"Modern World Is In Chaos" - How To Get Ahead of 99% of People In 2025 | Sam Harris
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
In this episode of Impact Theory, Sam Harris, a neuroscientist and philosopher, addresses how to navigate anxiety and find purpose in a chaotic modern world. He argues that anxiety is physiologically similar to excitement; the difference lies entirely in the "framing" or story one tells oneself about those sensations. By recognizing that negative emotions have an incredibly short half-life if not continuously reinforced by narrative thinking, individuals can achieve psychological freedom without needing to eliminate their physiological responses. Harris emphasizes that well-being is a skill set rather than a passive state of being, suggesting that the default human condition involves identifying with every thought and emotion as "self," which leads to unnecessary suffering. He advocates for mindfulness meditation not as an act of passivity or femininity, but as a rigorous discipline akin to Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu—a method for breaking free from reactive patterns and maintaining control over one's mental state even when facing internal threats like intrusive thoughts. Harris discusses the malleability of belief systems, asserting that our beliefs must map onto reality to avoid suffering caused by bumping into hard objects or social friction. He warns against dogmatism, which he defines as holding propositions with such emotional intensity that one becomes hostile toward evidence and conversation. Instead, he proposes adopting a scientific attitude in all areas of life, including meaning-making and ethics, rather than partitioning reality where science is rigorous but morality is not. A core organizing principle for Harris is the utility of skills; whether it is learning architecture to build seed vaults or mastering martial arts for self-defense, acquiring abilities that have real-world applications provides a clear direction for improvement. He contrasts this with the "slave-like mentality" of avoiding work and punishment, urging listeners to constantly upgrade their cognitive firmware by remaining open to error correction through human conversation and education. The conversation also explores the distinction between the "experiencing self," which lives in the immediate moment, and the "remembering self," which constructs a narrative about one's life satisfaction. Harris suggests that while people often seek global meaning or religious stories to console themselves against disappointment, these narratives are less important than maintaining intrinsic well-being in every fleeting moment of experience. He acknowledges the role of pharmacology for clinical depression but stresses that normal psychological suffering is largely a product of unexamined thinking patterns. To counter feelings of pointlessness, he recommends techniques such as gratitude and negative imagination—visualizing all the bad things that haven't happened to you yet—to reframe one's perspective instantly without changing material circumstances. Ultimately, Harris identifies artificial intelligence as perhaps the most consequential topic for humanity today because getting it wrong could lead to misery or extinction, making it a prime example of an idea that is both intellectually interesting and highly significant. He encourages individuals to engage honestly with such ideas while cultivating skills that allow them to flourish regardless of external outcomes. By integrating these principles—mindfulness, scientific rigor regarding beliefs, the pursuit of useful skills, and awareness of one's internal narrative—individuals can get ahead of 99% of people by taking control of their own minds rather than being hostage to ancestral fears or tribalistic impulses. This approach allows for a life where actions are aligned with reality, emotions are managed through state shifts like laughter or attention redirection, and the ultimate goal is effortless cooperation with others in a thriving civilization.
Read the full video transcript
If you're feeling anxiety,
there's actually a a place from which
you can just feel it, right? And and be
actually indifferent to it or anything
else you could be feeling. I mean, first
you can notice that anxiety isn't even
that unpleasant. I mean, it's it's so
close to excitement in its actual
physiology that really the difference
between excitement and anxiety is more
or less just the the the framing. It's
just the story you're telling yourself.
You know, if you felt these these
tingles
uh and this, you know, slightly
adrenalized response right before, you
know, you're about to go on a roller
coaster, that's part of why you're going
on the roller coaster. You like that
experience, right? But the fact that
you're feel that way when you're about
to have an interview or you're about to,
you know, walk out on stage, that's
intolerable, right? So, just dropping
back and and realizing the the power of
the framing, it has immense utility
because then you can realize that the
the half-life of negative emotions is
incredibly short.
Hey everybody, welcome to Impact Theory.
Our goal with this show and company is
to introduce you to the people and ideas
that will help you actually execute on
your dreams.
All right, today's guest is a
neuroscientist, philosopher, and a
five-time New York Times best-selling
author. His book, The End of Faith, won
the 2005 PEN Award for nonfiction and
spent an astonishing 33 weeks on the New
York Times bestseller list. He has a
degree in philosophy from Stanford, a
PhD in neuroscience, and he's practiced
meditation for more than 30 years. A
combination that gives him a very unique
perspective that has made him one of the
most sought-after thinkers on the
planet. He's given multiple TED Talks
with millions of views and his written
works have been translated into more
than 20 different languages.
Additionally, he's written for some of
the most prestigious publications around
including The New York Times, the Los
Angeles Times, and the Annals of
Neurology to name but a few. A clear and
rational voice almost without peer on
some of today's most difficult subjects.
When he speaks, thousands of people show
up in real life and millions listen
online.
And his ideas have been discussed by
some of the most visible and
well-respected outlets in the world
including Time, The New York Times,
Scientific American, Nature, and
countless others. He's also the host of
the Webby award-winning podcast Making
Sense which was named by Apple as one of
the iTunes Best. So, please help me in
welcoming the man who has spent roughly
two years in aggregated silent
contemplation, one of the four horsemen
of the non-apocalypse, Sam Harris.
What's up, man? How you doing?
Welcome.
Yeah, thank you.
Absolute pleasure to have you.
Yeah, pleasure to be here. I'm really
excited to dive into the some of these
subjects which I think you have just
such a fascinating take on. And the
thing that I've drawn the most wisdom
from with you is what and and these are
very much my words,
how to live a good life.
And that's where I want to start and
it'd be really interesting to hear your
definition of like what kind of life and
way of thinking should we be aiming for?
