deficits beyond previous records, while Biden is viewed as a continuation of the same establishment politics due to his role in passing the 1994 crime bill and supporting aggressive drug war policies that disproportionately affected minorities. The core thesis is that the illusion of choice between left and right is misleading, as both sides function interchangeably to maintain the status quo for the benefit of lobbyists and corporations rather than the populace.
A significant portion of the discussion focuses on the erosion of civil liberties and privacy, which the speaker believes will continue under any administration. The transcript highlights recent legislative changes, such as laws allowing warrantless searches under the guise of investigating illicit activities, placing the burden of proof on citizens to prove their innocence. The speaker expresses frustration that public attention is often distracted by election narratives or media stories about figures like Julian Assange or Edward Snowden, rather than focusing on these critical issues regarding surveillance and police militarization. Furthermore, the video suggests that the drive for profit by tech companies and the military-industrial complex ensures that wars continue regardless of who holds office, as conflicts serve economic interests involving oil, resources, and arms sales, making the concept of a "peaceful" transition to a different president largely illusory.
The speaker also touches upon the geopolitical landscape, specifically criticizing U.S. foreign policy interventions in regions like Iraq, Libya, and Syria, which are portrayed as driven by resource control rather than humanitarian concerns. The removal of leaders like Saddam Hussein and Muammar Gaddafi is described not as acts of liberation but as strategic moves to prevent challenges to the petrodollar hegemony and secure oil reserves. This analysis extends to China, where the speaker notes that while the U.S. criticizes Chinese human rights abuses, such as the treatment of Uyghur Muslims, these actions are tolerated because they do not threaten U.S. economic interests or resource dominance. The video concludes with a somewhat neutral but slightly hopeful outlook, suggesting that while a Biden victory might mean less divisiveness and a return to "business as usual," it will likely fail to bring material improvements like healthcare access or tax relief for ordinary citizens, leaving the system largely intact.
Read the full video transcript
the situation with the election is kind
of
hopeful in a way that it doesn't it
doesn't seem like there's anything going
to be too extreme happening either way
whether it's
whether trump you know takes takes the
uh the states to court and wins and then
the election gets ruled in his favor or
whether he concedes and biden takes over
with a peaceful trout power uh transfer
it doesn't i don't know what's your
thoughts on it do you think that
if anything is going to change much in
terms of the economy or
dollar printing or like what do you
think there
chomsky said at the best the party's
always in power
people have a illusionary viewpoint that
there's a difference between the left
and the right the left
is a left when it benefits the left the
right is a right when it benefits the
right
these policies are interchangeable they
switch they
they they switch them back and forth
candidates go from different party to
different party
so for me i i always ask a simple
question regardless of
who's in power what party's in power who
controls senate yada yada yada
the regular average working person in
the bell curve like 90
of the population no matter what we are
plebs
we get nothing we don't benefit we don't
we're not part of the inner circle we're
not part of the
nepotisic uh society that they run we're
not part of this
lobbyist that we get upside no matter
what we do get more taxes
no matter what more rights are taken
away from us no matter what there's more
you know privacy or i'll say lack of
privacy you know
taken away from us so like we don't win
like you just look at history
you look at every single year what
happens less privacy for us
less rights for us less freedom for us
more taxes for us
and just keeps on going regardless of
who's in power
yeah and the wool has definitely been
pulled over everybody's eyes like the
distraction from the real issues of
fighting against surveillance and pride
and pro privacy
like hard money sound money like all of
that stuff
like for example liberty like that's all
under attack and no one's watching what
there was
these no knock warrants like right they
passed i forget who who was it that
passed it was it uh
[ __ ] i forget who passed that law
probably
maybe i don't know who did it but it's
basically
uh without a warrant taken into your
house and just take whatever they want
under the the the guise of illicit
activities
and it's the the burden is on you to
