Money Expert: Trump Tariffs Will Make You MASSIVELY RICH - Do This Now!
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
The podcast opens with a discussion on the current market volatility, described as the worst week for stocks since March 2020, driven by President Trump's tariff announcements and fears of instability between the US and China. The hosts argue that while headlines suggest an impending "economic nuclear winter," history shows markets often bottom out during periods of extreme fear, citing Bill Auman's pessimistic predictions as a potential signal rather than a certainty. They emphasize that tariffs are unlikely to be implemented exactly as proposed due to the chaos they would cause and note Trump's tendency to reverse course quickly upon signs of disapproval or shifting political winds. Consequently, while short-term turbulence is expected with possible downside risks, the hosts believe policy will eventually revert to something more manageable within weeks or months, allowing investors to re-enter risk assets once clarity returns. To navigate this uncertainty, the speakers advise average individuals to generate extra cash through side jobs—such as driving for Uber or flipping merchandise—to invest in "risk assets" when valuations are low. They highlight that while macro predictions from figures like Warren Buffett and Vanguard regarding lower future market returns have merit given high interest rates, these forecasts assume a static world which AI is rapidly changing. The hosts identify artificial intelligence (AI), robotics, and automation as the primary drivers for productivity growth over the next decade, suggesting that investors should focus on companies positioned to benefit from this technological shift rather than worrying about short-term tariff noise. Specific mentions are made of Robinhood's potential dominance in retail investing due to its gamified interface and aggressive wallet-share strategy, alongside Tesla being viewed primarily as a robotics company despite political headwinds affecting its automotive division. A significant portion of the conversation addresses the geopolitical tension with China and the risks associated with relying on global supply chains versus domestic manufacturing. While acknowledging that some US companies face challenges due to anti-American sentiment or tariffs in international markets, the hosts argue for maintaining open trade relationships because American brands rely on foreign economies to thrive globally. They also touch upon government spending inefficiencies, advocating for strategic cuts and a shift toward drone technology over manned aircraft programs like the F-47. The dialogue includes an optimistic view that despite fears of job losses from automation, AI tools will allow human capital to be more productive, potentially leading to economic expansion rather than contraction as workers leverage new technologies to create greater value. The hosts conclude by asserting that this era represents a "golden age" for retail investors due to the democratization of information and access to powerful AI research assistants like ChatGPT. They illustrate how these tools can perform hours of manual research in seconds, allowing nimble individual investors to outpace bureaucratic Wall Street firms. The discussion touches on Ray Dalio's warnings about global debt cycles but counters that history shows humanity always finds unexpected technological solutions—such as the internet or mobile phones—to save itself from economic crises. Ultimately, they express confidence that AI and embodied robotics will usher in an age of abundance within 10 to 15 years, urging listeners not to fear short-term volatility but instead to prepare for a massive investing opportunity comparable to the industrial revolution or the rise of social media.
Read the full video transcript
So, we're looking at what the worst week
for stocks since March of 2020. Really
coming off of, of course, President
Trump's tariffs. People are concerned
about instability. Announced relief for
the rest of the world that caused more
turmoil in the markets, but touched off
a huge rally. The bigger concern is what
plans are now being made to circumvent
the US in any way possible because you
can't trust us. Beijing promising to
fight to the end. That is really amping
up. Why should people care? This is
where you make all of your money over
the course of 20 or 30 years. This is
the dream scenario for every investor.
As the trade war with China heats up,
President Trump is urging Americans to
stay cool. Guys, I've seen a lot. I have
never been more excited to be in the
market than right now. We're in
uncharted, unprecedented uncertainty.
So, what should the average person do
with this information and with
everything going on in the market? I
don't care what you have to do. Whatever
you can do to make a little bit of extra
cash over the next few weeks to next few
months to be able to invest in risk
assets. Chris and Dave, thank you so
much for coming on the ice coffee hour.
Really appreciate it. You both are
investors that I respect a lot. You're
not a hedge fund. You have nothing to
sell. Yet over the last few years, you
have made tens of millions of dollars in
the stock market. I want to read you a
quote and get your opinion on it. Bill
Aman has said, "We're heading for a
self-induced economic nuclear winter and
we should start hunkering down if
tariffs remain." Why should people care?
Well, most people, whether they know it
or not, are invested in the stock market
and it really does kind of appear to be
the verge of a nuclear winter. It's I I
think that quote like that was a very
long thread that he posted on X and he
has done a very good job historically of
freaking out right at the bottom. Have
you noticed that if you if you look at
every time he freaks out and goes on
CNBC and cries or he has a moment that
is the moment where the market has
bottomed. So I can't make a prediction
based on a Aman quote
but it's grim and you know at some point
markets always go up. Aman is just
trying to make a point. He's trying to
guide policy right. So okay technically
what he said is true but that's if no
one does anything which we all know that
won't happen right people are going to
do things policy will change. It will
get adjusted. He's calling out if you
stay on this track and go in even
deeper, it will result in this bad
outcome. But we all know that's not
going to happen, right? Like not at
least
not in in that manner without without
anyone trying to get in front of it. So
like yeah, technically I think he's
right, but that doesn't mean it's going
to happen. And what do you think the
breaking point is? Because there is the
fear that if tariffs stay on the same
path that they are and other countries
refuse to back down and that would be
namely China that things could get
substantially worse. And everyone has
the assumption Trump is not going to
back down because if he does he's going
to appear weak. And China they have a
lot of leverage as well because we get a
lot of product from China. They have
very cheap goods and services and they
allow us to buy iPhones at $1,000 versus
3500.
You got to get in the mindset of Trump,
right? Cuz like he is
unilaterally calling the shots. So like
for you to call this, you have to call
Trump correctly. I I was wrong last
week. I didn't go in hedge strong enough
last week. I didn't either. The history
of Trump is that he will reverse really
quickly at any sign of disapproval or
any sign uh of losing. Right. And he
didn't do this. I don't think I don't
think that the stock market is his
barometer this time around. He's I think
his approval rating will be the thing
that if it gets low enough then he'll
but approval rating Dave I is delayed by
about a month a survey four to 6 weeks.
So like yeah he won't see that for a
little while. Okay. So let's just let's
just talk about this. You're saying if
the tariffs go through as they're
proposed that won't happen. And that
can't happen. Like we all know that that
cannot happen. What's going to stop that
from happening?
Any type of rational like
thought. Right. Right. Right. Right. So
like thank you guys. Right. But but but
I I if if you if you look at the tariffs
as they're written, there's just no
possible way that those tariffs can be
implemented in that manner for any
meaningful amount of time. It it it it
will it will result in such chaos that
there's not any administration including
Trump as at his craziest. Do you agree
Dave that would allow that to actually
happen for any prolonged period of time?
So like here's the thing. There's a lot
of stuff happening right now and there
are a lot of rumors and there are a lot
of opinions and things are changing like
multiple times a day. So as the market
was prepared for a version of this. the
market was prepared for uh reciprocal
tariffs that were actually reciprocal
tariffs, but that's not what we got. The
market was going up when he said 10%
across the board. Then he pulls out the
the old easel or the chart. Yeah. And
those numbers were not close to what
anyone was expecting. Labeled
reciprocal, but not at all. It this is
this is not a reciprocal tariff. And to
call it that, I think reciprocal tariffs
might actually be effective. Basing
reciprocal tariffs on a an actual
formula that makes sense mathematically
that is reciprocal. And if you really
want to target a trade imbalance, you
could make that a portion of the the
ratio, but it doesn't make sense the way
it is now. We could talk about what they
should do or shouldn't do, but it really
doesn't matter what we think. The
reality is that when you have situations
like this where there are a lot of
possible outcomes, what we need to do as
investors is what I call run scenario
analysis, right? So essentially, you're
looking at every single scenario that
could play out and you're assigning
probabilities to each scenario. Now, you
could actually do that and you could
spend a lot of time running 60 different
scenarios of every way that this
storyline could play out and the
percentages that you assess to each of
those scenarios. And then you could look
at how many of those scenarios would
result in the market being okay and
quickly recovering and how many of those
scenarios would result in something
catastrophic happening. Well, you could
do that, but I'm just going to tell you
right now that if you were to go through
that process, there are very few
scenarios, very few that would result in
any type of catastrophic situation that
would last for any meaningful amount of
time, right? It it would be so
irrational. And while and while people
can do irrational things in government
for short periods of time, history has
shown us that it almost never has
durability. the mark, the the government
and policy makers will always revert
back to something normal, something
comfortable, something safe, something
safe for for for their party, uh
something safe for their future votes.
Okay. Um so if you run, if you just look
at the scenario analysis, I feel really
really good that we're gonna get through
this. Like the exact timing and the
exact nature of how we get through it is
to be determined. But guys, I have been
I have lived through 87. I was young,
but my family was in the market and I
lived through it. And I remember it like
it was yesterday. Dave and I were right
in the heat of it. No, 2000 during the
dot boom in boss. 2008, we were
definitely in the heat of it. Of course,
you know, COVID was one of our largest
investment trades uh of my lifetime. And
this doesn't even feel remotely as scary
as any of those. when you were to run
the scenario analysis. Meaning with each
of those situations, there was a higher
likelihood of leading us into a bad
place that could last for a while. Like
I just don't see that here. I just
don't. Personally, I don't think Trump
is going to back down. I think there's
going to be a riff between Trump and
China. China's not going to back down.
Trump's not going to back down. I think
that's going to spook the markets longer
than people expect. I wouldn't be
surprised if we see another 10 to 15%
downside from here, but I also wouldn't
be surprised if Trump delays things and
just says, "Okay, for the next 30 days,
we're not going to implement anything
and we're going to see if we could work
something out or spin something in his
favor where it's like, oh, actually, we
got this this thing and we're never
planning on the full tariffs as it was,
but now we got this and so we're winning
and we're way further ahead." Something
like that. That's what I think is going
to happen. I'm closer to that viewpoint.
I think that this this big number, the
big tariff number was a scare tactic. It
spooked the market. He was trying to
spook other
countries. The likelihood of it going
through as stated on that chart, I
think, is very low. Um, but I I I agree
with you that China is going to be the
sticking point. We've already seen
countries coming and saying 0%. I think
I think we could avoid all of this if
China just came back and said whatever
their actual tariff rate is if they if
they're I don't know what it is if it's
6% 7% whatever their current tariff on
US imports into China is if they just
made a broad statement and said you know
what our average Trump we are going to
lower our tariffs to whatever it
currently is 8% 6%. Which would be
dramatically lower than what
dramatically lower than what said it was
right. Yeah. I think Trump could take
that as a win and say, "Oh, well, we
won. We won with China and we're going
to do a reciprocal tariff with China
now." And if other countries did that,
like we've already seen some come back
and say zero. We haven't yet seen the uh
administration
respond to those with a with a new low
rate. But I think that the other
countries, if they bring Japan sending
their master negotiator to the White
House, did you see that? I did. Okay.
I'm sure that master negotiator can
outsmart whoever put that chart
together. Hot take. What do you think?
