NORDIC VALUES FOR DRUG POLICY — Uniting for Human Rights, Harm Reduction and Dignity
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
The video highlights a critical need for the Nordic region to align its drug policies with its core values of human rights, dignity, and universal welfare, arguing that current approaches are significantly behind global standards. While these countries boast strong democratic systems, their prohibitionist strategies have failed to eradicate drugs and instead exacerbated human rights violations, discrimination, and violence against marginalized communities. The transcript emphasizes that the "War on Drugs," a policy copied worldwide since 1971, has not only failed its primary aim but also shifted illicit industries into the shadows, causing environmental destruction and entrenching corruption in fragile ecosystems. Consequently, the speakers advocate for a paradigm shift away from criminalization and punishment toward evidence-based harm reduction, safer supply models, and effective regulation that treats drug use as a public health issue rather than a crime.
A central theme of the discussion is the devastating impact of stigma and punitive measures on the health and lives of people who use drugs, illustrated by stark examples from Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Iceland, and Finland. In Norway, despite recent progress such as decriminalization thresholds and the introduction of heroin-assisted treatment, healthcare systems still often reject individuals due to their drug status, denying them necessary psychiatric care and basic dignity. Similarly, Sweden's historically oppressive approach has led to severe penalties for possession, discriminatory policing practices based on race, and a situation where many users must cross borders to access harm reduction services available in neighboring Denmark. The speakers share personal testimonies of how drugs have served as a means of self-medication to cope with unaddressed mental health disorders and trauma, arguing that denying these individuals support while they are at their lowest point is both unethical and counterproductive.
The presentation also addresses specific national challenges and the importance of international cooperation within the Nordic network to solve shared issues. Finland faces a severe crisis with high overdose rates among youth linked to untreated mental health conditions and a lack of drug consumption rooms, while Iceland struggles with funding gaps for services beyond injection-related harm reduction, particularly for those using smoked opioids and stimulants. Denmark is noted for its new 2024 law that mandates discontinuing prosecution for personal use by dependent individuals, yet enforcement remains inconsistent across the country. The speakers criticize the hypocrisy of maintaining prohibitionist policies while claiming to avoid Sweden's mistakes, noting that repressive systems often foster criminal gangs and youth violence rather than preventing them. They argue that regulating drugs similarly to tobacco or alcohol is a pragmatic step toward responsibility, allowing for safer production, reduced health risks, and better environmental outcomes without radical departures from existing governance structures.
Ultimately, the video concludes with a powerful call to action for the Nordic region to unite behind a humane drug policy rooted in solidarity and political courage. The speakers urge activists and organizations to remain independent, stay rooted in their communities, and shape systems rather than waiting to be invited into them, emphasizing that change must come from within driven by an internal sense of injustice. By learning from historical failures like alcohol prohibition and embracing models that prioritize health over punishment, the Nordic countries can lead the world in creating a better future where all individuals are treated with dignity regardless of their drug use status. The message is clear that without hope and collective action, there is no progress, and the voices of the voiceless must be amplified to turn the tables on a system that has long failed its most vulnerable citizens.
Read the full video transcript
Whoever you are in the Nordic region,
the Nordic values unites us. And if
there's someone who needs them, [music]
it's us.
>> You need to to treat
everyone, also people using drugs,
with dignity. They are human beings,
first of all, with human rights that we
shall respect.
>> It's a very strong thing that the Nordic
countries are coming together
and to emphasize this on paradox that's
going on. We have the leadership in the
world when it comes to [music]
universal welfare system, democracy,
human rights. And I think [music] we
need to step up our game when it comes
to drug policy because we are far
behind.
>> These issues, they go amongst borders.
They affect [music] us all, so we really
need the international cooperation so
that we can actually solve these issues.
>> Even though there are of course
differences, the Nordic [music]
countries are very similar. So we can
use each other's data and see, "Okay,
what works in these countries? Could we
maybe implement what's making good and
useful changes?"
>> Without hope, we don't have anything.
>> We really want to get this going because
[music]
otherwise no one's going to do anything.
We are the voices for the voiceless. Uh
it's our job to try to turn the tables.
>> [music]
>> We are here at the conference on Nordic
drug policy and human rights. Can you
talk about the concept of this
conference? What would you like to
achieve with it?