show them that you're not guilty
so therefore you have to foot the bill
for the legal costs and the lawyers
think about that we as uh whatever you
can call it
uh the uh the legal establishment
the quote-unquote legal establishment
police force etc
all that stuff they can come to your
house and say well brad you know
we uh we have assumptions that you might
be you know
a drug cartel and we're gonna take all
these computers and we're gonna take
your car we're gonna take your house
we're gonna take your bank account
we don't know we're not going through
court system we can hold that we just
don't know if you're guilty or not
but it's the burdens on you to prove
your innocence
that's crazy yeah that that's nuts
that's all infuriating that stuff but
yeah it doesn't seem like biden's gonna
do anything different there's
like i was disappointed with trump a lot
of things that he was saying that he was
gonna change but then he
became are you really disappointed are
people like i find it i was
i was actually hopeful in 2016 that
trump was going to drain the swamp and
that he was going to actually become
you know that he wasn't an establishment
politician he was going to stop spending
hey i was hopeful but you know quickly
quickly obviously that became
you know he's he's getting spending more
money on the war and sport
spending more money on weapons he's
spending more money on uh
you know he cut a few things but he
spent more money on the military than
than any other president like that the
trillion dollar deficit
is like a new thing under trump he's he
was on track to spend more than even
obama and obama spent more money than
any other
president in history so he wasn't
keeping really the only way that we can
survive this
is city-states that's the only way i see
what is this civilization six we have to
get in
no we have city states now even canada
has city states people forget it
aboriginal land is city state legally
they have their own constitution their
own police force their own taxation
policy
their sovereign land uh
apart from canadian sovereign land the
united states a little bit different
because they have their own states and
they have more legal people really care
though about it for that to work people
like
the convenience of not having to deal
with garbage collection
you know people are gonna and policing
and stuff
i don't think that's gonna like what's
uh
what i mean there's still gonna be
police yeah i know i'm just thinking
like
that's kind of altruistic but like
it's not always going to happen it would
be nice
people don't even care about their
online surveillance you know like
they'll gladly
give up their rights and not care about
somebody like snowden or or julian
assange because
cnbc or cnn told them that they
hacked hillary's emails and now they're
an enemy of the united states
because they they gave the election of
donald trump or some bs like that when
they're not even looking at the facts of
how they
are fighting for privacy and fighting
for everybody's rights people will
eventually care when the boots so far up
their ass and the and the waters boiling
when they have no choice but to care
and that will happen i find it very
naive especially in canada because we're
much more calm and chill
that people think stuff can happen here
i'm like you do forget in world war
ii we imprison born japanese
yeah you have a very short-term memory
you do realize
do you understand what we did to the
aborigines here with our residential
schools do you understand
like not too long ago from you know
1940s
what we've done to our own citizens in
canada don't be so stupid and [ __ ]
indeed
like what we're kind of still doing even
now there's still some
some like people that not in canada so
much but in the us like the drug war is
still
raging there's still like prison
populations
that's not gonna change right like what
i was i was thinking that like
because joe biden was one of the people
that
helped pass the um the crime bill in the
90s and
supported clinton and like clinton's
three strike rule holy yeah the three
strike rule like they helped usher in
the militarization of the police
and three strikes you're out and all
this
all these like drug war policies that
just disappro just appropriate what is
that word dispro
disportionately affected minorities and
black
men in inner cities and now
50 years or 60 years later or whatever
he's still a politician
and he's i don't think he's changed that
much
so with with uh his vice president
you know kamala harris she was
also doing some pretty shady stuff when
she was d.a or of california was she
district attorney or what was she
in california i forget she like jailed
more black people than anybody else or
some [ __ ] like that
yeah there was a lot of people that were
like black men and
minorities that were prosecuted by her
for minor
non-violent drug crimes that's what