Uh Trump wants the win and he's going to
ensure that he gets the win. Right. Like
like and I don't think that's he's going
to take months to before he's willing to
get the win. I think I think it's more
like a perceptual win for him.
Necessarily a financial win. Correct.
Correct. Right. Right. So, like what
what I mean by that is I I I think he
wants to close the door on this. Trump
has a long history of not wanting to
stay on a single topic or issue for any
prolonged period of time. He likes to
move on, right? He likes to move on for
something else. I'm sure he's already
thinking of the next thing he wants to
talk about or deal with, and it's
probably not this tariff situation. So,
I think the situation gets resolved
probably in weeks. Um, what does resolve
mean? It doesn't even really matter,
right? It just doesn't matter. When do
we get the trillions of dollars back
into the market, though? That's what we
really want to know. Because the market
doesn't as long as
it's relatively rational, right? As long
as it's relatively the same as it is
today. We might have some additional
tariffs. We might have some additional
provisions, some additional trade deals.
It might look a little different. Um,
but the market just wants certainty
because if you're a US company, first of
all, you cannot onshore your
manufacture your manufacturing, which
will take 3 to 5 years and put you in a
time period when none of that might
matter. And now your competitors are
still manufacturing in Vietnam, in India
at half the price that you're me. You
can't afford to do that. But you also
can't afford to start expanding
internationally if you don't know
exactly what this situation looks like.
Right? Additionally, earning season is
about to hit. Now, if you're a CEO, are
you going to guide? Are you even going
to provide guidance? I think we might be
back in a
2020 2021 scenario where CEOs are like,
we can't provide guidance. That's going
that's going to rock the market. They
can't predict what's going to happen. So
they can't give guidance. So they get
the perfect excuse to pull guidance. So
the next few days to few weeks can
continue to be really volatile. And
that's like that's your there are a lot
of ways that the scenario analysis can
play out in the short run, but I think
there are less ways that it can play out
in the long run, which is why like I
don't really care. I actually hope this
like last a little bit now because like
I'm trying to earn some income. I'm
doing some things to try to get some
cash and I'm just hoping that the market
is still kind of here or lower by the
time that cash hits so I can go in
deeper. Um guys, I think we're going to
be fine. What do you think? There's too
there's too there's too much at risk. I
think we'll be back up to where it was
maybe a week ago
in three or four weeks. I think I
probably agree that there's going to be
some turbulence right now just because
of all of the news coming out and like
then you know pulling the tariffs and
adding tariffs and and no one likes that
and I think over the course of the next
three three four weeks that'll all be
resolved and every like ah and then the
money's going to come back in. That's
what I kind of think but who knows I I
this is great. This is what not to do
because I know about his predictions.
You inverse this. So we've got
another tricked me. Oh my god. Yeah,
that's what I wanted to hear because now
we just do the opposite of that. We got
a long way to fall. There is always an
edge. There's a long way to fall.
There's always an edge case scenario as
investors that you have to be prepared
for though, right? Like we're here
saying that I think we all kind of agree
that everybody wants this to be over,
probably including Trump at some point.
And we're more likely than not to see
this resolve itself in a matter of
weeks, if not months, worst case. But
there is that one edge case scenario
where Trump's a little crazier than any
of us realize right now, right? And and
cares a little less about the market
than he has previously.
Whenever you have a single individual
that has that much concentration of
power, there is more of a likelihood of
something crazy happening, right?
Because like if we were making these
decisions in a normal political
environment where Congress was involved,
right, and having to vote on this stuff
and looking out for everyone's kind of
hometowns and their future
elections, I think we could feel a
little bit better that it's going to
resolve and resolve quickly. But when
you have one person, you do have to look
out for that edge case scenario cuz like
we haven't seen Trump in a little while
in this situation. So, has he changed?
Like, has he changed so radically that
we need to be concerned? But before we
go into that, I'm sure a lot of you guys
remember we actually did a podcast with
Jordan Peterson last year. And on top of
that just being a really amazing
episode, it checked a massive personal
milestone for me. And things have been
developing. And I'm super excited to
announce we're actually partnering with
Peterson Academy to sponsor today's
episode. For those aware, Peterson
Academy is Jordan Peterson's online
university and it's available for
enrollment right now. If you love
learning, want to study under worldclass
professors, or have ever gained anything
from Dr. Peterson's lectures, books, or
podcasts, this platform is 100% for you.
Every month, Peterson Academy releases
four new in-depth 8-hour university
level courses taught by top experts
across philosophy, history, psychology,
science, business, and more. These
courses are seriously designed to keep
you engaged, and they also offer
optional testing to solidify your
understanding. Plus, there's also an
online community where you can connect
with other curious and ambitious
learners. And right now, they're
offering a 20% discount for anybody
under the age of 25, as well as
students, teachers, and military
personnel. Whether you're active duty or
a vet, it's just $599 a year or $59 a
month for access to more than 40 courses
with four new ones being added every
single month. They've also got a 7-day
money back guarantee, so there's no
reason not to give it a shot. All you
have to do to sign up is go to
petersonacademy.com/ic with the link
down below in the description. Again,
that's
petersonacademy.com/ic with the link
down below in the description. Thank you
so much Peterson Academy for sponsoring
this episode. Now, here's the thing.
When it comes to building a website, it
could be very difficult to figure
everything out from hosting, uptime,
security, traffic, all of it could be a
major headache. Not to mention slow
speeds, confusing dashboards, and when
something goes wrong, good luck getting
help. But all that changes with our
sponsor, Kinsta. If you need WordPress
hosting that just works, Kinsta takes
care of everything so you can focus on
growing your business, not fixing your
site. Kinsta offers blazing fast speeds
with 37 global data centers, which means
your website is going to load crazy
quick, which is great for SEO and
keeping visitors around. And when it
comes to security, Kinsta has enterprise
level protection, so you never have to
stress about hacks or downtime. Not to
mention, their dashboard is super modern
and intuitive, so you don't have to deal
with any more outdated, clunky
interfaces. And if you ever need any
help, you're talking with real WordPress
experts 24/7. No AI chat bots, just
actual humans that really know what
they're doing. So, if you're tired of
dealing with hosting issues, switch to
Kinsta and get your first month for
free. And by the way, guys, there is no
need to worry about the move because
they will handle the entire migration
for you. So, you don't need any tech
expertise to make it happen. All you got
to do is go to
kinsta.com/ic. That's k i n
sa.com/ic today to get started. There is
a link down below in the description.
Thank you so much to Kinstaff for
sponsoring this episode. Now, what are
your thoughts on Trump saying, and I'm
not sure if he said this, or there's a
narrative out there, that Trump is
taking money from the rich and giving it
back to the middle class in the sense
that really only the top 10% of people
own the vast majority of stocks. And for
the average person in the United States,
a stock market crash makes no difference
in their daily life. All they care about
is are eggs cheaper, is gas cheaper,
what is my car insurance like? Dayto-day
expenses. So for Trump crashing the
market for most people in the US, it
makes no difference. Well, so that so
that statement's
misleading because if the bottom
50% own a small fraction of the equity
market, that doesn't necessarily mean
that they're not also invested in the
equity market. It just it's just they
could be fully invested. Not saying that
they are, but they could be fully
invested in equities, but that still
represent a small piece of the overall
equity pie. Um, but
regardless, equity markets, love them or
hate them, they are intertwined
throughout our economy and there's no
getting around that. So, when equity
markets get hit, it has numerous impacts
across the economy. Whether you happen
to own stocks or not, your boss probably
does, right? The person hiring you
probably does. The company you work for
is impacted by their ability to raise
funds, right? To issue equity. So, it
really doesn't matter if you personally
own equities or not, although probably
most people are more directly tied to
equity markets than they think, even
through their pensions and various
things, right? um it will absolutely
crush the economy and everyone in it uh
if if the market starts to fall apart
and remains weak for a long period of
time. Like that's I think that's
undebatable guys. Um, also this whole
thing with tariffs and it's just so
frustrating to me because like the
blanket tariffs on these countries and
the trade imbalance and saying that we
want other countries to trade with us as
much as we want to just makes no sense
on any level. Like Graham, like you're
big into coffee, right? I you I'm sure
you've heard kind of this coffee
comparison going around like we're
charging like we want to charge tariffs
on Brazil and places Columbia places
that we get our coffee from in hopes
that we're going to buy more American
that doesn't make any sense at all. Like
American coffee comes almost exclusively
from Hawaii, right? And by the pound I
would say it's like at the cheapest $20
a pound. Is that right? It's expensive.
It's super expensive. So American coffee
is starting at $20 a pound. Most regular
coffee from these countries is like five
bucks, six, seven bucks a pound, four
bucks a pound. So yeah, like if if you
if we pay us paying more for that coffee
is not going to make us migrate the $20
a pound coffee, right? That's just
that's just obvious. So this at the end
of the day, this tariff is simply an
increase of cost to most people. Well,
given that because yeah, you're right. A
lot of the coffee is is naturally grows
the best around the equator. What about
the theory that Trump is purposely
trying to crash the stock market to
refinance the natur the national debt
and this is all part of a master plan?
I think that might be giving too much
credit to a master plan.
I've read that, too. It would be genius
if that were the case, but I don't I
don't buy into that. All you have to do
is kind of look into the long history of
Trump's uh the narrative of what he's
been pushing around why he wants
tariffs. And that's never been the
narrative. Right now, you can say all of
a sudden now that that narrative is no
longer working. You can pick a new one,
which is what happened the last few days
with that video that went viral that he
retweeted or he put on Truth Social. Was
that the Warren Buffett one? Yeah. Yeah.
Which which Warren Buffett did not say
when he said in the video, right? So,
for those unfamiliar, there was a video
that was retweeted so many times where
Warren Buffett was command uh, you know,
commenting on Trump's actions and
calling him like the most brilliant move
he has ever seen and how this is a great
move for the economy. Trump retweeted
that. A lot of people took that as fact.
Then Warren Buffett came out in a in a
note said, "I've never said this. This
is not me." Yeah. Interesting how some
of these things just get started and
Yeah. And and by the way, like that that
narrative of he's doing all of this just
to knock down interest rates for the
refinancing like in context that would
really wouldn't make sense to to do this
for months on end to American financial
markets. like we will save hundreds of
billions from that, you know, if we can
knock it down a point. But when you look
at the destruction that would have to
happen to our economy over the course of
the next 60 to 90 days, I think the some
of those interest rates are getting
reset in May. Like it doesn't balance
out like it we'd be losing more than we
would be gaining. Although we did see
Trump tweet directly to or I guess it
was on he truth. Can we call it truth?
He put it on truth social. Then the
administration came out lower the rates.
He does this. Of course he wants the
rates lowered. Of course, but the two
things are independent from each other.
And and and will this have the effect of
of you know lowering rates potentially?
