Non-Monogamy, Exclusivity Agreements & Regulating Sexual Jealousy - Justin Mogiliski

Just how popular is consensual non-monogamy getting at the moment? Well, it's much I think in some ways it's much more popular than it was before. If you look at some of the stats that exist looking at large national samples, we have the best data for the United States. It's something about one in five people are at least going to try it. And then those who stick with it something like 5 to 10%. So it's it's getting up there. What do you attribute this surge and so resurgence of a different monogamy strategy to? Well, I think I think there are a lot of factors. One thing is I think that of course within the past several hundred years we've been developing more of individualistic societies of course have taken foot. People have more equal opportunities. And I think for a very long time marriage was a system for you know, unifying families for marrying men to to women and women may not have had many other options. And so now that I think people have more options, they can perhaps pursue something that's a little more um that may match their current motives in life. And so to the degree that people are putting off family, marriage etc. to pursue you know, individual pursuits, furthering your career, whatever it happens to be. I think that those motivations are more present than they've ever been and so people may want an option to that that that fits that those motivations. You mentioned there that there was some sex differences in the freedoms that we had at least in the recent past when it comes to relationships, dating, marriage etc. Is there a sex difference in preference for consensual non-monogamous relationships? There is to some degree. So men are more likely to say that they want to be in a consensually non-monogamous relationships relationship probably because the first thing you think about is more sexual opportunities. Men are more likely to be thinking about sex, pursue at least casual sex. And women tend to report less of an interest, but it's not a huge as huge of a difference as you might guess. So there are still plenty of women who are who I think pursue consensual non-monogamy, but the motives again may differ between men and women. Talk to me about the motives. Yeah, so to the degree so I know that you've had a few people on this show before looking at kind of the evolutionary roots of some sex differences and one that seems to pop up is again men are looking for more casual term casual you know, short-term sexual relationships. And so to the degree that that is seen as an opportunity if you have if you can have multiple partners, I think men are at least seeking it out. Now whether they're having success in finding that number of partners that consensual non-monogamy could offer, that's an open question. Versus women, I again this is of course everyone's an individual, but the tendency is that women are a little bit more picky. They're they're a little more interested in commitment from a partner or at least are kind of oriented that way and so to the degree that they kind of act on that, you might find that they're less interested in this well, if you have multiple partners, are you really going to be sticking around and investing in me as much as say other other people. But at the same time I think women have a lot to potentially gain from something like consensual non-monogamy especially polyamory where there's an emphasis on multiple emotional close bonds. And so to the degree that having multiple partnerships could you know, provide opportunities for for have emotional connections, supports, you know, a support network as well as you know, down the line perhaps child care I think that it can be attractive. But at the get-go at least those who report they're interested in it, we're seeing that sex difference. I think that's why. It's it's interesting the the motives and obviously the sex difference here is is one of the sort of big um battlegrounds for exactly what's going on with consensual non-monogamy. Yes, men have more sexual fantasies, they have a higher frequency of partner changes within sexual fantasies, they desire more casual sex etc. etc. But I'm going to guess that men also experience more jealousy from their partner being physically intimate with somebody else. Which means that men it's a double-edged sword in some regards that men both perhaps get something that they want a lot, but also have to deal with something that they fear a lot. And then the same for women, you know, it might be nice for a woman to have multiple people that she's got an emotional connection with, but also there is a higher bar for her to get over to get this arousal and to be able to get into a casual relationship with somebody especially if she's managed to find a partner she's prepared to settle down with. Presumably if hypergamy's kicked in a little bit, you know, she might be dating close to the asymptote of whatever her potential mating pool is. So she's like dating down casually, maybe she's aware of this sort of second order if I do a thing that might make him jealous, that might make the person that I care about leave me. So yeah, uh like a double-edged sword quadruple-edged sword for both sexes doing non-monogamy. I think so. Yeah, what you'll see is that a lot of people do struggle with jealousy in consensual non-monogamy. And something that hasn't been studied as as deeply are these sex differences. And so I would guess that you're right. So what we find at least within monogamous relationships is that men tend to be more sexually jealous than women. Men women tend to be more what's called emotionally jealous or or jealous at their partner spending times spending their attention etc. on somebody else. And so I think where that leads is as men and women approach these types of relationships, they're going to run into different issues, different problems, different concerns that are going to make their life perhaps worse for for for trying it. And so to make it work, I think men and women will have to kind of resolve different resolve those different challenges for themselves. Yeah. Why does non-monogamy most often fail? So it tends to fail my One of the reasons that it tends to fail is that if you are at if you only have two individuals those relationships are going to be and it's just it's monogamy. That's going to be easier to maintain in some sense because you're only having to coordinate two individuals, right? And so I know if if I'm just with one other person, I know what you're thinking and feeling. I know what our plan we can we can talk about our shared plans for the future, you know, whether we purchase a house together, how we're going to have children. And when you add in a third person or more there's a unique dynamic that opens up where now you have to take into account how this third person is going to contribute perhaps to each person's life and how that third person might impact say another the other partner who maybe they're not dating this individual. And so I think these relationships tend to fail when we don't account for that or when we don't um taking into account how that third person is going to potentially introduce new relationship demands, competition between partners. I think and and this is an argument that people like Joe Henrich make about the value of monogamy is when you take out that third part when you just when your solution is well, let's just essentially abstain from having other relationships, what you're doing is you're taking out the potential for rivalry between partners. You're taking out the potential for rivalry for resources and experiences of jealousy. Um So it tends to fail at least in my opinion when these concerns are not taken into account. I think the default strategy is just kind of get your own and don't don't worry potentially about how how how say a the person that you if you're married with someone else and now you start dating someone else, you may not consider how dating that third person's going to affect your partner, the current dynamic that you have with your established partner etc. Yeah, jealousy to me from the outside even though we've both got mutual friends, a number of mutual friends who are in the varying depths of the world of non-monogamy. Jealousy must be a huge part of this. I know for instance Jeffrey Miller has, you know, done entire articles, entire studies trying to explain how to cope with mate jealousy, jealousy within relationships and stuff like that. Have you got any idea whether disparities in mate value influence jealousy in non-monogamous relationships? So I actually have that data. I have not analyzed it. But that is one of the earlier I know I'm teaching. No, there's a lot. We actually have a lot of data. But that so I looked at this in a smaller sample of predominantly monogamous people who were looking to get into consensually non-monogamous relationships or who were asked to to imagine getting into one. And there were differences such that those who are of relatively higher mate value had a greater interest in being in a consensually non-monogamous relation relative to their partner. Interest in being in a non-monogamous relationship and they they projected that they might experience less jealousy than the