Yeah, well, it's a hard question because
I my notion of human well-being is
really open-ended. I don't think we
understand what the horizon is if in
fact there is one for kind of ultimate
flourishing of conscious minds. We have
a pretty good sense of what we don't
want and are right not to want. We don't
want to be terrorized and
depressed and
find ourselves constantly in conflict
with strangers, finding our aims
frustrated. I mean
the generic
situation we want to find ourselves in
more and more is to effortlessly
cooperate with creative and happy
strangers, right? I mean that there's 7
billion of us. We have We need
institutions and laws and norms
uh and ways of thinking that take the
friction out of pleasurable and
non-paranoid interaction with strangers.
I mean it's not just about having, you
know, five or so close friends who's got
who have your back, right? I mean you
like clearly
we're all on the same team on some basic
level. And if we can't figure out how to
build a civilization where everyone
thrives to some degree, we'll have the
world we currently have until it becomes
unsustainable. And because it we're in
the a situation now where
I I think it's reasonable to worry that
our default state of partisanship and
tribalism and
um
rational fear of the incompatible aims
of, you know, other groups and other
people
uh is unsustainable in the presence of
more and more destructive technology. I
just think I I I think we have to get
our act together psychologically and
socially in a way that we haven't yet.
And when you think about that coming
down to the personal level,
um do you think about people as having a
a North Star or a purpose that they
should be pursuing? And to contextualize
that, I'll say um
because I always found myself wanting to
ask people that, I ended up answering
the question for myself. And so for me,
the purpose of my life from my
perspective is to um see how much of my
potential I can actuate. So how how many
skills can I acquire that have meaning
and utility to me that allow me to serve
not only myself but others. And so that
sense of pushing myself to always get
better, to always improve, to show up
every day, um and not think about
whether I
get something, cross some finish line,
generate a certain amount of wealth, or
anything like that, but just
do I sincerely approach the idea of
bettering myself in a very specific
direction based on what I want to
accomplish in my life or not. And if I
do that sincerely, then I say that the
day or the life has been a victory. And
if I don't do that, then to me I'm
pointed in the wrong direction. Do you
have any sort of guiding light like that
that say you would try to pass on to
your children or that you yourself have
for you?
Well, I I think that's a good one and I
share it, but I can imagine
uh
other versions of having a an aim which
don't really totally overlap with that.
I mean, say, you know, it would be you
know, someone could decide for instance
that they have a talent
that is highly marketable
and what they want to do is make as much
money as possible so that they can give
a lot of it away to help people. I mean,
money money is is just energy, right? It
just you know, if you are making
billions of dollars and you're giving
billions of dollars away to good causes
well, that, you know, on an effective
altruism metric, that's
that's much better than you going to
Africa yourself and handing out food,
you know, in a famine, right? You want
to be
bankrolling thousands of people to do
that, right?
Uh and if you have the a skill, you
know, if you're a a great singer or
whatever and and uh it may be some a
skill that you didn't spend a lot of
time to acquire, right? So, you you
don't have this whole mastery story that
you have and that actually resonates
with me.
Um
So, that that would be a good life, you
know, provided you can extract the
psychological satisfaction from it cuz
most of what we experience in
philanthropy is
uh when it when it's telescopic in this
way, when you're just signing a check,
you're not necessarily connected to the
good you're doing and I can imagine
uh someone doing immense good in the
world by signing very large checks, but
not actually internalizing the
gratification of that. On some level, we
have to be aware of the possibility of
rowing in two boats simultaneously.
There's what the effects are in the
world of how we're living. So, you you
know, we we want to have a a good impact
on others,
but we actually want our conscious
states of psychological pain and
pleasure to be mapped in some rational
way to the kinds of effects we're
having, right? So, you don't want to be
a callous person who's just leaving
devastated and unhappy people in your
wake and taking pleasure in that. I
mean, that you're a psychopath if that's
that's how you're tuned. Um but you also
don't want to be a person who's doing a
lot of good in the world, but not able
to internalize the felt sense of your
connectedness to others because you're,
you know, you're too neurotic or you're
too distracted or you're just not, you
know, connecting with others. So, It's
really interesting and I don't think
I've ever heard anybody else talk about
that notion of making sure that you're
mapping what you're doing to sort of be
outwardly altruistic to actually map to
your own um internal state of
well-being, if you will. And hearing the
discussions that you've been around
Islam and how beliefs and ideas can be
really dangerous made me ask a question
of how um and basically I'll I'll I'll
quickly summarize. So, you've got people
that they have a book and the book has
ideas and things that they are meant to
believe and then act in accordance with.
And because of where they grew up or,
you know, what their parents and the
society around them taught them, they
internalize those beliefs. And if we
could, through um communicating our
ideas well to them, get them to see um
something that caused more well-being
for other people, then that would be a
better way to move their belief system.
So, one, do you believe that a belief
system is malleable in that there's some
element of where you could choose this
set of ideology or you could choose this
um
and I don't know if you would say that
one of those is is more true than the
other but certainly one may take us
closer to well-being than the other. Um
and if you think that belief systems are
by their very nature malleable things,
what would sort of be the belief system
in just like a couple tenants that you
could hand to somebody that you think
would help them maximize their own
well-being as well as serve a greater
good.
Speaking generically, I think
having our beliefs map on to reality to
some degree is obviously good because if
you if they're not, you're just bumping
into hard objects. You know, what you
know, like if your map is completely
wrong, you are bound to suffer, right?
So, we have to be in a situation where
radical ignorance can't be bliss, right?