Yes. C can you say it's worthwhile at
this point if we're going to have
companies close down as a result of
What's interesting is that putting a
90-day postponement on the tariffs. And
we saw the market basically recover
shows just how much the market wants to
be back into the market and wants to go
to the moon again. True. But it shows me
also in in support of that theory that
he could keep it alive temporarily long
enough to refinance some of the debt,
save hundreds of billions of dollars,
and then all of a sudden pull out the
rug and the stocks recover. There are
other im there are so many things that
are getting impacted by this market. For
example, look at the lack of capital
gains that are going to be paid. How
many people are selling right now at
losses and that's going to impact our
ability to collect taxes right this
year. And how much in taxes could it be
hundreds of it could be hundreds of
billions of taxes that we're losing out
on right now by people selling at a
loss, right? Um, so like there are just
so many things h look at what companies
are doing as a result of this, right?
Uh, look at the lack of growth, the lack
of hiring, everyone being in a
standstill. Do we really want to keep
corporate America frozen for the next 90
days? Well, how would that impact the
next couple of years, right? Like you
can't just look at things in a vacuum.
And I I don't believe that was the
impetus for Trump doing what he did.
Like it just he has months, years
talking about these tariffs. That's why
he did it. He he feels that this is the
right economic strategy and you can
agree with him or disagree with him.
Give me the case for tariffs. When you
say tariffs like it's not about broad
tariffs. Tariffs are probably a good
thing in certain industry sectors with
certain countries where it happens to
make sense. Maybe we got kind of caught
off foot in a few situations and and
maybe they need to be more balanced.
Great. Like like that's fine. But just
this whole blanket statement of
terrorists when you're you're looking at
tariffs from a 100 years ago and trying
to make that the president for why we
need to have tariffs stay that narrative
just is
nonsensible. Tariffs do make sense in
certain situations. I'll give you a
perfect situation like the milk the milk
scenario right like with Canada like we
have this incredibly high 200 plus%
tariff that Canada puts on the US for
milk but that tariff doesn't actually
start until we hit this very high floor
for milk. The reason why that tariff is
there is to ensure that we don't
completely flood Canada with our milk
and put their own milk producers out of
business. So Canada is saying, "Hey,
we'll take all this milk up into a
point, but at a point you kind of have
to stop selling us milk because we have
to have our own milk producers selling
us milk." And I believe we're selling a
lot. They're buying a ton more milk from
us than they ever have the last few
years. But at a certain point, they're
going to cap it. So they put this
ridiculously high tariff rate. Now, I
don't think we've paid anything in
tariffs or they paid anything in tariffs
for milk because we never hit that rate
even with all the additional milk. So
tariffs are like supposed to be
strategic for a very specific product
class where you have an issue and
tariffs are a tool. It's an economic
tool. It's one of many economic tools
that you can use to address a problem.
Um but the most important thing that we
need to be thinking about right now is
supply chain. Like the global supply
chain that we have kind of initiated
over the past what 20 25 years of free
trade is so sophisticated and so
strategic. If you look at like cars in
the US like how many times the auto
parts move between Canada and Mexico
like why do you think that is? It's
because of specialization right? It's
because we happen to have a plant in
that country and we happen to have a
labor uh uh uh uh uh class in that
country that is really good at doing
this one thing and it really doesn't
make sense for every country in the
world to replicate that one thing. That
would be inefficient for the entire
automotive sector. So, we all kind of
agree that, hey, they're going to do
this, you're going to do that, you're
going to do that, and we're all going to
optimize so that we can have a car,
right, that I
utilizes everyone's workforce and
everyone's sense of specialization. Now,
it's not a perfect model, but it's like
the best model that we've been able to
come up with over the past 25 years. And
and look how cheap generally our
products have become. Like I joke about
this all the time like like stuff is so
cheap now take the brand stuff away like
the premium that you pay for a brand. I
mean you can go right now to Target or
Walmart and you can get like a pretty
decent shirt for like singledigit
dollars. Like do you remember Dave back
in the 80s when we were growing up? I
think it costs more back then to buy the
same shirt in those dollars, right?
That's insane. And like what sort of
impact has that had for quality of life
where every single American no matter
who you are can like have a nice shirt
and have a good pair of jeans and have a
pair of I mean that sounds kind of
stupid but like what's the danger of
that if we become too reliant on
inexpensive labor in other countries.
It's not always about the expense. Okay,
I'll talk about hard drives. For
example, China has like something like
100,000 skilled laborers in China with
mostly
female, mostly smaller females with
really tiny hands that have years and
years of expertise of like fine-tune
articulation for hard drive line
manufacturing, right? You've heard Tim
Cook talk about this a little bit with
the iPhone. He's like, "It's not about
the cost always. We just don't have the
specialized labor force to do a lot of
these manufacturing jobs.
And sometimes it's expertise. Sometimes
it's literally just having the labor
that's willing to do that job. Like
listen, my daughter does not want to go
work in a sewing
factory. Surprise, surprise. Like I
don't care who you are in America. I
don't care what your demographic is,
where you live, what your what your
level of wealth is, I bet you if you
have a 16-year-old daughter anywhere in
the US right now and you are like, "Hey,
what do you think about like working in
a sewing factory for the next 30 years?"
She's like, "Not happening." Period. End
of story. You know what I'm saying? Like
there are but but there are other
cultures around the world where that's
not only acceptable but that's like that
would be awesome. Like a good paying job
in a sewing factory where my cousins
work and like yeah and it's part of the
culture. So like part of this is
cultural part of this is
specialization. Uh like there's so many
factors here. It's not always about cost
but yes sometimes it is right. And
like that I agree like the one thing I
can agree with with this administration
is our top priority shouldn't always be
about how to consume everything at the
lowest possible cost. At a certain point
though, if you take that to like the nth
degree, if other countries are like
abusing labor laws and stuff like that
and they're able to then get dirt cheap
labor, dirt cheap product and then sell
it to the United States so we could
effectively note compete with anything.
like do you see that even being a
possibility or is that kind of a um a
false threat? I I I I think that I think
that's false because truthfully like
there are other countries you can shift
labor to where you have more control
over not over adhering to labor laws.
You're not going to necessarily bring
that back to the United States cuz again
in most of those situations we just
simply do not have the labor force. end
of story period, right? So, like that
could be a real problem, but that
doesn't mean that we have half a million
people prepared to make sneakers in the
United States, right? Every day, right?
Like, and we do make some in in the US,
by the way, today. Like, usually a lot
of our manufacturers here, most of them
are like at capacity. Most of them have
open jobs. They're trying to hire. Guys,
you know this, like I half of my life
right now is in robotics. Why? because
most of the world's manufacturers are
desperate for workforce, right? They
want more humans. We want these these
humans to work in factories. We just
can't get them right now. Um I believe
what we should be thinking about is a
longer
term strategy for onshoring, like a
30-year strategy for onshoring with
automation and robotics, right? Um
that's really doable. Maybe we make some
huge sacrifices where we start to
onshore our most critical industries,
you know, pharmaceutical supply, you
know, minerals, like maybe even
semiconductors, things that we think are
critical to our country's sovereignty.
like yes, maybe we should make those
moves first and then get on a 20 or
30-year plan for how do we ultimately
onshore more manufacturing in a way that
works for the United States which is not
going to be putting humans in factories
by the millions. I just hate to say it
like why are we not talking about that?
Like nobody wants to do that here. Like
it's it's not even an option. So like we
shouldn't pretend like it's an option.
And that's why when you asked me in the
start like, hey, what can we do about
these? I'm like, you actually can't
implement those tariffs. Like, it's it's
not even an option. So, you think you
could implement them and then everything
just gets more expensive until it
doesn't work anymore. Correct. And it
won't work anymore and then you will end
up reversing out of the tariffs. So like
yes, you could do anything for a short
period of time, but there is no viable
path for us to actually implement
anything remotely close to the tariffs
that were shown on that board. Do you
think the market's response to the
proposed tariffs were expected by the
administration or do were you would you
guys say it was easily predictable that
this would be the severity of the
response? I I would have predicted it. I
bet the person at Kinko that made that
chart got online and bought some puts on
the market because that's not what
anyone was expecting. We were expecting
either unilateral or three tiers. Like
we had a bunch of different things that
that seemed reasonable and that the
market was expecting and the market had
been going down for months in
anticipation of it. And then when we saw
those actual numbers, they just seemed
so far-fetched and out of reality that
the market
the reason why the freakout happened is
because those numbers don't actually
exist in real life. So no one could be
anticipating them, right? Like like like
even if your worst case scenario was
we're going to match every tariff in the
world, that would have been the worst
case scenario, right? Like reciprocal
tariff, even double the actual tariff
around the world. So there is no
scenario that any
rational person or investor would have
run through to say you know what we're
going to come out and put tariffs on the
world that are like five to seven times
what they are in every country like that
that that was never in anyone's game
plan. That's why the market freaked out.
Do you think the market drop is
appropriate given the tariffs that were
suggested or do you think that the
market is completely irrational right
now because the tariffs are not real to
begin with that those could never be
implemented so everything is a big
overreaction? I think the latter
everything is an overreaction but people
are concerned about instability. So it's
not just the tariffs it's about how do
we get here? How do we even allow that
to happen? And what's going to happen
next? And how will the rest of the world
how does the rest of the world think
about the United States right now? The
bigger concern is what plans are now
being made to circumvent the US in any
way possible because you can't trust us.
That's the concern. So the concern is if
we did that, what are we going to do
next? Can you trust us or should you
start making moves no matter where you
are in the world to try to not be
reliant on the US because you never know
what we're going to pull. Is that priced
into the market? What do you guys think?
I think yeah, the market is pretty good
at pricing things in. Uh this is just a
weird scenario because it is so bizarre
that the market doesn't know how to
really price it in. By the way, this is
all as an investor. Let's be honest,
like unless you're like retirement age,
this is what you wish for. This is what
you wish for. Yes, it is. Especially
you. You're like half my age. You should
be you should be you should be dreaming.
You should be dreaming about scenarios
like this. If you lose 20%, you need to
gain something like 35% just to break
even. Graham, this is where you make all
of your money over the course of 20 or
30 years. This is the dream scenario for
every investor is for the market to
drop. We We played We played CO so well
and I feel like we missed the boat on
this one. Well, we missed the What do
you mean we missed the boat? We didn't
We weren't hedging. Okay. But we weren't
double dip hedging our entire portfolios
the way we were when we saw CO because
CO was like, okay, we see it coming and
we knew that the market there's there's
no reason the market could go up because
this terrible thing is coming and it
made sense.
We're old. We don't work anymore. We
don't have an regular income. If I was
25 or 30 and I had a monthly income and
I was putting I had the ability to
invest 10 or 20 or 30% of that monthly
income, which everyone should be doing.
This is the dream. You hope this stays
like this for a year or two. Like this
is where you make your money. This is
it, guys. Like how do you not like this?
How? Because in January I put all of my
money in. All of your money? Do you make
any money a month? I I do, but I have a
tax bill coming up and so I'm I'm going
to be So the timing is not optimal for
you, fine. But hopefully it stay it
stays like this for a while. If it stays
like this for a while, then I'm okay.
