Members’ Business: Driving Test Delays and the Impact on Learners in Scotland - 02 September 2026
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
The debate centered on the severe delays in securing practical driving tests in Scotland and the profound negative impact these delays have on learners, particularly in rural communities where access to public transport is limited. Members highlighted that the current system forces individuals to queue online for hours, often joining a national list rather than a local one, which creates unrealistic barriers for those with work, study, or caring responsibilities. The consequences extend beyond mere inconvenience; learners are forced to pay for additional driving lessons while waiting, risking the expiration of their theory test certificates, and facing significant financial strain during an ongoing cost-of-living crisis. For young people in rural areas, obtaining a license is not just a convenience but a fundamental necessity for accessing employment, education, apprenticeships, and social activities.
A key point of contention arose regarding the UK government's assurances that waiting times had improved to under 21 weeks, which members argued did not reflect the reality on the ground where many still cannot find any available appointments at all. While the Minister acknowledged the frustration and outlined plans to increase capacity through recruitment, training, and overtime incentives, critics emphasized that statistical averages offer little comfort to individuals unable to book a test locally. The discussion also touched upon recent changes to the booking system designed to prevent the resale of appointments, with concerns raised that these anti-abuse measures may have inadvertently made the system less flexible for legitimate users. Furthermore, specific cases were brought forward, such as foreign nationals who must meet residency requirements before taking a theory test, drastically reducing their window to obtain a license, and the controversial use of defense driving examiners in England but not Scotland, which was criticized as discriminatory.
The debate concluded with a strong call for devolution, arguing that since driving tests are a public service failing to meet local needs, responsibility should be transferred from Westminster to the Scottish Parliament under the principle of "devolution by default." Speakers argued that the UK government must accept accountability for ensuring the service works effectively or face the logical conclusion that powers should reside closer to the communities affected. While the Minister and some members agreed on the need for urgent action and promised continued engagement with the UK government to address capacity gaps and workforce issues, there was a consensus that constitutional debates are secondary to the immediate practical goal of restoring a functional booking system. Ultimately, the session underscored that the true measure of success is not policy promises but the ability for any learner in Scotland to secure a test within a reasonable timeframe without excessive delay or additional expense.
Read the full video transcript
The final item of business is a member's
business debate on motion 832 in the
name of Keith Brown on driving test
delays and the impact on learners in
Scotland. This debate will be concluded
without any questions being put. I ask
members who wish to speak in this debate
to press the request to speak buttons
now. Keith Brown.
>> Thank you presigning officer. Uh I'm
very grateful for the opportunity to
bring this issue before parliament
because although responsibility for
driving tests rests with the UK
government, the consequences of the
current system are being felt by people
and communities across Scotland. I'm
also very grateful to all those members
that signed this motion. I understand
for the first time since I've been here
nearly 20 years, this debate nearly
never happened because a member who
signed it and you require two parties to
sign it from the reform party then
withdrew her name this afternoon which
put in jeopardy. Now I don't know if
that was a mistake if she hadn't read
the motion, didn't like it in some way
or was trying to spike the debate but
very unfortunate and there's not a
single member of reform here as well. I
do know though from the correspondence
I've received that this is not a
theoretical problem. It's affecting
people's ability to work, to study, and
particularly in rural communities simply
to get on with their lives. I first
became aware of the scale of the problem
through constituents contacting me about
their experiences trying to book a
practical driving test. One constituent
described logging on before 6:00 in the
morning only to find themselves behind
tens of thousands of other people in the
queue. The reason for that is you don't
join a local queue to join in Sterling
or Scotland. You join behind everyone in
the UK. And others have described
waiting for hours to access the booking
system only to find no suitable tests
available or experiencing technical
problems and losing the place
altogether. For people who work or who
attend college or have caring
responsibilities, sitting online for
hours in the hope that an appointment
might appear simply is not realistic.
And there is a significant financial
consequence.
Learner drivers are paying for
additional lessons while they wait. Some
are seeing their theory test
certificates move closer and closer to
expiry where they are unable to secure a
practical test. So that's why I wrote to
the UK government earlier this month
setting out the experiences that my
constituents had brought to me and asked
what action was being taken. and I've
now received a response from the
Minister for Roads, Justin Madders MP.
Now, I welcome the fact that the
Minister acknowledges the frustration
being experienced by learner drivers and
importantly recognizes the particular
impact on young people in rural areas
where access to work, education, and
social activities can depend upon having
a driving license. And the minister also
assures me that action is being taken.