So, that's that's one principle. Now,
there could be a looseness of fit. There
could be situations where
being
strictly right about what's true
may be non-optimal, right? There may be
it may be useful to have a slightly
delusional self-serving bias, right? To
think you're coming off better than you
are. Well, like it may give you more
enthusiasm for your life and more
confidence, but
anything that's too out of register is
just delusion, right? And other people
notice and other people treat you like
somebody who's just not tracking in a
reality. Uh and so,
that's one principle. So, I think we
want our beliefs to be true in some
basic sense.
And therefore, we want to be open to new
evidence and better arguments
perpetually, right? Because if you're if
you close yourself off, if you say,
"Well, listen, I'm done. I'm done
thinking about reality and I know what's
true."
then again, when when more data comes
in, you know, when something surprising,
when when when when one of your
intuitions proves to be faulty,
if you can't error correct, again,
you're just going to fall out of
alignment with what's going on in the
world and what with what other people
think is true as well. So, that really
the only mechanism we have to do that is
human conversation. But we we have to be
open to
having other people point out errors in
our thinking, and we have you know in in
and in the conversation we have with
ourselves, we have to do likewise. We
have to be continually open to the
possibility that we might be wrong and
in fact we're very likely to be wrong a
lot of the time.
And so then, you know, then hence the
virtue of getting educated and
surrounding yourself with smart people
and reading good books and just exposing
yourself to
the kinds of lessons that
other people
have learned over, you know, thousands
of years and are learning in real time
right now, and
you can live vicariously through You
don't have to make all the errors that
everyone has made around you. So, you
don't have to So, like you can look at
Lance Armstrong and say, "Okay, well,
it's probably not not a good idea to
lie, you know, relentlessly about
something and then try to punish the
people who caught you in your lies and
then get caught and have to wind up on
Oprah apologizing." Right? I mean,
that's, you know, you can you can
internalize that lesson and understand
something about the the ethics and
reputational costs of lying.
Uh
so
given that con- given that conversation
and an openness to the intrusions of
other people's thinking is
really the the the best game in town for
understanding what reality is and how to
navigate within it,
then you can see how
non-optimal
and you know, ultimately dangerous
dogmatism is. Now, dogmatism is just
holding to an idea no matter what else
comes into view, right? So, there's
nothing you can say to challenge that
that I'm I'm so, you know, I'll talk to
you about all this stuff, but over here
there's something that I care about.
It's some proposition, you know, some
assertion that something is true that I
care about so much. I'm so emotionally
attached to it that not only is it
non-negotiable,
if you continue to push over here, I'm
going to get angrier and angrier, right?
I'm going to I'm going to threaten you
with violence, right? That is the
default state of organized religion,
right? Historically and I mean you know,
certain religions now have kind of
relaxed their
intolerance to a degree where the the
the violence isn't explicit, but that is
the not only is that the default of
faith-based religion,
they have a a way of thinking about
dogmatism. I mean dogmatism is a good
word in the context of religion. I mean
Christian dogma is not is not a
derogatory term. They call it dogma for
a reason, right?
I can't certainly can't the Catholics
do. So,
the this this notion that you can
believe something strongly without
evidence or certainly without good
evidence or without evidence that can
survive pressure from outside. So, the
the idea that wanting evidence is a
perversion of your circumstance, right?
So, like you you know, you really if you
if you buy this thing in the bag that
you keep that I haven't shown you, you
are that that redounds to your credit,
right? Uh it's just it's one is not true
because the experiential core of these
religions I mean the experiences like
unconditional love, say, those can be
experienced. I mean that it's not that
everything in our religious literature
is is untrue, but there's nothing that
has to be believed on insufficient
evidence to be explored. And so, I what
I recommend here is that we really adopt
a scientific attitude everywhere. We
don't partition our thinking about
reality where we say, "Well, the here's
the stuff over here where
super important, but we can't think
about it too rigorously, right? To in
fact, I think about it too rigorously is
to corrupt it. And then over here we've
got, you know, science and technology
and you know,
engineers to calculate on a bridge is
going to, you know, withstand the weight
of the traffic on it. And there we can
think rigorously. So you you know, don't
tell me about rigor with respect to
meaning and you know, what what's worth
living for and what's worth dying for
and you know, what
what is love and compassion and
well-being. Like that's all that has to
be just
we have to be hostage to a conversation
that our ancestors were having 2,000
years ago and we have to imagine that
certain of our books were dictated by
the creator of the universe to organize
all that. But over here, let's get let's
get it all dialed in because we really
care about how our smartphones work,
right? It makes It makes no sense. It's
trying to trying to resolve that tension
is something I've spent a lot of time
on.
It's It's interesting to me that that
tension exists and it makes me come back
to, okay, why doesn't that tension exist
in my own life? And the organizing
principle that I use
and I think a lot about like, what would
somebody pass on to their children? Now,
I've decided not to have kids, so I will
never get to answer this, but I spend a
lot of time thinking about, what are the
organizing principles? You've referred
to ideas as sort of the operating system
of the mind.
And I that seems very apt to me. So,
what are the organizing principles that
I would give somebody to think in a
certain way? And one of the things I'm
obsessed with and I think I explained
this so poorly, I don't see it light
people's eyes up and I'd love to figure
out how to say it well, which is this:
Skills have utility.
Now, what I mean by that is learning
architecture is interesting because it
allows you to build a structure that
could protect somebody. Allows you to
build a structure that to really make it
basic, um, like the one, I forget
exactly what country it's in, but the
seed vault, right? Like you understand
architecture well enough and how to
ventilate things and all the things that
seeds would need to like live for a very
long time so that we could replant if we
had to.
Learning those skills
had a purpose and that purpose allows
for something to happen. And so, let's
take Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu, which I know
that you do Jiu-Jitsu. Mhm.