>> There are the universal [music] values
that we have of human rights, dignity
for all humankind, truth, you know,
transparency. Those Those are values
which stand really, really very strong
in the Nordic countries. Whatever we do
going forward, those values should be
the compass that we're using when we
design drug policy as well. So what we
did is we invited organizations from the
four other countries in the Nordic
countries from Finland,
Iceland, Denmark,
and Sweden. And we said, you know, look,
let's let's try to make a network where
we can mobilize for these values that we
actually hold dear.
>> If we talk about drugs and people who
use these drugs, how can we apply those
principles, values to to this phenomena?
>> For us in Oslo, it's important to treat
everyone with dignity. And I think quite
often we have a tendency of thinking
that punishment and criminalization
and incarceration solves everything, but
actually
particularly for young people, it always
makes the problems bigger. So, again, we
need to help people, give them
meaningful work, education, health care,
stable and secure environments.
That's best for them, and that's the
best for the society and the cities.
>> [music]
>> The war on drugs was launched by Richard
Nixon in 1971. And as I've heard many of
you say, the war has failed. It's a
policy consisting of an aggressive and
discriminatory campaign to enforce drug
prohibition. It has been copied by many
governments across the world from the
Americas to Asia.
And it has failed in its primary but
questionable aim,
that of eradicating drugs. And it has
facilitated countless of human rights
violations, affecting some of the
poorest and most marginalized people
across the world, further entrenching
discrimination that already existed.
And it also exacerbated the harms of
using drugs
and intensified the violence associated
with illicit markets.
>> To answer the question, why have we now
got children dealing drugs in the market
in in the UK? It's because the police is
so good at catching the adults.
In the UK, we're really bloody good at
policing drugs, but you're also really
good at policing drugs in this region
cuz your
your police are actually more qualified
than the UK.
And in Sweden, police are great at it,
and that is why you have the violence in
in reply.
It's like if you want to grow a bush in
your garden, and you want the bush to
thrive and grow, and you want lots of
flowers on it, you prune it, and it
grows back stronger. You prune it some
more, it grows back stronger each year.
That is what's happening with drug
policy in Sweden and most places where
there is a very aggressive
prohibitionist policy. You're making a
very strong bush. Organized crime is
becoming more effective.
>> Prohibitionist governance failure
doesn't reduce demand,
and it just shifts an entire industry
into the shadows. So, prohibition
essentially creates the conditions that
make environmental
destruction profitable and also
inevitable.
And it rewards actors that exploit
nature. And the frontier dynamics mean
that drug enforcement is actually
shifting a lot of these actors into
places of fragile ecosystems where
there's predominantly weak governance
systems, and what you often see is that
marginalized communities are at the
forefront of the violence, exploitation,
and corruption.
>> The prohibitionist approach has
ultimately resulted in police violence,
discrimination,
extrajudicial executions, illness, mass
incarceration, poverty, and
displacement.
So, the iron fist
is only effective as a rhetorical tool,
not as public policy.
>> The
unstable toxic supply in the drug
market, I think, poses Well, it does
pose an immediate risk. This is a health
emergency that impacts people who use
drugs, but it also puts immense pressure
on local and national health systems. We
have to push for a socially led response
with safer supply being the ultimate
goal.
>> We need to move away from punishing and
stigmatizing people.
We need to decriminalize the use, the
possession, the cultivation, and
purchase of all drugs for personal use.
We need to expand evidence-based
prevention,
harms reduction,
and treatment programs, as well as
addressing the root causes why people
turn to drugs or become involved in the
drug trade. We need to regain control
and reduce violence by moving towards
effective regulation of drugs.
And we need to put in place measures
that tackle social inequalities and
promote social justice.
>> And we have yet another
mayor opening the conference for us
in a video message.
>> Regulation is not a radical departure
from responsibility.
It's a pragmatic step towards greater
responsibility. It allows us to set
standards for safer production, to
reduce health risks for users,
to limit environmental damage, to
provide accurate information, education,
and early intervention, and to shift our
focus from reacting to harm to
preventing it. This is about governance
where today there is none.
>> You know, we have models for regulating
tobacco, we have models for regulating
alcohol, which
uh are quite quite good.
Um I think we could extend those models
to use uh for other drugs as well. I
hope that that the tiny little thing
that is
stopping the authorities from
understanding that actually regulation
is more control,
I hope that that goes away after a
little while, especially in the Nordic
countries, I think it would be a
very good place to to start to try out
different regulatory [music] models for
for for different drugs.
