NEMO European Museum Conference 2025 | Panel: Collective care - Museums, communities, and wellbeing
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
The panel session titled "Collective care - Museums, communities, and wellbeing" explored transformative models where museums act as healing spaces rather than traditional healthcare settings. Speakers from Denmark, Italy, and Ireland presented distinct approaches that embed collective care into their core identities, moving away from clinical terminology to use art and movement as a neutral third party for dialogue. Mia Listed from the Museum of Aros highlighted how this institution, originally rooted in a psychiatric hospital, now fosters social inclusion through daily creative workshops and youth-led exhibitions that embrace imperfection under values of acceptance, respect, and trust. Similarly, Roberto Casaroto demonstrated how contemporary dance in Italy engages teenagers with psychological vulnerabilities by co-designing activities that reinterpret artworks through movement, while Seneta Rice described the National Gallery of Ireland's strategic shift from short-term "parachute programming" to long-term partnerships that address barriers for underserved communities through art psychotherapy.
A central theme across these initiatives is the necessity of sustainability and autonomy to ensure programs do not remain finite projects but evolve into enduring civic responsibilities. To avoid superficial engagement, museums must secure state funding as a foundation, cultivate trust with frontline services like hospices and domestic violence centers, and empower participants—especially young people—to own their museum experiences. The speakers emphasized that true collective care requires interdisciplinary collaboration between art, science, and healthcare sectors to measure impact effectively, often relying on qualitative storytelling alongside quantitative data to justify the value of these programs to boards and insurers. By framing these efforts as essential responses to discrimination and socioeconomic deprivation, institutions can demonstrate tangible benefits that go beyond intellectual understanding, ensuring that initiatives like those supporting women experiencing domestic violence or individuals with Parkinson's disease are viewed as core functions rather than optional add-ons.
However, implementing such profound changes presents significant challenges regarding institutional culture, resource allocation, and the well-being of staff themselves. Aligning priorities between education mandates and health outcomes requires honest reflection on workload pressures and a willingness to shift organizational mindsets to view care as intrinsic to the museum's mission. When demand exceeds available resources, museums must practice discernment by prioritizing organizations capable of long-term commitment while offering alternative training or engagement opportunities to others. Furthermore, fostering a genuine culture of care within the team necessitates regular collective activities and a recognition that caring for vulnerable communities requires simultaneous self-care among staff members. Ultimately, the consensus was that successful collective care is not merely an added service but a persistent, open-minded practice that breaks down stigma around mental health and builds solidarity across diverse groups through shared artistic and physical experiences.
Read the full video transcript
Okay, so we're back
after our coffee break and
we're on to our first session
which is about collective care, museums,
communities, and the practice of
well-being.
And I'd like to pick up some of the some
of the thoughts and ideas that were
shared this morning. One of the speakers
said that museums can heal. And that's
an interesting reflection. We also heard
from Elizabeth about three potential
futures which concern tech, human
connections, and systems.
She also told us that systems are hard
to change. Most of us know that
but there's also a public concept of
museum that is also a challenge in
itself.
So the questions that we'll be trying to
find an answer to
would look like or read like what care
looks like whose well-being we are
really talking about
and practice how museums can embed
collective care within within their
practice.
And I'd like to introduce three seeds
from the present that we can water and
I'll be introducing them. So there's Mia
Listed. Hope I got your surname right.
She's the the director of the Ovarachi
Museum in Denmark and she's led this
museum in Aros since 2004.
We've also got
um Roberto Casaroto. He's the founding
director of dance well and co-dire of
co-irector of waves Italy
and he has developed numerous
international dance initiatives. He'll
be telling us a lot about that. And then
there is senate rice
who is head of education and public
programming at the national gallery in
Ireland and she'll also be taking us
through an interesting project that they
have been working on at the national
gallery. So without further ado, I'd
like to invite
Mia.
>> I'm always hopeless with names, so I'm
want to make sure that I get through the
stage.
>> Thank you.
>> To tell us more about the project.
>> Yeah, sure. Thank you.
>> Floor is yours.
>> Thank you.
>> Hello everyone.
Uh and thank you for inviting me for
this conference. I've been looking
forward. we have at the museum. But I
will start with a small video. So I hope
this the technique is with me.
Museum of Vatasi has its roots in the
old psychiatric hospital of Ous
established in 1852.
Back in a time where long-term
hospitalization was the main treatment,
patients spent their time in the psych
ward creating art and artifacts. These
unique creations continuously formed the
collection of the museum.
A restructuring of the Danish hospitals
meant a relocation for the museum in
2023.
Now we reside in the northern part of
Orus in close proximity to the new
psychiatric hospital. Relocating has
been a great opportunity to rethink and
redefine our values, our educational
activities and our social value
approach.
Now we are a part of a process of urban
development transforming a bleak area to
a more lively cultural city quarter.
With our temporary exhibitions, we bring
young artists to the museum focusing on
current societal topics. Our permanent
exhibition now includes more
interactivity,
direct questions to the public,
enhancing reflection and discussion.
Historical artifacts from Danish
psychiatry tell the tale of the reality
met by former patients. Here we
challenge the definition of gender,
norms, identity, and imagination
through the artistic universe of our
most known artist, Ovatasi.
Was a psychiatric patient hospitalized
for 56 years, diagnosed with a complex
mental illness such as schizophrenia.
A skilled painter, he created countless
artworks during his stay at the psych
ward. Besides its artistic qualities, it
acts as a prism. It allows us to see the
development in how the psych psychiatric
patients are treated then and now.
>> Another important part of our DNA is the
creative workshop for people struggling
with mental health. Welcome to our
creative workshop. We open 4 days a week
or year round and uh you can join
different kind of the workshops. Here we
have the ceramics. Yeah. Over here
people are working the decopage and
leather sewing drawings.
At our workshop you are not defined by
your diagnosis. Just come as well. We
know you are amazing.
We love to encourage creativity
with our creative activities. We try to
demystify mental illness for the young
generation. For the young adults, we
have an open approach with projects
tailored to their wishes. Here, young
participants get to set the agenda of
exhibitions and events. They are our
ambassadors for the future. As a small
museum, we are grateful for our circle
of volunteers who come with creative
ideas, helpful hands, and big smiles.
Authentic social inclusion is what
characterizes us. The Museum of Aasi is
a museum for everyone.
Thank you.
And of course uh we have to show you
this um logo from from Mia because this
spring we uh received a an award. So we
are very proud and uh happy.
Can I do the slides?
I do. We have some slides as well. Thank
you.
Um I can just start here. Our vision and
our activities at museumachi are
inspired by the artistachi as you met
here. Uvatachi was a psychiatric patient
for 56 years in creating art east his
mental struggles. He created more than
800 artworks, paintings and sculptures
now on display at our museum. His art is
deeply relevant today because through
his colorful life, his identity and
gender in flux, he challenged the
definition of normality.
We have a unique narrative with a focus
on art and how creativity and
inclusiveness can better the lives of
people struggling with their mental
health. Our main task force task
therefore is to force foster
understanding and remove the taboo
around mental illness. This focus is a
huge opportunity for our museum because
this topic is more relevant than ever.
We make it possible that many people
feel better through art and culture by
walking new paths.
How do we do this? We reach out to
unconventional venues, projects, and new
audiences who are not part of the local
cultural agenda. We bring art to public
spaces, libraries, hospitals, and even
to public transport.
We invite young people in to set the
agenda in workshops, events, and even as
curators of exhibitions. and we organize
a collective gardening project including
yoga and mindfulness sessions.