Everything that you learn in Jiu-Jitsu
has a real-world implication. And that
real-world implication is, one, if you
got into a fight, you'd probably be more
likely to be able to successfully defend
yourself. And that in and of itself is
is so profound as to be worth the time.
Now, there's obviously all kinds of
other benefits as well, but once people
understand, "Okay, these skills have
utility, then I need to be fiendish
about increasing my skill set because it
has real-world applications." So, the
the problem that I get into where people
are dogmatic about anything, whether
it's religion or like I wrote this
belief system, okay? It was the 25
things that I had to do to my mind in
order to go from being a good employee,
which I always lovingly refer to as sort
of a slave-like mentality. I kept my
head down, did as little work as
possible, and avoided punishment at all
costs. That's where I started. That's
what my parents taught me to do.
And to get out of that and to become an
entrepreneur, there were these very
simple, write-downable things that I had
to choose to believe and act in
accordance with.
And if you came to me and said, "Hey
Tom, by the way, number 14 on your list
doesn't make sense, and it doesn't make
sense for this reason. I think you
misunderstood something about your own
journey." I'd be like, "That's so rad!"
Because now you're giving me something
that has more utility than the thing
that I've used thus far.
One, what why do you think that breaks
down? What is it that people value more
than that? Is there some internal thing?
And then, what process can people use to
become more aware of
what's guiding their decision-making?
Cuz I think a lot of people, I don't
know if it's just at a feeling level.
It's like a limbic thing or what?
Well, I think it's a framing problem
because
most of what people care about can be
thought of as a skill, right? I mean,
well-being is is a skill. Not suffering
unnecessarily is a skill. Regulating
noticing your emotional life and
regulating negative emotion is a skill.
I saw you know I have a meditation app
and you know meditation is a skill it's
a it's a very useful one and I'm
spending a lot of time teaching
you know what's now referred to as
mindfulness meditation.
And the moment you begin practicing
mindfulness which is just just learning
to pay close attention to the nature of
your experience. You're not adding
anything to your experience you're just
noticing what it's like to be you moment
to moment but in a way that is
not reactive. You're not grasping at
what's pleasant or pushing what's
unpleasant away you're just I mean to
make this concrete I mean let's say you
have a fear of public speaking right so
you about to go down out on stage and
you feel anxiety.
The the usual the default state of
someone who doesn't want to have that
experience is to try to figure is is one
to you know in advance worry about that
experience. I mean the anxiety is
kindled just by the mere thought of what
you have to do. Then once you feel the
butterflies
you
are at war with them right you you
contract your mind contracts around it
your conversation with yourself is is an
unhappy one it's like why the [ __ ] am I
this person who just can't like I see
people do this all the time they're
they're relaxed I'm unhappy you know
when am I and you're you're you're
talking to yourself you're not noticing
it because you're the thoughts just come
up from behind you as fast as as as they
can and they seem to be you right you're
identified with each thought that
emerges in consciousness.
And most people live their lives as
though there's no alternative.
We're not given a rulebook for how to
operate a human mind right and there's
no place in a normal education where
where where uh
where it's even indicated that there's
no alternative here and so we get we
kind of stumble out into adulthood
more or less assuming that we have we'll
always have the minds we have and that
really there's you know you the only
thing we can do to really upgrade our
firmware is to
just add new content you know we can
read books we can we
develop interest, but
there's nothing
at the sort of root level of our
emotional and cognitive life that can
change. And so mindfulness is a way of
kind of dropping a little bit lower and
and realizing so in this case
if you're feeling anxiety
there's actually a a place from which
you can just feel it, right? And and be
actually indifferent to it or anything
else you could be feeling. I mean just
just notice that there's even a an
unpleasant sensation.
I mean first you can notice that anxiety
isn't even that unpleasant. I mean it's
so close to excitement in its actual
physiology that really the difference
between excitement and anxiety is more
or less just the the the framing. It's
just the story you're telling yourself.
You know, if you felt these these
tingles
and this, you know, slightly adrenalized
response right before, you know, you're
about to go on a roller coaster, that's
part of why you're going on the roller
coaster. You like that experience,
right? But the fact that you're feeling
that way when you're about to have an
interview or you're about to, you know,
walk out on stage that's intolerable,
right? So just dropping back and and
realizing the the power of the framing
is again this is a skill that is a
fairly esoteric one, but now, you know,
many people are are learning it. You
know, the secret's out. Um
and it has immense utility because then
you can realize that the
the half-life of negative emotions is
incredibly short. I mean one you could
you can actually be psychologically free
even in their presence, right? Your your
your freedom and your well-being isn't
even predicated on getting rid of the
physiology, right? It like it can it can
still be there, but if you're not
continually thinking about all the
reasons why you should be anxious
the physiology dissipates very very
quickly. And that's true for anger, it's
true for anything that that is
classically negative.
And
um
so to come back to your question, but
you know,
many of the things that people think
they want out of life,
they either think are or or many or many
of the the
the ways they're keeping score about how
good their lives are or aren't,
they're not seen as these are either
you know, this experience is being
delivered to them either based on the
skills they have or the skills they've
never thought to acquire, right? And
uh yeah, so that's that's one thing I
would add to the the picture of the the
usefulness of skills. I want to talk
about the emotional control that you
bring up. I think that's super powerful.
When my wife and I were first married,
my problem was I have a very slow fuse
or very long fuse. And so, it takes a
lot to get me angry. And that was
actually a big complaint of hers. She'd
be really annoyed. Something would
happen, someone would cut in front of us
in line, and I wouldn't freak out. And
she wanted me to freak out. And she
wanted me to like just bask in how
unjust it was. And
she would really lament that. And it
just seemed so strange to me. But then
when I got mad, I would stay mad.