>> Norway has
seen quite a significant change in drug
policy in the past 10 years, let's say.
So,
can [music] you tell me how drug
policies are changing in Norway? And
also, [music]
what are you particularly proud of to
achieve?
>> We are drug user representative. We
represent people who use drugs because
of the prohibition, because of the
criminalization, and we have
changed
got the government to change from heroin
injection site to drug consumption room.
We have got more medications in opioid
substitution treatment, not only
buprenorphine and methadone, but also
short- and long-acting morphine, and we
also have heroin-assisted treatment.
It's a trial, and we have substitution
treatment trial for other serious
addictions. So, we
we're in the front, and we have had
conservative government suggesting drug
a drug policy reform with
decriminalization, and we got
very good depenalization.
The police cannot seize drugs from
people with the drug problems anymore
with threshold 3 g of heroin, 2 g of
amphetamine, I think it's 10 g of
cannabis, and so on. They made a step
with a broad majority at the parliament,
and all the parties said, "We're
continuing in the [music] direction of a
humane drug policy based on human
rights."
>> [music]
>> Oslo still has some areas where there is
more visible drug use like open drug
scenes. How does your city address those
issues?
>> Again, it's about treating people with
dignity and we have a very big good
cooperation with lots of civil society
organizations.
User run organizations and one example
for example is Huset, the house. It is a
great place. It's run by uh uh people
that used to use drugs or are currently
using drugs and it's a place you can be
safe. You will be treated with dignity.
You get food, you get uh a place to
stay, uh meaningful activities.
>> Oslo drug check? [music]
>> So, you have drug drug checking
services?
>> Sure.
So, it's a testing machine down in the
corner.
So, they bring whatever they need to to
test here and Daniel will help them. I
think
>> the machine is ready within 15 minutes.
You will have a good
answer on whatever it is you have. You
[music] put the actual substance within
that one, within this square there. You
put it in machine and there's a
>> [music]
>> laser scanning in a spiral as such when
within 15 minutes you will [music] have
a rather exact answer what it is and
what it is not.
>> [music]
>> Maybe we forgot that criminalizing a
behavior
doesn't accidentally stigmatize the
people that engage in the behavior. It's
designed to stigmatize the people
[music] that engage in the behavior and
maybe we don't want to do that.
Certainly, if we look epidemiologically,
stigma is disastrous for public health.
Maybe we don't want to do that, but
maybe there's something inherently wrong
with doing that for a behavior like
this.
>> How do you see the main challenges? What
are the main violations of human rights
of people who use drugs in Norway where
you can still make some progress.
>> We made progress on on use of
punishments. I think maybe health care
is one of the most challenging areas
for the time being and and in ahead of
us.
>> There's still a lot of stigma in
relation to to to drug use. Human rights
demand that you give services to the
person irrespective of drug status. So,
I think that that's a big challenge in
in delivering services that's adapted to
the person.
>> The health care is like, you don't
belong here. You're not going to get the
help that you need. You're not going to
get the psychiatric. You're not going to
be treated nice. When you come in the
door, they smile to everyone but you.
The smile is gone and you get treated
badly.
>> They don't want us in the in the health
system. They want us into what they call
drug treatment to make us stop using
drugs and those with severe drug
problems, they use drugs for a good
reason and the
majority should not stop not at the
moment when they're ready and what makes
them ready is to have a dignified life.
>> We must not forget that
actually drug um drugs have saved a lot
of people
because
a lot of people that
otherwise
maybe taken their own lives,
they use drugs instead.
>> Heroin has saved our lives
several times.
>> We would have been dead if we haven't
tried heroin. It's the reason we are
alive. It's also reason why we were dead
a couple of times, but it's the reason
why we stand here alive. It's to stop
feeling the pain.
So, it's self-medication and everyone do
it in their own way and everyone find
own way to how they it will help them,
but to help them stop. You have to help
them to understand why why are you
running [music] from? Why are you
medicating? What do you want to hush?
What do you want [music] to feel less?
And then
somebody can try [music] to give you the
help you need so you don't have to
feel like you need to
push it down there with [music]
the with narcotics.
>> For a long time Sweden has seen itself
as a [music]
country with a clear and coherent
approach to drugs.
