Video summary
Eric Weinstein engages in a deep analysis of heterosexual female preferences and evolutionary dynamics, arguing that modern women still fundamentally desire classical masculinity despite societal shifts toward egalitarianism. He contrasts this with early 2010s trends following *Fifty Shades of Grey*, where the feminist pushback against dominant male archetypes like the "bearded" or axe-wielding hero led to a rise in softer, more agreeable characters on book covers; however, Weinstein notes these did not sell well. He posits that there is a massive gap between stated preferences and revealed ones, noting that what one fantasizes about sexually often differs from what they optimize for in long-term marriage or partnership. This disconnect creates unstable eroticism when women realize their life cycles are uncertain—whether to marry with children, remain single parents, stay childless, or balance career and family—which complicates the signals sent between men and women regarding relationship goals. The discussion highlights a troubling correlation where increased gender pay equality actually decreases relationship satisfaction for both sexes; specifically, marriages where the woman earns significantly more than her partner are twice as likely to end in divorce, while men earning less face higher rates of erectile dysfunction issues. Weinstein introduces the concept of "hypergamy," explaining that women retain an evolutionary attraction to partners who rank above them on a status hierarchy. He illustrates this with the "tall goal problem": just as it is difficult for someone at the top of their own hierarchy to find another person even higher, highly educated and wealthy women face diminishing returns in finding suitable mates because there are simply fewer men available across from them at that level. This scarcity becomes particularly poignant among older cohorts who report a heartbreaking inability to find partners they could look up to due to societal constraints against expressing such desires openly. A significant portion of the conversation addresses how modern culture actively dampens ambition, which Weinstein views as essential for innovation and solving major problems. He criticizes current advice given to young men that discourages raw drive in favor of "work-life balance," arguing this approach ties promising individuals down with damaged ones rather than channeling their energy toward high-stakes goals like earning a PhD by age 20 or tackling global challenges. Citing Elon Musk's restructuring of Twitter to attract those willing to sleep under desks and work on massive problems, Weinstein defends the necessity of an "arrogant yet humble" mindset required for breakthrough achievements. He contends that society mistakenly labels this drive as arrogance when it is actually a necessary input for progress, pointing out that many people feel a calling to contribute to astronomically sized goals rather than seeking Frappuccinos and ping pong matches all week. Weinstein further explores the issue of elitism versus enforced helplessness in institutions like universities, distinguishing between legitimate elite objects who excel at specific tasks (like Stanley Jordan playing guitar) and administrators who stifle potential through bureaucracy. He questions how society can return to valuing risk-taking creators while protecting those unable to compete with them, noting that some individuals are built for high-risk activities akin to flying wing suits but require a supportive environment rather than constant interference. The dialogue concludes by emphasizing the need to identify and empower these ambitious cohorts who wish to solve profound problems, suggesting that current cultural narratives often misunderstand or suppress this vital human trait under the guise of mental health concerns or fairness, ultimately leaving society without the necessary fuel for advancement.
Read the full video transcript
do you find that women heterosexual
women respond to classical
masculinity have to be very careful as I
asked because they certainly respond
more than they're supposed to according
to Modern rules of femininity correct
but my guess is that it's greatly
decreased
from the market for masculinity in the
60s let's say so
look again inter and intr seexual
Dynamics something I've spent an awful
lot of time learning about wrting a book
at the moment with David bus
evolutionary psychologist okay on
this in the early 2010s after the
success of 50 Shades of Gray mhm there
was a proliferation of dark romance
novels and
they there was a push back from the
feminism movement saying that the
portrayals of men as dominant masculine
beard did big chested in a loin cloth or
a plaid shirt wielding an axe uh wasn't
what women wanted they wanted a softer
more like the bronny guy or the Marboro
man correct they they wanted a softer
version of this so they started putting
more agreeable more feminized men on the
front cover of books they didn't sell
right but I wouldn't guess that either
of those would be where modern women's
heads would be at now in the space of 10
years so I think that there's a there
there's massively a difference between
stated and reveal preferences sure right
and also to you know to caveat that the
thing that you may sexually fantasize
about is not necessarily what you want
to get into a relationship with guys
will say say more that uh what you
optimize for in a one night stand and
what you optimize for in a marriage
partner aren't always necessarily the
same I would think they would be wildly