person who was relatively lower mate value. Now whether that's actually the case, I couldn't tell you. But I would get the prediction is that as much as people in monogamous or consensually non-monogamous relationships are tuned into, Mhm. you know, the value of their partner and potentially making kind of calculations of, well, is this some could I find someone who maybe maybe better meets certain needs, um they might be tempted to say, um uh they they they might feel less jealousy if they're of higher mate value because they're in one, they're interested in finding other partner, but in two, they may feel that their current partner is unlikely to leave them or perhaps find someone better. It's kind of a darker way to think about these things, but um it is a pattern that we see. So, I would predict that yes, you'd see that. Yeah, I think so, too. Uh I spoke to this guy, Chris Bumstead. He's a bodybuilder type dude. He's Mr. Olympia three or four times. Just like the biggest alpha chad on the planet by the way that he looks. And he told me the story about how a few weeks before one of the big competitions he was doing, he broke down and cried in his girlfriend's arms on the bathroom floor and sobbed and sobbed and sobbed. And I made a point that he is kind of the face of the sigma male meme on the internet. A lot of these like cool, hardcore orchestral music over the top of a dude looking really buff and lean. Like he's literally the face of the sigma male, you don't need to give a [ __ ] like, you know, stoicism, Ryan Holiday quotes, all this [ __ ] Um and I I thought I was like, look, this is interesting. Like the guy that is the face of this movement is also somebody who is incredibly open and vulnerable with his partner. And the internet uh mentioned the only reason that he was able to be so vulnerable is he has so much excess mate value from being this guy that he basically has a a a bank account an overdraft limit into which he can withdraw. And um it kind of feels a little bit similar to what we're talking about here with if there's a disparity in mate value, if one mate is more attractive or more desirable than the other one, or at least that's the way that they're perceived, they kind of get this sense that they can [ __ ] about a little bit more, that they can make more errors, that there's less risk of their partner leaving because, well, how are they going to beat this? And yeah, there's just it's like a buffer, right? It's like it like an overdraft limit. Mhm. Yeah, no, I I I think that's absolutely right. I think to the degree that you feel almost more secure really in your attachment to another partner in to to your partner, but also secure in your ability to attract other people, you're right that you're going to be more willing to take a risk. And I think that's a principle that you see even outside the mating market, right? Is if you have the the the excess value to kind of take risk, you're more likely to take risk. And I would say that that is a risk. Yeah, that's interesting. Interesting to think that uh your it's kind of like um women's bodies are more fragile than men's, therefore they take less risky behavior. They do indirect aggression instead of direct aggression. Uh and this same mate that is presumably uh they've just got more room. They've got more room to [ __ ] about. So, talk to me about what sorts of people get into non-monogamous relationships. Can you predict this? Is there a personality profile of the classic non-monogamouser? So, the personality profiles don't tend to vary much except on one dimension, which is openness to experience. And for those who are unfamiliar with personality psychology, this is um kind of your tendency to be open to new ideas, new experiences. Uh people tend to be less judgmental, etc. So, that's the big personality difference. The other predictor tends to be, so people who are LGBTQ+, are more likely to be in consensually non-monogamous relationships. And then also people who are more um what's known as they have an unrestricted sociosexuality. So, they have a greater interest in um casual sex. They think about casual sex more often. Though, I do want to note that you know, much of consensual non-monogamy is is not only just about the sex. A lot of people are looking for multiple attachments as well. So, I think if we were to break apart, which you don't see this much in the research, people who tend to pursue it for sexual reasons versus other reasons, um maybe you wouldn't see that that predictor. Or maybe there'd be other unique predictors. So, what that all of that is to say that if you just lump everyone together, those are the predictors that kind of pop the the the demographic variables that that that pop out. But um I I think if we were to look at a more fine-grained analysis, we'd see others. Yeah, that's so interesting. You know, you the world of non-monogamy is, you know, on the outskirts of kink. It's like orbiting kink culture and it's orbiting a bunch of I think a lot of people kind of see it as a it's a sex thing, right? It's a sex thing because people want to have more partners and they want to have multiple partners and maybe in one bed at the same time and so on and so forth. I totally didn't that um someone who has unrestricted like um socio uh emotional or something, yeah. or something something like that, you know, like affectionality perhaps. You know, someone just needs to be cuddled twice as much as the next normal person. Sure. Um and they're leaning on this very different sort of dynamic that is afforded by being non-monogamous. Scott Alexander that does Slate Star Codex, now Astral Codex 10. Um he I'm pretty sure, I might be throwing him under the bus here, I'm pretty sure that he says that he's asexual, that he's not interested in sex, or at least I've heard that some of the guys that are in his crew are, but I also know that he lived in a polycule for a while. Mhm. Mhm. So, you have even this is a perfect control. Like you have somebody who is largely not interested in sex and yet is in an environment that has multiple intimate relationships. Uh and you know, that there you go. Like that's that's precisely the situation. And this is what you see a lot as people say, you know, I a lot of people feel they can't get everything that they need from just one partner. And so, the idea is that you could have multiple relationships that are emotionally deep, they're intimate, you get something different from each person. The relationship is is it affords there are different affordances to each relationship. And so, I think that that is the correct way to to look at I mean, clearly the difference between a romantic relationship and a platonic one is that you're usually having sex with someone, right? But I think there's also the love the depth of how much love you feel for them, how much interdepend how interdependent you are with them, whether you build a life around them. Um and I think that those are factors to not ignore. There's I think there are um I I would also expect there's a there's a sex difference there. Again, to the degree that men and women seek out sex versus emotional connection uh differently. Have you got any idea what the most popular non-monogamy setups are? How many people are doing it one way versus doing it another way? So, only because of the classifications, so if you look at the research, they tend to differentiate people who are polyamorous, swinging, and then people who are in open relationships. There tend to be a lot of people in open relationships just because it's a broader category. If you just say you're open, that could mean a lot of things. When you look at the exact practices, my intuition is publicly uh polyamorous people are in the greatest quantity. Though, that also depends more where you are. what do you mean? So, polyamorous specifically, these are when you have uh multiple relationships that tend to that are set that can be sexual, but then also tend to include emotional attachment. So, that is that that's kind of baked into the definition. You are, you know, multiple loves, right? Polyamorous. Versus something like swingers. Uh swingers, they tend to be far more secretive about the fact that they're swingers, and the relationships tend to focus more on sex, and they might not include these Um so, the there's a funny thing because the the exact frequency of these different relationships is hard to nail down because it is and many of my co-authors kind of kind of colleagues would argue this it's a it's a stigmatized type of relationship, right? If you say that you're polyamorous, you say that you're a swinger, people start to believe, you know, they think they assume certain things about you, they make assumptions, and it's it's to some degree it tends to be negative. And there's there's good research showing that um people do tend to at least have that first impression. I asked a female non-monogamous friend whether or not she was hit on she's in a relationship whether or not she was hit on more when she was single or when people found out that she was non-monogamous. And it was like she was said by far when they found out that I was a non-monogamous because that's a signal like she's hot trot, she's just like ready to go at all times. Like she's just in it because she's kind