Built around the idea of a drug-free
society and zero tolerance
with strong political backing and broad
public support.
A system that has been consistent and in
many ways resistant to change or even
debate.
>> So Sweden is a kind of notorious about
being a very having a very oppressive
[music] approach to drug policy. For a
long time it wanted to create a
drug-free [music] society.
How would you characterize Swedish
approach to drug policy?
>> It's been difficult difficult in Sweden.
>> A lot of stigma.
>> Yeah, much stigma.
Very much stigma. It's a big change a
lot. We have naloxone. We have needle
exchange. We have
opioid
Yeah.
But it must be better.
We cannot stop there. Important is to
decriminalize people.
>> If you have a little say 1 g heroin on
you,
I think it's 1 year prison.
>> 1 year prison?
>> I think it's more now.
>> Yeah, they've increased the penalties
for possession.
>> Yeah.
>> Do you think that the police in Sweden
discriminates people based on the color
of their skin?
>> Yeah.
>> Yes.
>> To get the more and more
better statistics they pinpoint target
different the same people all the time.
>> Yeah.
>> And the young children, if you have a
wrong hat or something, the police see
you and they
will have a drug test. Are you still a
little dizzy? Drug test. And
I think the most dangerous in Sweden is
that police catch you. For relatives
it's just much
still
put the
close the door
lock the bottom
don't give them money, don't let them
in.
But we don't think that is the right way
to go.
We must include and help
and take them in the hands and
talk for the the right if they don't can
by themself.
>> [music]
>> It used to be that Swedish drug users
moved to Denmark, right? [music] To use
the services there. Is it still the
case?
>> I I think it's still the case. I don't
know if it's the it's as prevalent as it
was earlier. I think the needle syringe
programs have become a little better in
in Sweden. Um perhaps also the OIC, but
we still have a lot of Swedes
in Copenhagen and also actually also in
the Danish prison system.
The Swedes I talked to they they tell me
that they go to Copenhagen because
there's a drug consumption rooms. You
can get into the shelter even though you
are personally use drugs. You know, you
get a place to sleep. You can access
needle syringe programs without
registering with your
social security number and
I just think it's a nice example of
people who use drugs want to do it in a
safe way. They are willing to move from
their country and go to another country
in order to access harm reduction.
I really think it's it says something
about the agency and determination of
people who use drugs and they are not
that different from everyone else. They
want a a good health and they want to
survive.
>> The image of a drug user is somebody who
is
heavily addicted to heroin, I would say,
you know, but that is not the typical
drug user. The typical drug user looks
just like you and me, you know, and I
think
we should talk more about that, you
know, the real the drug user is actually
so normal.
>> How would you characterize uh drug
policy in your country? What has been
changing in the past, let's say, 10
years?
>> The legal scope of the drugs policy in
Denmark is a combination of harm
reduction and criminalization.
We had a uh new law turned into force in
2024
where the prosecution must be
discontinued if you have drugs for your
own use
um and you are dependent on drugs in
your everyday life. So, this is very
good and you shouldn't be fined. And in
um addition to that, if you are near a
uh
certified drug consumption room, you
should also not have your drugs
confiscated. Even though it's not being
enforced correctly all over Denmark, we
do see the the good that this change has
brought.
>> In many countries, Iceland has this
image that there is the Iceland
prevention model and
>> [laughter]
>> uh it's kind of uh works very well and
there's very few people using drugs and
you don't need a harm reduction. So, how
would you challenge that image?
>> The prevention model works for some
people, but there are a lot of us, a lot
of us that it doesn't. We need harm
reduction, we need more detox
facilities, we need more help. We also
just need more on-site help because at
least where I'm from in Akureyri,
northeast Iceland, there isn't anything.
>> We started the Matildurs organization in
2022 and we felt there was a critical
need
of
harm reduction services for people who
were not injecting because the whole
focus on harm reduction in Iceland has
been on people who were injecting and
people who are would fall into the
category of chaos drug use,
homelessness, severe mental health
problems.
And we knew also that there was a
massive spike in people smoking
Oxycontin, severe opioid
challenges, and in crack cocaine smoke
smoking.
So, we established this specialized
service for people who smoke opioids and
stimulants.
>> I wouldn't be here if it wasn't for
Matildur, it wasn't for Reykur, it
wasn't for all these harm reduction
programs.