But if I mean, I don't know. The problem
was just back in January, I was like,
"Okay, I've built up my savings." And
then I was like, "Okay, let me just kind
of dump it all in." So I bought a bunch
and then I nearly fully depleted it. And
then we like took a distribution off the
podcast so I had some some cash and then
I finished putting that in. Then the
tariffs hit and I have a tax bill. So
I'm I'm basically pretty, you know,
pretty thin right now in terms of how
much I can invest. We joked about this
even before the tariffs. Like soon as
Jack went all in, we were joking and be
like, "Oh yeah, that's the peak."
Actually incredible. Like like I I
cannot believe it cuz I'm not
superstitious at all and I've mentioned
this on the podcast. This is nearly the
final straw in terms of like how is it
how is it every single time that First
of all, I'm buying your dinner tonight,
okay? So you can just relax a little
bit. That's okay. We We got a company
card, you know. But but all right.
Short-term painful. It is. I get that.
I'm not even looking at my portfolio.
I'm probably down so much money. Can I
look at it? You're going to have a
reaction. And I' I'd prefer not to. You
know, the feeling you get when these
things happen. It is disheartening. Your
heart drops. And it feels so bad when
you're an investor to see your account
down 20, 30, 40%, 50%. I've seen it
multiple times. I've seen my countdown
60 70% in my life. And you always look
back a year later and you go, "God, I
wish I just had the balls to just just
to hang in there and not sell or invest
more." There's not one time in my life
going through five market crashes that I
haven't looked back a year later. And
the snapbacks are always so much quicker
than you anticipate them to be, right?
Every single time. But think about it
this way, guys.
We are at the impetus of of what is
likely to be um the largest uh
productivity leap in the history of
mankind the next 5 to 8 years ever.
Okay. I don't think there has ever been
a better time to be an investor with
capital to deploy into markets. And it's
because of the productivity leap we're
about to see, mainly through AI and
embodied AI and automation and robotics.
Um, this is going to benefit the world,
I believe, in a huge way. And I'm so
excited to be in capital markets right
now and to have this gift. It's a gift
to have all of that on the horizon and
to have a market crash right before it.
It's almost a dream. Yeah. Yeah. And I
just want this market to stay here for
like 60 days. Just stay here for 60 days
cuz every dollar that I get is going
into this market. Stocks that I loved 2
months ago are half price. Now, before
we go into that, if you're ever curious
how we keep the ice coffee hour running
so smoothly from tracking different
episodes we have coming up, lining up
integrations, and staying organized, no
joke, it's all with our sponsor, Notion.
We've basically built out our entire
podcast brain within Notion over the
last few years, and we were genuinely so
excited when they reached out for a
sponsorship because this is a company we
use all the time. Notion is the ultimate
all-in-one workspace that works for
anyone. Whether you're a student
balancing classes, someone trying to
grow a business, or just trying to get
your day-to-day life in order, Notion
lets you organize things your way, and
it's super customizable, so you can
build whatever system works best for
you. You could create to-do lists, set
up a calendar, track your workouts or
meals, whatever it is. The options are
endless. I also really like their
design. It's just clean, minimal, and it
makes everything seem calm and under
control. So, if you've been thinking
about getting organized, I highly
recommend you guys check out Notion at
notion.com/iced coffee, all lowercase.
That's
notion.com/iced coffee, and there's a
link down below in the description.
Seriously, I know you will love it. It
is the best organizational tool out
there. We use it every single day for
the ice coffee hour for basically all of
our information from guest scheduling to
sponsor scheduling to content ideation.
Couldn't recommend it more. Thank you so
much to Notion for sponsoring this
episode. Now, I got to say there's no
better sound than hearing and if you
want to hear a bunch more, then it's
time to get started with our sponsor,
Shopify. For those unaware, Shopify is
home to the number one checkout on the
planet with way less carts going
abandoned and way more sales going. For
example, in terms of how they're able to
do this, Shopify has a service called
Shop Pay that allows customers to save
their email address, billing and
shipping information and credit card
information, which could boost
conversions up to 50%. And if you're
into growing your business, your
commerce platform better be ready to
sell wherever your customers are
scrolling or strolling, whether that be
on the web, in their feed, in a physical
storefront, or anywhere in between. All
in all, nobody is selling better than
Shopify. So, if you want to upgrade your
business, you can get started with their
$1 trial period when you go to
shopify.com/ic all lowercase. Again,
that's
shopify.com/ic to upgrade your selling
today.
Shopify.com/ic with the link down below
in the description. Thank you so much,
Shopify, for sponsoring this podcast.
Docs that I loved two months ago are
half price. Yeah, half price. And I'm
just like, what do you think about the
warning from like Vanguard and Buffett
and Charlie Munger that we might see
lower than average returns over the last
decade? And they've been saying this
since really 2021. And they've warned
investors that, you know what, sure,
you've you've gotten about 10% a year,
but I believe over the next one to two
decades, it's likely to be about 4% a
year, 3% a year. What are your thoughts
on that? I I try to stay away from macro
predictions. I'm not great at them. Um I
don't really care what the market does.
I think there will be big winners the
next decade, right? So, as long as I
could predict who those big winners are,
and I think I know who they are, so the
S&P might not perform the next 5 years
as good as it did the last 5 years. Who
knows, right? But if you pick the right
stocks, you're going to outperform the
S&P. Yeah, I I think you you you
mentioned Buffett and I have so much
respect for Buffett. Like he's one of my
favorite people in the world, but he
essentially missed the entire technology
cycle, right? Buffett could be a multi-
trillionaire right now easily if he
would have just put a small piece of his
portfolio in the technology during the
technology boom of the early 2000s. So
macro stuff is hard. That's all I'm
saying. It's hard for me. It's hard for
Buffett. It's hard for everyone to
predict macro because there are too many
variables and the world is constantly
evolving and changing in ways that we
never would have anticipated. So
whenever you hear someone making macro
predictions, they're making them
assuming that the world stays
relatively consistent with the way that
it's been during their lifetime. I'm
telling you that we're about to see a
radical radical shift in technology
driven mainly by artificial
intelligence. Um where nobody could
really predict how the next 10 years is
going to go and how it's going to look.
The one thing that I do know is that
productivity I think will skyrocket. So
what should the average person do with
this information and with everything
going on in the market? either don't do
anything or if you are going to do
something, I would be figuring out
whatever you can do to get a second or a
third job. Start driving Uber at night,
start washing cars on the weekend, uh
start flipping garage sale merchandise.
I don't care what you have to do.
Whatever you can do to make a little bit
of extra cash over the next few weeks to
next few months to be able to invest in
risk assets. That's listen for me I'm
investing in Robin Hood and Nvidia and
and you know aggressive tech stock Tesla
you know like like that's what I'm doing
with my money. Like you might not agree
with my stock picks but but I this is
the time to be to be to to figure out
how to find risk dollars in your life.
Do it in a way that won't harm your
family if it goes wrong. All right. But
like fine wrist like like just this is a
this is the time to maybe like save some
money, make some extra money, figure out
how to get some extra cash just for the
purpose of getting crazy rich later
because you want to be you want to have
money in risk assets right now for the
next 10 years. Like you want to find
money to put in risk assets. I am so
guys I've seen a lot I have never been
more excited to be in the market than
right now. So, how do you have how do
you have your portfolio positioned right
now? Are you do you have any cash? Are
you still in margin? Like this is I
always I'm not with the volatility and
when the concentration risk of having a
single individual moving equity markets
every day. I mean, what if like what if
Trump lost his mind a week ago? like
like what if like right that's a when
we're running scenario analysis one of
those scenarios must be that maybe Trump
lost his mind right and maybe he's just
going to keep going on this and not stop
even if the market's down 50% and you
can't do anything about it right so
there's a con level you have to
acknowledge that as a risk so I'm not
lever Dave and that's for me I did my
best to get my margin down to zero Now,
I did have to get back into margin a
little bit because of some
opportunities, but I'm waiting for some
clarity on tariffs to then ratchet my
leverage back up. Agreed. I'm I'm
waiting to pounce. That's what I'm
doing. So, so I do have some some degree
of hedging going on in my portfolio. Uh
and it changes every day and it's a
little bit of a gut instinct of like
what is the news cycle going to be in
the next 24 hours? Is there a likelihood
that something
that crazy is going to happen. And if
so, I need to like I'm only hedging my
portfolio maybe 35% at most. So, it's
not a lot. And I and I did that the
weekend after the tariffs were shown to
the public. Yeah. I uh just had a hunch
that we could see another Black Monday.
And if there was going to be a Black
Monday, I wanted to have some puts on
the S&P. Yeah. And was able to cover
those, you know, the morning of. By the
way, al I will I will admit there is a
counterargument to what I'm saying right
now that is a little scary. Ray Dalio um
if you read his stuff, I love him and he
makes a pretty darn good case that we're
in the early cycles of I don't want to
call it like the end of everything
basically of the I don't want to freak
you out. dominance in the financial
world. No, no. If if you haven't seen
it, it's a 40minute animated like here's
how the world works. It is the most I
watched it again this weekend just
because this is all that's on my mind
and you you would love Did you read his
post today though on X? No, he put out a
I read it on the way here. He put out a
post today on X and he listen, you got
to listen to everything he says because
it's legitimate. But I will say this,
he's not taking into account anything
that I just said. We've always somehow
have found a way to save ourselves.
Something that we didn't expect like the
internet or cloud computing or like the
mobile phone. Like right when we thought
we were totally screwed, something just
happens. I don't know how that is, but
something always happens that makes the
world so much more productive and saves
industry and like makes everyone like
everything more profitable. But if you
but if you watch the Ray Dalio video, as
the US is going down and China is going
up, you have to hope that the US is
going to be able to capitalize on that
new technology better than China. I
don't know that we need to be able to
capitalize better than China. We just
can't be that much worse than China. We
have to be we have to kind of be in the
same world as China because China is
they're they're ready. They're going
like I I've been, you know, and and if
and if you think about tariffs as a
solution to this, it's kind of awkward.
But if you think about like IP
management of things like deepsek
stealing content from our technology,
that that's where you like there is a
little bit of a facade when it comes to
China. there they are. We should be
concerned. But I'll give you one
example. So like one of my LPs of of the
robotics company that you know I'm
involved with. Uh he has been traveling
China for 2 weeks meeting with every
single robot company in China like every
single one. And he's looking at them to
potentially invest. He's also looking at
them as as it relates to competitive
intelligence. and he's somewhat
impressed cuz he said there's like a
hundred humanoid like robotics companies
over there. It's wild. But but his word
to me last night was nothing really to
be worried about. Meaning like yeah,
there's a lot of startups. There's a lot
of action,
but these companies aren't structured as
formally and as like well thought out as
you might think from the videos you're
seeing on YouTube. Okay. So, so it's not
all that it seems, but they are a force
to be dealt with. China the next 10 or
15 years. We we we I do believe that
we're going to figure it out. I think
we're scared right now, and that's a
good thing. I think like when I mean by
scared, like we're scared that we're
about to get beat out by China. And I
will say this, Dave, like we like to rip
on Gen Z for like these kids being a
little like lax and and
just soft. I'll say I'm Gen X, right?