of a sex fiend. Yeah. Um and uh yeah, it you're right. The the non-monogamy world has uh a branding problem to say the least. If it depends on like unless that's how it wants to be viewed. But you know, if it wants to just be another sexual proclivity, there's an awful lot of baggage I guess that comes along with it. What about the most popular of manosphere talking points from 2023, the one-sided non-monogamous relationship? How rare or common is that? I don't know the answer to that. I don't know if anyone's recorded that particular configuration. Um usually we ask questions about how people self-identify, the label that they give themselves, and then also the number of partners that they have. Now, whether that's equal or not, tough to parse out. Would be interesting to ask uh I guess you'd have to fight with stated and revealed preferences here, but I would certainly be interested in questions along the line of um would you be happy with your partner being non-monogamous as long as you knew that they were going to stay committed to you long-term if you were entirely monogamous to them. Um and I would be very interested to see the sex difference because the the kind of bro science on the internet would say um if it's a sufficiently high-value man, the woman will be prepared to let him sleep around because she knows that she's captured like the dude that's got all of the resources and the status and stuff like that. Um from just my anecdotal evidence almost all of the relationships, in fact all of them except for Dan Bilzerian all of them are two-sided open relationships. I know one where the it's it's open on both sides, but it's only girls. So it's like a it's like a lesbian for the girl and it's a straight non-monogamy for the guy. Uh I think if I was to again pull my bro science out of my ass that uh that helps to mitigate some of the jealousy feelings from the male side. Uh that there's a great Joe Rogan bit where he talks about how um if his wife came home and said that she'd like ended up getting with one of her friends, he would have absolutely no problems at all. Uh whereas obviously the reverse wouldn't be true if it'd been a guy. And also I'm not convinced that the reverse would be quite as true if he'd come home and said like I accidentally sucked my friend's dick. Like, you know, there's there's a mix yeah, yeah, yeah. There's a mixed bag of a one-way street going on here. Um but yeah, this this one-sided non-monogamy thing it seems to be uh at least hypothetically being uh touted as a potential solution. Yeah, so I I I take your point that it's it's I think that would be called a one-penis policy, right? Where essentially there just needs to be one penis, yeah, within the relationship. And and that tends to be common. I mean, if you look at if you look at really traditional instantiations of of this kind of thing. So polyamory is a very modern thing, but if you can look at any, you know, societies that practice plural marriage, the vast majority of relationships tend to be polygyny, where there's one man and multiple women. And I think that's precisely why is is men have had this recurrent adaptive issue of avoiding cuckoldry, of making sure that their children are genetically related to them. And so yeah, that is a solution. Just don't let you you know, try to reach an agreement with your partner where they don't have sex with where a woman doesn't have sex with other men. The problem with that and what you see complaints about usually, you know, when when people are are talking about um issues with one-penis policies is that women are feeling restricted, right? Is is, you know, they may find they may be attracted to more than just other women. And so in those situations where maybe the man is kind of alleviating his anxieties because there are no other penises um women may be accumulating anxieties because now they have to hold back, whereas their male partner does not need to hold back. And so that can create its own tension. So you may be placating one partner while actually making things more difficult for the other. Are there differences in where conflict comes from in monogamous versus non-monogamous relationships? Well they both have many of the same conflicts, right? To the degree that you need to negotiate you know, where you're going to be going in the future, where you're going to be living, how to manage just, you know, when you get into fights about X, Y, and Z. All of that's basically the same. The big difference is again, you're adding in this third person. And so once you add in the third person, some unique issues pop up. I mean, you have um I think people may worry depending on how they handle it, they worry more about losing their partner. And so that attachment issue, the anxiety that comes with with with fear of losing your partners there. I mean, you have to you need to manage potential um you know, STI transmission, sexually transmitted infections. Uh you need to, you know, if you have children, you need to coordinate child care in some way that because it's already sometimes hard enough to get two parents to agree on how to raise a child. So if you're adding a third person, that's a whole other layer. Um and I think that people in consensually non-monogamous relationships also need to deal with uh their reputation more. Right? It's it's if you say you're monogamous, oh great. Congratulations. If you say that you're non-monogamous um you need to hide that and secrecy is associated with with all kinds of uh negative relationship outcomes. So I think that those are the predominant issues you're going to see more often. Again uh thinking about my friends that I've spoken to about the successes and many failures of trying to get non-monogamy to work um their ability to be completely open and truthful seems to be a huge mediating factor here. That if little white lies turn into little white lies turn into a little bit more turn into a little bit more and then it spirals out of control. Um so if you speak to anybody about non that's in a non-monogamous relationship or has tried it and you were to say, "Well, what are some of the things that you need to do in order to make it work?" Like absolute 100% transparency would be maybe the first thing they'd say. I I imagine the first thing I you hear that all the time, communication, right? And I I think it's because what communication does is it gets you into the other person's head. And so you can make a better prediction. For example, if you if if my partner gets involved with somebody else I may not know that person. I may not know what their motivations are for the for the relationship. I may not know how my partner thinks about this partner, this new person. Are they going to be just someone who's a sexual fling? Is it going to be someone who's sticking around? And so the more that you communicate with your partner about these things and the more open you are, the better I'm going to be at predicting how that relationship's going to evolve over time, how it's going to affect me. And so part of not lying, part of having that communication is I think kind of nipping in the bud those those simulations that you run, right? You say, "Uh this is how this is going to turn out. This person is going to replace me in this way." And when you talk about it, you realize, "Well, maybe no, they're they're filling a totally different role or my partner's still very much interested in being with me." And to nail that down, it's kind of like you were saying earlier, if someone says, "I'm still going to be committed to you." And they show that and there's evidence of that um that that tends to help quite a bit. Yeah, the uh so the vacuum sucks in speculation. And uh by filling the vacuum with transparency, the I guess the speculation doesn't happen so much. So you came up with the multi-relationship maintenance strategies scale. And I want to go through all of the different maintenance strategies that people use. The first one is an exclusivity agreement. What's that? Well, so this is actually so if you the data we've collected looking at this, um the exclusivity factor ended up not coming out, but originally what we had thought this was is in the beginning of your relationship Yeah, this is So we we gathered data to validate um uh this measure of different strategies and nine of them stuck around. That was the one that we lost. But nevertheless, this was something that people within consensually non-monogamous relationships, as we were gathering this data, they nominated it and said you people should be doing this. And so the idea is at the beginning of your relationship, you should be not only very explicit that this is our agreement that we are not going to sleep with or fall in love with, form attachments with other people. And so having that explicit conversation up front. Cuz right now you can sometimes assume that, right? You start dating someone or you you meet someone for the first time, there might be this assumption that if things continue, you're going to be monogamous. And so if your expectations are mismatched then that's a breeding ground for potential conflict where say a month down the line surprise, I'm still dating other people and you are not, right? You've agreed to monogamy you thought we were monogamous and and we're