I got a lot more help from them. They
would call me a lot, like if I didn't
call them, they just called me, checked
in, made sure I was doing okay, planted
little seeds of, you know, recovery,
what that meant for me and what I wanted
to do.
>> [snorts]
>> And so, I went down that road. They
helped me get into that detox facility
and I got clean and I've been sober
since. Now, I am a peer supporter. I am
helping others around me.
>> We have a phone line every weekday from
12:00 to 5:00, so people all over the
country can call us. We do counseling,
we
assist people to treatment, and we also
send packages all over Iceland with
clean supplies for smoking. We also send
Naloxone and a testing strip, but
we do lack a lot of things in the
outside the capital area.
>> What would you say what are the main
challenges right now in Iceland?
>> Funding.
The main challenging
is [music] to get the government and the
municipality to understand that we need
harm reduction service for the whole
spectrum.
Not only people who are dealing with the
most severe problem.
>> How would you characterize the drug
situation
in [music] in Finland?
>> Recently, we have become the one of the
highest countries in the Europe European
Union with
>> [music]
>> drug related deaths on youth like
overdose deaths. So, the situation is
severe, I would say.
>> Why do you think that there are those
negative trends? What causes them?
>> Among the young people who died of
overdose in Finland, 50 50% of them had
a mental health disorder. And at the
same time, we have systemic level
issues. If people use drugs, they can be
denied mental health care and seen that
they first have to quit using drugs or
be cured of a substance abuse problem
before receiving proper mental health
care, even though from research, we can
see that they are highly correlated and
that we can treat people who have
substance abuse problems and have mental
health problems at the same time.
>> There are
some things that we lack for instance in
the harm reduction
field like drug consumption rooms or
drug checking services that some other
Western European countries do have.
>> There's also criminalization of of use
and possession. So, it's kind of like
support and punish.
>> I'm a chair of the Finnish Cannabis
Association and I'm a medical patient
myself.
And there is an ongoing crisis regarding
medical cannabis in Finland. It has been
legal since 2006
and we have now hundreds of medical
cannabis patients in Finland. The
medicine has been taken away from them.
And many of these people are now
resorting to
criminal markets and sick people are
made into criminals, which is wrong and
it's evil. And I'm I'm personally
implicated that in in that, so this is
what keeps me going.
>> Can you describe those citizens
initiatives? What were they about?
>> About the citizen initiative on drug
consumption rooms, uh
it's kind of uh paradoxical that it was
in the first place in 2018 proposed by
the city of Helsinki with the majority
of uh the city council. And uh
then the parliament says clearly no,
which tells about the kind of uh
differences between urban
uh politicians and uh politicians from
countryside. They are more conservative.
>> As far as I know, Finland also
experimented with alcohol prohibition,
which is quite unique in Europe. How did
it go?
>> Alcohol prohibition didn't mean that
there was no alcohol in Finland, so in a
way that lesson still should be learned
that just prohibiting something doesn't
make it go away. It makes it more
dangerous.
>> The problems that we have with drug
policy now are identical to the problems
that we had with alcohol prohibition.
That would be a good good example of how
to to sort these things out. But, for
some reason we do not want to learn from
that example.
>> And I also feel when we look
to Sweden and we say that we don't want
to repeat the mistakes they've made or
we don't we don't want to go that way.
We don't want to have such like youth
criminal gangs and whatever. Still,
we're kind of
not seeing [music] that it's the
repressive system that's kind of
fostering this kind of development.
And we are actually repeating
those mistakes.
>> [music]
>> Please never underestimate
um the change and the positive
transformation that can be created by
many people working together,
strategizing together, and lifting each
other up. Um you know, we must still
believe that a better world is possible.
>> I want to speak directly to those
working to build the Nordic network of
people who use drugs. You are not
starting from zero.
You are part of the global movement with
decades of struggle, knowledge, and
solidarity behind you. My wishes for you
are very, very simple. Stay independent.
Stay rooted in community.
Be unapologetically political. Do not
wait to be invited into systems. Shape
them.
>> We believe that we still [music] can
make a change and we can help others to
make a change for the better.
>> Change is something [music]
that comes from inside you. You you burn
for you. You
have a drive inside that you know that
something [music] is unjust. Injustice
inside you, then you know you have to
fight against That's exactly what
Yiannis said. That is totally true.
Without hope, we [music] don't have
anything.
>> [music]