changed that's right non-violent drug
deal for california and she had like
like civil rights groups and everything
were after her so you got like her
who has a terrible reputation already
for
not standing up for people of color and
ending these
corrupt insane drug laws and
and non-violent criminals like ruining
their lives ruining families lives
plus you got ball packed pretty much
with the other
uh the clinton bill clinton and the
democrats in the 90s
it does not seem okay let's not be too
negative though because
there was a really good
trend of marijuana legalization and
even hard drug decriminalization in some
places
wasn't it oregon who decriminalized most
hard drugs and there was a few states
that legalized
psilocybin i think it was well
california
california in a nutshell it's not
legally decriminalized but not enforced
that's great like we're moving forward
that's great like it's good to see that
but we need to see
uh it just sucks to see all these people
in jail for non-violent crimes
and uh
a lot of people like if he gets pushed
out like he'll be part of this
pardon like ninety percent of the people
in the for profit
and get and get get ross out of jail
yeah ross aldrick too get rid of
get him out of jail you know i don't
know can he pardon julian assange
because julian assange isn't an american
wait he's an american or no yeah no he's
not oh then he can't
but he can give him asylum
okay yeah so that would be awesome
it would be really nice if trump did
that if he's going to get even hey
countries give asylum to most random
people like
you look at history for example um in
africa
uganda it was uh idi amin you know idi
amin was a dictator killed millions of
people
and saudi arabia gave him asylum and he
died a rich
man in saudi arabia but he was one of
the biggest sociopaths possible crazy
so i guess it does you know it's not
bad it's not good it's just more status
quo
i'm actually a little bit leaning more
towards the hopeful side of things
because i think
when you look at it from a net
perspective of just energy you know
there was more negative energy
the last four years because of trump and
i'm not saying
trump did these things like colluded
with putin and he was a
agent of russia and all this stuff but
the energy was there and it was
fixation from social media and like you
said like the ai
basically like sucked everybody down the
rabbit hole
the the algorithms and these companies
are making record profits but
at the same time it it drove the people
to seek out unbiased information and
that
the trump is a maturing candidate that
this is all psyops
and he's controlled opposition and they
put him in place over there
as an escape goat to create what's that
what's that theory
i don't know i'm just making up on the
flyer it makes sense to me
like give me something i want to hear
this so this is a manchurian candidate
all right
well there is something going around now
about how they you know people are
saying that trump is playing
5d chess and he uh had like he was
working with the dhs
the department of homeland security to
bait
the the democrats into doing fraudulent
mail mail and ballot rigging so with
this sort of like blockchain technology
ballot printing or something like that
and it was a big sting operation i think
it's all bs but like
i think i think we find out tonight or
tomorrow
i think nevada is the last state for
counting i think george
georgia or something said there has to
do a recount i don't know i'm not really
keeping up to date with it just
whatever but let's say biden does win
the
electoral college and gets the seats
that he needs to get
knowing trump i definitely see
him um appealing that
and taking that taking that to uh to the
highest level possible for
whether it's last time that has happened
this happened with bush and gore i
believe
yeah i remember that was like a month or
something it took
no it was it took it took a while for
the final results to come in from
i remember i was watching uh uh bill
maher every night i'd watched bill maher
talk about it i was
19 20 whatever it was at the time and my
friends and i would just
sit down in front of the tv and watch
bill maher it's always the comedians
that seem to uh
but watch this you know people talk
about like the progressive party of
of uh biden and kamel biden's either
gonna die
if he's president or he's gonna have to
step aside because that guy's mentally
ill
not from a negative perspective just too
old he's senile man the guy can
speak english and you can't even
remember anything the energy for you
to be commander in chief of the world's
most powerful military so he's gonna
whether voluntarily step aside or be
physically forced to step aside because
he can't physically handle the stress of
being president
maybe kamala harris becomes the first
female president who knows
i don't know but mark my words they're
gonna go to war
these guys are gonna they're gonna