He says that Scotland is included in the
DVSA program to increase test capacity,
including through recruiting and
training new examiners, encouraging
qualified staff to return to examining
roles, increasing training capacity, and
offering overtime incentives. And he
tells me also that waiting times have
now fallen to under 21 weeks and that
testing capacity is at its strongest
level in more than a year with
appointment availability at its highest
level since 2024.
And I really genuinely hope that's uh
the beginning of a genuine improvement.
But there is a problem. It simply is not
the experience uh being reported to me
by people on the ground. People are not
contacting my office to complain that
they have been given a test in 20 weeks.
rather than 24 weeks. They're contacting
me because they cannot get a test at
all. And I think we need to distinguish
between two different things, waiting
times and availability.
An average waiting time statistic is of
little comfort to the learner who logs
onto the booking system and cannot find
an appointment anywhere reasonably
accessible to them. If there is no test
available to book, the theoretical
waiting time is almost irrelevant. So
I'd like to know what the national
improvements described by the minister
actually mean for people in club manager
in Sterling and across Scotland. How
many additional tests have been made
available locally? How many additional
examiners have been recruited or
deployed here? How has capacity changed
at individual test centers? And most
importantly, when should learners in our
communities expect to be able to log on
and find a test that they can actually
book?
The minister's letter says that
resources are being deployed to areas of
highest demand and that workforce
planning and demand forecasting are
being strengthened. If that is
happening, we need to see the evidence
of it locally. And there's also the
question of changes to the booking
system. I absolutely understand why
action had to be taken against the
manipulation and resale of driving
tests. Nobody should be able to profiter
from a shortage of appointments.
The UK government says reforms have
significantly reduced manipulation and
reseller activity and that the DVSA has
carried out more than 6,000 enforcement
interventions since the changes were
introduced. And that is welcome. But we
also need to ask whether measures
designed to stop abuse have
inadvertently made the system less
flexible for genuine learners and
legitimate driving instructors.
Tackling the resale of appointments
should not mean making an already
difficult system even harder for the
people it's supposed to serve. And
there's another group for whom these
delays create a particularly acute
problem. One constituent who's contacted
me had moved to Scotland from the United
States to work with the Church of
Scotland. As a US license holder, they
have a limited period following arrival
in this country during which they can
drive using that license. But before
they can even book a practical test,
they must first meet the residency
requirements for taking the theory test.
That significantly reduces the window
available to complete the whole process.
And a practical test weight of many
months, assuming they can secure an
appointment at all and what should be a
straightforward process, becomes
extraordinarily difficult. And that
illustrates why this matter goes well
beyond inconvenience. For some people,
having a driving license is fundamental
to their ability to work. For young
people in rural communities, it can
determine whether a particular job,
apprenticeship, or college course is
realistically accessible. And there is
an inequality here, too. Somebody with a
financial means to continue paying for
lessons for months while waiting for a
test is in a very different position
from a young person or family already
struggling with the cost of living.
So I also asked the UK government to
consider what could be done for people
whose theory certificates expire because
they have simply been unable to access a
practical test. People should not have
to pay again and repeat a test they have
already passed because the state has
been unable to provide the next stage of
the process within a reasonable period.
>> I will do. Yes.
>> Rachel Hamilton.
>> Thank Keith Brown for taking the
intervention. I received a letter on the
25th of August from from one of my
constituents who was absolutely frantic
about the process of booking for her
daughter who's clearly looking for work
as well and I believe that one in six
people are locked out of work in
Scotland because of this. Um she was
getting up at 6:00 a.m. in the morning
for six weeks and because the DVSA have
changed the criteria to stop the bots,
it means that only the person applying
for the test can apply for that um
application. And I think this is
something that I would appeal that we
work together uh towards is to bring our
collective cross party concerns from our
constituents and raise them as one to
the DVSA on behalf of Scotland because I
think there is as a collective we could
do a lot more.