We strive for social impact through art
and creativity. Focusing on every single
person is our main goal because for us
everyone is unique and special.
Our everyday practice,
everything we do is influenced by our
social responsibility. We operate based
on three core values. Accept, respect,
and trust.
Accept. At our museum, you can come as
you are. A teenage spy once came up to
us, Hudian, and said, "I like coming
here because I can just be me."
An important part of our community is
our creative workshop daily visited by
10 to 20 individuals who are vulnerable
or living with mental health challenges.
Respect is not just something we say. It
is how we greet people, see them without
judgment and make space for them to
contribute. We avoid labels and don't
put people in boxes. We make room for
imperfection in people, in art, in our
spaces. Our building is full of lounge
zones and people from all walks of life.
Trust. We believe everyone has resources
and something to give. We work closely
with the municipality of to offer a
range socially responsible employment
models from flexible jobs to
internships. This gives us an inclusive
and diverse workplace. We trust people
to contribute in their own way and they
do.
But why does this work for us? Care and
social responsibility is not something
we add on. It is embedded in who we are.
Our collection of outsider art and
psychiatric history makes visible those
who have previously been excluded,
overlooked and misunderstood.
The the life and art of the artistic
transforms how we think about ourselves
and each other. Our sensit our creative
workshop has been in an integral part of
the museum since the beginning now not
as an outreach project but as a core
practice.
So we look forward to welcoming you and
museum in August and we know that you
are all unique. Thank you.
>> Thank you Mia. That's that's inspiring I
would say. I mean a museum with a
holistic social value approach. That's
quite an interesting uh project and I'm
I'm really curious. I have already lots
of questions and I'm sure also the
audience has much more to add. So I
would like to invite Roberto next to
give his presentation.
>> Can I speak from here?
>> Definitely.
>> Great. Thank you. I'm Roberto Kazarto
and I would like to thank Nemo for
having me here and the speak the people
that spoke before me this morning. Um
I've been very lucky because in the last
15 years I've been part of teams of
dance artists, museum experts and
scientists that have been exploring what
dance can do or how dance can inhabit
museums. We've done it in massive
institutions and the tiniest little
museums across Europe, Japan and Hong
Kong. And in this journey uh some
scientists helped us to discover the
neuroesthetic
um experience. When we uh are exposed to
beauty, beauty enters into our bodies
through the senses. And when we dance,
we activate more than 21 senses at the
same time simultaneously.
So the neuroesthetic experience um or
the exposure to beauty um somehow
triggers some neurotransmitters
that boost the use of physical, mental,
emotional, empathic, imaginatives
um possibilities that anybody has.
Bodies of different ages and bodies with
different abilities. With this in mind,
we've developed some programs that have
explored dance for people living with
Parkinson's, dance for people that live
and are beyond cancer, and most lately
uh some dance practices for uh people,
young people, teenagers that live with
psychological vulnerability and
depression. And I'm going to focus on
that in a minute. But before maybe I
share with you what is a dance practice.
Um basically it's an embodied uh action
where we uh look at the body as a site
of knowledge, learning and experience.
We don't divide the mind from the flesh.
Um, we've been trusting the ability of
uh processing through physicality,
through motions, through emotions,
information and to read the reality we
live in with this knowledge. So I would
like to ask Rebecca to introduce you to
future moves. Future Moves is a brand
new experience that we are developing
with the municipality in the northeast
of Italy, a city council, uh the museums
of the city, um the local health um
national agency and two foundations that
are supportive and an organization of
dance artists called Aventi Dancer.
Future Moves introduces contemporary
dance practices in museums to group of
teenagers. They are invited to move and
express themselves in the exhibit spaces
during the opening hours using
imaginaries, images, dialogues with
architectures and works of art. They
navigate experiences that are both
individual and collective at the same
time. Future Moves offer young
participants tools and skills to face
the challenges and the critical issues
that often accompany growth. It is aimed
at engaging mixed groups of youngsters,
some of them living with psychological
fragility and oppression. The dance
sessions are held regularly every week
and are offered free of charge. The
practices are led by experienced dance
artist who have been working
cross-disciplinary for many years and
are designed to activate soft skills.
Teenagers choose the specific artifact
that will inspire each dance session and
they take turn in describing that
artwork to the group. They are
encouraged to co-design the activities
to develop their own narratives and to
discover new ways to engage with arts
and heritage. The involvement of a
scientific team is particularly relevant
in addressing the dynamics, the looming
critical issues, and the challenges that
impact young people in adolescence.
Together, we explore new territories of
action, how dance can impact well-being,
health, and social dynamics. We look at
limits as opportunities, enhancing
different and alternative definitions of
beauty, and excellence. Since May 2025,
the civic museums of Vicensza opened
their doors to welcome young people and
dance, placing the human body in motion
at the center of new forms of immersive
dialogue with art
and maybe I can share some glimpses of
what's happening in this museum. Um most
of the times uh at the end of a dance
session when the participants the the
dancers the teenagers start to describe
what um an artwork from 500 years ago uh
resonating them. They they may orders
and and art historians, but they really
um engage each other and often the
visitors of the museum to the point that
the people that guard the rooms have to
ask us to leave because the time of our
session is over. And this is of course
something new for that museum because
it's very hard to convey teenagers and
it's even harder to keep them in a room
concentrated and engaged uh to the point
that they don't want to live. So what
we've been doing um from the very
beginning was to involve all the parts
that are involved in this project. So
people from the municipality, from the
health care system, from the museums and
also from the supporting uh sphere, the
uh foundations that are allowing us to
make it happen. And from the very
beginning we discuss the fact that when
we start these kind of initiatives like
the ones for Parkinson's and people that
live uh with cancer we don't put an
expiring end and we we tend to call them
processes because they have such an
impact on people's life that it's very
hard to say it's over or it will end. So
this is another concept of um sharing
responsibility and building shared
strategies to make it sustainable. Uh on
the other hand, we are also um aware of
the importance of sharing protocols of
behavior rules and assuring the people
of the museums that the dance artists
can bring knowledge. they can manage a
room uh where people are dancing and
suddenly you have a group of visitors.
So in real time they can adapt and
change what they are proposing and
coexist. Most of the times the visitors
join the class as you can imagine and uh
and also what it is to practice empathy
uh especially from the perspective of
the personnel and how they can you know
uh in some ways um empathically
experience with the participant what we
build together.
>> Fantastic. A round of applause.
Thank you.
That was great, Roberto. I really find
your project interesting because it's
not about the museum becoming a space
for dance, but the point of departure is
the collection, is the artwork. And I
really think that's a that's an
interesting take. But without further
ado, let's have Senit present her
project.
>> Okay.
>> Which is about a journey towards
collective care.
a slow journey.
Um, I just wait for it to be brought up.
I'm distracted now. I I think this
happens to everyone now. I want to dance
and I also want to go to our house. So,
my own work now doesn't seem uh I want
to do something else. Um, so yes, good
morning. My name is Chenade Rice and I'm
a head of education and public
programming at the National Gallery of
Ireland. And I wanted to take you on a
little journey about how we are slowly
getting towards uh more of a sense of
collective care at the gallery because
we do care. Um absolutely but it's a
slow journey. So just to start because
the more I work with Nemo and the more I
meet people from different museums
around the world and across Europe I
realize how important it is to be able
to give context to where we work because
it does really shape what we are able to
do and how we do it. So, the National
Gallery of Ireland, which is over here
on the screen, um is located right in
the heart of Dublin city center in one
of the most affluent parts opposite a
beautiful park. On uh to the left there
are our Houses of Parliament and to the
right is Trinity College Dublin, which
is a very famous um institution. It is
quite classical in terms of style in
terms of Georgian um architecture uh
that would have been seen in the United
Kingdom at the time and uh the
collection reflects that also.