not. Uh and then another part of that is revisiting that over time, right? Because what your what your agreement is and how interested you are in it and how you want to maintain it could change. Right. Is that So the exclusivity agreement saying that you won't fall in love and won't do these things and so on and so forth presumably there's different levels that different types of non-monogamous relationships try and drop into. There'll be some where you're only allowed to do this with a person, you're only allowed to see them so often or whatever. Yeah. Yeah, a lot of degree of exclusivity as well, right? So to um you know, I I may be totally fine with you having sex with somebody, but don't fall in love or you can have this deep intimate attachment, but I I don't want sex. And then Because both of those two things are so unbelievably easy to pass apart. That's right. Yeah, yeah. And I think that's where people get into they they get into trouble, right? Is you make that agreement and you're saying, "Okay, this is how it's going to work." Then you are having sex, you are talking to this person, you're creating that attachment, and then suddenly you say, "You know what? I kind of want to do more." And so revisit That's why I think revisiting the agreement also helps because once you establish it things can change. All right, it does attraction disclosure. Yeah, so this was actually the biggest one. In in statistical speak, it explained the most of variance in people's responses to the scale. So and it it was the most strongly correlated with some of their relationship quality outcomes, satisfaction, conflict. Um what this is is if you are if you are in a relationship and you are attracted to someone outside of your relationship, um tell your partner about it. So disclose that you're attracted to other people. Right now, I think the habit for a lot of people is if you're attracted to someone else, just hide it. Don't talk about it. You know, brush it under the under the rug and just don't acknowledge it because if you say that to your partner, the first reaction your partner's usually going to have is, wait, what? There's this other person? And they they your heart rate goes up, they get all panicked. And that seems like an unpleasant experience. But again, what you're doing is you are giving your partner true information because the alternative is let's say that your partner observes that you're talking with this other person, that clearly you're attracted to them. Now they are free to just stew in their own simulations of what's going to happen between you two. versus um if they know that you're attracted to this other person, there's no mystery. So it sucks, but you can at least be confident that um you know, that something is actually happening. Then from there, you can take other steps. Okay, so was this was this proposed by some people in the non-monogamous community as potential strategies for people in monogamous relationships to also try? They were nominated as the best We asked for the best and the worst practices for doing consensual non-monogamy. So they weren't even thinking, should monogamous people do this? But what we found in our data set was that people who were monogamous, who did this, also tended to report higher relationship satisfaction. Have you got any idea which way the arrow of causality runs there? That's unclear. So none of this data was experimental, none of it was longitudinal. We got one snapshot in time. My guess is that the cuz we asked it as adherence to certain behaviors. So the people that we're we're asking, how often do you do this? And so from there, we can guess that the behavior may have led to greater satisfaction. The opposite is less clear to me. If you're already satisfied, that leads you to disclose your attraction more. Mhm. Maybe you're more comfortable doing that. Mhm. Um and that could be a possibility. But my guess is that engaging in the behavior leads to the you know, the satisfaction. Got you. Compersion. So compersion, if you Google that, what you'll get is usually um it's how much you enjoy or like that your partner is currently involved with someone else, whether that's sexually, romantically, or otherwise. And this depending on who you ask, the scholar that you ask, what compared the definition will change. I think in general, it is if your partner's involved with someone else and they are having a good time, you can then be happy for them, right? You can actually feel that that that pleasure that that that they're getting what they need. This is kind of like being This is a very platonic way of thinking about it, but this is kind of like being happy for a friend or a colleague or someone else who had a major um success in their life, right? They ended up getting the job they really wanted, they ended up having, say, the vacation that they were really looking forward to, etc. You're just happy that they're having this positive experience. And so would be you are happy that you are romantic partner is having this very positive experience with someone else. And so for example, um say if your partner's involved with someone else, you're happy at first, but then you realize this person isn't very good for them, or they seem to be stressed more, they're crying more than they used to, then and if that person seems to be causing it, you might feel less compersion because now you know that they're not enjoying themselves. So it's really about this appreciation for the other person your partner's experience, positive experience. Yeah, I mean, we're running into all manner of pretty heavily hardwired concerns here. You know, my husband is getting really great emotional support and affection from this other woman. That's going to trigger an awful lot in most women. And my wife is getting sexually satisfied by that dude down the street or that guy that she goes to see in Dallas once every 6 weeks or whatever. Again, you know, like that compersion seems like a uh ancestorily rare emotion to have felt, which is probably why no one's ever tried to spell it or write it before. Yeah, I I don't think My my guess is that cuz there's very little that we know about compersion, but my guess is that this is not something that spontaneously arise, at least not as spontaneously as jealousy or envy does, right? Is I think that you have to to some degree reason yourself towards compersion because at first you're feeling jealousy, you're you're insecure about whether your relationship is going to last, or you're feeling envious, you really want what this other who's what's this other guy doing for my wife that I'm not able to do. You're feeling that envy first, and then from there, you have to work your way and say, okay, despite the fact that I'm feeling this, I know that she is getting something that gives her joy, but then may not actually affect me, right? Is as I think you make the assumption that this relationship is going to filter back and negatively affect me somehow, but there is a world where it doesn't. And so when you realize that that's that can be true, it gets easier. Yeah, security of attachment must be a big mediator here. Okay, next one as you just said there, jealousy regulation. Yeah, I mean, this is straightforward, right? Is if your partner's involved with someone else, you're going to feel jealousy. And the way that the items are worded for our measure is how well can you how how free do you feel to communicate about jealousy? Because I think you can find yourself in a situation where you know, you're feeling this jealousy and and you really want to and and and even if you were to communicate it, you wouldn't resolve it. But the fact that you can just openly talk about your experiences with your partner then leads you to be able to resolve the concern, right? Cuz if you're not talking about the jealousy, again, you are trying to deal with it yourself, you are trying to reason through it yourself, you're trying to again, what is my what is my partner going to going to be going to be doing with this other person? So um it's all it's many of these are kind of part and parcel with this openness of communication, this honesty, just just giving your partner the information that they need to work through whatever whatever emotional or otherwise issues they're having. And so I think openness to talk about jealousy um helps people resolve that. Have you learned anything or did you discover anything during your research about how people can better manage sexual jealousy? So there are there are multiple strategies that are identified. Some of the ones that are worse are avoidance. So I'll start with the bad ones, right? The the worst the worst one tends to be avoidance, where it's it's you're experiencing this and you just say, you know what? I shouldn't be experiencing this, and so I'm just not even going to address it. I'm not going to give it the light of day. Um a better way to a better way tends to be um one of the ways is is cognitive reframing. So in other words, rather than So if you experience jealousy, the first place that your mind goes is you focus on all the ways that this other relationship that your partner has could harm you. What you could do instead is think about all the ways in which that other relationship could actually enrich your life. Uh