invade iran or there's gonna the war
machine is gonna continue it's no
different
this whole idea of being progressive
this is like the most classic
machiavellian you can go read the book
if you guys haven't read it go read
prince
machiavellian fantastic book details a
lot it's very it's all occam's razor
it's a very common sense
they'll say whatever they need to say to
be voted in power once in power they
have power [ __ ] off
it's business as usual obama took the us
from two wars to seven wars and
they killed more people more people with
drones than any other president
yeah but i mean i used to say that too
but then i heard a good argument that
like you know the technology for drones
came up in his
era so it was just not not really his
his uh initiative it was more so just a
situation he found himself in just like
how
the 2008.com or the 2008 real estate
bubble collapsed the economy and he had
to print so much money
well somebody had to do something and
they were kicking the can down the road
so
but regardless obama didn't
didn't stop war he increased the
the amount of theaters of war and and
trump didn't stop them either trump kind
of made some
concessions here and there but ins you
know maybe he took some troops out of
uh afghanistan maybe he tried to get out
of syria and let the
let the middle east the military the
military industrial complex runs
everything
that's it trump was no better because he
sold
billions and billions of dollars what
happened to saudi arabia who committed
genocide in yemen
so from a geo geopolitical standpoint
you can see why he did that though
i mean it all goes back for me to like
ron paul's
policies of non-interventionism and why
should i
why should you take tax money from the
citizens to go kill people overseas like
we're not
we're not meant that's not what our
country
in canada or the united states is
supposed to be doing we're not supposed
to be just going over fighting wars over
oil and lithium and resources
and stealing tax money from people to go
do that it's not constitutional
and there was no votes like they didn't
vote congress thinks to declare war
and they haven't declared war in since
uh world war
ii or something like that what was the
last time congress let's google that
when was the last time
congress declared war
it's been a long time so japan yeah
world war ii
yeah so since then it's all been illegal
wars constitutionally
but yeah whether it's whether it's biden
or trump
or bush or obama i mean
the war is going to continue because
it's good for the economy it's good for
jobs
but trump was like obama was a bit of
a statesman about it obama was just like
politically like
a good speaker and you know he would
have a somber tone when he talked about
it and he wouldn't say things straight
up
trump would just be like well we need to
sell them the weapons because we need
the money like that's that's hot that's
400 billion dollars
you know that's a lot of jobs so like
trump would just be
just openly honest about selling all
these hundreds of billions of dollars of
weapons
that's a little bit more it's a little
bit more complicated than that right so
they have they have to uh control their
position against iran saudi arabia's
biggest threat is
uh so you tell me tell me why because i
didn't follow that one very much why
why is saudi arabia and yemen at war and
what's the justification for it
controlling geo controlling the
geographical power struggle for oil
production
simple as that same with iran this is
why iran is with russia
and so saudi arabia for the longest time
was a powerhouse in the middle east
right so they controlled
this is why united states turned a blind
eye for the wahhabism of saudi arabia
you mean
do you know how many do you mean people
or or organizations saudi arabia
probably funds through their wahhabi
ideology like a very twisted form of
islam
and uh united states since
[ __ ] you know since since the ottoman
empire got kicked out in
what 19 world war i think with the final
remnants for there was like one
world war one they left saudi arabia
britain came in uh bp came over there
united states came over there and ever
since that the united states pretty much
get i think united states biggest
military base outside of united states
is in saudi arabia
it wasn't turkey uh as i said raybury
turkey but
they have to uh the united states to
have the relationship with saudi arabia
has to provide them and it's all part of
the deal provide them the military means
obviously they make money from it but
the military means
to have the might to go against iran
within the middle east it's a power
struggle there
so it says the biggest military base
outside of the usa
is bigger than new york city holy [ __ ]
is it saudi arabia i'm trying to find
which one it is
or was it turkey
i think it's a rack iraq no
really no i know they built like a
multi-billion dollar
back i don't think that's a wreck