>> Keith Brown as can I thank the member
for her intervention and of course she
will have an even greater experience of
the rural effect in this area as well. I
accept that. Now, I also accept that she
probably wouldn't want to support every
part of my motion, but I do undertake I
do undertake to work together with those
where there's common ground, and I think
there is a lot of common ground in
relation to this. So, the minister in
response to my query said he was closely
monitoring the measures that he's
introduced, and that if waiting times
cannot be reduced to an acceptable
level, further action will be
considered. And I welcome that
commitment as well. But it raises two
obvious questions. What does the UK
government regard as an acceptable
waiting time? and by what date does it
expect to achieve those acceptable
waiting times? Because a target and a
timetable is very difficult for
parliament or indeed learners without a
target or a timetable. It's very hard
for them to judge whether these measures
are succeeding. I also raised the
question of devolution. It seems
entirely reasonable to me. Uh the
minister confirmed there are currently
no plans to devolve responsibility for
driving tests to either Scotland or
Wales, although he acknowledges that
this could be done through changes to
legislation.
If the UK government intends to retain
responsibility for the service, then it
must also accept responsibility for
ensuring the service actually works. But
if the present system consistently fails
to provide an adequate service in
Scotland, then it's perfectly reasonable
in my view to ask whether decisions
about capacity, resources, and delivery
will be better taken here. Now, the
Prime Minister Andy Bernham has spoken
about a new approach of devolution by
default. A presumption that power should
sit closer to the people and communities
they affect rather than being held
unnecessarily at Westminster. Presiding
officer, when it comes to driving test,
the current system is quite literally
defaulting. If the UK government cannot
provide a system that allows people in
Scotland to access a basic public
service within a reasonable time, then
the case for retaining that power at
Westminster becomes very difficult to
sustain. If devolution by default is
genuinely meant to mean something, this
would be a very good place to start.
It's time in my view to put Scotland in
the driving seat and devolve these
powers to the Scottish Parliament
because the reality is that we know the
particular challenges facing our rural
communities. We know the needs of
learners across Scotland and we should
have the ability to design a system that
responds to them. And also from the
example I gave, it seems fairly
straightforward to me that the UK
solution of everybody in the UK having
to bid into the 20,000 waiting list at
6:00 in the morning is not working. So,
as I say, time to put these uh powers uh
to the Scottish Parliament. So, I do
welcome the insuranceances I've now
received from the UK government, and I
genuinely hope that the measures
outlined by the minister work, but
assurances from Whiteall are not the
same thing as appointments appearing in
a booking screen. So, the test of
success is actually very simple. Can a
learner driver in clip manure, Sterling,
Dumblain, Cosby Head in my constituency
bridge of Allen or across Scotland
within a reasonable time find an
appointment reasonably close to where
they live and sit their test without
months of unnecessary delay and
additional expense. I had one example
from a colleague who's no longer here
who told me his friend moved down to
Preston for a week having got an
appointment down there, played some
golf, passed his test and came back up.
But people shouldn't be asked to do
that. And at the moment, too many people
are telling me that the answer is no.
And I would tell every member here, you
you'll have constituents in the same
position, and it's a grim experience for
them. So, I will continue to press the
UK government and the DVSA for action.
And following this debate, I intend to
go back to the minister specifically
seeking the local information that is
missing from his first response. I want
to know what additional capacity is
being delivered, what improvement
learners here should expect to see, and
when they should expect to see it.
Because while the UK government tells us
that the system is improving, my
constituents are telling me they still
not can get cannot get a test and
ultimately is the test and the ability
to procure it that matters. Thank you,
presiding officer,
>> David Lindon.