so for example, this is kind of hard to see if you're really worried about your partner, but um if your partner is, you know, spending more time with someone else, they are having a good time, that means they're going to be in a better mood, probably. And so if they come home or you see them again, they're going to be better prepared to meet you where you're at. They're not going to be, you know, having this desire to go off and do other things. Um you're also getting more time. When your partner spends more time with someone else, I mean, that's more personal time for you. And I I think some people um you know, if if if you're in a relationship and you're kind of following the traditional monogamous paradigm is is you're pretty much up each other's asses all the time, right? And so that a little bit of distance can be a good thing. So when you kind of reframe what are the consequences after I feel this emotion, um I think that tends to help. I I almost think of it as a really as a type of mindfulness, right? Where you recognize that you're experiencing an emotion, it's rising up, and rather than just follow the script and get possessive, get worried, start punishing your partner, instead you observe that emotion and think, is this emotion actually serving the purpose for which it's designed? Jealousy is meant to preserve pair bonds, preserve relationships. But there is jealousy that you can experience, especially if it's chronic, if it's, you know, mis- misapplied, um that it makes the relationship worse. So you have to ask yourself, is this jealousy motivating me, say, to address a problem that I have with my partner, or is this jealousy just something that I'm experiencing, I'm running with the negative emotions, and it's not helping me at all? Yeah, it's interesting to think that I I I'd love to know if polyamorous relationships, non-monogamous relationships have higher rates of domestic violence. Well, my my guess is low so I imagine you're thinking that just because when you Jealously make guarding and Jealously yeah yeah yeah jealously make guarding yeah that's all that is all is all wrapped up in domestic intimate partner view violence and so Yeah, to the degree that these emotions are poorly managed. Yes, I think that you'd probably see more of that and that's what you see in monogamous relationships, right? When there's cheating people just are they feel absolutely valid in saying I feel jealous. I want to murder my partner essentially. You're almost justified in doing that. versus if you're successfully managing these emotions which my impression of most people who who are polyamorous they are. I don't think you would see more domestic violence. I would guess that they would be they would probably have rates as common as monogamous people who are faithfully monogamous. Yeah, that's interesting. I just I guess it all comes down to it's a high wire act. Right? It's it's you're purposefully putting yourself into a situation where there will be more jealousy, there will be more mate guarding, but how many people are accidentally finding themselves in in a non-monogamous relationship? Like they've very much first principles anti-culturing their way into this kind of relationship setup. So they're probably doing at least some of the cognitive work to be able to okay and what do I need to think about and what are the risks and what are the benefits and what are the costs and what are the so on and I guess it's a it's a balancing act of is preparing for the fire whilst going further into the fire. Which one is more effective, you know? Right. Right. Yeah, I think it's preparation. I think it's also how you handle yourself along the way, right? Because I think so one of the things I'll say about the practices that we've identified is even if I think you followed all of them and you were going into it as prepared as you could be. There are going to be experiences that you're not prepared for and I think it is about managing in the moment how you respond to what's happening and keeping your eye on is what is happening over here between my partner and someone else. How is that actually going to filter back and affect me? Right? Because I we I think it's less defensible to restrict a partner's kind of behavior with other people if it's really just to to to make you feel better about your jealousy or make you feel better about your fear. We wouldn't really do that for for in many other in many other situations where you know, I my partner just doesn't want this for some undisclosed reason. So I'm not going to do it. I I think that's part of of of keeping track of that. The other thing that your comment made me think of is for a long time I've been thinking about the degree to which people in monogamous versus polyamorous relationships differ on intelligence and it intelligence would probably aid in helping to again be aware of what's happening as you're being non-monogamous, keeping track of what's happening and then devising these these kind of novel creative solutions to dealing with jealousy or whatever's happening. I don't know of any data on that, but um I'd be curious. Yeah, okay. Partner hierarchy. Okay, so this is one of the things that you'll observe if you ever get if you ever kind of like tipping your toe into polyamory and all that is that people will essentially label their partners as primary versus secondary or tertiary and this is the idea that primary relationships are going to look more like the traditional monogamous relationship where you have deep investment with one another, you have shared goals together, you know, if you buy a house this is the person that you're buying the house with, you're sharing, you know, you're taking care of children together and then the secondary might fill some other role, but they're usually treated they have maybe their voice in some cases may matter less. So if the primary partner puts their foot down and says no, this is not okay, the secondary may not have much of a say in that. And so this really gets at to what degree are you more hierarchical or are you more non-hierarchical where you not that you treat partners exactly the same, but you don't go into the relationship already having specified who's going to be primary and who's going to be secondary. People who are non-hierarchical, what they tend to do what they tend to say is is you want the kind of natural relationships that arise the the chemistry between people as it arises to guide how much time you spend, what you do with each partner, etc. So letting letting it follow your preference rather than imposing that structure from the beginning. That's interesting. Okay, sexual health maintenance. I mean that's that's straightforward, right? Is if you're having one of the things that we know it's well documented is if people have denser sexual networks, you have sex with a greater number of people and they all have sex with multiple people, the risk of contracting an STI is is higher. And so you you see this in polyamorous communities getting tested regularly is is very very common. It's expect it's it's almost it's a moral imperative in these communities where if you're not doing this, you are introducing risk. So it's that it's preventing spread of pathogens, but also making sure that you use safer sex tools to prevent you know, unwanted pregnancy because if one partner gets pregnant, I mean that's its own drama and there are there are a lot of there are a lot of issues that can come from that. So the idea is take away all of the risks that can come from having sex with multiple people. Got you. Shares extra pair sexuality. Ah, yeah. Okay, so this one's fun because this is including your partner in the sex that you have with other people. Right. And so that could look like I think what most people are probably familiar with is I think it's more common for example for partners to watch pornography together where you're including a third partner in your sexual you're you're including it essentially a third person in your sexual fantasies, but of course it's it's someone else who's far away, who's a fictional character, they're you know, porn star that you're never going to meet, right? But it could also include once you start getting involved with someone else, you also get involved with them. And my thinking here is that this is going to produce less conflict and that's what we see is it's so associated with lower with less conflict in relationships. To the degree that you're both getting something out of that third partner you have less reason to really complain about it or to find it as a to see it as a negative, right? You are getting something from it and you know, again with with any collaborative kind of endeavor if if you if all people are on the same page, they're all working towards the same goal, you tend to see better cooperation. You do need to have someone who's at least slightly malleable in the sexual orientation. Well, to you I guess it depends who's doing what with who in the bedroom specifically the nuts and bolts and mechanics of of what's going on. Yeah, so if you're actually involved with the other person, yes, but if you're present and you're just playing a part, you could for example say if it's two guys, one girl, you could still be having sex with your partner and you're