So the gallery always had education at
the heart and this is reflected in the
very first minutes from the board of
governors and guardians in 1854 after an
act was passed by parliament to set up a
national galler of Ireland. And they
said that the chief object of such an
institution as an educational one
demands it should be open to all and
free of charge. And it is. And when it
opened 10 years later it was open to the
public. Students came in and drew from
the collection. Um they copied from the
masters. And today it is open 7 days a
week, 362 days a year. And like all the
national cultural institutions in
Ireland, it is free of charge, which is
fantastic in terms of overcoming one
barrier.
However, even though education was at
the heart of it, it wasn't until 110
years later in 1974 that the first
education officer was appointed at the
museum. After that an education
department was established in uh 1990
and with this we had a shift to people
first programming moving away from just
the care of the collection and into care
of people also and something that's been
really important for me as I've gone on
this journey trying to think about
collective care and where we get to that
is that it is a slow process and we can
only be where we are now myself and my
team within the institution because of
all the work that came for a long time
before, such as, as you can see on the
screen, very early tours for new mothers
in the gallery in the 90s. Things that
kind of, I suppose, uh, were radical at
the time in terms of bringing lots of
children, glass, jars of water, people
in to work in the galleries and in the
rooms and draw in the rooms themselves
and painting the rooms themselves. And
in terms of working uh finally going
beyond the walls and into outreach
programming,
we also began in the 90s going out and
working with hospitals as well, which
you'll see in this beautiful image of
this little girl in a children's
hospital in Dublin city center. And this
work very much paved the way for the
work that we are trying to do today in
the education department at the gallery
in terms of fostering that culture of
care.
So we are now hopefully at a point where
within the institution we're a
collective focus on community health and
well-being.
A strategy for the National Gallery of
Ireland. One of our key aims is to be a
gallery for all. And as my colleague
Bina Casey who's here today as well
pointed out last night, the education
department live and breathe that
ambition at the gallery. Our mission is
to provide accessible inclusive opportun
opportunities to learn about make and
explore art. And this is very much
anchored in that ethos of expanding
accessibility to the museum's
collections and leveraging art for
societal well-being, which I think is
really important in the context of this
conference and in our work generally.
Collectively, we are we decided as a
team in order to advance these
objectives that we needed to commit
together to working on-site, off-site,
and online. And this is over the past 10
years we've been doing this. This is
very much to try and achieve a situation
where no one person is responsible for
outreach but we are all going beyond the
walls to try and engage the different
remmits that we have responsibility for
and working more collaboratively to do
so. We decided to identify and address
barriers and prioritize research where
possible. We wanted to strategically
support underserved vulnerable
communities and respond to societal
needs. And when I say strategically, I
mean that also we make it a strategic
priority to do something. If there is a
limited budget, collectively we decide,
okay, we're going to focus it here
because we've said that this is
something that needs to be addressed. We
avoid parachute programming at all costs
so that we don't go into a community
deliver something and then disappear as
uh we know this to be quite detrimental
at times. It's a challenge obviously
with funding but this is something we
strive to do. We have embedded equity,
diversity, inclusivity, and we really
strive to uphold our public sector duty
in relation to discrimination and human
rights. We have developed dedicated
arts, health and well-being strands, and
we've really worked to make well-being
an objective in other core programs. And
fundamentally, we are advocating for a
more inclusive institution, accessible,
welcoming, and culturally competent.
This has allowed us to enhance some of
the existing programs we have. And one
such here I'm blocking it on the screen
sorry but this is uh I'm I'm in the way
of the text. Oh sorry thanks. Uh this is
a longstanding partnership we have with
the children's hospice in Ireland where
we have gone out provided restbite um
services within the hospice delivered
programs and projects not for just for
children uh that are uh at end of life
but also for their families and
caregivers. But working in this way has
allowed us to enhance that program. This
is um an image from a major project
we've now run for a couple of years with
our national theater, the Abbey, where a
whole production happens. The children
are involved from the outset and it is
quite transformative in terms of a day
for the parents and children themselves.
It's allowed us to learn. It's allowed
us to be a bit brave and do programs we
may not have done. And this is a still
from something from there, a three-year
program and national community project
working with people who were living in
direct provision, which was a center for
people seeking asylum who were waiting
to be processed in Ireland. Um that was
created again by my colleague Bina.
It has allowed us to push in terms of
what we already do. So we have a
long-standing commitment to providing a
service for um people with dementia and
their caregivers. But earlier this year,
we worked with a contemporary artist to
show a film about dementia, to create an
um an installation with time- based
activity in the gallery and also to have
um a full program where even the
activities we were running for very
young children spoke in some way to
memory loss um which enriched the
program in the round as well, not just
for people to mention their caregivers.
>> And it's allowing us to lead and to
learn and to lead. Um so a project that
we're very uh happy to be able to
discuss with the support of Nemo in
particular with uh Margarita through the
learning and engagement network is our
work in art psychotherapy and the museum
and this is a program we've been running
for over three years now. We began with
a pilot where we worked with uh women
who were experiencing domestic violence
and a uh service provider for them in
Ireland. And we worked in collaboration
with a art psychotherapist who's here
again today my colleague Andrea to
develop a program where we could put art
psychotherapy right at the heart of the
museum respond to the collection
uh do art psychotherapy workshops and
provide a really valuable service that
our frontline services weren't able to
do. So, no words is this program and
there's um ample material on the gallery
website about it and my colleague Andrea
is going to run a workshop tomorrow that
I know some of you are going to which
specifically addresses it. But it's a
collaborative project developed in
partnership with our art psychotherapist
and it provides those sessions at the
gallery for vulnerable people. It can
and does deliver far-reaching impact of
mutual benefit which I think is really
important both for participants and the
institution alike. And the model, just
as you were saying, which I thought was
really interesting as well, some of the
best programs we have are agile and
adaptable and can be taken to different
spaces. Um, the model can be adapted to
support a highly diverse range of
cultural spaces and audiences of all
ages and abilities. And in fact, no
words is a wonderful title because you
don't need to have a common language to
engage in these sessions because the
language is really through the process
of making art. It has led to the
appointment of the first and only
cultural arts psychotherapist in
residents in a museum or cultural
institution in Ireland and it provides
opportunity for partnerships with a
myriad of organizations, services and
communities and for enhancing our
existing programs. This program for me
almost defies defies categorization
because it can work for so many people
and it is enhancing what we already do.
In the future, we are looking at
collaborating with higher education
institutions to develop accredited
modules um on art psychotherapy and
museum based art psychotherapy and
consult on post-graduate arts and health
courses. And we are currently authoring
the no words art psychotherapy in the
museum learning and engagement um in
museums and Nemo publication in 2025 and
my colleague Brienne here today is
currently writing that at the moment.
I want to end with a quote from our
psychotherapist um from our art
psychotherapist Andrea because this for
me really sums up what we're talking
about today and how we've got to how we
are getting to the point where we are
properly embedding a culture of care in
the museum. And Andrea says, "I've
learned to trust that together we can
hold and support even the most
vulnerable people within our society to
safely find a creative space that is
traumainformed and protected. That to me
is success when art care and community
meet in a way that sustains hope and
everyone therapist, participant and
artwork alike is changed by the counter
and thank you very much.