So, I'm going to call him soft. But I
I'm starting to engage with a lot of
these kids, uh, especially in robotics.
And let me tell you something, they are
smart as hell. And I don't think we can
just label Gen Z as one thing because
there is a section of Gen Z, these kids
are just wildly ambitious and crafty and
resourceful. Um, and I actually believe
that that generation's going to step up
in a really big way and save us. I do. I
think they're going to compete. I I I I
think they're going to compete. Um, I'm
confident in that. How do you do such a
great job separating your emotions from
investing? I've been doing this. I've
been trading options since I was 13
years old. I've been losing incredible
amounts of money uh at periods, right,
Dave? There have been a couple times
when I broke down. I got I did some bad
stuff. I put myself in a really bad
situation when I was younger and I
learned my le and Dave even has had a
talk with me. He's like, "You got to
chill." Um he became your bank for a
little bit. Yeah, bank. He did. He was
my bank. Like there was a point where I
went broke and Dave would lend me money
and he like kept a tab of like how much
money I owed him. Like he keep lending
him money.
Just D always had money. He's always
been more conservative than me. Yeah.
He's a good friend. But I've always
believed in this. You you see this brain
at work right now. Would you not believe
in that? Well, you know, if you had a
record of losing and losing and losing,
then maybe I would feel otherwise. But
no, I I see where you're coming from. Is
there a specific time in the day that's
better to buy stocks? Like if you have
auto investing on should be buying as
soon as market opens during market close
or some somewhere in between. I saw a
chart that said every day if you just
bought after hours you would make more
money than buying at like market open or
that buying at market close I think
there there are nuances to that that I
don't think were reflected in the report
that you saw cuz I saw it too. Uh
because you're not you don't actually
get to buy it at that does that make
sense? It's like it's not as clean as
you think it is. Cuz I I was curious
when I read that report and I read into
it and then I was like, "Oh." Cuz I was
like, there's no nothing that could be
easily arbitrage actually exists in the
market. Just so you're aware. Um with
the with the with the volume of
algorithms trading at high frequency
firms right now, they're able to assess
anything that's easily arbed out and it
gets arbed out almost instantaneously.
So like don't look for easy things. It's
impossible because there are computers
that are looking for that stuff and it
will react to it really quickly. So my
answer to you is I don't really know and
that's not how I trade. I don't think
like that. You know how I think. I look
for information that other people uh
missed. Like I'm I'm not looking at the
market. I'm trying to look for actual
cultural consumer behavioral shifts
that, you know, the money heads on Wall
Street are too consumed with with
financial noise to to quickly surface in
the world. What do you two think are the
main things people are missing right
now? Well, well, I think they're too
consumed by something that's short-term.
Yeah. The tariff stuff. Yeah. And by the
way, it's it's it's really difficult to
get in the head of Donald Trump and
assess what he's going to say and do
intraday. So like unless you're on his
team,
uh unless you're on the truly on the
inside and you have access to that level
of information, why why are you trying
to do something that you can't do? Focus
on things you can control. The thing I
love most about these short-term
volatile macro events is that it tends
to take down the entire market whether
it's justified or not. So finding
finding the opportunities when
everything is down, finding those
companies that you wanted to be in
anyway and being able to buy them on
sale at a discount, there's nothing
better. I to I totally agree. Um, as you
guys know, I've been on like a Robin
Hood kick for like seven, eight months.
I really feel strongly uh that the
psychopaths that run Robin Hood are
going to make the most of this
deregulatory environment that we're in
the next few years. We haven't heard
anything about dereg. It's our attention
spans are so short. We hear tariff,
tariff, tariff, and that's all we can
think about. We we now do have the
deregulatory president. We have the
Bitcoin president. We have all these
other things that were that were the top
of mind like 2 weeks ago and now all we
talk about is tariffs. So So I like I I
I was in Robin Hood pretty heavy but
then I was like I didn't think the stock
was going to go from 20 to 70 to 65 in
like a few months. That really pissed me
off cuz I was like wanting to slowly No,
I was in it pretty heavy but like I
wanted to be in it even heavier and now
it's down to like 30 31 33 or whatever.
And so yeah, like I'm doubling down. I'm
finding money to get into the stocks
that I really want to be in heavy and
this is just like a blessing having this
opportunity. Um there are companies like
Amazon that have been down 9 weeks in a
row. So you know like one of my biggest
themes the next decade is automation and
robotics and efficiencies that will be
brought to enterprise on a vast global
scale. I cannot think of a company
that's set up to benefit from that
trend, even if they're not actually
making the robots, which they are too,
but but to benefit from that trend more
than Amazon. So, yeah, I'm I'm I think
there are huge opportunities right now
and you just have to like not get
nervous with the short-term noise cuz
like let's be honest, none of us are in
the market in for the short term, right?
Like no, come on. We should that would
be insane. like we're in this for our
lifetime, right? And Dave, what's your
approach right now with investing? I'm
basically trying to not touch my
portfolio as things are going down other
than to hedge a little bit and then
looking for those opportunities and
doubling down on the stocks that I think
are are the ones that that have the
biggest opportunity. And I'm I it's the
same stocks. We we we talk every day, so
it's like hard to separate the our our
two philosophies, but Robin Hood, ever
since they announced the gold card and
they have productized now a bank where
they're not a bank, but they get to have
banking services, I just feel like
they're so aggressive with trying to
take wallet share that that's a stock
that I want to be in. Um, and so I'm
just looking for opportunities like
that. Yeah. Tesla Tesla I'm not letting
the politics of Tesla cloud my judgment
on Tesla as a robotics company be it's I
don't care about their automotive
division at all they are a robot company
speaking of Tesla though what are your
thoughts on Elon Musk turning that a bit
political that now it seems like almost
it's a statement if you drive a cyber
truck it it's terrible for Tesla but
could it get worse it has to be at its
worst right now, right? Like, could he
possibly get more political than he is
right now? Cyber Truck's on fire
everywhere. It's already got What was
crazy? I went to LA recently and I was
there for a day and I heard twice
someone said, "Excuse the car." They
were driving a test. Excuse I got this
before everything. One of them even
said, "I looked into seeing if I could
give the car back or do like a swap a
lease sort of thing and have someone
take over my payments, but there's like
a penalty if you do that." I think it's
a great car. I mean, but like there's
that. But that's a very LA. It's not
just LA. My, you know, my friend in
Florida has a Cyber Truck. Uh, it got
vandalized a week ago, week and a half
ago. But it's going to be a volatile
year for Tesla. That's There's no way of
getting around it. like you you either
believe in the future of Tesla FSD and
Optimus and robotics because that's
really all that matters for Tesla over
the next decade or you don't. And if you
believe in that, you kind of you love
the fact that they're having this
volatile year because again, it provides
you with an opportunity and us long-term
Tesla investors are very used to the
volatility. This is this is nothing.
seeing Apple drop like it did and Amazon
and all every stock just tank. That's
shocking to long-term investors of the
kind of blue chips of the tech world.
But but getting really surprised through
the noise guys again like
the entire generation of young people
are investors for the first time in
history. You have an entire generation
where every single one of them,
especially the ma, you know, male, like
every guy, like, you know, I have coffee
every morning, my dog, and like every
other morning there's another random
person walking up to me that's young and
just wants to talk about stocks or
crypto or whatever. Like, I'm like,
people do not understand that literally
every single person in that generation
is investing for themselves through an
app. When you look at Robin Hood the
next two to three decades, I truly
believe they're in the pole position to
be the largest financial institution on
earth within 25 years. Like, and they're
a 34 billion company today. Mhm. Which
is a which is nothing. I mean, they
could theoretically 20x from here over
the next two decades if that thesis
plays out. And it's a thesis that I
don't even see. I'm trying to figure out
how it doesn't happen. They have to do
something stupid again, right? I mean,
yeah. if they if they got rid of the
sell button again or got rid of the buy
button. Yeah, that that could be a
problem. Still have not gotten over
that. By the way, a lot of people still
reference that moment even though
brokerages did the same thing and it
wasn't an issue just with Robin Hood,
but they got all the flash. I don't
think it's as big of a I think you were
kind of in the middle of it more so
you're more aware of it, but I don't
hear No. Every time every time I I post
on X about Robin Hood, there's always a
comment that says it's the same seven
people,000 people in the world. I don't
hear about it from all of my friends
that haven't been investing for a while.
It's only the people that already know
about it. And the worst that they could
do is just not transfer their money to
Robin Hood, which it doesn't exist there
right now anyways. But those transfer
bonuses, like Robin's just doing so much
to draw money in and to keep you in
their sticky app. Their app is such it
is such a better interface than I I use
Schwab for forever. I use Robin Hood as
my primary brokerage now. It's crazy to
me. I I made my first sports wager on
Robin Hood a week and a half ago on the
Duke game and won. It was a small wager,
but let me tell you, it was so
enjoyable. It was so easy. You know,
they they call it a prediction market.
Like I've been in other apps like MGM
Sports and stuff just trying to figure
out like how to place the It's not hard
but it's kind of like it's geared for
sports people and you this is more
geared towards finance people. Normal
No, it's just geared towards like normal
people. Well, I think it's geared
towards game gamifying the entire
system. They gamified investing and
they're gamifying. They did the same
thing with sports. Like if you get on
one of those sports apps, it's not hard,
but like it's kind of a little bit
cumbersome and confusing and clunky.
They are just good at the thing that
actually matters. They dumb it down.
I've seen it where it's like, do you
think market's going to go up or down?
And it's just like red or green. And you
pick one of them. Like, how much do you
want to make on this? And then you could
like do the sliding scale of like, I
want to make this much. All right. Well,
your odds are this and it'll cost you
this. Do you want to buy? Yes or no? And
it's like, yes. And then like confetti
shoots up. It's dumb, but it matters.
It's it's the stuff that matters. Like
on our live show, Chris will sometimes
buy stocks in real time, and he is the
worst at like understanding what he's
doing with the the app for whatever
brokerage you were using at the time. Uh
the experience on Robin Hood, I was this
morning half half asleep trading
options, but the interface just makes it
so easy to roll your options down and
just scroll and visually see what you're
doing and it's just it's a better
experience. So where do we draw the line
between investing and gambling? I don't
think there's any similarities between
in I'm like I refute that aggressively.
That sounds like a gambler would say
that. No, no, come on. So I So listen, I
I've gotten into a few like I I put
maybe two grand total into random
options. Yeah. To me, that's no
different than Amily. No, that is if
you're going to put it into random
options. Well, I'm not talking random
options like a blindfolded just like
picking something. But I'm like bankrupt
uh companies that are like on the verge
where I'm like I'm going to buy some
call options on this and if they don't
go bankrupt, I'm going to 10x. But if
they do, it's money I'm willing to risk.
Okay. So, so that's kind of like more
just pure speculation and that that kind
of sits on the line. I I would agree.