Yeah. And there were times I would stay
mad 8, 10, 12 hours. And I was working
so much at the beginning of our
relationship. The only time that we
really had together as husband and wife
would be for part of a Saturday.
And I would inevitably she would say
something, it would upset me, I would
get pissed, and I would stay pissed the
entire time. But then as you said, once
you stop reinforcing it, which I would
do unfortunately, I'd be reinforcing and
reinforcing and reinforcing it, then
something would happen, it would change
my neurochemistry. I'd forget like why
was I so mad? Every single time I was
like,
"Why did I just waste that time being
mad?" So, I end up writing myself this
letter. And I gave it to my wife and I
said, "Read that to me the next time I
get pissed off."
And in the letter I said, "Hey me, it's
me. I have no hidden agenda here as to
why I want you to calm down other than
the fact that you know that if you end
up being pissed for several hours,
you're you're going to regret it every
single time. And
right now, I want you to laugh out loud.
And for however long it takes, just
laugh out loud. You know, studies show
that you can't laugh out loud and remain
pissed. And so,
I gave it to her. I got pissed. She read
it. She only had to read it once. It was
so profoundly transformational to see
that just by laughing out loud, I
couldn't stay angry, that it really
helped me get control of my emotions, so
that I knew I can do a what I'll call a
state shift. I don't think I've ever
heard you use that kind of language, but
if I'm angry, I'm choosing to stay
angry.
Yeah.
Unfortunately, I hadn't found meditation
at that point, so I had to sort of brute
force my way to that. What can people do
to learn to get control of their
emotions?
Mhm.
Well, I the first thing to realize is
that they already have control. Like
virtually anyone watching this, I would
expect, can do this under certain
circumstances. So, the the one example I
would
have you recall is I'm truth to almost
everyone. You're in some state like
that. You're you're angry. You've just
gotten triggered by something.
Uh but then the phone rings, right? And
the phone it's it's you're getting
called by somebody who this is not
someone for you to process your anger
with. This is like a business call or
like you have to function, right? And it
actually
perfectly interrupts your state. You
actually can just reset and uh
have the conversation and the physiology
is dissipating very, very quickly there.
Your attention is on something else and
you're just having to function. Now, of
course, if somebody if if it's a friend
or your mother or somebody who you can
complain to, well, then you'll you'll
jump on and you'll you'll amplify the
state because you'll you'll have a
reason to talk about it.
Uh so, you you can interrupt these
states
and simply put your attention on
something else and and then, you know,
and then it dissipates.
One thing that uh I'm really curious to
know, you seem just
freakishly educated on a whole lot of
topics. What is your process for
learning? How do you go about
intaking data? How do you start? Do you
pull threads? What thread do you pull
first if you do? Like, how do you really
begin to educate yourself on any given
topic?
Well, I don't really have I mean I I
take in a lot of information and I
always have, so that's you know,
and not in necessarily an efficient or
smart way. I mean so I don't I don't
have, you know, life hacks that that um
optimize me as a
consumer of information. So, you like
you know,
I know there are ways that are
recommended to read a book so as to
extract the you know, the the actionable
information as as quickly as possible
from it. I have never been
an adopter of any of those ways. So,
like you know, and I mean worse still, I
basically read everything at the same
speed. So, like I read everything like a
scripture. So, if it's you know, you
know, People magazine in a waiting room
of a dentist's office, I'm reading that
at the same speed that I'm reading, you
know, a work of philosophy or
neuroscience. And the big change of
late, I mean the you know, I guess this
is probably happened somewhere around 10
years ago is that what once I realized
that
there's functionally an infinite amount
of information to consume. You know,
it's doubling in the sciences every 3 to
5 years and you know, there are
literally thousands of good books that I
will wish I had read, but I will never
get around to reading.
Um I've become a very fickle reader
uh in the sense that I you know, I I I
cut my losses very early. The sunk cost
fallacy has completely disappeared from
me. The idea that I've, you know, spent
5 hours or 5 days on this thing, so I
better just finish it, right? That used
to be my orientation with respect to
reading books. Now, I'll I'll discard a
book, you know, just on a whim because I
know there's an infinite amount of stuff
I want to read. You know, I don't go
into the table of contents and look at
the structure of the book and then go to
the index and then look at the topics
and then I mean I I just start on page
one and start reading and then when I
get bored I stop, you know, and
uh
so that's uh you know, do what do with
what do with that life hack what you
will.
But um
I do
continually I mean I'm either listening
to audiobooks or podcasts or the news
when I'm working out or commuting or or
um
you know, I'm just uh
you know, constantly taking in in
information, you know, fairly passively
when I'm multitasking. Uh so there's
not, you know, that I mean the one thing
that that I don't have a lot of in my
life is music because I you know, I
can't write to to music, certainly not
music with lyrics.
I can't podcast to music obviously. Uh
and I've decided that there's so much
that I'm interested in. There's so much
that I want to know that basically I
just hear music by accident now. I mean
I just like if someone else is playing
music or if I walk into a store, there's
music associated with a film, it's
getting in, but um otherwise I'm just
you know, I'm I it's just a fire hose of
information pointed at my head most of
the time.
No, I get that. So,
despite the uh the perchance haphazard
way that you're reading, it does seem at
least from the outside that you are
striving, I would say, pretty truly for
excellence.
Help me reconcile. So, one of the things
I struggled with with meditation was it
felt decidedly feminine um and in a way
that as somebody who I felt I felt that
um certainly growing up that I was far
more on the feminine end of being a guy
than anything else. And so for me, my
journey certainly to being an
entrepreneur was one of toughening up.