Great. Lots of things to to consider to
think about. If we had to site the
future cone that Elizabeth has shared
with us this morning, these are
possibilities. These are happening. This
is the real thing.
And I'd like to kickstart the
conversation with a question with a
general question to you all. So in your
case, Mia, it's a it's an art museum,
but not quite. It's a museum that is
focused on health and well-being, but
not just
in your case, you're working from
outside the sector with with, you know,
with curators and and with museum
people. In your case, it's a national
museum. So, there's an one other level
of of connections and the politics of it
all. My question to you would be, what
are the challenges that you have
encountered? I mean I'm sure that the
audience here would be interested to
know not just that it's doable but how
what challenges did you had to engage
with and how did you also tackle those
Mia?
>> Wow. Yeah. What challenges?
Um at first our one of our challenges
was that we had to combine you know we
are an art museum with with all the uh
responsibilities for the different
subjects collection
uh communication everything. Uh but when
we started this new museum actually we
had the two collections also a
historical part. So our challenge from
the beginning was to um make this um uh
work together.
Um we found the way. So we are still
nowadays an art museum uh with roots
back in the historical part of our
collection and the psych the psychiatric
history.
Uh the challenges nowadays um could be
to communicate to communicate um who we
are to the public because people will
say that well what are you then are you
an art museum are you a cultural or you
do all these kind of creative things. So
what kind of museum are you as you ask
us we would say that we are much more
than a museum. So as I said we do not
add it on because we are this kind of
museum but we are much more because we
we believe that we have a certain uh
spirit um within uh the organization.
So this is mixing our daily uh work is
mixing all these ingredients you know uh
communicating art uh working with the
young people working with children uh
the the uh art studio. So it is a part
of our daily life you know the way we
see uh this the world outside and the
people visiting us people who come to
our place. So it's a it's a kind of
thinking
and um yeah
uh we also have the chalice of course
sometimes when we are with the e
economical part again because we we we
put beside between two chairs sometimes
uh we do not uh say about ourselves that
we are a theraputical
we do we do not uh use the word
therapists at all because we just do
this kind of work as a normal part of of
our daily work. So sometimes the
definition can be quite hard. So we want
to be a museum and much more than this
>> than a museum.
>> You're beyond definition to some extent.
>> We are fantastic.
>> Yeah.
>> Where to start? Um
>> that's a good sign.
Um I think one of the things that
Elizabeth highlighted before was the um
importance of um
identifying what is a priority and what
to measure. So one of the things that uh
intuitively we try to do in these um
programs is to um
have different layers of uh research
around the impact. They are initiatives
that literally change people's lives and
that's tangible, visible, measurable.
also the scientists that work with us
because we have teams of scientists that
across Europe have been for example
exploring which dance practices are more
impactful and uh a fantastic Lithuanian
um neuroscient recently um confirmed
that improvisationbased practices boost
the neuroplasticities more than copying
an existing choreography. So you you you
source the information from different
perspective and with a
multid-disciplinary approach you try to
build um evidence and um measurements or
um narrations around what what you bring
into a museum and how a museum can can
somehow um
host make blossom some of these
initiatives. Um
so first of all the uh the choice on
what to focus. For example in future
move we have uh a team that is um
studying the development of soft skills
that the teenagers will uh uh go through
uh throughout the sessions that we do.
Um at the same time we are in dialogue
with the museums around how is their
perception uh when new narratives are
built by young people about their
historical works, their collection and
sometimes they clash with what you can
provide as an institution. Um, what is
the impact on the people that work in
the museum when they have suddenly, you
know, some some music and techno music
sometimes in a or the reenactment of a
rave party in inside an historical um
building. Um, so yeah, it's a learning
process. The other thing is that because
it's such immediate um and so um
storytelling in a way uh when we come to
the impacts a lot of institutions come
and approach us and say oh can we do it
in our museum and then the conversation
starts how long are you open to stay
committed to this initiative it's not a
tick in the box action how can we um
guarantee that artistic level of the
practice because when you start to move
across countries and areas, you need to
source artists that have the tools, the
knowledge that go through a common
training to understand the different
layers that are behind the uh conduction
of an experience. So there's scientific
knowledge, artistic knowledge and um and
many many other tools. Um there's also
the topic of sustainability of course
because as I said we try to engage
organizations institutions in uh in a
collective journey. So again to bring an
institution to work collectively with
other small organizations other forms of
organizations is not always easy but
when it comes to happen it's fantastic.
>> Great. So in a sense your practice is
also about interpreting artworks. Did I
did I get it? It's a yes and no. It's a
different perspective. It is it is about
uh taking inspiration from what is
available in a space and of course a
museum is a fantastic playground and uh
it can trigger imagination and build
imaginaries and through those images and
imaginaries we trigger movement. So the
miracle of seeing a person that could
not lift an arm uh because of health
condition happens all the times.
Suddenly they become one of the images
that are offered in the space and their
body reacts in a unexpected way. Doctors
always get surprised and they say oh we
should diagnose heart attacks here when
we use you know loud and upbeat music.
and suddenly there's a collective
dimension that supports the individual
experience that's another layer of uh of
what we do. So it is reinterpreting
what it is available in a in a museum
but it's also working together to build
new meanings for what is held in a
museum.
very interesting sen challenges as a
national institution
there's
>> um there's a lot uh I think definitely
one of the biggest ones that I find is
um while we all obviously have umbrella
strategic objectives for me as head of
education and public programming a
priority may not align directly with
someone else's remmit or responsibility
and we are people first in education and
learning and engage engagement and I
know my presentation really focused on
that but that is because that is my area
but also I would say within the national
cultural institutions in Ireland and I
see some colleagues uh from other ones
here today um when we talk about a
culture of care when we're looking at
health and well-being when we're looking
at these initiatives that is where it
sits it tends to sit within education
what we're all trying to do is stop that
just being the case that it doesn't just
sit within education in the past also
for example EDI or access would have
been considered uh the domain of
education we're trying to push that out
to change the culture of the museum um
that is a challenge because there's only
so many resources there's only so many
hours in the day and I think it's about
allowing people to be experts in their
field and showing how it can enhance and
benefit what they're doing we have a
wonderful example from um when we ran
our um our pilot program for the art
psychotherapy in the museum, the
cultural art psychotherapy, we worked
with um women in domestic violence
center. And when we first proposed it,
there were many questions. Is this the
role of the National Gallery of Ireland?
Why why would we be working in this way?
and genuine concern and I absolutely
recognize that because there is a fear
because you have to be able care for you
have to honor your agreement and we
needed to be able ensure that we could
keep these people safe that we could
protect their identities that we would
deliver as you say through to the end.