desperate correct which means that the
front cover of the romance novel is not
necessarily the partner that you want
long term they're the one that you want
to fantasize
about most of these stories are driven
by sex
rather than driven by love so I I have
this hypothesis and I wonder if you you
have names for all sorts of things that
I let before you give me I just need to
Bunch this up your acronym your ponant
for Acron acronyms yeah and a friend
Mary says meme first explain later and I
think that uh some of my favorite
episodes they rely on aphorisms they
rely on on creating memes sure small
quippy razors and so on and so forth
first off because it makes it easier to
remember but secondly because that's
what gets the hooks into you this is how
you make things so if you are somebody
that's listening that has an idea that
really loves that idea give it a name
give it a name and give it a cool name I
came up with Fame seesaw the other day
which is that uh on your way up people
want to support you because you remind
them of their dreams when you're at the
top they tear you down because you
remind them of what they gave up on yeah
yeah Fame seesaw beautiful and now even
if it's [ __ ] wrong you can't forget
it so it's good very nice you were
saying
um that when women when heterosexual
women realize that they have several
possible life cycles and they don't have
a clear sense of which one they will
actually
live am I going to get married and raise
children and be at home with the
children am I going to get married and
have one child maybe two and be a career
person am I never going to couple but
have children am I going to have no
children whatsoever am I going to do
that in a coupled situation
y their decision trees blow out as to
what it is that they're actually looking
for and one of my strong
senses is that women encountered
something they weren't expecting which
is that they might even be smarter than
the guy at work who they're competing
with but he's happy to come
in all of Saturday all of Sunday and
work hours that are completely psychotic
and so then the idea of well we need
work life balance we don't want people
coming in on Friday and Saturday because
that's sort of an unfair advantage that
somebody who wants a healthy life is
different from somebody who wants an
extreme life and so now you have this
problem which is I'm attracted to the
sort of man I wouldn't want to compete
with at
work if I'm going to be in the office I
want to know that I'm not going to have
to deal with the guy who's willing to
give up every weekend and work hours
that I'm unwilling to work because
that's not how I'm set at the
factory
versus um I want that guy as the
go-getter while I'm pregnant and
incapacitated in raising children to
make sure that not only he can Shepherd
our family through anything because he's
highly capable but can also get me back
into the workforce when I'm done raising
children
and this is somewhat what I believe is
responsible for the sort
of incoherent messages that men and
women are sending to each other is that
when we don't know what life cycle we
are going to be inhabiting our eroticism
and our romance and our desire is
unstable one of the most
uncomfortable correlations that I've
found over the last few years is that as
gender inequality pay inequality between
the genders increases relationship
satisfaction for both men and women
increases as well sorry decreases the
more egalitarian the more equal the pay
the less satisfied both sexes are with
relationships H men who are in
relationships where the woman is the
primary bread winner of 50% more likely
to use erectile dysfunction
medication where a woman is contributing
More than 70% of the household income
the marriage is twice as likely to end
in
divorce women for a man uh sorry for
a woman to move herself the same
distance on a 10o scale in terms of
attractiveness that a man can by
increasing his income by $100,000 she
would need a 10,000 times increase in
income in short women are interested
socioeconomically in the status of their
partner in a way that men aren't now the
problem that you have is that women now
have access to education and employment
in a way that they never have done
before so they're no longer financially
dependent on men sure but you're seeing
something which is particularly
heartbreaking in my group of of females
which would be women in their mid to
late
50s I have to be honest I've seen some
of the women I was most impressed by
never
coupling and when I when you talk to
them there's some very uncomfortable
things that get said one of which was I
was looking for a man I could look up to
and the pool was just so small and then
and and you know you're thinking well
okay it's illegal to say I'm looking for
a man that I could look up to right
because that's not in accordance with
modern feminism and
egalitarianism but on the other hand
this idea that when you're you know one
of the world's leading chemists or
something uh there's just not that many
men that are going to be in that
position I got another meme for you yeah
this is I got in a lot of trouble for
this it's called the toll goal problem
so if you stand at top your own status
hierarchy it's very difficult to find
somebody else across and above from
yours you know if you're a 6' one girl
without heals you're looking at
professional athletes and two women for
every one man completing a four-year us
college degree by 2030 between the ages
of 21 and 29 women earn
1,111 more on average than their male
counterparts right but women still have
this vestigial attraction to the man who