one overseas base is vastly larger than
others it's so large that its footprint
is bigger than the entire city of new
york
it covers 303 square miles is this legit
what am i reading here yeah wikipedia
where is it it won't tell me huh
secret location bass struck yeah it's
it's on a need to know basis
i think i think i'm reading some click
bait here
yeah cause it's making me read the
entire thing and showing me a bunch of
ads
okay let's see here
america's largest base
oh my god i can't find this
i believe you there are big bases
there's lots of bases all over the world
and uh i remember that one that they
built in iraq was pretty
pretty a political sort of football that
they were throwing around because it was
it was massive and they spent so much
money on it and i think they ended up
um they're here here's a classic example
you know
weapons of mass destruction with bush
let's go to iraq and
you know my uh my wife's family is
kuwaiti
and iraqi and uh i have first-hand
experience from their family there so
this isn't me reading the internet this
is me
talking to people who born and raised
there you know right from the horse's
mouth
and yes saddam hussein was a cia agent
highly intelligent
operative was with the united states for
the very longest period of time
uh they had economic uh treaties with
the united states
and uh his bath party was sadistic like
don't get me wrong
so i'm like am i here clapping and
celebrating saddam hussein but he was
the crazy [ __ ] that was so
[ __ ] crazy that other crazy
[ __ ] were crazy of him because
he was almost the craziest [ __ ]
yeah he was he was the head of the hydra
there that
he even the other so-called clans and
quote unquote warlords would not [ __ ]
with him with the bath party so he held
this very fine delicate balance of power
in middle east
and then when you chop off the head of
the uh
of the pyramid there you create a vacuum
this is exactly what
hillary did with [ __ ] gaddafi in
libya
what what iraq is right now and what
libya is right now
it's [ __ ] i can't even describe how
bad it is
and it's not you know like libya there's
open slave trading happening right now
that wasn't happening when gaddafi was
in power
daffy was the same gaddafi was do not
[ __ ] with it i read afterwards that like
i was i was trying to find get to the
truth of that because like
there's that there was that viral thing
that went around when during the 2016
election when hillary was laughing about
it like we came we saw he died you know
and she was cackling about it and it was
just kind of like
okay is that a joke or is that literally
how she is but
regardless they didn't care about
gaddafi or libya
until they threatened the us dollar and
they threatened to create the old
petrodollar yep and create a unified
african currency
and afterwards i had read like people
like nelson mandela
supported gaddafi like that we respect
as
thought leaders and stuff supported
gaddafi so he they didn't
you know i'm sure he wasn't a good guy
either but they
missiled his entire family and
evaporated his grandchildren
it was disgusting and she's laughing
about it
but you know it just i was talking to my
wife about this the other day because
she was listening to a podcast about
with somebody who
escaped north korea like north korea is
insane right now
and if they really did care about people
and suffering and ending suffering and
all this stuff that they try to sell war
on they would do something about north
korea because that's
that's a crazy situation that's
happening in north korea right now
there's people starving and like yeah
i'll give you a better example
like i i met but i was at the dmz zone
so i had a
good three days to chat with uh people
who escaped north korea so
you were you were in south korea yeah i
spent a bunch of time in south korea and
i spent a while at the dmz demilitarized
zone there and i
personally spent uh two to four days
speaking with people that escaped north
korea and got the
inside scoop of how it is and so i'll
give you a better example than north
korea
the [ __ ] [ __ ] happening in china
right
like legitimate concentration camps not
like make believe
con like we're talking about full blown
concentration camp with uyghur muslims
the no human rights policy uh
they have they are first then iran
they have the most executions then iran
has a second execution these are public
executions
but yeah uh it's okay well yeah the
problem with china is that they've got a
military and they and they can't really
just go in and take over like they took
over libya iraq or whatever
but even the case like if they were
legitimately genuine about their
concerns about
saddam hussein and lib and gaddafi they
would
they would go in and fix that situation
in north korea because
north korea can't stop america from
going in and overthrowing
kim jong-un or whatever you know in his
hair there's too much second order and