It can't be lip service. It has to mean
something and it has to mean something
throughout the institution and the it it
took time for that to happen. So
everything is slow like very slow and
especially in old historical
institutions it's going to be slow but
the reward is fantastic when you see it
come together a huge moment for us was
that um Andrea our art psychotherapist
brought the expertise that we don't have
and that came up this morning as well in
terms of museums uh working outside of
the museum sector you know working with
uh healthcare providers with social
workers And Andrea actually was a social
worker before she became uh an art
psychotherapist. And my colleague Bina
that works with me is a psychotherapist
in has her own private clinical practice
but also is in works in education in the
museum. So these are unusual things to
have that you should lean right into. Uh
I'm a qualified secondary school teacher
in art. So I lean into that as well. And
you we we pulled expertise but it gave a
robust space and that gave confidence
and we did it as a pilot. And from the
pilot, we emerged something that could
not be argued with in terms of its
value. The strength of the pilot and the
word of mouth that came from that and
the interest from the public, from um
health care practitioners, service
providers, frontline service providers,
which in Ireland are always struggling
and I'm sure it's the same everywhere
else. There's never enough money. Uh we
had the thing this morning where if
hospitals are going to keep going, we
have to think of other ways to work. we
are able provide a service that some of
our frontline services simply can't. It
is incredible to me that a domestic
violence um service doesn't have the
capacity to provide therapy or
therapeutic initiatives. They just
don't. They are keeping the lights on
and keeping people safe. So for us also
as a civic institution, public servants
delivering a public service, it's a very
different space, but there's no reason
why it can't happen and it has. So the
the struggle is kind of getting it over
the line in the first instance and then
accepting that what my belief is the
most important thing is not always going
to line up with somebody else's but then
maybe demonstrating very clearly um why
things should happen and then also it is
incredible to meet other colleagues
because one thing I should say is since
we began the research for the
publication which we are doing with the
learning and engagement um working group
for Nemo
uh We thought we were quite isolated and
then you dig and dig and we're not. But
what is very visible often times in
museums unless they are wonderful spaces
where I suppose the human um experience
is front and center they're not as
visible. So this work is happening and
has been happening in much more places
than we realized but it's not visible
because what is being communicated by
museums a lot of the time um uh is not
necessarily a balance of people and
objects. It may be objects heavy or it
may be that that's where the research is
and we're trying to create a shift now
in that and ripple and lead to a bigger
culture of care. You know,
>> very interesting.
You inspired my next question because
you're working with young adults and as
most of us know here that's a tough
category to engage with. Yes, I'm
hearing a
>> quite quite some consensus coming up
from the audience.
And what is your experience bringing
young adults into a museum? And perhaps
you might wish to add Mia and Senate.
>> Well um acknowledge that they are
autonomous
>> uh human beings um trying to bring uh
people that facilitate the dance that
could be close to their age. Uh Anna is
here. She's going to lead one practice
tomorrow.
>> There's Anna over there. Yeah.
>> Yeah. So, um,
one of the things that we didn't say in
the video yet that is coming is that
they will start to organize some guided
tours in the museum and it's going to be
their own um, design, their own choice
of which artworks they want to share
with others and so on. So again making
them feel that the museum has a civic uh
identity and making the museum uh
realizing and and questioning what is
the civic uh role in these days when
we're facing the fact that you know
after covid wars depression is uh going
everywhere um so and the British medical
journal on 14th of February 2024 changed
our life because they said the physical
practice to do when you're depressed is
called dance. So suddenly we had you
know a paper that we could bring
everywhere and
>> and convince people about that.
>> It helped a lot to reach them because uh
there's a lot of uh stigma there's a lot
of uh um concerns around um also being
part of groups that deal with these
topics. But the fact of creating a mixed
group in all the programs that we did
for Parkinson's, for cancer and for
depression helps a lot. You're never
asked when you come to the museum, do
you have any pathologist? I mean the the
the people that lead the practice, the
artistic practice know how to identify
some things. Of course, there's uh uh
dialogues with um some doctors that may
send uh some of the participants, but
there's always this situation that
really builds solidarity, mutual
understanding, active listening. This is
what you encounter in a dance practice
basically. So yeah, um sharing agency,
um making them feel that a museum is
something that they can own. Uh it's so
important and that's what creates the
legacy of these programs.
>> Yeah.
>> And not just with young people I think.
Yeah.
>> I mean uh when you you know when you
talk about problems as well I showed you
where Dublin is which is this or not
where Dublin is sorry where the National
Gallery is within Dublin and it is in a
very affluent part of the city but you
know two streets over is an area of real
socio economic deprivation. And so we
have people who could be in the gallery
in two seconds but they don't come
because they don't think it's for them.
And again this program has broken down
some of those barriers. It was always an
ambition where people would gain
confidence in their own autonomy coming
to the institution once they completed
the program. um where they felt safe
enough themselves that then they may
come independently or with their
children but also that it could start
through word of mouth and other people
thinking oh maybe that can be somewhere
I would like to go or that can be
somewhere I trust but it's built slowly
and similarly with uh the young people
we work with in the gallery that
autonomy is hugely important um it's
just it's it's wonderful to have these
spaces and yesterday I visited some
incredible spaces here too and even but
even if you're in a in in a situation
where it's open seven days a week and
it's free of charge. There are always
going to be people who need a little bit
more help and then obviously decide
whether we want to come or not. But I
think creating something magic for
different uh different audiences,
different opportunities and just
different ways of thinking about health
and how we live our lives is really
important and museums can do that. they
can lead the way in doing that and take
us away from which is really important
some of the much darker conversations
that are happening you know not just you
know across the globe at the moment and
I I I think that's where we can hold on
to what it is to be human actually and
have you know real moments shared
experiences in society and I'm sure that
happens absolutely with your two
institutions
>> Mia would you like to add to that
>> yeah I was thinking about um um our
guests our um people who who visited
the museum but also our studio the
creative part. Um we never ask them uh
about diagnosis because as I was saying
that we would want to get rid of the
taboos but um in the exhibitions and in
the museum but actually we never ask
about diagnosis and never speak about
diagnosis or treatment. So instead um
just an example Maria as you um met in
the video uh she will take um the people
the the ones who visited wanted to work
with us uh in the exhibition or in the
creative part. She will bring them along
in the exhibition and they will have um
a talk about still not diagnosis or why
are you coming here and what do you want
but uh about the art uh pieces. So um
suddenly the art is getting you know
like a mirror. So they're they're
talking about the art, but M Maria, she
will um you know get some she'll get to
learn the person she's uh talking with.
So we always use the art as a um third
part of our work.
>> Okay. uh speaking into it, uh taking
parts out of it, uh all always um um
bringing the the art into our uh kind of
work and um
yeah, I think uh it also meant a lot
that you know the people who visit us
coming for u working at the the creative
part uh they're not walking into a
special activity um
uh established from the uh healthc care.
uh they're walking into a culture
institution into a museum and it is um
it's a different
>> yes
>> you know so it's not a special it's not
what they meet so often in their life
doctors or respectful of course but
doctors
p treatment persons uh because they're
walking into a culture institution is
makes a lot of difference to them
psychologically
So, so it's also important
>> to be an institution for culture.
>> Yes.
>> In this area.
>> Yeah.
>> Absolutely. I'm sure there are a lot of
questions already coming up. I I've got
one last question for you. Um in short
and then we'll open the floor to to the
audience. And my question is this. I
mean if museums really want to embed
collective care within their know in the
practice what is that one piece of
advice that you can give them based on
your project your experience that one
piece of advice
>> Mia
>> sorry
>> okay
>> yes
>> if museums want to go your way you know
they get inspired by your project what
is that one piece of advice that you
will give them to get there in the
future there.
>> Oh, it's a hard one.
>> A hard one. Okay.
>> You probably asked some some some
questions, you know, to this effect.
What needs to be done? What do they need
to do?
>> Um,
they need to be um what do you call when
um they need to strive.
>> Okay. Strive in the sense of struggle or
be persistent.
>> But they really want to do it, you know.
They need to be convinced.
>> Yeah. And they need to be uh to really
have a good working team uh around you.
>> Okay.
>> Uh with the same spirit. Uh they need to
be open-minded and um have a look at um
the next person, your surroundings, you
know, all the the people that you mixed
with. um have a good look at the the
world surrounding you and um ask
yourself uh what can we do here um to
meet people who they are because I I
believe that this is the glue this is
the starting point is the glue you
mentioned
>> the glue yeah um seeing people and um
listen to them and uh ask yourself what
kind of museum would I like to be how do
I meet the world outside in the best way
>> I would suggest to identify
an action and to practice it together.