Um and so anything that that made me
sort of feel that old school sort of
gentle way,
um
I would push back on and it's why I
didn't meditate for a long time. Um but
I see you you doing Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu,
you're somebody who obviously cares
about martial arts and being able to
fight and defend yourself. I've heard
you talk very eloquently about
um violence and clearly in your
professional life, you've just even just
what you've done in the writing let
alone the lecturing, you've already
achieved such massive success. I refuse
to believe that there wasn't a just
massive amount of energy behind that.
So, how do you think about meditation in
that context? Is this like going to war
with your mind and you're I'm going to
come out the other side having faced
demons uh and having won some sort of
victory that allows me to perform at a
higher level or am I totally missing all
of this and it needs to be a letting go
of a more peaceful, relaxed sort of
transient experience? Yeah, well, I mean
first that's a very common association.
I mean I totally understand it and and
it's presented in many ways
where yeah, you under that framing you
can just feel the testosterone leaving
your body, you know.
Uh so, uh
yeah, that's not my orientation. It is a
lot like Jiu-Jitsu for the mind and it's
and it's a lot like it
I mean what's so beautiful about
Jiu-Jitsu in particular is that
you can have this massive effect in the
domain of violence
while being relaxed. It is what Aikido
off- you know, advertises itself to be,
but it's a much more, you know, at least
in my estimation, a much more effective
version of that same
underlying ethic where you can like like
you can control someone
uh
and
use as a little violence as as necessary
and basically just use
a superior knowledge of physics and
leverage and position against them. So,
it's it's a very it can be incredibly
relaxed and yet
um
given what what the circumstance is, it
can be a
a a very high testosterone in the
experience, you know, it's not so kind
of quintessentially
um
masculine thing to be doing.
But
uh you can internalize the same sort of
structure
and that's largely what meditation is
because basically the the default state
is one of being attacked and ambushed
all the time by your thoughts and by
your reactivity and by uh
you're being taken in
by assumptions and and illusions and not
know you know just you just you're
you're in a fog. Uh not you personally
but you know one is and um
you know, even when you learn to
meditate you're in this fog most of the
time. I mean and so you're
so the practice
is one of continually breaking the
spell. You are constantly on the mat,
constantly finding yourself in a
position of some surprising
disadvantage, right? Like it's like all
of a sudden there's a rear naked choke
that's you know 3/4 applied, right? And
you need an answer for that and not
knowing the answer is just synonymous
with death, right? It's like you're
you're just getting you know
you're just you'll be as miserable for
as long as as circumstances dictate in
the absence of a of
Really fast and and and I shudder to
interrupt this cuz I find it so
interesting tying it to BJJ but
um I need to know why is it or I want it
said why is it that the identification
with the I or the these never any
thoughts why do they create suffering?
Well, it's just the ego is
at bottom it is itself a kind of
contraction. I mean when you look at
what you you're this feeling of self is,
right? So I mean let's just talk about
what the the sense of self is.
The sense of self for most of us is not
a feeling that we're identical with our
bodies. Most people don't feel identical
with their physical bodies. They feel
like they're passengers inside their
bodies, right? They like like my body's
down here like these are my hands, these
are my legs. You know, I obviously care
about these things. You know, if if you
know, I I you know, this these are where
my pains and pleasures are coming from.
But I'm up here in the head.
And I'm a kind of passenger. I'm a
witness of this.
Uh
and if you look, I mean most people when
they try to pay attention, they try to
find themselves. They try to you know,
they uh
they try to meditate,
they feel that they're a locus of
attention in the head behind their face,
behind their eyes. You know, looking out
at the world and the world is not self.
You know, you're you're over there, I'm
looking across space at you. I'm here
behind my face. And my face is a kind of
mask, really. I mean, it's like I'm not
I'm not identical to my face. I mean, I
I
it's it states manner to me. Like if I
have some weird expression on my face,
you know, or like someone said, like
we're going to can we take a picture of
you and you can't figure out how to
smile and you're you feel uptight. Like
you're you're reading the state of your
face as you know, your emotions are
playing on your on your face, right?
The the signature of the emotion you're
feeling has a lot to do with what you
feel in your face.
Um and it feeds back into your mind. If
you force yourself to smile, you you can
you actually feel a state of happiness
coming in your in your mind.
Uh
but people feel like they're behind
their face in their head, right? And so
that you know, kind of homunculus that
that that person in the head,
which we know doesn't make any sense
neurologically. There's no place in the
brain where there could be a little, you
know, consciousness that is one thing,
that is the stable self that's looking
out through the eyes, right? Uh
there's a flow of experience and you
know, it's it is invoking you know, many
regions of the brain at all times and
there is no you you are identical
to this flow of experience. This this
stream of consciousness
is what you are as a matter of
subjectivity, right? I'm not I'm not
meant I'm not saying that it's not
arising in the brain or that bodies
aren't real or that there's no physical
universe. I'm saying as a matter of
experience
there is just this flow of consciousness
and its contents. And yet we seem to put
this unchanging center to it. And that
is a the what what that is, you know,
what the what is giving us that feeling
that there is an unchanging center to
this flow
is this sort of this contracted
identification with thought. It is a
kind of thought. It is just each moment
of, you know, if I'm saying something
and it doesn't make sense or it's it's
it sounds like [ __ ] and the part of
it the part that the the experience in
you which says, "Oh, that's not right."
Right? That
feels like you, right? I mean, you're
not you're not witnessing it as an
object in consciousness just arise and
pass away. It sort of has come up from
behind and it just feels like that's me,
right? And but that thing is always
happening that that's me feeling is
always happening. And so
you just feel like you're in your head
behind your face, right?