third-order effects
when it comes to stuff like that i know
but if they really cared about it they
would go do it so i'm just saying like
they don't actually care about ending
suffering and all the stuff that they
try to sell us on and manipulate our
emotions and stuff
what they really care about is the
resources libya was a threat
gaddafi was threatening to challenge the
the hegemony of the us dollar and create
an african-backed currencies to trade
oil in
so they had to take them out iran and
iraq
have oil reserves and so they had to go
and take the oil and
prevent them from getting a monopoly on
the oil
and even syria like the whole reason why
the the war in syria happened was
because of the gas
that's the pipeline that they were
trying to build through syria like
russia has the main
pipeline that goes through syria that
that connects to the rest of europe
and russia has the like the gas prime
bank has the
monopoly on on the stranglehold of the
power
in in that region and so saudi arabia is
trying to build a pipeline through syria
and that's when every everything became
oh well we care about the syrian people
now
and then look what happened they
destroyed an entire country
fighting over a gas pipeline telling us
it's about like assad is gassing his
people and
they care about that meanwhile kim
jong-un or eel or
what is it un now he's i don't know he's
starving his people
and has them all brainwashed and like
they don't care about suffering and like
you said like the uyghur muslims and
there's like any any any religious
organizations that start up in
in china they end up sending them to
concentration camps because they don't
they don't want anything to challenge
the the cpp
yep that's exactly it
you know like in one way it's kind of
fun be
kind of funny or whatever the word is
it's kind of
a relief for somebody in china that is
just going along obeying the traffic
laws and trying not to get their social
credit score dings
you know taking up the garbage being
polite respecting the communist party
because they don't even have to think
about biden versus trump they don't
think about politics like everybody is
just communist party
it's just the communist party and it's
it's a
brainwashing but it frees up your mind
from all this divisiveness because you
just
you don't have options china i like that
i'm just it's an interesting observation
china
china will collapse like any other
nation through its own
internal power struggles it's the oro
boris the snake eats it on tails so
where in xinjingpeng
finally i know probably has to die
before because he's pretty much
president for life for the ccp
same thing with putin though i read
something today putin has
parkinson's and he's considering step i
don't [ __ ] know
uh but you'll see eventually that
through the mechanism of the ouroboros
and the different ethnicities within a
country
the snake eats so entailed there's only
you can only
keep power for so long until your own
power system and structure collapse on
itself
like time is against you
yeah you were telling me before in a
podcast that we did a while back that
like the chinese strategy of
one of the war strategies of war is just
to send a million people over the border
like they don't care about
people that was one of the cold war
strategies in world war yeah yeah
that overwhelmed the enemy with having
to take care of their
their citizens yeah and the papers a
million people they would send over and
like here
yeah i mean that's that's like
that just shows you that the way that
the the the communist party thinks about
the individual you know i find if it's
it's hilarious hilarious it's not
hilarious it's actually
it's actually sad that you have people
here
and they're so brainwashed you have
people over here
clapping and uh
you know they they are supporting
socialism whatever you
definition you want to label it as but
yeah you look at the history of china
through mao
mao singh tung was a [ __ ] sociopath
but how many people mao killed
yeah wasn't it something like 20 million
or
a hundred million or this conservative
starvation right yeah starvation
camps forced labor
that was the great you know he had this
policy of the
great leap yeah and it was to try to get
people out of poverty but it actually
caused a lot of death through starvation
right the great leap forward yeah killed
45 million
stalin was involved in that uh economic
mix because
russia couldn't produce a lot of food so
china was producing all the grain to
feed the russian army
that was in what the 50s or 60s or
something something like that
so yeah a lot of people
a lot of people came out of poverty from
his policies
but it was one of the biggest mass
murders in history and now you got a lot
more people that are like doing better
like
hundreds of millions or maybe even a
billion people are probably doing better
now
because of his great leap forward but