So at all levels all the staff try to
practice something together to
understand what cares mean beyond
intellectual
and um mental trips uh but really put
your body in the action uh collectively
and probably you will understand a lot.
Okay,
it
>> I I agree with both of those and
especially uh so I'll stop but almost
like practice what you're preaching and
I meant to say
>> I think that's really important that we
we share those experiences within our
institutions for me fundamentally it is
about coming back to what it is to be a
civic institution because that for us
that is what we are we are a civic
institution and I come back to that time
and time again but the best way is to
learn from each other also and to put
yourself in it and for example a
colleague a curator at the gallery did
one of the uh sort of taster sessions
that um our art psychotherapist run ran
and bravely the uh Andrea our art
psychotherapist went to that curator's
exhibition uh for this part of the
program and the curator told me herself
I didn't think there was anything I
didn't know about that that's my
exhibition that's my show I've put it
other and then after the session said I
saw things I hadn't seen
>> and experienced it in a different way
and I was so grateful to her for giving
us her time for being part of it because
she also now understands that that
program can be super relevant not just
in terms of obviously just the
therapeutic service but also seeing the
gallery in a different way and it again
can bring it back to that civic
responsibility in terms of who we're
serving and how
>> great
I'm sure there are questions questions.
Yes, quite a few h raised hands mics.
Thank you, Margarita and Maren.
>> Okay, first question. Claire
>> um Claire Bam Arts Engage podcast. I
can't see you all, but I'll peer around.
Yeah, there.
>> So, thanks to all of the panelists for
um talking about their work. Super
interesting. I have so many questions.
I'll limit it to one. Um, so Chenade,
you you used the phrase parachute
programming, which I thought was um
really good. Uh, could you perhaps all
of you um respond to how you
um I'm losing my words, maybe it's
nearly lunchtime. How you um how you
ensure that you don't use parachute
programming, that idea of going in,
delivering, and then disappearing. How
do you ensure that this process is
perhaps ethical and sustainable?
>> Yeah,
that's a question.
>> Um,
so I'm very fortunate in that uh there
are certain things I can put in place
that unless we had a complete uh you
know overhaul of our current country as
it is, we're pretty secure. We're funded
by the state. So the the gallery is
funded by the state and then we also
obviously seek um you know external
funding uh corporate partnerships etc.
>> But what we this was what I meant about
us making a decision collectively within
the education department which also then
had to be supported by senior management
and the director of the institution is
that this is a direction we're going to
go. So if we only have this much funding
we'll guarantee that this is going to
happen anyway. this is how we're going
to do it. So that we're not going into a
community and then saying actually we
don't have the money to go any further
with this. Um on a base level even if we
have external funding for a project we
will find a way then to make that part
of our core program. Again I'm very
fortunate as another colleague reminded
me only a couple of weeks ago because we
have this core um public fund to come
back to. However, within the staff then
within my team, we always operate on the
basis that while we might be doing
something at a higher level with lots of
money, if some of the resources are
pulled, we will strive to still deliver
it, although we may have to pay it back.
So, it has I suppose the the best way we
do that within my institution and with
my team is that we all have to
collectively agree that that is going to
be the direction we're going in because
otherwise if we're all trying to achieve
different things, it's never going to
happen. And collectively if we agree
that well-being or health or care or
that uh prioritizing that for a
significant period of time until it
becomes embedded in the fabric of the
work itself that's how we negate that
happening at least um and also I would
say another thing that we've done is a
program might begin with one person a
community outreach program for children
in a particular area um that program
might finish but actually then there's
an opportunity for it to become part of
an afterchool program or it can lead
into the parents participating in a
program that we run for adults for
example. So we try also to I suppose
prop up the work we're doing through our
other areas even though the audience
remit may appear to sit with one person
in the first instance there's capacity
then for it to go out further and it
comes back to the idea of trying to
really create um uh autonomy for people
where they feel confident and welcome
coming to the institution independently
themselves also then so there's layers
you can have something that's very
in-depth takes a huge amount of time and
budget
But out of that program can be something
that's quite light touch then and that
also prevents parachute programming
happening. Um that's from my side.
>> Interesting. There's another question.
Yeah.
>> Hello. My name is Tio Kristoff and I
have question. Yeah. Okay. Yeah. Hello.
I have question about because you talked
on different approaches of what programs
did you uh deliver and my question is
how do you choose the targets the target
people you're going to deliver and my
question is for all of you but
especially for Chenid because uh as a
national museum you said and I'm also
working in a national museum and it's
for everybody but when you're doing a
program you should narrow it down to a
certain group And how do you choose
which group you are going to do a
program for? Thank you.
>> Thank you. Um so I suppose a lot of it
in terms of a specific program like this
one, the art psychotherapy um program.
This is where we are working with
partners in the first instance and then
based on people coming to us who want to
deliver it or us reaching out. So we
have a core program. We program what we
call cradle to grave. So we have
programs from everything from babies
that are not yet walking right up to
kind of um later stages of life or uh
even hospice care and everything in
between. And that core program runs
consistently. Sometimes there are peaks
and troughs but that is the way we try
to cater for everybody. So in that
program we try to be as inclusive as
possible and that tends to be uh very
considered but slightly lighter touch
when it comes to a program like this. So
for example the reason we worked in the
first instance with the domestic
violence services is that these
conversations had already started
beginning and then um our colleague
Andrea uh the art psychotherapist had
also had a relationship. So there was a
position of trust with which to build
from with that particular service
provider. When we completed the pilot
program, we had a launch at the gallery
where we shared a short film about the
project and I interviewed the three key
project participants. So the director of
services from the domestic violence
center, uh Andrea, our art
psychotherapist and my colleague Bina
who managed the program um who is
education manager for special projects.
On the basis of that event, we then had
an outpouring of requests from other
frontline services, um, community
organizations, healthcare providers
where they were interested then in
participating in this program. So, at
the moment, we're in a situation of
supply and demand.
>> If we were to run it seven days a week,
we could provide a service seven days a
week. That is the interest in this
program. We don't have the resources to
do that and then it gets difficult. So
what we what we try to do then is access
or assess who will be capable of
committing to the program also because a
major thing for us is not just
participants are interested but that the
the organization or the service
providers can support it throughout
also. So they may come and do some
training with us in the first instance.
We need to know that they're very
comfortable referring their clients or
their service users to us. Um and so we
have a waiting list at the moment which
uh we were only talking about the other
day of organizations and um uh I suppose
service users that want to participate
in that program. But there are other
ways as well. So we may instead provide
training for example for the
organization leaders as opposed to just
the participants which is a way in lie
of participating in the program in uh I
suppose beginning the conversation
around what cultural arts psychotherapy
will be so that their service users can
understand it a little before they come
to us while there is a delay. Um
honestly it's difficult to do and what
tends to happen is it's in order of who
is available for x amount of time what
dates will work with certain people and
then also sometimes where it seems to be
the pressing need maybe because as I
said I can't think of anyone that this
isn't a value for in the same vein that
you know at the moment it's young people
but as you said there's any any audience
can engage you know
>> absolutely would you like to add to
>> yeah how do you prioritize
>> I think the question was also addressed
to
>> to the whole panel.
Oh,
>> please.
>> There are also more questions.
>> Yes, I can imagine.