But what I love is I was so annoyed a
few years ago when all these young
people would just talk about meme stocks
and GameStop and
crypto crap coins, right? There's still
a little bit of that, but not anymore.
Like, if you look at what they're
talking about this week, they're talking
about losing real money in real
companies. And like that's actually
awesome. I would say
95 plus% of what's happening on Robin
Hood is investing right now, not extreme
speculation of meme style stuff. Uh I
think the majority of it is actual
investing. And I think every year we go
forward, it's only going to get more
that way. I think there's a bigger
percentage of people's accounts that are
investing accounts, but it's it gives
you the opportunity to have fun and make
a crazy bet on something happening in
the markets the same way you can on a
sports. You you just you just said it
like I would I would I would assume the
majority of your account is investing
and then you have a little fun on the
side doing some speculation that could
theoretically be closer to gambling. And
I think there are a lot of people like
that and that's totally fine. if you
want to throw some money on something
stupid, but like the majority of your
account is likely investing. And I think
it's like that. It's that way for almost
every single investor on Robin Hood
right now except for some except for the
ones that are on Wall Street Bets
posting their screen because because I
because I've seen listen I'm close to a
lot of these guys that were like big big
memecoin traders and they were big
GameStop guys like a few years ago and I
converse with them and they're not
really talking about that stuff more
than once in a blue moon. Now, they
still do a little bit of it on the side,
but most of them are in Nvidia and
they're in Robin Hood and they're in
like, you know, they're trading actual
technology stocks, actual growth
companies because that's what actually
happens. Dave, we were during the dot
boom when we were that age. We were
doing the equivalent of meme stocks back
then, investing in all the IPOs, all the
stupid IPOs, pets.com, all and it was
all based on hype and short-term Cisco
options because they seem to go up every
day. And then most of those companies
went actually bankrupt. We lost all of
our money that was invested in growth
stocks. Like actually all of it like our
account was down 50 to 60%. Do you
remember? We actually lost 60%. I just
remember I remember the year that I lost
more money in the stock market than I
made at my job. Yeah, but here's what
happened. You were late. I might this
year, but but here's what happened. The
at the account we still had our E Trade
app, right? And 6 months later, 12
months later, when we're still we're
earning income because we had real jobs,
what are we going to do with it? We
started putting it back in the market
and dollar cost averaging to the S&P.
Two years later, us and all of our
friends, we're now investing in real
companies. So, yeah, we started doing
stupid stuff. We learned the lessons the
hard way. You have to learn them the
hard way. It's the only way you know
that like if you don't lose money, you
don't learn your lesson. Maybe next time
you you'll dollar cost average. This is
the second time I've learned I I was
dollar cost averaging, but it wasn't
enough. And so I was like, okay, I need
to start depleting the savings. And
that's January. But I'm curious, do you
feel like Robin Hood is just as safe
then to put your money in as any other
Charles Schwab, TD, Merit Trade,
Vanguard? Would you feel just as
comfortable using it? And if not, I
think we have differing opinions on
this. I do. It's where I keep the
majority of my money. Um, Robin Hood is
I think of it as a marketing interface
on top of other people's uh back end. So
Robin Hood isn't, you know, they're not
doing the trades, they're facilitating
the trades to make you have an easy
experience and then handing it off to a
back-end company. the same way Schwab
and TD and the others
do. I would not have my money in Robin
Hood three years ago. Today, I think
they three years ago today I I I think
they learned their lessons. I think
they're they're becoming a grown-up
company now. Uh I bet their compliance
team is meaningfully larger today than
it was in 2021. I would feel relatively
comfortable having a large amount of
money with Robin Hood. That said, I had
been I was with Ameritrade before that.
Scott Trade got acquired by me trade and
then Schwab acquired a merit trade. Now,
as you guys know, I'm publicly audited
every year and they've told me not to
move my accounts because that would be
like a red flag. So, I have like an
18-year track record within one account.
So, I'm sticking with Schwab for that
reason alone right now. But also, I like
I can actually I have a private a guy. I
can get him on the phone if there's an
issue. Um, if the if the site is down,
they'll manually place a trade for me. I
feel like if anything horrible happened
at at Robin Hood, you'll never get
someone on the phone like that to do
that for you. I've had good chat
conversations with them, but I have also
had the Schwab guy come to my house when
I needed some papers. He drove to my
house. I can drive to the Schwab office
in our neighborhood if I needed to. You
should be your house. He'll do that. If
the consumer app was down, I'd be like,
"Place my trade now. Sell my stock." if
like I don't know an earthquake went
off. I heard a rumor for Robin Hood that
they want to get into banking and one of
the services that they might offer is a
Uber service where they deliver cash to
They already do. They've announced that.
That's it. Yeah. Okay. So, you can It's
not in the app yet. It's coming I think
this fall, but you'll be able to instead
of going to an ATM, you'll be able to
access your Robin Hood banking premium
banking service. They can't call
themselves a bank because they're a
banking service. Um, but you'll be able
to on your phone in the Robin Hood app
say $100, here's where I am, and someone
will bring you $100 in cash. How is that
profitable? How could they do that? I
don't know why they did it. I don't care
about it. It's not why I'm invested in
Robin. I think that just it's a little
market because you're talking about it.
But I'm I'm thinking it's like there's
got to be a minimum because let's just
say I want 20 bucks and they're driving
like 30 minutes to bring me a 20 unless
you're doing a drug deal. Who needs
that? But that's why it's probably
marketing cuz I I don't know if I'd ever
use that. But it's nice to think, okay,
if I need like a few hundred bucks. So
at their event, they actually demoed it
and it appeared to be a free delivery
and you tip the driver the same way you
would a Door Dash or an Uber Eats or
whatever. It's just a delivery service
that's delivering cash instead of
drivers. Like whose money is the driver
holding? I'm sure it's insurance. I
think this is a roundoff error, guys. I
think it's a conversation topic and it's
a marketing gimmick. Like they're smart
when it comes to this stuff, right? They
basically wanted they wanted to offer
private banking like services. And so
the same way Schwab will drive to my
house and hand me paperwork, they wanted
to have what would what would the
equivalent of that be? and without being
a bank and without wanting to have to
deal with the ATM networks and becoming
a part of that, they're able to say,
"Oh, yeah, you need cash, we'll bring it
to you." But but here's what matters
when it comes to Robin Hood. There's
what you see and there's what you don't
see. Like when did we start talking
about them getting into sports wagering
a year ago, right? We were had
conversing about and now they're in
sports wagering.
This team, Vlad and his team, they're
animals. Like they're animals. They're
going to they're going to ask for
forgiveness later. Anything that
remotely
touches money in any way, they're going
to try to take over. They're going to
try to Amazon it. Like if it touches
money. So you heard the rumors about
real estate like eventually. What's this
with real estate? Eventually there's
rumors that they would potentially get
into Was that a real rumor? I just
thought you made that up. No, that was
abs that is absolutely real and I
believe it's going to happen. So what is
it? You have to explain it now. Well,
that they would eventually get into the
broker game as well. Uh, and transact.
Oh, so I would be able to buy a house
buy or sell your house. Yes. And and
they would get So when you think about
when all these companies started up,
maybe it was like seven years ago and
they were trying to integrate the real
estate tech stack to have basically
commissionfree brokerage, right?
They didn't have enough funding and the
technology wasn't there and they just
didn't execute well enough to pull that
off. It's really expensive to market on
the front end as you know to get your
customers. It's a lot of work. They were
too early. I don't think I think Robin
Hood is going to wait for the right time
and they will have the right resources.
And the beauty behind Robin Hood is they
will already own the customer base,
right? So they're just going to layer it
in as a product. I don't know how long
until it happens. I just know they will
try to make that happen. Um, when you
think about a financial institution,
they're probably thinking larger than
any financial institution on Earth
today. They want to be involved in more
things that touch money than JP Morgan
is. They've stated that they want to
touch every dollar that you that you
interact with. And if there's one thing
that gets me going, it's a big company
that thinks like a startup. That's
Tesla, right? I don't know if you guys
have ever had the privilege to work at a
big company like Dave and I had earlier
in our career. We've sold our companies
to big companies and were forced to work
there for periods of time. It's a joke.
Like when you understand the difference
between a large incumbent and a nimble
startup, it's like night and day. So if
you're able to catch that rare form of
large company that still thinks like a
startup and is willing to take risk and
ask for forgiveness later, that is
something I am going to throw money at.
I'm just going to cuz it's such a
rarity. It hardly ever happens because
then I'll keep throwing money at that
until there's an indication that they're
starting to be more corporate. Correct.
Like think think about I worked at Yahoo
in 1999 when it was still kind of a
startup and I worked there for 10 years
and by by the end it was so corporate.
So I I left because it was just he just
stayed too long cuz he got to help
produce the Victoria Secret fashion show
coverage for for for like 10 years.
World's largest streaming event at the
time. But but here's here's where
everyone got messed up on Robin Hood.
They were in a horrible regulatory
environment where they were getting
attacked by the government anytime they
tried to do anything and so they froze
for years. The company just froze. So
we're kind of look and then at the same
time they made the worst mistake ever
whether it was their fault or not. They
got caught up in the whole GameStop
issue which was literally the worst PR
attack that I have ever seen on a
company in my lifetime. So they had all
of that bad stuff happening at the same
exact time and now that has mostly
resolved itself and now they're in the
polar opposite regulatory environment
and they're just putting the pedal to
the metal and going for it. So I I think
a lot of people just don't fully
understand or grasp that this is a
company that's trying to grow to a half
trillion dollar financial institution
over the next 10-15 years. Um, and
they're gonna they're going to do
everything they can to make that happen.
And I don't really see any massive
roadblocks.
And we talked about the tailwind of of
the wealth transfer, right? The 8090
hundred trillion dollar wealth transfer.
Robin Hood has all these accounts and
they're all relatively small still and
they're just getting bigger every single
year. They're getting bigger because
young people are earning more money and
they're inheriting money. I see one big
roadblock. I think on Tuesday or
whenever the next day of trading is
open, I'm going to put some money in
Robin Hood. Oh, no. So, I think I think
that you know, whatever you guys have
right now, you might want to sell. Are
you actually going to do that? I won't
tell you. Yeah, I you'll end up finding
out. Got to check the stock price. Yeah.
Just look at the market. Yeah. Yeah.
That that was a very What would what do
you say to people who maybe have all
their money invested in the markets and
want to go into margin because they see
the opportunity the stock market has
fallen over 20% and they want to buy in
but they want to do margin. Well, it
depends. We have a very different risk
profile than the average normal
investor. I would not listen to us when
it comes to uh using margin and triple
leveraging and and all of that. But the
way we use it I feel is very responsible
given our high threshold for
risk. I have buckets of money that are
earmarked
uh to for maximum aggressiveness in the
market and I know the risk associated
with that whether it's taking on margin
uh or investing in options that can
dissipate overnight and go to zero which
they have many times. So, like it's all
about bucketing your money. And if you
have a bucket of money that is geared to
generate three to five times the market
return and you're willing to take on
that risk, there are appropriate times
to have margin, but you have to
understand the risk that's associated
with that. And the risk is large. So
like it's not the type of thing you want
to do inside of your core account that's
part of your core portfolio
uh where you cannot you know you can't
withstand a massive loss because again
there's always tail risk. People do not
understand that tail risk are actually
very real and there's tail risk you can
see and tail risk that you can't see but
they're potentially massive and they
could destroy you.