getting something from just being there. This is actually one of the I see this a lot where if your partner's off having sex with somebody else, you're again simulating thinking about what's going on, what's that what's that like? If you're actually there, you see what that's like. You see the dynamic and that can be Yeah, it could be traumatizing or it could be useful. sure. Yeah yeah yeah. I'm not convinced that that's There's many many people going Yeah, no, I'd just keep it in my mind. It can't be as bad in my mind as it is in reality. Yeah, maybe you'll discover something you don't want to know. That that is possible, but so that's I think the the first step is really you're present now you know. And this is true with all these practices. You know this information now. But that's only the first step. The next step is what do you do with that information and that's where you get into thinking about, you know, I want to be if you're present and you're experiencing jealousy envy because of actually watching say other people have sex, well, what do you do with those emotions that you experience, right? Do you channel that into your own sexual satisfaction? Do you channel that into anger and aggression? Do you realize that it's again this is not going to something that's going to harm you, etc. That's going to lead to that that I think is what leads to different kind of positive or or negative outcomes. Got you. Reputation management. That is the way that we measured it was we we asked people how often they hide their relationships from other people. So that is from people outside of their current relationship. This is managing do other people know that you're consensually non-monogamous? So people who are consensually non-monogamous, they tend to be more secretive about their relationships and that's associated with um again having worse experiences overall cuz for example if you're if you're in a relationship with someone and they're a secret, let's say that they do want to be a greater part of things. They want to maybe hang out in a public setting with all of your friends. If they want to you know, be brought to a family event. Now they can't do that and that's important for a lot of people and I think that's a that's a keystone part of many romantic relationships. So you're taking away that opportunity to be public about it, you know. Yeah, that's uh I I suppose the branding problem. Uh Mhm, sure. that we were that we were talking about earlier on and I don't know, there's just it if it was more uh accepted in wider culture, even if it was not even more accepted, if it was somehow held in high esteem, uh you know, reputation management would be a totally different task, right? It might be it might be um playing it up even more because then we're going to gain a little bit more social status from doing it. Uh resource distribution. So, this is whether you think about how you spend time, give attention, share physical resources among your partners. Um one of the things that pops up is that you're in a relationship, you're in a maybe an established pair bond, okay, with just two individuals, and then someone else comes in. At first, and this happens with all dating, you're now going to up your game and try to uh you know, shower this other person with presents, with attention. There's that new relationship energy, the initial courtship, where you're investing more effort than you otherwise would. To your current partner, who maybe you've been past that stage for a long time, what it's going to look like is you're spending more time, you're giving them more stuff than you ever give me. And so, that is a source of jealousy as well. And so, if you think more carefully about how each partner is whether they're getting what they need, you the ideal might be yes, you're kind of embracing this new relationship energy with the new partner, but then maybe you should also be considering that your partner is going to feel a little bit more uh threatened, they may be more jealous, and so maybe you need to up your game with your current partner as well. The idea is you don't want to neglect one in favor of another. Cuz that's where you get a lot of rivalry. Yeah, what so this is your your big matrix of of strategies that were most likely used. Was there anything else that you learned just while going through this big fat piece of research? Well, I think I've I've mentioned just in in passing uh bits and details, but I I I kind of want to visit the the the branding um point that you you keep here bringing up, which I I think that again, when you hear something like polyamory, swinging, open relationships, etc., there is that initial reaction because there aren't really scripts, there isn't really a playbook for how to do consensual non-monogamy in a way that's ethical or in a way that doesn't potentially uh harm somebody, right? And so, I think people are having almost a mhm, it's a justifiable reaction where you say, well, there's going to be this other person, how's that going to affect me? You know, maybe there are more STIs, maybe, you know, I'm I'm going to be neglected. And what we're doing by identifying these different practices is we're showing how there is a logic to how people in polyamorous relationships navigate these issues, that it's not just a free-for-all, and it's not just, you know, I'm going to be involved with someone else, suck it up, you got to deal with that, it is what it is. It's more of there's there's a conscientiousness to how people approach these relationships. And I think that if that were better known, if the process were better known, um as much as it's well known up for monogamy and how people should navigate monogamy, I think that if that were known, that stigma, that branding problem would start to go away. But of course, all of that relies on are these are these practices actually working? Our our evidence our our data suggests they seem to be, but again, until we have experimental longitudinal data, we can't really say that they are. Mhm. And so, this is I this is this is just a whole scientific endeavor that needs to happen, and and we need to know whether what people in polyamorous relationships, for example, are doing actually has a positive effect, as many claim that it does. Um Yeah. Yeah. Why do you think it is that people so heavily condemn consensual non-monogamy? Like the wider culture. I think there's because there are legitimate risks to because of jealousy, because of envy, because the the probability that when you experience these things, you're going to be more combative, you're going to be more um aggressive with with other people. I mean, there's there's um for example, it's it's well known that you know, if you talk to to William uh the other time, you know, if you have incels, like people who are having a a difficult time for one reason or another finding relationships, and it seems like you know, everyone's flocking to the most attractive, most valuable relationships, and and I'm not getting much at all, you're going to see more animosity, more envy, more jealousy. And so, I think the idea is if you maintain monogamy, it's almost like maintaining um kind of abstinence abstinence-only education, right? It's just you're you're you're telling people, you know, if you have these issues, you should just ignore them, you should so that we can avoid all of this envy, all of this jealousy, all this aggression that comes from being disappointed in the mating market. Um So, I I I think that people are are are noticing that this is um that this is that this that this can be that these can be issues, right? When you engage in non-monogamy, it's it can be messier. And so, for it to be popular, and for people to be getting into these relationships, you look at that and you say, well, this is going to affect my life, this is going to cause more chaos than I really want, and so I I don't want to support that. I think the other legitimate concern is and I've thought about I've I've kind of tossed this idea back and forth a little bit is if I'm in a polyamorous relationship and you are monogamous, I'm saying it's okay for your partner to have sex with, fall in love with other people. And so, if you are committed and you say, no, I'm only interested in monogamy, I'm only interested in in you, uh my love, and then they see that other people are being monogam- are being polyamorous, they're being non-monogamous, they say, oh jeez, that option's out there, maybe I want to try that. And so, I think there there is there's this fear that polyamory is a threat to monogamy, and I think in some ways it is. It permits a different way of approaching relationships. Um and so, to the degree that you don't want that alternate option, you might be motivated to not have it be popular. Yeah, the I I got it in my head that polyamory is kind of like an animal that's able to you throw something at it and it just eats it and keeps on moving, whereas monogamy is much more fragile. Like polyamory is much more difficult to break, not impossible to break at all, but it's way more sort of flexible and robust than non-monogamy than monogamy is. I guess as well, you know, this uh intersexual competition has to play a a big part of this, right? That I am in a relationship with my significant other and