>> Hello and thank you so much for um the
contribution during the panel today. Um
I'm Sophia Vidman. I'm from Museum
Booster and uh we manage a major applied
research project called Future Museum
where well-being is going to be one of
the major focus areas in the next two
years. And the question that all of our
participants have is how do you measure
the impact concrete impact of your
programs in order that they can be
justified and funded by insurance
companies. Um also referring back to
Elizabeth how measuring what you
prioritize. So do you use any kind of
psychiatric measurement like bag
depression inventory to monitor the
continuous progress and do you also
attend the psychiatric conferences
to integrate museums into their
landscape?
>> That's an interesting question. Would
you like to go first?
>> Uh yes, I can start. Um we realized soon
that some of the
brain health topics that we were dealing
with through dance could not be measured
with the um standard protocols that the
scientific community is applying. So
there's a whole movement led by
different scientists from different
universities across Europe. There are
people in their 30s and 40s that start
to redefine those protocols and
likely they are engaging artists and
people that study and measure the social
impact in their new
designs and studies. Uh this is a new
movement. uh they realized that they
could not rely on past uh structured
protocols and um there's also an
approach that is more and more um
appearing which is not to consider the
individual and the individual pathology
but to look at the collectiveness around
a person with Parkinson's with cancer
with depression so we're working
together and this again is why we work
with mixed groups because sometimes you
may have a person with Parkinson's that
come with other people that don't have
Parkinson's but together they're going
through a process of um support or
healing or um social engagement. Um so
again the multiddisciplinary approach
seems to be very very relevant in the
context of Parkinson's. There's one of
the most known um scientists that have
developed a multi-disiplinary approach.
It's called Baz Bloom is based in the
Netherlands and he's starting now to um
scientifically
uh design a new format of collections of
storytelling because he says that that's
an an important evidence the scientific
community have always not considered. So
there's there's a there's new waves of
understanding. So I would imagine that
if a museum would engage in these um
journeys, it could be very relevant and
important because of what your voices
could bring in this path.
>> Yeah. about um it is talking about
challenges. It is a challenge also for
us to um get it into a kind of
scientific um project because uh we can
of course we have been trying to measure
it um in a small scale just inside the
house. uh you know we are asking people
before they um starting working at the
at our place and the with the creative
things uh how do you feel today and they
can make some marks and when they go
home again we ask them how how do we
feel now in a way so we can of course
measure the difference um but not uh not
in a scientific way. So it's still
waiting for us to be uh um to be done
actually. Uh we can every day we watch
people growing um and uh every month uh
we um
we we get more and more people uh coming
and visiting us uh and using our uh
uh creative parts and uh studios and the
projects. But but it's still it is a a
hard um area to measure um the stuff. So
we can listen to people what they say
when they are coming back or writing uh
it for us but um it's not in a
scientific um way still.
>> Okay. Would you like to add to that or
perhaps we take another question? Yeah.
>> Thank you. Uh my name is Roland. I'm
currently from Germany I would say. uh
spent most of my life uh working in
museums without museum objects but full
of real people. Um but when I I lived
about 2 years ago in Denmark and I had
an aha alipis as we called it in Germany
there was an article published in the
Danish newspapers the national newspaper
say nobody's normal we all are patients
and we have research to prove it they
had research to prove it this was a
scientific article saying 80%
of the people in Denmark have recently
either been diagnosed have been using
medicines or whatsoever It's not normal
to be normal. The norm is to be a
patient if you want to call it that way.
So
>> what is normalness? I got
>> Thank you so much for that reflection.
>> Hi, my name is Cena. Uh I have a
question probably especially for you
Chenade. Uh it's about the the line of
arguments you can use as a museum
director if you want to implement
projects like the one you have with with
the victims of uh of vi domestic abuse
and etc. Because many times uh everybody
would say that that's a nice agenda but
what does it have to do with a museum
and how does it what is why is that
relevant in a museum context? Couldn't
it be everywhere else? So what is it
specifically you would use as a line of
arguments for saying how do you connect
this with the art or the objects
cultural heritage etc.
Um, so I would say for uh in particular
I I'll answer I'll answer as well as I
can but to really give context to this
project we have it fully scoped on the
gallery website with the film and a full
report and just in line in relation to
kind of measuring for the pilot program
we did we employed an external evaluator
which was crucial because it wasn't just
me then saying look you know see what's
happening. we had this very
well-informed document with you know
looking at things like social uh return
on investment and also looking at other
measures because as institutions were
constantly asked how many people and
what did it cost and uh for me it's
really difficult to move away from that
because I would I mean my background is
visual art practice and education and
storytelling and the qualitative is
where I live but what I'm asked for is
what are the KPIs and what's going to
happen and so this was never going to be
about big numbers. It isn't going to
generate revenue at all. Uh it is a risk
in terms of if you're if you're looking
at what a risk is, it it is a risk to
run this program in the first instance.
But we came back always to the fact that
we are a civic institution. And just to
say uh it's also I feel for any of us in
terms of leaning into opportunity and
the reason why my presentation spoke to
how I got to this point is because it
didn't spring out of nowhere. We were a
long time building trust not just with
the communities we worked with but also
within the institution that my uh the
director of collections and research who
is my own boss and then the director of
the institution are in a position now
where they trust us to deliver the
programs and so I leaned into that but
also for the initial pilot program we
ran we had a phenomenal exhibition of an
incredible um uh artist Levvenia Fontana
uh on her work
>> point of departure And that was the
point of departure where we looked at
this phenomenal woman who lived in the
1600s but had 11 surviving children and
a incredible artistic career.
>> And we looked at the barriers that she
faced even though she had this
incredibly successful career and her
husband stayed at home with the children
which I still can't get my head around.
She had a marriage contract everything.
I'm like 2025 that'd be great. Never
mind 1600s bolognia. But uh she was
exceptional and we decided if we were
going to do something we wanted to make
it for women and we wanted to make it
about empowering vulnerable women and
then serendipitously we had had this
conversation with this exceptional art
psychotherapist. So everything came
together but we we funded that initially
from Bank of America because they were
they were sponsoring the exhib or they
were funding the exhibition and they had
a separate funding pot we could apply
for and it was put to us. We feel you
could pay it back. we feel it could
reduce it and we we stood our ground and
said if we're going to do this we need
this amount of funding and we have to do
it this way and I think we led with
conviction but I do think also our track
record to that point really helped us so
that our director also had the
confidence to go to the board or speak
to the department to say we believe this
can happen and when it was delivered it
has now led to the conviction that yes
we should continue this work and we can
in confidence continue this work and
actually what has happened is it has
achieved so many other objectives for
the gallery because it is absolutely
addressing discrimination. It is the
first time working through this program
is the first time we've had a real
conversation about class in the
institution which we simply haven't had
before and it has brought people to the
gallery that just have never come. Um
and so it started with Levvenia Fontana
and women and grew into this art
psychotherapy program which is now core
at the institution but is changing
slowly is changing how we think so
that's also helping the argument because
not just I am starting to think well why
not my colleague says all the time we
care for objects we can care for people
these two things can be true you know
>> no problem
>> great more questions coming up.
>> Yeah, over here. Uh, thank you for
sharing your knowledge and your
experience. So, I'm Donna. I'm with the
National Museum of Ireland. So, I know
Chenade. Hi.
>> Hi. Hi.
>> We can see you.
>> Oh, there you are.