So I I have an appropriate amount of
margin for my level of risk. Um but
that's a very it's a very personal
decision. You just you just can't
blanket discuss
margin without understanding someone's
personal tolerance for risk and what
their objectives are. Quite honestly,
it's almost impossible to
achieve five, six, 7x market returns
without leverage, some form of leverage.
And I need to That's those are the
returns I'm looking for. And when was
the last time both of you were wrong? I
was wrong last week. I was wrong last
week. What? I I did not I I said that I
was not fast trading the Rose Garden
event the way I should have. I thought
that Trump would react more quickly to
dissatisfaction
uh on his brand. He always has in the
past. And this is the first time that
Trump has not had a knee-jerk reaction
when something went not the way that he
wanted it to go or that he anticipated
it to go. So, I was wrong. Yeah. And and
and if I if I thought this is a
possibility, I would have been way more
aggressively hedged on my account than I
was. I was hedged a small amount, but
not nearly enough. I got slaughtered
this last week. You know, I put a post
on X on f last, you know, last Friday,
and I was like, "Hey, listen. I got
slaughtered. I I How much were you down?
Millions um over the course of two days,
a large low double-digit percentage of
my trading portfolio. And it was because
I miscalculated something and it was
Trump." And I just explained that those
things are going to happen. they're
going to happen. You're not alone. I
knew I wasn't alone. It's not We have a
We have a, you know, a strong community
and I knew they were hurting. Um, and I
just wanted everyone to know it's not
just you. It's like it's me. I'm hurting
really bad. I misjudged something. I got
it wrong and now I'm paying the price.
But I have been here before and it has
always been okay in the long run. I have
never looked back at any of those
scenarios and been like that just ruined
my whole life. Yeah. uh the the a
brighter days are ahead of us. I don't
know exactly how it plays out. I don't
know the exact timing of it, but if
brighter days are not ahead of us, then
that will be the first time in history.
It does it does worry me in the sense
that you are very confident that things
are going to rebound because I remember
the same things happening in in 2020.
And I I I don't want to say like I felt
the bottom, but it seemed like when
things were bottomed, I knew so many
people are like, I'm not going near
that. I don't want to touch it. Things
are going to go much worse. We're we're
entering a 1920s Great Depression. This
time around, I see everyone have the
same sentiment as you, that this is
nothing. Prices are going to rebound.
And listen, it might be, but it's just
it seems like a a completely different
narrative shift than I saw four years
ago. I mean, I I think the panic has
been very real the last few days,
though. Um, if you look at investor
sentiment, it's like all I'm seeing on
Twitter is buy the dip, buy the dip, buy
the dip, buy the dip. I don't see anyone
saying like, oh, this is this is the
start of the next like sure you see like
Robert Kiyosaki and like a few of the
people saying like, oh, this is this is
the moment I've been talking about.
They've always he's been the moment for
him for years, right? But on a large
scale, I see everyone being like, I'm
excited. I see very few people fearful
about it. And that worries me that maybe
that fear has not been priced in. But my
I think it's about time frame. Like my
time frame is not buy the dip so I'm up
in 3 weeks. Yeah. My it for me it's I
don't know or three years from now, you
know, you're going to be fine. I do not
care if it takes two years to come out
of the dip. I want it to take two years.
I want the market to stay down for at
least a year. That would be awesome for
me. Um because I feel better seeing a
large number in my account than a small
number. And I don't I know this is the
only way we get real opportunity. This
is where the real gains are made for me.
This is always where I've made the most,
right? I've always made the most going
in deepest uh during the times where it
felt hardest to do that. But on the
macro side, and I know we don't really
we don't have any ability to predict
that if there was a year of the stock
market going down, you you're happy
because you can keep buying more always.
But that is that is a recession. That is
people not people being afraid to take
money and spend it because the the world
is ending, right? Yeah. And recessions
are temporary. Always have been. What do
you think the biggest risk to the
economy is besides tariffs? I think the
bigger risk to the economy is that we do
meaningful damage to the global supply
chain. Uh if we really stick to this
policy too firmly and we if we really
want to bring iPhone manufacturing to
Nebraska, that is a long-term change in
the way the world has worked.
And that I think I I think that the
damage to the reputation of the US as a
trading partner that you can trust is
kind of the bigger picture. All I care
about is the global supply chain. It's
precious. It's highly efficient and it's
a big part of why uh we operate here in
the US. US companies are able to operate
uh with such high productivity around
the world. And it's just this amazing
thing that we built up over decades. I
know there are areas where we probably
need to like tweak, right? And I I'd be
fine with the administration doing that.
Um but I don't want to do anything
detrimental to the global supply chain.
That is absolutely critical and it has
it has like fingers into every company
in the country and every worker in this
country. And I hope that this
administration has a deep level of
respect for that supply chain because
it's not something that changes easily.
I do have respect for wanting to onshore
long term, but there's a way a a right
and a wrong way to do that. You can't
flip a switch and expect US companies to
be able to start manufacturing. We do
not have sewing factories or iPhone
factories in the US. We just couldn't do
it. If we want to onshore, I would love
to have a long-term viable strategy for
onshoring over the next couple of
decades and
incentivize uh US companies to onshore
versus punishing by making them pay more
and then decide how to pass that extra
cost. But but also guys, we need a
healthy global economy. Like so as an
investor, uh I've probably listened to
more earnings calls than I think any
investor in the world. uh probably maybe
10,000. Like I'm not joking. Like this
is my my hobby is listening to earnings
calls. I I love it. It's like my
reading. And over the course of the past
15 years, uh the degree of importance
that's been put on international sales
for American companies, I just I can't
even really communicate it to you guys.
It's so critically important. It's all
that matters almost these days. Like you
get to that point in the call where
you're like even if things were terrible
here, all of our growth is coming from
international sales, from China, right,
from Asia, uh from all over the world.
It is so critical, as you're saying,
Dave, to keep those relationships moving
and well greased and to not have an
anti-American sentiment because like
whether you like it or not, we are
better together globally, right? And
like if you're part of the investing
ecosystem, there's no way you don't know
that, right? Any of these companies
you're investing in, look at the
percentage of sales that we're getting
globally. Look at McDonald's. Look at
Starbucks. Look at Popeye's. Look at
like all these companies. Like their
growth is international. Look at
Columbia Sportsear. I could just go on
and on. Uggs and this. Every single
company I've been investing in
international is a huge Lululemon. Yeah.
look at what they care about
international. We've already heard too
like brands like Starbucks and
McDonald's in other countries where they
they aren't necessarily facing any
tariffs because they're sourcing locally
in those markets. There is a decline in
store traffic for these US brands that
are part of US companies because of this
kind of anti-American. But forget about
the anti-American sentiment. We want
their economies to be doing well so they
can go to those places and spend money.
It's like America is great. We have
great ideas. We have great execution.
Like we have amazing corporate
enterprise scaling around the world with
our brands that have brand value in
every country in the world. That only
matters if every country in the world is
doing okay and generally doing better
every year to spend money on these
amazing American brands that are around
the world, right? So, I just think there
are nuances here that aren't being
respected right now. Do you think
government spending is anything of any
importance? Can we continue on the same
path? Is it good we're trying to cut it
down or do you think it's just another
distraction? No, I think it's a major
issue that we need to like be very
serious about. I'm like very pro Doge,
you know. I think do and even if Doge
doesn't make any real massive impact,
it's setting the right mindset for
government, right? Even if Doge only
ends up clearing out a couple hundred
billion or 100 billion, it's a mindset
change. Um, truthfully, we do have to go
in and make probably I don't even want
to call them cuts, but we have to think
more strategically about how we spend
money on defense, right? About how we
spend money on some of these pro because
listen, you can't make any massive cuts
unless you start to cut into defense. I
was not happy to hear about the F-47
program, right? Like what was that?
Manned aircraft like this, the new
manned aircraft. Like the last time we
had a big manned aircraft program was it
in the trillions of waste. Um listen, if
you look back at Elon's tweets from back
in the day, he was very very anti- uh
manned aircraft because drones are the
future. We don't necessarily need to
send a fighter jet with pilots to do
that job, right? You can send a robot to
do that job and have it controlled from,
you know, offshore. We we listen we we
just need to we need to like be at our
best in terms of creativity how we think
about spend big spending programs. There
are ways for us to solve these problems.
They're not easy. They're nuanced. We
just need to treat them seriously. It's
not necessarily even spending less. It's
just spending more efficiently and in in
smarter ways. But I will say this, yes,
it's a huge problem. It needs to be
controlled. But we've always kind of had
something come out of nowhere and save
us like I was saying like whether it was
the industrial revolution or whether it
was the technology revolution or the
internet or mobile you know mobile
smartphones or cloud computing right AI
in my lifetime is bigger than anything
I've ever seen and it has potential to
be the thing that saves us. So we need
to think really strategically about how
we think about implementing AI across
the globe in industry and it could be
the thing that pulls us out of this
hole. So like I want to be I'm always
I'm a little bit of an optimist quite
honestly. Um but I'm hoping that AI and
embodied AI and automation and robotics
are the things that kind of save save
us. And when I say save, not just us in
the US, but really save the world from
all the mistakes that we've made the
last 15 years
overspending, getting greedy, right?
Like we have been kind of stupid with
our money, quite honestly. Do you think
there's a chance we get back down to 0%
interest rates? That would not be a good
thing if that if that if we got there,
it's because something really bad
happened. I really hope that doesn't
happen. Graham, are you looking for
that? I don't know. I see a lot of talks
about getting back down to zero. God,
that's not healthy. I don't think Zero
means we had
another tragic problem that we had to
address by by printing money. Look at
the mistakes we made when it was zero.
Cheap money does not lead to good
decision-m you do not want money to flow
that easily. There's a balance. I always
say like everyone's always about I want
big government or I want small
government. I want lots of taxes or low
tax. How about just appropriately sized
government that operates better? Um, how
about appropriate interest rates for the
time that we're in, right? Like I don't
know if the right number is 2 3 4 6
7%. But whenever you go to an extreme, I
don't think it's healthy. And when money
is flowing to that degree, I hate it.
Like it's just it's flowing
inefficiently. like it had to be there
because we didn't have the capacity to
solve that problem strategically and
with precision. So, they just threw
money out in hopes that it would just
get us through a very scary moment in
time where we didn't have all the
information on how to fix it. Okay?
Like, let's be honest, we put interest
rates to zero cuz we didn't know how to
solve the problem strategically. Um, I
think the only way it gets back down to
zero is if we have a really big problem
that we can't figure out how to solve
and we're trying to bandaid it. But you
saw what happened. We're now starting to
dig out of that hole. Like you just
asked me if we can cut the budget and
you're talking about zero. Like those
two things conflict in a really big way.