it's almost unsustainable that they can
continue like this
or is it because the united states
opened up the door
with uh what's his face the uh
the bureau kraken uh kissinger when
kissinger went to uh
china and they uh opened up economic
policies
and so if china wasn't that so united
states became the buyers market
you know the deal was to go there get
cheap slave labor and pretty much it is
slave labor
different now but it was slave labor and
united states became the vacuum
they became the buyers of everything
being made in china so
if it wasn't the buy sell marketplace
the united states created china wouldn't
be here
yeah so much investment went into china
and huge the last
what 30 years or something it's just
insane how they've grown
and we've all heard stories of the ghost
cities and all that where
they just had this massive
infrastructure
roll out that that helped employ a lot
of people and
and do these amazing architectural
construction epochs really that that was
like
had so many people employed and then
they built these beautiful cities
and then no one's in them yeah so it's a
big waste just to stimulate the economy
but like
what's gonna happen with president biden
with the china situation because
president trump was very in your face
about how china's manipulating their
currency
china's are taking advantage of the uh
the manufacturing
they're taking advantage of uh the the
trade
deficit and all that stuff so everything
is said is true though
they are taking an advantage yes and he
was he was actually
standing up against china he he was the
first president to challenge the
one china policy like he took a call
from the taiwanese president and
acknowledged that they were a legitimate
like there was a leader he also
publicly acknowledged that hong kong
isn't a free country anymore
yeah i mean one thing about trump is
that like if you're not
if you're following the real situation
he he's not
this evil racist dictator that
mainstream news has you
lead to believe but he isn't a great
president like i'm
actually happy to see that i'm not going
to have to listen to trump's face
voice anymore or see his face like that
you're jumping the gun maybe maybe
not i'd be happy to see that like
regardless i'm not really like
i know i'm not brainwashed into thinking
that trump is a racist
like you you see that trump just got
more votes
by black and latino and and and
spanish or not black latino and um
what was the other demographic he did
super well with
women in general latinos yeah general
women so more black people voted for
trump this
year than any republican in 60 years
so trump's obviously not this
nazi like hitler racist guy that
cnn and new york times make you have to
believe but he is
like a crude poor speaker
bad example for children not very
statesmanlike
rude like he is all these things and it
is kind of annoying to have to listen to
him speak
and i always have to put it on at least
1.5 x or 2x whenever i hear him
to get through it but if biden wins
which it looks like he will i won't be
too sad that trump's
i'm not gonna have to listen to him
anymore and i won't have to listen to
the the
the make the made-up like ridiculous
things that they say about him
like i'm not a fan of him and i'm i'm
also i don't want to be as devil's
advocate
i'm such a centrist i'm like okay listen
i have to
jump in when people are on facebook or
whatever and say this is inaccurate this
isn't accurate you're
kind of brainwashed here i do it a lot
less now but i'm glad i won't have to do
that because
it won't be talked about anymore that's
going to be awesome
so in a way it's good that this
is i'm hoping there's going to be less
divisiveness online
and i think that just like the tea party
kind of faded away in their fervent sort
of like
time in the limelight i think that
the trump like the really hardcore trump
supporters are going to kind of fade
away too
and that that's not going to go to like
civil war or some kind it's not going to
continue to grow as divisive as it has
been
i think sure people are going to talk
about it but i feel like
it's good for public discourse even
though
for privacy for the economy for
the value of the dollar it's bad that
another establishment politician is in
power
but in a way it's good so
i'm i'm just kind of like neutral on it
but slightly leaning towards
positive that biden looks like he's
going to win but i'd what i also don't
want to see biden president because i
know all the crazy [ __ ] that
that the that they did you know they
they kind of like
are not going to change anything
people's lives aren't going to material
change under biden
not like people are going to get health
care or they're
you know going to see their taxes go
down or their their quality of life's
not going to go up
it's still going to be more insiders
getting richer and
they'll leave listen the name of the
game is status quo that's it
keep the machine going