Well, for two reasons. There's two sides
of this coin. So much of our of of what
we're thinking is making us miserable,
right? So much of it is unpleasant. So
much of it is causing anxiety. We got we
look at your to-do list, you got 50
things on it. You just feel like, "Oh my
god, there's just the day is not long
enough." Right? This is you know, the
state and that's a good you know, that's
a you know, high-class problem to have,
right? There are many you know, there
are worse problems. Uh
this is the state we're in.
And the obverse of that is when we're
really just
connecting with life in a joyful,
creative, beautiful way. Like when you
look out the window and it's the most
beautiful sunset ever,
and you are just looking at the sunset,
right? You're not you like you're fully
connected with its beauty.
Uh
those are all moments where you're
losing this sense of of self. But the
difference between meditation and those
moments is that
you're not really aware of losing the
sense of self in those moments. You're
not You're not really aware of what is
uh freeing about those moments and you
can't do it in other circumstances. Like
Like you can't like you know, I need the
I need the beautiful sunset. Just
looking at your shoe isn't a good enough
for me, right? But with with meditation,
I can actually look at your shoe in the
same way that I look at the sunset.
Right? So, that's the like what's what's
what's happening for people most people
is that they're waiting for the world to
give them a good enough reason to just
be present. And to be present so fully
that they lose their sense of of self.
Right? They're they're no longer behind
their face. You know,
just waiting for something good to
happen. Right? Or or figuring out how to
change the the experience enough so that
again, they can stop They're they're no
longer at war. I mean, we're we're
To a greater or lesser degree,
we're always at war. I mean, we're we're
always fighting something. You know,
there's always this like you know,
you're always noticing something wrong.
You're feeling uncomfortable in your
body. You're reacting to something that
somebody did or you thought they did.
You're navigating a social encounter
that seems off-kilter, you know, it's
awkward and like you're trying to figure
out what to say and that would that
sounded stupid and like you're you're
you're just being blown around. And
the moments where you really feel good
are moments where you can you are
there isn't a
a coming to rest, right? Where it's not
about the past or future. You know, it's
it's not even about It's not about half
a second ago. It's not about half a
second from now. And the ultimate
version of that is to
entails the dropping of this this sense
of self.
Is everything you do about flourishing
for you? Unfortunately not. I mean, that
I mean, that you know, I mean, wisdom
would be
really being able to track what is going
to matter, you know, at the end of the
day or at the end of a life. For me,
flourishing
is a matter of
spending your time
presently
and happily and creatively
uh
and having fun, but in all the ways
which
it every moment when someone asks you,
well, you know, that last hour, that
last day, that last week, that last
year,
do you feel good about that? Was that a
good use of your time?
That remembering self, that
retrospective
gesture,
that's where people worry about things
like meaning, right? I mean, that's like
it's like there's two I mean, to use,
you know, Danny Kahneman's
framing here, there's the experiencing
self and there's the remembering self.
And the remembering self is the self
that you're talking to when you say, you
know, are you are you satisfied with
your life, whether you're asking
yourself or someone's asking you.
And
the answers that are available in that
in those moments really determine
whether or not somebody has a kind of
global life satisfaction, whether they
have meaning. And those are that's the
those are the moments where people feel
like, you know, I need religion, I need
to know I you know, I need to know how
the the the far future is going to be. I
need like I need some story
to tell myself that is fundamentally
consoling.
But the experiencing self, the the self
that is just going in moment to moment,
feeling pains and pleasure and uh
just dealing with dealing with this the
very short, you know, time horizon,
uh
I think that is
that's fundamentally our real self. I
mean, the the remembering self is the
is a version of that. You know, if you
ask me, are you satisfied with your
life? And I you know, spend the next 30
seconds telling you about that, that is
yet another, you know, brief chapter in
my experiencing self, right? And most of
life
is it is
a story is is, you know, is getting a
getting summed over this this this
lifeline of the experiencing self. And
their
questions of meaning
and a kind of global story to tell
yourself about what this all is all
about are are far less important than
people think. I mean, I think I think
you want to be playing both games
intelligently. You don't want
to be absorbed in in pleasures which
every time you think about your life
have you feeling
God, I'm just wasting my life. I'm just,
you know, I'm a superficial guy, you
know, I've, you know, I got wealthy and
now I just, you know, do heroin and play
golf, right? And it's just fun, you
know, I like you whenever you check in
with me, I I feel pretty good cuz I
have, you know, an unlimited supply of
heroin and golf. Uh but
it's
you know, I can't really, you know, I'm
sort of embarrassed by it every time I
have to talk about it, right? That like
that's not the, you know, you you you do
want so over here you'd still do want
uh
you want your pleasures to be justified
by good relationships and a and a a
world that cares about your inputs and
outputs, right? So like you're you're
like you want
you know, you want what you're paying
attention to all day long to matter to
someone else. And we're so deeply
social.
It's not wrong to want those things.
Uh but again
it's possible to have a a a
purchase on well-being that is deeper
than any one of those things. So that
when you lose one of those things,
right? When you find out that the the
thing you thought
people would love, they actually hated,
right? You know, the the television show
you wrote or the novel you wrote or
whatever you you invested all this time,
you had a hope for this thing, but your
hopes were disappointed. How long do you
suffer over that, right?
In the absence of
and this sort of superpower that where
you can actually find an intrinsic
well-being to consciousness,
it will be for as long as, you know,
your, you know, bad genes and bad life
experiences dictate, right? It's like
it's just you're at the mercy of who you
were yesterday. And so meta, you know,
as a skill, meditation is fairly unique
in that
you can actually reset independent of
what's going on. But again, it's not a
reason to become
uh
totally immune to your integrate the
effects you're having on the world and
what the world is telling you because
ultimately, you are going to spend most
of your time
asleep and dreaming, you know, this in
this state with, you know,
in conversation with yourself and in
conversation with others, no matter how
much you meditate. I mean, I I you know,
I think ultimately, there are people who
get
you know, quote, fully enlightened and
completely break the spell of being
identified with with thoughts.