And I hope we're kind of like somewhere
in the middle. Do you think it's harder
to be a good investor today than 10
years ago? I think it's easier because
we have just access to more information,
faster trading, easier everything. Like
10 years ago, yeah, we had apps we could
trade on. 20 years ago, you were calling
someone on the phone. I think AI and you
know, mana managing our portfolio with
AI is going to be a thing in the future.
I think it's it's only getting easier to
be a good investor, but once everyone's
a good investor, is anyone a good
investor? Sure. So the the world is
digitally connected now and it means
that we all have access to almost all
information in real time. Information
does no longer sits behind a payw wall.
So if you want to assess like what is
the world buying today? How are they
what products do they like? What brands
are doing well? Like how are we spending
our money today versus a year ago? Like
the answers are there for you to to see
on social media as regular people. And
that used to be something that only like
analysts and funds and they would buy
all of this data and they could analyze
it, but now anyone can. Yeah, we that's
the thing I keep telling everyone like
like information has been democratized
and that's to the advantage of retail
investors. They just don't know it
because they think there's this big
mystical Wall Street that's screwing
them. I'm like, no, they're they're
afraid to tell you that we have the
advantage as retail investors. So like
we had think about all the big movements
in companies the last few years. If you
go back to all those movements and you
say like why did that company start
flying whether it was like Abberrombie
back what it's all based on information
that we could have seen as regular
people. It's not information that Wall
Street was privy to that we weren't. So
like even if you look at stuff like
Nvidia, there's nothing about chat GPT
and Nvidia that Wall Street had access
to that we didn't. We all had access to
chat GPT at the same time as the hedge
fund managers and we could connect the
dots more quickly than they could
because they have a bureaucracy that
they they have to go through to get a
trade cleared. It could take them two
weeks, right? Like we we we're nimble.
like we see the world unfolding in real
time as just regular people and we're we
like we have our feet deeper in the real
world than some finance head on Wall
Street. So like I think this is the
golden age for retail investors because
we can see the world unfolding and we
can we have our Robin Hood app or
whatever app, right? And you and we're
not intimidated to trade on it. We all
know how to trade now. We all know how
to invest. By the way, we've all been
through kind of a couple bad cycles,
which is important. And we're no longer
making stupid mistakes like we were like
all the investors that came in during
the 2021 thing. They all lost they made
their le learn lessons. Um we're getting
smarter. This is the golden age. And by
the way, at the end of the day, with
change comes opportunity. And I
literally just told you that the biggest
change of our lifetime is about to
happen with AI. I don't know exactly how
it plays out. I don't know exactly who
the winners are, but there will be
winners, there will be losers. And the
change is about to be so big and so
massive and come on so quickly that it
will be the biggest investing
opportunity of a lifetime. And it's
ahead of us. It's not behind us. It's
like the next 5 years, the next 5 to
seven years. It's being able to invest
at the beginning of the industrial
revolution. It's amazing. I honestly
thought like during the internet age, I
was like, Dave, are we going to get
another one of these? I'm nerv I was
nervous that that was the last thing.
And then and then when mobile phone like
you the whole Facebook thing with social
media and with iPhone I was like god
that was a big thing. Are we going to
get another one of those? And then we
got cloud computing which is kind of big
but a little more obscure. Yeah. And I'm
like dude I don't know if we have
anything left. Is there going to be
another big one? And then like dude AI
happened. I was like no this can't be
real. It can't be real. Yeah. Because
like if this is real, this is bigger
than everything put together. And like
damn, it's going to be a good time to be
an investor the next 10 years. It is so
real and so prolific. And what's going
to happen the next 5 years as these as
this technology starts to get
productized because it's not productized
yet. That's what's so crazy. It's like
people are not using it. They're
literally not using it for what it can
do. Yeah, some of it has been
productized, but there's so much more to
go. And companies will form on top of
existing technology and the fact that
you can go onto a chatbot and code an
entire app and launch it in the app
store in a weekend is crazy to me. Chad
GBT, I was hanging out with some friends
and we wanted to do Jeopardy and it
created a straight I've never coded
before in my entire life. I know zero
about coding, but it walked me through
beginning to end how to create a
Jeopardy board out of code and I could
customize it exactly how I wanted to.
Hooked it up to my television and all of
a sudden we had Jeopardy. It came up
with all the questions. I was like, "Use
these categories. Do you think any other
category would be more fun?" I gave them
I gave Chach our gen uh our demographics
of like our age group. You know, we're
mostly men and it came up with the
categories created this entire thing
native to so it was in CatchBT2. I
didn't have to open up terminal. I
didn't have to, you know, open up Java.
Whatever you do, it was all in there.
Created Jeopardy had a blast. It was
insane. But any regular person right now
can go on the text image generator on
either Google or chat GPT or Grock. Play
around with it. And then I want you just
to think about all the applications just
for that one tool. And then remind
yourself that you're working on 1.0.
That tool 1.0. Think about what it's
going to be like in a year, two years.
Literally every single business manager
in the world at their fingertips can
create ad campaigns in one minute is
whatever is in their mind, whatever is
in their head. They can what's going to
stop eventually because if we keep going
down this path, what's going to end up
happening is that we're all going to be
hooked up to electrodes and then Chad
GPT is going to create the perfect
simulation and the perfect world for you
to be in where you don't have to spend
any money. You don't have to do
anything. are going to be hooked up in a
pod in some fluid. We're all going to be
like every science fiction movie.
Okay. And then all of a sudden you just
you just like kind of pulse every now
and then and sending like shots but in
your mind you're living like the dream
life and you could be hooked up to this
pod for like 50 bucks a month. How do
you know we're not already there from
another intelligent being from another
planet and we're just in their
simulation? But all but also guys, that
is the weirdest timing ever. See, it's a
sign. Oh my. That is that is insane. The
lights are blinking blinking now. It's
like Yeah. Yeah. You got it. All right,
Graham. That's interesting. Did we just
blow a fuse or are we in a simulation?
Do you ever use chatbt to make trades
for you? No. Like, do you ever run your
ideas by ChadBt as a heristic? Yeah, I I
ask ChatGBT about the company, about
things. I I get transcripts from
earnings calls from ChatGBT or Grock. I
I use it as an assistant. So like if I
discover a cultural shift or like a a
change in consumer behavior, I explain
it to chat GPT and I this used to take
me a lot of time to do manually, but
I'll say, "Hey, I'm identifying this
change, this shift in consumer behavior.
Can you help me identify industry
sectors and companies that are publicly
traded anywhere in the world that would
both benefit and be harmed by this
shift? And it will
basically give me all the companies and
sectors and its opinions. And that's my
1.0 for my doing my own research. Before
I would have to spend like six hours,
maybe maybe even 10 hours doing research
to do what that does for me in 20
seconds. So it just it just kind of
allows me to do more.
um with like the things that I'm
surfacing, but I haven't yet figured out
a way to allow it to surface. Yeah.
Surfacing the ideas much, but like using
it as your own personal research
assistant who can pull data for you.
Unbelievable. Unbelievable. Summarize a
lot of like you can you can just like
upload 200page PDFs and say, "Okay, give
me a gist of this. Is there anything
interesting in here?" And I use that all
the time. It it it's it's incredible.
And I think people keep going to the
fact that, oh, this is going to remove
all these jobs. Like, it's going to make
our economy small. Like, there you don't
need people. I'm like, no, no, no.
That's not how it's going. There will be
some job loss. But what I'm seeing more
of is you could do more with the people
you have. And because you could do more
with every individual person, as long as
that correlates to additional potential
for your company, you're likely now to
hire even more people because that one
person has the value of four, right? So
before a person could you really were
you really going to spend money to hire
that person if they could only generate
potentially this much more value for
your company? But if hiring that person
can generate this much more value for
your company and I know this isn't
instantaneous, right? Um but over the
long term, over the next decade, I think
that's how enterprise is going to think
about human capital. As long as that
human capital is savvy and they
understand how to leverage these tool
sets, I think we're going to see a
massive expansion in the global economy
as opposed to people getting left out of
it. And again, I am an optimist and I've
been kind of people rip on me for that.
But if you look at the history of the
world, that type of thinking has always
been correct. So that the down and out,
this is going to screw everyone and put
us put us out of jobs. There is some
truth there for some industry sectors
for some transitionary state of time,
but I'm fairly confident that this is
going to massively increase the
opportunity for human capital over the
next two decades because human capital
is going to be able to to constructively
do so much more with these new tool
sets. What do you think people are going
to look back on 10 years from now and
just say, I can't see I saw that coming?
Robots. The robots see that coming.
Robots are going to be everywhere in 10
to 15 years. Yeah. Me and Dave were we
you'll be interacting with them as just
it'll be just as normal as using your
phone all day every day. You'll be using
a robot. I I was I was driving on the
service road of a highway and there was
construction and Dave looked over uh
this is like a month ago and said it's
going to be weird in like eight or nine
years when we look over and for every
human doing that construction work there
will be like three or four bots working
with them. And it'll just be totally
normal the same way that tractors are
normal now where back in the day we just
saw humans doing the work and now we see
them with machinery. Japan thing that
they came out with that little like it
looks like a like a Wolverine that they
get on top of and it just like runs. It
was like a CGI thing but they came up
with this uh this like mobility thing.
guys, the stuff that I am seeing in the
last 60 days coming out of robotics and
the amount of talent that's moving into
the space, that's what's really
interesting. So the young kids, remember
I was kind of mentioning that Gen Z, all
of these young kids that would have gone
into like computer science or
programming, almost all these kids I'm
talking to right now are wanting to go
into electrical engineering, robotics,
like hard like it's wild. There's so
much human talent pouring into this
space. And as you you might not know
this, but China has earmarked $134
billion to ensure that they're the
global leader in robotics and humanoids.
And I hope that the US is going to do
something similar soon. I don't know if
it's a cash infusion, but just in terms
of like a national mandate that we're
not going to lose this arms race to
China. Yeah. I think what you're going
to see in the next 5 years is going to
blow your mind. It's going to melt your
mind. And in 10 years, you're going to
be like, we're living in a robotic
world. And it will be what ushers us
into the age of abundance that I love to
talk about. Um, where we just get to do
things that are more creative as humans
because a lot of the repetitive jobs are
going to get taken up by robotics and
automation. So I think it's robots in 10
years. Thank you too for coming on the
ice coffee hour. It really means so
much. I mean this is a lastm minute
podcast just because of everything crazy
that's been happening. So really
appreciate you guys making the time.
Thank you. We're going to link to your
info down below in the description.
Really appreciate it. Thank you to the
viewers for making it this far. Means a
lot. Subscribe if you haven't done that
already. Subscribe, like, comment if you
want. Yeah, the like button really helps
out, too. I hate asking for it, but it
actually does make a significant
difference for the video, for the entire
channel. So, if you're watching to this
point, just give it a quick like. It's
free. Subscribe if you haven't done that
already. It really does help out. Thank
you for watching, guys. Thanks so much.