>> Thank you, presiding officer. It's a
pleasure to follow Keith Brown whom I
congratulate for securing the debate and
thank him for the opportunity to shine a
light on an issue that is Mr. Brown
rightly says affects thousands of
constituents. I don't think there'll be
any of the 129 members in this chamber
who are not impacted by this. Um, and so
I want to at the outset declare an
interest firstly because I've got Bison
test center in my constituency. It's
also the test center where 19 years ago
I passed my own test and I pay tribute
to the staff there for the work that
they do um to to provide a service
there. But the reason I chose to speak
in Mr. Browns debate is because in June
I received an email from Lynn who lives
in the Broom House area of my
constituency and she was talking about
the fact that her daughter had to wait
months to to reset a test and she spoke
about the the race against time
particularly in respect of the theory
test which runs out and I think it's
important that Mr. Brown um put in
context that this impacts so many young
people and there are many spin-offs from
that um in terms of the impact in the
economy. I saw for example earlier on
today when the minister who'll respond
to this debate was um taking a question
from another member of the chamber on
the issue of the nighttime economy. So
you know if you've got young people who
are wanting to take up a job for example
in the upur hotel and they're they're
doing a late shift at night the the
reality is having a car is actually very
important. Um but lots of young people
I'm afraid at the moment are being
prohibited from the ability to take up
jobs for example at the upl hotel which
the minister of course um spends quite a
fair bit of time in from time to time um
because of this delay in people getting
access to tests but there's also a
financial barrier as well because in the
period when someone is waiting to take a
test whether that's their initial test
or reset test almost certainly presiding
officer you will find their driving
instructor saying to them well look
don't be away from the gears and and the
pedals for too long. So come and do more
lessons. Now lessons are incredibly
expensive and we're in the middle of a
cost of living crisis. So there's a
financial element to this as well. So I
think that there are lots of
opportunities that mean that young
people are essentially being held back
because of this delay and dthering at
the DVSA which Mr. Brown is absolutely
right to put on the record. And so he is
right and I would support his calls for
ministers in White Hall to take action
to ensure that young people and indeed
people of all ages are able to get these
tests. And of course if the British
government is unable to get its act
together, if the prime minister is too
busy playing the stone roses, then maybe
it's time for them to consider devolving
responsibility for driving tests to this
institution. But my fundamental message
to the British government tonight is
that start moving up the gears. Let's
get motoring and let's get young people
like Lynn's daughter onto the road and
getting those opportunities. Thank you,
>> Finley Carson.
>> Thank you, presiding officer. Um, I
congratulate Keith Brown for gaining
cross party support, then losing cross
party support, then once again gaining
cross party support. With that said, I I
do welcome the opportunity to contribute
to this debate and recognize the genuine
concerns that have been raised by my
constituents regarding access to
practical driving tests. Whilst this
motion ra relates to the experiences of
learners and families in Clark Maner and
Dumblain, it highlights issues that have
been felt right across Scotland,
including in my own constituency of
Galloway and Western F. For many people,
driving passing a driving test is much
more than a personal milestone. The
ability to drive can be the difference
between accessing education
opportunities, securing employment,
taking up an apprenticeship or
fulfilling caring responsibilities. And
in a rural and semi-ural community where
public transport options are often
limited, obtaining a driving license is
often a necessity rather than a
convenience.
Learners frequently report joining
online booking cues early in the morning
only to find thousands of them ahead of
them. Others spend hours attempting to
secure an appointment with little
success. Even when learners have
completed their training and are ready
to set their tests often face months of
uncertainty before suitable slots become
available. And as we've already heard,
there is a real financial burden.
Learners often continuing to pay for
lessons to maintain their driving
standards while waiting for a test date.
Many face the prospect of theory test
certificates expiring before they can
access a practical test. Uh and my
daughter who was included twice that
that happened. um requiring them uh this
requires them to incur further expense
and it's no fault of their own and this
is at a time where families are already
facing financial pressures and that is
understandably a source of great
frustration and the concerns outlined in
the motion are therefore entirely
legitimate and I agree that urgent
access action is required to reduce
waiting times improve access to
practical driving tests and ensure that
learners are not unfairly penalized by a
system that is struggling to meet
demand. Learners deserve to get a
booking system that works effectively
and transparently, and they deserve
confidence that they can secure a test
within a reasonable time scale. However,
while I share much of the concerns
expressed in the motion, I'm sure it
comes at no uh surprise to the member
that I'm less persuaded by its
conclusions that responsibility for
driving tests should be devolved to the
Scottish Parliament if improvements are
not delivered. The difficulties facing
learn learners today are operational
problems that require practical
solutions. The priority must be to
increase test capacity, recruiting and
retaining examiners, improving access to
appointments and ensuring that the
booking system functions fairly and
efficiently. Simply transferring
responsibility from one parliament to
another would not in itself create more
examiners, open more test slots or
shorten waiting times for learners and
dump Newton Stewart, Cass Douglas or
anywhere else in Scotland indeed
constituents contacting us about this
issue. I will
>> Keith Brown
>> I appreciate his point and it's not
unexpected. I would say just to explain
I'm not doing this from a a genuinely
doctrinary point of view. I'm one of the
people in my party and not everyone
agrees that thought that during the
independence referendum perfectly
legitimate for Scotland to have signed
an MOU with DVLA to provide some of the
services that they do. But if I'm not
providing the service uh then that's a
different question and I would I would
say I would say it's not necessarily
just about more examiners even changing
the app to an app that works so it's
localized would have a beneficial
impact. So just to reassure the member
I'm not doing it simply for doctrinary
reasons.