we are committed to each other, and that person over there is also in a relationship. Therefore, I can be pretty reliable in knowing that they're not going to try and steal my partner away, whereas now, like I said before, my friend who was hit on way more when it was found out that she was non-monogamous than when she was single, oh, the some sort of sexual voodoo magician, they they know all of these tricks from living in their polycules for the last few decades, or they're going to invite her to a fivesome, and and she's never going to love me again. So, you know, like all of these concerns that we have, uh I guess other reasons that I can spitball would be monogamy is a pretty good sexual redistribution strategy. Uh people would be concerned about some sort of harem beginning by this one turbo chad that's able to capture all of the women. Uh I think there's still like a sort of vestige of puritanism uh around sex and and and sort of what we're supposed to be doing sexually. There's still an awful lot of suppose, about what it is that people actually want to do, and and non-monogamy puts sex into the forefront of the conversation in a way that monogamy doesn't uh for some reason, but again, because people I think often consider non-monogamy to be primarily about the sex they're all about the sex. Um So, I think that probably contributes. Uh Yeah, to the to the degree that people have to be mindful or or put effort into dealing with the emotions that pop up, it really is more um I guess the term for it would be cognitive overhead, right? You have to think about more. And so, with any every interaction that you have with a person, yeah, if you're monogamous, everyone's monogamous, you know that sex is off the No, no one's eyeing each other up and they're going to get romantically involved. Um versus you're right, if you're opening that up, now not only are you holding a business meeting and you're talking about non-sexual things, but you're maybe in the background having these obsessive, intrusive thoughts about wait, is she looking at him in this way, and etc., etc. Um I think that that's avoidable. I think that again, if you get good enough at handling those emotions, I think that it's less effortful and that comes into play less. I think also, if you the the more of an attachment you have with your partner, the more that you trust that your partner is not going to pursue anything in a way that is directly harmful to you, that becomes less it becomes less costly that something could happen between them and someone else, right? So, um it's it I think the fear really isn't that sex with someone else or emotion with some- or emotional attachment with someone else is going to happen, it's that it's going to happen and then there's going to be this consequence. But if you can cinch up that consequence, then the act of it will matter less, if that makes sense. That does make sense. It's It's so I'm trying to sort of parse apart in my mind the my imagined envy. Um Is it How much of it is because of something inherent in the act itself, and how much of it is because of what that the implication of that act has down the line? And And it's like it almost gets into This conversation almost gets into sort of questions of sacredness and kind of like axiomatic truths and and virtues and honesties and, you know, chastity in and of itself, commitment in and of itself um it is a good, you know, uh and then from there you need to scale it out into a binding the local community together, binding the entire civilization together, helping to tamp down some of the more um base instincts. Is this a slippery slope for everyone to just be sniffing ketamine at 3:00 in the afternoon and not getting anything done? Like It's a very It's like a kind of like a flash point for a lot of of human nature's more like visceral hedonic immediate pleasures. Mhm. I'm definitely a consequentialist, yeah. To the degree I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Beyond just the romance, you do have to coordinate how these kinds of relationships are going to affect the larger society and how people get along and well how you know, stable societies will be. And again, to the degree that the consequences can be addressed effectively, right? At least as at least as effectively as what we currently have. The current paradigm is be monogamous. That's That's It's the equivalent I I again, I say this again. It's like abstinence only education, right? Just solve the problem by ignoring it all together. By just don't even expose yourself. This is more of It's almost like teaching safe sex, right? It's How do you safely have multiple relationships? And I think that we just don't know we we don't know all the joints at which doing that is going to affect our personal lives, our social lives, our communities, etc. We have really good models for predicting how monogamy versus non-monogamy tends to affect or or, you know, how we predict it affects society. But I don't think that we have we we haven't tested how these more innovative kind of contemporary versions of non-monogamy, if they have actually solved some of these problems for themselves. It's just not well studied. Yeah, and I suppose the It's not just can some people make it work, right? It's can everyone make it work. You mentioned earlier on, um you know, what about the potential link between intelligence and preference for relationship setup. Uh you know, it may be the case that um people who are in the upper 40th percentile and above of of in intelligence are able to um on average engineer themselves into this, but it's not. It's about Okay, what does this happen across an entire society? Uh and there's even a question there about, you know, like again, egalitarianism in terms of quality of life. You know, if we then make more widespread and more accepted a uh setup of mating which benefits few at the cost of perhaps more or many, that's not particularly good. And then, what if you end up again with this sort of like squeezing of sexual desire up and across to whoever the most desirable sociosexual few are, and then you've just got everybody else is [ __ ] orbiting these black holes of sex and and and pleasure or something. Um So I'm I To to to comment on the the harem idea, right? That one or a few extremely attractive men are going to get all the women. I'm actually I tend not to be convinced by that, particularly in a modern environment where people have more individual choice, they have more individual freedom. For example, So that I think that the big fear is women will all go for that one guy, right? But women are more independent, they have more resources, they have more choice than they've ever had in many societies throughout history. And so, it's not that they would need to get into a relationship with the Chad to support themselves, right? That is the That is the paradigm for polygamous marriages, where you have one extremely wealthy man who has to provide for multiple wives. But if you're living in a society where the women can take care of themselves, they are independently empowered, yes, maybe they'll have some relationship with the most attractive man, but that doesn't mean that they won't also, by their own accord, have relationships with other people because say that one very attractive man says, "No, you can't have sex with other people." She can say, "Fuck you. No, I can. And if you don't aren't going to support I can support myself, right?" So I think the the There's like a traditional power dynamic where women have to get into these kinds of relationship you know, they they have to be with certain men because they provide the most resources. But as soon as you you know, more widely distribute and make the resources available to to everyone, more people have choice. And I think we'll we'll see few We would see fewer harem-like situations for that reason. Given that your uh area of expertise that you came up through was evolutionary psychology, and you know, what we've been talking about today are kind of these different ways that people in a modern world with uh confluent relationships that highly prioritize individual happiness, individual enjoyment, freedom at all costs is something which should be should be maximized. We are still working largely with uh ancient programming, right? Our our source code is is however many hundreds of thousands of years old. How much is ancestral polygamy a myth in your opinion? Well, I don't think it's a myth at all to the degree that So are you talking about just men with multiple women, or just the kind of multi-male, multi-female Yeah, the multi-male, multi-female sharing of of of everything. You know, that's what Largely, that's it seems like what you're talking about here, that um people have managed to find a particular relationship setup that allows them to get something out of it that they couldn't get out of a traditional monogamous relationship. Therefore, they have uh hacked or somehow improved uh on uh a situation that may have only come about because of the last 10,000 years of human sort of culture, and was it the church? Was it because of trying to control kinship? Was it trying to be strategic and get the farmer's daughter next door to marry you? You know, I'm trying to work how much is this kind of like the paleo