is across and above from them that's
hypergamy and this means that as you
rise up through your dominance hierarchy
it amounts to a opportunity of
diminishing returns but then why are we
not allowed to build better men I mean
this is the really this is this thing
that just floors
me I'm now through through being a
father looking
at the subset of young men who are
absolutely looking to crush
it and the advice they're being given is
so horrific what like
well that doesn't seem mentally healthy
and uh you know I I think it's much
better for you to sort of enjoy this
time with everyone else and you know
it's just like watering down raw
ambition
and you know was it ludicrous who said
get out the way you
know get out of the way of these people
these people want to invest and blow
your socks off and just do amazing
things and there's some administrator or
nanny or nurse ratchet who's like well
that would be arrogant we can't have
that and and you're saying I don't think
you understand it but
ambition is a necessary input for
certain humans and if you sit there and
say why do you have a right to innovate
when nobody else is innovated or uh
don't you realize that your go-getter
personality during the covid uh
situation was based on your privilege
and uh in fact a lot of other people are
suffering from mental health he just
thinking why am I taking the most
promising people and tying them to the
most damaged people why not instead take
the most promising people and have them
get a PhD by the age of 2021 and study
what to do for their for their fellow
Souls who are
struggling do you remember when Elon
took over Twitter and he started to rip
out the tech team yeah and and he said I
want to make Twitter a place where the
people who want to work the hardest on
the biggest problems can come and work
and people said they looked at that and
said this is going back to an archaic
form of Silicon Valley where people are
forced to sleep under desks and it's a
blah blah
blah those people do not have theory of
mind to understand what it's like to be
someone as driven as it takes to look at
that from Elon not as modern day
slavery but no wait a second it can be
modern day slavery or it could be the
person saying for God's sakes I'm
burning to solve this problem let me
sleep under my desk unhook unhook the
leash and let me go at this and there is
a there is a cohort of people out there
for whom that's their calling they
didn't want to work at Twitter if they
got Frappuccinos and mindful Munday
afternoons off and to be able to play
ping pong for half the week and whatever
it was that was going on they want to go
and they want to feel like they're
contributing to an astronomically sized
goal an un unreasonable goal and they
want to feel the the rush of of going
toward
it and I think you're right I think that
there is a dampening of ambition
and since being in America since moving
to America 18 months ago it's the fuel
that I've had from the enthusiasm from
the people I've been around has fueled
me empowered me in a way that I I didn't
I wasn't it was alien I was 33 years old
and I'd never felt it before I want to
look there's so much to do and it
requires ambitious people and those
people have to be both arrogant and
humble it's a complicated thing it
involves mentorship it's I want to say
also something about
elitism elitism is incredibly
unfair you know I I've hung out with
Stanley Jordan and I am never going to
play any instrument the way Stanley
Jordan plays the guitar he's an elite
object I am not going to be that guy you
have to learn how to let Elite people do
Elite things that where you can't
compete with
them I don't know what to do about this
the idea that we're turning against the
concept of elite because we've got this
sort of pretend Elite that sits in these
chairs that screws everything up and
you've got all of these ambitious people
who are being destroyed by enforced
helplessness you know how do we get R
how do we fire the administrators
necessary to return universities to
being
universities how how do
we explain that some people are built to
fly Wing
suits you know it's a super dangerous
activity but somebody needs that brush
or they're not
alive you know people need danger they
need risk they need to be able to create
and they don't need you in their in
their way all the time this episode is
brought to you by element element is a
tasty electrolyte drink mix with
everything that you need and nothing
that you don't it's a healthy
alternative to sugary electrolyte drinks
it's got a science-backed electrolyte
ratio of sodium potassium and magnesium
you might ask what do I want with an
electrolyte drink well it'll regulate
your appetite it'll curb Cravings it'll
help improve your brain function best of
all it tastes phenomenal first thing in
the morning this orange element salt in
water is outstanding your adenosine
system that caffeine axon isn't even
active for the first 90 minutes of the
day so it's pointless having a morning
coffee your adrenal system which is what
salt Aon is active so this will make you
feel more alert more awake and improve
your hydration best of all they've got a
no BS no questions asked refund policy
so you can buy it and if you do not like
it for any reason they will give you
your money back that's how confident
they are that you'll love it head to
drink LM nt.com slod wisdom to get a
free sample pack of all eight flavors
with your first box that's drink LM
nt.com
slod wisdom thank you very much for
tuning in if you enjoyed that clip with
Eric then press here for the ful length
3our
episode go on press it