Carson.
>> Yeah, I I I take on board what the the
member suggesting, but you know,
transferring that doesn't necessarily
that suggest a parliament in Scotland
would would do it any better. Um, you
know, you could argue that devolution of
uh, you know, healthboard
responsibilities closer to home to
health boards might shorten waiting
times and and have more responsibility
to to those who are are accessing those
health services locally. However,
>> quick.
Rachel Hamilton.
>> Thank you. I think I can demonstrate
that um it isn't a Scottish specific
problem um compared to the rest of the
United Kingdom because um an FOI that I
had suggested that in Barericon Tweed
the average waiting time was 24 weeks
and in Kelsu it was 18 um and I've got
loads of figures like that. So it
actually is as bad over the border as it
is in Scotland and I think we need to be
looking at it as a UKwide uh system. So
I would just add that to context to
Finley Carson's um argument.
>> Finley Carson.
>> Yeah, I I think yeah, for one of those
reasons, I I do believe that doesn't
matter what Parliament is, the focus
should should be on securing
improvements to the service itself. Uh
the DVSA and the UK government, yes,
should be held accountable. Uh and they
should be delivering meaningful
reductions in waiting times and
restoring confidence in the system. But
the experiences highlighted in this
motion deserve action and they deserve
attention and this debate will no doubt
have done that. But while constitutional
debates may attract headlines uh the
real measure of success will be whether
the learners in clack manager Dumblain
Galloway and Dree and across Scotland
can access practical driving tests when
they need one. That's what learners are
asking for and that's absolutely where
our focus should be.
>> Don Black
Thank you, presiding officer. And I
refer you to my registered interest as a
DVSA approved driving instructor. So,
I'm going to come at this from a
slightly different angle. Um, the
significant delays still being faced by
learner drivers for their driving tests
create the stress, uncertainty, and
additional costs for lessons, and
they're not great for instructors or
driving schools either. Now, it's been
rehearsed already the impact that it has
on learning. Obtaining a driving license
is not a matter of convenience or a
right of passage for learners in rural
constituencies like mine, but an
absolute necessity to be able to access
education, work, health appointments,
and seeing family and friends as their
reality is that there is no feasible
public transport available to them. And
indeed, a driving license also opens
doors to jobs and can be a prerequisite
to being hired. And disappointingly,
it's often those very communities that
rely most heavily on cars that are
experiencing longest waiting times for
driving tests. Analysis by the RAAC
Foundation found that Fford Test Center
in my constituency actually has the
longest median waiting time in the whole
of the UK at 29.7 weeks. That's almost
seven months. That is the length of time
it generally takes to teach someone how
to drive. So, it's just not acceptable.
And I know from my experience as a
driving instructor that some of the
contributing factors to the backlog are
pupils not showing up for tests or
presenting for tests before they're
ready and are unlikely to pass. So then
they need to keep booking subsequent
tests or turning up to the test center
without their provisional license or a
car that'sed and or not roadworthy. And
even pupils from anywhere in the UK are
being able to book tests in the
northeast of Scotland or anywhere in the
UK and are traveling and taking local
test slots away from local pupils. And
it's so much wasted. And to their
credit, the DVSA have managed to stop
the illegal selling of tests at inflated
prices and the proliferation of
cancellation apps by only allowing the
students to book their own tests
directly on the UK government website.
But this in turn is also hamping
hampering uh driving instructors ability
to manage their driving schools effect
efficiently and effectively. So it's not
just affecting the learners, it's also
infect affecting the instructors.
>> Yeah, absolutely.
>> Keith Brown,
>> thank you for taking the intervention.
My brother has been a driving instructor
for over 30 years and I had a long
discussion with him about it and I
acknowledge the points that you make.
Uh, one of the points was that often the
driving instructor is the one that knows
when a pupil should be represented for a
test and that's now been taken away
admittedly as part of a well-intentioned
measure to try and remedy it, but it's
not working really.
>> Don Black.
>> Yes, I would totally agree with that
point and and your brother's absolutely
correct. Um, but the key factor behind
backlog is actually capacity, the
shortage of full-time driving in
examiners. Now, I've witnessed at test
centers myself, and the National Audits
Office investigation into driving test
center waiting times has also confirmed
that examiner recruitment and retention
is a major barrier to reducing the
backlog. Examiners are classed as civil
servants and in 2024 2025, the examiner
attrition rate stood at 14%, which is
double the 7.1 average within the civil
service. To attract more applicants and
retain them, it's clear that examiners
need to be paid more for the vital job
that they do. They currently get just 26
to30,000 a year for a high stress job
where they go out on the road in a car
with a novice driver they do not know
seven times a day, 5 days a week. And
the DVSA has run many recruitment
campaigns. And I've witnessed them and
even considered it myself at one point.