Um you know, I'm not one of those
people, you know, certainly not yet. And
uh so, I experience this fluctuation.
But the the
the fluc- fluctuation is so important
for my well-being that I am mad that I
can
talk about it without, you know,
hesitation.
What do you say to people who the deep
fundamental problem in their life is
that they're lost? They have no sense of
meaning or purpose. They don't know what
direction to go into. They're sliding
towards depression because it all seems
so pointless.
Um that that's something that I
encounter with people a lot. Um people
will stop me randomly and just be like,
help. And
I'd love to know, knowing that you have
a very limited window of time with that
person, you know, what would you say in
like 60 or 90 seconds that would
hopefully send them on a path that would
actually be useful?
Well, I would just point out the
mechanics of it, which is what is
actually going on is that they're lost
in thought. They're they're thinking
without knowing that they're thinking
basically every moment of their waking
life, right? And the and the character
of that story in this case is depressing
or or
um you know,
certainly productive of unhappiness.
Now, there are two
there are three at least three possible
antidotes to that and they should try
all of them, right? So that like if if
we're talking about a clinical
depression, it's it's useful to say that
there's a physiology to this that, you
know, can be driven from below in a way
that's not narrowly responsive to their
thinking, right? So it's it'll tend to
produce uh depressive thoughts and the
depressive thoughts will tend to feed
back on the state, but you know, I don't
think all forms of depression are just a
matter of what a person's thinking. I
mean, it can be really it's it's best
viewed as a kind of disease, you know,
or of a physiology and so, you know, I'm
not against antidepressants at all. I
know many people who have, you know,
received a lot of help from them and I
hope we get better ones in the future
and and pharmacology is definitely a
piece of the of the
solution for for many people.
Uh and everything else that is good to
do that people sort of lose their
commitment to doing at the worst
possible time
should be done. I mean, you have to sort
of get behind yourself and push to to
exercise and to socialize and to do
things that, you know, you you may not
want to do because those are good for
you and help you know, break can can
break you out of it.
But the normal
range of psychological suffering,
you know, not clinical depression, but
just feeling like, you know, life sucks
and you're a failure and there's
nothing, you know, it's like
uh you're just
it's you're stuck.
That is a story of
telling yourself a story. You're
thinking and you can
either become more and more mindful of
that and interrupt that more and more.
Uh and or and it and it should be and
you can reframe this continually and
tell yourself a better story. Right? You
can actually just engineer
you know, you can you can change the
code that you're that you're you know
uh
running moment to moment.
And
I mean just you know, very simple one
which I you know, I use and I actually
recently recorded this
in a lesson on the app. You know, just
gratitude. Just thinking This is
actually you know, this particular
maneuver is
I believe comes from Stoic philosophy. I
I didn't actually get it from Stoic
philosophy, but this this sort of use of
negative imagination where you think of
all of the bad things that haven't
happened to you. Right? So, if you're
just you know, if you're stuck in
traffic, driving to the job that you
don't like and you're you're frustrated
uh
you can think of all the things that
could happen to you, right? That
haven't.
And if any one of them happened to you
you would consider your prayers answered
if you could just be returned to this
moment, right? Like you haven't been
diagnosed with cancer, right? You've got
two young kids say you know, you want to
live to see them grow up and you could
be the guy who today is going to find
out you've got 2 months to live, right?
And you have to then the next 2 months
is spent just unwinding your worldly
affairs, right? You're not that guy,
right? That hasn't happened to you yet.
That's just more thought thinking but it
can have a profound effect. You can you
can reframe your experience in a way
that doesn't actually change anything
material about your circumstance and it
can let the the light in. And there are
many techniques like that that are just
a matter of invoking useful concepts
skillfully.
Tell these guys where they can find you
online. The Making Sense podcast is
something I spend a lot of time doing.
Um
my meditation app is at wakingup.com.
It's called Waking Up. And otherwise I'm
just my website samharris.org. I'm on
Twitter is also samharrisorg. There's no
dot. But you just put in Sam Harris and
you know you'll get an eyeful.
Yes, very true.
What's the impact that you want to have
on the world?
Why, you know, I
what I'm spending my time doing is
trying to engage
honestly with
interesting and consequential ideas. I
mean that's so the net
the Venn diagram I I have, you know, I
don't I don't think about it a lot but
when I
think about, you know, retrospectively
what I have been spending a lot of time
doing
I I seem to keep finding the
intersection of
intellectually interesting ideas. They
have to have some con- connection to
science or philosophy or I mean it just
it has to be the kind of thing that
someone would may want to think about
anyway because they're just cool ideas.
So something like artificial
intelligence, right?
Very interesting to think about.
But it's also hugely consequential, you
know, increasingly so and if we get it
wrong
it will, you know, redound to our
misery, right? If not extinction, right?
So like that is that's
the the center of the bull's eye for me.
Something that's interesting, something
that's consequential, something that
that getting it the difference between
getting it right and wrong is enormous,
right? And that's so that's so those are
that's
so the landscape where I'm I'm trying to
continually focus my conversations. I
love that.
All right, guys, truly there are few
people on this planet that have
influenced my thinking more than this
man. I hope that you will dive into his
world and let it expand your own
consciousness and and discover new
things that you're capable of.
If you haven't already, be sure to
subscribe. And until next time, my
friends, be legendary. Take care.
Sam Jesus dude. How many times have you
robbed a bank? I robbed a bank the way
uh
you mean as in went into a bank and
stole the cash? Four times. Woah.
And stole money virtually dozens of
times.