>> Um, but yeah, my question's open to
anyone who'd like to speak to it. Um,
we're talking about kind of creating a
culture of care and how we're doing this
in our outreach and engagement work and
how we connect with communities. Um, but
I always think the staff um and those
working in our organizations, we're also
a community as well. Um, and we need to
be kind of thinking about how we create
a culture of care amongst each other as
well. Um, and I think this can actually
be really formative to how we connect
with communities in general. Um, so I
know we do often have kind of limited
resources and that's something we're
very aware of. Um, and we shouldn't be
expecting staff to kind of be providing
for all of the support needs for each
other as well. I'm aware of that. But I
do think there's things that we can do
to kind of build a culture of care in
our teams, whether that's two people or
100 people. Um, so I'm wondering, do you
have experience of any kind of
meaningful strategies or initiatives
that kind of created a culture of care
amongst staff or amongst peers within
the organization? So yeah, thank you.
>> Would you like to go first?
>> Oh well, yeah, thank thank you for the
question. Well, I think um an important
starting point could be uh asking
questions.
>> Asking questions.
>> Yeah. Because um relevant questions, you
know, which um I think everyone
would be thinking about.
for example, asking the questions um who
am I, who are we, where do we come from?
So this re kind of relevance uh is
something that
that um everyone could relate to. So if
you're young, if you're an adult, uh if
you are in a staff, uh so asking
questions which is relevant for you uh
relevant um to this uh world we are
living in um for the future for example.
So I think a good starting point would
be asking questions um to get started
>> started.
Anybody else would like to get to that?
I would suggest a 45 minute session
every Wednesday morning where you dance
together in the gallery. Just that.
>> Yeah, I'm actually going to write that
down
>> and bring it home. Um,
>> you have fabulous artists in Ireland.
So, you know, and everywhere. So,
>> I think it's a brilliant suggestion to
dance. Uh, I think I'm really Don, I
can't see it, but I I heard you. I'm
really glad you Oh, hi. I'm really glad
you brought it up. was in my notes, but
I couldn't see them on the slideshow
because it's really important to be
honest as well because
>> um I'm wrecked and even, you know,
carving out the time to come here was
huge. Uh committing to the programs we
commit to you, you can't work, you can't
talk about care and vulnerable people
and kind of collective care in any kind
of flippant way. If you're committing to
it, you have to commit to it completely.
But as a member of staff then not just
me but the whole team I work with.
That's huge. That's a lot of pressure.
You're carrying you're you're acutely
aware at all times of the vulnerability
of the people you're working with and
you are responsible for them. And so it
it's a lot. And I would say as well that
once you start doing these programs
anything that you think the amount of
time we've allocated will triple 100%.
Um there's no way on earth in my
experience that you can say I'm going to
prioritize this research and I'm going
to carve it out because all the other
stuff keeps happening. So it ends up
being on top of instead of instead of
and I don't have a hard and fast answer,
but the thing that I'm trying to do all
the time is just be really honest about
it and be open about it and not pretend
that it's clean. It's actually a lot of
the work we're doing is messy sometimes
because it takes a huge commitment and
we are in old institutions where well in
the gallery for example you know even
the majority of artists are not living
artists it's a lot of um historical
artists and then objects are safer in
some ways not all the time but you know
whereas if you're dealing with a child
or an adult or whoever and they are
vulnerable and you have a commitment to
them as we should as a civic
institution, but absolutely that
commitment has to be to ourselves as
well. Um, and it's something I'm trying
to figure out because honestly the more
we do this work the more challenging it
is I think. Uh, so if anyone has a
strategy or solution, I'd be really
interested.
>> We take the last two questions.
>> Yes.
>> Dance definitely.
>> Sophia Tidu from uh from the Greek
Ministry of Culture. Thank you all three
uh for your wonderful examples of
socially based practice and for valuing
collective care as a priority. My
question to all of you is how has this
work that you've been doing affected you
personally and professionally and has
this work in the intersection of art and
healthcare transformed you in any way
and what kind of impact does it have on
your own health and well-being and your
team's health and well-being? Thanks.
>> I'd ask the pen to be brief so that we
can take one other question. Mia,
whoever. Yeah, Roberto. Um, I think it
really helped to question what kind of
meanings we build with what we do in
society and at the current time how we
can still in our environments build
spaces where people can meet as humans
beside the polarization, divisions,
conflicts and uh proliferations of
enemies
uh around us. These are the questions
that I take from these projects.
Yeah,
>> I think that's wonderful.
>> It sorry for me it's reminds me what it
is to be human all the time and that
that is what ideally we should try and
focus on and start from that point of
supporting each other and using our
civic spaces to enhance uh society and
not uh tear it down. But also it has
opened my eyes to so many uh issues in
society in Ireland that I knew a little
about but not enough about. Um but that
has a real impact. You don't just you
know switch off uh as we had in the
first session. You it doesn't just do
that.
>> Yeah. But um I would say that it gives
completely new energy you know to uh to
look to experience that people are
growing. uh they are we we're doing
something good for other people when we
can watch them change in a good way and
um help them uh on their path for the
future. Uh then it gives us a new energy
for our daily work and uh we said yes uh
things are functioning and we are um
doing a a bit a little difference in in
this world.
>> One last question.
Hi, thank you very much to all of you
and Palamos from Spain, Madrid from
National Museum of the Aquatic Arts,
also a civic museum funded by state. So
quite a tight budget and we've been
doing for a nowadays 15 years several
projects with people in in risk of
exclusion.
But still I have the the feeling that
not not a fall not a fall of our staff
we have around 40 50 people including
the gallery people and I am very happy
to see that many of us have the same
feeling of how we evaluate it to
convince to explain to justify
that's why I signed up to the to the
workshop this the one because it was
difficult to to choose the workshops.
But the one the workshop uh this
afternoon and in evaluating
uh because I only two times we had the
the the budget to have an external
evaluator
which is well but what if you don't have
it? We've been doing it very homemade
and and also my colleagues they are they
say oh oh it's very nice it's very cute
you did it well but I I don't think
think I think that most more of the
times they say oh this is palama stuff
they not feel engaged totally engaged so
all the things come first and this not
become a priority although my my aim
this all the time and that this is
mainstream. Thank you very much.
>> Reactions to that?
>> Sorry, I'm not quite sure about what I
think.
>> It was more of a reflection. I
understand.
>> It's more than a reflection.
>> It was more of a reflection. Yeah.
>> Question
started.
>> Yeah. Okay. In one sentence, please.
>> Yes. Thank you. Um I would suggest to
study uh publications where there is uh
different forms of evaluation and maybe
see if something can inspire you. There
there's quite a lot uh I talk about the
dancing. There's quite a lot of that
because they have less supports than
museums I guess. Um so maybe have a
look. I can share with you more uh
information later. Or perhaps your
museum won't allocate the money for an
external evaluator, but perhaps they
would commit to a member of staff
attending training in some form of more
socially engaged evaluation and that may
be a way then for it to to stay within
the organization. It doesn't lighten the
workload.
uh so you know but it it might be an
opport it might be something else you
can do or to collaborate with a PhD
student or somebody who is looking for
something to evaluate and you give it to
them and then maybe it's more likely
that it can happen in that way
>> or you could yeah sorry and or you could
invite for a dialogue you know it's um
to invite the local area for a dialogue
invite them into yourself and be a kind
of as it we use we should be very
democratic You know, so even when you
feel you are heard, you're listened to,
uh it's a it's also an a way of inviting
people and they have listen to what they
really want or what is going on their
minds um and then try to switch a bit in
your program maybe.
>> So that's it. These were our three seeds
from the present. I'm sure that you have
many more questions and that could be
the right opportunity to catch up over
lunch break. But thank you so much
and I'm sure that was inspiring
and very useful. Thank you.
>> Thank you. Thanks Andrea.