But a longerterm approach to workforce
planning is necessary alongside more
action to improve morale. But while
they've taken steps to increase the
number of examiners through recruitment,
bringing examiners out of retirement and
deployment of qualified management staff
back into the examiner role, some of
these actions appear to have actually
forgotten about Scotland. Because in
2025, the DVSA announced an agreement
with the Ministry of Defense under which
35 defense driving examiners could
conduct driving tests one day a week for
a year. But that additional support
provided was only in England. So, it's
no coincidence that seven out of the 10
10 test centers in the UK with the
longest driving test waiting times are
actually in Scotland. The DVSA has
failed to effectively manage driving
examiner recruitment in Scotland and now
the scale of the challenge requires a
more ambitious and responsive approach
and it's no longer sufficient for the
DVSA to blame the pandemic for these
delays which they did for quite a long
time. Learners have been waiting too
long and Scottish test centers cannot
continue to be treated as an
afterthought. And the Labor government
um there's one here. Sorry, I was about
to say there's none but there's one. um
has shown over the past two years that
they is unable to get a grip of the
problem and learner drivers deserve much
better than the current UK centralized
system and it's time they were given the
service they need and deserve. So I
therefore urge the Scottish government
to continue engaging with the UK
government and the DVSA to improve the
situation in Scotland. And I'd ask the
minister to consider the role that
Scottish driving instructor training and
professional development could play
within the Transport Scotland's road
safety framework to 2030. So for the
sake of learner drivers across Scotland,
we must ensure that they're not held
back from getting a driving license by
the UK system that is failing.
I now call on Tom Arthur to respond to
the debate.
>> Thank you very much, presiding officer.
Can I begin by thanking Keith Brown for
bringing this motion to parliament? Um
it's clear from the contributions that
we've heard from members that this is an
issue that is significantly impacting
upon constituents the length and breadth
of the country. And of course there will
be a a differential to that impact based
upon rurality and availability of public
transport as well. So while constituents
across Scotland will be experiencing the
impact of the challenges and being able
to secure a driving test, that impact
will not be felt equally and that is
something that we we have to bear in
mind. Um and I'm grateful for the number
of members who have taken the time to
illustrate their constituent cases. I
note the case that Mr. London raised and
the impact that is having. He made
reference to my own constituency and I
look at my own constituency as a county
constituency with a a significant rural
and perural element. the utter
importance of having a car um and the
opportunities um but also just the
necessities of life that are afforded
and made possible by access to to a car
and particularly the impact that that
will have upon young people as they
leave school and progress into further
education, training, apprenticeships,
employment. Um we recognize we have some
significant challenges around youth
employment and economic inactivity in
this country and it's important that
when we can make interventions to
address that some of which are complex
and systemic but some of which are more
straightforward such as the operation of
public agencies with regards to the
provision of driving test that we take
these opportunities to do so. Um, I also
note the points that Don Black makes as
well, bringing her professional
background and expertise to bear. Um,
and want to assure that the reflections
that she's offered to the chamber will
form part of the Scottish government's
thinking. Well, of course, recognizing
that this is a reserved area and I
appreciate the points that have been
articulated by uh both both Mr. Brown
and indeed uh by Finley Carson as well.
But uh while these are predominantly
operational matters, there clearly is
significant questions uh to be posed to
the UK government with regards to their
responsibilities and oversight. And
while I spoke about the differential
impact that constituents will face
depending upon provision of public
transport and rurality, um the points
that Miss Black raises certainly
highlight the differential impact it's
been felt across the UK with the
statistics that she has put on the
record. Now, while this of course is a
reserved area, I would want to assure
the uh the chamber that the the
government is engaged in this matter and
we will seek to continue to engage with
the UK government and to push them to
take action. Um, I would note the points
that Keith Brown raised with regards to
his engagement for UK Minister Justin
Madders. And I would want to ensure the
member that uh following this evening's
debate, the cabinet secretary for
transport, Steven Flynn, will be writing
to his counterpart in the UK government
to highlight the issues that have been
raised in this debate and also take the
opportunity to raise these matters at
the next interministerial forum. Happy
to give way. Keith Brown,
>> can I thank the minister for taking
intervention and for the action he's
proposing to take on behalf of the
Scottish government. I have to say I was
unaware of the point which Don Black has
made about the use of the armed forces
and it sets me off in a different path
which gets me very animated. Over the
years I've seen as a minister and
elsewhere wherever there was a question
of the armed forces being used to help
in a situation in Scotland, we were
being offered as if it was a favor from
someone else. And the ability for people
to try and get support for the armed
forces in Scotland is quite substantial.