diet for for human mating? Uh and and how much is this like um you know, fast food for the soul? I I think ancestrally we were a mix of monogamy, polygyny, polyandry, and then, you know, multiple women with one man, multiple Not as much, but multiple men with one woman. And I think it really depended on the environmental context. For example, you know, you look back to the onset of agriculture. Agriculture did a huge bit for marriage systems, because now you see a concentration of wealth, men can support potentially multiple wives, versus if you're in an environment where no one can monopolize resources as well, you start to see this more even distribution of of relationships. And so, what I would guess is yes, clearly we have wealth inequality. There are people who control far more wealth than other people in the world, but we also I think individuals have access to greater wealth, or at least the ability to live a a minimally very satisfying life than ever before. And that could almost be seen as a as a flattening of the ability to monopolize resources. You know, if you're someone who's just looking for a partner that you can have consistent enjoyable sex with, that you have an attachment with, and that you can kind of plan a life with, I think that's more available in some ways than it's ever been for a person to reach that point. And so I I I In ancestrally we're We've clearly been a mix, I think, since we've been able to concentrate wealth, monogamy's been far Well, since we've been able to concentrate wealth, I think we see more um ability to to monopolize mates as well. Uh but I I I think we've been a mix, and I think we'll continue to be a mix depending on the circumstances. And I think maybe the circumstances favor some amount of non-monogamy right now. Yeah, it's an it's an interesting one. I definitely see, at least my current logic and educated deeply opinion is sort of a serial monogamy seemed to be the most common relationship setup. You know, there seems to be a kind of 3-7 year window in which pair bonds begin to dissolve a little bit. Again, not to say that people can't stay together for life, which they obviously do, and people can't get sick of their partner after 6 months, which they obviously do. But it seems to me like that makes the most sense. I can see why it would the adaptive story that that tells me is the most I I think the most compelling. You still get the benefits of allo parenting and the bodyguard hypothesis and the grandmother hypothesis. All of those things get folded in without needing to try and somehow overcome mate guarding and jealousy and male parental uncertainty and you know, the entire litany of reasons why we're worried about infidelity. So what what I what I with that in mind my the thing that I'm kind of not bemused but I'm like pretty amazed by the fact that so many people that I know are able to are able to do this and make this work. And maybe it's just that I haven't I haven't jumped in at the deep end and gone through the nine the nine steps of non-monogamy or whatever it is. But um yeah, like from a from a personal perspective I think I would struggle and from a like adaptive perspective it's one of those things where like the story the story to me doesn't it doesn't make quite so much compelling sense. Well, we might yet see that polyamory looks a lot more like serial monogamy serial monogamy than we think because what I think you know, a situation you could see is you're polyamorous, you get involved with one person, you really like them, you really get involved with them, you are essentially acting like you are monogamous. You're pair bonded to this person but then you're also maybe kind of flirting on the side but maybe you're not as interested, right? Because you're you're absorbed with this one person and not so much with other people. And so you behave almost the exact same as a serial monogamist where several years years down the line you then say to yourself I'm just I wasn't as much of a match with this person as I thought. I have these other flirtations going on. Now I start to put more energy towards someone else because I just met them. They're a better fit. The equivalent of that would be your monogamous you meet someone else and then you have this horrible breakup, right? There's there's this huge amount these these huge emotions that come out and you have to absolutely separate from the other person. If you're married, if you own property together, there's you know, divorce proceedings where all that and it's just a huge headache. This is almost in a in a way it's almost like it could be serial monogamy except there's this built-in assumption that you could or your partner could start investing more effort into someone else if that's their preference. As much as that's true for anyone who's in a monogamous relationship. Yeah, the partner hierarchy thing I guess would come into play here. When I think about consensual non-monogamy the typical setup that I think about is basically a couple and the couple have varying degrees of freedom to go and do things themselves. So I'm not convinced that it fixes the problem like the breakup is still going to hurt, the divorce is still going to be whatever. Maybe there's even more vestigial concern of oh god, I knew that I shouldn't have let him sleep with that [ __ ] guy or that girl whatever that you know, like there's maybe even more degrees of of what ifs that get opened up. So yeah, it's I mean I can see why you're fascinated to study this. It's a a really interesting way to kind of illuminate our the sex differences, our predispositions, our fears and our concerns and you really need a good grounding in the EP world before you can then start to see these things for what they are. Like what are the thermodynamics of this system and why why are the why are the physics of this setup in a particular way that people need to do this? Oh well, that's because they need to counteract mate guarding. And why do they do this? Oh well, that's because they need to so and so forth. Yeah, yeah. I think those concern those concerns are really front and center, right? With monogamy they're there but you kind of ignore them. Now it's front and center how you deal with it, right? At least as as time goes on. Oh yeah. What are you doing next? What's the next studies Well, to be honest I mean there's a lot of data here. I need to write up this data. I need to get it published. I need to get it out. So all of my projects revolve around kind of this in several ways. Some of the other papers that we're working on for example is there's a distinct lack of information about parenting in consensual non-monogamous relationships and how that works. So we have some data on that. I'm I'm writing that up with one of the big names in in kind of polyamorous research is Elizabeth Sheff. And so she and I are taking the lead on getting that data together. Um but one of the things that I really want to do is in my in my mind because this is a stigmatized type of relationship I and there are many false beliefs. My idea right my plan right now is really let's if if there's gold here, if there's something to be learned and there are ideals here that we that we could take from consensual non-monogamous relationships maybe even planet you know, use them from monogamous relationships. Um if we can kind of present the steel man of polyamory, right? The the best reasons why it works. My next step is I want to start looking at what are the ways in which it goes wrong and in particular when it is exploited. So some of the other research that I've done in the past is looking at dark personality traits, narcissism, psychopathy, Machiavellianism. And I think when you start throwing some of the So in in general these describe a willingness to exploit other people for personal gain. I think when you start throwing those personality traits into this dynamic, there are so many opportunities for people to exploit one another. And I think that that's probably happening more than maybe we want to admit or people in the polyamorous community want to admit. There I mean you go on to any Facebook Facebook group, Reddit group, there are plenty of complaints about it but you just don't see that much research on it. So I'm I'm wanting to kind of set up the steel man of the best versions of consensual non-monogamy and then I'd really like to say okay yes but here are some of the the issues that are not resolved or that can arise because you have bad actors. Very interesting. Yeah. Very interesting. Justin, I love your work. I'm very sorry that I missed your talk at H Fest. Where should people go if they want to keep up to date with all of the stuff that you're doing? Uh well, I'm I'm on Twitter. I'm on Facebook. I I'm also on ResearchGate. ResearchGate is turned into my where where if you want the if you want the updates on the actual hard science, that's where you should go. But I announce these things on Twitter and Facebook. So feel free to friend me, follow me, etc. So long as you don't mind some some weird posts every so often. Oh yeah. Justin, I appreciate you. Thank you. I appreciate you. Thank you. If you enjoyed that episode, then press here for a selection of the best clips from the podcast over the last few weeks. And don't forget to subscribe.