It's a it's a constant struggle to use
the armed forces in this way as if they
were an adjunct for only England and
Wales. It's destructive of that support
for the armed forces. I feel very
strongly about this issue and if you can
make that part of your representations
that would be very um welcome given what
Don Black has said. Tom Arthur,
>> I'll certainly be happy to ask that that
is included in the representations made
particularly given the authority and the
moral authority with which Mr. Brown
speaks upon these matters. Um, just by
way of information to the chamber, I
would want to share that officials met
with the DVSA at the end of August who
confirmed that they are working to
increase the testing capacity and that
is to the extent of delivering almost
200,000 practical tests across the UK in
July 26 alone. and understand that this
is more than 120,000 additional tests
conducted since April compared with the
same period last year. However, as we
have heard, waiting times in Scotland
remain too high, averaging at 20.9 weeks
and I'm informed that the DVSA
recognizes that Scotland faces a testing
capacity gap as has been highlighted in
the contributions. Um,
DVSA is in response and I think this was
something that was articulated in the
correspondence that Mr. Brown received
DVC is recruiting additional examiners,
increasing training and overtime and
targeting resources where demand is the
greatest. Um there is also um it's been
touched upon the work that's been
undertaken around reform to tackle
misuse of the booking system by third
party operators. Um however, I recognize
that there may be some unintended
consequences that have arisen from that
that have been articulated in the
debate. So I I will ask again that in
the representations that officials
continue to make and indeed the c
engagement the cabinet secretary will
take forward that is something that can
be raised as well. It's also important I
think we recognize that there's clear
communication and information is
provided and this is about reducing
uncertainty and individuals understand
time scales and support that is um
available to them. I'm informed that the
DVSA is committed to ongoing monitoring
of progress and we do welcome the
publication of additional driving test
performance data on their website which
goes towards providing that greater
transparency on local and national
waiting times and appointment
availability. But I note the key point
that Mr. Brown raised which is not to
conflate availability with waiting
times. Um and frankly just reflecting
upon the experiences of individual
constituents which have been articulated
around having to join a waiting list
very early in the day. I think that is
something that we're all prepared to do
if we want to go and see our our
favorite artists perform and headline a
stadium gig and hope we can get a
ticket. I don't think it's something we
really expect when we get in terms of
access of a fundamental public service.
So we want to engage constructively with
the UK government on this presiding
officer and yeah certainly happy to
before I conclude
>> Carol moan great thanks very much I
really appreciate the debate it's been
really worthwhile I think um and it's
just to offer to say the points are so
valid that I think cross party it's
important to to work in that way um and
so if there is things that yourself or
members feel that we can do cross party
to raise this issue then I would
certainly be very happy in behalf of the
labor group to to do that. Tom Arthur,
>> can I reckon I thank the member for the
contribution and recognize that um while
it's for government to to respond based
upon the the the contributions that have
been made in the position that
government forms and have stated how we
will seek to do that and I would note of
course that well it's for parliament not
for government parliament is of course
at liberty to explore these issues
through its existing structures across
party groups and committees and I just
think giving the the impacts upon
devolved competencies that this is
leading to that have been articulated
quite clearly from across the chamber.
It may be something um that members of
parliament wish to consider through
their their various fora that are
available. However, I would want to give
the undertaking I'm committed to
engaging constructively and along with
the cabinet secretary, keeping members
up to date. And as I said, uh following
tonight's um debate, uh the cabinet
secretary for transport, Steven Flynn,
will be writing to his counterpart and
seeking that opportunity to discuss
these matters at a future
interministerial group meeting. On that
presiding officer, I will draw my
remarks to a conclusion. And again, I
would like to thank the member Keith
Brown for bringing forward this
important debate and for all the members
for their contribution this evening.
That concludes the debate and I close
this meeting.